1
|
Zwart WH, Temmink SJD, Hospers GAP, Marijnen CAM, Putter H, Nagtegaal ID, Blomqvist L, Kranenbarg EMK, Roodvoets AGH, Martling A, van de Velde CJH, Glimelius B, Peeters KCMJ, van Etten B, Nilsson PJ. Oncological outcomes after a pathological complete response following total neoadjuvant therapy or chemoradiotherapy for high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer in the RAPIDO trial. Eur J Cancer 2024; 204:114044. [PMID: 38636289 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A pathological complete response (pCR) following chemoradiation (CRT) or short-course radiotherapy (scRT) leads to a favourable prognosis in patients with rectal cancer. Total neo-adjuvant therapy (TNT) doubles the pCR rate, but it is unknown whether oncological outcomes remain favourable and whether the same characteristics are associated with pCR as after CRT. METHODS Comparison between patients with pCR in the RAPIDO trial in the experimental [EXP] (scRT, chemotherapy, surgery, as TNT) and standard-of-care treatment [STD] (CRT, surgery, postoperative chemotherapy depending on hospital policy) groups. Primary and secondary outcomes were time-to-recurrence (TTR), overall survival (OS) and association between patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics and pCR. RESULTS Among patients with a resection within six months after preoperative treatment, 120/423 (28%) [EXP] and 57/398 (14%) [STD] achieved a pCR. Following pCR, 5-year cumulative TTR and OS rates in the EXP and STD arms were 8% vs. 7% (hazard ratio 1.04, 95%CI 0.32-3.38) and 94% vs. 93% (hazard ratio 1.41, 95%CI 0.51-3.92), respectively. Besides the EXP treatment (odds ratio 2.70, 95%CI 1.83-3.97), pre-treatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) <5, pre-treatment tumour size <40 mm and cT2 were associated with pCR. Distance from the anal verge was the only characteristic with a statistically significant difference in association with pCR between the EXP and STD treatment (Pinteraction=0.042). pCR rates did not increase with prolonged treatment time. CONCLUSIONS The doubled pCR rate of TNT compared to CRT results in similar oncological outcomes. Characteristics associated with pCR are the EXP treatment, normal CEA, and small tumour size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter H Zwart
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Sofieke J D Temmink
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hein Putter
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Lennart Blomqvist
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Annet G H Roodvoets
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Anna Martling
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Bengt Glimelius
- Uppsala University, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Koen C M J Peeters
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Surgery, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Affleck AG, Herzig D. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:609-617. [PMID: 38677824 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer has traditionally included sequenced multimodal therapy including radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery. The relative contribution of each and the order of treatments have evolved over the years. By the early twenty-first century, there was widespread use of the German Rectal Cancer Trial approach: preoperative chemoradiation, followed by standardized surgery including total mesorectal excision, and finally adjuvant chemotherapy. Recent advances have defined the superiority of moving the chemotherapy into the preoperative setting. This approach, termed total neoadjuvant therapy promises better systemic control and overall survival and expaned options for omitting surgery in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur G Affleck
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA. https://twitter.com/AffleckIv
| | - Daniel Herzig
- Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 Southwest Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code L-223A, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
O'Brien T, Hospers G, Conroy T, Lenz HJ, Smith JJ, Andrews E, O'Neill B, Leonard G. The role of total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a survey of specialists attending the All-Ireland Colorectal Cancer Conference 2022 including lead investigators of OPRA, PRODIGE-23 and RAPIDO. Ir J Med Sci 2024; 193:1183-1190. [PMID: 38141097 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03591-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has evolved following recent landmark trials of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT)-the delivery of preoperative chemotherapy sequenced with radiation. AIM To assess the preferences of colorectal surgery (CRS), radiation oncology (RO) and medical oncology (MO) specialists attending the All-Ireland Colorectal Cancer Conference (AICCC) 2022 regarding the neoadjuvant management of LARC. METHODS A live electronic survey explored the preferred treatment approach and TNT regimen for early-, intermediate-, bad-, and advanced-risk categories of rectal cancer according to the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines. The survey was preceded by an update from lead investigators of TNT trials (OPRA, PRODIGE-23 and RAPIDO), who then participated in a multidisciplinary panel discussion. RESULTS Ten CRS, 7 RO and 15 MO (32 of 45 specialists) participated fully in the survey resulting in a response rate of 71%. Ninety-four percent, 76% and 53% of specialists preferred a TNT approach for patients with advanced, bad, and intermediate-risk rectal cancer, respectively. A consolidation TNT regimen of long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by chemotherapy was the most preferred regimen. Upfront surgery was preferred by 77% for early-risk disease. CONCLUSION This survey illustrated the general acceptance of TNT by rectal cancer specialists attending the AICCC as a valuable treatment strategy for higher-risk category LARC. Whilst the treatment of LARC changes, it remains best practice to individualize care, incorporating the selective use of TNT as discussed by an MDT and in keeping with the patient's goals of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy O'Brien
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
| | - Geke Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Thierry Conroy
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, Nancy, France
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, Équipe MICS, Nancy, France
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jesse Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emmet Andrews
- Department of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Brian O'Neill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gregory Leonard
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu WY, Tang Y, Li N, Tang Y, Cheng YJ, Yang L, Fang H, Lu NN, Qi SN, Chen B, Wang SL, Song YW, Liu YP, Li YX, Liu Z, Liang JW, Pei W, Wang XS, Zhang HZ, Wang J, Zhou HT, Jin J. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in older patients with rectal cancer guided by comprehensive geriatric assessment within a multidisciplinary team-a multicenter phase II trial. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:442. [PMID: 38773457 PMCID: PMC11106876 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05046-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (preCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer in older people who were classified as "fit" by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). METHODS A single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial was designed. Patients were eligible for this study if they were aged 70 years or above and met the standards of "fit" (SIOG1) as evaluated by CGA and of the locally advanced risk category. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). Patients were scheduled to receive preCRT (50 Gy) with raltitrexed (3 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22). RESULTS One hundred and nine patients were evaluated by CGA, of whom eighty-six, eleven and twelve were classified into the fit, intermediate and frail category. Sixty-eight fit patients with a median age of 74 years were enrolled. Sixty-four patients (94.1%) finished radiotherapy without dose reduction. Fifty-four (79.3%) patients finished the prescribed raltitrexed therapy as planned. Serious toxicity (grade 3 or above) was observed in twenty-four patients (35.3%), and fourteen patients (20.6%) experienced non-hematological side effects. Within a median follow-up time of 36.0 months (range: 5.9-63.1 months), the 2-year overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 89.6% (95% CI: 82.3-96.9), 92.4% (95% CI: 85.9-98.9) and 75.6% (95% CI: 65.2-86.0), respectively. Forty-eight patients (70.6%) underwent surgery (R0 resection 95.8%, R1 resection 4.2%), the corresponding R0 resection rate among the patients with positive mesorectal fascia status was 76.6% (36/47). CONCLUSION This phase II trial suggests that preCRT is efficient with tolerable toxicities in older rectal cancer patients who were evaluated as fit based on CGA. TRIAL REGISTRATION The registration number on ClinicalTrials.gov was NCT02992886 (14/12/2016).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Yang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yun-Jie Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Lin Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ning-Ning Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shu-Nan Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shu-Lian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yong-Wen Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yue-Ping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ye-Xiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jian-Wei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Pei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xi-Shan Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hai-Zeng Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
| | - Hai-Tao Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Williams B, Gupta A, Iype P, Woll S, Koller SE, Shin J, Cologne KG, Lee SW, Duldulao MP. Pathologic Outcomes of Short-Course and Long-Course Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancers Treated With Total Neoadjuvant Therapy. Am Surg 2024:31348241256055. [PMID: 38770756 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241256055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is now the standard of care. Randomized trials suggest the use of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) are oncologically equivalent. OBJECTIVE To describe pathologic outcomes after surgical resections of patients receiving SCRT versus LCRT as part of TNT for LARC. PARTICIPANTS All patients with LARC treated at a single tertiary hospital who underwent proctectomy after completing TNT were included. Patients were excluded if adequate details of TNT were not available in the electronic medical record. RESULTS A total of 53 patients with LARC were included. Thirty-nine patients (73.5%) received LCRT and 14 (26.4%) received SCRT. Forty-nine patients (92.5%) were clinical stage III (cN1-2) prior to treatment. The average lymph node yield after proctectomy was 20.9 for SCRT and 17.0 for LCRT (P = .075). Of the 49 patients with clinically positive nodes before treatment, 76.9% of those who received SCRT and 72.2% of those who received LCRT achieved pN0 disease after TNT. Additionally, there were no significant differences in rates of pathologic complete response between patients who received SCRT and LCRT, 7.1% and 12.8%, respectively (P = .565). CONCLUSION Pathologic outcomes of patients with LARC treated with SCRT or LCRT, as part of TNT, may be similar. Further prospective trials are needed to assess long-term clinical outcomes and to determine best treatment protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Williams
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Abhinav Gupta
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Priyanka Iype
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sabrina Woll
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sarah E Koller
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joongho Shin
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kyle G Cologne
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sang W Lee
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marjun P Duldulao
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smith HG, Nilsson PJ, Shogan BD, Harji D, Gambacorta MA, Romano A, Brandl A, Qvortrup C. Neoadjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer: comprehensive review. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrae038. [PMID: 38747103 PMCID: PMC11094476 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy has an established role in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. However, its role continues to evolve due to both advances in the available treatment modalities, and refinements in the indications for neoadjuvant treatment and subsequent surgery. METHODS A narrative review of the most recent relevant literature was conducted. RESULTS Short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy have an established role in improving local but not systemic disease control in patients with rectal cancer. Total neoadjuvant therapy offers advantages over short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy, not only in terms of increased local response but also in reducing the risk of systemic relapses. Non-operative management is increasingly preferred to surgery in patients with rectal cancer and clinical complete responses but is still associated with some negative impacts on functional outcomes. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be of some benefit in patients with locally advanced colon cancer with proficient mismatch repair, although patient selection is a major challenge. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with deficient mismatch repair cancers in the colon or rectum is altering the treatment paradigm for these patients. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant treatments for patients with colon or rectal cancers continue to evolve, increasing the complexity of decision-making for patients and clinicians alike. This review describes the current guidance and most recent developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry G Smith
- Abdominalcenter K, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Dept. of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Benjamin D Shogan
- Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Deena Harji
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andreas Brandl
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Camilla Qvortrup
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Medioni M, Cervantes B, Huguet F, Bachet JB, Parc Y, André T, Lefèvre JH, Cohen R. [An update on total neoadjuvant treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum]. Bull Cancer 2024; 111:483-495. [PMID: 38553289 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
A major advance has been made in the management of rectal cancer, with the emergence in 2021 of total neoadjuvant treatment. The main publications from the RAPIDO and PRODIGE-23 trials reported a significant improvement in progression-free survival and the pathological complete response rate. The aim of this review is to synthesize recent data on neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer, to explain the long-term results of the RAPIDO and PRODIGE-23 trials, and to put them into perspective, considering current advances in de-escalation strategies. The update of the 5-year survival data from the RAPIDO trial highlights an increased risk of loco-regional relapse, with 11.7% of relapses in the experimental group and 8.1% in the control group, while the update of the PRODIGE-23 trial confirms the benefits of this treatment regimen, with a significant improvement in overall survival. In addition, the results of the OPRA and PROPSPECT trials confirm the benefit of total neoadjuvant treatment with induction chemotherapy, as well as the possibility of surgical de-escalation in the OPRA trial and radiotherapy in the PROSPECT trial. The challenge for the future is to identify patients who require total neoadjuvant treatment with the aim of curative surgery to obtain a cure without local or distant relapse, and those for whom therapeutic de-escalation can be envisaged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maroussia Medioni
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service d'oncologie médicale, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Baptiste Cervantes
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service d'oncologie médicale, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Florence Huguet
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Bachet
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, service d'hépato-gastroentérologie, Paris, France
| | - Yann Parc
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service de chirurgie générale et digestive, Paris, France
| | - Thierry André
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service d'oncologie médicale, 75012 Paris, France; INSERM URMS_938, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, SIRIC CURAMUS, équipe instabilité des microsatellites et cancer, équipe labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Jérémie H Lefèvre
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service de chirurgie générale et digestive, Paris, France
| | - Romain Cohen
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service d'oncologie médicale, 75012 Paris, France; INSERM URMS_938, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, SIRIC CURAMUS, équipe instabilité des microsatellites et cancer, équipe labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Iguchi K, Numata M, Atsumi Y, Sato T, Rino Y, Saito A. Robotic surgery after total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: pitfalls of beyond total mesorectal excision for patients with sidewall invasion. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:1047-1052. [PMID: 38566354 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
AIM Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is rapidly spreading. The robotic surgical techniques to approach lateral invasion, such as that of the pelvic plexus, have not yet been established. In this technical note, we present a video illustrating a surgical technique for lateral invasion using our novel technique and discuss its pitfalls. METHOD We present the case of a 65-year-old man with LARC. Robotic surgery was performed after TNT using the da Vinci Xi Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The surgical procedure was as follows: (1) D3 lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery using a medial-to-lateral approach; (2) rectal mobilization; (3) dissection of the ureterohypogastric fascia and ureter; and (4) combined resection of the hypogastric nerve and pelvic plexus. The key surgical point for sidewall invasion is the resection extent. Dividing the resection extent into three areas is important: zone A, which contains the pelvic plexus and is closest to the tumour; zone B, which contains the iliac vessels; and zone C, the most lateral zone, which contains the obturator nerves. This allows organ and function preservation by resecting only the smallest organ that truly requires R0 resection. RESULTS The operating time was 333 min, console time was 232 min, and blood loss was 0 mL. The circumferential resection margin was 10 mm, and an R0 resection was achieved. CONCLUSION We introduced a novel approach for robotic surgery after TNT for LARC with sidewall invasion. This technique can be performed safely and may help standardize 'beyond total mesorectal excision'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenta Iguchi
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Masakatsu Numata
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yosuke Atsumi
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Sato
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yasushi Rino
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Aya Saito
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bhutiani N, Peacock O, Uppal A, You YN, Bednarski BK, Skibber JM, Messick C, White MG, Chang GJ, Konishi T. The current multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:394-400. [PMID: 38707228 PMCID: PMC11066499 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer has rapidly evolved over the last several years. This review describes recent data surrounding total neoadjuvant therapy, organ preservation, and management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes. It then presents our treatment algorithm for management of rectal cancer at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the context of this and other existing literature. As part of this discussion, the review describes how we tailor management based upon both patient and tumor-related factors in an effort to optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Bhutiani
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Oliver Peacock
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Abhineet Uppal
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Y. Nancy You
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Brian K. Bednarski
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - John M. Skibber
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Craig Messick
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Michael G. White
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - George J. Chang
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Tsuyoshi Konishi
- Division of Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McKechnie T, Brennan K, Eskicioglu C, Farooq A, Patel SV. Applying the fragility index to randomized controlled trials evaluating total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: A methodological survey. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110148. [PMID: 38341094 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, there has been significant interest in, and adoption of, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We designed the present study to assess the robustness of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating contemporary TNTs for LARC using the fragility index (FI). MATERIALS AND METHODS Relevant articles were identified through a review article by Johnson et al. in the Canadian Journal of Surgery. Dichotomous outcomes within these RCTs were eligible for inclusion if the reported effect size had a p-value < 0.05. The main outcome was FI for each included outcome. Walsh et al.'s method of calculating FI was utilized. Correlations between FI and research characteristics were assessed using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane recommended tools. RESULTS Ten RCTs were identified with 25 outcomes having statistically significant differences between groups. Eleven outcomes were time-to-event outcomes, while the remainder were dichotomous outcomes. Approximately half (n = 13) were oncologic outcomes. The median FI was 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-16). The number of patients lost to follow-up exceeded the FI in 17 outcomes (68.0 %) and thus these results were considered "fragile". Lower FI was associated with high risk of bias (rho = -0.5594) and greater loss to follow-up (rho = -0.4394), while higher FI was associated with large study size (rho = 0.5120). CONCLUSIONS The robustness of outcomes from trials assessing TNT for LARC was found to be questionable. Most outcomes were fragile, as determined by the FI. This survey is limited by the number of included studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler McKechnie
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Kelly Brennan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Cagla Eskicioglu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ameer Farooq
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Sunil V Patel
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
De Felice F, Miccini M, Botticelli A, Roberto M, Petrucciani N. The multidisciplinary management of locally advanced rectal cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024:1-7. [PMID: 38676281 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2349137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The classic paradigm for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) consists of (chemo)radiotherapy (C)RT), total mesorectal excision, and adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT). At present, due to the high rate of distant metastasis (up to 30%), the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) with the administration of systemic CHT in the neoadjuvant setting has gained acceptance as standard of care.Our aim is to critically review the current literature on LARC management and summarize the different approaches recently proposed to improve clinical outcomes. It represents a starting step to develop an effective strategy that ultimately could harmonize the standard of care in daily clinical practice. AREAS COVERED Studies reporting the impact of TNT approaches were deemed eligible. De-escalation strategies, including non-operative management (NOM) after TNT, as well as RT omission or systemic therapy alone, were also investigated. EXPERT OPINION The year 2020 has seen promising new data from randomized phase III trials in the field of LARC management. Nowadays, TNT strategy has been accepted as the primary treatment for LARC. The role of de-escalation strategies is still unknown. The goal is to achieve better survival outcomes with improving quality of life. Only selected patients are likely to benefit from NOM or immunotherapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Botticelli
- Department of Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Roberto
- Department of Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Niccolò Petrucciani
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, St Andrea University Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sullo FG, Passardi A, Gallio C, Molinari C, Marisi G, Pozzi E, Solaini L, Bittoni A. Advancing Personalized Medicine in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2562. [PMID: 38731090 PMCID: PMC11084727 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer presents a significant burden globally, often requiring multimodal therapy for locally advanced cases. Long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by surgery have been conventional neoadjuvant approaches. Recent trials favor LCRT due to improved local control. However, distant tumor recurrence remains a concern, prompting the exploration of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) as a comprehensive treatment strategy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show promise, particularly in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, potentially revolutionizing neoadjuvant regimens. Nonoperative management (NOM) represents a viable alternative post-neoadjuvant therapy for selected patients achieving complete clinical response (cCR). Additionally, monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) emerges as a non-invasive method for the assessment of treatment response. This review synthesizes current evidence on TNT, ICIs, NOM, and ctDNA, elucidating their implications for rectal cancer management and highlighting avenues for future research and clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Giulio Sullo
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.G.S.); (C.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Alessandro Passardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.G.S.); (C.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Chiara Gallio
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.G.S.); (C.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Chiara Molinari
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (C.M.); (G.M.)
| | - Giorgia Marisi
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (C.M.); (G.M.)
| | - Eleonora Pozzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 47121 Forlì, Italy (L.S.)
| | - Leonardo Solaini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 47121 Forlì, Italy (L.S.)
| | - Alessandro Bittoni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.G.S.); (C.G.); (A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xu T, Feng L, Zhang W, Li H, Ma H, Abulimiti M, Tan Y, Deng F, Huang W, Zou S, Kang W, Jiang L, Wang Y, Hu C, Chen Y, Zhou H, Tang Y, Jin J. The efficacy and safety of short-course radiotherapy followed by sequential chemotherapy and Cadonilimab for locally advanced rectal cancer: a protocol of a phase II study. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:501. [PMID: 38641773 PMCID: PMC11031930 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12254-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), namely, intensifying preoperative treatment through the integration of radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy before surgery, was commonly recommended as the standard treatment. However, the risk of distant metastasis at 3 years remained higher than 20%, and the complete response (CR) rate was less than 30%. Several clinical trials had suggested a higher complete response rate when combining single-agent immunotherapy with short-course radiotherapy (SCRT). The CheckMate 142 study had shown encouraging outcomes of dual immunotherapy and seemingly comparable toxicity for CRC compared with single-agent immunotherapy in historical results. Therefore, dual immunotherapy might be more feasible in conjunction with the TNT paradigm of SCRT. We performed a phase II study to investigate whether the addition of a dual immune checkpoint inhibitor bispecific antibody, Cadonilimab, to SCRT combined with chemotherapy might further increase the clinical benefit and prognosis for LARC patients. METHODS This single-arm, multicenter, prospective, phase II study included patients with pathologically confirmed cT3-T4N0 or cT2-4N + rectal adenocarcinoma with an ECOG performance score of 0 or 1. Bispecific antibody immunotherapy was added to SCRT combined with chemotherapy. Patients enrolled would be treated with SCRT (25 Gy in five fractions over 1 week) for the pelvic cavity, followed by 4 cycles of CAPOX or 6 cycles of mFOLFOX and Cadonilimab. The primary endpoint was the CR rate, which was the ratio of the pathological CR rate plus the clinical CR rate. The secondary endpoints included local-regional control, distant metastasis, disease-free survival, overall survival, toxicity profile, quality of life and functional outcome of the rectum. To detect an increase in the complete remission rate from 21.8% to 40% with 80% power, 50 patients were needed. DISCUSSION This study would provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of SCRT plus bispecific antibody immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with LARC, which might be used as a candidate potential therapy in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION This phase II trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, under the identifier NCT05794750.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tongzhen Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lingling Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China
| | - Wenjue Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China
| | - Haoyue Li
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Huiying Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Muyasha Abulimiti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China
| | - Yutong Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China
| | - Feiyan Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China
| | - Wenting Huang
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Shuangmei Zou
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wenyan Kang
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China
| | - Liming Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China
| | - Chen Hu
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Yinggang Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China.
| | - Haitao Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Yuan Tang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Jing Jin
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Temmink SJD, Peeters KCMJ, Nilsson PJ, Martling A, van de Velde CJH. Surgical Outcomes after Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1539. [PMID: 38672621 PMCID: PMC11048284 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, the treatment of rectal cancer has changed considerably. The implementation of TME surgery has, in addition to decreasing the number of local recurrences, improved surgical morbidity and mortality. At the same time, the optimisation of radiotherapy in the preoperative setting has improved oncological outcomes even further, although higher perineal infection rates have been reported. Radiotherapy regimens have evolved through the adjustment of radiotherapy techniques and fields, increased waiting intervals, and, for more advanced tumours, adding chemotherapy. Concurrently, imaging techniques have significantly improved staging accuracy, facilitating more precise selection of advanced tumours. Although chemoradiotherapy does lead to the downsizing and -staging of these tumours, a very clear effect on sphincter-preserving surgery and the negative resection margin has not been proven. Aiming to decrease distant metastasis and improve overall survival for locally advanced rectal cancer, systemic chemotherapy can be added to radiotherapy, known as total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). High complete response rates, both pathological (pCR) and clinical (cCR), are reported after TNT. Patients who follow a Watch & Wait program after a cCR can potentially avoid surgical morbidity and colostomy. For both early and more advanced tumours, trials are now investigating optimal regimens in an attempt to offer organ preservation as much as possible. Multidisciplinary deliberation should include patient preference, treatment toxicity, and likelihood of end colostomy, but also the burden of intensive surveillance in a W&W program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofieke J. D. Temmink
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Koen C. M. J. Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Per J. Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kaval G, Dagoglu Kartal MG, Azamat S, Cingoz E, Ertas G, Karaman S, Kurtuldu B, Keskin M, Berker N, Karabulut S, Oral EN, Dagoglu Sakin N. Evaluating complete response prediction rates in locally advanced rectal cancer with different radiomics segmentation approaches. Pathol Oncol Res 2024; 30:1611744. [PMID: 38694706 PMCID: PMC11061551 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2024.1611744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Studies examining prediction of complete response (CR) in locally advanced rectum cancer (LARC) from pre/post chemoradiotherapy (CRT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are performed mostly with segmentations of the tumor, whereas only in two studies segmentation included tumor and mesorectum. Additionally, pelvic extramesorectal region, which is included in the clinical target volume (CTV) of radiotherapy, may contain information. Therefore, we aimed to compare predictive rates of radiomics analysis with features extracted from segmentations of tumor, tumor+mesorectum, and CTV. Methods and materials Ninety-three LARC patients who underwent CRT in our institution between 2012 and 2019 were retrospectively scanned. Patients were divided into CR and non-CR groups. Tumor, tumor+mesorectum and CTV were segmented on T2 preCRT MRI images. Extracted features were compared for best area under the curve (AUC) of CR prediction with 15 machine-learning models. Results CR was observed in 25 patients (26.8%), of whom 13 had pathological, and 12 had clinical complete response. For tumor, tumor+mesorectum and CTV segmentations, the best AUC were 0.84, 0.81, 0.77 in the training set and 0.85, 0.83 and 0.72 in the test set, respectively; sensitivity and specificity for the test set were 76%, 90%, 76% and 71%, 67% and 62%, respectively. Conclusion Although the highest AUC result is obtained from the tumor segmentation, the highest accuracy and sensitivity are detected with tumor+mesorectum segmentation and these findings align with previous studies, suggesting that the mesorectum contains valuable insights for CR. The lowest result is obtained with CTV segmentation. More studies with mesorectum and pelvic nodal regions included in segmentation are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gizem Kaval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | | | - Sena Azamat
- Department of Radiology, Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Eda Cingoz
- Department of Radiology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Gokhan Ertas
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Sule Karaman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Basak Kurtuldu
- Department of Emergency, Hackalibaba Hospital, Trabzon, Türkiye
| | - Metin Keskin
- Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Neslihan Berker
- Department of Pathology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Senem Karabulut
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Ethem Nezih Oral
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Nergiz Dagoglu Sakin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Soomro MY, Khan SR, Muhammad H, Ahmad S, Zehra N, Ali I, Samar MR, Hameed A, Moosajee M, Rashid YA. Exploring treatment outcomes in Stage II-III rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy at a tertiary care center in Pakistan: a comprehensive analysis of pathological outcomes. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:479. [PMID: 38627736 PMCID: PMC11020334 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12241-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rectal cancer treatment has transformed in recent years, with neoadjuvant treatment (NT) and total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) aiming to enhance pathological responses. This pioneering study in our country delves into rectal cancer management, offering crucial insights by examining pathological outcomes in patients treated with the NT and TNT approach, shaping the evolving landscape. METHODS In this retrospective-cohort study spanning January 2017 to December 2022 at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan, ethical approval was obtained to examine outcomes of two treatments. Patients were divided into TNT (chemoradiation and pre-surgery 5 FU-based chemotherapy) and NT (chemoradiation, surgery, and subsequent 5 FU-based chemotherapy). The primary end-point was response rates-no response, pathological complete response (pCR), near complete response (near CR), and partial response (PR). The Chi-Square Test for Independence assessed the association between treatment response and type (TNT or NT). Data analysis used STATA MP 64; significance was set at p < 0.05 for all two-tailed tests. RESULTS We analyzed 77 patients, 60 underwent standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and 17 followed the total neoadjuvant approach. Predominantly male, most were > 65 with ECOG 0-1. The TNT group showed higher response rates (76% vs 62%, p = 0.039), with 40.38% achieving pCR. In the overall population, pCR and near-CR were similar (27.2% vs 26%), while PR were 14%. Treatment characteristics correlated significantly with chemotherapy type, concurrent chemoradiation, LVI, PNI, and T, N, M staging (p < 0.05). Median overall survival was not reached, and mean survival was 89.1 months (CI: 95.0 to 83.3). Side effects varied, with notable differences in neuropathy, diarrhea, oral mucositis, and thrombocytopenia between NT and TNT groups. CONCLUSION Our study adds to evidence favoring neoadjuvant approaches in managing rectal cancer in pakistan. Demonstrating a favorable pcr rate, ongoing research with extended follow-up is essential, given the dynamic landscape of rectal cancer treatment for improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Saqib Raza Khan
- Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Section of Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
| | | | - Sujjawal Ahmad
- Aga Khan University Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Insia Ali
- Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Arif Hameed
- Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jin Y, Jiang J, Mao W, Bai M, Chen Q, Zhu J. Treatment strategies and molecular mechanism of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett 2024; 591:216858. [PMID: 38621460 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) remodels the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and modulates the immune response to indirectly destroy tumor cells, in addition to directly killing tumor cells. RT combined with immunotherapy may significantly enhance the efficacy of RT in colorectal cancer by modulating the microenvironment. However, the molecular mechanisms by which RT acts as an immunomodulator to modulate the immune microenvironment remain unclear. Further, the optimal modalities of RT combined with immunotherapy for the treatment of colorectal cancer, such as the time point of combining RT and immunization, the fractionation pattern and dosage of radiotherapy, and other methods to improve the efficacy, are also being explored parallelly. To address these aspects, in this review, we summarized the mechanisms by which RT modulates TIME and concluded the progress of RT combined with immunization in preclinical and clinical trials. Finally, we discussed heavy ion radiation therapy and the efficacy of prediction markers and other immune combination therapies. Overall, combining RT with immunotherapy to enhance antitumor effects will have a significant clinical implication and will help to facilitate individualized treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhao Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, China; Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China; Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences Hangzhou, 310000, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Jin Jiang
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing, 31400, China
| | - Wei Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, China; Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences Hangzhou, 310000, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Minghua Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Qianping Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, China; Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences Hangzhou, 310000, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, 310000, China.
| | - Ji Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, China; Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China; Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences Hangzhou, 310000, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, 310000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lafarge MW, Domingo E, Sirinukunwattana K, Wood R, Samuel L, Murray G, Richman SD, Blake A, Sebag-Montefiore D, Gollins S, Klieser E, Neureiter D, Huemer F, Greil R, Dunne P, Quirke P, Weiss L, Rittscher J, Maughan T, Koelzer VH. Image-based consensus molecular subtyping in rectal cancer biopsies and response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:89. [PMID: 38594327 PMCID: PMC11003957 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00580-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
The development of deep learning (DL) models to predict the consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) from histopathology images (imCMS) is a promising and cost-effective strategy to support patient stratification. Here, we investigate whether imCMS calls generated from whole slide histopathology images (WSIs) of rectal cancer (RC) pre-treatment biopsies are associated with pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant long course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) with single agent fluoropyrimidine. DL models were trained to classify WSIs of colorectal cancers stained with hematoxylin and eosin into one of the four CMS classes using a multi-centric dataset of resection and biopsy specimens (n = 1057 WSIs) with paired transcriptional data. Classifiers were tested on a held out RC biopsy cohort (ARISTOTLE) and correlated with pCR to LCRT in an independent dataset merging two RC cohorts (ARISTOTLE, n = 114 and SALZBURG, n = 55 patients). DL models predicted CMS with high classification performance in multiple comparative analyses. In the independent cohorts (ARISTOTLE, SALZBURG), cases with WSIs classified as imCMS1 had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving pCR (OR = 2.69, 95% CI 1.01-7.17, p = 0.048). Conversely, imCMS4 was associated with lack of pCR (OR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.88, p = 0.031). Classification maps demonstrated pathologist-interpretable associations with high stromal content in imCMS4 cases, associated with poor outcome. No significant association was found in imCMS2 or imCMS3. imCMS classification of pre-treatment biopsies is a fast and inexpensive solution to identify patient groups that could benefit from neoadjuvant LCRT. The significant associations between imCMS1/imCMS4 with pCR suggest the existence of predictive morphological features that could enhance standard pathological assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime W Lafarge
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Enric Domingo
- Department of Oncology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Korsuk Sirinukunwattana
- Ground Truth Labs, Oxford, UK
- Department of Engineering Science, Institute of Biomedical Engineering (IBME), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ruby Wood
- Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Leslie Samuel
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graeme Murray
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Susan D Richman
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew Blake
- Department of Oncology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Simon Gollins
- North Wales Cancer Treatment Centre, Besti Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bodelwyddan, UK
| | - Eckhard Klieser
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Daniel Neureiter
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Florian Huemer
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Richard Greil
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Philip Dunne
- The Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Philip Quirke
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lukas Weiss
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jens Rittscher
- Department of Engineering Science, Institute of Biomedical Engineering (IBME), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Tim Maughan
- Department of Oncology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Viktor H Koelzer
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Department of Oncology and Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Roohani S, Wiltink LM, Kaul D, Spałek MJ, Haas RL. Update on Dosing and Fractionation for Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy for Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:543-555. [PMID: 38478330 PMCID: PMC10997691 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01188-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) over 5-6 weeks with daily doses of 1.8-2.0 Gy to a total dose of 50-50.4 Gy is standard of care for localized high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities and trunk wall. One exception is myxoid liposarcomas where the phase II DOREMY trial applying a preoperative dose of 36 Gy in 2 Gy fractions (3-4 weeks treatment) has achieved excellent local control rates of 100% after a median follow-up of 25 months.Hypofractionated preoperative RT has been investigated in a number of phase II single-arm studies suggesting that daily doses of 2.75-8 Gy over 1-3 weeks can achieve similar oncological outcomes to conventional neoadjuvant RT. Prospective data with direct head-to-head comparison to conventional neoadjuvant RT investigating oncological outcomes and toxicity profiles is eagerly awaited.For the entire group of retroperitoneal sarcomas, RT is not the standard of care. The randomized multi-center STRASS trial did not find a benefit in abdominal recurrence-free survival by the addition of preoperative RT. However, for the largest histological subgroup of well-differentiated and grades I and II dedifferentiated liposarcomas, the STRASS trial and the post-hoc propensity-matched STREXIT analysis have identified a possible benefit in survival by preoperative RT. These patients deserve to be informed about the pros and cons of preoperative RT while the longer follow-up data from the STRASS trial is awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyer Roohani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Lisette M Wiltink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mateusz Jacek Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Radiotherapy I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Rick L Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Safont MJ, García-Figueiras R, Hernando-Requejo O, Jimenez-Rodriguez R, Lopez-Vicente J, Machado I, Ayuso JR, Bustamante-Balén M, De Torres-Olombrada MV, Domínguez Tristancho JL, Fernández-Aceñero MJ, Suarez J, Vera R. Interdisciplinary Spanish consensus on a watch-and-wait approach for rectal cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:825-835. [PMID: 37787973 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03322-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Watch-and-wait has emerged as a new strategy for the management of rectal cancer when a complete clinical response is achieved after neoadjuvant therapy. In an attempt to standardize this new clinical approach, initiated by the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors (TTD), and with the participation of the Spanish Association of Coloproctology (AECP), the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP), the Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (SEED), the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), and the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology (SERAM), we present herein a consensus on a watch-and-wait approach for the management of rectal cancer. We have focused on patient selection, the treatment schemes evaluated, the optimal timing for evaluating the clinical complete response, the oncologic outcomes after the implementation of this strategy, and a protocol for surveillance of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Jose Safont
- Oncology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia. Valencia University, Av. de les Tres Creus, 2, 46014, València, Spain.
| | - Roberto García-Figueiras
- Radiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | | | - Jorge Lopez-Vicente
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Mostoles, Mósteles, Spain
| | - Isidro Machado
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
- Pathology Department, Patologika Laboratory QuironSalud, Valencia, Spain
- Pathology Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Marco Bustamante-Balén
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Mª Jesús Fernández-Aceñero
- Surgical Pathology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdiSSC, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Suarez
- General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ruth Vera
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación (Idisna), Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Willett CG, Acklin-Wehnert S. Neoadjuvant Short- Vs. Long-Course Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: How to Choose. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:427-433. [PMID: 38386240 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01185-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Over the past decades, the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer has evolved dramatically due to improvements in diagnostic imaging, surgical technique, and the addition of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Fractionation of neoadjuvant radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy remains the subject of discussion and the question multiple recent trials have aimed to answer. In light of recent data and concern for locoregional recurrence, our institution favors long-course chemoradiation in most cases, especially in low-lying primaries, threatened circumferential resection margin, consideration of non-operative management, or if the surgeon has concerns for resectability. Exceptions would include cases of oligometastatic disease planned for metastasectomy in which curative-intent treatment was pursued or if additional factors required a reduction in treatment time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G Willett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3085 Med Ctr, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Scarlett Acklin-Wehnert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3085 Med Ctr, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lin W, Li C, Clement EA, Brown CJ, Raval MJ, Karimuddin AA, Ghuman A, Phang PT. Surgical Outcomes in Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer Versus Standard Long-course Chemoradiation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg 2024; 279:620-630. [PMID: 38009646 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the impact of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for rectal cancers on surgical complications and surgical pathology when compared with standard long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT). BACKGROUND The oncological benefits of TNT are well published in previous meta-analyses, but there is little synthesized information on how it affects surgical outcomes. A recent study has suggested an increase in local recurrence and higher rates of breached total mesorectal excision (TME) plane in TNT patients. METHODS This study conformed to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A search was performed in Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane databases, EMBASE and CINAHL to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes between TNT and LCRT. Meta-analyses of pooled proportions between TNT and LCRT were performed, comparing primary outcomes of surgical mortality, morbidity and all reported complications; surgical-pathology differences, namely mesorectal quality, R0 resection rates, circumferential resection margin positive rates, and sphincter preservation rates. Death and progression of disease during neoadjuvant treatment period was also compared. Risk of bias of RCTs was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS A total of 3185 patients with rectal cancer from 11 RCTs were included in the analysis: 1607 received TNT and 1578 received LCRT, of which 1422 (TNT arm) and 1391 (LCRT arm) underwent surgical resection with curative intent. There was no significant difference in mortality [risk ratio (RR)=0.86, 95% CI: 0.13-5.52, P =0.88, I2 =52%] or major complications (RR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.86-1.26, P =0.70, I2 =0%) between TNT and LCRT. There was a significantly higher risk of breached TME in TNT group on pooled analysis (RR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.03-12.16, P =0.03, I2 =0%), and on subgroup analysis there is higher risk of breached TME in those receiving extended duration of neoadjuvant treatment (>17 weeks from start of treatment to surgery) when compared with LCRT (RR=1.61, 95% CI: 1.06-2.44, P =0.03). No difference in R0 resection rates (RR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.66-1.10, P =0.21, I2 =15%), circumferential resection margin positive rates (RR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.65-1.16, P =0.35, I2 =10%) or sphincter preservation rates (RR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.83-1.25, P =0.88, I2 =57%) were observed. There was a significantly lower risk of progression of disease to an unresectable stage during the neoadjuvant treatment period in TNT patients (RR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.92, P =0.03, I2 =18%). On subgroup analysis, it appears to favor those receiving extended duration of neoadjuvant treatment (RR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.80, P =0.002), and those receiving induction-type chemotherapy in TNT (RR=0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.88, P =0.03). CONCLUSIONS TNT increases rates of breached TME which can contribute to higher local recurrence rates. TNT, however, improves systemic control by reducing early progression of disease during neoadjuvant treatment period. Further research is warranted to identify patients that will benefit from this strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjie Lin
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Christine Li
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Elizabeth A Clement
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Carl J Brown
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Manoj J Raval
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ahmer A Karimuddin
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amandeep Ghuman
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Paul T Phang
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wang C, Liu X, Wang W, Miao Z, Li X, Liu D, Hu K. Treatment Options for Distal Rectal Cancer in the Era of Organ Preservation. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:434-452. [PMID: 38517596 PMCID: PMC10997725 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01194-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The introduction of total mesorectal excision into the radical surgery of rectal cancer has significantly improved the oncological outcome with longer survival and lower local recurrence. Traditional treatment modalities of distal rectal cancer, relying on radical surgery, while effective, take their own set of risks, including surgical complications, potential damage to the anus, and surrounding structure owing to the pursuit of thorough resection. The progress of operating methods as well as the integration of systemic therapies and radiotherapy into the peri-operative period, particularly the exciting clinical complete response of patients after neoadjuvant treatment, have paved the way for organ preservation strategy. The non-inferiority oncological outcome of "watch and wait" compared with radical surgery underscores the potential of organ preservation not only to control local recurrence but also to reduce the need for treatments followed by structure destruction, hopefully improving the long-term quality of life. Radical radiotherapy provides another treatment option for patients unwilling or unable to undergo surgery. Organ preservation points out the direction of treatment for distal rectal cancer, while additional researches are needed to answer remaining questions about its optimal use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaoliang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Weiping Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Zheng Miao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaoyan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Dingchao Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ishizuka M, Shibuya N, Hachiya H, Nishi Y, Takayanagi M, Fujita J, Ihara K, Shiraki T, Matsumoto T, Mori S, Iso Y, Nakamura T, Aoki T, Irisawa A. Clinical influence of prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection on oncologic outcomes of patients with mid-low rectal cancer undergoing mesorectal excision: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:548-558. [PMID: 38583909 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although several recent meta-analyses have investigated the clinical influence of the addition of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) on oncologic outcomes in patients with mid-low rectal cancer (RC) undergoing mesorectal excision (ME), most studies included in such meta-analyses were retrospectively designed. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the clinical influence of prophylactic LLND on oncologic outcomes in patients with mid-low RC undergoing ME. METHODS A comprehensive electronic search of the literature up to July 2022 was performed to identify studies that compared oncologic outcomes between patients with mid-low RC undergoing ME who underwent LLND and patients with mid-low RC undergoing ME who did not undergo LLND. A meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effects models and the generic inverse variance method to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs, and heterogeneity was analyzed using I2 statistics. RESULTS A total of 6 studies, consisting of 3 randomized and 3 propensity score matching studies, were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis of 2 randomized studies demonstrated no significant effect of prophylactic LLND on improving oncologic outcomes concerning overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.89-1.69; I2 = 0%; P = .22) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.81-1.31; I2 = 28%; P = .83). CONCLUSION The results of this meta-analysis revealed no significant influence of prophylactic LLND on oncologic outcomes-OS and RFS-in patients with mid-low RC who underwent ME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuru Ishizuka
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan; Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
| | - Norisuke Shibuya
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan; Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Hachiya
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan; Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Yusuke Nishi
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan; Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Masashi Takayanagi
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Junki Fujita
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ihara
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Shiraki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Takatsugu Matsumoto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Shozo Mori
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Iso
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Takatoshi Nakamura
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Taku Aoki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Atsushi Irisawa
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Liu IC, Gearhart S, Ke S, Hu C, Chung H, Efron J, Gabre-Kidan A, Najjar P, Atallah C, Safar B, Christenson ES, Azad NS, Lee V, Zaheer A, Birkness-Gartman JE, Reddy AV, Narang AK, Meyer J. Surgical and local control outcomes after sequential short-course radiation therapy and chemotherapy for rectal cancer. Surg Open Sci 2024; 18:42-49. [PMID: 38318322 PMCID: PMC10838936 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is an accepted approach for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and is associated with a decreased risk of development of metastatic disease compared to standard neoadjuvant therapy. However, questions remain regarding surgical outcomes and local control in patients who proceed to surgery, particularly when radiation is given first in the neoadjuvant sequence. We report on our institution's experience with patients who underwent short-course radiation therapy, consolidation chemotherapy, and surgery. Methods We retrospectively reviewed surgical specimen outcomes, postoperative complications, and local/pelvic control in a large cohort of patients with LARC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy incorporating upfront short-course radiation therapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy. Results In our cohort of 83 patients who proceeded to surgery, a complete/near-complete mesorectal specimen was achieved in 90 % of patients. This outcome was not associated with the time interval from completion of radiation to surgery. Postoperative complications were acceptably low. Local control at two years was 93.4 % for all patients- 97.6 % for those with low-risk disease and 90.4 % for high-risk disease. Conclusion Upfront short-course radiation therapy and consolidation chemotherapy is an effective treatment course. Extended interval from completion of short-course radiation therapy did not impact surgical specimen quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Chia Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Susan Gearhart
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Division of Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Suqi Ke
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Chen Hu
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Haniee Chung
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Division of Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan Efron
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Division of Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alodia Gabre-Kidan
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Division of Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Peter Najjar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Division of Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Chady Atallah
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bashar Safar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric S. Christenson
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nilofer S. Azad
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Valerie Lee
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Atif Zaheer
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Abhinav V. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amol K. Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Socha J, Bujko K. Repopulation of Rectal Cancer May Explain Worse Local Control After Short-Course Radiation Therapy in the RAPIDO Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:e204-e205. [PMID: 38064232 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Socha
- Department of Radiotherapy, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Oncology Centre, Częstochowa, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Bujko
- Department of Radiotherapy, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Glimelius B. Recent advances in rectal cancer treatment - are we on the right track? Ups J Med Sci 2024; 129:10537. [PMID: 38449909 PMCID: PMC10916366 DOI: 10.48101/ujms.v129.10537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Staging and treatment of rectal cancer have evolved over several decades with considerably fewer locoregional recurrences but no marked improved survival since systemic recurrence risks remain virtually unchanged. This development will briefly be summarised followed by a thorough discussion of two recent developments. Methods A systematic approach towards the literature is aimed at focusing on organ preservation and the delivery of all non-surgical treatments prior to surgery or total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). Results Organ preservation, that is to defer surgery if the tumour happens to disappear completely after any pre-treatment given to locally advanced tumours to decrease recurrence risks has increased in popularity and is, if not universally, widely accepted. To give neo-adjuvant treatment to intentionally obtain a clinically complete remission to avoid surgery is practised in some environments but is mostly still experimental. TNT, that is to provide both radiotherapy and chemotherapy aimed at killing microscopic disease in the pelvis or elsewhere has been subject to several trials. Collectively, they show that the chance of achieving a complete response, pathologically or clinically, has approximately doubled, increasing the chance for organ preservation, and the risk of distant metastasis has decreased at least in some trials. The best schedule remains to be established. Conclusions To obtain substantial progress and also improve survival, the systemic treatments need to be improved even if preoperative delivery is more effective and better tolerated than postoperative. The locoregional treatment may be further optimised through better risk prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Verheij FS, Omer DM, Williams H, Lin ST, Qin LX, Buckley JT, Thompson HM, Yuval JB, Kim JK, Dunne RF, Marcet J, Cataldo P, Polite B, Herzig DO, Liska D, Oommen S, Friel CM, Ternent C, Coveler AL, Hunt S, Gregory A, Varma MG, Bello BL, Carmichael JC, Krauss J, Gleisner A, Guillem JG, Temple L, Goodman KA, Segal NH, Cercek A, Yaeger R, Nash GM, Widmar M, Wei IH, Pappou EP, Weiser MR, Paty PB, Smith JJ, Wu AJ, Gollub MJ, Saltz LB, Garcia-Aguilar J. Long-Term Results of Organ Preservation in Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma Treated With Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: The Randomized Phase II OPRA Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:500-506. [PMID: 37883738 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.To assess long-term risk of local tumor regrowth, we report updated organ preservation rate and oncologic outcomes of the OPRA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02008656). Patients with stage II/III rectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation (INCT-CRT) or chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CRT-CNCT). Patients who achieved a complete or near-complete response after finishing treatment were offered watch-and-wait (WW). Total mesorectal excision (TME) was recommended for those who achieved an incomplete response. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary end point was TME-free survival. In total, 324 patients were randomly assigned (INCT-CRT, n = 158; CRT-CNCT, n = 166). Median follow-up was 5.1 years. The 5-year DFS rates were 71% (95% CI, 64 to 79) and 69% (95% CI, 62 to 77) for INCT-CRT and CRT-CNCT, respectively (P = .68). TME-free survival was 39% (95% CI, 32 to 48) in the INCT-CRT group and 54% (95% CI, 46 to 62) in the CRT-CNCT group (P = .012). Of 81 patients with regrowth, 94% occurred within 2 years and 99% occurred within 3 years. DFS was similar for patients who underwent TME after restaging (64% [95% CI, 53 to 78]) and patients in WW who underwent TME after regrowth (64% [95% CI, 53 to 78]; P = .94). Updated analysis continues to show long-term organ preservation in half of the patients with rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy. In patients who enter WW, most cases of tumor regrowth occur in the first 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floris S Verheij
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Dana M Omer
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Hannah Williams
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sabrina T Lin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Li-Xuan Qin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James T Buckley
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Hannah M Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jonathan B Yuval
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jin K Kim
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Richard F Dunne
- Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Jorge Marcet
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Peter Cataldo
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Blase Polite
- Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Daniel O Herzig
- Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - David Liska
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Samuel Oommen
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, John Muir Cancer Institute, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, CA
| | - Charles M Friel
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Charles Ternent
- Methodist Hospital Physicians Clinic Colon and Rectal Surgery and The Creighton University Clinical Research Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Andrew L Coveler
- Department of Medicine, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Steven Hunt
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Anita Gregory
- Department of Surgery, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, CA
| | - Madhulika G Varma
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Brian L Bello
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | - Joseph C Carmichael
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA
| | - John Krauss
- Department of Medicine, Rogel Cancer Center at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ana Gleisner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, CO
| | - José G Guillem
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Larissa Temple
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Neil H Segal
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Maria Widmar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Iris H Wei
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Emmanouil P Pappou
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Philip B Paty
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Abraham J Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Leonard B Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Xu X, Zhong H, You J, Ren M, Fingerhut A, Zheng M, Li J, Yang X, Song H, Zhang S, Ding C, Abuduaini N, Yu M, Liu J, Zhang Y, Kang L, Cai Z, Feng B. Revolutionizing sphincter preservation in ultra-low rectal cancer: exploring the potential of transanal endoscopic intersphincteric resection (taE-ISR): a propensity score-matched cohort study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:709-720. [PMID: 38016136 PMCID: PMC10871607 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the optimization of neoadjuvant treatment regimens, the indications for intersphincteric resection (ISR) have expanded. However, limitations such as unclear surgical field, impaired anal function, and failure of anal preservation still exist. Transanal total mesorectal excision can complement the drawbacks of ISR. Therefore, this study combined these two techniques and proposed transanal endoscopic intersphincteric resection (taE-ISR), aiming to explore the value of this novel technique in anal preservation for ultra-low rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Four high-volume centres were involved. After 1:1 propensity score-matching, patients with ultra-low rectal cancer underwent taE-ISR ( n =90) or ISR ( n =90) were included. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, pathological results, and follow-up were compared between the two groups. A nomogram model was established to assess the potential risks of anal preservation. RESULTS The incidence of adjacent organ injury (0.0% vs. 5.6%, P =0.059), positive distal resection margin (1.1% vs. 8.9%, P =0.034), and incomplete specimen (2.2% vs. 13.3%, P =0.012) were lower in taE-ISR group. Moreover, the anal preservation rate was significantly higher in taE-ISR group (97.8% vs. 82.2%, P =0.001). Patients in the taE-ISR group showed a better disease-free survival ( P =0.044) and lower cumulative recurrence ( P =0.022) compared to the ISR group. Surgery procedure, tumour distance, and adjacent organ injury were factors influencing anal preservation in patients with ultra-low rectal cancer. CONCLUSION taE-ISR technique was safe, feasible, and improved surgical quality, anal preservation rate and survival outcomes in ultra-low rectal cancer patients. It held significant clinical value and showed promising application prospects for anal preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ximo Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
| | - Hao Zhong
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun You
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen
| | - Mingyang Ren
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong
| | - Abe Fingerhut
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Section for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, Graz, Austria
| | - Minhua Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianwen Li
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Haiqin Song
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Sen Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chengsheng Ding
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Naijipu Abuduaini
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengqin Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingyi Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Liang Kang
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhenghao Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo Feng
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lee SF, Yip PL, Wo B, Wong NSM, Vellayappan BA, Mamon HJ, Lee FAS. Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy or chemoradiation plus consolidative chemotherapy followed by radical operation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1284569. [PMID: 38322287 PMCID: PMC10844885 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1284569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Limited evidence compares short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT), both of which are followed by consolidative chemotherapy before radical rectal surgery. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess treatment response, survival outcomes, and toxicity in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Materials and methods Patients (cT3-4 and/or N+) treated with SCRT or LCCRT, consolidative chemotherapy, or total mesorectal excision between 2013 and 2021 were identified. the cause-specific cumulative incidence of disease-related treatment failure, locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, and overall survival were evaluated using flexible parametric competing risk analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods, adjusted for treatment regimens and clinicopathological factors. A pathological complete response (pCR), tumor downstaging, and toxicity have been reported. Results Among the 144 patients, 115 (80%) underwent curative rectal surgery. The LCCRT and SCRT groups achieved pCR in 10 (18%) and seven (12%) patients, respectively (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-4.78). The adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio for disease-related treatment failure with LCCRT versus SCRT was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.08-0.87). Three-year cumulative probability of disease-related treatment failure was 10.0% and 25.6% for LCCRT and SCRT, respectively. No significant differences in T-downstaging, N-downstaging, significant pathologic downstaging (ypT0-2N0), locoregional failure, distant metastasis, or overall survival were found. Late rectal toxicity occurred in 10 (15%) LCCRT and two (3%) SCRT patients, respectively. Conclusion LCCRT with consolidative chemotherapy demonstrated improved disease-related treatment failure compared with SCRT, despite higher late rectal toxicity. Further research is needed to assess the long-term oncologic outcomes and toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shing Fung Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pui Lam Yip
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Barry Wo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Natalie Sean-Man Wong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Balamurugan A. Vellayappan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Harvey J. Mamon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Francis Ann Shing Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wen F, Lin T, Zhang P, Zeng H, Wei Q, Shen Y. Bladder sparing by short-course radiotherapy combined with toripalimab in high-risk/extremely high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HOPE-04): study protocol for a single-arm, prospective, phase II trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e076663. [PMID: 38262639 PMCID: PMC10806730 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radical cystectomy remains the standard treatment for intravesical Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) because potential bladder-preserving therapies are not well established. Combination of radiotherapy with programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody may offer an optional bladder preservation treatment for high-risk/extremely high risk NMIBC. Hence, the current study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of short-course radiotherapy (5×5 Gy) and toripalimab (PD-1 antibody) as a novel bladder sparing treatment in this population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS HOPE-04 is an open-label, single-arm, phase II study, designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of short-course radiotherapy and toripalimab in patients with high-risk/extremely high risk NMIBC. Fifty-five patients with pathological and imaging diagnosed NMIBC with or without BCG treatment will be recruited. Radiotherapy of 5×5 Gy will be given to the whole bladder followed by a focal tumour bed boost and concomitant administration of toripalimab of 240 mg intravenous infusion every 21 days for 12 cycles (about 1 year). The primary endpoints are disease-free survival and safety. The secondary endpoint is overall survival. Additional indicators include implementation rate of salvage surgery and quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Trial findings will be disseminated via peer reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Chinese Ethics Committee of Registering Clinical Trials (ChiCTR2200059970).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Wen
- Abdominal Oncology Ward, Division of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Tianhai Lin
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hao Zeng
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yali Shen
- Abdominal Oncology Ward, Division of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Conces ML, Mahipal A. Adoption of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:366-382. [PMID: 38248109 PMCID: PMC10813931 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31010024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Local and metastatic recurrence are primary concerns following the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Chemoradiation (CRT) can reduce the local recurrence rates and has subsequently moved to the neoadjuvant setting from the adjuvant setting. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates have also been noted to be greater in patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT prior to surgery. The standard approach to treating LARC would often involve CRT followed by surgery and optional adjuvant chemotherapy and remained the treatment paradigm for almost two decades. However, patients were often unable to complete adjuvant chemotherapy due to a decreased tolerance of chemotherapy following surgery, which led to upfront treatment with both CRT and chemotherapy, and total neoadjuvant therapy, or TNT, was created. The efficacy outcomes of local recurrence, disease-free survival, and pCR have improved in patients receiving TNT compared to the standard approach. Additionally, more recent data suggest a possible improvement in overall survival as well. Patients with a complete clinical response following TNT have the opportunity for watch-and-wait surveillance, allowing some patients to undergo organ preservation. Here, we discuss the clinical trials and studies that led to the adoption of TNT as the standard of care for LARC, with the possibility of watch-and-wait surveillance for patients achieving complete responses. We also review the possibility of overtreating some patients with LARC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amit Mahipal
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Huang CY, Bai MH, Shen JW, Sun QQ, Feng YR, Chen QP, Mao W, Ju HX, Zhu J. Anus preservation in low rectal adenocarcinoma based on MMR/MSI status (APRAM): a study protocol for a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre phase III trial. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:57. [PMID: 38200410 PMCID: PMC10782729 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11829-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anus preservation has been a challenge in the treatment of patients with low rectal adenocarcinoma (within 5 cm from the anal verge) because it is difficult to spare the anus with its functioning sphincter complex under the safe margin of tumour resection. Patients with dMMR/MSI-H can achieve a favourable complete response (CR) rate by using a single immune checkpoint inhibitor. For patients with pMMR/MSS/MSI-L, intensified neoadjuvant three-drug chemotherapy may be the preferred option for anal preservation. In addition, the watch and wait (W&W) strategy has been proven safe and feasible for patients with rectal cancer who achieve a clinical complete response (cCR). Therefore, we initiated this clinical trial to explore the optimal neoadjuvant treatment pattern for patients with low locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with different MMR/MSI statuses, aiming to achieve a higher cCR rate with the W&W strategy and ultimately provide more patients with a chance of anus preservation. METHODS This is a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre phase III trial. Patients with clinical stage T2-4 and/or N + tumours located within 5 cm from the anal verge are considered eligible. Based on the results of pathological biopsy, the patients are divided into two groups: dMMR/MSI-H and pMMR/MSS. Patients in the dMMR/MSI-H group will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either arm A (monoimmunotherapy) or arm B (short-course radiotherapy followed by monoimmunotherapy). Patients in the pMMR/MSS group will be initially treated with long-term pelvic radiation with concurrent capecitabine combined with irinotecan. Two weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to arm C (XELIRI six cycle regime) or arm D (FOLFIRINOX nine cycle regime). The irinotecan dose will be adjusted according to the UGT1A1-genotype. After treatment, a comprehensive assessment will be performed to determine whether a cCR has been achieved. If achieved, the W&W strategy will be adopted; otherwise, total mesorectal excision (TME) will be performed. The primary endpoint is cCR with the maintenance of 12 months at least, determined using digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and rectal MRI or PET/CT as a supplementary method. DISCUSSION APRAM will explore the best anus preservation model for low LARC, combining the strategies of consolidation chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and short-course radiotherapy, and aims to preserve the anus of more patients using W&W. Our study provides an accurate individual treatment mode based on the MMR/MSI status for patients with low LARC, and more patients will receive the opportunity for anus preservation under our therapeutic strategy, which would transform into long-term benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05669092 (Registered 28th Nov 2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Yi Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming-Hua Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jin-Wen Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Quan-Quan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yan-Ru Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qian-Ping Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei Mao
- Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Xing Ju
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Ji Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 310022, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, 310022, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Li J, Hu YT, Liu CC, Wang LH, Ju HX, Huang XF, Chi P, Du JL, Wang JP, Xiao Y, Lin GL, Zhang W, Zhao H, Liu M, Song YM, Xu D, Wang JW, Sun LF, Xie HT, Cao HF, Xiao Q, Wang J, Wu QB, Li DC, Dai S, Jiang WZ, Shen L, Yuan Y, Wang ZQ, Ding KF. Primary Surgery Followed by Selective Chemoradiotherapy Versus Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(23)08261-5. [PMID: 38185388 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this work was to determine whether locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with negative mesorectal fascia (MRF) predicted by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be excluded from preoperative radiation therapy treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS This multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with LARC within 6 to 12 cm from the anal verge and with negative MRI-predicted MRF. Participants were randomized to the intervention group (primary surgery, in which the patients with positive pathologic [CRM] circumferential margins were subjected to chemoradiotherapy [CRT] and those with negative CRM underwent adjuvant chemotherapy according to pathologic staging) or the control group (preoperative CRT, in which all patients underwent subsequent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS A total of 275 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 140) and control (n = 135) groups, in which 33.57% and 28.15% patients were at clinical T4 stage and 85.92% and 80.45% patients were at "bad" or "ugly" risk in the intervention and control groups, respectively. There were 2 patients (1.52%) and 1 patient (0.77%) with positive CRM in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P > .05). The non-adherence rates for the intervention and control groups were 3.6% and 23.7%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 34.6 months (IQR, 18.2-45.7), 43 patients had positive events (28 patients and 15 patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively). There were 6 patients (4.4%) with local recurrence in the intervention group and none in the control group, which led to the termination of the trial. The 3-year DFS rate was 81.82% in the intervention group (95% CI, 78.18%-85.46%) and 85.37% in the control group (95% CI, 81.75%-88.99%), with a difference of -3.55% (95% CI, -3.71% to -3.39%; hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 0.94-3.30). In the per-protocol data set, the difference between 3-year DFS rates was -5.44% (95% CI, -5.63% to -5.25%; hazard ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.01-4.06). CONCLUSIONS Based on the outcomes of this trial, in patients with LARC and MRI-negative MRF, primary surgery could negatively influence their DFS rates. Therefore, primary surgery was an inferior strategy compared with preoperative CRT followed by surgery and cannot be recommended for patients with LARC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ye-Ting Hu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Cheng-Cheng Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Liu-Hong Wang
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Xing Ju
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Xue-Feng Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Pan Chi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jin-Lin Du
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Jian-Ping Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Yi Xiao
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Guo-Le Lin
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yong-Mao Song
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Dong Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jian-Wei Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Li-Feng Sun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hai-Ting Xie
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hong-Feng Cao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qian Xiao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qing-Bin Wu
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - De-Chuan Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Sheng Dai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Zhong Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Li Shen
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China; Department of Radiation Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Ministry of Education, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ying Yuan
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China; Department of Medical Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Ministry of Education, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zi-Qiang Wang
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Ke-Feng Ding
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nilsson PJ. T3 N1 M0 rectal cancer: optimal initial management is total neoadjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad322. [PMID: 37995257 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Langenfeld SJ, Davis BR, Vogel JD, Davids JS, Temple LKF, Cologne KG, Hendren S, Hunt S, Garcia Aguilar J, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rectal Cancer 2023 Supplement. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:18-31. [PMID: 37647138 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sean J Langenfeld
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Bradley R Davis
- Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Jon D Vogel
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | - Larissa K F Temple
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Kyle G Cologne
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Samantha Hendren
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Steven Hunt
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Julio Garcia Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel L Feingold
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ian M Paquette
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Peng Q, Tao J, Xu Y, Shen Y, Wang Y, Jiao Y, Mao Y, Zhu Y, Liu Y, Tian Y. Lipid metabolism-associated genes serve as potential predictive biomarkers in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in rectal cancer. Transl Oncol 2024; 39:101828. [PMID: 38000147 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the potential role of lipid metabolism-associated genes (LMAGs) in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and immunotherapy for rectal cancer. METHODS Differential LMAGs were characterized and functional enrichment analysis was performed. Multiple machine learning algorithms were combined to explore candidate LMAGs. ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the predicting accuracy of candidate LMAGs. The expression patterns, prognostic value, genetic alterations, and immune cell infiltration of the top-ranked LMAGs were investigated. RESULTS We identified 45 LMAGs that were differentially expressed in tumor samples of nCRT responders and non-responders. These LMAGs were closely associated with lipid metabolism-related biological processes and pathways. ROC analysis revealed that the SREBF2 gene, an important transcription factor in regulating lipid metabolism, was the highest predictor of nCRT in rectal cancer. SREBF2 was highly expressed in rectal cancer tissues and high expression of SREBF2 was associated with favorable prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that SREBF2 was an independent prognostic factor, and we integrated it with other clinical factors to establish an effective prognostic nomogram. SREBF2 also played a synergistic role with its co-expressed genes in the prognostic process of rectal cancer. Furthermore, SREBF2 was demonstrated to be closely associated with multiple immune infiltrating cells, and immunotherapy-related genes and may be used to predict the response to immunotherapy. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that LMAGs may serve as promising biomarkers in nCRT combined with immunotherapy for rectal cancer. However, large-scale clinical trials and biological experiments are necessary to demonstrate the efficacy and underlying mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiliang Peng
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China; Institute of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jialong Tao
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yingjie Xu
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yi Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Suzhou Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yong Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China; Institute of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yang Jiao
- Re-Stem Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Suzhou, China
| | - Yiheng Mao
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China; Institute of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yaqun Zhu
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China; Institute of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
| | - Yulong Liu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
| | - Ye Tian
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China; Institute of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Saklani A, Kazi M, Desouza A, Sharma A, Engineer R, Krishnatry R, Gudi S, Ostwal V, Ramaswamy A, Dhanwat A, Bhargava P, Mehta S, Sundaram S, Kale A, Goel M, Patkar S, Vartey G, Kulkarni S, Baheti A, Ankathi S, Haria P, Katdare A, Choudhari A, Ramadwar M, Menon M, Patil P. Tata Memorial Centre Evidence Based Management of Colorectal cancer. Indian J Cancer 2024; 61:S29-S51. [PMID: 38424681 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_66_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This review article examines the evidence-based management of colorectal cancers, focusing on topics characterized by ongoing debates and evolving evidence. To contribute to the scientific discourse, we intentionally exclude subjects with established guidelines, concentrating instead on areas where the current understanding is dynamic. Our analysis encompasses a thorough exploration of critical themes, including the evidence surrounding complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy in colon cancers. Additionally, we delve into the evolving landscape of perioperative chemotherapy in both colon and rectal cancers, considering its nuanced role in the context of contemporary treatment strategies. Advancements in surgical techniques are a pivotal aspect of our discussion, with an emphasis on the utilization of minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery in both colon and rectal cancers, including advanced rectal cases. Moving beyond conventional radical procedures, we scrutinize the feasibility and implications of endoscopic resections for small tumors, explore the paradigm of organ preservation in locally advanced rectal cancers, and assess the utility of total neoadjuvant therapy in the current treatment landscape. Our final segment reviews pivotal trials that have significantly influenced the management of colorectal liver and peritoneal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avanish Saklani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Mufaddal Kazi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Advanced Centre of the Treatment, Research, and Education in Cancer, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Ashwin Desouza
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Ankit Sharma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Advanced Centre of the Treatment, Research, and Education in Cancer, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Rahul Krishnatry
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Shivkumar Gudi
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Vikas Ostwal
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Anant Ramaswamy
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Aditya Dhanwat
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Prabhat Bhargava
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Shaesta Mehta
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Sridhar Sundaram
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Aditya Kale
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Mahesh Goel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Shraddha Patkar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Gurudutt Vartey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Suyash Kulkarni
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Akshay Baheti
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Suman Ankathi
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Purvi Haria
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Aparna Katdare
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Amit Choudhari
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Mukta Ramadwar
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Munita Menon
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Prachi Patil
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Janczak J, Ukegjini K, Bischofberger S, Turina M, Müller PC, Steffen T. Quality of Surgical Outcome Reporting in Randomised Clinical Trials of Multimodal Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:26. [PMID: 38201454 PMCID: PMC10778098 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) continue to provide the best evidence for treatment options, but the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical outcomes and complication data vary widely. The aim of this study was to measure the quality of reporting of the surgical outcome and complication data in RCTs of rectal cancer treatment and whether this quality has changed over time. METHODS Eligible articles with the keywords ("rectal cancer" OR "rectal carcinoma") AND ("radiation" OR "radiotherapy") that were RCTs and published in the English, German, Polish, or Italian language were identified by reviewing all abstracts published from 1982 through 2022. Two authors independently screened and analysed all studies. The quality of the surgical outcome and complication data was assessed based on fourteen criteria, and the quality of RCTs was evaluated based on a modified Jadad scale. The primary outcome was the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical results and complication data. RESULTS A total of 340 articles reporting multimodal therapy outcomes for 143,576 rectal cancer patients were analysed. A total of 7 articles (2%) met all 14 reporting criteria, 13 met 13 criteria, 27 met from 11 to 12 criteria, 36 met from 9 to 10 criteria, 76 met from 7 to 8 criteria, and most articles met fewer than 7 criteria (mean 5.5 criteria). Commonly underreported criteria included complication severity (15% of articles), macroscopic integrity of mesorectal excision (17% of articles), length of stay (18% of articles), number of lymph nodes (21% of articles), distance between the tumour and circumferential resection margin (CRM) (26% of articles), surgical radicality according to the site of the primary tumour (R0 vs. R1 + R2) (29% of articles), and CRM status (38% of articles). CONCLUSION Inconsistent surgical outcome and complication data reporting in multimodal rectal cancer treatment RCTs is standard. Standardised reporting of clinical and oncological outcomes should be established to facilitate comparing studies and results of related research topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Janczak
- Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital for the Region Fürstenland Toggenburg, CH-9500 Wil, Switzerland;
| | - Kristjan Ukegjini
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| | - Stephan Bischofberger
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| | - Matthias Turina
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Philip C. Müller
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Thomas Steffen
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Qin Q, Huang B, Wu A, Gao J, Liu X, Cao W, Ma T, Kuang Y, Guo J, Wu Q, Shao B, Guan Q, Yao H, Zhang X, Wang H. Development and Validation of a Post-Radiotherapy Prediction Model for Bowel Dysfunction After Rectal Cancer Resection. Gastroenterology 2023; 165:1430-1442.e14. [PMID: 37625498 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The benefit of radiotherapy for rectal cancer is based largely on a balance between a decrease in local recurrence and an increase in bowel dysfunction. Predicting postoperative disability is helpful for recovery plans and early intervention. We aimed to develop and validate a risk model to improve the prediction of major bowel dysfunction after restorative rectal cancer resection with neoadjuvant radiotherapy using perioperative features. METHODS Eligible patients more than 1 year after restorative resection following radiotherapy were invited to complete the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score at 3 national hospitals in China. Clinical characteristics and imaging parameters were assessed with machine learning algorithms. The post-radiotherapy LARS prediction model (PORTLARS) was constructed by means of logistic regression on the basis of key factors with proportional weighs. The accuracy of the model for major LARS prediction was internally and externally validated. RESULTS A total of 868 patients reported a mean LARS score of 28.4 after an average time of 4.7 years since surgery. Key predictors for major LARS included the length of distal rectum, anastomotic leakage, proximal colon of neorectum, and pathologic nodal stage. PORTLARS had a favorable area under the curve for predicting major LARS in the internal dataset (0.835; 95% CI, 0.800-0.870, n = 521) and external dataset (0.884; 95% CI, 0.848-0.921, n = 347). The model achieved both sensitivity and specificity >0.83 in the external validation. In addition, PORTLARS outperformed the preoperative LARS score for prediction of major events. CONCLUSIONS PORTLARS could predict major bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer resection following radiotherapy with high accuracy and robustness. It may serve as a useful tool to identify patients who need additional support for long-term dysfunction in the early stage. CLINICALTRIALS gov, number NCT05129215.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiyuan Qin
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Binjie Huang
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Aiwen Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Unit III, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jiale Gao
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Xinzhi Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Unit III, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Wuteng Cao
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tenghui Ma
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yingyi Kuang
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jirui Guo
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qian Wu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Biyan Shao
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qi Guan
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongwei Yao
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
| | - Xiaoyan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education Beijing, Beijing, China.
| | - Hui Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Yu Z, Hao Y, Huang Y, Ling L, Hu X, Qiao S. Radiotherapy in the preoperative neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1300535. [PMID: 38074690 PMCID: PMC10704030 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1300535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are effective treatments for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and can significantly improve the likelihood of R0 resection. Radiotherapy can be used as a local treatment to reduce the size of the tumor, improve the success rate of surgery and reduce the residual cancer cells after surgery. Early chemotherapy can also downgrade the tumor and eliminate micrometastases throughout the body, reducing the risk of recurrence and metastasis. The advent of neoadjuvant concurrent radiotherapy (nCRT) and total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has brought substantial clinical benefits to patients with LARC. Even so, given increasing demand for organ preservation and quality of life and the disease becoming increasingly younger in its incidence profile, there is a need to further explore new neoadjuvant treatment options to further improve tumor remission rates and provide other opportunities for patients to choose watch-and-wait (W&W) strategies that avoid surgery. Targeted drugs and immunologic agents (ICIs) have shown good efficacy in patients with advanced rectal cancer but have not been commonly used in neoadjuvant therapy for patients with LARC. In this paper, we review several aspects of neoadjuvant therapy, including radiation therapy and chemotherapy drugs, immune drugs and targeted drugs used in combination with neoadjuvant therapy, with the aim of providing direction and thoughtful perspectives for LARC clinical treatment and research trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Xigang Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kang MK, Park SY, Park JS, Kim HJ, Kim JG, Kang BW, Baek JH, Cho SH, Seo AN, Kim DW, Kim J, Baek SJ, Kim JH, Kim JY, Ha GW, Park EJ, Park IJ, Kim CH, Kang H, Choi GS. Preoperative sequential short-course radiation therapy and FOLFOX chemotherapy versus long-course chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SOLAR trial). BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1059. [PMID: 37923987 PMCID: PMC10623855 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11363-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy has been widely used as an effective treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), leading to a significant reduction in pelvic recurrence rates. Because early administration of intensive chemotherapy for LARC has more advantages than adjuvant chemotherapy, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has been introduced and evaluated to determine whether it can improve tumor response or treatment outcomes. This study aims to investigate whether short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by intensive chemotherapy improves oncologic outcomes compared with traditional preoperative long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS A multicenter randomized phase II trial involving 364 patients with LARC (cT3-4, cN+, or presence of extramural vascular invasion) will be conducted. Patients will be randomly assigned to the experimental or control arm at a ratio of 1:1. Participants in the experimental arm will receive SCRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions, daily) followed by four cycles of FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid) as a neoadjuvant treatment, and those in the control arm will receive conventional radiotherapy (45-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions, 5 times a week) concurrently with capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil. As a mandatory surgical procedure, total mesorectal excision will be performed 2-5 weeks from the last cycle of chemotherapy in the experimental arm and 6-8 weeks after the last day of radiotherapy in the control arm. The primary endpoint is 3-year disease-free survival, and the secondary endpoints are tumor response, overall survival, toxicities, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION This is the first Korean randomized controlled study comparing SCRT-based TNT with traditional preoperative LC-CRT for LARC. The involvement of experienced colorectal surgeons ensures high-quality surgical resection. SCRT followed by FOLFOX chemotherapy is expected to improve disease-free survival compared with CRT, with potential advantages in tumor response, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered at Clinical Research Information under the identifier Service KCT0004874 on April 02, 2020, and at Clinicaltrial.gov under the identifier NCT05673772 on January 06, 2023.
Collapse
Grants
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- HA22C0042 National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
- National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Kyu Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Soo Yeun Park
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 807 Hogukro, Buk-gu, Daegu, 41404, South Korea
| | - Jun Seok Park
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 807 Hogukro, Buk-gu, Daegu, 41404, South Korea
| | - Hye Jin Kim
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 807 Hogukro, Buk-gu, Daegu, 41404, South Korea
| | - Jong Gwang Kim
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Byung Woog Kang
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Jin Ho Baek
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Seung Hyun Cho
- Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - An Na Seo
- Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Duck-Woo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jin Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Se Jin Baek
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji Hoon Kim
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Kim
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Gi Won Ha
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, South Korea
| | - Eun Jung Park
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - In Ja Park
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of surgery, , University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chang Hyun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Hwasun, South Korea
| | - Hyun Kang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Gyu-Seog Choi
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 807 Hogukro, Buk-gu, Daegu, 41404, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kagawa Y, Watanabe J, Uemura M, Ando K, Inoue A, Oba K, Takemasa I, Oki E. Short-term outcomes of a prospective multicenter phase II trial of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer in Japan (ENSEMBLE-1). Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:968-976. [PMID: 37927927 PMCID: PMC10623965 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim To evaluate the feasibility and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in Japan. Methods This prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase II trial was conducted at five institutions. The key eligibility criteria were age ≥ 20 years, LARC within 12 cm from the anal verge, and cT3-4N0M0 or TanyN+M0 at the time of diagnosis that enabled curative resection. Preoperative short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) 5 Gy × 5 days (total 25 Gy) + CAPOX (six courses) followed by total mesorectum excision (TME) was the treatment protocol. Non-operative management (NOM) was allowed if clinical complete response (cCR) was obtained in the preoperative evaluation. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Results Thirty patients (male, n = 26; female, n = 4; median age, 62.5 [44-74] years; cT [T2, n = 1; T3, n = 25; T4, n = 4]; cN [N0, n = 13; N1, n = 13; N2, n = 4]) were enrolled. The final analysis included 30 patients in total. The completion rates were 100% for SCRT and 83% for CAPOX. TME and NOM were performed in 20 and seven patients, respectively. pCR was observed in six patients (30% [95% CI 14.0%-50.8%]). The primary endpoint was met. pCR+cCR was observed in 13 (43.3%) patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade ≥3 (CTCAE ver. 5.0) adverse events (≥20%), including diarrhea (23.3%) and neutropenia (23.3%). The median follow-up period was 15.6 (10.5-22.8) months, with no recurrence or regrowth in NOM. Conclusions ENSEMBLE-1 demonstrated satisfactory pCR and cCR, and well-tolerated safety of TNT for patients with LARC in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinori Kagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka General Medical CenterOsakaJapan
| | - Jun Watanabe
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological CenterYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Mamoru Uemura
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryGraduate School of Medicine, Osaka UniversitySuitaJapan
| | - Koji Ando
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Akira Inoue
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka General Medical CenterOsakaJapan
| | - Koji Oba
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public HealthThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Ichiro Takemasa
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and ScienceSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoJapan
| | - Eiji Oki
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Carbone F, Petz W, Borin S, Bertani E, de Pascale S, Zampino MG, Fumagalli Romario U. Tumour-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and functional outcomes. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107069. [PMID: 37708660 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumour-specific mesorectal excision (TSME) practice for rectal cancer only relies on small retrospective studies. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the oncological and functional outcomes of TSME practice. METHODS A systematic review protocol was drawn to include all the studies that compared partial versus total mesorectal excision (PME vs TME) practised for rectal adenocarcinoma up to 16 cm from the anal verge. A systematic literature search was conducted on EMBASE-Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane Library. Reports were screened for the study's outcomes: oncological radicality, postoperative anastomotic leak risk and functional outcomes. Included studies were appraised for risk-of-bias and meta-analysed. Evidence was rated with the GRADE approach. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies were included, consisting of 12325 patients (PME n = 4460, 36.2%; TME n = 7865, 63.8%). PME was performed for tumours higher than 10 cm from the anal verge in 54.5% of patients. There was no difference between PME and TME in circumferential resection margin positivity (OR 1.31, 95%CI 0.43-3.95, p = 0.64; I2 = 38%), and local recurrence risk (HR 1.05, 95%CI 0.52-2.10, p = 0.90; I2 = 40%). The postoperative leak risk (OR 0.42, 95%CI 0.27-0.67, p < 0.001; I2 = 60%) and the major low anterior resection syndrome risk (OR 0.34, 95%CI 0.28-0.40, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%) were lower after PME surgery. No difference was found in urinary incontinence (OR 0.68, 95%CI 0.13-3.67, p = 0.66) and urinary retention after early catheter removal (OR 2.00, 95%CI 0.24-16.51, p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS Evidence from this meta-analysis shows that TSME for rectal cancer has good oncological results and leads to the best-fitted functional results possible for the patient's condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Carbone
- Digestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Wanda Petz
- Digestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Simona Borin
- Digestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Emilio Bertani
- Digestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Maria Giulia Zampino
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Temmink SJD, Martling A, Angenete E, Nilsson PJ. Complete response rates in rectal cancer: Temporal changes over a decade in a population-based nationwide cohort. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:106991. [PMID: 37495447 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.106991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the past decade many changes in neoadjuvant treatment for patients with rectal cancer have taken place and are expected to impact complete response rates. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact on pathological, and overall, complete response rates in a nationwide population-based cohort, in relation to changes in neoadjuvant treatment and the start of a Watch & Wait (WoW) study. MATERIALS AND METHODS A nationwide register study using prospectively collected data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register between 2009 and 2020. Patients with rectal cancer stage I-III with a ypT0N0 in the resected specimen after neoadjuvant treatment and clinical complete responders from the yearly inclusion data of the national WoW study were included. Temporal changes in pathological and overall complete response rates were analysed, and differences in neoadjuvant treatment regimens over time and per region were studied. RESULTS Between 2009 and 2020 the pathological complete response rate for rectal cancer remained similar (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.091, p = 0.68) while the overall complete response rate increased significantly from 3.0% to 9.6% (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.818, p < 0.001). The pathological complete response rate for patients receiving short course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy was reduced by 50% after the introduction of the WoW study. CONCLUSIONS During the studied time period the overall complete response rate increased significantly presumably due to changes in national neoadjuvant treatment regimens. Since the start of the national WoW study clinical complete response seem to partly replace pathological complete response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofieke J D Temmink
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Anna Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Eva Angenete
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kato S, Miyoshi N, Fujino S, Minami S, Nagae A, Hayashi R, Sekido Y, Hata T, Hamabe A, Ogino T, Tei M, Kagawa Y, Takahashi H, Uemura M, Yamamoto H, Doki Y, Eguchi H. Treatment response prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer by deep learning of colonoscopy images. Oncol Lett 2023; 26:474. [PMID: 37809043 PMCID: PMC10551859 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.14062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
In current clinical practice, several treatment methods, including neoadjuvant therapy, are being developed to improve overall survival or local recurrence rates for locally advanced rectal cancer. The response to neoadjuvant therapy is usually evaluated using imaging data collected before and after preoperative treatment or postsurgical pathological diagnosis. However, there is a need to accurately predict the response to preoperative treatment before treatment is administered. The present study used a deep learning network to examine colonoscopy images and construct a model to predict the response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 53 patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy followed by radical resection for advanced rectal cancer at the Osaka University Hospital between January 2011 and August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. A convolutional neural network model was constructed using 403 images from 43 patients as the learning set. The diagnostic accuracy of the deep learning model was evaluated using 84 images from 10 patients as the validation set. The model demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and area under the curve of 77.6% (38/49), 62.9% (22/33), 71.4% (60/84), 74.5% (38/51) and 0.713, respectively, in predicting a poor response to neoadjuvant therapy. Overall, deep learning of colonoscopy images may contribute to an accurate prediction of the response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Kato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
- Department of Innovative Oncology Research and Regenerative Medicine, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Norikatsu Miyoshi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
- Department of Innovative Oncology Research and Regenerative Medicine, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Shiki Fujino
- Department of Innovative Oncology Research and Regenerative Medicine, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Soichiro Minami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
- Department of Innovative Oncology Research and Regenerative Medicine, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Ayumi Nagae
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
- Department of Innovative Oncology Research and Regenerative Medicine, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Rie Hayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
- Department of Innovative Oncology Research and Regenerative Medicine, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Yuki Sekido
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Atsushi Hamabe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Takayuki Ogino
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Mitsuyoshi Tei
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka 591-8025, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Kagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka 558-8588, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Mamoru Uemura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gao Y, Wu A. Organ Preservation in MSS Rectal Cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2023; 36:430-440. [PMID: 37795468 PMCID: PMC10547535 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1767710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
Rectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease with complex genetic and molecular subtypes. Emerging progress of neoadjuvant therapy has led to increased pathological and clinical complete response (cCR) rates for microsatellite stable (MSS) rectal cancer, which responds poorly to immune checkpoint inhibitor alone. As a result, organ preservation of MSS rectal cancer as an alternative to radical surgery has gradually become a feasible option. For patients with cCR or near-cCR after neoadjuvant treatment, organ preservation can be implemented safely with less morbidity. Patient selection can be done either before the neoadjuvant treatment for higher probability or after with careful assessment for a favorable outcome. Those patients who achieved a good clinical response are managed with nonoperative management, organ preservation surgery, or radiation therapy alone followed by strict surveillance. The oncological outcomes of patients with careful selection and organ preservation seem to be noninferior compared with those of radical surgery, with lower postoperative morbidity. However, more studies should be done to seek better regression of tumor and maximize the possibility of organ preservation in MSS rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuye Gao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Unit III, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Aiwen Wu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Unit III, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Chen Y, Wang Y, Zhang H, Wan J, Shen L, Wang Y, Zhou M, Wu R, Yang W, Zhou S, Cai S, Li X, Zhang Z, Xia F. Short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitor in low-lying early rectal cancer: study protocol for a single-arm, multicentre, prospective, phase II trial (TORCH-E). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e076048. [PMID: 37802608 PMCID: PMC10565143 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current standard treatment for patients with early rectal cancer is radical surgical resection. Although radical surgery provides effective local tumour control, it also increases the mortality risk and considerable adverse effects, including bowel, bladder, sexual dysfunction and loss of anal function, especially in patients with low-lying rectal cancer. Recent studies have shown promising synergistic effects of the combination of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and radiotherapy in improving tumour regression. For patients who reach a clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy, a 'Watch & Wait' (W&W) approach can be adopted to preserve anorectal function and improve quality of life. Thus, this study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 antibody in patients with low early rectal cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS TORCH-E study is designed as a multicentre, prospective, phase II trial of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitor in patients with cT1-3bN0M0 low rectal cancer. The trial was initiated in December 2022 and is currently recruiting patients, with an anticipated completion of participant enrolment by June of the following year. The enrolled 34 patients will receive SCRT (25 Gy/5 Fx), followed by four cycles of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin chemotherapy and PD-1 antibody (toripalimab) and finally receive surgery or the W&W strategy. The primary endpoint is the complete response (CR) rate, that is, the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) plus cCR. The secondary endpoints include organ preservation rate, 3-year local recurrence-free survival rate, 3-year disease-free survival rate, 3-year overall survival rate, grade 3-4 adverse effects rate and patients' quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Trial results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05555888 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajie Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yaqi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Juefeng Wan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lijun Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Menglong Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruiyan Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wang Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Shujuan Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Sanjun Cai
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Xinxiang Li
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fan Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Huang W, Huang P, Guo H, Huang Z, Wei M, Guo J, Lin C, Li Y, Luo B, Lin J, Wang L. Single-arm, phase II study of intra-arterial chemotherapy plus total neoadjuvant therapy to optimise complete response in distal rectal cancer: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e075023. [PMID: 37798027 PMCID: PMC10565178 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Organ preservation is now considered an acceptable alternative option in distal rectal cancer patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT). But the cCR rate is low and about one-third of tumour will regrow, which requires more effective local treatment. CRT combined with intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) might be a promising approach. Additionally, total neoadjuvant therapy using FOLFIRINOX induction chemotherapy improved survival while consolidation chemotherapy improved organ preservation. We assess whether IAC plus CRT and FOLFIRINOX consolidation chemotherapy can improve the chance of organ preservation and survival in distal rectal cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This prospective, monocentric, open-label, single-arm phase II study will include 32 patients with cT3-4NanyM0 distal rectal adenocarcinoma. All patients will receive one cycle of IAC (irinotecan, raltitrexed and oxaliplatin), followed by CRT (50 Gy/25 fractions with concomitant capecitabine) and then with six cycles of FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan). After final evaluation, patients with cCR will receive non-operative management or surgery at their own discretion and others are mandatorily referred to surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy with six cycles of mFOLFOX6 (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) will be used for patients with adverse pathological features. The primary endpoint is the rate of complete response (CR; pathological CR or sustained cCR≥2 years). The main secondary endpoints are toxicity, compliance, short-term and long-term oncological outcomes, surgical morbidity and quality of life. This protocol has been designed in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials 2013 guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study was approved by the Academic and Ethics Committee of The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities in March 2023. Trial results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals and on the ChiCTR website. PROTOCOL VERSION Registered on 18 April 2023; version #1. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ChiCTR2300070620.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenpeng Huang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, China
| | - Puda Huang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, China
| | - Houji Guo
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, China
| | - Zanyi Huang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, China
| | - Mingwei Wei
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, China
| | - Junyu Guo
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, China
| | - Cheng Lin
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, China
| | - Yepeng Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, China
| | - Biao Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, China
| | - Jie Lin
- Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, China
| | - Lixue Wang
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Dijkstra EA, Nilsson PJ, Hospers GA, Bahadoer RR, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Roodvoets AG, Putter H, Berglund Å, Cervantes A, Crolla RM, Hendriks MP, Capdevila J, Edhemovic I, Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ, Glimelius B, van Etten B. Locoregional Failure During and After Short-course Radiotherapy Followed by Chemotherapy and Surgery Compared With Long-course Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery: A 5-Year Follow-up of the RAPIDO Trial. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e766-e772. [PMID: 36661037 PMCID: PMC10481913 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 62.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze risk and patterns of locoregional failure (LRF) in patients of the RAPIDO trial at 5 years. BACKGROUND Multimodality treatment improves local control in rectal cancer. Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) aims to improve systemic control while local control is maintained. At 3 years, LRF rate was comparable between TNT and chemoradiotherapy in the RAPIDO trial. METHODS A total of 920 patients were randomized between an experimental (EXP, short-course radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery) and a standard-care group (STD, chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and optional postoperative chemotherapy). LRFs, including early LRF (no resection except for organ preservation/R2 resection) and locoregional recurrence (LRR) after an R0/R1 resection, were analyzed. RESULTS Totally, 460 EXP and 446 STD patients were eligible. At 5.6 years (median follow-up), LRF was detected in 54/460 (12%) and 36/446 (8%) patients in the EXP and STD groups, respectively ( P =0.07), in which EXP patients were more often treated with 3-dimensional-conformed radiotherapy ( P =0.029). In the EXP group, LRR was detected more often [44/431 (10%) vs. 26/428 (6%); P =0.027], with more often a breached mesorectum (9/44 (21%) vs. 1/26 (4); P =0.048). The EXP treatment, enlarged lateral lymph nodes, positive circumferential resection margin, tumor deposits, and node positivity at pathology were the significant predictors for developing LRR. Location of the LRRs was similar between groups. Overall survival after LRF was comparable [hazard ratio: 0.76 (95% CI, 0.46-1.26); P =0.29]. CONCLUSIONS The EXP treatment was associated with an increased risk of LRR, whereas the reduction in disease-related treatment failure and distant metastases remained after 5 years. Further refinement of the TNT in rectal cancer is mandated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmée A. Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Per J. Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Geke A.P. Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Renu R. Bahadoer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Annet G.H. Roodvoets
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hein Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Åke Berglund
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Andrés Cervantes
- Department of medical oncology, Biomedical Research Institute Incliva, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Jaume Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall Hebron University Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ibrahim Edhemovic
- Department of surgical oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Corrie A.M. Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|