Phase I study of weekly outpatient paclitaxel and concurrent cranial irradiation in adults with astrocytomas

The use of radiosensitizing agents in the therapy of glioblastoma multiforme-a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in human adults. Despite several improvements in resective as well as adjuvant therapy over the last decades, its overall prognosis remains poor. As a means of improving patient outcome, the possibility of enhancing radiation response by using radiosensitizing agents has been tested in an array of studies.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of clinical trials involving radiation therapy in combination with radiosensitizing agents on patients diagnosed with glioblastoma was performed in the National Center for Biotechnology Information's PubMed database.

RESULTS

A total of 96 papers addressing this matter were published between 1976 and 2021, of which 63 matched the subject of this paper. All papers were reviewed, and their findings discussed in the context of their underlining mechanisms of radiosensitization.

CONCLUSION

In the history of glioblastoma treatment, several approaches of optimizing radiation-effectiveness using radiosensitizers have been made. Even though several different strategies and agents have been explored, clear evidence of improved patient outcome is still missing. Tissue-selectiveness and penetration of the blood-brain barrier seem to be major roadblocks; nevertheless, modern strategies try to circumvent these obstacles, using novel sensitizers based on preclinical data or alternative ways of delivery.

The role of neuropathology in the management of progressive glioblastoma : a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline

QUESTION

1. What are the most important diagnostic considerations in reporting progressive glioblastoma?

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adults with progressive glioblastoma

RECOMMENDATIONS

LEVEL III

For patients who undergo biopsy or neurosurgical resection at the time of radiologic or clinical progression, it is recommended that the pathologist report the presence and extent of progressive neoplasm as well as the presence and extent of necrosis within the pathologic material examined. Furthermore, to ensure the proper interpretation of progressive glioblastoma, it is recommended that the pathologist take into account the patient's previous diagnosis and treatment, as well as the current clinical and neuroimaging features that have led to a second biopsy or resection.

QUESTION

2. What techniques and ancillary studies are most useful in separating malignant progression from treatment effect?

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adults with progressive glioblastoma

RECOMMENDATIONS

LEVEL III

In the setting of prior radiation and chemotherapy, it is recommended to adhere to strict histologic criteria for microvascular proliferation and necrosis in order to establish a diagnosis of a glioblastoma. Immunohistochemistry and genetic studies are selectively recommended for distinguishing neoplastic cells from atypical reactive cells in progressive glioblastoma.

Neuromuscular complications

Although direct neoplastic involvement of muscle tis-sue is surprisingly rare, considering the large amount of body mass that is represented by muscle tissue, the most important and unresolved muscle effect is muscle cachexia.Other associations, such as inflammatory, paraneo-plastic, toxic, and several extremely rare associations,have been described. Drug-induced toxicity and radiation recall syndrome need to be taken into consideration when muscle symptoms appear in patients with cancer.

Dose-escalating and pharmacokinetic study of a weekly combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: JCOG 9910-DI

OBJECTIVE

Combined paclitaxel and carboplatin is a standard regimen for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although an every-3-week schedule is common, weekly paclitaxel is clinically effective for various cancers. A Phase I clinical trial was conducted to determine maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) for weekly combined paclitaxel and carboplatin, and to evaluate anti-tumor response, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients with inoperable NSCLC.

METHODS

Twenty patients with inoperable NSCLC received weekly carboplatin at area under the curve (AUC) = 2 mg/ml min and paclitaxel. Paclitaxel was escalated if MTD was not reached. Three patients each were entered at levels 1 and 2 (level 1, paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 2 mg/ml min; level 2, 60/2), six at level 3 (70/2), five at level 4 (80/2) and three at level 5 (90/2).

RESULTS

One patient had grade 4 (G4) neutropenia at level 2, one had G3 hepatic toxicity at level 3 and one had G3 cardiac toxicity at level 4. MTD was not reached for all dose levels. Response rate (RR) was 35% (7/20) and median survival was 11.1 months. Severe neutropenia (G3 and G4) was seen in seven patients associated with greater AUC, peak concentration (C(max)) and the duration of plasma concentration >50 ng/ml of paclitaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly combined paclitaxel (up to 90 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 2 mg/ml min) was well tolerated. A higher dose intensity of paclitaxel can be given, and RR and survival are not less than the every-3-week protocol. The weekly regimen is an alternative for untreated inoperable NSCLC patients.

Initial experience with bevacizumab treatment for biopsy confirmed cerebral radiation necrosis

BACKGROUND

Cerebral radiation necrosis is a serious complication of radiation treatment for brain tumors. Therapeutic options include corticosteroids, anticoagulation and hyperbaric oxygen with limited efficacy. Bevacizumab, an antibody against VEGF had been reported to reduce edema in patients with suspected radiation necrosis. We retrospectively reviewed 6 patients with biopsy proven cerebral radiation necrosis treated with bevacizumab between 2006 and 2008.

RESULTS

Interval MRI follow-up demonstrated radiographic response in all patients with an average reduction of 79% for the post gadolinium studies and 49% for the FLAIR images. The initial partial radiographic response was noted for up to a mean follow-up time of 5.9 months (6 weeks to 18 months).

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab appears to produce radiographic response and clinical benefits in the treatment of patients with cerebral radionecrosis.

Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy

Neurotoxic side effects of cancer therapy are second in frequency to hematological toxicity. Unlike hematological side effects that can be treated with hematopoietic growth factors, neuropathies cannot be treated and protective treatment strategies have not been effective. For the neurologist, the diagnosis of a toxic neuropathy is primarily based on the case history, the clinical and electrophysiological findings, and knowledge of the pattern of neuropathy associated with specific agents. In most cases, toxic neuropathies are length-dependent, sensory, or sensorimotor neuropathies often associated with pain. The platinum compounds are unique in producing a sensory ganglionopathy. Neurotoxicity is usually dependent on cumulative dose. Severity of neuropathy increases with duration of treatment and progression stops once drug treatment is completed. The platinum compounds are an exception where sensory loss may progress for several months after cessation of treatment ("coasting"). As more effective multiple drug combinations are used, patients will be treated with several neurotoxic drugs. Synergistic neurotoxicity has not been extensively investigated. Pre-existent neuropathy may influence the development of a toxic neuropathy. Underlying inherited or inflammatory neuropathies may predispose patients to developing very severe toxic neuropathies. Other factors such as focal radiotherapy or intrathecal administration may enhance neurotoxicity. The neurologist managing the cancer patient who develops neuropathy must answer a series of important questions as follows: (1) Are the symptoms due to peripheral neuropathy? (2) Is the neuropathy due to the underlying disease or the treatment? (3) Should treatment be modified or stopped because of the neuropathy? (4) What is the best supportive care in terms of pain management or physical therapy for each patient? Prevention of toxic neuropathies is most important. In patients with neuropathy, restorative approaches have not been well established. Symptomatic and other management are necessary to maintain and improve quality of life.

Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: pitfalls in neurooncology

Although radionecrosis has been exhaustively described in depth in the neurooncological literature, its diagnosis is still a challenging issue because its radiological pattern is frequently indistinguishable from that of tumor recurrence. This review discusses the causes of radionecrosis and the potential effect of adjuvant chemotherapy concomitant with radiotherapy on its rate and onset. The potential pitfalls in clinical studies attempting to make a differential diagnosis between radionecrosis and disease progression are also discussed.

A Phase II multi-institutional trial of chemoradiation using weekly docetaxel and erythropoietin for high-risk postoperative head and neck cancer patients

PURPOSE

To determine efficacy and toxicities of postoperative concurrent chemoradiation using docetaxel in high-risk head and neck cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

High-risk patients were enrolled 2-8 weeks after surgery. Treatment included 60 Gy for 6 weeks with weekly docetaxel 25 mg/m(2) and erythropoietin alpha 40,000 U for hemoglobin < or =12 g/dL. Primary endpoints included locoregional control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and patterns of failure (POF). Secondary endpoints were toxicity and quality of life.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled (14 male, 4 female), aged 24-70 years (median, 55 years). Primary site included oropharynx = 7, oral cavity = 8, hypopharynx = 1, and larynx = 2. Pathologic American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage was III = 3 patients, IV = 15 patients. High-risk eligibility included > or =2 positive lymph nodes = 13, extracapsular extension = 10, positive margins = 8 (11 patients with two or more risk factors). Docetaxel was reduced to 20 mg/m(2)/week after 5 patients had prolonged Grade 3 or higher mucositis. Overall, number of doses delivered was 2 of 6 = 1, 3 of 6 = 2, 4 of 6 = 2, 5 of 6 = 4, 6 of 6 = 9 patients. With median follow-up of 30 months (range, 5-66), 10 (56%) patients are alive and have no evidence of disease (NED); POF: three local recurrences (two with distant) and 1 distant only. One-year survival was 76%, median PFS and DFS had not been reached. Three-year LC was 82%. No Grade 3 or higher late toxicities were observed, although a few cases of prolonged mucositis and taste loss (>3 months) were seen, particularly at 25 mg/m(2)/week.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative radiation therapy with weekly docetaxel 20 or 25 mg/m(2)/week for high-risk postoperative head and neck cancer caused intolerable mucosal toxicity, prompting early study termination. Further studies should consider 15 mg/m(2). Actuarial 3-year LC is 82%, similar to cisplatin-based chemoradiation regimens. Distant metastasis remains an important issue requiring additional systemic interventions.

Comparative preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetics of a cremophor-free, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007) and paclitaxel formulated in Cremophor (Taxol)

PURPOSE

To compare the preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic properties of paclitaxel formulated as a Cremophor-free, albumin-bound nanoparticle (ABI-007) and formulated in Cremophor-ethanol (Taxol).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

ABI-007 and Taxol were given i.v. to Harlan Sprague-Dawley male rats to determine pharmacokinetic and drug disposition. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetic properties also were assessed in 27 patients with advanced solid tumors who were randomly assigned to treatment with ABI-007 (260 mg/m(2), 30 minutes; n = 14) or Taxol (175 mg/m(2), 3 hours; n = 13), with cycles repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

The volume of distribution at steady state and clearance for paclitaxel formulated as Cremophor-free nanoparticle ABI-007 were significantly greater than those for paclitaxel formulated with Cremophor (Taxol) in rats. Fecal excretion was the main elimination pathway with both formulations. Consistent with the preclinical data, paclitaxel clearance and volume of distribution were significantly higher for ABI-007 than for Taxol in humans [21.13 versus 14.76 L/h/m(2) (P = 0.048) and 663.8 versus 433.4 L/m(2) (P = 0.040), respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel formulated as ABI-007 differs from paclitaxel formulated as Taxol, with a higher plasma clearance and a larger volume of distribution. This finding is consistent with the absence of paclitaxel-sequestering Cremophor micelles after administration of ABI-007. This unique property of ABI-007 could be important for its therapeutic effectiveness.

A Phase II trial of paclitaxel and topotecan with filgrastim in patients with recurrent or refractory glioblastoma multiforme or anaplastic astrocytoma

PURPOSE

Therapy for high-grade gliomas remains unsatisfactory. Paclitaxel and topotecan have separately demonstrated activity against gliomas. We conducted a Phase II trial of these agents in combination with filgrastim (G-CSF) in patients with recurrent or refractory glioblastoma multiforme or anaplastic astrocytoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult patients with radiographic evidence of recurrent or progressive tumor following primary therapy were eligible for study. Patients received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV over 3 h on day 1 and topotecan 1.0 mg/m2 IV over 30 min on days 1-5. Filgrastim 5 microg/kg was given days 6-14 for neutrophil support. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled on study, and seventeen were considered evaluable for response. Two patients (12/%) exhibited partial remission and seven patients (41/%) exhibited stable disease in response to therapy. Hematologic toxicity was common with 25 /% of patients experiencing grade III or IV leukopenia despite G-CSF support. Two patients died of infectious complications on protocol, prompting suspension of further accrual.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel and topotecan with G-CSF support exhibits modest activity in adults with recurrent or refractory glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma. The significant hematotoxicity encountered, however, cannot justify further investigation of this combination in patients with high grade brain tumors.

Consolidation therapies revisited: weekly paclitaxel

Most patients with advanced ovarian cancer exhibit clinically relevant objective and subjective responses to platinum/paclitaxel-based combination, which is now considered the standard chemotherapeutic regimen. Unfortunately, responses are generally of limited duration, and long-term disease-free survival is experienced by few patients. Efforts should be taken to maintain such a response as long as possible, where it realistically might be hoped that continuation of chemotherapy could consolidate the absence of clinically detectable disease. In this regard, the administration of paclitaxel on a weekly schedule seems to be particularly attractive, especially after the demonstration that a weekly regimen in heavily pretreated women bearing metastatic breast, head, and neck or lung cancers was proven to be well tolerated without the requirement of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, with limited neurotoxicity and with substantial anticancer activity, thanks to its pro-apoptotic and antiangiogenesis properties. In Italy, a multi-institutional phase II prospective study (After-6 Protocol 2) has been initiated to verify the effectiveness of paclitaxel, administered on a weekly schedule (60 mg/m2 for 21 courses), in patients bearing microscopic residual disease detected at second-look operation to define its effectiveness after completing their primary platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy treatment. When possible, patients were surgically re-evaluated thorough a third-look operation to evaluate the percentage of conversion of microPR into a pathological complete remission status. An interim evaluation based on 534 cycles administered to 41 patients showed than only one patient experienced grade 4 anemia, 7.4% grade 2 transient peripheral neurotoxicity, and 2.7% delay in treatment delivery. Therefore, weekly paclitaxel has been proven to be easily administered even in heavily pretreated patients, with acceptable hematological and neurological toxicity.

Population pharmacokinetics of low-dose paclitaxel in patients with brain tumors

Our aim was to assess the pharmacokinetics of a low-dose schedule of paclitaxel in combination with radiation therapy in patients with brain tumors. Eighteen patients received 20-50 mg/m2 paclitaxel as a 1-h infusion 18-24 h before radiation with 2 Gy on 5 consecutive days. In total, 156 plasma samples from 13 patients and 38 urine samples from nine patients were collected and analyzed by a validated capillary electrophoresis method. Data analysis was done using NONMEM with a two-compartmental model and proportional error model. No signs of non-linearity in the pharmacokinetic parameters were observed in this dosing range. The median cumulative urinary excretion was 2.4% (range 0.86-7.72%) of the given dose. Plasma clearance was found to be 6.71 l/h+/-70% and central volume of distribution was 3.64 l+/-79% (population mean +/- interindividual variability, respectively). At the time of the radiation, i.e. 24 h after administration with the lowest dose of 20 mg/m2, the mean concentration of paclitaxel was 0.038 mg/l (0.045 microM) in plasma. We conclude that even with the lowest dose of 20 mg/m2 paclitaxel, plasma concentrations at the time of radiation are achieved which are radiosensitizing in vitro.

Additive effects of radiation and docetaxel on murine SCCVII tumors in vivo: special reference to changes in the cell cycle

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of a combination of docetaxel and irradiation in vivo with special reference to docetaxel-arrested G(2)/M-phase cells. At 24 and 48 h after intraperitoneal administration of docetaxel (90 mg/kg), tumor-bearing mice were irradiated with (60)Co gamma rays. Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by a DNA-Ki-67 double staining method using flow cytometry. An accumulation of cells in the G(2)/M phase of up to approximately 40% was observed 24 h after administration of docetaxel. Between 24 and 72 h, the percentage of cells arrested in G(2)/M phase that expressed Ki-67 decreased from 37.2% to 13.8%, in accordance with the increase in the Ki-67-negative G(2)/M-phase fraction. More than half of the cells arrested in G(2)/M phase lost their expression of Ki-67 protein between 24 and 72 h. The G(1)-phase fraction decreased from 28.4% to 8.6% at 24 h after docetaxel treatment; this remained unchanged at 72 h. These flow cytometry data suggested that docetaxel-arrested G(2)/M-phase cells did not enter the next cell cycle and were killed by docetaxel alone. Our data showed that arrest of cells in G(2)/M phase does not contribute to the synergism that has been reported for combinations of docetaxel and radiation in in vivo tumor models.

Hyperfractionated radiotherapy and paclitaxel for locally advanced/unresectable pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

To determine prospectively the maximal tolerated dose and potential antitumor activity of weekly paclitaxel with concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced and/or unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We embarked on Phase I-II study of hyperfractionated radiotherapy using a concomitant in-field boost to a total dose of 63.80 Gy in 6 weeks at 1.1 Gy/fraction. Paclitaxel was administered weekly on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36 as a 3-h infusion. Paclitaxel doses were escalated from 20 mg/m(2)/wk to 70 mg/m(2)/wk. Twenty patients were studied, 14 women and 6 men (mean age 64 years). Some patients presented with one or more symptoms. Obstructive jaundice was the main presenting symptom in 10 patients and epigastric pain in 14. All patients had unresectable histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (15 head, 4 body, and 1 tail). Reasons for unresectability were involvement of the portal vein, and/or superior mesenteric artery (n = 14), paraaortic nodes (n = 8), and medically inoperable (n = 1). Fourteen patients underwent a biliary bypass procedure before treatment (four endoscopic stenting, five choledochojejunostomy, and five cholecystojejunostomy). The follow-up period ranged from 14 to 66 months (median 44).

RESULTS

The dose-limiting toxicity was observed at 70 mg/m(2)/wk. Grade IV Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late GI toxicity was seen in 1 patient in the form of duodenal stricture and hemorrhage. Grade II gastrointestinal adverse effects occurred in 13 patients and Grade 3 in 1 patient. No neurologic morbidity was encountered. Eight patients required cytokine support for Grade 2 and 3 neutropenia. The treatment course was delivered within the planned time in 80% of the patients. Complete relief of pain occurred in 10 of 14 patients. The CA 19-9 level was either stable or decreasing in 12 of 15 patients. Of 17 assessable patients, stable disease was seen in 10, regression in 2, a partial response in 3, and a complete response in 2.

CONCLUSION

The use of hyperfractionated radiotherapy to a dose of 63.80 Gy with concomitant weekly paclitaxel is tolerated. The maximal tolerated dose of paclitaxel for this study was 60 mg/m(2)/wk. The preliminary objective responses denote activity of the regimen. We recommend testing this regimen in larger scale studies.

Quantitative measurement of quality outcome in malignant glioma patients using an independent living score (ILS). Assessment of a retrospective cohort

PURPOSE

Although a number of tools have been developed to measure 'quality of life' in patients with malignant glioma, there remains no completely satisfactory technique that incorporates a quality of life measure into survival analysis. We propose that a patient's ability to maintain independent activity offers a way to accomplish this goal.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An independent living score (ILS) is generated by awarding points on a monthly basis based on Karnofsky score and weighing the score based on the particular month of the clinical course. The ILS has a large range for any given survival, and can discriminate important treatment effects to which standard survival analyses are completely insensitive. Using this score and several variations, we were able to retrospectively analyze a patient cohort to assess what correlated with ILS.

RESULTS

We found a strong correlation with survival of all the measures tested. Interestingly, we found that patients for whom a total resection was performed and those who were most intensively treated had significantly higher ILS values, suggesting that not only did more aggressive treatment improve survival but that it did not simply increase survival at the expense of the time a patient remained independent.

CONCLUSION

Since the general course for patients with malignant glioma is one of increasing disability and loss of independence, we feel that these measures can serve as a way to distinguish between those therapies that increase survival at the expense of quality of life versus those that do not. Consideration should be given to incorporating these measures into prospective trials.

A Phase I/II trial of concurrent docetaxel and radiation after induction chemotherapy in patients with poor prognosis squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a Phase I/II study in patients with a poor prognosis who had locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and who were treated initially with induction chemotherapy. Patients were treated with weekly docetaxel and concurrent daily fractionated radiation therapy to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel and the efficacy of the regimen.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled, and 21 patients were treated. Eight patients had Stage III SCCHN, and 13 patients had Stage IV SCCHN without distant metastases and were treated first with 2-3 cycles of induction chemotherapy, which consisted of cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil with or without leucovorin. Patients with a poor prognosis were identified as those who achieved a partial response to induction treatment, achieved a complete response with a positive biopsy, or were at high risk for developing recurrent disease. Patients were treated subsequently with concurrent, escalating doses of docetaxel (given weekly x 6) and once daily 200-centigray radiation fractions.

RESULTS

Three patients were treated with a weekly docetaxel dose of 20 mg/m(2) without dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Both patients who were treated at the next dose level of 30 mg/m(2) experienced DLT. A dose of 25 mg/m(2) was studied without DLT in the 16 patients who were treated, establishing this as the MTD. Sixty-seven percent of the patients are alive without disease at a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 12-59 months) after the initiation of chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of weekly docetaxel with concurrent daily radiation therapy in the postinduction setting was 25 mg/m(2). Disease free survival data from this study were good and indicated that this regimen was effective in the treatment of patients with SCCHN who had a poor prognosis.

Pharmacodynamics of non-break weekly paclitaxel (Taxol) and pharmacokinetics of Cremophor-EL vehicle: results of a dose-escalation study

We characterized the toxicity and determined the maximum tolerated dose of non-break weekly paclitaxel (Taxol) in chemotherapy-naive cancer patients, and studied pharmacokinetics of the formulation vehicle Cremophor-EL with this schedule. Twenty-three patients with primary refractory solid tumors received weekly paclitaxel at the dose range of 70-200 mg/m2. As dose-limiting toxicity we defined granulocytopenia grade > or =2 causing a treatment delay for more than 2 weeks, or febrile neutropenia or grade >2 organ-specific toxicity. Plasma kinetics of Cremophor-EL were analyzed over the first five courses of treatment. Non-break weekly paclitaxel was feasible at doses up to 110 mg/m2, while granulocytopenia precluded scheduled administration of doses > or =130 mg/m2. Clinically relevant peripheral neurotoxicity tended to occur at around 1500 mg/m2 cumulative dosage at weekly doses > or =110 mg/m2. Detectable Cremophor-EL levels were found in all pre-dose samples, but there was no evidence of accumulation up to the sixth course. Our results, discussed in the light of an overview of published data, suggest that chronic weekly administration of paclitaxel is feasible and with a lack of significant accumulation of Cremophor-EL levels at doses up to 90 mg/m2.

Novel chemotherapeutic approaches to brain tumors

In reviewing the numerous investigational drug trials for patients with anaplastic gliomas over the past 20 years, it would be fair to say that there have been more than a few disappointments and that the real impact of many of these therapies on patients' duration and quality of survival has been minor at best. It is also fair to state that there has been progress in developing new types of chemotherapy and other agents, in devising new treatment strategies, and in gaining a deeper understanding of the problems that must be overcome to treat patients with anaplastic gliomas successfully. The past several years have seen the realization that oligodendroglioma, primary CNS lymphoma, and medulloblastoma are sensitive to chemotherapy treatments. It is hoped that future studies will delineate better the optimal use of chemotherapy for these tumors.

Phase II radiation therapy oncology group trial of weekly paclitaxel and conventional external beam radiation therapy for supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme

PURPOSE

Fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) +/- carmustine (BCNU) is the standard of care for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), but survival results remain poor. Preclinical studies indicate synergy between RT and paclitaxel (TAX) in astrocytoma cell lines. Phase I studies in GBM have demonstrated a maximum tolerated dose for TAX of 225 mg/m(2)/3 h/week x 6, during EBRT, with no exacerbation of typical RT-induced toxicities. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) therefore mounted a Phase II study to determine the feasibility and efficacy of conventional EBRT and concurrent weekly TAX at its MTD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients with histologic diagnosis of GBM were enrolled from 8/16/96 through 3/21/97 in a multi-institutional Phase II trial of EBRT and TAX 225 mg/m(2)/3 h (1-3 h before EBRT), administered the first treatment day of each RT week. Total EBRT dose was 60 Gy (200 cGy/fraction), 5 days per week. A smaller treatment field, to include gross disease plus a margin only, was used after 46 Gy.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (98%) were evaluable. Median age was 55 years (range, 28-78). Seventy-four percent were > or = 50 years. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Classes III, IV, V, VI included 10 (17%), 21 (34%), 25 (41%), and 5 (8%) patients, respectively. Gross total resection was performed in only 16%. There was no Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Hypersensitivity reactions precluding further use of TAX occurred in 4 patients. There were 2 instances of late neurotoxicity (4% Grade 3 or 4). Ninety-one percent of patients received treatment per protocol. Seventy-seven percent completed prescribed treatment (6 weeks). Of 35 patients with measurable disease, CR/PR was observed in 23%, MR in 17%, and SD in 43%. Seventeen percent demonstrated progression at first follow-up. Median potential follow-up time is 20 months. Median survival is 9.7 months, with median survivals for RPA classes III, IV, V, and VI of 16.3, 10.2, 9.5, 2.5 months, respectively. Ten patients remain alive.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent full-dose EBRT and weekly high-dose TAX is feasible in the majority of GBM patients. Acute toxicity is acceptable; myelosuppression and peripheral sensory neuropathy are surprisingly modest, despite considerably higher overall dose intensity, compared to that achievable in other disease sites. Median survival by RPA class without prolonged adjuvant therapy is comparable to RTOG controls treated with standard EBRT and BCNU (1 year of BCNU).

Phase I trial of weekly paclitaxel plus oral estramustine phosphate in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To exploit the favorable dose intensity and safety profile of weekly paclitaxel, we conducted a Phase I trial of paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion in combination with estramustine phosphate (EM) in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The antimicrotubule drug combination of paclitaxel by 96-hour infusion plus EM is active in HRPC.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with metastatic HRPC and progressive tumor after antiandrogen withdrawal were enrolled in this study. Oral EM was taken at a dose of 600 mg/m(2) daily for the initial 21 patients and on a reduced schedule of 280 mg twice daily for the final 3 patients. Paclitaxel was escalated from 60 to 118 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

The major toxicities were gastrointestinal and thromboembolic complications related to daily oral dosing of EM. Of the first 21 patients, one third (n = 7) discontinued therapy within 4 weeks because of protracted nausea and/or thrombotic complications. Dose-limiting toxicities at 118 mg/m(2) paclitaxel were fatigue and hepatotoxicity. Of 13 patients with measurable soft-tissue lesions, 6 had objective partial regressions, and 9 (37.5%) of 24 patients (95% confidence interval 19.1% to 59.1%) with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels had a 50% or greater decline of at least 4 weeks' duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly paclitaxel at doses of 60 to 107 mg/m(2) were feasible in combination with oral EM, but daily oral EM produced unacceptable toxicity. On the basis of these results, a Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel with the reduced dose and schedule of EM was initiated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group to assess further the benefits and risks of this treatment in men with metastatic HRPC.

Paclitaxel, cisplatin, and concurrent radiation for esophageal cancer

Paclitaxel is an active agent for adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus and is a radiation sensitizer. We sought to investigate the toxicity and complete response rate of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and concurrent radiation for esophageal cancer. Forty-one patients with esophageal cancer were studied, 29 with adenocarcinomas and 12 with squamous cell cancers. Twelve patients had tumor extension into the proximal stomach and/or abdominal adenopathy. Patients received paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 by 3-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion, and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 weekly on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Radiation was administered concurrently to a total dose of 39.60 Gy, in 1.80 Gy fractions, for 22 treatments. Patients with medical or surgical contraindications to esophagectomy received 2 additional weeks of paclitaxel with a radiation boost to 50.4 Gy. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 toxicity occurring in 10 patients (24%). Only 2 patients (5%) had grade 4 esophagitis requiring parenteral nutrition. Twelve patients (29%) obtained a complete response. The 2-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 40% and 42%, respectively. Esophagitis was less severe than expected and prophylactic enteral feeding tubes were not necessary. Additional effective systemic treatments are needed to reduce the development of distant metastases.

Recent developments in weekly paclitaxel therapy in lung cancer

Paclitaxel has undergone a remarkable evolution of schedule and dosage based on observed schedule-dependent toxicity and consequent improvement of therapeutic index. A weekly schedule of administration was originally developed to exploit opportunities for radiation synergy and was subsequently explored without radiation to evaluate the potential for reduced toxicity. Three weekly schedules have emerged: paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2)/wk with concurrent radiation, paclitaxel 80 to 90 mg/m(2)/wk as a dose-dense schedule without radiation, and paclitaxel 150 to 175 mg/m(2)/wk as a dose-intensive schedule. The efficacy of these schedules, their integration as combination treatment with chemotherapy and nonchemotherapeutic agents, and their role are the subjects of substantial investigation.

Taxanes in combined modality therapy for solid tumors

The taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, are novel antimitotic agents that are under extensive investigation in clinical trials. Both taxanes have demonstrated significant activity against many solid tumors as single agents and in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. In addition, taxanes arrest cells at the G2/M phase of the cell cycle, which is the most radiosensitive phase. These properties are exploited in clinical trials combining this taxane with radiation therapy. Most studies included patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cancers of the head and neck and there are a few studies with concurrent taxane/RT in esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, brain and breast cancer. Information concerning the tolerability and possible utility of docetaxel is also becoming available. This manuscript will review some of the more prominent trials of the taxanes in combination with radiation therapy for solid tumors.

Phase I trial and pharmacological study of a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion in children with refractory solid tumours: a SFOP study

The maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel administered by 24-hour continuous infusion in children is known. Short infusion might offer equivalent antitumour efficacy and reduced haematological toxicity, without increasing the allergic risk. Our aims were to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in children when administered in 3-h infusion every 3 weeks. Patients older than 6 months, younger than 20 years with refractory malignant solid tumours were eligible when they satisfied standard haematological, renal, hepatic and cardiologic inclusion criteria with life expectancy exceeding 8 weeks. Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour infusion after premedication (dexamethasone, dexchlorpheniramine). Pharmacokinetic analysis and solvent assays (ethanol, cremophor) were performed during the first course. 20 courses were studied in 17 patients; 4 dosage levels were investigated (240 to 420 mg/m(2)). No dose-limiting haematological toxicity was observed. Severe acute neurological and allergic toxicity was encountered. One treatment-related death occurred just after the infusion at the highest dosage. Delayed peripheral neurotoxicity and moderate allergic reactions were also encountered. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed dose-dependent clearance of paclitaxel and elevated blood ethanol and Cremophor EL levels. Although no limiting haematological toxicity was reached, we do not recommend this paclitaxel schedule in children because of its acute neurological toxicity.

Concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy and carboplatin/etoposide in patients with malignant glioma: long-term results of a phase II study

PURPOSE

Feasibility, antitumor activity and toxicity of accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Acc Hfx RT) and concurrent carboplatin/etoposide (CBDCA/VP 16) chemotherapy were investigated in patients with malignant glioma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-nine patients with either glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) (n = 61) or anaplastic astrocytome (AA) (n = 18) entered into a phase II study on the use of Acc Hfx RT with 60 Gy in 40 fractions in 20 treatment days over 4 weeks and concurrent CBDCA, 200 mg/m2, and VP 16, 200 mg/m2, both given once weekly during the RT course.

RESULTS

The median survival time for all 79 patients was 14 months (11 and 44 months for GBM and AA patients, respectively), while the 2- and 4-year survival was respectively 33% and 11% for all patients, 13% and 1.6% for GBM patients, and 100% and 44% for AA patients (p < 0.0001). The median time to progression for all patients was 12 months (9 and 40 months for GBM and AA, respectively), while the 2- and 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) was respectively 28% and 10% (all patients), 10% and 1.7% (GBM) and 89% and 39% (AA) (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that age, performance status, and preoperative size of tumor influenced survival in GBM. Only 5 (6%) patients experienced grade 3 leukopenia and 6 (8%) patients experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia. No late RT-induced toxicity was observed to date.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Acc Hfx RT/CBDCA + VP 16 was feasible and little toxic, it failed to improve survival/progression-free survival over that obtained with other currently used regimens. These results do not justify the investigation of this regimen in a phase III trial.

Radiation and concomitant weekly administration of paclitaxel in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. A phase II study

The present study was conducted to evaluate the activity and toxicity profile of radiation (RT) and concomitant chemotherapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Thirty-nine patients were treated postoperatively with RT and concomitant administration of paclitaxel. Cranial irradiation was initiated 2-3 weeks postoperatively and was administered in 2.0 fractions, one fraction per day, for 5 consecutive days per week, to a total of 60 Gy. Paclitaxel was delivered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 over 3-h once weekly for 6 weeks. Thirty-three patients received all 6 cycles of paclitaxel according to the protocol. Totally, 217 cycles were delivered all of them at full dose. The median relative dose intensity of paclitaxel was 1 (range 0.88-1.1). Three (7.5%) patients achieved complete and 9 (23%) partial response, while 12 (30.5%) patients demonstrated stabilization of the disease. Side effects from combined chemoradiotherapy were mainly mild. Grade III toxicity included infection (7.5%) and alopecia (5%). Median time to progression was 6 (range 0.9-27) months and median survival 10.7 (range 0.9-39.5+) months. The present study has clearly shown that 100 mg/m2 of paclitaxel in 1-h infusion weekly can be safely given concomitantly with RT in patients with GBM with manageable toxicity. However, the efficacy of this combined modality treatment does not appear to be superior to that of RT alone.

A phase II study of paclitaxel in chemonaïve patients with recurrent high-grade glioma

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of malignant gliomas remains poor. In recurrent disease, chemotherapy can be considered.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this phase II study we determined the anti-tumour efficacy of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 in a three-hour intravenous infusion every three weeks in chemonaïve patients with recurrent high-grade glioma in terms of response, survival, and quality of life.

RESULTS

In 17 patients (14 glioblastoma multiforme, 3 anaplastic astrocytoma) 69 paclitaxel cycles were administered. Partial or complete responses were not observed. Stable disease for four to six months was observed in five patients (29%). Median time to progression and median survival were two and 10 months, respectively. Toxicity due to paclitaxel was as to be expected and minor in most cases. Quality of life and mood estimates appeared rather stable over time.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that three-weekly 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel chemotherapy for patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas did not lead to major complications or adverse effects on quality of life and mood. However, this therapy is of only very limited value in terms of response and survival in such patients.

Paclitaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer : an alternative high-dose weekly schedule

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Sequential phase I and phase II trials of paclitaxel using an extended weekly schedule were performed to explore its effect on tolerance, limits of dose intensity, and activity at maximum dose intensity in disseminated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

DESIGN

Patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were eligible if they had a performance status of 0 to 2, no previous chemotherapy, and normal organ function. Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-h infusion weekly for 6 weeks of an 8-week cycle. Doses were modified for toxicity observed on the day of treatment.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Paclitaxel, 100 to 200 mg/m(2)/wk, was administered in the phase I trial. Dose escalation was limited primarily by neutropenia, and a relationship between dose and response was noted. A phase II trial of paclitaxel, 175 mg/m(2)/wk, the maximum tolerated dose, was initiated; data are available for the first 25 patients. Eighty-three, 75, 58, and 50% of intended doses were delivered during cycles one to four, respectively. Grade 2 or 3 neuropathy occurred in nine patients, but improved in all following dose reduction. Platelet counts rose by 17,000/microL/wk. Partial responses occurred in 14 of 25 patients (56%; confidence interval, 46 to 66%). The duration of response was 6 months, and 1-and 2-year survival rates were 53% and 18%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel administered on a weekly schedule allows enhanced dose intensity, has a protective or stimulatory effect on platelets, and is active in NSCLC.

The use of carboplatin and paclitaxel with daily radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

PURPOSE

Unresectable squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) continue to pose a significant therapeutic challenge. This report defines the toxicities, efficacy, and prognostic factors associated with the combination of carboplatin (CBDCA), paclitaxel, and once-daily radiation for patients with locally advanced disease. Additionally, the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel were investigated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1993-1998, 62 patients with Stage III-IV SCCHN were treated with 70.2 Gy of RT at 1.8 Gy/fraction/day to the primary site. Weekly chemotherapy was given during RT consisting of paclitaxel (45 mg/m(2)/wk) and CBDCA (100 mg/m(2)/wk). All patients presented with locally advanced disease; 77% had T4 disease and 21% had T3 disease. Fifty-eight percent had N2b-N3 disease.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were evaluable for response and survival with a median follow-up of 30 months (range 7-70). Ninety-eight percent of patients completed prescribed therapy. One patient died after refusing medical management for pseudomembranous colitis and is scored as a Grade 5 toxicity. Two patients suffered Grade 4 leukopenia. Median number of break days was two. A clinical complete response (CR) at the primary site was obtained in 82%, with a total (primary site and neck) CR rate of 75%. The median survival for the entire cohort is 33 months. Response to therapy and status of the neck at presentation were the only prognostic factors found to influence survival. The median survival for patients who attained a CR is 49 months versus 9 months in those who did not attain a CR (p < 0.0001). The 2- and 3-year overall survival for complete responders are 79% and 61%. Plasma paclitaxel concentrations in the range shown to be radiosensitizing were achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel given concurrently with definitive once-daily external beam radiation therapy is well tolerated with over 90% of patients completing prescribed therapy. An ultimate CR rate of greater than 70% was obtained, which translated directly into improved survival. With 48% 3-year overall survival for the entire group, this regimen is an excellent option for this group of patients with a historically poor prognosis.

A study of concurrent radiochemotherapy with paclitaxel in glioblastoma multiforme

Despite advances in neurosurgery and radiotherapy, the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma multiforme remains poor. Reports in the literature about the radiosensitizing properties of paclitaxel stimulated the authors to conduct a study using paclitaxel concurrently with radiation in a group of 18 patients who had residual disease postoperatively. Paclitaxel was delivered weekly as an intravenous infusion in a dose of 60 mg/m2 along with radiation to the primary lesion. A total of 108 cycles of paclitaxel was given. All the patients tolerated the treatment well. The main side effects were haematological, and neuropathy which was self-limiting. The overall 1-year survival rate was 70%, with 12 patients alive at 13 months. The median survival has not yet been reached although it is more than 13 months. Thus, paclitaxel can be safely delivered concomitantly with radiation in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Larger, randomized trials are required to establish the comparative efficacy of paclitaxel as a radiosensitizer in glioblastoma multiforme.

Salvage chemotherapy with taxol for recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas

BACKGROUND

A prospective Phase II study of Taxol in young adult patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (15 men; 9 women) ages 19-45 years (median 31.5), with recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas were treated. All patients had previously been treated with surgery and involved-field radiotherapy (median dose 60 Gy; range 51-61 Gy). Additionally, 22 patients were treated adjuvantly with nitrosourea-based chemotherapy (PCV in 17; BCNU in 5). Fourteen patients were treated with salvage chemotherapy at first recurrence with 1-2 chemotherapy regimens (median 1). Taxol was administered at a fixed dose of 175 mg/m2 given as a 3 h intravenous infusion monthly. Neurological and neuroradiographic evaluation were performed every 8 weeks after 2 courses of Taxol, operationally defined as a single cycle of Taxol.

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable. A median of 3.5 cycles of Taxol (range 1-13) were administered. Taxol-related toxicity included: partial alopecia (13 patients); non-disabling peripheral neuropathy (4); neutropenia (4); anemia (3); and thrombocytopenia (2). Four patients required transfusions (2 packed red blood cell; 2 platelet) and one patient was treated for culture negative neutropenic fever. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Three patients (13%) demonstrated a neuroradiographic partial response, 16 patients (67%) demonstrated stable disease and 5 patients (21%) had progressive disease following a single cycle of Taxol. Time to tumor progression ranged from 2-26 months (median 7.5 months). Nineteen patients were offered alternative chemotherapy after failing Taxol of whom 13 clinically responded. Survival ranged from 3-56 months (median 18.5 months). Four patients are alive, all are on alternative chemotherapy regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Taxol demonstrated modest efficacy with manageable toxicity in this heavily pre-treated cohort of young adult patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas.

An initial experience using concurrent paclitaxel and radiation in the treatment of head and neck malignancies

BACKGROUND

Combined modality therapy plays a central role in the management of head and neck malignancies. This study examined the feasibility and preliminary results of treating a group of patients using concurrent bolus paclitaxel (Taxol) and radiation therapy.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with a median age of 56 years (range 42-81) were treated. Paclitaxel was given every 3 weeks at a dose of 100 mg/m2 concurrently with external beam radiation. The patients treated included those who had failed to achieve a complete response (CR) to induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (PFL), or who had locally advanced disease not previously treated.

RESULTS

Median follow-up from the initiation of treatment is 40 months (range 23-48). The majority of patients (13/14) achieved clinical CRs at the primary site. The development of responses was characterized by a long time course. Three patients who were nonresponders (NRs) to induction PFL chemotherapy were treated. One was a clinical CR at the primary site, one did not achieve a CR, and the other had residual disease in the neck. Four patients have failed, one with local-regional disease, one with a marginal failure, one with distant metastases, and one was not rendered disease-free by the treatment. As expected, significant local toxicity was observed. Most patients were managed with the aid of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Two patients experienced significant moist desquamation and required treatment breaks of greater than 1 week.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel can be given on a 3-week schedule at 100 mg/m2 concurrently with radiation. The preliminary results indicate good local responses and acceptable toxicity. This treatment approach merits further study in the treatment of head and neck malignancies, and should be considered as an option in other sites.

Inhibitory effects of phenylbutyrate on the proliferation, morphology, migration and invasiveness of malignant glioma cells

The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of sodium 4-phenylbutyrate (phenylbutyrate) on the proliferation, morphology, migration and invasiveness of malignant glioma cells in vitro. Phenylbutyrate is a novel differentiating and cytotoxic compound used clinically with low toxicity in the treatment of beta-thalassemia, sickle cell anemia and urea cycle disorders. Preliminary clinical trials testing phenylbutyrate as an anti-cancer agent have included patients with malignant glioma. However, little information is available regarding the effects of phenylbutyrate on glioma cells, particularly with respect to the expression of genes important in the pathogenesis of glial malignancy. In experiments reported here, glioma cell lines and explant cells from a tumor patient were exposed to 2, 4 and 8 mM phenylbutyrate and compared to untreated control cells. The effect on cellular proliferation was assessed using cell counts and DNA flow cytometry. Changes in morphology were evaluated using vimentin staining. Scratch and Matrigel assays were performed to assess changes in cellular migration and invasiveness. Finally, Northern blot analysis was used to study c-myc and urokinase expression. Phenylbutyrate was found to have dose-dependent inhibitory effects on glioma cell proliferation, morphology, migration, invasiveness and c-myc and urokinase expression. Mean growth-inhibitory (IC50) phenylbutyrate concentrations ranged from 0.5 mM for T98G cells to 5.0 mM for explant cells. Phenylbutyrate treatment reduced % S phase cells, increased % G0/G1 cells, and produced morphologic changes consistent with induction of differentiation. 24 hours of treatment with 4 mM phenylbutyrate resulted in a 50% reduction in migration and invasiveness. Northern blots showed a decrease in urokinase and c-myc expression at non-cytotoxic doses. We conclude that phenylbutyrate is a promising candidate compound for treating patients with malignant glioma.

Mutation of the p53 gene in human astrocytic tumours correlates with increased resistance to DNA-damaging agents but not to anti-microtubule anti-cancer agents

Astrocytic tumours often become resistant to a variety of chemotherapeutic agents in advanced stages and frequently possess mutations in the p53 tumour-suppressor gene. Previous studies using established cell lines to investigate the relation between mutated p53 genes and altered resistance to anti-cancer agents brought inconsistent results. In this report, we examined the status of the p53 gene in 56 astrocytic tumour specimens by single-strand conformation polymorphism and their in vitro chemosensitivity to 30 different kinds of anti-cancer agents. The chemosensitivity was determined by drug-induced cell death using flow cytometry. We found that the mutated p53 gene correlated with increased resistance to DNA-damaging agents but the sensitivity to anti-microtubule agents was independent of the mutation, suggesting a clinical significance of the status of p53 gene in astrocytic tumours and a rational application of anti-microtubule agents to the patients with p53-mutated astrocytic tumours.

Carboplatin and teniposide concurrent with radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

The outcome after treatment for glioblastoma remains poor. Therefore, the authors evaluated the long term efficacy and toxicity of treatment with radiotherapy and concurrent carboplatin plus teniposide followed by three cycles of carmustine in patients who underwent resection for glioblastoma.

METHODS

Fifty-six newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma underwent radiotherapy (1.8-2 gray [Gy]/day, 5 days a week using limited fields up to 60 Gy), and concurrent chemotherapy with carboplatin (350 mg/m2) on Days 1, 22, and 43, and teniposide (50 mg/m2) on Days 1, 2, 3, 22, 23, 24, 43, 44, and 45. Four weeks after the end of radiotherapy, patients were given carmustine (200 mg/m2) every 8 weeks for 3 cycles. Treatment then was suspended, but if disease progression was found, treatment was resumed using different drugs.

RESULTS

All 56 patients were evaluated for time to progression (TTP) and median survival time (MST). The TTP was 7.5 months and the MST was 12.5 months. Toxicity manifested as thrombocytopenia and in most cases was acceptable. Four patients (7.1%) had radiation necrosis at 2, 2, 7, and 9 months, respectively, from the end of radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained in the current study with concurrent radiochemotherapy in patients with glioblastoma are comparable to the best results reported using radiotherapy alone followed by chemotherapy with nitrosoureas.

Phase I trial of taxol as a radiation sensitizer with cisplatin in advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine tolerable doses and potential toxicities of taxol, administered weekly, with concomitant cisplatin and radiation therapy in advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

Patients with cervical cancer, either with evidence of distant metastatic disease at presentation or otherwise at high risk for recurrent disease, were eligible for this phase I study. Taxol was administered weekly as a 3-hr intravenous infusion in addition to the prescribed radiation therapy. The starting dose was 10 mg/m2/week and escalated at 10 mg/m2/week increments if tolerated by successive cohorts of three new patients. Cisplatin was given every 3 weeks at 50 mg/m2. Chemotherapy was continued until radiation was completed. For each patient quality of life was assessed weekly during therapy.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients, undergoing a total of 102 cycles, have been enrolled. Dose escalation of taxol from 10 mg/m2/week to 50 mg/m2/week was well tolerated, with no significant change in quality of life during therapy. Two radiation fractions (0.5%) were delayed due to toxicity from this chemotherapy regimen. Of 102 cycles, 6 resulted in grade 2 and 1 in grade 3 neutropenia, and no patient developed >grade 2 anemia or thrombocytopenia. Three patients developed GI-related toxicities and 1 patient presented with urosepsis during treatment. There was a 93% response rate to this regimen, with 10 patients (63%) presently having no evidence of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated that up to 50 mg/m2/week of taxol is well tolerated in patients undergoing radiation therapy for advanced cervical cancer. A phase II trial will assist in determining the efficacy of taxol as a radiation sensitizer in these patients.

Paclitaxel as a radiosensitizer combined with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of recurrent medulloblastoma

This report describes the treatment of a 39-year-old man with recurrent medulloblastoma previously treated with extensive chemotherapy and radiation therapy. A novel treatment technique combining paclitaxel (275 mg IV bolus) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (30 Gy in six fractions over 3 weeks) was given to palliate the patient's significant neurologic symptoms. The patient experienced a significant improvement both radiographically and in the quality of his life at follow-up 5 months after completion of treatment. No toxicity has been observed. The treatment of medulloblastoma with paclitaxel and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, either alone or in combination, merits further investigation.

Cisplatin-paclitaxel weekly schedule in advanced solid tumors: a phase I study

PURPOSE

The objective of our study was to determine the maximum tolerable doses (MTDs) of both paclitaxel and cisplatin when given in a weekly schedule alone or simultaneously with G-CSF in advanced solid neoplasms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced cancer either chemotherapy-naive or resistant to standard treatments received paclitaxel in a three-hour infusion followed by cisplatin, with or without the addition of r-HuG-CSF (5 micrograms/kg s.c. days three to five). The starting doses of CDDP and paclitaxel were 25 mg/m2/week and 45 mg/m2/week, respectively. During the first six courses the dosages of the two drugs were alternately escalated by 20% (CDDP = 5 mg/m2/week, and paclitaxel 10 mg/m2/week) at each step until the appearance of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in one-third or more of the patients enrolled in that cohort.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients with cancer (16 lung, 16 breast, 11 ovarian, 7 head and neck, 1 renal, 1 esophageal, 1 cervical, 1 soft-tissue sarcoma, and 1 of unknown primary), 25 of whom were pretreated, were entered into the study. A total of 439 weekly courses were delivered. In chemotherapy-naïve patients, the MTDs of cisplatin and paclitaxel were 30 mg/m2/week and 65 mg/m2/week, respectively, in the absence of G-CSF support, which increased to 40 mg/m2/week and 85 mg/m2/week, respectively, when G-CSF was given. There were no toxic deaths in this study. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity (100/439 courses), but was seldom severe. Neurotoxicity was quite frequent (18 of 55 patients for the total of 88 courses) but never dose-limiting. It was more frequent and clinically relevant in cisplatin-pretreated patients. Overall 18 patients (eight ovarian, five breast, three lung, and two head and neck) achieved objective responses.

CONCLUSIONS

The cisplatin-paclitaxel weekly administration seems a safe, practical and effective therapeutical approach in patients with advanced solid neoplasms. Large phase II trials are warranted to accurately define the efficacy of this schedule in cisplatin-paclitaxel sensitive tumors.

The development and clinical utility of the taxane class of antimicrotubule chemotherapy agents

The taxane class of antimicrotubule anticancer agents is perhaps the most important addition to the chemotherapeutic armamentarium against cancer over the past several decades. After only a brief period, the taxanes have not only demonstrated a unique ability to palliate the symptoms of many types of advanced cancers, including carcinoma of the ovary, lung, head and neck, bladder, and esophagus, they have also demonstrated effectiveness in the initial therapy of earlier stages of cancer, a setting in which any new therapy is likely to make its greatest impact. The challenge now facing investigators is to develop strategies to maximize therapeutic benefits with the taxanes in the early stages, as well as the advanced stages, of many cancers. This review describes the preclinical features and clinical results of the two major taxanes, paclitaxel (Taxol, Bristol-Myers Squibb) and docetaxel (Taxotere, Rhone-Poulenc Rhorer).

Concurrent Paclitaxel and Radiation Therapy for Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND: Combination radiation and chemotherapy has an intuitive appeal for improving cancer treatment. Experimental results suggest that paclitaxel plus radiation might produce additive or synergistic effects. METHODS: A series of phase I and II trials to test tolerance and begin to evaluate effectiveness were performed on patients with non-small cell lung cancer, high-grade astrocytic brain tumors, and pancreatic and gastric cancers. RESULTS: Tolerance of the combined drug and radiation programs was generally good. Esophagitis was dose-limiting for the intrathoracic tumors. Hematologic toxicity was mild, but peripheral neuritis and cutaneous reactions were common. CONCLUSIONS: These trials show that paclitaxel plus concurrent radiation is feasible at the dose levels and schedules tested. Antitumor responses have been observed.