Randomized study of continuous infusion fluorouracil versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

TGF-β in correlation with tumor progression, immunosuppression and targeted therapy in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex malignancy responsible for the second-highest cancer deaths worldwide. TGF-β maintains normal cellular homeostasis by inhibiting the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis, but its elevated level is correlated with colorectal cancer progression, as TGF-β is a master regulator of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, a critical step of metastasis. Tumors, including CRC, use elevated TGF-β levels to avoid immune surveillance by modulating immune cell differentiation, proliferation, and effector function. Presently, the treatment of advanced CRC is mainly based on chemotherapy, with multiple adverse effects. Thus, there is a need to develop alternate tactics because CRC continue to be mostly resistant to the present therapeutic regimen. TGF-β blockade has emerged as a promising therapeutic target in cancer therapy. Blocking TGF-β with phytochemicals and other molecules, such as antisense oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies, and bifunctional traps, alone or in combination, may be a safer and more effective way to treat CRC. Furthermore, combination immunotherapy comprising TGF-β blockers and immune checkpoint inhibitors is gaining popularity because both molecules work synergistically to suppress the immune system. Here, we summarize the current understanding of TGF-β as a therapeutic target for managing CRC and its context-dependent tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressing nature.

Evaluations of Anticancer Effects of Combinations of Cisplatin and Tirucallane-Type Triterpenes Isolated from Amphipterygium adstringens (Schltdl)

The cytotoxic activity of combinations of masticadienonic (AMD) or 3αOH-hydroxy-masticadienonic (3αOH-AMD) acids with cisplatin (CDDP) was evaluated against PC3 prostate and HCT116 colon cancer cell lines. Combinations A (half the IC50 value), B (IC50 value), and C (twice the IC50 value) were tested at a 1 : 1 ratio. All AMD plus CDDP combinations demonstrated increased cytotoxic effect, as determined by the sulforhodamine B test, in both cell types. The best combination was B, which showed 93 % and 91 % inhibition of the proliferation of PC3 and HCT116 cells, respectively. It also increased apoptosis in the PC3 cell lines, as evaluated by flow cytometry. However, in vivo tests showed no additional activity from the AMD plus CDDP combinations. These results showed that the increased cytotoxic activity of the combinations in vitro did not reflect in vivo tests. All combinations of 3αOH-AMD plus CDDP exerted antagonistic effects in both cell types.

Pharmacological Properties of Pt(II) and Pt(IV) Complexes with 2,2'-Dipyridylamine; the Comparative In Vitro Thereof

Pt-based drugs such as cisplatin are frontline drugs used for the treatment of different solid malignancies. However, they represent major problems, such as severe side effects and drug resistance. To find out the structure-activity relationship; in this study, Pt(II) and Pt(IV) complexes with similar ligands, namely tetrachloro(2,2'-dipyridylamine)platinum(IV) (1) and dichloro(2,2'-dipyridylamine)platinum(II) (2) were synthesized, tested for their in vitro activity over different tumor cell lines and compared with cisplatin. Despite nontoxicity against nonmalignant cells, both titled compounds depict considerable killing activity over HT-29 cells. So, this cell line is served for further investigation. Cell cycle test revealed that the mechanism of cell cycle arrest induced by complexes 1 and 2 over HT-29 cells was relatively similar and obviously different from cisplatin. Moreover, apoptosis analysis showed that late apoptosis/necrosis is the primary disease for the death of cell by three complexes. Comet assay and colony-forming test were also performed on HT-29 cells whose results were thoroughly discussed.

Molecular basis of cancer-therapy-induced cardiotoxicity: introducing microRNA biomarkers for early assessment of subclinical myocardial injury

Development of reliable biomarkers for early clinical assessment of drug-induced cardiotoxicity could allow the detection of subclinical cardiac injury risk in vulnerable patients before irreversible damage occurs. Currently, it is difficult to predict who will develop drug-induced cardiotoxicity owing to lack of sensitivity and/or specificity of currently used diagnostics. miRNAs are mRNA regulators and they are currently being extensively profiled for use as biomarkers due to their specific tissue and disease expression signature profiles. Identification of cardiotoxicity-specific miRNA biomarkers could provide clinicians with a valuable tool to allow prognosis of patients at risk of cardiovascular injury, alteration of a treatment regime or the introduction of an adjunct therapy in order to increase the long-term survival rate of patients treated with cardiotoxic drugs.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using cisplatin powder mixed with degradable starch microspheres for colorectal liver metastases after FOLFOX failure: results of a phase I/II study

PURPOSE

To report the results of a phase I/II study of a transcatheter arterial chemoembolization protocol using cisplatin powder and degradable starch microspheres (DSM) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases after failure of FOLFOX (5-flourouracil, leucovorin plus oxaliplatin) chemotherapy conducted to determine the recommended dose of cisplatin powder and to assess the efficacy and safety of the protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A fine-powder formulation of cisplatin was mixed with DSM and administered via the hepatic artery every 4 weeks. In phase I, three cohorts of patients received escalating doses of cisplatin powder: 50 mg/m(2), 65 mg/m(2), and 80 mg/m(2). In phase II, tumor response, toxicity, and survival times were assessed.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 24 patients. Previously, FOLFOX had been administered to all patients, an irinotecan-containing regimen had been administered to 12 patients, and bevacizumab or cetuximab or both had been administered to 14 patients. In phase I, dose-limiting toxicity did not appear at any level, and the recommended dose of cisplatin powder was determined to be 80 mg/m(2). In phase II, a tumor response rate of 61.1% was achieved. The median hepatic progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.06-13.5 mo) and 21.1 months (95% CI, 8.37-33.8 mo). The following grade 3 toxicities were observed: thrombocytopenia (12.5%), aspartate transaminase elevation (33.3%), alanine transaminase elevation (12.5%), hyponatremia (8.3%), and cholecystitis (4.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with cisplatin powder at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) mixed with DSM is well tolerated and can produce a high response rate with a long survival time for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases after failure of FOLFOX.

Multicenter retrospective study of 132 patients with unresectable small bowel adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

No standard chemotherapy regimen has been established for unresectable or recurrent small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA).

METHODS

Clinical courses of 132 patients with unresectable or recurrent SBA who received chemotherapy at 41 institutions in Japan were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were classified into five groups according to first-line chemotherapy regimens: fluoropyrimidine monotherapy (group A), fluoropyrimidine-cisplatin (group B), fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin (group C), fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan (group D), and other regimens (group E).

RESULTS

The number of patients in each group was as follows: groups A, 60 patients; group B, 17 patients; group C, 22 patients; group D, 11 patients; and group E, 22 patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) times were as follows: group A, 5.4 months; group B, 3.8 months; group C, 8.2 months; group D, 5.6 months; and group E, 3.4 months. Median overall survival (OS) times were as follows: group A, 13.9 months; group B, 12.6 months; group C, 22.2 months; group D, 9.4 months; and group D, 8.1 months. Patients in group C achieved significantly longer PFS times and substantially (but not significantly) longer OS times than patients in group A. After adjusting for clinical background characteristics, fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin therapy was a significant positive prognostic factor for PFS and OS times.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin combination therapy is the most promising first-line chemotherapy regimen for unresectable or recurrent SBA.

Change in Expression of Survivin Caused by Using Oxaliplatin in HCT116 Colon Cancer Cells

Purpose

Oxaliplatin is a third-generation platinum compound, and it has no nephrotoxicity and has reduced bone marrow toxicity. Cancer cells that are resistant to cisplatin are sensitive to oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin is used widely for the treatment of colon cancers. Recently, oxaliplatin was reported to inhibit the expression of survivin, which protects cell apoptosis. However, there are no reports on the expressions of survivin variants and the changes in intracellular localization of survivin in cancer cells. We studied the expression of survivin caused by oxaliplatin in HCT116 colon cancer cells, and we observed the localization of survivin in the mitotic phase.

Methods

We treated the HCT116 colon cancer cells with 2.0 µM of oxaliplatin, and we studied the expressions of survivin protein, and survivin mRNA variants, as well as the changes in intracellular localization, by using the Western blot method, RT-PCR, immunocytochemistry, and flowcytometry.

Results

Oxaliplatin inhibits the expression of the survivin protein and survivin mRNA in HCT116 colon cancer cells. The expression of the survivin-2B variants, which have no antiapoptotic activity but control cell mitosis by localization on a microtubule, is reduced continuously 2 days after treatment with oxaliplatin. In immunocytochemistry, expression of survivin in the cytoplasm is reduced and especially is not expressed in microtubules and contractile rings.

Conclusion

One of the mechanisms of oxaliplatin is to inhibit the expression of and to change the localization of survivin. Based on these results, we suggest that changes in the expression of survivin variants and in their localization are two effects of oxaliplatin.

Chemotherapy of advanced small-bowel adenocarcinoma: a multicenter AGEO study

BACKGROUND

Small-bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare tumor of poor prognosis. Data on the efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced SBA are scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with advanced SBA who received frontline chemotherapy from 1996 to 2008 were eligible for this retrospective multicenter study.

RESULTS

Ninety-three consecutive patients were included. In the entire population, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were 6.6 and 15.1 months, respectively. Median PFS times among patients treated with LV5FU2 (n = 10), FOLFOX (n = 48), FOLFIRI (n = 19) and LV5FU2-cisplatin (n = 16) were 7.7, 6.9, 6.0 and 4.8 months, respectively, while median OS times were 13.5, 17.8, 10.6 and 9.3 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, World Health Organization performance status (PS) (P < 0.0001) and elevated serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (P = 0.02) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) (P = 0.03) were the only variables significantly associated with poor OS. In the subgroup of patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, multivariate analysis showed that LV5FU2-cisplatin was associated with poorer PFS (P < 0.0001) and OS (P = 0.02) compared with FOLFOX.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study of chemotherapy in advanced SBA. Baseline PS and CEA and CA 19-9 levels were the main prognostic factors. FOLFOX seems to be the most effective platinum-based chemotherapy regimen.

A phase I dose-escalation study of S-1 plus carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the recommended dose and the safety profile of S-1 and carboplatin combination regimen in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with S-1 and carboplatin. S-1 was administered orally twice daily for 14 days and carboplatin on day 1 of each cycle, and this was repeated every 4 weeks. Doses of each drug were planned as follows: level 1, 5/65; level 2, 5/80; level 3, 6/80 [carboplatin (area under the curve, mg/ml/min)/S-1 (mg/m/day)]. The dose-limiting toxicity of the regimen was assessed during the first chemotherapy cycle. Twelve patients were enrolled in this study. The main grade 3 or grade 4 toxicities observed during the first cycle were neutropenia (41%), thrombocytopenia (41%) and transaminase elevation. Two of three patients in level 2 had dose-limiting toxicity and this level was considered the maximum tolerated dose. Level 1 was selected as the recommended dose. Objective responses were seen in four patients (response rate 33%). The combination of S-1 plus carboplatin is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Therapeutic Options in the Management of Colon Cancer: 2005 Update

Recently, major developments in the treatment of colon cancer have emerged. These developments include improvements in surgical technique and staging and the introduction of new molecularly targeted pharmacologic agents. Improvements in surgical management involve enhanced staging techniques, allowing more accurate determination of risk of recurrence. Newer agents, such as oxaliplatin, cetuximab, and bevacizumab, now are approved for the treatment of colon cancer. The data associated with use of oxaliplatin in adjuvant and metastatic settings continue to mature; survival benefits are expected to become more fully apparent in the next two years. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor, when combined with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFL), was superior to IFL alone in achieving median and progression-free survival. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor, when given in combination with irinotecan, achieved an increased objective response and increased time to progression, compared with cetuximab alone, in patients refractory to irinotecan-containing regimens. In addition to surgical and pharmacologic developments, the recognition that genetics and molecular markers play an important role in carcinogenesis has heightened research to integrate this knowledge into practice. Nurses play a pivotal role in the care of patients with colon cancer and must be conversant in the new advances in treatment.

Metronomic Outpatient-Based Chemotherapy with 5′-DFUR and Low-Dose Cisplatin for Conventional Platinum-Based Chemotherapy-Resistant Advanced Urothelial Cancer

Background

Metronomic chemotherapy is aimed at lessening the adverse effects of treatment while rendering cancer cells cytostatic. The oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug “5′-DFUR” has been shown to inhibit angiogenesis and is regarded as a good candidate agent for metronomic chemotherapy. Moreover, cisplatin and 5′-DFUR have been shown to synergistic cytotoxic effects.

Methods

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of metronomic chemotherapy using daily oral 5′-DFUR at the dose of 600 mg/day and biweekly cisplatin infusion at the dose of 20 mg/person in 23 patients with urothelial cancer resistant to conventional platinum-based chemotherapy.

Results

Twenty-three patients were enrolled between August 2000 and December 2004. The median survival time after the initiation of metronomic chemotherapy was 15.2 months. The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 55.1%, 45.1% and 5.9%, respectively. Grade 3 fatigue was observed as severe toxicity in one patient. No cases showed nephrotoxicity and adverse effects necessitating medical intervention.

Conclusions

Although a large-scale prospective study would be necessary before the therapy is established as a standard, our metronomic chemotherapy regimen appears to be a potentially useful palliative treatment alternative for patients with advanced urothelial cancer resistant to conventional platinum-based chemotherapy.

Abbreviations

M-VAC: methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin; GC: gemcitabine and carboplatin; 5′-DFUR: 5′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine; 5-FU: 5-fluorouracil; CDDP: cisplatin; TCC: transitional cell carcinoma; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PS: performance status; UICC: Union International Contre le Cancer; WHO: World Health Organization; NCI-CTC: National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria; CI: confidence interval; PR: partial response; NC: no change; PD: progressive disease; TP: thymidine phosphorylase; AUC: areas under the curve.

Randomized crossover trial of intravenous 5-FU versus oral UFT both modulated by leucovorin: a one-centre experience

Although intravenous (IV) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and uracil/futraful (UFT) have comparable antitumour efficacy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC), we wanted to assess which of these two regimens would be preferred by our patients. We randomized 20 previously untreated patients with MCC at our centre to receive oral UFT or bolus IV 5-FU both associated with leucovorin. After the first cycle patients were crossed over to the other arm. Before the third cycle we left patients to choose one of the regimens to continue their treatment until disease progression. Two patients chose 5-FU and 18 chose UFT (P < 0.001). Fewer side effects (50%) and convenience of home treatment (40%) were the main reasons for their choice for the oral regimen. UFT induced less mucositis (P = 0. 02) and diarrhoea (P = 0. 01). We conclude that convenience and lower toxicity may explain the observed preference for oral UFT.

S-1 plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a novel combination chemotherapeutic regimen including cisplatin with an oral anticancer agent, S-1 that consisted of tegafur, 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine, and potassium oxonate, for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this phase II trial, patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC were treated with the oral administration of S-1 at 40 mg/m(2) twice a day for 21 consecutive days while cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) was administered intravenously on day 8. This schedule was repeated every 5 weeks.

RESULTS

Of 56 patients enrolled in the study, 55 patients were eligible and analyzed. The median number of cycles administered was 3 (range, 1-12 cycles). Among these 55 patients, one complete response and 25 partial responses were observed with an overall response rate of 47% (95% confidence interval, 34-61%). The median survival time was 11 months and the 1-year survival rate was 45%. Hematologic toxicities of grades 3 and 4 included neutropenia (29%) and anemia (22%). No grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed. Grade 3 toxicity included anorexia (13%), vomiting (7%), or diarrhea (7%).

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy showed a promising effectiveness with acceptable toxicity rates in patients with advanced NSCLC. These results warrant further investigations of this regimen including a randomized controlled trial for its use as a first line treatment for NSCLC.

Randomized comparative study of surgical adjuvant chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil and dl-leucovorin with CDDP, 5-FU and dl-leucovorin for advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most useful chemotherapeutic agent for colorectal carcinoma. Recently, the effectiveness of multidrug therapy in modifying the anticancer activity of 5-FU for advanced cases was clarified. We conducted a randomized comparative study of surgical adjuvant chemotherapy comparing cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (CDDP), 5-FU and dl-leucovorin (LV) (PFL therapy) with dl-LV and 5-FU (FL therapy) in patients who underwent curative resection of stage II and III colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients, 13 ungergoing PFL therapy and 18 undergoing FL therapy, completed the scheduled administration, while 20 dropped out. Administration schedules were as follows: PFL therapy consisted of 13 mg/m2 CDDP, 300 mg/m2 5-FU and 30 mg/body weight LV for 5 consecutive days. The FL therapy consisted of 300 mg/m2 5-FU and 30 mg/body weight LV for 5 consecutive days in hospital. Both regimens were followed by biweekly administration of the same dosages of LV and 5-FU in an outpatient setting.

RESULTS

Seven of 23 patients in the PFL therapy group and five of 28 patients in the FL therapy group experienced recurrence of colorectal carcinomas. Regarding prognosis of stage II patients, both groups showed similar results in 5-year disease specific survival and disease-free survival. However, stage III patients obtained better prognostic results in the FL therapy group than in the PFL therapy group. Major toxicities in these regimens were vomiting and leukopenia, both being more frequent in the PFL therapy group. Symptoms of toxicity resolved completely in all patients.

CONCLUSION

From the present study we found that PFL therapy brought no benefit for stage II and III colorectal carcinoma compared with FL therapy. We should search for more appropriate adjuvant therapy, increasing the therapeutic effect of 5-FU + LV for stage II and III colorectal carcinoma.

Enduring challenge in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer with clinical stage IIIB: results of a trimodality approach

BACKGROUND

Stage IIIb (T4/N3) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is considered an inoperable disease and treatment is an enduring challenge. Surgery after induction therapy seems to improve locoregional control. We report the results of a phase II prospective trimodality trial (chemotherapy and concomitant radiotherapy plus surgery) in patients with stage IIIb NSCLC.

METHODS

From November 1992 to June 2000, 39 patients (37 men and 2 women, mean age 65 years) with clinical stage IIIb (34 T4N0 to 2, 4 T2 to 3N3, 1 T4N3, excluding T4 for malignant pleural effusion) entered the study. They received intravenous infusions of cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m(2) (days 1 to 4 and 25 to 28) combined with a total dose of 50.4 Gy radiotherapy delivered over 4 weeks (1.8 Gy daily). Upon clinical restaging responders underwent surgery.

RESULTS

All patients were available for clinical restaging. No complete response was observed. Twenty-one patients had partial response (53.8%), 16 had stable disease (41%), and 2 had progressive disease (5.2%). Hematologic toxicity was moderate. Twenty-two patients (56.4%), 21 with partial response and 1 with stable disease, underwent surgery with no perioperative death. A radical resection was possible in 21 cases. Nine lobectomies, 3 bilobectomies, and 9 pneumonectomies were performed. Complications occurred in 5 patients (23.6%). Fourteen of the patients who underwent surgery (66.6%) showed a pathologic downstaging. A complete pathologic response was obtained in 9 cases (49%). Overall 5-year survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 23%. Resected versus non-resected patients showed a significant difference: 38% versus 5.6% (p = 0.028, log rank).

CONCLUSIONS

This trimodal approach for stage IIIb NSCLC appears safe and effective. It provides good therapeutic results with acceptable morbidity in surgical cases.

Phase I study of combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and nedaplatin (NDP): adverse effects and eecommended dose of NDP administered after 5-FU

When nedaplatin (NDP) was used as a single agent in the phase I study, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was thrombocytopenia and the recommended dose (RD) was 100 mg/m2. However, the DLT, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and RD of NDP used in combination with 5-fluorouracil remained unknown. Therefore, we performed this study to assess the DLT and RD of NDP administered after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In this study, 5-FU was administered to 38 patients at a fixed dose (700 mg/m2/d on days 1-5) and NDP administered on day 6 at an initial dose of 80 mg/m2, which was subsequently increased to 100, 120, 130, 140, 150, and 160 mg/m2. The DLT of NDP was leukopenia and its MTD and RD were 160 and 150 mg/m2, respectively. Concerning impairment of renal function, only two patients had a grade I increase in serum creatinine. There were 19 responders (50%, 19/38) achieving partial response or complete response in the evaluation of antitumor effect. The result of this study is notable in that administration of 5-FU before NDP allows the dose of NDP to be substantially increased.

Metastatic urothelial cancer showing an efficacy by low-dose cisplatin

A 69-year-old man who had developed multiple distant metastases on retrocaval lymph nodes after four courses of Methotraxate, Vinblastine, Adriamycin, Cisplatin (MVAC) chemotherapy was successfully treated by intravenous infusion of low-dose cisplatin (CDDP) (10 mg/time, once per week) and oral administration of 600 mg/day 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR), a pro-drug of 5-FU, in an outpatient setting. A partial response (62% reduction rate) was confirmed by abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan after 7 months. Although the CDDP dosage had been reduced to 5 mg/week 1 year previously, the tumor was still reducing in size in November 2000. Combination therapy of 5'-DFUR with low-dose CDDP could become an option for advanced bladder cancer that compromises the patient's quality of life, especially when used in an outpatient setting.

The incidence and cost of hospitalization for 5-FU toxicity among Medicare beneficiaries with metastatic colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence and associated cost of hospitalizations for toxicities associated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Using the 1994 Medicare 5% sample, we identified all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had undergone colorectal surgery. We then stratified them into those who received 5-FU therapy within 90 days of their surgery (5-FU group) and those who did not receive chemotherapy (no-chemotherapy group); patients who received chemotherapeutic agents other than 5-FU were excluded from the sample. Using techniques of survival analysis, we then compared the incidence and associated cost of all hospital admissions with listed International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnostic codes (primary or secondary) for conditions possibly related to 5-FU toxicity (e.g., volume depletion, stomatitis, nausea, and vomiting).

RESULTS

A total of 441 patients met all study entry criteria, including 192 who received 5-FU and 249 who did not receive chemotherapy following surgery. Patients in the 5-FU group were younger than those in the no-chemotherapy group (p < .001). Mean (+/- SD) follow-up time was slightly longer in the 5-FU group (137 +/- 96 days vs. 117 +/- 88 days for no chemotherapy). The incidence of toxicity-related hospitalizations at 10.5 months (principally volume depletion, agranulocytosis, gastroenteritis, and nausea and vomiting) was 31% among patients who received 5-FU and 8% among those who did not receive chemotherapy. The cost of inpatient care at 10.5 months was $2716 higher among 5-FU patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalization for toxicity of Medicare patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving 5-FU is frequent and costly.

Protracted hepatic arterial infusion with low-dose cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil for unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy is a treatment option for unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer, but it is not yet a standard treatment. The aims of this study were to demonstrate the efficacy of protracted HAI chemotherapy with low-dose cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil for patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer were treated with continuous HAI of 300 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil for 5 days a week and 6 mg/m2 cisplatin for 2 hours on 5 consecutive days a week. The plasma concentrations of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil during the treatment were measured for a pharmacokinetic study.

RESULTS

Of the 22 patients, 2 had a complete response, 13 had a partial response, 6 had stable disease, and 1 had progressive disease, and the response rate was 68% (15/22). The median survival time was 17 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 59%, 26%, and 13%, respectively. Progressive disease was the reason for treatment discontinuation in 10 (45%) of the 22 patients, and 9 (41%) patients had to stop the treatment because of complications. Systemic toxicity was minimal. The pharmacokinetic study showed a high degree of hepatic extraction for both cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil during the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment regimen described herein thus appears to be efficacious regarding the tumor response and survival for patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Chronotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and carboplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer; an interesting therapeutic index in a phase II trial

The aim of this study was to develop a phase II study gauging the contribution of a daily low-dose of carboplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FOL) in a chronotherapy schedule for advanced colorectal cancer patients. 60 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were included in a phase II trial in which 50% of patients had received prior chemotherapy of up to three regimens. Treatment consisted of a combination of 5-FU (700 mg/m(2)/day) and FOL (300 mg/m(2)/day) infused from 10.00 pm to 10. 00 am peaking at 4.00 am with carboplatin infused from 10.00 am to 10.00 pm at 40 mg/m(2)/day with a peak at 4.00 pm. 4-day courses were repeated every 2 weeks in an ambulatory setting with a programmable pump. Patients experienced excellent tolerance (grades III-IV%): diarrhoea, 8.1; nausea/vomiting, 4.8; mucositis, 3.2; skin or neurological 1.7; granulocytes 29.0; platelets and haemoglobin (Hb) 9.7. Major tumour responses were observed in 47% of cases, 4 complete response (CR), 24 partial response (PR); 3 CR and 6 PR (69%) were recorded in 13 previously untreated patients; 11 (18%) underwent subsequent surgical resection of residual metastases. Median survival was 14.6 months with 22% patients surviving over 2 years (35% survival for responders versus 0 for non-responders). In conclusion, this chronotherapy determined administration of 5-FU/FOL and carboplatin yielded an excellent therapeutic index for the combination and warrants further evaluation in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

UFT plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a multiinstitutional phase II trial. For the Japan UFT Lung Cancer Study Group

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy comprised of oral UFT (a combination of tegafur and uracil) and cisplatin was shown to be an effective regimen for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and to be associated with a low incidence rate of toxicity in a previous, single institution, Phase II trial on a small patient sample. Therefore, the current multiinstitutional Phase II trial was conducted to confirm the earlier results.

METHODS

Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed Stage IIIB or IV nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and good performance status. Patients who had received prior treatment were excluded. All had measurable disease. UFT (400 mg/m(2)) was administered orally on Days 1-14, and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) was injected intravenously on Day 8. Treatment was repeated every 3-4 weeks.

RESULTS

Approximately 70% of the 108 eligible patients had systemic metastatic disease. All 108 patients were assessable for toxicity and survival, and 103 were assessable for response. Among these 103 patients there was 1 complete response and 29 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 29.1% (95% confidence limits [CL], 20.4-37.9%). The median survival time was 40 weeks and the 1-year survival rate was 39% (95% CL, 30-49%). The median progression free survival time was 28 weeks. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Grade 3 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in only 1 patient (0.9%) and 3 patients (2.8%), respectively. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities included elevated bilirubin (6.5%) and emesis (7.4%). One patient who had a past history of duodenal ulcer died of ulcer perforation 15 days after completing the first treatment cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral UFT plus cisplatin is a moderately active regimen with an extremely low rate of incidence of myelosuppression as an adverse event, and warrants comparison with other cisplatin-based regimens in a prospective randomized trial.

A phase II study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with concurrent hyperfractionated thoracic radiation for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a preliminary report from the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group

A recent meta-analysis and randomized studies have demonstrated that combined chemoradiotherapy is associated with a survival advantage for selected patients with locally advanced unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase II study of combined chemoradiotherapy to find a more effective combination of drugs and radiation than those previously reported for such patients. Between January 1994 and November 1996, 50 previously untreated patients with locally advanced unresectable NSCLC (stage IIIA with N2 or IIIB disease) were entered in this study. Patients were required to have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or = 2, age < or = 75 years and adequate organ function. Treatment consisted of three cycles of cisplatin (20 mg m(-2), days 1-5) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (500 mg m(-2), days 1-5) every 4 weeks, and concurrent hyperfractionated thoracic radiation (1.25 Gy twice daily, with a 6-h interfraction interval; total radiation dose, 62.5-70 Gy). Of the 50 patients entered, 37 (74%) responded to this chemoradiotherapy, including two (4%) with complete response. By a median follow-up time of 41.0 months, 35 patients had died and 15 were still alive. The median time to progression for responding patients was 14.1 months (range, 2.6-51.3+ months). The median survival time was 18.7 months, with a survival rate of 66.0% at 1 year, 46.0% at 2 years and 27.6% at 3 years. Survival outcome was strongly affected by the extent of nodal involvement (median survival time, 27.4 months for N0-2 disease (n = 37) vs 10.7 months for N3 disease (n = 13); P = 0.007). The major toxicities of treatment were leukopenia and neutropenia (> or = Grade 3, 58% and 60% respectively). Other toxicities of > or = Grade 3 included thrombocytopenia (26%), anaemia (26%), nausea/vomiting (16%) and radiation oesophagitis (6%). Treatment-related death occurred for one patient. Our findings suggest that cisplatin and 5-FU in combination with concurrent hyperfractionated thoracic radiation is effective and feasible for the treatment of locally advanced unresectable NSCLC. The short-term survival in this study appeared to be more encouraging than those of similar chemoradiation trials. A randomized trial will be needed to compare the combination of cisplatin and 5-FU with other platinum-based regimens together with concurrent hyperfractionated thoracic radiation. In addition, in future studies, inclusion criteria for N3 disease with or without supraclavicular involvement should be reconsidered to correctly evaluate the effect of combined chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced unresectable NSCLC.

Influence of the schedule of exposure on the cytotoxic effect of melphalan on human 8226 and A2780 cells

Melphalan was investigated for antitumoral activity using two schedules of exposure (solid versus sequential exposure) in two human cancer cell lines (8226 and A2780). Sequential exposure of melphalan was more effective than solid exposure at the same total dose. The IC50 values averaged 8.2 (solid exposure) and 0.16 microgram/ml (sequential exposure) for 8226 cells (myeloma), and 7.5 (solid) and 0.53 microgram/ml (sequential) for A2780 cells (ovarian carcinoma). Intracellular melphalan accumulation, determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, showed that the area under the intracellular concentration of melphalan versus time curve (between 0 and 30 h) was significantly higher after sequential doses (9.4 micrograms/ml x h) than after solid dose (6.6 micrograms/ml x h). Moreover, intracellular/extracellular concentration ratios indicated that melphalan uptake followed a passive transport system. The increase of both duration of exposure (11 h after solid exposure versus 20 h after sequential doses) and intracellular concentrations 5-6 h after the beginning of the experiment (approximately 3 times higher after sequential doses) indicate sequential administration of melphalan could be more effective than solid exposure.

A simplified regimen of weekly high dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as a 24-hour infusion in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Reports of in vitro experiments in colorectal carcinoma cells suggest that prolonged cellular exposure to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with relatively low concentrations of leucovorin (LV) provides optimal enhancement of 5-FU efficacy. In this study, a simplified regimen of weekly 24-hour infusion of high dose 5-FU combined with a relatively low dose of LV was used to treat patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma received 5-FU, 2600 mg/m2, admixed with LV, 100 mg/m2, in a portable infusion pump administered intravenously over a 24-hour period. High dose 5-FU/LV was delivered once a week for 5 consecutive weeks followed by a 1-week recovery period. All patients were assessable for toxicity and response.

RESULTS

Two complete responses and 15 partial responses were observed (response rate of 47.2%; 95% confidence interval, 30.1-64.4%). The median response duration was 9.6 months. The median survival and time to progression were 11.9 months and 7.1 months, respectively. The toxicity was mild and acceptable. The major dose-limiting factors were hand-foot syndrome and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

This simplified regimen of weekly 24-hour continuous infusion of high dose 5-FU/LV is an effective regimen in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Further study of the pharmacokinetics of combination therapy with 5-FU and LV as used in this regimen and its correlation with response and toxicity is warranted.

5-fluorouracil: a pharmacological paradigm in the use of cytotoxics

1. Painstaking progress in drug development is well illustrated by 5-fluorouracil (5FU), originally designed 40 years ago as a fluorinated analogue of the naturally occurring base uracil. Innovative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic strategies have seen significant clinical improvements for cancer patients over the past decade. 2. 5-Fluorouracil acts by three main mechanisms. Principally, the intermediate metabolite fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate inhibits a key enzyme in pyrimidine biosynthesis, namely thymidylate synthase (TS). Additionally, 5FU is metabolized to ribo- and deoxy-ribonucleotides, which act as false bases for incorporation into RNA and DNA. 3. Biomodulation of 5FU has been attempted with methotrexate (MTX), folinic acid, interferons, cisplatin and radiotherapy. Methotrexate augments the actions of 5FU by inhibiting dihydrofolate reductase and decreasing the folate pool required for pyrimidine biosynthesis, inhibiting TS via MTX-polyglutamate and directly inhibiting purine biosynthesis. Interferons increase steady state concentrations of 5FU. 5-Fluorouracil enhances the cytotoxicity of cisplatin and radiotherapy by inhibiting DNA repair. Folinic acid enhances TS inhibition by increasing the intracellular pool of folates that stabilize the 5FU-TS complex. 4. 5-Fluorouracil has a short plasma half-life. Thymidylate synthase inhibition is limited to the S-phase of the cell cycle and only a small fraction of most cancer cells are in S-phase at any one time. Increased response rates seen with infusional protocols may reflect the effective recruitment of additional mechanisms of cytotoxicity, not dependent on cell cycle, including effects on RNA synthesis. 5. Patients with localized metastatic disease may benefit from locoregional treatments. These include hepatic intra-arterial therapy with related compounds, such as floxuridine, which reach high concentrations at sites of tumour, while systemic toxicities are minimized by efficient hepatic clearance. 6. Recent developments include orally bioavailable formulations, such as ftorafur, capecitabine and the combination of 5FU with the dihydropyrimidine phosphate dehydrogenase inhibitor ethynyluracil. Recognition of diurnal variation in the activity of such key enzymes as DPD has led to the administration of 5FU at regulated, variable infusion rates (chronomodulation). These promising pharmacological approaches may further improve clinical outcomes in common cancers.

Sequence-dependent antitumour efficacy of combination chemotherapy of nedaplatin, a novel platinum complex, with 5-fluorouracil in an in vivo murine tumour model

The antitumour efficacy of a sequential combination of nedaplatin (NDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was evaluated using Lewis lung carcinoma in vivo. NDP was developed as a second generation platinum complex. Because it has greater antitumour activity and lower nephrotoxicity than cisplatin (CDDP), we also compared the antitumour activity of NDP plus 5-FU with that of CDDP plus 5-FU. A fixed 5-FU dose was injected daily for 5 days and increasing doses of either NDP or CDDP were injected once via the tail vein into the Lewis lung carcinoma-implanted mice. The sequential administration of either NDP or CDDP prior to 5-FU (NF or CF therapy) resulted in severe body weight loss followed by the death of the tumour-bearing mice when the high-dose of NDP or CDDP was administered. In contrast, the sequential administration of 5-FU prior to NDP or CDDP (FN or FC therapy) resulted in synergistically enhanced inhibition of tumour growth and prolonged survival in comparison with NDP, CDDP or 5-FU monotherapy. At the high-dose of NDP in FN therapy, a reduction of tumour size and long-term tumour-free survival were frequently observed. The survival effect of the combinations of NDP with 5-FU was superior to those of the combination of CDDP with 5-FU. In conclusion, the sequence-dependent antitumour efficacy and toxicity of the combination of NDP or CDDP with 5-FU was demonstrated in this study, and FN therapy appeared to be the most efficient regimen as a clinical therapy.

Continuous infusion of chemotherapy: focus on 5-fluorouracil and fluorodeoxyuridine

Continuous infusion of chemotherapy is one of the developments to try to improve the treatment of metastatic cancer. There is a sound theoretical rationale to deliver cytotoxic drugs as a continuous infusion. Furthermore, the development of reliable venous access devices and portable infusion pumps enables patients to be treated in an ambulatory setting. This review focuses on the continuous infusion of the most frequently used drugs: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR). An overview is given of both preclinical studies and studies in humans. Continuous infusion of 5-FU and FUDR has proven to be feasible in all studies. However, the results (response rate and especially survival) are rather disappointing. So far, continuous infusion of cytostatic drugs can still be considered as an experimental procedure. Whether protracted, intermittent of circadian modulated continuous infusion is the optimal treatment schedule has still to be proven in future studies. Furthermore, studies are needed to demonstrate whether dose intensity for most tumours is important for treatment outcome. Also, studies are needed to investigate quality of life and economic issues.

Oxaliplatin as single agent in previously untreated colorectal carcinoma patients: a phase II multicentric study

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin is a new cytotoxic agent from the diaminocyclohexane family with proven antitumor activity against colon cancer cell lines. Activity in patients with colorectal carcinoma previously treated with 5-fluorouracil has been studied in three single-agent phase II trials, showing a reproducible response rate of 10%. Here we report a phase II trial with oxaliplatin as a first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients were entered in the study. All of them had metastatic disease without previous chemotherapy, and at least one lesion had to be measurable by computed tomography (CT). Therapy consisted of a two-hour infusion of oxaliplatin at a dose of 130 mg/m2 every 21 days.

RESULTS

The overall response rate determined by investigators was 20% (95% CI, 6.8%-40.7%). Eight patients (32%) had stable disease. The median time to disease progression in responders was six months (range four to nine). The median progression-free survival was four months and median overall survival 14.5 months (95% CI, 10-20 months). The main toxic effects were peripheral neuropathy (92%) and laryngopharyngeal dysesthesia (75%). No severe grade 3-4 neurotoxicities (NCI-CTC) were found. Gastrointestinal and hematological toxicities were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxaliplatin is an active agent in first-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer. It was well tolerated, caused no toxic deaths, had low hematotoxicity, well controlled gastrointestinal toxicity, and frequent but mild peripheral neurological symptoms. Therefore, it is of interest to associate oxaliplatin with other active compounds.

The cellular interaction of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in a human colon carcinoma cell line

The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (CDDP) has been shown to have synergistic cytotoxicity in human tumours, but the biochemical mechanism for this interaction remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the interaction of 5-FU and CDDP in a human colon carcinoma cell line, NCI H548. A 24 h exposure to 5-FU resulted in a 5-FU IC50 value of 24.2 +/- 4.5 microM, Dm 22.6 microM; exposure to CDDP for 2 h resulted in a IC50 value of 20.8 +/- 8.0 microM, Dm 21.9 microM. When cells were exposed simultaneously to 5-FU for 24 h and CDDP for the initial 2 h, or when cells were treated with CDDP for 2 h followed by various concentrations of 5-FU for 24 h, no greater than additive cytotoxicity was observed. In contrast, when cells were treated with 5-FU for 24 h prior to CDDP for 2 h, a greater than additive interaction was noted (5-FU IC50 1.2 +/- 0.6 microM, Dm 1.3 microM, CI 0.45). Thymidine 10 microM partially reversed the growth inhibitory effects of the 5-FU/ CDDP combination. Using both immunological and biochemical assays, no notable differences in the total amount of TS enzyme or the fraction of bound TS enzyme could be detected in the absence or presence of CDDP. No notable differences could be detected in intracellular reduced folate pools, FdUMP or FUTP pools, or 5-FU incorporation into RNA or DNA with the addition of CDDP to 5-FU. DNA fragmentation studies revealed that the combination of 5-FU followed by CDDP demonstrated a greater degree of single-stranded DNA fragments in parental (P = 0.024) and newly synthesised DNA (P = 0.025) compared with the administration of CDDP prior to 5-FU or either drug alone. The increase in smaller DNA fragment size was reversed with the addition of thymidine (10 microM). These findings suggest that the interaction of 5-FU and CDDP is associated with a greater degree of fragmentation of both nascent and parental DNA.

Intraarterial hepatic chemotherapy with fluorouracil, fluorodeoxyuridine, mitomycin C, cisplatin or methotrexate as single-agent anticancer drugs for a transplanted experimental liver tumor in rats

A prospective, controlled and standardized animal experiment was performed to study the influence of various anticancer drugs. The Novikoff hepatoma transplanted into male Sprague-Dawley rats was treated with fluorouracil (FUra), mitomycin C, methotrexate, cisplatin and fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd) at equi-effective dosage, in terms of side effects (weight loss), in comparison to a control group (0.9% saline solution) by locoregional application via the hepatic artery. The tumor multiplication factor (TMF = tumor volume day 12/tumor volume day 5) served as the parameter to compare the tumor growth of the various groups. All drugs showed a significant (P < 0.05) effect on the tumor growth. In comparison to the control group (mean TMF 9.66), FdUrd (3.78) and FUra (3.03) only limited the tumor growth, mitomycin C (0.96) produced stable tumor, cisplatin (0.64) and methotrexate (0.15) significantly reduced (P < 0.01) the tumor size. We suggest that, in addition to the established (FUra, FdUrd, mitomycin C) drugs, methotrexate and cisplatin should be considered in further studies of the treatment of primary and secondary liver malignancies.

Phase II study of a short course of weekly high-dose cisplatin combined with long-term oral etoposide in metastatic colorectal cancer

In a phase I study of weekly administered cisplatin combined with oral etoposide, we observed a partial response in 4 out of 11 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Subsequently, we performed a phase II study to investigate the activity of this combination as first-line treatment in this disease. Fourteen patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study. Treatment consisted of cisplatin, administered in 3% sodium chloride, at a dose of 70 mg m-2 on days 1, 8 and 15 and days 29, 36 and 43 combined with oral etoposide 50 mg absolute dose daily on days 1-15 of both courses. Patients with stable disease or better continued treatment with etoposide 50 mg m-2 orally on days 1-21 every 28 days. A partial response was observed in two patients with liver metastases (14%; 95% confidence limits 2-42%) for 30 and 32 weeks. Five patients had stable disease. Toxicity consisted mainly of anaemia, leucocytopenia, nausea and vomiting. Tinnitus was reported by six patients. The activity of the combination cisplatin-oral etoposide in the schedule is only minimal in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Hydroxyurea may increase the activity of fluorouracil plus folinic acid in advanced gastrointestinal cancer: phase II study

In a phase II trial, 36 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer were treated with: folinic acid (FA) 500 mg/m2 in a 2-hr intravenous (IV) infusion, 5- fluorouracil (5-FU) 600 mg/m2 as an IV push injection 1 hr after FA, and hydroxyurea (HU) 35 mg/kg/day given p.o. in three administrations (every 8 hr) 6 hr after 5-FU. Cycles consisted of six weekly treatments for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. Thirty-three patients were evaluable for response and 36 for toxicity; 73% had previous chemotherapy. The response rate was 30% (CR + PR), the median duration of response was 21 weeks (range 5-36), and time to failure was 17 weeks (range 3-51). The response in patients previously exposed to chemotherapy was 29% and 44% in chemotherapy-naïve patients. The median survival for all entered patients was 28 weeks (range 6-54). The most common toxicity was gastrointestinal: diarrhea 22/36 (61%), mucositis 15/36 (42%), and nausea and vomiting 15/36 (42%); hematological toxicity was mild. We conclude that HU can potentiate the activity of 5-FU plus FA in advanced gastrointestinal cancer; in particular, HU can restore the activity of 5-FU in patients previously exposed to chemotherapy.

Intermittent continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and low dose oral leucovorin in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: relationship between plasma concentrations and clinical parameters

Modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by leucovorin and continuous infusion of 5-FU can both result in enhanced therapeutic efficacy. The main objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral leucovorin in combination with continuous infusion of 5-FU for 14 days every 4 weeks at a dose of 300 mg/m2/day in 30 patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The MTD of oral leucovorin was established at 10 mg/day. Dose-limiting toxicities were mucositis, diarrhoea and hand-foot syndrome. Plasma leucovorin concentrations were below the detection limit of the assay (< 0.5 microM). Plasma 5-FU concentrations varied considerably from 0.06 to 11.3 microM. A relation between toxicity, response and plasma concentration of 5-FU could not be established. Our data may indicate that even very low plasma concentrations of leucovorin are able to modulate 5-FU. In 17 patients with colorectal cancer the response rate was 24% (95% CI: 7-50%), which is comparable to other treatment schedules with leucovorin or to continuous infusion of 5-FU alone.

Effect of cisplatin in advanced colorectal cancer resistant to 5-fluorouracil plus (S)-leucovorin

Modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is currently being investigated in advanced colorectal cancer. In an attempt to improve the results obtainable for the association of 5-FU and leucovorin, we decided to add cisplatin to 5-FU and (6S)-leucovorin (S-LV) after disease progression. The hypothesis was that a pharmacological enhancement of the efficacy of 5-FU would result in responses in 5-FU-unresponsive patients or in a second response in previously responding patients. A group of 28 5-FU+S-LV-pretreated patients, with advanced measurable colorectal cancer, were treated with 80 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1, 80 mg/m2 S-LV and 370 mg/m2 5-FU as an i. v. bolus for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. We obtained 3 partial responses (response rate: 11 +/- 11%), while 11 patients had stable disease (39 +/- 18%). Among the 3 responders, 1 patient had earlier achieved a partial response, a second stable disease and 1 had disease progression after the previous 5-FU+S-LV treatment. The median survival time for all 28 patients was 11 months. Toxicity was minimal and consisted of mild and reversible gastrointestinal symptoms and myelosuppression. We believe that further studies must be carried out to establish the real impact of the synergism between cisplatin, 5-FU and S-LV in untreated patients.

Chronomodulation of chemotherapy against metastatic colorectal cancer. International Organization for Cancer Chronotherapy

Toxic effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin (L-OHP), two active drugs against metastatic colorectal cancer, varied by 50% or more according to circadian dosing time in mice or rats. Adaptation of chemotherapy delivery to circadian rhythms (chronotherapy) was assessed in fully ambulatory outpatients, using multichannel programmable pumps. These devices allowed us to reliably test the clinical relevance of such a chronotherapy principle. First, single agent 5-day chronomodulated schedules were devised and assessed in Phase I and II trials with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, peak delivery at 4:00 h) or oxaliplatin (L-OHP, peak at 16:00 h). Both schedules were then combined, folinic acid (FA) being added, synchronous with 5-FU infusion. This three-drug chronomodulated regimen (chrono-FFL) produced a 58% response rate (95% C.I.: 48-68%) in 93 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, 46 of whom had previously received chemotherapy. In the first European randomised trial in 92 previously untreated patients, chronomodulated three-drug delivery achieved 53% response, as compared to 32% in those patients receiving flat infusion (P = 0.038). These respective figures were confirmed in a subsequent multicentre randomised trial involving 186 additional patients. Since the most active schedule was also the least toxic one by 2- to 10-fold, chrono-FFL was further intensified in three consecutive Phase II trials involving a total of 200 additional patients. Results suggest that both response rate and quality were further improved with such treatment intensification. Thus, chrono-FFL more than doubled the activity of chemotherapy against metastatic colorectal cancer in a multicentre European setting.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A phase II trial of oral tegafur and uracil plus cisplatin in patients with inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The combination of uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar concentration (UFT) has a greater antitumor activity than 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and tegafur. Because the combination of 5-FU and cisplatin has been proven to have a synergistic antitumor effect in many experimental and clinical studies, a Phase II study was conducted using the combination of UFT and cisplatin in patients with inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with measurable disease were entered into the study; all were evaluable for toxicity and response. Their median age was 61 years (range, 36-75 years). There were 13 patients with Stage III and 17 with Stage IV disease. Twenty-two (71%) patients had received no prior treatment. UFT (400 mg/m2) was administered orally on days 1 through 21 and cisplatin (80 mg/m2) was injected intravenously on day 8. This treatment was repeated every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The median number of treatment cycles was two (range, 1-4 cycles). There were 11 partial responses (35%; 95% confidence interval, 19%-52%). The median response time was 6 months (range, 3-13 months). The median survival time was 11 months (range, 4-27+ months) for Stage III and 8 months (range, 2-22 months) for Stage IV. This chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated. The hematologic toxicities, such as leukopenia and thrombocytopenia of grades 3 and 4, occurred in only 2 of 31 (6%) patients. Nonhematologic toxicities of grades 3 or 4 were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral UFT plus cisplatin administration demonstrated an activity comparable with that of other combinations based on cisplatin and an extremely low incidence of side effects. These observations suggest that this chemotherapy regimen is worthy of further investigation in a multi-institutional trial to determine the antitumor effect and the quality of life of patients.

Multi-chemothermoimmunotherapy for human colon adenocarcinoma in vitro

Effective adjunctive therapies for colorectal carcinoma are clearly needed. We evaluated the cytotoxic responses in vitro of human colon carcinoma cell lines to combined modalities: 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV), carboplatin (CP), tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and hyperthermia (HTX). Cytotoxicity was evaluated in a cell proliferation assay using crystal violet staining. 5-FU/LV was administered 2-3 days before TNF and CP, followed 1 h later by HTX. These cell lines were relatively resistant to HTX alone (42 degrees C for 2 h), but were heterogeneous in their responses to various doses of the other single agents. This heterogeneity was also evident for combined modalities: the HCT-15 cell line exhibited significant supra-additivity for selected doses of CP, TNF and 5-FU/LV, which was further enhanced by hyperthermia. In contrast, the HT-29 cell line did not demonstrate a strong pattern for supra-additivity, whereas the DLD-1 cell line had an intermediate response. Thus, our results suggest one approach to develop effective and dose-sparing multimodality therapeutic regimens for colon adenocarcinoma.

Dermatological toxicity from chemotherapy containing 5-fluorouracil

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is an antimetabolite frequently used in the treatment of cancer. The most common adverse reactions are acute gastrointestinal effects and bone marrow suppression while neurological, ocular and dermatological toxicities are unusual. Several cutaneous manifestations can be found. They are hyperpigmentation, maculo-papular eruption and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPES) promptly reversed with discontinuation of 5-FU. The etiopathogenesis of such manifestations is still unknown particularly as regards PPES, but it has been postulated that the local drug accumulation secondary to different scheduling (continuous infusion instead of bolus infusion), the total amount of drug, alcoholism, local trauma, increased blood flow could be responsible for them. In this study we have reported 10 cases of dermatological toxicity (1 of these had PPES) observed from January '91 to December '93 in 81 patients treated with bolus injection of 5-FU containing combination chemotherapy.

Treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer with hepatic artery occlusion, intraportal 5-fluorouracil infusion, and oral allopurinol. A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Regional therapy for colorectal liver metastases aimed at prolonging survival has not been tested fully in a randomized trial with untreated control subjects. This study explored the efficacy of temporary hepatic artery occlusion followed by intraportal infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oral allopurinol as biochemical modulators in prolonging the survival of patients with nonresectable liver metastases and no extrahepatic cancer.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients were considered for randomization, of whom 24 were excluded at laparotomy because of extrahepatic cancer (n = 17) or resectable lesions (n = 5). In two patients, no cancer was identified in the liver. Thirty-two patients were allocated to receive treatment, and 28 were allocated to receive no regional or systemic treatment. Six patients were excluded after randomization because of major protocol violations.

RESULTS

The median survival time for patients was 17 months (range, 0-66), and for control subjects, the median was 8 months (range, 0-31). Log rank analysis demonstrated a significant survival benefit for treatment versus no treatment (P = 0.0039). (In two patients, early death was due to toxicity from the wrong dose of 5-FU and the wrong route of administration, respectively; the mean and median survival were reduced by 1 month).

CONCLUSION

This study identified a treatment modality that prolongs survival in patients with nonresectable liver metastases and no extrahepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, suggesting that control subjects receiving no therapy may not be necessary in future randomized trials.

The influence of platinum drugs on the radiation response of rat kidneys

The influence of a single bolus injection of platinum drugs on the radiation sensitivity of the kidneys was investigated in WAG/Rij rats. Drugs employed were cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum(II) (cisplatin, CDDP), cis-diammine-1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylate platinum(II) (carboplatin, CBDCA) and cis-dichloro,trans- dihydroxy-bis-isopropylamine platinum(IV) (iproplatin, CHIP). Both kidneys were irradiated with a range of single X-ray doses while drugs were administered at 1 day or 1 week before irradiation. Maximum tolerated drug doses (defined as the LD1, the dose resulting in a mortality of 1%) were given. Damage inflicted upon the kidneys was monitored by determination of several parameters indicative of kidney function. Isoeffective radiation doses were calculated from these data for each treatment group at 4-8-week intervals up to 80 weeks following treatment. At each assay time, dose modifying factors (DMF) were calculated for each drug/radiation combination. The mean DMFs were highest for CDDP: approximately 1.6. Those for CBDCA and CHIP were lower: approximately 1.1 and 1.2, respectively. The CHIP DMFs were significantly different from unity. When the radiation was given in 4 or 8 daily fractions (4 fractions/week) the DMFs for CDDP were identical to those obtained with single doses. For CBDCA and CHIP, however, the DMFs after fractionated treatments were not significantly different from unity. Analysis in terms of the linear-quadratic (LQ) model indicated that not one of the three drugs had an effect on the alpha/beta ratio, and hence on the fractionation sensitivity of the rat kidney. Consequently, if these data are extrapolated to the clinical setting, the administration of these drugs at the maximum tolerated dose preceding a fractionated radiation treatment should not be expected to result in extra, unexpected, radiation toxicity of the kidney.

Randomized comparison of fluorouracil and leucovorin therapy versus fluorouracil, leucovorin, and cisplatin therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Because of experimental and preliminary clinical evidence that additional modulation of the biochemical pharmacology and cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) may be possible by combination of these agents with cisplatin (CDDP), the authors undertook a prospective randomized trial in patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Between 1989 and 1992, 138 patients with advanced measurable colorectal cancer previously unexposed to chemotherapy were randomly assigned to treatment with either 5-FU (425 mg/m2) and LV (20 mg/m2) for 5 days, or the combination of 5-FU and LV in the same daily dose plus cisplatin (20 mg/m2), each drug given for 4 consecutive days. In both treatment arms, courses were administered every 28 days, if toxicity allowed, for a total of 6 months or until evidence of tumor progression.

RESULTS

The overall responses (complete and partial response) were 19% and 28% for the 5-FU/LV and the 5-FU/LV/CDDP treatment arms, respectively. Although the three-drug combination appeared superior to 5-FU/LV for time to progression or death (8.5 versus 5.2 months; P = 0.042), there was no evidence that the adoption of cisplatin will translate into a definite survival advantage. A comparative analysis of the toxicities experienced by the patients in the two treatment groups showed a comparable rate, although severe side effects (P < 0.05), specifically stomatitis (P = 0.013), were noticed more frequently in patients treated with 5-FU/LV for 5 days.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the therapeutic index of 5-FU/LV in metastatic colorectal cancer may be improved with the addition of cisplatin. However, the somewhat better therapeutic activity and lower incidence of severe gastrointestinal side effects have to be weighed against additional pharmaceutical charges and the need for a more intense antiemetic regimen.

Treatment of advanced colorectal cancer with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in combination with cisplatinum

51 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (stage Dukes D) were treated with intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1, 3, 5, 8 and 16 with folinic acid (200 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2), and on days 1, 8 and 16 with cisplatinum (25 mg/m2 i.v.); cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. All 51 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response criteria. 26 patients had objective responses (3 complete responses, 5.9%; 23 partial responses, 45.1%), relative risk 51% (95% confidence intervals 36.7-65.0%). Response duration ranged from 4 to 28.0 months (median 16.8). Overall median survival of all patients included was 14.7 months (range 3.0-33.0). Toxicity of WHO grade III, requiring dose reduction, occurred in 9 (18%) patients. The regimen described here appears to be active, safe and well tolerated for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Preclinical and clinical aspects of biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil

Although single agent 5-FU has for many years been the standard therapy for advanced colorectal malignancies, a number of recent clinical trials show higher response rates with biomodulation of 5-FU by several different agents. In general, trials of leucovorin, methotrexate, interferon, and PALA given in biomodulatory doses and sequences with 5-FU have demonstrated comparable response rates over a broad range. However, in the absence of controlled direct comparative phase III trials, final judgement on clinical superiority of a particular regimen must be reserved. Nevertheless, on the basis of current data, certain approaches appear promising and warrant further investigation. Compared to single agent 5-FU, survival benefit has been demonstrated with both low and high dose leucovorin/5-FU regimens and response rates in the 20-50% range appear reproducibly higher than those of 5-FU alone. Low dose and either continuous infusion or repetitive dosing of leucovorin, as well as the effect of treatment sequence and intervals between drugs, require additional investigation. When given 20-24 h before 5-FU, methotrexate achieves response rates similar to leucovorin modulated 5-FU, but the potential role of rescue leucovorin used in many of the trials makes definitive interpretation difficult. Interferon/5-FU regimens attaining response rates of 30-40% are promising but need to be carefully and rationally designed. Low dose PALA with effective doses of 5-FU achieving responses in 35-45% of patients represent a marked improvement in earlier trials of high dose PALA, but additional studies with higher doses not compromising 5-FU dose intensity should be considered. Certainly, the concomitant use of multiple modulating agents also needs further investigation. While many such trials already performed attained results no better than single agent biomodulation, the preliminary results obtained by Grem and colleagues with IFN/LV/5-FU in untreated patients, and by Conti et al. using TMTX/LV/5-FU in previously treated patients are encouraging. Further understanding of the mechanisms of action and interaction of modulating agents should allow additional rational combinations to be explored clinically. Cisplatin biomodulation of 5-FU has been studied in gastrointestinal and head and neck malignancies achieving excellent results in the latter group. Preclinical evidence exists which suggests, however, that 5-FU modulation of cisplatin may be more effective, especially when 5-FU is administered 24 h or more before cisplatin. Clinical investigation of this sequence is currently lacking. Data to support the clinical promise of AZT, IdUrd, uridine, and the benzylacyclouridines are not yet available, although preclinical and preliminary clinical studies are promising.