1
|
Jin H, Kolawole O, Wang Z. Cost-effectiveness analysis of physical activity interventions for people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 2023; 223:362-376. [PMID: 37526007 PMCID: PMC10405045 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2023.52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical guidelines recommend providing physical activity interventions (PAIs) to people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder for weight management. However, the cost-effectiveness of PAIs is unknown. AIMS To evaluate the availability and methodological quality of economic evaluations of PAIs for people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. METHOD Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo and Scopus) were searched on 5 July 2022. Based on the retrieved studies, forward and backward citation searches were conducted. Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion. Study quality was assessed using the Drummond checklist. Review results were presented using narrative synthesis. RESULTS Fourteen articles reporting nine studies were included. All included studies assessed PAIs within a multicomponent lifestyle intervention. Mixed findings were reported on the cost-effectiveness of multicomponent lifestyle intervention: three studies reported it as cost-effective; four studies reported it as not cost-effective; and two studies did not conclude whether it was cost-effective or not. Very limited evidence suggests that certain patient subgroups might be more likely to benefit from multicomponent lifestyle interventions with a PAI component: men; individuals with comorbid type 2 diabetes; and individuals who have been psychiatric hospital in-patients for ≥1 year. The quality of included studies ranged from moderate to high. CONCLUSIONS The current economic evidence suggests that not all modalities of multicomponent lifestyle intervention including a PAI component are cost-effective for people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder; and not all people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder would benefit equally from the intervention. Future research is urgently needed to identify the cost-effective modality of PAI for different patient subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huajie Jin
- King's Health Economics (KHE), Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Oluwafunso Kolawole
- King's Health Economics (KHE), Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Zhengwei Wang
- King's Health Economics (KHE), Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jalali A, Tamimi RM, McPherson SM, Murphy SM. Econometric Issues in Prospective Economic Evaluations Alongside Clinical Trials: Combining the Nonparametric Bootstrap With Methods That Address Missing Data. Epidemiol Rev 2022; 44:67-77. [PMID: 36104860 PMCID: PMC10362933 DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxac006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Prospective economic evaluations conducted alongside clinical trials have become an increasingly popular approach in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a public health initiative or treatment intervention. These types of economic studies provide improved internal validity and accuracy of cost and effectiveness estimates of health interventions and, compared with simulation or decision-analytic models, have the advantage of jointly observing health and economics outcomes of trial participants. However, missing data due to incomplete response or patient attrition, and sampling uncertainty are common concerns in econometric analysis of clinical trials. Missing data are a particular problem for comparative effectiveness trials of substance use disorder interventions. Multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting are 2 widely recommended methods to address missing data bias, and the nonparametric bootstrap is recommended to address uncertainty in predicted mean cost and effectiveness between trial interventions. Although these methods have been studied extensively by themselves, little is known about how to appropriately combine them and about the potential pitfalls and advantages of different approaches. We provide a review of statistical methods used in 29 economic evaluations of substance use disorder intervention identified from 4 published systematic reviews and a targeted search of the literature. We evaluate how each study addressed missing data bias, whether the recommended nonparametric bootstrap was used, how these 2 methods were combined, and conclude with recommendations for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Jalali
- Correspondence to Dr. Ali Jalali, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 425 East 61st Street, Suite 301, New York, NY 10065 (e-mail: )
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Archie S, Palaniyappan L, Olagunju AT, Johnson N, Kozloff N, Sadeh E, Bardell A, Baines A, Anderson KK, Ayonrinde O, Ferrari M. Insights about Cannabis and Psychosis Using Video Games for Young People with a First Episode of Psychosis, particularly those from Black Racialized Backgrounds: Study Design. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e36758. [PMID: 35389874 PMCID: PMC9166641 DOI: 10.2196/36758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cannabis use disorder among young people with a first episode of psychosis contributes to relapse, hospitalization, and impaired functioning. However, few studies have examined what young people with early phase psychosis, particularly those from Black racialized communities, understand or appreciate about this relationship, even though they may be at risk. There are no formally tested knowledge translation strategies that disseminate these research findings for young people with emerging psychosis from Black racialized communities. Objective This study aims to conceptualize what young people with early phase psychosis/cannabis use disorder understand about the relationship between cannabis and psychosis, focusing on people from racialized backgrounds. This study also aims to assess whether the knowledge translation product, the “Back to Reality Series,” increases awareness of the impact of cannabis use on psychosis from the perspectives of young people with emerging psychosis and cannabis use disorder from Black African and Caribbean communities. Methods Qualitative analysis will reveal themes from qualitative interviews about cannabis and psychosis from the perspectives of young people with emerging psychosis and cannabis use disorder from Black African and Caribbean communities. Perceptions before and after exposure to the Back to Reality Series will be qualitatively analyzed. A control game will be used for comparison, and scores on a quiz after playing the Back to Reality Series will be quantitatively analyzed to establish whether the Back to Reality Series raises awareness of the effects of cannabis on psychosis. An advisory council involving young people from Black communities, family members, and clinicians will bring community perspectives to this research. Results We began recruiting participants for this study in September 2021. We will complete data collection on demographic and clinical factors, qualitative interviews, and quantitative assessments of the Back to Reality Series. Conclusions The voices of young people from racialized backgrounds will generate preliminary data to inform early psychosis programs, addressing cannabis use in this population. The findings may advance the use of a new knowledge translation product that deals with gaps in knowledge about cannabis use for people experiencing early phase psychosis, particularly those from racialized communities. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/36758
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lena Palaniyappan
- Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, CA.,Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, CA.,Lawson Health Research Institute, London, CA
| | - Andrew T Olagunju
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, CA.,Discipline of Psychiatry, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, AU
| | | | - Nicole Kozloff
- Slaight Family Centre for Youth in Transition, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, CA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, CA
| | - Elham Sadeh
- On Track, Champlain District Regional First Episode Psychosis Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, CA
| | - Andrea Bardell
- On Track, Champlain District Regional First Episode Psychosis Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, CA.,Canadian Consortium for Early Psychosis Intervention, Ottawa, CA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CA.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, CA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CA
| | - Alexandra Baines
- On Track, Champlain District Regional First Episode Psychosis Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, CA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CA.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, CA.,Integrated Schizophrenia and Recovery Program, The Royal Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, CA
| | - Kelly K Anderson
- Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martens N, Destoop M, Dom G. Organization of Community Mental Health Services for Persons with a Severe Mental Illness and Comorbid Somatic Conditions: A Systematic Review on Somatic Outcomes and Health Related Quality of Life. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:E462. [PMID: 33435525 PMCID: PMC7826863 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
It is well established that persons with a severe mental illness (SMI) have a greater risk of physical comorbid conditions and premature mortality. Most studies in the field of community mental health care (CMHC) have only focused on improving cardiovascular health in people with a SMI using lifestyle approaches. Studies using organizational modifications are rather scarce. This systematic review aimed to synthesize and describe possible organizational strategies to improve physical health for persons with a SMI in CMHC. The primary outcome was Health-related Quality of Life (HR-QOL). Results suggested modest effects on quality of life and were inconsistent throughout all the included studies. Despite these findings, it appears that a more integrated approach had a positive effect on health outcomes, patient satisfaction and HR-QOL. The complexity of the processes involved in community care delivery makes it difficult to compare different models and organizational approaches. Mental health nurses were identified as possible key professionals in care organization, but no clear description of their role was found. This review could provide new insights into contributing factors for integrated care. Future research targeting the identification of the nurses' role and facilitating factors in integrated care, in order to improve treatment and follow-up of somatic comorbidities, is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolaas Martens
- Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Antwerp University, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium; (M.D.); (G.D.)
- Multiversum Mental Health Services, B-2530 Boechout, Belgium
- Department of Health and Welfare, Karel De Grote University College, B-2018 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marianne Destoop
- Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Antwerp University, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium; (M.D.); (G.D.)
- Multiversum Mental Health Services, B-2530 Boechout, Belgium
| | - Geert Dom
- Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Antwerp University, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium; (M.D.); (G.D.)
- Multiversum Mental Health Services, B-2530 Boechout, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Smith J, Griffiths LA, Band M, Hird-Smith R, Williams B, Bold J, Bradley E, Dilworth R, Horne D. Early Intervention in Psychosis: Effectiveness and Implementation of a Combined Exercise and Health Behavior Intervention Within Routine Care. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11:577691. [PMID: 33193094 PMCID: PMC7649318 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.577691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim Young people with psychosis have higher rates of obesity, premature cardiovascular disease, and death compared to non-psychotic peers in the general population due to changes in metabolic regulation linked to antipsychotic medication and adverse health risk behaviors. The aim of this paper is to outline the development, implementation, and evaluation of a combined 12-week exercise and health behavior intervention delivered as part of an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) routine service, within the UK. Methods Participants (n = 27) completed a 12-week combined intervention program, engaging in weekly, 90-min sessions comprising a healthy behavior education session (45 min), followed by a facilitated exercise session (45 min). Anthropometric data from participants (n = 26) were collected at baseline, 12 weeks, and 12 months post-intervention. Health behaviors and clinical measurements were assessed at baseline and 12 months. Results Mean baseline data suggests participants were at an increased health risk on entry to the program, with elevated values in mean body mass index (BMI; 70% overweight/obese), waist circumference, resting heart rate, and triglycerides. Fifty percent reported smoking daily, 64% ate < 5 fruits/vegetables per day, and 52% of participants were prescribed highly obesogenic antipsychotic medications (i.e., Olanzapine). At 12 weeks and 12 months, no changes were observed in mean BMI, waist circumference or any other clinical variable (p > 0.05). At 12 months, participants reported a positive impact on health behaviors including improved diet, increased physical activity levels, and cessation of substance use (n = 2), alcohol use (n = 2), and smoking (n = 4). Focus groups captured participant experiences, engagement with and satisfaction with the program, including challenges/barriers to program adherence. Conclusions The 12-week exercise and health behaviors program supported participants to attenuate their physical health risk which was sustained at 12-month follow-up. Self-reported positive health behavior changes are likely to have contributed to the prevention of excessive weight gain in this high-risk period. The evaluation was designed to have validity for a "real world EIP setting" and reflect the complexity of delivery to this participant group. Evaluation findings influenced subsequent commissioning of the physical health intervention as an ongoing element of routine EIP care within the participant site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Smith
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa A. Griffiths
- Department of Nutrition, Food and Exercise Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States
| | - Marie Band
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachael Hird-Smith
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, United Kingdom
| | - Briony Williams
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, United Kingdom
| | - Justine Bold
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, United Kingdom
- Centre for Medical Education, Medical School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Eleanor Bradley
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Dilworth
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, United Kingdom
| | - Dominic Horne
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aceituno D, Pennington M, Iruretagoyena B, Prina AM, McCrone P. Health State Utility Values in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:1256-1267. [PMID: 32940244 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient preferences are increasingly important in informing clinical and policy decisions. Health-state utility values (HSUVs) are quantitative measures of people's preferences over different health states. In schizophrenia, there is no clarity about HSUVs across the symptoms' severity spectrum. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize the literature on HSUVs in people with schizophrenia. METHODS We searched Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, EconLit, The Cochrane Library, and specialized databases. The studies reporting HSUVs in people with schizophrenia were selected and pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the mean HSUV obtained from participants. RESULTS A total of 54 studies involving 87 335 participants were included. The pooled estimate using direct elicitation was a mean HSUV of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70-0.88) for mild symptomatic states, 0.69 (95% CI: 0.54-0.85) in moderate states, and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.13-0.56) in severe states. Studies using indirect techniques resulted in a pooled mean HSUV of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.78) applying the EuroQol 5-dimension, 0.66 (95% CI: 0.62-0.71) in the Short-Form 6-dimension, and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.57-0.61) using the Quality of Well-Being scale. All the estimates resulted in considerable heterogeneity, partially reduced by meta-regression. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that the severity of psychotic symptoms has an important effect on HSUVs in schizophrenia, with values mirroring patients with disabling physical conditions such as cancer and stroke. Decision makers should be aware of these results when including people's preferences in trials, models, and policy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Aceituno
- Health Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience. King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
| | - Mark Pennington
- Health Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience. King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Barbara Iruretagoyena
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Early Intervention Program, J. Horwitz Psychiatric Institute, Santiago, Chile
| | - A Matthew Prina
- Health Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience. King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul McCrone
- Healthcare Economics, Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gaughran F, Stahl D, Patel A, Ismail K, Smith S, Greenwood K, Atakan Z, Gardner-Sood P, Stringer D, Hopkins D, Lally J, Forti MD, Stubbs B, Lowe P, Arbuthnott M, Heslin M, David AS, Murray RM. A health promotion intervention to improve lifestyle choices and
health outcomes in people with psychosis: a research programme including the
IMPaCT RCT. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar08010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Background
People with psychotic disorders have reduced life expectancy largely because
of physical health problems, especially cardiovascular disease, that are
complicated by the use of tobacco and cannabis.
Objectives
We set out to (1) chart lifestyle and substance use choices and the emergence
of cardiometabolic risk from the earliest presentation with psychosis, (2)
develop a pragmatic health promotion intervention integrated within the
clinical teams to improve the lifestyle choices and health outcomes of
people with psychosis and (3) evaluate the clinical effectiveness and
cost-effectiveness of that health promotion intervention.
Design
We performed a longitudinal cohort study of people presenting with their
first episode of psychosis in three mental health trusts and followed up
participants for 1 year [work package 1, physical health and substance use
measures in first episode of psychosis (PUMP)]. We used an iterative Delphi
methodology to develop and refine a modular health promotion intervention,
improving physical health and reducing substance use in psychosis (IMPaCT)
therapy, which was to be delivered by the patient’s usual care
co-ordinator and used motivational interviewing techniques and
cognitive–behavioural therapy to improve health choices of people
with psychosis (work package 2). We then conducted a multicentre, two-arm,
parallel-cluster, randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical
effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using the intervention with people
with established psychosis (work package 3: IMPaCT randomised controlled
trial) in five UK mental health trusts. The work took place between 2008 and
2014.
Participants
All people aged between 16 and 65 years within 6 months of their first
presentation with a non-organic psychosis and who were proficient in English
were eligible for inclusion in the PUMP study. Participants in the work
package 2 training development were staff selected from a range of settings,
working with psychosis. Participants in the phase 3 Delphi consensus and
manual development comprised three expert groups of (1)
therapists/researchers recruited from the local and national community, (2)
clinicians and (3) service users, each of whom took part in two iterative
review and feedback sessions. For work package 3, IMPaCT randomised
controlled trial, care co-ordinators in participating community mental
health teams who were permanently employed and had a minimum of four
eligible patients (i.e. aged between 18 and 65 years with a diagnosis of a
psychotic disorder) on their caseload were eligible to participate. In
studies 1 and 3, patient participants were ineligible if they were pregnant
or had a major illness that would have had an impact on their metabolic
status or if they had a significant learning disability. All participants
were included in the study only after giving written confirmed consent.
Main outcome measures
Cardiometabolic risk markers, including rates of obesity and central obesity,
and levels of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and lipids, were the
main outcomes in work package 1 (PUMP), with descriptive data presented on
substance use. Our primary outcome measure for the IMPaCT randomised
controlled trial was the physical or mental health component Short Form
questionnaire-36 items quality-of-life scores at 12 months.
Results
Obesity rates rose from 18% at first presentation with psychosis to 24% by 1
year, but cardiometabolic risk was not associated with baseline lifestyle
and substance use choices. Patterns of increase in the levels of
HbA1c over the year following first presentation showed
variation by ethnic group. We recruited 104 care co-ordinators, of whom 52
(with 213 patients) were randomised to deliver IMPaCT therapy and 52 (with
193 patients) were randomised to deliver treatment as usual, in keeping with
our power calculations. Of these 406 participants with established
psychosis, 318 (78%) and 301 (74%) participants, respectively, attended the
12- and 15-month follow-ups. We found no significant effect of IMPaCT
therapy compared with treatment as usual on the physical or mental health
component Short Form questionnaire-36 items scores at either time point in
an intention-to-treat analysis [physical health score (‘d’)
–0.17 at 12 months and –0.09 at 15 months; mental health score
(‘d’) 0.03 at 12 months and –0.05 at 15 months] or on
costs. Nor did we find an effect on other cardiovascular risk indicators,
including diabetes, except in the case of high-density lipoprotein
cholesterol, which showed a trend for greater benefit with IMPaCT therapy
than with treatment as usual (treatment effect 0.085, 95% confidence
interval 0.007 to 0.16; p = 0.034).
Limitations
Follow-up in work package 1 was challenging, with 127 out of 293 participants
attending; however, there was no difference in cardiometabolic measures or
demographic factors at baseline between those who attended for follow-up and
those who did not. In work package 3, the IMPaCT randomised controlled
trial, care co-ordinators struggled to provide additional time to their
patients that was devoted to the health promotion intervention on top of
their usual clinical care contact with them.
Conclusions
Cardiometabolic risk is prominent even soon after first presentation with
psychosis and increases over time. Lifestyle choices and substance use
habits at first presentation do not predict those who will be most
cardiometabolically compromised 1 year later. Training and supervising care
co-ordinators to deliver a health promotion intervention to their own
patients on top of routine care is not effective in the NHS for improving
quality of life or reducing cardiometabolic risk.
Future work
Further work is needed to develop and evaluate effective, cost-effective and
affordable ways of preventing the emergence of and reversing existing
cardiometabolic risk indicators in people with psychosis.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN58667926.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in
full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 8, No.
1. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project
information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Gaughran
- National Psychosis Service, South London and Maudsley NHS
Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry,
Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College
London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Stahl
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute
of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College
London, London, UK
| | - Anita Patel
- Anita Patel Health Economics Consulting Ltd, London, UK
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute,
Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Khalida Ismail
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry,
Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College
London, London, UK
| | - Shubulade Smith
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Science,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s
College London, London, UK
- Forensic Services, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation
Trust, London, UK
| | - Kathryn Greenwood
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Zerrin Atakan
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry,
Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College
London, London, UK
| | - Poonam Gardner-Sood
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry,
Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College
London, London, UK
| | - Dominic Stringer
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute
of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College
London, London, UK
| | - David Hopkins
- Institute of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Obesity, King’s
Health Partners, London, UK
| | - John Lally
- National Psychosis Service, South London and Maudsley NHS
Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry,
Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College
London, London, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland,
Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Marta Di Forti
- Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s
College, London, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical
Neuroscience (BIONEC), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Brendon Stubbs
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry,
Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College
London, London, UK
- Physiotherapy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS
Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Margaret Heslin
- King’s Health Economics, Health Service & Population
Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology &
Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Anthony S David
- Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University
College London, London, UK
| | - Robin M Murray
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry,
Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College
London, London, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical
Neuroscience (BIONEC), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Looijmans A, Jörg F, Bruggeman R, Schoevers RA, Corpeleijn E, Feenstra TL, van Asselt ADIT. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of a lifestyle intervention to improve cardiometabolic health in patients with severe mental illness. GLOBAL & REGIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2020; 7:131-138. [PMID: 36627968 PMCID: PMC9677596 DOI: 10.33393/grhta.2020.2027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study assessed the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of a lifestyle intervention to improve cardiometabolic health in severe mentally ill (SMI) patients in the LION trial. Methods Patients (n = 244) were randomized to receive either care-as-usual or a lifestyle intervention in which mental health nurses coached patients in changing their lifestyle by using a web tool. Costs and quality of life were assessed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Incremental costs per centimeter waist circumference (WC) lost and per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained were assessed. Budget impact was estimated based on three intervention-uptake scenarios using a societal and a third-party payer perspective. Results Costs and reduction in WC were higher in the intervention (n = 114) than in the control (n = 94) group after 12 months, although not statistically significant, resulting in €1,370 per cm WC lost. QALYs did not differ between the groups, resulting in a low probability of the intervention being cost-effective in cost/QALY gained. The budget impact analysis showed that for a reasonable participation of 43%, total costs were around €81 million over 5 years, or on average €16 million annually (societal perspective). Conclusions The intervention is not cost-effective at 12 months and the budget impact over 5 years is substantial. Possibly, 12 months was too short to implement the intervention, improve cardiometabolic health, and reduce care costs. Therefore, the incentive for this intervention cannot be found in short-term financial advantages. However, there may be benefits associated with lifestyle interventions in the long term that remain unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Looijmans
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen - The Netherlands
- Rob Giel Research Centre, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen - The Netherlands
| | - Frederike Jörg
- Rob Giel Research Centre, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen - The Netherlands
- Research Department, Friesland Mental Health Services, Leeuwarden - The Netherlands
| | - Richard Bruggeman
- Rob Giel Research Centre, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen - The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen - The Netherlands
| | - Robert A Schoevers
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen - The Netherlands
| | - Eva Corpeleijn
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen - The Netherlands
| | - Talitha L Feenstra
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen - The Netherlands
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven - The Netherlands
| | - A D I Thea van Asselt
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen - The Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen - The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Holt RIG, Gossage-Worrall R, Hind D, Bradburn MJ, McCrone P, Morris T, Edwardson C, Barnard K, Carey ME, Davies MJ, Dickens CM, Doherty Y, Etherington A, French P, Gaughran F, Greenwood KE, Kalidindi S, Khunti K, Laugharne R, Pendlebury J, Rathod S, Saxon D, Shiers D, Siddiqi N, Swaby EA, Waller G, Wright S. Structured lifestyle education for people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and first-episode psychosis (STEPWISE): randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2019; 214:63-73. [PMID: 30251622 PMCID: PMC6330076 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2018.167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2018] [Revised: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is a major challenge for people with schizophrenia.AimsWe assessed whether STEPWISE, a theory-based, group structured lifestyle education programme could support weight reduction in people with schizophrenia. METHOD In this randomised controlled trial (study registration: ISRCTN19447796), we recruited adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or first-episode psychosis from ten mental health organisations in England. Participants were randomly allocated to the STEPWISE intervention or treatment as usual. The 12-month intervention comprised four 2.5 h weekly group sessions, followed by 2-weekly maintenance contact and group sessions at 4, 7 and 10 months. The primary outcome was weight change after 12 months. Key secondary outcomes included diet, physical activity, biomedical measures and patient-related outcome measures. Cost-effectiveness was assessed and a mixed-methods process evaluation was included. RESULTS Between 10 March 2015 and 31 March 2016, we recruited 414 people (intervention 208, usual care 206) with 341 (84.4%) participants completing the trial. At 12 months, weight reduction did not differ between groups (mean difference 0.0 kg, 95% CI -1.6 to 1.7, P = 0.963); physical activity, dietary intake and biochemical measures were unchanged. STEPWISE was well-received by participants and facilitators. The healthcare perspective incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £246 921 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. CONCLUSIONS Participants were successfully recruited and retained, indicating a strong interest in weight interventions; however, the STEPWISE intervention was neither clinically nor cost-effective. Further research is needed to determine how to manage overweight and obesity in people with schizophrenia.Declaration of interestR.I.G.H. received fees for lecturing, consultancy work and attendance at conferences from the following: Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Lundbeck, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Otsuka, Sanofi, Sunovion, Takeda, MSD. M.J.D. reports personal fees from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Servier, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc.; and, grants from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen. K.K. has received fees for consultancy and speaker for Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Servier and Merck Sharp & Dohme. He has received grants in support of investigator and investigator-initiated trials from Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Merck Sharp & Dohme. K.K. has received funds for research, honoraria for speaking at meetings and has served on advisory boards for Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Novo Nordisk. D.Sh. is expert advisor to the NICE Centre for guidelines; board member of the National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH); clinical advisor (paid consultancy basis) to National Clinical Audit of Psychosis (NCAP); views are personal and not those of NICE, NCCMH or NCAP. J.P. received personal fees for involvement in the study from a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) grant. M.E.C. and Y.D. report grants from NIHR Health Technology Assessment, during the conduct of the study; and The Leicester Diabetes Centre, an organisation (employer) jointly hosted by an NHS Hospital Trust and the University of Leicester and who is holder (through the University of Leicester) of the copyright of the STEPWISE programme and of the DESMOND suite of programmes, training and intervention fidelity framework that were used in this study. S.R. has received honorarium from Lundbeck for lecturing. F.G. reports personal fees from Otsuka and Lundbeck, personal fees and non-financial support from Sunovion, outside the submitted work; and has a family member with professional links to Lilly and GSK, including shares. F.G. is in part funded by the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research & Care Funding scheme, by the Maudsley Charity and by the Stanley Medical Research Institute and is supported by the by the Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard I. G. Holt
- Professor in Diabetes and Endocrinology, Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton andHonorary Consultant Physician, Division B, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Rebecca Gossage-Worrall
- Trial Manager (Research Associate), Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- Reader in Complex Interventions and Assistant Director, Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Michael J. Bradburn
- Senior Medical Statistician, Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Paul McCrone
- Professor of Health Economics and Director of King's Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Tiyi Morris
- Research Assistant, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Charlotte Edwardson
- Associate Professor in Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Health, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK
| | - Katharine Barnard
- Health Psychologist and Visiting Professor, Faculty of Health and Social Science, University of Bournemouth, UK
| | - Marian E. Carey
- Director: Structured Education Research Portfolio, Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicesterand Honorary Associate Professor, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK
| | - Melanie J. Davies
- Professor of Diabetes Medicine, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK
| | - Chris M. Dickens
- Professor of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, UK
| | - Yvonne Doherty
- Consultant Clinical Psychologist and Senior Research Associate, Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK
| | | | - Paul French
- Associate Director, Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Fiona Gaughran
- Reader, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London and Consultant Psychiatrist and Director of Research, National Psychosis Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Kathryn E. Greenwood
- Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and Professor in Clinical Psychology, Sussex Psychosis Research Interest Group, School of Psychology, University of Sussex, UK
| | - Sridevi Kalidindi
- Consultant Psychiatrist, Rehabilitation and Recovery, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Senior Clinical Lecturer, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Professor of Primary Care Diabetes and Vascular Medicine, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK
| | - Richard Laugharne
- Consultant Psychiatrist and Honorary Senior Lecturer, Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | - Shanaya Rathod
- Consultant Psychiatrist and Director of Research, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust and Visiting Professor, Faculty of Science, University of Portsmouth, UK
| | - David Saxon
- Research Fellow, Mental Health Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Honorary Research Consultant, Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust andHonorary Reader in Early Psychosis, School of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Clinical Senior Lecturer in Psychiatry, Health Sciences, University of York, Hull York Medical School and Consultant Psychiatrist, Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Elizabeth A. Swaby
- Study Manager, Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Glenn Waller
- Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Stephen Wright
- Lead Consultant, Early Intervention Psychiatry, Tees Esk & Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|