1
|
Thompson DR, Ski CF. Adopting adaptation in REACH-HF. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2024:zvae076. [PMID: 38813943 DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvae076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- David R Thompson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
| | - Chantal F Ski
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pfledderer CD, von Klinggraeff L, Burkart S, da Silva Bandeira A, Lubans DR, Jago R, Okely AD, van Sluijs EMF, Ioannidis JPA, Thrasher JF, Li X, Beets MW. Consolidated guidance for behavioral intervention pilot and feasibility studies. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:57. [PMID: 38582840 PMCID: PMC10998328 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01485-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the behavioral sciences, conducting pilot and/or feasibility studies (PFS) is a key step that provides essential information used to inform the design, conduct, and implementation of a larger-scale trial. There are more than 160 published guidelines, reporting checklists, frameworks, and recommendations related to PFS. All of these publications offer some form of guidance on PFS, but many focus on one or a few topics. This makes it difficult for researchers wanting to gain a broader understanding of all the relevant and important aspects of PFS and requires them to seek out multiple sources of information, which increases the risk of missing key considerations to incorporate into their PFS. The purpose of this study was to develop a consolidated set of considerations for the design, conduct, implementation, and reporting of PFS for interventions conducted in the behavioral sciences. METHODS To develop this consolidation, we undertook a review of the published guidance on PFS in combination with expert consensus (via a Delphi study) from the authors who wrote such guidance to inform the identified considerations. A total of 161 PFS-related guidelines, checklists, frameworks, and recommendations were identified via a review of recently published behavioral intervention PFS and backward/forward citation tracking of a well-known PFS literature (e.g., CONSORT Ext. for PFS). Authors of all 161 PFS publications were invited to complete a three-round Delphi survey, which was used to guide the creation of a consolidated list of considerations to guide the design, conduct, and reporting of PFS conducted by researchers in the behavioral sciences. RESULTS A total of 496 authors were invited to take part in the three-round Delphi survey (round 1, N = 46; round 2, N = 24; round 3, N = 22). A set of twenty considerations, broadly categorized into six themes (intervention design, study design, conduct of trial, implementation of intervention, statistical analysis, and reporting) were generated from a review of the 161 PFS-related publications as well as a synthesis of feedback from the three-round Delphi process. These 20 considerations are presented alongside a supporting narrative for each consideration as well as a crosswalk of all 161 publications aligned with each consideration for further reading. CONCLUSION We leveraged expert opinion from researchers who have published PFS-related guidelines, checklists, frameworks, and recommendations on a wide range of topics and distilled this knowledge into a valuable and universal resource for researchers conducting PFS. Researchers may use these considerations alongside the previously published literature to guide decisions about all aspects of PFS, with the hope of creating and disseminating interventions with broad public health impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher D Pfledderer
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health in Austin, Austin, TX, 78701, USA.
- Michael and Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health in Austin, Austin, TX, 78701, USA.
| | | | - Sarah Burkart
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29205, USA
| | | | - David R Lubans
- College of Human and Social Futures, The University of Newcastle Australia, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Russell Jago
- Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK
| | - Anthony D Okely
- Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
| | | | - John P A Ioannidis
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - James F Thrasher
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29205, USA
| | - Xiaoming Li
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29205, USA
| | - Michael W Beets
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nomali M, Mohammadrezaei R, Yaseri M, Tayebi A, Ayati A, Roshandel G, Keshtkar A, Ghiyasvandian S, Alipasandi K, Navid H, Zakerimoghadam M. Efficacy of a self-monitoring traffic light diary on outcomes of patients with heart failure: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 152:104704. [PMID: 38368847 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Patients with heart failure experience high hospitalization. However, patients cannot recognize symptoms according to current approaches, which needs to be improved by new self-monitoring instruments and strategies. Thus, we aimed to assess a self-monitoring traffic light diary on outcomes of patients with heart failure. METHODS This was a single-blind, two-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial at the heart failure clinic of Tehran Heart Center (Tehran, Iran). Adult patients with a definitive diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (i.e., ejection fraction of less than 40 %), and New York Heart Association functional classes II-IV were included. A block-balanced randomization method was used to assign eligible subjects to the intervention or control group. Baseline data were collected before random allocation. Participants in the intervention group received a comprehensive intervention consisting of (1) self-care education by an Australian Heart Foundation booklet on heart failure, (2) regular self-monitoring of weight and shortness of breath at home, and (3) scheduled call follow-ups for three months. Patients in the control group received usual care. The primary outcome was heart failure self-care; the secondary outcomes were heart failure quality of life, knowledge, and all-cause hospitalization. RESULTS From June to August 2017, 68 patients were included in the study. The overall age of participants was 55 (13.6) years old, and 71 % of patients were male. A significant association between the intervention and self-care maintenance (β 5.1; 95 % CI 2.50 to 7.70, P < 0.001), self-care management (β 10.6; 95 % CI 6.50 to 14.8, P < 0.001), self-care confidence (β 8.0; 95 % CI 5.0 to 11.0, P < 0.001) and heart failure knowledge (β 1.7; 95 % CI 1.30, 2.04; P < 0.001) was found. However, there was no association between the intervention and quality of life (β 2.5; 95 % CI -0.79, 5.88, P 0.135) and hospitalization-free survival of the two groups (Log-Rank P 0.540). CONCLUSION A self-monitoring traffic light diary can improve self-care behaviors and heart failure knowledge in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. RCT APPROVAL ID Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials IRCT2017021032476N1. STUDY PROTOCOL PMCID: PMC6262204.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahin Nomali
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ramin Mohammadrezaei
- Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Tehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehdi Yaseri
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirhossein Tayebi
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
| | - Aryan Ayati
- Tehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Gholamreza Roshandel
- Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
| | - Abbasali Keshtkar
- Department of Disaster & Emergency Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahrzad Ghiyasvandian
- Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kian Alipasandi
- Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hossein Navid
- Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Tehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Masoumeh Zakerimoghadam
- Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Talty A, Morris R, Deighan C. Home-based self-management multimodal cancer interventions & cardiotoxicity: a scoping review. CARDIO-ONCOLOGY (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2024; 10:12. [PMID: 38424647 PMCID: PMC10903028 DOI: 10.1186/s40959-024-00204-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to advancements in methods of cancer treatment, the population of people living with and beyond cancer is dramatically growing. The number of cancer survivors developing cardiovascular diseases and heart failure is also rising, due in part to the cardiotoxic nature of many cancer treatments. Guidelines are being increasingly released, emphasising the need for interdisciplinary action to address this gap in survivorship care. However, the extent to which interventions exist, incorporating the recommendations of cardio-oncology research, remains undetermined. OBJECTIVE The aim of this scoping review is to assess the nature, extent and remit of existing cancer care interventions and their integration of cardio-oncology principles. METHODS The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews Guidelines. Databases were independently searched for articles from 2010 to 2022, by two members of the research team. Data were charted and synthesised using the following criteria: (a) the focus of the intervention (b) the medium of delivery (c) the duration (d) the modalities included in the interventions (e) the research articles associated with each intervention (f) the type of studies conducted (g) key measures used (h) outcomes reported. RESULTS Interventions encompassed six key modalities: Psychological Support, Physical Activity, Nutrition, Patient Education, Lifestyle and Caregiver Support. The focus, medium of delivery and duration of interventions varied significantly. While a considerable number of study protocols and pilot studies exist documenting HSMIs, only 25% appear to have progressed beyond this stage of development. Of those that have, the present review did not identify any 'feasible' interventions that covered each of the six modalities, while being generalisable to all cancer survivors and incorporating the recommendations from cardio-oncology research. CONCLUSION Despite the substantial volume of research and evidence from the field of cardio-oncology, the findings of this scoping review suggest that the recommendations from guidelines have yet to be successfully translated from theory to practice. There is an opportunity, if not necessity, for cardiac rehabilitation to expand to meet the needs of those living with and beyond cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Talty
- The Heart Manual Department, Astley Ainslie Hospital, Grange Loan, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, EH9 2HL
| | - Roseanne Morris
- The Heart Manual Department, Astley Ainslie Hospital, Grange Loan, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, EH9 2HL
| | - Carolyn Deighan
- The Heart Manual Department, Astley Ainslie Hospital, Grange Loan, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, EH9 2HL.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Matheson L, Greaves C, Duda JL, Wells M, Secher D, Rhodes P, Lorenc A, Jepson M, Ozakinci G, Watson E, Fulton-Lieuw T, Mittal S, Main B, Nankivell P, Mehanna H, Brett J. Development of the 'ACT now & check-it-out' intervention to support patient-initiated follow up for Head and Neck cancer patients. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 119:108033. [PMID: 37988772 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current Head and Neck cancer (HNC) follow-up models are considered sub-optimal at detecting recurrences. We describe the development of a patient-initiated follow up (PIFU) trial intervention support package, to support HNC patients to engage in PIFU self-care behaviors. METHODS An intervention mapping approach, informed by evidence synthesis, theory and stakeholder consultation, guided intervention development. Data sources included a patient survey (n = 144), patient interviews (n = 30), 7 workshops with patients (n = 25) and caregivers (n = 3) and 5 workshops with health professionals (n = 21). RESULTS The intervention ('ACT now & check-it-out') comprises an education and support session with a health professional and an app and/or a booklet for patients. The main targets for change in patient self-care behaviors were: assessing what is normal for them; regularly checking for symptom changes; prompt help-seeking for persistent/new symptoms; self-management of fear of recurrence; engaging with the intervention over time. CONCLUSIONS We have developed an evidence, person and theory-based intervention to support PIFU self-care behaviors in HNC patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS A trial is underway to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. If successful, this intervention could be adapted for patients with other cancers or diseases, which is important given the recent shift towards PIFU pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Matheson
- Oxford Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Research, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0FL Oxford, UK.
| | - Colin Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Joan L Duda
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Mary Wells
- Nursing Directorate, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF, UK.
| | | | | | - Ava Lorenc
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Marcus Jepson
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Gozde Ozakinci
- Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
| | - Eila Watson
- Oxford Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Research, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0FL Oxford, UK.
| | - Tessa Fulton-Lieuw
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Saloni Mittal
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Barry Main
- Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, BS1 2LY, UK.
| | - Paul Nankivell
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Hisham Mehanna
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Jo Brett
- Oxford Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Research, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0FL Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Noonan MC, Frost J, Dalal HM, Taylor RS. Caregiver presence in a home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme improves the health-related quality of life of patients with heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2024; 23:90-94. [PMID: 36882086 DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) is a home-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention designed for patients with heart failure and their caregivers. We present a pooled analysis of patients >18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of HF recruited to two REACH-HF randomized controlled trials. Where identified by patients and consented to participate, caregivers were randomly assigned with patients to receive the REACH-HF intervention plus usual care or usual care alone. Our analysis demonstrated that compared to control group, the REACH-HF group had a greater gain in their disease-specific health-related quality of life at follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam C Noonan
- Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK
| | - Julia Frost
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Hasnain M Dalal
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Devon, UK
- Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust, Cornwall, UK
| | - Rod S Taylor
- Social and Public Health Institute, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pfledderer CD, von Klinggraeff L, Burkart S, da Silva Bandeira A, Lubans DR, Jago R, Okely AD, van Sluijs EM, Ioannidis JP, Thrasher JF, Li X, Beets MW. Expert Perspectives on Pilot and Feasibility Studies: A Delphi Study and Consolidation of Considerations for Behavioral Interventions. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3370077. [PMID: 38168263 PMCID: PMC10760234 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3370077/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Background In the behavioral sciences, conducting pilot and/or feasibility studies (PFS) is a key step that provides essential information used to inform the design, conduct, and implementation of a larger-scale trial. There are more than 160 published guidelines, reporting checklists, frameworks, and recommendations related to PFS. All of these publications offer some form of guidance on PFS, but many focus on one or a few topics. This makes it difficult for researchers wanting to gain a broader understanding of all the relevant and important aspects of PFS and requires them to seek out multiple sources of information, which increases the risk of missing key considerations to incorporate into their PFS. The purpose of this study was to develop a consolidated set of considerations for the design, conduct, implementation, and reporting of PFS for interventions conducted in the behavioral sciences. Methods To develop this consolidation, we undertook a review of the published guidance on PFS in combination with expert consensus (via a Delphi study) from the authors who wrote such guidance to inform the identified considerations. A total of 161 PFS-related guidelines, checklists, frameworks, and recommendations were identified via a review of recently published behavioral intervention PFS and backward/forward citation tracking of well-know PFS literature (e.g., CONSORT Ext. for PFS). Authors of all 161 PFS publications were invited to complete a three-round Delphi survey, which was used to guide the creation of a consolidated list of considerations to guide the design, conduct, and reporting of PFS conducted by researchers in the behavioral sciences. Results A total of 496 authors were invited to take part in the Delphi survey, 50 (10.1%) of which completed all three rounds, representing 60 (37.3%) of the 161 identified PFS-related guidelines, checklists, frameworks, and recommendations. A set of twenty considerations, broadly categorized into six themes (Intervention Design, Study Design, Conduct of Trial, Implementation of Intervention, Statistical Analysis and Reporting) were generated from a review of the 161 PFS-related publications as well as a synthesis of feedback from the three-round Delphi process. These 20 considerations are presented alongside a supporting narrative for each consideration as well as a crosswalk of all 161 publications aligned with each consideration for further reading. Conclusion We leveraged expert opinion from researchers who have published PFS-related guidelines, checklists, frameworks, and recommendations on a wide range of topics and distilled this knowledge into a valuable and universal resource for researchers conducting PFS. Researchers may use these considerations alongside the previously published literature to guide decisions about all aspects of PFS, with the hope of creating and disseminating interventions with broad public health impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sarah Burkart
- University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health
| | | | | | - Russ Jago
- University of Bristol Population Health Sciences
| | | | | | | | | | - Xiaoming Li
- University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Purcell C, Purvis A, Cleland JGF, Cowie A, Dalal HM, Ibbotson T, Murphy C, Taylor RS. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation for people with heart failure and their caregivers: a mixed-methods analysis of the roll out an evidence-based programme in Scotland (SCOT:REACH-HF study). Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2023; 22:804-813. [PMID: 36617216 DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Alternative models of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are required to improve CR access and uptake. Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) is a comprehensive home-based rehabilitation and self-management programme, facilitated by trained health professionals, for people with heart failure (HF) and their caregivers. REACH-HF was shown to be clinically effective and cost-effective in a multi-centre randomized trial. The SCOT:REACH-HF study assessed implementation of REACH-HF in routine clinical practice in NHS Scotland. METHODS AND RESULTS A mixed-method implementation study was conducted across six regional Health Boards. Of 136 people with HF and 56 caregivers recruited, 101 people with HF and 26 caregivers provided 4-month follow-up data, after participating in the 12-week programme. Compared with baseline, REACH-HF participation resulted in substantial gains in the primary outcome of health-related quality of life, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (mean difference: -9.8, 95% CI: -13.2 to -6.4, P < 0.001). Improvements were also seen in secondary outcomes (PROM-CR+; EQ-5D-5L; Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) domains of maintenance and symptom perception; Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care domains of symptom perception and management). Twenty qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 REACH-HF facilitators, five supporting clinicians, and four national stakeholders. Interviewees were largely positive about REACH-HF, considering it to have 'filled a gap' where centre-based CR was not an option. Key issues to support future roll-out were also identified. CONCLUSION Our findings support wider roll-out of REACH-HF as an alternative to centre-based models, to improve CR access and uptake for people with HF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie Purcell
- Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, The Open University in Scotland, 10 Drumsheugh Gardens, Edinburgh EH3 7QJ, UK
| | - Anthony Purvis
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Berkeley Square, 99 Berkeley St, Glasgow G3 7HR, UK
| | - John G F Cleland
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Level 11, Boyd Orr Building, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Aynsley Cowie
- NHS Ayrshire and Arran, University Hospital Crosshouse, Kilmarnock Rd, Crosshouse, Kilmarnock KA2 0BE, UK
| | - Hasnain M Dalal
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Tracy Ibbotson
- General Practice & Primary Care, University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow G12 9LX, UK
| | - Clare Murphy
- NHS Forth Valley, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Stirling Road, Larbert FK5 4WR, UK
| | - Rod S Taylor
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Berkeley Square, 99 Berkeley St, Glasgow G3 7HR, UK
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Level 11, Boyd Orr Building, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pearce G, Holliday N, Sandhu H, Eftekhari H, Bruce J, Timms E, Ablett L, Kavi L, Simmonds J, Evans R, Magee P, Powell R, Keogh S, McGregor G. Co-creation of a complex, multicomponent rehabilitation intervention and feasibility trial protocol for the PostUraL tachycardia Syndrome Exercise (PULSE) study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:143. [PMID: 37582801 PMCID: PMC10426060 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01365-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a dearth of research to support the treatment of people with postural tachycardia syndrome (PoTS). Despite expert consensus suggesting exercise is recommended for this patient group, there are no randomised control trials examining this rigorously. The aim was to co-create a feasibility trial protocol and a rehabilitation intervention for people living with PoTS. METHODS The intervention and feasibility trial design were co-created as part of the PostUraL tachycardia Syndrome Exercise (PULSE) study. We used the 'three co's framework' of co-define, co-design and co-refine. Recruitment included key national charities and National Health Service Trusts treating people living with PoTS in the UK. Eighteen patient and public involvement members attended the co-define session, and 16 co-creators with a mix of expertise attended the subsequent co-design and co-refine sessions. Seven intervention practitioners were trained in the rehabilitation intervention, providing feedback for further co-refinement. RESULTS The final co-created intervention comprises online physical activity, and lifestyle and behaviour change support sessions. It is based on functional movement activities using a patient-centred approach tailored to individual needs. Physical activity intensity is guided by individuals' perception of effort rather than by objective measures. Recumbent bikes are provided for home use. Patients deemed randomisation to be acceptable because research in this area was considered important. CONCLUSIONS An innovative approach was used to co-create the PULSE intervention and feasibility trial protocol to meet the evidence-based and logistical needs of people living with PoTS, clinicians, service deliverers, third-sector organisations, academics and funders. This can be used as a successful example and template for future research internationally. People living with PoTS were recognised as experts and involved in every aspect of conceptualisation, design and refinement. This complex rehabilitation intervention is currently being tested in a randomised feasibility trial comparing the PULSE intervention with best-practice usual care for people living with PoTS. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN45323485 was registered on April 7, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Helen Eftekhari
- University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Julie Bruce
- University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Emma Timms
- Patient and Public Involvement, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
- Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Laura Ablett
- Patient and Public Involvement, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | | | | | - Rebecca Evans
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Richard Powell
- Coventry University, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Gordon McGregor
- Coventry University, Coventry, UK
- University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Purcell C, McDaid L, Forsyth R, Simpson SA, Elliott L, Bailey JV, Moore L, Mitchell KR. A peer-led, school-based social network intervention for young people in the UK, promoting sexual health via social media and conversations with friends: intervention development and optimisation of STASH. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:675. [PMID: 37041542 PMCID: PMC10088210 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15541-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quality of school-based sex and relationships education (SRE) is variable in the UK. Digitally-based interventions can usefully supplement teacher-delivered lessons and positively impact sexual health knowledge. Designed to address gaps in core SRE knowledge, STASH (Sexually Transmitted infections And Sexual Health) is a peer-led social network intervention adapted from the successful ASSIST (A Stop Smoking in Schools Trial) model, and based on Diffusion of Innovation theory. This paper describes how the STASH intervention was developed and refined. METHODS Drawing on the Six Steps in Quality Intervention Development (6SQuID) framework, we tested a provisional programme theory through three iterative stages -: 1) evidence synthesis; 2) intervention co-production; and 3) adaptation - which incorporated evidence review, stakeholder consultation, and website co-development and piloting with young people, sexual health specialists, and educators. Multi-method results were analysed in a matrix of commonalities and differences. RESULTS Over 21 months, intervention development comprised 20 activities within the three stages. 1) We identified gaps in SRE provision and online resources (e.g. around sexual consent, pleasure, digital literacy), and confirmed critical components including the core ASSIST peer nomination process, the support of schools, and alignment to the national curriculum. We reviewed candidate social media platforms, ruling out all except Facebook on basis of functionality restrictions which precluded their use for our purposes. 2) Drawing on these findings, as well as relevant behaviour change theories and core elements of the ASSIST model, we co-developed new content with young people and other stakeholders, tailored to sexual health and to delivery via closed Facebook groups, as well as face-to-face conversations. 3) A pilot in one school highlighted practical considerations, including around peer nomination, recruitment, awareness raising, and boundaries to message sharing. From this, a revised STASH intervention and programme theory were co-developed with stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS STASH intervention development required extensive adaptation from the ASSIST model. Although labour intensive, our robust co-development approach ensured that an optimised intervention was taken forward for feasibility testing. Evidencing a rigorous approach to operationalising existing intervention development guidance, this paper also highlights the significance of balancing competing stakeholder concerns, resource availability, and an ever-changing landscape for implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN97369178.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie Purcell
- Open University, 10 Drumsheugh Gardens, Edinburgh, EH3 7QJ, UK.
- School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Lisa McDaid
- Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Long Pocket Precinct, 80 Meiers Rd, Indooroopilly, Brisbane, QLD, 4068, Australia
| | - Ross Forsyth
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears Building, Byres Road, Glasgow, G12 8TA, Scotland
| | - Sharon A Simpson
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears Building, Byres Road, Glasgow, G12 8TA, Scotland
| | - Lawrie Elliott
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Nursing and Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Room 420 George Moore Building, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 OBA, UK
| | - Julia V Bailey
- University College London E-Health Unit, Royal Free Hospital, Upper Third Floor, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Laurence Moore
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears Building, Byres Road, Glasgow, G12 8TA, Scotland
| | - Kirstin R Mitchell
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears Building, Byres Road, Glasgow, G12 8TA, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dibben GO, Hillsdon M, Dalal HM, Tang LH, Doherty PJ, Taylor R. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation and physical activity in people with heart failure: a secondary analysis of the REACH-HF randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e063284. [PMID: 36759035 PMCID: PMC9923308 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To quantify the impact of a home-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention (Rehabilitation Enablement in Chronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF)) on objectively assessed physical activity (PA) of patients with heart failure (HF) and explore the extent by which patient characteristics are associated with a change in PA. DESIGN Secondary analysis of randomised controlled trial data. SETTING Five centres in the UK. PARTICIPANTS 247 patients with HF (mean age 70.9±10.3 years; 28% women). INTERVENTIONS REACH-HF versus usual care (control). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES PA was assessed over 7 days via GENEActiv triaxial accelerometer at baseline (pre-randomisation), post-intervention (4 months) and final follow-up (6-12 months). Using HF-specific intensity thresholds, intervention effects (REACH-HF vs control) on average min/day PA (inactivity, light PA and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA)) over all days, week days and weekend days were examined using linear regression analysis. Multivariable regression was used to explore associations between baseline patient characteristics and change in PA. RESULTS Although there was no difference between REACH-HF and control groups in 7-day PA levels post-intervention or at final follow-up, there was evidence of an increase in weekday MVPA (10.9 min/day, 95% CI: -2.94 to 24.69), light PA (26.9 min/day, 95% CI: -0.05 to 53.8) and decreased inactivity (-38.31 min/day, 95% CI: -72.1 to -4.5) in favour of REACH-HF. Baseline factors associated with an increase in PA from baseline to final follow-up were reduced MVPA, increased incremental shuttle walk test distance, increased Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety score and living with a child >18 years (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS While participation in the REACH-HF home-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention did not increase overall weekly activity, patient's behaviour patterns appeared to change with increased weekday PA levels and reduced inactivity. Baseline PA levels were highly predictive of PA change. Future focus should be on robust behavioural changes, improving overall levels of objectively assessed PA of people with HF. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS ISRCTN78539530 and ISRCTN86234930.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace O Dibben
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Melvyn Hillsdon
- Department of Public Health and Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Hasnain M Dalal
- Research, Development and Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, TRURO, Cornwall, UK
- Primary Care, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, UK
| | - Lars H Tang
- The Research Unit PROgrez, Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Sjaelland, Denmark
- The Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark
| | | | - Rod Taylor
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mielke J, Brunkert T, Zúñiga F, Simon M, Zullig LL, De Geest S. Methodological approaches to study context in intervention implementation studies: an evidence gap map. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:320. [PMID: 36517765 PMCID: PMC9749183 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01772-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Within implementation science studies, contextual analysis is increasingly recognized as foundational to interventions' successful and sustainable implementation. However, inconsistencies between methodological approaches currently limit progress in studying context and guidance to standardize the use of those approaches is scant. Therefore, this study's objective was to systematically review and map current methodological approaches to contextual analysis in intervention implementation studies. The results would help us both to systematize the process of contextual analysis and identify gaps in the current evidence. METHODS We conducted an evidence gap map (EGM) based on literature data via a stepwise approach. First, using an empirically developed search string, we randomly sampled 20% of all intervention implementation studies available from PubMed per year (2015-2020). Second, we assessed included studies that conducted a contextual analysis. Data extraction and evaluation followed the Basel Approach for CoNtextual ANAlysis (BANANA), using a color-coded rating scheme. Also based on BANANA and on the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework-an implementation framework that pays ample attention to context- we created visual maps of various approaches to contextual analysis. RESULTS Of 15, 286 identified intervention implementation studies and study protocols, 3017 were screened for inclusion. Of those, 110 warranted close examination, revealing 22% that reported on contextual analysis. Only one study explicitly applied a framework for contextual analysis. Data were most commonly collected via surveys (n = 15) and individual interviews (n = 13). Ten studies reported mixed-methods analyses. Twenty-two assessed meso-level contextual and setting factors, with socio-cultural aspects most commonly studied. Eighteen described the use of contextual information for subsequent project phases (e.g., intervention development/adaption, selecting implementation strategies). Nine reported contextual factors' influences on implementation and/or effectiveness outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This study describes current approaches to contextual analysis in implementation science and provides a novel framework for evaluating and mapping it. By synthesizing our findings graphically in figures, we provide an initial evidence base framework that can incorporate new findings as necessary. We strongly recommend further development of methodological approaches both to conduct contextual analysis and to systematize the reporting of it. These actions will increase the quality and consistency of implementation science research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Mielke
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thekla Brunkert
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
- University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Franziska Zúñiga
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Simon
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Leah L. Zullig
- Center for Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System and Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC USA
| | - Sabina De Geest
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Academic Center for Nursing and Midwifery, Louvain, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jeemon P, Reethu S, Ganapathi S, Lakshmi Kanth LR, Punnoose E, Abdullakutty J, Mattumal S, Joseph J, Joseph S, Venkateswaran C, Sunder P, Babu AS, Padickaparambil S, Neenumol KR, Chacko S, Shajahan S, Krishnankutty K, Devis S, Joseph R, Shemija B, John SA, Harikrishnan S. A multicentric, 2 × 2 factorial, randomised, open-label trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of structured physical activity training and cognitive behavioural therapy versus usual care in heart failure patients: a protocol for the PACT-HF trial. Wellcome Open Res 2022; 7:210. [PMID: 36105556 PMCID: PMC9445562 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18047.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a multi-morbid chronic condition, which adversely affects the quality of life of the affected individual. Engaging the patient and their caregivers in self-care is known to reduce mortality, rehospitalisation and improve quality of life among HF patients. The PACT-HF trial will answer whether clinical benefits in terms of mortality and hospitalisation outcomes can be demonstrated by using a pragmatic design to explore the specific effects of physical activity, and cognitive behavioural therapy in HF patients in India. Methods: We will conduct a 2 × 2 factorial, randomized, open-label trial, which aims to see if rehabilitation strategies of structured physical activity training and cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and self-management reduce the risk of repeat hospitalisation and deaths in HF patients in India. Patients will be randomised to (1) physical activity + usual care (2) cognitive behaviour therapy + usual care, (3) physical activity + cognitive behaviour therapy + usual care, and (4) usual care at 1:1:1:1 ratio. Time to mortality will be the primary outcome. A composite of mortality and hospitalisation for HF will be the main secondary outcome. Additional secondary outcomes will include ‘days alive and out of hospital’, cumulative hospitalisation, quality of life, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire score, depression score, six minutes walking distance, handgrip strength, and adherence to medicines and lifestyle. The effects of intervention on the primary outcome will be estimated from Cox proportional hazard models. For the continuous secondary outcome variables, differences between randomised groups will be estimated from linear mixed models or generalised estimating equations (GEE) as appropriate. Discussion: PACT-HF is designed to provide reliable evidence about the balance of benefits and risks conferred by physical activity and cognitive behavioural therapy-based cardiac rehabilitation for those with HF, irrespective of their initial disease severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panniyammakal Jeemon
- ICMR-Centre for Advanced Research and Excellence in Heart Failure (CARE-HF) and Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, India
| | - Salim Reethu
- ICMR-Centre for Advanced Research and Excellence in Heart Failure (CARE-HF), Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute of Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India
| | - Sanjay Ganapathi
- ICMR-Centre for Advanced Research and Excellence in Heart Failure (CARE-HF), Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute of Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India
| | - Lakshmipuram Rajappan Lakshmi Kanth
- ICMR-Centre for Advanced Research and Excellence in Heart Failure (CARE-HF), Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute of Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India
| | | | | | | | | | - Stigi Joseph
- Little flower hospital and research centre, Angamali, India
| | | | | | - Abraham Samuel Babu
- Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Sebastian Padickaparambil
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Kandagathuparambil Rajan Neenumol
- ICMR-Centre for Advanced Research and Excellence in Heart Failure (CARE-HF), Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute of Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India
| | - Susanna Chacko
- ICMR-Centre for Advanced Research and Excellence in Heart Failure (CARE-HF), Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute of Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India
| | - Shamla Shajahan
- ICMR-Centre for Advanced Research and Excellence in Heart Failure (CARE-HF), Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute of Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India
| | | | - Selma Devis
- Little flower hospital and research centre, Angamali, India
| | | | | | | | - Sivadasanpillai Harikrishnan
- ICMR-Centre for Advanced Research and Excellence in Heart Failure (CARE-HF), Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute of Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Amirova A, Lucas R, Cowie MR, Haddad M. Perceived barriers and enablers influencing physical activity in heart failure: A qualitative one-to-one interview study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0271743. [PMID: 35925964 PMCID: PMC9352074 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
In heart failure (HF), increased physical activity is associated with improved quality of life, reduced hospitalisation, and increased longevity and is an important aim of treatment. However, physical activity levels in individuals living with HF are typically extremely low. This qualitative study with one-to-one interviews systematically explores perceived clinical, environmental, and psychosocial barriers and enablers in older adults (≥70 years old) living with HF. Semi-structured interviews (N = 16) based on the Theoretical Domains Framework elicited 39 belief statements describing the barriers and enablers to physical activity. Theoretical domains containing these beliefs and corresponding constructs that were both pervasive and common were deemed most relevant. These were: concerns about physical activity (Beliefs about Consequences), self-efficacy (Beliefs about Capabilities), social support (Social Influences), major health event (Environmental Context and Resources), goal behavioural (Goal), action planning (Behavioural Regulation). This work extends the limited research on the modifiable barriers and enablers for physical activity participation by individuals living with HF. The research findings provide insights for cardiologists, HF-specialist nurses, and physiotherapists to help co-design and deliver a physical activity intervention more likely to be effective for individuals living with HF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliya Amirova
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Rebecca Lucas
- St Raphael’s Hospice Hospital & Health Care, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Martin R. Cowie
- Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- School of Cardiovascular Medicine & Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Haddad
- Health Services Research and Management, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Daw P, Wood GER, Harrison A, Doherty PJ, Veldhuijzen van Zanten JJCS, Dalal HM, Taylor RS, van Beurden SB, McDonagh STJ, Greaves CJ. Barriers and facilitators to implementation of a home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme for patients with heart failure in the NHS: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060221. [PMID: 35831041 PMCID: PMC9280226 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to identify barriers to, and facilitators of, implementation of the Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) programme within existing cardiac rehabilitation services, and develop and refine the REACH-HF Service Delivery Guide (an implementation guide cocreated with healthcare professionals). REACH-HF is an effective and cost-effective 12-week home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme for patients with heart failure. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS In 2019, four early adopter 'Beacon Sites' were set up to deliver REACH-HF to 200 patients. In 2020, 5 online REACH-HF training events were attended by 85 healthcare professionals from 45 National Health Service (NHS) teams across the UK and Ireland. DESIGN Our mixed-methods study used in-depth semi-structured interviews and an online survey. Interviews were conducted with staff trained specifically for the Beacon Site project, identified by opportunity and snowball sampling. The online survey was later offered to subsequent NHS staff who took part in the online REACH-HF training. Normalisation Process Theory was used as a theoretical framework to guide data collection/analysis. RESULTS Seventeen healthcare professionals working at the Beacon Sites were interviewed and 17 survey responses were received (20% response rate). The identified barriers and enablers included, among many, a lack of resources/commissioning, having interest in heart failure and working closely with the clinical heart failure team. Different implementation contexts (urban/rural), timing (during the COVID-19 pandemic) and factors outside the healthcare team/system (quality of the REACH-HF training) were observed to negatively or positively impact the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS The findings are highly relevant to healthcare professionals involved in planning, delivering and commissioning of cardiac rehabilitation for patients with heart failure. The study's main output, a refined version of the REACH-HF Service Delivery Guide, can guide the implementation process (eg, designing new care pathways) and provide practical solutions to overcoming common implementation barriers (eg, through early identification of implementation champions).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Daw
- School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Grace E R Wood
- School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | - Hasnain M Dalal
- Royal Cornwall Hospital, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, UK
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Rod S Taylor
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Institute of Health and Well Being, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Sinead T J McDonagh
- Primary Care Research Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin J Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Daw P, Harrison A, Doherty PJ, van Zanten JJCSV, Dalal HM, Taylor RS, van Beurden SB, McDonagh STJ, Greaves CJ. A pragmatic effectiveness-implementation study comparing trial evidence with routinely collected outcome data for patients receiving the REACH-HF home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2022; 22:270. [PMID: 35710336 PMCID: PMC9202968 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02707-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure continues to be greatly underused worldwide despite being a Class I recommendation in international clinical guidelines and uptake is low in women and patients with mental health comorbidities. METHODS Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) programme was implemented in four UK National Health Service early adopter sites ('Beacon Sites') between June 2019 and June 2020. Implementation and patient-reported outcome data were collected across sites as part of the National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation. The change in key outcomes before and after the supervised period of REACH-HF intervention across the Beacon Sites was assessed and compared to those of the intervention arm of the REACH-HF multicentre trial. RESULTS Compared to the REACH-HF multicentre trial, patients treated at the Beacon Site were more likely to be female (33.8% vs 22.9%), older (75.6 vs 70.1), had a more severe classification of heart failure (26.5% vs 17.7%), had poorer baseline health-related quality of life (MLHFQ score 36.1 vs 31.4), were more depressed (HADS score 6.4 vs 4.1) and anxious (HADS score 7.2 vs 4.7), and had lower exercise capacity (ISWT distance 190 m vs 274.7 m). There appeared to be a substantial heterogeneity in the implementation process across the four Beacon Sites as evidenced by the variation in levels of patient recruitment, operationalisation of the REACH-HF intervention and patient outcomes. Overall lower improvements in patient-reported outcomes at the Beacon Sites compared to the trial may reflect differences in the population studied (having higher morbidity at baseline) as well as the marked challenges in intervention delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION The results of this study illustrate the challenges in consistently implementing an intervention (shown to be clinically effective and cost-effective in a multicentre trial) into real-world practice, especially in the midst of a global pandemic. Further research is needed to establish the real-world effectiveness of the REACH-HF intervention in different populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Daw
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT UK
| | - Alexander Harrison
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Patrick J. Doherty
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Hasnain M. Dalal
- grid.416116.50000 0004 0391 2873University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Rod S. Taylor
- grid.8756.c0000 0001 2193 314XMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Samantha B. van Beurden
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Sinéad T. J. McDonagh
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024Primary Care Research Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin J. Greaves
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
McGregor G, Evans B, Sandhu H, Simmonds J, Joshi S, Devi G, Zhupaj A, Holliday N, Pearce G, Patel C, Hee SW, Powell R, Heine P, Patel S, Kavi L, Bruce J, Hayat S, Lim B, Eftekhari H, Panikker S. Protocol update for a randomised controlled feasibility trial of exercise rehabilitation for people with postural tachycardia syndrome: the PULSE study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:101. [PMID: 35525992 PMCID: PMC9077338 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01056-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PULSE (PostUraL tachycardia Syndrome Exercise) study is a randomised controlled trial assessing the feasibility of conducting a multicentre RCT testing supervised exercise rehabilitation with behavioural and motivational support, compared to best-practice usual care, for people with Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (PoTS). The original trial protocol was published in BMC Pilot & Feasibility Studies (accessible at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00702-1 ). The PULSE intervention consists of (1) individual assessment; (2) 12-week, twice-weekly, supervised exercise training; (3) behavioural and motivational support; and (4) guided lifestyle physical activity. The control intervention is best-practice usual care with a single 30-min, one-to-one practitioner appointment, and general advice on safe and effective physical activity. Sixty-two people (aged 18-60 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of PoTS will be invited to enrol on a feasibility RCT with an embedded qualitative study. The primary outcome will be feasibility; process-related measures will include eligibility, recruitment, randomisation and withdrawal rates, along with indicators of exercise programme adherence and acceptability. Secondary physiological, clinical and health-related outcomes will be assessed. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, here we describe amendments to the trial protocol. METHODS Restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic meant it was necessary to change the delivery of the PULSE and control interventions. These changes reflected the need to limit the risk of COVID-19 transmission in a clinical population, some of whom were at increased risk of contracting the virus and suffering serious illness. The major change was that the originally intended centre-based PULSE and control interventions would now be delivered remotely on-line. Subsequently, there were minor changes to the participant eligibility criteria. These decisions followed an on-line co-creation session with people affected by PoTS, and relevant public and professional stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS We present an update of the original trial protocol in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. No participants were recruited to the original protocol; thus, results will reflect the on-line delivery of the intervention. PULSE will be the first randomised trial to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive multi-centre RCT testing supervised on-line exercise rehabilitation with behavioural and motivational support, compared to best-practice usual care, for people with PoTS. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN45323485 registered on 7 April 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon McGregor
- Department of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, Centre for Exercise & Health, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV1 3LN UK
- Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Research Institute for Health &Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Becky Evans
- Department of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, Centre for Exercise & Health, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV1 3LN UK
| | - Harbinder Sandhu
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Jane Simmonds
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Faculty of Population Health, University College, London, UK
| | - Shivam Joshi
- Research & Development, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Gita Devi
- Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Research Institute for Health &Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - Albiona Zhupaj
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Nikki Holliday
- Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Research Institute for Health &Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - Gemma Pearce
- Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Research Institute for Health &Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - Chloe Patel
- Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Research Institute for Health &Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - Siew Wan Hee
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Richard Powell
- Department of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, Centre for Exercise & Health, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV1 3LN UK
- Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Research Institute for Health &Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - Peter Heine
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shilpa Patel
- Department of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, Centre for Exercise & Health, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV1 3LN UK
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Julie Bruce
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Sajad Hayat
- Department of Cardiology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Boon Lim
- Department of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Helen Eftekhari
- Research & Development, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Sandeep Panikker
- Research & Development, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Overwijk A, Hilgenkamp TIM, van der Schans CP, van der Putten AAJ, Waninge A. Development of a Dutch Training/Education Program for a Healthy Lifestyle of People With Intellectual Disability. INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2022; 60:163-177. [PMID: 35297990 DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-60.2.163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Individuals with intellectual disability (ID) need support from direct support professionals (DSPs) to engage in a healthy lifestyle. However, literature shows DSPs feel insufficiently equipped to support a healthy lifestyle. Therefore, the aim of this study is to develop a theory-based program for DSPs to support physical activity and healthy nutrition for people with moderate to profound levels of ID, and to design its evaluation. The Intervention Mapping Protocol (IM) was followed to develop a theory-based program for DSPs. The program evaluation consists of process and feasibility evaluations. This study provided a theory-based program consisting of a training and education section with online and face-to-face components to support DSPs in promoting health for people with ID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies Overwijk
- Annelies Overwijk, Research Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences and University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Psychology, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Thessa I M Hilgenkamp
- Thessa I.M. Hilgenkamp, Department of General Practice, Intellectual Disability Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and Department of Physical Therapy, University of Nevada
| | - Cees P van der Schans
- Cees P. van der Schans, Research Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Health Psychology
| | - Annette A J van der Putten
- Annette A.J. van der Putten, Department of Inclusive and Special Needs Education, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Aly Waninge
- Aly Waninge, Research Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, and University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Psychology, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dalal HM, Taylor RS, Wingham J, Greaves CJ, Jolly K, Lang CC, Davis RC, Smith KM, Doherty PJ, Miles J, van Lingen R, Warren FC, Sadler S, Abraham C, Britten N, Frost J, Hillsdon M, Singh S, Hayward C, Eyre V, Paul K. A facilitated home-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention for people with heart failure and their caregivers: a research programme including the REACH-HF RCT. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar09010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background
Rates of participation in centre (hospital)-cardiac rehabilitation by patients with heart failure are suboptimal. Heart failure has two main phenotypes differing in underlying pathophysiology: heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is characterised by depressed left ventricular systolic function (‘reduced ejection fraction’), whereas heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is diagnosed after excluding other causes of dyspnoea with normal ejection fraction. This programme aimed to develop and evaluate a facilitated home-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention that could increase the uptake of cardiac rehabilitation while delivering the clinical benefits of centre-based cardiac rehabilitation.
Objectives
To develop an evidence-informed, home-based, self-care cardiac rehabilitation programme for patients with heart failure and their caregivers [the REACH-HF (Rehabilitation Enablement in Chronic Heart Failure) intervention]. To conduct a pilot randomised controlled trial to assess the feasibility of a full trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the REACH-HF intervention in addition to usual care in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. To assess the short- and long-term clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the REACH-HF intervention in addition to usual care in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and their caregivers.
Design
Intervention mapping to develop the REACH-HF intervention; uncontrolled feasibility study; pilot randomised controlled trial in those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; randomised controlled trial with a trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis in those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; qualitative studies including process evaluation; systematic review of cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure; and modelling to assess long-term cost-effectiveness (in those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction).
Setting
Four centres in England and Wales (Birmingham, Cornwall, Gwent and York); one centre in Scotland (Dundee) for a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Participants
Adults aged ≥ 18 years with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction < 45%) for the main randomised controlled trial (n = 216), and those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 45%) for the pilot randomised controlled trial (n = 50).
Intervention
A self-care, facilitated cardiac rehabilitation manual was offered to patients (and participating caregivers) at home over 12 weeks by trained health-care professionals in addition to usual care or usual care alone.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was disease-specific health-related quality of life measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included deaths and hospitalisations.
Results
The main randomised controlled trial recruited 216 participants with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and 97 caregivers. A significant and clinically meaningful between-group difference in the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score (primary outcome) at 12 months (–5.7 points, 95% confidence interval –10.6 to –0.7 points) favoured the REACH-HF intervention (p = 0.025). Eight (4%) patients (four in each group) had died at 12 months. There was no significant difference in hospital admissions, at 12 months, with 19 participants in the REACH-HF intervention group having at least one hospital admission, compared with 24 participants in the control group (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 1.51; p = 0.386). The mean cost of the intervention was £418 per participant with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The costs at 12 months were, on average, £401 higher in the intervention group than in the usual care alone group. Model-based economic evaluation, extrapolating from the main randomised controlled trial in those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction over 4 years, found that adding the REACH-HF intervention to usual care had an estimated mean cost per participant of £15,452 (95% confidence interval £14,240 to £16,780) and a mean quality-adjusted life-year gain of 4.47 (95% confidence interval 3.83 to 4.91) years, compared with £15,051 (95% confidence interval £13,844 to £16,289) and 4.24 (95% confidence interval 4.05 to 4.43) years, respectively, for usual care alone. This gave an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year of £1721. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated 78% probability that the intervention plus usual care versus usual care alone has a cost-effectiveness below the willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. The intervention was well received by participants with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, as well as their caregivers. Both randomised controlled trials recruited to target, with > 85% retention at follow-up.
Limitations
Key limitations included (1) lack of blinding – given the nature of the intervention and the control we could not mask participants to treatments, so our results may reflect participant expectation bias; (2) that we were not able to capture consistent participant-level data on level of intervention adherence; (3) that there may be an impact on the generalisability of findings due to the demographics of the trial patients, as most were male (78%) and we recruited only seven people from ethnic minorities.
Conclusions
Evaluation of the comprehensive, facilitated, home-based REACH-HF intervention for participants with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and caregivers indicated clinical effectiveness in terms of health-related quality of life and patient self-care but no other secondary outcomes. Although the economic analysis conducted alongside the full randomised controlled trial did not produce significant differences on the EuroQol-5 Dimensions or in quality-adjusted life-years, economic modelling suggested greater cost-effectiveness of the intervention than usual care. Our REACH-HF intervention offers a new evidence-based cardiac rehabilitation option that could increase uptake of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure not attracted to or able to access hospital-based programmes.
Future work
Systematic collection of real-world data would track future changes in uptake of and adherence to alternative cardiac rehabilitation interventions in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and increase understanding of how changes in service delivery might affect clinical and health economic outcomes. The findings of our pilot randomised controlled trial in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction support progression to a full multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN86234930 and ISRCTN78539530.
Funding details
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 9, No. 1. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasnain M Dalal
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- Research and Development, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Rod S Taylor
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- Professor of Population, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jennifer Wingham
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin J Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Chim C Lang
- School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Russell C Davis
- Cardiology Department, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Karen M Smith
- Cardiac Rehabilitation Office, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK
| | | | - Jackie Miles
- Research and Development, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, St Woolos Hospital, Newport, UK
| | | | - Fiona C Warren
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Susannah Sadler
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Charles Abraham
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicky Britten
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Julia Frost
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Sally Singh
- Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | - Kevin Paul
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- Research and Development, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dadipoor S, Aghamolaei T, Mirzaei-Alavijeh M, Ghaffari M, Heyrani A, Hosseini Teshnizi S. What are the intervention goals of women's hookah cessation? A systematic, evidence-based and participatory study. J Ethn Subst Abuse 2021; 21:1-17. [PMID: 33413046 DOI: 10.1080/15332640.2020.1864538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
This Study was designed to answer the question: what are the intervention goals of women for ceasing to smoke. The present research was part of a larger study and was a pioneering systematic research conducted between September 23, 2018 and September 26, 2019 through an intervention mapping in southern Iran among professional hookah Smoking (HS) women. In order to know more about the HS among women, the behavioral and environmental correlates of HS/cessation and the determiners or fundamental causes of these factors were extracted via a systematic review and a local qualitative study. As the results revealed, the expected outcomes of the educational program concerning hookah cessation were achieved. As the realization of these outcomes requires certain changes to the behavioral and environmental dimensions, in the next step, the intervention goals of hookah cessation were identified. As the results showed, four behavioral factors involved in the unhealthy HS behavior were individual HS, Being in the Company of hookah smokers, Visiting tempting and contaminated places and Physical and mental dependence on HS (habit), In addition, four effective environmental factors were found at different interpersonal, organizational, community and policy levels. These include, respectively: recommendation and motivation for cessation by influential figures, care providers' poor inadequate knowledge and skill, Easy acceptance of hookah in society, and the lack of effective rules. Knowledge, awareness, social norms, Motivation to comply, skill and self-efficacy, habit, were among the determining factors of hookah cessation. Employment of a systematic is based on evidence and cooperation and is guided by a assessing the needs of the target population. Such a method can suggest more purposive and relevant intervention goals so as to cease HS. The aim would be to intervene in the purposes of the above-mentioned change, as compared in predetermined interventions, and increase the chances of HS cessation among women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakineh Dadipoor
- Student Research Committee, Faculty of Health, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| | - Teamur Aghamolaei
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| | - Mehdi Mirzaei-Alavijeh
- Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Mohtasham Ghaffari
- Environmental and Occupational Hazards Control Research Center, School of Public Health & Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Heyrani
- Social Determinants in Health Promotion Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Smith K, Lang C, Wingham J, Frost J, Greaves C, Abraham C, Warren FC, Coyle J, Jolly K, Miles J, Paul K, Doherty PJ, Davies R, Dalal H, Taylor RS. Process evaluation of a randomised pilot trial of home-based rehabilitation compared to usual care in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and their caregiver's. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7:11. [PMID: 33407893 PMCID: PMC7786976 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00747-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whilst almost 50% of heart failure (HF) patients have preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), evidence-based treatment options for this patient group remain limited. However, there is growing evidence of the potential value of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. This study reports the process evaluation of the Rehabilitation Enablement in Chronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) intervention for HFpEF patients and their caregivers conducted as part of the REACH-HFpEF pilot trial. Methods Process evaluation sub-study parallels to a single-centre (Tayside, Scotland) randomised controlled pilot trial with qualitative assessment of both intervention fidelity delivery and HFpEF patients’ and caregivers’ experiences. The REACH-HF intervention consisted of self-help manual for patients and caregivers, facilitated over 12 weeks by trained healthcare professionals. Interviews were conducted following completion of intervention in a purposeful sample of 15 HFpEF patients and seven caregivers. Results Qualitative information from the facilitator interactions and interviews identified three key themes for patients and caregivers: (1) understanding their condition, (2) emotional consequences of HF, and (3) responses to the REACH-HF intervention. Fidelity analysis found the interventions to be delivered adequately with scope for improvement in caregiver engagement. The differing professional backgrounds of REACH-HF facilitators in this study demonstrate the possibility of delivery of the intervention by healthcare staff with expertise in HF, cardiac rehabilitation, or both. Conclusions The REACH-HF home-based facilitated intervention for HFpEF appears to be a feasible and a well-accepted model for the delivery of rehabilitation, with the potential to address key unmet needs of patients and their caregivers who are often excluded from HF and current cardiac rehabilitation programmes. Results of this study will inform a recently funded full multicentre randomised clinical trial. Trial registration ISRCTN78539530 (date of registration 7 July 2015). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-020-00747-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Smith
- School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee & NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | - Chim Lang
- School of Medicine, University of Dundee & NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | - Jennifer Wingham
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter College of Medicine, Exeter, UK
| | - Julia Frost
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter College of Medicine, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| | - Charles Abraham
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter College of Medicine, Exeter, UK.,School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - Fiona C Warren
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter College of Medicine, Exeter, UK
| | - Joanne Coyle
- School of Medicine, University of Dundee & NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jackie Miles
- Research and Development, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, St Woolos Hospital, Newport, UK
| | - Kevin Paul
- REACH-HF Patient and Public Involvement Group, c/o Research development and Innovation Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | | | - Russell Davies
- Cardiology Department, Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Hasnain Dalal
- Research, Development & Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.,Primary Care, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro Campus, Truro, UK
| | - Rod S Taylor
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter College of Medicine, Exeter, UK. .,MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Top floor, 200, Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, Scotland, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
van Beurden SB, Greaves CJ, Abraham C, Lawrence NS, Smith JR. ImpulsePal: The systematic development of a smartphone app to manage food temptations using intervention mapping. Digit Health 2021; 7:20552076211057667. [PMID: 34868619 PMCID: PMC8637692 DOI: 10.1177/20552076211057667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impulsive processes driving eating behaviour can often undermine peoples' attempts to change their behaviour, lose weight and maintain weight loss. AIM To develop an impulse management intervention to support weight loss in adults. METHODS Intervention Mapping (IM) was used to systematically develop the "ImpulsePal" intervention. The development involved: (1) a needs assessment including a qualitative study, Patient and Public advisory group and expert group consultations, and a systematic review of impulse management techniques; (2) specification of performance objectives, determinants, and change objectives; (3) selection of intervention strategies (mapping of change techniques to the determinants of change); (4) creation of programme materials; (5) specification of adoption and implementation plans; (6) devising an evaluation plan. RESULTS Application of the IM Protocol resulted in a smartphone app that could support reductions in unhealthy (energy dense) food consumption, overeating, and alcoholic and sugary drink consumption. ImpulsePal includes inhibition training, mindfulness techniques, implementation intentions (if-then planning), visuospatial loading, use of physical activity for craving management, and context-specific reminders. An "Emergency Button" was also included to provide access to in-the-moment support when temptation is strong. CONCLUSIONS ImpulsePal is a novel, theory- and evidence-informed, person-centred app that aims to support impulse management for healthier eating. Intervention Mapping facilitated the incorporation of app components that are practical operationalisations of change techniques targeting our specific change objectives and their associated theoretical determinants. Using IM enabled transparency and provided a clear framework for evaluation, and enhances replicability and the potential of the intervention to accomplish the desired outcome of facilitating weight loss through dietary change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Colin J Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Charles Abraham
- School of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AUS
| | | | - Jane R Smith
- College of Medicine of Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Purcell C, Daw P, Kerr C, Cleland J, Cowie A, Dalal HM, Ibbotson T, Murphy C, Taylor R. Protocol for an implementation study of an evidence-based home cardiac rehabilitation programme for people with heart failure and their caregivers in Scotland (SCOT:REACH-HF). BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040771. [PMID: 33277287 PMCID: PMC7722379 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite evidence that cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an essential component of care for people with heart failure, uptake is low. A centre-based format is a known barrier, suggesting that home-based programmes might improve accessibility. The aim of SCOT: Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) is to assess the implementation of the REACH-HF home-based CR intervention in the context of the National Health Service (NHS) in Scotland.This paper presents the design and protocol for this observational implementation study. Specific objectives of SCOT:REACH-HF are to: (1) assess service-level facilitators and barriers to the implementation of REACH-HF; (2) compare real-world patient and caregiver outcomes to those seen in a prior clinical trial; and (3) estimate the economic (health and social) impact of implementing REACH-HF in Scotland. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The REACH-HF intervention will be delivered in partnership with four 'Beacon sites' across six NHS Scotland Health Boards, covering rural and urban areas. Health professionals from each site will be trained to facilitate delivery of the 12-week programme to 140 people with heart failure and their caregivers. Patient and caregiver outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 4-month follow-up. Assessments include the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), five-dimension EuroQol 5L, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Caregiver Burden Questionnaire. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with up to 20 health professionals involved in programme delivery (eg, cardiac nurses, physiotherapists). 65 facilitator-patient consultations will be audio recorded and assessed for fidelity. Integrative analysis will address key research questions on fidelity, context and CR participant-related outcomes. The SCOT:REACH-HF findings will inform the future potential roll-out of REACH-HF in Scotland. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been given ethical approval by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Service (reference 20/WS/0038, approved 25 March 2020). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study is listed on the ISRCTN registry with study ID ISRCTN53784122. The research team will ensure that the study is conducted in accordance with both General Data Protection Regulations and the University of Glasgow's Research Governance Framework. Findings will be reported to the funder and shared with Beacon Sites, to facilitate service evaluation, planning and good practice. To broaden interest in, and understanding of REACH-HF, we will seek to publish in peer-reviewed scientific journals and present at stakeholder events, national and international conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paulina Daw
- School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Claire Kerr
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - J Cleland
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Aynsley Cowie
- Cardiac Rehabilitation, University Hospital Crosshouse, NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Kilmarnock, UK
| | - Hasnain M Dalal
- Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Tracy Ibbotson
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Clare Murphy
- Royal Alexandra Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Rod Taylor
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit and Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
O'Keefe S, Stanley M, Sansonetti D, Schneider EJ, Kras M, Morarty J, Lannin NA. Designing an intervention process that embeds work-focussed interventions within inpatient rehabilitation: An intervention mapping approach. Aust Occup Ther J 2020; 68:65-77. [PMID: 33078431 DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Returning to work is a goal for many people after brain injury. The failure to return to work after injury brings both economic and personal (quality of life) costs to those living with stroke or brain injury, their families, and society. This study explored the barriers to providing work-focused interventions during hospital-based rehabilitation and co-created solutions with rehabilitation providers to increase the provision of work-focused intervention during inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS This study used an Intervention Mapping approach (a six-step protocol that guides the design of complex interventions) based on an action research methodology. Focus group data, in addition to best evidence from systematic reviews, practice guidelines and key articles were combined with theoretical models for changing behaviour and clinician experience. This was then systematically operationalised into an intervention process using consensus among clinicians. The process was further refined through piloting and feedback from key stakeholders, and group consensus on the final process. RESULTS A detailed five phase return to work intervention process for inpatient rehabilitation was developed. The key features of the process include; having one key allied health clinician to coordinate the process, choosing assessments based on pre-injury work demands, emphasising the importance of core work skills and considering the most appropriate service for referral at the conclusion of rehabilitation. CONCLUSION We used a systematic approach, guided by the intervention mapping approach and behaviour change theory to tailor existing workfocused interventions to the inpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie O'Keefe
- Occupational Therapy, School of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | | | | | - Emma J Schneider
- Occupational Therapy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Marni Kras
- Acquired Brain Injury Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | | | - Natasha A Lannin
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,Brain Recovery & Rehabilitation Group, Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Frost J, Wingham J, Britten N, Greaves C, Abraham C, Warren FC, Dalal H, Taylor RS. The value of social practice theory for implementation science: learning from a theory-based mixed methods process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20:181. [PMID: 32631324 PMCID: PMC7336630 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01060-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although there is trial evidence that complex interventions are effective for the self-management of heart failure, little evidence supports their effectiveness in routine practice. We used Social Practice Theory to guide a Type 1 Hybrid Trial: a mixed methods process evaluation of a complex intervention for heart failure. The objective of this paper is to explore the value of Social Practice Theory for implementation science. Methods Social Practice Theory informed a mixed methods process evaluation of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a 12 week home-based intervention to optimise self-care support for people with heart failure and their caregivers - Rehabilitation EnAblement in Chronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF). Interviews were conducted with 19 people with heart failure and 17 caregivers at 4 months and 12 months after recruitment into the trial. Cases were constructed at the level of the individual, couple, facilitator and centre; and included multi-modal process and outcome data. Evaluative coding and subsequent within- and cross-case analyses enabled the development of a typology of relationships linking fidelity of intervention delivery and tailoring of content to individual needs and concerns. Social Practice Theory was used to interrogate the relationships between elements of the intervention and their implementation. Results Of 216 trial participants, 107 were randomised to the intervention (REACH-HF plus usual care). The intervention was most effective when fidelity was high and delivery was tailored to the individual’s needs, but less effective when both tailoring and fidelity were low. Theory-based analysis enabled us to model complex relationships between intervention elements (competencies, materials and meanings) and social context. The findings illustrate how intervention fidelity and tailoring are contextual and how the effectiveness of the REACH-HF intervention depended on both optimal alignment and implementation of these elements. Conclusion The study demonstrates the utility of theory-based analysis which integrates data from multiple sources to highlight contexts and circumstances in which interventions work best. Social Practice Theory provides a framework for guiding and analysing the processes by which a complex intervention is evaluated in a clinical trial, and has the potential to guide context-specific implementation strategies for clinical practice. Trial registration ISRCTN, IISRCTN86234930. Registered 13th November 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Frost
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter College of Medicine and Health, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2LU, UK.
| | - Jennifer Wingham
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter College of Medicine and Health, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Nicky Britten
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter College of Medicine and Health University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Colin Greaves
- Psychology Applied to Health, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Charles Abraham
- School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.,Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter College of Medicine and Health, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Fiona C Warren
- Medical Statistics, Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, University of Exeter College of Medicine and Health, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Hasnain Dalal
- University of Exeter College of Medicine and Health (Truro Campus), Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, TR1 3HD, UK
| | - Rod S Taylor
- Health Services Research, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter College of Medicine and Health, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2LU, UK.,Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow 200, Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sun Y, Wang A, Yu S, Hagger MS, Chen X, Fong SSM, Zhang C, Huang WY, Baker JS, Dutheil F, Gao Y. A blended intervention to promote physical activity, health and work productivity among office employees using intervention mapping: a study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:994. [PMID: 32586293 PMCID: PMC7315542 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09128-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Regular participation in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is related to decreased risk of morbidity and mortality. Among working populations, lack of MVPA may also be a risk factor for absenteeism and presenteeism. Both traditional workplace-based and web-based interventions have been suggested as being effective in promoting participation MVPA, health-related outcomes, and work-related productivity. However, several challenges limit their application in real world contexts. A ‘blended’ intervention approach combining the two intervention strategies is proposed to overcome these limitations. The proposed intervention aims to utilize the blended approach to increase participation in MVPA, health-related outcomes, and work productivity among inactive workers. Methods The study will comprise of a three-group cluster randomized controlled trial (cluster-RCT), comprising a three-month actual intervention and a nine-month behavioral follow-up period. The three groups will be: a web-based intervention group, a blended intervention group combining the web-based components with face-to-face workshops and posters, and a control group. Physically inactive office employees (N = 495) from 33 companies (i.e., clusters) will be recruited and randomly assigned to the three groups by cluster randomization. The intervention mapping (IM) framework will be used for selecting and applying effective health behavioral theories and behavioral change techniques (BCTs) to the development, implementation and assessment of the intervention, which will be personally tailored. The primary outcome variable will be objectively-measured MVPA using an accelerometer. Secondary outcomes will consist of indices of health including adiposity, blood pressure, blood sugar, blood lipids, self-reported depression, anxiety, stress, health-related quality of life and work-related variables including absenteeism and presenteeism. Discussion The proposed study adopts a robust blended intervention approach that is expected to overcome challenges in applying workplace-based and web-based interventions separately and yield larger effects in promoting MVPA participation, health-related outcomes and work productivity. Improvements in work productivity outcomes will be of particular interest to employers. If more effective, the new blended intervention has the potential to be implemented on a larger scale to benefit workplace populations. Trial registration The trial is prospectively registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov PRS (Trial ID: NCT04391270; Date of First Posted: May 18, 2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Sun
- Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Aiwei Wang
- Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Siyue Yu
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Martin S Hagger
- Psychological Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA, USA
| | - Xiangyan Chen
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Shirley Siu Ming Fong
- Department of Health and Physical Education, Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Chunqing Zhang
- Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wendy Yajun Huang
- Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Julien S Baker
- Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Frédéric Dutheil
- LaPSCo, Physiological and Psychosocial Stress, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Preventive and Occupational Medicine, Witty Fit, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Yang Gao
- Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Daw P, van Beurden SB, Greaves C, Veldhuijzen van Zanten JJCS, Harrison A, Dalal H, McDonagh STJ, Doherty PJ, Taylor RS. Getting evidence into clinical practice: protocol for evaluation of the implementation of a home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme for patients with heart failure. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036137. [PMID: 32565467 PMCID: PMC7307528 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves health-related quality of life and reduces hospital admissions. However, patients with heart failure (HF) often fail to attend centre-based CR programmes. Novel ways of delivering healthcare, such as home-based CR programmes, may improve uptake of CR. Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) is a new, effective and cost-effective home-based CR programme for people with HF. The aim of this prospective mixed-method implementation evaluation study is to assess the implementation of the REACH-HF CR programme in the UK National Health Service (NHS). The specific objectives are to (1) explore NHS staff perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of REACH-HF, (2) assess the quality of delivery of the programme in real-life clinical settings, (3) consider the nature of any adaptation(s) made and how they might impact on intervention effectiveness and (4) compare real-world patient outcomes to those seen in a prior clinical trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS REACH-HF will be rolled out in four NHS CR centres across the UK. Three healthcare professionals from each site will be trained to deliver the 12-week programme. In-depth qualitative interviews and focus groups will be conducted with approximately 24 NHS professionals involved in delivering or commissioning the programme. Consultations for 48 patients (12 per site) will be audio recorded and scored using an intervention fidelity checklist. Outcomes routinely recorded in the National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation will be analysed and compared with outcomes from a recent randomised controlled trial: the Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire and exercise capacity (Incremental Shuttle Walk Test). Qualitative research findings will be mapped onto the Normalisation Process Theory framework and presented in the form of a narrative synthesis. Results of the study will inform national roll-out of REACH-HF. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study (IRAS 261723) has received ethics approval from the South Central (Hampshire B) Research Ethics Committee (19/SC/0304). Written informed consent will be obtained from all health professionals and patients participating in the study. The research team will ensure that the study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Data Protection Act 2018, General Data Protection Regulations and in accordance with the Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (2005). Findings will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international meetings to publicise and explain the research methods and findings to key audiences to facilitate the further uptake of the REACH-HF intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN86234930.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Daw
- School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samantha B van Beurden
- Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Hasnain Dalal
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Cornwall, UK
| | | | | | - Rod S Taylor
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Róin T, Á Lakjuni K, Kyhl K, Thomsen J, Veyhe AS, Róin Á, Jan R, Marin S. Knowledge about heart failure and self-care persists following outpatient programme- a prospective cohort study from the Faroe Islands. Int J Circumpolar Health 2020; 78:1653139. [PMID: 31429677 PMCID: PMC6713150 DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2019.1653139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Longer life expectancies imply increased prevalence of heart failure. Blittle is known about the maintenance of disease specific knowledge following patient education. Our aim was to investigate if self-care and heart failure knowledge persists at 9 month follow up among patients with heart failure after an outpatient programme in the Faroe Islands. Methods: A prospective cohort study with patients recently diagnosed with heart failure were recruited and evaluated by questionnaire at baseline, after 3 and 9 months using The European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale and the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale. Clinical and demographic information was collected. Results: Seven (15%) women and 40 (85%) men with heart failure and NYHA > 2 were included. There was an overall improvement in patients’ self-care from baseline 25 (8) to 3 months 15 (5) and to 9 months (16 (45); both p < 0.001). Mean knowledge score 10 (3) improved to 13 (2) at 3 months and 12 (2) at 9 months (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: Disease specific patient education is applicable to heart failure patients, which can produce persistent improvements in self-care and knowledge after multidisciplinary outpatient programme. Practice Implications: Multidisciplinary outpatient programmes are beneficial for patients with heart failure and alters disease specific knowledge and self-care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tóra Róin
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Hospital , Torshavn , Faroe Islands.,Centre of Health Research, National Hospital of the Faroe Islands , Tórshavn , Faroe Islands
| | - Katrin Á Lakjuni
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Hospital , Torshavn , Faroe Islands
| | - Kasper Kyhl
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Hospital , Torshavn , Faroe Islands.,Centre of Health Research, National Hospital of the Faroe Islands , Tórshavn , Faroe Islands.,Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - Jacoba Thomsen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Hospital , Torshavn , Faroe Islands
| | - Anna Sofía Veyhe
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre of Health Research, University of the Faroe Islands , Torshavn , Faroe Islands
| | - Ása Róin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre of Health Research, University of the Faroe Islands , Torshavn , Faroe Islands
| | - Rasmussen Jan
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Hospital , Torshavn , Faroe Islands.,Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - Strøm Marin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre of Health Research, University of the Faroe Islands , Torshavn , Faroe Islands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Duncan E, O'Cathain A, Rousseau N, Croot L, Sworn K, Turner KM, Yardley L, Hoddinott P. Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e033516. [PMID: 32273313 PMCID: PMC7245409 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve the quality and consistency of intervention development reporting in health research. DESIGN This was a consensus exercise consisting of two simultaneous and identical three-round e-Delphi studies (one with experts in intervention development and one with wider stakeholders including funders, journal editors and public involvement members), followed by a consensus workshop. Delphi items were systematically derived from two preceding systematic reviews and a qualitative interview study. PARTICIPANTS Intervention developers (n=26) and wider stakeholders (n=18) from the UK, North America and Europe participated in separate e-Delphi studies. Intervention developers (n=13) and wider stakeholders (n=13) participated in a 1-day consensus workshop. RESULTS e-Delphi participants achieved consensus on 15 reporting items. Following feedback from the consensus meeting, the final inclusion and wording of 14 items with description and explanations for each item were agreed. Items focus on context, purpose, target population, approaches, evidence, theory, guiding principles, stakeholder contribution, changes in content or format during the development process, required changes for subgroups, continuing uncertainties, and open access publication. They form the GUIDED (GUIDance for the rEporting of intervention Development) checklist, which contains a description and explanation of each item, alongside examples of good reporting. CONCLUSIONS Consensus-based reporting guidance for intervention development in health research is now available for publishers and researchers to use. GUIDED has the potential to lead to greater transparency, and enhance quality and improve learning about intervention development research and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Duncan
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professional Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Alicia O'Cathain
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professional Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Liz Croot
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Katie Sworn
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Lucy Yardley
- Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Pat Hoddinott
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professional Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hubbard G, Thompson CW, Locke R, Jenkins D, Munoz SA, Van Woerden H, Maxwell M, Yang Y, Gorely T. Co-production of "nature walks for wellbeing" public health intervention for people with severe mental illness: use of theory and practical know-how. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:428. [PMID: 32238165 PMCID: PMC7115083 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08518-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Interventions need to be developed in a timely and relatively low-cost manner in order to respond to, and quickly address, major public health concerns. We aimed to quickly develop an intervention to support people with severe mental ill-health, that is systematic, well founded both in theory and evidence, without the support of significant funding or resource. In this article we aim to open and elucidate the contents of the ‘black box’ of intervention development. Methods A multidisciplinary team of seven academics and health practitioners, together with service user input, developed an intervention in 2018 by scoping the literature, face-to-face meetings, email and telephone. Researcher fieldnotes were analysed to describe how the intervention was developed in four iterative steps. Results In step 1 and 2, scoping the literature showed that, a) people with severe mental illness have high mortality risk in part due to high levels of sedentary behaviour and low levels of exercise; b) barriers to being active include mood, stress, body weight, money, lack of programmes and facilities and stigma c) ‘nature walks’ has potential as an intervention to address the problem. In Step 3, the team agreed what needed to be included in the intervention so it addressed the “five ways to mental wellbeing” i.e., help people to connect, be active, take notice, keep learning and give. The intervention was mapped to key behavioural change concepts such as, personal relevance, relapse prevention, self-efficacy. In Step 4, the team worked out how best to implement the intervention. The intervention would be delivered over 12 weeks by members of the hospital team and community walk volunteers. Participants would receive a nature walks booklet and text messages. Conclusions We developed a theoretically-informed, evidence-based nature walks programme in a timely and relatively low-cost manner relevant in an era of growing mental illness and funding austerity. Further research is required to test if the intervention is effective and if this approach to intervention development works.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gill Hubbard
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the Highlands and Islands, Centre for Health Science, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, Scotland, UK.
| | - Catharine Ward Thompson
- OPENspace research centre, University of Edinburgh, 74 Lauriston Place, Edinburgh, EH3 9DF, UK
| | - Robert Locke
- Partnerships for Well-Being, 33 Wells Street, Inverness, IV35JU, Scotland
| | - Dan Jenkins
- NHS Highland, Larch House, Stoneyfield Business Park, Inverness, IV2 7PA, UK
| | - Sarah-Anne Munoz
- Division of Rural Health and Well-being, University of the Highlands and Islands, Centre for Health Science, Old Perth Road, Inverness, Scotland, UK, IV2 3JH
| | - Hugo Van Woerden
- NHS Highland, Larch House, Stoneyfield Business Park, Inverness, IV2 7PA, UK
| | - Margaret Maxwell
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland
| | - Yaling Yang
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Trish Gorely
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the Highlands and Islands, Centre for Health Science, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chambers D, Cantrell A, Booth A. Implementation of interventions to reduce preventable hospital admissions for cardiovascular or respiratory conditions: an evidence map and realist synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundIn 2012, a series of systematic reviews summarised the evidence regarding interventions to reduce preventable hospital admissions. Although intervention effects were dependent on context, the reviews revealed a consistent picture of reduction across different interventions targeting cardiovascular and respiratory conditions. The research reported here sought to provide an in-depth understanding of how interventions that have been shown to reduce admissions for these conditions may work, with a view to supporting their effective implementation in practice.ObjectivesTo map the available evidence on interventions used in the UK NHS to reduce preventable admissions for cardiovascular and respiratory conditions and to conduct a realist synthesis of implementation evidence related to these interventions.MethodsFor the mapping review, six databases were searched for studies published between 2010 and October 2017. Studies were included if they were conducted in the UK, the USA, Canada, Australia or New Zealand; recruited adults with a cardiovascular or respiratory condition; and evaluated or described an intervention that could reduce preventable admissions or re-admissions. A descriptive summary of key characteristics of the included studies was produced. The studies included in the mapping review helped to inform the sampling frame for the subsequent realist synthesis. The wider evidence base was also engaged through supplementary searching. Data extraction forms were developed using appropriate frameworks (an implementation framework, an intervention template and a realist logic template). Following identification of initial programme theories (from the theoretical literature, empirical studies and insights from the patient and public involvement group), the review team extracted data into evidence tables. Programme theories were examined against the individual intervention types and collectively as a set. The resultant hypotheses functioned as synthesised statements around which an explanatory narrative referenced to the underpinning evidence base was developed. Additional searches for mid-range and overarching theories were carried out using Google Scholar (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA).ResultsA total of 569 publications were included in the mapping review. The largest group originated from the USA. The included studies from the UK showed a similar distribution to that of the map as a whole, but there was evidence of some country-specific features, such as the prominence of studies of telehealth. In the realist synthesis, it was found that interventions with strong evidence of effectiveness overall had not necessarily demonstrated effectiveness in UK settings. This could be a barrier to using these interventions in the NHS. Facilitation of the implementation of interventions was often not reported or inadequately reported. Many of the interventions were diverse in the ways in which they were delivered. There was also considerable overlap in the content of interventions. The role of specialist nurses was highlighted in several studies. The five programme theories identified were supported to varying degrees by empirical literature, but all provided valuable insights.LimitationsThe research was conducted by a small team; time and resources limited the team’s ability to consult with a full range of stakeholders.ConclusionsOverall, implementation appears to be favoured by support for self-management by patients and their families/carers, support for services that signpost patients to consider alternatives to seeing their general practitioner when appropriate, recognition of possible reasons why patients seek admission, support for health-care professionals to diagnose and refer patients appropriately and support for workforce roles that promote continuity of care and co-ordination between services.Future workResearch should focus on understanding discrepancies between national and international evidence and the transferability of findings between different contexts; the design and evaluation of implementation strategies informed by theories about how the intervention being implemented might work; and qualitative research on decision-making around hospital referrals and admissions.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duncan Chambers
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anna Cantrell
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hall JF, Crocker TF, Clarke DJ, Forster A. Supporting carers of stroke survivors to reduce carer burden: development of the Preparing is Caring intervention using Intervention Mapping. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:1408. [PMID: 31664985 PMCID: PMC6819539 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7615-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Burden is well documented among carers of stroke survivors, yet current evidence is insufficient to determine if any strategies reduce this negative outcome. Existing interventions for carers of stroke survivors typically involve supporting carers according to their individual needs through face-to-face interactions and provision of information including workbooks or educational guides. To date, no interventions have been developed using a method which systematically incorporates evidence, behaviour change theories, and stakeholder involvement to change the behaviours of carers and relevant individuals who support carers. This study aimed to develop a programme plan for a theory and evidence-based intervention to reduce burden in carers of stroke survivors. Methods Informed by evidence from two systematic reviews and 33 qualitative interviews, the first four stages of Intervention Mapping were used to guide the intervention development process: 1) needs assessment; 2) identifying outcomes and objectives; 3) selecting theoretical methods and practical applications; and 4) creating a programme plan. Structured and facilitated involvement from stakeholders, including carers, researchers, and professionals from health and community services was integral to the intervention development process. Stakeholders helped to prioritise the focus of the intervention, develop the goals, outcomes and objectives for the programme, and generate and refine intervention ideas. Results Stakeholders prioritised the need for carers to feel prepared before and during the transition from hospital to home as key to reducing burden. The proposed intervention ‘Preparing is Caring’ targets this need and involves providing and signposting carers to relevant information and support for practical and emotional needs. This is to be delivered before, during, and immediately after the stroke survivor’s transition from hospital to home by a person taking on a single point of contact role. It is comprised of multiple theory-based components including: training packages for information and support providers working with carers and wider staff teams, plus elements to support carers to feel prepared. Conclusions We have developed a comprehensive programme plan for a multiple-component, theory and evidence informed behaviour change intervention aimed at preparing carers before and during the transition from hospital to home. Future work is required to refine, implement and evaluate the Preparing is Caring intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica F Hall
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK. .,Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Thomas F Crocker
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.,Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David J Clarke
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.,Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Anne Forster
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.,Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dimech-Betancourt B, Ross PE, Ponsford JL, Charlton JL, Stolwyk RJ. The development of a simulator-based intervention to rehabilitate driving skills in people with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2019; 16:289-300. [DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1673835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bleydy Dimech-Betancourt
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, Australia
| | - Pamela E. Ross
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, Australia
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Epworth Rehabilitation & Mental Health, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, Australia
| | - Jennie L. Ponsford
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, Australia
| | - Judith L. Charlton
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Renerus J. Stolwyk
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lancaster GA, Thabane L. Guidelines for reporting non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2019; 5:114. [PMID: 31608150 PMCID: PMC6778655 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0499-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
As the number of submissions to Pilot and Feasibility Studies increases, there is a need for good quality reporting guidelines to help researchers tailor their reports in a way that is consistent and helpful to other readers. The publication in 2016 of the CONSORT extension to pilot and feasibility trials filled a much-needed gap, but there still remains some uncertainty as to how to report pilot and feasibility studies that are not randomised. This editorial aims to provide some general guidance on how to report the most common types of non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies that are submitted to the journal. We recommend using the CONSORT extension to pilot and feasibility trials as the main reference document—it includes detailed elaboration and explanation of each item, and in most cases, simple adaptation, or non-use of items that are not applicable, will suffice. Several checklists found on the Equator website may provide helpful supplementary guidance, when used alongside the CONSORT extension, and we give some examples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian A Lancaster
- School of Primary, Social and Community Care, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
| | - Lehana Thabane
- School of Primary, Social and Community Care, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Noonan MC, Wingham J, Dalal HM, Taylor RS. Involving caregivers in self‐management interventions for patients with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Adv Nurs 2019; 75:3331-3345. [DOI: 10.1111/jan.14172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam C. Noonan
- European Centre for Environment and Human Health College of Medicine and Health University of Exeter, Knowledge SpaRoyal Cornwall Hospital Truro Cornwall UK
| | - Jennifer Wingham
- Primary Care Research Group College of Medicine and Health University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | - Hasnain M. Dalal
- Institute of Health Research College of Medicine and Health University of Exeter Exeter UK
- Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust Truro UK
| | - Rod S. Taylor
- Institute of Health Research College of Medicine and Health University of Exeter Exeter UK
- Institute of Health and Well Being University of Glasgow Glasgow UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Frost J, Wingham J, Britten N, Greaves C, Abraham C, Warren FC, Jolly K, Doherty PJ, Miles J, Singh SJ, Paul K, Taylor R, Dalal H. Home-based rehabilitation for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: mixed methods process evaluation of the REACH-HF multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026039. [PMID: 31377692 PMCID: PMC6686989 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and explore change processes explaining the effects of the Rehabilitation Enablement in Chronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) intervention taking account of reach, amount of intervention received, delivery fidelity and patient and caregiver perspectives. DESIGN Mixed methods process evaluation parallel to a randomised controlled trial using data from the intervention group (REACH-HF plus usual care). SETTING Four centres in the UK (Birmingham, Cornwall, Gwent and York). PARTICIPANTS People with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and their caregivers. METHODS The REACH-HF intervention consisted of a self-help manual for patients with HFrEF and caregivers facilitated over 12 weeks by trained healthcare professionals. The process evaluation used multimodal mixed methods analysis. Data consisted of audio recorded intervention sessions; demographic data; intervention fidelity scores for intervention group participants (107 patients and 53 caregivers); qualitative interviews at 4 and 12 months with a sample of 19 patients and 17 caregivers. OUTCOME MEASURES Quantitative data: intervention fidelity and number, frequency and duration of intervention sessions received. Qualitative data: experiences and perspectives of intervention participants and caregivers. RESULTS Intervention session attendance with facilitators was high. Fidelity scores were indicative of adequate quality of REACH-HF intervention delivery, although indicating scope for improvement in several areas. Intervention effectiveness was contingent on matching the intervention implementation to the concerns, beliefs and goals of participants. Behaviour change was sustained when shared meaning was established. Respondents' comorbidities, socio-economic circumstances and existing networks of support also affected changes in health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS By combining longitudinal mixed methods data, the essential ingredients of complex interventions can be better identified, interrogated and tested. This can maximise the clinical application of research findings and enhance the capacity of multidisciplinary and multisite teams to implement the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN25032672; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Frost
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Nicky Britten
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- PenCLAHRC—The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Charles Abraham
- School of Pscyhological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Fiona C Warren
- Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- University of Birmingham, Institute of Applied Health Research, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Jackie Miles
- Department of innovation and Research, Aneurin Bevan Health Board, Newport, UK
| | - Sally J Singh
- Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Kevin Paul
- Patient and Public Involvement Group, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Rod Taylor
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Hasnain Dalal
- Teaching and Research, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
- Primary Care, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Taylor RS, Sadler S, Dalal HM, Warren FC, Jolly K, Davis RC, Doherty P, Miles J, Greaves C, Wingham J, Hillsdon M, Abraham C, Frost J, Singh S, Hayward C, Eyre V, Paul K, Lang CC, Smith K. The cost effectiveness of REACH-HF and home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared with the usual medical care for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A decision model-based analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2019; 26:1252-1261. [PMID: 30884975 PMCID: PMC6628466 DOI: 10.1177/2047487319833507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The REACH-HF (Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure) trial found that the REACH-HF home-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement in disease-specific health-related quality of life in patients with reduced ejection fraction heart failure (HFrEF). The aims of this study were to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of the addition of REACH-HF intervention or home-based cardiac rehabilitation to usual care compared with usual care alone in patients with HFrEF. DESIGN AND METHODS A Markov model was developed using a patient lifetime horizon and integrating evidence from the REACH-HF trial, a systematic review/meta-analysis of randomised trials, estimates of mortality and hospital admission and UK costs at 2015/2016 prices. Taking a UK National Health and Personal Social Services perspective we report the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, assessing uncertainty using probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS In base case analysis, the REACH-HF intervention was associated with per patient mean QALY gain of 0.23 and an increased mean cost of £400 compared with usual care, resulting in a cost per QALY gained of £1720. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 78% probability that REACH-HF is cost effective versus usual care at a threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained. Results were similar for home-based cardiac rehabilitation versus usual care. Sensitivity analyses indicate the findings to be robust to changes in model assumptions and parameters. CONCLUSIONS Our cost-utility analyses indicate that the addition of the REACH-HF intervention and home-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes are likely to be cost-effective treatment options versus usual care alone in patients with HFrEF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rod S Taylor
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter College of Medicine and Health and Institute of Health and Wellbeing,
University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Susannah Sadler
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter College of Medicine and Health and Institute of Health and Wellbeing,
University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Hasnain M Dalal
- University of Exeter College of Medicine
and Health and Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Fiona C Warren
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter College of Medicine and Health and Institute of Health and Wellbeing,
University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- Institute of Applied Health Research,
University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Russell C Davis
- Cardiology Department, Sandwell &
West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Jackie Miles
- Research and Development, Aneurin Bevan
University Health Board, St Woolos Hospital, Newport, UK
| | - Colin Greaves
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter Medical School, UK
| | - Jennifer Wingham
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter College of Medicine and Health and Institute of Health and Wellbeing,
University of Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Charles Abraham
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter Medical School, UK
| | - Julia Frost
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter College of Medicine and Health and Institute of Health and Wellbeing,
University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Sally Singh
- Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation
Science, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, UK
| | | | | | - Kevin Paul
- REACH-HF Patient and Public
Involvement Group, c/o Research, Development & Innovation, Royal Cornwall
Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Chim C Lang
- School of Medicine, University of
Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, UK
| | - Karen Smith
- School of Nursing and Health Sciences,
University of Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wingham J, Frost J, Britten N, Greaves C, Abraham C, Warren FC, Jolly K, Miles J, Paul K, Doherty PJ, Singh S, Davies R, Noonan M, Dalal H, Taylor RS. Caregiver outcomes of the REACH-HF multicentre randomized controlled trial of home-based rehabilitation for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2019; 18:611-620. [PMID: 31117815 PMCID: PMC6764010 DOI: 10.1177/1474515119850011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caregivers frequently provide support to people living with long-term conditions. However, there is paucity of evidence of interventions that support caregivers in their role. Rehabilitation EnAblement in Chronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) is a novel home-based, health-professional-facilitated, self-management programme for patients with heart failure (HF) and their caregivers. METHODS Based on the random allocation of individual adult patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and left ventricular ejection fraction <45% within the past five years, the caregiver of patients was allocated to receive the REACH-HF intervention over 12 weeks (REACH-HF group) or not (control group). Caregiver outcomes were generic health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), Family Caregiver Quality of Life Scale questionnaire (FamQol), Caregiver Burden Questionnaire HF (CBQ-HF), Caregiver Contribution to Self-care of HF Index questionnaire (CC-SCHFI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Outcomes were compared between groups at 4, 6 and 12 months follow-up. Twenty caregivers receiving REACH-HF were purposively selected for qualitative interviews at 4 and 12 months. RESULTS Compared with controls (44 caregivers), the REACH-HF group (53 caregivers) had a higher mean CC-SCHFI confidence score at 12 months (57.5 vs 62.8, adjusted mean difference: 9.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.8-16.8, p = 0.016). No significant between group differences were seen in other caregiver outcomes. Qualitative interviews showed that most caregivers who received the REACH-HF intervention made positive changes to how they supported the HF patient they were caring for, and perceived that they had increased their confidence in the caregiver role over time. CONCLUSION Provision of the REACH-HF intervention for caregivers of HF patients improved their confidence of self-management and was perceived for some to be helpful in supporting their caregiver role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Wingham
- Primary Care Research Group, University
of Exeter Medical School, UK
| | - Julia Frost
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter Medical School, UK
| | - Nicky Britten
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter Medical School, UK
| | - Colin Greaves
- Institute of Applied Health Research,
University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Charles Abraham
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter Medical School, UK
| | - Fiona C Warren
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter Medical School, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- Institute of Applied Health Research,
University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Jackie Miles
- Anuerin Bevan University Health Board,
Research and Development, Abergavenny, UK
| | - Kevin Paul
- REACH-HF Patient and Public Involvement
Group, c/o Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | | | - Sally Singh
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS
Trust, UK
| | - Russell Davies
- Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals
NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Miriam Noonan
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter Medical School, UK
| | - Hasnain Dalal
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter Medical School, UK
- Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust,
Truro, UK
| | - Rod S Taylor
- Institute of Health Research, University
of Exeter Medical School, UK
- Institute of Health and Well Being,
University of Glasgow, UK
- Rod Taylor, Institute of Health and Well
Being, MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow,
Top floor, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, Scotland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Corry M, Neenan K, Brabyn S, Sheaf G, Smith V. Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of adults with diagnosed illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 5:CD012533. [PMID: 31087641 PMCID: PMC6516056 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012533.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintaining care for ill persons in the community is heavily dependent on support from unpaid caregivers. Many caregivers, however, find themselves in a caring role for which they are ill prepared and may require professional support. The telephone is an easily accessible method of providing support irrespective of geographical location. OBJECTIVES The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of telephone support interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, when compared to usual care or non-telephone-based support interventions for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of people with acute and chronic diagnosed illnesses, and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of telephone interventions in this population. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases from inception to 16 November 2018: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; Embase; PsycINFO; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I; and CINAHL Complete. We also searched 11 caregiver-specific websites, three conference links, and two clinical trial registries. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (including cluster-RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. We excluded cross-over trials because of the high risk of carry-over effects from one intervention to another. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened citations against the review's inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the included studies using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. The review's prespecified primary (quality of life and burden) and secondary outcomes (skill acquisition, psychological health, knowledge, health status and well-being, family functioning, satisfaction, and economic outcomes), where reported, were assessed at the end of intervention delivery and at short-term (≤ 3 months), medium-term (> 3 to ≤ 6 months) and longer-term time points (> 6 to 12 months) following the intervention. Where possible, meta-analyses were conducted, otherwise results were reported narratively. MAIN RESULTS We included 21 randomised studies involving 1,690 caregivers; 19 studies compared telephone support interventions and usual care, of which 18 contributed data to the analyses. Two studies compared telephone and non-telephone professional support interventions. Caregiver ages ranged from 19 years to 87 years across studies. The majority of participants were female (> 70.53%), with two trials including females only. Most caregivers were family members, educated beyond secondary or high school level or had the equivalent in years of education. All caregivers were based in the community. Overall risk of bias was high for most studies.The results demonstrated that there is probably little or no difference between telephone support interventions and usual care for the primary outcome of quality of life at the end of intervention (SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.19, 4 studies, 364 caregivers) (moderate-certainty evidence) or burden at the end of intervention (SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.07, 9 studies, 788 caregivers) (low-certainty evidence). For one study where quality of life at the end of intervention was reported narratively, the findings indicated that a telephone support intervention may result in slightly higher quality of life, compared with usual care. Two further studies on caregiver burden were reported narratively; one reported that telephone support interventions may decrease burden, the other reported no change in the intervention group, compared with usual care.We are uncertain about the effects of telephone support interventions on caregiver depression at the end of intervention (SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.05, 9 studies, 792 caregivers) due to very low-certainty evidence for this outcome. Depression was reported narratively for three studies. One reported that the intervention may reduce caregiver depression at the end of intervention, but this effect was not sustained at short-term follow-up. The other two studies reported there may be little or no difference between telephone support and usual care for depression at the end of intervention. Six studies measured satisfaction with the intervention but did not report comparative data. All six reported high satisfaction scores with the intervention. No adverse events, including suicide or suicide ideation, were measured or reported by any of the included studies.Our analysis indicated that caregiver anxiety may be slightly reduced (MD -6.0, 95% CI -11.68 to -0.32, 1 study, 61 caregivers) and preparedness to care slightly improved (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.64, 2 studies, 208 caregivers) at the end of intervention, following telephone-only support interventions compared to usual care. Findings indicated there may be little or no difference between telephone support interventions and usual care for all of the following outcomes at the end of intervention: problem-solving, social activity, caregiver competence, coping, stress, knowledge, physical health, self-efficacy, family functioning, and satisfaction with supports (practical or social). There may also be little or no effect of telephone support interventions for quality of life and burden at short-term follow-up or for burden and depression at medium-term follow-up.Litttle or no difference was found between groups for any of the reported outcomes in studies comparing telephone and non-telephone professional support interventions. We are uncertain as to the effects of telephone support interventions compared to non-telephone support interventions for caregiver burden and depression at the end of intervention. No study reported on quality of life or satisfaction with the intervention and no adverse events were reported or noted in the two studies reporting on this comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although our review indicated slight benefit may exist for telephone support interventions on some outcomes (e.g. anxiety and preparedness to care at the end of intervention), for most outcomes, including the primary outcomes, telephone-only interventions may have little or no effect on caregiver outcomes compared to usual care. The findings of the review were mainly based on studies with overall high risk of bias, and few participants. Further high-quality trials, with larger sample sizes are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margarita Corry
- Trinity College DublinSchool of Nursing and MidwiferyDublinIreland
| | - Kathleen Neenan
- Trinity College DublinSchool of Nursing and MidwiferyDublinIreland
| | - Sally Brabyn
- University of YorkDepartment of Health SciencesHeslingtonYorkUKYO10 5DD
| | - Greg Sheaf
- The Library of Trinity College DublinCollege StreetDublinIreland
| | - Valerie Smith
- Trinity College DublinSchool of Nursing and MidwiferyDublinIreland
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advances in treatment, the increasing and ageing population makes heart failure an important cause of morbidity and death worldwide. It is associated with high healthcare costs, partly driven by frequent hospital readmissions. Disease management interventions may help to manage people with heart failure in a more proactive, preventative way than drug therapy alone. This is the second update of a review published in 2005 and updated in 2012. OBJECTIVES To compare the effects of different disease management interventions for heart failure (which are not purely educational in focus), with usual care, in terms of death, hospital readmissions, quality of life and cost-related outcomes. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL for this review update on 9 January 2018 and two clinical trials registries on 4 July 2018. We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with at least six months' follow-up, comparing disease management interventions to usual care for adults who had been admitted to hospital at least once with a diagnosis of heart failure. There were three main types of intervention: case management; clinic-based interventions; multidisciplinary interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Outcomes of interest were mortality due to heart failure, mortality due to any cause, hospital readmission for heart failure, hospital readmission for any cause, adverse effects, quality of life, costs and cost-effectiveness. MAIN RESULTS We found 22 new RCTs, so now include 47 RCTs (10,869 participants). Twenty-eight were case management interventions, seven were clinic-based models, nine were multidisciplinary interventions, and three could not be categorised as any of these. The included studies were predominantly in an older population, with most studies reporting a mean age of between 67 and 80 years. Seven RCTs were in upper-middle-income countries, the rest were in high-income countries.Only two multidisciplinary-intervention RCTs reported mortality due to heart failure. Pooled analysis gave a risk ratio (RR) of 0.46 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23 to 0.95), but the very low-quality evidence means we are uncertain of the effect on mortality due to heart failure. Based on this limited evidence, the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) is 12 (95% CI 9 to 126).Twenty-six case management RCTs reported all-cause mortality, with low-quality evidence indicating that these may reduce all-cause mortality (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.90; NNTB 25, 95% CI 17 to 54). We pooled all seven clinic-based studies, with low-quality evidence suggesting they may make little to no difference to all-cause mortality. Pooled analysis of eight multidisciplinary studies gave moderate-quality evidence that these probably reduce all-cause mortality (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.83; NNTB 17, 95% CI 12 to 32).We pooled data on heart failure readmissions from 12 case management studies. Moderate-quality evidence suggests that they probably reduce heart failure readmissions (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.78; NNTB 8, 95% CI 6 to 13). We were able to pool only two clinic-based studies, and the moderate-quality evidence suggested that there is probably little or no difference in heart failure readmissions between clinic-based interventions and usual care (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.18). Pooled analysis of five multidisciplinary interventions gave low-quality evidence that these may reduce the risk of heart failure readmissions (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.92; NNTB 11, 95% CI 7 to 44).Meta-analysis of 14 RCTs gave moderate-quality evidence that case management probably slightly reduces all-cause readmissions (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.01); a decrease from 491 to 451 in 1000 people (95% CI 407 to 495). Pooling four clinic-based RCTs gave low-quality and somewhat heterogeneous evidence that these may result in little or no difference in all-cause readmissions (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.12). Low-quality evidence from five RCTs indicated that multidisciplinary interventions may slightly reduce all-cause readmissions (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01); a decrease from 450 to 383 in 1000 people (95% CI 320 to 455).Neither case management nor clinic-based intervention RCTs reported adverse effects. Two multidisciplinary interventions reported that no adverse events occurred. GRADE assessment of moderate quality suggested that there may be little or no difference in adverse effects between multidisciplinary interventions and usual care.Quality of life was generally poorly reported, with high attrition. Low-quality evidence means we are uncertain about the effect of case management and multidisciplinary interventions on quality of life. Four clinic-based studies reported quality of life but we could not pool them due to differences in reporting. Low-quality evidence indicates that clinic-based interventions may result in little or no difference in quality of life.Four case management programmes had cost-effectiveness analyses, and seven reported cost data. Low-quality evidence indicates that these may reduce costs and may be cost-effective. Two clinic-based studies reported cost savings. Low-quality evidence indicates that clinic-based interventions may reduce costs slightly. Low-quality data from one multidisciplinary intervention suggested this may be cost-effective from a societal perspective but less so from a health-services perspective. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found limited evidence for the effect of disease management programmes on mortality due to heart failure, with few studies reporting this outcome. Case management may reduce all-cause mortality, and multidisciplinary interventions probably also reduce all-cause mortality, but clinic-based interventions had little or no effect on all-cause mortality. Readmissions due to heart failure or any cause were probably reduced by case-management interventions. Clinic-based interventions probably make little or no difference to heart failure readmissions and may result in little or no difference in readmissions for any cause. Multidisciplinary interventions may reduce the risk of readmission for heart failure or for any cause. There was a lack of evidence for adverse effects, and conclusions on quality of life remain uncertain due to poor-quality data. Variations in study location and time of occurrence hamper attempts to review costs and cost-effectiveness.The potential to improve quality of life is an important consideration but remains poorly reported. Improved reporting in future trials would strengthen the evidence for this patient-relevant outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Takeda
- University College LondonInstitute of Health Informatics ResearchLondonUK
| | - Nicole Martin
- University College LondonInstitute of Health Informatics ResearchLondonUK
| | - Rod S Taylor
- University of Exeter Medical SchoolInstitute of Health ResearchSouth Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree RoadExeterUKEX2 4SG
| | - Stephanie JC Taylor
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of LondonCentre for Primary Care and Public Health and Asthma UK Centre for Applied ResearchYvonne Carter Building58 Turner StreetLondonUKE1 2AB
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Majid U, Kim C, Cako A, Gagliardi AR. Engaging stakeholders in the co-development of programs or interventions using Intervention Mapping: A scoping review. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0209826. [PMID: 30586425 PMCID: PMC6306258 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care innovations tailored to stakeholder context are more readily adopted. This study aimed to describe how Intervention Mapping (IM) was used to design health care innovations and how stakeholders were involved. METHODS A scoping review was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Science Citation Index were searched from 2008 to November 2017. English language studies that used or cited Intervention Mapping were eligible. Screening and data extraction were done in triplicate. Summary statistics were used to describe study characteristics, IM steps employed, and stakeholder involvement. RESULTS A total of 852 studies were identified, 449 were unique, and 333 were excluded based on title and abstracts, 116 full-text articles were considered and 61 articles representing 60 studies from 13 countries for a variety of clinical issues were included. The number of studies published per year increased since 2008 and doubled in 2016 and 2017. The majority of studies employed multiple research methods (76.7%) and all 6 IM steps (73.3%). Resulting programs/interventions were single (55.4%) or multifaceted (46.4%), and 60.7% were pilot-tested. Programs or interventions were largely educational material or meetings, and were targeted to patients (70.2%), clinicians (14.0%) or both (15.8%). Studies provided few details about current or planned evaluation. Of the 4 (9.3%) studies that reported impact or outcomes, 3 achieved positive improvements in patient or professional behaviour or patient outcomes. Many studies (28.3%) did not involve stakeholders. Those that did (71.7%) often involved a combination of patients, clinicians, and community organizations. However, less than half (48.8%) described how they were engaged. Most often stakeholders were committee members and provide feedback on program or intervention content or format. CONCLUSIONS It is unclear if use of IM or stakeholder engagement in IM consistently results in effective programs or interventions. Those employing IM should report how stakeholders were involved in each IM step and how involvement influenced program or intervention design. They should also report the details or absence of planned evaluation. Future research should investigate how to optimize stakeholder engagement in IM, and whether use of IM itself or stakeholder engagement in IM are positively associated with effective programs or interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umair Majid
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Kim
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Albina Cako
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna R. Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ranaldi H, Deighan C, Taylor L. Exploring patient-reported outcomes of home-based cardiac rehabilitation in relation to Scottish, UK and European guidelines: an audit using qualitative methods. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e024499. [PMID: 30559161 PMCID: PMC6303573 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Heart Manual (HM) is the UK's leading facilitated home-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme for individuals recovering from myocardial infarction and revascularisation. This audit explored patient-reported outcomes of home-based CR in relation to current Scottish, UK and European guidelines. SETTING Patients across the UK returned their questionnaire after completing the HM programme to the HM Department (NHS Lothian). PARTICIPANTS Qualitative data from 457 questionnaires returned between 2011 and 2018 were included for thematic analysis. Seven themes were identified from the guidelines. This guided initial deductive coding and provided the basis for inductive subthemes to emerge. RESULTS Themes included: (1) health behaviour change and modifiable risk reduction, (2) psychosocial support, (3) education, (4) social support, (5) medical risk management, (6) vocational rehabilitation and (7) long-term strategies and maintenance. Both (1) and (2) were reported as having the greatest impact on patients' daily lives. Subthemes for (1) included: guidance, engagement, awareness, consequences, attitude, no change and motivation. Psychosocial support comprised: stress management, pacing, relaxation, increased self-efficacy, validation, mental health and self-perception. This was followed by (3) and (4). Patients less frequently referred to (5), (6) and (7). Additional themes highlighted the impact of the HM programme and that patients attributed the greatest impact to a combination of all the above themes. CONCLUSIONS This audit highlighted the HM as comprehensive and inclusive of key elements proposed by Scottish, UK and EU guidelines. Patients reported this had a profound impact on their daily lives and proved advantageous for CR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Louise Taylor
- The Heart Manual Department, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Olsen Zwisler AD. Home-based rehabilitation interventions aimed at congestive heart failure: Are we there yet? Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018; 26:259-261. [DOI: 10.1177/2047487318816783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Dorthe Olsen Zwisler
- Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, Holbæk Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dalal HM, Taylor RS, Jolly K, Davis RC, Doherty P, Miles J, van Lingen R, Warren FC, Green C, Wingham J, Greaves C, Sadler S, Hillsdon M, Abraham C, Britten N, Frost J, Singh S, Hayward C, Eyre V, Paul K, Lang CC, Smith K. The effects and costs of home-based rehabilitation for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: The REACH-HF multicentre randomized controlled trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018; 26:262-272. [PMID: 30304644 PMCID: PMC6376602 DOI: 10.1177/2047487318806358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Cardiac rehabilitation improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and reduces hospitalizations in patients with heart failure, but international uptake of cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure remains low. Design and methods The aim of this multicentre randomized trial was to compare the REACH-HF (Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronicHeart Failure) intervention, a facilitated self-care and home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme to usual care for adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The study primary hypothesis was that the addition of the REACH-HF intervention to usual care would improve disease-specific HRQoL (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLHFQ)) at 12 months compared with usual care alone. Results The study recruited 216 participants, predominantly men (78%), with an average age of 70 years and mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 34%. Overall, 185 (86%) participants provided data for the primary outcome. At 12 months, there was a significant and clinically meaningful between-group difference in the MLHFQ score of –5.7 points (95% confidence interval –10.6 to –0.7) in favour of the REACH-HF intervention group (p = 0.025). With the exception of patient self-care (p < 0.001) there was no significant difference in other secondary outcomes, including clinical events (p > 0.05) at follow-up compared with usual care. The mean cost of the REACH-HF intervention was £418 per participant. Conclusions The novel REACH-HF home-based facilitated intervention for HFrEF was clinically superior in disease-specific HRQoL at 12 months and offers an affordable alternative to traditional centre-based programmes to address current low cardiac rehabilitation uptake rates for heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasnain M Dalal
- 1 Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.,2 Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Rod S Taylor
- 1 Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- 3 Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Russell C Davis
- 4 Cardiology Department, Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Patrick Doherty
- 5 Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Jackie Miles
- 6 Research and Development, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, St Woolos Hospital, Newport, UK
| | | | - Fiona C Warren
- 1 Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin Green
- 1 Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Jennifer Wingham
- 1 Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin Greaves
- 8 Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Susannah Sadler
- 1 Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Melvyn Hillsdon
- 9 Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Charles Abraham
- 10 Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicky Britten
- 1 Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Julia Frost
- 1 Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Sally Singh
- 11 Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | - Kevin Paul
- 14 REACH-HF Patient and Public Involvement Group, c/o Research, Development & Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Chim C Lang
- 15 School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Karen Smith
- 16 School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lake AJ, Browne JL, Abraham C, Tumino D, Hines C, Rees G, Speight J. A tailored intervention to promote uptake of retinal screening among young adults with type 2 diabetes - an intervention mapping approach. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:396. [PMID: 29855307 PMCID: PMC5984467 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3188-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young adults (18-39 years) with type 2 diabetes are at risk of early development and rapid progression of diabetic retinopathy, a leading cause of vision loss and blindness in working-age adults. Retinal screening is key to the early detection of diabetic retinopathy, with risk of vision loss significantly reduced by timely treatment thereafter. Despite this, retinal screening rates are low among this at-risk group. The objective of this study was to develop a theoretically-grounded, evidence-based retinal screening promotion leaflet, tailored to young adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS Utilising the six steps of Intervention Mapping, our multidisciplinary planning team conducted a mixed-methods needs assessment (Step 1); identified modifiable behavioural determinants of screening behaviour and constructed a matrix of change objectives (Step 2); designed, reviewed and debriefed leaflet content with stakeholders (Steps 3 and 4); and developed program implementation and evaluation plans (Steps 5 and 6). RESULTS Step 1 included in-depth qualitative interviews (N = 10) and an online survey that recruited a nationally-representative sample (N = 227), both informed by literature review. The needs assessment highlighted the crucial roles of knowledge (about diabetic retinopathy and screening), perception of personal risk, awareness of the approval of significant others and engagement with healthcare team, on retinal screening intentions and uptake. In Step 2, we selected five modifiable behavioural determinants to be targeted: knowledge, attitudes, normative beliefs, intention, and behavioural skills. In Steps 3 and 4, the "Who is looking after your eyes?" leaflet was developed, containing persuasive messages targeting each determinant and utilising engaging, cohort-appropriate imagery. In Steps 5 and 6, we planned Statewide implementation and designed a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the leaflet. CONCLUSIONS This research provides an example of a systematic, evidence-based approach to the development of a simple health intervention designed to promote uptake of screening in accordance with national guidelines. The methods and findings illustrate how Intervention Mapping can be employed to develop tailored retinal screening promotion materials for specific priority populations. This paper has implications for future program planners and is intended to assist those wishing to use Intervention Mapping to create similar theoretically-driven, tailored resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia J. Lake
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jessica L. Browne
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Charles Abraham
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Dee Tumino
- Vision 2020 Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Gwyneth Rees
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, 3002 Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010 Australia
| | - Jane Speight
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- AHP Research, Hornchurch, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
House A, Latchford G, Russell AM, Bryant L, Wright J, Graham E, Stansfield A, Ajjan R. Development of a supported self-management intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes and a learning disability. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:106. [PMID: 29862037 PMCID: PMC5975532 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0291-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although supported self-management is a well-recognised part of chronic disease management, it has not been routinely used as part of healthcare for adults with a learning disability. We developed an intervention for adults with a mild or moderate learning disability and type 2 diabetes, building on the principles of supported self-management with reasonable adjustments made for the target population. METHODS In five steps, we:Clarified the principles of supported self-management as reported in the published literatureIdentified the barriers to effective self-management of type 2 diabetes in adults with a learning disabilityReviewed existing materials that aim to support self-management of diabetes for people with a learning disabilitySynthesised the outputs from the first three phases and identified elements of supported self-management that were (a) most relevant to the needs of our target population and (b) most likely to be acceptable and useful to themImplemented and field tested the intervention. RESULTS The final intervention had four standardised components: (1) establishing the participant's daily routines and lifestyle, (2) identifying supporters and their roles, (3) using this information to inform setting realistic goals and providing materials to the patient and supporter to help them be achieved and (4) monitoring progress against goals.Of 41 people randomised in a feasibility RCT, thirty five (85%) completed the intervention sessions, with over three quarters of all participants (78%) attending at least three sessions.Twenty-three out of 40 (58%) participants were deemed to be very engaged with the sessions and 12/40 (30%) with the materials; 30 (73%) participants had another person present with them during at least one of their sessions; 15/41 (37%) were reported to have a very engaged main supporter, and 18/41 (44%) had a different person who was not their main supporter but who was engaged in the intervention implementation. CONCLUSIONS The intervention was feasible to deliver and, as judged by participation and engagement, acceptable to participants and those who supported them. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN41897033 (registered 21/01/2013).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan House
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Gary Latchford
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Amy M. Russell
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Louise Bryant
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Judy Wright
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Elizabeth Graham
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | | | - Ramzi Ajjan
- Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lang CC, Smith K, Wingham J, Eyre V, Greaves CJ, Warren FC, Green C, Jolly K, Davis RC, Doherty PJ, Miles J, Britten N, Abraham C, Van Lingen R, Singh SJ, Paul K, Hillsdon M, Sadler S, Hayward C, Dalal HM, Taylor RS. A randomised controlled trial of a facilitated home-based rehabilitation intervention in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and their caregivers: the REACH-HFpEF Pilot Study. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e019649. [PMID: 29632081 PMCID: PMC5893929 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Home-based cardiac rehabilitation may overcome suboptimal rates of participation. The overarching aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the novel Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Hear Failure (REACH-HF) rehabilitation intervention for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and their caregivers. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients were randomised 1:1 to REACH-HF intervention plus usual care (intervention group) or usual care alone (control group). REACH-HF is a home-based comprehensive self-management rehabilitation programme that comprises patient and carer manuals with supplementary tools, delivered by trained healthcare facilitators over a 12 week period. Patient outcomes were collected by blinded assessors at baseline, 3 months and 6 months postrandomisation and included health-related quality of life (primary) and psychological well-being, exercise capacity, physical activity and HF-related hospitalisation (secondary). Outcomes were also collected in caregivers.We enrolled 50 symptomatic patients with HF from Tayside, Scotland with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45% (mean age 73.9 years, 54% female, 100% white British) and 21 caregivers. Study retention (90%) and intervention uptake (92%) were excellent. At 6 months, data from 45 patients showed a potential direction of effect in favour of the intervention group, including the primary outcome of Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire total score (between-group mean difference -11.5, 95% CI -22.8 to 0.3). A total of 11 (4 intervention, 7 control) patients experienced a hospital admission over the 6 months of follow-up with 4 (control patients) of these admissions being HF-related. Improvements were seen in a number intervention caregivers' mental health and burden compared with control. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the feasibility and rationale for delivering the REACH-HF facilitated home-based rehabilitation intervention for patients with HFpEF and their caregivers and progression to a full multicentre randomised clinical trial to test its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN78539530.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chim C Lang
- School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Karen Smith
- School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
- School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Jennifer Wingham
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- Research, Development and Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | | | - Colin J Greaves
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Fiona C Warren
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin Green
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Russell C Davis
- Cardiology Department, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Jackie Miles
- Research and Development, Anuerin Bevan University Health Board, St Woolos Hospital, Newport, UK
| | - Nicky Britten
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Charles Abraham
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Robin Van Lingen
- Cardiology Department, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Sally J Singh
- Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Kevin Paul
- REACH-HF Patient and Public Involvement Group, c/o Research, Development & Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | | | - Susannah Sadler
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Hayes M Dalal
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- Research, Development and Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Rod S Taylor
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Eyre V, Lang CC, Smith K, Jolly K, Davis R, Hayward C, Wingham J, Abraham C, Green C, Warren FC, Britten N, Greaves CJ, Doherty P, Austin J, Van Lingen R, Singh S, Buckingham S, Paul K, Taylor RS, Dalal HM. Rehabilitation Enablement in Chronic Heart Failure-a facilitated self-care rehabilitation intervention in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (REACH-HFpEF) and their caregivers: rationale and protocol for a single-centre pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012853. [PMID: 27798024 PMCID: PMC5093626 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure in patients with Heart Failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (REACH-HFpEF) pilot trial is part of a research programme designed to develop and evaluate a facilitated, home-based, self-help rehabilitation intervention to improve self-care and quality of life (QoL) in heart failure patients and their caregivers. We will assess the feasibility of a definitive trial of the REACH-HF intervention in patients with HFpEF and their caregivers. The impact of the REACH-HF intervention on echocardiographic outcomes and bloodborne biomarkers will also be assessed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A single-centre parallel two-group randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 1:1 individual allocation to the REACH-HF intervention plus usual care (intervention) or usual care alone (control) in 50 HFpEF patients and their caregivers. The REACH-HF intervention comprises a REACH-HF manual with supplementary tools, delivered by trained facilitators over 12 weeks. A mixed methods approach will be used to assess estimation of recruitment and retention rates; fidelity of REACH-HF manual delivery; identification of barriers to participation and adherence to the intervention and study protocol; feasibility of data collection and outcome burden. We will assess the variance in study outcomes to inform a definitive study sample size and assess methods for the collection of resource use and intervention delivery cost data to develop the cost-effectiveness analyses framework for any future trial. Patient outcomes collected at baseline, 4 and 6 months include QoL, psychological well-being, exercise capacity, physical activity and HF-related hospitalisation. Caregiver outcomes will also be assessed, and a substudy will evaluate impact of the REACH-HF manual on resting global cardiovascular function and bloodborne biomarkers in HFpEF patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study is approved by the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service (Ref: 15/ES/0036). Findings will be disseminated via journals and presentations to clinicians, commissioners and service users. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN78539530; Pre-results .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Eyre
- Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
| | - C C Lang
- School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - K Smith
- School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Dundee University, Dundee, UK
| | - K Jolly
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - R Davis
- Cardiology Department, Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - C Hayward
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - J Wingham
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- Research, Development & Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - C Abraham
- Psychology Applied to Health Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - C Green
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - F C Warren
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - N Britten
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - C J Greaves
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - P Doherty
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - J Austin
- Heart Failure Services and Cardiac Rehabilitation, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Nevill Hall Hospital, Abergavenny, UK
| | - R Van Lingen
- Cardiology Department, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - S Singh
- Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - S Buckingham
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - K Paul
- REACH-HF Patient and Public Involvement Group, c/o Research, Development & Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - R S Taylor
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - H M Dalal
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- Research, Development & Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| |
Collapse
|