Perampanel efficacy and tolerability with enzyme-inducing AEDs in patients with epilepsy

Development and Validation of a Population Pharmacokinetics Model of Perampanel for Pediatric Epilepsy Patients for Optimized Dosing

Background

Perampanel exhibits substantial interindividual variability, and pharmacokinetic data in pediatric patients are scarce. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model to optimize the dosing of perampanel in children with epilepsy.

Methods

The PPK model was developed via a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach, utilizing a dataset comprising 454 plasma concentrations of perampanel obtained from 151 pediatric patients with epilepsy, 120 (79.5%) of whom were aged < 12 years. Goodness-of-fit plots and bootstrap analysis were employed to evaluate the final model. Monte Carlo simulations were utilized to suggest perampanel dosing strategies using a reference plasma concentration range of 100-1000 ng/mL.

Results

In the final PPK models of perampanel, linear centralized age, coadministration of oxcarbazepine (OXC), carbamazepine (CBZ), and valproic acid (VPA) were covariates of clearance (CL/F), and log-transformed body weight was a covariate of the apparent distribution volume (V). The CL/F was estimated via the formula CL/F=0.177*((age+10)/8.8)1.31*1.51OXC*0.745VPA*1.88CBZ. The relative standard errors (RSEs) for each fixed effect parameter were 15.2%, 14.2%, 12.0%, 7.92%, and 16.3%, respectively. The V was estimated via the formula V=227*LGBW with an RSE of 14.1%. The model demonstrated good robustness according to goodness-of-fit plots and bootstrap analysis. The simulation analysis resulted in a dosing regimen stratified by covariates.

Conclusion

A reliable perampanel PPK model for pediatric patients was successfully developed. This result could be helpful for dosing optimization in pediatric patients receiving perampanel, especially those aged under 12 years.

Improving the tolerability of antiseizure medications: When and how to use cenobamate and other new antiseizure medications

Despite the introduction of newer antiseizure medications (ASMs) with improved safety profiles over the past several years, rates of treatment-related intolerable adverse events (AEs) for people with epilepsy have not changed substantially. Tolerability issues can potentially jeopardize optimal dosing and effectiveness, regimen adherence, and treatment retention with these newer medications. Long-term clinical studies, open-label extension studies, and postmarketing studies allow flexible dosing and adjustment of concomitant ASMs, which can help clinicians reduce treatment-related AEs and thus improve the retention and tolerability of these treatments. With newer effective treatments (e.g., lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, perampanel, brivaracetam, and most recently, cenobamate), the risk of AEs may be minimized by proactively adjusting concomitant ASMs that have known pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic drug interactions. Additional tolerability considerations should be made for specific populations, for example, more determined reductions in concomitant ASMs may be required to improve treatment tolerability in older people, and individuals with more refractory seizures may require higher doses. Strategies to improve the tolerability of effective ASMs further, including earlier add-on therapy and transition to, or initial, monotherapy should be investigated. Ongoing clinical studies in children and people with generalized tonic-clonic seizures of the most recent ASM addition, cenobamate, will further inform the safety profile of cenobamate and its potential utility as a broad-spectrum treatment option.

The Therapeutic Role of Perampanel in Treating Pediatric Patients With Dravet Syndrome: A Scoping Review

Sodium channelopathies are genetic disorders caused by mutations in genes, including sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 1 (SCN1A), that lead to several epilepsy syndromes. Traditional treatments with sodium channel blockers often have limited effectiveness and side effects. Dravet syndrome (DS), a severe epilepsy starting in infancy, presents significant treatment challenges. Perampanel (PER), a noncompetitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist, has shown promise for DS, reducing seizure frequency and improving quality of life (QoL). The limited availability of randomized controlled trials on PER among DS is challenging, but broader studies on refractory epilepsies offer insights. Real-world studies support PER's efficacy, underscoring its potential for managing refractory seizures in DS. Studies showed long-term effectiveness in reducing seizure frequency and enhancing QoL. While PER has minimal impact on cognitive development, it significantly improves seizure control. Numerous studies confirm the use of PER as an effective adjunctive treatment for DS; however, it is crucial to observe the safety profile, especially for pediatric sodium channelopathy patients. Common side effects include dizziness, drowsiness, and irritability, necessitating careful management. Long-term safety is generally favorable, but monitoring for behavioral and mood changes is essential. Additionally, the response to PER in DS varies widely, complicating its use. The limited clinical data and the need for careful dosage monitoring, especially in children, present significant challenges. Side effects, potential drug interactions, and high costs further complicate treatment. Despite increasing attention to its cost-effectiveness, accessibility remains limited in some regions, posing significant barriers for many families. In this paper, we review the role of PER in treating pediatric patients with DS, emphasizing clinical evidence and practical considerations.

Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimization of perampanel in children with epilepsy: A real-world study

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this study were to explore the pharmacokinetics of perampanel (PER) in children with epilepsy, identify factors that contribute to pharmacokinetic variations among subjects, evaluate the connection between PER exposure and clinical outcome, and establish an evidence-based approach for tailoring individualized antiepileptic treatment in this specific population.

METHODS

In this prospective study, PER plasma concentrations and genetic information on metabolic enzymes were obtained from 194 patients younger than 18 years. The disposition kinetics of PER in pediatric patients following oral dosing were characterized using nonlinear mixed effect models. The effective range for the plasma concentration of PER was determined by assessing the efficacy and safety of PER treatment and analyzing the relationship between drug exposure and clinical response. Monte Carlo simulations were then performed to evaluate and optimize the current dosing regimens.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic profile of PER was adequately described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Body weight, total bilirubin level, and concomitant oxcarbazepine were found to have significant influences on PER pharmacokinetics. Model estimates of apparent clearance and volume of distribution were .016 ± .009 L/h/kg and 1.47 ± .78 L/kg, respectively. The effective range predicted from plasma concentration data in responders was 215-862 μg/L. Dosing scenarios stratified according to essential covariates were proposed through simulation analysis.

SIGNIFICANCE

In this study, we captured the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of PER in pediatric epilepsy patients through analysis of real-world data and adopted a pharmacometric approach to support an individualized dosing strategy for PER in this specific population.

Long-term efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients from the Asia-Pacific region with refractory focal-onset seizures in Study 335 open-label extension

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel for the treatment of patients with refractory focal-onset seizures (FOS), with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), from the Asia-Pacific region.

METHODS

Study 335 (NCT01618695) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study. Patients aged ≥12 years with refractory FOS who completed the Core Study could enter an open-label extension (OLEx) Phase (6-week Conversion and ≥46-week Maintenance Period). Endpoints included median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days, 50% responder and seizure-freedom rates, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

The Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set included 704 patients (529 received perampanel and 175 received placebo during the Core Study; all patients received perampanel during OLEx). The median percent reduction in seizure frequency and 50% responder rates in patients who received perampanel during the Core Study were maintained throughout the OLEx Phase (Week 64-75: 55.9% and 54.3%, respectively). Seizure freedom for ≥12 consecutive months at any time during perampanel treatment was achieved by 4.1% of patients with FOS and 14.2% of patients with FBTCS. Among patients treated with perampanel 4 mg/day (n = 83), median reduction in seizure frequency was lower in those who received concomitant enzyme-inducing anti-seizure medications (EIASMs) than those who received non-EIASMs. The most common TEAE was dizziness (n = 318; 46.8%); 141 (20.8%) patients had TEAEs that led to study/drug withdrawal.

SIGNIFICANCE

Overall, long-term seizure control was achieved with adjunctive perampanel in patients with refractory FOS, with or without FBTCS, in an Asia-Pacific population.

Efficacy, tolerability and safety of add-on third-generation antiseizure medications in treating focal seizures worldwide: a network meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled trials

Background

Adjunctive newer antiseizure medications (ASMs) are being used in patients with treatment-resistant focal-onset seizures (FOS). An updated network meta-analysis (NMA) was necessary to compile evidence in this critical area.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from their inception until 17 January 2024, evaluating the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of rufinamide (RUF), brivaracetam (BRV), cenobamate (CNB), eslicarbazepine (ESL), lacosamide (LCM), retigabine (RTG), and perampanel (PER) as adjunctive treatments for FOS. Efficacy outcomes included seizure response and seizure freedom. Tolerability was assessed by discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Safety outcomes were evaluated based on the number of patients experiencing at least one AE and serious adverse events (SAEs). This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023485130).

Findings

A total of 29 studies involving 11,750 participants were included. For seizure response, all ASMs were significantly superior to placebo, with RTG ranking highest, followed by CNB. Considering dosage, CNB 400 mg/d was top-ranked, followed by RTG 1200 mg/d. For seizure freedom, BRV was highest-ranked, followed by CNB, with BRV 100 mg/d leading, followed by CNB 400 mg/d. Regarding tolerability, LCM 600 mg/d had the lowest ranking, followed by CNB 400 mg/d. For the safety outcome of AEs, ESL 1200 mg/d was ranked lowest, followed by CNB 400 mg/d. Regarding SAEs, LCM 400 mg/d was ranked lowest, followed by RTG 1200 mg/d.

Interpretation

ASMs at different dosages have varying efficacy and tolerability profiles. We have provided hierarchical rankings of ASMs for efficacy and safety outcomes. Our findings offer the most comprehensive evidence available to inform patients, families, physicians, guideline developers, and policymakers about the choice of ASMs in patients with treatment-resistant FOS.

Funding

None.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of perampanel: Clinical utility and impact of co-medication on pharmacokinetic variability

BACKGROUND

Perampanel (PER) is a newly developed antiseizure medication (ASM). This study aimed to determine the utilization of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for PER in a real-world clinical setting and investigate the influence of concomitant use of ASMs on the plasma concentration profile of PER.

METHOD

We analyzed data from the Chang Gung Research Database, which is the largest multi-institutional electronic medical records database in Taiwan. The main outcomes were the comparisons of PER plasma concentration and the ratio of concentration to the weight-adjusted dose (C/D; [ng/mL]/[mg/kg/d]) among patients received TDM of different clinical indication and among different ASM co-medication subgroups.

RESULTS

Overall, 88 plasma samples were collected from 66 epilepsy patients treated with PER. The majority of patients (77.3 %) underwent PER TDM owing to poorly controlled seizures. There was a trend toward a higher plasma concentration and C/D ratio in those suspected of having PER toxicity owing to adverse events than of other indications. The PER concentration exhibited dose linearity. The mean PER plasma concentrations in patients co-medicated with enzyme-inducing ASMs were significantly lower than those in the patients who were not prescribed enzyme-inducing or enzyme-inhibiting ASMs, and co-medication with carbamazepine (CBZ) resulted in a significant reduction in the PER concentration.

CONCLUSION

PER concentration exhibited a linear regression relationship with PER dose, and the plasma concentration of the drug was highly susceptible to the drug's interactions with enzyme-inducing ASMs. TDM with clear indication could help determine the influence of ASMs used concomitantly on PER concentrations and guide clinical adjustments.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Perampanel in Children With Refractory Epilepsy: Focus on Influencing Factors on the Free-Perampanel Concentration

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the effect of perampanel dose, age, sex, and antiseizure medication cotherapy on steady-state free-perampanel concentration in children with refractory epilepsy, as well as the relationship between inflammation and the pharmacokinetics of perampanel.

METHODS

This prospective study in China included 87 children with refractory epilepsy treated with adjunctive perampanel therapy. Free and total perampanel concentrations in plasma were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Free-perampanel concentration was compared among patients with various potential influencing factors.

RESULTS

A total of 87 pediatric patients (44 female children) aged 2-14 years were enrolled. The mean free-perampanel concentration and free concentration-to-dose (CD) ratio in plasma were 5.7 ± 2.7 ng/mL (16.3 ± 7.7 nmol/L) and 45.3 ± 21.0 (ng/mL)/(mg/kg) [129.6 ± 60.1 (nmol/L)/(mg/kg)], respectively. The protein binding of perampanel in plasma was 97.98%. A linear relationship was observed between perampanel dose and free concentration in plasma, and a positive relationship was found between the total and free-perampanel concentrations. Concomitant use of oxcarbazepine reduced the free CD ratio by 37%. Concomitant use of valproic acid increased the free CD ratio by 52%. Five patients had a plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP) level of >5.0 mg/L (Hs-CRP positive). The total and free CD ratios of perampanel were increased in patients with inflammation. Two patients with inflammation developed adverse events, which disappeared as the Hs-CRP level returned to normal, and neither required perampanel dose reduction. Age and sex did not influence the free-perampanel concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found complex drug interactions between perampanel and other concomitant antiseizure medications, providing valuable information to enable clinicians to apply perampanel in the future reasonably. In addition, it may be important to quantify both the total and free concentrations of perampanel to assess complex pharmacokinetic interactions.

Efficacy of perampanel in pediatric epilepsy with known and presumed genetic etiology

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of perampanel (PER) in pediatric epilepsy with specific etiologies has not been well established. Here, we investigated outcome and predictors of PER treatment in a pediatric cohort with known and presumed genetic etiology.

METHODS

We included pediatric patients with potential genetic epilepsy who received PER treatment and underwent whole-exome sequencing (WES) from January 2020 to September 2021. All patients were followed up for >12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients were included. Overall response rates were 51.6% and 49.6% at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 27 multiple genes were detected among 58 patients (46.8%) by WES. On performing multivariate logistic regression analysis, only developmental delay (OR = 0.406, P = 0.042) was a negative predictor of treatment response. However, the seizure onset age, positive WES results, and number of ASMs before PER administration were not significantly. Thirteen carriers with variants in the SCN1A gene showed a better response compared to eight patients with other sodium channels (P = 0.007), and to the other 45 patients with positive WES results (OR = 7.124, 95% CI = 1.306-38.860, P = 0.023). Adverse events were only reported in 23 patients, the most common being emotional problems.

INTERPRETATION

PER is safe and efficacious in pediatric patients with known and presumed genetic etiology. The response rate is comparable to that reported in other pediatric populations, and lower among those with developmental delay. A gene-specific response to PER is found along with better efficacy links to pathogenic variants in the SCN1A gene.

Therapeutic Salivary Monitoring of Perampanel in Patients with Epilepsy Using a Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling Technique

The objective of this study was to validate a novel assay using the volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) technique combined with liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the determination of the antiseizure medication perampanel in saliva and its clinical applicability in patients with epilepsy. VAMS tips were loaded with 30 μL of saliva and dried for 60 min. Analytes were extracted with methanol. The supernatant was evaporated under a gentle stream of nitrogen and reconstituted with 60 μL of methanol. Separation and quantification were achieved on a monolithic column connected to a mass spectrometer. Calibration curves were linear between 0.5 and 300 ng/mL. Intra- and inter-day accuracy was within 85.6-103.2% and intra-day and inter-day precision did not exceed 12.1%. Perampanel was stable in samples collected by VAMS and stored under different storage conditions. The VAMS-LC-MS/MS method was validated according to internationally accepted criteria and tested in patients with epilepsy who were receiving a combination of perampanel and other antiseizure medications. The method showed adequate bioanalytical performances, holding great potential as an alternative strategy to support domiciliary TDM in patients with epilepsy treated with perampanel according to the simplicity of sample collection.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Perampanel in Portuguese Patients Diagnosed with Refractory Epilepsy

Perampanel is a promising antiepileptic drug (AED) for refractory epilepsy treatment due to its innovative mechanism of action. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to be further used in initial dose optimization of perampanel in patients diagnosed with refractory epilepsy. A total of seventy-two plasma concentrations of perampanel obtained from forty-four patients were analyzed through a population pharmacokinetic approach by means of nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM). A one-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the pharmacokinetic profiles of perampanel. Interpatient variability (IPV) was entered on clearance (CL), while the residual error (RE) was modeled as proportional. The presence of enzyme-inducing AEDs (EIAEDs) and body mass index (BMI) were found as significant covariates for CL and volume of distribution (V), respectively. The mean (relative standard error) estimates for CL and V of the final model were 0.419 L/h (5.56%) and 29.50 (6.41%), respectively. IPV was 30.84% and the proportional RE was 6.44%. Internal validation demonstrated an acceptable predictive performance of the final model. A reliable population pharmacokinetic model was successfully developed, and it is the first enrolling real-life adults diagnosed with refractory epilepsy.

Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Treatment With Perampanel in Pediatric Patients With Epilepsy Aged ≥4 Years: A Real-Life Observational Study

Purpose: The safety and effectiveness of perampanel in clinical settings involving Chinese pediatric patients are limited, as perampanel has only recently been approved for use in China, in September 2019. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel as an adjunctive therapy for pediatric patients with epilepsy aged ≥ 4 years in Xinjiang, Northwest China. Methods: Efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in seizure frequency at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up compared with baseline. The baseline was 3 months before the addition of perampanel, and the seizure frequency was based on the patients' seizure diary. The safety and tolerability depended on the type and frequency of any adverse event during epilepsy treatment across all pediatric patients. Results: Overall, 67 pediatric patients from 2 different hospitals were enrolled in the study. Among the pediatric patients with seizures during the baseline period, the effective rates for all seizure types at 3, 6, and 12 months were 59.1%, 58.7%, and 57.4%, respectively. During perampanel treatment, 34 patients (50.7%) experienced at least 1 adverse reaction. Conclusion: Overall, this real-world retrospective study of pediatric patients validated that perampanel is an effective treatment option as an adjunctive therapy among pediatric patients with epilepsy aged ≥4 years.

Effects of low-dose titration on the tolerability and safety of perampanel

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of low-dose titration on the tolerability and safety of perampanel.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1065 patients who started perampanel therapy and compared the incidence of adverse events after standard titration (Group A: starting dose, 2 mg/day; titration speed, 2 mg/2 weeks or longer) and low-dose titration (Group B: starting dose, < 1 mg/day; titration speed, < 1 mg/2 weeks or longer).

RESULTS

Adverse events were reported in 158 patients (14.8%) within the initial first 90 days of starting perampanel (mean concentration, 331 ng/mL). At 90 days, the cumulative incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (24.5% vs. 16.3%, respectively; log-rank test p < 0.001). A Cox proportional hazards model also showed that low-dose titration decreased the incidence risk of adverse events (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.69). When the groups were stratified by use of enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (inducers), Group A patients without inducers had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of adverse events than the other three subgroups (26.7%, p < 0.001). In patients taking 2 mg of perampanel, median concentrations in patients with or without inducers were 43 ng/mL and 204 ng/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Perampanel is generally initiated at 2 mg, but serum perampanel concentrations show substantial interindividual variation. Our study suggests that care must be taken when setting the starting dose of perampanel. In particular, low-dose titration is recommended in patients not taking inducers.

The safety of perampanel in different disorders and doses: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety of perampanel in different disorders and doses.

METHODS

Embase, the Cochrane Library, Medline, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to July 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3 and R 4.2.1 software.

RESULTS

A total of 17 RCTs with 5711 subjects were included in the final analysis. The double-blind treatment phase was from 12 weeks to 48 weeks. Our results showed that 11 adverse events (aggression, ataxia, balance disorder, dizziness, fall, fatigue, irritability, rash, somnolence, vertigo, and weight increase) were statistically significantly associated with perampanel, and 4 of them (ataxia, dizziness, fatigue, and somnolence) showed a clear dose-response relationship. Psychiatric adverse events occurred most frequently among serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). At 8 mg/day, seven adverse events (aggression, balance disorder, dizziness, fatigue, irritability, vertigo, and weight increase) occurred more frequently in patients with epilepsy than in patients with other disorders, whereas dose discontinuation rates due to adverse events were lower in patients with epilepsy than in patients with other disorders.

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of perampanel is dependent on diseases and dose. The risk of adverse events was statistically significantly higher, with doses exceeding 4 mg/day. Despite a higher risk of adverse events, patients with epilepsy had a lower perampanel discontinuation rate than patients with other disorders.

Effectiveness and safety of perampanel as adjunctive therapy among Chinese patients with focal-onset epilepsy: A real-world prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

Perampanel (PER) has previously been shown to be effective and tolerable when used as an adjunctive therapy for patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of PER as adjunctive therapy for patients with FOS in the Chinese population under real-world conditions for 1 year.

METHODS

A prospective, single-center, 1-year observational study was conducted at Huashan Hospital, enrolling both under age (≥4 years old) and adult patients with FOS. Response to PER was assessed at 3-, 6-, and 12-month checkpoints by analyzing the 50 % responder rate, the seizure-free rate, and reduction in seizure frequency.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients (mean age: 26.6 years, 56.5 % males) with FOS were included, with seventy-six patients finishing the 1-year follow-up (retention rate: 70.4 %, mean PER dose: 4.3 mg/day). The seizure frequency was reduced significantly at 3, 6, and 12 months relative to baseline (p < 0.001 for each seizure type). At 12 months, the responder rate was 65.8 %, and the seizure-free rate was 39.5 %. A significantly higher responder rate was found in patients with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (p = 0.024), among which the percentage of patients with sleep-related epilepsy was significantly high (p = 0.045). Responders had a lower number of concomitant anti-seizure medications (ASMs) than the non-responders (p = 0.009). Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 37 % of patients, mostly mild or moderate, and the patients who experienced AEs had a higher daily dose of PER than those who did not (p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Perampanel, an add-on therapy for focal-onset seizures, was found to be effective and tolerable in Chinese patients at 12 months.

Safety evaluation of perampanel as monotherapy or first adjunctive therapy in patients with epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

There is a need for anti-seizure medications (ASMs) that are well tolerated and effective as monotherapy or first adjunctive therapy to reduce the need for adjunctive ASMs to treat newly diagnosed epilepsy, and to reduce the number of concomitant ASMs in patients with refractory epilepsy. Although the pivotal trials of perampanel evaluated its adjunctive use in patients with refractory seizures, open-label/real-world studies support its use in first/second-line settings.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety/tolerability of perampanel, focusing on its use as monotherapy or first adjunctive therapy. The safety of perampanel in special populations and its safety/tolerability compared with that of other ASMs is also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Perampanel is a favorable candidate for initial or first adjunctive therapy due to its favorable efficacy and safety/tolerability as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy, its long half-life and ease of use, and its limited drug-drug interactions. The proposed mitigation strategies for managing the risk of serious psychiatric adverse events are appropriate patient selection, use of low doses, and slow titration. The growing body of evidence might shift current treatment strategies towards the early use of perampanel and its use at a low dose (4 mg/day).

Movement disorders associated with antiseizure medications: A systematic review

New-onset movement disorders have been frequently reported in association with the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs). The frequency of specific motor manifestations and the spectrum of their semiology for various ASMs have not been well characterized. We carried out a systematic review of literature and conducted a search on CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus from inception to April 2021. We compiled the data for all currently available ASMs using the conventional terminology of movement disorders. Among 5123 manuscripts identified by the search, 437 met the inclusion criteria. The largest number of reports of abnormal movements were in association with phenobarbital, valproic acid, lacosamide, and perampanel, and predominantly included tremor and ataxia. The majority of attempted interventions for all agents were discontinuation of the offending drug or dose reduction which led to the resolution of symptoms in most patients. Familiarity with the movement disorder phenomenology previously encountered in relation with specific ASMs facilitates early recognition of adverse effects and timely institution of targeted interventions.

Long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel as a first add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy: Three-year extension study

PURPOSE

We investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel as a first add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy.

METHODS

This retrospective study represented the 3-year extension phase of a multicenter, open-label, phase 4, prospective study of perampanel as a first add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy. Seizure and safety outcomes were assessed annually from the start of the extension study, and the retention rate was calculated from the start of perampanel exposure in the original study.

RESULTS

The 50% responder and seizure freedom rates were 84.8% and 58.7%, respectively, during the third year and 71.7% and 32.6%, respectively, during the entire 3-year period of the extension study. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year retention rates were 62.5%, 53.1%, and 52.1%, respectively. Efficacies were higher in patients that were aged >55 years, male, and receiving ≤4 mg of perampanel. Perampanel was generally well tolerated; 47.3% of patients experienced at least one adverse event during the 3 years of extension (46 adverse events (AEs) in 35 patients). The most common AEs were dizziness (33.8%), somnolence (5.4%), anger (4.1%), and irritability (4.1%). AEs were resolved with perampanel dose reduction or discontinuation in 10 (13.5%) and 12 (16.2%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Long-term treatment with perampanel as a first add-on therapy did not raise new safety signals in patients with focal epilepsy. Especially at low perampanel doses (≤4 mg/day), sustained improvement in seizure control was achieved, which could potentially avoid adverse drug reactions.

Perampanel as first add-on antiseizure medication: Italian consensus clinical practice statements

Background

When use of a single antiseizure medication (ASM) fails to induce seizure remission, add-on therapy is justified. Perampanel (PER) is approved in Europe as adjunctive therapy for focal, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Aim of the study was to establish whether PER is suitable for first add-on use.

Methods

A Delphi methodology was adopted to assess consensus on a list of 39 statements produced by an Expert Board of 5 epileptologists. Using an iterative process, statements were finalized by a Delphi Panel of 84 Italian pediatric and adult neurologists. Each statement was rated anonymously to determine level of agreement on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was established as agreement by at least 80% of the panelists. The relevance of each statement was also assessed on a 3-point scale.

Results

Consensus was achieved for 37 statements. Characteristics of PER considered to justify its use as first add-on include evidence of a positive impact on quality of life based on long term retention data, efficacy, tolerability, and ease of use; no worsening of cognitive functions and sleep quality; a low potential for drug interactions; a unique mechanism of action. Potential unfavorable factors are the need for a relatively slow dose titration; the potential occurrence of behavioral adverse effects; lack of information on safety when used in pregnancy; limited access to plasma PER levels.

Conclusion

Perampanel has many features which justify its use as a first add-on. Choice of an ASM as first add-on should be tailored to individual characteristics.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-021-02450-y.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Perampanel as Adjunctive Therapy in Chinese Patients With Focal-Onset Seizures: An Observational, Prospective Study

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel (PER) in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures, with or without secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Methods: Fifty-six patients aged 14-72 years were recruited consecutively in this single-center prospective observational study. All patients received PER as add-on treatment on the basis of clinical judgment. Seizure frequency, adverse events (AEs), and retention rates were obtained at 3 and 6 months after PER introduction. Results: The overall response rates were 60 and 71.1% after 3 and 6 months, respectively, and the freedom of seizures at the same points were reached in 8 and 15.8%. The retention rates were 89.3% at the 3-month follow-up and 67.9% at the 6-month follow-up. The overall incidence of adverse events was 55.4%. The leading reported AEs were dizziness (39.3%) and somnolence (25%). Conclusions: Our study confirmed the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive PER in Chinese patients in real-life conditions. Based on our treatment experience, a lower maintenance dose of PER would be needed in Chinese patients.

Abuse potential assessment of the new dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant in recreational sedative drug users as compared to suvorexant and zolpidem

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Abuse potential properties have been reported for the dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) suvorexant and lemborexant. Daridorexant is a new DORA currently in late-stage clinical development. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled 6-period crossover study assessed its abuse potential in healthy recreational sedative drug users (n=63).

METHODS

In each study period, a single, oral, morning dose of either daridorexant (50, 100, 150 mg), placebo, or active control, i.e., suvorexant (150 mg) or zolpidem (30 mg), was administered. Primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was the Emax of the Drug-liking visual analog scale (VAS) assessed over 24 h. Several secondary subjective and objective pharmacodynamic endpoints were also assessed.

RESULTS

Study validity was confirmed based on drug-liking of suvorexant and zolpidem greater than placebo applying a pre-defined 15-point validity margin (p<0.0001). Drug-liking VAS Emax (mean; 95% CI) of daridorexant at 50 mg (73.2; 69.0-77.5) was significantly lower compared to suvorexant (80.7; 77.0-84.5) and zolpidem (79.9; 76.2-83.5) (p<0.001), but similar at 100 mg (79.1; 75.0-83.3) and 150 mg (81.3; 77.7, 84.8). Such dose-related patterns were also observed for most secondary endpoints. At each daridorexant dose, Drug-liking VAS scores were greater than placebo. Both control drugs and daridorexant were safe and the pharmacokinetics of daridorexant was consistent with earlier trials indicating quick absorption and elimination.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, valid human abuse potential study, daridorexant showed dose-related drug-liking among recreational sedative drug users with lower effects at the highest phase-3 dose, and similar effects at higher doses compared to supratherapeutic doses of suvorexant and zolpidem.

Optimal Use of Perampanel in Asian Patients with Epilepsy: Expert Opinion

Perampanel is a once-daily, first-in-class AMPA receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of epilepsy and exhibits broad-spectrum efficacy in a range of seizure types when used as both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy. Clinical studies and real-world evidence have demonstrated the advantages of initiating perampanel at low doses and utilizing a slow titration strategy. Initiating perampanel at an early stage has also been shown to be associated with better patient outcomes. However, the optimal use and place of perampanel in clinical practice has not yet been clearly defined for the Asian patient population. Use of perampanel in clinical practice varies markedly across the Asia region because of variation in knowledge, attitudes, and practice. There is currently no specific guidance on best practices for prescribing perampanel in Asian patients or how to optimize treatment strategies to maximize adherence. A group of epilepsy experts attended a virtual meeting in September 2020 to discuss their experience with using perampanel in the Asian practice setting, including their views regarding appropriate patient populations, optimal starting and maintenance doses, optimal titration regimens, key barriers to adherence, and prevention and management of adverse events. This article summarizes key clinical and real-world evidence for perampanel and consolidates the experts’ opinions on optimization of perampanel prescribing and adherence in real-world practice, providing practical strategies for clinicians to implement to improve outcomes for people with epilepsy in Asia.

Adjunctive Perampanel in Older Patients With Epilepsy: A Multicenter Study of Clinical Practice

Background

Clinical data regarding use of newer antiseizure medications (ASMs) in an older population are limited. In randomized-controlled, placebo-controlled trials, older patients are under-represented, and protocols deviate markedly from routine clinical practice, limiting the external validity of results. Studies performed in a naturalistic setting are a useful complement to characterize the drug profile. Perampanel is a third-generation ASM and the first and only non-competitive alfa-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate receptor antagonist.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel over a 1‐year period in a population of older patients with epilepsy treated in a real-world setting.

Methods

Older (≥ 65 years of age) patients prescribed add-on perampanel at 12 Italian epilepsy centers were retrospectively identified. Seizure occurrence, adverse events (AEs), and drug withdrawal were analyzed. Effectiveness outcomes included the rates of seizure response (≥ 50% reduction in baseline monthly seizure frequency), seizure freedom, and treatment discontinuation. Safety and tolerability outcomes were the rate of treatment discontinuation due to AEs and the incidence of AEs.

Results

A total of 92 patients with a median age of 69 (range 65–88) years were included. The median daily dose of perampanel at 12 months was 6 mg (interquartile range 4–6 mg). At 12 months, 53 (57.6%) patients were seizure responders, and 22 (23.9%) patients were seizure free. Twenty (21.7%) patients discontinued perampanel; the reasons for treatment withdrawal were insufficient efficacy (n = 6/20; 30.0%), AEs (n = 12/20; 60.0%), and a combination of both (n = 2/20; 10%). The most common AEs included irritability (8.7%), somnolence (4.3%), and dizziness/vertigo (4.3%). The rate of behavioral and psychiatric AEs was higher in patients with history of psychiatric comorbidities (p = 0.044). There were no differences in the occurrence of behavioral and psychiatric AEs according to the concomitant use of levetiracetam (p = 0.776) and history of cognitive decline (p = 0.332).

Conclusions

Adjunctive perampanel was associated with improvement in seizure control and good tolerability in a real-life setting and can represent a viable therapeutic option in older patients with epilepsy.

Cytochrome P450-mediated estrogen catabolism therapeutic avenues in epilepsy

Epilepsy is a neuropsychiatric disorder, which does not have any identifiable cause. However, experimental and clinical results have asserted that the sex hormone estrogen level and endocrine system function influence the seizure and epileptic episodes. There are available drugs to control epilepsy, which passes through the metabolism process. Cytochrome P-450 family 1 (CYP1A1) is a heme-containing mono-oxygenase that are induced several folds in most of the tissues and cells contributing to their differential expression, which regulates various metabolic processes upon administration of therapeutics. CYP1A1 gene family has been found to metabolize estrogen, a female sex hormone, which plays a central role in maintaining the health of brain altering the level of estrogen active neuropsychiatric disorder like epilepsy. Hence, in this article, we endeavor to provide an opinion of estrogen, its effects on epilepsy and catamenial epilepsy, their metabolism by CYP1A1 and new way forward to differential diagnosis and clinical management of epilepsy in future.

A multivariable prediction model of a major treatment response for focal-onset seizures: A post-hoc analysis of Phase III trials of perampanel

OBJECTIVE

Although 50 % reduction in seizure frequency is a common efficacy endpoint in clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), 75 % or greater reductions may be required to improve patients' health-related quality of life. Identification of clinical factors that are associated with high responder rates may help to inform clinicians on which patients may optimally benefit from treatment. We evaluated potential predictive factors for achieving major treatment responses (≥75 % reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from study baseline) in patients with drug-resistant focal-onset seizures, with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (FBTC) seizures in perampanel trials designed for regulatory approval.

METHODS

Univariate analyses using logistic regression were performed using data from three double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III studies of adjunctive perampanel (Studies 304 [NCT00699972], 305 [NCT00699582], 306 [NCT00700310]), and their open-label extension study (OLEx; Study 307 [NCT00735397]). For the double-blind studies, baseline seizure frequency, number of baseline AEDs, baseline seizure type, baseline concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs (EIAEDs), baseline carbamazepine, lamotrigine, or valproic acid, age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, etiology, and perampanel plasma concentration were included individually with study treatment. The same factors were included for the OLEx analysis except for plasma concentration and treatment. Variables found to be significant predictors for a major treatment response in univariate analyses were subsequently included in multivariable analyses using backwards and forwards selection.

RESULTS

In the double-blind studies, 175/1374 patients had a major response to placebo (n = 25) or perampanel (n = 150). The best predictors of a major treatment response in multivariable models with forwards and backwards selection were: the presence of FBTC seizures during baseline (P = 0.0002), higher perampanel plasma concentration (P < 0.0001), older age at diagnosis (P = 0.0024 and 0.0045, respectively), and lower baseline seizure frequency (P = 0.0364 and 0.0127, respectively). In the OLEx, 217/1090 patients had a major treatment response. The best predictors of a major treatment response in the final multivariable model, regardless of backwards or forwards selection, were a lower baseline seizure frequency (P = 0.0022), the absence of focal impaired awareness seizures during baseline (P = 0.0011), the presence of FBTC seizures during baseline (P = 0.0164), lower number(s) of baseline AEDs (P = 0.0002), the absence of EIAEDs during baseline (P = 0.0059), an older age at diagnosis (P = 0.0054), and absence of structural etiologies (P = 0.0138).

SIGNIFICANCE

These analyses of placebo-controlled and long-term extension trial data identified a number of potential predictive factors for patients with focal-onset seizures achieving a major treatment response. These factors may help guide clinicians when predicting a patient's response to treatment and optimizing individual treatment regimens.

White matter injury in infants with intraventricular haemorrhage: mechanisms and therapies

Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) continues to be a major complication of prematurity that can result in cerebral palsy and cognitive impairment in survivors. No optimal therapy exists to prevent IVH or to treat its consequences. IVH varies in severity and can present as a bleed confined to the germinal matrix, small-to-large IVH or periventricular haemorrhagic infarction. Moderate-to-severe haemorrhage dilates the ventricle and damages the periventricular white matter. This white matter injury results from a constellation of blood-induced pathological reactions, including oxidative stress, glutamate excitotoxicity, inflammation, perturbed signalling pathways and remodelling of the extracellular matrix. Potential therapies for IVH are currently undergoing investigation in preclinical models and evidence from clinical trials suggests that stem cell treatment and/or endoscopic removal of clots from the cerebral ventricles could transform the outcome of infants with IVH. This Review presents an integrated view of new insights into the mechanisms underlying white matter injury in premature infants with IVH and highlights the importance of early detection of disability and immediate intervention in optimizing the outcomes of IVH survivors.

Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and clinical effectiveness of perampanel in Japanese patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the influence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on serum perampanel concentration and to correlate the concentration with clinical response and tolerability.

METHODS

A total of 4224 serum samples were obtained from 763 pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients for routine therapeutic drug monitoring. We compared the extent of enzyme induction between cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inducer regimens and built a statistical model to estimate the serum perampanel concentration that considered use of CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors. To assess the tolerability and clinical effectiveness of perampanel therapy, we used the nested case-control approach. The case group was matched with the control group for age, sex, epilepsy type, and perampanel exposure periods.

RESULTS

Concomitant use of the inducers phenytoin, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital dose-dependently reduced the perampanel concentration by 51 %, 67 %, and 37 %, respectively. The estimate model showed a good correlation between the predicted and measured concentrations (r² = 0.62, p < 0.001). In 206 patients, the seizure reduction from baseline was > 50 % and the median perampanel concentration was 351 ng/mL (interquartile range, 191-603 ng/mL). Adverse events, such as somnolence, dizziness, and irritability, were experienced by 185 patients. The responder odds ratio was 5.1-fold higher in patients with a serum concentration > 600 ng/mL than in those with a serum concentration < 200 ng/mL; however, the former group had a 7.9-fold higher incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic drug monitoring is clinically useful to assess drug interactions between perampanel and CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors. We recommend that the target concentration of perampanel is initially set at 200-600 ng/mL. Serum concentrations > 600 ng/mL were associated with greater anti-seizure effects but had an increased risk of adverse events.

Efficacy and tolerability of perampanel as a first add-on therapy with different anti-seizure drugs

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel (PER) when administered as a first add-on therapy to patients with focal epilepsy or idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) taking one other antiseizure drug (ASD).

METHODS

This multicentre, retrospective, one-year observational study collected data from patients (≥12 years) who initiated treatment with PER as first add-on therapy. Patients had to be experiencing inadequate seizure control on ASD monotherapy and tried ≤3 ASD monotherapies before initiating PER. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusted for the number and type of previous seizures, duration and aetiology of epilepsy.

RESULTS

Of the 149 patients included in the study (mean age 41 years; 54.4 % male), 118 (79.2 %) were still receiving PER as first add-on treatment after 12 months. Mean PER dose was 6.2 mg/day. At 12 months, 45.6 % were seizure-free and 84.6 % responders. A significant difference in seizure freedom rate was found between patients with IGE and patients with focal epilepsy, but not in responders. Reduced seizure control was observed when PER was administered with strong enzyme-inducing ASDs; conversely, increased seizure control was seen when the same dose of PER was combined with enzyme-inhibiting ASDs. The most frequent adverse events were dizziness (15.4 %), irritability (14.1 %) and drowsiness (14.1 %); no differences in tolerance were observed among different combinations.

CONCLUSION

PER demonstrated a good efficacy and safety profile when used as a first add-on therapy in patients who did not respond to monotherapy. PER dose adjustments may optimize seizure control when combined with strong enzyme-inducing or enzyme-inhibiting ASDs.

Effects of perampanel add-on therapy on immunoglobulin levels in pediatric patients with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Perampanel (PER) has a unique pharmacological mechanism and marked efficacy in both focal and generalized epilepsy, but may cause adverse events similar to those of other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). AEDs can affect multiple organ systems, as well as thyroid function, lipid profiles, and immunoglobulin levels; the low free T4 levels, hyperlipidemia, and low immunoglobulin levels can be caused by AEDs. While many studies have examined conventional AEDs, little is known about the long-term effects of PER on blood parameters.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 18 pediatric patients with epilepsy who were treated with PER added to >1 other AED. Blood parameters (e.g., blood cell counts, biochemical and thyroid function, and immunoglobulin levels) were investigated at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after initiation of PER.

RESULTS

PER did not affect the blood counts, transaminase levels, lipid profile, or thyroid function at 12 months after initiation of PER. However, IgA levels significantly increased (p = 0.00319) without symptoms. IgM levels increased temporarily, but had returned to baseline by 12 months after initiation of PER.

CONCLUSIONS

IgA levels were elevated at 12 months after initiation of PER in pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy, although no symptoms were observed. PER did not affect other parameters, including lipid profile and thyroid function.

Antiseizure drugs and risk of developing smoking-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or lung cancer: A population-based case-control study

AIMS

To determine whether enzyme-inducing antiseizure drugs (ASDs) affect the risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or lung cancer in smokers.

METHODS

Cases of COPD and lung cancer and matched controls without these conditions were identified from a population of smokers with ≥1 prescription for any type of ASD in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink UK database of patients managed in primary care (1995-2016). A matched case-control study was performed utilising multivariate logistic regression analyses of exposure to enzyme-inducing ASDs compared to non-enzyme-inducing ASDs. The duration of ASD exposure and level of tobacco exposure were also assessed.

RESULTS

We identified 5952 incident COPD and 1373 incident lung cancer cases, and 59 328 and 13 681 matched controls, respectively. Compared with never use, ever use of enzyme-inducing ASDs was associated with slightly decreased risk estimates of COPD (adjusted odds ratio: 0.85, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.89) and lung cancer (adjusted odds ratio: 0.82, 95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.92). These risk estimates were attenuated in heavy smokers.

CONCLUSION

We found slightly decreased risk estimates of COPD and lung cancer among smokers taking enzyme-inducing ASDs and hypothesise that this may be related to induction of detoxification of tobacco-specific lung toxins.

The efficacy of perampanel as adjunctive therapy in drug-resistant focal epilepsy in a "real world" context: focus on temporal lobe epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Perampanel (PER) is a novel antiepileptic drug approved as an add-on therapy for focal onset seizures with or without generalization and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Aim of this study was to evaluate PER efficacy and tolerability as add-on therapy in patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures and especially temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

METHODS

An observational, prospective, multicentre study on adult with drug-resistant focal epilepsy consecutively recruited from six Italian tertiary epilepsy centres. All patients received add-on PER according to indication and clinical judgement. Seizure frequency and adverse events (AEs) were recorded at 6 and 12 months after PER introduction.

RESULTS

Study sample comprised 246 patients, 77 of which with TLE. Seventy-five (35.9%) out of 209 and 66 (38.8%) out of 170 patients still taking PER resulted to be responders (i.e. ≥50% of seizure frequency or seizure free) after six and 12 months, respectively. In the TLE group, 39 (57.3%) out of 68 subjects on PER after 6 months and 32 (60.4%) out of 53 subjects taking PER after 12 months were responders. Overall reported incidence of AEs was 26.1%. In 28 cases (11.3%) AEs lead/contributed to PER discontinuation. The most frequently reported AE were dizziness (14/84) and somnolence (14/84). Regarding TLE patients, 25.9% of them experienced at least one AE and discontinuation for AEs occurred in eight (10.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the good efficacy and safety of PER for drug-resistant focal epilepsy in real-life conditions and, above all, for the first time provide its effectiveness in patients with TLE.

Changes in perampanel levels during de-induction: Simulations following carbamazepine discontinuation

Objective

To evaluate the time course of changes in perampanel levels when co‐administered with carbamazepine, and following carbamazepine discontinuation, using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model.

Methods

The PBPK model was developed, verified using clinical PK data, and used to simulate the effect of abrupt discontinuation and down‐titration (75 mg twice daily [bid]/wk) of co‐administered carbamazepine 300 mg bid on the PK of perampanel once daily (qd). Perampanel dose tapering (8‐4 mg) and up‐titration (2‐6 mg) were simulated during abrupt carbamazepine 300 mg bid discontinuation to identify a titration schedule that minimizes changes in perampanel plasma concentrations.

Results

The PBPK model accurately reproduced perampanel plasma concentration‐time profiles from clinical studies in single‐ and multiple‐dose regimen simulations, including multiple‐dose carbamazepine co‐administration. The time course of return to pre‐induced perampanel levels occurred more slowly following carbamazepine down‐titration (~48 days after first down‐titration) vs abrupt discontinuation (~25 days). Perampanel dose tapering (8‐4 mg) at abrupt carbamazepine discontinuation produced minimal changes in steady‐state concentrations, which returned to the levels observed during carbamazepine co‐administration in ~15 days from the time of carbamazepine discontinuation. When perampanel was up‐titrated in the presence of carbamazepine, return to steady state occurred more slowly when carbamazepine was down‐titrated weekly (~45 days) vs abrupt discontinuation (~24 days).

Conclusion

This PBPK model simulated and predicted optimal perampanel dose tapering and up‐titration schedules for maintaining perampanel levels during conversion to monotherapy. These results may guide physicians when managing conversion from perampanel polytherapy with concomitant enzyme‐inducing anti‐seizure medications to monotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal-onset seizures with newly diagnosed epilepsy or recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission: The open-label Study 342 (FREEDOM Study)

Objective

Our study assessed perampanel monotherapy in patients (aged ≥12 years) with focal‐onset seizures (FOS) with or without focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures (FBTCS) in Japan and South Korea.

Methods

Study 342 (NCT03201900; FREEDOM) is a single‐arm, open‐label, Phase III study. Patients initially received perampanel in a 32‐week 4‐mg/d Treatment Phase (6‐week Titration; 26‐week Maintenance Periods). If they experienced a seizure during the 4‐mg/d Maintenance Period, they could be up‐titrated to 8 mg/d across an additional 30‐week Treatment Phase (4‐week Titration; 26‐week Maintenance Periods). Primary endpoint was the seizure‐freedom rate during the Maintenance Period (4 mg/d and last evaluated dose [4 or 8 mg/d]). Secondary endpoints included time to first seizure onset and to withdrawal during Maintenance. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored.

Results

At data cutoff (February 28, 2019), 89 patients with FOS (84 [94.4%] with newly diagnosed epilepsy and 5 [5.6%] with recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission) had received ≥1 perampanel dose; 16 patients discontinued during the 4‐mg/d Titration Period, meaning 73 patients entered the 4‐mg/d Maintenance Period and were included in the primary analysis set for efficacy. Seizure‐freedom rate in the 26‐week Maintenance Period was 46/73 (63.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 50.9‐74.0) at 4 mg/d and 54/73 (74.0%; 95% CI: 62.4‐83.5) at 4 or 8 mg/d. Cumulative probability of seizure‐onset and withdrawal rates during Maintenance was 30.8% (95% CI: 21.5‐43.0) and 23.7% (95% CI: 15.4‐35.3) at 4 mg/d, and 18.2% (95% CI: 11.0‐29.3) and 23.3% (95% CI: 15.2‐34.8) at 4 or 8 mg/d. Perampanel was generally well tolerated, and the most common TEAE was dizziness.

Significance

Perampanel monotherapy (4 to 8 mg/d) was efficacious and consistent with the known safety profile up to 26 weeks in patients (≥12 years) with primarily newly diagnosed FOS with or without FBTCS.

Usefulness of saliva for perampanel therapeutic drug monitoring

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) helps optimize drug management for patients with epilepsy. Salivary testing is both noninvasive and easy, and has several other advantages. Due to technical advances, salivary TDM has become feasible for several drugs, including AEDs, and its value has been investigated. Until recently, saliva TDM of perampanel (PER) had not been reported. The purpose of our study was to confirm whether saliva is a biological substitute for plasma in PER TDM.

METHODS

Adult patients diagnosed with epilepsy who received PER from August 2018 to March 2019 at Seoul National University Hospital were enrolled. Total and free PER were measured in simultaneously obtained plasma and saliva samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC). We examined the correlations between saliva and plasma PER concentrations and whether the use of concomitant medications classified as cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 inducers affected the correlations.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled, aged 16 to 60; 10 (33%) were women. Patients received 2 to 12 mg (mean, 6 mg) of PER. The average total and free concentrations of PER were 343.02 (46.6-818.0) and 1.53 (0.51-2.92) ng/mL in plasma and 9.74 (2.21-33.0) and 2.83 (1.01-6.8) ng/mL in saliva, respectively. A linear relationship was observed between the total PER concentrations in saliva and the total and free PER concentrations in plasma (both P < .001; r = .678 and r = .619, respectively). The change in the PER concentration caused by the CYP3A4 inducer did not affect the correlation between saliva and plasma concentrations (all P < .001).

SIGNIFICANCE

The PER concentration in saliva was correlated with that in plasma. This correlation was not affected by CYP3A4 inducers. Our results demonstrate for the first time that PER is measurable in saliva and suggest the potential for the clinical application of the saliva PER TDM matrix.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of perampanel in Asian and non-Asian patients with epilepsy

People of different ethnic or racial backgrounds may experience variations in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to drug therapies. Our post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of perampanel in Asian and non-Asian populations with refractory focal seizures with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (FBTC) seizures. This analysis pooled data from 4 randomized, placebo-controlled, phase-3 studies involving patients aged ≥12 years who have focal seizures with or without FBTC seizures. Patients were receiving 2, 4, 8, or 12 mg perampanel (or placebo) by the end of a 6-week titration period and for a further 13 weeks during the maintenance phase. Efficacy endpoints included median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days, and 50% and seizure-freedom responder rates relative to baseline. The median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline was significantly greater than placebo for perampanel 8 and 12 mg (-31.1% and -38.1% change, respectively; each P < 0.0001) in the Asian population, and for perampanel 4, 8, and 12 mg (-21.1% [P = 0.0001], -26.3% [P < 0.0001], and -27.7% [P = 0.0001] change, respectively) in the non-Asian population. The 50% responder rate relative to baseline was significantly greater than placebo for perampanel 8 and 12 mg (40.1% and 43.8%, respectively; each P < 0.0001) in the Asian population, and for perampanel 4, 8, and 12 mg (29.4% [P = 0.0002], 32.8% [P < 0.0001] and 34.5% [P = 0.0001]), respectively, in the non-Asian population. Seizure-freedom rate among all patients was 4.9%-11.7% for perampanel 2, 4, 8, and 12 mg. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) across both populations were dizziness, somnolence, irritability, headache, and fatigue. The most common psychiatric TEAEs were aggression and irritability. Perampanel demonstrated a favorable and similar risk-benefit profile in both Asian and non-Asian populations with refractory focal seizures.

Efficacy and safety of perampanel in generalized and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures: A comparative study of Asian and non-Asian populations

Perampanel is an approved adjunctive treatment for focal seizures with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (FBTC) seizures and generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures. We compared efficacy and safety of perampanel vs placebo in Asian and non-Asian populations in a post hoc analysis of pooled data from 5 randomized phase 3 studies. Patients (≥12 years old) with focal + FBTC seizures received perampanel 2, 4, 8, or 12 mg or placebo; patients with GTC seizures received perampanel 8 mg or placebo (titration: 4-6 weeks; maintenance: 13 weeks). Efficacy endpoints included median percentage change in FBTC or GTC seizure frequency per 28 days and 50% responder rate relative to baseline. Median percentage change in FBTC seizure frequency was significantly greater for perampanel 8 and 12 mg than placebo in the Asian population (median difference from placebo: -30.32%, P = 0.0017; -30.06%, P = 0.0008, respectively) and perampanel 4, 8, and 12 mg in the non-Asian population (-35.07%, P = 0.0001; -37.78%, P < 0.0001; -34.53%, P < 0.0001, respectively). In both populations, median percentage change in GTC seizure frequency was significantly greater for perampanel 8 mg than placebo (median difference from placebo: Asian, -37.37%, P = 0.0139; non-Asian, -27.04%, P = 0.0006). The 50% responder rates were significantly greater than placebo for perampanel 8 and 12 mg for FBTC seizures (Asian: 58.0%, P = 0.0017 and 58.6%, P = 0.0013, respectively; non-Asian: 59.3%, P < 0.0001 and 54.3%, P = 0.0050, respectively) and perampanel 8 mg for GTC seizures (Asian: 57.6%, P = 0.0209; non-Asian: 68.8%, P = 0.0329). Pooled FBTC/GTC seizure data showed generally similar patterns of response to perampanel in both populations. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, irritability, dizziness, somnolence, and headache. Perampanel was effective, well tolerated, and can be considered a therapeutic option for FBTC/GTC seizures in Asian populations.

SAD-B modulates epileptic seizure by regulating AMPA receptors in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and in the PTZ-induced epileptic model

α-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors are the predominant mediators of glutamate-induced excitatory neurotransmission. It is widely accepted that AMPA receptors are critical for the generation and spread of epileptic seizure activity. Dysfunction of AMPA receptors as a causal factor in patients with intractable epilepsy results in neurotransmission failure. Brain-specific serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (SAD-B), a serine-threonine kinase specifically expressed in the brain, has been shown to regulate AMPA receptor-mediated neurotransmission through a presynaptic mechanism. In cultured rat hippocampal neurons, the overexpression of SAD-B significantly increases the frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs). Here, we showed that SAD-B downregulation exerted antiepileptic activity by regulating AMPA receptors in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and in the pentylenetetrazol (PTZ)-induced epileptic model. We first used immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry analysis to demonstrate that SAD-B expression was increased in the epileptic rat brain. Subsequently, to explore the function of SAD-B in epilepsy, we used siRNA to knock down SAD-B protein and observed behavior after PTZ-induced seizures. We found that SAD-B downregulation attenuated seizure severity and susceptibility in the PTZ-induced epileptic model. Furthermore, we showed that the antiepileptic effect of SAD-B downregulation on PTZ-induced seizure was abolished by CNQX (an AMPA receptor inhibitor), suggesting that SAD-B modulated epileptic seizure by regulating AMPA receptors in the brain. Taken together, these findings suggest that SAD-B may be a potential and novel therapeutic target to limit epileptic seizures.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in adolescent patients with epilepsy: Post hoc analysis of six randomized studies

OBJECTIVE

This post hoc analysis of six randomized, double-blind, Phase II and III studies evaluated efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel (2-12 mg/day) in adolescent patients (aged ≥12 to ≤17 years) with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, with or without secondarily generalized (SG) seizures, or primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures.

METHODS

Adolescent patients from Studies 304 (NCT00699972), 305 (NCT00699582), 306 (NCT00700310), 335 (NCT01618695), 235 (NCT01161524), and 332 (NCT01393743) were included. Efficacy assessments (split by seizure type) included median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline and seizure-freedom rates. Safety assessments (all seizure types combined) included monitoring of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

The Safety Analysis Set included 372 adolescent patients (placebo, n = 114; perampanel, n = 258); the Full Analysis Set included 346 patients with partial-onset seizures (placebo, n = 103; perampanel, n = 243), of whom 125 experienced SG seizures during baseline (placebo, n = 37; perampanel, n = 88), and 22 with PGTC seizures (placebo, n = 9; perampanel, n = 13). Compared with placebo, perampanel 8 and 12 mg/day conferred greater median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days for partial-onset seizures (18.0% vs 35.9% and 53.8% [both P < 0.01]) and SG seizures (24.4% vs 72.8% [P < 0.001] and 57.8% [P < 0.01]), and greater seizure-freedom rates (partial-onset: 7.8% vs 13.2% and 11.8% [not statistically significant]; SG: 8.1% vs 40.7% [P < 0.001] and 41.7% [P < 0.01]). For PGTC seizures, and compared with placebo, perampanel 8 mg/day was also associated with greater median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days (29.8% vs 88.0%) and greater seizure-freedom rates (11.1% vs 23.1%). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 76 (66.7%) placebo- and 192 (74.4%) perampanel-treated patients (most common: dizziness, somnolence, headache, and nasopharyngitis). Serious TEAEs occurred in 5 (4.4%) placebo- and 11 (4.3%) perampanel-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive perampanel was efficacious and generally well tolerated in adolescent patients with partial-onset, SG, or PGTC seizures and represents a potentially beneficial treatment option for adolescents with uncontrolled epilepsy.

Pharmacological Management of the Genetic Generalised Epilepsies in Adolescents and Adults

Common genetic generalised epilepsy syndromes encountered by clinicians include childhood and juvenile absence epilepsies, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and generalised tonic-clonic seizures on awakening. Treatment of these syndromes involves largely the use of broad-spectrum antiseizure drugs. Those effective for the generalised epilepsies include sodium valproate, phenobarbital, ethosuximide, clobazam, clonazepam, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate, zonisamide and, more recently, perampanel and brivaracetam. Results from the few rigorous studies comparing outcomes with drugs for genetic generalised epilepsies show valproate to be the most effective. The majority of patients with genetic generalised epilepsy syndromes will become seizure free on antiseizure monotherapy; those for whom control proves elusive may benefit from combination regimens. Early counselling regarding management may assist the patient to come to terms with their diagnosis and improve long-term outcomes. Treatment can be lifelong in some individuals, although others may remain seizure free without medication. Choice of antiseizure medication depends on the efficacy for specific seizure types, as well as tolerability. For patients prescribed comedication, drug interactions should be considered. In particular, for young women taking oral hormonal contraceptives, ≥ 200 mg/day of topiramate can decrease the circulating concentration of ethinylestradiol and ≥ 12 mg/day of perampanel can induce levonorgestrel metabolism. The use of valproate in women of childbearing potential is limited by associated teratogenic and neurodevelopmental effects in offspring. Given that valproate is often the antiseizure drug of choice for genetic generalised epilepsies, this creates a dilemma for patients and clinicians. Decision making can be aided by comprehensive assessment and discussion of treatment options. Psychiatric comorbidities are common in adolescents and adults with genetic generalised epilepsies. These worsen the prognosis, both in terms of seizure control and quality of life. Attendant lifestyle issues can impact significantly on the individual and society. Frontal lobe dysfunction, which can present in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, can adversely affect the long-term outlook, regardless of the nature of seizure control. Ongoing management requires consideration of psychosocial and behavioural factors that can complicate diagnosis and treatment. An assured supportive attitude by the neurologist can be an important contributor to a positive outcome. The mechanisms underlying genetic generalised epilepsies, including genetic abnormalities, are unclear at present. As the pathophysiology is unravelled, this may lead to the development of novel therapies and improved outcomes for patients with these syndromes.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel 4 mg/d for the treatment of focal seizures: A pooled post hoc analysis of four randomized, double-blind, phase III studies

OBJECTIVE

This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel 4 mg/d received as modal dose, which may have differed from randomized dose, for treatment of focal seizures.

METHODS

Data were pooled from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III studies of adjunctive perampanel in patients (aged ≥12 years) with focal seizures, with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (FBTC) seizures: studies 304 (NCT00699972), 305 (NCT00699582), 306 (NCT00700310), and 335 (NCT01618695). Efficacy assessments included median percentage reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days and seizure-freedom rates for patients receiving placebo and perampanel 4 mg/d (modal dose). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed in patients receiving perampanel 4 mg/d at their TEAE onset. Outcomes were also assessed with/without enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EIASMs).

RESULTS

The full analysis set included 979 patients with focal seizures (placebo: n = 616 [235 with FBTC seizures]; perampanel 4 mg/d: n = 363 [134 with FBTC seizures]). Compared with placebo, perampanel 4 mg/d conferred significantly greater median percentage reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days for focal (12.6% vs 21.1%; P = .0004) and FBTC seizures (17.4% vs 49.8%; P < .0001), and seizure-freedom rates for focal (0.8% vs 3.6%; P = .0018) and FBTC seizures (11.1% vs 18.7%; P = .0424). Seizure improvements with perampanel 4 mg/d were greater without EIASMs than with EIASMs. For assessment of TEAEs, overall 1376 patients with focal seizures received perampanel 4 mg/d at any time (FBTC seizures, n = 499). TEAEs with perampanel 4 mg/d occurred in 419 of 1376 (30.5%) and 148 of 499 (29.7%) patients with focal and FBTC seizures, respectively; most common was dizziness. The proportion of TEAEs was similar with or without EIASMs.

SIGNIFICANCE

This post hoc analysis showed adjunctive perampanel 4 mg/d was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with focal seizures, with or without FBTC seizures. This dose may be a valuable treatment option in patients unable to tolerate higher perampanel doses up to 12 mg/d.

Real-Life Effectiveness and Tolerability of Perampanel in Pediatric Patients Aged 4 Years or Older with Epilepsy: A Korean National Multicenter Study

Background and Purpose

The US Food and Drug Administration approval for perampanel has only recently been expanded to patients as young as 4 years, and so there have been few real-life studies of the effects of perampanel in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy, factors affecting treatment response, and tolerability of perampanel as an add-on therapy in pediatric patients aged 4 years or older with epilepsy.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective observational study collected data from pediatric epilepsy centers of four Korean national universities. Changes in the seizure frequency from baseline, adverse events, and retention rates were obtained at 3, 6, and 12 months. Adverse events and discontinuation profiles were obtained to assess tolerability.

Results

This study included 220 children and adolescents (117 males and 103 females) aged 4 to 20 years. The overall response rate was 43.6%, and the seizure-freedom rate was 17.7%. Factors affecting a good treatment response were the absence of intellectual disability, small number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs, and low baseline seizure frequency. Eighty-eight patients (40%) experienced adverse events, but they mostly were of mild severity and resolved after the dose reduction or discontinuation of perampanel. The retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 85.0%, 71.8%, and 50.5%, respectively.

Conclusions

Adjunctive treatment with perampanel was efficacious and tolerated in pediatric patients aged 4 years or older with epilepsy. Early perampanel treatment may help to reduce the burden of their seizures and improve their quality of life.

Efficacy and serum concentrations of perampanel for treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in children, adolescents, and young adults: comparison of patients younger and older than 12 years

PURPOSE

Perampanel (PER) is a selective, non-competitive antagonist of the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor. In Japan, PER is approved for patients with epilepsy who are at least 12 years old for the adjunctive treatment of primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures and partial-onset seizures (with or without secondary generalization). We surveyed the efficacy, adverse effects, and serum concentrations of PER, focusing especially on patients younger than 12 years of age.

METHODS

We retrospectively surveyed the clinical information of patients treated with PER and assessed the efficacy at 6 months after treatment initiation. We compared efficacy, adverse effects, and serum concentration in patients younger or older than 12 years of age. Responders were defined as those who experienced a ≥50% seizure reduction.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were enrolled. The average age of the younger group was 7.1 ± 3.3 (standard deviation) years compared to 16.4 ± 3.7 years in the older group. The responder rate was 42.9% (36/84). The responder rate did not differ between the two age groups (<12 years, 20/44, 45.4%; >12 years, 16/40, 40.0%; p = 0.78). The younger age group had a significantly lower concentration-to-dose (CD) ratio than the older age group (<12 years, 1849.8 ± 2209.3; >12 years, 3076.3 ± 3352.2, p = 0.02). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 22.6% (19/84) of patients, with the most common being somnolence (8/84, 9.5%).

CONCLUSION

PER may be an alternative to treat seizures in paediatric drug-resistant epilepsy. Serum concentrations of PER might be lower in patients younger than 12 years than in older patients.

Perampanel Pharmacokinetics in Children: Correlation of Dose With Serum Concentrations

Enzyme-inducing antiseizure drugs taken concomitantly with perampanel are known to influence perampanel serum concentrations. In this study, we examined perampanel dosage, serum concentrations, and the effect of concomitant enzyme-inducing antiseizure drugs in children for a 3-year period. A retrospective chart review determined patient age, weight, perampanel serum concentration and prescribed dose, and concomitant drugs. Of 87 patients included in the study, 41 were prescribed an enzyme-inducing antiseizure drug. Although perampanel dosage did not differ between patients prescribed/not prescribed enzyme-inducing antiseizure drugs, serum concentrations were significantly lower in patients taking enzyme-inducing antiseizure drugs (average serum concentration for the enzyme-inducing antiseizure drug group was still above the previously reported efficacious serum concentration of 70 ng/mL). Although perampanel serum concentrations are negatively influenced by enzyme-inducing antiseizure drugs in children, it is likely that efficacy would be improved in patients not concomitantly prescribed enzyme-inducing antiseizure drugs because pediatric perampanel dosing is similar to that reported in prior adult efficacy trials.

Influence of Inflammation on the Pharmacokinetics of Perampanel

BACKGROUND

It is well-known that the pharmacokinetics of various drugs are influenced by inflammation. This study evaluated the relationship between C-reactive protein (CRP; an inflammation marker) and the pharmacokinetics of perampanel.

METHODS

Among 111 patients who underwent measurement of both CRP and perampanel, 23 patients had a serum CRP level exceeding 1.5 mg/dL (CRP-positive). We compared the concentration/dose ratio (CD ratio) of perampanel in these 23 patients between the times when they were CRP-positive and CRP-negative. To evaluate the effect of CRP on the CD ratio, multiple regression analysis was performed with the following covariates: CRP-positive status, body weight, and use of phenytoin, carbamazepine, or phenobarbital, and combinations of these drugs.

RESULTS

In 10 patients using enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), the mean CD ratio increased by 53.5% [from 1389 to 2132 (ng/mL)/(mg/kg)] when they were CRP-positive. In 13 patients without enzyme-inducing AEDs, the mean CD ratio increased by 100.8% [from 3826 ng/mL to 7683 (ng/mL)/(mg/kg)] when they were CRP-positive. By multiple regression analysis, the CRP level was a significant independent determinant of the CD ratio of perampanel. Despite a marked increase of the CD ratio, no adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of concomitant administration of enzyme-inducing AEDs, the serum perampanel concentration showed a marked increase in patients with inflammation. However, this increase was not associated with central nervous system toxicity. Although it is unknown whether the concentration of free and/or bound perampanel was increased, it seems likely that dose reduction is unnecessary for elevation of the serum perampanel level in patients with inflammation.

Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel treatment in children under 12 years of age with refractory epilepsy

Purpose

There is limited data on the use of perampanel in children under 12 years of age. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel treatment in children under 12 years of age with refractory epilepsy.

Methods

This retrospective observational study was performed in Kyungpook National University Hospital from July 2016 to March 2018. A responder was defined as a patient with ≥50% reduction in monthly seizure frequency compared with the baseline. Adverse events and discontinuation data were obtained to evaluate tolerability.

Results

Twenty-two patients (8 males, 14 females) aged 3.1–11.4 years (mean, 8.0±2.5 years) were included in this study. After an average of 9.2 months (range, 0.5–19 months) of follow-up, 15 patients (68%) showed a reduction in seizure frequency, including 5 patients (23%) with seizure freedom. The age at epilepsy onset was significantly lower (P=0.048), and the duration of epilepsy was significantly longer (P=0.019) in responders than in nonresponders. Nine patients (41%) experienced adverse events, including somnolence (23%), respiratory depression (9%), violence (4.5%), and seizure aggravation (4.5%). The most serious adverse event was respiratory depression, which required mechanical ventilation in 2 patients (9%). Eight patients (36%) discontinued perampanel due to lack of efficacy or adverse events. Three out of 4 patients (75%) who discontinued perampanel due to adverse events had an underlying medical condition.

Conclusion

Perampanel offers a treatment option for refractory epilepsy in children. Adjunctive treatment with perampanel requires special consideration in those with underlying medical conditions to prevent serious adverse events.