Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Discovery of seven-membered ring berberine analogues as highly potent and specific hCES2A inhibitors

Human carboxylesterase 2A (hCES2A) is a key serine hydrolase responsible for the metabolic clearance of large number of compounds bearing the ester- or amide-bond(s). Inhibition of hCES2A can relieve the chemotherapy-induced toxicity and alter the pharmacokinetic bahaviors of some orally administrate esters-containing agents. However, most of the hCES2A inhibitors show poor cell-membrane permeability and poor specificity. Herein, guided by the structure activity relationships (SAR) of fifteen natural alkaloids against hCES2A, fifteen new seven-membered ring berberine analogues were designed and synthesized, and their anti-hCES2A activities were evaluated. Among all tested compounds, compound 28 showed potent anti-hCES2A effect (IC₅₀ = 1.66 μM) and excellent selectivity over hCES1A (IC₅₀ > 100 μM). The SAR analysis revealed that the seven-membered ring of these berberine analogues was a crucial moiety for hCES2A inhibition, while the secondary amine group of the ring-C is important for improving their specificity over other serine hydrolases. Inhibition kinetic analyses and molecular dynamic simulation demonstrated that 28 strongly inhibited hCES2A in a mixed-inhibition manner, with an estimated K_i value of 1.035 μM. Moreover, 28 could inhibit intracellular hCES2A in living HepG2 cells and exhibited suitable metabolic stability. Collectively, the SAR of seven-membered ring berberine analogues as hCES2A inhibitors were studied, while compound 28 acted as a promising candidate for developing highly selective hCES2A inhibitors.

Covalent CES2 Inhibitors Protect against Reduced Formation of Intestinal Organoids by the Anticancer Drug Irinotecan

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan is widely used to treat various types of solid and metastatic cancer. It is an ester prodrug and its hydrolytic metabolite (SN-38) exerts potent anticancer activity. Irinotecan is hydrolyzed primarily by carboxylesterase-2 (CES2), a hydrolase abundantly present in the intestine such as the duodenum. We have identified several potent and covalent CES2 inhibi¬tors such as remdesivir and sofosbuvir. Remdesivir is the first small molecule drug approved for COVID-19, whereas sofosbuvir is a paradigm-shift medicine for hepatitis C viral infection. Irinotecan is generally well-tolerated but associated with severe/life-threatening diarrhea due to intestinal accu¬¬mula¬tion of SN-38.

OBJECTIVE

This study was to test the hypothesis that remdesivir and sofosbuvir protect against irinotecan-induced epithelial injury associated with gastrointestinal toxicity.

METHODS

To test this hypothesis, formation of organoids derived from mouse duodenal crypts, a robust cellular model for intestinal regeneration, was induced in the presence or absence of irinotecan +/- pretreatment with a CES2 drug inhibitor.

RESULTS

Irinotecan profoundly inhibited the formation of intestinal organoids and the magnitude of the inhibition was greater with female crypts than their male counterparts. Consistently, crypts from female mice had significantly higher hydrolytic activity toward irinotecan. Critically, remdesivir and sofosbuvir both reduced irinotecan hydrolysis and reversed irinotecan-reduced formation of organoids. Human duodenal samples robustly hydrolyzed irinotecan, stable CES2 transfection induced cytotoxicity and the cytotoxicity was reduced by CES2 drug inhibitor.

CONCLUSION

These findings establish a therapeutic rationale to reduce irinotecan-gastrointestinal injury and serve as a cellular foundation to develop oral formulations of irinotecan with high safety.

Impact of follow-up on generalized pairwise comparisons for estimating the irinotecan benefit in advanced/metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The net treatment effect (∆) is a new method to assess the treatment benefit that combines multiple time-to-event, binary and continuous endpoints according to a pre-specified sequence. It represents the net probability for a random patient treated in the experimental arm to have a better overall outcome than a random patient from the control arm does. We aimed at characterizing the impact of follow-up on ∆ estimated from both time-to-event and binary toxicity endpoints, in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of irinotecan-based regimen in advanced/metastatic gastric cancer (AGC).

STUDY DESIGN

Three RCTs are reanalysed. The net treatment effect using from one to three outcomes (i.e. overall survival, time to progression and toxicity in this order) and the hazard ratio (HR) were estimated after various cut-off dates and compared to the values obtained after complete follow-up were reported.

RESULTS

In all three RCTs (897 patients), the irinotecan-based regimen was superior to the non-irinotecan containing regimen in terms of HR and ∆. This superiority was lower when the net treatment effect also accounted for toxicity. The HR was slightly less influenced by an incomplete follow-up than ∆ was, but correction proposed by Péron to account for censored observations showed quite robust results.

CONCLUSIONS

The net treatment effect using Péron's correction can be used in case of interim analyses or high censoring rates. In addition to relative measures such as the hazard ratio, it provides a simple mean to evaluate the net treatment effect with and without toxicity outcomes.

Discovery of hCES2A inhibitors from Glycyrrhiza inflata via combination of docking-based virtual screening and fluorescence-based inhibition assays

An integrated strategy via combination of chemical profiling, docking-based virtual screening and fluorescence-based high-throughput inhibitor screening assays was used to efficiently identify natural hCES2A inhibitors from herbal medicines.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of indanone-chalcone hybrids as potent and selective hCES2A inhibitors

Human carboxylesterase 2 (hCES2A), one of the major serine hydrolases distributed in the small intestine, plays a crucial role in hydrolysis of ester-bearing drugs. Accumulating evidence has indicated that hCES2A inhibitor therapy can modulate the pharmacokinetic and toxicological profiles of some important hCES2A-substrate drugs, such as the anticancer agent CPT-11. Herein, a series of indanone-chalcone hybrids are designed and synthesized to find potent and highly selective hCES2A inhibitors. Inhibition assays demonstrated that most indanone-chalcone hybrids displayed strong to moderate hCES2A inhibition activities. Structure-hCES2A inhibition activity relationship studies showed that introduction of a hydroxyl at the C4' site and introduction of an N-alkyl group at the C6 site were beneficial for hCES2A inhibition. Particularly, B7 (an N-alkylated 1-indanone-chalcone hybrid) exhibited the most potent inhibition on hCES2A and excellent specificity (this agent could not inhibit other human esterases including hCES1A and butyrylcholinesterase). Inhibition kinetic analyses demonstrated that B7 potently inhibited hCES2A-mediated FD hydrolysis in a mixed inhibition manner, with a calculated K_i value of 0.068 μM. Furthermore, B7 was capable of inhibiting intracellular hCES2A in living cells and displayed good metabolic stability. Collectively, our findings show that indanone-chalcone hybrids are good choices for the development of hCES2A inhibitors, while B7 is a promising candidate for the development of novel anti-diarrhea agents to ameliorate irinotecan-induced intestinal toxicity.

Oral administration of irinotecan in patients with solid tumors: an open-label, phase I, dose escalating study evaluating safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND

Oral drug formulations have several advantages compared to intravenous formulation. Apart from patient convenience and favorable pharmacoeconomics, they offer the possibility of frequent drug administration at home. In this study, we present a new oral irinotecan formulation designed as an enteric coated immediate release tablet which in pre-clinical studies has shown good exposure with low variability.

METHODS

A phase I, dose escalating study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of an oral irinotecan formulation and to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Each treatment cycle was once-daily irinotecan for 14 days followed by 1 week rest.

RESULTS

25 patients were included across four cohorts; 3 patients were included in cohort 1 (20 mg/m²), 7 patients were included in cohort 2 (30 mg/m²), 3 patients were included in cohort 3 (25 mg/m²) and 12 patients were included in cohort 4 (21 mg/m²). Median age was 67 years, 52% were performance status (PS) 0 while 48% were PS 1. Median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1-6). MTD was established at 21 mg/m². No responses were observed. Nine patients (36%) had stable disease (SD), lasting median 19 weeks (range 7-45 weeks). Among these five patients had previously received irinotecan. No grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were reported. Totally six patients experienced grade 1/2 anemia, three patients had grade 1/2 leucopenia and 1 patient had grade 1 thrombocytopenia. Most common non-hematological grade 1 and 2 adverse events were nausea, fatigue, diarrhea, vomiting and cholinergic syndrome. Grade 3 toxicities included diarrhea, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, no grade 4 events were reported. PK data showed consistent daily exposures during treatment at days 1 and 14 and no drug accumulation. SN-38 interpatient variability was in the same range as after infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral irinotecan was generally well tolerated; side effects were manageable and similar in type to those observed with intravenous irinotecan. Hematological toxicities were few and only grade 1/2. In this heavily pre-treated patient population, oral irinotecan demonstrated activity even among patients previously treated with irinotecan.

Anticancer therapy and lung injury: molecular mechanisms

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy and radiation therapy are two mainstream strategies applied in the treatment of cancer that is not operable. Patients with hematological or solid tumor malignancies substantially benefit from chemotherapeutic drugs and/or ionizing radiation delivered to the site of malignancy. However, considerable adverse effects, including lung inflammation and fibrosis, are associated with the use of these treatment modalities. Areas covered: As we move toward the era of precision health, we are compelled to understand the molecular basis of chemoradiation-induced pathological lung remodeling and to develop effective treatment strategies that mitigate the development of chronic lung disease (i.e. fibrosis) in cancer patients. The review discusses chemotherapeutic agents that are reported to induce or associate with acute and/or chronic lung injury. Expert commentary: There is a need to molecularly understand how chemotherapeutic drugs induce or associate with respiratory toxicities and whether such characteristics are inherently related to their antitumor effect or are collateral. Once such mechanisms have been identified and/or fully characterized, they may be able to guide disease-management decisions including effective intervention strategies for the adverse effects. In the meantime, radiation oncologists should be judicious on the dose of radiation delivered to the lungs, the volume of lung irradiated, and concurrent use of chemotherapeutic drugs.

Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of New Medical Treatments in Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Results of a Workshop Organized by the Eortc Gitccg

During the last few years several factors have contributed to an increasing change in the medical treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Among them are the more general acceptance of the impact of chemotherapy on quality of life and survival in first as well as in second-line treatment, the introduction of new drugs and the definition of novel endpoints which can roughly be defined as “patient benefit”. For this reason the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group (GITCCG) felt it was appropriate to organize a workshop with experts from different countries and national groups to discuss in depth several aspects concerning the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Irinotecan Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Study

Aims and background

The advantage of delivering chemotherapy by hepatic arterial infusion is the acquisition of a high concentration of the drug in the target. Irinotecan (CPT-11) is active for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. In phase I studies, doses of 20 mg/m2/d for 5 days given every 4 weeks as continuous infusion or 200 mg/m2 as a short 30-min infusion given every 3 weeks is recommended for phase II studies.

Methods and study design

Twelve patients with a median liver substitution of 30% (20-50%) were enrolled, 6 progressed after a FOLFOX-induced partial response and 6 progressed after 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid. All patients had a surgically (n = 6) or angiographically placed port (n = 6). They received hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with CPT-11 (200 mg/m2) on an outpatient basis, every 3 weeks as a short 30-min infusion for six cycles.

Results

Four partial responses were observed (33%) lasting 24, 15, 12 and 8+ weeks, 3 stable disease (25%) lasting more than 12 weeks, and 5 progressions (41%). Six patients (50%) presented a >30% reduction in CEA. Toxicity was G2 diarrhea in 5 patients (41%) and G2 myelosuppression in 6 (50%); one patient had abdominal right upper quadrant pain requiring analgesics.

Conclusions

CPT-11 is active as hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in liver metastases from colorectal cancer and can rescue systemically pretreated patients. Our schedule seems safe, feasible and well accepted on an outpatient basis.

Weekly Irinotecan in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Failing 5-Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy: Efficacy and Prognostic Factors

Aims and background

We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of weekly irinotecan as a second-line treatment in patients with colorectal cancer failing 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and searched for predictive and prognostic factors.

Methods

A total of 36 patients were included. Median age was 53 years (range, 33-72). One treatment cycle consisted of irinotecan, 100 mg/m2 weekly, for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest. Gender, age, primary site, number of metastatic sites, histologic subtype, differentiation, pretreatment CEA, CA 19-9 and lactate dehydrogenase levels and marker response to treatment were investigated as predictive factors for response to treatment and as prognostic factors in the overall survival and time to progression of the patients.

Results

A total of 120 cycles (median, 3 cycles) was delivered. An overall 14% objective response rate (1 complete and 4 partial responses) was achieved. The median response duration was 4 months (range, 2-7). Another 36% of the patients had stable disease for a median duration of 4 months (range, 2-8). Median time-to-disease progression was 4 months and overall median survival was 12 months (95% confidence interval, 9-15). Pretreatment serum CA 19-9 level and marker response to two courses of treatment were found to be clinically significant in time to progression and overall survival. Younger age (≤45 years) was a poor prognostic factor associated with a shorter time to progression. The major toxicity was grade 3-4 diarrhea, which occurred in 28% of the patients, and treatment was discontinued in 3 (8%) patients due to toxicity. Other hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild and manageable.

Conclusions

We concluded that weekly irinotecan at the dose of 100 mg/m2 is an effective and tolerable treatment option, with a 50% disease control rate, for patients with colorectal cancer failing previous 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

Single-Agent Irinotecan as Second-Line Weekly Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Aims and background

Irinotecan is a standard option for relapsed/refractory advanced colorectal cancer. Although in a recently reported, randomized trial it was found that a regimen of irinotecan once every 3 weeks was associated with a lower incidence of severe diarrhea than with weekly treatment with similar efficacy, there is no evidence in the literature that suggests the optimal dosing strategy for the drug, along with treatment efficacy and safety, following 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in elderly patients. A phase II study has reported significantly reduced toxicity when irinotecan was administered once a week for 2 weeks, followed by a week rest.

Patients and methods

From January 2004 to April 2005, we analyzed, retrospectively, our data on single-agent irinotecan as a second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients (≥70 years) with advanced colorectal cancer. Twenty-three patients were evaluated. CPT-11 (80 mg/m2) was given as a 60-min intravenous infusion in repeated 21-day courses comprising weekly treatment for 2 consecutive weeks followed by a 1-week rest. Tumor measurements were obtained after every third course of therapy. Toxicity was assessed weekly using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.

Results

The median number of treatment courses received per patient was 4 (range, 1–8). All patients were assessable for toxicity and 21 for response. The most frequently observed severe toxicities were diarrhea (grade 3, 13%) and neutropenia (grade 3, 30.4%; grade 4, 8.6%). Only 1 case of neutropenic fever occurred. Other hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild and manageable. Objective partial responses were observed in 3 patients (13%). An additional 10 patients (43%) had stable disease as their best response. To date, 12 patients have progressed with a median time-to-progression of 4.3 months and a median survival of 8.3 months.

Conclusions

A weekly irinotecan administration can induce tumor control in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer that has progressed during or shortly after 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. However, a careful monitoring of hematological toxicity and special instructions to prevent and manage diarrhea are mandatory in this setting of patients.

Irinotecan Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Phase I Clinical Study

Background

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is a promising approach in liver metastases from colorectal cancer, but chemical hepatitis, biliary sclerosis, arterial thrombosis and right upper quadrant pain are limiting factors. Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an active drug in colorectal cancer. We planned a short hepatic arterial infusion of CPT-11 to describe the toxicity, to determine the dose-limiting toxicity, and to define the doses of CPT-11 to be recommended for phase II studies.

Patients and Methods

Fourteen patients with a median liver substitution of 30% (10-60%) were enrolled. All patients received hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with CPT-11 on an outpatient basis every 3 weeks as a short, 30-min infusion.

Results

At 240 mg/m2, 2 of 4 patients experienced grade 4 diarrhea and neutropenia, and 3 of them also reported grade 4 abdominal pain of the right upper quadrant. The maximum tolerated dose was reached at 240 mg/m2. The recommended doses of CPT-11 for phase II studies is 200 mg/m2, given every 3 weeks.

Conclusions

CPT-11 presents a low hepatic toxic profile and could be considered a new active drug, suitable for hepatic arterial infusion in liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Hair disorders in patients with cancer

Cytotoxic chemotherapies, molecularly targeted therapies, immunotherapies, radiotherapy, stem cell transplants, and endocrine therapies may lead to hair disorders, including alopecia, hirsutism, hypertrichosis, and pigmentary and textural hair changes. The mechanisms underlying these changes are varied and remain incompletely understood, hampering the development of preventive or therapeutic guidelines. The psychosocial impact of chemotherapy-induced alopecia has been well documented primarily in the oncology literature; however, the effect of other alterations, such as radiation-induced alopecia, hirsutism, and changes in hair color or texture on quality of life have not been described. This article reviews clinically significant therapy-related hair disorders in oncology patients, including the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, severity grading scales, patient-reported quality of life questionnaires, management strategies, and future translational research opportunities.

Germline genetic variants with implications for disease risk and therapeutic outcomes

Genetic testing has multiple clinical applications including disease risk assessment, diagnosis, and pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics can be utilized to predict whether a pharmacologic therapy will be effective or to identify patients at risk for treatment-related toxicity. Although genetic tests are typically ordered for a distinct clinical purpose, the genetic variants that are found may have additional implications for either disease or pharmacology. This review will address multiple examples of germline genetic variants that are informative for both disease and pharmacogenomics. The discussed relationships are diverse. Some of the agents are targeted for the disease-causing genetic variant, while others, although not targeted therapies, have implications for the disease they are used to treat. It is also possible that the disease implications of a genetic variant are unrelated to the pharmacogenomic implications. Some of these examples are considered clinically actionable pharmacogenes, with evidence-based, pharmacologic treatment recommendations, while others are still investigative as areas for additional research. It is important that clinicians are aware of both the disease and pharmacogenomic associations of these germline genetic variants to ensure patients are receiving comprehensive personalized care.

Review : Topoisomerase I inhibitors: 2. Irinotecan

Purpose. The primary objective of this article is to discuss the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical use, and adverse effects of the approved topoisomer ase I inhibitors. This is the second in a series of two articles and will focus on irinotecan.

Data Sources. We reviewed the literature through a MEDLINE search of English language arti cles from 1985 through 1998. Relevant articles cited in the titles obtained from the MEDLINE search were also used. The following terms were used for purpose of conducting the MEDLINE search: topoisomerase inhibitors, irinotecan, topoisomerase I, camptosar, and CPT-11.

Data Extraction. We have reviewed the current literature to discuss the pharmacology, pharmacokinet ics, clinical use, toxicity, drug interactions, indications, formulation, dosage and administration, and pharmaceu tical issues surrounding the use of irinotecan.

Data Synthesis. The topoisomerase I inhibitors are new antineoplastic agents with a unique mechanism of action. Promising areas of application include colo rectal cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer, cervical cancer, and lymphomas. Clinical trials detailing the activity of topoisomerase I inhibitors in these areas are presented.

Different schedules of irinotecan administration: A meta-analysis

The concept of the UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A1 genotype-directed schedule of irinotecan administration is still far from being introduced into clinical practice, and the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan are in part schedule-dependent. The objective of the present meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy and adverse effects of 3-weekly vs. weekly irinotecan for the treatment of solid tumors. The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases and the search engines Google Scholar and Medical Martix were searched for randomized controlled trials to compare the two regimens of irinotecan administration. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that the 3-weekly regimen yielded a longer time to progression, while other measures of efficacy, such as the objective response rate and overall survival of patients with solid tumors were similar between the two regimens of irinotecan administration. Furthermore, the group receiving the 3-weekly regimen had a lower incidence of grade 3/4 diarrhea and a higher rate of grade 3/4 neutropenia compared with the group receiving the weekly regimen. However, these results require confirmation by large-sample, multicenter, randomized, controlled trials.

Irinotecan chemotherapy combined with fluoropyrimidines versus irinotecan alone for overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy is the treatment of choice in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) where surgical resection of metastases is not an option. Both irinotecan (IRI) and fluoropyrimidines are often included in first- or second- line chemotherapy treatment regimens in such patients. However, it is not clear whether combining these agents is superior to irinotecan alone.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of two chemotherapeutic regimens, irinotecan monotherapy or irinotecan in combination with fluoropyrimidines, for patients with advanced CRC when administered in the first or second-line settings.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials: Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group Specialised Register (January 13, 2016), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)(The Cochrane Library Issue 12, 2016), Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to January 13, 2016), Ovid EMBASE (1974 to January 13, 2016), registers of controlled trials in progress, references cited in relevant publications and conference proceedings in related fields (BioMed Central and Medscape's Conference). The key authors or investigators of all eligible studies, and professionals in the field were contacted when necessary. The search from January 2016 identified one eligible study, an ongoing trial currently presented as an abstract, to be considered in an update of this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety of IRI chemotherapy combined with fluoropyrimidine compared with IRI alone for the treatment of patients with advanced CRC, regardless of treatment line settings.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study eligibility and methodological quality were assessed independently by the two authors, and any disagreement was solved by a third author. The data collected from the studies were reviewed qualitatively and quantitatively using the Cochrane Collaboration statistical software RevMan 5.3.

MAIN RESULTS

Five studies were included in this review with a total of 1,726 patients. The top-up search resulted in an additional ongoing trial, the results of which have not been incorporated in this review. Among five included studies, no reduction in all-cause mortality was observed in the combination arm, with a summary hazard ratio (HR) of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.81-1.02). Longer progression-free survival was observed in those treated with the combination chemotherapy (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.53-0.87), however, this result may have been driven by findings from the single first-line treatment setting study.The quality of evidence for overall survival was low and for progression-free survival was moderate, mainly due to study limitation from the lack of information on randomisation methods and allocation concealment.There were higher risks of toxicity outcomes grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea and grade 1 or 2 alopecia, and a lower risk of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in controls compared to the invervention group. Evidence for toxicity has been assessed to be low to moderate quality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was no overall survival benefit of the irinotecan and fluoropyrimidine treatment over irinotecan alone, thus both regimens remain reasonable options in treating patients with advanced or metastatic CRC. Given the low and moderate quality of the evidence, future studies with sufficient numbers of patients in each treatment arms are needed to clarify the benefit observed in progression-free survival with combination irinotecan and fluoropyrimidines.

Irinotecan and nedaplatin as salvage therapy for patients with advanced germ cell tumors following intensive treatment with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapies

BACKGROUND

To analyze the clinical outcomes of the irinotecan plus nedaplatin (IN) regimen in patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCTs) refractory to cisplatin-based combination chemotherapies.

METHODS

This study included a total of 20 consecutive advanced GCT patients who were categorized into intermediate- or poor-risk GCT groups according to the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification, and were judged to show refractory or relapsed disease after bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin and cisplatin, ifosfamide and paclitaxel therapies. All 20 patients subsequently received IN therapy (irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15; nedaplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1) every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Following a median of 3 cycles of IN, 9 patients (45 %) achieved normalization of serum tumor markers. In addition, surgical resection of the residual tumors following IN was performed in 5 patients, of whom 4 were pathologically diagnosed with no viable cancer cells. At a median follow-up of 9 months, 11 patients (55 %) were alive, including 7 (35 %) with no evidence of disease, whereas the remaining 9 (45 %) died of disease progression. The median duration of overall survival after the introduction of IN to these 20 patients was 13.4 months. Severe hematological toxicities were observed in all patients, but were manageable. Although fatal treatment-related interstitial pneumonia occurred in 1 patient, other non-hematological toxicities were generally tolerable.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the markedly unfavorable characteristics of the included patients with advanced GCT who were intensively treated with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapies, IN could be regarded as having promising therapeutic activity with an acceptable toxicity profile.

A Case of Organizing Pneumonia Associated with FOLFIRI Chemotherapy

The combination chemotherapy of irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI regimen) was recently proven to be beneficial in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Pulmonary toxicity is very rare in adverse effects of irinotecan. No case of organizing pneumonia (also known as bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia) associated with FOLFIRI chemotherapy has been reported. We experienced a case of a 62-year-old man who presented persistent dry cough and progressive dyspnea after receiving chemotherapy with FOLFIRI regimen. After surgical lung biopsy, the patient was diagnosed with FOLFIRI chemotherapy-induced organizing pneumonia which was successfully treated with steroid therapy.

FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy after failure of FOLFOX4 in advanced colorectal cancer: a Korean single-center experience

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The incidence of colorectal cancer has been increasing every year in Korea. Irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based regimens including biologic agents are known to be effective in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. But in practice, FOLFOX (combination of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) or FOLFIRI (combination of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) regimens without biologic agents are more commonly used in Korea due to of the high costs of biologic agents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of FOLFIRI following FOLFOX4 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 54 patients with advanced colorectal cancer who were treated between May 2005 and May 2013 with FOLFOX4 as first-line chemotherapy and with FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy at Kosin University Gospel Hospital (Busan, Korea) were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients received second-line FOLFIRI chemotherapy. Five patients (9.3%) had a partial response, 29 patients (53.7%) had a stable disease. The median overall survival was 8.90 months and the median time to progression was 4.33 months. Toxicities were tolerable.

CONCLUSIONS

In a Korean population, FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy is effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer after failure of FOLFOX4. Although the efficacy of FOLFIRI in this study was lower than that of second-line FOLFIRI with biologic agents, these results can help in the formulation of a treatment strategy for financially troubled patients.

Irinotecan as Salvage Chemotherapy for Advanced Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: A Series of Three Patients

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a relatively rare disease. Because of its rarity the role of chemotherapy either as adjuvant or for advanced disease has not been clearly defined. Therefore any information, including case reports, is warranted. We report on three patients with adenocarcinoma of the jejunum and ileum. Two patients with positive lymph nodes received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil-folinic acid (5FU-FA) for 12 months but they developed metastatic disease 3 and 8 months later, respectively. The third patient was initially treated with the same agents but for metastatic disease. All patients were subsequently treated for tumor recurrence with irinotecan 350 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks as salvage chemotherapy supported by Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF) for 5 days. Two patients achieved a minor response and had a dramatic improvement of their symptoms. Their survival times after irinotecan administration were 14 and 6 months with an overall survival after primary diagnosis of 29 and 27 months, respectively. The third patient who had a tumor refractory to 5FU-FA progressed also on irinotecan and had an 8-month overall survival. Although conclusions cannot be drawn regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in SBA, it seems reasonable to extrapolate from large bowel carcinoma experience. Irinotecan seems to have some degree of activity in the treatment of SBA but further studies are warranted.

Good Tolerance of Weekly Irinotecan in a Patient with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer on Chronic Hemodialysis

Pharmacokinetic properties of many antineoplastic agents or their metabolites change with organ dysfunction. Unfortunately, chemotherapy doses determined in phase I and II studies in patients with normal hepatic and renal reserves are not usually applicable to those with hepatic and/or renal dysfunction. Considering the high incidence of colorectal adenocarcinoma, it is not unusual for a colorectal cancer patient to be on chronic hemodialysis. We report a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer on chronic hemodialysis who tolerated weekly irinotecan at 50 mg/m2 well without significant toxicity. We briefly discuss therapeutic dose modification in such patients.

Intercostal artery pseudoaneurysm formation after irinotecan transarterial chemoembolization of a spinal metastasis from colorectal cancer

Over the past decade, irinotecan has become one of the first-line chemotherapeutic agents used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Recently, irinotecan has been administered transarterially in order to perform chemoembolization in the liver. In the limited number of reports available to date using this approach, serious adverse effects have not yet been reported. In this paper, we describe the formation of an intercostal artery pseudoaneurysm after transarterial chemoembolization with irinotecan-eluting beads in a patient with spinal metastasis from colorectal cancer.

Single-agent irinotecan or FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer; results of a randomised phase II study (DaVINCI) and meta-analysis [corrected]

BACKGROUND

Second-line treatment with irinotecan for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer prolongs survival. It is uncertain whether irinotecan is better administered with 5-fluorouracil or alone in patients previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine. We compared toxicity (particularly diarrhoea), quality of life, and efficacy of combination chemotherapy and irinotecan in these patients.

METHODS

In DaVINCI, a randomised phase II trial, patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomly allocated to: Combination therapy (FOLFIRI), irinotecan (180 mg/m(2) IV over 90 min, day 1), 5-fluorouracil (400mg/m(2) IV bolus and 2400 mg/m(2) by 46-hour infusion from day 1) and folinic acid (20mg/m(2) IV bolus, day 1), 2-weekly; or Single-agent, irinotecan (350 mg/m(2) IV over 90 min), 3-weekly. Toxicity was evaluated every treatment cycle; QOL and response 6-weekly. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial, amended from a larger factorial design, was terminated early due to slow recruitment. Results were also combined with other second-line irinotecan trials.

FINDINGS

We randomised 44 patients to combination and 45 to single agent. Eight patients in the irinotecan arm and 4 in the combination arm had grade 3/4 diarrhoea (P=0.24). Treatment groups did not differ significantly in overall QOL changes, response rate or progression free or overall-survival. In a systematic review of 29 trials of second-line irinotecan-based treatment, single-agent irinotecan was associated with more diarrhoea and alopecia than the combination but efficacy was similar.

INTERPRETATION

Combination treatment compared with single-agent irinotecan reduces alopecia and diarrhoea without compromising efficacy on clinical outcomes. Both regimens remain as reasonable treatment options.

FUNDING

Research grant (Pfizer).

Cancer therapies utilizing the camptothecins: a review of the in vivo literature

This review summarizes the in vivo assessment-preliminary, preclinical, and clinical-of chemotherapeutics derived from camptothecin or a derivative. Camptothecin is a naturally occurring, pentacyclic quinoline alkaloid that possesses high cytotoxic activity in a variety of cell lines. Major limitations of the drug, including poor solubility and hydrolysis under physiological conditions, prevent full clinical utilization. Camptothecin remains at equilibrium in an active lactone form and inactive hydrolyzed carboxylate form. The active lactone binds to DNA topoisomerase I cleavage complex, believed to be the single site of activity. Binding inhibits DNA religation, resulting in apoptosis. A series of small molecule camptothecin derivatives have been developed that increase solubility, lactone stability and bioavailability to varying levels of success. A number of macromolecular agents have also been described wherein camptothecin(s) are covalently appended or noncovalently associated with the goal of improving solubility and lactone stability, while taking advantage of the tumor physiology to deliver larger doses of drug to the tumor with lower systemic toxicity. With the increasing interest in drug delivery and polymer therapeutics, additional constructs are anticipated. The goal of this review is to summarize the relevant literature for others interested in the field of camptothecin-based therapeutics, specifically in the context of biodistribution, dosing regimens, and pharmacokinetics with the desire of providing a useful source of comparative data. To this end, only constructs where in vivo data is available are reported. The review includes published reports in English through mid-2009.

Clinical features of interstitial lung disease induced by standard chemotherapy (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is rarely reported, but its clinical features remain to be clarified.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using a computerized database, we retrospectively identified patients who developed ILD from 734 patients with CRC treated with infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) from April 2005 to December 2008 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East.

RESULTS

Of 734 patients, 11 patients developed ILD (1.5%) and 4 of those patients died (0.54%). Of the 11 patients, 10 showed pulmonary shadows other than lung metastases before chemotherapy. ILD developed during FOLFOX in six patients, at 137 days after completion of FOLFOX in one patient, during oxaliplatin interruption of FOLFOX in one patient and during FOLFIRI in the remaining three patients. FOLFOX had been administered at some point for all ILD patients, with a median of 10 cycles (range 2-17 cycles) and a median dose of administered oxaliplatin of 850 mg/m(2) (range 170-1445 mg/m(2)).

CONCLUSIONS

ILD following FOLFOX or FOLFIRI is an uncommon but life-threatening complication. Care must be taken regarding the onset of ILD, not only during but also after chemotherapy for CRC.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor plus Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Dual Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Synergy or Antagonism?

There has been an intensive effort to develop novel therapies for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies panitumumab and cetuximab and the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab have demonstrated clinical efficacy and acceptable toxicity in the treatment of mCRC as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy. Recent clinical trials have explored the efficacy and safety of treatment regimens incorporating chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab and either panitumumab or cetuximab in patients with mCRC. Results from the BOND-2 trial, which investigated cetuximab, bevacizumab, and chemotherapy in mCRC, provided support for this therapeutic approach. Two large randomized phase 3 trials were initiated to evaluate firstline treatment of mCRC. The Panitumumab Advanced Colorectal Cancer Evaluation (PACCE) study investigated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab with or without panitumumab; CAIRO2 assessed the efficacy and safety of capecitabine/oxaliplatin and bevacizumab with or without cetuximab. In both trials, the combination of bevacizumab, an EGFR-specific antibody, and chemotherapy in first-line treatment of mCRC was associated with increased toxicity and no improvement in patient outcome. These results suggest that these specific combinations should not be used in first-line mCRC outside investigational studies.

Phase I/II study of sequential therapy with irinotecan and S-1 for metastatic colorectal cancer

Background:

Both irinotecan (CPT-11) and S-1 are active against colorectal cancer; however, as S-1 is a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-FU and its metabolites might inhibit the antitumour effect of CPT-11. Therefore, we designed a sequential combination, in which CPT-11 infusion was given on day 1 and S-1 was given orally at 80 mg m⁻² per day on days 3–16 every 3 weeks.

Methods:

Twelve patients entered the phase I study, and the recommended doses were determined as a CPT-11 dose of 150 mg m⁻² and an S-1 dose of 80 mg m⁻².

Results:

In all, 36 patients entered the phase II study, of whom 4 and 16 had complete and partial responses. The overall response rate was 55.6% (95% confidence interval, 38.1–72.1%), and median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (95% confidence interval, 4.8–12.6 months). Grade 3 neutropenia was the most common haematological toxicity and occurred in 6.5% of 215 treatment courses. Grade 3 non-haematological toxicities included anorexia (1.4%) and diarrhoea (0.9%). There was no grade 4 toxicity of any kind.

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that this regimen is convenient, safe and promising, compared with conventional regimens for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Treatment of Fluorouracil-Refractory Patients With Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer by Using Yttrium-90 Resin Microspheres Plus Concomitant Systemic Irinotecan Chemotherapy

Purpose

Liver metastases are the principal cause of death in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Irinotecan is a chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of CRC and has demonstrated synergistic potential when used with radiation. Radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres has demonstrated increased response and survival rates when given with fluorouracil chemotherapy. This study's goal was to evaluate the maximum-tolerated dose of concomitant irinotecan and radioembolization in fluorouracil-refractory patients with CRC hepatic metastases.

Patients and Methods

Twenty-five irinotecan-naïve patients who had experienced relapse after previous chemotherapy were enrolled onto three dose-escalating groups. Irinotecan was administered at 50, 75, or 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle for the first two cycles, and full irinotecan doses (ie, 100 mg/m2) were administered during cycles 3 to 9. Radioembolization was administered during the first chemotherapy cycle.

Results

Most patients experienced acute, self-limiting abdominal pain and nausea. Mild lethargy and anorexia were common. Grades 3 to 4 events were seen in three of six patients at 50 mg/m2 (obstructive jaundice, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea), in five of 13 patients at 75 mg/m2 (neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated alkaline phosphatase, abdominal pain, ascites, fatigue) and in four of six patients at 100 mg/m2 (diarrhea, deep vein thrombosis, constipation, leukopenia). Eleven (48%) of 23 patients had a partial response, and nine patients (39%) had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 6.0 months; the median survival was 12.2 months.

Conclusion

Concomitant use of radioembolization plus irinotecan did not reach a maximum-tolerated dose. The recommended dose of irinotecan in this setting is 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle.

North Central Cancer Treatment Group--achievements and perspectives

The North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) was founded in 1977 as a regional cooperative group to allow cancer patients in the upper Midwest of the United States to gain access to clinical trials in oncology by establishing a network of community oncology practices with one academic research base, the Mayo Clinic. Since then, the NCCTG has grown into an international cooperative group with 43 members in 33 US states and Canada. This article details 30 years of achievements of the NCCTG, including important scientific contributions from disease-specific and treatment modality committees, the cancer control program, patient-reported outcomes and quality-of-life research, and biostatisticians that support the NCCTG's specific aims: to improve the duration and quality of life of cancer patients, to enhance our understanding of the biological consequences of cancer and its treatment, and to improve methods for clinical trial conduct.

Salvage radioembolization of liver-dominant metastases with a resin-based microsphere: initial outcomes

PURPOSE

The use of radioembolization of hepatic metastases with yttrium-90 ((90)Y) microspheres is increasing. The present report describes the outcomes in a cohort of patients with metastatic liver tumors treated with a resin-based microsphere agent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with colon (n = 13), breast (n = 7), and other primary cancers (n = 10) were treated after the failure of first- and second-line therapy. Overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and time to treatment failure (TTTF) were calculated from the first treatment. Response was measured according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors at interval follow-up imaging.

RESULTS

Thirty patients underwent 56 infusions of (90)Y, and 18 remained alive at the end of the study. Fourteen patients (47%) had a partial response or stable disease. OS (604 vs 251 days), TTP (223 vs 87 days), and TTTF (363 vs 87 days) were all significantly longer for patients who had a partial response or stable disease (P < .05). Median OS, TTP, and TTTF for patients with colorectal carcinoma were 357, 112, and 107 days, respectively, versus 638, 118, and 363 days in patients with other metastatic sources. Median survival was not reached for patients with breast carcinoma, and the TTP and TTTF were each 282 days. One patient (3%) experienced grade 3 toxicity (gastrointestinal ulceration).

CONCLUSIONS

(90)Y microsphere therapy produced promising survival rates compared with systemic salvage options, with minimal toxicity.

Hepatic yttrium-90 radioembolization of chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer liver metastases

PURPOSE

To present data for radioembolization with yttrium-90 ((90)Y) resin microspheres in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases in whom currently available therapies had failed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review was conducted of case files of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases in whom chemotherapy had failed, prompting hepatic (90)Y radioembolization administered as a single-session, whole-liver treatment. Imaging and laboratory follow-up results were available for 36 patients. Response and toxicity were assessed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients (mean age, 61 years; 30 men) received hepatic (90)Y radioembolization with resin microspheres (mean activity, 1.9 GBq). At a median interval of 2.9 months after radioembolization, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were demonstrated in seven, 25, and four patients, respectively. Median overall survival was 10.5 months, with improved survival for patients with a decrease in carcinoembryonic antigen level (19.1 months vs 5.4 months) and imaging response (29.3 months vs 4.3 months; P = .0001). Except for one instance of treatment-associated cholecystitis (grade 4 toxicity) and two gastric ulcers (grade 2 toxicity), no severe toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic (90)Y radioembolization can be performed with manageable toxicity in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases whose disease is refractory to chemotherapy. The antitumoral effect is supported by imaging and tumor marker responses. Further investigation is warranted to determine the optimal use of this emerging therapeutic modality.

Enterohepatic recirculation model of irinotecan (CPT-11) and metabolite pharmacokinetics in patients with glioma

BACKGROUND

Enterohepatic recirculation of irinotecan and one of its metabolites, SN-38, has been observed in pharmacokinetic data sets from previous studies. A mathematical model that can incorporate this phenomenon was developed to describe the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 32 patients with recurrent malignant glioma were treated with weekly intravenous administration of irinotecan at a dose of 125 mg/m(2). Plasma concentrations of irinotecan and its three major metabolites were determined. Pharmacokinetic models were developed and tested for simultaneous fit of parent drug and metabolites, including a recirculation component.

RESULTS

Rebound in the plasma concentration suggestive of enterohepatic recirculation at approximately 0.5-1 h post-infusion was observed in most irinotecan plasma concentration profiles, and in some plasma profiles of the SN-38 metabolite. A multi-compartment model containing a recirculation chain was developed to describe this process. The recirculation model was optimal in 22 of the 32 patients compared to the traditional model without the recirculation component.

CONCLUSION

A recirculation chain incorporated in a multi-compartment pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its metabolites appears to improve characterization of this drug's disposition in patients with glioma.

Phase I/II study of 24-hour infusion of irinotecan combined with oral UFT for metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with UFT for untreated and pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Escalating doses of irinotecan (80-110 mg/m(2)) were administered by 24-hour infusion on day 1. UFT was administered orally at 400 mg/m(2)/day on days 3-7 and 10-14. The treatment cycles were repeated every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

In the phase I study, the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan was 110 mg/m(2) and the recommended dose for the phase II study was determined to be 100 mg/m(2). Thirty-five patients including 3 patients at the recommended dose in the phase I study were evaluated in the phase II study. The grade 3/4 toxicities observed were leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia. No grade 3 or more severe nonhematological toxicities were noted. The response rate was 62.9% and the median overall survival 16.7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

A 24-hour infusion of irinotecan combined with UFT is feasible and active for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Metastatic colorectal cancer: current systemic treatment options

The treatment of colorectal cancer has become increasingly complex over recent years. With the emergence of new chemotherapy drugs and targeted agents, there has been great improvement in the prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. This review summarises the evidence supporting the use of combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan with fluorouracil (5-FU) for the treatment of colorectal cancer and outlines the pivotal trials. Phase III trials have demonstrated the superiority of combination chemotherapy over single-agent 5-FU, but the optimal sequencing and combination of treatment is yet to be determined. Oral fluoropyrimidine derivatives have been shown to be equivalent to bolus 5-FU treatment and these offer another option for the treatment of colorectal cancer, but further studies are required to evaluate their use with irinotecan and oxaliplatin. The use of newer targeted therapies, such as bevacizumab and cetuximab, alone and in combination with chemotherapy are discussed, and the most recent data supporting their use is outlined. Bevacizumab-containing regimens have been shown to be superior to those without for the first-line treatment of colorectal cancer, and cetuximab has demonstrated activity in combination with chemotherapy in both the first- and second-line setting. Other targeted agents, such as vatalanib and panitumumab, are discussed and early clinical studies with these agents show promising results.

Role of UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*28 and ABCG2 c.421C>A polymorphisms in irinotecan-induced neutropenia in Asian cancer patients

The objectives of the present study were (i) to study the pharmacogenetics of UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*28 and ABCG2 c.421C>A in three distinct healthy Asian populations (Chinese, Malays and Indians), and (ii) to investigate the polygenic influence of these polymorphic variants in irinotecan-induced neutropenia in Asian cancer patients. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic analyses were done after administration of irinotecan as a 90-min intravenous infusion of 375 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks (n = 45). Genotypic-phenotypic correlates showed a non-significant influence of UGT1A1*28 and ABCG2 c.421C>A polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of SN-38 (P > 0.05), as well as severity of neutropenia (P > 0.05). Significantly higher exposure levels to SN-38 (P = 0.018), lower relative extent of glucuronidation (REG; P = 0.006) and higher biliary index (BI; P = 0.003) were found in cancer patients homozygous for the UGT1A1*6 allele compared with patients harboring the reference genotype. The mean absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was 85% lower and the prevalence of grade 4 neutropenia (ANC < or = 500/microL) was 27% in patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 compared with the reference group. Furthermore, the presence of the UGT1A1*6 allele was associated with an approximately 3-fold increased risk of developing severe grade 4 neutropenia compared with patients harboring the reference genotype. These exploratory findings suggest that homozygosity for UGT1A1*6 allele may be associated with altered SN-38 disposition and may increase the risk of severe neutropenia in Asian cancer patients, particularly in the Chinese cancer patients who comprised 80% (n = 36) of the patient population in the present study.

Phase II trial of oxaliplatin/irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Individually, oxaliplatin and irinotecan have substantial activity in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin. A combination regimen using all 4 agents could potentially increase response rates in CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter phase II trial of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1, irinotecan 175 mg/m(2) on day 1, 5-fluorouracil 240 mg/m(2) by 90-minute infusion on days 2-5, and leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) on days 2-5 of a 21-day cycle was undertaken in patients with CRC through the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. The primary endpoint was response rate, with secondary endpoints of toxicity and quality of life.

RESULTS

Of 14 patients enrolled (13 evaluable), 3 partial responses were seen (23%; 95% confidence interval, 5%-54%), and 9 patients had stable disease (69%). Toxicity was significant, with 1 (8%) grade 5 event (diarrhea and dehydration) and 3 (23%) grade 4 events (leukopenia and diarrhea). The study was closed to further enrollment because of toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The 4-drug regimen was extremely toxic. Future studies incorporating irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-based therapy should consider alternative schedules.

Sequential administration of 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV) followed by irinotecan (CPT-11) at relapse versus CPT-11 followed by 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal carcinoma. A phase III randomized study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the differences in the sequence of administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) followed by irinotecan (CPT-11), or CPT-11 followed by 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with ACC were allocated to the following treatment groups: group A, a bolus of 20 mg/m(2) LV and 425 mg/m(2) 5-FU for 5 days until progression/relapse, and upon progression treatment with weekly CPT-11 (100 mg/m(2)), and group B, CPT-11 followed at progression/relapse by 5-FU/LV at the same doses and schedules as in group A.

RESULTS

120 patients were randomized to receive one of the two treatment sequences and their pretreatment characteristics were equally balanced between treatment arms. No statistically significant difference was found in the objective response rate to CPT-11 (p = 0.45); partial response (PR) was 23.3% for group A patients and 33.3% for group B. Following documented progression and second line treatment there was a significant difference between the response rate in group A (23.3%) and group B where no patients were found to respond to second-line treatment with 5-FU/LV (p = 0.024). The median overall survival was 42.0 weeks (range, 36.6-47.4 weeks) for group A and 32.0 weeks (range, 28.2-35.8 weeks) for group B. The median time to progression for patients in group A following first-line 5-FU/LV was 18 weeks (range, 10-36 weeks) and 12 weeks (range, 10-16 weeks) for group B following first-line CPT-11 (p = 0.0005). Toxicity, according to WHO, was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating patients with CPT-11 upon progression to 5-FU/LV treatment seems to be superior to the opposite sequence. We used these treatments as sequential monotherapies (at progression/relapse), and the best results are gained when 5-FU/LV is followed by CPT-11 at disease progression or relapse.

Immunohistochemical study of DNA topoisomerase I, p53, and Ki-67 in uterine carcinosarcomas

Uterine carcinosarcomas (UCs) are highly aggressive neoplasms for which no effective adjuvant therapy has been established. The aim of this study was to test potential indicators of UC sensitivity to topoisomerase I (topo I)-targeted drugs. Laboratory studies have shown that the cellular response to topo I-targeted drugs is dependent on topo I expression, DNA replication rate, and activity of the apoptotic pathway. Therefore, this study investigated expression of topo I, a proliferation marker Ki-67, and the apoptosis initiator p53 in 20 cases of UC. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections were immunostained with monoclonal antibodies against topo I, Ki-67, and p53. The hospital records of all 20 patients with UC were reviewed. Twelve (60%) of 20 cases showed increased expression of topo I. Staining for Ki-67 showed elevated expression in 15 (75%) of 20 cases. Fourteen cases (70%) showed positive staining for p53 in more than 20% of the tumor cells. However, analysis of the relationship between immunohistochemical results and clinical parameters revealed no correlations with topo I expression. There were no significant correlations between the expression of topo I and Ki-67 (P = .704), or topo I and p53 (P = .465). Significantly increased expression of topo I, Ki-67, and p53 in UC tumor cells suggests sensitivity to topo I-targeted drug treatment.

A Randomised Phase II Study of Irinotecan in Combination with 5-FU/FA Compared with Irinotecan Alone as Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We conducted a randomised phase II study to compare irinotecan monotherapy with irinotecan in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) regarding efficacy and safety of these regimens in second-line therapy after failed fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

55 patients with mCRC after failure of a first-line therapy were randomised to receive either irinotecan 80 mg/m2 followed by FA 500 mg/m2 and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m2 24 h weekly for 6 weeks, with courses repeated on day 50 (arm A), or irinotecan 125 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks, with cycles repeated on day 43 (Arm B).

RESULTS

Both regimens yielded a partial response rate of 11% with identical progression-free survival (3.7 months for both regimens) and similar overall survival (9.5 months for the combination therapy vs. 10.7 months for the monotherapy). Both regimens were very well tolerated, and the combination of irinotecan with 5-FU/FA did not result in increased toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that irinotecan alone or in combination with infusional 5-FU/FA is an effective and safe regimen for CRC patients who failed first-line therapies. However, the role of 5-FU in addition to irinotecan for fluoropyrimidine failures remains unclear. Due to the small sample size, a decision cannot be made which therapy should be preferred, and a significant contribution to the efficacy of single-agent irinotecan is not obvious from this small randomised phase II trial.

Schedule-dependent cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan in a colon cancer cell line

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to clarify the significance of widely accepted irinotecan (CPT-11)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combinations in colon cancer by investigating their sequential effect.

METHODS

The sequential effect of CPT-11/5-FU in two colon cancer cell lines, LoVo and SW480, was evaluated by WST-8 colorimetric assay. The cell cycle distributions of each drug were analyzed by flow cytometry, and then the chemoresistant mechanisms and expression of a drug transporter (MDR1), the bcl-2 apoptotic pathway, metabolizing enzymes [carboxylesterase (CE), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase], and target enzymes (topoisomerase I, thymidine synthase) associated with sequence-dependent cytotoxicity were examined.

RESULTS

The cytotoxicity of 5-FU (10, 100, 1000 microM) followed by CPT-11 (1 microM) was significantly greater than that of CPT-11 (1 microM) followed by 5-FU (10, 100, 1000 microM) (P < 0.05). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that exposure to 5-FU downregulated both MDR1 and bcl-2 mRNA and simultaneously upregulated CE2 mRNA expression, suggesting enhancement of subsequent CPT-11 cytotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The cytotoxic effects of the CPT-11/5-FU combinations were shown to be schedule-dependent in human colon cancer cells. The findings suggest that 5-FU followed by CPT-11 administration might be the optimal sequence for CPT-11/5-FU treatment of advanced colon cancer.

90Y microsphere (TheraSphere) treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer metastases of the liver: response to treatment at targeted doses of 135-150 Gy as measured by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomographic imaging

PURPOSE

The purpose of this phase II study was to determine the safety and efficacy of TheraSphere treatment (90Y microspheres) in patients with liver-dominant colorectal metastases in whom standard therapies had failed or were judged to be inappropriate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with unresectable hepatic colorectal metastases were treated at a targeted absorbed dose of 135-150 Gy. Safety and toxicity were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3.0. Response was assessed with use of computed tomography (CT) and was correlated with response on [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). Survival from first treatment was estimated with use of the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Tumor response measured by FDG PET imaging exceeded that measured by CT imaging for the first (88% vs 35%) and second (73% vs 36%) treated lobes. Tumor replacement of 25% or less (vs >25%) was associated with a statistically significant increase in median survival (339 days vs 162 days; P = .002). Treatment-related toxicities included mild fatigue (n = 13; 48%), nausea (n = 4; 15%), and vague abdominal pain (n = 5; 19%). There was one case of radiation-induced gastritis from inadvertent deposition of microspheres to the gastrointestinal tract (n = 1; 4%). Three patients (11%) experienced ascites/pleural effusion after treatment with TheraSphere as a consequence of liver failure in advanced-stage metastatic disease. With the exception of these three patients whose sequelae were not considered to be related to treatment, all observed toxicities were transient and resolved without medical intervention.

CONCLUSION

TheraSphere administration appears to provide stabilization of liver disease with minimal toxicity in patients in whom standard systemic chemotherapy regimens have failed.