1
|
Higgins I, Kleinig P, Le DT, Londema J, Shephard B, Siow EMQ, Sohal E, Kumar S. Facilitators and Barriers to Cancer Screening Participation Across Southeastic Asia: A Scoping Review. Psychooncology 2025; 34:e70139. [PMID: 40181418 PMCID: PMC11969030 DOI: 10.1002/pon.70139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2024] [Revised: 02/06/2025] [Accepted: 03/20/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As the prevalence of cancer cases in Southeast Asia (SEA) increases, understanding facilitators and barriers to participation in and uptake of cancer screening is important. However, to date, no review has been undertaken on this topic. This review aimed to address this knowledge gap. METHODS The search was conducted across academic databases and grey literature sources. Two reviewers independently screened the results, followed by data extraction. Social cognitive therapy was used as part of narrative synthesis of the data. RESULTS Of the 735 studies, 26 were included. Barriers and facilitators were grouped into headings of personal, environmental, societal, and behavioural domains. The commonly reported barriers to participation in cancer screening included poor knowledge, emotional factors, belief of low personal susceptibility, lack of time, misperceptions, cost, inconvenience, social influence, and lack of skills required. The facilitators were education, greater self-perceived risk, reassurance, past medical history, reduced cost and improved access to healthcare, social supports, religious beliefs, and routine health check-ups. CONCLUSIONS A multitude of barriers, and some facilitators, to participation in cancer screening were reported in the literature. This complexity highlights the importance of a multifaceted and nuanced strategy in promoting cancer screening in SEA countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Higgins
- UniSA Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
| | - Paige Kleinig
- UniSA Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
| | - Duy Toan Le
- UniSA Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
| | - Jade Londema
- UniSA Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
| | - Benn Shephard
- UniSA Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
| | - Emily Mei Qiong Siow
- UniSA Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
| | - Ekam Sohal
- UniSA Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
| | - Saravana Kumar
- UniSA Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alberto NRI, Alberto IRI, Puyat CVM, Antonio MAR, Ho FDV, Dee EC, Mahal BA, Eala MAB. Disparities in access to cancer diagnostics in ASEAN member countries. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. WESTERN PACIFIC 2023; 32:100667. [PMID: 36785859 PMCID: PMC9918780 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Diagnostics, including laboratory tests, medical and nuclear imaging, and molecular testing, are essential in the diagnosis and management of cancer to optimize clinical outcomes. With the continuous rise in cancer mortality and morbidity in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), there exists a critical need to evaluate the accessibility of cancer diagnostics in the region so as to direct multifaceted interventions that will address regional inequities and inadequacies in cancer care. This paper identifies existing gaps in service delivery, health workforce, health information systems, leadership and governance, and financing and how these contribute to disparities in access to cancer diagnostics in ASEAN member countries. Intersectoral health policies that will strengthen coordinated laboratory services, upscale infrastructure development, encourage health workforce production, and enable proper appropriation of funding are necessary to effectively reduce the regional cancer burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Edward Christopher Dee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brandon A. Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michelle Ann B. Eala
- College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA,Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rajendram P, Singh P, Han KT, Utravathy V, Wee HL, Jha A, Thilagaratnam S, Pathadka S. Barriers to breast cancer screening in Singapore: A literature review. ANNALS OF THE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, SINGAPORE 2022; 51:493-501. [PMID: 36047524 DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2021329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer death among women, and its age-standardised incidence rate is one of the highest in Asia. We aimed to review studies on barriers to breast cancer screening to inform future policies in Singapore. METHOD This was a literature review of both quantitative and qualitative studies published between 2012 and 2020 using PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases, which analysed the perceptions and behaviours of women towards breast cancer screening in Singapore. RESULTS Through a thematic analysis based on the Health Belief Model, significant themes associated with low breast cancer screening uptake in Singapore were identified. The themes are: (1) high perceived barriers versus benefits, including fear of the breast cancer screening procedure and its possible outcomes, (2) personal challenges that impede screening attendance and paying for screening and treatment, and (3) low perceived susceptibility to breast cancer. CONCLUSION Perceived costs/barriers vs benefits of screening appear to be the most common barriers to breast cancer screening in Singapore. Based on the barriers identified, increasing convenience to get screened, reducing mammogram and treatment costs, and improving engagement with support groups are recommended to improve the screening uptake rate in Singapore.
Collapse
|
4
|
Chua BWB, Neo P, Ma VY, Lim LM, Ng JSY, Wee HL. Health care provider's experience and perspective of cervical cancer screening in Singapore: A qualitative study. Front Public Health 2022; 10:853453. [PMID: 35958842 PMCID: PMC9360748 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.853453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Singapore, the current cervical cancer screening (CCS) coverage rate of 48% falls below the national target of 70%. Health care providers (HCPs) play a critical role in promoting CCS uptake. However, there is limited understanding of the perspectives of HCPs regarding CCS. Hence, we aimed to understand the challenges encountered by HCPs delivering CCS in different care settings in the Singapore health system. We also aimed to explore perspectives on newer features of CCS such as self-sampling and HPV genotyping. Methods Physicians, nurses, program administrators and laboratory technicians involved with CCS were invited for a one-on-one semi-structured interview conducted over Zoom between May to August 2021. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Eighteen HCPs from 12 institutions were interviewed. Most participants were women (61.1%) and worked in public health institutions (72.2%). For factors influencing CCS, nine key themes were identified and organized into four categories: (1) patient factors, (2) HCP factors, (3) health system factors and (4) health promotion factors. Key themes commonly highlighted by study participants were related to patients' preferences and acceptance for screening, the processes of delivering CCS, the national priority for cervical cancer and the effectiveness of existing health promotion efforts. Five key themes were identified for CCS innovations. Self-sampling was viewed favorably to increase CCS uptake, while primary HPV screening with HPV partial genotyping had higher sensitivities to detect pre-cancers and cancers compared to cytology. Extended HPV genotyping beyond HPV16/18 could play an important role in CCS with increasing HPV vaccination coverage, as well as in the management of persistent HPV infection. Conclusion In Singapore, HCPs face multiple challenges for CCS in practice. Insights from this study are directly relevant to, and useful for developing policies around national CCS programs and treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon Wen Bing Chua
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research Center of Excellence (Greater Asia), Becton, Dickinson and Company, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pearlyn Neo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Viva Yan Ma
- Strategic Access, Public Affairs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Li Min Lim
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joseph Soon Yau Ng
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hwee Lin Wee
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- *Correspondence: Hwee Lin Wee
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chan TKC, Tan LWL, van Dam RM, Seow WJ. Cancer Screening Knowledge and Behavior in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population: The Singapore Community Health Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:684917. [PMID: 34476210 PMCID: PMC8406849 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.684917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer has become the leading cause of mortality in Singapore and among other Asian populations worldwide. Despite the presence of National Cancer Screening programmes in Singapore, less than half of the population has had timely screening according to guidelines. The underlying factors of poor cancer screening rates and health outcomes among Asian ethnic groups remain poorly understood. We therefore examined cancer screening participation rates and screening behavior in a multi-ethnic Singapore population. Methods We collected data from 7,125 respondents of the 2015–2016 Singapore Community Health Study. Factors associated with cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening were evaluated using modified Poisson regression. Adjusted prevalence ratios were computed with 95% confidence intervals after adjusting for confounders. Results The mean age of the respondents was 57.7 ± 10.9 years; 58.9% were female and were predominately Chinese (73.0%), followed by Malay (14.2%), and Indian (10.9%). Less than half of the respondents in the recommended age groups had undergone cancer screening (cervical, 43%; breast, 35.1%; colorectal, 27.3%). Malay respondents were significantly less likely to screen as recommended for cervical (aPR = 0.75, CI = 0.65–0.86, p < 0.001), breast (aPR = 0.83, CI = 0.68–0.99, p = 0.045), and colorectal cancer (aPR = 0.55, CI = 0.44–0.68, p < 0.001), as compared to Chinese respondents. Respondents who had obtained lower secondary level education were 42% more likely to screen for cervical cancer (aPR = 1.42, CI = 1.23–1.64, p < 0.001), and 22% more likely to screen for breast cancer (aPR = 1.22, CI = 1.02–1.46, p = 0.032), compared to those with primary level education and below. Respondents with a household income ≥S$10,000/month were 71% more likely to screen for breast cancer (aPR = 1.71, CI = 1.37–2.13, p < 0.001), as compared with <$2,000/month. Conclusions Ethnicity and socio-economic status were significantly associated with lower uptake of cancer screening tests in Singapore. To improve the screening uptake among disadvantaged groups, a multi-faceted approach is needed that addresses the barriers to screening such as the adequacy of subsidy schemes and ethnic differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Linda Wei Lin Tan
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rob M van Dam
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Jie Seow
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chua B, Ma V, Asjes C, Lim A, Mohseni M, Wee HL. Barriers to and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:4586. [PMID: 33926019 PMCID: PMC8123618 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
In Southeast Asia, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women. Low coverage for cervical cancer screening (CCS) becomes a roadblock to disease detection and treatment. Existing reviews on CCS have limited insights into the barriers and facilitators for SEA. Hence, this study aims to identify key barriers and facilitators among women living in SEA. A systematic literature review was conducted on Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS. Primary qualitative and quantitative studies published in English that reported barriers and facilitators to CCS were included. The Mix Methods Appraisal Tool was used for the quality assessment of the included studies. Among the 93 included studies, pap smears (73.1%) were the most common screening modality. A majority of the studies were from Malaysia (35.5%). No studies were from Timor-Leste and the Philippines. The most common barriers were embarrassment (number of articles, n = 33), time constraints (n = 27), and poor knowledge of screening (n = 27). The most common facilitators were related to age (n = 21), receiving advice from healthcare workers (n = 17), and education status (n = 11). Findings from this review may inform health policy makers in developing effective cervical cancer screening programs in SEA countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon Chua
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, Singapore 117549, Singapore; (B.C.); (M.M.)
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research Centre of Excellence (Greater Asia), Becton, Dickinson and Company, 2 International Business Park Road, Singapore 609930, Singapore;
| | - Viva Ma
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research Centre of Excellence (Greater Asia), Becton, Dickinson and Company, 2 International Business Park Road, Singapore 609930, Singapore;
| | - Caitlin Asjes
- Government and Public Affairs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, 2 International Business Park Road, Singapore 609930, Singapore;
| | - Ashley Lim
- Department of Pharmacy, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899, Singapore;
| | - Mahsa Mohseni
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, Singapore 117549, Singapore; (B.C.); (M.M.)
| | - Hwee Lin Wee
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, Singapore 117549, Singapore; (B.C.); (M.M.)
- Faculty of Science, Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|