Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Split-Dose Cisplatin Plus Pembrolizumab as Neoadjuvant Therapy Before Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Management of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer with clinical evidence of pelvic lymph node metastases

Identification of clinically positive pelvic lymph node metastases (cN+) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is currently challenging, as the diagnostic accuracy of available imaging modalities is limited. Conventional CT is still considered the gold-standard approach to diagnose lymph node metastases in these patients. The development of innovative diagnostic methods including radiomics, artificial intelligence-based models and molecular biomarkers might offer new perspectives for the diagnosis of cN+ disease. With regard to the treatment of these patients, multimodal strategies are likely to provide the best oncological outcomes, especially using induction chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in responders to chemotherapy. Additionally, the use of adjuvant nivolumab has been shown to decrease the risk of recurrence in patients who still harbour ypT2-T4a and/or ypN+ disease after surgery. Alternatively, the use of avelumab maintenance therapy can be offered to patients with unresectable cN+ tumours who have at least stable disease after induction chemotherapy alone. Lastly, patients with cN+ tumours who are not responding to induction chemotherapy are potential candidates for receiving second-line treatment with pembrolizumab.

Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Versus Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy or Upfront Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Muscle-invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent progresses in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) have challenged the therapeutic standards in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC).

OBJECTIVE

To compare neoadjuvant pembrolizumab followed by radical cystectomy (RC) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and RC or upfront RC, according to cisplatin eligibility.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted two separate analyses for cisplatin-eligible and cisplatin-ineligible cT2-4N0M0 MIBC patients. We used a propensity score adjustment that relied on inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW).

INTERVENTION

Pembrolizumab within the PURE-01 trial, and NAC and RC or upfront RC from a high-volume tertiary care referral center.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint in both analyses was event-free survival (EFS), defined as freedom from recurrence, and/or death from any cause indexed from the date of treatment initiation or RC. The secondary endpoints included EFS in propensity score-matched patients, pathologic response rate, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after RC.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 458 patients who underwent RC, with or without NAC, at Moffitt Cancer Center between October 2005 and October 2020, and 146 patients enrolled in PURE-01 were analyzed. In cisplatin-ineligible patients, EFS was superior in those receiving pembrolizumab (p < 0.001). The estimated 3-yr EFS was 77.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.5-95.2) for pembrolizumab and RC, and 36.1% (95% CI: 28.6-45.5) for upfront RC. EFS remained superior in those receiving neoadjuvant ICI (NICI) following IPTW (p < 0.001). In cisplatin-eligible patients, EFS was superior in those receiving pembrolizumab and RC (p < 0.001). The estimated 3-yr EFS was 86.9% (95% CI: 80.9-93.3) for pembrolizumab and 63.5% (95% CI: 56.5-71.4) for NAC. EFS remained superior in those receiving NICI following IPTW (p < 0.001). Pathologic responses and RFS in pembrolizumab-treated patients were also superior to those in NAC-treated patients. Results are limited by the retrospective nature of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first ever reported comprehensive comparison of outcomes between neoadjuvant ICI and NAC, followed by RC, or upfront RC, we report increased responses and improved oncologic outcomes with neoadjuvant ICI in patients with MIBC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We compared the results obtained from the use of pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy with standard-of-care treatments in patients with bladder carcinoma infiltrating the muscle layer. We reported increased response and survival rates possibilities with the use of immunotherapy, anticipating the possibility to set new therapeutic standards in these patients, pending the results of ongoing randomized studies.

Effectiveness of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin as compared to gemcitabine-based regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for oncologic outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer cases-Single-center study in Japan

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) with gemcitabine-based regimens for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients treated in Japan.

METHODS

Data for MIBC patients who received NAC-dd-MVAC followed by a radical cystectomy from June 2019 to May 2023 performed at our hospital were analyzed. For comparisons, data for MIBC patients who received NAC gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) or gemcitabine and carboplatin (GCarbo) therapy between January 2010 and March 2019 were also obtained. Rates of ypT1N0 or less, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and NAC adverse effects were compared between the GC/GCarbo and dd-MVAC regimens.

RESULTS

Results for 32 patients who received dd-MVAC and 30 who received GC/GCarbo NAC therapy were analyzed. ypT1N0 or less was noted in 40.7% of the dd-MVAC and 40.0% of the GC/GCarbo groups, while ypT0N0 rates were 25% and 10%, respectively, with no statistical differences noted. However, Kaplan-Meier analysis of the total cohort demonstrated that dd-MVAC was associated with significantly better PFS and OS rates than GG/GCarbo (hazard ratios: 0.33, p = 0.0237, and 0.23, p = 0.0127, respectively). Propensity-matched models also showed similar results for both PFS and OS. Adverse effects of dd-MVAC were acceptable and the incidence of hematologic toxicity was lower as compared with GC/GCarbo therapy.

CONCLUSION

The present study is the first to show that dd-MVAC as NAC can provide better survival as compared with a gemcitabine-based regimen for patients with MIBC treated in Japan.

The role of immunotherapy in urological cancers

Immunotherapy is defined as a therapeutic approach that targets or manipulates the immune system. A deeper understanding of the cellular and molecular composition of the tumour environment, as well as the mechanisms controlling the immune system, has made possible the development and clinical investigation of many innovative cancer therapies. Historically, immunotherapy has played an essential role in treating urologic malignancies, while in the modern era, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been critical to urology. Urothelial carcinoma is a common type of cancer in the genitourinary system, and treatment strategies in this area are constantly evolving. Intravesical and systemic immunotherapeutic agents have begun to be used increasingly frequently in treating urothelial carcinoma. These agents increase the anti-tumour response by affecting the body's defence mechanisms. Immunotherapeutic agents used in urothelial carcinoma include various options such as BCG, interferon, anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab). Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been known for many years as a tumour with unique sensitivity to immunotherapies. The recent emergence of ICIs that block PD-1/PD-L1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab) or CTLA4 (ipilimumab) signalling pathways has reestablished systemic immunotherapy as central to the treatment of advanced RCC. In light of randomized clinical trials conducted with increasing interest in the application of immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting, combination therapies (nivolumab/ipilimumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib, pembrolizumab/ axitinib, pembrolizumab/lenvantinib) have become the standard first-line treatment of metastatic RCC. Prostate cancer is in the immunologically "cold" tumour category; on the contrary, in recent years, immunotherapeutic agents have come to the fore as an essential area in the treatment of this disease. Especially in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer, immunotherapeutic agents constitute an alternative treatment method besides androgen deprivation therapy and chemotherapy. Ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and Sipuleucel T (Vaccine-based) are promising alternative treatment options. Considering ongoing randomized clinical trials, immunotherapeutic agents promise to transform the uro-oncology field significantly. In this review, we aimed to summarize the role of immunotherapy in urothelial, renal and prostate cancer in the light of randomized clinical trials.

Immune features are associated with response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) alone, and ICI in combination with chemotherapy, have demonstrated promising pathologic response ( Collapse

Key Words

• predictive markers
• bladder cancer
• immunotherapy
• tumour immunology

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/immunology
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
• Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods
• Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives
• Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use
• Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage
• Gemcitabine
• Immunotherapy/methods
• Male
• Cisplatin/therapeutic use
• Cisplatin/administration & dosage
• Female
• Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
• Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use
• Aged
• Middle Aged
• Neoplasm Invasiveness
• Interleukin-9/metabolism
• B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism
• Biomarkers, Tumor/blood
• Treatment Outcome

Collapse

Grants

• F30 CA278317 NCI NIH HHS
• 1F30CA278317-01A1 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI)
• Merck & Co., Inc. | Merck Sharp and Dohme (Merck Sharp & Dohme)
• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Wolfgang Beckabir Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Mi Zhou Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Jin Seok Lee Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Steven P Vensko Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Mark G Woodcock Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Hsing-Hui Wang Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Sara E Wobker Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Gatphan Atassi Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Alec D Wilkinson Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Kenneth Fowler Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Leah M Flick Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Jeffrey S Damrauer Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Michael R Harrison Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
Karen P McKinnon Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Tracy L Rose Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Matthew I Milowsky Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Jonathan S Serody Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
William Y Kim Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Benjamin G Vincent Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Computational Medicine Program, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Collapse

Phase 2 Study of Preoperative Tislelizumab in Combination with Low-dose Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors and nab-paclitaxel have achieved significant therapeutic effects in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with low-dose nab-paclitaxel in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

METHODS

TRUCE-01 was a single-arm phase 2 study that included 62 patients with T2-4a N0/X M0 MIBC tumors with predominant urothelial carcinoma histology. Eligible patients received three 21-d cycles of intravenous 200 mg tislelizumab on day 1 plus intravenous 200 mg nab-paclitaxel on day 2, followed by surgical assessment. The primary study endpoint was a clinical complete response (cCR). Treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) profiles were recorded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The safety analysis included all 62 patients and the efficacy analysis included 48 patients. The primary efficacy endpoint (cCR) was met by 25 patients (52%) patients. Among the 62 patients in the safety analysis, six (9.7%) had grade ≥3 TRAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Tislelizumab combined with low-dose nab-paclitaxel showed promising antitumor effectiveness and was generally well tolerated, which makes it an excellent preoperative therapy option for MIBC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We found that a combination of the drugs tislelizumab and low-dose nab-paclitaxel had satisfactory efficacy and safety for preoperative treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

How Immunotherapy Has Redefined the Treatment Paradigm of Metastatic or Locally Advanced Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma

In the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal for metastatic bladder cancer has expanded considerably, with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin, and anti-fibroblast growth factor receptor agents. Clinical trials evaluating ICIs as neoadjuvants, adjuvants, or first- or second-line treatments have produced conflicting results. However, first-line therapeutic strategies have been redefined by the recent publication of results from two clinical trials: CheckMate-901, which demonstrated the superiority of combined treatment with nivolumab and chemotherapy in extending overall survival, and EV-302, which demonstrated that combined treatment with pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin reduced the risk of death by 53%. In this review, we discuss the role of ICIs, alone or in combination, in bladder cancer management in the metastatic and adjuvant settings in 2024, considering the latest published trials. The potential role of ICIs as neoadjuvants is also discussed.

Adverse Event Reporting in Cancer Clinical Trials: Incorporating Patient-Reported Methods. A Systematic Scoping Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The history of clinical trials is fraught with unethical practices. Since 1945, robust frameworks have evolved to standardise the collection and reporting of safety data, most notably, the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) from the National Cancer Institute; used by investigators to report side effects experienced by participants. As medicine moves into the patient-centred model, interest has been growing to collect data on adverse events directly from participants (patient-reported adverse events). The aim of this systematic scoping review was to investigate the inclusion of patient-reported adverse event data within safety/tolerability analyses and explore the collection and reporting of patient-reported adverse event data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A database search was undertaken and the Covidence platform was used to manage the review; results were analysed descriptively. Sixty-eight studies were included in the analysis. An increase in the number of studies that incorporate patient-reported adverse event data was seen by year. Seventy instruments were used for the collection of patient-reported adverse event data with recall period, mode, frequency and site of administration varying across studies; the duration of data collection ranged from 28 days to 6 years. Frequently, information on these details was omitted from publications. The number of instruments used by studies to collect patient-reported adverse event data ranged from one to seven instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite growing calls for the inclusion of patient-reported adverse events, this has not yet translated into published reports. The collection and reporting of these data were variable and conducted using instruments that were not designed for purpose. To address these inconsistencies, standardisation of data collection and reporting using a purpose-built validated instrument is required.

Downstaging guided neoadjuvant strategy shift and bladder preservation in locally advanced bladder cancer: A case report

Background

The study of bladder preservation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) mainly focuses on the T2 stage, which remains difficult in the T3 and T4 stage. Pembrolizumab has been applied as neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical cystectomy for MIBC, gaining encouraging results in the phase II study. Disitamab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), also achieved promising efficacy for refractory bladder cancer. However, the neoadjuvant therapy strategy of these drugs for bladder sparing remains further exploration.

Case presentation

A patient with locally advanced MIBC at our institute underwent a neoadjuvant therapeutic regimen followed by transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In light of limited initial efficacy, we enacted an adaptive shift in the neoadjuvant treatment strategy, transitioning from a combination of gemcitabine, cis-platinum, and pembrolizumab to disitamab vedotin with pembrolizumab. This approach ultimately achieved bladder preservation, complete response, and a remarkable 1-year disease-free survival (DFS).

Conclusion

Proactive evaluation in the early stages of tumor downstaging can serve as a guiding principle for neoadjuvant strategies. This is the first successful case of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with disitamab vedotin and chemotherapy in MIBC patients achieving complete response and bladder preservation.

Spatial Relationships in the Tumor Microenvironment Demonstrate Association with Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is standard for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Pathologic response (complete: ypT0N0 and partial:

OBJECTIVE

Using the NanoString GeoMx platform, we performed proteomic digital spatial profiling (DSP) on transurethral resections of bladder tumors from 18 responders (

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Pretreatment tumor samples were stained by hematoxylin and eosin and immunofluorescence (panCK and CD45) to select four regions of interest (ROIs): tumor enriched (TE), immune enriched (IE), tumor/immune interface (tumor interface = TX and immune interface = IX).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

DSP was performed with 52 protein markers from immune cell profiling, immunotherapy drug target, immune activation status, immune cell typing, and pan-tumor panels.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Protein marker expression patterns were analyzed to determine their association with pathologic response, incorporating or agnostic of their ROI designation (TE/IE/TX/IX). Overall, DSP-based marker expression showed high intratumoral heterogeneity; however, response was associated with markers including PD-L1 (ROI agnostic), Ki-67 (ROI agnostic, TE, IE, and TX), HLA-DR (TX), and HER2 (TE). An elastic net model of response with ROI-inclusive markers demonstrated better validation set performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.827) than an ROI-agnostic model (AUC = 0.432). A model including DSP, tumor mutational burden, and clinical data performed no better (AUC = 0.821) than the DSP-only model.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite high intratumoral heterogeneity of DSP-based marker expression, we observed associations between pathologic response and specific DSP-based markers in a spatially dependent context. Further exploration of tumor region-specific biomarkers may help predict response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in MIBC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we used the GeoMx platform to perform proteomic digital spatial profiling on transurethral resections of bladder tumors from 18 responders and 18 nonresponders from two studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin) plus immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (LCCC1520 [pembrolizumab] and BLASST-1 [nivolumab]). We found that assessing protein marker expression in the context of tumor architecture improved response prediction.

Collapse

Key Words

• BLASST-1
• Bladder cancer
• Digital spatial profiling
• Elastic net regression
• GeoMx
• LCCC1520
• Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Cisplatin
• Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods
• Gemcitabine
• Nivolumab/therapeutic use
• Proteomics
• Tumor Microenvironment
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
• Biomarkers, Tumor
• Muscles/pathology
• Immunotherapy
• Neoplasm Invasiveness
• Cystectomy

Collapse

Grants

• P30 CA016086 NCI NIH HHS
• R01 CA241810 NCI NIH HHS
• T32 CA244125 NCI NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Wolfgang Beckabir Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Sara E Wobker Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Jeffrey S Damrauer Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Bentley Midkiff Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Gabriela De la Cruz Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Vladmir Makarov Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
Leah Flick Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Mark G Woodcock Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Petros Grivas Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
Marc A Bjurlin Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Michael R Harrison Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
Benjamin G Vincent Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Computational Medicine Program, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Tracy L Rose Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Shilpa Gupta Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
William Y Kim Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Matthew I Milowsky Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Collapse

Patient-derived Immunocompetent Tumor Organoids: A Platform for Chemotherapy Evaluation in the Context of T-cell Recognition

Most of the anticancer compounds synthesized by chemists are primarily evaluated for their direct cytotoxic effects at the cellular level, often overlooking the critical role of the immune system. In this study, we developed a patient-derived, T-cell-retaining tumor organoid model that allows us to evaluate the anticancer efficacy of chemical drugs under the synergistic paradigm of antigen-specific T-cell-dependent killing, which may reveal the missed drug hits in the simple cytotoxic assay. We evaluated clinically approved platinum (Pt) drugs and a custom library of twenty-eight PtIV compounds. We observed low direct cytotoxicity of Pt drugs, but variable synergistic effects in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In contrast, the majority of PtIV compounds exhibited potent tumor-killing capabilities. Interestingly, several PtIV compounds went beyond direct tumor killing and showed significant immunosynergistic effects with ICIs, outstanding at sub-micromolar concentrations. Among these, Pt-19, PtIV compounds with cinnamate axial ligands, emerged as the most therapeutically potent, demonstrating pronounced immunosynergistic effects by promoting the release of cytotoxic cytokines, activating immune-related pathways and enhancing T cell receptor (TCR) clonal expansion. Overall, this initiative marks the first use of patient-derived immunocompetent tumor organoids to explore and study chemotherapy, advancing their path toward more effective small molecule drug discovery.

A bibliometric insight into neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder cancer: trends, collaborations, and future avenues

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) remains the cornerstone of treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). While platinum-based regimens have demonstrated benefits in tumor downstaging and improved long-term survival for selected patients, they may pose risks for those who are ineligible or unresponsive to chemotherapy.

Objective

We undertook a bibliometric analysis to elucidate the breadth of literature on NAC in bladder cancer, discern research trajectories, and underscore emerging avenues of investigation.

Methods

A systematic search of the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) was conducted to identify articles pertaining to NAC in bladder cancer from 1999 to 2022. Advanced bibliometric tools, such as VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and SCImago Graphica, facilitated the examination and depicted the publication trends, geographic contributions, institutional affiliations, journal prominence, author collaborations, and salient keywords, emphasizing the top 25 citation bursts.

Results

Our analysis included 1836 publications spanning 1999 to 2022, indicating a growing trend in both annual publications and citations related to NAC in bladder cancer. The United States emerged as the predominant contributor in terms of publications, citations, and international collaborations. The University of Texas was the leading institution in publication output. "Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations" was the primary publishing journal, while "European Urology" boasted the highest impact factor. Shariat, Shahrokh F., and Grossman, H.B., were identified as the most prolific and co-cited authors, respectively. Keyword analysis revealed both frequency of occurrence and citation bursts, highlighting areas of concentrated study. Notably, the integration of immunochemotherapy is projected to experience substantial growth in forthcoming research.

Conclusions

Our bibliometric assessment provides a panoramic view of the research milieu surrounding neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer, encapsulating the present state, evolving trends, and potential future directions, with a particular emphasis on the promise of immunochemotherapy.

Predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy in urothelial cancer

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NACC) followed by radical cystectomy is the standard treatment for localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Patients who achieve a complete pathological response following NACC have better overall survival than those with residual disease. However, a subset of patients does not derive benefit from NACC while experiencing chemotherapy-related side effects that may delay cystectomy, which can be detrimental. There is a need for predictive and prognostic biomarkers to better stratify patients who will derive benefits from NACC. This review summarizes the currently available literature on various predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Covered predictors include clinical factors, treatment regimens (including chemotherapy and immunotherapy), histological predictors, and molecular predictors such as DNA repair genes, p53, FGFR3, ERBB2, Bcl-2, EMMPRIN, survivin, choline-phosphate cytidylyltransferase-α, epigenetic markers, immunological markers, other molecular predictors and gene expression profiling. Further, we elaborate on the potential role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and the correlative biomarkers of response.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors [PD-(L)1 inhibitors] for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC).

Materials and methods

Four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and 21 CENTRAL) were searched for articles studying neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors for MIBC. The search time period was from the establishment of each database to 21 July 2023. Meta-analyses of pCR, pPR, Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate, RFS, and OS were performed.

Results

In total, 22 studies were included for meta-analysis. The overall pooled pCR of neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.36 (95%CI=0.30-0.42, p=0.00). In subgroup meta-analysis, the pooled PCR of PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.27 (95%CI=0.19-0.35, p=0.1), 0.41 (95%CI=0.21-0.62, p=0.01), 0.43 (95%CI=0.35-0.50, p=0.06), respectively. The overall pooled pPR of neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.53 (95%CI=0.46-0.60, p=0.00). In subgroup meta-analysis, the pooled pPR of PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.36 (95%CI=0.22-0.51, p=0.01), 0.51 (95%CI=0.39-0.62, p=0.43), and 0.61 (95%CI=0.53-0.69, p=0.01), respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and RFS were reconstructed, but there was no significant difference among three groups in terms of OS or RFS. The pooled result of Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate for neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.15 (95%CI=0.09-0.22, p=0.00%). In subgroup analysis, the pooled result of Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate for PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.07 (95%CI=0.04-0.11, p=0.84), 0.31 (95%CI=0.16-0.47, p=0.06), and 0.17 (95%CI=0.06-0.31, I2 = 71.27%, p=0.01), respectively.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors were feasible and safe for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Compared with PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy were associated with higher pCR and pPR, but higher Grade≥3 irAEs. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and RFS indicated that neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors had an acceptable long-term prognostic, but it was not possible to discern statistical differences between the three neoadjuvant subgroups.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023452437, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42023452437).

All-cause and immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury in immune checkpoint inhibitor users: a meta-analysis of occurrence rate, risk factors and mortality

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the occurrence rate of ICI-related AKI has not been systematically examined. Additionally, exposure to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were considered as risk factors for AKI, but with inconclusive results in ICI-related AKI. Our aim was to analyse the occurrence rate of all-cause AKI and ICI-related AKI and the occurrence rates of severe AKI and dialysis-requiring AKI, and to determine whether exposure to PPIs and NSAIDs poses a risk for all-cause and ICI-related AKI.

Methods

This study population was adult ICI recipients. A systematic review was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed through October 2023. We included prospective trials and observational studies that reported any of the following outcomes: the occurrence rate of all-cause or ICI-related AKI, the relationship between PPI or NSAID exposure and AKI development or the mortality rate in the AKI or non-AKI group. Proportional meta-analysis and pairwise meta-analysis were performed. The evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.

Results

A total of 120 studies comprising 46 417 patients were included. The occurrence rates of all-cause AKI were 7.4% (14.6% from retrospective studies and 1.2% from prospective clinical trials). The occurrence rate of ICI-related AKI was 3.2%. The use of PPIs was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-2.18] for all-cause AKI and an OR of 2.42 (95% CI 1.96-2.97) for ICI-related AKI. The use of NSAIDs was associated with an OR of 1.77 (95% CI 1.10-2.83) for all-cause AKI and an OR of 2.57 (95% CI 1.68-3.93) for ICI-related AKI.

Conclusions

Our analysis revealed that approximately 1 in 13 adult ICI recipients may experience all-cause AKI, while 1 in 33 adult ICI recipients may experience ICI-related AKI. Exposure to PPIs and NSAIDs was associated with an increased OR risk for AKI in the current meta-analysis.

Tislelizumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin as a neoadjuvant regimen for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: case series

Introduction and importance

The feasibility of combined tislelizumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin as a neoadjuvant regimen for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) remains to be investigated.

Case presentation

The neoadjuvant treatment not only shrunk tumours significantly but also lowered their stages from T4bN1M0, T3N0M0, and T3bN0M0 to pT1, pT0 and pTis, respectively. The treatment suppressed tumour cell proliferation and promoted luminal-to-basal transition.

Clinical discussion

MIBC is an aggressive bladder cancer with poor prognosis. All three patients with MIBC benefited greatly from the neoadjuvant regimen (tislelizumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin). It appears that the effect of the treatment is independent of the levels of programmed death-ligand 1 nor the subtype of urothelial bladder cancer.

Conclusion

Combination of tislelizumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin appeared to be a safe and efficacious neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC.

Immuno-Oncology Advances in Genitourinary Cancers

Immuno-oncology (IO) has made monumental gains in the past decade in the genitourinary space. In this review, we highlight advances with IO in renal cell carcinoma where it now has become standard-of-care frontline therapy in the metastatic setting but also discuss challenges with the initial approach. In urothelial carcinoma, we discuss the growing use of IO including exciting recent updates with IO-based regimens that may soon become the new standard of care. We further discuss difficulties with IO in prostate cancer, germ cell tumors, and penile squamous cell carcinoma. Finally, we highlight advances in IO approaches beyond checkpoint inhibition including the role of the gut microbiome and T-cell redirecting therapies.

PrECOG PrE0807: A Phase 1b Feasibility Trial of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Without and with Lirilumab in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Ineligible for or Refusing Cisplatin-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy (RC) improves overall survival (OS) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, many patients are cisplatin ineligible; therefore, new treatment options are needed. Nivolumab without/with lirilumab prior to RC was investigated in cisplatin-ineligible patients in this phase 1b trial (NCT03532451) to determine its safety/feasibility.

METHODS

Patients with localized MIBC received two doses of nivolumab (480 mg) alone (cohort 1) or with lirilumab (240 mg; cohort 2) prior to RC. Cohorts were enrolled sequentially. The key eligibility criteria were cT2-4aN0-1M0 stage and cisplatin ineligibility/refusal. The primary endpoint was the rate of grade (G) ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The key secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients who underwent RC >6 wk after the last dose, CD8+ T-cell density change between pretreatment transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and post-treatment RC, ypT0N0,

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Among 43 patients enrolled (n = 13, cohort 1; n = 30, cohort 2), 13 and 29 completed intended neoadjuvant therapy, respectively, in cohorts 1 and 2, and 41 underwent RC. The median time from the last dose to RC was 4 wk. The G3 TRAEs occurred in 0% (90% confidence interval [CI] 0-21%) of patients in cohort 1 and 7% (90% CI 1-20%) in cohort 2; all these TRAEs resolved and no G4/5 TRAEs occurred. No patient had delayed RC for >6 wk. In cohorts 1 and 2, ypT0N0 rates for patients with MIBC and RC were 17% and 21%,

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Neoadjuvant nivolumab-based immunotherapy was safe, feasible, and well tolerated in cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC. Although ypT0N0 rates were lower than expected, 2-yr survival rates seem to be comparable with those of other neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials. Nivolumab is being evaluated in the CA-017-078 trial (NCT03661320).

PATIENT SUMMARY

For patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer unable to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, treatment with nivolumab without and with lirilumab prior to radical cystectomy was safe, feasible, and well tolerated. Nivolumab-based immunotherapy showed lower pathologic response rates than but similar survival rates to other neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials.

Collapse

Key Words

• Anti-KIR antibody
• Bladder cancer
• Immune checkpoint inhibitors
• Neoadjuvant therapy
• Urothelial carcinoma

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Petros Grivas Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Vadim S Koshkin Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
Xiangying Chu Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
Suzanne Cole University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Rohit K Jain H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
Robert Dreicer University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Jeremy P Cetnar Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
Debasish Sundi Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
Benjamin A Gartrell Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
Matthew D Galsky Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Brianna Woo Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Elsa Li-Ning-Tapia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Noah M Hahn Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Michael A Carducci Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

Collapse

Phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with four cycles of dose-dense MVAC followed by radical cystectomy in Korean patients with muscle-invasive or locally advanced urothelial carcinoma of bladder

PURPOSE

While previous retrospective or phase II studies in Western populations showed that dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (ddMVAC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was beneficial, no studies have been reported in Asian populations. This prospective phase II study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of ddMVAC in Korean patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) or locally advanced urothelial cancer (UC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with MIBC (cT2-4aN0M0) or locally advanced UC (cTanyN1-3M0) eligible for radical cystectomy (RC) were enrolled prospectively. The participants were treated with four cycles of ddMVAC with pegfilgrastim every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was pathologic response rate (≤ypT1N0). Secondary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0N0), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Among 24 patients enrolled between December 2019 and August 2021, 23 were evaluable (52%, cT2-4aN0; 48%, cTanyN1-3). Eighteen patients (78%) completed four cycles of ddMVAC, while remaining five patients experienced early discontinuation. Dose modification (91%) and dose delay (70%) occurred, and the dose intensity of ddMVAC was 79%. Nineteen patients underwent RC and four patients declined. Of 19 patients who underwent RC, eight patients (42%) achieved ≤ypT1N0. With a median follow-up of 22.8 months, the median RFS was 13.5 months (95% CI, not yet evaluable) and the median OS was 28.9 months (95% confidence interval, 19.9-37.9).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed substantial efficacy and safety of ddMVAC, even in patients with locally advanced UC. The ddMVAC still should be a promising option as NAC in Asian patients with UC.

Perioperative Chemoimmunotherapy With Durvalumab for Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma: Primary Analysis of the Single-Arm Phase II Trial SAKK 06/17

PURPOSE

The integration of immunotherapy in the perioperative setting of muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) appears promising. SAKK 06/17 investigated the addition of neoadjuvant durvalumab to gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and adjuvant checkpoint inhibition with durvalumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

SAKK 06/17 was an investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm phase II study including cisplatin-fit patients with stage cT2-T4a cN0-1 operable MIUC. Four cycles of neoadjuvant GC in combination with four cycles of durvalumab (start with GC cycle 2) were administered, followed by radical surgery. Adjuvant durvalumab was given for 10 cycles. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years.

RESULTS

Sixty one patients were accrued at 12 sites. The full analysis set consisted of 57 patients, 54 (95%) had bladder cancer. Median follow-up was 40 months. The primary end point was met, with EFS at 2 years of 76% (one-sided 90% CI [lower bound], 67%; two-sided 95% CI, 62 to 85). EFS at 3 years was 73% (95% CI, 59 to 83). Complete pathologic response in resected patients (N = 52) was achieved in 17 patients (33%), and 31 (60%) had pathologic response

CONCLUSION

The addition of perioperative durvalumab to the standard of care for patients with resectable MIUC results in a high EFS and OS at 2 years.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
• Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy
• Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery
• Cisplatin/adverse effects
• Deoxycytidine/adverse effects
• Muscles
• Immunotherapy
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
• Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Richard Cathomas Division of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
Sacha I. Rothschild Department of Medical Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
Stefanie Hayoz Competence Center of SAKK, Bern, Switzerland
Lukas Bubendorf Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Berna C. Özdemir Department of Oncology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
Bernhard Kiss Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
Andreas Erdmann Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
Stefanie Aeppli Department of Oncology, University Hospital HUG, Geneva, Switzerland
Nicolas Mach Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
Räto T. Strebel Division of Urology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
Boris Hadaschik Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Dominik Berthold Department of Oncology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Hubert John Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
Deborah Zihler Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
Mathias Schmid Department of Oncology, Triemlispital, Zürich, Switzerland
Ilaria Alborelli Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Martina Schneider Competence Center of SAKK, Bern, Switzerland
Jana Musilova Competence Center of SAKK, Bern, Switzerland
Martin Spahn Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland Hirslanden Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland Lindenhofspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Ulf Petrausch Onkozentrum Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

Collapse

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Urothelial Carcinoma-Future Directions and Biomarker Selection

CONTEXT

Several recent phase 2 and 3 trials have evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy for urothelial carcinoma (UC) in the metastatic, localized muscle-invasive UC (MIUC), upper tract UC, and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) disease state.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes and toxicity of CPIs across the treatment landscape of UC and contextualize their application to current real-world treatment.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We queried PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases and conference abstracts to identify prospective trials examining CPIs in UC. The primary endpoints included overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and toxicity (when available). A secondary analysis included biomarker evaluation of response.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 21 trials, 12 phase 2 and nine phase 3 trials, in which a CPI was used for metastatic UC (seven), MIUC (nine), and NMIBC (five). For first-line (1L) metastatic UC, concurrent chemotherapy with CPIs failed to show superiority. Improved overall and progression-free survival for switch maintenance avelumab (after achieving stable disease or response with induction systemic chemotherapy) has established the current standard of care for 1L metastatic UC. A single-agent CPI is a consideration for patients unable to tolerate chemotherapy. CPIs in the perioperative setting are limited to only the adjuvant treatment with nivolumab after radical surgery for MIUC in patients at a higher risk of recurrence based on pathologic stage. Only pembrolizumab is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for carcinoma in situ unresponsive to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in patients who are not fit for or who refuse radical cystectomy. Trials investigating CPIs in combination with multiple immune regulators, antibody drug conjugates, targeted therapies, antiangiogenic agents, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are enrolling patients and may shape the future treatment of patients with UC.

CONCLUSIONS

CPIs have an established role across multiple states of UC, with broadened applications likely to occur in the future. Several combinations are being evaluated, while the development of predictive biomarkers and their validation may help identify patients who are most likely to respond.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Our findings highlight the broad activity of checkpoint inhibitors in urothelial carcinoma, noting the need for further investigation for the best application of combinations and patient selection to patient care.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin plus nivolumab as organ-sparing treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a phase 2 trial

Cystectomy is a standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but it is life-altering. We initiated a phase 2 study in which patients with MIBC received four cycles of gemcitabine, cisplatin, plus nivolumab followed by clinical restaging. Patients achieving a clinical complete response (cCR) could proceed without cystectomy. The co-primary objectives were to assess the cCR rate and the positive predictive value of cCR for a composite outcome: 2-year metastasis-free survival in patients forgoing immediate cystectomy or Collapse

Key Words

• phase ii trials
• translational research
• bladder cancer
• cancer immunotherapy
• chemotherapy

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
• Cisplatin/therapeutic use
• Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use
• Disease-Free Survival
• Gemcitabine
• Muscles
• Neoadjuvant Therapy
• Neoplasm Invasiveness
• Nivolumab/therapeutic use
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
• Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group D Protein

Collapse

Grants

• U24 CA224319 NCI NIH HHS
• U01 DK124165 NIDDK NIH HHS
• U24 CA224316 NCI NIH HHS
• U24 CA224285 NCI NIH HHS
• T32 CA078207 NCI NIH HHS
• P30 CA196521 NCI NIH HHS
• U24 CA224331 NCI NIH HHS
• R01 CA249175 NCI NIH HHS
• V Foundation for Cancer Research (V Foundation)
• Bristol-Myers Squibb (Bristol-Myers Squibb Company)
• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI)
• Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH)/Partnership for Accelerating Cancer Therapies (PACT)

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Matthew D Galsky Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Siamak Daneshmand Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Sudeh Izadmehr Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Edgar Gonzalez-Kozlova Department of Oncological Sciences, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Kevin G Chan Department of Urology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
Sara Lewis Department of Radiology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Bassam El Achkar Department of Radiology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Tanya B Dorff Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
Jeremy Paul Cetnar Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
Brock O Neil Department of Urology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Anishka D'Souza Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Ronac Mamtani Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Christos Kyriakopoulos Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
Tomi Jun Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA Formerly with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Mahalya Gogerly-Moragoda Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Rachel Brody Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Department of Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Hui Xie Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Kai Nie Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Geoffrey Kelly Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Amir Horowitz Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Yayoi Kinoshita Department of Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Ethan Ellis Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Yohei Nose Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Giorgio Ioannou Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Rafael Cabal Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Diane M Del Valle Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
G Kenneth Haines Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Li Wang Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Gene Dx, Stamford, CT, USA
Kent W Mouw Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Robert M Samstein Department of Radiation Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Reza Mehrazin Department of Urology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Nina Bhardwaj Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Menggang Yu Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
Qianqian Zhao Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
Seunghee Kim-Schulze Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Robert Sebra Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Jun Zhu Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Gene Dx, Stamford, CT, USA
Sacha Gnjatic Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
John Sfakianos Department of Urology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Sumanta K Pal Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA

Collapse

Perioperative Immunotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

There is an acute unmet need to develop novel treatment regimens in the perioperative setting since many patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) are not eligible for the current standard of care (SOC) neoadjuvant treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), both as monotherapy and in combination regimens with other ICIs, chemotherapy, or targeted drugs, may provide safe and clinically effective treatment options that could revolutionize current standard of care. In the neoadjuvant setting, compelling data from phase II clinical trials suggests that single-agent immunotherapy, as well as dual-checkpoint blockade, may emerge as reasonable alternatives to traditional cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Prospective studies combining ICIs with chemotherapy or with antibody-drug conjugates have also demonstrated robust outcomes. However, these studies are not yet practice changing and data from larger randomized studies are needed to confirm this benefit. In the adjuvant setting, nivolumab is the FDA-approved treatment based on a disease-free survival benefit relative to placebo in a randomized trial. However, it will be important to confirm an overall survival benefit of this treatment and to better identify patients who need additional adjuvant treatment based on novel biomarker data. The treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer is moving toward the individualization of treatment options based on specific tumor and patient characteristics and away from the one-size-fits-all approach that has dominated this space for the last couple of decades. Emerging biomarker data, such as with ctDNA, suggests that immunotherapy may confer greater benefit to selected patients. Identifying who those patients are will be of paramount importance since additional treatments always come with additional toxicities. On the other hand, the more favorable toxicity profiles of certain immunotherapy-based regimens may make them superior options for some patients who would otherwise be unable to tolerate other systemic regimens. In the near future, it is likely that subsets of patients with MIBC will be receiving treatments with predominantly immunotherapy-based regimens while many patients may still be treated with regimens containing a cisplatin-based chemotherapy backbone. Currently ongoing clinical trials will help to better define patient populations optimized for each treatment.

Long-term Outcomes from a Phase 2 Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (SWOG S1314; NCT02177695)

BACKGROUND

The COXEN gene expression model was evaluated for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a secondary analysis of the association of each COXEN score with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) and by treatment arm.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a randomized phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) or dose-dense methotrexate-vinblastine-adriamycin-cisplatin (ddMVAC) in MIBC.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to ddMVAC (every 14 d) or GC (every 21 d), both for four cycles.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

EFS events were defined as progression or death before scheduled surgery, a decision to not undergo surgery, recurrence, or death due to any cause after surgery. Cox regression was used to evaluate the COXEN score or treatment arm association with EFS and OS.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 167 evaluable patients were included in the COXEN analysis. The COXEN scores were not significantly prognostic for OS or EFS in the respective arms, but the GC COXEN score had a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.99; p = 0.047) when the arms were pooled. In the intent-to-treat analysis (n = 227), there was no significant difference between ddMVAC and GC for OS (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.54-1.40; p = 0.57) or EFS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.59-1.26; p = 0.45). Among the 192 patients who underwent surgery, pathologic response (pT0 vs downstaging vs no response) was strongly correlated with superior postsurgical survival (5-yr OS 90%, 89% and 52%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The COXEN GC score has prognostic value for patients receiving cisplatin-based neoadjuvant treatment. The randomized, prospective design provides estimates of OS and EFS for GC and ddMVAC in this population. Pathologic response (

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we evaluated a biomarker to predict the response to chemotherapy. The results did not meet the preset study parameters, but our study provides information on clinical outcomes with the use of chemotherapy before surgery for bladder cancer.

Collapse

Key Words

• Biomarkers
• Cystectomy
• Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
• Urinary bladder cancer

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Cisplatin
• Cystectomy/methods
• Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use
• Muscles/pathology
• Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods
• Neoplasm Invasiveness
• Retrospective Studies
• Treatment Outcome
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology

Collapse

Grants

• U10 CA180821 NCI NIH HHS
• UG1 CA233324 NCI NIH HHS
• UG1 CA180830 NCI NIH HHS
• UG1 CA233160 NCI NIH HHS
• UG1 CA233373 NCI NIH HHS
• UG1 CA233196 NCI NIH HHS
• U10 CA180820 NCI NIH HHS
• U10 CA180888 NCI NIH HHS
• U10 CA180819 NCI NIH HHS
• UG1 CA233328 NCI NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Thomas W Flaig School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Catherine M Tangen Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
Siamak Daneshmand Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Ajjai Shivaram Alva University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
M Scott Lucia School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
David James McConkey Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Dan Theodorescu Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Amir Goldkorn Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Matthew I Milowsky University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Rick Bangs Southwestern Oncology Group, San Antonio, TX, USA
Gary R MacVicar Illinois CancerCare PC, Peoria, IL, USA
Bruno R Bastos Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
Jared S Fowles Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Daniel L Gustafson Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Melissa Plets Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
Ian M Thompson CHRISTUS Medical Center Hospital, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
Seth P Lerner Scott Department of Urology, Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

Collapse

Predictive signature of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer integrating mRNA expression, taxonomic subtypes, and clinicopathological features

Background and objective

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by cystectomy is the standard of care in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Pathological response has been associated with longer survival, but no currently available clinicopathological variables can identify patients likely to respond, highlighting the need for predictive biomarkers. We sought to identify a predictive signature of response to NAC integrating clinical score, taxonomic subtype, and gene expression.

Material and methods

From 1994 to 2014, pre-treatment tumor samples were collected from MIBC patients (stage T2-4N0/+M0) at two Spanish hospitals. A clinical score was determined based on stage, hydronephrosis and histology. Taxonomic subtypes (BASQ, luminal, and mixed) were identified by immunohistochemistry. A custom set of 41 genes involved in DNA damage repair and immune response was analyzed in 84 patients with the NanoString nCounter platform. Genes related to pathological response were identified by LASSO penalized logistic regression. NAC consisted of cisplatin/methotrexate/vinblastine until 2000, after which most patients received cisplatin/gemcitabine. The capacity of the integrated signature to predict pathological response was assessed with AUC. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

LASSO selected eight genes to be included in the signature (RAD51, IFNγ, CHEK1, CXCL9, c-MET, KRT14, HERC2, FOXA1). The highest predictive accuracy was observed with the inclusion in the model of only three genes (RAD51, IFNɣ, CHEK1). The integrated clinical-taxonomic-gene expression signature including these three genes had a higher predictive ability (AUC=0.71) than only clinical score plus taxonomic subtype (AUC=0.58) or clinical score alone (AUC=0.56). This integrated signature was also significantly associated with OS (p=0.02) and DSS (p=0.02).

Conclusions

We have identified a predictive signature for response to NAC in MIBC patients that integrates the expression of three genes with clinicopathological characteristics and taxonomic subtypes. Prospective studies to validate these results are ongoing.

Differentiation of bladder cancer stages using the vesical imaging -reporting and data system and apparent diffusion coefficient

Background

T stage is closely related to the treatment and prognosis of patients with bladder cancer (BC). However, preoperative T staging is still challenging. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) may be valuable. This study was performed to explore the value of the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) and the volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram parameters in detecting T2 stage and below stage (≤T2 stage) from T3 stage and above stage (≥T3 stage) BCs.

Methods

The study included 62 patients (mean age, males vs. females: 62.1±10.9 vs. 61.8±11.7 years) with BC pathologically confirmed by partial or radical cystectomy. All of the tumors were scored normatively by two radiologists using the VI-RADS scoring system by two radiologists. The volumetric ADC histogram of each lesion was obtained from the ADC maps. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to examine the relevance between VI-RADS scores and T stages. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the histogram parameters between ≤T2 stage and ≥T3 stage BCs. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the predictive power of each model.

Results

The minimum ADC; mean ADC; median ADC; maximum ADC; and 10th, 25th, 75th, and 90th percentile ADC of ≤T2 stage BCs were significantly higher than those of ≥T3 stage BCs, while skewness and kurtosis had opposite results. VI-RADS achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.834 among all parameters. The combination of VI-RADS, skewness and kurtosis yield a significantly higher AUC than VI-RADS alone (0.915 vs. 0.834, P=0.0478).

Conclusions

VI-RADS and volume ADC histogram analysis can effectively discriminate between ≤T2 stage and ≥T3 stage BCs, and the volumetric ADC histogram can provide further information to supplement VI-RADS.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy: A Promising New Standard of Care

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach in the treatment of various malignancies, with preclinical studies showing improved immune responses in the preoperative setting. FDA-approved neoadjuvant-immunotherapy-based approaches include triple-negative breast cancer and early non-small cell lung cancer on the basis of improvement in pathological response and event free survival. Nevertheless, current trials have only shown benefits in a fraction of patients. It is therefore crucial to identify predictive biomarkers to improve patient selection for such approaches. This review aims to provide an overview of potential biomarkers of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer, bladder cancer, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer and gastric cancer. By the extrapolation of the metastatic setting, we explore known predictive biomarkers, i.e., PD-L1, mismatch repair deficiency and tumour mutational burden, as well as potential early-disease-specific biomarkers. We also discuss the challenges of identifying reliable biomarkers and the need for standardized protocols and guidelines for their validation and clinical implementation.

Muscle invasive bladder cancer: where is the field headed?

INTRODUCTION

The standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy or upfront radical cystectomy for cisplatin-ineligible patients. In those who are ineligible for or refuse radical cystectomy, trimodal therapy with chemoradiation is offered. However, with the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin in the metastatic setting, several trials are implementing these drugs in the neoadjuvant setting for cisplatin ineligible patients. Indeed, nivolumab is approved as adjuvant therapy for high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma.

AREAS COVERED

Clinical trials using ICI, ICI/ICI, and ICI/chemotherapy combination therapies in the perioperative setting have been completed. These clinical trials have demonstrated that neoadjuvant ICI are safe and have encouraging pCR, making them promising treatment options. Neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin alone and in combination with pembrolizumab is also being studied, and preliminarily to have promising activity. ICI is also being combined with radiation therapy (RT) and early data indicate that ICI combined with RT or chemo-RT may be safe with promising activity.

EXPERT OPINION

Biomarkers are urgently needed to identify appropriate treatment options for individual patients. The use of novel treatment approaches and biomarkers will help shape the future of precision therapy for MIBC and enable bladder preservation.

Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Genomic Alterations in Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Genomic alterations in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) genes have been linked to a reduced response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Some of the immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) could be distorted because of the inhibition of interferon signaling pathways. We present a landscape of FGFR genomic alterations in distorted UBC to evaluate the immunogenomic mechanisms of resistance and response.

METHODS

There were 4035 UBCs that underwent hybrid, capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling. Tumor mutational burden was determined in up to 1.1 Mbp of sequenced DNA and microsatellite instability was determined in 114 loci. Programmed death ligand expression in tumor cells was assessed by immunohistochemistry (Dako 22C3).

RESULTS

The FGFR tyrosine kinases were altered in 894 (22%) UBCs. The highest frequency of alterations was in FGFR genomic alterations with FGFR3 at 17.4% followed by FGFR1 at 3.7% and FGFR2 at 1.1%. No FGFR4 genomic alterations were identified. The age and sex distribution were similar in all groups. Urothelial bladder cancers that featured FGFR3 genomic alterations were associated with lower driver genomic alterations/tumors. 14.7% of the FGFR3 genomic alterations were FGFR3 fusions. Other findings included a significantly higher frequency of ERBB2 amplification in FGFR1/2-altered UBCs compared with FGFR3-altered UBCs. Urothelial bladder cancers with FGFR3 genomic alterations also had the highest frequency of the activating mTOR pathway. FGFR3-altered UBCs also featured significantly higher frequencies of biomarkers associated with a lack of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors including a lower tumor mutational burden, lower programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and higher frequencies of genomic alterations in MDM2. Also linked to IO drug resistance, CDKN2A/B loss and MTAP loss were observed at a higher frequency in FGFR3-driven UBC.

CONCLUSIONS

An increased frequency of genomic alterations is observed in UBC FGFR. These have been linked to immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate UBC FGFR-based biomarkers prognostic of an immune checkpoint inhibitor response. Only then can we successfully incorporate novel therapeutic strategies into the evolving landscape of UBC treatment.

Novel sequential treatment strategy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): intravesical recombinant BCG, followed by neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, radical cystectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant immunotherapy - protocol of a multicentre, single arm phase 2 trial (SAKK 06/19)

INTRODUCTION

The combination of checkpoint inhibition and cisplatin-based chemotherapy is investigated in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and results from phase 2 trials have been presented. Intravesical BCG has been used for non-MIBC (NMIBC) in patients with carcinoma in situ and high-grade Ta/T1 tumours. BCG induces innate and adapted immune response and upregulation of PD-L1 in preclinical models. The proposed trial is intended to implement a new immuno-immuno-chemotherapy induction therapy for MIBC. The combination of BCG and checkpoint inhibition with chemotherapy aims at higher intravesical responses and better local and systemic control of disease.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

SAKK 06/19 is an open-label single-arm phase II trial for patients with resectable MIBC T2-T4a cN0-1. Intravesical recombinant BCG (rBCG: VPM1002BC) is applied weekly for three instillations followed by four cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin/gemcitabine every 3 weeks. Atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks is started together with rBCG and given for four cycles. All patients then undergo restaging and radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Atezolizumab is continued as maintenance therapy after surgery every 3 weeks for 13 cycles. Pathological complete remission is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include pathological response rate (<ypT2 N0), event-free survival, recurrence-free survival, overall survival, feasibility and toxicity. An interim safety analysis will be performed after the first 12 patients have completed neoadjuvant treatment specifically assessing toxicity possibly associated with intravesical rBCG application.The study has received approval by ethical committee Zurich, Switzerland, BASEC-No. 2021-01872. Results will be made available by publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04630730.

A Systematic Review of Oncological Outcomes Associated with Bladder-sparing Strategies in Patients Achieving Complete Clinical Response to Initial Systemic Treatment for Localized Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

CONTEXT

Bladder-sparing strategies (BSSs) have been proposed for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients achieving clinical complete response (cCR) to initial systemic treatment to avoid toxicity related to radical cystectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the current literature evaluating oncological outcomes of BSSs in patients achieving cCR to initial systemic treatment for localized MIBC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A computerized bibliographic search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed for all studies reporting oncological outcomes of MIBC patients undergoing either surveillance or radiation therapy after achieving cCR to initial systemic treatment. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we identified 23 noncomparative prospective or retrospective studies published between 1990 and 2021. The mean bladder and metastatic recurrence rates (range) as well as the mean bladder preservation rate (BPR; range) were calculated, and overall survival (OS) was extracted from included reports.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 16 and seven studies evaluated surveillance (n = 610) and radiation therapy (n = 175) in MIBC patients achieving cCR to initial systemic treatment, respectively. With regard to surveillance, the median follow-up ranged from 10 to 120 mo, with a mean bladder recurrence rate of 43% (0-71%), including 65% of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and 35% of MIBC recurrences. The mean BPR was 73% (49-100%). The mean metastatic recurrence rate was 9% (0-27%), while 5-yr OS rates ranged from 64% to 89%. With regard to radiation therapy, the median follow-up ranged from 12 to 60 mo, with a mean bladder recurrence rate of 15% (0-29%), including 24% of NMIBC, 43% of MIBC, and 33% of unspecified recurrences. The mean BPR was 74% (71-100%). The mean metastatic recurrence rate was 17% (0-22%), while the 4-yr OS rate was 79%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review showed that only low-level evidence supports the effectiveness of BSSs in selected patients achieving cCR to initial systemic treatment for localized MIBC. These preliminary findings highlight the need for further prospective comparative research to demonstrate its efficacy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed studies evaluating bladder-sparing strategies in patients achieving complete clinical response to initial systemic treatment for localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Based on low-level evidence, we observed that selected patients could benefit from surveillance or radiation therapy in this setting, but prospective comparative research is requested to confirm their efficacy.

Evolving systemic management of urothelial cancers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bladder cancer is the 12th most common cancer worldwide. Historically, the systemic management of urothelial carcinoma has been confined to platinum-based chemotherapy. In this review, we discuss the evolving landscape of systemic treatment for urothelial carcinoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since 2016, when the Food and Drug Administration approved the first immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI), programmed cell death 1 and programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors have been evaluated in the nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, localized muscle invasive bladder cancer as well as advanced/metastatic bladder cancer settings. Newer approved treatments such as fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent second-line and third-line options. These novel treatments are now being assessed in combination as well as with older traditional platinum-based chemotherapy.

SUMMARY

Novel therapies continue to improve bladder cancer outcomes. Personalized approach with well validated biomarkers are important to predict response to therapy.

Perioperative systemic therapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer: Current standard method, biomarkers and emerging strategies

Bladder cancer ranks as the 10th most common cancer type globally, and muscle-invasive disease accounts for approximately 25% of newly diagnosed bladder cancers. Despite definitive treatment, 50% of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) develop metastasis within 2 years, leading to death. Perioperative systemic therapy is generally recommended to control local relapse or distant metastasis after surgical resection for patients with MIBC. Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is the current standard treatment to improve oncologic control and survival outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with pathological T3-4 or positive lymph nodes after radical cystectomy if no neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given. Nonetheless, perioperative systemic therapy is not applied widely because of its toxicity, and less than 25% of patients receive cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, the development of predictive biomarkers for neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy and alternative effective regimens for cisplatin-ineligible patients are important. Furthermore, recently, novel anticancer agents such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates have proven survival benefits in the metastatic setting, thereby expanding their therapeutic applications to the perioperative setting for non-metastatic MIBC. Herein, we discuss the current status and future perspectives of perioperative systemic strategies for MIBC.

Immune checkpoint therapy-current perspectives and future directions

Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has dramatically altered clinical outcomes for cancer patients and conferred durable clinical benefits, including cure in a subset of patients. Varying response rates across tumor types and the need for predictive biomarkers to optimize patient selection to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicities prompted efforts to unravel immune and non-immune factors regulating the responses to ICT. This review highlights the biology of anti-tumor immunity underlying response and resistance to ICT, discusses efforts to address the current challenges with ICT, and outlines strategies to guide the development of subsequent clinical trials and combinatorial efforts with ICT.

Efficacy and safety of transurethral resection of bladder tumour combined with chemotherapy and immunotherapy in bladder-sparing therapy in patients with T1 high-grade or T2 bladder cancer: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Bladder cancer is the tenth most common cancer worldwide. For patients with T1 high-grade or T2 bladder cancer, radical cystectomy is recommended. However, radical cystectomy is associated with various complications and has a detrimental impact on the quality of life. Bladder-sparing therapy has been widely explored in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and whether a combination of transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) with chemotherapy and immunotherapy shows definite superiority over TURBT plus chemotherapy is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of TURBT combined with chemotherapy and immunotherapy in bladder-sparing therapy in patients with T1 high-grade or T2 bladder cancer who are unwilling or unsuitable to undergo radical cystectomy.

METHODS

An open-label, multi-institutional, two-armed randomized controlled study will be performed with 86 patients with T1 high-grade or T2 bladder cancer meeting the eligibility criteria. Participants in the experimental group (n = 43) will receive TURBT combined with chemotherapy (GC: gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on the 1st day and the 8th day, cisplatin 70 mg/m² on the 2nd day, repeated every 21 days) and immunotherapy (toripalimab 240 mg on the 5th day, repeated every 21 days), and those in the control group (n = 43) will receive TURBT plus chemotherapy (GC). The primary outcome is pathological response, and the secondary outcomes include progression-free survival, overall survival, toxicities, and quality of life.

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TURBT combined with GC regimen and toripalimab in bladder-sparing therapy in patients with T1 high-grade or T2 bladder cancer. The expected benefit is that the combination of TURBT with chemotherapy and immunotherapy would be more effective than TURBT plus chemotherapy without compromising the quality of life and increasing the toxicity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2200060546, chictr.org.cn, registered on June 14, 2022.

PD‑1/PD‑L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in neoadjuvant therapy for solid tumors (Review)

A comprehensive search regarding programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‑1)/programmed death‑ligand 1 (PD‑L1) inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy in neoadjuvant settings of 11 types of solid cancer was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases, and the abstracts of various conferences were screened. Data presented in 99 clinical trials indicated that preoperative treatment with PD‑1/PD‑L1 combined therapy, particularly immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, could achieve a higher objective response rate, a higher major pathologic response rate and a higher pathologic complete response rate, as well as a lower number of immune‑related adverse events compared with PD‑1/PD‑L1 monotherapy or dual immunotherapy. Although PD‑1/PD‑L1 inhibitor combination caused more treatment‑related adverse events (TRAEs) in patients, most of the TRAEs were acceptable and did not cause marked delays in operation. The data suggest that patients with pathological remission after neoadjuvant immunotherapy exhibit improved postoperative disease‑free survival compared with those without pathological remission. Further studies are still required to evaluate the long‑term survival benefit of neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Current Status of Perioperative Therapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer and Future Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy has been a standard of care in the perioperative management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer for years, but several novel therapies are under active investigation. This review aims to provide an update on recent relevant literature and a forward look at the future landscape of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients who opt for radical cystectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent approval of nivolumab as adjuvant therapy established a new treatment option for high-risk patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer after radical cystectomy. Several phase II studies of chemo-immunotherapy combinations and immunotherapy alone have reported pathological complete responses in the 26-46% range, including studies in cisplatin-ineligible patients. Randomized studies of perioperative chemo-immunotherapy, immunotherapy alone, and enfortumab vedotin are ongoing. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer remains a challenging disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality; however, increasing options in systemic therapy and an increasingly personalized approach to cancer treatment suggest continued future improvements in patient care.

Clinical Significance and Tumor Microenvironment Characterization of a Novel Immune-Related Gene Signature in Bladder Cancer

Cancer immunotherapy plays a crucial role in bladder cancer (BC) progression. Increasing evidence has elucidated the clinicopathologic significance of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in predicting outcomes and therapeutic efficacy. This study sought to establish a comprehensive analysis of the immune-gene signature combined with TME to assist in BC prognosis. We selected sixteen immune-related genes (IRGs) after a weighted gene co-expression network and survival analysis. Enrichment analysis revealed that these IRGs were actively involved in Mitophagy and Renin secretion pathways. After multivariable COX analysis, the IRGPI comprising NCAM1, CNTN1, PTGIS, ADRB3, and ANLN was established to predict the overall survival of BC, which was validated in both TCGA and GSE13507 cohorts. In addition, a TME gene signature was developed for molecular and prognosis subtyping with unsupervised clustering, followed by a panoramic landscape characterization of BC. In summary, the IRGPI model developed in our study provided a valuable tool with an improved prognosis for BC.

Perspectives on the future of urothelial carcinoma therapy: chemotherapy and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Despite recent developments in the landscape of urothelial carcinoma (UC) treatment, platinum combination chemotherapy still remains a milestone. Recently immunotherapeutic agents have gained ever-growing attractivity, particularly in the metastatic setting. Novel chemotherapeutic strategies and agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and powerful combination regimens have been developed to overcome the resistance of most UC to current therapies.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, we review the current standard-of-care chemotherapy, the development of ADCs, the rationale for combining therapy regimens with chemotherapy in current trials, and future directions in UC management.

EXPERT OPINION

Immunotherapy has prompted a revolution in the treatment paradigm of UC. However, only a few patients experience a long-term response when treated with single-agent immunotherapies. Combination treatments are necessary to bypass resistance mechanisms and broaden the clinical utility of current options. Current evidence supports the intensification of standard-of-care chemotherapy with maintenance immunotherapy. However, the optimal sequence, combination, and duration must be determined to achieve individual longevity with acceptable health-related quality of life. In that regard, ADCs appear as a promising alternative for single and combination strategies in UC, as they specifically target the tumor cells, thereby, theoretically improving treatment efficacy and avoiding extensive off-target toxicities.

Current and Future Landscape of Perioperative Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is the current standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, less than half of patients are candidates for this treatment, and 50% will develop metastatic disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy could be offered if neoadjuvant treatment has not been administered for suitable patients. It is important to reduce the risk of systemic recurrence and improve the prognosis of localized MIBC. Systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma has evolved in recent years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates or FGFR inhibitors, are new therapeutic alternatives and have shown their benefit in advanced disease. Currently, several clinical trials are investigating the role of these drugs, as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings with promising outcomes. In addition, the development of predictive biomarkers could predict responses to neoadjuvant therapies.

Intratumoral T cell depletion following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is associated with poor clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Whereas neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) followed by a radical cystectomy remains the standard treatment for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), increasing evidence suggests that checkpoint inhibitors, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, are effective in the (neo)adjuvant setting. The major aim of this study was to improve our understanding of the immune-modulating effects of NAC in MIBC.

METHODS

Tumor tissue of 81 patients was used, including 60 patients treated with NAC and 21 patients undergoing upfront cystectomy. Multiplex immunohistochemistry was performed to assess CD3⁺, CD3⁺CD8⁺, CD3⁺CD8^-FoxP3^-, CD3⁺FoxP3⁺, and CD20⁺ cells. Patients were classified into a favorable or unfavorable outcome group based on the development of a recurrence within a year.

RESULTS

The density of intratumoral CD3⁺ T cells decreased following NAC in patients with a recurrence at one year, while it remained stable in patients without a recurrence (median fold change 0.6 [95CI 0.3; 1.0] versus 1.0 [95CI 0.6; 2.2]). This decrease was mainly attributable to a decrease in CD3⁺CD8^-FoxP3^- and CD3⁺FoxP3⁺ T cells and was not observed in patients with an early recurrence after upfront cystectomy. Additionally, in cystectomy tissue of patients treated with NAC, median CD3⁺ and CD3⁺CD8⁺ T cell densities were significantly lower in patients with versus patients without a recurrence (CD3: 261. cells/mm² [95CI 22.4; 467.2]; CD8: 189.6 cells/mm² [95CI 2.0;462.0]).

CONCLUSION

T cell density decreases following NAC in MIBC patients with poor clinical outcome. Further research is needed to investigate whether this decrease in T cell density affects the efficacy of subsequent checkpoint inhibitors. PRéCIS: The major aim of this study was to improve our understanding of the immune-modulating effects of NAC in patients with MIBC. We reveal a decline in intratumoral CD3⁺ T cell density following NAC in patients with an early recurrence.

Derivation and external validation of dendritic cell-related gene signatures for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy in bladder urothelial carcinoma

Background

In the regulation of tumor-related immunity, dendritic cells (DCs) are crucial sentinel cells; they are powerful to present antigens and initiate immune responses. Therefore, we concentrated on investigating the DC-related gene profile, prognosis, and gene mutations in bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) patients to identify sensitivity to immunotherapy of patients.

Methods

According to DC infiltration, BLCA patients were divided into two subgroups, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained. Patients were classified by unsupervised clustering into new subgroups. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and Cox regression were used to develop a DC-related risk model. CIBERSORT, xCell, and GSEA were used to infer immune cells' relative abundance separately and enriched immune pathways.

Results

A total of 29 prognosis-related DEGs were identified from the unsupervised cluster. Among them, 22 genes were selected for constructing the DC-related risk model. The dendritic cell-related risk score (DCRS) can accurately distinguish patients with different sensitive responses to immunotherapy and overall survival outcomes. Furthermore, patients with ryanodine receptor 2 (RYR2) mutation had a better prognosis.

Conclusions

The DCRS played an essential part in immunity pathway and formation of TME diversity. Our study indicated that RYR2 mutation combined with DCRS is useful for predicting the prognosis and discovering appropriate patients for immunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer: 3-Year Median Follow-Up Update of PURE-01 Trial

PURPOSE

The PURE-01 study (NCT02736266) pioneered the neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy before radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC). We herein present the survival outcomes after a median follow-up of three years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included 155 patients. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time from pembrolizumab initiation until radiographic disease progression precluding RC, initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, recurrence after RC, or death. Further outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS) post-RC and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression analyses for EFS were performed. Kaplan-Meier analyses compared EFS outcomes according with baseline programmed cell-death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) and according to the molecular subtypes.

RESULTS

After a median (interquartile range, IQR) follow-up of 39 (30-47) months, 36-month EFS and OS were 74.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 67.8-81.7] and 83.8% (95% CI, 77.8-90.2) in the ITT population, respectively. Overall, 143 (92.3%) patients underwent RC. Within the cohort of patients who did not receive additional chemotherapy (N = 125), 36-month RFS was 96.3% (95% CI, 91.6-100) for patients achieving a ypT0N0, 96.1% (95% CI, 89-100) for ypT1/a/isN0, 74.9% (95% CI, 60.2-93) for ypT2-4N0, and 58.3% (95% CI, 36.2-94.1) for ypTanyN1-3 response. EFS was significantly stratified among PD-L1 tertiles (lower tertile: 59.7% vs. medium tertile: 76.7% vs. higher tertile: 89.8%, P = 0.0013). The claudin-low and basal/squamous subtypes displayed the lowest rates of events.

CONCLUSIONS

At a median follow-up of three years, PURE-01 results further confirm the sustained efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab before RC. PD-L1 expression was the strongest predictor of sustained response post-RC.

Surgery-mediated tumor-promoting effects on the immune microenvironment

Surgical resection continues to be the mainstay treatment for solid cancers even though chemotherapy and immunotherapy have significantly improved patient overall survival and progression-free survival. Numerous studies have shown that surgery induces the dissemination of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and that the resultant inflammatory response promotes occult tumor growth and the metastatic process by forming a supportive tumor microenvironment (TME). Surgery-induced platelet activation is one of the initial responses to a wound and the formation of fibrin clots can provide the scaffold for recruited inflammatory cells. Activated platelets can also shield CTCs to protect them from blood shear forces and promote CTCs evasion of immune destruction. Similarly, neutrophils are recruited to the fibrin clot and enhance cancer metastatic dissemination and progression by forming neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Activated macrophages are also recruited to surgical sites to facilitate the metastatic spread. More importantly, the body's response to surgical insult results in the recruitment and expansion of immunosuppressive cell populations (i.e. myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells) and in the suppression of natural killer (NK) cells that contribute to postoperative cancer recurrence and metastasis. In this review, we seek to provide an overview of the pro-tumorigenic mechanisms resulting from surgery's impact on these cells in the TME. Further understanding of these events will allow for the development of perioperative therapeutic strategies to prevent surgery-associated metastasis.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and combination therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A multi-center real-world retrospective study

To parallelly compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (tislelizumab), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin), and neoadjuvant combination therapy (tislelizumab + GC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and explore the efficacy predictors, we perform a multi-center, real-world cohort study that enrolls 253 patients treated with neoadjuvant treatments (combination therapy: 98, chemotherapy: 107, and immunotherapy: 48) from 15 tertiary hospitals. We demonstrate that neoadjuvant combination therapy achieves the highest complete response rate and pathological downstaging rate compared with neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemotherapy. We develop and validate an efficacy prediction model consisting of pretreatment clinical characteristics, which can pinpoint candidates to receive neoadjuvant combination therapy. We also preliminarily reveal that patients who achieve pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatments plus maximal transurethral resection of the bladder tumor may be safe to receive bladder preservation therapy. Overall, this study highlights the benefit of neoadjuvant combination therapy based on tislelizumab for MIBC.