Escalating systemic exposure of continuous infusion topotecan in children with recurrent acute leukemia

Topotecan clearance based on a single sample and a population pharmacokinetic model: Application to a pediatric high-risk neuroblastoma clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Topotecan, an antitumor drug with systemic exposure (SE)-dependent activity against many pediatric tumors has wide interpatient pharmacokinetic variability, making it challenging to attain the desired topotecan SE. The study objectives were to update our topotecan population pharmacokinetic model, to evaluate the feasibility of determining individual topotecan clearance using a single blood sample, and to apply this approach to topotecan data from a neuroblastoma trial to explore exposure-response relationships.

PROCEDURE

Our previous population pharmacokinetic and covariate model was updated using data from 13 clinical pediatric studies. A simulation-based Bayesian analysis was performed to determine if a single blood sample could be sufficient to estimate individual topotecan clearance. Following the Bayesian approach, single pharmacokinetic samples collected from a Children's Oncology Group Phase III clinical trial (ANBL0532; NCT0056767) were analyzed to estimate individual topotecan SE. Associations between topotecan SE and toxicity or early response were then evaluated.

RESULTS

The updated population model included the impact of patient body surface area (BSA), age, and renal function on topotecan clearance. The Bayesian analysis with the updated model and single plasma samples showed that individual topotecan clearance values were estimated with good precision (mean absolute prediction error ≤16.2%) and low bias (mean prediction error ≤7.2%). Using the same approach, topotecan SE was derived in patients from ANBL0532. The exposure-response analysis showed an increased early response after concomitant cyclophosphamide and topotecan up to a topotecan SE of 45 h ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple single-sample approach during topotecan therapy could guide dosing for patients, resulting in more patients reaching target attainment.

How I treat hepatitis C virus infection in patients with hematologic malignancies

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is not uncommon in cancer patients. Over the past 5 years, treatment of chronic HCV infection in patients with hematologic malignancies has evolved rapidly as safe and effective direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have become the standard-of-care treatment. Today, chronic HCV infection should not prevent a patient from receiving cancer therapy or participating in clinical trials of chemotherapy because most infected patients can achieve virologic cure. Elimination of HCV from infected cancer patients confers virologic, hepatic, and oncologic advantages. Similar to the optimal therapy for HCV-infected patients without cancer, the optimal therapy for HCV-infected patients with cancer is evolving rapidly. The choice of regimens with DAAs should be individualized after thorough assessment for potential hematologic toxic effects and drug-drug interactions. This study presents clinical scenarios of HCV-infected patients with hematologic malignancies, focusing on diagnosis, clinical and laboratory presentations, complications, and DAA therapy. An up-to-date treatment algorithm is presented.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of cancer chemotherapy

Therapeutic drug monitoring is not routinely used for chemotherapy agents. There are Several reasons, but one major drawback is the lack of established therapeutic Concentration ranges. Combination chemotherapy makes the establishment of Therapeutic ranges for individual drugs difficult, the concentration-effect relationship for a single drug may not be the same as when that drug is used in a drug combination. Pharmacokinetic optimization protocols for many classes of cytotoxic compounds exist in specialized centers, and some of these protocols are now part of large multicentre trials. Nonetheless, TDM clearly has the potential to improve the clinical use of chemotherapy gents, most of which have very narrow therapeutic indices and highly variable pharmacokinetics. A substantial body of literature accumulating during the past 15 years demonstrates relationships between systemic exposure to various chemotherapy agents and their toxic or therapeutic effects. This article reviews TDM concepts in addition to tools based on pharmacokinetic modeling of chemotherapy agents. The administered dose of chemotherapy agents is sometimes adjusted individually using either a priori or a posteriori methods. These models can only be applied by using the same dose and schedule as the original study. Bayesian estimation offers more flexibility in blood sampling times and, owing to its precision and to the amount of information provided is the method of choice for ensuring that a given patient benefits from the desired systemic exposure. Moreover, the role and application of Pharmacogenetics as a tool for individualizing chemotherapy is discussed highlighting the agents and mechanisms that have been well studied and defined and their relevance to clinical practice. Finally, this paper address issues critical to the optimal use of TDM in a clinical setting, and the role of clinical pharmacist in this regard. In addition, it discusses future developments in this field that can contribute to improving cancer chemotherapy In terms of patient outcome and survival. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2007) 13: 207—221.

Review : Topoisomerase I inhibitors: 1. Topotecan

Purpose. The primary objective of this article is to discuss the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clin ical use, and adverse effects of the approved topoisomerase I inhibitors. This is the first in a series of two articles and will focus on topotecan.

Data Sources. We reviewed the literature through a MEDLINE search of English language articles from 1985 through 1997. Relevant articles cited in the titles obtained from the MEDLINE search were also used. The following terms were used for purpose of conducting the MEDLINE search: topoisomerase inhibitors, topotecan, topo isomerase I, Hycamtin, SKF 104864.

Data Extraction. We reviewed the current literature in order to discuss the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical use, toxicity, drug inter actions, indications, formulation, dosage and ad ministration, and pharmaceutical issues surround ing the use of topotecan.

Data Synthesis. The topoisomerase I inhibi tors are new antineoplastic agents with a unique mechanism of action. Promising areas of applica tion include ovarian cancer, lung cancer, radiation sensitization, and refractory leukemias. Clinical tri als detailing its activity in these areas are pre sented.

Characterization and drug resistance patterns of Ewing's sarcoma family tumor cell lines

Despite intensive treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, over 70% of patients with metastatic Ewing's Sarcoma Family of Tumors (EFT) will die of their disease. We hypothesize that properly characterized laboratory models reflecting the drug resistance of clinical tumors will facilitate the application of new therapeutic agents to EFT. To determine resistance patterns, we studied newly established EFT cell lines derived from different points in therapy: two established at diagnosis (CHLA-9, CHLA-32), two after chemotherapy and progressive disease (CHLA-10, CHLA-25), and two at relapse after myeloablative therapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (post-ABMT) (CHLA-258, COG-E-352). The new lines were compared to widely studied EFT lines TC-71, TC-32, SK-N-MC, and A-673. These lines were extensively characterized with regard to identity (short tandem repeat (STR) analysis), p53, p16/14 status, and EWS/ETS breakpoint and target gene expression profile. The DIMSCAN cytotoxicity assay was used to assess in vitro drug sensitivity to standard chemotherapy agents. No association was found between drug resistance and the expression of EWS/ETS regulated genes in the EFT cell lines. No consistent association was observed between drug sensitivity and p53 functionality or between drug sensitivity and p16/14 functionality across the cell lines. Exposure to chemotherapy prior to cell line initiation correlated with drug resistance of EFT cell lines in 5/8 tested agents at clinically achievable concentrations (CAC) or the lower tested concentration (LTC): (cyclophosphamide (as 4-HC) and doxorubicin at CAC, etoposide, irinotecan (as SN-38) and melphalan at LTC; P<0.1 for one agent, and P<0.05 for four agents. This panel of well-characterized drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cell lines will facilitate in vitro preclinical testing of new agents for EFT.

Phase I Study of Topotecan, Ifosfamide, and Etoposide (TIME) with autologous stem cell transplant in refractory cancer: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic correlates

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan in combination with ifosfamide, mesna, and etoposide (TIME), followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), in patients with chemotherapy-refractory malignancies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients were treated with (in mg/m(2)/d) ifosfamide 3,333, mesna 3,333, and topotecan 3.3 to 28.3 during days -8 through -6 and etoposide 500 (days -5 through -3) followed by HCT on day 0. Once MTD was defined, we expanded this dosing cohort to include patients with high-risk lymphoma due to activity seen during dose escalation. Topotecan pharmacokinetic analyses were carried out, and topoisomerase I levels and activity were measured.

RESULTS

The topotecan MTD in this regimen was 64 mg/m(2) (21.3 mg/m(2)/d). Mucositis was dose limiting and correlated with topotecan dose level and area under the curve (AUC). Dose level was also correlated with length of hospitalization, number of days of parenteral nutrition, and neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Topotecan AUC was significantly correlated with time to platelet recovery. The baseline peripheral blood mononuclear cell topoisomerase I level was found to be a significant positive predictor for overall and progression-free survival. Topotecan AUC was positively correlated with dose level, with a trend toward decreasing clearance with increasing dose.

CONCLUSION

Topotecan can be a useful drug in the high-dose setting given its activity in some malignancies when given in standard dose. Pharmacokinetic monitoring may be a valuable tool for optimizing the use of topotecan and to avoid toxicity seen with high-systemic exposures. Baseline topoisomerase I levels may have an important role in predicting topotecan efficacy.

Initial testing of topotecan by the pediatric preclinical testing program

BACKGROUND

Topotecan is a small molecule DNA topoisomerase I poison, that has been successful in clinical trials against pediatric solid tumors and leukemias. Topotecan was evaluated against the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program (PPTP) tumor panels as part of a validation process for these preclinical models.

PROCEDURES

In vivo three measures of antitumor activity were used: (1) an objective response measure modeled after the clinical setting; (2) a treated to control (T/C) tumor volume measure; and (3) a time to event (fourfold increase in tumor volume for solid tumor models, or > or =25% human CD45+ cells in the peripheral blood for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, ALL models) measure based on the median event-free survival (EFS) of treated and control animals for each xenograft.

RESULTS

Topotecan inhibited cell growth in vitro with IC(50) values between 0.71 and 489 nM. Topotecan significantly increased EFS in 32 of 37 (87%) solid tumor xenografts and in all 8 of the ALL xenografts. Seventy-five percent of solid tumors met EFS T/C activity criteria for intermediate (n = 17) or high activity (n = 7). Objective responses were noted in eight solid tumor xenografts (Wilms, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastoma). Among the six neuroblastomas, three achieved a PR. For the ALL panel, two maintained CRs, three CRs, and two PRs were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Topotecan demonstrated broad activity in vitro and in vivo against both the solid tumor and ALL panels, with significant tumor growth delay generated in all the panels. These results further demonstrate the validity of the PPTP panel for preclinical testing of new drugs.

Altered intravenous pharmacokinetics of topotecan in rats with acute renal failure (ARF) induced by uranyl nitrate: Do adenosine A1antagonists (selective/non-selective) normalize the altered topotecan kinetics in ARF?

A series of exploratory investigations with multiple agents was carried out in normal rats and in rats with uranyl nitrate-induced acute renal failure to understand the disposition characteristics of intravenous topotecan (TPT) used as a model substrate. The disposition of TPT was unaltered in normal rats when treated with methotrexate, whereas treatment with probenecid increased the systemic exposure of TPT. In case of uranyl nitrate-induced acute renal failure (UN-ARF) rats, the systemic exposure of TPT was increased when compared with normal rats, whereas in UN-ARF rats treated with probenecid a further reduction in renal clearance of TPT was noted as compared with that of UN-ARF induced rats. Thus, TPT may be involved in the tubular secretory pathway when a passive glomerular filtration pathway for elimination was not possible. The disposition of TPT did not normalize in UN-ARF rats when treated with caffeine, a non-selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, whereas the selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist (1,3-dipropyl-8-phenylxanthine, DPPX) normalized TPT pharmacokinetic disposition by improving renal function. Renal excretion studies demonstrated that CLR improved by almost fivefold following DPPX treatment in ARF rats. In addition, the qualitative stability/metabolism pattern of TPT in liver microsomes prepared from various groups of rats (normal rats, UN-ARF rats, rats treated with DPPX, and UN-ARF rats treated with DPPX) was found to be similar. In summary, using a pharmacokinetic tool as a surrogate, it has been shown that the pharmacokinetic disposition of TPT improved considerably upon treatment with DPPX, a selective adenosine A1 antagonist.

Phase II study of topotecan in combination with dexamethasone, asparaginase, and vincristine in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first relapse

BACKGROUND

The authors evaluated the response rate, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of topotecan given before standard induction therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first relapse.

METHODS

Patients received topotecan (2.4 mg/m(2) daily as a 30-minute infusion) for 5 days before induction therapy with dexamethasone, vincristine, and asparaginase (native or pegylated Escherichia coli). The pharmacokinetics of topotecan were measured with the first dose of treatment in 23 patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of 31 patients with circulating blast cells were evaluable for response to topotecan. Twenty-five patients (89.3%) had a response (>25% decrease in circulating blast cells). The leukocyte count (P = .0001) and blast cell count (P = .0009) declined significantly during topotecan therapy. The median (range) topotecan lactone area under the concentration-time curve after the first dose was 85.4 L/hour/m(2) (range, 38.7-229.3 L/hour/m(2)). At the end of induction, 23 patients (74.2%) had a complete response, 1 patient (3.2%) had a partial response, 5 patients (16.1%) had no response, and 2 patients had died of infection. Six of the 17 patients who were studied for minimal residual disease (MRD) achieved MRD-negative status at the end of induction. The main toxicities were hematologic, gastrointestinal, and hepatic. The estimated 5-year survival rate, event-free survival rate, and cumulative incidence of second relapse were 24.1% +/- 7.9%, 18.2% +/- 7.4%, and 22.8% +/- 8.7%, respectively, in the 29 patients who had a hematologic first relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

A regimen comprising single-agent topotecan given with a standard 3-drug combination was effective in inducing remission in pediatric patients with relapsed ALL and was tolerated well.

Antiangiogenic activity of thalidomide in combination with fludarabine, carboplatin, and topotecan for high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia

Forty-two patients with poor prognosis AML were enrolled in a phase II study combining fludarabine, carboplatin, and topotecan (FCT) with thalidomide. Laboratory correlates included serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels (VEGF) and bone marrow microvascular density (MVD). Ten of 42 (24%) patients achieved a complete remission (CR or CRp). Serious thrombotic adverse events were observed in 5 patients suggesting that the combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy and thalidomide may be thrombogenic despite significant thrombocytopenia. VEGF did not correlate with response to therapy, while a trend towards decreased MVD was noted in patients who achieved CR. The addition of thalidomide did not significantly influence angiogenic markers. It is not clear that thalidomide adds any efficacy to the FCT regimen.

Involvement of Rat and Human Organic Anion Transporter 3 in the Renal Tubular Secretion of Topotecan [(S)-9-Dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin hydrochloride]

Topotecan [(S)-9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin hydrochloride] is primarily excreted into urine in humans, with approximately 49% of the dose recovered as total topotecan (topotecan lactone plus topotecan hydroxyl acid form). The renal elimination of topotecan involves tubular secretion in addition to glomerular filtration, but little is known about the molecular mechanism of the renal tubular secretion. In the present study, we investigated the transport characteristics of topotecan hydroxyl acid across the renal basolateral membrane using rat kidney slices and rat or human transporter-expressing Xenopus laevis oocytes. Pravastatin and probenecid significantly inhibited the uptake of topotecan hydroxyl acid by rat kidney slices with K(i) values of 10.6 and 8.1 microM, respectively, and p-aminohippurate was weakly inhibitory at high concentrations, whereas excess tetraethylammonium had no effect. The uptake of topotecan hydroxyl acid by oocytes injected with complementary RNA of either rat or human organic anion transporter 3 (rOAT3 or hOAT3) was greater than that of water-injected oocytes. Kinetic analysis showed that the K(m) values for rOAT3 and hOAT3 were 21.9 and 56.5 microM, respectively. Neither rOAT1 nor hOAT1 stimulated topotecan hydroxyl acid transport. These results suggest that the urinary excretion of topotecan hydroxyl acid is accounted for by transport via OAT3, as well as glomerular filtration, in both rats and humans; therefore, drug-drug interactions involving OAT3 may cause a change in clearance of topotecan.

Topotecan Central Nervous System Penetration Is Altered by a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

A potential strategy to increase the efficacy of topotecan to treat central nervous system (CNS) malignancies is modulation of the activity of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters at the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers to enhance topotecan CNS penetration. This study focused on topotecan penetration into the brain extracellular fluid (ECF) and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a mouse model and the effect of modulation of ABC transporters at the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers by a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (gefitinib). After 4 and 8 mg/kg topotecan i.v., the brain ECF to plasma AUC ratio of unbound topotecan lactone was 0.21 +/- 0.04 and 0.61 +/- 0.16, respectively; the ventricular CSF to plasma AUC ratio was 1.18 +/- 0.10 and 1.30 +/- 0.13, respectively. To study the effect of gefitinib on topotecan CNS penetration, 200 mg/kg gefitinib was administered orally 1 hour before 4 mg/kg topotecan i.v. The brain ECF to plasma AUC ratio of unbound topotecan lactone increased by 1.6-fold to 0.35 +/- 0.04, which was significantly different from the ratio without gefitinib (P < 0.05). The ventricular CSF to plasma AUC ratio significantly decreased to 0.98 +/- 0.05 (P < 0.05). Breast cancer resistance protein 1 (Bcrp1), an efficient topotecan transporter, was detected at the apical aspect of the choroid plexus in FVB mice. In conclusion, topotecan brain ECF penetration was lower compared with ventricular CSF penetration. Gefitinib increased topotecan brain ECF penetration but decreased the ventricular CSF penetration. These results are consistent with the possibility that expression of Bcrp1 and P-glycoprotein at the apical side of the choroid plexus facilitates an influx transport mechanism across the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, resulting in high topotecan CSF penetration.

Gefitinib modulates the function of multiple ATP-binding cassette transporters in vivo

The 4-anilinoquinazoline (4-AQ) derivative gefitinib (Iressa) is an oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Oral administration of 4-AQ molecules, such as gefitinib, inhibits ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter-mediated drug efflux and strongly increases the apparent bioavailability of coadministered drug molecules that are transporter substrates. Based on in vitro studies investigating 4-AQ interactions with several transporters, these effects have primarily been attributed to the inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP; ABCG2). Although 4-AQ shows in vitro inhibition of P-glycoprotein [multidrug resistance protein (MDR1); ABCB1], the in vivo effect on this and other transporters is not known. In our studies, pretreatment of Abcg2(-/-) and Mdr1(a/b)(-/-) mice with gefitinib increased oral absorption and decreased systemic clearance of topotecan, a model substrate, indicating that additional transporters were inhibited. These results were extended to human orthologues using engineered cell lines to show that gefitinib inhibited the efflux of BCRP and MDR1 substrates and restored vincristine sensitivity in MDR1-expressing cells. Although gefitinib inhibited BCRP more potently than MDR1 (10-fold), the inhibition of both transporters occurred at clinically relevant concentrations (e.g., 1-5 micromol/L). These studies illustrate the broad implications for the therapeutic combination of gefitinib or other 4-AQ molecules with agents that are BCRP and MDR1 substrates. 4-AQ molecules may offer a means to increase the low and variable oral drug absorption of transporter substrates while decreasing interpatient variability and reversing tumor drug resistance.

Pediatric Phase I Trials in Oncology: An Analysis of Study Conduct Efficiency

Purpose

To determine the efficacy and safety of pediatric phase I oncology trials in the era of dose-intensive chemotherapy and to analyze how efficiently these trials are conducted.

Methods

Phase I pediatric oncology trials published from 1990 to 2004 and their corresponding adult phase I trials were reviewed. Dose escalation schemes using fixed 30% dose increments were studied to theoretically determine whether trials could be completed utilizing fewer patients and dose levels.

Results

Sixty-nine pediatric phase I oncology trials enrolling 1,973 patients were identified. The pediatric maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was strongly correlated with the adult MTD (r = 0.97). For three-fourths of the trials, the pediatric and adult MTD differed by no more than 30%, and for more than 85% of the trials, the pediatric MTD was less than or equal to 1.6 times the adult MTD. The median number of dose levels studied was four (range, two to 13). The overall objective response rate was 9.6%, the likelihood of experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity was 24%, and toxic death rate was 0.5%.

Conclusion

Despite the strong correlation between the adult and pediatric MTDs, more than four dose levels were studied in 40% of trials. There appeared to be little value in exploring dose levels greater than 1.6 times the adult MTD. Limiting pediatric phase I trials to a maximum of four doses levels would significantly shorten the timeline for study conduct without compromising safety.

Phase I study of the combination of topotecan and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors

PURPOSE

We have shown in xenograft studies that the antitumor activities of topotecan and irinotecan are highly schedule- and dose-dependent, with a high frequency of response at low, protracted dose schedules. Preclinical and clinical data suggest that topotecan and irinotecan have different antitumor activities and mechanisms of resistance, and non-overlapping toxicities, providing a rationale for their combination. Combining both agents may increase the amount of camptothecin delivered to the tumor, without additive toxicity.

METHODS

We conducted a phase I study in children with refractory solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan when administered with a targeted systemic exposure (TSE) of topotecan and to define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of this combination. Irinotecan was administered IV over 60 min followed by topotecan over 30 min daily for 5 days for two consecutive weeks. We initially fixed the topotecan-TSE to 80+/-10 ng*h/ml and investigated the ability to escalate irinotecan (starting dose 16 mg/m2/d). Topotecan and irinotecan pharmacokinetics were determined.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (median age 10 years) were enrolled. Owing to DLT, irinotecan was de-escalated to 12 (level -1; n = 3) and 9 (level -2; n = 3) mg/m2/day, and topotecan-TSE was reduced to 60+/-10 ng*h/ml (level -3; n = 2). DLTs were neutropenia (n = 8), typhlitis (n = 5), and skin rash (n = 1). MTD could not be reached. Median (range) irinotecan and topotecan lactone systemic clearances were 50.3 (16.6-76.2) l/h/m2 and 27.6 (14.7-55.9) l/h/m2, respectively. The pharmacokinetics profile of each agent was similar to that seen in previous single agent studies. One patient with neuroblastoma and one with rhabdomyosarcoma had a partial and a complete response, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite promising antitumor activity, the combination of topotecan and irinotecan given on a protracted schedule does not warrant further development in children due to unacceptable toxicity.

A phase I trial defining the maximum tolerated systemic exposure of topotecan in combination with Carboplatin and Etoposide in extensive stage small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Topotecan is active in relapsed small cell lung cancer; thus, its addition to the standard carboplatin-etoposide regimen may improve outcomes in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients. Significant interpatient variability in the topotecan systemic exposure results when it is dosed based on body surface area (mg/m2). The purpose of this Phase I trial was to determine the maximally tolerated systemic exposure (MTSE) of topotecan in combination with carboplatin and etoposide.

METHODS

Thirty-four chemotherapy-naïve ES-SCLC patients received topotecan in combination with carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL*min and oral etoposide 100 mg/m2/day. Topotecan was administered as a 30-minute infusion either on Days 1-5 or Days 1-3 and the dosage was individualized to attain a topotecan lactone AUC range (ng/mL*hr) in successive patient cohorts from 7 to 23; 24 to 36; 37 to 53; 54 to 66.

RESULTS

The majority (67 percent) of the measured topotecan AUCs were within target range. Overall, 8 of 34 patients experienced Cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), either neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Carboplatin administration prior to topotecan resulted in 2 of 6 patients having Cycle 1 DLT. When the administration sequence was changed (topotecan, carboplatin, etoposide), Cycle 1 hematologic toxicity decreased; however, the maximum topotecan lactone AUC of 24-36 ng/mL*hr (median dose 0.82 mg/m2) had significant cumulative hematologic toxicity. The number of topotecan doses were reduced from 5 to 3, which resulted in a maximum topotecan lactone AUC of 37 to 53 ng/mL*hr with only 1 of 6 patients having Cycle 1 DLT. Overall response rate was 71 percent with median survival of 10.8 months.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to target topotecan lactone AUC in adult ES-SCLC patients. However, this triplet regimen resulted in considerable hematologic toxicity and has a median survival comparable to carboplatin-etoposide. Alternative, less toxic regimens should be investigated for improving survival in ES-SCLC.

Phase I and Pharmacologic Study of Infusional Topotecan and Carboplatin in Relapsed and Refractory Acute Leukemia

PURPOSE

To assess the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and antileukemic activity of topotecan and carboplatin in adults with recurrent or refractory acute leukemias.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients received topotecan and carboplatin by 5-day continuous infusion at nine dose levels. Patients achieving a complete remission received up to two additional courses for consolidation. Plasma topotecan and ultrafilterable platinum were assayed on days 1 to 5. In addition, pretreatment levels of various polypeptides in leukemic cells were examined by immunoblotting to assess possible correlations with response.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients received a total of 69 courses of therapy. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of grade 4/5 typhlitis and grade 3/4 mucositis after one course of therapy or grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia lasting >50 days when a second course was administered on day 21. Among 45 evaluable patients, there were 7 complete remissions, 2 partial remissions, 1 incomplete complete remission, and 1 reversion to chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia. Topotecan steady-state plasma concentrations increased with dose. No accumulation of topotecan or ultrafilterable platinum occurred between days 1 and 5 of therapy. Leukemic cell levels of topoisomerase I, checkpoint kinase 1, checkpoint kinase 2, and Mcl-1 correlated with proliferating cell nuclear antigen but not with response. In contrast, low Bcl-2 expression correlated with response (P = 0.014, Mann-Whitney U test).

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum tolerated dose was 1.6 mg/m(2)/d topotecan plus 150 mg/m(2)/d carboplatin. The complete remission rate in a heavily pretreated population was 16% (33% at the highest three dose levels). Responses seem to correlate with low pretreatment blast cell Bcl-2 expression.

Accurate measurement of individual glomerular filtration rate in cancer patients: an ongoing challenge

A narrow therapeutic index is a characteristic feature of cytotoxic agents. Some of these agents are almost entirely eliminated renally in unchanged active form. As a consequence, assessment of the individual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) may help to predict the pharmacokinetic behaviour of cytotoxic agents in plasma more precisely. In addition, GFR-adapted individualization of cancer chemotherapy may have an enormous impact on the severity of side effects. Several methods are available to determine GFR or creatinine clearance (CrCl). GFR-measurement based on experimental methods with radiolabelled isotopes, contrast media or inulin helps to reflect the real situation very closely. In addition, 24-h urine collection is a convenient and feasible method to measure creatinine clearance. Finally, several mathematical equations exist to estimate GFR or CrCl based on serum creatinine and other parameters. Only a few of these equations have been developed in oncologic patients. However, some of these equations are routinely used in clinical practice, because they allow a rapid estimation of GFR. Based on the fact that clinically relevant differences have been assessed between calculated values and the real situation, mathematical calculation of GFR or CrCl does not seem to be appropriate to assess individual renal function precisely enough over a broad range of individual GFR or CrCl. Whether the measurement of low-molecular-weight proteins, such as cystatin C and ss-trace protein, may help to reflect the real situation more precisely is a matter of controversial debate.

A phase I and pharmacodynamic study of fludarabine, carboplatin, and topotecan in patients with relapsed, refractory, or high-risk acute leukemia

PURPOSE

A novel regimen designed to maximize antileukemia activity of carboplatin through inhibiting repair of platinum-DNA adducts was conducted in poor prognosis, acute leukemia patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients received fludarabine (10 to 15 mg/m(2) x 5 days), carboplatin (area under the curve 10 to 12 by continuous infusion over 5 days), followed by escalated doses of topotecan infused over 72 hours (fludarabine, carboplatin, topotecan regimen). Twenty-eight patients had acute myelogenous leukemia (7 untreated secondary acute myelogenous leukemia, 11 in first relapse, and 10 in second relapse or refractory), 1 patient had refractory/relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 2 patients had untreated chronic myelogenous leukemia blast crisis. Six patients had failed an autologous stem cell transplant. Patients ranged from 19 to 76 (median 54) years. Measurement of platinum-DNA adducts were done in serial bone marrow specimens.

RESULTS

Fifteen of 31 patients achieved bone marrow aplasia. Clinical responses included 2 complete response, 4 complete response with persistent thrombocytopenia, and 2 partial response. Prolonged myelosuppression was observed with median time to blood neutrophils >/=200/microl of 28 (0 to 43) days and time to platelets >/=20,000/microl (untransfused) of 40 (24 to 120) days. Grade 3 or greater infections occurred in all of the patients, and there were 2 infection-related deaths. The nonhematologic toxicity profile was acceptable. Five patients subsequently received allografts without early transplant-related mortality. Maximum tolerated dose of fludarabine, carboplatin, topotecan regimen was fludarabine 15 mg/m(2) x 5, carboplatin area under the curve 12, and topotecan 2.55 mg/m(2) over 72 hours. An increase in bone marrow, platinum-DNA adduct formation between the end of carboplatin infusion and 48 hours after the infusion correlated with bone marrow response.

CONCLUSIONS

Fludarabine, carboplatin, topotecan regimen is a promising treatment based on potential pharmacodynamic interactions, which merits additional study in poor prognosis, acute leukemia patients.

A phase I study of intraperitoneal topotecan in combination with intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intraperitoneal (i.p.) topotecan combined with standard doses of intravenous (i.v.) carboplatin and paclitaxel and to investigate its pharmacokinetics. Women with primary ovarian cancer stage IIb - IV received six cycles of i.v. carboplatin and paclitaxel with escalating topotecan doses i.p. of 10, 15, 20 and 25 mg/m(2). Twenty-one patients entered this trial. Febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusion and fatigue grade 3 were dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) at 25 mg/m(2) i.p. and 20 mg/m(2) i.p. of topotecan was considered to be the MTD. The mean plasma t(1/2) was 3.8 +/- 2.3 h for total topotecan and 4.4 +/- 3.9 h for active lactone. The area under the curve (AUC) was proportional with dose, R = 0.54, p < 0.05 for total topotecan and the peritoneal / plasma AUC ratio was 46 +/- 30. Fifteen patients who completed treatment had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 27 months. In this setting the MTD of topotecan is 20 mg/m(2) i.p. The efficacy of this regimen should be explored further in a formal phase III study.

Individualised Cancer Chemotherapy: Strategies and Performance of Prospective Studies on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring with Dose Adaptation

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly used in clinical practice for the optimisation of drug treatment. Although pharmacokinetic variability is an established factor involved in the variation of therapeutic outcome of many chemotherapeutic agents, the use of TDM in the field of oncology has been limited thus far. An important reason for this is that a therapeutic index for most anticancer agents has not been established; however, in the last 20 years, relationships between plasma drug concentrations and clinical outcome have been defined for various chemotherapeutic agents. Several attempts have been made to use these relationships for optimising the administration of chemotherapeutics by applying pharmacokinetically guided dosage. These prospective studies, individualising chemotherapy dose during therapy based on measured drug concentrations, are discussed in this review. We focus on the way a target value is defined, the methodologies used for dose adaptation and the way the performance of the dose-adaptation approach is evaluated. Furthermore, attention is paid to the results of the studies and the applicability of the strategies in clinical practice. It can be concluded that TDM may contribute to improving cancer chemotherapy in terms of patient outcome and survival and should therefore be further investigated.

Sequential Intraperitoneal Topotecan and Oral Etoposide Chemotherapy in Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Carcinoma

PURPOSE

The purpose is to investigate the safety and efficacy of i.p. topotecan and oral etoposide as salvage treatment for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients were treated with i.p. topotecan initial dose, 1 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5, followed by oral etoposide 100 mg on days 6 to 9 of a 28-day cycle for six cycles. Dose reduction of topotecan was used for severe bone marrow suppression. Peritoneal (topotecan) and plasma (topotecan and etoposide) levels were assessed at multiple time points using high-pressure liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (mean age, 61 years) with a median of 1.5 prior treatments were enrolled. Etoposide peak plasma concentrations ranged from 1.9 to 6.9 microg/mL (mean, 3.6 microg/mL). Topotecan plasma levels rose with increasing peritoneal concentration and were detectable within 1 hour but tended to decrease rapidly to below detectable levels within 24 hours. The peak plasma concentration of topotecan was 12.82 +/- 8.55 microg/mL with a plasma half-life of 6.17 +/- 2.75 hours. A total of 104 cycles was administered; 14 patients (64%) completed all six planned cycles. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 21 patients were evaluable for response. The most common grade 4 toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in eight and four patients (36 and 18%), respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. The overall response rate was 38% [complete response, three (14%); partial response, five (24%)]. Seven patients had stable disease and six progressed while on treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of i.p. topotecan and oral etoposide is an active and well-tolerated regimen in platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma. Additional studies investigating topotecan in combination with etoposide are warranted.

Topotecan disposition in an anephric child

Although limited data are available about topotecan disposition in patients with renal insufficiency, nothing has been reported in anephric patients. The objective of this report is to characterize topotecan disposition in an anephric child with Wilms tumor, both on and off hemodialysis. The patient received topotecan and cyclophosphamide for four cycles; topotecan was administered daily for 5 days, with hemodialysis on the second and fourth day. Therapy was well tolerated, with grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 2 neutropenia noted after cycle four. The median topotecan lactone clearance was 15.5 L/h/m off hemodialysis and 18.7 L/h/m on hemodialysis. Topotecan clearance was minimally affected by hemodialysis and was similar to that observed in children without renal failure.

Camptothecin analogs (irinotecan or topotecan) plus high-dose cyclophosphamide as preparative regimens for antibody-based immunotherapy in resistant neuroblastoma

PURPOSE

We used high-dose cyclophosphamide plus topotecan/vincristine (CTV) or irinotecan (C/I) in patients with resistant neuroblastoma. The aim was to use a regimen with little risk to major organs to (a) achieve or consolidate remission in heavily treated patients and to (b) induce an immunological state conducive to passive immunotherapy with the murine 3F8 antibody.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

CTV and C/I included cyclophosphamide 140 mg/kg ( approximately 4200 mg/m(2)). With CTV, topotecan 2 mg/m(2) was infused i.v. (30 min) on days 1-4 (total, 8 mg/m(2)), and vincristine 0.067 mg/kg was injected on day 1. With C/I, irinotecan, 50 mg/m(2) was infused i.v. (1 h) on days 1-5 (total, 250 mg/m(2)). Mesna and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor were used.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients received 38 courses of CTV, and 26 patients received 38 courses of C/I. All patients had previously received topotecan, a hemopoietic stem-cell transplant, and/or high-dose cyclophosphamide. CTV and C/I caused myelosuppression of comparably prolonged duration as follows: absolute neutrophil counts <500/ micro l lasted 5-12 days in patients who had not previously received transplant and 7-21 days in patients who were post-transplant. Other significant toxicities included typhlitis (two CTV-treated patients, one C/I-treated patient) and hemorrhagic cystitis (one C/I-treated patient). Major responses were seen in 4 (15%) of 26 CTV and 4 (17%) of 24 C/I-treated patients with assessable disease. Bone marrow disease resolved in 5 (28%) of 18 CTV-treated patients and in 4 (27%) of 15 C/I-treated patients. 3F8 after CTV or C/I was not blocked by neutralizing antibodies, consistent with the desired immunosuppressive effect of high-dose cyclophosphamide.

CONCLUSIONS

CTV and C/I require transfusional and antibiotic support but otherwise entail tolerable morbidity. They have modest antineuroblastoma activity in heavily treated patients and are good preparative regimens for passive immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of topotecan administered orally once daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks to pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase I trial of the injectable formulation of topotecan given orally once daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks (qd x 5 x 2) in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cohorts of two to six patients received oral topotecan at 0.8, 1.1, 1.4, 1.8, and 2.3 mg/m(2)/d every 28 days for a maximum of six courses. Twenty patients (median age, 10.6 years) received a total of 51 courses. Eight patients received topotecan capsules during course 2 only.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 2.3 mg/m(2)/d and consisted of prolonged grade 4 neutropenia (n = 2), grade 3 stomatitis as a result of radiation recall (n = 1), grade 3 hemorrhage (epistaxis) in the presence of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 1), and grade 3 diarrhea in the presence of Clostridium difficile infection (n = 1). Dose-limiting, prolonged grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in one patient at 1.4 mg/m(2)/d. Infrequent toxicities were mild nausea, vomiting, elevated liver ALT or AST, and rash. The maximum-tolerated dosage was 1.8 mg/m(2)/d; the mean (+/- standard deviation) area under the plasma concentration-time curve for topotecan lactone at this dosage was 20.9 +/- 8.4 ng/mL. h. The population mean (+/- standard error) oral bioavailability of the injectable formulation was 0.27 +/- 0.03; that of capsules was 0.36 +/- 0.06 (P =.16). Disease stabilized in nine of 19 assessable patients for 1.5 to 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Oral topotecan (1.8 mg/m(2)/d) on a qd x 5 x 2 schedule is well tolerated and warrants additional testing in pediatric patients.

A phase I and pharmacodynamic study of sequential topotecan and etoposide in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous and lymphoblastic leukemia

We designed a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic phase I study of sequential topotecan (2.55-6.3mg/m2) by 72h infusion followed by five daily doses of etoposide for patients with refractory acute leukemia based upon synergistic anti-tumor activity of topoisomerase I and II inhibitors in vitro. Eight of the 29 patients achieved bone marrow aplasia and two patients achieved clinical remission. Common grade 3-4 toxicities included hepatic and gastrointestinal dysfunction, and correlated with increased steady-state plasma topotecan concentration. The predicted up-regulation of topoisomerase II activity by topoisomerase I inhibition was not observed at this dose and schedule and may provide insight into the modest anti-leukemia activity of the regimen.

Application of pharmacokinetic modelling to the routine therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer drugs

Over the last 10 years, proofs of the clinical interest of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of certain anticancer drugs have been established. Numerous studies have shown that TDM is an efficient tool for controlling the toxicity of therapeutic drugs, and a few trials have even demonstrated that it can improve their efficacy. This article critically reviews TDM tools based on pharmacokinetic modelling of anticancer drugs. The administered dose of anticancer drugs is sometimes adjusted individually using either a priori or a posteriori methods. The most frequent clinical application of a priori formulae concerns carboplatin and allows the computation of the first dose based on biometrical and biological data such as weight, age, gender, creatinine clearance and glomerular filtration rate. A posteriori methods use drug plasma concentrations to adjust the subsequent dose(s). Thus, nomograms allowing dose adjustment on the basis of blood concentration are routinely used for 5-fluorouracil given as long continuous infusions. Multilinear regression models have been developed, for example for etoposide, doxorubicin. carboplatin, cyclophosphamide and irinotecan, to predict a single exposure variable [such as area under concentration-time curve (AUC)] from a small number of plasma concentrations obtained at predetermined times after a standard dose. These models can only be applied by using the same dose and schedule as the original study. Bayesian estimation offers more flexibility in blood sampling times and, owing to its precision and to the amount of information provided, is the method of choice for ensuring that a given patient benefits from the desired systemic exposure. Unlike the other a posteriori methods, Bayesian estimation is based on population pharmacokinetic studies and can take into account the effects of different individual factors on the pharmacokinetics of the drug. Bayesian estimators have been used to determine maximum tolerated systemic exposure thresholds (e.g. for topotecan or teniposide) as well as for the routine monitoring of drugs characterized by a very high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability such as methotrexate or carboplatin. The development of these methods has contributed to improving cancer chemotherapy in terms of patient outcome and survival and should be pursued.

Protracted intermittent schedule of topotecan in children with refractory acute leukemia: a pediatric oncology group study

PURPOSE

To determine dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of a protracted, intermittent schedule of daily 30-minute infusions of topotecan (TPT) for up to 12 consecutive days, every 3 weeks, in children with refractory leukemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-nine children were enrolled onto this phase I trial (24 with acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia [ANLL] and 25 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL]). TPT dosage was escalated from 2.0 to 5.2 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days and 2.4 mg/m(2)/d from 7 days to the same dose for 9 and 12 days in cohorts of three to six patients when no DLT was identified. TPT pharmacokinetics were studied in 33 children once or twice (first and last doses in patients who received TPT for > 7 days).

RESULTS

Seventy assessable courses of TPT were administered to 49 children who had refractory leukemia. DLTs were typhlitis, diarrhea, and mucositis, and the MTD was 2.4 mg/m(2)/d for 9 days in this group of heavily pretreated children. In 33 patients, the median TPT lactone clearance after the first dose was 19.2 L/h/m(2) (range, 9.4 to 45.9 L/h/m(2)) and did not change during the course. There were significant responses (one complete response [CR] and four partial responses [PR] in patients with ANLL and one CR and two PRs in patients with ALL), and all but one were at dosages of TPT given for at least 9 days.

CONCLUSION

The MTD was 2.4 mg/m(2)/d for 9 days. Further testing is warranted of TPT's schedule dependence in children with leukemia.

Phase II study of troxacitabine, a novel dioxolane nucleoside analog, in patients with refractory leukemia

PURPOSE

To investigate the activity of a novel dioxolane L-nucleoside analog, troxacitabine (L-(-)-OddC, BCH-4556), in patients with refractory leukemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Study participants were patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid (AML) or lymphocytic (ALL) leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), or chronic myelogenous leukemia in blastic phase (CML-BP). Troxacitabine was provided as an intravenous infusion for more than 30 minutes daily for 5 days at a dose of 8.0 mg/m(2)/d (40 mg/m(2) per course). Courses were given every 3 to 4 weeks according to antileukemic efficacy.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (AML, 18 patients; MDS, one patient; ALL, six patients; CML-BP, 17 patients) were treated. Median age was 51 years (range, 23 to 80 years); 22 patients were male. Stomatitis was the most significant adverse event, with three patients (7%) and two patients (5%), respectively, experiencing grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Ten patients (24%) had grade 3 hand-foot syndrome, and two patients (5%) had grade 3 skin rash. One patient (2%) had grade 3 fatigue and anorexia. Marrow hypoplasia occurred between days 14 and 28 in 12 (75%) of 16 assessable patients with AML. Two complete remissions and one partial remission (18%) were observed in 16 assessable patients with AML. None of six patients with ALL responded. Six (37%) of 16 assessable patients with CML-BP experienced a return to chronic-phase disease.

CONCLUSION

Troxacitabine has significant antileukemic activity in patients with AML and CML-BP.

The development of camptothecin analogs in childhood cancers

Camptothecin analogs, agents that target the intranuclear enzyme topoisomerase I, represent a promising new class of anticancer drugs for the treatment of childhood cancer. In preclinical studies, camptothecins, such as topotecan and irinotecan, are highly active against a variety of pediatric malignancies including neuroblastomas, rhabdomyosarcomas, gliomas, and medulloblastomas. In this paper, we review the status of completed and ongoing clinical trials and pharmacokinetic studies of camptothecin analogs in children. These and future planned studies of this novel class of cytotoxic agents are critical to defining the ultimate role of topoisomerase I poisons in the treatment of childhood cancer.

Cellular, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic aspects of response to camptothecins: can we improve it?

The camptothecins provide a novel class of effective anticancer agents that exert their action against DNA topoisomerase I. Members of the camptothecins include topotecan, irinotecan, 9-aminocamptothecin, and 9-nitrocamptothecin, which are analogs of the plant alkaloid 20(S)-camptothecin. These agents vary in their antitumor efficacy and toxicity. Several pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors including cellular efflux, modulation of topoisomerases I and II, lactone stability, alterations in metabolism, and drug-drug interactions, influence the antitumor response and toxicity of these agents. Preclinical studies suggest that protracted schedules of administration produce greater antitumor effect than bolus administration. However, the optimal treatment regimens and administration schedules of these agents have yet to be established in clinical studies.

Developmental therapeutics in childhood cancer. A perspective from the Children's Oncology Group and the US Food and Drug Administration

Drug development in pediatric oncology has been reviewed, concentrating on overall development issues and COG studies of cytotoxic compounds. A variety of interesting molecules with more specific targeting are becoming available. The challenges that remain include the availability of such compounds for pediatric trial and their study in a timely fashion, and the subsequent incorporation of the new agents into more up-front regimens, with the ultimate shared goal of curing more children with less toxicity.

Pilot study of topotecan and high-dose cyclophosphamide for resistant pediatric solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The recommended dosages of topotecan and cyclophosphamide in combination for prior-treated patients-3.75 mg/m(2) and 1,250 mg/m(2) in children, 5 mg/m(2) and 600 mg/m(2) in adults, respectively-are well below those of each agent when used singly. We tested the hypothesis that much higher dosing would meet critical goals of salvage therapy: antitumor effect and a lack of toxicity to key organs, so as not to preclude subsequent consolidative treatments needed for cure.

PROCEDURE

Patients with resistant pediatric solid tumors received cyclophosphamide 4,200 mg/m(2) by 48 hr infusion, and topotecan 6 mg/m(2) by 72 hr infusion (HD-Cy/Topo). Mesna and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor were used. Cycles were repeated when neutrophil counts were >1,000/uL and platelet counts were >75,000/uL.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients, aged 2 to 33 years (median, 14), received one (n = 4), two (n = 15), or > or =3 (n = 9) cycles of HD-Cy/Topo. All patients had previously received > or =6 cycles of other therapy, high-dose alkylator-based chemotherapy, and/or etoposide- and doxorubicin-containing regimens. HD-Cy/Topo was given in an outpatient setting. Profound myelosuppression was the major toxicity, but retreatment was possible by day 28, and preliminary results with peripheral blood stem cell collections showed a sparing effect on hemopoietic stem cells. Mucositis was uncommon. After HD-Cy/Topo, cardiac, renal, hepatic, and pulmonary function remained within the normal range. Partial or minor responses were noted in neuroblastoma, desmoplastic small round-cell tumor, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and osteosarcoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Its antitumor potential and limited toxicity make HD-Cy/Topo an attractive choice for inclusion in aggressive salvage programs aimed at achieving cures of resistant tumors. It may also merit incorporation into frontline treatment protocols.

Clinical use of topoisomerase I inhibitors in anticancer treatment

The camptothecin analogs topotecan and irinotecan have shown to be among the most effective anticancer agents and, as S-phase specific agents, their antitumor effect is maximized when they are administered in protracted schedules. The documented activity as single agents in many adult and pediatric malignancies has been followed by their use in combination with other anticancer agents. These studies have shown promising results, and have placed topotecan and irinotecan in the first line treatment for some malignancies. However, studies to better determine the optimal schedules and sequence of combinations are needed.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the combination of docetaxel and topotecan in patients with solid tumors

PURPOSE

The sequence in which chemotherapeutic agents are administered can alter their pharmacokinetics, therapeutic effect, and toxicity. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of docetaxel and topotecan when coadministered on two different sequences of administration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

On cycle 1, docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour infusion at 60 mg/m(2) without filgrastim and at 60, 70, and 80 mg/m(2) with filgrastim on day 1, and topotecan was administered at 0.75 mg/m(2) as a 0.5-hour infusion on days 1 to 4. On cycle 2, topotecan was administered on days 1 to 4, and docetaxel was administered on day 4. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Blood samples for high-performance liquid chromatography measurement of docetaxel (CL(DOC)) and topotecan (CL(TPT)) total clearance were obtained on day 1 of cycle 1 and day 4 of cycle 2. CL(DOC) and CL(TPT) were calculated using compartmental methods.

RESULTS

Mean +/- SD CL(DOC) in cycles 1 and 2 were 75.9 +/- 79.6 L/h/m(2) and 29.2 +/- 17.3 L/h/m(2), respectively (P: <.046). Mean +/- SD CL(TPT) in cycles 1 and 2 were 8.5 +/- 4.4 L/h/m(2) and 9.3 +/- 3.4 L/h/m(2), respectively (P: >. 05). Mean +/- SD neutrophil nadir in cycles 1 and 2 were 4,857 +/- 6, 738/microL and 2,808 +/- 4,518/microL, respectively (P: =.02).

CONCLUSION

Administration of topotecan on days 1 to 4 and docetaxel on day 4 resulted in an approximately 50% decrease in docetaxel clearance and was associated with increased neutropenia.

A phase II and pharmacokinetic study of weekly 72-h topotecan infusion in patients with platinum-resistant and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

As suggested by preclinical trials, prolonged administration of topotecan, a reversible inhibitor of topoisomerase-I, may have a therapeutic advantage. Following a phase I trial of weekly 72-h topotecan infusion, we performed a phase II trial utilizing this schedule in ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS

Eligibility included platinum-/paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma, measurable disease, and adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. A dose of 2.0 mg/m(2) of topotecan was administered as a 72-h infusion weekly via an ambulatory pump. Plasma topotecan concentrations were determined prior to and at the completion of each weekly course.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were entered and 23 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Two hundred eighteen weekly courses of therapy were administered (median 7 weeks, range 4-46 weeks). Toxicity was mild with grade 3 leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia occurring in 13, 13, and 17% of patients, respectively. Two of 23 patients (9.1%) (CI 1-28%) had partial responses of 2 and 3 months' duration and 6 had stable disease. Steady state plasma topotecan lactone concentrations were a median of 1.2 ng/ml (range 0.4-8.00 ng/ml) following the first week of infusion. Steady state topotecan lactone concentrations after the first week of infusion were highest in 2 patients with partial responses. Mean steady state plasma topotecan lactone concentrations after the first week of infusion were 4.6, 2.0, and 1.3 ng/ml for partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. An analysis of variance of steady state plasma topotecan concentrations after the first week of infusion over all administered cycles demonstrated a significant difference in steady state plasma topotecan lactone concentrations between patients with partial response and stable disease and between partial response and no response (significant at the 0.05 level after adjustment for multiple comparisons). Controlling for cycle number, steady state topotecan lactone concentrations are significantly greater for patients with responding or stable disease than those with progressive disease (P = 0.0003) and have a lower bound of > or = 1.9 ng/ml (95% confidence level).

CONCLUSION

Steady state topotecan lactone concentrations are associated with responding or stable disease in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer. Steady state topotecan concentrations could potentially be utilized to modify tumor exposure and response.

Phase I trials in pediatric oncology: perceptions of pediatricians from the United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group and the Pediatric Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To identify areas of concern regarding the conduct of phase I trials, the perceived expectations and motivations of the parents of children entered, the expectations of toxicity and benefit, and the ethical concerns of pediatric hematologists and oncologists in the United Kingdom and North America.

METHODS

A survey instrument consisting of 19 open- and closed-ended questions was sent to United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group (UKCCSG)- and Pediatric Oncology Group (POG)-affiliated pediatricians.

RESULTS

Fifty-three UKCCSG- and 78 POG-affiliated pediatricians responded. Thirty-two UKCCSG and 51 POG respondents had previously entered at least one child into a phase I study. Overall, respondents believed that parents entered their children for medical benefit, altruism, and hope of cure. Although many respondents believed that children could benefit from medical improvement, feelings of altruism, and maintenance of hope, the chance of cure or complete remission was thought to be small. Similarly, parents were thought to potentially benefit through altruism and maintenance of hope. Whereas 83% of UKCCSG respondents indicated that phase I trials were associated with ethical difficulties, this was a concern for 48% of POG respondents. The main ethical concerns of respondents were risk of toxicity, consent of the child, unrealistic hope, and coercion.

CONCLUSION

The respondents in this survey expressed mainly ethical concerns regarding the conduct of phase I trials and had realistic expectations of the potential for toxicity and benefit for those children who participate in these studies.

Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents

Numerous studies have found a clear relationship between systemic exposure and the toxicity or (more rarely) the efficacy of anticancer agents. Moreover, the clearance of most of these drugs differs widely between patients. These findings, combined with the narrow therapeutic index of anticancer drugs, suggest that patient outcome would be improved if doses were individualised to achieve a target systemic exposure. Bayesian maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) forecasting is an efficient and robust method for the optimisation of drug therapy, but its use for anticancer drugs is not yet extensive. The aim of this paper is to review the application of population pharmacokinetics and MAP to anticancer drugs and to evaluate whether and when MAP Bayesian estimation improves the clinical benefit of anticancer chemotherapy. For each drug, the relationships between pharmacokinetic variables [e.g. plasma concentration or the area under the concentration-time curve] and pharmacodynamic effects are described. Secondly, the methodologies employed are considered and, finally, the results are analysed in terms of predictive performance as well as, where possible, the impact on clinical end-points. Some studies were retrospective and intended only to evaluate individual pharmacokinetic parameter values using very few blood samples. Among the prospective trials, a few studied the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships which provided the basis for routine pharmacokinetic monitoring. Others were performed in clinical context where MAP Bayesian estimation was used to determine maximum tolerated systemic exposure (e.g. for carboplatin, topotecan, teniposide) or for pharmacokinetic monitoring (e.g. for methotrexate or platinum compounds). Indeed, its flexibility in blood sampling times makes this technique much more applicable than other limited sampling strategies. These examples demonstrate that individual dose adjustment helps manage toxicity. The performance of pharmacokinetic monitoring is linked to the methodology used at each step of its design and application. Moreover, a limitation to the use of pharmacokinetic monitoring for certain anticancer drugs has been the difficulty in obtaining pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic data. Recent progress in analytical methods, as well as the development of noninvasive methods (such as positron emission tomography) for evaluating the effects of chemotherapy, will help to define pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships. Bayesian estimation is the strategy of choice for performing pharmacokinetic studies, as well as ensuring that a given patient benefits from the desired systemic exposure. Together, these methods could contribute to improving cancer chemotherapy in terms of patient outcome and survival.

Topotecan for the treatment of recurrent or progressive central nervous system tumors - a pediatric oncology group phase II study

Topotecan was studied as a 72 h infusion given every 3 weeks. Treatment began at a dose of 1.0 mg/m2/day and was increased to 1.25 mg/m2/day after the first 6 patients tolerated this higher dose without excessive toxicities. Eighty-eight evaluable children were accrued in 6 strata. There were no complete nor partial responses. Twenty subjects had stable disease (astrocytoma 5/11, malignant glioma 5/13, medulloblastoma 0/12, brain stem tumor 4/19, ependymoma 5/17, and miscellaneous histologies 1/16). Two patients (astrocytoma, ependymoma) completed the maximum 18 topotecan courses. The remaining 68 children developed progressive disease within 2 months. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity. Grade 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 18, 32, 5, and 23 participants, respectively. It was concluded that topotecan as given according to this schedule showed insufficient activity to promote it to frontline protocol usage.

Clinical applications of the camptothecins

The camptothecin topoisomerase I-targeting agents are new class of antitumor drugs with demonstrated clinical activity in human malignancies, such as colorectal cancer and ovarian cancer. Currently, irinotecan and topotecan are the most widely used camptothecin analogs in clinical use and clinical trials are ongoing to better characterize their spectra of clinical activity, to determine their optimal schedules of administration and to define their use in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Newer camptothecin analogs in clinical development, such as 9-aminocamptothecin, 9-nitrocamptothecin, GI147211 and DX-8951f, are also being studied to determine if they have improved toxicity and efficacy profiles compared with existing analogs. Other potential clinical applications include the use of camptothecin derivatives as radiation sensitizers or as antiviral agents. The successful development of the camptothecins as antitumor agents highlights the importance of topoisomerase I as a target for cancer chemotherapy.

Relationship between topotecan systemic exposure and tumor response in human neuroblastoma xenografts

BACKGROUND

Topotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor with activity against xenografts of childhood solid tumors and established clinical activity against neuroblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. We have studied the relationship between systemic exposure to and the antitumor activity of topotecan lactone (the active form of the drug) in the xenograft models. Furthermore, we determined whether the responses seen in these models occur at systemic exposure levels that are tolerable in children.

METHODS

Neuroblastoma xenografts derived from the tumors of six different patients were established subcutaneously in immune-deprived mice. Topotecan was administered by intravenous bolus injection 5 days a week for 2 consecutive weeks, repeated every 21 days for three cycles. The minimum daily doses that induced complete responses (CRs) and partial responses (PRs) were determined. Topotecan lactone pharmacokinetic studies were performed in both tumor-bearing and nontumor-bearing mice.

RESULTS

The minimum doses associated with CRs and PRs in four of the six neuroblastoma xenografts were 0.61 and 0.36 mg/kg body weight, respectively. The topotecan lactone single-day systemic exposures associated with these doses were 88 and 52 ng x hr/mL, respectively. There was an approximately sixfold difference in topotecan lactone systemic exposure (290 ng x hr/mL versus 52 ng x hr/mL) associated with achieving CRs in the least-sensitive and most-sensitive tumors, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuroblastoma xenografts are highly sensitive to topotecan therapy, and responses in mice are achieved at systemic exposures similar to those that are clinically effective and tolerable in children. These results support the concept of deriving preclinical data relating systemic exposure to antitumor activity in xenograft models. Such data may be valuable in making informed decisions regarding the clinical development of new agents.

Preclinical development of camptothecin derivatives and clinical trials in pediatric oncology

Although the prognosis of childhood cancers has dramatically improved over the last three decades, new active drugs are needed. Camptothecins represent a very attractive new class of anticancer drugs to develop in paediatric oncology. The preclinical and clinical development of two of these DNA-topoisomerase I inhibitors, i.e. topotecan and irinotecan, is ongoing in paediatric malignancies. Here we review the currently available results of this evaluation. Topotecan proved to be active against several paediatric tumour xenografts. In paediatric phase I studies exploring several administration schedules, myelosuppression was dose-limiting. The preliminary results of topotecan evaluation in phase II study showed antitumour activity in neuroblastoma (response rate: 15% at relapse and 37% in newly diagnosed patients with disseminated disease) and in metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (40% in untreated patients). Topotecan-containing drug combinations are currently investigated. Irinotecan displayed a broad spectrum of activity in paediatric solid tumour xenografts, including rhabdo-myosarcoma, neuroblastoma, peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, malignant glioma and juvenile colon cancer. For several of these histology types, tumour-free survivors have been observed among animals bearing an advanced-stage tumour at time of treatment. The clinical evaluation of irinotecan in children is ongoing. Irinotecan undergoes a complex in vivo biotransformation involving several enzyme systems, such as carboxylesterase, UDPGT and cytochrome P450, in children as well as in adults. Preclinical studies of both drugs have shown that their activity was schedule-dependent. The optimal schedule of administration is an issue that needs to be addressed in children. In conclusion, the preliminary results of the paediatric evaluation of camptothecin derivatives show very encouraging results in childhood malignancies. The potential place of camptothecins in the treatment of paediatric malignant tumours is discussed.

Topoisomerase I inhibitors: review and update

This review presents a summary of preclinical and clinical data on the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitors that are under clinical development. To date, all of the topo I inhibitors that have been clinically evaluated are analogues of camptothecin, an extract of the Chinese tree Camptotheca acuminata. The therapeutic development of camptothecin was initially limited by its poor solubility and unpredictable toxicity. More recently, a number of water-soluble camptothecin analogues have undergone extensive evaluation and have demonstrated significant clinical activity. These include irinotecan (CPT-II), topotecan, and 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC). Preliminary data are also reviewed on other camptothecin analogues (GG-211 and DX-8951f), on oral formulations, and on non-camptothecin topoisomerase I inhibitors. The topoisomerase I inhibitors have already demonstrated a broad spectrum of antitumour activity, most probably due to their unique mechanism of action and lack of clinical cross-resistance with existing antineoplastic compounds. The challenge for the next five years is to identify ways to integrate the topo I inhibitors into multidrug and multimodality therapies to achieve optimal antitumour effect, while keeping the side effects of these therapies manageable.

Topoisomerase I inhibitors: the relevance of prolonged exposure for present clinical development

Topoisomerase I inhibitors constitute a new class of anti-cancer agents. Recently, topotecan and irinotecan were registered for clinical use in ovarian cancer and colorectal cancer respectively. Cytotoxicity of topoisomerase I inhibitors is S-phase specific, and in vitro and in vivo studies have suggested that, for efficacy, prolonged exposure might be more important than short-term exposure to high concentration. Clinical development of those topoisomerase I inhibitors that have reached this stage is also focused on schedules aiming to achieve prolonged exposure. In this review, we summarize all published preclinical studies on this topic for topoisomerase I inhibitors in clinical development, namely 20-S-camptothecin, 9-nitro-camptothecin, 9-amino-camptothecin, topotecan, irinotecan and GI147211. In addition, preliminary data on clinical studies concerning this topic are also reviewed. The data suggest that prolonged exposure may indeed be relevant for anti-tumour activity. However, the optimal schedule is yet to be determined. Finally, clinical data are yet too immature to draw definitive conclusions.

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) study of topotecan using a five-day course in children with refractory solid tumors: a pediatric oncology group study

PURPOSE

A phase I trial was conducted in children with refractory solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics for topotecan administered by a 30-min infusion for 5 consecutive days.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty children with a variety of recurrent solid tumors, including nine patients with neuroblastoma and 10 with brain tumors, were given topotecan as a 30-min infusion for 5 consecutive days, beginning with a dose of 1.4 mg/m2/day. The dose was escalated in 20% increments after establishing that DLT was not present at the prior dose. Drug toxicity was graded using standard criteria. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade 3 or 4 nonhematopoietic toxicity or grade 4 hematopoietic toxicity lasting > 7 days. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during the first infusion course.

RESULTS

The DLT was hematopoietic and involved both platelets and neutrophils. Grade 4 hematopoietic toxicity of brief duration was seen at all dose levels. Over half of the patients received red blood cell transfusion support, and 19/40 received platelet transfusions. Hospital admissions for fever and neutropenia or for documented infections occurred in 32 of 169 courses of therapy. Gastrointestinal symptoms with nausea and vomiting or diarrhea were mild to moderate in 12 of the 40 patients. Antitumor responses were seen in three patients with neuroblastoma. An additional four patients (one with neuroblastoma, two with anaplastic astrocytomas, one with Ewing) had stable disease with continued therapy for > 6 months. Using a limited sampling model, pharmacokinetic studies were performed in 36 of the 40 patients. Topotecan lactone and total clearance were similar to those reported in other pediatric populations receiving topotecan by continuous infusion. A pharmacodynamic relation between systemic exposure to topotecan lactone and myclosuppression was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In heavily pretreated children, the MTD for topotecan given by intermittent 30-min infusion for 5 days is 1.4 mg/m2 without GCSF and 2.0 mg/m2/day with GCSF. The dose-limiting toxicity is hematopoietic. Data from this study provide the basis for further studies of topotecan in children with cancer.

Topoisomerase I interactive drugs in children with cancer

Topotecan, irinotecan, and 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) are analogs of the plant alkaloid 20(S)-camptothecin (CMT), the prototypical DNA topoisomerase I interactive agent. These agents interact with the topoisomerase I-DNA complex and prevent resealing topoisomerase I-mediated DNA single-strand breaks. This eventual leads to double-strand DNA breaks and apoptosis or cell death. Topotecan, irinotecan, and 9-AC have shown significant activity in mice bearing pediatric solid tumor xenografts; the greatest antitumor responses were found with protracted continuous schedules. Preclinical data also suggest that maintenance of an exposure-duration threshold (EDT) may be required to achieve optimal cytotoxicity. Pediatric Phase I trials have evaluated the toxicity and safety to camptothecin analogs in children with relapsed solid tumors and relapsed acute leukemia. The primary dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for the CMT analogs in children has been myelosuppression, except for mucositis observed with the 120-hr continuous topotecan infusion schedule. Pharmacodynamic relationships with these analogs have been reported between systemic exposure, and myelosuppression and mucositis. Although not a primary objective of the early Phase I studies, antitumor responses have been reported. In this review, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics of the CMT analogs studied in children are summarized, and future studies of these agents are discussed.