Anti-factor IXa/X bispecific antibody ACE910 prevents joint bleeds in a long-term primate model of acquired hemophilia A

Final Analysis Results from the AGEHA Study: Emicizumab Prophylaxis for Acquired Hemophilia A with or without Immunosuppressive Therapy

Primary analysis of the phase III AGEHA study suggested a favorable benefit-risk profile for emicizumab prophylaxis in patients with acquired hemophilia A (PwAHA); however, only patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy (IST; Cohort 1) were included.To present final analysis results of AGEHA, including data on IST-ineligible patients (Cohort 2) and on long-term prophylaxis with emicizumab.For patients in both Cohorts 1 and 2, emicizumab was administered subcutaneously at 6 mg/kg on Day 1, 3 mg/kg on Day 2, and 1.5 mg/kg once weekly from Day 8 onward.Twelve patients (Cohort 1) and two patients (Cohort 2) were enrolled. Duration of emicizumab treatment was 8 to 639 days (median: 44.5 days) in Cohort 1 and 64 and 450 days in Cohort 2. In both cohorts, no major bleeds were observed after initial emicizumab administration. Six patients started their first rehabilitation sessions during emicizumab treatment and no rehabilitation-related bleeds occurred. Twenty-three surgeries were performed under emicizumab prophylaxis and there were no bleeds related to surgeries. Although asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis was reported in one patient in the primary analysis, no other thrombotic events occurred thereafter. Two patients developed anti-emicizumab antibodies, one of whom showed accelerated emicizumab clearance. Tailored IST approaches (delayed initiation, no use, or reduced dose) were successfully executed in three patients undergoing emicizumab prophylaxis.These results suggest that emicizumab prophylaxis has a favorable benefit-risk profile in PwAHA regardless of eligibility for IST.

Strategies for Performing Factor Assays in the Presence of Emicizumab or Other Novel/Emerging Hemostatic Agents

For several decades, therapeutic options for inherited deficiencies of factor VIII or IX (hemophilia A or B, respectively) have largely been the replacement of the missing clotting factor with plasma-derived or recombinant products. Hemostasis laboratories use standard activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based clotting or chromogenic assays to monitor plasma factor levels to guide therapy. The emergence in the past 10 years of extended half-life replacement products and other novel therapies for hemophilia has led to a reappraisal of assay suitability, with studies of product measurement showing some existing assay types or reagents to be unsuitable for some products. The hemostasis laboratory must adapt to the changing landscape by adding new assays or modifying existing assays to ensure accurate results for product measurement. These strategies include switching from a chromogenic assay to a clotting assay, or vice versa, changing an aPTT reagent brand, or introducing product specific calibrators. This article evaluates the effects of some of the newer treatment options on the laboratory testing of factor levels and related assays.

Inhibitor eradication and treatment for acquired hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare hemorrhagic autoimmune disorder characterized by autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). In approximately half of the cases AHA does not recognize any cause (idiopathic form), while in the other cases it may be triggered by autoimmune disorders, cancers, drugs, infections, or pregnancy. Besides treating the underlying disorder, specific AHA treatment includes management of bleeding, if necessary, and inhibitor eradication.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review summarizes the main epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic characteristics of AHA. In particular, it is focused on the current therapeutic options for the inhibitor eradication, also showing the latest findings on the innovative therapies. A literature search strategy was performed, without temporal limits, through Medline and PubMed electronic databases.

EXPERT OPINION

Various first-line and second-line immunosuppressive agents are currently available for the management of AHA. Among the latter, the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has been the object of intense research during the last years from investigators as innovative promising eradicating therapy for AHA. Preliminary data from the studies support the use of this drug as a first-line option for newly diagnosed AHA cases.

Emicizumab: the hemophilia A game-changer

In hemophilia, the unmet needs regarding adherence to prophylaxis and lack of effective long-term prophylaxis regimens, especially in patients with inhibitors, led to the production of emicizumab, the first non-factor medicine for subcutaneous administration in patients with severe and moderate hemophilia A with or without factor VIII inhibitors. This review describes the research steps behind the development of this game-changing medication as well as its success in the prophylaxis of bleeding episodes, as witnessed by the results of pivotal clinical trials but also by real-life use in the frame of a still expanding global market. We also discuss potential and actual adverse events and the nuances related to clinical use, such as laboratory monitoring, development of neutralizing antidrug antibodies, risk of thrombosis/hypercoagulability and role in the management of surgical operations. The potential of emicizumab to prevent bleeding in other congenital and acquired coagulation disorders is also outlined.

Design and engineering of bispecific antibodies: insights and practical considerations

Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have attracted significant attention due to their dual binding activity, which permits simultaneous targeting of antigens and synergistic binding effects beyond what can be obtained even with combinations of conventional monospecific antibodies. Despite the tremendous therapeutic potential, the design and construction of bsAbs are often hampered by practical issues arising from the increased structural complexity as compared to conventional monospecific antibodies. The issues are diverse in nature, spanning from decreased biophysical stability from fusion of exogenous antigen-binding domains to antibody chain mispairing leading to formation of antibody-related impurities that are very difficult to remove. The added complexity requires judicious design considerations as well as extensive molecular engineering to ensure formation of high quality bsAbs with the intended mode of action and favorable drug-like qualities. In this review, we highlight and summarize some of the key considerations in design of bsAbs as well as state-of-the-art engineering principles that can be applied in efficient construction of bsAbs with diverse molecular formats.

The role of emicizumab in acquired hemophilia A

Acquired hemophilia is a rare bleeding disorder that predominantly affects older people with potential underlying comorbidities, including cardiovascular and thrombotic risk factors. The current standard therapies with hemostatic agents for acute bleeding and immunosuppression often require inpatient management, are not approved for routine bleeding prophylaxis, and contribute to the high mortality in this population. Emicizumab is a factor VIII (FVIII) mimetic approved for bleeding prophylaxis in congenital hemophilia A with and without FVIII inhibitors. Given subcutaneously, it may allow easier outpatient bleeding prophylaxis and reduce intensity of immunosuppression. This article summarizes the currently available data on the efficacy and safety of emicizumab in acquired hemophilia A.

Coagulant potentials of emicizumab in the plasmas from infant and toddler patients with hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab significantly reduces bleedings in patients with hemophilia A (PwHA). A clinical study (HAVEN 7; NCT04431726) for PwHA aged less than or equal to 12 months is ongoing, but emicizumab-driven coagulation potential in PwHA in early childhood remains to be clarified.

AIM

To investigate the in vitro or in vivo coagulation potential of emicizumab in plasmas obtained from infant and toddler PwHA.

METHODS

Twenty-seven plasma samples from 14 infant/toddler PwHA (aged 0-42 months, median 19 months) who received emicizumab (n = 9), factor (F)VIII products (n = 8), or no treatment (n = 10) were obtained. FVIII activity in FVIII-treated plasmas was cancelled by the addition of anti-FVIII monoclonal antibody (mAb). Emicizumab-treated plasmas (in vivo) and emicizumab-spiked plasmas (in vitro) were analyzed. Emicizumab-untreated plasma or emicizumab-treated plasma supplemented with two anti-emicizumab mAbs were used as references. Adjusted maximum coagulation velocity (Ad|min1|) by clot waveform analysis and peak thrombin (Peak-Th) by thrombin generation assay was assessed.

RESULTS

Ad|min1| values in 24 samples were improved by the presence of emicizumab. Values did not improve in the three remaining samples (aged 1, 23, and 31 months). Although the presence of emicizumab showed an age-dependent increase in Peak-Th in 20 samples, this increase was not observed in seven samples (aged 0, 1, 1, 2, 8, 19, and 36 months). Emicizumab-dependent increases in both Ad|min1| and Peak-Th were shown in 18 samples, and increases in either parameter were shown in eight samples. One sample (from patient aged 1 month) showed no increase in both, however.

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab could improve coagulant potential in plasmas from infant/toddler patients with hemophilia A.

Hemophilia A: Emicizumab monitoring and impact on coagulation testing

Hemophilia A is an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder characterized by absent or ineffective coagulation factor VIII, a condition that could result in a severe and potentially life-threatening bleed. Although the current standard of care involves prophylactic replacement therapy of factor VIII, the development of neutralizing anti-factor VIII alloantibody inhibitors often complicates such therapeutic treatment. Emicizumab (Hemlibra®), a novel recombinant therapeutic agent for patients with hemophilia A, is a humanized asymmetric bispecific IgG4 monoclonal antibody designed to mimic activated factor VIII by bridging factor IXa and factor X thus effecting hemostasis. Importantly, this drug eliminates the need for factor VIII and complications associated with inhibitor generation. Emicizumab has been approved for use in several countries including the United States and Japan for prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in hemophilia A with and without FVIII inhibitors. Therapy is also approved in the European Union for routine prophylaxis of bleeds in hemophilia A with inhibitors or severe hemophilia A without inhibitors. Unfortunately, emicizumab therapy presents unique challenges for routine and specialty coagulation tests currently used to monitor hemophilia A. In this review, hemophilia A is presented, the biochemistry of factor VIII is discussed, and the impact of the therapeutic agent emicizumab is highlighted.

A prospective, multicenter, open-label phase III study of emicizumab prophylaxis in patients with acquired hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody that mimics the cofactor function of activated factor (F) VIII. It prevents bleeds in patients with congenital hemophilia A regardless of the inhibitor status; however, no prospective clinical studies have been conducted for emicizumab in patients with acquired hemophilia A (PwAHA).

OBJECTIVES

To describe the primary analysis results from a prospective, multicenter, open-label phase III study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of emicizumab in PwAHA (AGEHA; JapicCTI-205151).

METHODS

Emicizumab was administered subcutaneously at 6 mg/kg on day 1 and 3 mg/kg on day 2, followed by 1.5 mg/kg once weekly from day 8 onward. Predefined criteria for the completion of dosing included FVIII activity of >50 IU/dL.

RESULTS

By the cutoff date (April 23, 2021), 12 patients on immunosuppressive therapy were enrolled, and 11 of them (91.7%) completed emicizumab treatment. The mean trough plasma emicizumab concentration rapidly reached a steady state (1 week), achieving the efficacious level that was established in patients with congenital hemophilia A (>30 μg/mL). Before first emicizumab administration, 7 patients (58.3%) experienced 77 major bleeds. During emicizumab treatment, no major bleeds occurred in any patient. Neither death due to bleeding or infection nor any study treatment-related serious adverse event was reported. One asymptomatic, nonserious deep vein thrombosis was discovered with no laboratory findings indicating any trend toward hypercoagulation.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that emicizumab prophylaxis with the tested dosing regimen and completion criteria may have a favorable benefit-risk profile in PwAHA.

In vitro validation of chromogenic substrate assay for evaluation of surrogate FVIII-activity of emicizumab

[Introduction] Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody mimicking activated factor VIII (FVIII), is increasingly used in prophylaxis against bleeding in hemophilia A. Human factor-based chromogenic substrate assay (hCSA) shows concentration-dependency between emicizumab and reported FVIII activity. However, the assay measurement settings have not been optimized for emicizumab, and the reported FVIII activity cannot be directly referred as surrogate FVIII activity. [Materials and Methods] For in vitro validation of hCSA-reported surrogate FVIII activity, we compared the equation curves for emicizumab concentration with surrogate FVIII activity using spiked plasma in the thrombin generation assay (TGA), hCSA, and clot waveform analysis (CWA). Then, we generated conversion equations for hCSA-reported surrogate FVIII value to that of TGA. We also assessed the additive effect of rFVIII onto 340 nM (i.e., 50 μg/mL) emicizumab using the same assays. [Results] With 1:20 diluted plasma, halving hCSA-reported surrogate FVIII activity can be approximated to that in TGA triggered by the extrinsic pathway reagent (27.3 IU/dL vs. 13.9 IU/dL) under therapeutic emicizumab concentration. Both in TGA and hCSA, the additive effect of added FVIII on therapeutic emicizumab concentration (340 nM) was maintained at low levels of FVIII but gradually decreased at higher levels. [Conclusions] Surrogate FVIII activity can be estimated simply by halving hCSA-reported FVIII value, and the additive effect of FVIII on emicizumab diminishes at high concentrations. Based on our in vitro study, a clinical study is currently being conducted to compare individual variation of surrogate FVIII activity in hCSA and TGA.

Current and future therapies for haemophilia-Beyond factor replacement therapies

Some non-factor products that work by facilitating the coagulation pathway (emicizumab) and blocking the anticoagulant pathway (fitusiran, concizumab and marstacimab) for patients with haemophilia (H) have been developed, and clinical trials using these products are currently ongoing. Prophylaxis using non-factor products by subcutaneous administration provides marked reductions of bleeding episodes in patients with HA or HB, regardless of the presence of inhibitor. Emicizumab has already been approved globally. Emicizumab alters the phenotype of patients with HA from severe to mild by maintaining trough levels of equivalent factor VIII activity (15-20 iu/dl). Phase 3 clinical trials and long-term observations assessing emicizumab revealed tolerable safety and efficacy. However, thrombotic events have occurred in patients receiving these non-factor products. Furthermore, monitoring of the haemostatic function of these products with concomitant therapy is also required in clinical practice. These products have promising haemostatic efficiency, but wider clinical experience is needed to provide optimal therapeutic strategies in the future.

Heterogeneous coagulant potential of emicizumab in neonatal factor VIII-deficient plasma

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab prophylaxis reduces bleeding in hemophilia A (HA) patients. However, there are few data on emicizumab treatment in neonates with HA (neonate-HA), and the procoagulant effects of emicizumab in these patients are unknown.

AIM

To investigate the coagulation activity of emicizumab in vitro in a plasma model of neonate-HA.

METHODS

Plasmas from 84 neonates with non-HA were enrolled. However, due to the limited plasma volumes in some cases, 50 plasmas were assigned to two different assay groups. To prepare the neonate-HA model, plasma was first preincubated with an antifactor (F) VIII A2 monoclonal antibody (mAb). After further incubation with emicizumab, global coagulation activity was measured: adjusted maximum coagulation velocity (Ad|min1|) in clot waveform analysis (CWA) and peak thrombin in thrombin generation assay (TGA).

RESULTS

Because the addition of anti-FVIII mAb to 22 of 43 samples showed little decrease in Ad|min1|, the remaining 21 samples were analyzed by CWA. The addition of emicizumab increased Ad|min1| in 18 of the 19 cases (effective group) but not in the remaining 3 cases (noneffective group). Similarly, TGA found that emicizumab (effective group) improved peak thrombin in seven of the nine samples tested, but two cases did not respond (noneffective group). Although the effective group had lower levels of FX, there was no significant difference between the effective and noneffective groups in terms of FIX, protein S, protein C, antithrombin, and fibrinogen.

CONCLUSIONS

The in vitro coagulant potentials of emicizumab in the neonate-HA model were more heterogeneous than those recorded in the adult-HA model.

Acquired Hemophilia A: Current Guidance and Experience from Clinical Practice

In acquired hemophilia A (AHA), autoantibodies to coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) neutralize FVIII activity leading to a potentially severe bleeding diathesis that carries a high rate of morbidity and mortality. This disorder is rare and occurs mainly in adults over 60 years of age or in the postpartum period. The diagnosis should be suspected in patients with new-onset bleeding without a personal or family history of bleeding and can be confirmed via specific assays for FVIII inhibitors. Treatment involves both hemostatic therapies to decrease bleeding and immune modulation strategies to re-establish immune tolerance to FVIII. There are limited data on treatment for refractory disease, based mostly on small case series. Registry studies have informed consensus guidelines for optimal hemostatic therapies and initial immunosuppressive therapies. Additional studies are needed to evaluate novel hemostatic agents and develop biomarkers to risk-stratify treatment while limiting adverse events.

Anticoagulation for Stroke Prevention after Restoration of Haemostasis with Emicizumab in Acquired Haemophilia A

Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare haemorrhagic disorder caused by the development of autoantibodies inhibiting factor VIII function. It predominantly affects the elderly, who are often burdened with a considerable number of comorbidities, and can result in life-threatening bleeding. The management of AHA consists of two aspects: inhibitor eradication with an immunomodulator and bleed control with a bypassing agent. Here we present a case of AHA with a high titre inhibitor in a patient with extensive comorbidities and atrial fibrillation in whom inhibitor eradication could not be achieved within a few weeks using corticosteroids alone. Due to coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 restrictions and complications of care, emicizumab offered an effective and convenient therapy, not only sparing the need for continued and intensified inhibitor eradication, but also allowing anticoagulation for stroke prophylaxis.

LEARNING POINTS

Emicizumab may offer a suitable option for bleeding prophylaxis when inhibitor eradication is not achievable with immunotolerance treatment, especially in the age of the COVID-19 pandemic when the consequences of immunosuppression can be detrimental.Bleeding prophylaxis with emicizumab may enable long-term anticoagulation in patients with acquired haemophilia A during inhibitor eradication.The prothrombotic risks of emicizumab are not yet sufficiently characterized.

Design of an international investigator-initiated study on MOdern Treatment of Inhibitor-positiVe pATiEnts with haemophilia A (MOTIVATE)

Background:

Inhibitor development is the most serious treatment-related complication of replacement coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) therapy for patients with haemophilia A. Immune tolerance induction (ITI), which involves intensive and prolonged treatment with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII, is the only clinically proven strategy for eradication of inhibitors. The bispecific antibody emicizumab is approved for use in patients with and without inhibitors to prevent bleeding but does not eliminate inhibitors. MOTIVATE (www.motivate-study.com) aims to capture different approaches to the treatment and management of patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors, document current ITI approaches from real-world clinical experience, and evaluate the efficacy and safety of ITI, emicizumab prophylaxis and ITI with emicizumab prophylaxis.

Methods:

The investigator-initiated MOTIVATE study [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04023019; EudraCT 2019-003427-38] will investigate in real-life clinical practice the management of patients with haemophilia A of any severity who have developed inhibitors to FVIII. All treatment is at the investigator’s discretion. The following treatment approaches will be evaluated: Group 1 – ITI with Nuwiq^®, octanate^® or wilate^® and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat bleeding episodes (BEs) or during surgery or for prophylaxis; Group 2 – ITI with Nuwiq^®, octanate^® or wilate^® and emicizumab prophylaxis and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat BEs or during surgery; Group 3 – routine prophylaxis with emicizumab, aPCC or rFVIIa without ITI and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat BEs or during surgery. Patients will not be randomised to a treatment group and may change groups during the study.

Conclusions:

It is planned to enrol 120 patients who will be followed for up to 5 years. Optional sub-studies will explore factors that may influence ITI results as well as the impact of different treatment approaches on important aspects of patient health, including joint and bone health and the risk of thrombotic events.

Exposure-Bleeding Count Modeling of Emicizumab for the Prophylaxis of Bleeding in Persons with Hemophilia A with/Without Inhibitors Against Factor VIII

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Emicizumab is a monoclonal antibody that bridges activated coagulation factor IX and factor X to restore effective hemostasis in persons with hemophilia A. It is indicated for routine prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in persons with hemophilia A. The aim of the present study is to describe the exposure-response relationship between emicizumab concentrations and bleeding frequency, and to confirm adequate bleeding control of the investigated dosing regimens 1.5 mg/kg once weekly, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, and 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks.

METHODS

Treated bleeding events were pooled from 445 persons with hemophilia A with and without inhibitors against factor VIII, participating in six clinical studies. Emicizumab concentrations were predicted using a previously developed population pharmacokinetic model. A count model was used to quantify the exposure-response relationship. These models were used to illustrate the relationship between emicizumab concentrations and cumulative count of bleeding over 1 year (annualized bleeding rate).

RESULTS

The final exposure-response model, based on a generalized Poisson distribution and an inhibitory Emax relationship, adequately describes the relationship between daily emicizumab concentrations and daily bleed frequency. A significant effect of factor VIII prophylaxis among persons with hemophilia A without inhibitors was found. Annualized bleeding rate simulations show that the three emicizumab dosing regimens maintain the concentrations close to the plateau of the effect. At the average steady-state concentration across all regimens (53.5 µg/mL), the predicted mean annualized bleeding rate is 1.28, corresponding to a 94.0% reduction from baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that average emicizumab concentrations achieved with all three emicizumab dosing regimens provide adequate bleeding control.

Hemostatic therapy as a management strategy for acquired hemophilia: what does the future hold?

Introduction: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies that bind and inactivate factor VIII (FVIII), predisposing to a potentially life-threatening bleeding.Areas covered: The main epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and therapeutic features of AHA are critically discussed. In particular, we focus on the hemostatic management of AHA patients analyzing the currently available treatment options and showing the latest data on the innovative hemostatic agents still under investigation. Authors searched the Medline and PubMed electronic databases for publication on AHA in the last twenty years.Expert opinion: While a rapid recognition of suspected cases of AHA is essential to make a correct diagnosis and appropriately and timely treat the hemorrhagic manifestations, the multidisciplinary approach to this challenging, rare and life-threatening bleeding disorder is of equal importance to improve patients' outcome. Although promising, the safety and efficacy of the clinical use of emicizumab in AHA needs to be validated by trials including an adequate number of patients, before registering the drug also for this indication.

Ex Vivo Prediction of Comprehensive Coagulation Potential Using Simulated Blood Concentrations of Emicizumab in Patients with Acquired Hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

 Emicizumab prophylaxis improves coagulation function in congenital hemophilia A, regardless of inhibitor presence. We recently reported that emicizumab enhanced the coagulant potentials, ex vivo, in plasmas from patients with acquired hemophilia A (PwAHAs) at diagnosis. However, coagulant effects of emicizumab in PwAHAs during the clinical course remain unclear.

AIM

 To assess ex vivo coagulant effects of emicizumab in PwAHAs during the clinical course.

METHODS/RESULTS

 Blood samples were obtained from 14 PwAHAs on (median) days 0 and 6 during a severe-bleeding phase, and days 27 and 59 during a reduced-bleeding phase with elevated endogenous factor VIII (FVIII) and decreased inhibitor titers. If administered a single dose of 3 or 6 mg/kg, or two doses at 6 mg/kg followed by 3 mg/kg, estimated plasma emicizumab concentrations (10/5/2.5, 20/10/5, and 30/15/7.5 µg/mL on days 0-7/30/60, respectively) could be used to represent potential changes, based on the half-life (T _1/2: ∼30 days). Emicizumab concentrations that covered maximum plasma concentrations of each dosage were used for spiking on day 0. Ex vivo addition of estimated emicizumab to PwAHA's plasma containing endogenous FVIII and/or inhibitor, without and with recombinant (r)FVIIa administration during immunosuppressive therapy, increased the calculated Ad|min1| values, assessed by clot waveform analysis, and their coagulant potentials were below normal levels. Rotational thromboelastometry revealed that ex vivo emicizumab addition resulted in the further improvement of coagulant potentials in whole bloods when combined with rFVIIa administration.

CONCLUSION

 Based on ex vivo and in vitro data, emicizumab has the potential to be effective in clinical situations for PwAHAs.

Targeted inhibition of activated protein C by a non-active-site inhibitory antibody to treat hemophilia

Activated protein C (APC) is a plasma serine protease with antithrombotic and cytoprotective functions. Based on the hypothesis that specific inhibition of APC’s anticoagulant but not its cytoprotective activity can be beneficial for hemophilia therapy, 2 types of inhibitory monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are tested: A type I active-site binding mAb and a type II mAb binding to an exosite on APC (required for anticoagulant activity) as shown by X-ray crystallography. Both mAbs increase thrombin generation and promote plasma clotting. Type I blocks all APC activities, whereas type II preserves APC’s cytoprotective function. In normal monkeys, type I causes many adverse effects including animal death. In contrast, type II is well-tolerated in normal monkeys and shows both acute and prophylactic dose-dependent efficacy in hemophilic monkeys. Our data show that the type II mAb can specifically inhibit APC’s anticoagulant function without compromising its cytoprotective function and offers superior therapeutic opportunities for hemophilia.

Activated protein C (APC) is a plasma serine protease with antithrombotic and cytoprotective functions. Here, the authors develop a monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits APC’s anticoagulant function without compromising its cytoprotective function, and shows efficacy in animal models.

The availability of new drugs for hemophilia treatment

INTRODUCTION

A number of new FVIII/IX concentrates enriched the portfolio of products available for the treatment of hemophilia A/B patients. Due to the large inter-patient variability, accurate tailoring of the therapy became essential to improve patients' adherence, clinical outcomes, and cost/effectiveness ratio. Recently, non-replacement therapies have taken the limelight and succeeded in decreasing the bleedings of patients.

AREAS COVERED

The PK characteristics, efficacy, and safety of the new rFVIII and rFIX concentrates and of non-replacement therapy, are reported in detail in the published clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Outstanding improvements of rFIX concentrates' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have allowed to reduce the bleedings in hemophilia B patients, in order to increase their adherence to prophylaxis and quality of life. Less significant are the effects of pegylation or Fc fusion on the pharmacokinetics of the new rFVIII concentrates. The new non-replacement therapy is achieving the favor of many treaters and patients, in particular those with Factor VIII inhibitors. Great attention must be paid to the dangerous synergy of APCC and emicizumab, responsible for some fatal events during the clinical trials and compassionate use of this drug. So far, replacement therapy should be the standard of care for hemophilia patients without inhibitors or difficulties in venous access.

A bispecific antibody demonstrates limited measurability in routine coagulation assays

: Accurate monitoring of coagulation, needed for optimal management of patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors, presents a challenge for treating physicians. Although global haemostatic assays may be used in this population, their utility with nonfactor therapies has yet to be established in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to assess options for potential haemostatic activity monitoring and feasibility for factor VIII (FVIII)-equivalency measurement with a sequence identical analogue (SIA) to emicizumab using different coagulation assays. SIA was analysed using five commercial chromogenic assays and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) assays including clot waveform analysis using five different triggers. Recombinant FVIII served as a comparator in all assays. Thrombin generation in haemophilia A plasma was measured using extrinsic and intrinsic trigger conditions (tissue factor or Factor XIa). Of the five chromogenic assays, a concentration-dependent increase in Factor Xa was observed with one assay, with human Factor IXa and X reagents. The SIA dose-response signal plateaued at therapeutically relevant concentrations and was nonparallel with FVIII reference, thereby not permitting FVIII-equivalence assessment. aPTT varied between reagents, with aPTT normalization occurring at low and below-therapeutic SIA concentrations. SIA [600 nmol/l (90 μg/ml)] only partially restored thrombin generation in individual haemophilia A patient plasma. FVIII-equivalence of SIA could not be determined using standard FVIII protocols and was found to be highly influenced by assay type, analytical conditions and parameters used for calculation. New and/or modified methodology and standard reagents specific for use with nonfactor therapies are required for their utilization in the clinical setting.

Novel Insights and New Developments Regarding Coagulation Revealed by Studies of the Anti-Factor IXa (Activated Factor IX)/Factor X Bispecific Antibody, Emicizumab

Emicizumab is a humanized anti-FIXa/FX (factor IXa/X) bispecific monoclonal antibody that mimics FVIIIa (activated factor VIII) cofactor function. The hemostatic efficacy of emicizumab has been confirmed in clinical studies of patients with hemophilia A, irrespective of the presence of FVIII inhibitors. Emicizumab differs in some properties from FVIIIa molecule. Emicizumab requires no activation by thrombin and is not inactivated by activated protein C, but emicizumab-mediated coagulation is regulatable and maintains hemostasis. A small amount of FIXa (activated factor IX) is required to initiate emicizumab-mediated hemostasis, whereas tissue factor/FVIIa (activated factor VII)-mediated FXa (activated factor X) and thrombin activation initiates FVIIIa-mediated hemostasis. Fibrin formation, followed by fibrinolysis, appears to be similar between emicizumab- and FVIIIa-mediated hemostasis. These results suggest possible future uses of emicizumab for treating hemorrhagic diseases other than hemophilia A and reveal previously unobservable behaviors of procoagulation and anticoagulation factors in conventional hemostasis. Here, we have reviewed novel insights and new developments regarding coagulation highlighted by emicizumab.

An anti-factor IXa/factor X bispecific antibody, emicizumab, improves ex vivo coagulant potentials in plasma from patients with acquired hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is caused by autoantibodies against factor (F)VIII, and is characterized by severe, spontaneous bleeding, which can be life-threatening. Emicizumab, an anti-FIXa/FX bispecific antibody, significantly reduces bleeding events in congenital hemophilia A (HA) with and without inhibitors. The known pathophysiological mechanisms and current preclinical data in HA suggest that emicizumab could provide effective treatment for AHA, but the coagulation activities of emicizumab in these patients remain unknown.

AIM

To evaluate the coagulant effects of emicizumab in plasma from AHA patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Tissue factor-triggered thrombin generation assays using normal plasma preincubated with anti-FVIII monoclonal antibodies recognizing different epitopes demonstrated that 20 µg/mL emicizumab recovered the depressed peak levels of thrombin generation to 46% to 72%. Further studies were devised, therefore, to simulate the clinical course in AHA patients, including during the acute phase for severe bleeding requiring FVIII-bypassing therapy, and during the subacute/chronic phase with less bleeding. Various concentrations of emicizumab were used to represent the potential changes in plasma levels based on the half-life of the antibody (~30 days). The ex vivo addition of emicizumab to plasma samples from AHA patients (n = 16) increased peak thrombin in all cases, irrespective of the inhibitor epitope specificity. Thrombin generation at 20 and 100 µg/mL emicizumab was restored to (median) 43.9% and 92.2%, respectively. Differences were evident in some cases, however, and recovery rates appeared likely to be greater in patients with type 2 inhibitor than those with type 1.

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab improved ex vivo coagulation potential in plasma from AHA patients.

Emicizumab for the treatment of haemophilia A: a narrative review

One of the most serious complications of the treatment of severe haemophilia A is the development of alloantibodies against exogenous factor VIII (FVIII). Inhibitors render factor replacement therapy ineffective, exposing patients to a remarkably high risk of morbidity and mortality. Besides the well-known bypassing agents (i.e. activated prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated factor VII) used to treat or prevent bleeding in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, there is growing interest in newer haemostatic therapies that are not based on the replacement of the deficient FVIII. This review will focus on the most interesting among these innovative therapies, emicizumab, and will provide an update on its current stage of clinical development.

Paradigm shift for the treatment of hereditary haemophilia: Towards precision medicine

Patients with haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) experience spontaneous limb- or life-threatening bleedings which are prevented by regular prophylactic intravenous infusions of the deficient coagulation factor (FVIII or FIX). Prophylaxis with subcutaneous long-acting non-factor products that improve in vivo thrombin generation is now under intensive investigation (concizumab, fitusiran) or successfully employed (emicizumab) in haemophilia patients. Both haemophilia patients with/without inhibitors take advantage of non-factor products employed alone. In those who also need bypassing agents (or FVIII concentrates) for breakthrough bleeds, thromboembolic events and/or thrombotic microangiopathy may occur. By enhancing thrombin generation, prothrombotic mutations co-segregating with FVIII/FIX gene mutations may trigger thrombotic episodes in HA patients carrying acquired thrombogenic factors (e.g. venous catheters). A thorough knowledge of individual needs increasingly contributed to improve comprehensive care and personalize treatments in haemophilia. Integrating genomics, lifestyle and environmental data is expected to be key to: 1) identify which haemophilia patients are less likely to benefit from a given intervention; 2) define optimal dosing and scheduling of bypassing agents (or FVIII) to employ in combination with non-factor products; 3) establish tests to monitor in vivo thrombin generation; 4) improve communication and deliver results to individuals. As individual outcomes will be improved and the risk of adverse events minimized, non-factor products will come into wider use within the haemophilia community, and patients will hopefully have no more risks of breakthrough bleeds. The risks of a normal life for a "former haemophilia patient" is likely to change the treatment landscape and the structure of haemophilia Centers.

Intrinsic differences between FVIIIa mimetic bispecific antibodies and FVIII prevent assignment of FVIII-equivalence

Essentials Non-factor VIII (FVIII) therapies for hemophilia A, such as bispecific antibodies (bsAbs), are in development. Bispecific antibodies are intrinsically different from FVIII and lack many of the same regulatory mechanisms. These differences complicate assignment and interpretation of FVIII-equivalent activity. Inability to assign FVIII equivalence compromises our capacity to assess hemostatic potential of bsAb therapies.

BACKGROUND

Activated factor VIII (FVIIIa) mimetic bsAbs aim to enable prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A patients with and without inhibitors. With different mechanisms of action, benchmarking their activity against FVIII to determine efficacious yet safe dosage is difficult.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the activities of sequence identical emicizumab (SI-Emi) and another bsAb, BS-027125, to recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) using clinical and nonclinical assays and to evaluate our ability to assign a FVIII-equivalent value to bsAbs and implications thereof.

METHODS

Activities of SI-Emi, BS-027125, and rFVIII were measured by one-stage clotting assay, chromogenic factor Xa generation assay, and thrombin generation assay. We also assessed the activity of anti-FIXa and anti-FX bivalent homodimers of each bsAb and probed the effect of different reagents in thrombin generation assay (TGA).

RESULTS

The FVIII-like activity of SI-Emi and BS-027125 ranged greatly across each assay, varying both by parameter measured within an assay and by reagents used. Notably, SI-Emi anti-FIXa bivalent homodimer had meaningful activity in several assays, whereas BS-027125 anti-FIXa bivalent homodimer only had activity in the chromogenic assay. Surprisingly, SI-Emi displayed activity in the absence of phospholipids, while BS-027125 had minimal phospholipid-independent activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Bispecific antibodies demonstrate little consistency between assays tested here owing to intrinsic differences between FVIII and bsAbs. While some trends are shared, the bsAbs also differ in mechanism. These inconsistencies complicate assignment of FVIII-equivalent values to bsAbs. Ultimately, a deeper mechanistic understanding of bsAbs as well as bsAb-tailored assays are needed to monitor and predict their hemostatic potential and long-term efficacy and safety confidently.

Current and emerging biologics for the treatment of hemophilia

INTRODUCTION

The development of new biologic agents able to restore thrombin generation has become the focus of innovation in hemophilia management. There is growing interest in the proposal of novel, non-replacement therapy with alternative mechanisms of action and route of administration, hoping to solve still unmet needs in treatment of hemophilic patients with or without inhibitors.

AREAS COVERED

The review describes the new molecules, in particular the bi-specific antibody mimicking the coagulation function of FVIII and/or those which work by inhibiting the natural anticoagulants, their mechanism of action and the results of ongoing clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Exciting results in enhancing the protection against bleeding and improving quality of life are emerging from clinical trials. However, these molecules with their mechanisms of action also open new problems. Treatment of bleeding and management of surgery in subjects with a rebalanced hemostasis may be difficult, especially for the lack of laboratory tests perfectly reflecting the in vivo coagulation status. A careful surveillance is required to evaluate the risk of thrombotic complication in patients with rebalanced hemostasis, in addition to understand whether these new products offer the same protection on joints as regular prophylaxis with the missing clotting factors.

Emicizumab-kxwh: First Global Approval

Emicizumab-kxwh (Hemlibra^®) is a bispecific humanized monoclonal antibody that restores the function of missing activated FVIII by bridging activated FIX and FX to facilitate effective haemostasis in patients with haemophilia A. Subcutaneous emicizumab-kxwh is approved in the USA for use as routine prophylaxis to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in adults and paediatric patients with haemophilia A (congenital FVIII deficiency) with FVIII inhibitors. Subcutaneous emicizumab-kxwh is awaiting approval in several countries worldwide, including in the EU and Japan, and is undergoing phase 3 development in haemophilia A without FVIII inhibitors. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of emicizumab-kxwh leading to its first global approval for use as prophylaxis to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A.

Emicizumab in the Treatment of Acquired Haemophilia: A Case Report

The prognosis of acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is severe and treatment options are limited. Emicizumab is a novel bispecific humanized monoclonal antibody in the treatment of inherited AHA with inhibitors. An 83-year-old AHA patient with congestive heart failure and a high risk for thromboembolic and cardiac events who had initially been treated successfully with steroids and substitution of recombinant B-domain-deleted porcine FVIII developed severe bleeding complications and a secondary increase in inhibitor titres after 4 weeks of treatment. Conventional therapeutic strategies failed, and the patient was subsequently treated with emicizumab on off-label and named patient use premises. After the application of emicizumab, the clinical conditions stabilized and no further substitution of coagulation factors was needed. The patient could be discharged and survived 36 days in a cardiac rehabilitation centre without indications for spontaneous bleeding or thromboembolic events. We suggest that the effects of emicizumab in acquired haemophilia should be evaluated in clinical trials.

New therapies using nonfactor products for patients with hemophilia and inhibitors

Regular prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) or FIX products to prevent bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) and HB, respectively, results in marked suppression of the onset of arthropathy and contributes greatly to improvements in quality of life. Some issues remain with the use of clotting factor replacement therapy, however. The need for multiple IV infusions is associated with a substantial mental and physical burden, and the hemostatic effect of bypassing agents (BPAs) in patients with inhibitor is inconsistent. The development of subcutaneous products with prolonged hemostatic efficiency, irrespective of the presence of inhibitors, has been a longtime wish for patients. A new class of therapeutic agents that act by enhancing coagulation (emicizumab) and inhibiting anticoagulant pathways (fitusiran and concizumab) have been established, and clinical trials using these nonfactor products are ongoing. The current findings have demonstrated that prophylaxis by nonfactor products supports marked reductions of bleeding episodes in hemophilia patients with or without inhibitor. Emicizumab has already been approved for use internationally. Some concerns are evident, however. Thrombotic microangiopathy and thromboembolism have occurred in 5 emicizumab-treated patients receiving repeated infusions of activated prothrombin complex concentrates, and a sinus vein thrombosis has occurred in a fitusiran-treated patient receiving repeated infusions of FVIII product. Moreover, reliable techniques to monitor hemostatic function in patients receiving nonfactor products with concomitant BPA or FVIII/FIX therapies require further assessment. These novel therapeutic agents have promising hemostatic properties, although wider experience in hemophilia centers is warranted to establish appropriate therapeutic strategies.

Emicizumab (ACE910): Clinical background and laboratory assessment of hemophilia A

Congenital hemophilia A, a relatively common and sometimes life-threatening bleeding disorder, is caused by inherited deficiency of clotting factor (F) VIII. The adoption of an appropriate medical and environmental prophylaxis is critical for long-term management of hemophilia because it will considerably reduce the number of both mild and severe bleeding episodes. Among the many therapeutic options that have become available over the past decades, ACE910 (also known as emicizumab) is a bispecific immunoglobulin G antibody characterized by its unique ability to bind FIX or FIXa on one arm and FX on the other, thus abrogating FVIII activity in vivo. Several phase I to III clinical trials have now been published, confirming the clinical efficacy and relative safety of this new agent for long-term prophylaxis of hemophilia A, especially those patients having FVIII inhibitors. The recent regulatory clearance of ACE910 in many countries will hence impose additional challenges to clinical laboratories because the panel of available tests will need to address the emerging issue of monitoring patients treated with this novel anti-hemophilic agent by using conventional as well as innovative approaches. Therefore, this article is aimed to provide an update on clinical background and challenges of laboratory assessment in hemophilia A patients undergoing ACE910 administration.

Emicizumab for hemophilia A with factor VIII inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia is a serious bleeding disorder characterized by repeated bleeding episodes into joints and muscles which can lead to permanent disabilities. Treatment with factor replacement therapy has proven to be effective at preventing these complications; however, it can lead to formation of neutralizing antibodies termed inhibitors which significantly complicate the management of the disorder. These inhibitor patients suffer from increased morbidity and mortality and there has been a major unmet need for novel therapeutic approaches. Recently, one such therapy, emicizumab, has been licensed in the United States. Areas covered: This manuscript contains a detailed discussion of the mechanism of action, the clinical trial development program as well as a review of the benefits and risks of this novel agent. In addition, practical considerations for the use of the agent are also described. Expert commentary: Emicizumab represents a new class of medication for the treatment of hemophilia A which in the past has relied on factor replacement therapy and bypassing agent (alternative factor) therapy. Emicizumab fulfills two major unmet needs in patients with hemophilia who have FVIII inhibitors. First, it provides for a much more effective therapy for the prevention of bleeding and second it substantially reduces the treatment burden.

The role of emicizumab, a bispecific factor IXa- and factor X-directed antibody, for the prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A

Hemophilia A, characterized by impaired or absent expression of factor VIII, has long been managed via direct factor replacement. Functionally, factor VIII acts as a cofactor for factor IXa and allows activation of factor X, which, in combination with factor V, generates thrombin. Bispecific antibodies such as emicizumab are recombinant, monoclonal antibodies capable of recognizing and binding to two distinct antigenic targets simultaneously; emicizumab binds factors IXa and X, resulting in spatial approximation and activation of factor X, thereby mimicking the actions of factor VIII. Critically, the presence of antifactor VIII antibodies, for example, inhibitors, impacts neither the mechanism nor the efficacy by which emicizumab functions. The results and interim analyses of the emicizumab clinical trials, HAVEN 1, 2, 3, and 4, are additionally reviewed and discussed.

Relative and Absolute Bioavailability Study of Emicizumab to Bridge Drug Products and Subcutaneous Injection Sites in Healthy Volunteers

Emicizumab (ACE910) is a bispecific antibody that is a novel, subcutaneously injectable treatment for patients with hemophilia A. This study assessed the relative bioavailability of emicizumab between old and new drug products (DPs) and among 3 commonly used subcutaneous injection sites (abdomen, upper arm, and thigh), together with its absolute bioavailability in healthy volunteers. Forty‐eight healthy volunteers were randomized into 4 groups to receive a single subcutaneous injection of 1 mg/kg with the old or new DP, and another 12 volunteers each received a single, 90‐minute, intravenous infusion of 0.25 mg/kg with the new DP. Similar pharmacokinetic profiles were observed between the DPs, with geometric mean ratios of 1.199 (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.060‐1.355) for the maximum plasma concentration and 1.083 (90% CI 0.920‐1.275) for area under the plasma concentration‐time curve extrapolated to infinity. The geometric mean ratios of maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration‐time curve extrapolated to infinity for upper arm versus abdomen were 0.823 (90% CI 0.718‐0.943) and 0.926 (90% CI 0.814‐1.053), respectively, and those for thigh versus abdomen were 1.168 (90% CI 1.030‐1.324) and 1.073 (90% CI 0.969‐1.189), respectively. Absolute bioavailability ranged from 80.4% to 93.1%. These results suggested that no emicizumab dose adjustment would be needed when switching the DPs or injecting to different sites interchangeably and that emicizumab injected subcutaneously is highly bioavailable.

A Pharmacometric Approach to Substitute for a Conventional Dose-Finding Study in Rare Diseases: Example of Phase III Dose Selection for Emicizumab in Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab (ACE910) is a bispecific antibody mimicking the cofactor function of activated coagulation factor VIII. In phase I-I/II studies, emicizumab reduced the bleeding frequency in patients with severe hemophilia A, regardless of the presence of factor VIII inhibitors, at once-weekly subcutaneous doses of 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg.

METHODS

Using the phase I-I/II study data, population pharmacokinetic and repeated time-to-event (RTTE) modeling were performed to quantitatively characterize the relationship between the pharmacokinetics of emicizumab and reduction in bleeding frequency. Simulations were then performed to identify the minimal exposure expected to achieve zero bleeding events for 1 year in at least 50% of patients and to select the dosing regimens to be tested in phase III studies.

RESULTS

The RTTE model adequately predicted the bleeding onset over time as a function of plasma emicizumab concentration. Simulations suggested that plasma emicizumab concentrations of ≥  45 μg/mL should result in zero bleeding events for 1 year in at least 50% of patients. This efficacious exposure provided the basis for selecting previously untested dosing regimens of 1.5 mg/kg once weekly, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, and 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks for phase III studies.

CONCLUSIONS

A pharmacometric approach guided the phase III dose selection of emicizumab in hemophilia A, without conducting a conventional dose-finding study. Phase III studies with the selected dosing regimens are currently ongoing. This case study indicates that a pharmacometric approach can substitute for a conventional dose-finding study in rare diseases and will streamline the drug development process.

Attempting to remedy sub-optimal medication adherence in haemophilia: The rationale for repeated ultrasound visualisations of the patient's joint status

Haemophilia is marked by joint bleeding (haemarthrosis) leading to cartilage damage (arthropathy). Lifelong prophylaxis-initiated after the first bleeding episode-leads to a dramatic decrease in arthropathy in haemophilia patients. However, adherence to continuous intravenous administrations of factor VIII (FVIII) or FIX products is challenging, and patients potentially suffer from breakthrough bleedings while on prophylaxis. Newer FVIII/FIX products with enhanced convenience attributes and/or easier infusion procedures are intended to improve adherence. However, pharmacokinetic data should be harmonised with information from individual attitudes and treatment needs, to tailor intravenous dosing and scheduling in patients who receive extended half-life products. Nor is there sound evidence as to how subcutaneous non-FVIII/FIX replacement approaches (concizumab; emicizumab; fitusiran) or single intravenous injections of adeno-associated viral vectors (when employing gene therapy) will revolutionize adherence in haemophilia. In rheumatoid arthritis, repeated ultrasound examination of a patient's major joints is a valuable tool to educate patients and parents to understand the disease and provide an objective framework for clinicians to acknowledge patient's adherence. Joint ultrasound examination in haemophilia significantly correlates with cartilage damage, effusion, and synovial hypertrophy evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, in patients with haemophilia undergoing prophylaxis with an extended half-life product for a ≈ 2.8 year period, a significant continued improvement in joint health is detected at the physical examination. This provides the rationale for studies on repeated ultrasound examinations of joint status to attempt to remedy sub-optimal medication adherence and help identify which approach is most suited on which occasion and for which patient.

Novel therapeutics for hemophilia and other bleeding disorders

Hemophilia and von Willebrand disease are the most common congenital bleeding disorders. Treatment of these disorders has focused on replacement of the missing coagulation factor to prevent or treat bleeding. New technologies and insights into hemostasis have driven the development of many promising new therapies for hemophilia and von Willebrand disease. Emerging bypass agents including zymogen-like factor IXa and Xa molecules are in development and a bispecific antibody, emicizumab, demonstrated efficacy in a phase 3 trial in people with hemophilia A and inhibitors. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor, the protein C/S system, and antithrombin are targets of novel compounds in development to alter the hemostatic balance and new approaches using modified factor VIII molecules are being tested for prevention and eradication of inhibitor antibodies in hemophilia A. The first recombinant von Willebrand factor (VWF) product has been approved and has unique VWF multimer content and does not contain factor VIII. These new approaches may offer better routes of administration, improved dosing regimens, and better efficacy for prevention and treatment of bleeding in congenital bleeding disorders.

The Potential Close Future of Hemophilia Treatment - Gene Therapy, TFPI Inhibition, Antithrombin Silencing, and Mimicking Factor VIII with an Engineered Antibody

Summary Hemophilia is one of the best researched monogenic diseases. Hemophilia A will affect approximately 1:5,000 male live births. In recent decades, great progress has been made with the introduction of recombinant proteins in the 1990s for therapy and prophylaxis, securing adequate availability and, with the introduction of the prophylaxis concept, reducing the negative impact of hemophilia on morbidity (especially arthropathy). Despite this progress, there are still challenges to overcome to secure adequate prophylaxis and treatment: for the time being, causal pharmacological hemophilia prophylaxis and therapy requires repeated i.v. application on a regular basis. Although this approach leads to a reduced comorbidity, it does not yet represent an optimized approach with continuous reversal of the hemophilic defect, which would be the ideal solution. This review summarizes the very new treatment strategies for the treatment of hemophilia A and B.

Emicizumab, A Bispecific Antibody to Factors IX/IXa and X/Xa, Does Not Interfere with Antithrombin or TFPI Activity In Vitro

Emicizumab is a humanized bispecific antibody that binds simultaneously to factor (F) IXa and FX replacing the cofactor function of FVIIIa. Because emicizumab recognizes FIX/FIXa and FX/FXa, a question may arise whether emicizumab competes with antithrombin (AT) and/or tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), thereby enhancing overall hemostatic potential by blocking their antihemostatic effects. To address this question, we performed enzymatic assays using purified coagulation factors to confirm whether emicizumab interferes with the action of AT on FIXa or FXa, or with the action of TFPI on FXa. In those assays, we found no interference of emicizumab on the actions of AT and TFPI. We next assessed emicizumab's influences on the anticoagulation actions of AT or TFPI in thrombin generation assays triggered with FXIa or tissue factor (TF) in AT-depleted or TFPI-depleted plasma supplemented with AT or TFPI in vitro. In those assays, we employed anti-FIXa and anti-FX monospecific one-armed antibodies derived from emicizumab instead of emicizumab itself so as to prevent emicizumab's FVIIIa cofactor activity from boosting thrombin generation. Consequently, we found that neither anti-FIXa, anti-FX monospecific antibody, nor the mixture of the two interfered with the anticoagulation actions of AT or TFPI in plasma. Although emicizumab can bind to FIXa and FXa, our results showed no interference of emicizumab with the action of AT or TFPI on FIXa or FXa. This indicates that the presence of emicizumab is irrelevant to the action of AT and TFPI, and thus should not alter the coagulant/anticoagulant balance related to AT and TFPI.

Non-factor replacement therapy for haemophilia: a current update

One of the most challenging issues facing us in the treatment of haemophilia is the development of alloantibodies against infused factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX). Inhibitors render factor replacement therapy ineffective, exposing patients to an unacceptably high risk of morbidity and mortality. Besides the well-known bypassing agents (i.e. activated prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated factor VII) used to treat or prevent bleeding in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, there is growing interest in a new class of therapeutic agents which act by enhancing coagulation (i.e. emicizumab) or inhibiting anticoagulant pathways (i.e. fitusiran and concizumab). This review will focus on these innovative therapies, providing an update on their current stage of clinical development.

A new era of treatment for patients with haemophilia A?

Treatment and prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with severe haemophilia A require frequent intravenous injection of factor VIII. Inhibitory antibodies against factor VIII occur in approximately 30 % of these patients during the first exposure days and immune tolerance induction to eradicate the inhibitor is challenging. Prevention of bleeds in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors is less effective and there is ongoing research for alternative treatment options. A promising approach in 2016 is the development of emicizumab (ACE910), a bispecific IgG antibody to factor IXa and factor X, that mimics the cofactor function of factor VIII. Due to the different structure of this antibody it cannot be neutralized by factor VIII inhibitors and has the possibility to achieve haemostasis in patients with severe haemophilia A with and without inhibitors. First studies in healthy volunteers and in patients showed a shortened activated partial thromboplastin time and increased peak height of thrombin generation in a dose-dependent manner. The halflife of the drug was 4 to 5 weeks. There were no clinical signs of thrombosis and no laboratory abnormalities indicating hypercoagulability. In a first study with 18 patients with severe haemophilia A with and without inhibitors a remarkable reduction in the annualised bleeding rate occurred. Safety of the drug has to be proven in ongoing research. Mimicking the cofactor activity of factor VIII by a bispecific antibody for the treatment of severe haemophilia A is so far safe and seems to be effective and is one highlight in haemostasis 2016.

Novel alternate hemostatic agents for patients with inhibitors: beyond bypass therapy

Inhibitor formation is among the most severe complications of hemophilia treatment. With a cumulative incidence of ∼30% in those with severe hemophilia A and ∼3% in those with severe hemophilia B, inhibitors are caused by a T-cell response directed against infused coagulation factor; these inhibitors neutralize factor VIII or IX activity and disrupt normal hemostasis. Inhibitor patients become unresponsive to standard factor treatment and, as an alternative, use bypass treatment (eg, recombinant factor VIIa or factor VIII inhibitor bypass activity). However, response to bypass agents is poorer and the burden of disease is higher, with greater morbidity, hospitalization, cost, and mortality, than in noninhibitor patients. Furthermore, inhibitor formation interferes with prophylaxis to prevent bleeding episodes and is a contraindication to gene therapy. Thus, more effective therapies for inhibitor patients are greatly needed. In the last several years, there has been an explosion of novel alternative hemostatic agents for hemophilia patients with and without inhibitors. These agents take advantage of technologic manipulation of coagulation factors and natural anticoagulants to promote hemostasis. The approaches include the following: (1) mutants or mimics of coagulation factors, rendering them resistant to natural anticoagulants; or (2) knock-down or disruption of natural anticoagulants, preventing degradation of coagulation factors. The purpose of this article was to review these novel alternative hemostatic agents and their mechanisms of action, as well as the preliminary pharmacokinetic, safety, and efficacy data available from early-phase clinical trials.

Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody recognizing coagulation factors IX and X: how does it actually compare to factor VIII?

During the last decade, the development of improved and novel approaches for the treatment of hemophilia A has expanded tremendously. These approaches include factor VIII (FVIII) with extended half-life (eg, FVIII-Fc and PEGylated FVIII), monoclonal antibodies targeting tissue factor pathway inhibitor, small interfering RNA to reduce antithrombin expression and the bispecific antibody ACE910/emicizumab. Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody recognizing both the enzyme factor IXa and the substrate factor X. By simultaneously binding enzyme and substrate, emicizumab mimics some part of the function exerted by the original cofactor, FVIII, in that it promotes colocalization of the enzyme-substrate complex. However, FVIII and the bispecific antibody are fundamentally different proteins and subject to different modes of regulation. Here, we will provide an overview of the similarities and dissimilarities between FVIII and emicizumab from a biochemical and mechanistical perspective. Such insight might be useful in the clinical decision making for those who apply emicizumab in their practice now or in the future, particularly in view of the thrombotic complications that have been reported when emicizumab is used in combination with FVIII-bypassing agents.