Optimal CD4 T cell priming after LPS-based adjuvanticity with CD134 costimulation relies on CXCL9 production

The Protective Role of IL-36/IL-36R Signal in Con A-Induced Acute Hepatitis

The IL-36 family, including IL-36α, IL-36β, IL-36γ, and IL-36R antagonist, belong to the IL-1 superfamily. It was reported that IL-36 plays a role in immune diseases. However, it remains unclear how IL-36 regulates inflammation. To determine the role of IL-36/IL-36R signaling pathways, we established an acute hepatitis mouse model (C57BL/6) by i.v. injection of the plant lectin Con A. We found that the levels of IL-36 were increased in the liver after Con A injection. Our results demonstrated the infiltrated neutrophils, but not the hepatocytes, were the main source of IL-36 in the liver. Using the IL-36R-/- mouse model (H-2b), we surprisingly found that the absence of IL-36 signals led to aggravated liver injury, as evidenced by increased mortality, elevated serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, and severe liver pathological changes. Further investigations demonstrated that a lack of IL-36 signaling induced intrahepatic activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes and increased the production of inflammatory cytokines. In addition, IL-36R-/- mice had reduced T regulatory cell numbers and chemokines in the liver. Together, our results from the mouse model suggested a vital role of IL-36 in regulating T cell function and homeostasis during liver inflammation.

Unbiased analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells reveals CD4 T cell response to RSV matrix protein

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most important cause of respiratory tract illness especially in young infants that develop severe disease requiring hospitalization, and accounting for 74,000–126,000 admissions in the United States (Rezaee et al., 2017; Resch, 2017). Observations of neonatal and infant T cells suggest that they may express different immune markers compared to T-cells from older children. Flow cytometry analysis of cellular responses using “conventional” anti-viral markers (IL2, IFN-γ, TNF, IL10 and IL4) upon RSV-peptide stimulation detected an overall low RSV response in peripheral blood. Therefore we sought an unbiased approach to identify RSV-specific immune markers using RNA-sequencing upon stimulation of infant PBMCs with overlapping peptides representing RSV antigens. To understand the cellular response using transcriptional signatures, transcription factors and cell-type specific signatures were used to investigate breadth of response across peptides. Unexpected from the ICS data, M peptide induced a response equivalent to the F-peptide and was characterized by activation of GATA2, 3, STAT3 and IRF1. This along with upregulation of several unconventional T cell signatures was only observed upon M-peptide stimulation. Moreover, signatures of natural RSV infections were identified from the data available in the public domain to investigate similarities between transcriptional signatures from PBMCs and upon peptide stimulation. This analysis also suggested activation of T cell response upon M-peptide stimulation. Hence, based on transcriptional response, markers were chosen to validate the role of M-peptide in activation of T cells. Indeed, CD4+CXCL9+ cells were identified upon M-peptide stimulation by flow cytometry. Future work using additional markers identified in this study could reveal additional unconventional T cells responding to RSV infections in infants. In conclusion, T cell responses to RSV in infants may not follow the canonical Th1/Th2 patterns of effector responses but include additional functions that may be unique to the neonatal period and correlate with clinical outcomes.

Toll-like receptor 4 signaling in hematopoietic-lineage cells contributes to the enhanced activity of the human vaccine adjuvant AS01

The 3-O-desacyl-4'-monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) activates immunity through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling. The Adjuvant System AS01 contains MPL and is used in the candidate malaria vaccine and the licensed zoster vaccine. Recent studies reported that AS01 adjuvant activity depends on a transient inflammation at the site of vaccination, but the role of stromal or structural cells in the adjuvant effect is unknown. We investigated this question in mouse models by assessing the role of TLR4 on hematopoietic versus resident structural cells during immunization with AS01-adjuvanted vaccines. We first established that TLR4-deficient animals had a reduced immune response to an AS01-adjuvanted vaccine. Using bone marrow chimera, we consistently found that Tlr4 expression in radio-sensitive cells, i.e., hematopoietic cells, was required for an optimal adjuvant effect on antibody and T-cell responses. At day 1 after injection, the pro-inflammatory reaction at the site of injection was strongly dependent on TLR4 signaling in hematopoietic cells. Similarly, activation of dendritic cells in muscle-draining lymph nodes was strictly associated with the radio-sensitive cells expressing Tlr4. Altogether, these data suggest that MPL-mediated TLR4-signaling in hematopoietic cells is critical in the mode of action of AS01.

Understanding how combinatorial targeting of TLRs and TNFR family costimulatory members promote enhanced T cell responses

INTRODUCTION

Due to the ability of pathogen-associated molecular patters and tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) family costimulatory agonists to boost T cell responses, studies have combined Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands with TNFR family costimulatory receptor agonists to induce impressive and long-lasting T cell responses. Although some studies have determined how these combinatorial vaccines promote enhanced T cell responses, much remains unknown about the mechanism used by these combinations to promote synergistic T cell responses - especially in settings of infectious diseases or cancer.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we look in detail at the signaling pathways induced by combinatorial targeting of TLR and TNFR family costimulatory members that help them promote synergistic T cell responses. Understanding this can greatly aid the development of novel vaccine regimens that promote cellular immune responses, which is essential for treating certain infectious diseases and cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

Vaccines against some infectious diseases as well as therapeutic cancer vaccines require cellular immunity. Therefore, we evaluate here how signaling pathways induced by TLR ligand and costimulatory agonist combinations promote enhanced T cell responses during immunization with model antigens, viral pathogens, or tumor antigens. Once pathways that drive these combinatorial vaccines to boost T cell activation are identified, they can be incorporated in vaccines designed to target pathogens or cancer.