Statin and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infection: a meta-analysis

Statin use and risk of HCC in patients with MASLD and T2DM: an umbrella review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of statin use on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) or type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is still unclear. In this umbrella review, we aimed to assess the available evidence for the association of statin use and HCC risk in the target population.

METHODS

We carried out an umbrella review of previous systematic reviews/meta-analyses indexed in Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases and published between Jan 1st, 2013, and Oct 22, 2024. We used random effects models to recalculate summary risk estimates for HCC incidence. Using A Measurement Tool to Assess methodological quality of systematic Review (AMSTAR2) tool, two independent reviewers evaluated each article for eligibility and methodologic quality and gathered data from the included studies.

RESULTS

Of the initially identified 1,038 systematic reviews/meta-analyses, three non-overlapping studies with medium/high quality were included for qualitative synthesis. Statin use in people with T2DM was reported in six studies belonging to two meta-analyses. The results showed that statins were associated with a decreased risk of HCC (RR: 0.16, 95% CI: [0.03, 0.98]). However, the association was nonsignificant in patients with MASLD comprising five studies from one meta-analysis (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: [0.56, 1.40]).

CONCLUSION

Statin use is associated with a decreased incidence of HCC in people with T2DM. In patients with MASLD, the association is not significant. However, the effects of other variables including the stage of inflammation and/or liver fibrosis on the outcome need to be explored in future studies.

Lipid-targeting antiviral strategies: Current state and future perspectives

There is an urgent need for antiviral compounds effective against currently known and future viral threats. The development of host-targeting antivirals (HTAs) appears as an alternative strategy to fight viral infections minimizing the potential of resistant mutant development and potentially leading to the identification of broad-spectrum antiviral agents. Among the host factors explored for HTA strategy, lipids constitute an attractive target as many viruses, even genetically diverse, hijack specific lipids during their lifecycle. Multiple repurposing efforts have been performed to analyze the antiviral properties of lipid-targeting compounds. These studies include the analysis of the effects of cholesterol lowering drugs such as statins, cholesterol transport inhibitors, sphingolipid modulators, de novo lipogenesis inhibitors blocking fatty acid synthesis, compounds targeting glycerophospholipids or drugs interfering with lipid droplet metabolism. This review is focused on the current status of lipid-based or lipid-targeting antiviral strategies and their potential for the development of antiviral therapies, with special emphasis on those studies that have reached advanced stages of development such as efficacy studies in animal models or clinical trials. Whereas there is still a long way to go, multiple proof-of-concept studies and clinical evidence reinforce the therapeutic potential of these strategies warranting their further development into effective antiviral therapies.

Association between Statins Types with Incidence of Liver Cancer: An Updated Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have found a potential role for statins in liver cancer prevention.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the effect of different types of statins on the incidence of liver cancer.

METHODS

Relevant articles were systematically retrieved from PubMed, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception until July 2022 to explore the relationship between lipophilic statins or hydrophilic statins exposure and the incidence of liver cancer. The main outcome was the incidence of liver cancer.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed a reduced incidence of liver cancer in patients exposed to lipophilic statins (OR=0.54, p < 0.001) and hydrophilic statins (OR=0.56, p < 0.001) compared with the non-exposed cohort. Subgroup analysis showed that both exposures to lipophilic (Eastern countries: OR=0.51, p < 0.001; Western countries: OR=0.59, p < 0.001) and hydrophilic (Eastern countries: OR=0.51, p < 0.001; Western countries: OR=0.66, p=0.019) statins reduced the incidence of liver cancer in Eastern and Western countries, and the reduction was most significant in Eastern countries. Moreover, atorvastatin (OR=0.55, p < 0.001), simvastatin (OR=0.59, p < 0.001), lovastatin (OR=0.51, p < 0.001), pitavastatin (OR=0.36, p=0.008) and rosuvastatin (OR=0.60, p=0.027) could effectively reduce the incidence of liver cancer, unlike fluvastatin, cerivastatin and pravastatin.

CONCLUSION

Both lipophilic and hydrophilic statins contribute to the prevention of liver cancer. Moreover, the efficacy was influenced by the region and the specific type of statins used.

Risk of dyslipidemia in chronic hepatitis B patients taking tenofovir alafenamide: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to demonstrate how tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and other hepatitis B treatment drugs differentially impact lipid profiles in chronic hepatitis B patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies on the changes in cholesterol level in hepatitis B patients who underwent TAF therapy. The changes in lipid profiles (e.g., HDL-c, LDL-c, total cholesterol [TC], and triglyceride [TG]) were compared between the TAF treatment group and the baseline, other nucleoside analogs (NAs), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-only treatment groups. In addition, risk factors for worsening cholesterol level when treated with TAF were examined.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 6,127 patients were selected. After 6 months of TAF treatment, LDL-c, TC, and TG were increased by 5.69 mg/dL, 7.89 mg/dL, and 9.25 mg/dL, respectively, from the baseline level. In particular, with the treatment of TAF, levels of LDL, TC, and TG rose by 8.71 mg/dL, 18.34 mg/dL, and 13.68 mg/dL, respectively, showing a greater deterioration of cholesterol when the TAF treatment was implemented compared to other NAs (e.g., TDF or entecavir). When TAF was compared to TDF, LDL-c, TC, and TG worsened with a mean difference of 14.52 mg/dL, 23.72 mg/dL, and 14.25 mg/dL, respectively. As a result of a meta-regression analysis, risk factors for worsening lipid profiles were found to be treatment-experienced, previous diabetes, and hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

TAF continues to worsen lipid profiles including LDL-c, TC, and TG after 6 months of use compared to the other NAs.

Statin and aspirin use in parasitic infections as a potential therapeutic strategy: A narrative review

Infections, including zoonoses, constitute a threat to human health due to the spread of resistant pathogens. These diseases generate an inflammatory response controlled by a resolving mechanism involving specialized membrane lipid-derived molecules called lipoxins, resolvins, maresins, and protectins. The production of some of these molecules can be triggered by aspirin or statins. Thus, it is proposed that modulation of the host response could be a useful therapeutic strategy, contributing to the management of resistance to antiparasitic agents or preventing drift to chronic, host-damaging courses. Therefore, the present work presents the state of the art on the use of statins or aspirin for the experimental management of parasitic infections such as Chagas disease, leishmaniasis, toxoplasmosis or malaria. The methodology used was a narrative review covering original articles from the last seven years, 38 of which met the inclusion criteria. Based on the publications consulted, modulation of the resolution of inflammation using statins may be feasible as an adjuvant in the therapy of parasitic diseases. However, there was no strong experimental evidence on the use of aspirin; therefore, further studies are needed to evaluate its role inflammation resolution process in infectious diseases.

Statin Utilization Among Individuals Infected With Hepatitis C Virus: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction and Objectives Statin use for primary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) has historically been limited in patients with chronic liver disease due to concerns for increased adverse events with statin use in this population. We aimed to quantify the underutilization of statins among individuals with a history of HCV infection in a community health system to understand the clinical implications of statin underutilization in a diverse, generalizable population of patients infected with HCV. Materials and Methods We performed a single-center retrospective study of individuals with a history of HCV infection aged 40-75 years from 2019-2021. Statin eligibility was determined using the 2019 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines with the 2013 Pooled Cohort Equation used to determine atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Baseline characteristics and adverse events of statin and non-statin users were compared, and factors associated with statin use were determined using multivariable logistical regression. Results Based on 2019 ACC/AHA guidelines, 752/1,077 (69.8%) subjects had an indication for a statin, 280/752 (37.2%) of which were treated with a statin. Cirrhosis was independently associated with statin underutilization. Diabetes, anti-hypertensive use, and Black race were all independently associated with statin use in subjects with an indication for therapy. Statin use was not associated with adverse events. Conclusions Statins were underutilized and well tolerated in the cohort of individuals with a history of HCV infection. This high-risk population would benefit from increased CAD screening and utilization of statins for the primary prevention of CAD.

Prospects for the use of statins in antiviral therapy

Inhibitors of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase, in addition to suppressing cholesterol synthesis, have an antiviral effect. Clinical studies have shown antiviral efficacy of statins against COVID-19, HCV, HBV, RSV, HIV, influenza viruses. The ability of statins to inhibit influenza viruses, COVID-19, RSV, HIV, as well as Ebola, Zika, Dengue, Coxsackie, rotaviruses, ADV, HDV, HHV was experimentally confirmed. Statins can also enhance the effects of antiviral drugs, making them more effective in treating infections. Therefore, the use of statins in the complex therapy of viral infections is promising. In addition, the role of influenza viruses, T-cell leukemia and herpesviruses, HIV, HBV, HCV, HPV in the development of atherosclerosis has been identified, so the use of statins in complex treatment is also necessary to correct endothelial dysfunction that occurs under the influence of viruses. Since the activity of retroelements that are evolutionarily related to exogenous viruses increases with aging, it has been suggested that retrotransposons can also be targets for statins. This is evidenced by a change in the expression of non-coding RNAs under the action of statins, since the key sources of non-coding RNAs are retroelements. This property may be an additional factor in the prescription of statins to increase life expectancy, in addition to the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis, since pathological activation of retroelements are the causes of aging. Viruses, like retroelements, are involved in the pathogenesis of malignant neoplasms, in the treatment of which statins have shown their effectiveness and the ability to enhance the effect of anticancer drugs, overcoming chemoresistance (similar to the potentiation of antiviral drugs). One of the mechanisms of this activity of statins may be their effect on retroelements and viruses.

Antitumor Effects and Mechanisms of Metabolic Syndrome Medications on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Liver cancer has a high incidence and mortality rate worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being the most common histological type. With the decrease in the number of newly infected patients and the spread of antiviral therapy, hepatitis virus-negative chronic liver diseases including steatohepatitis are increasingly accounting for a large proportion of HCC, and an important clinical characteristic is the high prevalence of metabolic syndrome including hypertension, type 2 diabetes (T2D), dyslipidemia, and obesity. Since patients with steatohepatitis are less likely to undergo surveillance for early detection of HCC, they may be diagnosed at an advanced stage and have worse prognosis. Therefore, treatment strategies for patients with HCC caused by steatohepatitis, especially in advanced stages, become increasingly important. Further, hypertension, T2D, and dyslipidemia may occur as side effects during systemic treatment, and there will be increasing opportunities to prescribe metabolic syndrome medications, not only for originally comorbid diseases, but also for adverse events during HCC treatment. Interestingly, epidemiological studies have shown that patients taking some metabolic syndrome medications are less likely to develop various types of cancers, including HCC. Basic studies have also shown that these drugs have direct antitumor effects on HCC. In particular, angiotensin II receptor blockers (a drug group for treating hypertension), biguanides (a drug group for treating T2D), and statins (a drug group for treating dyslipidemia) have shown to elucidate antitumor effects against HCC. In this review, we focus on the antitumor effects of metabolic syndrome medications on HCC and their mechanisms based on recent literature. New therapeutic agents are also increasingly being reported. Analysis of the antitumor effects of metabolic syndrome medications on HCC and their mechanisms will be doubly beneficial for HCC patients with metabolic syndrome, and the use of these medications may be a potential strategy against HCC.

Impact of diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidemia on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver diseases

Despite the increasing prevalence of metabolic disorders, the potential effects of metabolic factors on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in individuals with chronic liver diseases (CLDs) are not well understood. For a metabolic factor to be identified as a risk factor for HCC in patients with CLDs, such as hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, there should be a strong synergistic interaction between the carcinogenic mechanisms of the metabolic factor and the CLD itself. This review aims to comprehensively summarize the published data on the relationship between metabolic factors such as diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, and blood lipids and the risk of HCC in patients with CLDs. DM consistently increases the risk of HCC in patients with CLD. When associated with DM, the risk of HCC seems to be highest in HCV and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), followed by alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and HBV. Obesity may increase the risk of HCC. Among CLDs, the evidence is relatively consistent and clear for ALD, while clear evidence is limited in other CLDs including HBV, HCV, and NAFLD. Total cholesterol, potentially low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride, seems to have strong inverse associations with HCC in individuals with CLDs. Despite evidence from observational studies, statins had no effect in preventing HCC in randomized controlled trials. Whether statins have a preventive effect against HCC is unclear. A better understanding and management of metabolic factors may be beneficial to reduce the risk of HCC in patients with CLDs.

Effect of Pravastatin and Simvastatin on the Reduction of Cytochrome C

Statins are used to treat hypercholesterolemia, with several pleiotropic effects. Alongside their positive effects (for example, decreasing blood pressure), they can also bring about negative effects/symptoms (such as myopathy). Their main mechanism of action is inducing apoptosis, the key step being the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria. This can be facilitated by oxidative stress, through which glutathione is oxidized. In this research, glutathione was used as a respiratory substrate to measure the mitochondrial oxygen consumption of rat liver with an O₂ electrode. The reduction of cytochrome c was monitored photometrically. Hydrophilic (pravastatin) and lipophilic (simvastatin) statins were used for the measurements. Pravastatin reduces the reduction of cytochrome c and the oxygen consumption of the mitochondria, while simvastatin, on the other hand, increases the reduction of cytochrome c and the mitochondrial oxygen consumption. The results make it seem probable that statins influence the mitochondrial oxygen consumption through cytochrome c. Simvastatin could enhance the oxidizing capacity of free cytochrome c, thereby increasing oxidative stress and thus facilitating apoptosis. The observed effects could further the understanding of the mechanism of action of statins and thereby aid in constructing optimal statin therapy for every patient.

A Meta-Analysis of Statin Use and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The use of statins is a potential protective factor against the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the contribution of statins to the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

We searched for PubMed and EMBASE through January 2021.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies (eighteen cohort, eleven case-control, and three randomized controlled trials) reporting 56,838 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma in 4,963,518 persons were included. Statin users were less likely to develop hepatocellular carcinoma than nonusers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.58; 95% CI: 0.51-0.67). Stratified analysis showed that statins reduced the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in Asian and Western populations (odds ratio, 0.54 vs. 0.60). Besides, statins have protective effects against hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatitis B virus (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% CI: 0.22-0.85) and hepatitis C virus infections (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.49-0.57). Statins have protective effects on people with chronic liver disease (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI: 0.40-0.68) and on the general population (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI: 0.50-0.72). Lipophilic statins can prevent hepatocellular carcinoma (odds ratio, 0.51, 95% CI: 0.46-0.57), while hydrophilic statins cannot (odds ratio, 0.77, 95% CI: 0.58-1.02). The single-drug analyses showed that simvastatin (odds ratio, 0.53, 95% CI: 0.48-0.59), atorvastatin (odds ratio, 0.54, 95% CI: 0.45-0.64), rosuvastatin (odds ratio, 0.55, 95% CI: 0.37-0.83), lovastatin (odds ratio, 0.30, 95% CI: 0.15-0.62), and pitavastatin (odds ratio, 0.36, 95% CI: 0.17-0.75) had significant benefits. Further studies have shown that those in the high-dose group experienced better effects in preventing hepatocellular carcinoma (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.38 vs. 0.55). Further research found that the combined use of aspirin did not increase the chemoprevention effect of liver cancer (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% CI: 0.40-0.81). In addition, the preventive effect of statins improved with the extension of follow-up time (odds ratio, 0.54 vs. 0.65).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis shows that the use of statins is associated with a lower risk of liver cancer.

Statin and aspirin for chemoprevention of hepatocellular carcinoma: Time to use or wait further?

Preclinical studies highlighted potential therapeutic applications of aspirin and statins as anticancer agents based on their pleiotropic effects. Epidemiologic studies suggested the role of aspirin and statins in the chemoprevention of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, observational data is prone to bias, and no prospective randomized trials are currently available to assess the risks and benefits of statin or aspirin therapy for chemoprevention of HCC. It is therefore important for clinicians and researchers to be aware of the quality of current evidence regarding this issue. In this review, we summarize currently available evidence to assist clinicians with their decision to use statin or aspirin and provide information for further clinical investigations.

Statins Show Promise Against Progression of Liver Disease

Content available: Audio Recording.

Statins and Liver Cancer in Cirrhosis: The Most Relevant Questions Are Still Unanswered

Several observational studies have shown an association between statin use and lower incidence of liver cancer. However, several potential biases limit a causal interpretation that could lead to a recommendation of statin prescription to patients with cirrhosis in the absence of a cardiovascular indication. Ongoing randomized trials will soon provide a clearer picture on the efficacy and safety of statins for preventing liver cancer and other complications of cirrhosis.

Time-dependent propensity-matched general population study of the effects of statin use on cancer risk in an interstitial lung disease and pulmonary fibrosis cohort

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of statins on risk of cancer in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary fibrosis.

SETTING

We retrospectively enrolled patients with ILD and pulmonary fibrosis and divided them into two cohorts by statin use (statin users (n=10 036) and statin non-users (n=10 036)).

PARTICIPANTS

We selected patients with ILD and pulmonary fibrosis (N=53 862) from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Time-dependent Cox models were used to compare risk of cancer of propensity-matched statin users and non-users. Cumulative cancer incidence was analysed through Cox proportional regression. We calculated adjusted HRs (aHRs) and their 95% CIs for cancer after adjusting for sex, age, comorbidities, and use of inhaled corticosteroids, oral steroids and statins.

RESULTS

Compared with statin non-users, the aHRs (95% CIs) for statin users were 0.60 (0.55 to 0.65) for cancer, 0.52 (0.35 to 0.78) for haematological malignancy, 0.52 (0.38 to 0.72) for cancer of the head and neck, 0.73 (0.59 to 0.89) for colorectal cancer, 0.34 (0.26 to 0.43) for liver cancer, 0.39 (0.23 to 0.67) for pancreatic cancer, 0.40 (0.17 to 0.96) for skin cancer, 0.67 (0.52 to 0.87) for breast cancer, 0.27 (0.14 to 0.54) for cervical cancer, 0.37 (0.30 to 0.46) for other immunological cancers, 0.73 (0.54 to 0.98) for bladder/kidney cancer and 0.88 (0.71 to 1.09) for lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

Statin use is associated with lower risk of cancer in the ILD and pulmonary fibrosis cohort.

Efficacy and Safety of Statin for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prevention Among Chronic Liver Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a deadly complication among patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Controversies on the efficacy and safety of statin to prevent HCC among patients with CLD remain despite the growing evidences. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of using statin for HCC prevention among adult with CLD.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of 4 electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrial.gov) up to April 15, 2020. We selected all types of studies evaluating the statin use and the risk of HCC among CLD patients, regardless of language, region, publication date, or status. The primary endpoint was the pooled risk of HCC. The secondary endpoint was the risk of statin-associated myopathy.

RESULT

From 583 citations, we included a total of 13 studies (1,742,260 subjects, 7 types of statins), fulfilling the inclusion criteria, evaluating efficacy and safety of statin in CLD patients for HCC prevention. All studies were observational (2 nested case-control studies, 11 cohort studies), and no randomised trial was identified. We found that statin user has a lower pooled risk of HCC development (hazard ratio=0.57, 95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.62, I2=42%). HCC reduction was consistent among statin users in cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus infections. The risk of statin-associated myopathy was similar between statin user and nonuser (hazard ratio=1.07, 95% confidence interval=0.91-1.27).

CONCLUSION

Statin use was safe and associated with a lower pooled risk of HCC development among adults with CLD. Given the bias with observation studies, prospective randomised trial is needed to confirm this finding.

Abnormal Metabolism in the Progression of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Mechanistic Insights to Chemoprevention

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is on the rise and becoming a major contributor to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Reasons for this include the rise in obesity and metabolic syndrome in contrast to the marked advances in prevention and treatment strategies of viral HCC. These shifts are expected to rapidly propel this trend even further in the coming decades, with NAFLD on course to become the leading etiology of end-stage liver disease and HCC. No Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications are currently available for the treatment of NAFLD, and advances are desperately needed. Numerous medications with varying mechanisms of action targeting liver steatosis and fibrosis are being investigated including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists and farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists. Additionally, drugs targeting components of metabolic syndrome, such as antihyperglycemics, have been found to affect NAFLD progression and are now being considered in the treatment of these patients. As NAFLD drug discovery continues, special attention should be given to their relationship to HCC. Several mechanisms in the pathogenesis of NAFLD have been implicated in hepatocarcinogenesis, and therapies aimed at NAFLD may additionally harbor independent antitumorigenic potential. This approach may provide novel prevention and treatment strategies.

A systematic review on pharmacokinetics, cardiovascular outcomes and safety profiles of statins in cirrhosis

Background/Aims

There is increased interest in the therapeutic use of statins in cirrhosis, but preferred statin and safety outcomes are still not well known. In this systematic review we aimed to address pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and effects on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes of statins in cirrhosis.

Methods

Our systematic search in several electronic databases and repositories of two regulatory bodies up to 2020-06-11 yielded 22 articles and 2 drug monographs with relevant data.

Results

Rosuvastatin and pitavastatin showed minimal PK changes in Child–Pugh A cirrhosis. Only rosuvastatin was assessed in a repeated dosing PK study. Atorvastatin showed pronounced PK changes in cirrhosis. No PK data was found for simvastatin, the most commonly used statin in cirrhosis trials. There was insufficient data to assess CV effects of statins in cirrhosis. Clinical trials in cirrhosis were limited to simvastatin, atorvastatin, and pravastatin. In patients taking simvastatin 40 mg, pooled frequency of rhabdomyolysis was 2%, an incidence 40-fold higher than that reported in non-cirrhosis patients, while this was no rhabdomyolysis observed in patients on simvastatin 20 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg, or pravastatin 40 mg. Drug-induced liver injury was of difficult interpretation due to co-existence of muscle damage. No overt liver failure was reported.

Conclusions

Simvastatin 40 mg should be avoided in decompensated cirrhosis. Safety data on simvastatin 20 mg or other statins are based on small study sample size. This rarity of evidence combined with lack of data in dose adjustment methods in cirrhosis is a barrier for using statins for CV indications or for investigational use for liver indications.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-01704-w.

EFFECT oF STATIN THERAPY oN SARS-CoV-2 INFECTION-RELATED

Aim

Assessing the effect of statin therapy at hospital admission for COVID-19 on in-hospital mortality.

Methods and Results

Retrospective observational study. Patients taking statins were 11 years older and had significantly more comorbidities than patients who were not taking statins. A genetic matching (GM) procedure was performed prior to analysis of the mortality risk. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for the cause-specific hazard (CSH) function, and a competing-risks Fine and Gray (FG) model was also used to study the direct effects of statins on risk.

Data from reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction-confirmed 2157 SARS-CoV-2-infected patients (1234 men, 923 women; age: 67 y/o (IQR 54-78)) admitted to the hospital were retrieved from the clinical records in anonymized manner. 353 deaths occurred. 581 patients were taking statins. Univariate test after GM showed a significantly lower mortality rate in patients on statin therapy than the matched non-statin group (19.8% vs. 25.4%, χ² with Yates continuity correction: p = 0.027). The mortality rate was even lower in patients (n = 336) who maintained their statin treatments during hospitalization compared to the GM non-statin group (17.4%; p = 0.045). The Cox model applied to the CSH function (HR = 0.58(CI: 0.39-0.89); p = 0.01) and the competing risks FG model (HR = 0.60(CI: 0.39-0.92); p = 0.02) suggest that statins are associated with reduced COVID-19-related mortality.

Conclusions

A lower SARS-CoV-2 infection-related mortality was observed in patients treated with statin therapy prior to hospitalization. Statin therapy should not be discontinued due to the global concern of the pandemic or in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.