2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline

Is it appropriate to select patients for primary prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim based on the risk of febrile neutropenia?

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia (FN), a major hematologic adverse event in perioperative chemotherapy for breast cancer, is more prevalent among Asian populations than Caucasians. Hematopoietic growth factor guidelines recommend pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis based on chemotherapy regimen and patient risk factors. We verified the appropriateness of these guidelines for patient selection.

METHODS

The CSPOR-BC FN study, a prospective multicenter study conducted in Japan from 2015 to 2017, included 477 patients surveyed for FN (≥ 37.5 ℃ and grade 4 neutropenia). Cutoff values for age and pre-treatment neutrophil count as risk factors were determined.

RESULTS

The incidence of FN was 28.7% (N = 137). The regimen (TC), age (≥ 65), low pre-treatment neutrophil count, and no primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim were significant FN risk factors. Logistic regression determined age ≥ 65 as a significant risk factor (odds ratio, OR = 2.24; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.34-3.75). However, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for FN cutoff at 65 were 28.4%, 83.8%, and 0.5195, respectively, indicating low discriminative ability. Similarly, pre-treatment neutrophil count at 1000/μl remained a risk factor (OR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.67-0.95), even with the ROC-optimized cutoff of 2436/μl. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 27.6%, 83.8%, and 0.5561, respectively, indicating a limited ability to differentiate.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the current approach to select patients for primary prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim by evaluating existing FN risk factors may not be appropriate for individual patient assessment.

Telpegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomized, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is usually managed by recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) and pegylated rhG-CSF (PEG-rhG-CSF). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of telpegfilgrastim, a novel Y-shaped PEG-rhG-CSF, for CIN prophylaxis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This was a multicentre, randomized, open-label, active-controlled non-inferiority study. Patients with NSCLC who received 1-4 chemotherapy cycles of docetaxel plus carboplatin were randomized 1:1:1 to receive telpegfilgrastim 2 mg, 33 µg/kg or control drug (rhG-CSF [Topneuter®] in cycle 1 of chemotherapy, rhG-CSF [Topneuter®] or PEG-rhG-CSF [Xinruibai®] per patients' choice in cycles 2-4 of chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was duration of grade 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included duration of grade 4 neutropenia in cycles 2-4 of chemotherapy, incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), duration and incidence of ≥ grade 3 neutropenia, dynamic change of absolute neutrophil count from baseline and safety.

RESULTS

From October 16, 2020, to September 1, 2021, 133 patients were randomized to telpegfilgrastim 2 mg (n = 44), 33 µg/kg (n = 45) and control group (n = 44). In cycle 1 of chemotherapy, the mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia in telpegfilgrastim 2 mg, 33 µg/kg groups and control group were 0.02 day, 0.09 day and 0.16 day, respectively. The least square mean differences versus control group were -0.14 day [95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.35, 0.06] for telpegfilgrastim 2 mg group and -0.06 day [95% CI: -0.26, 0.15] for telpegfilgrastim 33 µg/kg group. which met the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1 day. Incidence of grade 4 neutropenia, incidence of FN and duration of ≥ grade 3 neutropenia in cycles 1-4 of chemotherapy was similar between telpegfilgrastim groups and control group. Telpegfilgrastim was well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse events were comparable with control group.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that telpegfilgrastim 2 mg or 33 μg/kg was non-inferior to rhG-CSF (Topneuter®) and PEG-rhG-CSF (Xinruibai®) for the management of CIN in patients with NSCLC. In particular, a 2 mg fixed dose of telpegfilgrastim presents a more convenient administration option.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04466137 , July 10, 2020.

Bistable dynamics of TAN-NK cells in tumor growth and control of radiotherapy-induced neutropenia in lung cancer treatment

Neutrophils play a crucial role in the innate immune response as a first line of defense in many diseases, including cancer. Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) can either promote or inhibit tumor growth in various steps of cancer progression via mutual interactions with cancer cells in a complex tumor microenvironment (TME). In this study, we developed and analyzed mathematical models to investigate the role of natural killer cells (NK cells) and the dynamic transition between N1 and N2 TAN phenotypes in killing cancer cells through key signaling networks and how adjuvant therapy with radiation can be used in combination to increase anti-tumor efficacy. We examined the complex immune-tumor dynamics among N1/N2 TANs, NK cells, and tumor cells, communicating through key extracellular mediators (Transforming growth factor (TGF-$ \beta $), Interferon gamma (IFN-$ \gamma $)) and intracellular regulation in the apoptosis signaling network. We developed several tumor prevention strategies to eradicate tumors, including combination (IFN-$ \gamma $, exogenous NK, TGF-$ \beta $ inhibitor) therapy and optimally-controlled ionizing radiation in a complex TME. Using this model, we investigated the fundamental mechanism of radiation-induced changes in the TME and the impact of internal and external immune composition on the tumor cell fate and their response to different treatment schedules.

Impact of Filgrastim on Mortality During Induction Chemotherapy in Childhood B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Background Childhood B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a group of rapidly growing neoplasms that are fatal if left untreated. Induction chemotherapy during the treatment makes these patients vulnerable to several life-threatening infections due to their immunocompromised state. Prophylactic use of filgrastim before initiating the second induction chemotherapy cycle can improve outcomes. Therefore, our study aims to assess various parameters that can lead to acute mortality during induction chemotherapy and how the prophylactic use of filgrastim can prevent it. Methods This retrospective study was performed at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. All patients of B-cell NHL under 10 years of age diagnosed between January 2018 and October 2021 were included. Various parameters including patient age, stage of disease, treatment regimen, day of the start of filgrastim, number of episodes of febrile neutropenia, duration of admission in hospital due to febrile neutropenia, day of count recovery, and outcomes were collected. Results Of the 106 patients, 45 (42.4%) were female and 61 (57.5%) were male; 60 patients (56.7%) were between one and five years of age. All patients were started on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the seventh day of the first induction chemotherapy cycle. A total of 97 patients (91.5%) remained alive until the end of induction, and nine patients (8.5%) succumbed due to febrile neutropenia complications. The median days for filgrastim were eight (0-20) days after completion of the first cycle of COPADM (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone, doxorubicin, and methotrexate). On applying the Mann-Whitney U test, there was a significant difference in the day of count recovery among infected and non-infected patients (p = 0.01).  Conclusions Primary prophylactic use of filgrastim can significantly reduce mortality during induction chemotherapy in childhood B-cell NHL. Patients had lower febrile neutropenia episodes, decreased length of hospital stay, and, early count recovery. Therefore, filgrastim before the second cycle of induction chemotherapy, especially in resource-limited settings, can yield better outcomes.

Neutrophil diversity and function in health and disease

Neutrophils, the most abundant type of granulocyte, are widely recognized as one of the pivotal contributors to the acute inflammatory response. Initially, neutrophils were considered the mobile infantry of the innate immune system, tasked with the immediate response to invading pathogens. However, recent studies have demonstrated that neutrophils are versatile cells, capable of regulating various biological processes and impacting both human health and disease. Cytokines and other active mediators regulate the functional activity of neutrophils by activating multiple receptors on these cells, thereby initiating downstream signal transduction pathways. Dysfunctions in neutrophils and disruptions in neutrophil homeostasis have been implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous diseases, including cancer and inflammatory disorders, often due to aberrant intracellular signaling. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of neutrophil biological functions, integrating recent advancements in this field. Moreover, it examines the biological roles of receptors on neutrophils and downstream signaling pathways involved in the regulation of neutrophil activity. The pathophysiology of neutrophils in numerous human diseases and emerging therapeutic approaches targeting them are also elaborated. This review also addresses the current limitations within the field of neutrophil research, highlighting critical gaps in knowledge that warrant further investigation. In summary, this review seeks to establish a comprehensive and multidimensional model of neutrophil regulation, providing new perspectives for potential clinical applications and further research.

The clinical impact of primary granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who underwent induction chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Data describing the risk factors for the occurrence of severe infections in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients following induction chemotherapy and the role of prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the era of antimicrobials prophylaxis are limited.

METHODS

This study enrolled 188 children aged ≤18 years with newly diagnosed ALL who received Taiwan Pediatric Oncology Group ALL-2002 and 2013 treatments between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2021. Prophylactic G-CSF was administered when a patient continues neutropenia after achieving the first bone marrow remission since June 1, 2015. Clinical factors were assessed for their association with severe infections.

RESULTS

From January 2010 to May 2015, 80 children experienced a total of 11 (13.5%) episodes of severe infections; while 10 (9.2%) episodes were reported to occur in 108 patients who received prophylactic G-CSF. Reduction of severe infections occurrence did not achieve statistical significance during prophylactic G-CSF administration in ALL patients. Compared with ALL-high risk (HR) and very high risk patients with no G-CSF prophylaxis, the use of G-CSF prophylaxis significantly reduced episodes of febrile neutropenia. Occurrence of grade III-IV intestinal ileus, grade II-III oral mucositis, prolonged neutropenia, central venous catheter (CVC) placement, or the requirement insulin therapy for hyperglycemia were associated with higher risk of bloodstream infections.

CONCLUSIONS

ALL-HR patients with G-CSF prophylaxis were associated with reduction of febrile neutropenia episodes. Occurrence of severe ileus, oral mucositis, hyperglycemia, CVC placement, or prolonged neutropenia were associated with severe infections in ALL patients receiving induction chemotherapy.

Old drug, new use: Recent advances for G-CSF

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), also known as colony-stimulating factor 3 (CSF3), is a proinflammatory cytokine that primarily stimulates the survival, proliferation, differentiation and function of neutrophil granulocyte progenitor cells and mature neutrophils. Over the past years, G-CSF has mainly been used to cure patients with neutropenia and as a part of chemotherapy to induct the remission for refractory/relapse leukemia. Recent studies showed that C-CSF can been used as condition regimens and as a part of preventive methods after allogeneic transplantation to improve the survival of patients and also has immunoregulation, and has promote or inhibit the proliferation of solid tumors. Therefore, in this review, we firstly describe the structure for G-CSF. Then its functions and mechanism were reviewed including the neutrophil mobilization, differentiation, migration, and inhibiting apoptosis of neutrophils, and its immunoregulation. Finally, the clinical applications were further discussed.

Enhancing patient-centered care: a randomized study on G-CSF administration preferences in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia poses a significant risk to cancer patients, with pegfilgrastim being commonly used for its prevention. While pegfilgrastim can be administered via prefilled syringe or pen device, patient preferences and experiences with these delivery methods remain unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomized, observational trial (NCT05910164) at the Rafael Institute, France, comparing patient preferences for pegfilgrastim administration using a prefilled syringe versus a prefilled pen device. Patients undergoing chemotherapy and requiring pegfilgrastim were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive either syringe or pen first, with crossover administration. Questionnaires assessed patient preferences, learning experiences, autonomy, pain levels, emotional responses, satisfaction with nursing care, and empowerment.

RESULTS

Among 150 randomized patients (mean age 58 years; 69% female), both groups showed a preference for the pen device, with significantly higher mean scores favoring pen administration (4.94 ± 1.70 vs. 4.27 ± 1.84; p = 0.00106). Patients reported significantly lower perceived pain with pen administration and stronger positive emotions compared to syringe use. Satisfaction with nursing care was higher with syringe use. Empowerment levels were similar across groups but significantly stronger when using the pen in complete autonomy.

CONCLUSION

A preference for pegfilgrastim administration via the pen device was observed, though this may have been influenced by the administration sequence and the absence of syringe self-administration. The insights gained can help inform clinical decision-making and improve patient-centered care in managing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05910164 on June 15, 2023.

Significant Reduction of Radiation-Induced Death in Mice Treated with PrC-210 and G-CSF after Irradiation

The search for single or combined radiation countermeasures that mitigate the development of Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS) after radiation exposure remains a prominent goal of the U.S. government. This study was undertaken to determine whether PrC-210 and G-CSF, when administered 24-48 h postirradiation, would confer an additive or synergistic survival benefit and mitigate ARS in mice that had received an otherwise 96% lethal radiation dose. Our results show that optimum systemic doses of PrC-210 and G-CSF, when administered 24 h or later after a 96% lethal dose of whole-body irradiation, conferred: 1. strong individual survival benefits (PrC-210 44%, P = 0.003), (G-CSF 48%, P = 0.0002), 2. a profound combined 85% survival benefit (P < 0.0001) when administered together, and on day 14 postirradiation, 3. peripheral white blood cell/lymphocyte counts equal to unirradiated controls, 4. dense bone marrow cell density (>65% of unirradiated controls), 5. jejunal villi density that equaled 90% of unirradiated controls, and 6. spleen weights that equaled 93% of unirradiated controls. Our results show that PrC-210 and G-CSF given together 24 h after irradiation confer strong additive efficacy by protecting the immune system, and enabling recovery of the bone marrow, and they work synergistically to enable recovery of peripheral white blood cells in circulating blood.

Low-dose pegylated recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as hematopoietic support for adjuvant chemotherapy in Chinese patients with breast cancer: An open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial

AIMS

The recommended dosage of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) for Western chemotherapy patients is 6 mg per cycle. However, for Eastern Asians, the optimal dose remains unknown.

METHODS

This open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial (NCT05283616) enrolled Chinese female breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants were randomized to receive either 3 or 6 mg of PEG-rhG-CSF per cycle, stratified by body weight (BW; ≤60 kg vs. >60 kg). The primary endpoint was timely absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery before the second cycle of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients were randomized and 116 were included for efficacy analyses. The timely ANC recovery rate in the 3 mg arm was 89.8%, compared to 93.0% in the 6 mg arm (one-sided 95% confidence interval [CI] lower limit for difference: -11.7%), meeting the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 15%. The rate was 93.3% with PEG-rhG-CSF 3 mg and 96.6% with 6 mg in patients with BW ≤ 60 kg, and 86.2% and 89.3%, respectively, in those with BW > 60 kg. Although the incidence of severe neutropenia was similar across arms, the occurrence of excessively high ANC and white blood cell counts was higher in the 6 mg arm. No grade ≥3 adverse events related to PEG-rhG-CSF occurred.

CONCLUSION

Three milligrams of PEG-rhG-CSF per cycle provided non-inferior neutrophil protection and attenuated neutrophil overshoot compared to 6 mg doses. This low-dose regimen could be a new supportive care option for Chinese breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Targeting of human cancer stem cells predicts efficacy and toxicity of FDA-approved oncology drugs

Cancer remains the leading cause of death worldwide with approved oncology drugs continuing to have heterogenous patient responses and accompanied adverse effects (AEs) that limits effectiveness. Here, we examined >100 FDA-approved oncology drugs in the context of stemness using a surrogate model of transformed human pluripotent cancer stem cells (CSCs) vs. healthy stem cells (hSCs) capable of distinguishing abnormal self-renewal and differentiation. Although a proportion of these drugs had no effects (inactive), a larger portion affected CSCs (active), and a unique subset preferentially affected CSCs over hSCs (selective). Single cell gene expression and protein profiling of each drug's FDA recognized target provided a molecular correlation of responses in CSCs vs. hSCs. Uniquely, drugs selective for CSCs demonstrated clinical efficacy, measured by overall survival, and reduced AEs. Our findings reveal that while unintentional, half of anticancer drugs are active against CSCs and associated with improved clinical outcomes. Based on these findings, we suggest ability to target CSC targeting should be included as a property of early onco-therapeutic development.

Tumor-Homing Antibody-Cytokine Fusions for Cancer Therapy

Recombinant cytokine products have emerged as a promising avenue in cancer therapy due to their capacity to modulate and enhance the immune response against tumors. However, their clinical application is significantly hindered by systemic toxicities already at low doses, thus preventing escalation to therapeutically active regimens. One promising approach to overcoming these limitations is using antibody-cytokine fusion proteins (also called immunocytokines). These biopharmaceuticals leverage the targeting specificity of antibodies to deliver cytokines directly to the tumor microenvironment, thereby reducing systemic exposure and enhancing the therapeutic index. This review comprehensively examines the development and potential of antibody-cytokine fusion proteins in cancer therapy. It explores the molecular characteristics that influence the performance of these fusion proteins, and it highlights key findings from preclinical and clinical studies, illustrating the potential of immunocytokines to improve treatment outcomes in cancer patients. Recent advancements in the field, such as novel engineering strategies and combination strategies to enhance the efficacy and safety of immunocytokines, are also discussed. These innovations offer new opportunities to optimize this class of biotherapeutics, making them a more viable and effective option for cancer treatment. As the field continues to evolve, understanding the critical factors that influence the performance of immunocytokines will be essential for successfully translating these therapies into clinical practice.

The Impact of Prophylactic Post-Chemotherapy G-CSF on the Relapse Rates in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of prophylactic post-chemotherapy granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Overall, the relapse rate, overall survival, event-free survival, and mortality rate were similar in G-CSF (+) compared to G-CSF (-) patients. However, the relative risk (RR) of relapse was higher in children and in secondary AML patients who were treated with G-CSF compared to the G-CSF (-) group [RR, 95% confidence interval: 1.26, 1.04-1.52, and 1.12 (1.02-1.24)]. Treatment with post-chemotherapy G-CSF should be prescribed with caution in pediatric patients with AML and secondary AML as possibly increasing the relapse risk.

A real-world pharmacovigilance study of polatuzumab vedotin based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

Background

Polatuzumab vedotin, the first FDA-approved antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting CD79b, is utilized in the treatment of previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL), as well as relapsed or refractory (R/R) DLBCL. Despite its approval, concerns persist regarding the long-term safety profile of polatuzumab vedotin. This study aims to evaluate the adverse events (AEs) associated with polatuzumab vedotin since its approval in 2019, utilizing data mining strategies applied to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods

Signal detection employed four methodologies, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma poisson shrinker (MGPS), to evaluate and quantify the signals of polatuzumab vedotin-associated AEs. Additionally, subgroup analyses based on patients age, gender, and fatal cases were conducted to investigate AEs occurrences in specific subpopulations.

Results

A total of 1,521 reports listing polatuzumab vedotin as a "principal suspect (PS)" drug were collected from the FAERS database. Through concurrent compliance with four algorithms, 19 significant Standardized MedDRA Query (SMQ) AEs and 92 significant Preferred Term (PT) AEs were detected. Subgroup analyses revealed a higher incidence of PTs in male patients compared to female patients, increased likelihood of polatuzumab vedotin-associated AEs in elder patients (>65 years), and AEs with a high risk of fatal cases include: blood lactate dehydrogenase increased, cytopenia, and hydronephrosis. The median time to AEs occurrence following polatuzumab vedotin initiation was 18.5 (5∼57.75) days, with 95% of AEs occurred within 162 days.

Conclusion

This study identified various AEs associated with polatuzumab vedotin, offering critical insights for clinical monitoring and risk identification in patients receiving polatuzumab vedotin therapy.

Therapeutic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with febrile neutropenia: a comprehensive systematic review for clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia represents a critical oncologic emergency, and its management is pivotal in cancer therapy. In several guidelines, the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia is not routinely recommended except in high-risk cases. The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology has updated its clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF, incorporating a systematic review to address this clinical question.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted by performing a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web, focusing on publications from January 1990 to December 2019. Selected studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and cohort and case-control studies. Evaluated outcomes included overall survival, infection-related mortality, hospitalization duration, quality of life, and pain.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 332 records. Following two rounds of screening, two records were selected for both qualitative and quantitative synthesis including meta-analysis. Regarding infection-related mortality, the event to case ratio was 5:134 (3.73%) in the G-CSF group versus 6:129 (4.65%) in the non-G-CSF group, resulting in a relative risk of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-2.58; p = 0.54), which was not statistically significant. Only median values for hospitalization duration were available from the two RCTs, precluding a meta-analysis. For overall survival, quality of life, and pain, no suitable studies were found for analysis, rendering their assessment unfeasible.

CONCLUSION

A weak recommendation is made that G-CSF treatment not be administered to patients with febrile neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy. G-CSF treatment can be considered for patients at high risk.

Effect of lithium on chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in Egyptian breast cancer patients; a prospective clinical study

PURPOSE

Myelosuppressive chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) remains a major limitation of cancer treatment efficacy, necessitating very expensive supportive care. Lithium carbonate, an inexpensive drug, can increase the number of neutrophils, possibly providing an efficacious and cost-effective alternative for treating CIN. The aim of this study was to determine whether lithium therapy can attenuate chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and leukopenia in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 50 breast cancer patients were enrolled in this prospective, interventional, randomized, controlled, and single-blind study. The patients were divided into two groups: a control group (group 1, N = 25 patients) and a lithium-treated (treatment) group (group 2, N = 25 patients). Group 1 patients were further subclassified into a non-neutropenic control group (N = 16) and a neutropenic control (N = 9) based on the subsequent development of severe neutropenia, or not. The control group received 4 cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by 2 cycles of paclitaxel. The treatment group received the same regimen as the control group as well as oral lithium carbonate throughout the chemotherapy cycles.

RESULTS

The results showed that the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was increased in the lithium-treated group, while it was markedly reduced in both the non-neutropenic and neutropenic control groups (by 55.56% and 65.42% post-4 chemotherapy cycles, and by 19.57% and 39.90% post-6 cycles, respectively). The same pattern of alterations was observed for the total white blood cell count in both the control and treatment groups. In addition, the incidence and period prevalence were greatly reduced in the lithium-treated group compared to non-neutropenic and neutropenic control groups.

CONCLUSION

Lithium therapy ameliorated chemotherapy-induced leukopenia and neutropenia in breast cancer patients. This may provide a new strategy for cost-effective treatment of CIN, particularly in Egyptian cancer patients.

Risk factors for invasive fungal infections after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are common infectious complications after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), seriously threatening the survival of patients.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to investigate risk factors associated with IFIs following HSCT.

METHODS

Two authors independently conducted the selection of studies and extraction of data. Risk factors for IFIs, invasive aspergillosis or invasive mould infections and invasive candida infection after HSCT were compiled separately by meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 and R language 4.1.2.

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library until April 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Case-control or cohort studies that assessed risk factors for IFIs among HSCT recipients were included.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients experiencing HSCT.

TEST/S

None.

REFERENCE STANDARD

The IFIs were defined according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycosis Study Group (EORTC/MSG) criteria, or a similar definition.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

A random-effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool results from primary studies.

RESULTS

Out of 1637 studies screened, 51 studies involving 109 155 patients were included, with 45 studies providing adequate data for meta-analysis. Identified risk factors for IFIs included prolonged neutropenia, intensified therapy for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), previous transplantation, previous proven or probable IFI, acute GVHD ≥ grade II, extensive or severe chronic GVHD, use of anti-thymocyte globulin during transplantation, haploidentical transplantation, high-dose glucocorticoids, Epstein-Barr virus infection, cytomegalovirus infection or reactivation, and lower albumin. Conversely, antifungal prophylaxis emerged as the sole preventive factor. For invasive aspergillosis or invasive mould infections, the top risk factors were extensive or severe chronic GVHD, respiratory viral infection, high-dose glucocorticoids, acute GVHD ≥ grade II, and human leukocyte antigen mismatch. Cord blood transplantation was the sole significant risk factor for invasive candidiasis. However, there was likely a high degree of interdependence among various risk factors.

DISCUSSION

This meta-analysis provides a thorough review of risk factors for IFIs infection after HSCT. The achieved insights can aid in stratifying patients who are at an elevated risk of IFIs and promoting antifungal preventive strategies.

G-CSF improving combined whole brain radiotherapy and immunotherapy prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic advantage of G-CSF to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in combination with immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BMs).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 117 patients (37 in G-CSF group and 80 in no G-CSF group) who underwent first-line WBRT combined with immunotherapy were enrolled. Their survival, intracranial response, BM-related symptoms and toxicity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) of patients in G-CSF group was significantly improved compared to patients no G-CSF group (median time: 14.8 vs 10.2 months; HR: 0.61, 95 % CI: 0.38-0.97, p = 0.035). However, there were no significant differences in intracranial responses between the two groups (p > 0.05). The G-CSF group exhibited a significantly higher rate of relief from BM-related symptoms compared to the no G-CSF group (91.7 % vs 59.5 %, p = 0.037). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses indicated that after-treatment ALC > 0.9 × 10^9/L (HR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.32-0.99, p = 0.046) and Hb > 110 g/dL (HR 0.41, 95 % CI 0.24-0.71, p = 0.001) were significant potential factors associated with extended OS. The addition of G-CSF was well tolerated and effectively reduced the incidence of neutropenia (0 % vs 5.0 %, p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

Integrating G-CSF with WBRT and immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for NSCLC-BMs has exhibited significant efficacy and favorable tolerability.

Plasmablastic Lymphoma. A State-of-the-Art Review: Part 2-Focus on Therapy

The objective of this two-part review is to present a current and comprehensive understanding of the diagnosis and management of plasmablastic lymphoma. The first part, which was published previously, focused on the study of epidemiology, etiology, clinicopathological characteristics, differential diagnosis, prognostic variables, and the impact of plasmablastic lymphoma on specific populations. This second part addresses the difficult topic of the treatment of plasmablastic lymphoma, specifically examining both the conventional, consolidated approach and the novel therapeutic strategy.

The Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor as Primary Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: An Experience of Moroccan Oncologists

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a frequent and serious emergency for oncologic patients undergoing chemotherapy. Using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia is an integral part of the management of cancer patients. Our study aims to identify the challenges that prevent Moroccan oncologists from prescribing G-CSF for primary prevention. Seventy doctors participated in our study, with a participation rate of 35.35%. Twenty-two participants had at least five years of experience in oncology. Most participants were medical oncologists (82.9%), and two-thirds of them practiced in teaching hospitals. Regarding the use of G-CSF in primary prevention, all participants complied with the recommendations for FN risk assessment and the prescription of G-CSF for prophylaxis in patients at high risk of FN (>20%). However, their use in intermediate-risk patients remains limited mainly by the cost of these drugs (45.7% of participants). FN remains a dreadful complication in oncology. Since the introduction of G-CSF into standard oncology practice, particularly in primary prevention, the management of certain patients has improved considerably. Nevertheless, the indications for G-CSF in our context, essentially in intermediate-risk patients, are uncertain.

Efbemalenograstim alfa not inferior to pegfilgrastim in providing neutrophil support in women with breast cancer undergoing myelotoxic chemotherapy: results of a phase 2 randomized, multicenter, open-label trial

PURPOSE

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of efbemalenograstim alfa for neutrophil support in breast cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy in a phase 2, dose-finding, open-label study (NCT01648322, ClinicalTrials.gov, 2012-07-19).

METHODS

232 patients received up to 4 cycles of chemotherapy, 141 patients with docetaxel + cyclophosphamide (TC) and 91 patients with docetaxel + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (TAC). Patients were randomized to efbemalenograstim alfa (80, 240, or 320 µg/kg [TC]; 240 or 320 µg/kg [TAC]) or pegfilgrastim (6 mg) on Day 2 of each cycle.

RESULTS

Efbemalenograstim alfa was non-inferior to pegfilgrastim in duration of moderate and severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 1.0 × 109/L) in TAC Cycle 1 (mean [SD] of 2.1 [1.58] and 2.1 [1.46] days for 240 µg/kg and 320 µg/kg efbemalenograstim alfa, respectively, and 1.8 [1.28] days for pegfilgrastim), with a difference (95% CI) of 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1) days. ANC nadir occurred between Days 7-8 of TAC Cycle 1, with mean [SD] of 0.68 [1.064], 0.86 [1.407] and 0.78[1.283] × 109/L for 240 µg/kg, 320 µg/kg efbemalenograstim alfa and pegfilgrastim, respectively. Time to ANC recovery post nadir (defined as an ANC > 2.0 × 109/L after the expected ANC nadir) was 2.0-2.4 and 1.9 days for TAC patients treated with efbemalenograstim alfa and pegfilgrastim, respectively. No significant difference was found between any dose of efbemalenograstim alfa and pegfilgrastim in TAC Cycle 1 for incidence of moderate to severe neutropenia (76%-77% of patients) or incidence of severe neutropenia (ANC < 0.5 × 109/L; 63%-72%). Efbemalenograstim alfa exhibited similar safety profile to pegfilgrastim. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 4 (1.8%) patients, 2 patients each for 320 µg/kg efbemalenograstim alfa and pegfilgrastim, with no event considered related to study drug.

CONCLUSION

Efbemalenograstim alfa was comparable to pegfilgrastim in efficacy and safety.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01648322.

Spano M, Cohen A, Geng Y, Cohen L. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Acupuncture for Modulation of Immune and Inflammatory Markers in Cancer Patients

Introduction: Inflammation is associated with tumor initiation, and existing tumors are associated with immune suppression locally and systemically. Cancer treatment is also associated with immune suppression. This review evaluates evidence related to the use of acupuncture for modulation of inflammation and the immune system in cancer patients. Methods: Nine databases were searched for prospective, randomized, controlled trials evaluating the use of acupuncture for modulation of the immune system in cancer patients through March 2024. Only studies involving needle insertion into acupuncture points were included. No language limitations were applied. Studies were assessed for risk of bias (ROB) according to Cochrane criteria. The primary outcomes were levels of immune and inflammatory markers. Results: Of 3607 articles identified, 1526 duplicates were omitted, and 2261 articles were screened. Sixty-four (58 Chinese, 6 English) publications met all inclusion criteria and were evaluated for ROB. Forty-seven studies were rated as unclear ROB, and nine studies were rated as high ROB. However, when the blinding and allocation concealment criteria were removed, 12 studies had low ROB. Fifty-six studies were included in the meta-analysis, which found that acupuncture significantly increased interferon gamma (IFN-γ; P < .01), natural killer (NK) cells (P < .01), immunoglobulin G (IgG; P = .04), immunoglobulin M (IgM; P = .04), CD3 cells (P < .01), CD4 cells (P < .01), and the CD4/CD8 cell ratio (P < .01), and significantly lowered interleukin (IL)-1 (P = .01), IL-4 (P < .01), IL-6 (P < .01), and C-reactive protein (P < .01). Yet except for IFN-γ, there was high heterogeneity of results between studies. No significant differences were found in white blood cells, CD-8, neutrophil levels, IL-2, IL-10, or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). Conclusion: The current evidence is insufficient to either support or refute the immunomodulatory effects of acupuncture in cancer patients due to no studies fully meeting the low ROB criterion. The preliminary data, however, are promising. Future studies that are higher powered, with low ROB designs, are warranted.

Systemic Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO-Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on the management of patients with small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included response rates, overall survival, disease-free survival or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 95 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address systemic therapy options, timing of therapy, treatment in patients who are older or with poor performance status, role of biomarkers, and use of myeloid-supporting agents in patients with small-cell lung cancer.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

An observational, prospective, open label, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of pegfilgrastim as secondary prophylaxis to decrease the incidence of febrile neutropenia in Korean female patients with breast cancer

PURPOSE

Pegfilgrastim is a widely used long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) that prevents febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of chemotherapy-related FN events and other adverse events (AEs) during chemotherapy in Korean patients with breast cancer treated with pegfilgrastim as secondary prophylactic support.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, open-label, prospective, observational study. A total of 1255 patients were enrolled from 43 institutions. The incidence of FN was evaluated as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints included (1) incidence of bone pain, (2) proportion of patients with a relative dose intensity (RDI) of ≥85%, and (3) proportion of patients with AE.

RESULTS

Pegfilgrastim administration reduced FN by 11.8-1.6%. The highest incidence of bone pain was observed at the time point of the 1st day after the administration and mild bone pain was the most common of all bone pain severity. The mean RDI was 98.5 ± 7.3%, and the proportion of the patients with and RDI≥85% was 96.9% (1169/1233). AEs were reported in 52.6% of the patients, and serious drug reactions occurred in only 0.7%.

CONCLUSION

The use of pegfilgrastim as secondary prophylaxis was effective and safe for preventing FN in patients with breast cancer who were treated with chemotherapy.

Revisiting the Utility of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Post-Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Outpatient-Based Transplantations

The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been shown to reduce the time to neutrophil engraftment, as well as the duration of hospitalization post-transplantation. However, prior studies have focused on inpatient-based ASCT, where patients are routinely admitted for conditioning and frequently remain hospitalized until signs of neutrophil recovery. Given improvements in post-transplantation care, an increasing number of patients, particularly those receiving ASCT for multiple myeloma, are now undergoing transplantation in an outpatient setting. We hypothesized that the routine use of G-CSF for outpatient-based ASCT might not result in the same benefit with respect to a reduced duration of hospitalization and thus should be reconsidered in this setting. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 633 consecutive patients with multiple myeloma (MM; n = 484) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; n = 149) who underwent ASCT between September 2018 and February 2023. Outpatient ASCT comprised 258 (53%) of combined MM and NHL cases. Starting in September 2021, post-transplantation G-CSF was incorporated into the supportive care regimen for all ASCTs. A total of 410 patients (309 with MM, 101 with NHL) underwent ASCT during the pre-G-CSF policy period and 223 (175 with MM, 48 with NHL) did so in the post-G-CSF policy period. The primary outcome focused on the duration of hospitalization within the first 30 days following graft infusion. As expected, after implementation of the G-CSF policy, the time to neutrophil engraftment was reduced in the patients with MM (mean, -2.8 days; P < .0001) and patients with NHL (mean, -2.9 days; P < .0001). However, among the patients with MM, roughly one-half of whom underwent outpatient-based ASCT, the inpatient duration during the first 30 days was not reduced after G-CSF implementation (P = .40). Comparatively, the inpatient duration (mean, -1.8 days; P = .030) was reduced among patients with NHL, all of whom were electively admitted for ASCT. For patients with MM at an outpatient-based transplant center, incorporation of G-CSF post-ASCT resulted in reduced time to neutrophil engraftment but did not significantly reduce the time spent in the inpatient setting through day +30.

SIOP PODC adapted risk stratification and treatment guidelines: Recommendations for acute myeloid leukemia in resource-limited settings

In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), limited resources, suboptimal risk stratification, and disproportionate patient-to-infrastructure ratio result in low survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A high incidence of relapse, inherent to the biology, renders management arduous. The challenge of treating AML in LMICs is of balancing the intensity of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, which appears necessary for cure, with available supportive care, which influences treatment-related mortality. The recommendations outlined in this paper are based on published evidence and expert opinion. The principle of this adapted protocol is to tailor treatment to available resources, reduce preventable toxic death, and direct limited resources toward those children who are most likely to be cured.

Docetaxel Plus Ramucirumab With Primary Prophylactic Pegylated Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Support for Elderly Patients With Advanced NSCLC: A Multicenter Prospective Single Arm Phase 2 Trial: DRAGON Study (WJOG9416L)

Introduction

Docetaxel plus ramucirumab could be a promising treatment for chemo-naive elderly patients with NSCLC, but high incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) is a critical concern. We thus adopted a routine primary prophylactic pegylated-granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) to reduce FN and maximize the efficacy of docetaxel plus ramucirumab in elderly patients.

Methods

This is a single arm phase 2 trial for chemo-naive elderly patients (aged ≥75 y) with advanced NSCLC. Docetaxel (60 mg/m2, d 1) plus ramucirumab (10 mg/kg, d 1) with PEG-G-CSF (3.6 mg, d 2) was administered every 3 weeks until progression. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) (expected ORR: 35%).

Results

Between February 2018 and January 2021, 54 patients were enrolled. Median age was 78 (range: 75-86). A total of 21 (38.9%) partial response, 22 (40.7%) stable disease, nine (16.7%) progressive disease, and two (3.7%) not assessable were confirmed, resulting in ORR of 38.9% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 27.7%-51.0%) and disease control rate of 79.6%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.2 (95% CI: 4.2-6.9) and 12.7 (95% CI: 10.2-18.9) months, respectively. There were one (1.9%) FN, two (3.7%) bleeding grade greater than or equal to 3, and one (1.9%) treatment-related death (pneumonitis). Pneumonitis occurred in five patients (9.3%). Main adverse events grade greater than or equal to 3 were observed: four (7%) thrombocytopenia; three (5.6%) neutropenia; six (11.1%) hyposodium; five (9.3%) infection; five (9.3%) hypertension; four (7.4%) anorexia; and three (5.6%) oral mucositis.

Conclusions

Docetaxel plus ramucirumab with PEG-G-CSF revealed efficacy and safety for chemo-naive elderly patients with NSCLC. Primary prophylactic PEG-G-CSF highly prevented FN.

Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for the prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with cancer

PURPOSE

Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of all approved granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs), including filgrastim and pegfilgrastim, as primary febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis in patients receiving high- or intermediate-risk regimens (in those with additional patient risk factors). Previous studies have examined G-CSF cost-effectiveness by cancer type in patients with a high baseline risk of FN. This study evaluated patients with breast cancer (BC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) receiving therapy who were at intermediate risk for FN and compared primary prophylaxis (PP) and secondary prophylaxis (SP) using biosimilar filgrastim or biosimilar pegfilgrastim in Austria, France, and Germany.

METHODS

A Markov cycle tree-based model was constructed to evaluate PP versus SP in patients with BC, NSCLC, or NHL receiving therapy over a lifetime horizon. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated over a range of willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds for incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analyses evaluated uncertainty.

RESULTS

Results demonstrated that using biosimilar filgrastim as PP compared to SP resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) well below the most commonly accepted WTP threshold of €30,000. Across all three countries, PP in NSCLC had the lowest cost per QALY, and in France, PP was both cheaper and more effective than SP. Similar results were found using biosimilar pegfilgrastim, with ICERs generally higher than those for filgrastim.

CONCLUSIONS

Biosimilar filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis are cost-effective approaches to avoid FN events in patients with BC, NSCLC, or NHL at intermediate risk for FN in Austria, France, and Germany.

Chinese expert consensus on the application of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (2023 edition)

Neutropenia is the most common hematological toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), and leads to subsequent treatment delays and/or dose reductions. Neutropenia often advances to febrile neutropenia and serious infections, which can affect the prognosis and safety of patients. The reasonable prevention and management of neutropenia is vital for patients with malignancies undergoing CCRT. Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF), a long-acting recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, can prevent and treat neutropenia in more convenient clinical settings. Based on relevant guidelines and the most recent clinical data, the Chinese Association for Therapeutic Radiation Oncologists, China Society for Radiation Oncology, and Chinese Association of Radiation Therapy have evaluated the safety and efficacy of PEG-rhG-CSF during CCRT, clearly defined the clinical pathway and route of administration for the prevention and treatment of neutropenia, and formed a Chinese expert consensus on PEG-rhG-CSF application during CCRT, with the goal of promoting the reasonable clinical use of this treatment.

Feasibility of cabazitaxel in octogenarian prostate cancer patients

Background

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cabazitaxel in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients aged ≥80 years, we performed a retrospective study on a sample of patients from 11 Italian cancer centers.

Materials and methods

Fifty-seven patients aged ≥80 years were treated with cabazitaxel after previous failure with docetaxel; 39 completed a comprehensive geriatric assessment questionnaire (34 fit and 5 vulnerable) and 8 patients (14%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) ≥2, while most had a PS of 0-1 (86%). Cabazitaxel was administered at a dose of 25 mg/m2 in 30 (52%) patients and 20 mg/m2 or adapted schedules in 27 (48%) patients. These schedules were adopted mainly in patients ≥85 years (75%), with a PS ≥2 (87.5%), and those classified as vulnerable (100%).

Results

The duration of treatment was 4.8 months and was comparable in all subgroups; disease control rate was reported in 36 patients (63%); prostate-specific antigen response was recorded in 18 patients (31.5%). Median overall survival was 13.1 months regardless of age (<85/≥85 years), but overall survival was reduced in vulnerable (7.2 months) and PS ≥ 2 patients (6.8 months). The most frequently documented grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (14%) and diarrhea (10.5%). Six patients (10.5%) dropped out due to severe toxicity.

Conclusions

Octogenarian patients can be treated with cabazitaxel with reduced doses or alternative schedules that are associated with less toxicity and fewer treatment interruptions. Comprehensive geriatric assessment could facilitate more appropriate patient selection.

Patients Undergoing Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy Who Require Surgical Intervention: What Surgeons Need to Know

As part of routine cancer care, patients may undergo elective surgery with the aim of long-term cure. Some of these patients will receive systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. The majority of patients, usually with locally advanced or metastatic disease, will receive SACT with palliative intent. These treatment options are expanding beyond traditional chemotherapy to include targeted therapies, immunotherapy, hormone therapy, radionuclide therapy and gene therapy. During treatment, some patients will require surgical intervention on an urgent or emergency basis. This narrative review examined the evidence base for SACT-associated surgical risk and the precautions that a surgical team should consider in patients undergoing SACT.

Two decades of pegfilgrastim: what have we learned? Where do we go from here?

Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) is a medical emergency that may occur in patients with malignancies receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. FN requires early therapeutic intervention since it is associated with increased hospitalizations and high mortality risk of 5%-20%. FN-related hospitalizations are higher in patients with myeloid malignancies than in those with solid tumors due to the myelotoxicity of chemotherapy regimens and the compromised bone marrow function. FN increases the burden of cancer by causing chemotherapy dose reductions and delays. The administration of the first granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), filgrastim, reduced the incidence and duration of FN in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Filgrastim later evolved into pegfilgrastim, which has a longer half-life than filgrastim and was associated with a lower rate of severe neutropenia, chemotherapy dose reduction, and treatment delay. Nine million patients have received pegfilgrastim since its approval in early 2002. The pegfilgrastim on-body injector (OBI) is an innovative device facilitating the time-released auto-injection of pegfilgrastim approximately 27 hours after chemotherapy, as clinically recommended for the prevention of FN, thus eliminating the need for a next-day hospital visit. Since its introduction in 2015, one million patients with cancer have received pegfilgrastim using the OBI. Subsequently, the device has been approved in the United States (US), European Union, Latin America, and Japan, with studies and a postmarketing commitment demonstrating device reliability. A recent prospective observational study conducted in the US demonstrated that the OBI substantially improved the adherence to and compliance with clinically recommended pegfilgrastim therapy; patients receiving pegfilgrastim via the OBI experienced a lower incidence of FN than those receiving alternatives for FN prophylaxis. This review discusses the evolution of G-CSFs leading to the development of the OBI, current recommendations for G-CSF prophylaxis in the clinic, continued evidence supporting next-day pegfilgrastim administration, and improvements in patient care made possible with the OBI.

A Proactive Approach to Prevent Hematopoietic Exhaustion During Cancer Chemotherapy in Older Patients: Temporary Cell-Cycle Arrest

Age is associated with the decline of multiple organ systems. In older patients, hematological toxicities associated with chemotherapy are often dose limiting, impairing dose intensity and treatment efficacy. Contrary to the classical path using growth factors to activate tissue regeneration, a novel strategy is emerging to prevent chemotherapy toxicity that involves temporary cell-cycle arrest of normal cells, such as hematopoietic or epithelial precursors. This proactive approach may allow the sparing of the stem cell reserve of these tissues. Two molecules are included in this new category, trilaciclib and ALRN-6924, which induce cell-cycle arrest by two different pathways. Previous approaches, such as the use of myelopoietic growth factors, were reactive and they might even have accelerated the depletion of stem cells by enhancing the commitment of these elements. Trilaciclib causes cell-cycle arrest by CDK 4/6 inhibition and ALRN-6924 by p53 activation. In a pooled analysis of three randomized phase II studies of patients with small cell lung cancer, trilaciclib prevented neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Similar chemoprotective results were observed with ALRN-6924 in an open-label phase Ib study of patients with p53-mutated small cell lung cancer. Trilaciclib is now approved as a myelopreservation agent in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. ALRN-6924 is currently in phase Ib clinical development in patients with p53-mutated cancer. In addition to preserving the normal hemopoietic pool, these drugs promise to preserve the stem cell reserve of other normal tissues with high turnover, preventing potentially other dose-limiting toxicities, such as mucositis and diarrhea. An "ex vivo" study provided early evidence that ALRN-6924 may prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia. By affording protection from multiple toxicities with a single drug, trilaciclib and ALRN-6924 have the potential to transform the current standards of supportive care for oncology patients and may prevent the depletion of tissue stem cells already compromised with age.

Low pretherapy skeletal muscle mass index is associated with an increased risk of febrile neutropenia in patients with esophageal cancer receiving docetaxel + cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy

PURPOSE

Docetaxel + cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy, a frequently prescribed regimen for esophageal cancer, is associated with a high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). This study investigated whether a low skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) is an independent risk factor for FN.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study investigated the SMI of patients with esophageal cancer who received DCF therapy between March 2018 and July 2020. Based on the Asian sarcopenia criteria, patients were divided into two groups: high and low SMI (SMI of < 7.0 and 5.7 kg/m2 for males and females, respectively). The incidence of FN was then compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (20 and 19 in the high- and low-SMI groups, respectively) were included in this study. The incidence of FN was significantly higher in the low-SMI group (63.2% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.006). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that a low SMI was an independent risk factor for FN (odds ratio, 7.178; 95% confidence interval, 1.272-40.507; P = 0.026). In addition, the frequency of dose reduction in DCF therapy was significantly higher in the low-SMI group (68.4% vs. 35.0%, P = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

Low SMI is an independent risk factor for FN in patients with esophageal cancer receiving DCF therapy.

A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Standing Order Entry Intervention for Colony-Stimulating Factor Use Among Patients at Intermediate Risk for Febrile Neutropenia

PURPOSE

Primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factors (PP-CSFs) are prescribed to reduce febrile neutropenia (FN) but their benefit for intermediate FN risk regimens is uncertain. Within a pragmatic, randomized trial of a standing order entry (SOE) PP-CSF intervention, we conducted a substudy to evaluate the effectiveness of SOE for patients receiving intermediate-risk regimens.

METHODS

TrACER was a cluster randomized trial where practices were randomized to usual care or a guideline-based SOE intervention. In the primary study, sites were randomized 3:1 to SOE of automated PP-CSF orders for high FN risk regimens and alerts against PP-CSF use for low-risk regimens versus usual care. A secondary 1:1 randomization assigned 24 intervention sites to either SOE to prescribe or an alert to not prescribe PP-CSF for intermediate-risk regimens. Clinicians were allowed to over-ride the SOE. Patients with breast, colorectal, or non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled. Mixed-effect logistic regression models were used to test differences between randomized sites.

RESULTS

Between January 2016 and April 2020, 846 eligible patients receiving intermediate-risk regimens were registered to either SOE to prescribe (12 sites: n = 542) or an alert to not prescribe PP-CSF (12 sites: n = 304). Rates of PP-CSF use were higher among sites randomized to SOE (37.1% v 9.9%, odds ratio, 5.91; 95% CI, 1.77 to 19.70; P = .0038). Rates of FN were low and identical between arms (3.7% v 3.7%).

CONCLUSION

Although implementation of a SOE intervention for PP-CSF significantly increased PP-CSF use among patients receiving first-line intermediate-risk regimens, FN rates were low and did not differ between arms. Although this guideline-informed SOE influenced prescribing, the results suggest that neither SOE nor PP-CSF provides sufficient benefit to justify their use for all patients receiving first-line intermediate-risk regimens.

G-CSF filgrastim biosimilar-Sandoz reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving chemotherapy regimens with rest periods not exceeding 14 days: A French, multicenter, prospective, non-interventional study

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to describe filgrastim biosimilar-Sandoz modalities of use in patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens with a rest period of ≤14 days and to investigate the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a French, multicenter, prospective and descriptive, non-interventional study including patients with breast, lung, gastrointestinal cancer or a lymphoma initiating filgrastim biosimilar-Sandoz treatment and in the context of cytotoxic chemotherapy with a rest period not exceeding 14 days. Data were collected during two routine clinical visits on the modalities of use of filgrastim biosimilar-Sandoz, on the incidence of neutropenia events and on adverse events.

RESULTS

Between November 2015 and June 2018, 1080 patients were enrolled in the study in 129 centers. Overall, 941 patients were evaluable for efficacy and 937 for safety. Of the 941 patients, 84.8% had a solid tumor and 15.2% had a lymphoid hemopathy. Filgrastim biosimilar-Sandoz was prescribed as primary prophylaxis in 74.0% of the patients and as secondary prophylaxis in 22.4% of the patients. FN was reported in 1.5% of patients with a solid tumor and 12.6% of patients with a lymphoma. A chemotherapy relative dose intensity of over 85% with regard to the reference dose was achieved by more than 80% of the patients in all tumor localizations.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that filgrastim biosimilar-Sandoz is safe to use and effective in preventing FN and in allowing to maintain the dose intensity of chemotherapy.

[Effect and safety of pegylated recombinant human G-CSF on hematopoietic reconstitution after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in lymphoma patients]

Objective: Efficacy and safety analysis of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in promoting hematopoietic recovery after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in patients with lymphoma. Methods: A total of 149 patients after auto-HSCT in Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine were enrolled in this study from April 2016 to December 2021. There were 75 cases in the PEG-rhG-CSF group who were given a single subcutaneous dose of 100 µg/kg on the first day and +8 d, while 74 cases in the rhG-CSF group were given a dose of 5-10 µg·kg(-1)·d(-1) by subcutaneous injection from +1d continuing to an absolute value of neutrophil (ANC) of more than 1.5×10(9)/L. Results: ①The time of grade 3/4 agranulocytosis and neutrophil implantation in the PEG-rhG-CSF group were significantly different from that in rhG-CSF group (P=0.010, 0.030, 0.007) . There were no significant differences in the platelet implantation time, anemia incidence and duration, and platelet and red blood cell infusion within 1 month after transplantation between groups. ②The agranulocytosis with fever incidence in PEG-rhG-CSF group was similar to that in rhG-CSF group (84.0% vs 82.4% , P=0.798) , but the duration was shorter in the PEG-rhG-CSF group (4.0 d vs 5.5 d, P=0.005) . ③The incidence of infection in the PEG-rhG-CSF and the rhG-CSF groups were 22.7% (17/75) and 31.1% (23/74) , respectively (P=0.247) , and the bloodstream infection incidence were 5.3% (4/75) and 9.5% (7/74) , respectively (P=0.336) . ④The PEG-rhG-CSF group and rhG-CSF group's mean length of hospital stay were 31.5 (23-43) days and 37 (25-75) days, respectively (P<0.001) . ⑤The PEG-rhG-CSF group and rhG-CSF group's disease-free survival rates were (96.4±2.5) % and (94.7±2.6) % (P=0.638) , respectively, and the OS rates were 100.0% and (98.6±1.3) % (P=0.312) , respectively. Conclusion: PEG-rhG-CSF application after auto-HSCT in patients with lymphoma can promote hematopoietic granulocyte reconstruction and shorten hospital stay, but has no significant effect on the incidence of infection, disease-free survival, and overall survival after transplantation.

A systemic review of taxanes and their side effects in metastatic breast cancer

Taxanes-containing chemotherapy constitutes an essential backbone for both early and metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the two major taxane drugs—paclitaxel and docetaxel—have distinct safety profiles. In this review, we summarize the safety outcome and management following treatment with both taxanes from selected clinical trials. We utilized PubMed to perform literature search before April 2021. Five phase III randomized controlled trials with reports of individual taxane adverse events (AEs) were included in this review. Grade 3/4 AEs were summarized and discussed extensively. The rates of grade 3/4 neutropenia were higher with docetaxel than with paclitaxel. For non-hematologic grade 3/4 AEs, peripheral neuropathy was more frequent with paclitaxel while fluid retention was more frequent with docetaxel. Compared to paclitaxel, docetaxel had a higher rate of grade 3/4 gastrointestinal AEs. Grade 3/4 myalgia were generally comparable between the two taxanes. Except for neutropenia, the incidence rate of grade 3/4 AEs of taxanes was generally manageable. Peripheral neuropathy was more common with paclitaxel while grade 3/4 neutropenia was more common with docetaxel.

Effects of a Guideline-Informed Clinical Decision Support System Intervention to Improve Colony-Stimulating Factor Prescribing: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Colony-stimulating factors are prescribed to patients undergoing chemotherapy to reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia. Research suggests that 55% to 95% of colony-stimulating factor prescribing is inconsistent with national guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether a guideline-based standing order for primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factors improves use and reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cluster randomized clinical trial, the Trial Assessing CSF Prescribing Effectiveness and Risk (TrACER), involved 32 community oncology clinics in the US. Participants were adult patients with breast, colorectal, or non-small cell lung cancer initiating cancer therapy and enrolled between January 2016 and April 2020. Data analysis was performed from July to October 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Sites were randomized 3:1 to implementation of a guideline-based primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factor standing order system or usual care. Automated orders were added for high-risk regimens, and an alert not to prescribe was included for low-risk regimens. Risk was based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was to find an increase in colony-stimulating factor use among high-risk patients from 40% to 75%, a reduction in use among low-risk patients from 17% to 7%, and a 50% reduction in febrile neutropenia rates in the intervention group. Mixed model logistic regression adjusted for correlation of outcomes within a clinic.

RESULTS

A total of 2946 patients (median [IQR] age, 59.0 [50.0-67.0] years; 2233 women [77.0%]; 2292 White [79.1%]) were enrolled; 2287 were randomized to the intervention, and 659 were randomized to usual care. Colony-stimulating factor use for patients receiving high-risk regimens was high and not significantly different between groups (847 of 950 patients [89.2%] in the intervention group vs 296 of 309 patients [95.8%] in the usual care group). Among high-risk patients, febrile neutropenia rates for the intervention (58 of 947 patients [6.1%]) and usual care (13 of 308 patients [4.2%]) groups were not significantly different. The febrile neutropenia rate for patients receiving high-risk regimens not receiving colony-stimulating factors was 14.9% (17 of 114 patients). Among the 585 patients receiving low-risk regimens, colony-stimulating factor use was low and did not differ between groups (29 of 457 patients [6.3%] in the intervention group vs 7 of 128 patients [5.5%] in the usual care group). Febrile neutropenia rates did not differ between usual care (1 of 127 patients [0.8%]) and the intervention (7 of 452 patients [1.5%]) groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cluster randomized clinical trial, implementation of a guideline-informed standing order did not affect colony-stimulating factor use or febrile neutropenia rates in high-risk and low-risk patients. Overall, use was generally appropriate for the level of risk. Standing order interventions do not appear to be necessary or effective in the setting of prophylactic colony-stimulating factor prescribing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02728596.

Incidence of and risk factors for severe neutropenia during treatment with the modified FOLFIRINOX therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Although FOLFIRINOX (l-Leucovorin/5-FU/Irinotecan/Oxaliplatin) is established as one of the standard therapies for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, the modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) is often used in clinical practice to reduce the incidence of toxicities. Febrile neutropenia (FN) and severe neutropenia during FOLFIRINOX are especially frequently observed in Japanese patients. In this study, we evaluated the incidence of FN and severe neutropenia, and explored the risk factors for severe neutropenia in patients receiving treatment with mFOLFIRINOX. The data of patients who had received mFOLFIRINOX between December 2013 and December 2014 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East were reviewed retrospectively. We graded the neutropenia severity and defined ≥ Grade 3 neutropenia as severe neutropenia. Univariate and multivariate analysis were undertaken to evaluate the associations with risk of development of severe neutropenia. A total of 122 patients were enrolled in this study. Sixty two patients (51%) and 10 patients (8%) developed severe neutropenia and FN, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified a low baseline white blood cell count (odds ratio [OR], 14.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.27–111.14; p = 0.002) and presence of heterozygosity for UGT1A1*28 or UGT1A1*6 polymorphism (OR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.18–7.17; p = 0.023) as independent risk factors for severe neutropenia. The incidences of severe neutropenia and FN in patients receiving mFOLFIRINOX in our clinical practice were comparable to previous reports. The risk factors for severe neutropenia in patients receiving mFOLFIRINOX were a low baseline white blood cell count and presence of heterozygosity for UGT1A1*28 or UGT1A1*6 polymorphism.

A multinational, drug utilization study of lipegfilgrastim use in real-world setting in Europe

PURPOSE

Lipegfilgrastim (Lonquex, Teva Pharma B.V.) is approved for reduction in neutropenia duration and febrile neutropenia incidence. In the framework of lipegfilgrastim regulatory approval in the EU, the Health Authorities requested a drug utilization study. This study was conducted to characterize prescribing patterns of lipegfilgrastim and quantify the extent of on- and off-label use of lipegfilgrastim in real-world setting in Europe.

METHODS

Information on lipegfilgrastim use between January 2014 and March 2020 was abstracted from medical records in hospital and outpatient clinical settings. Indication for lipegfilgrastim was classified either as on-label or off-label use according to pre-determined criteria. The primary endpoint was the extent of lipegfilgrastim off-label use based on the most recent lipegfilgrastim cycle.

RESULTS

Records of 481 patients were obtained from five European countries. Lipegfilgrastim was most commonly prescribed for prevention of neutropenia by oncologists and hematologists. Patients who were administered lipegfilgrastim were primarily ≥ 55 years old (65.1%) and female (65.7%). The most frequent underlying diagnosis was breast cancer (38.3%). For the most recent lipegfilgrastim cycle, on-label use was recorded in 452/459 patients with no missing data (98.5%), while off-label use was recorded in 7/459 patients (1.5%). The majority of off-label use was attributed to use with non-cytotoxic chemotherapy (57.1%). Off-label use of lipegfilgrastim across all treatment cycles with no missing data was 11/1547 cycles (0.7%).

CONCLUSION

Using real-world data, these findings confirm the low rate of lipegfilgrastim off-label use as reported in a preceding feasibility study, indicating very high adherence to the approved indication.

Impact of G-CSF Prophylaxis on Chemotherapy Dose-Intensity, Link Between Dose-Intensity and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

In metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, few data are available on the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis and its impact on dose-intensity (DI), or the link between DI and progression-free survival (PFS). This study assessed the impact of G-CSF prophylaxis on the DI received by patients and the relationship between full DI and PFS according to chemotherapy regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients from three first-line randomized phase II clinical trials were included in this retrospective cohort. G-CSF prophylaxis groups were identified and balanced according to baseline characteristics using a propensity score. Patients were classified into 2 treatment groups (FOLFIRINOX vs FOLFIRI/nab-paclitaxel (NAB)). DI was a binary variable (full/reduced). Adverse events were defined using NCI-CTCAE v4.0.

RESULTS

Of the 498 patients, 154 (31%) were in "prophylaxis" group; 179 (36%) were treated by FOLFIRINOX and 319 (64%) by FOLFIRI/NAB. In FOLFIRINOX group, G-CSF prophylaxis was significantly associated with a higher rate of full DI (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.52-16.90; P < .01) while in FOLFIRI/NAB group, it was significantly associated with a lower rate of full DI (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.83; P = .03). Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS (FOLFIRINOX group: HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59-1.16; P = .27; FOLFIRI/NAB group: HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63-1.11; P = .22).

CONCLUSION

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis was associated with a higher rate of full DI with FOLFIRINOX. Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS. These results need to be confirmed prospectively.

Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Utilization and Prescribing Patterns in Cancer Patients: A Single Institution Experience of a Saudi Cancer Center

Background Febrile neutropenia (FN), owing to its negative association with immune function and infectious complications, acts as a treatment-limiting factor in myelotoxic cancer chemotherapy. This study aimed to analyze the incidence of FN, utilization of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients who experienced FN, and its association with age and comorbidities. Methodology This retrospective study was conducted in a major tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Inclusion criteria entailed all neutropenic adults aged >18 years with a proven cancer diagnosis, including solid and hematological malignancies. Patients who were treated with chemotherapy and G-CSF were included in the study. Data regarding FN, administration of G-CSF, and patient and physician-related factors were collected. Results We collected data on 53 cancer patients with a mean age of 41.9 ± 17.1 years (range = 16-75). FN was present in 16 (30.2%) patients and absent in 37 (69.8%) patients. The mean neutrophil count post-filgrastim did not significantly differ from pre-chemotherapy neutrophil count (Student's t-test, p = 0.067), while there was a significant difference from post-chemotherapy neutrophil count (Student's t-test, p = 0.044). In our cohort, 24 (45.3%) patients achieved remission, 12 (22.6%) died, and 17 (32.1%) were not cured. We did not find any significant association between gender, specialty, comorbidities, and age with FN. Conclusions G-CSF administration significantly decreases the incidence of FN post-chemotherapy in cancer patients.

G-CSF primary prophylaxis use and outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy at intermediate risk for febrile neutropenia: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a major dose-limiting toxicity of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, and several patients receiving chemotherapy are at intermediate risk of developing FN. However, the guidelines remain less clear regarding the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for this population and insights about real-world prophylaxis patterns and FN outcomes are needed.

AREAS COVERED

This scoping review summarizes the variability in real-world G-CSF prophylaxis treatment patterns, incidence of FN, and associated outcomes among patients receiving chemotherapy at intermediate risk of FN. G-CSF PP use varied across the included studies (N = 23). Overall, there was a trend for reduced FN incidence among patients who received G-CSF PP vs. those who did not. G-CSF PP was also associated with a lower incidence of FN-related dose delays and reductions and fewer hospitalization days. Gaps in the literature of real-world studies exist, particularly around incorporating FN risk factor assessment, patient-reported outcomes, and health economic outcomes.

EXPERT OPINION

Further studies are warranted to determine the impact of G-CSF PP use on clinical, quality of life, and economic outcomes in patients with intermediate FN risk, which could optimize care for this subgroup of patients, resulting in better population-based FN-related outcomes.

Burden, risk factors, and management of neutropenic fever among solid cancer patients in Ethiopia

Objectives

Although neutropenic fever is one of the most well-known oncologic emergencies and the common causes of death, a few studies have been conducted in resource-limited countries, particularly in Ethiopia. This study aimed to assess the burden, risk factors, and management of neutropenic fever among solid cancer patients in Ethiopia.

Methods

A hospital-based retrospective follow-up study was conducted from January 2017 to February 2021. Data were collected from patient's medical charts using a structured data abstraction format and analyzed using STATA version 14.2. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of neutropenic fever, and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 416 patients were included, with a mean age of 51 ± 14 years. The cumulative incidence of neutropenic fever was 13%. Advanced age, low baseline white blood cell, prolonged duration of neutropenia, and presence of two or more comorbidities were factors significantly associated with neutropenic fever (p < 0.05). Among patients who need primary prophylaxis, 68% of patients did not get appropriate primary prophylaxis, and 30%, 71%, and 93% of prescribed anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, and anti-viral agents were inappropriate according to Infectious Disease Society of America Guideline, respectively.

Conclusion

Neutropenic fever was common among solid cancer patients and it is multifactorial. The rate of guideline adherence during prophylaxis and treatment of neutropenic fever was poor. Health care professionals should be aware of these risk factors, and greater effort is needed to reduce the risk of neutropenic fever.

Effects of Prophylactic Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on Peripheral Leukocyte and Neutrophil Counts Levels After Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Both chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN) frequently occur and can lead to dose-limiting toxicity and even fatal chemotherapy side effects. The prophylactic use of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF), including pegylated rhG-CSF (PEG-rhG-CSF), significantly reduces the risks of CIN and FN during chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients. However, whether the prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), especially PEG-rhG-CSF, can influence white blood cell (WBC) counts and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) after finishing the chemotherapy remains unknown. Therefore, exploring the development and recovery tendency of WBC counts and ANCs during and after chemotherapy is crucial.

Objective

We aimed to investigate the variation tendency and recovery of WBC counts and ANCs during and after chemotherapy and evaluate the independent factors influencing leukopenia and neutropenia lasting longer after chemotherapy. We also aimed to provide individualized prophylactically leukocyte elevation therapy for breast cancer patients.

Methods

This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated 515 ESBC patients who received rhG-CSF or PEG-G-CSF for prophylaxis after adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Blood test reports were analyzed during chemotherapy, and on a 12-month follow-up period after finishing the chemotherapy. The WBC counts and ANCs were measured to assess their variation tendency characteristics and to identify independent factors that influenced the occurrence of leukopenia and neutropenia lasting longer than 12 months after chemotherapy.

Results

Prophylaxis with rhG-CSF or PEG-rhG-CSF kept the mean values of WBC counts and ANCs within the normal range during chemotherapy, but a significant difference in WBC levels was detected before the end of the last chemotherapy compared to the prechemotherapy period (baseline) (p < 0.001). During the 12-month follow-up after the end of the last chemotherapy, WBC counts and ANCs gradually recovered, but the group that used only PEG-rhG-CSF (long-acting group, p _WBC = 0.012) or rhG-CSF (short-acting group, p _WBC = 0.0005) had better leukocyte elevation effects than the mixed treatment group (PEG-rhG-CSF mixed rhG-CSF). Besides, the short-acting group had a better neutrophil elevation effect than the longer-acting (p _ANC = 0.019) and mixed (p _ANC = 0.002) groups. Leukopenia was still present in 92 (17.9%) patients and neutropenia in 63 (12.2%) 12 months after the end of the last chemotherapy. The duration of leukopenia over 12 months was closely associated with the baseline WBC level (p < 0.001), G-CSF types (p = 0.027), and surgical method (p = 0.041). Moreover, the duration of neutropenia over 12 months was closely related to the baseline ANC (p < 0.001), G-CSF types (p = 0.043), and molecular typing (p = 0.025).

Conclusion

The prophylactic application of G-CSF effectively stabilized the WBC counts and ANCs during chemotherapy in ESBC patients. Nevertheless, the recovery of WBC counts and ANCs after chemotherapy varied between different G-CSF treatment groups. The risk of leukopenia and neutropenia persisting for more than 12 months after chemotherapy was associated with G-CSF types, the baseline level of WBC count/ANCs, surgical method, and molecular typing.

Neutropenic Enterocolitis as a Complication of Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Case Series

Neutropenic enterocolitis (NE) is a rare but severe complication occurring in neutropenic patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy. Mortality is high, so early diagnosis is required to start urgent medical or surgical treatment. Data analysis of the development of NE after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains scarce. The aim of this case series is to discuss five out of 100 patients receiving autologous stem cell transplants (ASCTs) for multiple myeloma complicated with NE between 2016 and 2020 in the hematology department of the Cheikh Khalifa International University Hospital, Casablanca, Morocco. The patients were diagnosed with IgA and IgG multiple myeloma and aged between 58 to 64 years. They received induction therapy with four cycles of a triplet regimen including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and corticosteroids, allowing a complete remission. Intensification was based on ASCT with melphalan at 200 mg/m2. The period of aplasia was marked by the sudden appearance of NE, diagnosed based on clinical, biological, and imaging criteria. Treatment included antibiotherapy and supportive care. We report no complications in our cases, nor the need for surgical care. Therefore, we consider that early diagnosis and treatment allowed a good evolution in our case series. The management of NE must be multidisciplinary associating hematologists, gastroenterologists, radiologists, and biologists. More studies and trials are needed to establish specific diagnostic criteria and better treatment options.