Drug Target Interference in Immunogenicity Assays: Recommendations and Mitigation Strategies

In-depth characterization and semi-quantification of anti-drug antibodies in clinical samples using specific hybrid IC-LC-MS/MS methods

Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) generated by biotherapeutics can impair the drug clearance, prevent the binding to its target or lead to hypersensitivity reactions, thereby affecting efficacy and safety. It is therefore essential to assess the immunogenicity of potential biotherapeutics, particularly in clinical development. Ligand binding assays (LBA) are the gold standard for ADA detection because of their high sensitivity and throughput. However, LBA assays don't provide details on the isotypes produced and their relative abundance. As certain isotypes are known to be associated with ADA mediated adverse events, this information could be helpful to anticipate or better characterize the immunogenicity risk of biotherapeutics. A hybrid IC-LC-MS/MS strategy was developed for the detection of specific isotypes/subclasses of ADAs in a phase I clinical study. A first approach using the biotinylated drug to capture ADAs in human serum allowed the simultaneous semi-quantification of all IgG subclasses and the detection of ADAs of the IgM isotype in clinical samples. These results enabled a detailed characterization of the immune response against the biotherapeutic. A second assay was developed using a sequential immunocapture to measure drug specific IgEs known to be potentially associated with hypersensitivity reactions. The overall results were consistent with the clinical adverse events observed in some healthy volunteers.

Target tolerance improvement of the immunogenicity assay developed for analysing samples from clinical trials of RGB-14, a proposed biosimilar to Prolia/Xgeva

An immunogenicity assay was developed to support the clinical program of RGB-14, a proposed biosimilar to Prolia/Xgeva. The ADA assay was successfully validated following current guidelines and white papers. The validation included an assessment of target (RANKL) interference, and the assay passed the test up to a 30 pg/mL RANKL level. This concentration was anticipated to be the maximum level present in clinical samples. Despite the successful validation, most of the analysed samples from the RGB-14 Phase I clinical trial yielded false-positive results for anti-denosumab antibodies. The investigation concluded that unexpectedly high levels of RANKL were present in the samples and caused interference in the assay. Consequently, the assay was re-developed by adding target-specific reagent, eliminating acid dissociation step and doubling the assay dilution to enhance target tolerance to 10,000 pg/mL RANKL, a requirement for clinical sample testing. The re-developed assay underwent successful validation, and the samples from the clinical trials of RGB-14 were subsequently analysed with the improved assay. The article outlines a strategy for enhancing the target (RANKL) tolerance of the ADA assay. It also underscores the importance of monitoring clinical sample analysis results, even if a validated assay is used for sample testing, as clinical samples may differ from the spiked samples prepared for validation. If unexpected results are obtained, an investigation should be initiated, and the assay should be improved if needed to ensure the reliability of the results.

Inhibition of RANKL is critical for accurate assessment of anti-drug antibody incidence to denosumab in clinical studies

Denosumab is an approved monoclonal antibody therapeutic for the treatment of bone loss in the postmenopausal osteoporosis and oncology settings and acts by binding and neutralizing the activity of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa-B ligand (RANKL). Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to denosumab are measured via a standard electrochemiluminescence- (ECL) based bridging assay. In this format, the presence of soluble RANKL (sRANKL) in clinical samples can lead to false positive results. In a denosumab bioequivalence study, approximately 50 % of the serum samples showed reactivity to denosumab in the absence of a specific reagent to sequester the sRANKL. However, upon addition of osteoprotegerin (OPG) as a reagent to neutralize the sRANKL, the overall ADA incidence was lowered to <1 %. To address this RANKL reactivity over the long-term use of this assay, the performance of 3 RANKL inhibitors was evaluated using healthy donor sera samples spiked with different concentrations of positive control ADA, sRANKL, or both, in an ECL based immunoassay utilizing the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) platform. Based on these data, the denosumab antibody assay was modified to include a neutralizing anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody to eliminate the assay reactivity or false positivity due to sRANKL. Use of an anti-RANKL antibody did not impact the ADA-specific signal but inhibited the false positive assay signal due to sRANKL, resulting in an accurate detection of ADA incidence. Therefore, inhibition of interference posed by sRANKL in study samples is critical for the accurate assessment of ADA incidence towards denosumab and any biosimilars for this product that are undergoing clinical development.

Development and validation of an antidrug antibody assay for TRK-950 using Melon™ gel and SPEAD pretreatment

AIM & METHODS

TRK-950, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody against CAPRIN-1, which is reported to be expressed on the cell surface of various forms of cancer, is currently being developed for multiple types of solid cancer. We developed an antidrug antibody (ADA) assay that includes two pretreatment processes for use in clinical trials, namely, Melon™ gel treatment and solid-phase extraction with acid dissociation (SPEAD), to reduce baseline variability between individual serum samples and improve drug tolerance.

RESULTS

Comparing the assay with or without the pretreatment process using commercially available human serum samples, the mean response calculated from 18 individual human samples decreased from 327 to 270, and the coefficient of variation decreased from 41% to 16%. The new assay with the two-step pretreatment met the criteria set by the regulatory agency throughout the validation study. We also confirmed the recovery rates of IgG, IgM, and ADA - drug immune complexes after treatment with Melon™ gel. Clinical trials (NCT05423262) employing this improved analytical method have been conducted, and the results confirm the low immunogenicity of TRK-950.

CONCLUSION

The combination of pretreatment with Melon™ gel and SPEAD is applicable for clinical ADA assays.

Method development for the detection of anti-drug antibodies against a therapeutic peptide: assay format selection

AIM

Monitoring immune responses to therapeutic peptides with endogenous counterparts is crucial for evaluating drug safety and efficacy. In this paper, we focused on the selection of an optimal assay format to develop a sensitive, robust, and drug-tolerant immunoassay for the detection of anti-drug antibody (ADA) against a therapeutic peptide.

RESULTS

We assessed distinct ADA assay formats for preclinical and clinical studies, such as direct binding with labeled protein A/G, direct binding with labeled multiple species-specific antibodies for detection, bridging and affinity capture elution (ACE) formats. The assay formats were evaluated based on multiple assay parameters including sensitivity, drug tolerance, individual matrix variability and inter-assay precision. Overall, direct binding assay with labeled protein A/G for detection, which utilized less labeled peptide drug and achieved desired sensitivity and drug tolerance, is appropriate for preclinical studies. Bridging assay is more suitable format to support clinical studies as bridging assay has less assay variability than ACE assay.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted advantages and limitations of each ADA assay format for peptide drugs and evaluated the performance of different assay formats in the assay development process to aid in the selection of the best fit-for-purpose assay formats for preclinical and clinical phases.

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Antibodies Used for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Treatment and Clinical Considerations

The introduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors has led to a paradigm shift in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The subsequent introduction of both anti-integrins and cytokine blockers has since expanded the biologic armamentarium. However, immunogenicity, defined as the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to the prescribed biopharmaceutical, means a significant fraction of patients exposed to biologic agents will experience a secondary loss of response to one or more of the drugs. In clinical settings, immunogenicity may be caused by several factors, both patient related (e.g., underlying chronic disease, systemic immune burden, including previous biologic therapy failure, and [epi]genetic background) and treatment related (e.g., dose and administration regimens, drug physical structure, photostability, temperature, and agitation). Here, we outline these elements in detail to enhance biopharmaceutical delivery and therapy for patients with IBD. Moreover, concurrent immunomodulator medication may reduce the risks of ADA generation, especially when using the chimeric drug infliximab. Summarizing the latest developments and knowledge in the field, this review aims to provide strategies to prevent ADA production and information on managing non-responsiveness or loss of response to biologics. Better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of ADAs and the critical factors influencing the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals may lead to improved health outcomes in the IBD community that may benefit both the individual patient and society through lower healthcare expenses.

Immunogenicity dynamics and covariate effects after satralizumab administration predicted with a hidden Markov model

Immunogenicity is the propensity of a therapeutic protein to generate an immune response to itself. While reporting of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) is increasing, model-based analysis of such data is seldom performed. Model-based characterization of factors affecting the emergence and dissipation of ADAs may inform drug development and/or improve understanding in clinical practice. This analysis aimed to predict ADA dynamics, including the potential influence of individual covariates, following subcutaneous satralizumab administration. Satralizumab is a humanized IgG2 monoclonal recycling IL-6 receptor antagonist antibody approved for treating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Longitudinal pharmacokinetic (PK) and ADA data from 154 NMOSD patients in two pivotal Phase 3 studies (NCT02028884, NCT02073279) and PK data from one Phase 1 study (SA-001JP) in 72 healthy volunteers were available for this analysis. An existing population PK model was adapted to derive steady-state concentration without ADA for each patient. A mixed hidden Markov model (mHMM) was developed whereby three different states were identified: one absorbing Markov state for non-ADA developer, and two dynamic and inter-connected Markov states-transient ADA negative and positive. Satralizumab exposure and body mass index impacted transition probabilities and, therefore, the likelihood of developing ADAs. In conclusion, the mHMM model was able to describe the time course of ADA development and identify patterns of ADA development in NMOSD patients following treatment with satralizumab, which may allow for the formulation of strategies to reduce the emergence or limit the impact of ADA in the clinical setting.

Critical reagent considerations for immunogenicity assay development for bispecific biotherapeutic candidates

Aim: To demonstrate the importance of critical reagent characterization for immunogenicity assay development for multi-specific drugs using two case studies.Methods: Bridging anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay with acid-dissociated samples were used for both cases.Results: In the first case study, the unexpected interference in an ADA assay from clinical samples was identified; a model was created to replicate the issue, and an anti-target antibody was identified to mitigate the target interference. In the second case study, an issue due to non-specific binding of a domain-specific confirmatory reagent was identified, and various mitigation techniques were evaluated.Conclusion: A thorough characterization of the critical reagents helped identify the issues with these ADA case studies and provided strategies for resolving them.

Mitigating target interference challenges in bridging immunogenicity assay to detect anti-tocilizumab antibodies

Aim: An assay to detect anti-tocilizumab antibodies in the presence of high levels of circulating target and drug is needed for immunogenicity assessment in comparative clinical studies.Methods: An assay was developed and validated using a combination of blocking agents and dilutions to overcome target interference challenges.Results: No false-positive signal was detected in serum samples spiked with 350-500 ng/ml of IL-6 receptor. As low as 50 ng/ml of positive control antibodies could be detected in the presence of either 500 ng/ml of IL-6 or 250 μg/ml of the drug product. Assay also demonstrated high sensitivity, selectivity and precision.Conclusion: A robust, easy to perform immunogenicity assay was developed and validated for detecting anti-tocilizumab antibodies.

Analytical Interference in Chemiluminescence Assay-Measured Angiotensin I, Angiotensin II, Aldosterone, and Renin

BACKGROUND

The interference can be a significant source of laboratory errors with the potential to cause immunoassay results to drift. Therefore, we evaluated the interference in various endogenous and exogenous substances on immunoassay for angiotensin I (Ang I), angiotensin II (Ang II), aldosterone, and renin in vitro.

METHODS

Ten endogenous and eight exogenous substances were evaluated at supraphysiologic or supratherapeutic plasma levels using the screening study to identify potential interfering substances. Subsequently, potential interfering substances were further tested within maximum pathological or therapeutic plasma concentration ranges using the dose-response study to determine whether the interference has a significant bias. According to preset acceptance criteria, the interference in potential interfering substances for Ang I, Ang II, and renin and aldosterone assays was determined.

RESULTS

Six potential interfering substances for Ang I immunoassays were identified, namely valsartan, nifedipine, spironolactone, cholesterol, hemoglobin, and triglyceride. Meanwhile, ethanol, nifedipine, spironolactone, heparin sodium, warfarin, hemoglobin, uric acid, cholesterol, and triglyceride appeared to have potential interference in the Ang II assay. Three identified as possible interferents for aldosterone immunoassays were glucose, valsartan, and spironolactone. Moreover, warfarin, valsartan, spironolactone, uric acid, cholesterol, bilirubin unconjugated, triglyceride, and hemoglobin were potential interfering substances for renin immunoassays. However, only spironolactone of these potential interfering substances exceeded preset mean bias limits (less than ±10.0%) in aldosterone immunoassays.

CONCLUSION

Exogenous spironolactone caused clinically significant interference in aldosterone immunoassays. Moreover, the interference in other substances was acceptable in Ang I, Ang II, and renin and aldosterone immunoassays.

Highly drug/target-tolerant neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay development through target-based drug depletion and drug-based NAb extraction for an anti-EGFR therapeutic monoclonal antibody

The reduction of immunogenicity is fundamental for the development of biobetter Erbitux, given that the development of an immune response reduces treatment efficacy and may lead to potential side effects. One of the requirements for the clinical research of a Erbitux biobetter candidate (CMAB009) is to develop a neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay, and sufficient drug and target tolerance for the assay is necessary. Here, we describe the development of a competitive ligand binding (CLB) assay for CMAB009 with high drug and target tolerance through target-based drug depletion and drug-based NAb extraction, the integrated experimental strategy was implemented to simultaneously mitigate drug interference and enhance target tolerance. Following troubleshooting and optimization, the NAb assay was validated for clinical sample analysis with the sensitivity of 92 ng/mL, drug tolerance of 70 μg/mL and target tolerance of 798 ng/mL. The innovative drug depletion and NAb extraction achieved though the combination of drug and target beads would enable the development of reliable NAb assays for many other therapeutics that overcome drug and its target interference for more precise and sensitive NAb assessment.

Eliminating drug target interference with specific antibody or its F(ab')2 fragment in the bridging immunogenicity assay

Background: DB-1003 is a humanized anti-IgE monoclonal antibody with higher affinity than omalizumab. In the affinity capture elution (ACE)-based bridging electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA) for antibodies to DB-1003, monkey serum IgE caused false-positive results. Materials & methods: The target-specific antibody or its F(ab')2 fragment was used to mitigate drug target interference in an ACE-based bridging ECLIA for the detection of anti-DB-1003 antibodies. Results: The sensitivity of the developed assay was at least 100 ng/ml. When the anti-drug antibody concentration was 250 ng/ml, the assay tolerated at least 20.0 μg/ml of the monkey IgE. Conclusion: Incorporating the target-specific antibody or its F(ab')2 fragment can overcome the interference from monkey serum IgE in ACE-based bridging ECLIA for anti-DB-1003 antibody detection.

Strategy and validation of a nonclinical generic plug-and-play antidrug antibody method for human monoclonal antibody biotherapeutics

The measurement of antidrug antibodies (ADA) in nonclinical studies provides limited value because the formation and incidence of nonclinical ADA does not translate to clinical experience. The formation and presence of ADA in nonclinical species can, however, correlate to reduced drug exposure and safety observations including vasculitis and immune complex disease. Generic ADA methods for humanized monoclonal antibody biotherapeutics mitigate the need to develop bespoke ADA methods during nonclinical drug development. A drug-tolerant, sensitive, generic ADA immunoassay has been developed and validated for measuring ADA in cynomolgus monkey serum samples, allowing for immediate qualification of future monoclonal antibody biotherapeutics. This approach allows us to differentiate complexed and free ADA in a rapidly deployable manner when needed.

Application of N-Terminal Site-Specific Biotin and Digoxigenin Conjugates to Clinical Anti-drug Antibody Assay Development

Biotin- and digoxigenin (DIG)-conjugated therapeutic drugs are critical reagents used for the development of anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays for the assessment of immunogenicity. The current practice of generating biotin and DIG conjugates is to label a therapeutic antibody with biotin or DIG via primary amine groups on lysine or N-terminal residues. This approach modifies lysine residues nonselectively, which can impact the ability of an ADA assay to detect those ADAs that recognize epitopes located at or near the modified lysine residue(s). The impact of the lysine modification is considered greater for therapeutic antibodies that have a limited number of lysine residues, such as the variable heavy domain of heavy chain (VHH) antibodies. In this paper, for the first time, we report the application of site-specifically conjugated biotin- and DIG-VHH reagents to clinical ADA assay development using a model molecule, VHHA. The site-specific conjugation of biotin or DIG to VHHA was achieved by using an optimized reductive alkylation approach, which enabled the majority of VHHA molecules labeled with biotin or DIG at the desirable N-terminus, thereby minimizing modification of the protein after labeling and reducing the possibility of missing detection of ADAs. Head-to-head comparison of biophysical characterization data revealed that the site-specific biotin and DIG conjugates demonstrated overall superior quality to biotin- and DIG-VHHA prepared using the conventional amine coupling method, and the performance of the ADA assay developed using site-specific biotin and DIG conjugates met all acceptance criteria. The approach described here can be applied to the production of other therapeutic-protein- or antibody-based critical reagents that are used to support ligand binding assays.

Development and validation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the measurement of infliximab and anti-drug antibody levels

Infliximab and its anti-drug antibody (ADA) serum concentrations exhibit a strong correlation with clinical response and loss of response. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to measure the concentration of infliximab and ADA can facilitate clinical decision-making, helping patients attain optimal therapeutic effects. However, there are still limitations to the existing infliximab and its ADA detection methods. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based methods for measuring infliximab and its ADA levels in human plasma according to the general recommendations for immunoassays. Free infliximab is bound by recombinant TNF-α and detected using HRP-labeled anti-human antibody. The ADA is captured by on-plate-coated infliximab and recognized by biotin-labeled infliximab. Two bridging ELISA assays were developed and after assay optimization and validation, these assays have been applied in ten patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In infliximab detection assay, a standard curve ranging from 0.10 μg/mL to 8.0 μg/mL with great precision and accuracy has been established. Drug tolerance of the ADA assay was that 100 ng/mL ADA could tolerate at least 5.0 μg/mL infliximab in the plasma using a commercially available monoclonal anti-infliximab antibody as the positive control. The ADA screening and confirmatory assays achieved a sensitivity of 36.74 ng/mL and 37.15 ng/mL, respectively. All other assay characteristics met the requirements. The mean concentration of infliximab in eight patients with IBD was 7.88 (1.87-21.1) μg/mL, and the ADA levels were all negative. Moreover, the concentrations of infliximab in the remaining two patients were below the LLOQ and the ADAs were positive. Thus, accurate and sensitive ELISA methods have been developed and validated for the detection of infliximab and its ADA concentrations and have been successfully applied to clinical therapeutic drug monitoring.

Evaluation of multiple immunoassay formats for detection of anti-drug antibodies to zinpentraxin alfa

Zinpentraxin alfa (rhPTX-2; PRM-151) is currently being developed for the treatment of fibrotic diseases such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and myelofibrosis. Notably, because it is administered chronically and has an endogenously expressed counterpart, clinical studies of zinpentraxin alpha must include immunogenicity assessments. Since the typical homogenous bridging ELISA assay does not adequately measure anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against zinpentraxin alfa, additional assay formats have been developed to evaluate immunogenicity of this therapeutic. Here, we present the evaluation of four distinct assay formats that were used to measure zinpentraxin alpha ADA: step-wise bridging, direct binding, total ADA, and the semi-homogeneous formats, based on multiple parameters including assay sensitivity, precision, and drug tolerance. This paper presents the full details of method development for each of the aforementioned assay formats including evaluation of sample pre-treatment, determination of cut point, and assessment of assay performance by analyzing a subset of clinical samples. Overall, the semi-homogenous ADA assay format with no sample pre-treatment was selected for the measurement of zinpentraxin alpha immunogenicity as it provided the desired sensitivity, drug tolerance, and reproducibility. Our study emphasizes the importance of assay format evaluation during drug development and the necessity to select the most suitable assay format and sample pre-treatment method by which to evaluate therapeutic drug immunogenicity.

Addressing Domain Specificity in the Development of a Cell-Based Binding Assay for the Detection of Neutralizing Antibodies Against a CD47xPD-L1 Bispecific Antibody

PF-07257876 is a bispecific antibody being developed for the treatment of certain advanced or metastatic solid tumors. To support clinical development of PF-07257876, neutralizing antibody (NAb) assays were developed as part of a tiered immunogenicity testing approach. Because PF-07257876 targets both CD47 and PD-L1, determination of domain specificity of a NAb response may provide additional insight relating to PK, efficacy, and safety. Due to limitations of functional cell systems, two cell-based binding assays were developed using electrochemiluminescence to detect domain-specific NAb. While both NAb assays utilized a cell-based binding approach and shared certain requirements, such as sensitivity and tolerance to potentially interfering substances, the development of each assay faced unique challenges. Among the hurdles encountered, achieving drug tolerance while preserving domain specificity for CD47 proved particularly challenging. Consequently, a sample pretreatment procedure to isolate NAb from potentially interfering substances was necessary. The sample pretreatment procedure developed was based on a bead-extraction and acid dissociation (BEAD) approach. However, the use of the standard BEAD approach with whole drug to capture NAb resulted in loss of NAb detection under certain circumstances. Specifically, mock samples containing a mixture of NAb positive controls against both binding domains of the bispecific antibody produced false-negative results in the cell-based binding assay. An adaptation made to the standard BEAD approach restored domain-specific NAb detection, while also contributing to an assay sensitivity of 1 µg/mL in the presence of a clinically relevant drug tolerance level of up to 400 µg/mL.

Evolution of Antidrug Antibody Assays During the Development of Anti-Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor Monoclonal Antibody Marstacimab

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is an endogenous inhibitor of the extrinsic coagulation pathway. In patients with hemophilia A or B, inhibition of TFPI is an alternative therapeutic approach that augments the extrinsic coagulation pathway. Marstacimab is an investigational fully human monoclonal antibody that binds and neutralizes TFPI and is being evaluated as a prophylactic treatment to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in patients with severe hemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors (antibodies against coagulation factors). However, the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of marstacimab may be affected by the induction of antidrug antibody (ADA) responses. Here, we describe the evolution and validation of three quasi-quantitative electrochemiluminescence-based methods to detect marstacimab ADAs, starting from their use in a first-in-human phase 1 study to their use in phase 2 and 3 clinical studies of patients with severe hemophilia. For all three methods, validation criteria evaluated the performance of the assays in screening and confirmatory cut points, precision, selectivity, drug tolerance, target interference, and stability. Additional criteria for validation were dilution linearity (Methods 1 and 2) and low positive control concentration, prozone effect, plate homogeneity, and robustness (Method 3). The three methods met validation criteria and are a potentially valuable tool in detecting the induction of marstacimab ADAs during treatment in patients with hemophilia.

Development of a Cell-based Neutralizing Antibody Assay for Zinpentraxin Alfa: Challenges and Mitigation Strategies

Therapeutic protein drugs can potentially induce immune responses in patients and result in the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), including a subset of ADAs called neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) that might cause loss of efficacy by inhibiting clinical activities of the drug. Herein, we describe the unique challenges encountered during the development of a fit-for-purpose cell-based NAb assay for a new protein modality, zinpentraxin alfa, including our strategies for assay design to overcome various matrix interferences and improve assay drug tolerance. We demonstrated that a typical biotin-drug extraction with acid dissociation (BEAD) approach alone was not sufficient to eliminate matrix interferences in this assay. Instead, the combination of the BEAD and ZebaTM spin size exclusion plate (SEP) was required to achieve the desirable assay performance. We also demonstrated that appropriate acidic buffers were critical in sample pretreatment to improve assay drug tolerance, which not only dissociated the drug/NAb immune complex but also effectively and irreversibly denatured the free drug. The final assay performed well with confirmed assay robustness and suitability for the clinical applications.

Neutralizing Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization

Evolving immunogenicity assay performance expectations and a lack of harmonized neutralizing antibody validation testing and reporting tools have resulted in significant time spent by health authorities and sponsors on resolving filing queries. A team of experts within the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists' Therapeutic Product Immunogenicity Community across industry and the Food and Drug Administration addressed challenges unique to cell-based and non-cell-based neutralizing antibody assays. Harmonization of validation expectations and data reporting will facilitate filings to health authorities and are described in this manuscript. This team provides validation testing and reporting strategies and tools for the following assessments: (1) format selection; (2) cut point; (3) assay acceptance criteria; (4) control precision; (5) sensitivity including positive control selection and performance tracking; (6) negative control selection; (7) selectivity/specificity including matrix interference, hemolysis, lipemia, bilirubin, concomitant medications, and structurally similar analytes; (8) drug tolerance; (9) target tolerance; (10) sample stability; and (11) assay robustness.

High ionic strength dissociation assay reduces dimeric target interference in immunogenicity testing

Aim: The presence of di-/multi-meric forms of soluble target in biological samples can interfere in anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays, leading to increased background values and potentially false positivity. The authors investigated the use of the high ionic strength dissociation assay (HISDA) to reduce target interference in two different ADA assays. Results: Interference caused by homodimeric FAP was successfully eliminated to enable cut point determination after applying HISDA. Biochemical experiments confirmed the dissociation of homodimeric FAP after treatment with high ionic strength conditions. Conclusion: HISDA is a promising approach to simultaneously achieve high drug tolerance and reduced interference by noncovalently bound dimeric target molecules in ADA assays without extensive optimization, which is particularly advantageous in routine use.

Method validation of a bridging immunoassay in combination with acid-dissociation and bead treatment for detection of anti-drug antibody

Anti-drug antibody (ADA) positivity is correlated with disease relapse risk when treated with monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics. ADA evaluation can assist with interpreting pharmacokinetic, pharmacological, and toxicology results. Here, we established an ADA assay based on two steps of acid dissociation combined with a bridging immunoassay to provide a comprehensive validation strategy. The three-tiered sample analysis process included screening, confirmation, and titration assays using therapeutic HLX26 (targeting lymphocyte activation gene-3 [LAG-3]) as an example. The cut points were determined by testing 50 individual normal human serum samples, including screening cut point (SCP) (SNR: 1.08), confirmatory cut point (CCP) (% inhibition: 12.65), and titration cut point (TCP) (sample-to-noise ratio [SNR]: 1.17). The assay sensitivity, low positive control (LPC), and high positive control (HPC) titer acceptable range were also set up as 33.0 ng/mL, 41.0 ng/mL, and 320-1280, respectively. After full validation, both the intra-assay and inter-assay precision testing passed with coefficient of variations (CVs) < 20%. The assay enabled excellent drug tolerance up to 768.0 μg/mL at the HPC level and 291.0 μg/mL at the LPC level, while the tolerance of target interference was up to 74.0 ng/mL of soluble LAG3. Moreover, no false-positive results were observed in the presence of 5% hemolyzed serum samples and 150 mg/dL of triglyceride in the serum samples, no hook effect was observed, and the stability performed normally under room temperature for 24 h, 2-8 °C for 7 d, and six freeze/thaw cycles. In summary, this ADA assay is feasible and could be used for evaluating the immunogenicity of HLX26 in clinical trials.

Non-Trough adalimumab and certolizumab drug levels associated with a therapeutic EULAR response in adherent patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Interventions aimed at increasing tumour-necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor serum drug levels (SDLs) may improve treatment response; however, previous studies suggesting SDL cut-offs have not accounted for treatment adherence. The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between Adalimumab/Certolizumab SDLs and EULAR good vs non/moderate response, and to define SDL cut-offs associated with good response in fully adherent patients.

METHODS

In a prospective observational study, 475 patients with RA were treated with Certolizumab (n = 192) or Adalimumab (n = 283). At baseline, 3/6/12-months patients had DAS28, self-reported treatment adherence, and SDLs measured. Fully adherent patients were analysed as a subgroup. Follow-up data at 3/6/12-months was analysed separately. Median SDLs were compared in good vs non/moderate response, and receiver-operator characteristics curves (ROC) were used to establish cut-off SDLs.

RESULTS

Fully adherent good responders had significantly higher median Adalimumab/Certolizumab SDLs compared with non/moderate responders (p= 0·04 and p= 0·0005, respectively). ROC analysis reported 3-month non-trough Adalimumab SDLs discriminated good vs non/moderate response with an AUC of 0·63 (95% CI 0·52-0·75), with a cut-off of 7·5mg/l being 39·1% specific, and 80·9% sensitive. Similarly, 3-month non-trough Certolizumab SDLs discriminated good vs non/moderate response with an AUC of 0·65 (95% CI 0·51-0·78), with a cut-off of 26·0mg/l being 43·9% specific, and 77·8% sensitive.

CONCLUSION

In fully adherent patients, higher SDLs are detected in good responders suggesting that interventions to improve SDLs such as encouraging adherence could improve treatment response. 3-month non-trough SDL cut-offs of 7·5mg/l for Adalimumab and 26·0mg/l for Certolizumab may be useful in clinical practice.

Current Analytical Strategies for Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Biomatrices

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a new class of biotherapeutics, consisting of a cytotoxic payload covalently bound to an antibody by a linker. Ligand-binding assay (LBA) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) are the favored techniques for the analysis of ADCs in biomatrices. The goal of our review is to provide current strategies related to a series of bioanalytical assays for pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-drug antibody (ADA) assessments. Furthermore, the strengths and limitations of LBA and LC-MS platforms are compared. Finally, potential factors that affect the performance of the developed assays are also provided. It is hoped that the review can provide valuable insights to bioanalytical scientists on the use of an integrated analytical strategy involving LBA and LC-MS for the bioanalysis of ADCs and related immunogenicity evaluation.

Pre-existing Reactivity to an IgG4 Fc-Epitope: Characterization and Mitigation of Interference in a Bridging Anti-drug Antibody Assay

Twenty percent of baseline patient samples exhibited a pre-existing response in a bridging anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay for a human IgG4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutic. In some cases, assay signals were more than 100-fold higher than background, potentially confounding detection of true treatment-emergent ADA responses. The pre-existing reactivity was mapped by competitive inhibition experiments using recombinant proteins or chimeric human mAbs with IgG4 heavy chain regions swapped for IgG1 sequences. These experiments demonstrated that the majority of the samples had reactivity to an epitope containing leucine 445 in the CH3 domain of human IgG4. The pre-existing reactivity in baseline patient samples was mitigated by replacing the ADA assay capture reagent with a version of the drug containing a wild type IgG1 proline substitution at residue 445 without impacting detection of drug-specific, treatment-emergent ADA. Finally, purification on Protein G or anti-human IgG (H + L) columns indicated the pre-existing response was likely due to immunoglobulins in patient samples.

Graphical abstract

Novel isoelectric target depletion (ITaD) protocol reduces the need for specific reagents for immunogenicity testing

Background: The development of immunogenicity assays for clinical drug candidates targeting soluble proteins is challenging when the soluble target might produce either false-positive or false-negative signals in bridging anti-drug antibody screening assays. A generic soluble target removal protocol that uses a pH-dependent depletion was evaluated. Results: An anti-drug antibody bridging assay with a pH-dependent soluble target depletion step was successfully developed. Endogenous target levels of ∼600 nM could be depleted below 8 pM. The assay was highly drug tolerant and met regulatory requirements. Conclusion: A reagent-independent target depletion protocol can be used for immunogenicity testing in the presence of a soluble target. The generic protocol circumvents common depletion or masking protocols.

Immune Complex Formation Is Associated With Loss of Tolerance and an Antibody Response to Both Drug and Target

AMG 966 is a bi-specific, heteroimmunoglobulin molecule that binds both tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and TNF-like ligand 1A (TL1A). In a first-in-human clinical study in healthy volunteers, AMG 966 elicited anti-drug antibodies (ADA) in 53 of 54 subjects (98.1%), despite a paucity of T cell epitopes observed in T cell assays. ADA were neutralizing and bound to all domains of AMG 966. Development of ADA correlated with loss of exposure. In vitro studies demonstrated that at certain drug-to-target ratios, AMG 966 forms large immune complexes with TNFα and TL1A, partially restoring the ability of the aglycosylated Fc domain to bind FcγRIa and FcγRIIa, leading to the formation of ADA. In addition to ADA against AMG 966, antibodies to endogenous TNFα were also detected in the sera of subjects dosed with AMG 966. This suggests that the formation of immune complexes between a therapeutic and target can cause loss of tolerance and elicit an antibody response against the target.

Anti-drug Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization

Evolving immunogenicity assay performance expectations and a lack of harmonized anti-drug antibody validation testing and reporting tools have resulted in significant time spent by health authorities and sponsors on resolving filing queries. Following debate at the American Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences National Biotechnology Conference, a group was formed to address these gaps. Over the last 3 years, 44 members from 29 organizations (including 5 members from Europe and 10 members from FDA) discussed gaps in understanding immunogenicity assay requirements and have developed harmonization tools for use by industry scientists to facilitate filings to health authorities. Herein, this team provides testing and reporting strategies and tools for the following assessments: (1) pre-study validation cut point; (2) in-study cut points, including procedures for applying cut points to mixed populations; (3) system suitability control criteria for in-study plate acceptance; (4) assay sensitivity, including the selection of an appropriate low positive control; (5) specificity, including drug and target tolerance; (6) sample stability that reflects sample storage and handling conditions; (7) assay selectivity to matrix components, including hemolytic, lipemic, and disease state matrices; (8) domain specificity for multi-domain therapeutics; (9) and minimum required dilution and extraction-based sample processing for titer reporting.

Factors associated with reduced infliximab exposure in the treatment of pediatric autoimmune disorders: a cross-sectional prospective convenience sampling study

BACKGROUND

Inadequate systemic exposure to infliximab (IFX) is associated with treatment failure. This work evaluated factors associated with reduced IFX exposure in children with autoimmune disorders requiring IFX therapy.

METHODS

In this single-center cross-sectional prospective study IFX trough concentrations and anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were measured in serum from children diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n = 73), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (n = 16), or uveitis (n = 8) receiving maintenance IFX infusions at an outpatient infusion clinic in a tertiary academic pediatric hospital. IFX concentrations in combination with population pharmacokinetic modeling were used to estimate IFX clearance. Patient demographic and clinical data were collected by chart review and evaluated for their relationship with IFX clearance.

RESULTS

IFX trough concentrations ranged from 0 to > 40 μg/mL and were 3-fold lower in children with IBD compared to children with JIA (p = 0.0002) or uveitis (p = 0.001). Children with IBD were found to receive lower IFX doses with longer dosing intervals, resulting in dose intensities (mg/kg/day) that were 2-fold lower compared to children with JIA (p = 0.0002) or uveitis (p = 0.02). Use of population pharmacokinetic analysis to normalize for variation in dosing practices demonstrated that increased IFX clearance was associated with ADA positivity (p = 0.004), male gender (p = 0.02), elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (p = 0.02), elevated c-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.001), reduced serum albumin concentrations (p = 0.0005), and increased disease activity in JIA (p = 0.009) and IBD (p ≤ 0.08). No significant relationship between diagnosis and underlying differences in IFX clearance was observed. Multivariable analysis by covariate population pharmacokinetic modeling confirmed increased IFX clearance to be associated with anti-IFX antibody positivity, increased ESR, and reduced serum albumin concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced IFX clearance is associated with immunogenicity and inflammatory burden across autoimmune disorders. Higher systemic IFX exposures observed in children with rheumatologic disorders are driven primarily by provider drug dose and interval selection, rather than differences in IFX pharmacokinetics across diagnoses. Despite maintenance IFX dosing at or above the standard recommended range for IBD (i.e., 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks), the dosing intensity used in the treatment of IBD is notably lower than dosing intensities used to treat JIA and uveitis, and may place some children with IBD at risk for suboptimal maintenance IFX exposures necessary for treatment response.

Immunogenicity of Biologic and Biosimilar Therapies for Psoriasis and Impact of Novel Immunoassays for Immunogenicity Detection

Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) may develop against originator biologic and biosimilar therapies used for the treatment of psoriasis and may be the cause of initial therapeutic non-response or diminished therapeutic response over time. Comparing immunogenicity between therapeutic agents is challenging owing to the variation in assays used for detection, among other reasons. Using the results of a PubMed search for psoriasis clinical trials disclosing the rates of ADAs for originator biologic and biosimilar therapies approved for the treatment of psoriasis within the last 5 years, this review discusses the rates and potential clinical impact of ADA formation in patients with psoriasis managed with originator biologic and biosimilar therapies, along with novel methods of ADA testing. Anti-drug antibodies are detectable in all biologic and biosimilar therapies approved for the treatment of psoriasis in the last 5 years, and the effect of ADAs on clinical response varies by agent. Novel immunoassays used for the detection of ADAs may have increased sensitivity compared with traditional assays, although the increased rate of detection may not correlate with decreased clinical response and the decision to test for the presence of ADAs may vary from patient to patient. Though ADA formation seems ubiquitous with the use of biologic agents for the treatment of psoriasis, the increased rates of ADAs detected by novel immunoassays may not necessarily correlate with decreased treatment efficacy.

Immunogenicity of biologic therapies for migraine: a review of current evidence

Background

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have been shown to be effective in migraine prevention. Eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumb have shown efficacy in clinical trials along with favorable safety and tolerability profiles. Although erenumab is a human mAb and the others have been humanized to varying degrees, they all have the capacity to provoke immune reactions. The present review article aims to discuss the current relationship between mAbs targeting the CGRP pathway (CGRP mAbs) and immunogenicity and their potential clinical implications.

Findings

The incidence of patients developing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), their titer, and clinical significance are highly variable and depend on a variety of different drug and patient factors. Neutralizing ADAs (NAbs) bind to and inhibit or reduce the pharmacologic activity of the biologic drug molecule, whereas non-neutralizing antibodies (Non-NAbs) bind to the biologic drug molecule without affecting pharmacologic activity in an in vitro test, although pharmacokinetics and drug clearance may be affected. A direct comparison of immunogenicity data across clinical trials with different biologics is not possible due to a lack of standardized assays. Several phase 2, phase 3, and long-term studies evaluating CGRP mAbs for migraine prevention have reported immunogenicity data (5 studies each for eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab). Across these studies, prevalence of ADAs varied, ranging from < 1% to ~ 18%. Neutralizing ADAs were slightly less common, with a prevalence ranging from 0 to 12%. Adverse events related to ADA formation were rare.

Conclusions

As more CGRP mAb studies are conducted and more long-term follow-up data become available, evidence is increasing that immunogenicity rates of biologic therapies for migraine are low, and adverse events related to ADAs are rare. Taken together, these results add to the growing body of evidence for the safety and tolerability of this class of migraine medications.

Immunogenicity of biologic agents in rheumatology

Biologic agents have become a core component of therapeutic strategies for many inflammatory rheumatic diseases. However, perhaps reflecting the specificity and generally high affinity of biologic agents, these therapeutics have been used by rheumatologists with less consideration of their pharmacokinetics than that of conventional synthetic DMARDs. Immunogenicity was recognized as a potential limitation to the use of biologic agents at an early stage in their development, although regulatory guidance was relatively limited and assays to measure immunogenicity were less sophisticated than today. The advent of biosimilars has sparked a renewed interest in immunogenicity that has resulted in the development of increasingly sensitive assays, an enhanced appreciation of the pharmacokinetic consequences of immunogenicity and the development of comprehensive and specific guidance from regulatory authorities. As a result, rheumatologists have a greatly improved understanding of the field in general, including the factors responsible for immunogenicity, its potential clinical consequences and the implications for everyday treatment. In some specialties, immunogenicity testing is becoming a part of routine clinical management, but definitive evidence of its cost-effectiveness in rheumatology is awaited.

Overcoming multimeric target interference in a bridging immunogenicity assay with soluble target receptor, target immunodepletion and mild acidic assay pH

Background: Soluble multimeric target proteins can generate a target-mediated false-positive signal in bridging anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays. A high background signal due to target interference was observed in our anti-REGN-Y antibody assay, and two different strategies were evaluated to mitigate this false-positive signal. Results: Multiple anti-target antibodies were tested and found to be ineffective at reducing target interference, so soluble target receptor and co-factor proteins were used in combination to inhibit the target-mediated signal. These competitive blockers synergistically inhibited target interference and increased target tolerance levels, especially when the assay was performed under mild acidic conditions. A separate approach, target immunodepletion using magnetic beads conjugated with an anti-target antibody, was also effective at mitigating the target-mediated signal, also in combination with mild acidic assay pH. Both methods allowed detection of a true ADA signal in monkey and human post-dose serum samples. Conclusion: These methods provide alternative strategies for mitigating target interference when standard anti-target antibodies are ineffective, with the competitive blocker method being recommended, if possible, due to its higher throughput and easier execution.

Assessment of immunogenicity from galcanezumab phase 3 trials in patients with episodic or chronic migraine

BACKGROUND

This analysis characterizes the immunogenicity profile of galcanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively binds calcitonin gene-related peptide and inhibits its activity, in phase 3 migraine trials.

METHODS

Immunogenicity data were analyzed from baseline and double-blind, placebo-controlled phases of the 3-month chronic migraine study REGAIN, the 6-month episodic migraine studies EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2, and from baseline and open-label phases of the 12-month chronic and episodic migraine Study CGAJ. The incidence of baseline antidrug antibodies, treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies, neutralizing antidrug antibodies, and the effect of antidrug antibody titer on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed. The relationship between antidrug antibody status and efficacy was explored using average change in monthly migraine headache days. Safety analyses assessed the potential relationship between treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies and hypersensitivity events or adverse events related to injection sites.

FINDINGS

Across studies, 5.9-11.2% of patients had baseline antidrug antibodies. The incidence of treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies was 2.6-12.4% in the galcanezumab group and 0.5-1.7% in the placebo group. The majority of treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies were detected approximately 3-6 months after first study drug dose. Overall, the observed antidrug antibody titer did not impact galcanezumab concentrations, calcitonin gene-related peptide concentrations, or galcanezumab efficacy. There was no evidence that hypersensitivity events or adverse events related to injection sites were mediated by treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies.

INTERPRETATION

These data showed that immunogenicity did not impact galcanezumab concentrations, calcitonin gene-related peptide concentrations, or the efficacy and hypersensitivity profile of galcanezumab in patients with migraine.

Regulatory and strategic considerations for addressing immunogenicity and related responses in biopharmaceutical development programs

The last three decades have seen the biotherapeutic drug market evolve from promising concept to market dominance in a range of clinical indications. This growth has been spurred by the success of established drug classes like monoclonal antibodies, but also by the introduction of biosimilars, and more recently, multiple novel cell and gene therapies. Biotherapeutic drug development presents many unique challenges, but unintended immune responses are among the most common reasons for program attrition. Anti-drug antibodies can impact the safety and efficacy of drug products, and related immune responses, like the cytokine release syndrome that occurred in the infamous TGN-1412 clinical trial, can be challenging to predict with nonclinical models. For this reason, it is important that development programs proceed with a scientifically grounded and measured approach to these responses. This process begins at the discovery stage with the application of “quality by design,” continues into the clinic with the development of quality assays and management strategies, and culminates in the effective presentation of this information in regulatory documents. This review provides an overview of some of the key strategic and regulatory considerations for biotherapeutics as they pertain to immunogenicity and related responses.

Assessing the Potential Risk of Cross-Reactivity Between Anti-Bococizumab Antibodies and Other Anti-PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to bococizumab were detected in > 40% of subjects in the SPIRE lipid-lowering trials. The risk of cross-reactivity between anti-bococizumab antibodies and other approved anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was investigated using a single-assay approach.

METHODS

Bococizumab immunogenicity was assessed in SPIRE-HR, a 52-week study. The highest ADA titer sample from each ADA-positive subject (n = 155) was tested in vitro for cross-reactivity to alirocumab and evolocumab using a novel ADA assay approach. Additional specificity tiers within the bococizumab ADA assay against each drug were validated using recombinant PCSK9 as a surrogate cross-reactive positive control. If the highest ADA titer sample showed cross-reactivity, additional samples from that subject were analyzed. Cross-reactivity was determined by the ability of alirocumab or evolocumab to inhibit the sample signal greater than or equal to the cross-reactivity cut-points.

RESULTS

ADAs were detected in 44.0% (155/352) of bococizumab-treated subjects, and 27.0% also developed neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Median ADA and NAb titers ranged from 276 to 526 and 8 to 12 over the course of the study, respectively. From 155 ADA-positive subjects tested for cross-reactivity, one (0.6%) subject showed weak cross-reactivity to both alirocumab and evolocumab. This cross-reactivity signal was transient (from Days 337 to 373) and undetectable at the last ADA-positive timepoint (Day 407).

CONCLUSION

A novel, single-assay approach was validated to assess the potential cross-reactivity of anti-bococizumab antibodies to alirocumab and evolocumab. In subjects who developed ADAs to bococizumab, the likelihood of clinically relevant cross-reactivity to marketed anti-PCSK9 mAbs is remote, based on the low frequency of cross-reactivity observed, which was weak in signal inhibition and transient in nature.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The SPIRE-HR study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT01968954.

Implementation of a three-tiered approach to identify and characterize anti-drug antibodies raised against HIV-specific broadly neutralizing antibodies

The ability to detect, quantify, and interrogate the properties of immune responses raised against biological therapeutics is not only important to our understanding of these molecules, but also to their success in the clinic. A tiered assay approach to identify the presence, specificity, and titer of anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses has been adopted as a gold standard by industry leaders, the FDA, and the EMA. In order to support pre-clinical and clinical trials, these assays must be standardized, and their performance sufficiently characterized to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of results under relevant testing conditions. Here we present implementation of electrochemiluminiscence assays that fit into the tiered paradigm of ADA testing for five HIV broadly neutralizing antibodies (3BNC117, 3BNC117-LS, 10–1074, PGT121, and PGDM1400) in compliance with Good Clinical Laboratory practices. Assay sensitivities and matrix effects were evaluated and used to inform the development of positivity cut points. Once cut points were established, assay precision, specificity, free-drug tolerance, and robustness were defined. In all cases, assay characteristics met or surpassed recommendations set forth by the FDA. To further evaluate the performance of these assays and the tiered approach, samples from non-human primates that had received a subset of the five therapeutics were evaluated. In sum, this study reports qualification of a set of ADA assays available to the scientific community as pre-clinical and clinical trials of broadly HIV-neutralizing antibodies proceed, and a framework that is easily adapted as new drug products are advanced in the clinic.

Development and Utility of an ELISA Method for Sensitive and Specific Detection of IgE Antidrug Antibodies

Biologics can potentially induce unwanted immune responses, leading to formation of antidrug antibodies (ADA) of various affinity, isotypes, and subclasses. Among them, antigen and drug-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies have been reported to have potential correlation with hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis in particular. Recent regulatory guidance on immunogenicity testing has recommended the measurement of antigen-specific IgE antibodies for biologics with a reported high risk of anaphylaxis using assays with sensitivities in the high pg/mL to low ng/mL range. Nevertheless, IgE ADA remains challenging to detect due to their being the least abundant isotype in blood serum samples and the potential for interference in the bioanalytical methods due to high levels of endogenous immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) ADA, not to mention the nonspecific total serum IgE antibodies. Another challenge in developing IgE ADA assays is the need to create a surrogate drug-specific IgE antibody positive control to monitor the performance of the assay for the intended use. In this case study, utilizing a human IgE antidrug antibody positive control and a human IgE receptor as capture, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method was developed for the measurement of IgE ADA, meeting the regulatory expectations, with excellent assay sensitivity, selectivity, specificity, and tolerance towards potential interference in serum samples. This assay format could be readily adapted and implemented to assess drug-specific IgE antibodies in the event of drug-related anaphylaxis in clinical and in nonclinical development programs.

Mitigating target interference in bridging immunogenicity assay with target-blocking reagents and mild basic pH

Background: Soluble drug target in clinical study samples generated false positive results in anti-drug antibody (ADA) bridging assays due to target-mediated bridging. Results: The combination of two target-blocking reagents and mild basic assay pH resulted in high tolerance to recombinant target protein and reduced levels of positivity in clinical study samples with pharmacokinetic profiles that did not indicate significant ADA response. Testing with low-affinity ADA positive serum from immunized rabbits and known ADA positive samples from nonclinical studies in rats confirmed the assay's ability to detect ADA positive samples and the minimal impact of basic pH and target-blocking reagents on ADA detection. Conclusion: These strategies provide alternatives for mitigating target interference when standard target-blocking antibodies alone are ineffective.

Addressing soluble target interference in the development of a functional assay for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against a BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody

Proper evaluation of immunogenicity during clinical development of biotherapeutics is a major challenge to bioanalytical scientists, in part due to matrix interference in anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (NAB) assays. If not addressed, matrix interference could confound the immunogenicity assessment of a given biotherapeutic in clinical development. To support clinical development of a B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-CD3 bispecific antibody, a cell-based NAB assay was developed as part of a tiered approach to evaluating the immunogenicity of the drug. The assay endpoint (T cell activation) was chosen based on its strong association with the mechanism of action of the drug. The BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody activates T cells through simultaneous binding of CD3 on T cells and BCMA on target cells. In this system, T cell activation was assessed through the measurement of luciferase activity in an engineered Jurkat cell line. In the presence of NAB, the degree of T cell activation measured by the amount of luciferase activity can be reduced. During method development, soluble BCMA (sBCMA) interference in the NAB assay was apparent. The binding of sBCMA to the anti-BCMA domain of the bispecific drug led to reduced T cell activation, which caused false positive results in NAB testing. To mitigate this interference, several strategies to eliminate sBCMA were investigated. Among the procedures tested, a bead-based approach proved most effective in depleting sBCMA, while maintaining robust assay performance and achieving fit-for-purpose sensitivity. Using this sample pretreatment procedure, the NAB assay tolerated sBCMA up to 2 μg/mL, or approximately four times the estimated median sBCMA concentration in serum samples from patients with active multiple myeloma.

Bioanalytical assays in support of tanezumab developmental and reproductive toxicity studies: challenges and learnings

Bioanalytical challenges were encountered during developmental and reproductive toxicity studies of tanezumab in cynomolgus monkeys. Possible changes in breast milk composition over the postpartum period potentially complicated assessment of tanezumab concentration in this matrix, requiring validation of the quantification assay across different time intervals. Immunogenicity assessment in maternal serum was complicated by apparent increases in the incidence of antidrug antibody-positive results in treatment-naive samples as pregnancy progressed that were due to changes in the concentration of nerve growth factor, tanezumab's target protein. This was overcome by employing gestational day-specific cut points throughout pregnancy. Researchers should recognize potential challenges associated with dynamic matrices/physiological conditions and anticipate that assays developed under normal conditions may require adaptation for specialized situations.

Perspectives on exploring hybrid LBA/LC-MS approach for clinical immunogenicity testing

Biological drug products may elicit an antidrug antibody (ADA) response. The current widely used bridging ligand binding assay (LBA) is the gold standard for ADA assessments in drug development, which is a qualitative assay followed by a quasi-quantitative titer analysis but can be prone to interferences from biological matrices, drug targets and circulating drugs. We present our perspectives and findings in exploring a hybrid LBA/LC-MS as an orthogonal bioanalytical tool for clinical immunogenicity assessments. The hybrid LBA/LC-MS is a semiquantitative assay with acceptable specificity, drug tolerance and the capability of multiplexed detection of ADA isotypes. The assay results suggest this technology to be a promising and complementary bioanalytical tool that can provide informative immunogenicity data in drug development.

Neutralizing Antibody Assay Development with High Drug and Target Tolerance to Support Clinical Development of an Anti-TFPI Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody

Immunogenicity is a major challenge for protein therapeutics which can potentially reduce drug efficacy and safety and is often being monitored by anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (NAb) assays. Circulating targets and residual drugs in matrices can have significant impacts on accuracy of results from ADA and NAb assays, and sufficient drug and target tolerance for these assays are necessary. Here, we report the development of a competitive ligand binding (CLB) NAb assay for an anti-TFPI (tissue factor pathway inhibitor) monoclonal antibody (PF-06741086) with high drug and target tolerance to support ongoing clinical studies. A double acid affinity capture elution approach was used to mitigate drug interference, and a robust target removal strategy was employed to enhance target tolerance. The validated NAb assay has sensitivity of 313 ng/mL, drug tolerance of 50 μg/mL, and target tolerance of 1200 ng/mL. A step-by-step tutorial of assay development is described in this manuscript along with the rationale for using a high drug/target tolerant NAb assay. The NAb assay cut point factor obtained was 0.78. Other assay performance characteristics, e.g., precision and selectivity, are also discussed. This validated method demonstrated a superior drug and target tolerance to warrant specific and precise characterization of the NAb responses in support of ongoing clinical studies.

Perspectives on potentiating immunocapture-LC-MS for the bioanalysis of biotherapeutics and biomarkers

The integration of ligand-binding assay and LC-MS/MS (immunocapture-LC-MS) has unleashed the combined advantages of both powerful techniques for addressing the ever increasing bioanalytical challenges for biotherapeutics and biomarker assays. The highly specific, selective and sensitive characteristics of the immunocapture-LC-MS-based assays have enabled the determination of biotherapeutics and biomarkers in biomatrices with ease of method development, less requirements on key reagents as well as structural specificity for endogenous and engineered biomolecules. In addition, the versatile immunocapture-LC-MS technology has expanded into many challenging areas to enhance mechanistic studies of drug interactions with their targets. This paper intends to summarize our perspectives on enhancing the use of immunocapture-LC-MS in drug discovery and development for emerging new modalities.

Immunogenicity testing of therapeutic antibodies in ocular fluids after intravitreal injection

Aim: High drug concentrations in ocular fluids after intravitreal administration preclude the use of drug-sensitive immunoassays. A drug-tolerant immunoassay is therefore desirable for immunogenicity testing in ophthalmology. Experimental: Immune complex (IC) antidrug antibody (ADA) assays were established for two species. The assays were compared with the bridging assay in ocular and plasma samples from two preclinical studies. Results: The IC assays showed high drug tolerance, which enabled a reliable ADA detection in ocular fluids after intravitreal administration. The IC assays were superior to the bridging assay in the analysis of ocular fluids with high drug concentrations. Conclusion: The IC assay allows a reliable ADA detection in matrices with high drug concentrations, such as ocular fluids.