Preclinical evaluation of PSMA expression in response to androgen receptor blockade for theranostics in prostate cancer

JHU-2545 preferentially shields salivary glands and kidneys during PSMA-targeted imaging

PURPOSE

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy is a promising treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Several beta or alpha particle-emitting radionuclide-conjugated small molecules have shown efficacy in late-stage mCRPC and one, [[177Lu]Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, is FDA approved. In addition to tumor upregulation, PSMA is also expressed in kidneys and salivary glands where specific uptake can cause dose-limiting xerostomia and potential for nephrotoxicity. The PSMA inhibitor 2-(phosphonomethyl)pentanedioic acid (2-PMPA) can prevent kidney uptake in mice, but also blocks tumor uptake, precluding its clinical utility. Preferential delivery of 2-PMPA to non-malignant tissues could improve the therapeutic window of PSMA radioligand therapy.

METHODS

A tris(isopropoxycarbonyloxymethyl) (TrisPOC) prodrug of 2-PMPA, JHU-2545, was synthesized to enhance 2-PMPA delivery to non-malignant tissues. Mouse pharmacokinetic experiments were conducted to compare JHU-2545-mediated delivery of 2-PMPA to plasma, kidney, salivary glands, and C4-2 prostate tumor xenograft. Imaging studies were conducted in rats and mice to measure uptake of PSMA PET tracers in kidney, salivary glands, and prostate tumor xenografts with and without JHU-2545 pre-treatment.

RESULTS

JHU-2545 resulted in approximately 3- and 53-fold greater exposure of 2-PMPA in rodent salivary glands (18.0 ± 0.97 h*nmol/g) and kidneys (359 ± 4.16 h*nmol/g) versus prostate tumor xenograft (6.79 ± 0.19 h*nmol/g). JHU-2545 also blocked rodent kidneys and salivary glands uptake of the PSMA PET tracers [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18 F]F-DCFPyL by up to 85% with little effect on tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

JHU-2545 pre-treatment may enable greater cumulative administered doses of PSMA radioligand therapy, possibly improving safety and efficacy.

Exploring the Flare Phenomenon in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Enzalutamide-Induced PSMA Upregulation Observed on PSMA PET

Androgen receptor-targeting agents, particularly enzalutamide, show promise in enhancing prostate cancer diagnostic and therapeutic strategies by modulating prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). Methods: A retrospective clinical cohort study investigated 9 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer on enzalutamide. PSMA PET/CT scans were obtained before and after enzalutamide initiation to assess PSMA expression changes. Lesions and organs at risk were evaluated visually and semiquantitatively. The flare phenomenon was characterized by a significant increase (≥20%) in the SUVmax of existing lesions or the appearance of new PSMA-positive lesions. Results: Exposure to enzalutamide led to a significant PSMA expression increase in 56% of assessed lesions (n = 42), with new lesions detected in 1 patient (11%). PSMA expression in organs at risk remained largely unaffected, indicating a tumor-specific response. Conclusion: Enzalutamide induces PSMA upregulation in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, potentially enhancing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Further exploration of the flare phenomenon's clinical implications is warranted.

The role of PSMA-based radioligand therapy in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Conventional systemic therapies are valuable options in prostate cancer (PCa); however, such treatments can determine adverse events and toxicity. The observed improvement in overall survival, coupled with PSA reduction and a favorable safety profile in the post-taxane castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) setting has prompted the consideration of PSMA-based radioligand therapy (RLT) earlier in the treatment sequence. In this review, we will describe the literature and ongoing clinical trials regarding the use of PSMA-based RLT in hormone-sensitive PCa (HSPC) including the neoadjuvant, de-novo/synchronous metastatic, adjuvant, and early BCR settings.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search on the PubMed/MEDLINE/EMBASE and clinicaltrials.gov databases for studies and protocols assessing the role of PSMA-based RLT in HSPC.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 140 results. After screening titles and abstracts and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected 25 papers showing the potentialities of earlier RLT in HSPC, with several ongoing trials.

CONCLUSION

Early use of PSMA-based RLT holds significant potential in HSPC patients from the neoadjuvant to the BCR setting. In these stages, the lower tumor burden, more frequent exclusive nodal involvement, and higher organ reserve may improve treatment efficacy and allow for treatment combinations while maintaining a less toxic profile.

Treatment Response Assessment According to Updated PROMISE Criteria in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Using an Automated Imaging Platform for Identification, Measurement, and Temporal Tracking of Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) molecular imaging is widely used for disease assessment in prostate cancer (PC). Artificial intelligence (AI) platforms such as automated Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (aPROMISE) identify and quantify locoregional and distant disease, thereby expediting lesion identification and standardizing reporting. Our aim was to evaluate the ability of the updated aPROMISE platform to assess treatment responses based on integration of the RECIP (Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA positron emission tomography-computed tomography [PET/CT]) 1.0 classification.

METHODS

The study included 33 patients with castration-sensitive PC (CSPC) and 34 with castration-resistant PC (CRPC) who underwent PSMA-targeted molecular imaging before and ≥2 mo after completion of treatment. Tracer-avid lesions were identified using aPROMISE for pretreatment and post-treatment PET/CT scans. Detected lesions were manually approved by an experienced nuclear medicine physician, and total tumor volume (TTV) was calculated. Response was assessed according to RECIP 1.0 as CR (complete response), PR (partial response), PD (progressive disease), or SD (stable disease). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: aPROMISE identified 1576 lesions on baseline scans and 1631 lesions on follow-up imaging, 618 (35%) of which were new. Of the 67 patients, aPROMISE classified four as CR, 16 as PR, 34 as SD, and 13 as PD; five cases were misclassified. The agreement between aPROMISE and clinician validation was 89.6% (κ = 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

aPROMISE may serve as a novel assessment tool for treatment response that integrates PSMA PET/CT results and RECIP imaging criteria. The precision and accuracy of this automated process should be validated in prospective clinical studies.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We used an artificial intelligence (AI) tool to analyze scans for prostate cancer before and after treatment to see if we could track how cancer spots respond to treatment. We found that the AI approach was successful in tracking individual tumor changes, showing which tumors disappeared, and identifying new tumors in response to prostate cancer treatment.

Aspects and prospects of preclinical theranostic radiopharmaceutical development

This article provides an overview of preclinical theranostic radiopharmaceutical development, highlighting aspects of the preclinical development stages that can lead towards a clinical trial. The key stages of theranostic radiopharmaceutical development are outlined, including target selection, tracer development, radiopharmaceutical synthesis, automation and quality control, in vitro radiopharmaceutical analysis, selecting a suitable in vivo model, preclinical imaging and pharmacokinetic analysis, preclinical therapeutic analysis, dosimetry, toxicity, and preparing for clinical translation. Each stage is described and augmented with examples from the literature. Finally, an outlook on the prospects for the radiopharmaceutical theranostics field is provided.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Biology and Pathophysiology in Prostate Carcinoma, an Update: Potential Implications for Targeted Imaging and Therapy

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a transmembrane glycoprotein, was shown to be expressed 100-1000 fold higher in prostate adenocarcinoma as compared to normal prostate epithelium. Given the enzymatic function of PSMA with the presence of an internalization triggering motif, various Glu-urea-Lys-based inhibitors have been developed and, amongst others, radiolabeled with positron emitters for targeted positron emission tomography imaging such as 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC Glu-urea-Lys(Ahx) as well as with beta and alpha-emitting radioisotopes for targeted therapy, e.g., 177Lu-PSMA-617. In this paper, we review and discuss the potential implications for targeted imaging and therapy of altered PSMA-glycosylation, of PSMA-driven activation of the P13K/Akt/mTOR, of the evolution over time and the relationship with androgen signaling and changes in DNA methylation of PSMA, and of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate carcinoma.

Does enzalutamide related PSMA upregulation affect outcomes of lutetium-177 PSMA radioligand therapy?

BACKGROUND

Enzalutamide is an antiandrogen drug used prior to lutetium-177 prostate specific membrane antigen (Lu-PSMA) radioligand therapy and has shown promising results for upregulating the PSMA expression on prostate cancer cells. In this study, we aim to compare prostate specific antigen (PSA) level changes in prostate cancer patients who received enzalutamide to those who did not.

METHODS

Prostate cancer patients who underwent Lu-PSMA between 2021 and 2023 were retrospectively included. Patients were grouped based on prior enzalutamide therapy: those who received enzalutamide (EZ+) for at least 14 days and those who did not (EZ-). PSA changes and F-18 DCFPyL SUV (Standardized Uptake Values) were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were included, 18 EZ+ and 19 EZ-. The median age, Gleason score, and prior chemo/hormonal therapies were similar for EZ+ and EZ-, except for radium-223. Eleven patients (61%) in EZ+ and 13 patients (68%) in EZ- showed a decrease in PSA after the first cycle (p = 0.64). Four patients (22%) in EZ+ and seven patients (37%) in EZ- had more than 50% decrease in PSA after the first cycle (p = 0.33). The average percent decline at the end of the treatment was 23.3% in EZ+ and 50.4% in EZ- (p = 0.4). There was no difference in terms of lesion with highest SUVmax, mean SUV, total tumor volume or activity on pre-therapy PSMA imaging.

CONCLUSION

Enzalutamide treatment prior to Lu-PSMA does not improve patient outcomes when applied remotely. Larger studies evaluating the combination therapies and the timing of enzalutamide are needed to assess its correlation with Lu-PSMA outcomes.

Targeted interleukin-2 enhances the in vivo anti-cancer activity of Pluvicto™

PURPOSE

Pluvicto™ ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617), a radioligand therapeutic targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), has been recently approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPR). The drug suffers from salivary gland and kidney uptake that prevents its dose escalation to potentially curative doses. In this work, we sought to potentiate the in vivo anti-cancer activity of Pluvicto™ by combining it with L19-IL2, a clinical-stage investigational medicinal product based on tumor-targeted interleukin-2.

METHODS

We established a new PSMA-expressing model (HT-1080.hPSMA) and validated it using a fluoresceine analogue of PSMA-617 (compound 1). The HT-1080.hPSMA model was used to study the saturation and tumor retention of Pluvicto™ (compound 2) and to run combination therapy studies with L19-IL2. To complement our understanding of the mechanism of action of this novel combination, we conducted proteomics experiments on tumor samples after therapy with Pluvicto™ alone or in combination with the immunocytokine.

RESULTS

High, selective, and long-lived tumor uptake was observed for Pluvicto™ (2) in the novel HT-1080.hPSMA model. Therapy studies in HT-1080.hPSMA tumor-bearing mice revealed that the combination of Pluvicto™ (2) plus L19-IL2 mediated curative and durable responses in all animals. Potent in vivo anti-cancer activity was observed solely for the combination modality, at doses that were well tolerated by treated animals. Proteomics studies indicated that L19-IL2 boosts the activation of the immune system in animals pre-treated with Pluvicto™.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic efficacy of Pluvicto™ at low radioactive doses can be effectively enhanced by the combination with L19-IL2. Our findings warrant further clinical exploration of this novel combination modality.

Preclinical Efficacy of a PSMA-Targeted Actinium-225 Conjugate (225Ac-Macropa-Pelgifatamab): A Targeted Alpha Therapy for Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Initially, prostate cancer responds to hormone therapy, but eventually resistance develops. Beta emitter-based prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radionuclide therapy is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Here we introduce a targeted alpha therapy (TAT) consisting of the PSMA antibody pelgifatamab covalently linked to a macropa chelator and labeled with actinium-225 and compare its efficacy and tolerability with other TATs.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The in vitro characteristics and in vivo biodistribution, antitumor efficacy, and tolerability of 225Ac-macropa-pelgifatamab (225Ac-pelgi) and other TATs were investigated in cell line- and patient-derived prostate cancer xenograft models. The antitumor efficacy of 225Ac-pelgi was also investigated in combination with the androgen receptor inhibitor darolutamide.

RESULTS

Actinium-225-labeling of 225Ac-pelgi was efficient already at room temperature. Potent in vitro cytotoxicity was seen in PSMA-expressing (LNCaP, MDA-PCa-2b, and C4-2) but not in PSMA-negative (PC-3 and DU-145) cell lines. High tumor accumulation was seen for both 225Ac-pelgi and 225Ac-DOTA-pelgi in the MDA-PCa-2b xenograft model. In the C4-2 xenograft model, 225Ac-pelgi showed enhanced antitumor efficacy with a T/Cvolume (treatment/control) ratio of 0.10 compared with 225Ac-DOTA-pelgi, 225Ac-DOTA-J591, and 227Th-HOPO-pelgifatamab (227Th-pelgi; all at 300 kBq/kg) with T/Cvolume ratios of 0.37, 0.39, and 0.33, respectively. 225Ac-pelgi was less myelosuppressive than 227Th-pelgi. 225Ac-pelgi showed dose-dependent treatment efficacy in the patient-derived KuCaP-1 model and strong combination potential with darolutamide in both cell line- (22Rv1) and patient-derived (ST1273) xenograft models.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide a strong rationale to investigate 225Ac-pelgi in patients with prostate cancer. A clinical phase I study has been initiated (NCT06052306).

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ENZA-p): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Enzalutamide and lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 both improve overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Androgen and PSMA receptors have a close intracellular relationship, with data suggesting complementary benefit if targeted concurrently. In this study, we assessed the activity and safety of enzalutamide plus adaptive-dosed [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus enzalutamide alone as first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

METHODS

ENZA-p was an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial done at 15 hospitals in Australia. Participants were men aged 18 years or older with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer not previously treated with docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET-CT (PSMA-PET-CT) positive disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and at least two risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by a centralised, web-based system using minimisation with a random component to stratify for study site, disease burden, use of early docetaxel, and previous treatment with abiraterone acetate. Patients were either given oral enzalutamide 160 mg daily alone or with adaptive-dosed (two or four doses) intravenous 7·5 GBq [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 every 6-8 weeks dependent on an interim PSMA-PET-CT (week 12). The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, defined as the interval from the date of randomisation to the date of first evidence of PSA progression, commencement of non-protocol anticancer therapy, or death. The analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population, using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04419402, and participant follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

162 participants were randomly assigned between Aug 17, 2020, and July 26, 2022. 83 men were assigned to the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group, and 79 were assigned to the enzalutamide group. Median follow-up in this interim analysis was 20 months (IQR 18-21), with 32 (39%) of 83 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 16 (20%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group remaining on treatment at the data cutoff date. Median age was 71 years (IQR 64-76). Median PSA progression-free survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 11·0-17·0) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 7·8 months (95% CI 4·3-11·0) in the enzalutamide group (hazard ratio 0·43, 95% CI 0·29-0·63, p<0·0001). The most common adverse events (all grades) were fatigue (61 [75%] of 81 patients), nausea (38 [47%]), and dry mouth (32 [40%]) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and fatigue (55 [70%] of 79), nausea (21 [27%]), and constipation (18 [23%]) in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 32 (40%) of 81 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 32 (41%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3 events that occurred only in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group included anaemia (three [4%] of 81 participants) and decreased platelet count (one [1%] participant). No grade 4 or 5 events were attributed to treatment on central review in either group.

INTERPRETATION

The addition of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 to enzalutamide improved PSA progression-free survival providing evidence of enhanced anticancer activity in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide and warrants further evaluation of the combination more broadly in metastatic prostate cancer.

FUNDING

Prostate Cancer Research Alliance (Movember and Australian Federal Government), St Vincent's Clinic Foundation, GenesisCare, Roy Morgan Research, and Endocyte (a Novartis company).

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Therapies for Prostate Cancer: Towards Improving Therapeutic Outcomes

CONTEXT

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in most prostate cancers and exploited as a target for PSMA-targeted therapies. Different approaches to target PSMA-expressing cancer cells have been developed, showing promising results in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the regulation of PSMA expression and the main PSMA-targeted therapeutic concepts illustrating their clinical development and rationalizing combination approaches with examples.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a detailed literature search using PubMed and reviewed the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology annual meeting abstracts up to September 2023.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We present an overarching description of the different strategies to target PSMA. The outcomes of PSMA-targeted therapies strongly rely on surface-bound PSMA expression. However, PSMA heterogeneity at different levels (interpatient and inter/intratumoral) limits the efficacy of PSMA-targeted therapies. We highlight the molecular mechanisms governing PSMA regulation, the understanding of which is crucial to designing therapeutic strategies aimed at upregulating PSMA expression. Thus far, homeobox B13 (HOXB13) and androgen receptor (AR) have emerged as critical transcription factors positively and negatively regulating PSMA expression, respectively. Furthermore, epigenetic regulation of PSMA has been also reported recently. In addition, many established therapeutic approaches harbor the potential to upregulate PSMA levels as well as potentiate DNA damage mediated by current radioligands.

CONCLUSIONS

PSMA-targeted therapies are rapidly advancing, but their efficacy is strongly limited by the heterogeneous expression of the target. A thorough comprehension of how PSMA is regulated will help improve the outcomes through increasing PSMA expression and will provide the basis for synergistic combination therapies.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is overexpressed in most prostate cancers. PSMA-targeted therapies have shown promising results, but the heterogeneous expression of PSMA limits their efficacy. We propose to better elucidate the regulation of PSMA expression to increase the levels of the target and improve the therapeutic outcomes.

Towards Improving the Efficacy of PSMA-Targeting Radionuclide Therapy for Late-Stage Prostate Cancer-Combination Strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is a radiopharmaceutical that emits beta-minus radiation and targets prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive prostate cancer. Despite its clinical success, there are still patients not showing sufficient response rates. This review compiles latest studies aiming at therapy improvement in [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617-naïve and -resistant patients by alternative or combination treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

A variety of agents to combine with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 are currently under investigation including alpha radiation-emitting pharmaceuticals, radiosensitizers, taxane chemotherapeutics, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and external beam radiation. Actinium-225 (225Ac)-labeled PSMA-targeting inhibitors are the most studied pharmaceuticals for combination therapy or as an alternative for treatment after progression under [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. Alpha emitters seem to have a potential of achieving a response to PSMA-targeting radionuclide therapy in both initial non-responders or responders to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 later developing treatment resistance. Emerging evidence for immunostimulatory effects of radiopharmaceuticals and first prospective studies support the combination of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and immune checkpoint inhibition for late-stage prostate cancer.

Effects of novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors on PSMA PET signal intensity in patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a prospective exploratory serial imaging study

BACKGROUND

PSMA expression is influenced by hormonal status. We evaluated changes in PSA and whole-body 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (WB-PSMA PET) after initiation of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi).

METHODS

Prospectively enrolled patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) initiating ARSi underwent serial PSA measurements and WB-PSMA PET at baseline, 1-week, and 3-months post-ARSi. We correlated WB-PSMA PET metrics and PSA kinetics after ARSi to 1-year clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Due to low enrollment rate, the study was closed before reaching the recruitment goal of 30 patients. Nine patients were enrolled. At 1-year, unfavorable outcome was documented in 6/9 (66%) patients. Nine/9 patients completed PSMA PET at 1-week, 5/9 at 3-months. Changes in PSA, PSMA-VOL, SUVmean and SUVmax were - 12%, + 5%, + 3%, and + 10% at 1-week, - 42%, - 16%, - 15% and - 17% at 3-months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our prospective trial involving 9 mCRPC patients initiating ARSi did not show significant modulation of PSMA expression measured on WB-PSMA PET at 1-week. This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04279561).

Preclinical Development in Radiopharmaceutical Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in men worldwide. Among the various treatment options, radiopharmaceutical therapy has shown notable success in metastatic, castration-resistant disease. Radiopharmaceutical therapy is a systemic approach that delivers cytotoxic radiation doses precisely to the malignant tumors and/or tumor microenvironment. Therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals are composed of a therapeutic radionuclide and a high-affinity, tumor-targeting carrier molecule. Therapeutic radionuclides used in preclinical prostate cancer studies are primarily α-, β--, or Auger-electron-emitting radiometals or radiohalogens. Monoclonal antibodies, antibody-derived fragments, peptides, and small molecules are frequently used as tumor-targeting molecules. Over the years, several important membrane-associated proteases and receptors have been identified, validated, and subsequently used for preclinical radiotherapeutic development for prostate cancer. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is the most well-studied prostate cancer-associated protease in preclinical literature. PSMA-targeting radiotherapeutic agents are being investigated using high-affinity antibody- and small-molecule-based agents for safety and efficacy. Early generations of such agents were developed simply by replacing radionuclides of the imaging agents with therapeutic ones. Later, extensive structure-activity relationship studies were conducted to address the safety and efficacy issues obtained from initial patient data. Recent regulatory approval of the 177Lu-labeled low-molecular-weight agent, 177Lu-PSMA-617, is a significant accomplishment. Current preclinical experiments are focused on the structural modification of 177Lu-PSMA-617 and relevant investigational agents to increase tumor targeting and reduce off-target binding and toxicity in healthy organs. While lutetium-177 (177Lu) remains the most widely used radionuclide, radiolabeled analogs with iodine-131 (128I), yttrium-90 (89Y), copper-67 (67Cu), and terbium-161 (161Tb) have been evaluated as potential alternatives in recent years. In addition, agents carrying the α-particle-emitting radiohalogen, astatine-211 (211At), or radiometals, actinium-225 (225Ac), lead-212 (212Pb), radium-223 (223Ra), and thorium-227 (227Th), have been increasingly investigated in preclinical research. Besides PSMA-based radiotherapeutics, other prominent prostate cancer-related proteases, for example, human kallikrein peptidases (HK2 and HK3), have been explored using monoclonal-antibody-(mAb)-based targeting platforms. Several promising mAbs targeting receptors overexpressed on the different stages of prostate cancer have also been developed for radiopharmaceutical therapy, for example, Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL-3), CD46, and CUB domain-containing protein 1 (CDCP1). Progress is also being made using peptide-based targeting platforms for the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), a well-established membrane-associated receptor expressed in localized and metastatic prostate cancers. Furthermore, mechanism-driven combination therapies appear to be a burgeoning area in the context of preclinical prostate cancer radiotherapeutics. Here, we review the current developments related to the preclinical radiopharmaceutical therapy of prostate cancer. These are summarized in two major topics: (1) therapeutic radionuclides and (2) tumor-targeting approaches using monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, and peptides.

Improved Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Stimulation Using a Super Additive Effect of Dutasteride and Lovastatin In Vitro

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based imaging improved the detection of primary, recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer. However, in certain patients, a low PSMA surface expression can be a limitation for this promising diagnostic tool. Pharmacological induction of PSMA might be useful to further improve the detection rate of PSMA-based imaging. To achieve this, we tested dutasteride (Duta)-generally used for treatment of benign prostatic enlargement-and lovastatin (Lova)-a compound used to reduce blood lipid concentrations. We aimed to compare the individual effects of Duta and Lova on cell proliferation as well as PSMA expression. In addition, we tested if a combination treatment using lower concentrations of Duta and Lova can further induce PSMA expression. Our results show that a treatment with ≤1 μM Duta and ≥1 μM Lova lead to a significant upregulation of whole and cell surface PSMA expression in LNCaP, C4-2 and VCaP cells. Lower concentrations of Duta and Lova in combination (0.5 μM Duta + 0.5 μM Lova or 0.5 μM Duta + 1 μM Lova) were further capable of enhancing PSMA protein expression compared to a single compound treatment using higher concentrations in all tested cell lines (LNCaP, C4-2 and VCaP).

Bipolar Androgen Therapy: When Excess Fuel Extinguishes the Fire

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the cornerstone of advanced prostate cancer treatment. However, the progression towards castration-resistant prostate cancer is inevitable, as the cancer cells reactivate androgen receptor signaling and adapt to the castrate state through autoregulation of the androgen receptor. Additionally, the upfront use of novel hormonal agents such as enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate may result in long-term toxicities and may trigger the selection of AR-independent cells through "Darwinian" treatment-induced pressure. Therefore, it is crucial to develop new strategies to overcome these challenges. Bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) is one such approach that has been devised based on studies demonstrating the paradoxical inhibitory effects of supraphysiologic testosterone on prostate cancer growth, achieved through a variety of mechanisms acting in concert. BAT involves rapidly alternating testosterone levels between supraphysiological and near-castrate levels over a period of a month, achieved through monthly intramuscular injections of testosterone plus concurrent ADT. BAT is effective and well-tolerated, improving quality of life and potentially re-sensitizing patients to previous hormonal therapies after progression. By exploring the mechanisms and clinical evidence for BAT, this review seeks to shed light on its potential as a promising new approach to prostate cancer treatment.

New perspectives on metabolic imaging in the management of prostate cancer in 2022: A focus on radiolabeled PSMA‑PET/CT (Review)

Nuclear medicine is an essential part of prostate cancer management concerning initial staging, patient follow-up and even therapy. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a glutamate carboxypeptidase II transmembrane glycoprotein expressed by 80% of prostatic cells. The interest in this protein is due to its specificity for prostatic tissue. The use of 68GaPSMA PET/CT in the context of disease staging is thus well-established and recommended, especially for high-risk disease with metastases and lymph node involvement. However, the risk of false positives raises questions regarding its place in the management of patients with prostate cancer. The present study aimed to determine the use of PET-PSMA in the care of patients with prostate cancer but also to assess its limits of use.

PSMA-heterogeneity in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Circulating tumor cells, metastatic tumor burden, and response to targeted radioligand therapy

BACKGROUND

We explored the interrelation between prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and that of solid metastatic lesions as determined by whole-body PSMA-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) to refine the prediction of response to subsequent PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT).

METHODS

A prospective study was performed in 20 patients with advanced mCRPC. Of these, 16 underwent subsequent RLT with [¹⁷⁷ Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 at a dose of 7.4 GBq every 6-8 weeks. PSMA expression on CTCs using the CellSearch system was compared to clinical and serological results, and to marker expression in targeted imaging and available histological sections of prostatectomy specimens (19% of RLT patients). Clinical outcome was obtained after two cycles of RLT.

RESULTS

Marked heterogeneity of PSMA expression was observed already at first diagnosis in available histological specimens. Targeted whole-body imaging also showed heterogeneous inter- and intra-patient PSMA expression between metastases. Heterogeneity of CTC PSMA expression was partially paralleled by heterogeneity of whole-body tumor burden PSMA expression. Twenty percent of CTC samples showed no PSMA expression, despite unequivocal PSMA expression of solid metastases at PET. A high fraction of PSMA-negative CTCs emerged as the sole predictor of poor RLT response (odds ratio [OR]: 0.9379 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.8558-0.9902]; p = 0.0160), and was prognostic for both shorter progression-free survival (OR: 1.236 [95% CI, 1.035-2.587]; p = 0.0043) and overall survival (OR: 1.056 [95% CI, 1.008-1.141]; p = 0.0182).

CONCLUSION

This proof-of-principle study suggests that liquid biopsy for CTC PSMA expression is complementary to PET for individual PSMA phenotyping of mCRPC.

Quantitative assessment of PSMA PET response to therapy in castration-sensitive prostate cancer using an automated imaging platform for disease identification and measurement

RATIONALE

Prostate cancer treatment response may be automatically quantified using a molecular imaging analysis platform targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer who underwent PSMA-targeted molecular imaging prior to and 3 months or more after treatment was conducted. Disease burden was analyzed with aPROMISE, an artificial intelligence imaging platform that automatically quantifies PSMA-positive lesions. The calculated PSMA scores for prostate/bed, nodal, and osseous disease sites were compared with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values.

RESULTS

Of 30 eligible patients, the median decline in prostate/bed, nodal, and osseous disease PSMA scores were 100% (range 52-100%), 100% (range - 87-100%), and 100% (range - 21-100%), respectively. PSMA score decline was significantly associated with PSA decline.

CONCLUSION

Changes in aPROMISE PSMA scores are associated with changes in PSA and may quantify treatment response.

PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0

Here we aim to provide updated guidance and standards for the indication, acquisition, and interpretation of PSMA PET/CT for prostate cancer imaging. Procedures and characteristics are reported for a variety of available PSMA small radioligands. Different scenarios for the clinical use of PSMA-ligand PET/CT are discussed. This document provides clinicians and technicians with the best available evidence, to support the implementation of PSMA PET/CT imaging in research and routine practice.

Quantitative In Vivo Imaging of the Androgen Receptor Axis Reveals Degree of Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy Response

Noninvasive biomarkers for androgen receptor (AR) pathway activation are urgently needed to better monitor patient response to prostate cancer therapies. AR is a critical driver and mediator of resistance of prostate cancer but currently available noninvasive prostate cancer biomarkers to monitor AR activity are discordant with downstream AR pathway activity. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) remains a common treatment for all stages of prostate cancer, and DNA damage induced by EBRT upregulates AR pathway activity to promote therapeutic resistance. [89Zr]11B6-PET is a novel modality targeting prostate-specific protein human kallikrein 2 (hK2), which is a surrogate biomarker for AR activity. Here, we studied whether [89Zr]11B6-PET can accurately assess EBRT-induced AR activity.Genetic and human prostate cancer mouse models received EBRT (2-50 Gy) and treatment response was monitored by [89Zr]11B6-PET/CT. Radiotracer uptake and expression of AR and AR target genes was quantified in resected tissue.EBRT increased AR pathway activity and [89Zr]11B6 uptake in LNCaP-AR and 22RV1 tumors. EBRT increased prostate-specific [89Zr]11B6 uptake in prostate cancer-bearing mice (Hi-Myc x Pb_KLK2) with no significant changes in uptake in healthy (Pb_KLK2) mice, and this correlated with hK2 protein levels.

IMPLICATIONS

hK2 expression in prostate cancer tissue is a proxy of EBRT-induced AR activity that can noninvasively be detected using [89Zr]11B6-PET; further clinical evaluation of hK2-PET for monitoring response and development of resistance to EBRT in real time is warranted.

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography as a Biomarker to Assess Treatment Response in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer

CONTEXT

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) has superior accuracy for detection of metastatic lesions in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Although PSMA PET has a prominent role in primary and secondary imaging of PC, data on its role in assessing treatment response in advanced PC are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To review current data in the literature regarding the impact of antiandrogen therapy on PSMA expression of metastatic sites and the role of serial (baseline and at least 1 follow-up scan) PSMA PET to assess treatment response in patients with metastatic PC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive literature search in the PubMed database was performed using the terms "PSMA expression prostate", "PSMA regulation", "PSMA PET response assessment", and "serial PSMA PET".

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Serial PSMA PET studies (baseline and at least 1 follow-up scan) provide valuable data regarding PSMA expression changes after systemic treatment in patients with metastatic PC. PSMA PET-detected flare and upregulation of PSMA expression following hormonal intervention seem to be early events resolving after 3 mo of treatment. PSMA PET imaging is essential in selecting patients for ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). Growing evidence favors its use in assessing treatment responses after RLT. Preliminary evidence indicates the value of PSMA PET for assessment of the treatment response in patients receiving systemic treatment other than RLT for metastatic PC.

CONCLUSIONS

PSMA flare following antiandrogen therapy seems to be an early event and thus PET scans should be performed no earlier than 3 mo after the start of treatment. PSMA PET has a promising role in tailoring treatment according to the specific needs of individual patients and assessing responses following systemic treatment in patients with advanced PC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This review describes how a sensitive imaging method can be used to assess the tumor response to treatment for metastatic prostate cancer.

Pharmacological Optimization of PSMA-Based Radioligand Therapy

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men of middle and older age. The standard treatment strategy for PCa ranges from active surveillance in low-grade, localized PCa to radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, hormonal treatment and chemotherapy. Recently, the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) for metastatic castration-resistant PCa has been approved. PSMA is predominantly, but not exclusively, expressed on PCa cells. Because of its high expression in PCa, PSMA is a promising target for diagnostics and therapy. To understand the currently used RLT, knowledge about pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the PSMA ligand and the PSMA protein itself is crucial. PK and PD properties of the ligand and its target determine the duration and extent of the effect. Knowledge on the concentration-time profile, the target affinity and target abundance may help to predict the effect of RLT. Increased specific binding of radioligands to PSMA on PCa cells may be associated with better treatment response, where nonspecific binding may increase the risk of toxicity in healthy organs. Optimization of the radioligand, as well as synergistic effects of concomitant agents and an improved dosing strategy, may lead to more individualized treatment and better overall survival.

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Biology in Lethal Prostate Cancer and its Therapeutic Implications

CONTEXT

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising, novel theranostic target in advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Multiple PSMA-targeted therapies are currently in clinical development, with some agents showing impressive antitumour activity, although optimal patient selection and therapeutic resistance remain ongoing challenges.

OBJECTIVE

To review the biology of PSMA and recent advances in PSMA-targeted therapies in PCa, and to discuss potential strategies for patient selection and further therapeutic development.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and review of American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology annual meeting abstracts up to April 2021.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

PSMA is a largely extracellular protein that is frequently, but heterogeneously, expressed by PCa cells. PSMA expression is associated with disease progression, worse clinical outcomes and the presence of tumour defects in DNA damage repair (DDR). PSMA is also expressed by other cancer cell types and is implicated in glutamate and folate metabolism. It may confer a tumour survival advantage in conditions of cellular stress. PSMA regulation is complex, and recent studies have shed light on interactions with androgen receptor, PI3K/Akt, and DDR signalling. A phase 2 clinical trial has shown that 177Lu-PSMA-617 causes tumour shrinkage and delays disease progression in a significant subset of patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa in comparison to second-line chemotherapy. Numerous novel PSMA-targeting immunotherapies, small molecules, and antibody therapies are currently in clinical development, including in earlier stages of PCa, with emerging evidence of antitumour activity. To date, the regulation and function of PSMA in PCa cells remain poorly understood.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been rapid recent progress in PSMA-targeted therapies for the management of advanced PCa. Dissection of PSMA biology will help to identify biomarkers for and resistance mechanisms to these therapies and facilitate further therapeutic development to improve PCa patient outcomes.

PATIENT SUMMARY

There have been major advances in the development of therapies targeting a molecule, PSMA, in PCa. Radioactive molecules targeting PSMA can cause tumour shrinkage and delay progression in some patients with lethal disease. Future studies are needed to determine which patients are most likely to respond, and how other treatments can be combined with therapies targeting PSMA so that more patients may benefit.

Factors Influencing the Therapeutic Efficacy of the PSMA Targeting Radioligand 212Pb-NG001

Simple Summary

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a protein overexpressed in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and a promising target for targeted radionuclide therapy. PSMA-targeted alpha therapy is of growing interest due to the high-emission energy and short range of alpha particles, resulting in a prominent cytotoxic potency. This study assesses the influence of various factors on the in vitro and in vivo therapeutic efficacy of the alpha particle generating PSMA-targeting radioligand ²¹²Pb-NG001.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the influence of cellular PSMA expression, radioligand binding and internalization, and repeated administrations on the therapeutic effects of the PSMA-targeting radioligand ²¹²Pb-NG001. Cellular binding and internalization, cytotoxicity, biodistribution, and the therapeutic efficacy of ²¹²Pb-NG001 were investigated in two human prostate cancer cell lines with different PSMA levels: C4-2 (PSMA+) and PC-3 PIP (PSMA+++). Despite 10-fold higher PSMA expression on PC-3 PIP cells, cytotoxicity and therapeutic efficacy of the radioligand was only 1.8-fold better than for the C4-2 model, possibly explained by lower cellular internalization and less blood-rich stroma in PC-3 PIP xenografts. Mice bearing subcutaneous PC-3 PIP xenografts were treated with 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 MBq of ²¹²Pb-NG001 that resulted in therapeutic indexes of 2.7, 3.0, and 3.5, respectively. A significant increase in treatment response was observed in mice that received repeated injections compared to the corresponding single dose (therapeutic indexes of 3.6 for 2 × 0.2 MBq and 4.4 for 2 × 0.4 MBq). The results indicate that ²¹²Pb-NG001 can induce therapeutic effects at clinically transferrable doses, both in the C4-2 model that resembles solid tumors and micrometastases with natural PSMA expression and in the PC-3 PIP model that mimics poorly vascularized metastases.

Molecular Imaging Assessment of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer

Hormonal therapy has long been recognized as a mainstay treatment for prostate cancer. New generation imaging agents have provided unprecedented opportunities at all phases along the natural history of prostate cancer. We review the literature on the effect of androgens and androgen deprivation therapy on prostate tumor at its various biological phases using the new generation molecular imaging agents in conjunction with positron emission tomography.

Addition of Standard Enzalutamide Medication Shows Synergistic Effects on Response to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy in mCRPC Patients with Imminent Treatment Failure-Preliminary Evidence of Pilot Experience

Simple Summary

In this study, we investigated co-medication with enzalutamide, a well-established newer androgen axis drug, as a potential re-sensitizer for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) in n = 10 patients with imminent treatment failure on standard ¹⁷⁷Lu-based PSMA-RLT. After the introduction of enzalutamide medication, all patients showed a PSA decrease (7/10 patients with partial remission). This pilot experience suggests the synergistic potential of adding enzalutamide to PSMA-RLT derived from the intra-individual comparison of ¹⁷⁷Lu-based PSMA-RLT ± enzalutamide.

Abstract

Well-received strong efficacy of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) does not prevent patients from either early or eventual disease progression under this treatment. In this study, we investigated co-medication with enzalutamide as a potential re-sensitizer for PSMA-RLT in patients with imminent treatment failure on standard ¹⁷⁷Lu-based PSMA-RLT. Ten mCRPC patients who exhibited an insufficient response to conventional [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT received oral medication of enzalutamide 160 mg/d as an adjunct to continued PSMA-RLT. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and standard toxicity screening lab work-up were performed to assess the treatment efficacy and safety in these individuals. The mean PSA increase under PSMA-RLT before starting the re-sensitizing procedure was 22.4 ± 26.5%. After the introduction of enzalutamide medication, all patients experienced a PSA decrease, –43.4 ± 20.0% and –48.2 ± 39.0%, after one and two cycles of enzalutamide-augmented PSMA-RLT, respectively. A total of 70% of patients (7/10) experienced partial remission, with a median best PSA response of –62%. Moreover, 5/6 enzalutamide-naïve patients and 2/4 patients who had previously failed enzalutamide exhibited a partial remission. There was no relevant enzalutamide-induced toxicity observed in this small cohort. This pilot experience suggests the synergistic potential of adding enzalutamide to PSMA-RLT derived from the intra-individual comparison of ¹⁷⁷Lu-based PSMA-RLT ± enzalutamide.

Upregulation of PSMA Expression by Enzalutamide in Patients with Advanced mCRPC

In this study, we investigated upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) by enzalutamide in a cohort (n = 30) of patients with advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients were examined by [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT pre- and post-enzalutamide medication (mean 13 ± 7 days). Imaging results were compared based on quantification of whole-body PSMA tumor burden: total lesion PSMA (TLP) and normalized TLP values to liver (TLP-LR) and to parotid gland (TLP-PR). In addition, lesion-based analyses were performed. The median (mean) increases in TLP, TLP-LR and TLP-PR after enzalutamide medication were 10.1% (20.2%), 29.5% (34.8%) and 27.6% (24.4%), respectively. These increases were statistically significant (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001), while prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum values did not change significantly (p = 0.483). The increase was independent of prior patient exposure to enzalutamide. SUVmax increased substantially (>10%) in 49.6% of target lesions. The relative change was significantly higher in the subgroup of lesions with SUVmax < 10 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, short-term enzalutamide medication significantly increases PSMA expression in patients with mCRPC, irrespective of prior enzalutamide exposure. The relative PSMA upregulation effect seems to be more pronounced in lesions with only moderate baseline PSMA expression. Enzalutamide may provide a potential enhancer medication for PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy.

Impact of Androgen Receptor Activity on Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an essential molecular regulator of prostate cancer (PCa) progression coded by the FOLH1 gene. The PSMA protein has become an important factor in metastatic PCa diagnosis and radioligand therapy. However, low PSMA expression is suggested to be a resistance mechanism to PSMA-based imaging and therapy. Clinical studies revealed that androgen receptor (AR) inhibition increases PSMA expression. The mechanism has not yet been elucidated. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of activation and inhibition of androgen signaling on PSMA expression levels in vitro and compared these findings with PSMA levels in PCa patients receiving systemic therapy. To this end, LAPC4, LNCaP, and C4-2 PCa cells were treated with various concentrations of the synthetic androgen R1881 and antiandrogens. Changes in FOLH1 mRNA were determined using qPCR. Open access databases were used for ChIP-Seq and tissue expression analysis. Changes in PSMA protein were determined using western blot. For PSMA staining in patients' specimens, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed. Results revealed that treatment with the synthetic androgen R1881 led to decreased FOLH1 mRNA and PSMA protein. This effect was partially reversed by antiandrogen treatment. However, AR ChIP-Seq analysis revealed no canonical AR binding sites in the regulatory elements of the FOLH1 gene. IHC analysis indicated that androgen deprivation only resulted in increased PSMA expression in patients with low PSMA levels. The data demonstrate that AR activation and inhibition affects PSMA protein levels via a possible non-canonical mechanism. Moreover, analysis of PCa tissue reveals that low PSMA expression rates may be mandatory to increase PSMA by androgen deprivation.

Combined 177 Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT and abiraterone acetate versus 177 Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT monotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: An observational study comparing the response and durability

OBJECTIVE

The aim of present study was to determine and compare the overall response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and clinical toxicity of the combination of 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (PRLT) and abiraterone acetate (AA) versus 177Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT as monotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The mCRPC patients who received at least one cycle of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT with or without AA therapy, were included and analyzed in the present study. The patients were divided into two major groups. Group 1 received only 177 Lu-PSMA PRLT and Group 2 received combined 177 Lu-PSMA PRLT + AA therapy. Therapeutic dose of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT was 4.4-5.55 GBq per patient per cycle administered at intervals of 10-12 weeks in both groups. The Group 2 patients additionally received a dose of 1000 mg of AA once daily and 5 mg of prednisone twice daily. Treatment response in two groups was evaluated under four broad categories (a) symptomatic, (b) biochemical (serum prostate-specific antigen level), (c) objective molecular imaging (68 Ga-PSMA-11 and 18 F-FDG PET/CT), and (d) objective anatomical imaging (computed tomography). For assessing treatment response, patients in two groups were categorized into responders (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], and stable disease [SD]) and nonresponders (progressive disease [PD]). The Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to calculate PFS and OS following first 177 Lu-PSMA PRLT in the two groups. Univariate analysis was used to compare the patients' characteristics in two groups using a χ2 or Fisher exact test. The Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS and OS between two groups were compared by using the log-rank test (p < 0.05 significant).

RESULTS

A total of 58 mCRPC patients (Group 1, 38 patients and Group 2, 20 patients) were included in this study analysis. The clinical and demographic characteristics of these patients (age, Gleason score, FDG avid disease, metastatic disease burden, and average number of 177 Lu-PSMA PRLT cycles) in two groups were compared and found to be similar (p > 0.05). Post-treatment, symptomatic, biochemical, molecular, and anatomic imaging responders were found in 22 patients (58%) and 17 patients (85%), 22 patients (58%) and 16 patients (80%), 19 patients (54%) and 14 patients (78%), and 19 patients (54%) and 14 patients (78%) in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. The median PFS of 7 months and median OS of 8 months were documented in Group 1, whereas median PFS was not reached and median OS of 16 months registered in Group 2. Transient hematological toxicity of Grades 1 and 2 was found in total seven patients (five patients in Group 1 and two patients in Group 2). On comparison of the treatment outcome between two groups, significant p value was found for symptomatic responders (58% in Group 1 vs. 85% in Group 2), median PFS (7 months in Group 1 vs. not reached in Group 2), and median OS (8 months in Group 1 vs. 16 months in Group 2), with better outcome in Group 2 patients for these variables.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, the combination of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT and AA therapy showed significant improvement in mCRPC patients' symptomatic response, PFS, and OS as compared to 177 Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT monotherapy.

Androgen Receptor Signaling in Prostate Cancer and Therapeutic Strategies

Understanding of the molecular mechanisms of prostate cancer has led to development of therapeutic strategies targeting androgen receptor (AR). These androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) include androgen synthesis inhibitor-abiraterone and androgen receptor antagonists-enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide. Although these medications provide significant improvement in survival among men with prostate cancer, drug resistance develops in nearly all patients with time. This could be through androgen-dependent or androgen-independent mechanisms. Even weaker signals and non-canonical steroid ligands can activate AR in the presence of truncated AR-splice variants, AR overexpression, or activating mutations in AR. AR splice variant, AR-V7 is the most studied among these and is not targeted by available ARSIs. Non-androgen receptor dependent resistance mechanisms are mediated by activation of an alternative signaling pathway when AR is inhibited. DNA repair pathway, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, BRAF-MAPK and Wnt signaling pathway and activation by glucocorticoid receptors can restore downstream signaling in prostate cancer by alternative proteins. Multiple clinical trials are underway exploring therapeutic strategies to overcome these resistance mechanisms.

Comparing the Effect of Multiple Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors on SSTR2 Expression and [111In]In-DOTATATE Uptake in NET Cells

Simple Summary

Patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are often treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This therapy targets the somatostatin type-2 receptors (SSTR2) frequently overexpressed on these types of tumors. Although this therapy has proven to be effective, complete responses are rare and therapy improvement is desirable. We aimed to increase SSTR2 expression on NET cells, potentially increasing the number of patients eligible for SSTR2-targeted PRRT and improving clinical outcomes. We used histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) to manipulate the epigenetic machinery and hereby aimed to increase SSTR2 gene transcription. Our results showed that the HDACis increased SSTR2 expression in several NET cell lines. Moreover, the uptake of radiolabeled DOTATATE, the tracer used for PRRT, was enhanced. The observed reversibility profile after HDACi withdrawal of the induced effects suggests that proper timing of HDACi treatment is likely essential.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to increase somatostatin type-2 receptor (SSTR2) expression on neuroendocrine tumor (NET) cells using histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis), potentially increasing the uptake of SSTR2-targeted radiopharmaceuticals and subsequently improving treatment efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Human NET cell lines BON-1, NCI-H727, and GOT1 were treated with HDACis (i.e., CI-994, entinostat, LMK-235, mocetinostat, panobinostat, or valproic acid (VPA); entinostat and VPA were the HDACis tested in GOT1 cells) to examine SSTR2 mRNA expression levels and uptake of SSTR2-targeting radiotracer [¹¹¹In]In-DOTATATE. Reversibility of the induced effects was examined after drug-withdrawal. Finally, the effect of VPA on radiosensitivity was investigated. A strong stimulatory effect in BON-1, NCI-H727, and GOT1 cells was observed after HDACi treatment, both on SSTR2 mRNA expression levels and [¹¹¹In]In-DOTATATE uptake. The effects of the HDACis were largely reversible over a period of seven days, demonstrating largest reductions within the first day. The reversibility profile of the induced effects suggests that proper timing of HDACi treatment is most likely essential for a beneficial outcome. In addition to increasing SSTR2 expression levels, VPA enhanced the radiosensitivity of all cell lines. In conclusion, HDACi treatment increased SSTR2 expression, and radiosensitivity was also enhanced upon VPA treatment.

PSMA Theranostics: Current Landscape and Future Outlook

INTRODUCTION

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising novel molecular target for imaging diagnostics and therapeutics (theranostics). There has been a growing body of evidence supporting PSMA theranostics approaches in optimizing the management of prostate cancer and potentially altering its natural history.

METHODS

We utilized PubMed and Google Scholar for published studies, and clinicaltrials.gov for planned, ongoing, and completed clinical trials in PSMA theranostics as of June 2021. We presented evolving evidence for various PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical agents in the treatment paradigm for prostate cancer, as well as combination treatment strategies with other targeted therapy and immunotherapy. We highlighted the emerging evidence of PSMA and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT as a predictive biomarker for PSMA radioligand therapy. We identified seven ongoing clinical trials in oligometastatic-directed therapy using PSMA PET imaging. We also presented a schematic overview of 17 key PSMA theranostic clinical trials throughout the various stages of prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In this review, we presented the contemporary and future landscape of theranostic applications in prostate cancer with a focus on PSMA ligands. As PSMA theranostics will soon become the standard of care for the management of prostate cancer, we underscore the importance of integrating nuclear medicine physicians into the multidisciplinary team.

Darolutamide Potentiates the Antitumor Efficacy of a PSMA-targeted Thorium-227 Conjugate by a Dual Mode of Action in Prostate Cancer Models

PURPOSE

Androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors are well established in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer and have recently shown efficacy also in castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Although most patients respond well to initial therapy, resistance eventually develops, and thus, more effective therapeutic approaches are needed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed in prostate cancer and presents an attractive target for radionuclide therapy. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and explored the mode of action of the PSMA-targeted thorium-227 conjugate (PSMA-TTC) BAY 2315497, an antibody-based targeted alpha-therapy, in combination with the AR inhibitor darolutamide.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The in vitro and in vivo antitumor efficacy and mode of action of the combination treatment were investigated in preclinical cell line-derived and patient-derived prostate cancer xenograft models with different levels of PSMA expression.

RESULTS

Darolutamide induced the expression of PSMA in androgen-sensitive VCaP and LNCaP cells in vitro, and the efficacy of darolutamide in combination with PSMA-TTC was synergistic in these cells. In vivo, the combination treatment showed synergistic antitumor efficacy in the low PSMA-expressing VCaP and in the high PSMA-expressing ST1273 prostate cancer models, and enhanced efficacy in the enzalutamide-resistant KUCaP-1 model. The treatments were well tolerated. Mode-of-action studies revealed that darolutamide induced PSMA expression, resulting in higher tumor uptake of PSMA-TTC, and consequently, higher antitumor efficacy, and impaired PSMA-TTC-mediated induction of DNA damage repair genes, potentially contributing to increased DNA damage.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide a strong rationale to investigate PSMA-TTC in combination with AR inhibitors in patients with prostate cancer.

Target Heterogeneity in Oncology: The Best Predictor for Differential Response to Radioligand Therapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors and Prostate Cancer

Simple Summary

In the era of precision medicine, novel targets have emerged on the surface of cancer cells, which have been exploited for the purpose of radioligand therapy. However, there have been variations in the way these receptors are expressed, especially in prostate cancers and neuroendocrine tumors. This variable expression of receptors across the grades of cancers led to the concept of ‘target heterogeneity’, which has not just impacted therapeutic decisions but also their outcomes. Radiopharmaceuticals targeting receptors need to be used when there are specific indicators—either clinical, radiological, or at molecular level—warranting their use. In addition, response to these radioligands can be assessed using different techniques, whereby we can prognosticate further outcomes. We shall also discuss, in this review, the conventional as well as novel approaches of detecting heterogeneity in prostate cancers and neuroendocrine tumors.

Abstract

Tumor or target heterogeneity (TH) implies presence of variable cellular populations having different genomic characteristics within the same tumor, or in different tumor sites of the same patient. The challenge is to identify this heterogeneity, as it has emerged as the most common cause of ‘treatment resistance’, to current therapeutic agents. We have focused our discussion on ‘Prostate Cancer’ and ‘Neuroendocrine Tumors’, and looked at the established methods for demonstrating heterogeneity, each with its advantages and drawbacks. Also, the available theranostic radiotracers targeting PSMA and somatostatin receptors combined with targeted systemic agents, have been described. Lu-177 labeled PSMA and DOTATATE are the ‘standard of care’ radionuclide therapeutic tracers for management of progressive treatment-resistant prostate cancer and NET. These approved therapies have shown reasonable benefit in treatment outcome, with improvement in quality of life parameters. Various biomarkers and predictors of response to radionuclide therapies targeting TH which are currently available and those which can be explored have been elaborated in details. Imaging-based features using artificial intelligence (AI) need to be developed to further predict the presence of TH. Also, novel theranostic tools binding to newer targets on surface of cancer cell should be explored to overcome the treatment resistance to current treatment regimens.

Evolving Castration Resistance and Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Expression: Implications for Patient Management

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains an incurable disease, despite multiple novel treatment options. The role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in the process of mCRPC development has long been underestimated. During the last years, a new understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of rising PSMA expression and its association with disease progression has emerged. Accurate understanding of these complex interactions is indispensable for a precise diagnostic process and ultimately successful treatment of advanced prostate cancer. The combination of different novel therapeutics such as androgen deprivation agents, 177LU-PSMA radioligand therapy and PARP inhibitors promises a new kind of efficacy. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about the most relevant molecular mechanisms around PSMA in mCRPC development and how they can be implemented in mCRPC management.

PET/CT variants and pitfalls in prostate cancer: What you might see on PET and should never forget

2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) gained an impressive role in the diagnostic management of many oncological diseases, even though its use in imaging prostate cancer (PC) is limited to selected cases, mostly advanced stage of PC and selection for prostate specific antigen membrane (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT). In the past years, several PET tracers have been developed for both staging and restaging PC. The three most employed PET molecules in daily practice are [¹¹C] or [¹⁸F]F-Choline, [¹⁸F]F-Fluciclovine (Anti-1- amino-3-[18F]Fluorocyclobutane-1-Carboxylic Acid, also known as (Anti-[¹⁸F]FACBC), [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA and recently FDA approved the first Fluorinated PSMA-based named [¹⁸F]F-DCFPyl. Each one has its own physiological and peculiarity which are worth exploring. Moreover, an increasing number of case reports and studies have reported tracers' variants, pitfalls, or even non-prostatic diseases (benign and malignant) incidentally detected. In prostate oncology, PET can be performed with several indications in different stages of disease, as highlighted in the EAU Guidelines on PC. A correct scan interpretation depends on the knowledge of both the physiological distribution of the tracers and the uptake of possible variants and pitfalls. The aim of this critical review is to provide a comprehensive knowledge of physiological distribution of these three tracers, as well as an updated overview of variants and pitfalls.

Enzalutamide Enhances PSMA Expression of PSMA-Low Prostate Cancer

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed radioligand therapy (RLT) prolongs overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, men with low PSMA expression are excluded from RLT. We explored the effect of androgen receptor blockade with enzalutamide on PSMA expression. Assessment of PSMA and androgen receptor (AR) expression on the human PC cell lines 22Rv1, C4-2, and LNCaP by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry revealed low (22Rv1) and high (C4-2 and LNCaP) PSMA expression, and high, comparable AR positivity. Treatment with enzalutamide increased PSMA levels in 22Rv1, C4-2, and LNCaP (2.2/2.3/2.6-fold, p = 0.0005/0.03/0.046) after one week compared to DMSO-treated controls as assessed by flow cytometry. NOD/Scid mice bearing 22Rv1 tumors were treated with enzalutamide for two weeks. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) demonstrated higher tumor uptake of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA after enzalutamide treatment (p = 0.004). Similarly, a clinical case with low baseline PSMA avidity demonstrated increased uptake of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA after enzalutamide on PET/CT and post-therapeutic ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA scintigraphy in a patient with mCRPC. Enzalutamide induced PSMA expression in the 22Rv1 xenograft model and in an mCRPC patient, both with low baseline tumoral PSMA levels. Therefore, enzalutamide pre-treatment might render patients with low PSMA expression eligible for ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA RLT.

[18F]-JK-PSMA-7 and [18F]-FDG tumour PET uptake in treated xenograft human prostate cancer model in mice

PURPOSE

This preclinical study aims to evaluate the extent to which a change in prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) following standard treatment is reflected in [18F]JK-PSMA-7 PET/CT.

METHODS

Castrated mice supplemented with testosterone implant were xenografted with human LNCaP CRPC. After appropriate tumour growth, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was carried out by the removal of the implant followed by a single injection of docetaxel (400 μg/20-g mouse) 2 weeks later. [18F]JK-PSMA-7 PET/CT were performed before ADT, then before and at days 12, 26, 47 and 69 after docetaxel administration. The [18F]JK-PSMA-7 PET data were compared to corresponding unspecific metabolic [18F]FDG PET/CT and ex vivo quantification of PSMA expression estimated by flow cytometry on repeated tumour biopsies.

RESULTS

ADT alone had no early effect on LNCaP tumours that pursued their progression. Until day 12 post-docetaxel, the [18F]JK-PSMA7 uptake was significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG, indicating the persistence of PSMA expression at those time points. From day 26 onwards when the tumours were rapidly expanding, both [18F]JK-PSMA7 and [18F]FDG uptake continuously decreased although the decrease in [18F]JK-PSMA uptake was markedly faster. The fraction of PSMA-positive cells in tumour biopsies decreased similarly over time to reach a non-specific level after the same time period.

CONCLUSION

Applying PSMA-based imaging for therapy monitoring in patients with CRPC should be considered with caution since a reduction in [18F]JK-PSMA-7 PET uptake after successive ADT and chemotherapy may be related to downregulation of PSMA expression in dedifferentiated and rapidly proliferating tumour cells.

Antihormone treatment differentially regulates PSA secretion, PSMA expression and 68Ga-PSMA uptake in LNCaP cells

BACKGROUND

In recent years, a variety of innovative therapeutics for castration-resistant prostate cancer have been developed, including novel anti-androgenic drugs, such as abiraterone or VPC-13566. Therapeutic monitoring of these pharmaceuticals is performed either by measuring PSA levels in serum or by imaging. PET using PSMA ligands labeled with Fluor-18 or Gallium-68 is the most sensitive and specific imaging modality for detection of metastases in advanced prostate cancer. To date, it remains unclear how PSMA expression is modulated by anti-hormonal treatment and how it correlates with PSA secretion.

METHODS

We analyzed modulation of PSMA-mRNA and protein expression, 68Ga-PSMA uptake and regulation of PSA secretion by abiraterone or VPC-13566 in LNCaP cells in vitro.

RESULTS

We found that abiraterone and VPC-13566 upregulate PSMA protein and mRNA expression but block PSA secretion in LNCaP cells. Both anti-androgens also enhanced 68Ga-PSMA uptake normalized by the number of cells, whereas abiraterone and VPC-13566 reduced 68Ga-PSMA uptake in total LNCaP monolayers treated due to cell death.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that PSA secretion and PSMA expression are differentially regulated upon anti-androgen treatment. This finding might be important for the interpretation of 68Ga-PSMA PET images in monitoring therapies with abiraterone and VPC-13566 in prostate cancer patients, but needs to be validated in vivo.

Impact of short-term Dutasteride treatment on prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in a mouse xenograft model

Background

Dutasteride has been shown to increase expression of the prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in prostate cancer cells in previous in vitro studies. This 5‐alpha‐reductase inhibitor is commonly used for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement. The modulation of PSMA expression might affect PSMA‐based prostate cancer imaging and therapy.

Aim

The purpose of this work was to further analyze concentration‐dependent effects of Dutasteride on PSMA expression in a mouse xenograft model.

Methods and results

Four groups of mice bearing LNCaP xenografts were treated for 14 days with daily intraperitoneal injections of either vehicle control or different concentrations of Dutasteride (0.1, 1, 10 mg/kg). Total expression of PSMA, androgen receptor (AR), and caspase‐3 protein was analyzed using immunoblotting (WES). In addition, PSMA, cleaved caspase‐3 and Ki‐67 expression was assessed and quantified by immunohistochemistry. Tumor size was measured by caliper on day 7 and 14, tumor weight was assessed following tissue harvesting.

The mean PSMA protein expression in mice increased significantly after treatment with 1 mg/kg (10‐fold) or 10 mg/kg (sixfold) of Dutasteride compared to vehicle control. The mean fluorescence intensity significantly increased by daily injections of 0.1 mg/kg Dutasteride (1.6‐fold) as well as 1 and 10 mg/kg Dutasteride (twofold). While the reduction in tumor volume following treatment with high concentrations of 10 mg/kg Dutasteride was nonsignificant, no changes in AR, caspase‐3, cleaved caspase‐3, and Ki‐67 expression were observed.

Conclusion

Short‐term Dutasteride treatments with concentrations of 1 and 10 mg/kg significantly increase the total PSMA protein expression in a mouse LNCaP xenograft model. PSMA fluorescence intensity increases significantly even using lower daily concentrations of 0.1 mg/kg Dutasteride. Further investigations are needed to elucidate the impact of Dutasteride treatment on PSMA expression in patients.

Evaluation of the PSMA-Binding Ligand 212Pb-NG001 in Multicellular Tumour Spheroid and Mouse Models of Prostate Cancer

Radioligand therapy targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is rapidly evolving as a promising treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The PSMA-targeting ligand p-SCN-Bn-TCMC-PSMA (NG001) labelled with ²¹²Pb efficiently targets PSMA-positive cells in vitro and in vivo. The aim of this preclinical study was to evaluate the therapeutic potential of ²¹²Pb-NG001 in multicellular tumour spheroid and mouse models of prostate cancer. The cytotoxic effect of ²¹²Pb-NG001 was tested in human prostate C4-2 spheroids. Biodistribution at various time points and therapeutic effects of different activities of the radioligand were investigated in male athymic nude mice bearing C4-2 tumours, while long-term toxicity was studied in immunocompetent BALB/c mice. The radioligand induced a selective cytotoxic effect in spheroids at activity concentrations of 3–10 kBq/mL. In mice, the radioligand accumulated rapidly in tumours and was retained over 24 h, while it rapidly cleared from nontargeted tissues. Treatment with 0.25, 0.30 or 0.40 MBq of ²¹²Pb-NG001 significantly inhibited tumour growth and improved median survival with therapeutic indexes of 1.5, 2.3 and 2.7, respectively. In BALB/c mice, no signs of long-term radiation toxicity were observed at activities of 0.05 and 0.33 MBq. The obtained results warrant clinical studies to evaluate the biodistribution, therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of ²¹²Pb-NG001.

E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET

RATIONALE

The development of consensus guidelines for interpretation of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is needed to provide more consistent reports in clinical practice. The standardization of PSMA-PET interpretation may also contribute to increasing the data reproducibility within clinical trials. Finally, guidelines in PSMA-PET interpretation are needed to communicate the exact location of findings to referring physicians, to support clinician therapeutic management decisions.

METHODS

A panel of worldwide experts in PSMA-PET was established. Panelists were selected based on their expertise and publication record in the diagnosis or treatment of PCa, in their involvement in clinical guidelines and according to their expertise in the clinical application of radiolabeled PSMA inhibitors. Panelists were actively involved in all stages of a modified, nonanonymous, Delphi consensus process.

RESULTS

According to the findings obtained by modified Delphi consensus process, panelist recommendations were implemented in a structured report for PSMA-PET.

CONCLUSIONS

The E-PSMA standardized reporting guidelines, a document supported by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), provide consensus statements among a panel of experts in PSMA-PET imaging, to develop a structured report for PSMA-PET in prostate cancer and to harmonize diagnostic interpretation criteria.

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-based Imaging of Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

CONTEXT

Positron emission tomography (PET) targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has unprecedented accuracy for localization of initial or recurrent prostate cancer (PC). There is now growing evidence regarding the value of PSMA-PET in patients with advanced PC.

OBJECTIVE

To review the value of PSMA-PET/computed tomography (CT) in the context of castration-resistant PC (CRPC).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A search of the PubMed database using the terms "PSMA PET castration resistant prostate cancer" (years 2011-2020) was performed. Reviews, case reports/series, non-English articles, preclinical studies, access-restricted studies, and studies on PSMA radioligand therapy without further analysis of PSMA-PET parameters were subsequently excluded.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Compared to conventional imaging, PSMA-PET better identifies the true extent of CRPC, especially nonmetastatic CRPC. The clinical benefit of this stage migration is still unclear and needs to be evaluated in further studies. High accuracy of PSMA-PET holds promise for better, PET-guided metastasis-directed treatment in patients with oligometastatic CRPC. PSMA-PET is an essential eligibility criterion for [¹⁷⁷Lu]-PSMA theranostic applications. Preliminary evidence indicates the value of PSMA-PET for the assessment of treatment responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Among other applications, PSMA-PET offers more precise staging for nonmetastatic CRPC. In particular, target localization for metastasis-directed therapy and target expression assessment for PSMA radioligand therapy also hold promise. Potential translation of this diagnostic tool into an oncologic benefit needs to be defined in future trials.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This review describes how prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET), a new sensitive imaging tool for prostate cancer, might help to guide clinicians in making treatment decisions for advanced prostate cancer.

PSA-Targeted Alpha-, Beta-, and Positron-Emitting Immunotheranostics in Murine Prostate Cancer Models and Nonhuman Primates

PURPOSE

Most patients with prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors develop therapeutic resistance due to restoration of AR functionality. Thus, there is a critical need for novel treatment approaches. Here we investigate the theranostic potential of hu5A10, a humanized mAb specifically targeting free PSA (KLK3).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

LNCaP-AR (LNCaP with overexpression of wildtype AR) xenografts (NSG mice) and KLK3_Hi-Myc transgenic mice were imaged with ⁸⁹Zr- or treated with ⁹⁰Y- or ²²⁵Ac-labeled hu5A10; biodistribution and subcellular localization were analyzed by gamma counting, PET, autoradiography, and microscopy. Therapeutic efficacy of [²²⁵Ac]hu5A10 and [⁹⁰Y]hu5A10 in LNCaP-AR tumors was assessed by tumor volume measurements, time to nadir (TTN), time to progression (TTP), and survival. Pharmacokinetics of [⁸⁹Zr]hu5A10 in nonhuman primates (NHP) were determined using PET.

RESULTS

Biodistribution of radiolabeled hu5A10 constructs was comparable in different mouse models. Specific tumor uptake increased over time and correlated with PSA expression. Treatment with [⁹⁰Y]/[²²⁵Ac]hu5A10 effectively reduced tumor burden and prolonged survival (P ≤ 0.0054). Effects of [⁹⁰Y]hu5A10 were more immediate than [²²⁵Ac]hu5A10 (TTN, P < 0.0001) but less sustained (TTP, P < 0.0001). Complete responses were observed in 7 of 18 [²²⁵Ac]hu5A10 and 1 of 9 mice [⁹⁰Y]hu5A10. Pharmacokinetics of [⁸⁹Zr]hu5A10 were consistent between NHPs and comparable with those in mice. [⁸⁹Zr]hu5A10-PET visualized the NHP-prostate over the 2-week observation period.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a complete preclinical evaluation of radiolabeled hu5A10 in mouse prostate cancer models and NHPs, and establish hu5A10 as a new theranostic agent that allows highly specific and effective downstream targeting of AR in PSA-expressing tissue. Our data support the clinical translation of radiolabeled hu5A10 for treating prostate cancer.

Detection Rate of 68Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer and Androgen Deprivation Therapy

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand PET/CT enables the localization of tumor lesions in patients with recurrent prostate cancer, but it is unclear whether androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) influences diagnostic accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ADT on the detection rate of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT. Thus, 399 patients with initial radical prostatectomy and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT during PSA relapse were retrospectively evaluated. Propensity score matching was used to create two balanced groups of 62 subjects who either did or did not receive ADT within six months before imaging. All ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT were evaluated visually and with semiquantitative measures. The detection rate of tumor recurrence was significantly higher in the group with ADT (88.7% vs. 72.6%, p = 0.02) and improved with increasing PSA-levels in both groups. In subjects with pathological PET/CT and ADT, whole-body total lesion PSMA (p < 0.01) and PSMA-derived tumor volume (p < 0.01) were significantly higher than in those without ADT. More PSMA-positive lesions and higher PSMA-derived volumetric parameters in patients with ADT suggest that a better detection rate is related to a (biologically) more advanced disease stage. Due to high detection rates in patients with PSA-levels < 2 ng/mL, the withdrawal of ADT before PSMA ligand PET/CT cannot be recommended.

Meeting report from the Prostate Cancer Foundation PSMA theranostics state of the science meeting

INTRODUCTION

The Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) convened a PCF prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) Theranostics State of the Science Meeting on 18 November 2019, at Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.

METHODS

The meeting was attended by 22 basic, translational, and clinical researchers from around the globe, with expertise in PSMA biology, development and use of PSMA theranostics agents, and clinical trials. The goal of this meeting was to discuss the current state of knowledge, the most important biological and clinical questions, and critical next steps for the clinical development of PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agents and PSMA-targeted radionuclide agents for patients with prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Several major topic areas were discussed including the biology of PSMA, the role of PSMA-targeted PET imaging in prostate cancer, the physics and performance of different PSMA-targeted PET imaging agents, the current state of clinical development of PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy (RNT) agents, the role of dosimetry in PSMA RNT treatment planning, barriers and challenges in PSMA RNT clinical development, optimization of patient selection for PSMA RNT trials, and promising combination treatment approaches with PSMA RNT.

DISCUSSION

This article summarizes the presentations from the meeting for the purpose of globally disseminating this knowledge to advance the use of PSMA-targeted theranostic agents for imaging and treatment of patients with prostate cancer.

Molecular analysis of circulating tumor cells of metastatic castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy

Rationale: Lu-177-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT) is currently under approval for treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with late stage disease. However, previous studies demonstrated both heterogeneity of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression, as well as response to PSMA treatment among mCRPC patients. Thus, there is an unmet need for identifying predictive parametres prior or under PSMA-RLT treatment. We therefore aimed to correlate several clinical and molecular parameters with response to PSMA treatment in a cohort of mCRPC patients undergoing PSMA RLT followed by a detailed analysis of promising candidates.

Methods: Nineteen patients, median age 68.8 years (range: 56.9 - 83.3) with mCRPC were included in this study. We performed baseline analysis of clinical parameters based on PSMA PET/CT, (metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total tumor volume (TTV)), serum PSA, ALP, LDH and gene expression analysis of circulating tumor cells (expression of AR full length (AR-FL), AR splice variant 7 (AR-V7), PSA and PSMA) as well as common markers for neuroendocrine differentiation (NED).

Results: Patients presented with bone, lymph node, and visceral metastases (89%, 68%, and 21%, respectively). All patients were pretreated with docetaxel, either abiraterone or enzalutamide, or both. Biochemical response in terms of PSA decline ≥50 or ≥30% was observed in 42% and 63%, respectively. There were significant correlations between PSA and PSMA mRNA expression, as well as tumor volumes (both MTV and TTV), AR-FL and AR-V7 mRNA expression. However, there was no correlation with response to PSMA treatment. Furthermore, none of these parameters was significantly correlated with baseline serum PSA values. Common NED markers were shown to be specifically high expressed and revealed impact on OS independent from AR-V7 gene expression.

Conclusion: We demonstrate that AR-FL and its splice variant AR-V7 might serve as prognostic biomarkers displaying high tumor burden in mCRPC patient prior to PSMA-RLT. Contrary, PSMA, which has been discussed as a biomarker for PSMA targeted treatment, does not display strong prognostic ability - at least on the mRNA level. Surprisingly, none of these parameters correlates to response to PSMA treatment. In contrast, commom NED markers such as SYP and ENO2 as well as FOXA1 expression level seem to predict OS, but not PFS, more reliably. We admit that a limitation of our study is the focus on mRNA expression of potential biomarkers only. Further investigations analyzing the potential role of protein expression of these markers are therefore warranted.