Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in pediatric patients with focal seizures

Adjunctive treatment for pediatric focal epilepsy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

We aim to use a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiseizure medications and provide a theoretical basis for rational drug use for children and adolescents in adjunctive treatment.

METHODS

The databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for random clinical trials about perampanel, valproic acid, carbamazepine, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, zonisamide, brivaracetam, cenobamate, eslicarbazepine acetate, and pregabalin from their inception until December 10, 2023. The included studies' risk of bias was evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration's tool (RoB2). The network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15 on the included studies.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were identified and of these 19 randomized controlled trials evaluating 9 different antiepileptic drugs were included. In total, 2959 patients were covered in the analysis of the outcomes. For efficacy, lacosamide (OR = 1.91, 95%CI 1.14-3.20), lamotrigine (OR = 3.82, 95%CI 1.86-7.83), levetiracetam (OR = 3.01, 95%CI 1.89-4.80), oxcarbazepine (OR = 2.75, 95%CI 1.52-4.96), perampanel (OR = 2.05, 95%CI 1.15-3.65), and zonisamide (OR = 2.27, 95%CI 1.21-4.24) were more effective than placebo in the 50% responder rate. Lamotrigine ranked first on the cumulative probability curve, followed by levetiracetam. Eslicarbazepine acetate (OR = 6.44, 95%CI 1.43-29.00) and levetiracetam (OR = 5.75, 95%CI 2.45-13.50) were better than placebo in seizure freedom. For safety, topiramate (OR = 4.11, 95%CI 1.43-11.76) and oxcarbazepine (OR = 2.72, 1.28-5.76) were more likely to cause adverse effects in children or adolescents compared to placebo.

CONCLUSION

In terms of efficacy and safety, lamotrigine and levetiracetam may be selected preferentially for the adjunctive treatment of focal epilepsy in children and adolescents. However, owing to the limited random clinical trials, our results need to be verified by further studies.

Sodium channel blockers for the treatment of focal epilepsy: A Chinese expert consensus

PURPOSE

To provide consensus-based recommendations for the use of sodium channel blockers (SCBs) in the management of focal epilepsy.

METHODS

A three-round modified Delphi procedure was conducted among a Delphi panel of 24 Chinese experts to build a consensus. A steering committee developed 9 statements related to SCBs for the treatment of focal epilepsy, and these statements were evaluated and voted upon by the expert panel.

RESULTS

The expert panel achieved consensus on nine statements regarding the treatment recommendations for oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, topiramate, zonisamide and cenobamate in focal epilepsy patients and treatment adjustments for SCBs.

CONCLUSION

This is a Chinese expert consensus on the use of SCBs in focal epilepsy developed using the modified Delphi method. These recommendations can help clinicians in their practice and guide future research.

The placebo effect in the treatment of children with epilepsy: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To investigate the placebo effect in the treatment of children and adolescents with epilepsy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of studies comparing anti-seizure medication (ASM) to placebo in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Eligible studies were identified through the database PubMed following PRISMA guidelines resulting in the identification of 1173 articles. Screening and inclusion were assessed by two independent reviewers and 17 studies met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies involving children and adolescents with epilepsy were included in this review. Compared to levetiracetam (LEV) and perampanel (PER), the placebo did not show a significant reduction in seizures. However, compared to pregabalin (PGB) the placebo was significant in reducing seizures at lower doses. Results for eslicarbazepine (ESL) were contradictory. Placebo-treated patients generally had lower Child Behavior checklist (CBCL) problem scores than those on LEV, which was associated with higher Total Problem Scores and worse Aggressive Behavior scores. Adverse event (AE) rates in the placebo groups varied widely, from 14 % to 91.8 %.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review examined the effect of placebo treatment compared to ASMs in childhood epilepsy across 17 studies. The effectiveness of placebos was not significant compared to LEV and PER. However, there was a significant placebo effect compared to PGB, which was higher compared to low PGB doses than compared to high PGB doses. AE rates varied widely. Assessing long-term cognitive and behavioral outcomes was challenging due to short study durations and potential biases. Future research could play a critical role in preventing AEs in children undergoing ASM treatment by providing a deeper understanding of the placebo effect associated with these medications.

Cenobamate efficacy in specific populations

Most people with epilepsy are able to achieve good seizure control with currently available medications. However, despite the development of more than 20 new antiseizure medications (ASMs) over the past 30 years, approximately one third of patients (both pediatric and adult) are treatment-resistant and at risk of increased morbidity and mortality, including sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. The management of epilepsy in these populations can be complex. Metabolic differences in older people and pediatric patients can alter drug metabolism, increasing the risk of adverse drug effects. Comorbid conditions, potential or existing polypharmacy, and age-related physiological changes need to be considered when treating these patients. Rare developmental epileptic encephalopathies such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome are typically diagnosed in childhood and have proven to be refractory to treatment and to have high mortality rates. Here, we provide an overview of ASM use in patients with refractory epilepsy, in older patients, and in pediatric patients, with a focus on the efficacy outcomes, safety, and tolerability observed with a newer ASM, cenobamate.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Lacosamide in Chinese Pediatric Patients with Epilepsy: Focus on Clinical Effectiveness, Tolerability and Drug Interactions

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) and to select a better reference range for its concentration in plasma for Chinese pediatric patients with epilepsy. In addition, it is necessary to evaluate the potential determinates of LCM concentration. Methods: Pediatric epilepsy patients using LCM were retrospective included. The clinical data of these patients were retrospectively reviewed, and the effectiveness at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment was assessed. Drug concentrations from routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were also obtained. The trough concentration-to-dose ratio (C0/dose ratio) of LCM was compared among patients with various potential influencing factors. In addition, a new reference range was established based on the range in which the majority of patients were located and the proportion of responders within this range. Results: A total of 153 pediatric epilepsy patients were finally included. The frequency of seizures decreased by ≥50% was 74.7%, 73.0%, and 71.2% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 53 patients, and most AEs were mild and moderate. The TDM data showed that it is reasonable to recommend using 2.5 to 6.5 µg/mL as the reference range. The C0/dose ratio was significantly associated with weight, but those aged 4 to 12 were significantly lower than those aged >12 years. In addition, LCM-antiepileptic drug (AED) interactions were observed. Oxcarbazepine and perampanel significantly decreased the C0/dose ratio of LCM. Conclusions: LCM was efficacious in reducing seizure frequency and well tolerated in pediatric patients with epilepsy. The reference range 2.5-6.5 µg/mL, for routine LCM monitoring may be more applicable. As complex LCM-AED interactions were observed, it is necessary to monitor the plasma concentration.

Impact of Age and Concurrent Antiseizure Medication Use on Lacosamide Dose to Concentration Ratio and Dosing in Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate age, adjunctive antiseizure medication (ASM), and specific ASMs on lacosamide (LCM) weight normalized dose-to-concentration ratio (DCR) and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) dosing guidelines in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Patients 1 mo to ≤18 years with a LCM serum concentration between October 2009 and June 2017 were considered. Demographics, LCM DCR, and adjunctive ASM were recorded. LCM DCR/hr was used as a surrogate for clearance. Data were stratified by age (1 mo-< 2 yr; ≥ 2-6 yr; ≥ 6-12 yr; and ≥12-≤18 yr), FDA dosing weights, and ASM potential to interaction with LCM.

RESULTS

There were 646 sera (380 patients) with median dose 8.36 mg/kg/day (IQR, 5.92-11.16). 50.2% of doses were within FDA-weight guidelines; however, 40.4% exceeded recommendations. Most (81.3%) LCM concentrations were between 2 and 12 mg/L. A difference existed in DCR between ages, with those <2 years having the highest DCR (p < 0.001). Moving across age groups, the DCR decreases by 30.7%, 50.5%, and 63.4%. There was a weak (r2 = 0.073) but significant (p < 0.001) negative correlation between DCR and age. 84.8% received adjunctive ASM consisting of at least one of 31 different ASMs. DCR was higher with adjunctive ASMs compared with monotherapy [0.061 (0.039-0.095) vs 0.043 (0.030-0.062)], respectively (p < 0.001) and was greatest with inducers. Phenobarbital increased DCR by 2.6-fold, topiramate by 72.1%, and clobazam by 32.6%. Inhibitors had no effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The correlation between age and DCR was weak, accounting for 6% of variability. Strong inducers significantly increased DCR. Synergy may exist when multiple inducers are given. Weak inhibitors did not affect DCR. Those ≥6 to 11 kg, ≥30 to 50 kg, and those given strong inducers may require larger -initial LCM doses. Serum concentrations should be used to individualize dosing, especially in those receiving strong inducers.

Long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability, including behavior and executive functioning, during adjunctive lacosamide treatment in pediatric patients with uncontrolled epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability, including behavior and executive functioning, during adjunctive lacosamide (LCM) treatment in pediatric patients (≥1 month to <18 years of age) with focal-onset or generalized seizures enrolled in 2 open-label, long-term follow-up trials.

METHODS

Two open-label extension trials (SP848: NCT00938912; EP0034: NCT01964560) were conducted in pediatric patients who had participated in previous trials of adjunctive LCM (SP0847/NCT00938431; SP0966/NCT01969851; EP0060/NCT02710890; SP0967/NCT02477839; SP0969/NCT01921205); SP848 also directly enrolled eligible pediatric patients who had not previously participated in a clinical trial of LCM. Outcomes included retention, efficacy, and safety/tolerability. Patient improvement was assessed with Clinician's and Caregiver's Global Impression of Change scale. Behavior and emotional function was assessed with Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and executive functioning was assessed with Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function® (BRIEF).

RESULTS

The pooled dataset from both trials included 905 patients (851 in the focal-onset seizure population and 47 in the generalized seizure population). In the overall population, Kaplan-Meier-estimated 1-year retention was 80 %. From baseline to the end of the treatment period, patients in the focal-onset seizure population had a median percent reduction in focal-onset seizure frequency per 28 days of 60.4 %, 55.4 % of patients were 50 % responders, and 40.8 % of patients were 75 % responders. In patients with ≥12 months of LCM treatment, ≥12 month seizure freedom during the LCM treatment period was achieved by 29.9 % of patients in the focal-onset seizure population (median duration of first ≥12-month seizure-free interval: 641 days) and 24.4 % of patients in the generalized seizure population (median duration of first ≥12-month seizure-free interval: 665 days). Improvement during LCM treatment was reported in >75 % of patients by both physicians and caregivers. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 749 (82.8 %) patients, most commonly pyrexia (18.9 %), upper respiratory tract infection (18.6 %), nasopharyngitis (16.2 %), vomiting (15.7 %), and somnolence (11.8 %). The most common drug-related TEAEs were somnolence (8.5 %), dizziness (7.6 %), and vomiting (5.4 %). Behavioral and emotional function was generally stable in patients 1.5-5 years of age and slightly improved in patients ≥6 years of age, and executive functioning was stable in patients <5 years of age and generally slightly improved in patients 5-18 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis of a large patient pool from 2 open-label trials, long-term adjunctive LCM was efficacious and generally well tolerated in children with epilepsy and focal-onset or generalized seizures. Behavior and executive functioning were generally stable without observable worsening during long-term adjunctive LCM treatment.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive Lacosamide therapy for focal seizures in young children aged ≥1 month to ≤4 years: A real-world study

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide therapy against focal seizures in young children (1 month - 4 years).

METHODS

This non-randomized, open-label, and self-controlled real-world study included 105 children (1 month-4 years) with focal seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide therapy at Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.

RESULTS

(1) The 50% response rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of follow-up were 58.1%, 61.0%, 57.1%, and 56.2%, while the seizure-free rates were 27.6%, 34.3%, 32.4%, and 37.1%, respectively. The 50% response rate of the first addition of lacosamide for focal seizures was much higher than the second and later added treatment at 3 months (p = 0.038). After 1 year of follow-up, these children showed an improvement in neurodevelopmental levels (p < 0.05). (2) Lacosamide retention rate was 72.7% (64/88) after 1 year of follow-up. Lack of efficacy and serious adverse events were independent risk factors for the lacosamide retention rate. (3) During adjunctive lacosamide therapy, 13 (12.4%) patients reported adverse events and five (4.7%) patients withdrew due to adverse events, including vomiting drowsiness, ataxia (0.94%), neck itching with eczema (0.94%), irritability (1.88%), and gastrointestinal discomfort (0.94%).

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive lacosamide therapy was effective, safe, and well-tolerated in young Chinese children with focal seizures in this study.

Effectiveness and safety of Lacosamide in pediatric patients with epilepsy under four years: Results from a prospective cohort study in China

BACKGROUND

Lacosamide (LCM) has shown promising efficacy and safety outcomes in clinical trials. However, the evidence is limited among pediatric patients especially under four years in real-world. The study investigated the treatment outcomes and safety of LCM in patients under four years based on the data of the epilepsy registry of Children in China.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted among patients under 4 years who newly received LCM as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. The treatment outcomes were measured by retention rate of LCM, 50 % response rates and seizure-free rates during follow-up. The retention rate of LCM was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier survival model. Adverse events were reported as a percentage of all participants.

RESULTS

Of 109 participants (mean follow-up: 18.6 months), 59 received LCM as monotherapy and 50 as adjunctive therapy. Sixty patients had focal epilepsy, 44 had generalized epilepsy and 5 had combined generalized and focal epilepsy. 70 % of patients in the monotherapy group and 41 % in the adjunctive therapy group remained on LCM treatment without additional treatments for at least one year. In patients with monotherapy, 50 % response rate and seizure-free rate were 75 % and 56 % at 12 months, respectively. In adjunctive therapy group, these rates were 51 % and 36 %, respectively. Lower baseline seizure frequency in both treatment groups (monotherapy: p < 0.001; adjunctive therapy: p = 0.02) and younger age groups within the monotherapy group (P = 0.04) correlated with a higher LCM retention rate. Adverse events were reported by 15 patients (13.8 %), with somnolence being the most common (7 of 15 patients).

CONCLUSION

With a comprehensive information and high-quality of data, the study demonstrates the effective treatment outcome and safety of LCM. The study adds reliable evidence to exiting real-word evidence of LCM in the specific age group of patients with epilepsy to fill the evidence gap.

Lacosamide extended-release capsules are bioequivalent to lacosamide immediate-release tablets: Pharmacokinetic observations and simulations

OBJECTIVES

Assess the bioequivalence of lacosamide extended-release (XR) capsules and immediate-release (IR) tablets and answer real-world clinical questions regarding the use of lacosamide XR.

METHODS

An open-label, randomized, two-treatment, two-sequence, oral comparative bioavailability study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two lacosamide formulations. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive lacosamide XR capsules (400 mg once-daily) or IR tablets (200 mg twice-daily) in 1 of 2 sequences over 7-day periods. Primary outcome was the area under the lacosamide concentration-time curve over 24 h at steady-state (AUC0-τ,ss). Secondary outcomes were maximum (Cmax,ss) and minimum concentrations at steady-state (Cmin,ss). Bioequivalence was established when 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric least square means ratios (GLSMs) were between 80% and 125%. Adverse events (AEs) and other safety outcomes were also assessed. Pharmacokinetic simulations, including adherent and partially adherent dosing scenarios with XR and IR formulations, modeled the clinical use of lacosamide XR.

RESULTS

Thirty-five healthy adult males were enrolled in the bioequivalence study. After 7 days of study drug, mean AUC0-τ,ss, Cmax,ss, and Cmin,ss values were similar between XR and IR formulations; all 90% CIs for GLSMs were between 80% and 125%. AEs were mild and no serious AEs or other clinically significant safety findings were observed. Pharmacokinetic simulations suggested that partial adherence affected formulations similarly; and the best strategy for switching formulations was to take the morning lacosamide IR dose followed by the evening lacosamide XR dose, as this resulted in the most consistent lacosamide plasma concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily lacosamide XR capsules were bioequivalent to twice-daily lacosamide IR tablets. Pharmacokinetic simulations indicated lacosamide XR and IR formulations were similarly affected by partial adherence, though once-daily dosing with lacosamide XR may offer clinical advantages, and formulations can be easily switched. These results support the use of lacosamide XR capsules as a once-daily alternative to lacosamide IR tablets.

Efficacy, tolerability and safety of add-on third-generation antiseizure medications in treating focal seizures worldwide: a network meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled trials

Background

Adjunctive newer antiseizure medications (ASMs) are being used in patients with treatment-resistant focal-onset seizures (FOS). An updated network meta-analysis (NMA) was necessary to compile evidence in this critical area.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from their inception until 17 January 2024, evaluating the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of rufinamide (RUF), brivaracetam (BRV), cenobamate (CNB), eslicarbazepine (ESL), lacosamide (LCM), retigabine (RTG), and perampanel (PER) as adjunctive treatments for FOS. Efficacy outcomes included seizure response and seizure freedom. Tolerability was assessed by discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Safety outcomes were evaluated based on the number of patients experiencing at least one AE and serious adverse events (SAEs). This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023485130).

Findings

A total of 29 studies involving 11,750 participants were included. For seizure response, all ASMs were significantly superior to placebo, with RTG ranking highest, followed by CNB. Considering dosage, CNB 400 mg/d was top-ranked, followed by RTG 1200 mg/d. For seizure freedom, BRV was highest-ranked, followed by CNB, with BRV 100 mg/d leading, followed by CNB 400 mg/d. Regarding tolerability, LCM 600 mg/d had the lowest ranking, followed by CNB 400 mg/d. For the safety outcome of AEs, ESL 1200 mg/d was ranked lowest, followed by CNB 400 mg/d. Regarding SAEs, LCM 400 mg/d was ranked lowest, followed by RTG 1200 mg/d.

Interpretation

ASMs at different dosages have varying efficacy and tolerability profiles. We have provided hierarchical rankings of ASMs for efficacy and safety outcomes. Our findings offer the most comprehensive evidence available to inform patients, families, physicians, guideline developers, and policymakers about the choice of ASMs in patients with treatment-resistant FOS.

Funding

None.

Clinical Analysis of Lacosamide Monotherapy in the Treatment of Self-Limited Epilepsy with Centrotemporal Spikes

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (LCM) monotherapy in the treatment of self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (SeLECTS).

Methods

In this study, 89 children with SeLECTS who were treated with LCM monotherapy in the Children's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University from June 2019 to June 2021 were included. Clinical seizures and spike wave index (SWI) on video EEG during slow-wave sleep were evaluated before and after treatment. The role of LCM monotherapy in improving SWI, controlling clinical seizures and improving cognition was analyzed, and corresponding adverse reactions were documented.

Results

There were 52 males and 37 females in this group, with an average age of 7.6 ± 2.1 years. The total effective rate was 93.83% and at 18 months of treatment, the cumulative control rate was 85.19%, the retention rate was 91.01% and the effective rate in terms of EEG spike index was 72.92%, all of which showed a high rate; there was no statistically significant difference in intelligence quotient before and after treatment (P > 0.05). In addition, it was found in the study that the earlier the age of onset, the less obvious the improvement in SWI after LCM treatment; the lower the baseline seizure frequency, the more significant the improvement in SWI after LCM treatment.

Conclusion

LCM monotherapy had curative effect and adverse reactions for SeLECTS, with no negative impact on cognition. These significant findings indicate that LCM is likely to become a widely prescribed ASM for the treatment of SeLECTS. Meanwhile, the onset age and baseline seizure frequency had certain value in judging prognosis and predicting curative effect.

Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in patients aged <4 years with focal seizures

OBJECTIVE

Primary objective was to evaluate efficacy of lacosamide administered concomitantly with 1-3 antiseizure medications in young children with uncontrolled focal (partial-onset) seizures.

METHODS

Double-blind, parallel-group trial (SP0967: NCT02477839/2013-000717-20) conducted between June 2015 and May 2020 at hospitals and clinics in 25 countries. Patients (aged ≥1 month to <4 years) with uncontrolled focal seizures were randomized 1:1 to adjunctive lacosamide or placebo using an interactive voice/web response system and stratified by age. After a 20-day titration period, patients who reached target-dose range (8-12 mg/kg/day) entered a 7-day maintenance period. Region-specific primary efficacy variables were based on ≤72-h video-electroencephalograms: change in average daily frequency (ADF) of electrographic focal seizures as measured on end-of-maintenance video-electroencephalogram versus end-of-baseline video-electroencephalogram (United States); 50% responder rate (≥50% reduction in ADF of focal seizures) during maintenance (European Union).

RESULTS

In total, 255 patients were randomized (lacosamide/placebo: 128/127) and received ≥1 trial medication dose. Percentage reduction in ADF of focal seizures for lacosamide (116 patients) versus placebo (120 patients) was 3.2% (95% confidence interval = -13.6 to 17.5, p = 0.69). 50% responder rate was 41.4% for lacosamide (116 patients), 37.5% for placebo (120 patients) (p = 0.58). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 44.5% of lacosamide-treated patients (placebo 51.2%).

INTERPRETATION

Adjunctive lacosamide did not show superior efficacy versus placebo in young children with focal seizures. However, efficacy variables were potentially affected by high variability and low reliability between readers in video-electroencephalogram interpretation. Lacosamide was generally well tolerated; safety profile was acceptable and consistent with that in adults and children aged ≥4 years.

Pitfalls of using video-EEG for a trial endpoint in children aged <4 years with focal seizures

OBJECTIVE

Double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial SP0967 (NCT02477839/2013-000717-20) did not demonstrate superior efficacy of lacosamide versus placebo in patients aged ≥1 month to <4 years with uncontrolled focal seizures, per ≤72 h video-electroencephalogram (video-EEG)-based primary endpoints (reduction in average daily frequency of focal seizures at end-of-maintenance [EOM] versus end-of-baseline [EOB], patients with ≥50% response). This was unexpected because randomized controlled trial SP0969 (NCT01921205) showed efficacy of lacosamide in patients aged ≥4 to <17 years with uncontrolled focal seizures. SP0969's primary endpoint was based on seizure diary instead of video-EEG, an issue with the latter being inter-reader variability. We evaluated inter-reader agreement in video-EEG interpretation in SP0967, which to our knowledge, are the first such data for very young children with focal seizures from a placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

Local investigator and central reader agreement in video-EEG interpretation was analyzed post hoc.

RESULTS

Analysis included 105 EOB and 98 EOM video-EEGs. Local investigators and central reader showed poor agreement based on ≥2 focal seizures at EOB (Kappa = 0.01), and fair agreement based on ≥2 focal seizures at EOM (Kappa = 0.23). Local investigator and central reader seizure count interpretations varied substantially, particularly for focal seizures, but also primary generalized and unclassified epileptic seizures, at both timepoints.

INTERPRETATION

High inter-reader variability and low inter-reader reliability of the interpretation of seizure types and counts prevent confident conclusion regarding the lack of efficacy of lacosamide in this population. We recommend studies in very young children do not employ video-EEGs exclusively for accurate study inclusion or as an efficacy measure.

Long-term safety and efficacy of adjunctive brivaracetam in pediatric patients with epilepsy: An open-label, follow-up trial

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) treatment in pediatric patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

A phase 3, open-label, multicenter, long-term follow-up trial (N01266; NCT01364597) was conducted on patients (aged 1 month to <17 years at core trial entry; direct enrollers aged 4 to <17 years) treated with BRV. Outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), behavior assessments (Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist [CBCL], Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function [BRIEF]/BRIEF-Preschool version [BRIEF-P]), and efficacy outcomes (percent change in focal seizure frequency, 50% responder rate for all seizure types for patient subgroups <2 years and ≥2 years of age using daily record card data).

RESULTS

Of 257 patients with ≥1 dose of BRV (141 [54.9%] male; mean age = 8.0 years [SD = 4.5]), 36 patients were <2 years of age, and 72.0% of patients had a history of focal seizures. Mean BRV exposure was 3.2 patient-years. At least one TEAE occurred in 93.4% patients, and 32.3% had serious TEAEs. Seven patients died during the trial; no deaths were considered treatment-related. Patients ≥2 years of age had a median decrease in 28-day adjusted focal seizure frequency of 62.9%, and 50.9% had a ≥50% response in all seizures. Patients <2 years of age had a median decrease in 28-day adjusted focal seizure frequency of 96.9%, and 68.2% had a ≥50% response in all seizures. Kaplan-Meier estimated treatment retention was 72.7%, 64.5%, 57.8%, 53.3%, 50.1%, and 44.8% at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 years, respectively. Mean changes (baseline to last evaluation) for all Achenbach CBCL and BRIEF-P/BRIEF subscale scores were negative, reflecting stability/slight improvement.

SIGNIFICANCE

Long-term adjunctive BRV treatment was generally well tolerated and efficacious in reducing seizure frequency, and had high retention rates, with generally stable cognitive/behavioral scores in pediatric patients with epilepsy.

Efficacy and Safety of Five Broad-Spectrum Antiseizure Medications for Adjunctive Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Overall, up to one-third of epilepsy patients have drug-resistant epilepsy. However, there was previously no meta-analysis to support the guidelines for broad-spectrum antiseizure medication selection for the adjunctive treatment of refractory epilepsy. In the present meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of three second-generation broad-spectrum antiseizure medications, lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), and topiramate (TPM), and two third-generation broad-spectrum antiseizure medications, perampanel (PER) and lacosamide (LCM), for the adjunctive treatment of refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to July 15, 2022. The studies included in the meta-analysis were required to meet the following criteria: (1) be randomized, double-blind clinical trials; (2) include patients aged >2 years with a clinical diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy; (3) have at least 8 weeks for the treatment period excluding the titration phase; and (4) report the outcomes of seizure response, seizure freedom and the withdrawal rate due to treatment-emergent adverse effects. Data were extracted, and the risk of bias for each study was assessed by two authors independently using RoB2 tools. We performed the network meta-analysis for each outcome through a group of programs in the mvmeta and network packages in Stata. Relative odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated as the result of the analyses. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and mean ranks were used to rank these treatments.

RESULTS

Forty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (LTG-placebo: n = 6, LEV-placebo: n = 13, TPM-placebo: n = 9, PER-placebo: n = 6, LCM-placebo: n = 7, LEV-TPM: n = 1) with 10257 participants (LTG = 569, LEV = 1626, TPM = 701, PER = 1734, LCM = 1908, placebo = 3719) were included. Levetiracetam had subequal efficacy in 50 % seizure frequency reduction to TPM [odds ratio (OR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.38], and LEV had a higher rate of ≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction than LCM (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.11-2.01) and PER (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.24-2.29). Levetiracetam was also related to a higher proportion of seizure freedom participants than TPM (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.20-2.89), PER (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.12-4.43), and LCM (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.46-6.05). In addition, LEV was associated with a lower risk of experiencing at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) than PER (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46-0.85) and TPM (OR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.36-0.72) and a lower proportion of patients experiencing TEAEs leading to discontinuation than PER (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.97) and TPM (OR 0.50, 95 % CI 0.27-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Third-generation drugs (PER and LCM) had no advantages in terms of efficacy and safety for adjunctive treatment of refractory epilepsy compared with several second-generation drugs (LEV and LTG). Levetiracetam was the priority choice for adjunctive treatment of refractory epilepsy. Perampanel and LCM had no advantages in terms of efficacy and safety among the five drugs.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number, CRD42022344153; last edited on December 23, 2022.

Perampanel and lacosamide monotherapy in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: A prospective study evaluating efficacy, tolerability, and behavior

PURPOSE

Perampanel (PER) and lacosamide (LCM) are the new third-generation anti-seizure medications (ASMs) that were approved for the monotherapy of focal epilepsy in children over four years of age in China, in 2021. Very few studies have analyzed the application of PER monotherapy among pediatric patients aged ≥four years, and no study compared the efficacy and tolerability of PER monotherapy with LCM monotherapy in pediatric patients with focal epilepsy. The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy, tolerability, and effect on behavior and emotion of PER and LCM as monotherapy in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy, which is beneficial for clinicians to have more choices to treat pediatric patients with focal epilepsy.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-center, observational study that involved pediatric patients (disease onset age ≥four years) with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy treated with PER or LCM as primary monotherapy. Outcomes included retention, being responders, and seizure-free rates after 3, 6, and 12 months. Adverse events (AEs) were noticed throughout the follow-up period. Behavioral outcomes were evaluated with Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL/4-16) at baseline and after three and six months.

RESULTS

Using randomization, 60 patients receiving PER (31 females, 29 males, median age: 7.79 [5.34, 10.16] years, median dose: 3.0 [2.0, 4.0] mg/day) and 60 patients receiving LCM (25 females, 35 males, median age: 7.72 [5.91, 10.72] years, median dose: 150.0 [100.0, 200.0] mg/day) were enrolled in the study. At the 12-month follow-up, the retention rates in the PER and LCM groups, both were 90.4%, and the responder rates were 65.4% and 71.2%, while seizure-free rates were 57.7% and 67.3%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the retention, responder and seizure-free rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the responder rates between patients with BECTS, abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or types of seizure in the two groups (P > 0.05). In the PER group, 28.8% (15/52) of patients experienced AEs, of which the most frequently reported were irritability (n = 7; 13.5%), dizziness (n = 5; 9.6%), somnolence (n = 3; 5.8%), ataxia (n = 1; 1.9%), headache (n = 1; 1.9%), and rash (n = 1; 1.9%). In the LCM group, 15.4% (8/52) of the patients had AEs, including headache (n = 4; 7.5%), dizziness (n = 4; 7.5%), nausea (n = 2; 3.8%), somnolence (n = 2; 3.8%), irritability (n = 1; 1.9%), stomach ache (n = 1; 1.9%), and vomiting (n = 1; 1.9%). The incidence of irritability was significantly higher in the PER group than in the LCM group (13.5% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.031), which occurred mainly within eight weeks after drug administration. Patients with irritability were not dangerous to surrounding people by the assessment of parental observation in the life. And the symptoms were relieved spontaneously within a few months. The outcomes of total scores, internalizing scores, and externalizing scores of the CBCL did not show statistically significant differences in the PER and LCM groups between baseline and three and six months. Characteristics of behavior and emotion did not have substantial changes in patients treated with PER and LCM monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study documented similar good effectiveness and good tolerance of PER and LCM as monotherapy in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and showed no behavioral or emotional impact, as assessed by the CBCL. Though the incidence of irritability with PER monotherapy may be higher than that with LCM monotherapy soon after medication initiation, this side effect appears to resolve spontaneously within a few months. At present, this study was the first research about PER and LCM monotherapy in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy evaluating efficacy, tolerability, and behavior in China.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of lacosamide among children: is it helpful?

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of Lacosamide (LCM) in a pediatric population with epilepsy using LCM serum concentration and its correlation to the age of the participants and the dosage of the drug. Methods: Demographic and clinical data were collected from the medical records of children with epilepsy treated with LCM at Shamir Medical Center between February 2019 to September 2021, in whom medication blood levels were measured. Trough serum LCM concentration was measured in the biochemical laboratory using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and correlated with the administered weight-based medication dosing and clinical report. Results: Forty-two children aged 10.43 ± 5.13 years (range: 1-18) were included in the study. The average daily dose of LCM was 306.62 ± 133.20 mg (range: 100-600). The average number of seizures per day was 3.53 ± 7.25 compared to 0.87 ± 1.40 before and after LCM treatment, respectively. The mean LCM serum concentration was 6.74 ± 3.27 mg/L. No statistically significant association was found between LCM serum levels and the clinical response (p = 0.58), as well as the correlation between LCM dosage and the change in seizure rate (p = 0.30). Our study did not find a correlation between LCM serum concentration and LCM dosage and the gender of the participants: males (n = 17) females (n = 23) (p = 0.31 and p = 0.94, respectively). A positive trend was found between age and LCM serum concentrations (r = 0.26, p = 0.09). Conclusion: Based on the data that has been obtained from our study, it appears that therapeutic drug monitoring for LCM may not be necessary. Nonetheless, further research in this area is needed in the light of the relatively small sample size of the study.

Real-Life Efficacy and Tolerability of Lacosamide in Pediatric Patients Aged 4 Years or Older with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive lacosamide therapy in pediatric patients aged ≥4 years with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).Methods: Medical records of children aged 4 to 19 years treated with lacosamide as adjunctive therapy for DRE were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age at the start of lacosamide treatment: group A (aged 4–15 years) and group B (aged 16–19 years). Changes in seizure frequency from baseline, adverse events, and the retention rate were evaluated at each follow-up visit.Results: Sixty-two patients (33 males and 29 females) with a mean age of 11.4 years (range, 4 to 19) were included. The mean duration of follow-up was 20.1±12.9 months. The mean maintenance dose of lacosamide was 6.7±4.8 mg/kg/day. Forty-two patients (67.7%) were responders (≥50% reduction in seizures) with 19.4% (12/62) achieving freedom from seizures. The response rate did not differ significantly between groups A and B (67.6% vs. 68.0%, <i>P</i>=0.795) and was not affected by the concomitant use of sodium channel blockers. Significant independent factors associated with a good response to lacosamide treatment were a shorter duration of epilepsy (<i>P</i>=0.035) and fewer concomitant anti-seizure medications (<i>P</i>=0.002). Mild transient adverse events were observed in 20 patients (32.3%).Conclusion: Lacosamide adjunctive therapy was efficacious and tolerated in children aged ≥4 years with DRE. Early use of lacosamide may be helpful for a good response to drug-resistant seizures.

Long-term effectiveness and safety of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy: a real-world study

PURPOSE

The effectiveness and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) among Chinese children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy has not yet been established. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of LCM among children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy in Xinjiang, Northwest China.

METHODS

Effectiveness was assessed by measuring changes in seizure frequency at 3, 6 and 12 months compared with baseline. Patients that achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the frequency of all seizures per month, relative to baseline, were considered to be responders.

RESULTS

105 children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy were enrolled in the study. The responder rates were 47.6%, 39.2%, and 31.9%, respectively at 3, 6, and 12 months. Seizure freedom rates were 32.4%, 28.9%, and 23.6% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 92.4%, 78.1%, and 69.5%, respectively. The maintenance dose of LCM within the responder group (8.2 ± 4.5 mg·kg^- 1·d^- 1) was significantly higher compared to the non-responder group (7.3 ± 2.3 mg·kg^- 1·d^- 1) (p < 0.05). At first follow-up, 44 patients (41.9%) reported experiencing at least one treatment-emergent adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study of children and adolescents validated that LCM was both an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for the treatment of refractory epilepsy.

Tolerability and Safety of Lacosamide in Neonatal Population

Lacosamide is a newer antiepileptic medication used in refractory neonatal seizures with limited safety and efficacy data. This case series spans 4 years and includes 38 neonates cared for in the neonatal, pediatric, and cardiovascular intensive care units, who received lacosamide for refractory seizures. Because lacosamide affects atrioventricular node function in adults, among other metrics, electrocardiogram (ECG) changes were monitored closely in these neonates. Within this cohort, 2 neonates were found to have atrial bigeminy on ECG and telemetry. Otherwise, lacosamide was generally well tolerated with sleepiness being the most common symptom noted. This case series reports data on the tolerability of lacosamide and emphasizes the importance of monitoring key cardiac intervals with ECG before and after the use of lacosamide in this population.

The therapeutic effects of lacosamide on epilepsy-associated comorbidities

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder associated with severe social and psychological effects, and most epilepsy patients often report at least one comorbidity. Accumulating evidence have suggested that lacosamide, a new generation of anti-seizure medications, may exhibit efficacy in the management of both epilepsy and its related comorbidities. Therefore, this narrative review aimed to elucidate the recent advancements regarding the therapeutic role of lacosamide in epilepsy-associated comorbidities. The possible pathophysiological mechanisms between epilepsy and epilepsy-associated comorbidities have been also partially described. Whether lacosamide improves cognitive and behavioral functions in patients with epilepsy has not been conclusively established. Some studies support that lacosamide may alleviate anxiety and depression in epilepsy patients. In addition, lacosamide has been found to be safe and effective in the treatment of epilepsy in people with intellectual disabilities, epilepsy of cerebrovascular etiology, and epilepsy associated with brain tumors. Moreover, lacosamide treatment has demonstrated fewer side effects on other systems. Hence, future larger and higher quality clinical studies are needed to further explore both the safety and efficacy of lacosamide in the treatment of epilepsy-associated comorbidities.

Safety and tolerability of short-term infusions of intravenous lacosamide in pediatric patients with epilepsy: An open-label, phase 2/3 trial

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intravenous (IV) lacosamide infusion in patients aged ≥1 month to <17 years with epilepsy.

METHODS

This Phase 2/3 open-label trial (EP0060; NCT02710890) enrolled patients in two age cohorts (cohort 1: ≥8 to <17 years; cohort 2: ≥1 month to <8 years). Eligible patients were receiving oral lacosamide as adjunctive treatment or monotherapy (in an open-label long-term trial or by prescription) or were not receiving lacosamide before enrolment. Patients initiated IV lacosamide (2-12 mg/kg/day or 100-600 mg/day; 15-60 minutes infusion) as a replacement for oral lacosamide or as adjunctive treatment. The primary outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and discontinuations due to TEAEs.

RESULTS

In total, 103 patients were enrolled and completed the trial; 55 patients were included in cohort 1 (≥8 to <17 years), 48 in cohort 2 (≥1 month to <8 years). During the 4 weeks before screening, 74 (71.8%) patients had focal seizures, 12 (11.7%) had generalized seizures, and two (1.9%) had unclassified seizures. Most patients (74 [71.8%]) initiated lacosamide as adjunctive IV treatment. The mean overall duration of exposure to IV lacosamide was 1.18 days. Seventy-nine (76.7%) patients had one IV lacosamide infusion, 20 (19.4%) had two, one (1.0%) had three, and three (2.9%) had 10 infusions. Overall, five (4.9%) patients had a total of seven TEAEs. The only TEAEs reported in two or more patients were increased blood triglycerides (two [1.9%]). No serious or severe TEAEs were reported, and no patients discontinued due to TEAEs. No TEAEs were considered drug-related by the investigator. No consistent or clinically relevant treatment-related changes from baseline were observed for hematology, clinical chemistry parameters, vital signs, or 12-lead electrocardiograms.

SIGNIFICANCE

IV lacosamide was generally well tolerated in pediatric patients (≥1 month to <17 years) with epilepsy, and no new safety concerns were identified.

Twelve-Month Efficacy of Lacosamide Monotherapy at Maximal Dose and Tolerability for Epilepsy Treatment in Pediatric Patients: Real-World Clinical Experience

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of lacosamide (LCM) monotherapy in Chinese pediatric patients with epilepsy have not been established. Therefore, this real-world retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of 12 months after achievement the maximal dose and tolerability of LCM as monotherapy for epilepsy treatment in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Pediatric patients were administered LCM monotherapy in two ways: primary or conversion monotherapy. Seizure frequency was recorded as an average per month for the preceding three months at baseline and then at each follow-up period for three, six, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Primary monotherapy with LCM was administered to 37 (33.0%) pediatric patients, whereas conversion to monotherapy was achieved in 75 (67.0%) pediatric patients. The responder rates of pediatric patients receiving primary monotherapy with LCM at three, six, and 12 months were 75.7% (28 of 37), 67.6% (23 of 34), and 58.6% (17 of 29), respectively. The responder rates of pediatric patients receiving conversion to monotherapy with LCM at three, six, and 12 months were 80.0% (60 of 75), 74.3% (55 of 74), and 68.1% (49 of 72), respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions with conversion to LCM monotherapy and primary monotherapy was 32.0% (24 of 75) and 40.5% (15 of 37), respectively.

CONCLUSION

LCM is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option as monotherapy for the treatment of epilepsy.

Increasing use of newer antiseizure medication during pregnancy: An observational study with special focus on lacosamide

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy is a common neurological disease requiring long-term therapy also during pregnancy. Most studies on pregnancy outcomes in women with epilepsy are based on antiseizure medication (ASM) in monotherapy. However, about 20-30% of epilepsy patients require polytherapy and newer ASMs are an option, when seizure control is not achieved with first line ASMs.

METHODS

Observational study evaluating the use of newer ASMs with marketing authorization since 2005 reported to the Embryotox Center of Clinical Teratology and Drug Safety in Pregnancy between 2004 and 2019. In addition, course and outcome of lacosamide exposed pregnancies were analysed.

RESULTS

Our study confirms the increasing use of newer ASMs also in pregnant women. This is especially true for lacosamide, eslicarbazepine and brivaracetam with rising numbers of exposed pregnancies soon after marketing authorization. Analysis of 55 prospectively and 10 retrospectively ascertained lacosamide exposed pregnancies does not indicate increased risks of major birth defects or spontaneous abortion. However, bradycardia observed in 3 neonates might be related to prenatal lacosamide exposure.

CONCLUSION

Available data do not support the assumption of lacosamide being a major teratogen. The increasing use of newer ASMs during pregnancy underscores the need for more studies to guide preconception counselling, especially for lacosamide, eslicarbazepine and brivaracetam.

Comparative antiseizure medications of adjunctive treatment for children with drug-resistant focal-onset seizures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Purpose: In this study, we intended to compare and rank the efficacy and acceptability of antiseizure medications (ASMs) for adjunctive treatment of children with drug-resistant focal-onset seizures. Method: We conducted a computerized search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before 31 May 2022. We included studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of antiseizure medications for children with drug-resistant focal-onset seizures. The efficacy and safety were reported in terms of responder and dropout rate along with serious adverse events, the outcomes were ranked with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results: A total of 14 studies (16 trials) with 2,464 patients were included, involving 10 active antiseizure medications. For the primary endpoint of at least 50% reduction in focal-onset seizures, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve ranking suggested that lamotrigine and levetiracetam were more effective as compared with other antiseizure medications; moreover, levetiracetam had the highest probability of rank first for achieving seizure freedom. Concerning tolerability, oxcarbazepine and eslicarbazepine acetate were associated with higher dropout rates relative to other antiseizure medications and placebo, and topiramate was associated with higher occurrence of side effects. No significant differences were found between active antiseizure medications concerning dropout for side effects. Conclusion: According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve ranking, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and oxcarbazepine were more efficacious than other active antiseizure medications in terms of responder rate. Concerning tolerability, oxcarbazepine was more likely to lead to dropout and topiramate was associated with higher occurrence of side effects.

Use of lacosamide in children: experience of a tertiary medical care center in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation anti-seizure drug approved in Europe and the United States, either as a monotherapy or adjunctive therapy, to treat partial-onset seizures in adults, adolescents, and children. In Brazil, LCM is licensed for treatment only in patients older than 16 years of age.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a cohort of children presenting with refractory epilepsy who received LCM as an add-on therapy and observe the response and tolerability to the LCM treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary health care facility, which included 26 children, aged up to 16 years, who presented with refractory epilepsy and received LCM as an add-on treatment. The follow-up visits were scheduled every 3 months until 9 months of treatment with LCM.

RESULTS

After 3 months of LCM administration, in 73.1% of the children, there was a reduction of > 50% in the frequency of seizures, and this clinical improvement was maintained in most patients (73.9%) for the following 9 months. Mild (such as, somnolence and behavioral changes) or severe (seizure worsening) adverse effects were observed in two and three children respectively. Among responders to LCM, there was a higher prevalence of males, fewer concomitant anti-seizure drugs, and lower percentage of patients using sodium channel blockers.

CONCLUSIONS

Lacosamide should be considered as an early treatment option in pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy, mainly focal seizures.

Efficacy and safety of lacosamide in pediatric patients with epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Lacosamide (LCM), is a third-generation antiseizure medicine, with limited clinical evidence for use in pediatric populations. We aimed to evaluate evidence for the efficacy and safety of LCM in pediatric patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using literature published from inception to February 2022 identified in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and four Chinese databases. Efficacy and safety outcome data were collected, and a meta-analysis was performed.

RESULT

Twenty-one studies involving 1230 pediatric patients were included. The median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline to maintenance was 33.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.7%, 43.5%). After 6 months of treatment, the 50%, 75%, and 100% responder rates were 53.3% (95% CI 40.7%, 65.9%), 28.3% (95% CI 20.8%, 35.8%), and 20.4% (95% CI 12.6%, 28.2%), respectively. After 12 months of treatment, the 50%, 75%, and 100% responder rates were 42.0% (95% CI 29.5%, 54.5%), 19.5% (95% CI 11.1%, 27.8%), and 15.2% (95% CI 6.6%, 23.8%), respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were drowsiness (15.0%), dizziness (9.9%), and somnolence (8.3%).

CONCLUSION

Lacosamide is generally effective and well tolerated to use in children with epilepsy. However, further research with high-quality data and long-term follow-up of LCM use in pediatric populations is needed.

Impact of Antiseizure Medications on Appetite and Weight in Children

There are numerous potential factors that may affect growth in children with epilepsy, and these must be evaluated in any child with appetite and weight concerns. Antiseizure medications (ASMs) have potential adverse effects, and many may affect appetite, thus impacting normal growth and weight gain. The aim of this review is to focus on the impact of both epilepsy and ASMs on appetite and weight in children. We systematically reviewed studies using Medline assessing the impact of ASMs on appetite and weight in children. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and open-label studies (open-label extension and interventional) that targeted or included the pediatric population (0-18 years of age). Each study was classified using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Classification of Evidence for Therapeutic Studies, and the level of evidence for impact on appetite and weight in children was graded. ASMs associated with decreased appetite and/or weight loss include fenfluramine, topiramate, zonisamide, felbamate, rufinamide, stiripentol, cannabidiol, brivaracetam and ethosuximide; ASMs with minimal impact on weight and appetite in children include oxcarbazepine, eslicarbazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, lacosamide, carbamazepine, vigabatrin and clobazam. The ASM most robustly associated with increased appetite and/or weight gain is valproic acid; however, both pregabalin and perampanel may also lead to modest weight gain or increased appetite in children. Certain ASMs may impact both appetite and weight, which may lead to increased morbidity of the underlying disease and impaired adherence to the treatment regimen.

Efficacy of Lacosamide Add-on Therapy on Refractory Focal Epilepsies in Children and Adolescents: An Open-Label Clinical Trial

Objective

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder that affects 0.5%-1% of children. 30%-40% of patients are resistant to current anti-epileptic drugs. Lacosamide (LCM) appeared to be effective, safe, and well tolerated in children and adolescents. This study was aimed to evaluate whether LCM could be an effective add-on therapy in children with refractory focal epilepsies.

Methods

This study was conducted from April 2020 to April 2021 in Imam Hossein Children Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. We included 44 children aged 6 months to 16 years with refractory focal epilepsy (based on International League Against Epilepsy criteria). LCM was given in divided doses of 2 mg/kg/day, increasing by 2 mg/kg every week. The first follow-up visit was 6 weeks later, when all patients had reached the therapeutic dose.

Findings

The average age of the patients was 89.9 months. 72.5% of children had focal motor seizures. Evaluation of percent change in seizure frequency and duration before and after treatment showed a 53.22% reduction in seizure frequency and 43.72% reduction in seizure duration after treatment. Our study group tolerated LCM well, with few side effects. Headache, dizziness, and nausea were common side effects. In line with other studies, none of the suspected risk factors could predict response to LCM treatment.

Conclusion

LCM appears to be an effective, safe, and well-tolerated medication in children with uncontrolled drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Movement Disorders Secondary to Novel Antiseizure Medications in Pediatric Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Risk

Novel antiseizure medications are thought to be safer than their conventional counterparts, though no dedicated analysis of movement disorder risk among pediatric populations using novel antiseizure medications has been completed. We report a systematic review with meta-analysis describing the relationship between novel antiseizure medications and movement disorders in pediatrics.MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched up to October 2020 for randomized controlled trials investigating novel antiseizure medications in pediatric populations. Antiseizure medications included lacosamide, perampanel, eslicarbazepine, rufinamide, fenfluramine, cannabidiol, and brivaracetam. Outcomes were pooled using random effects models; risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.Twenty-three studies were selected from 1690 nonredundant manuscripts (n = 1912 total). There was a significantly increased risk of movement disorders associated with perampanel (RD 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.13; n = 133), though only 1 relevant trial was found. No increased risk of movement disorders was found with other antiseizure medications.Our findings indicate most novel antiseizure medications are safe to use in pediatric populations with respect to movement disorders. However, findings were limited by quality of adverse event reporting.

Clinical impact of the dose and blood concentration of lacosamide in Japanese pediatric patients with epilepsy: A cohort study

PURPOSE

The relationship between treatment efficacy/tolerability and the dose/blood concentration of lacosamide (LCM) was investigated in a clinical cohort of Japanese pediatric patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis reviewed the medical records of patients treated with LCM for >6 months at the Department of Pediatrics, Hiroshima University Hospital, from September 2017 to January 2021. The collected data included age, sex, epilepsy type, seizure type, seizure frequency before and after treatment initiation, adverse events leading to LCM discontinuation, dose at any evaluation point, serum concentration, and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

RESULTS

The study included 51 patients (31 male patients) between the ages of 2 and 19 years. All patients were Japanese. Epilepsy was classified as focal in 44 patients, generalized in six patients, and combined generalized and focal in one patient. The 50% responder rate for LCM treatment was 56.9%. Seven patients experienced complete seizure control (absence of seizures for 6 months before the follow-up visit). A relationship between dose and blood concentration was identified. Although the blood LCM concentration was higher in the responders than in the nonresponders (7.86 vs. 6.16 μg/mL; p = 0.028), there was no significant difference in dose between the two groups. Lacosamide showed efficacy at a dose >5 mg/kg/day in more than half of the 50% responders. The treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included seizure aggravation in five patients, irritability in two patients, and somnolence and drug eruption in one patient each. In six patients with TEAEs, the TEAEs developed within 1 month after treatment initiation and led to LCM discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

In Japanese pediatric patients with epilepsy, LCM treatment is effective, particularly at higher doses. The blood concentration may be related more to efficacy than to dose. Lacosamide is generally well-tolerated by pediatric patients, and should be used at the maximum tolerable dose (needed to be gradually increased) in patients with otherwise insufficient seizure control. As TEAEs leading to discontinue treatment likely occur in early phase, it is needed to monitor patients carefully if TEAEs would happen in that phase.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Lacosamide in Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose  Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is one of the most difficult to treat childhood-onset epileptic encephalopathies. There is growing evidence that lacosamide is safe and efficacious in patients and adults with refractory epilepsy. However, the evidence regarding the efficacy of lacosamide in LGS is controversial so far. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide in patients with LGS.

Methods  We conducted a systematic review on MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, collating all available literature till July 31, 2020. The qualitative review included case reports, case series, and both controlled/uncontrolled trials as well as retrospective studies, but for determining pooled estimates, we only included studies with a sample size of 5 or more. The primary outcome was the efficacy of lacosamide in patients with LGS. Clinical variables related to efficacy and adverse events attributed to lacosamide were extracted from each publication. The pooled estimate of variables related to these parameters was performed using a random-effect model.

Results  Of the 68 items identified by the search, 14 were reviewed as full-text. Eleven articles including two prospective and six retrospective studies fulfilled eligibility criteria and described outcomes in 81 patients (42 adults, 39 children, 60% male, range—1.4–61 years). On average, 35.2%, 27.9%, 7.3%, and 29.4% patients had > 50% reduction, < 50% reduction, no change, and worsening of seizure frequency, respectively. Although 36% of patients had adverse events like somnolence, behavioral abnormalities including irritability, aggressiveness, nausea, tremor, memory problems, dizziness, gastrointestinal discomfort, vomiting, and weight loss, no serious adverse events were noted.

Conclusion  The evidence available in the current literature is not sufficient to support or refute the use of lacosamide in patients with LGS. Although it is one of the possible therapeutic options worth exploring in patients with LGS, caution is still necessary, as there are reports of worsening of seizure frequency in some patients.

Plasma lacosamide monitoring in children with epilepsy: Focus on reference therapeutic range and influencing factors

BACKGROUND

Lacosamide (LCM) is a newer anti-seizure medication (ASM) that was approved in China in 2018, but its real-world clinical data and plasma concentrations in Chinese children with epilepsy are very limited. Of note, the reference range for routine LCM therapeutic drug monitoring is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of LCM as a monotherapy or an adjunctive treatment with other ASMs and to evaluate the potential factors affecting its efficacy and variable LCM plasma concentrations in Chinese children with epilepsy.

METHODS

Children with epilepsy (<18 years) with routine plasma LCM monitoring from March 2019 to December 2021 at the Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were retrospectively collected. Clinical data were obtained from the hospital information system.

RESULTS

76 pediatric patients (52 males) were finally enrolled. Mean age was 7.9 years (1.3-17.3 years) with a mean dose of LCM 6.3 mg/kg/day (2.0-11.3 mg/kg/day). The TDM data as a whole showed that the median plasma trough concentration (C ₀) was 3.42 μg/mL (1.25-8.31 μg/mL). A 6-month LCM add-on therapy produced 70% of patients achieving ≥50% seizure frequency reductions, and the number was 81% for the one-year follow-up findings. Interestingly, more patients who took LCM monotherapy achieved seizure freedom over the same periods of follow-up observations. Under maintenance dosages, approximately 92.1% of the C ₀ values were 2.0-7.0 μg/mL. The plasma-C ₀-to-daily dose (C ₀/Dose) ratio was significantly associated with age and body weight (BW). The C ₀/Dose ratio in patients aged 1- ≤ 6 and 6- ≤ 12 years was significantly higher by 81% and 29% than those aged 12- ≤ 18 years, respectively. The C ₀/Dose ratio in patients with a BW of ≥40 kg was 1.7-fold lower than in patients with a BW of ≤ 20 kg. In addition, complex LCM-ASMs interactions were observed. Oxcarbazepine significantly decreased the C ₀/Dose ratio of LCM by 28%.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study confirmed the effectiveness and tolerability of the LCM treatment used alone or with other ASMs in children with focal epilepsy. Children with higher BW and older age have lower C ₀/Dose ratio. Complex drug interactions between LCM and other concomitant ASMs were revealed. Notably, based on the data in our hands, the reference range, i.e., 2.0-7.0 μg/mL, for routine LCM monitoring may be feasible. The real-world evidence of this study supports LCM as a promising option in children with focal epilepsy.

Treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures in Children: Should This Be More Etiology-Driven?

To accelerate the process of licensing antiseizure medication (ASM) in children, extrapolation of efficacy data for focal-onset seizures from adults to children ≥2 or ≥4 years of age is now accepted. We summarized the efficacy evidence from randomized, controlled trials that was used to grant approval for the pediatric indication of focal-onset seizures for the different ASMs available in Europe. Data from high-quality randomized, controlled trials in young children are limited, especially on the use of ASMs in monotherapy. Licensure trials are typically focused on seizure type irrespective of etiology or epilepsy syndrome. We elaborate on the importance of etiology- or syndrome-driven research and treatment, illustrating this with examples of childhood epilepsy syndromes characterized by predominantly focal-onset seizures. Some of these syndromes respond well to standard ASMs used for focal-onset seizures, but others would benefit from a more etiology- or syndrome-driven approach. Advances in molecular genetics and neuroimaging have made it possible to reveal the underlying cause of a child's epilepsy and tailor research and treatment. More high-quality randomized, controlled trials based on etiology or syndrome type are needed, including those assessing effects on cognition and behavior. In addition, study designs such as "N-of-1 trials" could elucidate possible new treatment options in rare epilepsies. Broadening incentives currently in place to stimulate the development and marketing of drugs for rare diseases (applicable to some epilepsy syndromes) to more common pediatric epilepsy types and syndromes might be a means to enable high-quality trials, and ultimately allow more evidence-based treatment in children.

Effectiveness of lacosamide in children and young adults previously treated with other sodium channel blockers

PURPOSE

This multicenter study examined the effectiveness and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) for children and young adults with epilepsy, particularly in patients who had previously been treated with other sodium channel blockers (SCBs) and the difference in effectiveness and tolerability when using other concomitant SCBs.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the clinical information of patients aged <30 years given LCM to treat epilepsy. The effectiveness and adverse events (AEs) of LCM and the other SCBs were investigated. Factors related to the effectiveness and AEs of LCM, such as the number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) tried before LCM and concomitantly used SCBs, were also studied.

RESULTS

We enrolled 112 patients (median age = 11 years). One year after starting LCM, 29% of the patients were seizure free, and 50% had a ≥50% seizure reduction. Of the patients, 17% experienced AEs, the most common being somnolence. A ≥50% seizure reduction was observed for LCM in 30% of patients in whom other SCBs had not been effective. Lacosamide produced a ≥50% seizure reduction in 35% of the patients taking one concomitant SCB. By contrast, no patients had ≥50% seizure reduction, and 33% developed AEs, when LCM was administered concomitantly with two SCBs.

CONCLUSIONS

Lacosamide was effective in 30% of children and young adults in whom other SCBs had not been effective. The effectiveness of LCM may differ from that of other SCBs, and it is worth trying in patients with epilepsy resistant to other AEDs.

Analyses of seizure responses supportive of a novel trial design to assess efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in infants and young children with epilepsy: Post hoc analyses of pediatric levetiracetam and lacosamide trials

Objective

Recently, a novel trial design has been proposed to overcome challenges with traditional placebo‐controlled trials of antiepileptic drugs in infants and young children (≥1 month of age) (Auvin S, et al. Epilepsia Open 2019;4:537‐43). The proposed time‐to‐event trial design involves seizure counting by caregivers and allows adjustment of the duration of the baseline period and duration of exposure to placebo or potentially ineffective treatment based on the patient's seizure burden and response. We performed post hoc analyses to mimic this trial design and evaluate its viability. As these analyses required trials with prolonged baseline and treatment periods and diary data, which is not a typical design of trials in infants and young children (1 month to <4 years of age), data from two trials in pediatric patients (4‐16 years of age) were used.

Methods

We performed post hoc analyses of two randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials of adjunctive levetiracetam (N159; NCT00615615) and lacosamide (SP0969; NCT01921205) in children and adolescents (4‐16 years of age) with focal‐onset seizures. In these analyses, patients were followed until they completed the 10‐week maintenance period, discontinued during the maintenance period, or reached their “nth” seizure (n = number of seizures patient had during baseline). Efficacy was assessed by determining time to nth seizure.

Results

In the analyses of both trials, patients on levetiracetam or lacosamide had a 34% lower risk of reaching their baseline seizure count during their 10‐week maintenance period than patients on placebo. The previously published primary results of these trials also demonstrated efficacy of adjunctive levetiracetam and lacosamide.

Significance

Although these were post hoc analyses of trials in older children (4‐16 years of age), our results provide supportive evidence for the utility of the novel time‐to‐event trial design for future trials in infants and young children (1 month to <4 years of age).

Neurocognitive Effects of Antiseizure Medications in Children and Adolescents with Epilepsy

Impairments in cognition are common in epilepsy and may be caused or exacerbated by antiseizure medications (ASMs). Positive effects on cognition may also be seen with some ASMs. Cognitive outcomes are of particular concern in children who may be at an increased risk of cognitive adverse effects of treatment. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed in order to evaluate the evidence for cognitive changes associated with treatment with ASMs in paediatric epilepsy patients. The ASMs considered were those in the current edition of the British National Formulary (BNF). For most ASMs, remarkably few studies providing robust data on cognitive effects in paediatric patients were identified. The available evidence suggests cognitive impairments may be associated with treatment with phenobarbital. Topiramate and phenytoin are also associated with negative effects on cognition, in particular word-finding difficulties and other language deficits with topiramate, but there are few data available specifically on children. Lamotrigine, levetiracetam and fenfluramine are associated with improvements in some cognitive domains, although it is unclear whether these effects are directly attributable to the medications or are a result of improvements in seizures. Neutral effects on cognition (no substantial evidence of worsening) were suggested for carbamazepine, everolimus, lacosamide, oxcarbazepine, perampanel and valproate. There is limited data for cannabidiol, clobazam, eslicarbazepine acetate, ethosuximide, rufinamide, vigabatrin and zonisamide, although the available evidence suggests these drugs are not associated with severe cognitive impairment. There was too little information to reach conclusions about the effects of brivaracetam, felbamate, gabapentin, pregabalin, retigabine, stiripentol or tiagabine.

Safety, efficacy, and tolerability of lacosamide for the treatment of epilepsy in pediatric patients in Uygur, China

PURPOSE

Lacosamide (LCM) was approved in China in 2018. However, the safety of LCM has not been established in pediatric patients. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate its safety, efficacy, and tolerability in pediatric patients living in Uygur, Northwest China.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients diagnosed with epilepsy and on LCM therapy at a medical center. The seizure frequencies at 3, 6, and 12 months after starting LCM therapy were recorded and compared with the baseline monthly frequency. The primary outcome variables were the 50% responder and seizure-free rates. The secondary outcome variables included the terminal 6-month seizure remission and percentages of discontinuation due to a lack of efficacy and tolerability. Safety variables included the incidence and type of adverse reactions.

RESULTS

Seventy-two pediatric patients with epilepsy living in Uygur, China and receiving LCM treatment were included in the present study. Fifty (69%) children responded to LCM therapy with a more than 50% reduction in the frequency of seizures. Seizure-free rates increased over time, at 14%, 19%, and 20% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The number of baseline anti-seizure medications (ASMs) and order of LCM introduction significantly impacted the likelihood of seizure remission during the 12-month follow-up period (p < 0.05). During the entire period of LCM treatment, twenty-two children (30.5%) experienced at least one adverse reaction.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study of 72 pediatric patients with epilepsy in Uygur, China, showed that LCM therapy is safe and effective for epilepsy in children, resulting in a reduction in the seizure rate.

Use of Real-World Data and Pharmacometric Modeling in Support of Lacosamide Dosing in Pediatric Patients Under 4 Years of Age

The antiepileptic drug lacosamide (LCM) is approved in the United States and the European Union as monotherapy as well as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of focal seizures in children ≥4 years of age and adults. Using real-world therapeutic drug monitoring data, we performed a pharmacometric analysis for 315 pediatric patients (>1 month to <18 years of age) who received lacosamide as both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling with a 1-compartment structural model with linear elimination, where clearance and volume of distribution were allometrically scaled for body weight, with no further need for age-associated maturation functions. A covariate analysis for age, sex, race, and coadministration of other antiepileptic drugs identified phenobarbital and felbamate to significantly increase lacosamide clearance (1.71- and 1.46-fold, respectively). Based on the developed population pharmacokinetic model, simulations were performed in virtual pediatric patients to explore age-associated dose requirements to match lacosamide exposure in patient groups of different age with the exposure achieved in children ≥4 year of age with the weight-based dosing recommendations provided by the US Food and Drug Administration. Based on this approach, our analysis suggested that children ≥3 years of age needed the same dose as recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration for children ≥4 years of age (12 mg/kg/d), while children 1 to 3 years of age may need 13 to 14 mg/kg/d and infants between 1 month and 1 year of age may need 15 to 18 mg/kg/d (based on their actual age) to match the exposure seen in children ≥4 years of age.

Psychiatric Comorbidities in Pediatric Epilepsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Psychiatric comorbidities are close to 5-times higher in children and youth with epilepsy (CYE) compared to general population. With epilepsy being one of the most common neurological disorders in children, we provide a timely review of psychiatric issues in CYE.

RECENT FINDINGS

A meta-analysis found a pooled prevalence of anxiety in 18.9% and depression in 13.5% of CYE. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is 2.5 to 5.5 times higher in CYE compared to healthy counterparts. Recent evidence highlights that behavioral adverse effects may lead to discontinuation of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) in more than 10% of CYE. Up to 70% CYE shows elevation in baseline psychological symptoms after AED initiation. Identifying psychiatric symptoms can be easily accomplished by the routine use of psychiatric screening instruments in CYE clinics, which is associated with improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Psychoeducation is a key component for any visit with CYE. There is some evidence of the effectiveness of behavioral psychological interventions for CYE. There are no therapeutic trials of psychotropics in CYE, but treatment recommendations based on the experience in adults with epilepsy and general population are applicable. Early diagnosis and management of psychiatric comorbidities leads to improvement in HRQOL of CYE. This requires routine screening and a multidisciplinary teamwork.

Efficacy and tolerability of treatment with lacosamide in children: Postmarketing experience from the Middle East

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of lacosamide (LCM) in Lebanese children with focal-onset seizures and to determine if specific variables are predictive of better effectiveness.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis from three medical centers on consecutive children diagnosed with focal onset seizures and initiated on LCM. The seizure frequencies following the introduction of LCM were recorded and compared to the baseline monthly frequency at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary efficacy variables were the 50% responder and seizure-free rates. The secondary outcome variables included the terminal 6-month seizure remission and percentages of discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or tolerability.

RESULTS

58 patients with a mean age of 10 years experiencing a mean of 36.2 seizures per month during baseline were included. The seizure-free rates were 32.8%, 29.7%, and 12.5% at 6, 12 and 24 months follow up, respectively. Patients concomitantly treated with a sodium channel blocker were less likely to achieve a terminal 6-month seizure remission while the early introduction of LCM resulted in a significantly higher likelihood of attaining such a remission. 74.1% of patients were still maintained on LCM at the last follow-up. The most common adverse events consisted of dizziness, somnolence, nausea, vomiting, and rarely double vision.

CONCLUSIONS

LCM is efficacious and overall well tolerated in children with focal-onset seizures and exhibits higher efficacy with early introduction and when added to a non-sodium channel blocker.