Randomized Phase II Study of R-CHOP With or Without Bortezomib in Previously Untreated Patients With Non-Germinal Center B-Cell-Like Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas

B-cell lymphomas occur with an incidence of 20 new cases per 100 000 people per year in high-income countries. They can affect any organ and are characterised by heterogeneous clinical presentations and courses, varying from asymptomatic, to indolent, to very aggressive cases. Since the topic of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas was last reviewed in The Lancet in 2017, a deeper understanding of the biological background of this heterogeneous group of malignancies, the availability of new diagnostic methods, and the development and implementation of new targeted and immunotherapeutic approaches have improved our ability to treat patients. This Seminar provides an overview of the pathobiology, classification, and prognostication of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas and summarises the current knowledge and standard of care regarding biology and clinical management of the most common subtypes of mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. It also highlights new findings in deciphering the molecular background of disease development and the implementation of new therapeutic approaches, particularly those targeting the immune system.

How to improve RCHOP as frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials

RCHOP is the standard of care for patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) but failures occur in approximately 40% of them. We performed a meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing experimental regimens with RCHOP. We searched the database of PubMed with proper criteria, and data of efficacy (Progression Free Survival-PFS) in the ITT population were extracted and analyzed. Cross comparisons of RCTs were performed by using the CINEMA software. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%, CI) are reported. The literature search yielded 21 RCTs including 5785 patients in the RCHOP arm and 5648 patients in the experimental arm. Odds ratio (OR) for PFS in the total cohort was OR (95%, CI): 0.87 (0.76-0.99), p=0.02. Among different strategies to improve RCHOP, addition of a novel agent on RCHOP improved PFS. In total 1740 patients in the RCHOP arm were compared with 1755 in the RCHOP plus a novel agent arm, and the OR (95% CI) for PFS was 0.84 (0.71-0.97), p=0.02. Indirect comparisons of nine studies adding a novel agent on RCHOP does not give prominence to any agent. Subgroup analysis according to cell of origin was performed for non-GC DLBCL patients. In this subgroup, 1546 patients treated with RCHOP were compared with 1538 patients treated with experimental regimens. The OR (95% CI) for PFS was 0.86 (0.73-1.02), p=0.34. Overall survival data extracted from 18 studies showed no superiority of experimental regimens over RCHOP. Efficacy of RCHOP backbone is marginally improved when adding a novel anti-lymphoma agent.

Challenges identifying DLBCL patients with poor outcomes to upfront chemoimmunotherapy and its impact on frontline clinical trials

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has a variable course of disease among patients as it consists of subgroups that are clinically, biologically and molecularly heterogeneous. In this review, we will discuss how this heterogeneity has likely hindered the ability of traditional prognostic models to identify DLBCL patients at high risk of having poor outcomes with conventional upfront chemoimmunotherapy. We will highlight the challenges and downsides of using these models for risk stratification in clinical trials. Also, we present some of the novel prognosticators that have shown a prognostic value independently or when incorporated into existing prognostic models. Additionally, since the failure of frontline clinical trials to improve outcomes beyond R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy may be at least partially explained by the restrictive eligibility criteria, risk stratification methods and the selection bias encountered due to the complexed logistics of clinical trials; we will discuss strategies to refine and modernize clinical trial design.

New Insights into First-Line Therapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Are We Improving Outcomes?

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most prevalent subtype of lymphoma, comprising heterogeneous patient subgroups with distinctive biological and clinical characteristics. The R-CHOP combination (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) has been the standard initial treatment, yielding prolonged remissions in over 60% of patients with advanced-stage disease. Several attempts to enhance the outcomes of this regimen over the last two decades have shown limited success. Various novel therapeutic approaches have recently emerged in lymphoma, demonstrating promising results. These include small molecules, novel monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. This review explores recent advancements in therapeutic strategies for DLBCL and their potential impact on the initial management of DLBCL patients.

Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis: A roadmap to do better than Pola-RCHP in DLBCL

In treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), oncologists have traditionally relied on the chemotherapy backbone of R-CHOP as standard of care. The two dangers that the hematologist must navigate between are the aggressive disease (Charybdis that in the absence of therapy systematically destroys all the ships) and the toxicity of the therapies (Scylla with its six monstrous heads that devours six crew members at a time), and hematologists have to navigate very carefully between both. Therefore, three different strategies were employed with the goal of improving cure rates: de-escalating regimens, escalating regimens, and replacement strategies. With a replacement strategy, a breakthrough in treatment was identified with polatuzumab vedotin (anti-CD79B antibody/drug conjugate) plus R-CHP. However, this regimen still did not achieve the elusive universal cure rate. Fortunately, advances in genomic and molecular technologies have allowed for an improved understanding of the heterogenous molecular nature of the disease to help develop and guide more targeted, precise, and individualized therapies. Additionally, new pharmaceutical technologies have led to the development of novel cellular therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, that could be more effective, while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Thus, we aim to highlight the challenges of DLBCL therapy as well as the need to address therapeutic regimens eventually no longer tethered to a chemotherapy backbone. In the intersection of artificial intelligence and multi-omics (genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics), we propose the need to analyze multidimensional biologic datato launch a decisive attack against DLBCL in a targeted and individualized fashion.

Biomarkers and coptis chinensis activity for rituximab-resistant diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Combination of bioinformatics analysis, network pharmacology and molecular docking

BACKGROUND

Rituximab resistance is one of the great challenges in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but relevant biomarkers and signalling pathways remain to be identified. Coptis chinensis and its active ingredients have antitumour effects; thus, the potential bioactive compounds and mechanisms through which Coptis chinensis acts against rituximab-resistant DLBCL are worth exploring.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the core genes involved in rituximab-resistant DLBCL and the potential therapeutic targets of candidate monomers of Coptis chinensis.

METHODS

Using the Traditional Chinese Medicine System Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform (TCMSP), the Similarity Ensemble Approach and Swiss Target Prediction, the main ingredients and pharmacological targets of Coptis chinensis were identified through database searches. Through the overlap between the pharmacological targets of Coptis chinensis and the core targets of rituximab-resistant DLBCL, we identified the targets of Coptis chinensis against rituximab-resistant DLBCL and constructed an active compound-target interaction network. The targets and their corresponding active ingredients of Coptis chinensis against rituximab-resistant DLBCL were molecularly docked.

RESULTS

Berberine, quercetin, epiberberine and palmatine, the active components of Coptis chinensis, have great potential for improving rituximab-resistant DLBCL via PIK3CG.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed biomarkers and Coptis chinensis-associated molecular functions for rituximab-resistant DLBCL.

New Frontiers in Monoclonal Antibodies for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive lymphoma. Approximately 60% of patients are cured with R-CHOP as a frontline treatment, while the remaining patients experience primary refractory or relapsed disease (R/R). The prognosis for R/R DLBCL patients who are neither eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantations nor CAR-T-cell treatment is poor, representing an important unmet need. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have dramatically improved therapeutic options in anti-cancer strategies, offering new opportunities to overcome chemo-refractoriness in this challenging disease, even in cases of primary non-responder DLBCL. Several novel mAbs, characterized by different mechanisms of action and targets, are now available for R/R DLBCL. Unbound mAbs induce an immune response against cancer cells, triggering different mechanisms, including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), activation of antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and radioimmunotherapy (RIT), respectively, deliver a cytotoxic payload or a beta-emitter radionuclide to the targeted cells and nearby bystanders. Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTes) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) redirect and enhance the immune response against tumor cells. Here, we review therapeutic strategies based on monoclonal antibodies for R/R DLBCL.

Mature B-cell lymphomas in adolescents and young adults

Pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma includes over 30 histologies (many with subtypes), with approximately 800 cases per year in the US, compared to >60,000 cases of adult NHL annually. Improvements in survival in pediatric and adolescent mature B cell NHL over the past 5 decades align with the overall success of the cooperative trial model with dramatic improvements in outcomes through dose escalation of chemotherapy and, more recently, targeted therapy with rituximab. Pediatric dose-intense strategies carry risks of long-term consequences, but treatment failure is nearly universally fatal. By comparison, adult mature B cell lymphoma is typically less aggressive and treated with less intense chemotherapy. Optimizing therapy for adolescents and young adults remains a major challenge that requires creative solutions, including engineering study groups to combine biologically comparable adult and pediatric populations and developing effective salvage strategies that will ultimately be required for investigations of front-line dose reduction. In this review, we discuss challenges and opportunities for improving outcomes for adolescents and young adults with high-grade mature B cell lymphomas, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma.

2024 Update: Advances in the risk stratification and management of large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease with varying clinical outcomes. Our understanding of its molecular makeup continues to improve risk stratification, and artificial-intelligence and ctDNA-based analyses have the potential to enhance risk assessment and disease monitoring. R-CHOP and Pola-R-CHP are used in the frontline setting; chimeric antigen receptor therapy (CART) is now the new standard-of-care for most with primary refractory disease; both CART and autologous stem cell transplantation are utilized in the relapsed and refractory setting. In this review, we summarize the classification and management of DLBCL with an emphasis on recent advances in the field.

Myc rearrangement and concurrent high protein expression of C-Myc/Bcl2 carry an adverse prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

PURPOSE

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, characterized by a variety of clinicopathological, histomorphological, immunophenotypic, and molecular genetic features. The subtype of DLBCL known as double-expressor lymphoma (DEL) is associated with an adverse prognosis when treated with R-CHOP. Our study aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic features of DEL and the prognostic roles of Myc rearrangement and C-Myc expression in DEL patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 145 patients who were identified through fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing.

RESULTS

We found that DEL patients were more likely to have a non-germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype, stage III/IV disease, and a high International Prognostic Index (IPI) score. Our survival analysis indicated that Myc rearrangement and C-Myc expression were associated with poor prognosis. Although DEL patients with Myc rearrangement exhibited trends towards worse survival compared with patients without Myc rearrangement, the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.4008). The median overall survival (OS) of DEL patients with ≥70 % C-Myc expression (DEL-C-Mychigh) was 5 months. In the DEL-C-Mychigh group, the non-GCB subtype showed nonsignificant trends towards poorer survival compared with the GCB subtype (P = 0.1042).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study shows that a cut-off of ≥70 % for C-Myc expression in DEL patients can improve risk stratification, and suggests that more intensive treatment regimens may be necessary to improve survival in this high-risk population.

Intensified First Cycle of Rituximab Plus Eight Cycles of Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisolone with Rituximab Chemotherapy for Advanced-Stage or Bulky Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Phase II Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL) Study

PURPOSE

This phase II, open-label, multicenter study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of a rituximab intensification for the 1st cycle with every 21-day of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP-21) among patients with previously untreated advanced-stage or bulky diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-two patients with stage III/IV or bulky DLBCL from 21 institutions were administered 8 cycles of R-CHOP-21 with an additional one dose of rituximab intensification on day 0 of the 1st cycle (RR-CHOP). The primary endpoint was a complete response (CR) rate after 3 cycles of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Among the 92 DLBCL patients assessed herein, the response rate after 3 cycles of chemotherapy was 88.0% (38.0% CR+50.0% partial response [PR]). After the completion of 8 cycles of chemotherapy, the overall response rate was observed for 68.4% (58.7% CR+9.8% PR). The 3-year progression-free survival rate was 64.0%, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 70.4%. Febrile neutropenia was one of the most frequent grade 3 adverse events (40.0%) and 5 treatment-related deaths occurred. Compared with the clinical outcomes of patients who received R-CHOP chemotherapy as a historical control, the interim CR rate was higher in male patients with RR-CHOP (20.5% vs. 48.8%, p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

Rituximab intensification on days 0 to the 1st cycle of the standard 8 cycles R-CHOP-21 for advanced DLBCL yielded favorable response rates after the 3 cycles of chemotherapy and acceptable toxicities, especially for male patients. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01054781.

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of the Frontal Sinus: A Case Report

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). It often involves the gastrointestinal tract, head and neck, and skin, but virtually any tissue or organ can be affected. The primary NHL of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses are extremely rare, causing diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. We present the case of a 49-year-old woman with a 4-week history of diplopia and right superior eyelid swelling. Clinical, radiological, and histological examination led to the diagnosis of DLBCL of the right frontal sinus with anterior invasion of subcutaneous soft tissues and posterior intracranial involvement of the frontal region. She underwent three cycles of MATRIX chemotherapy, three cycles of R-DA-EPOCH, and CAR-T therapy. Unfortunately, treatments were unsuccessful and the patient died 11 months after diagnosis. In conclusion, an early diagnosis of DLBCL of the frontal sinus is difficult as it is often confused with other nasal pathologies. This causes a delay in treatment.

How to Treat Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Oncologic and Cardiovascular Considerations

Anthracycline-containing therapy is the cornerstone of frontline treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and autologous stem cell transplantation, and more recently, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy are the primary treatment options for relapsed refractory DLBCL. Given these therapies are all associated with cardiovascular toxicities, patients with underlying cardiac comorbidities are severely limited in treatment options. The focus of this review is to outline the cardiotoxicities associated with these standard treatments, explore strategies developed to mitigate these toxicities, and review novel treatment strategies for patients with underlying cardiovascular comorbidities. DLBCL patients with underlying cardiac complications are a high-risk patient population who require complicated management strategies that utilize a multidisciplinary approach with collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists.

Superiority of polatuzumab vedotin over other novel agents in previously untreated ABC-type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a network meta-analysis of 20 RCTs

Because of lacking of head-to-head comparison among polatuzumab (Pola) vedotin and other novel agents for untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the optimal option remains undefined. We searched twelve relevant published reports, covering 8376 subjects. Interestingly, the PFS benefit with Pola-R-CHP over other regimens was found prominently in those B-cell-like type (ABC-type) patients. For those ABC-type patients, the PFS advantage with Pola-R-CHP was statistically significant, when compared to R-CHOP+Bort (HR: 0.52, P=0.02), R-CHOP+Ibru (HR: 0.43, P=0.001), R-CHOP+Lena (HR: 0.51, P=0.009), G-CHOP (HR: 0.46, P=0.008), and R-CHOP (HR: 0.40, P<0.001). Meanwhile, for those germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) type patients, no PFS advantage with Pola-R-CHP was found when compared to R-CHOP+Bort (HR: 1.18, P=0.46), R-CHOP+Lena (HR: 1.21, P=0.45), G-CHOP (HR: 1.39, P=0.14), R-CHOP-14 (HR: 0.94, P=0.82), and R-CHOP (HR: 1.00, P=1). The PFS advantage with Pola-R-CHP over other regimens might be confined to those patients of ABC-type DLBCL.

Immune priming with avelumab and rituximab prior to R-CHOP in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: the phase II AvR-CHOP study

Immune evasion, due to abnormal expression of programmed-death ligands 1 and 2 (PD-L1/PD-L2), predicts poor outcomes with chemoimmunotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has limited efficacy at relapse but may sensitise relapsed lymphoma to subsequent chemotherapy. ICI delivery to immunologically intact patients may thus be the optimal use of this therapy. In the phase II AvR-CHOP study, 28 patients with treatment-naive stage II-IV DLBCL received sequential avelumab and rituximab priming ("AvRp;" avelumab 10 mg/kg and rituximab 375 mg/m2 2-weekly for 2 cycles), R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone for 6 cycles) and avelumab consolidation (10 mg/kg 2-weekly for 6 cycles). Grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 11%, meeting the primary endpoint of a grade ≥3 irAE rate of <30%. R-CHOP delivery was not compromised but one patient ceased avelumab. Overall response rates (ORR) after AvRp and R-CHOP were 57% (18% CR) and 89% (all CR). High ORR to AvRp was observed in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (67%; 4/6) and molecularly-defined EBV-positive DLBCL (100%; 3/3). Progression during AvRp was associated with chemorefractory disease. Two-year failure-free and overall survival were 82% and 89%. An immune priming strategy with AvRp, R-CHOP and avelumab consolidation shows acceptable toxicity with encouraging efficacy.

Prevalence of IRF4 rearrangement in large B-cell lymphomas of the Waldeyer's ring in adults

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) in adults. These lymphomas are classified according to gene expression profiling (GEP) into germinal center B-cell (GCB) and activated B-cell type (ABC). Recent studies have suggested new subtypes of large B-cell lymphoma, based on genetic and molecular alterations, among them is large B-cell lymphoma with IRF4-rearrangement (LBCL-IRF4). We used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), GEP (using the DLBCL COO assay by HTG Molecular Inc), and next generation sequencing (NGS) to comprehensively characterize 30 cases of LBCLs located in Waldeyer's ring in adult patients and to identify LBCL-IRF4. FISH revealed breaks of IRF4 in 2/30 cases (6.7%), BCL2 breaks in 6/30 cases (20.0%), and IGH breaks in 13/29 cases (44.8%). GEP classified 14 cases each as GCB or ABC subtype, and 2 cases remained unclassified; this was concordant with the immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 25/30 cases (83.3%). A subgrouping, based on GEP, was performed: group 1 included 14 GCB cases with the most frequent mutations in BCL2 and EZH2 in 6/14 cases (42.8%). The two cases with IRF4 rearrangement were assigned to this group by GEP and showed IRF4 mutations, supporting the diagnosis of LBCL-IRF4. Group 2 included 14 ABC cases; the most frequent mutations were CD79B and MYD88 identified in 5/14 patients (35.7%). Group 3 included 2 unclassifiable cases in which no molecular patterns were detected. Overall, LBCLs of Waldeyer's ring in adult patients are a heterogeneous group, including LBCL-IRF4, which shares several features with cases in the pediatric population.

Molecular classification and therapeutics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) encompasses a wide variety of disease states that have to date been subgrouped and characterized based on immunohistochemical methods, which provide limited prognostic value to clinicians and no alteration in treatment regimen. The addition of rituximab to CHOP therapy was the last leap forward in terms of treatment, but regimens currently follow a standardized course when disease becomes refractory with no individualization based on genotype. Research groups are tentatively proposing new strategies for categorizing DLBCL based on genetic abnormalities that are frequently found together to better predict disease course following dysregulation of specific pathways and to deliver targeted treatment. Novel algorithms in combination with next-generation sequencing techniques have identified between 4 and 7 subgroups of DLBCL, depending on the research team, with potentially significant and actionable genetic alterations. Various drugs aimed at pathways including BCR signaling, NF-κB dysfunction, and epigenetic regulation have shown promise in their respective groups and may show initial utility as second or third line therapies to patients with recurrent DLBCL. Implementation of subgroups will allow collection of necessary data to determine which groups are significant, which treatments may be indicated, and will provide better insight to clinicians and patients on specific disease course.

Navigating the Evolving Treatment Landscape of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, comprises a heterogenous group of morphologically, genetically, and clinically distinct diseases. Several recent advances have affected the treatment landscape, which had been mostly stagnant for the past few decades. We will review the practice-changing studies in frontline (POLARIX), early relapse (ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM), and multiple recurrent (ZUMA-1, JULIET, TRANSCEND, L-MIND, and LOTIS-2) stages and discuss how the treatment landscape may evolve with the emergence of bispecific antibodies.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, not otherwise specified, and emerging entities

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive and heterogenous group of diseases and the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In the past decade, there has been an explosion in molecular profiling that has helped to identify subgroups and shared oncogenic driving mechanisms. Since the 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, additional studies investigating these genomic abnormalities and phenotypic findings have been reported. Here we review these findings in DLBCL and address the proposed changes by the 2022 International Consensus Classification.

A comparison of the International Consensus and 5th World Health Organization classifications of mature B-cell lymphomas

Several editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications of lympho-hemopoietic neoplasms in 2001, 2008 and 2017 served as the international standard for diagnosis. Since the 4th WHO edition, here referred as WHO-HAEM4, significant clinico-pathological, immunophenotypic and molecular advances have been made in the field of lymphomas, contributing to refining diagnostic criteria of several diseases, to upgrade entities previously defined as provisional and to identify new entities. This process has resulted in two recent classifying proposals of lymphoid neoplasms, the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM5). In this paper, we review and compare the two classifications in terms of diagnostic criteria and entity definition, with focus on mature B-cell neoplasms. The main aim is to provide a tool to facilitate the work of pathologists, hematologists and researchers involved in the diagnosis and treatment of lymphomas.

The International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms: a report from the Clinical Advisory Committee

Since the publication of the Revised European-American Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms in 1994, subsequent updates of the classification of lymphoid neoplasms have been generated through iterative international efforts to achieve broad consensus among hematopathologists, geneticists, molecular scientists, and clinicians. Significant progress has recently been made in the characterization of malignancies of the immune system, with many new insights provided by genomic studies. They have led to this proposal. We have followed the same process that was successfully used for the third and fourth editions of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematologic Neoplasms. The definition, recommended studies, and criteria for the diagnosis of many entities have been extensively refined. Some categories considered provisional have now been upgraded to definite entities. Terminology for some diseases has been revised to adapt nomenclature to the current knowledge of their biology, but these modifications have been restricted to well-justified situations. Major findings from recent genomic studies have impacted the conceptual framework and diagnostic criteria for many disease entities. These changes will have an impact on optimal clinical management. The conclusions of this work are summarized in this report as the proposed International Consensus Classification of mature lymphoid, histiocytic, and dendritic cell tumors.

The NF-κB Pharmacopeia: Novel Strategies to Subdue an Intractable Target

NF-κB transcription factors are major drivers of tumor initiation and progression. NF-κB signaling is constitutively activated by genetic alterations or environmental signals in many human cancers, where it contributes to almost all hallmarks of malignancy, including sustained proliferation, cell death resistance, tumor-promoting inflammation, metabolic reprogramming, tissue invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis. As such, the NF-κB pathway is an attractive therapeutic target in a broad range of human cancers, as well as in numerous non-malignant diseases. Currently, however, there is no clinically useful NF-κB inhibitor to treat oncological patients, owing to the preclusive, on-target toxicities of systemic NF-κB blockade. In this review, we discuss the principal and most promising strategies being developed to circumvent the inherent limitations of conventional IκB kinase (IKK)/NF-κB-targeting drugs, focusing on new molecules that target upstream regulators or downstream effectors of oncogenic NF-κB signaling, as well as agents targeting individual NF-κB subunits.

Circulating tumor DNA in B-cell lymphoma: technical advances, clinical applications, and perspectives for translational research

Noninvasive disease monitoring and risk stratification by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling has become a potential novel strategy for patient management in B-cell lymphoma. Emerging innovative therapeutic options and an unprecedented growth in our understanding of biological and molecular factors underlying lymphoma heterogeneity have fundamentally increased the need for precision-based tools facilitating personalized and accurate disease profiling and quantification. By capturing the entire mutational landscape of tumors, ctDNA assessment has some decisive advantages over conventional tissue biopsies, which usually target only one single tumor site. Due to its non- or minimal-invasive nature, serial and repeated ctDNA profiling provides a real-time picture of the genetic composition and facilitates quantification of tumor burden any time during the course of the disease. In this review, we present a comprehensive overview of technologies used for ctDNA detection and genotyping in B-cell lymphoma, focusing on pre-analytical and technical requirements, the advantages and limitations of various approaches, and highlight recent advances around improving sensitivity and suppressing technical errors. We broadly review potential applications of ctDNA in clinical practice and for translational research by describing how ctDNA might enhance lymphoma subtype classification, treatment response assessment, outcome prediction, and monitoring of measurable residual disease. We finally discuss how ctDNA could be implemented in prospective clinical trials as a novel surrogate endpoint and be utilized as a decision-making tool to guide lymphoma treatment in the future.

Improving eligibility criteria for first-line trials for patients with DLBCL using a US-based Delphi-method survey

Recent first-line randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have shown negative results, which may be due in part to onerous eligibility criteria limiting enrollment of poor-risk patients who require immediate treatment. We conducted a Delphi-method survey with lymphoma experts in the United States to define recommendations for essential and potentially unnecessary enrollment criteria for modern first-line DLBCL RCTs aimed at increasing clinical diversity of ensuing study groups. We first tabulated enrollment criteria from 19 DLBCL RCTs spanning the rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) era to identify common eligibility criteria from prior DLBCL RCTs for inclusion in the Delphi-method survey. We tabulated 451 total eligibility criteria comprising 51 criterion categories across 19 first-line DLBCL RCTs in the R-CHOP era. We then surveyed lymphoma clinical trial experts representing 8 academic medical centers in the United States regarding essential and unnecessary eligibility criteria for modern DLBCL RCTs. Seventeen of 29 invited clinical investigators completed the round-1 questionnaire (response rate, of 58.6%), 15 of 17 round-1 participants (88.2%) completed the round-2 survey, and all round-1 participants reviewed finalized recommendations for eligibility criteria for modern first-line DLBCL RCTs. We defined consensus recommendations for 31 modernized eligibility criteria including threshold values for 10 quantitative eligibility criteria aimed at facilitating enrollment of a clinically diverse study population in first-line DLBCL RCTs designed to improve standard-of-care therapy.

Identifying aggressive subsets within diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: implications for treatment approach

INTRODUCTION

While the majority of patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be cured with front-line chemoimmunotherapy, a subset of patients with high-risk disease remain challenging to treat. Identification of high-risk DLBCL is important as future therapy options are explored.

AREAS COVERED

We discuss the clinical, pathologic and molecular risk stratification in DLBCL and how these factors are incorporated into the decision making for the front-line therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical and pathological risk stratification has long been the standard for identifying likelihood of future disease progression and overall survival; however, these prediction models lack the granularity of individual patient pathology and response to therapy. Molecular subtypes defined through whole exome sequencing have independent prognostic significance. While identifying molecular drivers of aggressive disease has provided the opportunity to analyze novel therapy combinations with front-line chemoimmunotherapy, only modest benefit has been observed when targeting DLBCL subtypes. Combining clinical, pathologic, and molecular data will likely result in significant improvement in our ability to identify the most aggressive DLBCL subsets. Novel therapies and trial designs will continue to play an important role as we target these at-risk populations in the future.

Revising the Treatment Pathways in Lymphoma: New Standards of Care-How Do We Choose?

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma are the most commonly encountered non-Hodgkin lymphomas in clinical practice. Both are biologically heterogeneous, with management strategies that are becoming increasingly complex. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma typically exhibits aggressive behavior but can be cured in the majority of cases with immunochemotherapy. While R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) has been the standard of care for decades, the recent combination of polatuzumab-vedotin-R-CHP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone) has demonstrated improved progression-free survival for patients with intermediate- and intermediate-high-risk disease. Numerous novel therapies, including targeted agents and immunotherapy-based approaches, have recently been approved for relapsed/refractory disease and have led to improved outcomes. Follicular lymphoma is an indolent lymphoma that remains incurable with standard approaches. Overall survival in most patients is excellent, although a proportion of patients will have early relapsing disease and poorer outcomes. The availability of novel agents in the relapsed/refractory setting has shifted the treatment algorithm, which requires thoughtful consideration of sequencing. This article will review recent developments in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

DLBCL 1L—What to Expect beyond R-CHOP?

Simple Summary

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. About two-thirds of patients are cured by the first-line (1L) standard of care (SOC), the R-CHOP (Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisolone) immunochemotherapy protocol. The profound molecular heterogeneity of DLBCL is the underlying reason why many patients, despite improved next-line options, eventually succumb to the disease. Hence, enhancing the efficacy of 1L treatment is critical for improving long-term outcomes in DLBCL. A plethora of novel treatment options with potential in later lines is currently under evaluation in 1L settings. We summarize here the established and emerging strategies for newly diagnosed DLBCL and emphasize the need for individualized treatment decisions.

Abstract

The R-CHOP immunochemotherapy protocol has been the first-line (1L) standard of care (SOC) for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients for decades and is curative in approximately two-thirds of patients. Numerous randomized phase III trials, most of them in an “R-CHOP ± X” design, failed to further improve outcomes. This was mainly due to increased toxicity, the large proportion of patients not in need of more than R-CHOP, and the extensive molecular heterogeneity of the disease, raising the bar for “one-size-fits-all” concepts. Recently, an R-CHP regimen extended by the anti-CD79b antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) Polatuzumab Vedotin proved superior to R-CHOP in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) in the POLARIX phase III trial. Moreover, a number of targeted agents, especially the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor Ibrutinib, seem to have activity in certain patient subsets in 1L and are currently being tested in front-line regimens. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, achieving remarkable results in ≥3L scenarios, are being exploited in earlier lines of therapy, while T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies emerge as conceptual competitors of CAR T-cells. Hence, we present here the findings and lessons learnt from phase III 1L trials and piloting phase II studies in relapsed/refractory (R/R) and 1L settings, and survey chemotherapy-free regimens with respect to their efficacy and future potential in 1L. Novel agents and their mode of action will be discussed in light of the molecular landscape of DLBCL and personalized 1L perspectives for the challenging patient population not cured by the SOC.

Reproducibility of Gene Expression Signatures in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Multiple gene expression profiles have been identified in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Besides the cell of origin (COO) classifier, no signatures have been reproduced in independent studies or evaluated for capturing distinct aspects of DLBCL biology. We reproduced 4 signatures in 175 samples of the HOVON-84 trial on a panel of 117 genes using the NanoString platform. The four gene signatures capture the COO, MYC activity, B-cell receptor signaling, oxidative phosphorylation, and immune response. Performance of our classification algorithms were confirmed in the original datasets. We were able to validate three of the four GEP signatures. The COO algorithm resulted in 94 (54%) germinal center B-cell (GCB) type, 58 (33%) activated B-cell (ABC) type, and 23 (13%) unclassified cases. The MYC-classifier revealed 77 cases with a high MYC-activity score (44%) and this MYC-high signature was observed more frequently in ABC as compared to GCB DLBCL (68% vs. 32%, p < 0.00001). The host response (HR) signature of the consensus clustering was present in 55 (31%) patients, while the B-cell receptor signaling, and oxidative phosphorylation clusters could not be reproduced. The overlap of COO, consensus cluster and MYC activity score differentiated six gene expression clusters: GCB/MYC-high (12%), GCB/HR (16%), GCB/non-HR (27%), COO-Unclassified (13%), ABC/MYC-high (25%), and ABC/MYC-low (7%). In conclusion, the three validated signatures identify distinct subgroups based on different aspects of DLBCL biology, emphasizing that each classifier captures distinct molecular profiles.

Phase 1 study of oral azacitidine (CC-486) plus R-CHOP in previously untreated intermediate- to high-risk DLBCL

Resistance to standard immunochemotherapy remains an unmet challenge in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and aberrant DNA methylation may contribute to chemoresistance. Promising early-phase results were reported with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) plus subcutaneous azacitidine, a hypomethylating agent. In this phase 1 study, we evaluated CC-486 (oral azacitidine) plus 6 cycles of R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated intermediate- to high-risk DLBCL or grade 3B/transformed follicular lymphoma. CC-486 doses of 100, 150, 200, or 300 mg given 7 days before cycle 1 and on days 8-21 of cycles 1-5 were evaluated; additional patients were enrolled in the expansion phase to examine preliminary efficacy. The primary objectives were to determine the safety and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CC-486 in combination with R-CHOP. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were hematologic, including neutropenia (62.7%) and febrile neutropenia (25.4%); grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon (<7%). The MTD was not established; 2 patients had dose-limiting toxicities (1 with grade 4 febrile neutropenia; 1 with grade 4 prolonged neutropenia). The recommended phase 2 dose was established as 300 mg. The overall response rate was 94.9%, with 52 patients (88.1%) achieving complete responses. With a median follow-up of 28.9 months, estimated 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 84.1% and 78.6%, respectively. Overall, epigenetic priming with CC-486 before R-CHOP can be delivered with acceptable safety to patients with previously untreated intermediate- to high-risk DLBCL or grade 3B/transformed follicular lymphoma. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02343536.

Diagnosis and Management of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Society of Medical Oncology, Pakistan Society of Hematology, and Pakistan Society of Clinical Oncology Joint Clinical Practice Guideline

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the commonest non-Hodgkin lymphoma encountered by hematopathologists and oncologists. Management guidelines for DLBCL are developed and published by countries with high income and do not cater for practical challenges faced in resource-constrained settings. This report by a multidisciplinary panel of experts from Pakistan is on behalf of three major national cancer societies: Society of Medical Oncology Pakistan, Pakistan Society of Hematology, and Pakistan Society of Clinical Oncology. The aim is to develop a practical and standardized guideline for managing DLBCL in Pakistan, keeping in view local challenges, which are similar across most of the low- and middle-income countries across the globe. Modified Delphi methodology was used to develop consensus guidelines. Guidelines questions were drafted, and meetings were convened by a steering committee to develop initial recommendations on the basis of local challenges and review of the literature. A consensus panel reviewed the initial draft recommendations and rated the guidelines on a five-point Likert scale; recommendations achieving more than 75% consensus were accepted. Resource grouping initially suggested by Breast Health Global Initiative was applied for resource stratification into basic, limited, and enhanced resource settings. The panel generated consensus ratings for 35 questions of interest and concluded that diagnosis and treatment recommendations in resource-constrained settings need to be based on available resources and management expertise.

Excellent survival after R‐Hyper‐CVAD in hospitalized patients with high‐risk large B‐cell lymphoma: The Karolinska experience

Patients with high‐risk aggressive B‐cell lymphoma exhibit poor survival after R‐CHOP. More intensive regimens yield higher rates of remission but also of complication. We investigated all 401 patients < 70 years with high‐risk (age‐adjusted [aa] international prognostic index [IPI] ≥2, extranodal, or bulky) aggressive B‐cell lymphoma hospitalized at Karolinska for urgent start of immunochemotherapy (129 R‐Hyper‐CVAD; 261 R‐CHOP/R‐CHOEP). Patients showed IPI 3–5 (70%), WHO PS ≥2 (49%), bulky disease (70%), extranodal (75%) and CNS (8%) involvement. Five‐year overall/progression‐free survival (OS/PFS) was better in patients who started R‐Hyper‐CVAD (84%/77%) compared with R‐CHOP/R‐CHOEP (66%/55%). Differences were independent in multivariable analysis, seen in all patient categories, and accentuated in extreme high‐risk disease: R‐Hyper‐CVAD vs. R‐CHOP/R‐CHOEP showed 5‐year PFS 69% vs.40% in aaIPI 3 and 88% vs. 38% in CNS involvement. For validation, survival was compared between the two Karolinska sites and calendar periods. Survival was superior 2006–2010 at the site that introduced R‐Hyper‐CVAD/R‐MA 2006, identical at both sites 2011–2017 after the other site adopted R‐Hyper‐CVAD/R‐MA 2011, and excellent 2018–2020 when R‐Hyper‐CVAD/R‐MA use increased to 75% of patients. Despite considerable toxicity, also patients aged 61–69 years showed better survival with R‐Hyper‐CVAD/R‐MA. This is the largest single‐centre series of patients treated with R‐Hyper‐CVAD/R‐MA, showing favourable outcome in high‐risk aggressive B‐cell lymphoma.

The beneficial effect of Escalated-R-CHOP-21 for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in elderly male patients: A propensity-matched cohort study

PURPOSE

Some studies have indicated that using 500 mg/m² rituximab combined with CHOP-14 may be beneficial for elderly men but not women with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential benefit of escalated doses of rituximab with CHOP-21 as the first-line treatment in male patients with DLBCL.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study to analyze the survival benefit of rituximab 500 mg/m² plus the CHOP-21 regimen (Escalated-R-CHOP-21) as the first-line treatment compared with using rituximab 375 mg/m² plus the CHOP-21 regimen (Standard-R-CHOP-21) in men with DLBCL. We used propensity score matching to maximize the balance of the observed covariables. The primary endpoints of this study were the progression-free survival (PFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate at 3 years.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 47 months (IQR 31-65), no significant difference in PFS and OS was found for men treated with Escalated-R-CHOP-21 compared with Standard-R-CHOP-21 [3-year PFS: 69.7% versus 71.9%, p = 0.867; 3-year OS: 83.0% versus 82.4%, p = 0.660]. After 1:1 propensity score matching, we found that the patients using Escalated-R-CHOP-21 had statistically significant survival benefits relative to Standard-R-CHOP-21 among the 96 matched elderly male patients for 3-year PFS [75.5% (95% CI 62.8-88.2) versus 58.2% (95% CI 44.3-72.1); p = 0.019] and 3-year OS [86.6% (95% CI 76.4-96.8) versus 65.8% (95% CI 52.1-79.5); p = 0.017]. However, no differences in survival were observed for younger male patients. Furthermore, the dose effect in PFS of Escalated-R-CHOP-21 was more obvious for elderly male patients with no high-risk extranodal sites (p = 0.005 and interaction p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

Escalated-R-CHOP-21 could be a safe and effective option for treating elderly male patients with DLBCL. This study provides new insight into optimizing the standard treatment regimen, which may have important therapeutic implications in elderly male patients with DLBCL.

Refractory DLBCL: Challenges and Treatment

Despite a greater understanding of pathologic factors that increase the chance for treatment failure, initial therapy of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has not evolved from R/CHOP. Although it was anticipated that the genetic underpinnings of the cell or origin would dramatically change treatment, thus far, this has not been realized. Similarly, contrary to the situation with Hodgkin lymphoma, meaningful early treatment response assessment with PET-CT has yet to be established in DLBCL. Nevertheless, there is tremendous enthusiasm that circulating tumor DNA, possibly in combination with PET- T may facilitate earlier recognition of treatment failure or relapse. And, in contrast to the situation with front-line treatment, therapy for recurrent disease appears to be on the cusp of dramatically improving. Thus, in addition to high dose therapy with autologous transplant, a treatment that is not feasible for many older patients, CAR-T cells, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), antibody-drug conjugates and new monoclonal antibodies are all offering the possibility of long-term disease control and possible cure. The success of the cell and immunotherapies even offer hope for a chemotherapy-free strategy, initially for recurrent disease. Herein, we review the landscape of the novel agents in resistant DLBCL and speculate about their appropriate sequencing and possible migration to earlier use.

Vincristine in Combination Therapy of Cancer: Emerging Trends in Clinics

Treatment of blood malignancies and other cancer diseases has been mostly unfeasible, so far. Therefore, novel treatment regimens should be developed and the currently used ones should be further elaborated. A stable component in various cancer treatment regimens consists of vincristine, an antimitotic compound of natural origin. Despite its strong anticancer activity, mostly, it cannot be administered as monotherapy due to its unspecific action and severe side effects. However, vincristine is suitable for combination therapy. Multidrug treatment regimens including vincristine are standardly applied in the therapy of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other malignancies, in which it is combined with drugs of different mechanisms of action, mainly with DNA-interacting compounds (for example cyclophosphamide), or drugs interfering with DNA synthesis (for example methotrexate). Besides, co-administration of vincristine with monoclonal antibodies has also emerged, the typical example of which is the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. Although in some combination anticancer therapies, vincristine has been replaced with other drugs exhibiting lesser side effects, though, in most cases, it is still irreplaceable. This is strongly evidenced by the number of active clinical trials evaluating vincristine in combination cancer therapy. Therefore, in this article, we have reviewed the most common cancer treatment regimens employing vincristine and bring an overview of current trends in the clinical development of this compound.

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma originating from the maxillary sinus with skin metastases: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of malignant lymphoma (ML), accounting for 30%-40% of cases of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) in adults. Primary paranasal sinus lymphoma is a rare presentation of extranodal NHL that accounts for only 0.17% of all lymphomas. ML from the maxillary sinus (MS) is a particularly rare presentation, and is thus often difficult to diagnose. We have reported the first known case of DLBCL originating from the MS with rapidly occurrent multiple skin metastasis.

CASE SUMMARY

An 81-year-old Japanese man visited our hospital due to continuous pain for 12 d in the left maxillary nerve area. His medical history included splenectomy due to a traffic injury, an old right cerebral infarction from when he was 74-years-old, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A plain head computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a 3 cm × 3.1 cm × 3 cm sized left MS. On day 25, left diplopia and ptosis occurred, and a follow-up CT on day 31 revealed the growth of the left MS mass. Based on an MS biopsy on day 50, we established a definitive diagnosis of DLBCL, non-germinal center B-cell-like originating from the left MS. The patient was admitted on day 62 due to rapid deterioration of his condition, and a plain CT scan revealed the further growth of the left MS mass, as well as multiple systemic metastasis, including of the skin. A skin biopsy on day 70 was found to be the same as that of the left MS mass. We notified the patient and his family of the disease, and they opted for palliative care, considering on his condition and age. The patient died on day 80.

CONCLUSION

This case suggests the need for careful, detailed examination, and for careful follow-up, when encountering patients presenting with a mass.

Combination of novel molecular targeted agent plus R-CHOP-based regimen versus R-CHOP alone in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The addition of molecular targeted agents (MTAs) to R-CHOP has been one of the main focuses of research in patients with DLBCL. Despite encouraging preliminary results, recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) have not shown a definitive benefit over standard R-CHOP. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of this strategy. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify RCT that evaluated the addition of MTA to R-CHOP-based regimen versus R-CHOP alone in previously untreated DLBCL patients. Fixed and random effects models were used to estimate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and adverse events (AE) were analyzed. A total of seven RCT including 3,255 patients with DLBCL met the eligibility criteria. Three different types of MTAs (bortezomib, ibrutinib, and lenalidomide) were investigated in combination with R-CHOP. Overall, R-CHOP plus MTA showed a slightly better PFS (HR=0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.98). No differences were observed according to the cell of origin subtype of DLBCL. Interestingly, patients younger than 60 years had a significantly better PFS with R-CHOP plus MTAs (HR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.56-0.93), while no benefit was observed in patients older than 60 years (HR=0.96). The combination strategy showed higher odds to develop serious AEs (OR= 1.46, 95% CI 1.11-1.91). R-CHOP plus MTA seems only to slightly improve PFS in patients with DLBCL, particularly in younger patients. An increase in toxicity was observed in comparison to R-CHOP.

Robustness and pragmatism of the evidence supporting the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of follicular lymphoma

Background: Results of randomized clinical trials may not be entirely applicable to clinical practice. The present manuscript aims to explore the pragmatism and robustness of the evidence that supports the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) follicular lymphoma (FL) guidelines.Methods & design: Analysis of all trials used to support positive, therapeutic, oncological recommendations in the 2020 ESMO FL guidelines. Predefined data points were extracted from each trial. Pragmatism was assessed by means of the PRECIS-2 tool, the difference in overall survival in the interventions compared and the source of funding. Robustness was assessed by means of the fragility index and the p value.Results: 28 trials were included. The full protocol or a protocol summary was provided for 12 (43%). Based on the PRECIS-2 domains, trials were considered pragmatic in organization, analysis and flexibility and explanatory in eligibility. Robustness was high, with 4/24 (17%) trials with p values between 0.05 and 0.005 and a median fragility index of 18.Conclusions: Results of trials to support ESMO recommendations in FL were robust. Pragmatism was high in some domains but modest to low in others and the pattern was similar across trials. Transparency in the publication of trial protocols was suboptimal.

R-CHOP compared to R-CHOP + X for newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is standard of care first line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), though outcomes remain suboptimal.

METHODS

We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of R-CHOP vs. R-CHOP + X (addition of another drug to R-CHOP) as first line treatment for DLBCL. We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed and conference proceedings up to September 2020.

RESULTS

Our search yielded ten trials including 4206 patients. The added drug was bortezomib or lenalidomide in three trials each, and gemcitabine, bevacizumab and ibrutinib, each drug in one trial. R-CHOP + X was associated with statistically significant improved disease control (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99). The point estimate was in favor of improved overall survival with R-CHOP + X (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.00), although this was not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis revealed improved disease control with the addition of lenalidomide and in patients younger than 60 years. R-CHOP + X was associated with an increase in serious adverse events and grade III/IV hematologic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The addition of another drug to frontline R-CHOP treatment for DLBCL did not result in a significant improvement in OS, although we did observe improved disease control compared to R-CHOP, perhaps most evident with the addition of lenalidomide. Yet, RCHOP + X was associated with an increased risk for serious and hematological adverse events. Further studies could reveal subgroups that would benefit most from augmentation of standard R-CHOP.

Why R-CHOP + X is not enough: lessons learned and next steps in the mission to improve frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Two-thirds of newly diagnosed cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are cured with R-CHOP, an immunochemotherapy regimen that has been the standard of care for almost two decades. Ongoing molecular characterization of DLBCL has revealed a heterogeneous disease comprised of multiple subtypes based on putative cell of origin or somatic mutations with unique oncogenic signaling pathways. The door has been opened to the use of novel agents that target the specific molecular vulnerabilities of DLBCL, but despite this, multiple randomized studies have not identified a suitable drug 'X' to combine with R-CHOP. This report will review recent attempts to add individual novel agents to R-CHOP in the mission to improve frontline treatment for DLBCL and discuss promising ongoing studies. It will offer potential strategies to explore when designing future clinical trials, including exploiting synergy between multiple novel agents.

Case Report: Concurrent Occurrence of Abdominal Double Expressor Lymphoma and Jejunum Follicular Lymphoma

Double expressor lymphoma (DEL), defined as overexpression of BCL2 and MYC, is an aggressive subtype of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Here we report a case of a 64-year-old female diagnosed with abdominal DEL transformed from jejunum follicular lymphoma (FL). 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography showed diffuse accumulation of FDG into the peritoneum and small bowel wall. Double balloon-assisted enteroscopy revealed whitish submucosal tumors in the proximal jejunum. Aggregation of atypical lymphocytes positive for CD20, CD79a, and BCL2 was seen in the jejunal biopsy samples. These atypical lymphocytes were monoclonal since cell surface expression of Ig light chains was limited to κ chain by flow-cytometry. Thus, immunohistochemical and flowcytometric analyses data were consistent with FL of the jejunum. Neoplastic lymphocytes obtained from ascites were positive for CD10, CD20, CD79a, BCL2, and BCL6. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed formation of BCL2/IgH fusion gene and extra copies of MYC, the former of which is a characteristic chromosomal abnormality of FL. These genetic alterations and protein expression profiles of ascitic fluid cells were consistent with those of DEL transformed from FL. Given that a significant population of patients with indolent FL of the gastrointestinal tract developed into aggressive DLBCL, it is likely that primary FL of the jejunum transformed into the abdominal aggressive DEL in this case. This case is unique in that concurrent occurrence of FL and DEL was confirmed by immunohistochemical and FISH analyses and that abdominal DEL transformed from jejunal FL was highly suspected.

Safety and Efficacy of Replacing Vindesine with Vincristine in R-ACVBP Regimen for the Treatment of Large B Cell Lymphomas

BACKGROUND

Intensified immunochemotherapy with rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone (R-ACVBP) improves outcomes in younger adults with diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) compared with R-CHOP. Due to vindesine unavailability, we assessed the safety and efficacy of replacing vindesine with vincristine in a modified R-ACVBP protocol (mR-ACVBP).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study including all consecutive adult patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who received first-line mR-ACVBP. Vindesine was replaced with vincristine 1.5 mg on days 1 and 5 of each cycle. Responders continued with published R-ACVBP consolidation. Patients with inadequate response on interim imaging were offered consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

We identified 56 patients with DLBCL, with a median age of 41 years (range, 21-67). Thirty-seven (66%) patients had an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index of ≥ 2. Complete response was achieved in 41 (80%) patients and partial response in 6 (12%). The most common adverse events during induction were anemia (91%), febrile neutropenia (64%; grade 4 in 46%), thrombocytopenia (39%), and mucositis (21%). Peripheral neuropathy was encountered in 7 (12%) patients (grade 3; n = 1). Two deaths from septic shock were reported in patients with initial poor performance status. After a median follow-up of 17 months, the 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 86% and 87%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The replacement of vindesine with vincristine in mR-ACVBP seems feasible, with manageable adverse events and excellent 2-year progression-free survival. These data need validation in larger prospective trials.

DLBCL-Morph: Morphological features computed using deep learning for an annotated digital DLBCL image set

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Though histologically DLBCL shows varying morphologies, no morphologic features have been consistently demonstrated to correlate with prognosis. We present a morphologic analysis of histology sections from 209 DLBCL cases with associated clinical and cytogenetic data. Duplicate tissue core sections were arranged in tissue microarrays (TMAs), and replicate sections were stained with H&E and immunohistochemical stains for CD10, BCL6, MUM1, BCL2, and MYC. The TMAs are accompanied by pathologist-annotated regions-of-interest (ROIs) that identify areas of tissue representative of DLBCL. We used a deep learning model to segment all tumor nuclei in the ROIs, and computed several geometric features for each segmented nucleus. We fit a Cox proportional hazards model to demonstrate the utility of these geometric features in predicting survival outcome, and found that it achieved a C-index (95% CI) of 0.635 (0.574,0.691). Our finding suggests that geometric features computed from tumor nuclei are of prognostic importance, and should be validated in prospective studies.

Measurement(s)	B-cell lymphoma • histology
Technology Type(s)	machine learning
Factor Type(s)	patient
Sample Characteristic - Organism	Homo sapiens

Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14465178

A refined cell-of-origin classifier with targeted NGS and artificial intelligence shows robust predictive value in DLBCL

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous entity of B-cell lymphoma. Cell-of-origin (COO) classification of DLBCL is required in routine practice by the World Health Organization classification for biological and therapeutic insights. Genetic subtypes uncovered recently are based on distinct genetic alterations in DLBCL, which are different from the COO subtypes defined by gene expression signatures of normal B cells retained in DLBCL. We hypothesize that classifiers incorporating both genome-wide gene-expression and pathogenetic variables can improve the therapeutic significance of DLBCL classification. To develop such refined classifiers, we performed targeted RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) with a commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform in a large cohort of 418 DLBCLs. Genetic and transcriptional data obtained by RNA-Seq in a single run were explored by state-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI) to develop a NGS-COO classifier for COO assignment and NGS survival models for clinical outcome prediction. The NGS-COO model built through applying AI in the training set was robust, showing high concordance with COO classification by either Affymetrix GeneChip microarray or the NanoString Lymph2Cx assay in 2 validation sets. Although the NGS-COO model was not trained for clinical outcome, the activated B-cell-like compared with the germinal-center B-cell-like subtype had significantly poorer survival. The NGS survival models stratified 30% high-risk patients in the validation set with poor survival as in the training set. These results demonstrate that targeted RNA-Seq coupled with AI deep learning techniques provides reproducible, efficient, and affordable assays for clinical application. The clinical grade assays and NGS models integrating both genetic and transcriptional factors developed in this study may eventually support precision medicine in DLBCL.

Genetic Events Inhibiting Apoptosis in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Simple Summary

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Despite the genetic heterogeneity of the disease, most patients are initially treated with a combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), but relapse occurs in ~50% of patients. One of the hallmarks of DLBCL is the occurrence of genetic events that inhibit apoptosis, which contributes to disease development and resistance to therapy. These events can affect the intrinsic or extrinsic apoptotic pathways, or their modulators. Understanding the factors that contribute to inhibition of apoptosis in DLBCL is crucial in order to be able to develop targeted therapies and improve outcomes, particularly in relapsed and refractory DLBCL (rrDLBCL). This review provides a description of the genetic events inhibiting apoptosis in DLBCL, their contribution to lymphomagenesis and chemoresistance, and their implication for the future of DLBCL therapy.

Abstract

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is curable with chemoimmunotherapy in ~65% of patients. One of the hallmarks of the pathogenesis and resistance to therapy in DLBCL is inhibition of apoptosis, which allows malignant cells to survive and acquire further alterations. Inhibition of apoptosis can be the result of genetic events inhibiting the intrinsic or extrinsic apoptotic pathways, as well as their modulators, such as the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins, P53, and components of the NF-kB pathway. Mechanisms of dysregulation include upregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins and downregulation of pro-apoptotic proteins via point mutations, amplifications, deletions, translocations, and influences of other proteins. Understanding the factors contributing to resistance to apoptosis in DLBCL is crucial in order to be able to develop targeted therapies that could improve outcomes by restoring apoptosis in malignant cells. This review describes the genetic events inhibiting apoptosis in DLBCL, provides a perspective of their interactions in lymphomagenesis, and discusses their implication for the future of DLBCL therapy.

Clinical and Molecular Properties of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Related Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is the most common malignancy affecting people living with HIV (PLWH). Among its several subtypes, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an important manifestation within the HIV-infected compartment of the population. Since HIV is able to modulate B cells and promote lymphomagenesis through direct and indirect mechanisms, HIV-related DLBCL has specific characteristics. In this review, we address the clinical and molecular properties of DLBCL disease in the context of HIV infection, as well as the mechanisms by which HIV is able to modulate B lymphocytes and induce their transformation into lymphoma.

Short Diagnosis-to-Treatment Interval Is Associated With Higher Circulating Tumor DNA Levels in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE

Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) in need of immediate therapy are largely under-represented in clinical trials. The diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) has recently been described as a metric to quantify such patient selection bias, with short DTI being associated with adverse risk factors and inferior outcomes. Here, we characterized the relationships between DTI, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), conventional risk factors, and clinical outcomes, with the goal of defining objective disease metrics contributing to selection bias.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated pretreatment ctDNA levels in 267 patients with DLBCL treated across multiple centers in Europe and the United States using Cancer Personalized Profiling by Deep Sequencing. Pretreatment ctDNA levels were correlated with DTI, total metabolic tumor volumes (TMTVs), the International Prognostic Index (IPI), and outcome.

RESULTS

Short DTI was associated with advanced-stage disease (P < .001) and higher IPI (P < .001). We also found an inverse correlation between DTI and TMTV (R_S = -0.37; P < .001). Similarly, pretreatment ctDNA levels were significantly associated with stage, IPI, and TMTV (all P < .001), demonstrating that both DTI and ctDNA reflect disease burden. Notably, patients with shorter DTI had higher pretreatment ctDNA levels (P < .001). Pretreatment ctDNA levels predicted short DTI independent of the IPI (P < .001). Although each risk factor was significantly associated with event-free survival in univariable analysis, ctDNA level was prognostic of event-free survival independent of DTI and IPI in multivariable Cox regression (ctDNA: hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI [1.2 to 2.0]; IPI: 1.1 [0.9 to 1.3]; -DTI: 1.1 [1.0 to 1.2]).

CONCLUSION

Short DTI largely reflects baseline tumor burden, which can be objectively measured using pretreatment ctDNA levels. Pretreatment ctDNA levels therefore have utility for quantifying and guarding against selection biases in prospective DLBCL clinical trials.

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Large B-cell lymphomas, with an estimated 150,000 new cases annually worldwide, represent almost 30% of all cases of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Patients typically present with progressive lymphadenopathy, extranodal disease, or both and require therapy. Despite the advanced stage at presentation in the majority of patients, more than 60% can be cured with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) immunochemotherapy (Fig. 1A). Patients with treatment failure after R-CHOP often have a poor outcome — in particular, those with disease that is refractory to frontline or subsequent therapies — although some patients can have a durable remission and be cured after secondary therapies. Over the past two decades, improved insights into large B-cell lymphomas, in terms of epidemiology, prognostic factors, and biologic heterogeneity, have led to a refinement of disease classification and the development of new therapeutic approaches.

ROBUST: A Phase III Study of Lenalidomide Plus R-CHOP Versus Placebo Plus R-CHOP in Previously Untreated Patients With ABC-Type Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Patients with the activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) historically showed inferior survival with standard rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Phase II studies demonstrated that adding the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide to R-CHOP improved outcomes in ABC-type DLBCL. The goal of the global, phase III ROBUST study was to compare lenalidomide plus R-CHOP (R2-CHOP) with placebo/R-CHOP in previously untreated, ABC-type DLBCL.

The effect of bulky mass on prognosis in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: still poor?

The introduction of rituximab to the CHOP protocol has demonstrated an improvement in PFS and OS in DLBCL patients with both early and advanced stages. Most studies in the pre-rituximab period indicated that bulky disease has an unfavorable impact on clinical outcomes of DLBCL. The effect of bulky mass on the outcome of DLBCL patients undergoing R-CHOP therapy remained uncertain. One-hundred-twelve newly diagnosed DLBCL patients aged 18 and older were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into groups-based presence of bulky disease. 56 patients with bulky disease and their age, gender, ECOG score, Ann Arbor stage, immunohistochemical origin, treatment, radiotherapy and comorbidity 1:1 matched 56 control patients with non-bulky disease included. Overall response rate at end of treatment was similar among groups (p = 0.1). Patients with bulky disease and non-bulky disease were comparable regarding overall survival (p = 0,9). All cohort investigated for predictors for survival, after multivariate analysis, ECOG score, Ann arbor stage, IPI score and LDH level were found significant. Here, we found no impact of bulky disease on remission and survival. We believe, with increasing available data, poor prognostic value of bulky disease will be weakening in the rituximab era.