Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irofulven, a novel mushroom-derived cytotoxin, administered for five consecutive days every four weeks in patients with advanced solid malignancies

Optimization of the production process for the anticancer lead compound illudin M: improving titers in shake-flasks

BACKGROUND

The fungal sesquiterpenes Illudin M and S are important base molecules for the development of new anticancer agents due to their strong activity against some resistant tumor cell lines. Due to nonspecific toxicity of the natural compounds, improvement of the pharmacophore is required. A semisynthetic derivative of illudin S (Irofulven) entered phase II clinical trials for the treatment of castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Several semisynthetic illudin M derivatives showed increased in vitro selectivity and improved therapeutic index against certain tumor cell lines, encouraging further investigation. This requires a sustainable supply of the natural compound, which is produced by Basidiomycota of the genus Omphalotus. We aimed to develop a robust biotechnological process to deliver illudin M in quantities sufficient to support medicinal chemistry studies and future preclinical and clinical development. In this study, we report the initial steps towards this goal.

RESULTS

After establishing analytical workflows, different culture media and commercially available Omphalotus strains were screened for the production of illudin M.Omphalotus nidiformis cultivated in a medium containing corn steep solids reached ~ 38 mg L-1 setting the starting point for optimization. Improved seed preparation in combination with a simplified medium (glucose 13.5 g L-1; corn steep solids 7.0 g L- 1; Dox broth modified 35 mL), reduced cultivation time and enhanced titers significantly (~ 400 mg L-1). Based on a reproducible cultivation method, a feeding strategy was developed considering potential biosynthetic bottlenecks. Acetate and glucose were fed at 96 h (8.0 g L-1) and 120 h (6.0 g L-1) respectively, which resulted in final illudin M titer of ~ 940 mg L-1 after eight days. This is a 25 fold increase compared to the initial titer.

CONCLUSION

After strict standardization of seed-preparation and cultivation parameters, a combination of experimental design, empirical trials and additional supply of limiting biosynthetic precursors, led to a highly reproducible process in shake flasks with high titers of illudin M. These findings are the base for further work towards a scalable biotechnological process for a stable illudin M supply.

Identification of Carcinogenesis and Tumor Progression Processes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using High-Throughput Proteomics

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive disease with an overall 5-year survival rate of just 5%. A better understanding of the carcinogenesis processes and the mechanisms of the progression of PDAC is mandatory. Fifty-two PDAC patients treated with surgery and adjuvant therapy, with available primary tumors, normal tissue, preneoplastic lesions (PanIN), and/or lymph node metastases, were selected for the study. Proteins were extracted from small punches and analyzed by LC-MS/MS using data-independent acquisition. Proteomics data were analyzed using probabilistic graphical models, allowing functional characterization. Comparisons between groups were made using linear mixed models. Three proteomic tumor subtypes were defined. T1 (32% of patients) was related to adhesion, T2 (34%) had metabolic features, and T3 (34%) presented high splicing and nucleoplasm activity. These proteomics subtypes were validated in the PDAC TCGA cohort. Relevant biological processes related to carcinogenesis and tumor progression were studied in each subtype. Carcinogenesis in the T1 subtype seems to be related to an increase of adhesion and complement activation node activity, whereas tumor progression seems to be related to nucleoplasm and translation nodes. Regarding the T2 subtype, it seems that metabolism and, especially, mitochondria act as the motor of cancer development. T3 analyses point out that nucleoplasm, mitochondria and metabolism, and extracellular matrix nodes could be involved in T3 tumor carcinogenesis. The identified processes were different among proteomics subtypes, suggesting that the molecular motor of the disease is different in each subtype. These differences can have implications for the development of future tailored therapeutic approaches for each PDAC proteomics subtype.

Developing New Agents for Treatment of Childhood Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities for Preclinical Testing

Developing new therapeutics for the treatment of childhood cancer has challenges not usually associated with adult malignancies. Firstly, childhood cancer is rare, with approximately 12,500 new diagnoses annually in the U.S. in children 18 years or younger. With current multimodality treatments, the 5-year event-free survival exceeds 80%, and 70% of patients achieve long-term “cure”, hence the overall number of patients eligible for experimental drugs is small. Childhood cancer comprises many disease entities, the most frequent being acute lymphoblastic leukemias (25% of cancers) and brain tumors (21%), and each of these comprises multiple molecular subtypes. Hence, the numbers of diagnoses even for the more frequently occurring cancers of childhood are small, and undertaking clinical trials remains a significant challenge. Consequently, development of preclinical models that accurately represent each molecular entity can be valuable in identifying those agents or combinations that warrant clinical evaluation. Further, new regulations under the Research to Accelerate Cures and Equity for Children Act (RACE For Children Act) will change the way in which drugs are developed. Here, we will consider some of the limitations of preclinical models and consider approaches that may improve their ability to translate therapy to clinical trial more accurately.

Advances in patient-derived tumor xenografts: from target identification to predicting clinical response rates in oncology

Most oncology compounds entering clinical development have passed stringent preclinical pharmacology evaluation criteria. However, only a small fraction of experimental agents induce meaningful antitumor activities in the clinic. Low predictability of conventional preclinical pharmacology models is frequently cited as a main reason for the unusually high clinical attrition rates of therapeutic compounds in oncology. Therefore, improvement in the predictive values of preclinical efficacy models for clinical outcome holds great promise to reduce the clinical attrition rates of experimental compounds. Recent reports suggest that pharmacology studies conducted with patient derived xenograft (PDX) tumors are more predictive for clinical outcome compared to conventional, cell line derived xenograft (CDX) models, in particular when therapeutic compounds were tested at clinically relevant doses (CRDs). Moreover, the study of the most malignant cell types within tumors, the tumor initiating cells (TICs), relies on the availability of preclinical models that mimic the lineage hierarchy of cells within tumors. PDX models were shown to more closely recapitulate the heterogeneity of patient tumors and maintain the molecular, genetic, and histological complexity of human tumors during early stages of sequential passaging in mice, rendering them ideal tools to study the responses of TICs, tumor- and stromal cells to therapeutic intervention. In this commentary, we review the progress made in the development of PDX models in key areas of oncology research, including target identification and validation, tumor indication search and the development of a biomarker hypothesis that can be tested in the clinic to identify patients that will benefit most from therapeutic intervention.

Inhibiting tumor growth by targeting tumor vasculature with galectin-1 antagonist anginex conjugated to the cytotoxic acylfulvene, 6-hydroxylpropylacylfulvene

Targeted delivery of therapeutic drugs promises to become the norm to treat cancer. Here, we conjugated the cytotoxic agent 6-hydroxypropylacylfulvene (HPAF) to anginex, a peptide that targets galectin-1, which is highly expressed in endothelial cells of tumor vessels. In a human ovarian cancer model in mice, the conjugate inhibited tumor growth better than equivalent doses of either compound alone. Immunofluorescence on tumor tissue demonstrated that the conjugate, like parent anginex, selectively targeted tumor vasculature and inhibited tumor angiogenesis. Increased activity from the conjugate further suggests that HPAF retains at least some of its normal cytotoxic activity when linked to anginex. More importantly perhaps is the observation that the conjugate abrogates apparent systemic toxicity from treatment with HPAF. This work contributes to the development of tumor vascular targeting agents against cancer in the clinic.

Ovarian tumor growth regression using a combination of vascular targeting agents anginex or topomimetic 0118 and the chemotherapeutic irofulven

Combination of chemotherapeutic agents and angiogenesis inhibitors is now commonly employed in the clinic to treat cancer. Here, we used angiostatic agents anginex and 0118, in combination with the chemotherapeutic irofulven, to treat human ovarian tumor xenografts in mice. General linear mixed models were used to statistically analyze tumor growth curves. Overall, combination of a low, non-toxic dose of irofulven with either angiogenesis inhibitor was more effective at inhibiting tumor growth than any of the single agent therapies. For example, the anginex/irofulven and 0118/irofulven combinations inhibited tumor growth relative to controls by 92% (p<0.0001) and 96% (p<0.0001), respectively, with the 0118/irofulven combinations yielding 100% complete responses. This study suggests that combination therapy of 0118 or anginex and irofulven may be highly effective in the clinical setting.

Synergy of Irofulven in combination with various anti-metabolites, enzyme inhibitors, and miscellaneous agents in MV522 lung carcinoma cells: marked interaction with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil

The novel agent Irofulven (HMAF, NSC 683863) has demonstrated significant antitumor activity against solid tumors in various xenograft models and human clinical trials. The antitumor potential of combining irofulven with 72 different anti-metabolite, enzyme inhibiting, and miscellaneous agents was investigated in this study. The human lung carcinoma MV522 cell line and its corresponding xenograft model were used to evaluate the activity of irofulven in combination with these different agents. Irofulven in combination with select anti-metabolites, notably cytidine or adenine-derived agents, displayed strong synergistic activity in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Agents demonstrating strong synergistic interaction with irofulven included gemcitabine, cyclocytidine, cytarabine, fludarabine phosphate, cladribine, and 5-fluorouracil. Other anti-metabolites, enzyme inhibitors, and a variety of miscellaneous agents failed to interact beneficially when administered in combination with irofulven. The therapeutic activity of irofulven is enhanced considerably when irofulven is combined with select anti-metabolite agents, and further clinical evaluation of these combinations is warranted. The synergistic interaction with these combinations may stem from a variety of actions including inhibition of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway, topoisomerase I activity, and caspase-dependent and independent induction of apoptosis.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irofulven and capecitabine administered every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose, dose limiting toxicities (DLT), safety and pharmacokinetics of irofulven combined with capecitabine in advanced solid tumor patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Irofulven was given i.v. over 30 min on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks; capecitabine was given orally twice daily, day 1 to 15. Dose levels (DL) were: irofulven (mg/kg)/capecitabine (mg/m2/day): DL1: 0.3/1,700; DL2: 0.4/1,700; DL3: 0.4/2,000; DL4: 0.5/2,000.

RESULTS

Between May 2002 and March 2004, 37 patients were treated and 36 evaluable for MTD. DLT occurred in 1/6 evaluable patients in DL1 (grade 3 thrombocytopenia); 1/6 in DL3 (grade 3 thrombocytopenia); 2/7 in DL4 (grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 thrombocytopenia). DL4 was defined as the MTD and DL3 was established as the recommended dose (RD). DLTs occurred in 1 of 14 additional patients treated at DL3. No treatment-related deaths or grade 4 non-hematological toxicity occurred, and grade 3 toxicities were infrequent. Antitumor activity was observed; two partial responses were noted in thyroid carcinoma (DL1, DL4); one unconfirmed partial response was observed in a patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, (DL3); 12 patients had disease stabilization >3 months; of eight patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), one patient had PSA normalization and four short-term stabilizations of PSA occurred. Capecitabine and irofulven pharmacokinetics results did not suggest drug-drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Irofulven with capecitabine was adequately tolerated and evidence of antitumor activity was observed. The recommended dose is irofulven 0.4 mg/kg and capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day.

Applications of microarray technology to pancreatic cancer research and drug development

As one of the deadliest forms of malignancy in the US and worldwide, pancreatic cancer is becoming a top research priority as therapies at present have had markedly limited or no success in controlling this disease. The arrival and advancement of microarray technology in the last decade offers the hope of new diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic applications. The purpose of this review is to describe the basic principles of microarray technology and techniques and its use in pancreatic cancer research for drug discovery and development, with a focus on the relevant published data obtained from the literature.

Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and routes of excretion of intravenous irofulven in patients with advanced solid tumors

Irofulven is currently in Phase 2 clinical trials against a wide variety of solid tumors and has demonstrated activity in ovarian, prostate, gastrointestinal, and non-small cell lung cancer. The objectives of this study were to determine its pharmacokinetics and route of excretion and to characterize its metabolites in human plasma and urine samples after a 30-min i.v. infusion at a dose of 0.55 mg/kg in patients with advanced solid tumors. Three patients were administered i.v. 100 microCi of [14C]irofulven over a 30-min infusion on day 1 of cycle 1. Serial blood and plasma samples were drawn at 0 (before irofulven infusion) and up to 144 h after the start of infusion. Urine and fecal samples were collected for up to 144 h after the start of infusion. The mean urinary and fecal excretion of radioactivity up to 144 h were 71.2 and 2.9%, respectively, indicating renal excretion was the major route of elimination of [14C]irofulven. The C(max), AUC(0-infinity), and terminal half-life values for total radioactivity were 1130 ng-Eq/ml, 24,400 ng-Eq . h/ml, and 116.5 h, respectively, and the corresponding values for irofulven were 82.7 ng/ml, 65.5 ng . h/ml, and 0.3 h, respectively, suggesting that the total radioactivity in human plasma was a result of the metabolites. Twelve metabolites of irofulven were detected in human urine and plasma by electrospray ionization/tandem mass spectrometry. Among these metabolites, the cyclopropane ring-opened metabolite (M2) of irofulven was found, and seven others were proposed as glucuronide and glutathione conjugates.

Phase I trial of irofulven (MGI 114) in pediatric patients with solid tumors

PURPOSE

We performed a Phase I trial of irofulven (MGI 114) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and the plasma pharmacokinetics of irofulven in children < or=21 years of age with refractory/recurrent malignancies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Thirty-five patients were entered into the study, of whom 34 were eligible. Patients received Irofulven daily x 5 days every 28 days over 10 min, following pre-treatment with ondansetron (0.45 mg/kg) and dexamethasone (12 mg/m(2)). The initial dose of irofulven was 8 mg/m(2) daily, with subsequent escalations to 10, 13, and 17 mg/m(2). Plasma pharmacokinetic samples were obtained in a subset patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were assessable for toxicity, and 30 were assessable for response. In heavily pre-treated patients, dose-limiting thrombocytopenia was observed in two patients at the 8 mg/m(2)/day, and in one patient at the 6 mg/m(2)/day dose level. In less heavily pre-treated patients, proteinuria and elevated creatinine were dose limiting in two patients at the 17 mg/m(2)/day dose level. At 13 mg/m(2)/day, constipation, hyperkalemia with elevated creatinine, and thrombocytopenia was dose limiting in three patients. There were no complete or partial responses. One patient with poorly differentiated carcinoma had stable disease and received 11 courses of therapy. Patients demonstrated a lower systemic exposure and greater clearance than adults treated at similar dose levels.

CONCLUSION

The MTD of irofulven administered daily x 5 every 28 days with concomitant ondansetron and dexamethasone is 6 mg/m(2)/day in heavily pre-treated patients and 10 mg/m(2)/day in less heavily pre-treated patients.

Irofulven as first line therapy in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II multicenter study by the Cancer Therapeutics Research Group (CTRG)

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of irofulven, a DNA interacting acylfulvene analog, as first line therapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer received irofulven at a dose of 0.45 mg/kg administered intravenously over 30-min infusion (up to a maximum of 50 mg), on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

The median number of cycles delivered per patient was 2 (range 1-6). Two patients (9%) had >or= 1-week delay in administration of subsequent cycle of chemotherapy. For the day 8 chemotherapy, dose reductions were required in seven patients (30%); dose omitting occurred in five patients (22%). Grade 3/4 anemia and neutropenia occurred in 22 and 17% of patients, respectively. There was no grade 4 thrombocytopenia and no neutropenic fever was observed. Of the 20 evaluable patients, there were no responses observed, 3 patients had stable disease after 2 cycles of treatment which was not confirmed by a further assessment. Median overall survival was 6.05 months (95% CI 4.55-9.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Irofulven was tolerated at the dose of 0.45 mg/kg on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks but showed no evidence of antitumor activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irofulven and cisplatin administered in a 30-min infusion every two weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

To determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose, safety and pharmacokinetics of irofulven combined with cisplatin in advanced solid tumor patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cisplatin and irofulven were given sequentially i.v. over 30 min on day 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. Four dose levels (DL) were explored: irofulven (mg/kg)/cisplatin (mg/m2): DL1: 0.3/30; DL2: 0.4/30; DL3: 0.4/40; DL4: 0.5/40. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) included dosing omission and delay > 1 week. MTD was the DL with DLT in 2/2 or > or = 2/6 patients during cycle 1-2.

RESULTS

Between March 2002 and April 2003, 33 patients were treated. DLT occurred in 1/6 patients in DL1 (hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia); 1/6 in DL2 (thrombocytopenia); 2 heavily pretreated patients out of 6 patients in DL3 (neutropenic infection, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis); 2/3 in DL4 (asthenia, blurred vision). Three DLT occurred in 12 additional patients treated at DL2. No toxic deaths occurred; grade 4 toxicity and grade 3 non-hematological toxicity were infrequent. Six patients reported grade 1-2 visual events. Antitumor activity was observed over a broad spectrum of tumor types in all DLs: 1 partial response in bulky sarcoma (DL1); 1 clinical response in endometrial carcinoma (DL1); 2 partial responses not confirmed due to discontinuation (ovarian DL2, renal DL4); 8 stabilizations > 3 months; PSA response: 3/9 prostate cancer patients. Irofulven showed rapid elimination and high interpatient variability. Platinum and irofulven pharmacokinetics did not suggest drug-drug interactions.

CONCLUSION

Irofulven with cisplatin was adequately tolerated and substantial evidence of antitumor activity was observed. The recommended dose is irofulven 0.4 mg/kg and cisplatin 30 mg/m2.

New cytotoxic agents: a review of the literature

The goal of treatment for patients with advanced cancer is to prolong survival, control symptoms, and reduce disease-related complications. Despite the introduction of many cytotoxic agents during the past decade, only modest improvement in survival has been achieved. In order to urgently improve these situations, new cytotoxic agents as well as molecular-targeted agents are now under investigation. In this article, we reviewed the latest information regarding antitumor activity, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and clinical application of the new cytotoxic agents.

Irofulven demonstrates clinical activity against metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer in a phase 2 single-agent trial

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this study was to assess the antitumor activity of irofulven in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer by measuring a sustained decrease of 50% or greater in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients (median age, 73 years) received at least 1 dose of 10.6 mg/m2 irofulven per day on days 1-5 of a 28-day course. Eligible patients had pathologically confirmed metastatic hormone-refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate and had not received prior cytotoxic chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients received a median of 3 courses of irofulven. Thirty-two patients received at least 2 courses of therapy and were evaluable for efficacy. Four patients (13%) achieved partial response, with a median duration of 2.9 months (range, 2.6-5.8 months). Twenty-seven patients (84%) had disease stabilization and 1 patient (3%) progressed on study. Median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% confidence interval, 2.3-4.2 months), with a median progression-free survival of 4.2 months (range, 3.5-6.9 months) for responders. Grade 4 toxicities consisted of thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia, occurring in 1 patient each. The most common treatment-related grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities included asthenia (19% of patients), vomiting (14%), nausea (12%), and infection without grade 3/4 neutropenia (10%).

CONCLUSION

Irofulven shows activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer and has an acceptable safety profile, warranting further investigation of this drug, particularly in combination therapies.

Characterizations of irofulven cytotoxicity in combination with cisplatin and oxaliplatin in human colon, breast, and ovarian cancer cells

PURPOSE

This study assessed the cytotoxic effects of irofulven in combination with oxaliplatin and cisplatin in a panel of human cancer cell lines.

METHODS

Growth inhibition studies were performed using the human HT29 colon cancer cell line, irofulven-resistant derivative HT29/IF2, breast cancer cell line MCF7, and ovarian cancer line CAOV3. Irofulven-oxaliplatin combinations were compared with irofulven-cisplatin combinations in the same cell lines using similar experimental settings. Cells were exposed for 1 h to irofulven and then for 24 h to oxaliplatin or cisplatin and vice versa.

RESULTS

Single agent irofulven displayed cytotoxic effects against human colon HT29 cells, human breast cancer cell lines including MCF7, SKBR3, and ZR-75-1, and human ovarian cancer cell lines CAOV3, OVCAR3, and IGROV1, with OVCAR3 being the most sensitive cancer cell line (IC50: 2.4 microM). In all tested cell lines the oxaliplatin-irofulven combination led to clear evidence of synergistic activity. In HT29 and HT29/IF2, the sequence oxaliplatin followed by irofulven appears to be the most effective whereas in MCF7 cells, irofulven given prior to or simultaneously with oxaliplatin is more effective than the other schedule. The combination displays additive activity toward CAOV3 ovarian cells when irofulven was administered prior to or simultaneously with oxaliplatin and partially synergistic when oxaliplatin was followed by irofulven. In most of the cell lines, the sequence oxaliplatin followed by irofulven appears to be the most effective as compared to other schedules. A combination of irofulven with cisplatin has the same efficacy as with oxaliplatin for the same cell lines. Cell cycle studies show that irofulven increases the proportion of cells in the S phase. Cisplatin-irofulven and oxaliplatin-irofulven combinations block cells in G1/S and potently induce apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

Irofulven displays synergistic antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects when combined with oxaliplatin over a broad range of concentrations in human colon and breast cancer cells. Acquired resistance to irofulven has limited impact on the effects of cisplatin-irofulven and oxaliplatin-irofulven combinations. Based on these data, irofulven-oxaliplatin and cisplatin-irofulven combinations will be further explored in clinical trials, favoring the use schedules of oxaliplatin given prior to irofulven in patients with cancer.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irofulven administered weekly or biweekly in advanced solid tumor patients

PURPOSE

We performed a Phase I and pharmacokinetic study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of irofulven (6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene; MGI-114, MGI PHARMA, Inc.), administered in intermittent weekly schedules in patients with advanced solid tumors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Three schedules were tested: A, days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks; B, days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; C, days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. Drugs were administered as 5- and 30-min (schedules B and C) infusions. Dose levels of 10, 12, and 14 mg/m(2)/week were explored.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients received 256 cycles. Fifteen of 74 patients evaluable for maximum tolerated dose experienced 16 dose-limiting toxicities (5 of 17 patients on schedule A, 2 of 25 on schedule B, and 8 of 32 on schedule C), principally treatment delay for thrombocytopenia. Schedule A was considered unsuitable because of frequent thrombocytopenia and treatment discontinuations. Twenty-three percent of the overall population (22 patients with grade 1-2, and 1 patient with grade 3), including 37% of patients on dose level 3, experienced unexpected dose-limiting visual toxicity, which included color perception and visual field alterations linked to retinal cone cell toxicity; the visual toxicity had an early onset, was mostly reversible, and was related to higher dose per infusion. Safety profiles were similar for 5- and 30-min infusions. The relationships between dose and area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration were linear for both 5- and 30-min infusions in the 78 patients evaluated for pharmacokinetics. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve and clearance were comparable between infusion durations. Responses included one complete (ovarian), one partial (renal), and seven disease stabilizations lasting >4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend doses of 18 mg/m(2)/infusion for schedule B and 24 mg/m(2)/infusion for schedule C, limited to 0.55 mg/kg and a total dose of 50 mg/infusion, administered over 30-min.

Characterization and Multiparameter Analysis of Visual Adverse Events in Irofulven Single-Agent Phase I and II Trials

PURPOSE

Irofulven (6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene) is a novel agent, derived from illudin S, with potent apoptotic effects in preclinical models. In the Phase I trial evaluating intermittent weekly schedules, visual symptoms were dose limiting. The aim of this analysis was to better characterize the visual adverse events of irofulven and provide treatment guidelines.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Clinical data from 277 patients entered in single-agent Phase I to II clinical trials who received irofulven on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks; days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks; or days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks were included in this multiparameter analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 74 patients (27%) experienced visual symptoms. The most frequently reported symptoms were flashing lights (12% of patients), blurred vision (9%), and photosensitivity (8%). Grade 3 toxicity was observed in 12 patients (4%). The incidence and severity of visual events were dose dependent, with no grade 3 visual events occurring at doses < or =0.50 mg/kg and grade 1 to 2 events in only 12% and 8% of patients, at doses of < or =0.50 mg/kg and < or =20 mg/m2, respectively. Grade 1 to 2 toxicity was reversible in most patients. Abnormal electroretinogram and abnormal visual fields were noted after irofulven treatment in 24 of 39 patients (62%) and 15 of 26 patients (58%), respectively. All but 1 patient who had electroretinogram assessment received doses >0.50 mg/kg. Clinical examination and visual field assessment were found to be better correlated with symptoms and appear to be more appropriate for surveillance of irofulven retinal symptoms than electroretinograms.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of retained antitumor activity and reversibility of grade 1 and 2 visual symptoms at lower doses, it appears that an irofulven dose of < or =0.50 mg/kg or < or =20 mg/m2, not to exceed 50 mg in a single dose, given as a 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks or days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks minimizes the frequency and severity of visual symptoms.

Evaluation of irofulven (MGI-114) in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma: A phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

OBJECTIVE

This multi-center phase II trial was conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group to evaluate the activity and toxicity of irofulven in patients with previously treated adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

METHODS

Eligible patients had documented recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma after receiving definitive locoregional therapy, and were required to have measurable disease, performance status of 0-2, and adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal functions prior to study entry. Patients were allowed one prior chemotherapy regimen. The initial dose of irofulven was 11 mg/m(2)/day for four days administered intravenously. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Doses were escalated or reduced based on previous cycle toxicity.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled onto the trial. There was one (4%) confirmed complete response. Seven (28%) patients had stable disease, with a median duration of 10.4 (range: 4.4-21.6) months. Patients received a median of one (range: 1-5) cycle of protocol treatment. There were three early treatment-related deaths due to renal failure and severe electrolyte disturbances. Two patients experienced grade 4 hematologic adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Irofulven administered at the dose and schedule used in this trial was minimally active and resulted in significant toxicity.

Enhanced antitumor activity of irofulven in combination with irinotecan in pediatric solid tumor xenograft models

PURPOSE

Irofulven, a novel chemotherapeutic agent with a broad spectrum of activity, is effective against preclinical models of pediatric tumors. The cytotoxic activity of irofulven is augmented when combined with agents that interact with DNA topoisomerase I; however, none of the reported studies have used the protracted dosing schedule found to be active clinically in treatment of childhood cancers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the antitumor activity of irofulven in combination with irinotecan administered on a protracted schedule in a panel of pediatric solid tumor xenografts.

METHODS

Irofulven and irinotecan were evaluated alone or in combination against eight independent xenografts, which included childhood brain tumors (n=5), neuroblastoma (n=1), and rhabdomyosarcoma (n=2). Irofulven was administered i.v. daily for 5 days with courses repeated every 21 days for a total of three cycles. Doses of irofulven ranged from 1.33 to 4.6 mg/kg. Irinotecan was given i.v. daily for 5 days each week for 2 weeks repeated every 21 days for three cycles at doses between 0.28 and 1.25 mg/kg.

RESULTS

Irofulven and irinotecan, given as single agents, induced few responses in pediatric solid tumor xenografts at the selected doses. At the same doses, irofulven in combination with irinotecan demonstrated superior antitumor activity, inducing complete responses in seven of the eight xenograft lines.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies show that the cytotoxic activity of irofulven is greater when combined with protracted administration of irinotecan. Although the systemic exposure of irofulven required to induce objective responses in this panel of pediatric solid tumors was in excess of that achievable in patients receiving maximally tolerated doses using this schedule of drug administration, the enhanced activity of irofulven in combination with irinotecan supports the pursuit of alternative administration strategies and combinations.

A phase II trial of 6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene (MGI-114, irofulven) in patients with relapsed or refractory non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of 6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene (HMAF; MGI-114, irofulven) as therapy for relapsed or refractory non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

A two-stage phase II design was employed separately for refractory and relapsed patients to differentiate between ineffective treatment (response rate < or =10%) and active treatment (response rate > or =30%). Eligible patients received HMAF 11 mg/m2 per day intravenously over 5 min on days 1-5, with cycles repeated every 28 days.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (15 relapsed; 21 refractory) were treated, and no responses were seen.

TOXICITY

Grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 thrombocytopenia each occurred in 11% of the patients. Grade 3 nausea occurred in 47%; grade 3-4 vomiting in 42%. Twenty-two percent developed grade 3 fatigue. Eleven percent developed grade 3 hallucinations.

CONCLUSIONS

HMAF, administered at this dose and schedule, is not active as salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory non-small cell lung cancer.

ATM-dependent CHK2 activation induced by anticancer agent, irofulven

Irofulven (6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene, HMAF, MGI 114) is one of a new class of anticancer agents that are semisynthetic derivatives of the mushroom toxin illudin S. Preclinical studies and clinical trials have demonstrated that irofulven is effective against several tumor types. Mechanisms of action studies indicate that irofulven induces DNA damage, MAPK activation, and apoptosis. In this study we found that in ovarian cancer cells, CHK2 kinase is activated by irofulven while CHK1 kinase is not activated even when treated at higher concentrations of the drug. By using GM00847 human fibroblast expressing tetracycline-controlled, FLAG-tagged kinase-dead ATR (ATR.kd), it was demonstrated that ATR kinase does not play a major role in irofulven-induced CHK2 activation. Results from human fibroblasts proficient or deficient in ATM function (GM00637 and GM05849) indicated that CHK2 activation by irofulven is mediated by the upstream ATM kinase. Phosphorylation of ATM on Ser(1981), which is critical for kinase activation, was observed in ovarian cancer cell lines treated with irofulven. RNA interference results confirmed that CHK2 activation was inhibited after introducing siRNA for ATM. Finally, experiments done with human colon cancer cell line HCT116 and its isogenic CHK2 knockout derivative; and experiments done by expressing kinase-dead CHK2 in an ovarian cancer cell line demonstrated that CHK2 activation contributes to irofulven-induced S phase arrest. In addition, it was shown that NBS1, SMC1, and p53 were phosphorylated in an ATM-dependent manner, and p53 phosphorylation on serine 20 is dependent on CHK2 after irofulven treatment. In summary, we found that the anticancer agent, irofulven, activates the ATM-CHK2 DNA damage-signaling pathway, and CHK2 activation contributes to S phase cell cycle arrest induced by irofulven.

Integrating pharmacology and in vivo cancer models in preclinical and clinical drug development

Historically, cancer drug development has been a roller coaster. Numerous agents have shown exciting activity in preclinical models and yet have had minimal activity clinically. These disappointments have led to reasonable scepticism about the true value of both syngeneic and xenograft rodent tumour models in accurately identifying agents that will have important clinical utility. Whereas the development of newer techniques, including transgenic mouse models of cancer, offers the potential to develop more predictive models, the role of such mice in cancer drug development is not yet validated. To advance in our understanding of predictive model systems it may be wise to analyse both the successes and the failures of conventional models in order to understand some of their limitations and perhaps to avoid making the same mistakes in the future. Here we review the value and limitations of xenograft models, and the role of integrating preclinical pharmacology in developing new treatments for solid tumours of childhood.

Phase I population pharmacokinetics of irofulven

Our aim was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for irofulven and to assess covariates that might affect irofulven pharmacokinetics. Irofulven was administered by 5- or 30-min i.v. infusion to cancer patients during a phase I study. Blood samples were collected over 4 h. Plasma samples were analyzed to quantitate irofulven by high-performance liquid chromatography. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a non-linear mixed effects modeling program, MP2. Fifty-nine patients were available for pharmacokinetic analysis. Irofulven plasma concentration-time profiles were best described by a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Clearance and central volume of distribution were not significantly influenced by individual characteristics, i.e. body weight (BW), body surface area (BSA), age and gender. Final parameter estimates of clearance and central volume of distribution were 616 l/h and 37 l, respectively, resulting in a very short terminal half-life of less than 10 min. A relatively high level of variability was observed in irofulven pharmacokinetics, which was mainly due to a significant residual variability, 39%. For a 30-min irofulven infusion, the optimal sampling schedule for clearance estimation using the Bayesian method was the three time points 0.35-0.45, 0.80 and 1-1.2 h from the beginning of a 30-min infusion. We conclude that after i.v. infusion of irofulven, plasma clearance was high and not dependent upon patient age, gender, BSA or BW.

Metastatic pancreatic cancer: emerging strategies in chemotherapy and palliative care

This update is devoted to discussion of optimal supportive and palliative care of patients with pancreatic cancer. Approximately 33,000 new cases of pancreatic cancer are predicted for the U.S. in 2002. Because diagnosis and intervention occur late in the course of this disease, the vast majority of patients already have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. These tumors are relatively resistant to systemic chemotherapy, making pancreatic cancer the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.S. and the Western world. For these reasons, efforts at identifying and treating disease-related symptomatology are priorities. This update overviews symptom management, supportive care strategies, and both standard and emerging palliative chemotherapy options. The incorporation of molecularly targeted therapies into treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer is reviewed as well. These strategies are of relevance to internists, gastroenterologists, oncologists, and other specialists who care for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Phase II study of MGI-114 administered intravenously for 5 days every 28 days to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

We examined the use of MGI-114 (6-hydroxymethyacylfulvene) for the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Twenty-six patients were enrolled, with a median age of 60 years (range 41-75); 64% were male and all patients had a performance status of 0 or 1. We administered a dose of 11 mg/m2/d x 5 days every 4 weeks. With a median of two cycles (range 0-6) administered, no complete responses or partial responses were observed. Four patients had no change in disease (16%); 15 patients (57%) had progressive disease; seven patients were inevaluable (27%). Toxicity was evaluated in 25 of 26 patients. The main toxicities were hematologic, including granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. Neuropsychiatric adverse events included hallucination (7.7%), depression/anxiety (15.4%), and/or insomnia (19.2%). Given the lack of antitumor activity, further study of MGI-114 in colorectal cancer does not appear warranted.

Apoptosis induction by the dual-action DNA- and protein-reactive antitumor drug irofulven is largely Bcl-2-independent

The overexpression of Bcl-2 is implicated in the resistance of cancer cells to apoptosis. This study explored the potential of irofulven (hydroxymethylacylfulvene, HMAF, MGI 114, NSC 683863), a novel DNA- and protein-reactive anticancer drug, to overcome the anti-apoptotic properties of Bcl-2 in HeLa cells with controlled Bcl-2 overexpression. Irofulven treatment resulted in rapid (12hr) dissipation of the mitochondrial membrane potential, phosphatidylserine externalization, and apoptotic DNA fragmentation, with progressive changes after 24hr. Bcl-2 overexpression caused marginal or partial inhibition of these effects after treatment times ranging from 12 to 48hr. Both Bcl-2-dependent and -independent responses to irofulven were abrogated by a broad-spectrum caspase inhibitor. Despite the somewhat decreased apoptotic indices, cell growth inhibition by irofulven was unaffected by Bcl-2 status. In comparison, Bcl-2 overexpression drastically reduced apoptotic DNA fragmentation by etoposide, acting via topoisomerase II-mediated DNA damage, but had no effect on apoptotic DNA fragmentation by helenalin A, which reacts with proteins but not DNA. Irofulven retains its pro-apoptotic and growth inhibitory potential in cell lines that have naturally high Bcl-2 expression. Collectively, the results implicate multiple mechanisms of apoptosis induction by irofulven, which may differ in time course and Bcl-2 dependence. It is possible that the sustained ability of irofulven to induce profound apoptosis and to block cell growth despite Bcl-2 overexpression may be related to its dual reactivity with both DNA and proteins.

Enhanced antitumor activity of irofulven in combination with antimitotic agents

The aim of this study was to determine the antitumor activity of irofulven when administered in combination with a variety of antimitotic agents. Irofulven in combination with either paclitaxel or docetaxel demonstrated synergistic activity in both the in vitro and in vivo studies. The majority of xenograft bearing animals that received suboptimal (< MTD) doses of irofulven and a taxane demonstrated complete cures. In contrast, in vitro studies produced either an additive or an antagonistic effect when irofulven was combined with other antimitotic agents such as vinca alkaloids, rhizoxin, s-trityl cysteine, or allocolchicine. Xenograft studies of irofulven and vinca alkaloids reflected in vitro results, as the tumor response in combination treated animals was less than the response in irofulven (monotherapy) treated animals. These results indicate that the therapeutic activity of irofulven is enhanced when combined with taxanes, and warrant further evaluation of these combinations.

A phase II study of Irofulven (MGI 114) in patients with stage IV melanoma

Sixteen patients with stage IV melanoma, who were heavily pretreated, received 11 mg/m2/day of intravenous Irofulven for five consecutive days every 28 days. There were no objective tumor responses, although one patient exhibited stable disease after 4 cycles. The most common toxicities were grade 1/2 nausea, vomiting, fatigue, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. One patient required a dose reduction for an elevated creatinine while another patient required cessation of treatment because of acute ataxia that may have been related to Irofulven. Based upon these data, Irofulven does not demonstrate significant antitumor activity to warrant further investigation in advanced melanoma.

Preferential targeting of apoptosis in tumor versus normal cells

Elimination of cancer cells by early apoptosis is preferred over other forms of cell growth inhibition. Apoptosis directly leads to tumor regression and reduces risks of selecting more aggressive and/or drug-resistant phenotypes that are often responsible for tumor regrowth and treatment failure. Although DNA damage by anticancer drugs is commonly recognized as an apoptotic stimulus, there is enormous variability in the magnitude and timing of such effects. Especially potent and rapid apoptosis seems to be a hallmark of various alkylating anticancer drugs that are regarded as DNA-reactive agents but are observed to react mainly with cellular proteins. Our studies with such dual-action drugs (irofulven, oxaliplatin) suggest that not only DNA damage, but also protein damage, contributes to apoptosis induction. DNA damage is well known to initiate death-signaling pathways leading to mitochondrial dysfunction. Protein damage, in turn, can distort cell redox homeostasis, which facilitates apoptosis execution. Such dual effects can be particularly lethal to tumor cells, which tend to function under pro-oxidative conditions. In contrast to tumor cells that are highly susceptible, normal cells show marginal apoptotic responses to the dual action drugs. This protection of normal cells might reflect their greater ability to buffer pro-oxidative changes and quickly restore redox homeostasis, despite substantial drug uptake and macromolecular binding. Importantly, by targeting the death process at multiple points, DNA- and protein-damaging drugs can be less vulnerable to various bypass mechanisms possible with single targets. The reviewed studies provide a proof of concept that differential apoptosis targeting in cancer versus normal cells can be a basis for tumor selectivity of anticancer drugs.

Irofulven induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells regardless of caspase-3 status

Caspase-3 deficiency can limit the efficiency of pro-apoptotic anticancer treatments. Irofulven (hydroxymethylacyl-fulvene, HMAF. MGI 114, NSC 683863) is an antitumor drug, currently in a Phase III and multiple Phase II trials, which can differentiate between tumor and normal cells in apoptosis induction. This study investigated whether apoptosis induced by irofulven requires caspase-3. Irofulven action was compared in breast cancer cells differing in caspase-3 status: deficient MCF-7 cells and proficient MDA-MB-231 cells and in normal human mammary epithelial cells, HMEC. Irofulven induces significant, concentration and time-dependent apoptotic DNA fragmentation in breast cancer cell lines, regardless of caspase-3 status. After 12, 24 and 48 h incubation at 1 microM irofulven (approximately 3 x GI50), fragmented DNA comprised 3.7, 14.1 and 34.6% and 8.4, 12.6 and 20.3% of total DNA in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively. Cell viability (trypan blue exclusion) remained largely unaffected during the first 24 h but decreased markedly after 48 h, indicating secondary necrosis. Net losses in cell numbers were apparent at 48 h. Normal HMEC cells were refractory to 1 microM drug with only approximately 3-9% fragmented DNA after 12-48 h, although apoptosis was observed at drug levels >3 microM. The broad-spectrum caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-fmk inhibited irofulven-induced apoptosis of all cell lines at 20 microM with nearly complete abrogation of apoptosis at 100 microM. Irofulven treatment resulted in marginal caspase-3 processing in MDA-MB-231 and HMEC cells. These results indicate that whereas the caspase cascade mediates irofulven- induced apoptosis, caspase-3 is dispensable (supported by NIH CA70091 and CA78706).

Ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynecologic malignancy in women in the United States. Studies from this year's American Society of Clinical Oncology more clearly defined the role of chemotherapy in women with early stage disease and now suggest that essentially all women with invasive disease should receive chemotherapy that contains carboplatin. Studies in women with advanced disease continue to support the use of carboplatin and paclitaxel in the treatment of women with newly diagnosed disease although early data suggest that carboplatin and docetaxel might be an acceptable alternative. Platinum-resistant disease remains a therapeutic challenge. Small molecules that inhibit the function of the epidermal growth factor receptor, such as OSI-774, and novel classes of chemotherapeutic agents, including the acylfulvene MGI-114 and epothilone B and its analogue, BMS247550, all warrant further study in this disease.