Treating Patients With EGFR-Sensitizing Mutations: First Line or Second Line—Is There a Difference?

Efficacy and safety of Toliparibumab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

This research intends to investigate the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using Toripalimab, focusing on its effectiveness and safety profile. Efficacy refers to the survival prognosis, while safety pertains to the occurrence of adverse events in our study. It also aims to provide reference information for neoadjuvant and postoperative therapies.

Methods

Up to March 20, 2024, studies on randomized controlled trials and single-arm trials involving Toripalimab for NSCLC were sourced from the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. Data extraction and analysis were independently conducted by two researchers utilizing Stata 15.0 and R software.

Results

A total of 8 studies were analyzed, including 6 single-arm studies and 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Toripalimab treatment in the RCTs showed an overall survival (OS) of [HR=0.67, 95% CI (0.53, 0.85); p=0.71]. The objective response rate (ORR) from single-arm studies was reported as [ES=0.59, 95% CI (0.36, 0.81); p<0.01], and progression-free survival (PFS) was [ES=4.89, 95% CI (2.65, 9.02); p<0.01]. Furthermore, observed adverse effects included Anemia [OR=0.53, 95% CI (0.26, 0.79); p<0.01], Neutropenia [OR=0.43, 95% CI (0.20, 0.68); p<0.01], and Thrombocytopenia [OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.18, 0.43); p<0.01].

Conclusions

Toripalimab, being China's first domestically developed anti-tumor PD-1 antibody drug, shows potential advantages over traditional chemotherapy in possibly prolonging patients' survival times. However, the limited number of studies included indicates the need for additional single-arm and RCT studies to further validate these findings.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier (CRD42024519806).

Gefitinib-Induced Severe Dermatological Adverse Reactions: A Case Report and Pharmacogenetic Profile

Gefitinib is a selective inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor that is used to treat advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Dermatological adverse reactions are most commonly associated with gefitinib treatment. The cause of adverse reactions in individuals is multifactorial. Pharmacogenetics is an effective tool to detect such adverse reactions. This case report describes a female patient with NSCLC who was administered gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg/day. However, due to severe adverse dermatological reactions, the treatment was interrupted for 15 d and antibiotic therapy was administered to manage the skin rashes, maculopapular rashes, and hyperpigmentation. Treatment adherence was adequate, and no drug interactions were detected. A pharmacogenetic analysis revealed homozygosity in the ATP-binding cassette (ABC)-B1 rs1128503 (c.1236A>G), heterozygosity in ABCG2 rs2231142 (c.421G>T) and rs2622604 (c.-20+614T>C), and a non-functional variant of the cytochrome P450 family 3, subfamily A, member 5 (CYP3A5). The relationship between altered genetic variants and the presence of adverse reactions induced by gefitinib is still controversial. Overall, this case report highlights the importance of continuing to study pharmacogenetics as predictors of adverse drug reactions.

Network meta-analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50

INTRODUCTION

The optimal first-line immunotherapy regimen for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50% remains unclear. Our aim is to determine the most effective treatment regimen through a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing these treatments.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases, and a Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. To ensure transparency, the study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022349712).

RESULTS

The analysis included 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 2037 patients and 12 immunotherapy combinations. ICI-ICI, ICI alone, and chemotherapy-ICI showed significant advantages over chemotherapy in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy showed the best OS results compared to chemotherapy. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy and sintilimab plus chemotherapy provided the best PFS results.

CONCLUSIONS

For NS-NSCLC patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy, and sintilimab plus chemotherapy are recommended as good treatment options based on the results of this Network meta-analysis (NMA).

Thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy plus first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant polymetastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: A propensity-matched retrospective study

The role of thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in addition to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutant polymetastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well established. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs with thoracic SBRT for the treatment of this patient group.Polymetastatic NSCLC was defined as having >5 metastatic lesions. Patients with polymetastatic NSCLC harboring positive EGFR mutations after initial TKI therapy for at least 8 weeks were eligible for SBRT between August 2016and August 2019. Eligible patients were treated with thoracic SBRT, and TKIs were administered for the duration of SBRT and continued after SBRT until they were considered ineffective. The control group was treated with TKI monotherapy. Propensity score matching (ratio of 1:4) was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and treatment safety were evaluated.In total, 136 patients were included in the study population. Among them, 120 patients received TKIs alone, and 16 patients received TKIs with thoracic SBRT. The baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the two cohorts after propensity score matching. The median PFS was 17.8 months in the thoracic SBRT group and 10.8 months in the control group (P = .033). In the multivariate analysis, a Cox regression model showed that thoracic SBRT was an independent statistically significant positive predictor of improved survival, with a hazard ratio of 0.54 (P = .046). We recorded no severe toxic effects or grade 4 to 5 toxicities.Real-world data demonstrate that thoracic SBRT significantly extends PFS in EGFR-mutant polymetastatic NSCLC patients with tolerable toxicity. Given these results, randomized studies are warranted.

Efficacy and acquired resistance for EGFR-TKI plus thoracic SBRT in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched retrospective study

Background

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to elucidate potential mechanisms of acquired resistance.

Methods

Patients with advanced NSCLC harboring positive EGFR mutations after initial TKI therapy for at least 8 weeks were eligible for SBRT between August 2016 and August 2019. Eligible patients were treated with thoracic SBRT, and TKI was continued after SBRT until it was considered ineffective. The control group was treated with TKIs monotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM, ratio of 1:2) was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment safety and resistance mechanisms were evaluated.

Results

Three hundred eight patients were included in the study population. Among them, 262 patients received TKIs alone, and 46 patients received TKIs with SBRT. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two cohorts after PSM. The median PFS was 19.4 months in the TKIs +SBRT group compared to 13.7 months in the TKIs group (p = 0.034). An influence on OS has not yet been shown (p = 0.557). Of the 135 patients evaluated after PSM, 28 and 71 patients in the TKIs and TKIs +SBRT cohorts, respectively, had plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed at baseline and disease progression. In the TKIs +SBRT cohort, the NGS results showed that T790M mutations were detected in 64.3% (18/28) of patients. Patients in the TKIs cohort exhibited fewer T790M-positive mutations (40.8%, p = 0.035) compared to patients in the TKIs +SBRT cohort.

Conclusion

Real world data prove that TKIs plus thoracic SBRT significantly extend PFS with tolerable toxicity. The mutation ratio of T790M was increased in the TKIs +SBRT group compared to the TKIs only group. Further randomized studies are warranted.

Detection of EGFR Mutations in Cerebrospinal Fluid of EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma With Brain Metastases

Background

We aimed to investigate the feasibility of detecting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma of advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) with brain metastases (BMs) by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR).

Methods

Thirty advanced LADC patients with BMs were enrolled, and their matched CSF and plasma samples were collected. Droplet digital PCR was used to test cfDNA in CSF and plasma for EGFR mutation status. The clinical response and prognosis were evaluated.

Results

Out of 30 patients, there were 21 females and 9 males, aged 34-75 years. In all of the cases, CSF cytology were negative. In ddPCR assays, 10 patients (33.3%) had EGFR mutation in CSF, including 3 cases of EGFR T790M mutation, and 16 patients (53.3%) had EGFR mutation in plasma, including 6 cases of EGFR T790M mutation. Five patients with activating EGFR mutations in CSF achieved an intracranial partial response (iPR) after combination treatment with the first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Three patients with EGFR T790M mutations in CSF achieved iPR after second-line osimertinib treatment. The median overall survival and intracranial progression-free survival were 17.0 months and 11.0 months, respectively.

Conclusion

It was feasible to test EGFR mutation in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma. In LADC patients with brain metastasis, cerebrospinal fluid can be used as a liquid biopsy specimen to guide treatment strategy by monitoring EGFR mutation status.

Compare the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Bayesian analysis

Background

Inhibitors of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have represented a novel approach for the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we aimed to estimate five anti-PD-1/L1 agents (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) using network meta-analyses (NMAs) and the Bayesian method to provide suggestions for advanced NSCLC treatments.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Wiley Online Library for eligible studies published up to March 2020. Both pairwise analyses and NMAs were conducted with clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and the incidences of adverse events. Results were presented in several patient populations according to treatment lines and PD-L1 status.

Results

Nineteen randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving 11,456 patients were included in our study. PD-1/L1 inhibitors showed significant benefits over chemotherapies in OS regardless of tumor PD-L1 status [first-line settings: OS =0.85, 95% CI (0.77, 0.94), I²=37%; second- or further-line settings: OS =0.77, 95% CI (0.71, 0.84), I²=37%]. The combined regimen of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy stood out to be the most effective and safest for patients in the first-line settings. Pembrolizumab monotherapy was showed to be the best especially for patients with PD-L1 ≥50%. In the subsequent-line settings, nivolumab ranked the best in improving the survival of patients, and durvalumab had the greatest effect in tumor shrinkage. Atezolizumab, followed by nivolumab, ranked the safest in reducing adverse events, whereas durvalumab was showed with the largest side effects among the five inhibitors.

Conclusions

The combination of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy is suitable for advanced NSCLC patients who have not received any systematic treatments before, and pembrolizumab monotherapy should also be considered, especially for patients with highly-expressed PD-L1 (≥50%). Nivolumab is the best option for patients with advanced NSCLC whose tumors have progressed following chemotherapies or combined modalities of treatments including chemotherapy. However, our results need to be further validated in future head-to-head clinical trials.

Brazilian Women With Lung Cancer Have a Higher Overall Survival Than Their Male Equivalents: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the principal cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide; however, there has been controversy as to whether there is a difference in survival rate according to gender in Brazil. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to compare the epidemiologic and clinical profile and the overall survival of patients with lung cancer according to gender.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed involving 1283 patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 2006 and 2014 at a single cancer center. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier statistics. A log-rank test was used to assess differences between survival curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to quantitate the relationship between gender and overall survival.

RESULTS

Compared with men, women were more frequently younger (P < .001), nonsmokers (P = .007), diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (P < .001), had early stage disease (P < .001), received surgery or surgery in combination with chemotherapy (P < .001), and had a better survival rate (P < .001). The median overall survival rate was higher in women (14.2 vs. 10.5 months in men; P < .001). Cox regression-adjusted analysis shows that women were 16% less likely to die than men (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.98; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher overall survival rate was found in women with lung cancer as compared with men with lung cancer in Brazil.

ATOM: A phase II study to assess efficacy of preemptive local ablative therapy to residual oligometastases of NSCLC after EGFR TKI

OBJECTIVES

NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutation invariably developed resistance to EGFR TKI. We postulated that oligoresidual disease (ORD) after initial TKI might harbor resistant clones. This study aimed to test if preemptive local ablative therapy (LAT) can improve progression free survival (PFS) or not compared to historic data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients indicated for EGFR TKI who possessed ORD (≤ 4 PET-avid lesions) after an initial 3-month TKI therapy were enrolled. After screening PET-CT, eligible patients with PET-avid ORDs were treated by LAT, either by stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) or surgery per clinicians' discretion. TKI was continued after LAT until it was considered ineffective. PET-CT was repeated on the 3rd and 12th month post-LAT (or at progression) apart from regular imaging. Further LAT was allowed in oligoprogressive disease. Primary endpoint was PFS rate at one-year from enrollment. Overall survival (OS), PFS and treatment safety were secondary endpoints. A post hoc comparison with screen failure cohort was performed.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled from 2014-17. Recruitment was stopped before the planned number (34) due to slow accrual. Two were excluded due to consent withdrawal and significant protocol violation. Median follow up was 39.1 months. Among the 16 analyzed patients, the one-year PFS rate (i.e. 15 month post TKI) was 68.8 %. Median OS was 43.3 months. All LAT were done by SABR, and none experienced ≥ grade 3 SABR related toxicities. Compared with screen failure cohort (n = 48), pre-emptive LAT effectively reduced risk of progression (HR 0.41, p = 0.0097).

CONCLUSION

Preemptive LAT in ORD appeared to be safe and feasible. The 1-year PFS rate was encouraging. However, potential biases and the limitations of the study should not be overlooked. Further randomized studies are warranted.

Exhaustive Review on Lung Cancers: Novel Technologies

BACKGROUND

Lung cancers or (Bronchogenic-Carcinomas) are the disease in certain parts of the lungs in which irresistible multiplication of abnormal cells leads to the inception of a tumor. Lung cancers consisting of two substantial forms based on the microscopic appearance of tumor cells are: Non-Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer (NSCLC) (80 to 85%) and Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer (SCLC) (15 to 20%).

DISCUSSION

Lung cancers are existing luxuriantly across the globe and the most prominent cause of death in advanced countries (USA & UK). There are many causes of lung cancers in which the utmost imperative aspect is the cigarette smoking. During the early stage, there is no perspicuous sign/symptoms but later many symptoms emerge in the infected individual such as insomnia, headache, pain, loss of appetite, fatigue, coughing etc. Lung cancers can be diagnosed in many ways, such as history, physical examination, chest X-rays and biopsy. However, after the diagnosis and confirmation of lung carcinoma, various treatment approaches are existing for curing of cancer in different stages such as surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and immune therapy. Currently, novel techniques merged that revealed advancements in detection and curing of lung cancer in which mainly includes: microarray analysis, gene expression profiling.

CONCLUSION

Consequently, the purpose of the current analysis is to specify and epitomize the novel literature pertaining to the development of cancerous cells in different parts of the lung, various preeminent approaches of prevention, efficient diagnostic procedure, and treatments along with novel technologies for inhibition of cancerous cell growth in advance stages.

Benefit of Targeted DNA Sequencing in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Without EGFR and ALK Alterations on Conventional Tests

BACKGROUND

Genetic sequencing testing has become widely used to inform treatment decisions for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We analyzed benefits of genetic sequencing testing in real practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 209 NSCLC patients who had no EGFR and ALK alterations on routine molecular tests and underwent next-generation targeted DNA sequencing of 380 cancer-related genes between November 2013 and October 2016. Median patient age was 59 years. A total of 96 patients (46%) were never smokers, and 195 patients (93%) had adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Among 209 total patients, 64 (31%) demonstrated actionable genetic alterations; 20 had EGFR mutations (6 L858R, 8 exon 19 deletions, 1 L861Q, 1 G719S, 4 exon 20 duplications), 4 ALK fusions, 9 ROS1 fusions, 6 BRAF V600E mutations, 15 RET fusions, 1 MET high-level amplification, 6 MET exon 14 skipping mutations, and 3 ERBB2 exon 20 insertion mutations. Of the 64 patients harboring actionable alterations, 28 patients received therapy targeted to their own actionable alterations (15 EGFR, 3 ALK, 1 ROS1, 8 RET, 1 BRAF). There were significant differences in overall survival between individuals with no actionable alterations, those with actionable alterations but no targeted therapy, and those with actionable alterations and targeted therapy (20.1 vs. 17.1 vs. 66.2 months, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The results of targeted DNA sequencing testing could provide improved treatment options for some NSCLC patients and result in a survival benefit to NSCLC patients with no EGFR and ALK alterations on routine tests who are treated with targeted therapy.

Long non-coding RNA LOC554202 promotes acquired gefitinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer through upregulating miR-31 expression

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation inevitably have a relapse due to the occurrence of acquired resistance, resulting in treatment failure. However, little is known about the mechanisms of acquired resistance of NSCLC patients. Here, we elucidated the expression pattern of LOC554202 and miR-31, and their biological functions and mechanisms in NSCLC with acquired EGFR TKI resistance to gefitinib. In the present study, we observed that LOC554202 and miR-31 promoted proliferation and clonogenic growth of gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cells in vitro. LOC554202 upregulated miR-31 expression and they both reduced sensitivity of NSCLC cells to gefitinib. In a xenograft mice model, we found that knockdown of miR-31 significantly repressed gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cells growth in vivo. Furthermore, both LOC554202 and miR-31 levels were significantly increased in NSCLC patients acquiring resistance to gefitinib, and the expression of LOC554202 was positively correlated with the expression of miR-31. By luciferase reporter assays, we identified RAS P21 Protein Activator 1 (RASA1) and Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1 Subunit Alpha Inhibitor (FIH-1) as direct targets of miR-31 in NSCLC cells. Mechanistically, miR-31 directly repressed RASA1 and FIH-1 expression, and thus, at least partially activated the RAF-MEK-ERK and PI3K-AKT signaling pathways in NSCLC with acquired resistance to gefitinib. In conclusion, these data will help us develop potential therapeutic targets for the diagnosis and treatment of acquired EGFR TKI resistance in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Astragalus polysaccharides (PG2) Enhances the M1 Polarization of Macrophages, Functional Maturation of Dendritic Cells, and T Cell-Mediated Anticancer Immune Responses in Patients with Lung Cancer

Background: Recently, we demonstrated that Astragalus polysaccharide (PG2), the active ingredient in dried roots of astragalus membranaceus, ameliorates cancer symptom clusters and improves quality of life (QoL) in patients with metastatic disease by modulating inflammatory cascade against the background roles of inflammatory cells, including macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs), and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in tumor initiation, metastasis, and progression. Nevertheless, the role of PG2 in the modulation of anticancer immunogenicity and therapeutic response remains relatively underexplored and unclear. Purpose: The present study investigates how and to what extent PG2 modulates cellular and biochemical components of the inflammatory cascade and enhances anticancer immunity, as well as the therapeutic implication of these bio-events in patients with lung cancer. Methods and Results: Herein, we demonstrated that PG2 significantly increased the M1/M2 macrophage polarization ratio in non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC) H441 and H1299 cells. This PG2-induced preferential pharmacologic up-regulation of tumoral M1 population in vitro positively correlated with the downregulation of tumor-promoting IL-6 and IL-10 expression in NSCLC cell-conditioned medium, with concomitant marked inhibition of cell proliferation, clonogenicity, and tumorsphere formation. Our ex vivo results, using clinical sample from our NSCLC cohort, demonstrated that PG2 also promoted the functional maturation of DCs with consequent enhancement of T cell-mediated anticancer immune responses. Consistent with the in vitro and ex vivo results, our in vivo studies showed that treatment with PG2 elicited significant time-dependent depletion of the tumor-associated M2 population, synergistically enhanced the anti-M2-based anticancer effect of cisplatin, and inhibited xenograft tumor growth in the NSCLC mice models. Moreover, in the presence of PG2, cisplatin-associated dyscrasia and weight-loss was markedly suppressed. Conclusion: These results do indicate a therapeutically-relevant role for PG2 in modulating the M1/M2 macrophage pool, facilitating DC maturation and synergistically enhancing the anticancer effect of conventional chemotherapeutic agent, cisplatin, thus laying the foundation for further exploration of the curative relevance of PG2 as surrogate immunotherapy and/or clinical feasibility of its use for maintenance therapy in patients with lung cancer.

Primary tumor location is an important predictor of survival in pulmonary adenocarcinoma

Purpose

The prognostic value of tumor location in pulmonary adenocarcinoma (ADC) is controversial. We compared the prognosis and relevant data between central-type ADC (CT-ADC) and peripheral-type ADC (PT-ADC) in order to identify the reasons for the different outcomes between them and to improve the treatment strategy and prognosis of these two types.

Patients and methods

Data of 256 patients with pathologically diagnosed ADC were retrospectively reviewed. The prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

A total of 124 and 132 patients had CT-ADC and PT-ADC, respectively. CT-ADC was associated with an earlier age, poorer Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), higher rates of advanced stage, bone metastasis, contralateral pulmonary metastasis, and pleural effusion. Besides, CT-ADC showed a trend toward lower rate of EGFR mutation. Patients with CT-ADC had a significantly shorter PFS/DFS and OS than did those with PT-ADC. Multivariate analysis revealed that advanced stage, central-type location, EGFR wild-type, no surgery, presence of COPD, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) were independent poor prognostic factors for OS. The rate of surgery was significantly lower in patients with CT-ADC. Among patients with ILD or COPD, OS is shorter in patients with central- than peripheral-type tumors.

Conclusion

CT-ADC is associated with poorer survival than PT-ADC and the lower rate of surgery in patients with CT-ADC is an important reason for this. Tumor location of pulmonary ADC plays a critical role in predicting prognosis and choosing therapeutic strategies.

Small molecule inhibitors targeting the EGFR/ErbB family of protein-tyrosine kinases in human cancers

The EGFR family is among the most investigated receptor protein-tyrosine kinase groups owing to its general role in signal transduction and in oncogenesis. This family consists of four members that belong to the ErbB lineage of proteins (ErbB1-4). The ErbB proteins function as homo and heterodimers. These receptors contain an extracellular domain that consists of four parts: domains I and III are leucine-rich segments that participate in growth factor binding (except for ErbB2) and domains II and IV contain multiple disulfide bonds. Moreover, domain II participates in both homo and heterodimer formation within the ErbB/HER family of proteins. Seven ligands bind to EGFR including epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-α, none bind to ErbB2, two bind to ErbB3, and seven ligands bind to ErbB4. The extracellular domain is followed by a single transmembrane segment of about 25 amino acid residues and an intracellular portion of about 550 amino acid residues that contains (i) a short juxtamembrane segment, (ii) a protein kinase domain, and (iii) a carboxyterminal tail. ErbB2 lacks a known activating ligand and ErbB3 is kinase impaired. Surprisingly, the ErbB2-ErbB3 heterodimer complex is the most active dimer in the family. These receptors are implicated in the pathogenesis of a large proportion of lung and breast cancers, which rank first and second, respectively, in the incidence of all types of cancers (excluding skin) worldwide. On the order of 20% of non-small cell lung cancers bear activating mutations in EGFR. More than 90% of these patients have exon-19 deletions (⁷⁴⁶ELREA⁷⁵⁰) or the exon-21 L858R substitution. Gefitinib and erlotinib are orally effective type I reversible EGFR mutant inhibitors; type I inhibitors bind to an active enzyme conformation. Unfortunately, secondary resistance to these drugs occurs within about one year owing to a T790M gatekeeper mutation. Osimertinib is an irreversible type VI inhibitor that forms a covalent bond with C797 of EGFR and is FDA-approved for the treatment of patients with this mutation; type VI inhibitors generally form a covalent adduct with their target protein. Resistance also develops to this and related type VI inhibitory drugs owing to a C797S mutation; the serine residue is unable to react with the drugs to form a covalent bond. Approximately 20% of breast cancer patients exhibit ErbB2/HER2 gene amplification on chromosome 17q. One of the earliest targeted treatments in cancer involved the development of trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody that interacts with the extracellular domain ErbB2/HER2 causing its down regulation. Surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy with cytotoxic drugs, and hormonal modulation are the mainstays in the treatment of breast cancer. Moreover, lapatinib and neratinib are FDA-approved small molecule ErbB2/HER2 antagonists used in the treatment of selected breast cancer patients. Of the approximate three dozen FDA-approved small molecule protein kinase inhibitors, five are type VI irreversible inhibitors and four of them including afatinib, osimertinib, dacomitinib, and neratinib are directed against the ErbB family of receptors (ibrutinib is the fifth and it targets Bruton tyrosine kinase). Avitinib, olmutinib, and pelitinib are additional type VI inhibitors in clinical trials for non-small cell lung cancer that target EGFR. Secondary resistance to both targeted and cytotoxic drugs is the norm, and devising and implementing strategies for minimizing or overcoming resistance is an important goal in cancer therapeutics.

Clinicoradiological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 and 21 mutation in lung adenocarcinoma

AIM

To retrospectively identify clinicopathological and radiological characteristics that could be independent predictors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 and 21 mutation in surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas in a cohort of Asian patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Demographics, histopathology data, and preoperative chest computed tomography (CT) images were evaluated retrospectively in 471 surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas. A total of 24 CT descriptors were assessed. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predicted factors of harbouring EGFR mutations.

RESULTS

EGFR mutations were existed in 252 (53.5%) of 471 patients, and associated with 11 clinicoradiological features. For the model with both clinical and radiological features, the independent predictors of harbouring EGFR mutation were small maximum diameter (≤3.9 cm), non-smokers, micropapillary pattern, pleural retraction, vascular convergence, and absence of solid pattern. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was 0.784. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that non-smokers, vascular convergence, and absence of solid pattern were important independent predictors of EGFR exon 19 mutation, while non-smokers and vascular convergence were independent predictors of EGFR exon 21 mutation. The AUCs were 0.807 and 0.794, respectively. A lepidic growth pattern appeared more frequently in exon 21 mutant tumours than in exon 19 mutant group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

CT imaging features of lung adenocarcinomas in combination with clinical variables could be used to prognosticate EGFR mutation status. The separate analysis of EGFR exon 19 or 21 mutation could further improve diagnostic performance.

Novel platinum agents and mesenchymal stromal cells for thoracic malignancies: state of the art and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma represent two of the most intriguing and scrutinized thoracic malignancies, presenting interesting perspectives of experimental development and clinical applications.

AREAS COVERED

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer, molecular targeted therapy is the standard first-line treatment for patients with identified driver mutations; on the other hand, chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients without EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangement or those with unknown mutation status. Once considered an ineffective therapy in pulmonary neoplasms, immunotherapy has been now established as one of the most promising therapeutic options. Mesenchymal stromal cells are able to migrate specifically toward solid neoplasms and their metastatic localizations when injected intravenously. This peculiar cancer tropism has opened up an emerging field to use them as vectors to deliver antineoplastic drugs for targeted therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

Molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy are the new alternatives to standard chemotherapy. Mesenchymal stromal cells are a new promising tool in oncology and-although not yet utilized in the clinical practice, we think they will represent another main tool for cancer therapy and will probably play a leading role in the field of nanovectors and molecular medicine.

The antiangiogenic action of cisplatin on endothelial cells is mediated through the release of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-1 from lung cancer cells

In addition to suppressing cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth, cisplatin has been shown to inhibit tumor angiogenesis. However, the underlying mechanism remains a matter of debate. The present study addressed the impact of cisplatin on potential tumor-to-endothelial cell communication conferring an antiangiogenic effect. For this purpose, migration and tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) exposed to conditioned media (CM) from vehicle- or cisplatin-treated A549 and H358 lung cancer cells were quantified. Cancer cells were exposed to non-toxic concentrations of cisplatin to mimic low-dose treatment conditions. CM from cancer cells exposed to cisplatin at concentrations of 0.01 to 1 µM elicited a concentration-dependent decrease in HUVEC migration and tube formation as compared with CM from vehicle-treated cells. The viability of HUVECs was virtually unaltered under these conditions. siRNA approaches revealed cisplatin-induced expression and subsequent release of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) by lung cancer cells to be causally linked to a decrease in HUVEC migration and tube formation. Moreover, TIMP-1 upregulation and consequent inhibition of HUVEC migration by cisplatin was shown to be dependent on activation of p38 and p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinases. Inhibition of angiogenic features was not observed when HUVECs were directly exposed to cisplatin. Similarly, antiangiogenic effects were not detectable in HUVECs exposed to CM from the cisplatin-challenged bronchial non-cancer cell line BEAS-2B. Collectively, the present data suggest a pivotal role of cisplatin-induced TIMP-1 release from lung cancer cells in tumor-to-endothelial cell communication resulting in a reduced cancer-associated angiogenic impact on endothelial cells.

Involvement of GLUT1-mediated glucose transport and metabolism in gefitinib resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer cells

Use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors represented by gefitinib and erlotinib has become the standard of treatment for non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with activating EGFR mutations. However, the majority of NSCLCs, which overexpress EGFR without such mutations, are resistant to EGFR inhibitors, and the mechanism(s) behind such primary resistance of NSCLCs without activating EGFR mutations to EGFR inhibitors still remains poorly understood. Here in this study, we show that glucose metabolism mediated by GLUT1, a facilitative glucose transporter, is involved in gefitinib resistance of NSCLC cells. We found that GLUT1 expression and glucose uptake were increased in resistant NSCLC cells after gefitinib treatment and that genetic as well as pharmacological inhibition of GLUT1 sensitized not only NSCLC cells with primary resistance but also those with acquired resistance to gefitinib. In vivo, the combination of systemic gefitinib and a GLUT1 inhibitor, both of which failed to inhibit tumor growth when administered alone, significantly inhibited the growth of xenograft tumors formed by the implantation of NSCLC cells with wild-type EGFR (wt-EGFR). Since our data indicated that GLUT1 was similarly involved in erlotinib resistance, our findings suggest that the activity of GLUT1-mediated glucose metabolism could be a critical determinant for the sensitivity of NSCLC cells to EGFR inhibitors and that concurrent GLUT1 inhibition may therefore be a mechanism-based approach to treating NSCLCs resistant to EGFR inhibitors, including those with wt-EGFR.

Combined treatment with metformin and gefitinib overcomes primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs with EGFR mutation via targeting IGF-1R signaling pathway

Aim

Although EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown dramatic effects against sensitizing EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ~20%–30% of NSCLC patients with EGFR-sensitive mutation exhibit intrinsic resistance to EGFR-TKIs. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the enhanced antitumor effect of metformin (Met), a biguanide drug, in combination with gefitinib (Gef) in primary resistant human lung cancer cells and the associated molecular mechanism.

Experimental design

H1975 cell line was treated with Met and/or Gef to examine the inhibition of cell growth and potential mechanism of action by using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), Ki67 incorporation assay, flow cytometry analysis, small interfering RNA technology, Western blot analysis and xenograft implantation.

Results

Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) signaling pathway was markedly activated in EGFR-TKI primary resistant H1975 cells as compared to EGFR-TKI acquired resistance cells (PC-9GR, H1650-M3) and EGFR-TKI sensitivity cells (PC-9, HCC827). Inhibition of IGF-1R activity by AG-1024 (a small molecule of IGF-1R inhibitor), as well as downregulation of IGF-1R by siRNA, significantly enhanced the ability of Gef to suppress proliferation and induce apoptosis in H1975 cells via the inhibition of AKT activation and subsequent upregulation of Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death (BIM). Interestingly, the observation showed that Met combined with Gef treatment had similar tumor growth suppression effects in comparison with the addition of AG-1024 to therapy with Gef. A clear synergistic antiproliferative interaction between Met and Gef was observed with a combination index (CI) value of 0.65. Notably, IGF-1R silencing mediated by RNA interference (RNAi) attenuated anticancer effects of Met without obviously resensitizing H1975 cells to Gef. Finally, Met-based combinatorial therapy effectively blocked tumor growth in the xenograft with TKI primary resistant lung cancer cells.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrated that Met combined with Gef would be a promising strategy to overcome EGFR-TKI primary resistance via suppressing IGF-1R signaling pathway in NSCLC.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced IL-6/STAT3 activation decreases sensitivity of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer to icotinib

Tyrosine kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has considerably benefited for non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC) harbor mutations in EGFR. However, the factors attenuating EGFR-TKI efficiency are obstacles to inhibit the proliferation of EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells successfully. Clarifying the insensitivity mechanisms of EGFR-TKI would help to develop new treatment strategy. In this study, the sensitivity of EGFR-mutant NSCLC cell lines, PC9 and HCC827, to icotinib was detected. Similar with other EGFR-TKIs such as gefitinib and erlortinib in previous research, the proliferation of two cell lines was apparently inhibited. However, we surprisingly found that contrast with the suppression of EGFR-AKT/ERK pathway, STAT3 was significantly activated in PC9 cells with the treatment of icotinib, but not in HCC827 cells. Further study confirmed that icotinib concomitantly induced IL-6 secretion and src activation in PC9 cells. Moreover, with the treatment of IL-6 neutralizing antibody or src inhibitor, dasatinib, icotinib-induced phosphorylation of STAT3 was reduced, as well as the sensitivity of PC9 to icotinib was also partially increased. Our results suggest that Src/IL-6/STAT3 bypass pathway is activated to maintain cell survival when the EGFR pathway was inhibited by TKIs, even in some EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells sensitive to TKIs. This finding provides a groundwork for potential combinatorial treatment with TKIs and Src or STAT3 inhibitor to improve icotinib sensitivity.

Mutation abundance affects the therapeutic efficacy of EGFR-TKI in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of mutation abundance and sites of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on therapeutic efficacies of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKIs) treatments of patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

EGFR mutational sites and mutation abundance were analyzed by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) in paraffin-embedded tissue sections taken from primary or metastatic tumors of 194 NSCLC patients.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) time of the enrolled patients was 9.3 months (95% CI, 8.2-10.8 months). The PFS was significantly different with EGFR gene mutation abundance after EGFR-TKI therapy (P = 0.014). The median PFS was significantly longer when the cut-off value of EGFR mutation abundance of exon 19 or exon 21, and solely exon 19 was > 26.7% and 61.8%, respectively. For patients who received EGFR-TKI as first-line treatment, the median PFS was significantly longer in the high mutation abundance group than in the low mutation abundance group (12.7 vs 8.7 months, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The PFS benefits were greater in patients with a higher abundance of exon 19 deletion mutations in the EGFR gene after EGFR-TKI treatment and first line EGFR-TKI treatment led to improved PFS in high mutation abundance patients.

Osimertinib As First-Line Treatment of EGFR Mutation–Positive Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

The AURA study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01802632) included two cohorts of treatment-naïve patients to examine clinical activity and safety of osimertinib (an epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] –tyrosine kinase inhibitor selective for EGFR–tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitizing [ EGFRm] and EGFR T790M resistance mutations) as first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and Methods

Sixty treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFRm NSCLC received osimertinib 80 or 160 mg once daily (30 patients per cohort). End points included investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety evaluation. Plasma samples were collected at or after patients experienced disease progression, as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), to investigate osimertinib resistance mechanisms.

Results

At data cutoff (November 1, 2016), median follow-up was 19.1 months. Overall ORR was 67% (95% CI, 47% to 83%) in the 80-mg group, 87% (95% CI, 69% to 96%) in the 160-mg group, and 77% (95% CI, 64% to 87%) across doses. Median PFS time was 22.1 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 30.2 months) in the 80-mg group, 19.3 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 26.0 months) in the 160-mg group, and 20.5 months (95% CI, 15.0 to 26.1 months) across doses. Of 38 patients with postprogression plasma samples, 50% had no detectable circulating tumor DNA. Nine of 19 patients had putative resistance mechanisms, including amplification of MET (n = 1); amplification of EGFR and KRAS (n = 1); MEK1, KRAS, or PIK3CA mutation (n = 1 each); EGFR C797S mutation (n = 2); JAK2 mutation (n = 1); and HER2 exon 20 insertion (n = 1). Acquired EGFR T790M was not detected.

Conclusion

Osimertinib demonstrated a robust ORR and prolonged PFS in treatment-naïve patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC. There was no evidence of acquired EGFR T790M mutation in postprogression plasma samples.

Comparison of outcomes of tyrosine kinase inhibitor in first- or second-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with sensitive EGFR mutations

Direct comparisons between the use of first- and second-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients with sensitive EGFR mutations are limited. A total of 264 advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with sensitive mutations received EGFR TKI therapy as the first-line therapy, and a total of 187 patients received TKI as the second-line therapy at Shanghai Chest Hospital. First-line EGFR TKI therapy [12.9 months, 95% confidence interval (CI), 10.7-15.2] provided longer progression-free survival (PFS) than did second-line EGFR TKI therapy (9.0 months, 95% CI, 7.7-10.2) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.78, P = 0.034]. The objective response rate (ORR) of first-, and second-line TKI therapy were 67.8% (159/233) and 55.6% (94/169), respectively (P = 0.001). The overall survival (OS) for patients (n = 141) receiving first-line TKI followed by second-line chemotherapy were longer than those for patients (n = 187) receiving first-line chemotherapy followed by second-line TKI (HR: 0.69, P = 0.02).Compared with second-line TKI, first-line therapy achieved a significant and longer PFS, and higher ORR in the sensitive EGFR mutated NSCLC patients. The therapeutic strategy of using TKI followed by chemotherapy achieved longer OS than that using chemotherapy followed by TKI.

Vandetanib in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer-harboring RET rearrangement: a phase II clinical trial

Background

Chromosomal rearrangements involving RET, which are found in about 1% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), define a unique molecular subset. We performed this study to examine the efficacy and safety of vandetanib 300 mg daily in this patient population.

Patients and methods

This study was a multi-center, open-label, phase II clinical trial. Patients were enrolled if they had metastatic or recurrent NSCLC with a RET rearrangement, which was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, had progressive disease against platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, and had a performance status of 0-2. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate.

Results

A total of 18 patients were enrolled in this study between July 2013 and October 2015. Patients were aged 35-71 years; three had a performance status of 2, and the majority were a heavily pretreated population (≥ two different previous chemotherapy regimens in 72% of the patients). Among the 17 evaluable patients, three had a partial response (objective response rate = 18%) and eight had a stable disease (disease control rate = 65%). Among these patients, the partial response or disease stabilization was durable for more than 6 months in eight patients. Vandetanib also showed a progression-free survival of 4.5 months, and an overall survival of 11.6 months during a median follow-up duration of 14 months. The safety profile was comparable with previous studies of vandetanib. Most vandetanib-related adverse events were mild with prevalent hypertension and rash (in >70% of patients). Grade 3 toxicity included hypertension (n = 3), QT prolongation (2), and elevation of aminotransferases (1), and as a consequence the dose was reduced in four patients. There were no adverse events associated with grade 4 or 5 toxicity.

Conclusion

Vandetanib is moderately active in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC-harboring RET rearrangements.

Histologic Grade Is Predictive of Incidence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma

Activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are associated with a high response rate to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The current guidelines recommend routine EGFR mutational analysis prior to initiating first line systemic therapy. The clinical characteristics including smoking status, histologic type, sex and ethnicity are known to be associated with the incidence of EGFR mutations. We retrospectively analyzed 277 patients with metastatic NSCLC within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC); among these patients, 83 were positive for EGFR mutations. We performed both univariate and multivariable logistic regressions to identify predictors of EGFR mutations. We found that histologic grade was significantly associated with the incidence of EGFR mutation, regardless of ethnicity, sex and smoking status. In grade I (well differentiated) and II (moderately differentiated), histology was associated with significantly higher incidence of EGFR mutations compared to grade II–III (moderate-to-poorly differentiated) and III (poorly differentiated). Ever-smokers with grade III lung adenocarcinoma had 1.8% incidence of EGFR mutations. This study indicates that histologic grade is a predictive factor for the incidence of EGFR mutations and suggests that for patients with grade II–III or III lung adenocarcinoma, prompt initiation of first-line chemotherapy or immunotherapy is appropriate while awaiting results of EGFR mutational analysis, particularly for patients with history of smoking.

Clinical and molecular characteristics of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutation: results of the nationwide French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup (IFCT) program

BACKGROUND

EGFR mutations cause inconsistent response to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI). To better understand these features, we reviewed all cases of EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer collected in the Biomarkers France database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 17 664 patients, 1837 (11%) with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed for clinical and molecular characteristics. Results were correlated with survival and treatment response for the 848 stage IV patients.

RESULTS

EGFR exon 18, 19, 20 and 21 mutations were found in 102 (5.5%), 931 (51%), 102 (5.5%) and 702 (38%) patients, respectively. Over 50% of exon 18 and 20 mutated patients were smokers. The median follow-up was 51.7 months. EGFR mutation type was prognostic of overall survival (OS) versus wild-type {exon 19: hazard ratio (HR)=0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-0.64], P < 0.0001; exon 21: HR = 0.76 (95% CI: 0.61-0.95), P = 0.002; exon 20: HR = 1.56 (95% CI: 1.02-2.38), P = 0.004}. EGFR mutation type was prognostic of progression-free survival versus wild-type [exon 19: HR = 0.62 (95% CI: 0.49-0.78), P < 0.0001; exon 20: HR = 1.46 (95% CI: 0.96-2.21), P = 0.07]. First-line treatment choice did not influence OS in multivariate analysis. First-line TKI predicted improved progression-free survival versus chemotherapy [HR = 0.67 (95% CI: 0.53-0.85), P = 0.001]. OS was longer for del19 versus L858R, which was associated with better OS compared with other exon 21 mutations, including L861Q. TKI improved survival in patients with exon 18 mutations, while chemotherapy was more beneficial for exon 20-mutated patients.

CONCLUSION

EGFR mutation type can inform the most appropriate treatment. Therapeutic schedule had no impact on OS in our study, although TKI should be prescribed in first-line considering the risk of missing the opportunity to use this treatment.

Oncogenic driver mutations, treatment, and EGFR-TKI resistance in a Caucasian population with non-small cell lung cancer: survival in clinical practice

Introduction

Oncogenic driver mutations activating EGFR, ALK, or BRAF in NSCLC predict sensitivity to specific tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We provide data on prevalence, treatment and survival of driver-mutation positive NSCLC in a predominantly Caucasian population in routine clinical practice.

Patients and Methods

NSCLC patients diagnosed from 2006-2015 with an EGFR-test result were included (n=265). Testing for EGFR, ALK, or BRAF was performed if specific TKI therapy was considered. Case-control analyses of overall survival (OS) comparing driver-mutation positive and negative patients were performed.

Results

44 sensitizing EGFR mutations (17%), 8 ALK translocations (7%, n=111) and 3 BRAF mutations (8%, n=39) were detected in adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma. We did not find mutations in tumors without an adenocarcinoma-component. More than 90% of inoperable driver-mutation positive patients received TKI-therapy. Case-control analysis revealed improved OS of driver-mutation positive patients (39.6 vs. 19.4 months, HR 0.51). OS was improved in stage IV patients but not in stage I-III patients.

OS of EGFR-TKI treated patients was similar for 1^st and 2^nd-line EGFR-TKI treatment. Patients not treated with EGFR-TKI had no benefit in OS. Re-biopsies obtained at progression revealed an EGFR-T790M mutation in 73% (n=11). These patients responded to the 3^rd-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib.

Discussion

Testing guided by predictive clinical parameters resulted in twice as high rates of mutation-positive patients than expected, and TKI treatment resulted in a strong long-term OS advantage.

Conclusion

Testing for driver mutations is feasible in routine clinical practice, and identifies patients who benefit from TKI-therapy. OS compares favorably with OS in clinical studies.

Clinical outcomes of WBRT plus EGFR-TKIs versus WBRT or TKIs alone for the treatment of cerebral metastatic NSCLC patients: a meta-analysis

Whether WBRT plus EGFR-TKIs has a greater survival benefit than EGFR-TKIs alone or WBRT alone remains controversial in NSCLC patients with multiple brain metastases. To rectify this, we conducted a systematic meta-analysis based on 9 retrospective studies and 1 randomized controlled study published between 2012 and 2016, comprising 1041 patients. Five studies were included in the comparison of WBRT plus EGFR-TKIs and EGFR-TKIs alone. The combined HR for OS of patients with EGFR mutation was 1.25 [95% CI 0.98-2.15; P = 0.08] and for intracranial PFS was 1.30 [95% CI 1.03-1.65; P = 0.03], which revealed that EGFR-TKIs alone produced a superior intracranial PFS than WBRT plus EGFR-TKIs. Five studies were included in the comparison of WBRT plus EGFR-TKIs and WBRT alone. The combined HR for OS, intracranial PFS and extracranial PFS were 0.52 [95% CI 0.37-0.75; P = 0.0004], 0.36 [95% CI 0.24-0.53; P < 0.001] and 0.52 [95% CI 0.38-0.71; P < 0.001], respectively, which revealed a significant benefit of WBRT plus EGFR-TKIs compared with WBRT alone. The results indicated that EGFR-TKIs alone should be the first option for the treatment of NSCLC patients with multiple BM, especially with EGFR mutation, since it provides similar OS and extracranial PFS but superior intracranial PFS compared with WBRT plus EGFR-TKIs.

Gefitinib or Erlotinib vs Chemotherapy for EGFR Mutation-Positive Lung Cancer: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Overall Survival

Background

We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis to examine the impact of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy on overall survival (OS) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Data from trials comparing EGFR-TKI against chemotherapy in exon 19 deletion (del19) or exon 21 L858R (L858R) EGFR mutations patients were used. We performed Cox regression to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Impact of postprogression therapies was examined in exploratory analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

Six eligible trials (gefitinib = 3, erlotinib = 3) included 1231 patients; 632 received EGFR-TKI and 599 received chemotherapy. At a median 35.0 months follow-up, there were 780 deaths and 1004 progressions. There was no difference in OS between EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.17, P =  .84). There was also no difference in OS for Del19 (n = 682, HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.16, P =  .68) and L858R (n = 540, HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.32, P =  .59) subgroups ( P interaction = .47), or according to smoking status, sex, performance status, age, ethnicity, or histology. However, EGFR-TKI statistically significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) overall (HR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.42, P <  .001) and in all subgroups. Following progression, 73.8% from the chemotherapy arm received EGFR-TKI, and 65.9% from the EGFR-TKI arm received chemotherapy. Nine percent from the EGFR-TKI arm received no further treatment vs 0.6% from the chemotherapy arm. Following disease progression, patients randomly assigned to EGFR-TKI had shorter OS than those randomly assigned to chemotherapy (12.8 months, 95% CI = 11.4 to 14.3, vs 19.8 months, 95% CI = 17.6 to 21.7).

Conclusions

Despite statistically significant PFS benefit, there is no relative OS advantage with frontline gefitinib or erlotinib vs chemotherapy in EGFR -mutated NSCLC. This finding is likely due to the high rate of crossover at progression.

Lapatinib with whole brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases from breast and non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)

Small molecules, mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are currently used in various malignancies. Lapatinib, a dual inhibitor of EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinases, has demonstrated effectiveness in brain metastases from HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. It also appears to sensitize EGFR-expressing cell lines to radiation. To evaluate the efficacy of lapatinib in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and breast cancer, as assessed by volumetric analysis by MRI. 81 patients were treated with WBRT (30 Gy in ten fractions) in combination with lapatinib 1250 mg once daily, followed by lapatinib 1500 mg once daily for a total 6 weeks. 21 patients had primary breast cancer and 60 patients NSCLC. Pre- and post-treatment MRI scans in a compact disk for central volumetric assessment were available for 43 patients. 27 patients (62.8%) achieved partial response, 15 patients (34.9%) had stable disease and only one patient (2.3%) had disease progression. Response was not associated to EGFR protein expression. All 81 patients were assessed for safety. The large majority of the adverse events were mild. Eight deaths occurred, four of which were considered related to the study drugs but there were also other contributing factors. Nine cases of serious infections were observed in eight patients, but they were also receiving dexamethasone. Lapatinib in combination with WBRT in patients with brain metastases from breast cancer and NSCLC is a feasible approach that can be further studied in larger clinical trials.

The comparison of EGFR-TKI failure modes and subsequent management between exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R mutation in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background: Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion (19 Del) and exon 21 L858R mutation (L858R) might be distinct diseases. Therefore, it is necessary to take EGFR mutation subgroups into consideration for making choices of subsequent treatment after tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) failure.

Patients and methods: 174 patients who developed to EGFR-TKI failure were categorized into three cohorts of dramatic progression, gradual progression and local progression. Chi-square was used to compare the distribution of failure modes between 19 Del and L858R. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox Regression were performed for analyses of survival in different subsequent treatments.

Results: The distribution of EGFR-TKI failure modes showed no significant difference between 19 Del and L858R. Patients in gradual progression had a longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with other failure modes in whole population, 19 Del cohort and L858R cohort. 19 Del patients with dramatic progression would obtain survival benefit from chemotherapy, while those with gradual progression got no survival benefit neither from chemotherapy nor previous TKI continuation. However, patients with dramatic or gradual progression would benefit from previous TKI continuation in L858R cohort.

Conclusion: For advanced EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI, subsequent treatment should be personalized according to EGFR-TKI failure modes & EGFR mutation subtypes.

Epidermal growth factor receptor is associated with the onset of skeletal related events in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Bone metastasis and skeletal related events (SREs) are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) could benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, it is unclear whether SRE is influenced by EGFR status. We aimed to evaluate the correlation of EGFR status and TKIs with the incidence of SREs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of stage IV NSCLC patients with bone metastasis. Incidence rate of SREs was collected and was compared using chi-square test. Logistic-regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors predicting the incidence of SREs.

Results

410 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. 49.0% were detected with EGFR mutation. 49.8% of patients received EGFR-TKIs therapy prior to the onset of SREs. 42.7% experienced at least one SRE. Patients who were treated with TKIs held lower incidence of SREs than patients who were not treated with TKIs (23.5% vs 61.7%, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that poor performance status (OR 5.550, 95%CI 2.290-13.450; p<0.001) and mutant EGFR (OR 3.050, 95%CI 1.608-5.787, p=0.001) were independent risk factors predicting the onset of SREs, while the usage of TKIs (OR 0.102, 95%CI 0.054-0.193, p<0.001) was a protective factor of SREs in NSCLC patients with bone metastasis.

Conclusions

This study indicates that the incidence of SREs is common in both patients with and without EGFR mutation. Poor performance ability and mutant EGFR imply higher risks of SREs, while the usage of TKIs may be a protective factor of SREs.

Comparison of gefitinib as first- and second-line therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with positive exon 21 or 19 del epidermal growth factor receptor mutation

OBJECTIVES

Gefitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), shows excellent clinical benefit in treating advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of gefitinib as first-line therapy and second-line therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with positive exon 21 (L858R) or exon 19 deletion of EGFR mutation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 60 EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients from July 2011 to November 2015 who have received oral gefitinib 250 mg once daily. Gefitinib was taken until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or death.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 792 days, one death had occurred. Among the 59 patients who survived, 17 patients progressed. Overall, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.53-12.46 months, p<0.05). The response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 33.33% and 71.66%, respectively. However, there was longer mPFS in the first line-therapy than that in the second-line therapy: in the first-line gefitinib therapy, mPFS was 12 months among 41 patients (95% CI: 9.58-14.41 months, p<0.05), and in the second-line therapy, mPFS was 7 months among 19 patients (95% CI: 1.31-12.68 months, p<0.05). Furthermore, in subgroup analyses examining different EGFR mutation types, we noted that mPFS was significantly longer for patients with exon 19 deletion than for those with positive exon 21in both the first-line therapy and second-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advance lung adenocarcinoma who were selected by positive exon 21 or 19 deletion mutations had significantly longer mPFS in the first-line therapy than that in the second-line therapy when treated with gefitinib. EGFR mutation types may influence the response to gefitinib therapy.

Factors associated with efficacy of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer

The finding of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which reflects a classical process of translational research, is a critical milestone for non-small-cell lung cancer treatment. Currently, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are recommended as first-line therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor-sensitive mutations. The status of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation is widely acknowledged as superior to other clinical factors, such as smoking, gender, and histological types for predicting the response to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, recent studies have shown that the efficacy might differ in patients with the same epidermal growth factor receptor-sensitive mutations, highlighting the need to investigate the putative factors related to the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This article reviews the factors associated with clinical efficacy of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib and erlotinib, and analyzes their potential implications with respect to clinical application. In addition, new findings related to clinical practice with respect to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors efficacy were summarized in this article.

Second-line Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Focus on the Clinical Development of Dacomitinib

Dacomitinib is a second-generation, irreversible, covalent pan-HER tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI). It showed potent EGFR signaling inhibition in experimental models, including first-generation TKI-resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. This preclinical efficacy did not translate into clinically meaningful treatment benefits for advanced, pretreated, molecularly unselected NSCLC patients enrolled in two parallel phase III trials. Dacomitinib and erlotinib showed overlapping efficacy data in chemotherapy-pretreated EGFR wild-type (WT) patients in the ARCHER 1009 trial. Similarly, it failed to demonstrate any survival benefits as compared to placebo in EGFR WT subsets progressing on chemotherapy and at least one previous first-generation TKI (erlotinib or gefitinib) in the BR.26 trial. In the case of EGFR-mutant NSCLCs, a pooled analysis of the ARCHER 1009 and ARCHER 1028 trials comparing the efficacy of dacomitinib vs. erlotinib in chemotherapy-pretreated, EGFR TKI-naïve patients showed a trend to a longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in favor of dacomitinib that did not reach statistical significance, with a higher rate of treatment related adverse events (mainly skin rash, paronychia, and gastrointestinal toxicities). On the other hand, the clinical activity in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLCs with acquired TKI resistance that were included in phase II/III trials was equally poor (response rate <10%; PFS 3-4 months). Therefore, with the results of the ARCHER 1050 trial (NCT01774721) still pending, the current clinical development of dacomitinib is largely focused on EGFR-mutant, TKI-naïve patients. Here, we review the most relevant clinical data of dacomitinib in advanced NSCLC. We discuss the potential role of dacomitinib in pretreated EGFR WT and EGFR-mutant (TKI-naïve and TKI-resistant) patients. Finally, we briefly comment the available clinical data of dacomitinib in HER2-mutant NSCLC patients.

Second-Line Treatment of NSCLC-The Pan-ErbB Inhibitor Afatinib in Times of Shifting Paradigms

In contrast to the established role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors for the first-line treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring activating EGFR mutations, the role of EGFR blockade and of EGFR molecular testing in the second-line treatment remains less clear. The irreversible pan-ErbB family inhibitor afatinib (Gi(l)otrif^®) was recently FDA- and EMA-approved for the second-line treatment of NSCLC with squamous cell histology irrespective of the EGFR mutational status (LUX-Lung 8). Contrariwise, results from the TAILOR and DELTA trials among retrospective biomarker analyses show the predictive value of the EGFR mutational status for efficacy of reversible EGFR inhibitors also as a second-line therapy. This mini review critically summarizes the current role of EGFR-targeting strategies in the second-line treatment of NSCLC with special respect to afatinib in light of emerging T790M-specific EGFR and immune check point inhibitors. The review also emphasizes the urgent need for reliable biomarkers to guide therapeutic decision-making and outlines prospective changes to the second-line landscape with some of the current second-line treatment concepts likely to be moved to the first-line.

Thyroid transcription factor 1 expression is associated with outcome of patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy

Pemetrexed is an antifolate cytostatic agent targeting several folate-dependent enzymatic pathways, widely used in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic stage non-small cell lung cancer. Aside from the non-squamous histology, there is still no available molecular biomarker predicting treatment efficacy of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the association of thyroid transcription factor 1 expression with outcome of a large cohort of patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed. We retrospectively analysed clinical data of 463 patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (IIIB or IV) treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Thyroid transcription factor 1 expression was assessed using indirect immunohistochemical detection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue at the time of diagnosis. Thyroid transcription factor 1 expression was detected in the tumour tissue from 76.0% of patients, and tumours from 24.0% of patients were thyroid transcription factor 1 negative. The median progression-free survival and overall survival for patients with thyroid transcription factor 1 positive tumours were 4.8 and 11.8 months compared to 2.8 and 8.3 months for those with thyroid transcription factor 1 negative tumours (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001). The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model revealed that thyroid transcription factor 1 expression was significantly associated with progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.57, p < 0.001) and also with overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.73, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the results of the conducted retrospective study suggest that the thyroid transcription factor 1 expression was independently associated with progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced-stage non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy.

The association between clinical prognostic factors and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective assessment of 94 cases with EGFR mutations

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the association of clinical prognostic factors with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

The demographic and clinical characteristics of 94 patients with stage IV NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed, and the association between clinical factors and EGFR-TKIs efficacy was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 94 stage IV NSCLC patients enrolled in this study, a 74.5% objective response rate (ORR) and 97.9% disease control rate (DCR) were observed for EGFR-TKIs treatment, and a higher ORR was seen in patients with 0 and 1 ECOG scores than those with 2 or greater scores (P = 0.049). The subjects had a median PFS of 11 months and a median OS of 31 months after EGFR-TKIs treatment. ECOG score and timing of targeted therapy were factors affecting PFS, and ECOG score, smoking status and brain metastasis were factors affecting OS. In addition, ECOG score was an independent prognostic factor for PFS in stage IV NSCLC patients, and the patients with EGFR 19del mutation had a longer PFS than those with exon 21 L855R mutation (P = 0.003), while ECOG score and brain metastasis were independent prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that EGFR-TKI therapy results in survival benefits for EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients, regardless of gender, smoking history, pathologic type, type of EGFR mutations, brain metastasis and timing of targeted therapy. ECOG score is an independent prognostic factor for PFS, and ECOG score and brain metastasis are independent prognostic factors for OS in advanced NSCLC patients.

Efficacy of chemotherapy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients who had acquired resistance to first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)

INTRODUCTION

Salvage chemotherapy is frequently used when tumour epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated patients experience disease progression with first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. However, the efficacy of salvage chemotherapy is still unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the chart records of our pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients between 2010 and 2013.

RESULTS

Five hundred and six of the 1240 stage IV adenocarcinoma patients had an EGFR mutation and 338 received first-line EGFR-TKI treatment. In all, 169 patients in this group received salvage chemotherapy after failure of EGFR-TKI, and 102 patients were eligible for this study. The chemotherapy response rate of these 102 patients was 24.5%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.5?months, and median survival time was 14.6?months. Patients who received pemetrexed-based chemotherapy had longer PFS and overall survival (OS), although the extent was statistically insignificant. Progression-free survival and OS were longer for patients who received combination chemotherapy than single-agent chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed-based combination chemotherapy is preferred before a more efficient treatment strategy is found.

Greater efficacy of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab compared to chemo- and targeted therapy alone on non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis

Control of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastasis is clinically challenging. This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of different adjuvant therapies for 776 cases of advanced NSCLCs with brain metastasis who treated with chemotherapy, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) alone, or supportive care. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) of patients treated with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were 8.5 and 10.5 months, respectively, which were better than those of patients treated with other three therapies(P < 0.01). For patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, the efficacy of TKI treatment was not statistically better than that of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab but was significantly better than that of other therapies. Moreover, for patients with EGFR wild-type NSCLC, the mPFS and mOS after chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were greater than those with other two therapies (P < 0.01). The local response rate (RR)and disease control rate (DCR)with regimen including pemetrexed were greater than those with regimen including paclitaxel (P < 0.05). Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab was more effective for NSCLC patients with brain metastasis. Further studies will investigate the benefit of TKI alone for patients with EGFR-mutated. For patients with EGFR wild-type, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab did improve PFS and OS. Furthermore, regimens including pemetrexed led to a greater RR.

Final overall survival in JO22903, a phase II, open-label study of first-line erlotinib for Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In Japan, the clinical efficacy of erlotinib monotherapy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer was demonstrated in the phase II JO22903 trial, which reported a median progression-free survival of 11.8 months. Here we report final overall survival data from JO22903.

METHODS

JO22903 (JapicCTI-101085) was a single-arm, multicenter, phase II, open-label, non-randomized study of first-line erlotinib monotherapy in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Eligible patients (≥20 years) with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer and confirmed activating mutations of EGFR (exon 19 deletion or L858R point mutation in exon 21) received oral erlotinib 150 mg/day until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival and safety; overall survival was a secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

At the final analysis, 102 patients were included in the modified intent-to-treat population and 103 in the safety population. Median follow-up was 32.3 months. Median overall survival was 36.3 months (95 % confidence interval 29.4-not reached). Subgroup analyses of overall survival suggested that the presence of brain metastases was a negative prognostic factor (median overall survival 22.7 months, 95 % confidence interval 19.6-29.4). The impact on overall survival of using versus not using EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in any line of treatment following disease progression was unclear (median 32.8 versus 36.3 months, respectively). No new safety issues were observed.

CONCLUSION

In this survival update, single-agent erlotinib achieved a median overall survival of more than 3 years in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Analysis of the benefit of sequential cranial radiotherapy in patients with EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastasis

Although cranial radiotherapy is considered the standard treatment for brain metastasis (BM), EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown promising activity in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with BM. However, the efficacy of sequential cranial radiotherapy in patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC who are treated with EGFR TKIs remains to be determined. Patients with NSCLC who harbored an EGFR mutation and whose BM had been treated with EGFR TKIs were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical outcomes of patients treated with EGFR TKIs alone and those treated with cranial radiotherapy followed by EGFR TKIs (additive therapy) were compared. Of the 573 patients with NSCLC with BM who harbored an EGFR mutation and had received EGFR TKIs, 121 (21.1 %) had BM at the time of initial diagnosis. Fifty-nine (49 %) patients were treated with additive therapy, whereas 62 (51 %) patients were treated only with EGFR TKIs. No significant differences were observed between the additive therapy group and the EGFR TKI alone group regarding intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) (16.6 vs 21.0 months, p = 0.492) or extracranial PFS (12.9 vs 15.0 months, p = 0.770). The 3-year survival rates were similar in both groups (71.9 vs 68.2 %, p = 0.675). Additive therapy consisting of cranial radiotherapy followed by EGFR TKI treatment did not improve OS or intracranial PFS compared with EGFR TKI treatment alone in EGFR mutant NSCLC patients with BM. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the precise benefits of sequential cranial radiotherapy in EGFR mutant NSCLC treated with EGFR TKIs.

Current Challenges in Cancer Treatment

PURPOSE

In this review, we highlight the current concepts and discuss some of the current challenges and future prospects in cancer therapy. We frequently use the example of lung cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a nonsystematic PubMed search, selecting the most comprehensive and relevant research articles, clinical trials, translational papers, and review articles on precision oncology and immuno-oncology. Papers were prioritized and selected based on their originality and potential clinical applicability.

FINDINGS

Two major revolutions have changed cancer treatment paradigms in the past few years: targeting actionable alterations in oncogene-driven cancers and immuno-oncology. Important challenges are still ongoing in both fields of cancer therapy. On the one hand, druggable genomic alterations are diverse and represent only small subsets of patients in certain tumor types, which limits testing their clinical impact in biomarker-driven clinical trials. Next-generation sequencing technologies are increasingly being implemented for molecular prescreening in clinical research, but issues regarding clinical interpretation of large genomic data make their wide clinical use difficult. Further, dealing with tumor heterogeneity and acquired resistance is probably the main limitation for the success of precision oncology. On the other hand, long-term survival benefits with immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-programmed death cell protein-1/programmed death cell ligand-1[PD-1/L1] and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 monoclonal antibodies) are restricted to a minority of patients, and no predictive markers are yet robustly validated that could help us recognize these subsets and optimize treatment delivery and selection. To achieve long-term survival benefits, drug combinations targeting several molecular alterations or cancer hallmarks might be needed. This will probably be one of the most challenging but promising precision cancer treatment strategies in the future.

IMPLICATIONS

Targeting single molecular abnormalities or cancer pathways has achieved good clinical responses that have modestly affected survival in some cancers. However, this approach to cancer treatment is still reductionist, and many challenges need to be met to improve treatment outcomes with our patients.

Factors that predict progression-free survival in Chinese lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Although first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have shown efficacy in patients with advanced lung cancers, survival predictors with these drugs have not been extensively investigated. This study was performed to explore factors that may predict progression-free survival (PFS) in Chinese lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinicopathologic data on 208 patients who received either gefitinib, erlotinib or icotinib, including the patients' EGFR mutation status and levels of six serum tumor markers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA21-1) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)]. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors associated with PFS.

RESULTS

At the study cutoff date, 189 (90.9%) of the patients met the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0 criteria for progressive disease (PD), while 19 (9.1%) had stable disease (SD). The median PFS of the 208 patients was 12.4 months (95% CI, 11.0-13.8 months). In the multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model, a non-smoking history [hazard ratio (HR) =2.460; 95% CI, 1.484-4.079; P<0.001], first-line treatment (HR =1.500; 95% CI, 1.062-2.119; P=0.021), and a high pretreatment serum level of CEA (HR =1.424; 95% CI 1.026-1.977; P=0.035) were found to be significant predictors of a longer PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

In Chinese lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, a non-smoking history, first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment and a high serum level of CEA were independent predictors of a longer PFS along with an EGFR-activating mutation.

Risk of brain metastasis reduced after erlotinib treatment in advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients with sensitive EGFR mutation

Purpose

Brain metastasis (BM) is associated with impaired quality of life and increased mortality. The study aimed to compare BM risk after erlotinib administration and chemotherapy in stage IIIB/IV pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation.

Patients and methods

Eligible patients underwent match pair process with matching factors, including age, sex, performance status score, first-line or second-line treatment, first-line chemotherapy regimen (for the second-line treatment subgroup), stage IIIB or IV, and genotypes of EGFR mutation. BM and mortality risk of both groups were recorded and compared.

Results

In total 129 matched pairs were included for analysis. During a median follow-up of 21.5 months, time to BM risk was longer and incidences of BM within 2 years were lower in patients who received erlotinib than chemotherapy in total population, as well as subgroups of first-line treatment, second-line treatment, stage IIIB, stage IV, exon 19 deletion mutation, and exon 21 L858R mutation. Similar overall survival time and 2-year survival rates were seen in two groups totally or in any subgroup. Multivariate analysis showed that BM was retarded in patients who received erlotinib administration (hazard ratio, 1.695; P=0.001) and in patients who were in stage IIIB (hazard ratio, 1.751; P=0.001).

Conclusion

Erlotinib administration decreases BM risk in advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients harboring sensitive EGFR mutations.