Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in B-Cell Lymphoma

Simple Summary

Immune-based treatment strategies, which include immune checkpoint inhibition, have recently become a new frontier for the treatment of B-cell-derived lymphoma. Whereas checkpoint inhibition has given oncologists and patients hope in specific lymphoma subtypes like Hodgkin lymphoma, other entities do not benefit from such promising agents. Understanding the factors that determine the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibition in different lymphoma subtypes can lead to improved therapeutic strategies, including combinations with various chemotherapies, biologics and/or different immunologic agents with manageable safety profiles.

Abstract

For years, immunotherapy has been considered a viable and attractive treatment option for patients with cancer. Among the immunotherapy arsenal, the targeting of intratumoral immune cells by immune-checkpoint inhibitory agents has recently revolutionised the treatment of several subtypes of tumours. These approaches, aimed at restoring an effective antitumour immunity, rapidly reached the market thanks to the simultaneous identification of inhibitory signals that dampen an effective antitumor response in a large variety of neoplastic cells and the clinical development of monoclonal antibodies targeting checkpoint receptors. Leading therapies in solid tumours are mainly focused on the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death 1 (PD-1) pathways. These approaches have found a promising testing ground in both Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, mainly because, in these diseases, the malignant cells interact with the immune system and commonly provide signals that regulate immune function. Although several trials have already demonstrated evidence of therapeutic activity with some checkpoint inhibitors in lymphoma, many of the immunologic lessons learned from solid tumours may not directly translate to lymphoid malignancies. In this sense, the mechanisms of effective antitumor responses are different between the different lymphoma subtypes, while the reasons for this substantial difference remain partially unknown. This review will discuss the current advances of immune-checkpoint blockade therapies in B-cell lymphoma and build a projection of how the field may evolve in the near future. In particular, we will analyse the current strategies being evaluated both preclinically and clinically, with the aim of fostering the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in lymphoma, including combination approaches with chemotherapeutics, biological agents and/or different immunologic therapies.

Phase Ib study of anti-CSF-1R antibody emactuzumab in combination with CD40 agonist selicrelumab in advanced solid tumor patients

Background

This phase Ib study evaluated the safety, clinical activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics (PD) of emactuzumab (anti-colony stimulating factor 1 receptor monoclonal antibody (mAb)) in combination with selicrelumab (agonistic cluster of differentiation 40 mAb) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods

Both emactuzumab and selicrelumab were administered intravenously every 3 weeks and doses were concomitantly escalated (emactuzumab: 500 to 1000 mg flat; selicrelumab: 2 to 16 mg flat). Dose escalation was conducted using the product of independent beta probabilities dose-escalation design. PD analyzes were performed on peripheral blood samples and tumor/skin biopsies at baseline and on treatment. Clinical activity was evaluated using investigator-based and Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors V.1.1-based tumor assessments.

Results

Three dose-limiting toxicities (all infusion-related reactions (IRRs)) were observed at 8, 12 and 16 mg of selicrelumab together with 1000 mg of emactuzumab. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached at the predefined top doses of emactuzumab (1000 mg) and selicrelumab (16 mg). The most common adverse events were IRRs (75.7%), fatigue (54.1%), facial edema (37.8%), and increase in aspartate aminotransferase and creatinine phosphokinase (35.1% both). PD analyzes demonstrated an increase of Ki67⁺-activated CD8⁺ T cells accompanied by a decrease of B cells and the reduction of CD14^Dim CD16^bright monocytes in peripheral blood. The best objective clinical response was stable disease in 40.5% of patients.

Conclusion

Emactuzumab in combination with selicrelumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and evidence of PD activity but did not translate into objective clinical responses.

Trialregistration number

NCT02760797.

The Use of Anti-CD40 mAb in Cancer

Immunomodulatory monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy is at the forefront of developing cancer therapeutics with numerous targeted agents proving highly effective in selective patients at stimulating protective host immunity, capable of eradicating established tumours and leading to long-term disease-free states. The cell surface marker CD40 is expressed on a range of immune cells and transformed cells in malignant states whose signalling plays a critical role in modulating adaptive immune responses. Anti-CD40 mAb therapy acts via multiple mechanisms to stimulate anti-tumour immunity across a broad range of lymphoid and solid malignancies. A wealth of preclinical research in this field has led to the successful development of multiple anti-CD40 mAb agents that have shown promise in early-phase clinical trials. Significant progress has been made to enhance the engagement of antibodies with immune effectors through their interactions with Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) by the process of Fc engineering. As more is understood about how to best optimise these agents, principally through the fine-tuning of mAb structure and choice of synergistic partnerships, our ability to generate robust, clinically beneficial anti-tumour activity will form the foundation for the next generation of cancer therapeutics.

Immune modulation with weekly dosing of an agonist CD40 antibody in a phase I study of patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Single-dose infusion of the agonistic anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody (mAb) CP-870,893 accomplishes immune activation and clinical responses in patients with advanced cancers, but repeat dosing of this agent has not been reported.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. The most common adverse event was transient, infusion-related cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 CRS and grade 3 urticaria; the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was estimated to be 0.2 mg/kg. Seven patients (26%) had stable disease as the best clinical response; no partial or complete responses were observed. At the MTD, patient B lymphocytes exhibited persistently increased expression of costimulatory and adhesion molecules without resetting to baseline between doses. In 4 of 8 patients (50%) evaluated at the MTD, there were marked declines in total CD3(+) T lymphocytes, as well as CD4(+) and CD8(+) subsets.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies received weekly intravenous infusions of CP-870,893 in four dose level cohorts. Safety and immune pharmacodynamics were assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly infusions of the agonist CD40 antibody CP-870,893 were well-tolerated, but there was little clinical activity in advanced cancer patients. Correlative studies demonstrate chronic B cell activation and in some patients, T cell depletion. Longer dosing intervals may be desirable for optimal immune pharmacodynamics.

Therapeutic targeting of TWEAK/Fnl4 in cancer: exploiting the intrinsic tumor cell killing capacity of the pathway

TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) and FGF-inducible molecule 14 (Fn14) are a TNF superfamily ligand-receptor pair. Initially identified as an inducer of tumor cell killing, TWEAK has pleiotropic effects, mediating proinflammatory and pro-angiogenic activity as well as stimulation of invasion, migration, and survival through its widely recognized receptor, Fn14. Fn14 is expressed at relatively low levels in normal tissues, but is dramatically elevated locally in injured and diseased tissues, where it plays a role in tissue remodeling. Herein we review the link between the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway and cancer as well as discuss potential therapeutic strategies targeting this pathway for cancer treatment. Many of the activities associated with the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway are linked with tumorigenesis and could thereby provide a growth advantage to tumors, suggesting that inhibition of the pathway may be beneficial in the treatment of cancer. At the same time, the elevated expression of Fn14 by tumor cells as well as the intrinsic tumor cell killing capacity of this receptor represents a promising alternative of harnessing the intrinsic tumor cell killing capacity of Fn14 to treat cancer.

Prospect of targeting the CD40 pathway for cancer therapy

The cell surface molecule CD40 is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily and is broadly expressed by immune, hematopoietic, vascular, epithelial, and other cells, including a wide range of tumor cells. CD40 itself lacks intrinsic kinase or other signal transduction activity but rather mediates its diverse effects via an intricate series of downstream adapter molecules that differentially alter gene expression depending on cell type and microenvironment. As a potential target for novel cancer therapy, CD40 may mediate tumor regression through both an indirect effect of immune activation and a direct cytotoxic effect on the tumor, resulting in a "two-for-one" mechanism of action of CD40 agonists. Several drug formulations that target the CD40 pathway have undergone phase 1 clinical evaluation in advanced-stage cancer patients, and initial findings show objective clinical responses and immune modulation in the absence of major toxicity.

Clinical activity and immune modulation in cancer patients treated with CP-870,893, a novel CD40 agonist monoclonal antibody

PURPOSE

The cell-surface molecule CD40 activates antigen-presenting cells and enhances immune responses. CD40 is also expressed by solid tumors, but its engagement results in apoptosis. CP-870,893, a fully human and selective CD40 agonist monoclonal antibody (mAb), was tested for safety in a phase I dose-escalation study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors received single doses of CP-870,893 intravenously. The primary objective was to determine safety and the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included assessment of immune modulation and tumor response.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients received CP-870,893 in doses from 0.01 to 0.3 mg/kg. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in two of seven patients at the 0.3 mg/kg dose level (venous thromboembolism and grade 3 headache). MTD was estimated as 0.2 mg/kg. The most common adverse event was cytokine release syndrome (grade 1 to 2) which included chills, rigors, and fever. Transient laboratory abnormalities affecting lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets, D-dimer and liver function tests were observed 24 to 48 hours after infusion. Four patients with melanoma (14% of all patients and 27% of melanoma patients) had objective partial responses at restaging (day 43). CP-870,893 infusion resulted in transient depletion of CD19+ B cells in blood (93% depletion at the MTD for < 1 week). Among B cells remaining in blood, we found a dose-related upregulation of costimulatory molecules after treatment.

CONCLUSION

The CD40 agonist mAb CP-870,893 was well tolerated and biologically active, and was associated with antitumor activity. Further studies of repeated doses of CP-870,893 alone and in combination with other antineoplastic agents are warranted.

Immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies for cancer therapy

Increasing immune responses with immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed to immune-receptor molecules is a new and exciting strategy in cancer therapy. This expanding class of agents functions on crucial receptors, either antagonizing those that suppress immune responses or activating others that amplify immune responses. Complications such as autoimmunity and systemic inflammation are problematic side effects associated with these agents. However, promising synergy has been observed in preclinical models using combinations of immunostimulatory antibodies and other immunotherapy strategies or conventional cancer therapies. Importantly, mAbs of this type have now entered clinical trials with encouraging initial results.