1
|
Murphy ES, Yang K, Suh JH, Yu JS, Stevens G, Angelov L, Vogelbaum MA, Barnett GH, Ahluwalia MS, Neyman G, Mohammadi AM, Chao ST. Phase I trial of dose escalation for preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with large brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1651-1659. [PMID: 38656347 PMCID: PMC11376451 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or surgical resection alone for brain metastases larger than 2 cm results in unsatisfactory local control. We conducted a phase I trial for brain metastases(>2 cm) to determine the safety of preoperative SRS at escalating doses. METHODS Radiosurgery dose was escalated at 3 Gy increments for 3 cohorts based on maximum tumor dimension starting at: 18 Gy for >2-3 cm, 15 Gy for >3-4 cm, and 12 Gy for >4-6 cm. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade III or greater acute toxicity. RESULTS A total of 35 patients/36 lesions were enrolled. For tumor size >2-3 cm, patients were enrolled up to the second dose level (21 Gy); for >3-4 cm and >4-6 cm cohorts the third dose level (21 and 18 Gy, respectively) was reached. There were 2 DLTs in the >3-4 cm arm at 21 Gy. The maximum tolerated dose of SRS for >2-3 cm was not reached; and was 18 Gy for both >3-4 cm arm and >4-6 cm arm. With a median follow-up of 64.0 months, the 6- and 12-month local control rates were 85.9% and 76.6%, respectively. One patient developed grade 3 radiation necrosis at 5 months. The 2-year rate of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) was 0%. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative SRS with dose escalation followed by surgical resection for brain metastases greater than 2 cm in size demonstrates acceptable acute toxicity. The phase II portion of the trial will be conducted at the maximum tolerated SRS doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin S Murphy
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kailin Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jennifer S Yu
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Glen Stevens
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Gene H Barnett
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Gennady Neyman
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ohno M, Takahashi M, Yanagisawa S, Osawa S, Tsuchiya T, Fujita S, Igaki H, Narita Y. Development of a scoring system to predict local recurrence in brain metastases following complete resection and observation. J Neurooncol 2024:10.1007/s11060-024-04790-4. [PMID: 39098980 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04790-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery to the resection cavity in patients with brain metastases is guideline-recommended therapy. However, Japanese Clinical Oncology Group 0504 study showed that postoperative observation could be a therapeutic option in patients with completed resected brain metastases. We hereby investigated the incidence and risk factors for local recurrence after complete resection without immediate radiotherapy and developed a scoring system for its prediction. METHODS We included 53 patients with 54 brain metastases, who underwent complete resection between January 2016 and December 2021. We identified risk factors for local recurrence and developed a scoring system to predict it using the extracted risk factors, by assigning one point to each risk factor and calculating the total scores for each patient. We evaluated the correlation between the prognostic score and time to local recurrence. RESULTS Local recurrence occurred in 37 of 54 tumors (68.5%), with a median follow-up duration of 21.0 months. The median time to local recurrence was 5.1 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that non-lung adenocarcinoma, infratentorial tumors, and no postoperative systemic therapy were identified as risk factors for local recurrence (non-lung adenocarcinoma, p = 0.035; infratentorial tumors, p = 0.044; and no postoperative systemic therapy, p = 0.0069). A score ≥ 2 showed a median time to local recurrence of 2.1 months, starkly contrasting with 30.8 months for a score ≤ 1 (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS Non-lung adenocarcinoma, infratentorial tumors, and no postoperative systemic therapy were risk factors for local recurrence. Our scoring system can predict local recurrence, thus potentially aiding treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Ohno
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
| | - Masamichi Takahashi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Yanagisawa
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Sho Osawa
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsuchiya
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Shohei Fujita
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Narita
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schulz C, Proescholdt M, Schmidt NO, Steger F, Heudobler D. [Brain metastases]. Pneumologie 2024; 78:578-589. [PMID: 38266745 DOI: 10.1055/a-2238-1840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Cerebral metastases in patients with metastatic lung cancer are found in more than 30% of patients at baseline and manifest themselves in two out of three patients during disease evolution. For a long time, the cerebral manifestation of the disease was classified as prognostically unfavorable and hence such patients were regularly excluded from therapy studies. In the context of targeted molecular therapy strategies and established immuno-oncological systemic therapies, the blood-brain barrier no longer represents an insurmountable barrier. However, the treatment of brain metastases requires decision making in a multidisciplinary team within dedicated lung cancer and/or oncology centers. The differentiated treatment decision is based on the number, size and location of the brain metastases, neurology and general condition, comorbidities, potential life expectancy and the patient's wishes, but also tumor biology including molecular targets, extra-cranial tumor burden and availability of a CNS-effective therapy. Systemic therapies as well as neurosurgical and radiotherapeutic concepts are now often combined for optimized and prognosis-improving therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Schulz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Martin Proescholdt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Nils Ole Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Felix Steger
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Daniel Heudobler
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Du S, Gong G, Liu R, Meng K, Yin Y. Advances in determining the gross tumor target volume for radiotherapy of brain metastases. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1338225. [PMID: 38779095 PMCID: PMC11109437 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1338225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) are the most prevalent intracranial malignant tumors in adults and are the leading cause of mortality attributed to malignant brain diseases. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a critical role in the treatment of BMs, with local RT techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) showing remarkable therapeutic effectiveness. The precise determination of gross tumor target volume (GTV) is crucial for ensuring the effectiveness of SRS/SBRT. Multimodal imaging techniques such as CT, MRI, and PET are extensively used for the diagnosis of BMs and GTV determination. With the development of functional imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) technology, there are more innovative ways to determine GTV for BMs, which significantly improve the accuracy and efficiency of the determination. This article provides an overview of the progress in GTV determination for RT in BMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanshan Du
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Guanzhong Gong
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Rui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Kangning Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Yong Yin
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Borm KJ, Behzadi ST, Hörner-Rieber J, Krug D, Baumann R, Corradini S, Duma MN, Dunst J, Fastner G, Feyer P, Fietkau R, Haase W, Harms W, Hehr T, Matuschek C, Piroth MD, Schmeel LC, Souchon R, Strnad V, Budach W, Combs SE. DEGRO guideline for personalized radiotherapy of brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:259-275. [PMID: 38488902 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02202-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this review was to evaluate the existing evidence for radiotherapy for brain metastases in breast cancer patients and provide recommendations for the use of radiotherapy for brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the current review, a PubMed search was conducted including articles from 01/1985 to 05/2023. The search was performed using the following terms: (brain metastases OR leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) AND (breast cancer OR breast) AND (radiotherapy OR ablative radiotherapy OR radiosurgery OR stereotactic OR radiation). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Despite the fact that the biological subtype of breast cancer influences both the occurrence and relapse patterns of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), for most scenarios, no specific recommendations regarding radiotherapy can be made based on the existing evidence. For a limited number of BCBM (1-4), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is generally recommended irrespective of molecular subtype and concurrent/planned systemic therapy. In patients with 5-10 oligo-brain metastases, these techniques can also be conditionally recommended. For multiple, especially symptomatic BCBM, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), if possible with hippocampal sparing, is recommended. In cases of multiple asymptomatic BCBM (≥ 5), if SRS/SRT is not feasible or in disseminated brain metastases (> 10), postponing WBRT with early reassessment and reevaluation of local treatment options (8-12 weeks) may be discussed if a HER2/Neu-targeting systemic therapy with significant response rates in the central nervous system (CNS) is being used. In symptomatic leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, local radiotherapy (WBRT or local spinal irradiation) should be performed in addition to systemic therapy. In patients with disseminated leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in good clinical condition and with only limited or stable extra-CNS disease, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) may be considered. Data regarding the toxicity of combining systemic therapies with cranial and spinal radiotherapy are sparse. Therefore, no clear recommendations can be given, and each case should be discussed individually in an interdisciplinary setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai J Borm
- TUM School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie T Behzadi
- TUM School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Rene Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Marien-Krankenhaus, Siegen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marciana Nona Duma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helios Clinics of Schwerin-University Campus of MSH Medical School Hamburg, Schwerin, Germany
- Department for Human Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Gerd Fastner
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Petra Feyer
- Formerly Department of Radiation Oncology, Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wulf Haase
- Formerly Department of Radiation Oncology, St.-Vincentius-Hospital Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Harms
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hehr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Christiane Matuschek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Marc D Piroth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | | - Rainer Souchon
- Formerly Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- TUM School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
- Partner Site Munich, Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Munich, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fadrus P, Vybihal V, Roskova I, Selingerova I, Smrcka M, Jancalek R, Sana J, Slaby O, Pospisil P, Hynkova L, Garcic J, Belanova R, Kristek J, Sprlakova-Pukova A, Mackerle Z, Juran V, Sova M, Neuman E, Valekova H, Lakomy R, Holanek M, Hrstka R, Svajdova M, Polachova K, Kolouskova I, Slampa P, Kazda T. Adjuvant radiotherapy after brain metastasectomy: analysis of consecutive cohort of 118 patients from real world practice. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2024; 29:30-41. [PMID: 39165600 PMCID: PMC11333081 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.99362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze a consecutive cohort of brain metastasis (BM) patients treated off clinical trials through combination of surgery and radiotherapy over the last 15 years in a tertiary neurooncology center. Materials and methods All BM patients operated between 2007-2019 received adjuvant linac-based radiotherapy categorized to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and tumor bed stereotactic radiotherapy. Survival outcomes and local control was analyzed. Results In total, 118 patients were enrolled, those with stereotactic radiotherapy (41%) had better baseline characteristics mirrored in longer overall survival (OS) [18 vs. 7.1 months, p < 0.001; hazard ratio (HR) 0.47, p = 0.004] with median follow-up of 58 months. Cumulative incidence for local, distant, and extracranial control was not significantly different between groups, with 12-month cumulative control of 22% vs. 18%, 44% vs. 29%, and 35% vs. 32% for stereotactic and WBRT group, respectively. WBRT was an independent factor for better distal brain control. Conclusions Real world data demonstrating significantly better overall survival in patients treated with postoperative targeted radiotherapy compared with postoperative WBRT is presented, with no significant difference in cumulative incidence for local or distant brain control. The majority of patients with targeted radiotherapy had a fractionated dose schedule with outcomes comparable to single-dose radiation trials of postoperative targeted radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel Fadrus
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Vaclav Vybihal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ivana Roskova
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Iveta Selingerova
- Research Center for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Smrcka
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Radim Jancalek
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Anne’s University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Anne’s University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Sana
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ondrej Slaby
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Pospisil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ludmila Hynkova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Garcic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Renata Belanova
- Department of Radiology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Kristek
- Department of Radiology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Andrea Sprlakova-Pukova
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Zdenek Mackerle
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Anne’s University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Anne’s University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Vilem Juran
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marek Sova
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Eduard Neuman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Valekova
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Anne’s University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Anne’s University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Radek Lakomy
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Milos Holanek
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Hrstka
- Research Center for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Michaela Svajdova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Radiation and Clinical Oncology, General Hospital Rimavska Sobota, Rimavska Sobota, Slovakia
| | - Katerina Polachova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ivana Kolouskova
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Slampa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Kazda
- Research Center for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Palmer JD, Perlow HK, Lehrer EJ, Wardak Z, Soliman H. Novel radiotherapeutic strategies in the management of brain metastases: Challenging the dogma. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S46-S55. [PMID: 38437668 PMCID: PMC10911796 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The role of radiation therapy in the management of brain metastasis is evolving. Advancements in machine learning techniques have improved our ability to both detect brain metastasis and our ability to contour substructures of the brain as critical organs at risk. Advanced imaging with PET tracers and magnetic resonance imaging-based artificial intelligence models can now predict tumor control and differentiate tumor progression from radiation necrosis. These advancements will help to optimize dose and fractionation for each patient's lesion based on tumor size, histology, systemic therapy, medical comorbidities/patient genetics, and tumor molecular features. This review will discuss the current state of brain directed radiation for brain metastasis. We will also discuss future directions to improve the precision of stereotactic radiosurgery and optimize whole brain radiation techniques to improve local tumor control and prevent cognitive decline without forming necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Haley K Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Zabi Wardak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Samanci Y, Ali Tepebasili M, Deniz Ardor G, Haluk Duzkalir A, Orbay Askeroglu M, Peker S. Efficacy of hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery in treating surgical beds of metastatic brain tumors. J Clin Neurosci 2024; 121:105-113. [PMID: 38387112 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Surgery alone for metastatic brain tumors (METs) often results in local recurrence due to microscopic residual tumor tissue. While stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is commonly used post-surgery, hypofractionation may be required for large surgical beds. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery (hf-GKRS) for the first time as a post-operative adjuvant therapy. METHODS This retrospective study involved 24 patients (28 surgical beds) who underwent hf-GKRS within four weeks after surgery. The study primarily focused on local control (LC) rate and analyzed distant intracranial failure (DICF), intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), leptomeningeal disease (LMD), overall survival (OS), and radiation necrosis (RN). RESULTS During a median follow-up of 9 months, LC was achieved in 89.3 % of surgical beds. LC estimates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 96.4 %, 82.7 %, and 82.7 %, respectively. DICF was observed in 45.8 % of patients, and LMD was identified in two patients (8.3 %). At the end of the follow-up, 58.3 % of patients were alive, and the median OS was 20 months. RN occurred in only one surgical bed (3.6 %). No grade 5 toxicity was observed. The univariate analysis identified a longer interval to GKRS (HR 11.842, p = 0.042) and a larger treatment volume (HR 1.103, p = 0.037) as significant factors for local failure. CONCLUSIONS hf-GKRS shows potential as an effective and safe adjuvant treatment for surgical beds. It offers an alternative to SRS, SRT, or WBRT, particularly for larger volumes or tumors near critical structures. Further research is needed to confirm these results and optimize treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yavuz Samanci
- Koc University School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Gokce Deniz Ardor
- Koc University Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ali Haluk Duzkalir
- Koc University Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - M Orbay Askeroglu
- Koc University Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Koc University School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Goldberg M, Mondragon-Soto MG, Dieringer L, Altawalbeh G, Pöser P, Baumgart L, Wiestler B, Gempt J, Meyer B, Aftahy AK. Navigating Post-Operative Outcomes: A Comprehensive Reframing of an Original Graded Prognostic Assessment in Patients with Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:291. [PMID: 38254781 PMCID: PMC10813622 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) has been proposed for various brain metastases (BMs) tailored to the primary histology and molecular profiles. However, it does not consider whether patients have been operated on or not and does not include surgical outcomes as prognostic factors. The residual tumor burden (RTB) is a strong predictor of overall survival. We validated the GPA score and introduced "volumetric GPA" in the largest cohort of operated patients and further explored the role of RTB as an additional prognostic factor. METHODS A total of 630 patients with BMs between 2007 and 2020 were included. The four GPA components were analyzed. The validity of the original score was assessed using Cox regression, and a modified index incorporating RTB was developed by comparing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUC parameters. RESULTS GPA categories showed an association with survival: age (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-3.3), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p < 0.001, HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.5), number of BMs (p = 0.019, HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8), and the presence of extracranial manifestation (p < 0.001, HR 3, 95% CI 1.6-2.5). The median survival for GPA 0-1 was 4 months; for GPA 1.5-2, it was 12 months; for GPA 2.5-3, it was 21 months; and for GPA 3.5-4, it was 38 months (p < 0.001). RTB was identified as an independent prognostic factor. A cut-off of 2 cm3 was used for further analysis, which showed a median survival of 6 months (95% CI 4-8) vs. 13 months (95% CI 11-14, p < 0.001) for patients with RTB > 2 cm3 and <2 cm3, respectively. RTB was added as an additional component for a modified volumetric GPA score. The survival rates with the modified GPA score were: GPA 0-1: 4 months, GPA 1.5-2: 7 months, GPA 2.5-3: 18 months, and GPA 3.5-4: 34 months. Both scores showed good stratification, with the new score showed a trend towards better discrimination in patients with more favorable prognoses. CONCLUSION The prognostic value of the original GPA was confirmed in our cohort of patients who underwent surgery for BM. The RTB was identified as a parameter of high prognostic significance and was incorporated into an updated "volumetric GPA". This score provides a novel tool for prognosis and clinical decision making in patients undergoing surgery. This method may be useful for stratification and patient selection for further treatment and in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Goldberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany; (L.D.); (G.A.); (B.M.); (A.K.A.)
| | - Michel G. Mondragon-Soto
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City 14269, Mexico;
| | - Laura Dieringer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany; (L.D.); (G.A.); (B.M.); (A.K.A.)
| | - Ghaith Altawalbeh
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany; (L.D.); (G.A.); (B.M.); (A.K.A.)
| | - Paul Pöser
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charite–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Lea Baumgart
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany;
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany; (L.D.); (G.A.); (B.M.); (A.K.A.)
| | - Amir Kaywan Aftahy
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany; (L.D.); (G.A.); (B.M.); (A.K.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Burney IA, Aal Hamad AH, Hashmi SFA, Ahmad N, Pervez N. Evolution of the Management of Brain Metastases: A Bibliometric Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5570. [PMID: 38067273 PMCID: PMC10705608 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
A systematic review of the published literature was conducted to analyze the management evolution of brain metastases from different cancers. Using the keywords "brain metastasis", "brain metastases", "CNS metastasis", "CNS metastases", "phase III" AND/OR "Randomized Controlled Trial" (RCT), relevant articles were searched for on the SCOPUS database. A total of 1986 articles were retrieved, published over a 45-year period (1977-2022). Relevant articles were defined as clinical studies describing the treatment or prevention of brain metastases from any cancer. Articles on imaging, quality of life, cognitive impairment after treatment, or primary brain tumors were excluded. After a secondary analysis, reviewing the abstracts and/or full texts, 724 articles were found to be relevant. Publications significantly increased in the last 10 years. A total of 252 articles (34.8%) were published in 12 core journals, receiving 50% of the citations. The number of publications in Frontiers in Oncology, BMC Cancer, and Radiotherapy and Oncology have increased considerably over the last few years. There were 111 randomized controlled trials, 128 review articles, and 63 meta-analyses. Most randomized trials reported on brain metastases management from unselected tumors (49), lung cancer (47), or breast cancer (11). In the last 5 years (2017 to 2022), management of brain metastasis has moved on from WBRT, the use of chemotherapy, and radio-sensitization to three directions. First, Radiosurgery or Radiotherapy (SRS/SRT), or hippocampal-sparing WBRT is employed to reduce radiation toxicity. Second, it has moved to the use of novel agents, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and third, to the use of molecularly directed therapy such as TKIs, in asymptomatic low volume metastasis, obviating the need for WBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ikram A. Burney
- Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Center, Muscat 123, Oman; (I.A.B.); (S.F.A.H.)
- Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine & Drug Research, International Center of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Karachi University, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
| | | | - Syed F. A. Hashmi
- Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Center, Muscat 123, Oman; (I.A.B.); (S.F.A.H.)
| | - Nisar Ahmad
- Department of Economics and Finance, College of Economics and Political Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman;
| | - Nadeem Pervez
- Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Center, Muscat 123, Oman; (I.A.B.); (S.F.A.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Buszek SM, Tran B, Long JP, Luo D, Suki D, Li J, Ferguson S, Chung C. Postoperative Management of Recurrence After Radiosurgery and Surgical Resection for Brain Metastases and Predicting Benefit From Adjuvant Radiation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e499-e503. [PMID: 37295724 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is often used as upfront treatment for brain metastases. Progression or radionecrosis after SRS is common and can prompt resection. However, postoperative management strategies after resection for SRS failure vary widely, and no standard practice has been established. In this approved study, we retrospectively reviewed patients who received SRS for a brain metastasis followed by resection of the same lesion. We extracted patient-, disease-, and treatment-related variables and information on disease-related outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathologic variables were used to create a model to predict factors associated with local failure (LF). A total of 225 patients with brain metastases treated with SRS from 2009 to 2017 followed by surgical resection were identified. Overall, 65% of cases had gross total resection (GTR) on postoperative imaging review. Twenty-one patients (9.3%) received adjuvant radiation therapy to the surgical cavity, and 204 (90.7%) were observed. Of these 204 patients, 118 had GTR with evidence of tumor within the pathology specimen. With a median follow-up of 13 months after resection, 47 patients (40%) developed LF after surgery. After salvage resection of a brain metastasis initially treated with SRS, the observed LF rate was 40% among those who had a GTR and evidence of tumor on pathologic examination. This LF rate is sufficiently high that adjuvant radiation to the surgical bed after salvage resection should be considered in these cases when there is tumor in the pathology, even after a GTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha M Buszek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - James P Long
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dershan Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dima Suki
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sherise Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hasanov E, Jonasch E. Management of Brain Metastases in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:1005-1014. [PMID: 37270383 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
The development of brain metastases is a poor prognostic indicator in renal cell carcinoma. Regular imaging and clinical examinations are necessary to monitor the brain before or during systemic therapy. Central nervous system-targeted radiation therapy, including stereotactic radiosurgery, whole-brain radiation therapy, and surgical resection, is a standard treatment option. Clinical trials are currently investigating the role of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in treating brain metastases and decreasing intracranial disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elshad Hasanov
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard FC11.3055, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Eric Jonasch
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard Unit 1374, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bhave VM, Lamba N, Aizer AA, Bi WL. Minimizing Intracranial Disease Before Stereotactic Radiation in Single or Solitary Brain Metastases. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:782-793. [PMID: 37036442 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in multiple fractions (typically ≤5) can effectively treat a wide range of brain metastases, including those less suitable for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Prior prospective studies on surgical resection with stereotactic radiation have focused exclusively on SRS, and retrospective studies have shown equivocal results regarding whether surgery is associated with improved outcomes compared with SRT alone. We compared resection with postoperative cavity SRT or SRS to SRT alone in patients with 1 brain metastasis, while including patients receiving SRS alone as an additional reference group. METHODS We studied 716 patients in a retrospective, single-institution cohort diagnosed with single or solitary brain metastases from 2007 to 2020. Patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy were excluded. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for overall survival and additional intracranial outcomes. RESULTS After adjustment for potential confounders, surgery with cavity SRT/SRS was associated with decreased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.39, 95% CI [0.27-0.57], P = 1.52 × 10 -6 ) compared with SRT alone, along with lower risk of neurological death attributable to intracranial tumor progression (HR: 0.46, 95% CI [0.22-0.94], P = 3.32 × 10 -2 ) and radiation necrosis (HR: 0.15, 95% CI [0.06-0.36], P = 3.28 × 10 -5 ). Surgery with cavity SRS was also associated with decreased all-cause mortality (HR: 0.52, 95% CI [0.35-0.78], P = 1.46 × 10 -3 ), neurological death (HR: 0.30, 95% CI [0.10-0.88], P = 2.88 × 10 -2 ), and radiation necrosis (HR: 0.14, 95% CI [0.03-0.74], P = 2.07 × 10 -2 ) compared with SRS alone. Surgery was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality and neurological death in cardinality-matched subsets of the cohort. Among surgical patients, gross total resection was associated with extended overall survival (HR: 0.62, 95% CI [0.40-0.98], P = 4.02 × 10 -2 ) along with lower risk of neurological death (HR: 0.31, 95% CI [0.17-0.57], P = 1.84 × 10 -4 ) and local failure (HR: 0.34, 95% CI [0.16-0.75], P = 7.08 × 10 -3 ). CONCLUSION In patients with 1 brain metastasis, minimizing intracranial disease specifically before stereotactic radiation is associated with improved oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varun M Bhave
- Harvard Medical School, Boston , Massachusetts , USA
| | - Nayan Lamba
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard University, Boston , Massachusetts , USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston , Massachusetts , USA
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston , Massachusetts , USA
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston , Massachusetts , USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Levis M, Gastino A, De Giorgi G, Mantovani C, Bironzo P, Mangherini L, Ricci AA, Ricardi U, Cassoni P, Bertero L. Modern Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases from Lung Cancer: Current Trends and Future Perspectives Based on Integrated Translational Approaches. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4622. [PMID: 37760591 PMCID: PMC10526239 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most frequent metastatic event in the course of lung cancer patients, occurring in approximately 50% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in up to 70% in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Thus far, many advances have been made in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, allowing improvements in the prognosis of these patients. The modern approach relies on the integration of several factors, such as accurate histological and molecular profiling, comprehensive assessment of clinical parameters and precise definition of the extent of intracranial and extracranial disease involvement. The combination of these factors is pivotal to guide the multidisciplinary discussion and to offer the most appropriate treatment to these patients based on a personalized approach. Focal radiotherapy (RT), in all its modalities (radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (aSRT)), is the cornerstone of BM management, either alone or in combination with surgery and systemic therapies. We review the modern therapeutic strategies available to treat lung cancer patients with brain involvement. This includes an accurate review of the different technical solutions which can be exploited to provide a "state-of-art" focal RT and also a detailed description of the systemic agents available as effective alternatives to SRS/SRT when a targetable molecular driver is present. In addition to the validated treatment options, we also discuss the future perspective for focal RT, based on emerging clinical reports (e.g., SRS for patients with many BMs from NSCLC or SRS for BMs from SCLC), together with a presentation of innovative and promising findings in translational research and the combination of novel targeted agents with SRS/SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Levis
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Alessio Gastino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Greta De Giorgi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Cristina Mantovani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Paolo Bironzo
- Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy;
| | - Luca Mangherini
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Alessia Andrea Ricci
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Luca Bertero
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Semenescu LE, Tataranu LG, Dricu A, Ciubotaru GV, Radoi MP, Rodriguez SMB, Kamel A. A Neurosurgical Perspective on Brain Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma: Multi-Institutional, Retrospective Analysis. Biomedicines 2023; 11:2485. [PMID: 37760926 PMCID: PMC10526360 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11092485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While acknowledging the generally poor prognostic features of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma (BM RCC), it is important to be aware of the fact that neurosurgery still plays a vital role in managing this disease, even though we have entered an era of targeted therapies. Notwithstanding their initial high effectiveness, these agents often fail, as tumors develop resistance or relapse. METHODS The authors of this study aimed to evaluate patients presenting with BM RCC and their outcomes after being treated in the Neurosurgical Department of Clinical Emergency Hospital "Bagdasar-Arseni", and the Neurosurgical Department of the National Institute of Neurology and Neurovascular Diseases, Bucharest, Romania. The study is based on a thorough appraisal of the patient's demographic and clinicopathological data and is focused on the strategic role of neurosurgery in BM RCC. RESULTS A total of 24 patients were identified with BM RCC, of whom 91.6% had clear-cell RCC (ccRCC) and 37.5% had a prior nephrectomy. Only 29.1% of patients harbored extracranial metastases, while 83.3% had a single BM RCC. A total of 29.1% of patients were given systemic therapy. Neurosurgical resection of the BM was performed in 23 out of 24 patients. Survival rates were prolonged in patients who underwent nephrectomy, in patients who received systemic therapy, and in patients with a single BM RCC. Furthermore, higher levels of hemoglobin were associated in our study with a higher number of BMs. CONCLUSION Neurosurgery is still a cornerstone in the treatment of symptomatic BM RCC. Among the numerous advantages of neurosurgical intervention, the most important is represented by the quick reversal of neurological manifestations, which in most cases can be life-saving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liliana Eleonora Semenescu
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Str. Petru Rares nr. 2–4, 710204 Craiova, Romania; (L.E.S.); (A.D.)
| | - Ligia Gabriela Tataranu
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, Soseaua Berceni 12, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (G.V.C.); (S.M.B.R.); (A.K.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 020022 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anica Dricu
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Str. Petru Rares nr. 2–4, 710204 Craiova, Romania; (L.E.S.); (A.D.)
| | - Gheorghe Vasile Ciubotaru
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, Soseaua Berceni 12, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (G.V.C.); (S.M.B.R.); (A.K.)
| | - Mugurel Petrinel Radoi
- Neurosurgical Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurovascular Diseases, Soseaua Berceni 10, 041914 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Silvia Mara Baez Rodriguez
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, Soseaua Berceni 12, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (G.V.C.); (S.M.B.R.); (A.K.)
| | - Amira Kamel
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, Soseaua Berceni 12, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (G.V.C.); (S.M.B.R.); (A.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
de Vocht DE, Schnog JJB, Merkies IS, Samson MJ. Untoward global effects of current guideline formulation of stereotactic radiotherapy for symptomatic brain metastases by international medical societies. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. AMERICAS 2023; 25:100584. [PMID: 37681018 PMCID: PMC10480773 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
The quality of evidence leading to new oncological treatments suffers shortcomings, as has recently been addressed for drug approvals. In this 'Personal view', we evaluate the unintended effects of adopting stereotactic radiosurgery as the standard of care for patients with limited number of symptomatic brain metastases and favourable prognostic factors in international guidelines in view of the limitations in the evidence of efficacy and effectiveness, with special focus on countries with relatively limited resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John-John B. Schnog
- Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Curaçao Medical Center, Willemstad, Curaçao
- Curaçao Biomedical & Health Research Institute, Willemstad, Curaçao
| | - Ingemar S. Merkies
- Department of Neurology, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Curaçao Medical Center, Willemstad, Curaçao
| | - Michael J. Samson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Curaçao Medical Center, Willemstad, Curaçao
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Morshed RA, Saggi S, Cummins DD, Molinaro AM, Young JS, Viner JA, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Goldschmidt E, Boreta L, Braunstein SE, Chang EF, McDermott MW, Berger MS, Theodosopoulos PV, Hervey-Jumper SL, Aghi MK, Daras M. Identification of risk factors associated with leptomeningeal disease after resection of brain metastases. J Neurosurg 2023; 139:402-413. [PMID: 36640095 PMCID: PMC11208084 DOI: 10.3171/2022.12.jns221490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Resection of brain metastases (BMs) may be associated with increased risk of leptomeningeal disease (LMD). This study examined rates and predictors of LMD, including imaging subtypes, in patients who underwent resection of a BM followed by postoperative radiation. METHODS A retrospective, single-center study was conducted examining overall LMD, classic LMD (cLMD), and nodular LMD (nLMD) risk. Logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards, and random forest analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with LMD. RESULTS Of the 217 patients in the cohort, 47 (21.7%) developed postoperative LMD, with 19 cases (8.8%) of cLMD and 28 cases (12.9%) of nLMD. Six-, 12-, and 24-month LMD-free survival rates were 92.3%, 85.6%, and 71.4%, respectively. Patients with cLMD had worse survival outcomes from the date of LMD diagnosis compared with nLMD (median 2.4 vs 6.9 months, p = 0.02, log-rank test). Cox proportional hazards analysis identified cerebellar/insular/occipital location (hazard ratio [HR] 3.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-6.11, p = 0.0003), absence of extracranial disease (HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.27-4.88, p = 0.008), and ventricle contact (HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.5-5.3, p = 0.001) to be associated with postoperative LMD. A predictive model using random forest analysis with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 in a test cohort identified tumor location, systemic disease status, and tumor volume as the most important factors associated with LMD. CONCLUSIONS Tumor location, absence of extracranial disease at the time of surgery, ventricle contact, and increased tumor volume were associated with LMD. Further work is needed to determine whether escalating therapies in patients at risk of LMD prevents disease dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramin A. Morshed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Satvir Saggi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Daniel D. Cummins
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Annette M. Molinaro
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Jacob S. Young
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Jennifer A. Viner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Ezequiel Goldschmidt
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Lauren Boreta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Steve E. Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Edward F. Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Mitchel S. Berger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Manish K. Aghi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Mariza Daras
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Diehl CD, Giordano FA, Grosu AL, Ille S, Kahl KH, Onken J, Rieken S, Sarria GR, Shiban E, Wagner A, Beck J, Brehmer S, Ganslandt O, Hamed M, Meyer B, Münter M, Raabe A, Rohde V, Schaller K, Schilling D, Schneider M, Sperk E, Thomé C, Vajkoczy P, Vatter H, Combs SE. Opportunities and Alternatives of Modern Radiation Oncology and Surgery for the Management of Resectable Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3670. [PMID: 37509330 PMCID: PMC10377800 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Postsurgical radiotherapy (RT) has been early proven to prevent local tumor recurrence, initially performed with whole brain RT (WBRT). Subsequent to disadvantageous cognitive sequalae for the patient and the broad distribution of modern linear accelerators, focal irradiation of the tumor has omitted WBRT in most cases. In many studies, the effectiveness of local RT of the resection cavity, either as single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypo-fractionated stereotactic RT (hFSRT), has been demonstrated to be effective and safe. However, whereas prospective high-level incidence is still lacking on which dose and fractionation scheme is the best choice for the patient, further ablative techniques have come into play. Neoadjuvant SRS (N-SRS) prior to resection combines straightforward target delineation with an accelerated post-surgical phase, allowing an earlier start of systemic treatment or rehabilitation as indicated. In addition, low-energy intraoperative RT (IORT) on the surgical bed has been introduced as another alternative to external beam RT, offering sterilization of the cavity surface with steep dose gradients towards the healthy brain. This consensus paper summarizes current local treatment strategies for resectable brain metastases regarding available data and patient-centered decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Medical Faculty, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ille
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Klaus-Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Julia Onken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Niedersachsen (CCC-N), 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Wagner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Jürgen Beck
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Brehmer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Oliver Ganslandt
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Marc Münter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Stuttgart Katharinenhospital, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Andreas Raabe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Veit Rohde
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Karl Schaller
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Geneva Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Elena Sperk
- Mannheim Cancer Center, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Popp I, Hartong NE, Nieder C, Grosu AL. PRO: Do We Still Need Whole-Brain Irradiation for Brain Metastases? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3193. [PMID: 37370802 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: In recent decades, the use of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in the treatment of brain metastases has significantly decreased, with clinicians fearing adverse neurocognitive events and data showing limited efficacy regarding local tumor control and overall survival. The present study thus aimed to reassess the role that WBRT holds in the treatment of brain metastases. (2) Methods: This review summarizes the available evidence from 1990 until today supporting the use of WBRT, as well as new developments in WBRT and their clinical implications. (3) Results: While one to four brain metastases should be exclusively treated with radiosurgery, WBRT does remain an option for patients with multiple metastases. In particular, hippocampus-avoidance WBRT, WBRT with dose escalation to the metastases, and their combination have shown promising results and offer valid alternatives to local stereotactic radiotherapy. Ongoing and published prospective trials on the efficacy and toxicity of these new methods are presented. (4) Conclusions: Unlike conventional WBRT, which has limited indications, modern WBRT techniques continue to have a significant role to play in the treatment of multiple brain metastases. In which situations radiosurgery or WBRT should be the first option should be investigated in further studies. Until then, the therapeutic decision must be made individually depending on the oncological context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilinca Popp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Freiburg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nanna E Hartong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Freiburg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Nieder
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, 8092 Bodø, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Freiburg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Baskaran AB, Buerki RA, Khan OH, Gondi V, Stupp R, Lukas RV, Villaflor VM. Building Team Medicine in the Management of CNS Metastases. J Clin Med 2023; 12:3901. [PMID: 37373596 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12123901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
CNS metastases are often terminal for cancer patients and occur at an approximately 10-fold higher rate than primary CNS tumors. The incidence of these tumors is approximately 70,000-400,000 cases annually in the US. Advances that have occurred over the past two decades have led to more personalized treatment approaches. Newer surgical and radiation techniques, as well as targeted and immune therapies, have enanled patient to live longer, thus increasing the risk for the development of CNS, brain, and leptomeningeal metastases (BM and LM). Patients who develop CNS metastases have often been heavily treated, and options for future treatment could best be addressed by multidisciplinary teams. Studies have indicated that patients with brain metastases have improved survival outcomes when cared for in high-volume academic institutions using multidisciplinary teams. This manuscript discusses a multidisciplinary approach for both parenchymal brain metastases as well as leptomeningeal metastases implemented in three academic institutions. Additionally, with the increasing development of healthcare systems, we discuss optimizing the management of CNS metastases across healthcare systems and integrating basic and translational science into our clinical care to further improve outcomes. This paper summarizes the existing therapeutic approaches to the treatment of BM and LM and discusses novel and emerging approaches to optimizing access to neuro-oncologic care while simultaneously integrating multidisciplinary teams in the care of patients with BM and LM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archit B Baskaran
- Department of Neurology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Robin A Buerki
- Health System Clinician of Neurology (Neuro-Oncology), Northwestern Medicine Regional Medical Group, Warrenville, IL 60555, USA
| | - Osaama H Khan
- Surgical Neuro-Oncology, Northwestern Medicine Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, IL 60190, USA
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nothwestern Medicine West Region, Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Warrenville, IL 60555, USA
| | - Roger Stupp
- Neuro-Oncology Division, Neurological Surgery, Medicine (Hematology and Oncology), Neurology, Department of Neurology, Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Rimas V Lukas
- Neuro-Oncology Division, Department of Neurology, Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Victoria M Villaflor
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Imaizumi J, Shida D, Boku N, Igaki H, Itami J, Miyakita Y, Narita Y, Takashima A, Kanemitsu Y. Prognostic factors associated with the transition in treatment methods for brain metastases from colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s10147-023-02352-8. [PMID: 37208499 PMCID: PMC10390364 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02352-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of brain metastases (BMs) from colorectal cancer (CRC) has transitioned with the expansion of indications for stereotactic radiotherapy. Our study aimed to assess changes in prognosis and prognostic factors associated with changes in treatment for BMs from CRC. METHODS We retrospectively surveyed treatments for and outcomes of BMs from CRC in 208 patients treated during 1997-2018. Patients were divided into two groups according to time of BM diagnosis, i.e., 1997-2013 ("first period") and 2014-2018 ("second period"). We compared overall survival between the periods and assessed how the transition impacted prognostic factors affecting overall survival, including the following prognostic factors such as Karnofsky performance status (KPS), volume-related factors (BM number and diameter), and BM treatment modalities as covariates. RESULTS Of the 208 patients, 147 were treated in the first period and 61 in the second period. Whole-brain radiotherapy use decreased from 67 to 39% in the second period, and stereotactic radiotherapy use increased from 30 to 62%. Median survival after BM diagnosis improved from 6.1 to 8.5 months (p = 0.0272). Multivariate analysis revealed KPS, control of primary tumor, stereotactic radiotherapy use, and chemotherapy history as independent prognostic factors during the entire observation period. Hazard ratios of KPS, primary tumor control, and stereotactic radiotherapy were higher in the second period, whereas prognostic impact of chemotherapy history before BM diagnosis was similar in both periods. CONCLUSION Overall survival of patients with BMs from CRC improved since 2014, which can be attributed to advances in chemotherapy and the more widespread use of stereotactic radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Imaizumi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 1040045, Japan
| | - Dai Shida
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 1040045, Japan.
- Division of Frontier Surgery, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 1088639, Japan.
| | - Narikazu Boku
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 1040045, Japan
- Department of Oncology and General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 1040045, Japan
| | - Jun Itami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 1040045, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Shin Matsudo Central General Hospital, 1-380 Shinmatsudo, Matsudo-shi, Chiba, 2700034, Japan
| | - Yasuji Miyakita
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 1040045, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Narita
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 1040045, Japan
| | - Atsuo Takashima
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 1040045, Japan
| | - Yukihide Kanemitsu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 1040045, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kalyvas A, Gutierrez-Valencia E, Lau R, Ye XY, O'Halloran PJ, Mohan N, Wong C, Millar BA, Laperriere N, Conrad T, Berlin A, Bernstein M, Zadeh G, Shultz DB, Kongkham P. Anatomical and surgical characteristics correlate with pachymeningeal failure in patients with brain metastases after neurosurgical resection and adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 2023; 163:269-279. [PMID: 37165117 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04325-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Neurosurgery (NS) is an essential modality for large brain metastases (BM). Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the standard of care adjuvant treatment. Pachymeningeal failure (PMF) is a newly described entity, distinct from classical leptomeningeal failure (LMF), that is uniquely observed in postoperative patients treated with adjuvant SRS. We sought to identify risk factors for PMF in patients treated with NS + SRS. METHODS From a prospective registry (2009 to 2021), we identified all patients treated with NS + SRS. Clinical, imaging, pathological, and treatment factors were analyzed. PMF incidence was evaluated using a competing risks model. RESULTS 144 Patients were identified. The median age was 62 (23-90). PMF occurred in 21.5% (31/144). Female gender [Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.65, p = 0.013], higher Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) index (HR 2.4, p < 0.001), absence of prior radiation therapy (HR N/A, p = 0.018), controlled extracranial disease (CED) (HR 3.46, p = 0.0038), and pia/dura contact (PDC) (HR 3.30, p = 0.0053) were associated with increased risk for PMF on univariate analysis. In patients with PDC, wider target volumes correlated with reduced risk of PMF. Multivariate analysis indicated PDC (HR 3.51, p = 0.0053), piecemeal resection (HR 2.38, p = 0.027), and CED (HR 3.97, p = 0.0016) independently correlated with PMF risk. PMF correlated with reduced OS (HR 2.90, p < 0.001) at a lower rate compared to LMF (HR 10.15, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION PMF correlates with tumor PDC and piecemeal resection in patients treated with NS + SRS. For unclear reasons, it is also associated with CED. In tumors with PDC, wider dural radiotherapy coverage was associated with a lower risk of PMF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristotelis Kalyvas
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada.
| | - Enrique Gutierrez-Valencia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ruth Lau
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Xiang Y Ye
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Philip J O'Halloran
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Nilesh Mohan
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Christine Wong
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Barbara-Ann Millar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tatiana Conrad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Bernstein
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - David B Shultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Paul Kongkham
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vaios EJ, Winter SF, Shih HA, Dietrich J, Peters KB, Floyd SR, Kirkpatrick JP, Reitman ZJ. Novel Mechanisms and Future Opportunities for the Management of Radiation Necrosis in Patients Treated for Brain Metastases in the Era of Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2432. [PMID: 37173897 PMCID: PMC10177360 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation necrosis, also known as treatment-induced necrosis, has emerged as an important adverse effect following stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) for brain metastases. The improved survival of patients with brain metastases and increased use of combined systemic therapy and SRS have contributed to a growing incidence of necrosis. The cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS) and stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway (cGAS-STING) represents a key biological mechanism linking radiation-induced DNA damage to pro-inflammatory effects and innate immunity. By recognizing cytosolic double-stranded DNA, cGAS induces a signaling cascade that results in the upregulation of type 1 interferons and dendritic cell activation. This pathway could play a key role in the pathogenesis of necrosis and provides attractive targets for therapeutic development. Immunotherapy and other novel systemic agents may potentiate activation of cGAS-STING signaling following radiotherapy and increase necrosis risk. Advancements in dosimetric strategies, novel imaging modalities, artificial intelligence, and circulating biomarkers could improve the management of necrosis. This review provides new insights into the pathophysiology of necrosis and synthesizes our current understanding regarding the diagnosis, risk factors, and management options of necrosis while highlighting novel avenues for discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene J. Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Sebastian F. Winter
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Helen A. Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Katherine B. Peters
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Scott R. Floyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - John P. Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Zachary J. Reitman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Leu J, Akerman M, Mendez C, Lischalk JW, Carpenter T, Ebling D, Haas JA, Witten M, Barbaro M, Duic P, Tessler L, Repka MC. Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1132777. [PMID: 37091181 PMCID: PMC10113671 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1132777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionBrain metastases are the most common intracranial tumor diagnosed in adults. In patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, the incidence of post-treatment radionecrosis appears to be rising, which has been attributed to improved patient survival as well as novel systemic treatments. The impacts of concomitant immunotherapy and the interval between diagnosis and treatment on patient outcomes are unclear.MethodsThis single institution, retrospective study consisted of patients who received single or multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for intact brain metastases. Exclusion criteria included neurosurgical resection prior to treatment and treatment of non-malignant histologies or primary central nervous system malignancies. A univariate screen was implemented to determine which factors were associated with radionecrosis. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the two groups for categorical variables, and the two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous data. Those factors that appeared to be associated with radionecrosis on univariate analyses were included in a multivariable model. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess potential predictors of time to local failure and time to regional failure.ResultsA total of 107 evaluable patients with a total of 256 individual brain metastases were identified. The majority of metastases were non-small cell lung cancer (58.98%), followed by breast cancer (16.02%). Multivariable analyses demonstrated increased risk of radionecrosis with increasing MRI maximum axial dimension (OR 1.10, p=0.0123) and a history of previous whole brain radiation therapy (OR 3.48, p=0.0243). Receipt of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy was associated with a decreased risk of local failure (HR 0.31, p=0.0159). Time interval between diagnostic MRI and first treatment, time interval between CT simulation and first treatment, and concurrent immunotherapy had no impact on incidence of radionecrosis or regional failure.DiscussionAn optimal time interval between diagnosis and treatment for intact brain metastases that minimizes radionecrosis and maximizes local and regional control could not be identified. Concurrent immunotherapy does not appear to increase the risk of radionecrosis and may improve local control. These data further support the safety and synergistic efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Leu
- Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States
| | - Meredith Akerman
- Division of Health Services Research, New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Christopher Mendez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan W. Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
- NYCyberKnife at Perlmutter Cancer Center – Manhattan, New York, NY, United States
| | - Todd Carpenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - David Ebling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan A. Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
- NYCyberKnife at Perlmutter Cancer Center – Manhattan, New York, NY, United States
| | - Matthew Witten
- Department of Medical Physics, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Marissa Barbaro
- Department of Neurology, New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Paul Duic
- Department of Neurology, New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Lee Tessler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Michael C. Repka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- *Correspondence: Michael C. Repka,
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pellerino A, Garbossa D, Rudà R, Soffietti R. The role of the neurologist in the diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases and carcinomatous meningitis. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2023; 179:464-474. [PMID: 36990824 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Traditionally, in the past, most of central nervous system metastases from solid tumors were associated with an advanced phase of the disease needing palliation only, while to date they increasingly develop as an early and/or solitary relapse in patients with the systemic disease under control. This review will cover all the aspects of a modern management of brain and leptomeningeal metastases from diagnosis to the different therapeutic options, either local (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance) or systemic. Particular emphasis is reserved to the new-targeted drugs, that allow to target specifically driver molecular alterations. These new compounds pose new problems in terms of monitoring efficacy and adverse events, but increasingly they allow improvement of outcome in comparison to historical controls.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ferraro E, Seidman AD. Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Achilles' Heel in Breast Cancer Patients' Care. Cancer Treat Res 2023; 188:283-302. [PMID: 38175350 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-33602-7_11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Brain metastases (BM) significantly affect the prognosis as well as the quality of life of breast cancer (BC) patients. Although advancements in neurosurgical and radiotherapy techniques improve local control and symptom management, BM remains associated with a poor prognosis. In addition, the efficacy of currently approved systemic therapies in central nervous system (CNS) compartment is still limited, especially after progression on local therapy. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) has been recognized as a mechanism of primary resistance to many chemotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies due to low drug penetration. Other mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance are still unclear and may vary across the BC subtypes. New small molecules have demonstrated efficacy in BM, in particular for the HER2-positive subtype, with a benefit in survival. A new era has begun in the field of BM, and many trials specifically designed for this population are currently ongoing. The BC research community needs to address this call with the final aim of improving the efficacy of systemic therapy in CNS compartment and ultimately preventing the occurrence of BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuela Ferraro
- Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew D Seidman
- Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
The correlations between psychological distress, cognitive impairment and quality of life in patients with brain metastases after whole-brain radiotherapy. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF SPANISH ONCOLOGY SOCIETIES AND OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE OF MEXICO 2023; 25:207-217. [PMID: 36038750 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02927-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychological distress and cognitive impairment are highly prevalent among patients with brain metastases after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Our purpose was to evaluate the correlations between psychological distress, cognitive impairment and quality of life in patients with brain metastases after WBRT. METHODS Seventy-one patients with brain metastasis treated with WBRT were enrolled in this study and were investigated with several scales, including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function version 3 (FACT-Cog, version 3), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain Module version 4 (FACT-Br, version 4) and the Psychological Distress Thermometer (DT), before and after WBRT. RESULTS The MoCA, FACT-Cog and FACT-Br scores in patients with brain metastases were significantly decreased after WBRT compared with before WBRT (z = - 7.106, - 6.933 and - 6.250, respectively, P < 0.001), while the DT scores were significantly increased (z = 6.613, P < 0.001). There was an obvious negative correlation between the DT score and the FACT-Cog score (r = - 0.660, P < 0.001), a significant negative correlation between the DT score and the FACT-Br score (r = - 0.833, P < 0.001), and an obvious positive correlation between the FACT-Cog score and the FACT-Br score (r = 0.603, P < 0.001). These results suggest that WBRT can cause cognitive impairment in patients with brain metastases, increase their psychological distress and reduce their quality of life (QOL). CONCLUSION After receiving WBRT, the cognitive function and QOL of patients with brain metastases were decreased, while psychological distress increased. The cognitive impairment and the decline of QOL after WBRT are associated with increased psychological distress, and that the decline of QOL is associated with cognitive impairment of patients.
Collapse
|
28
|
Rossi S, Marinello A, Pagliaro A, Franceschini D, Navarria P, Finocchiaro G, Toschi L, Scorsetti M, Santoro A. Current treatment approaches for brain metastases in ALK/ ROS1/ NTRK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:29-41. [PMID: 36548111 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2162044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients present a high incidence of CNS metastases either at diagnosis or during the course of the disease. In this case, patients present with worse prognosis and are often excluded from clinical trials unless brain metastases are pre-treated or clinically stable. AREAS COVERED As a result of the discovery of several oncogenic drivers in ALK/ROS1/NTRK-positive NSCLC, targeted agents have been tested in several trials. We evaluate and compare the intracranial efficacy of available targeted agents in ALK/ROS1/NTRK-positive NSCLC based on subgroup analysis from pivotal trials. EXPERT OPINION Last-generation ALK inhibitors have shown slightly superior intracranial activity but pivotal trials do not consider the same endpoints for intracranial efficacy, therefore data are not comparable. Local treatments for BM including surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and WBRT, should be integrated with systemic therapies basing on specific criteria like presence of oligoprogression or symptomatic progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Rossi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Arianna Marinello
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Arianna Pagliaro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanna Finocchiaro
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Toschi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Santoro
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hintelmann K, Petersen C, Borgmann K. Radiotherapeutic Strategies to Overcome Resistance of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases by Considering Immunogenic Aspects of Cancer Stem Cells. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:211. [PMID: 36612206 PMCID: PMC9818478 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in women, and symptomatic brain metastases (BCBMs) occur in 15-20% of metastatic breast cancer cases. Despite technological advances in radiation therapy (RT), the prognosis of patients is limited. This has been attributed to radioresistant breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs), among other factors. The aim of this review article is to summarize the evidence of cancer-stem-cell-mediated radioresistance in brain metastases of breast cancer from radiobiologic and radiation oncologic perspectives to allow for the better interpretability of preclinical and clinical evidence and to facilitate its translation into new therapeutic strategies. To this end, the etiology of brain metastasis in breast cancer, its radiotherapeutic treatment options, resistance mechanisms in BCSCs, and effects of molecularly targeted therapies in combination with radiotherapy involving immune checkpoint inhibitors are described and classified. This is considered in the context of the central nervous system (CNS) as a particular metastatic niche involving the blood-brain barrier and the CNS immune system. The compilation of this existing knowledge serves to identify possible synergistic effects between systemic molecularly targeted therapies and ionizing radiation (IR) by considering both BCSCs' relevant resistance mechanisms and effects on normal tissue of the CNS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Hintelmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Experimental Radiooncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cordula Petersen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Borgmann
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Experimental Radiooncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jia-Mahasap B, Madla C, Sripan P, Chitapanarux I, Tharavichitkul E, Chakrabandhu S, Klunklin P, Onchan W. Stereotactic radiosurgery for limited brain metastasis using three different techniques: helical tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and cone-based LINAC radiosurgery. Radiat Oncol J 2022; 40:232-241. [PMID: 36606300 PMCID: PMC9830036 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2022.00136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Specific radiation delivered to tumors by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become widely used in the treatment of brain metastasis. This study aimed to compare radiation therapy planning and its parameters from SRS using three different modalities: helical tomotherapy (HT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and cone-based linac radiosurgery (Cone-based). MATERIALS AND METHODS Each contouring dataset of patents who experienced one to four brain metastasis received SRS in our center was re-planned to create radiation therapy planning in all three treatment systems (HT, VMAT, and Cone-based). The parameters of conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), CI50, and gradient index (CGI) were analyzed to compare the effects of the three techniques. Decision score analysis was used to evaluate the performance on dosimetric and organs-at-risk parameters among the different techniques by applying the Cone-based technique as a benchmark. RESULTS A total of 21 patients with 39 lesions were included in this study. The results from the decision score analysis demonstrated statistically identical CI, CI50, and CGI values between Cone-based and VMAT for single lesions. For multiple lesions, VMAT also provided better CI when compared to Cone-based technique while HT exhibited the poorest dosimetric parameters. Moreover, VMAT exhibited the lowest BrainV5Gy value and displayed the shortest beam-on time calculation. CONCLUSION We have conducted a comprehensive comparison of SRS planning approaches. The Cone-based technique revealed the highest HI value, while VMAT provided the best estimated beam-on time value. HT displayed a feasible SRS modality for single lesions, but not for multiple lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bongkot Jia-Mahasap
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand,Correspondence: Bongkot Jia-Mahasap Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros Road, SriPoom, Muang, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Tel: +66(0)53935450 E-mail:
| | - Chakri Madla
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Patumrat Sripan
- Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Imjai Chitapanarux
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Ekkasit Tharavichitkul
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Somvilai Chakrabandhu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Pitchayaponne Klunklin
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Wimrak Onchan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Eng L, Brual J, Nagee A, Mok S, Fazelzad R, Chaiton M, Saunders D, Mittmann N, Truscott R, Liu G, Bradbury P, Evans W, Papadakos J, Giuliani M. Reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100605. [PMID: 36356412 PMCID: PMC9646674 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continued smoking after a diagnosis of cancer negatively impacts cancer outcomes, but the impact of tobacco on newer treatments options is not well established. Collecting and evaluating tobacco use in clinical trials may advance understanding of the consequences of tobacco use on treatment modalities, but little is known about the frequency of reporting and analysis of tobacco use in cancer cooperative clinical trial groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify cancer cooperative group clinical trials published from January 2017-October 2019. Eligible studies evaluated either systemic and/or radiation therapies, included ≥100 adult patients, and reported on at least one of: overall survival, disease/progression-free survival, response rates, toxicities/adverse events, or quality-of-life. RESULTS A total of 91 studies representing 90 trials met inclusion criteria with trial start dates ranging from 1995 to 2015 with 14% involving lung and 5% head and neck cancer patients. A total of 19 studies reported baseline tobacco use; 2 reported collecting follow-up tobacco use. Seven studies reported analysis of the impact of baseline tobacco use on clinical outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity in the reporting of baseline tobacco use: 7 reported never/ever status, 10 reported never/ex-smoker/current smoker status, and 4 reported measuring smoking intensity. None reported verifying smoking status or second-hand smoke exposure. Trials of lung and head and neck cancers were more likely to report baseline tobacco use than other disease sites (83% versus 6%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Few cancer cooperative group clinical trials report and analyze trial participants' tobacco use. Significant heterogeneity exists in reporting tobacco use. Routine standardized collection and reporting of tobacco use at baseline and follow-up in clinical trials should be implemented to enable investigators to evaluate the impact of tobacco use on new cancer therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Eng
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada,Prof L. Eng, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada. Tel: +1-416-946-2953; Fax: +1-416-946-6546 @Lawson_Eng@MeredithGiulia1@PMcancercentre
| | - J. Brual
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A. Nagee
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - S. Mok
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - R. Fazelzad
- Library and Information Services, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - M. Chaiton
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - D.P. Saunders
- Northeast Cancer Centre of Health Sciences North, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Canada
| | - N. Mittmann
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - R. Truscott
- Division of Prevention Policy and Stakeholder Engagement, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Canada
| | - G. Liu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - P.A. Bradbury
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - W.K. Evans
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - J. Papadakos
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada,Patient Education, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Canada
| | - M.E. Giuliani
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada,Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada,Correspondence to: Prof M. Giuliani, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada. Tel: +1-416-946-2983; Fax: +1-416-946-6546
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Perlow HK, Ho C, Matsui JK, Prasad RN, Klamer BG, Wang J, Damante M, Upadhyay R, Thomas E, Blakaj DM, Beyer S, Lonser R, Hardesty D, Raval RR, Prabhu R, Elder JB, Palmer JD. Comparing Pre-Operative Versus Post-Operative Single and Multi-Fraction Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Patients with Resectable Brain Metastases. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 38:117-122. [PMID: 36420099 PMCID: PMC9676204 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Pre-operative radiation therapy for brain metastases may reduce meningeal disease. Pre-operative radiation therapy for brain metastases may reduce radionecrosis. Fractionated radiation therapy for brain metastases may reduce local failure. Fractionated pre-operative radiation therapy requires prospective validation.
Background The standard treatment for patients with large brain metastases and limited intracranial disease is surgical resection and post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, post-operative SRS still has elevated rates of local failure (LF) and is complicated by radiation necrosis (RN), and meningeal disease (MD). Pre-operative SRS may reduce the risk of RN and MD, while fractionated therapy may improve local control through delivering a higher biological effective dose. We hypothesize that pre-operative fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) will have less toxicity compared to patients who receive post-operative SRS or FSRT. Methods A multi-institutional analysis was conducted and included patients who had surgical resection and stereotactic radiation therapy to treat at least one brain metastasis. Pertinent demographic, clinical, radiation, surgical, and follow up data were collected for each patient. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint defined as patients with one of the following adverse events: 1) LF, 2) MD, and/or 3) Grade 2 or higher (symptomatic) RN. Results 279 patients were eligible for analysis. The median follow-up time was 9 months. 87 % of patients received fractionated treatment. 29 % of patients received pre-operative treatment. The composite endpoint incidences for post-operative SRS (n = 10), post-operative FSRT (n = 189), pre-operative SRS (n = 27), and pre-operative FSRT (n = 53) were 0 %, 17 %, 15 %, and 7.5 %, respectively. Conclusions In our study, the composite endpoint of 7.5% for pre-operative FSRT compares favorably to our post-operative FSRT rate of 17%. Pre-operative FSRT was observed to have low rates of LF, MD, and RN. Prospective validation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley K. Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Cindy Ho
- Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Rahul N. Prasad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Brett G. Klamer
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Joshua Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mark Damante
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Evan Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Dukagjin M. Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sasha Beyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Russell Lonser
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Douglas Hardesty
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Raju R. Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Roshan Prabhu
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
- Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - James B. Elder
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- Corresponding author at: 460 W. 10 Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Avila J, Leone JP. Advances in the Management of Central Nervous System Metastases from Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:12525. [PMID: 36293379 PMCID: PMC9604332 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are common in breast cancer (BC) patients and are particularly relevant as new treatments for BC are prolonging survival. Here, we review advances in the treatment of CNS metastases from BC, including radiotherapy, systemic therapies, and the evolving role of immunotherapy. The use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for CNS metastases. However, new targeted therapies have recently been developed, including anti-HER2 agents and antibody-drug conjugates that have presented promising results for the treatment of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Avila
- Department of Internal Medicine, St Elizabeth’s Medical Center, 736 Cambridge St., Boston, MA 02135, USA
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| | - José Pablo Leone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
The Present and Future of Clinical Management in Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11195891. [PMID: 36233758 PMCID: PMC9573678 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Regardless of the advances in our ability to detect early and treat breast cancer, it is still one of the common types of malignancy worldwide, with the majority of patients decease upon metastatic disease. Nevertheless, due to these advances, we have extensively characterized the drivers and molecular profiling of breast cancer and further dividing it into subtypes. These subgroups are based on immunohistological markers (Estrogen Receptor-ER; Progesterone Receptor-PR and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-HER-2) and transcriptomic signatures with distinct therapeutic approaches and regiments. These therapeutic approaches include targeted therapy (HER-2+), endocrine therapy (HR+) or chemotherapy (TNBC) with optional combination radiotherapy, depending on clinical stage. Technological and scientific advances in the identification of molecular pathways that contribute to therapy-resistance and establishment of metastatic disease, have provided the rationale for revolutionary targeted approaches against Cyclin-Dependent Kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6), PI3 Kinase (PI3K), Poly ADP Ribose Polymerase (PARP) and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1), among others. In this review, we focus on the comprehensive overview of epidemiology and current standard of care treatment of metastatic breast cancer, along with ongoing clinical trials. Towards this goal, we utilized available literature from PubMed and ongoing clinical trial information from clinicaltrials.gov to reflect the up to date and future treatment options for metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
|
35
|
Matsui JK, Perlow HK, Raj RK, Nalin AP, Lehrer EJ, Kotecha R, Trifiletti DM, McClelland S, Kendra K, Williams N, Owen DH, Presley CJ, Thomas EM, Beyer SJ, Blakaj DM, Ahluwalia MS, Raval RR, Palmer JD. Treatment of Brain Metastases: The Synergy of Radiotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Biomedicines 2022; 10:2211. [PMID: 36140312 PMCID: PMC9496359 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are a devastating sequela of common primary cancers (e.g., lung, breast, and skin) and have limited effective therapeutic options. Previously, systemic chemotherapy failed to demonstrate significant benefit in patients with brain metastases, but in recent decades, targeted therapies and more recently immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have yielded promising results in preclinical and clinical studies. Furthermore, there is significant interest in harnessing the immunomodulatory effects of radiotherapy (RT) to synergize with ICIs. Herein, we discuss studies evaluating the impact of RT dose and fractionation on the immune response, early studies supporting the synergistic interaction between RT and ICIs, and ongoing clinical trials assessing the benefit of combination therapy in patients with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Haley K. Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Rohit K. Raj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Ansel P. Nalin
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Eric J. Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
| | | | - Shearwood McClelland
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Kari Kendra
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Nicole Williams
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Dwight H. Owen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Carolyn J. Presley
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Evan M. Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Sasha J. Beyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Dukagjin M. Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Manmeet S. Ahluwalia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
| | - Raju R. Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hasanov E, Yeboa DN, Tucker MD, Swanson TA, Beckham TH, Rini B, Ene CI, Hasanov M, Derks S, Smits M, Dudani S, Heng DYC, Brastianos PK, Bex A, Hanalioglu S, Weinberg JS, Hirsch L, Carlo MI, Aizer A, Brown PD, Bilen MA, Chang EL, Jaboin J, Brugarolas J, Choueiri TK, Atkins MB, McGregor BA, Halasz LM, Patel TR, Soltys SG, McDermott DF, Elder JB, Baskaya MK, Yu JB, Timmerman R, Kim MM, Mut M, Markert J, Beal K, Tannir NM, Samandouras G, Lang FF, Giles R, Jonasch E. An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:454-489. [PMID: 35708940 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454-489.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elshad Hasanov
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Debra Nana Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mathew D Tucker
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Todd A Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas Hendrix Beckham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian Rini
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Chibawanye I Ene
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Merve Hasanov
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sophie Derks
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Shaan Dudani
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Axel Bex
- The Royal Free London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- University College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sahin Hanalioglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Laure Hirsch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin University Hospital, Public Assistance Hospital of Paris, Paris, France
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maria I Carlo
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ayal Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul David Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mehmet Asim Bilen
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Eric Lin Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, California, Los Angeles
| | - Jerry Jaboin
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - James Brugarolas
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Toral R Patel
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - David F McDermott
- Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James Bradley Elder
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mustafa K Baskaya
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - James B Yu
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Michelle Miran Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Melike Mut
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - James Markert
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nizar M Tannir
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - George Samandouras
- Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
- University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frederick F Lang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rachel Giles
- International Kidney Cancer Coalition, Duivendrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Eric Jonasch
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Health related quality of life trajectories after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a systematic review. J Neurooncol 2022; 159:319-331. [PMID: 35788469 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04067-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Health related quality of life (HRQoL) is often used as an outcome measure of cancer treatment. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a mainstay treatment of brain metastases (BMs) with constantly improving treatment envelope. The goal of this systematic review was to evaluated HRQoL trajectories after SRS, identify important predictors of HRQoL after SRS, and to evaluate clinical importance of post-SRS HRQoL trajectories of BM patients treated with SRS. METHODS A systematic literature review according to the PRISMA guidelines analyzing HRQoL trajectories after SRS for BM published in the Pubmed/MEDLINE database before January, 2022. RESULTS We identified 18 studies that evaluated HRQoL before and at least once after SRS for BMs. The majority of studies were single-institution retrospective series and included patients with different cancer types. Different instruments were used to assess HRQoL. In the majority of studies (n = 10) at group level, there was no significant change in global HRQoL after SRS. Stability, improvement, and deterioration of HRQoL global and subscale scores at individual patient level were common. Post-SRS HRQoL deterioration was predicted by worse functional status, greater number of BMs, delayed SRS, symptomatic BMs, and presence of seizures and cognitive impairment. Shorter post-SRS survival and adverse radiation effects (AREs) were associated with worse HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS SRS for BMs is often associated with sustained preservation of HRQoL. Individual variation of HRQoL domains after SRS is common. Shorter survival and AREs are associated with worse HRQoL. Worse functional status and greater disease burden predict unfavorable HRQoL trajectories after SRS for BMs.
Collapse
|
38
|
Gondi V, Bauman G, Bradfield L, Burri SH, Cabrera AR, Cunningham DA, Eaton BR, Hattangadi-Gluth JA, Kim MM, Kotecha R, Kraemer L, Li J, Nagpal S, Rusthoven CG, Suh JH, Tomé WA, Wang TJC, Zimmer AS, Ziu M, Brown PD. Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:265-282. [PMID: 35534352 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This guideline provides updated evidence-based recommendations addressing recent developments in the management of patients with brain metastases, including advanced radiation therapy techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy and the emergence of systemic therapies with central nervous system activity. METHODS The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on the radiotherapeutic management of intact and resected brain metastases from nonhematologic solid tumors. The guideline is based on a systematic review provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Recommendations were created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS Strong recommendations are made for SRS for patients with limited brain metastases and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. Multidisciplinary discussion with neurosurgery is conditionally recommended to consider surgical resection for all tumors causing mass effect and/or that are greater than 4 cm. For patients with symptomatic brain metastases, upfront local therapy is strongly recommended. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases eligible for central nervous system-active systemic therapy, multidisciplinary and patient-centered decision-making to determine whether local therapy may be safely deferred is conditionally recommended. For patients with resected brain metastases, SRS is strongly recommended to improve local control. For patients with favorable prognosis and brain metastases receiving whole brain radiation therapy, hippocampal avoidance and memantine are strongly recommended. For patients with poor prognosis, early introduction of palliative care for symptom management and caregiver support are strongly recommended. CONCLUSIONS The task force has proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of radiation therapy for brain metastases with strong emphasis on multidisciplinary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinai Gondi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center and Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois.
| | - Glenn Bauman
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre & Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Stuart H Burri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Alvin R Cabrera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaiser Permanente, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Bree R Eaton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | | | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Seema Nagpal
- Division of Neuro-oncology, Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Wolfgang A Tomé
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Tony J C Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Alexandra S Zimmer
- Women's Malignancies Branch, National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mateo Ziu
- Department of Neurosciences, INOVA Neuroscience and INOVA Schar Cancer Institute, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Espenel S, Chargari C, Blanchard P, Bockel S, Morel D, Rivera S, Levy A, Deutsch E. Practice changing data and emerging concepts from recent radiation therapy randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 2022; 171:242-258. [PMID: 35779346 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oncology treatments are constantly and rapidly evolving. We aimed at highlighting the latest radiation therapy practice changing trials and emerging concepts, through an overview of recent randomised clinical trials (RCTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Requests were performed in the Medline database to identify all publications reporting radiation therapy RCTs from 2018 to 2021. RESULTS Recent RCTs sustained the role of newer combinatorial strategies through radioimmunotherapy for early stage or metastatic lung cancer, newer pro-apoptotic agents (e.g. debio 1143 in locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma) or nanoparticles (e.g. NBTXR3 in locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma). High-tech radiotherapy allows intensifying treatments and gaining ground in some indications through the development of stereotactic body radiotherapy for example. First randomised evidence on personalised radiation therapy through imaging-based (18FDG positron emission tomography-computed tomography for lung cancer or early stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma, PMSA positron emission tomography-computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for high-risk prostate cancer) or biological biomarkers (PSA for prostate cancer, HPV for head and neck cancer, etc) were conducted to more tailored treatments, with more favourable outcomes. Patients' quality of life and satisfaction appeared to be increasing aims. RCTs have validated (ultra)hypofractionated schemes in many indications as for breast, prostate or rectal cancer, resulting in equivalent outcomes and toxicities, more convenient for patients and favouring shared decision making. CONCLUSION Radiation therapy is a dynamic field of research, and many RCTs have greatly impacted therapeutic standards over the last years. Investments in radiotherapy research should facilitate the transfer of innovation to clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Espenel
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France; Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, F-91220, Brétigny sur Orge, France.
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, F-94270, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Oncostat, Inserm U-1018, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Sophie Bockel
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Daphne Morel
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Sofia Rivera
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm U-1030, Laboratoire de Radiothérapie Moléculaire et d'Innovation Thérapeutique, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Antonin Levy
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, F-94270, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm U-1030, Laboratoire de Radiothérapie Moléculaire et d'Innovation Thérapeutique, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, F-94270, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm U-1030, Laboratoire de Radiothérapie Moléculaire et d'Innovation Thérapeutique, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Fractionated pre-operative stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases: a multi-institutional analysis. J Neurooncol 2022; 159:389-395. [PMID: 35751740 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04073-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current standard of care for patients with a large brain metastasis and limited intracranial disease burden is surgical resection and post-operative single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, post-operative SRS can still lead to substantial rates of local failure (LF), radiation necrosis (RN), and meningeal disease (MD). Pre-operative SRS may reduce the risk of RN and MD, while fractionated treatments may improve local control by allowing delivery of higher biological effective dose. We hypothesize that pre-operative fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) can minimize rates of LF, RN, and MD. METHODS A retrospective, multi-institutional analysis was conducted and included patients who had pre-operative FSRT for a large or symptomatic brain metastasis. Pertinent demographic, clinical, radiation, surgical, and follow up data were collected for each patient. A primary measurement was the rate of a composite endpoint of (1) LF, (2) MD, and/or (3) Grade 2 or higher (symptomatic) RN. RESULTS 53 patients with 55 lesions were eligible for analysis. FSRT was prescribed to a dose of 24-25 Gy in 3-5 fractions. There were 0 LFs, 3 Grade 2-3 RN events, and 1 MD occurrence, which corresponded to an 8% per-patient composite endpoint event rate. CONCLUSIONS In this study, the composite endpoint of 8% for pre-operative FSRT was improved compared to previously reported rates with post-operative SRS of 49-60% (N107C, Mahajan etal. JCOG0504) and pre-operative SRS endpoints of 20.6% (PROPS-BM). Pre-operative FSRT appears to be safe, effective, and may decrease the incidence of adverse outcomes. Prospective validation is needed.
Collapse
|
41
|
Grabowski MM, Srinivasan ES, Vaios EJ, Sankey EW, Otvos B, Krivosheya D, Scott A, Olufawo M, Ma J, Fomchenko EI, Herndon JE, Kim AH, Chiang VL, Chen CC, Leuthardt EC, Barnett GH, Kirkpatrick JP, Mohammadi AM, Fecci PE. Combination Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy Plus Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) Increases Time to Progression for Biopsy-Proven Recurrent Brain Metastases. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac086. [PMID: 35795470 PMCID: PMC9248774 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Improved survival for patients with brain metastases has been accompanied by a rise in tumor recurrence after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has emerged as an effective treatment for SRT failures as an alternative to open resection or repeat SRT. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LITT followed by SRT (LITT+SRT) in recurrent brain metastases. Methods A multicenter, retrospective study was performed of patients who underwent treatment for biopsy-proven brain metastasis recurrence after SRT at an academic medical center. Patients were stratified by “planned LITT+SRT” versus “LITT alone” versus “repeat SRT alone.” Index lesion progression was determined by modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria. Results Fifty-five patients met inclusion criteria, with a median follow-up of 7.3 months (range: 1.0–30.5), age of 60 years (range: 37–86), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of 80 (range: 60–100), and pre-LITT/biopsy contrast-enhancing volume of 5.7 cc (range: 0.7–19.4). Thirty-eight percent of patients underwent LITT+SRT, 45% LITT alone, and 16% SRT alone. Median time to index lesion progression (29.8, 7.5, and 3.7 months [P = .022]) was significantly improved with LITT+SRT. When controlling for age in a multivariate analysis, patients treated with LITT+SRT remained significantly less likely to have index lesion progression (P = .004). Conclusions These data suggest that LITT+SRT is superior to LITT or repeat SRT alone for treatment of biopsy-proven brain metastasis recurrence after SRT failure. Prospective trials are warranted to validate the efficacy of using combination LITT+SRT for treatment of recurrent brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M Grabowski
- Corresponding Author: Matthew M. Grabowski, MD, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave. S4, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA ()
| | - Ethan S Srinivasan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eugene J Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eric W Sankey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Balint Otvos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Daria Krivosheya
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Alex Scott
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Michael Olufawo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elena I Fomchenko
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - James E Herndon
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Albert H Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Veronica L Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric C Leuthardt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - John P Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Treatment of brain metastases from gastrointestinal primaries: Comparing whole-brain radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in terms of survival. North Clin Istanb 2022; 9:47-56. [PMID: 35340309 PMCID: PMC8889206 DOI: 10.14744/nci.2021.65725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study was to analyze the clinical features and prognostic factors for survival in patients with brain metastasis (BM) from gastrointestinal primaries treated with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Methods: We retrospectively investigated patients with BMs resulting from gastrointestinal primaries who underwent WBRT or SRS. The effects of treatment modalities on overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: WBRT and SRS were applied to 24 and 17 patients, respectively. In the WBRT group, radiotherapy was delivered at 20–30 Gy in 5–10 fractions (fx). In the SRS group, a median dose of 22 Gy (range: 18–27 Gy) was applied in 1–3 fx. At BM diagnosis, all patients had synchronous extracranial metastases which were mostly detected in the lung and liver. Median OS values were 9 months and 4 months in the SRS and WBRT groups, respectively (p=0.005). Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score (≥70 vs. <70), diagnosis-specific graded prognostic index, gastrointestinal (GI) graded prognostic index, cumulative intracranial tumor volume (CITV), controlled systemic disease, and treatment modality (WBRT vs. SBRT) were found to be related with OS. Conclusion: In patients with GI cancer-related BMs, SRS should be preferred in those with longer OS expectancy who have controlled extracranial disease, good KPS and CITV values of <10 cm3.
Collapse
|
43
|
Bolem N, Soon YY, Ravi S, Dinesh N, Teo K, Nga VDW, Lwin S, Yeo TT, Vellayappan B. Is there any survival benefit from post-operative radiation in brain metastases? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Neurosci 2022; 99:327-335. [PMID: 35339853 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of adding upfront post-operative radiation, either whole-brain (WBRT) or cavity, after resection of brain metastases have been debated, particularly due to the long-term sequalae post radiation. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety between post-operative radiation versus resection alone. METHODS We searched various biomedical databases from 1983 to 2018, for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCT). Outcomes studied were local recurrence (LR), overall survival (OS) and serious (Grade 3 + ) adverse events. We used the random effects model to pool outcomes. Methodological quality of each study was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We employed the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. RESULTS We included 5 RCTs comprising of 673 patients. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for LR is 0.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.37, P < 0.001, GRADE certainty high), strongly supporting the use of post-operative radiation. Meta-regression analysis done comparing cavity and WBRT, did not show any difference in LR. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) is 1.1 (95% CI 0.90-1.34, P = 0.37, GRADE certainty high). The treatment-related toxicities could not be pooled; the 2 studies which reported this did not find differences between the approaches. The risk of bias across the included studies was low. CONCLUSION Our analysis confirms that upfront post-operative radiation significantly reduces the risk of LR. However, the lack of improvement in OS suggests that local control alone may not impact survival. Balancing local control, and neuro-cognitive effects of WBRT, cavity radiation seems to be a safe and effective option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nagarjun Bolem
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Yu Yang Soon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Sreyes Ravi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Nivedh Dinesh
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Kejia Teo
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Vincent Diong Weng Nga
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Sein Lwin
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Tseng Tsai Yeo
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Balamurugan Vellayappan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Deguchi S, Mitsuya K, Yasui K, Kimura K, Onoe T, Ogawa H, Asakura H, Harada H, Hayashi N. Neoadjuvant fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy followed by piecemeal resection of brain metastasis: a case series of 20 patients. Int J Clin Oncol 2022; 27:481-487. [PMID: 34796412 PMCID: PMC8882569 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-02083-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety and effectiveness of neoadjuvant fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) before piecemeal resection of brain metastasis (BM) remains unknown. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 20 consecutive patients with BM who underwent neoadjuvant FSRT followed by piecemeal resection between July 2019 and March 2021. The prescribed dose regimens were as follows: 30 Gy (n = 11) or 35 Gy (n = 9) in five fractions. RESULTS The mean follow-up duration was 7.8 months (range 2.2-22.3). The median age was 67 years (range 51-79). Fourteen patients were male. All patients were symptomatic. All tumors were located in the supratentorial compartment. The median maximum diameter and volume were 3.7 cm (range 2.6-4.9) and 17.6 cm3 (range 5.6-49.7), respectively. The median time from the end of FSRT to resection was 4 days (range 1-7). Nausea (CTCAE Grade 2) occurred in one patient and simple partial seizures (Grade 2) in two patients during radiation therapy. Gross total removal was performed in seventeen patients and sub-total removal in three patients. Postoperative complications were deterioration of paresis in two patients. Local recurrence was found in one patient (5.0%) who underwent sub-total resection at 2 months after craniotomy. Distant recurrence was found in six patients (30.0%) at a median of 6.9 months. Leptomeningeal disease recurrence was found in one patient (5.0%) at 3 months. No radiation necrosis developed. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant FSRT appears to be a safe and effective approach for patients with BM requiring piecemeal resection. A multi-institutional prospective trial is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoichi Deguchi
- Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-nagakubo, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Koichi Mitsuya
- Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-nagakubo, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
| | - Kazuaki Yasui
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Keisuke Kimura
- Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-nagakubo, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Onoe
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Ogawa
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Asakura
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Harada
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Nakamasa Hayashi
- Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-nagakubo, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Narita Y, Sato S, Kayama T. Review of the diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:3-7. [PMID: 34865060 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyab182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BM) occur in at least 10% of cancer patients, and are one of the main causes of cancer-related deaths and significant deterioration in the quality of life of cancer patients due to the neurological deterioration caused by brain compression and tumor invasion. Whole-brain irradiation has been emphasized as the standard treatment for BM. However, recent clinical trials including the JLGK0901 and JCOG0504 trials conducted in Japan have established therapeutic evidence for the use of stereotactic radiosurgery with regular follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging for BM. In addition to surgery and stereotactic radiotherapy, advances in drug therapy for BM, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, are expected. This review describes the history and the recent evidence of the diagnosis and treatment of BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshitaka Narita
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
| | | | - Takamasa Kayama
- National Cancer Center, Tokyo.,Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ramos A, Giantini-Larsen A, Pannullo SC, Brandmaier A, Knisely J, Magge R, Wilcox JA, Pavlick AC, Ma B, Pisapia D, Ashamalla H, Ramakrishna R. A multidisciplinary management algorithm for brain metastases. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac176. [PMID: 36532509 PMCID: PMC9749403 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of brain metastases continues to present a management issue despite the advent of improved systemic control and overall survival. While the management of oligometastatic disease (ie, 1-4 brain metastases) with surgery and radiation has become fairly straightforward in the era of radiosurgery, the management of patients with multiple metastatic brain lesions can be challenging. Here we review the available evidence and provide a multidisciplinary management algorithm for brain metastases that incorporates the latest advances in surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy while taking into account the latest in precision medicine-guided therapies. In particular, we argue that whole-brain radiation therapy can likely be omitted in most patients as up-front therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Ramos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexandra Giantini-Larsen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Susan C Pannullo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Brandmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jonathan Knisely
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rajiv Magge
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica A Wilcox
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anna C Pavlick
- Department of Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian, New York, New York, USA
| | - Barbara Ma
- Department of Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian, New York, New York, USA
| | - David Pisapia
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hani Ashamalla
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rohan Ramakrishna
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Vogelbaum MA, Brown PD, Messersmith H, Brastianos PK, Burri S, Cahill D, Dunn IF, Gaspar LE, Gatson NTN, Gondi V, Jordan JT, Lassman AB, Maues J, Mohile N, Redjal N, Stevens G, Sulman E, van den Bent M, Wallace HJ, Weinberg JS, Zadeh G, Schiff D. Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 40:492-516. [PMID: 34932393 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 281] [Impact Index Per Article: 93.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. RECOMMENDATIONS Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Stuart Burri
- Levine Cancer Institute at Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | - Dan Cahill
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Ian F Dunn
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Laurie E Gaspar
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO
| | - Na Tosha N Gatson
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ.,Geisinger Neuroscience Institute. Danville, PA
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Proton Center, Warrenville, IL
| | | | | | - Julia Maues
- Georgetown Breast Cancer Advocates, Washington, DC
| | - Nimish Mohile
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Navid Redjal
- Capital Health Medical Center - Hopewell Campus, Princeton, NJ
| | | | | | - Martin van den Bent
- Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - David Schiff
- University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Matsuzaki T, Ikemura S, Shinozaki T, Iwami E, Nakajima T, Katayama M, Shimamoto Y, Sasaki A, Serizawa T, Terashima T. Non-small cell lung cancer with multiple brain metastases remains relapse-free for more than 13 years: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol 2021; 16:18. [PMID: 34881038 PMCID: PMC8637853 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastasis (BM) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is usually associated with a poor prognosis. A 55-year-old Japanese man visited Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital with complaints of motor aphasia and fatigue. Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed multiple tumors. The patient's medical history included lung cancer surgery performed at another hospital 3 months prior to his visit to our hospital. Total resection of the left frontal tumor revealed BM from lung adenocarcinoma. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was performed for the remaining three BMs. At 9 months after SRS, another new BM was discovered, and SRS was again performed. More than 13 years have elapsed since the last SRS was performed, and the patient has remained relapse-free. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report describing a patient with NSCLC with multiple BMs who has remained relapse-free for >13 years with no neurological dysfunction, including cognitive deficit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsu Matsuzaki
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-8513, Japan
| | - Shinnosuke Ikemura
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-8513, Japan
| | - Taro Shinozaki
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-8513, Japan
| | - Eri Iwami
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-8513, Japan
| | - Takahiro Nakajima
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-8513, Japan
| | - Masateru Katayama
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-8513, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Shimamoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-8513, Japan
| | - Aya Sasaki
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-8513, Japan
| | - Toru Serizawa
- Tokyo Gamma Unit Center, Tsukiji Neurological Clinic, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Takeshi Terashima
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-8513, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wilcox JA, Brown S, Reiner AS, Young RJ, Chen J, Bale TA, Rosenblum MK, Newman WC, Brennan CW, Tabar V, Beal K, Panageas KS, Moss NS. Salvage resection of recurrent previously irradiated brain metastases: tumor control and radiation necrosis dependency on adjuvant re-irradiation. J Neurooncol 2021; 155:277-286. [PMID: 34655373 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03872-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The efficacy of salvage resection (SR) of recurrent brain metastases (rBrM) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is undefined. We sought to describe local recurrence (LR) and radiation necrosis (RN) rates in patients undergoing SR, with or without adjuvant post-salvage radiation therapy (PSRT). METHODS A retrospective cohort study evaluated patients undergoing SR of post-SRS rBrM between 3/2003-2/2020 at an NCI-designated cancer center. Cases with histologically-viable malignancy were stratified by receipt of adjuvant PSRT within 60 days of SR. Clinical outcomes were described using cumulative incidences in the clustered competing-risks setting, competing risks regression, and Kaplan-Meier methodology. RESULTS One-hundred fifty-five rBrM in 135 patients were evaluated. The overall rate of LR was 40.2% (95% CI 34.3-47.2%) at 12 months. Thirty-nine (25.2%) rBrM treated with SR + PSRT trended towards lower 12-month LR versus SR alone [28.8% (95% CI 17.0-48.8%) versus 43.9% (95% CI 36.2-53.4%), p = .07 by multivariate analysis]. SR as re-operation (p = .03) and subtotal resection (p = .01) were independently associated with higher rates of LR. On univariate analysis, tumor size (p = .48), primary malignancy (p = .35), and PSRT technique (p = .43) bore no influence on LR. SR + PSRT was associated with an increased risk of radiographic RN at 12 months versus SR alone [13.4% (95% CI 5.5-32.7%) versus 3.5% (95% CI 1.5-8.0%), p = .02], though the percentage with symptomatic RN remained low (5.1% versus 0.9%, respectively). Median overall survival from SR was 13.4 months (95% CI 10.5-17.7). CONCLUSION In this largest-known series evaluating SR outcomes in histopathologically-confirmed rBrM, we identify a significant LR risk that may be reduced with adjuvant PSRT and with minimal symptomatic RN. Prospective analysis is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Wilcox
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samantha Brown
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anne S Reiner
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Young
- Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin Chen
- Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tejus A Bale
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc K Rosenblum
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - William C Newman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Cameron W Brennan
- Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Viviane Tabar
- Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine S Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nelson S Moss
- Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Takaoka T, Tomita N, Mizuno T, Hashimoto S, Tsuchiya T, Tomida M, Yanagi T. Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2021; 20:15330338211060170. [PMID: 34806489 PMCID: PMC8606719 DOI: 10.1177/15330338211060170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Cognitive decline and alopecia after radiotherapy are challenging problems. We aimed to compare whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plans reducing radiation dose to the hippocampus and scalp between helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods: We conducted a planning study of WBRT for 10 patients. The clinical target volume was defined as the whole brain excluding the hippocampus avoidance (HA) region. The prescribed dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions to cover 95% of the target. Constraint goals were defined for the target and organs at risk (OAR). Results: Both techniques met the dose constraints for the target and OAR. However, the coverage of the target (dose covering 95% [D95%] and 98% [D98%] of the volume) were better in IMPT than HT (HT vs IMPT: D95%, 29.9 Gy vs 30.0 Gy, P < .001; D98%, 26.7 Gy vs 28.1 Gy, P = .002). The homogeneity and conformity of the target were also better in IMPT than HT (HT vs IMPT: homogeneity index, 1.50 vs 1.28, P < .001; conformity index, 1.30 vs 1.14, P < .001). IMPT reduced the D100% of the hippocampus by 59% (HT vs IMPT: 9.3 Gy vs 3.8 Gy, P < .001) and reduced the Dmean of the hippocampus by 37% (HT vs IMPT: 11.1 Gy vs 7.0 Gy, P < .001) compared with HT. The scalp IMPT reduced the percentage of the volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20Gy) and V10Gy compared with HT (HT vs IMPT: V20Gy, 56.7% vs 6.6%, P < .001; V10Gy, 90.5% vs 37.1%, P < .001). Conclusion: Both techniques provided acceptable target dose coverage. Especially, IMPT achieved excellent hippocampus- and scalp-sparing. HA-WBRT using IMPT is a promising treatment to prevent cognitive decline and alopecia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taiki Takaoka
- Narita Memorial Proton Center, Toyohashi, Aichi, Japan
| | - Natsuo Tomita
- 38386Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tomoki Mizuno
- 38386Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shingo Hashimoto
- 38386Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsuchiya
- 38386Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|