1
|
Antonioni A, Raho EM, Granieri E, Koch G. Frontotemporal dementia. How to deal with its diagnostic complexity? Expert Rev Neurother 2025:1-35. [PMID: 39911129 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2461758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Revised: 01/27/2025] [Accepted: 01/29/2025] [Indexed: 02/07/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) encompasses a group of heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorders. Aside from genetic cases, its diagnosis is challenging, particularly in the early stages when symptoms are ambiguous, and structural neuroimaging does not reveal characteristic patterns. AREAS COVERED The authors performed a comprehensive literature search through MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to gather evidence to aid the diagnostic process for suspected FTD patients, particularly in early phases, even in sporadic cases, ranging from established to promising tools. Blood-based biomarkers might help identify very early neuropathological stages and guide further evaluations. Subsequently, neurophysiological measures reflecting functional changes in cortical excitatory/inhibitory circuits, along with functional neuroimaging assessing brain network, connectivity, metabolism, and perfusion alterations, could detect specific changes associated to FTD even decades before symptom onset. As the neuropathological process advances, cognitive-behavioral profiles and atrophy patterns emerge, distinguishing specific FTD subtypes. EXPERT OPINION Emerging disease-modifying therapies require early patient enrollment. Therefore, a diagnostic paradigm shift is needed - from relying on typical cognitive and neuroimaging profiles of advanced cases to widely applicable biomarkers, primarily fluid biomarkers, and, subsequently, neurophysiological and functional neuroimaging biomarkers where appropriate. Additionally, exploring subjective complaints and behavioral changes detected by home-based technologies might be crucial for early diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annibale Antonioni
- Doctoral Program in Translational Neurosciences and Neurotechnologies, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy
| | - Emanuela Maria Raho
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy
| | - Enrico Granieri
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy
| | - Giacomo Koch
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy
- Center for Translational Neurophysiology of Speech and Communication (CTNSC), Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Ferrara, FE, Italy
- Non Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Santa Lucia, Roma, RM, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Porsche S, Klietz M, Greten S, Piot IA, Jensen I, Wegner F, Ye L, Krey L, Höllerhage M, Pötter-Nerger M, Zeitzschel M, Hagena K, Kassubek J, Süß P, Winkler J, Berg D, Paschen S, Tönges L, Gruber D, Gandor F, Jost WH, Kühn AA, Claus I, Warnecke T, Pedrosa DJ, Eggers C, Trenkwalder C, Classen J, Schwarz J, Schnitzler A, Krause P, Schneider A, Brandt M, Falkenburger B, Zerr I, Bähr M, Weidinger E, Levin J, Katzdobler S, Düzel E, Glanz W, Teipel S, Kilimann I, Prudlo J, Gasser T, Brockmann K, Spottke A, Esser A, Petzold GC, Respondek G, Höglinger GU. A Short Cognitive and Neuropsychiatric Assessment Scale for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2025. [PMID: 39868903 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.14348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2024] [Revised: 01/05/2025] [Accepted: 01/15/2025] [Indexed: 01/28/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) suffer from several neuropsychological impairments. These mainly affect the frontal lobe and subcortical brain structures. However, a scale for the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychiatric disability in PSP is still missing. OBJECTIVES To create and validate a new scale for cognitive and neuropsychiatric impairment in PSP. METHODS The Short Cognitive and Neuropsychiatric (ShoCo) scale was developed containing five items (bradyphrenia, apathy, aphasia, dysexecution and disinhibition). Each item can be categorized into 0 = no deficit, 1 = mild deficit, 2 = moderate deficit and 3 = severe deficit. The total score includes 15 points, 0 meaning no deficit and 15 severe deficits. Cross-sectional and longitudinal data from 201 baseline and 71 follow up patients were analyzed. RESULTS Baseline ShoCo scale results were 5.9 ± 2.9. No significant differences between patients with Richardson syndrome (PSP-RS) and variants (vPSP) could be detected in the PSP-ShoCo scale scores (PSP-RS 6.1 ± 3.0, n = 160, vPSP 5.1 ± 2.6, n = 41, P = 0.057). The scale showed good correlation with established scores (eg, Montreal cognitive assessment r = -0.535, P = 0.001). The ShoCo scale showed significant annualized change within the PSP-RS patients (baseline 6.2 ± 2.9, follow up 6.9 ± 3.1, annualized diff. 1.0 ± 3.1, n = 57, P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS The ShoCo scale seems a promising and valid tool to measure specific neuropsychological disabilities of PSP patients in clinical routine and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Porsche
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Martin Klietz
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stephan Greten
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ines A Piot
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Ida Jensen
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Wegner
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lan Ye
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lea Krey
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Monika Pötter-Nerger
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Molly Zeitzschel
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Keno Hagena
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Kassubek
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Ulm, Germany
| | - Patrick Süß
- Department of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Center of Rare Diseases Erlangen (ZSEER), University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Winkler
- Department of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Center of Rare Diseases Erlangen (ZSEER), University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Daniela Berg
- Department of Neurology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Lars Tönges
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- Neurodegeneration Research, Protein Research Unit Ruhr (PURE), Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Doreen Gruber
- Movement Disorders Hospital, Beelitz-Heilstätten, Beelitz-Heilstätten, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Florin Gandor
- Movement Disorders Hospital, Beelitz-Heilstätten, Beelitz-Heilstätten, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Andrea A Kühn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
| | - Inga Claus
- Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Tobias Warnecke
- Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Klinikum Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, Germany
| | - David J Pedrosa
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Eggers
- Department of Neurology, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany
| | | | - Joseph Classen
- Department of Neurology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Johannes Schwarz
- Department of Neurology, Klinik Haag I. OB, Mühldorf a. Inn, Germany
| | - Alfons Schnitzler
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, and Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Patricia Krause
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anja Schneider
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Moritz Brandt
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Dresden, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Björn Falkenburger
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Dresden, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Inga Zerr
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Goettingen, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Mathias Bähr
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Goettingen, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence Nanoscale Microscopy and Molecular Physiology of the Brain (CNMPB), University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Endy Weidinger
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Levin
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sabrina Katzdobler
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Emrah Düzel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wenzel Glanz
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
- Clinic for Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Teipel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock-Greifswald, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Ingo Kilimann
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock-Greifswald, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Johannes Prudlo
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock-Greifswald, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | - Thomas Gasser
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Kathrin Brockmann
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Annika Spottke
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Center of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Anna Esser
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Gabor C Petzold
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Center of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gesine Respondek
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Günter U Höglinger
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fieldhouse JLP, van Paassen DN, van Engelen MPE, De Boer SCM, Hartog WL, Braak S, Schoonmade LJ, Schouws SNTM, Krudop WA, Oudega ML, Mutsaerts HJMM, Teunissen CE, Vijverberg EGB, Pijnenburg YAL. The pursuit for markers of disease progression in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: a scoping review to optimize outcome measures for clinical trials. Front Aging Neurosci 2024; 16:1382593. [PMID: 38784446 PMCID: PMC11112081 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1382593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by diverse and prominent changes in behavior and personality. One of the greatest challenges in bvFTD is to capture, measure and predict its disease progression, due to clinical, pathological and genetic heterogeneity. Availability of reliable outcome measures is pivotal for future clinical trials and disease monitoring. Detection of change should be objective, clinically meaningful and easily assessed, preferably associated with a biological process. The purpose of this scoping review is to examine the status of longitudinal studies in bvFTD, evaluate current assessment tools and propose potential progression markers. A systematic literature search (in PubMed and Embase.com) was performed. Literature on disease trajectories and longitudinal validity of frequently-used measures was organized in five domains: global functioning, behavior, (social) cognition, neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers. Evaluating current longitudinal data, we propose an adaptive battery, combining a set of sensitive clinical, neuroimaging and fluid markers, adjusted for genetic and sporadic variants, for adequate detection of disease progression in bvFTD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay L. P. Fieldhouse
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dirk N. van Paassen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marie-Paule E. van Engelen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sterre C. M. De Boer
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Willem L. Hartog
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Simon Braak
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Mood, Anxiety, Psychosis, Sleep & Stress Program, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Sigfried N. T. M. Schouws
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- GGZ inGeest Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Welmoed A. Krudop
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- GGZ inGeest Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mardien L. Oudega
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Mood, Anxiety, Psychosis, Sleep & Stress Program, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- GGZ inGeest Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Henk J. M. M. Mutsaerts
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E. Teunissen
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Everard G. B. Vijverberg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yolande A. L. Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McKenna MC, Murad A, Huynh W, Lope J, Bede P. The changing landscape of neuroimaging in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: from group-level observations to single-subject data interpretation. Expert Rev Neurother 2022; 22:179-207. [PMID: 35227146 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2022.2048648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While the imaging signatures of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) phenotypes and genotypes are well-characterised based on group-level descriptive analyses, the meaningful interpretation of single MRI scans remains challenging. Single-subject MRI classification frameworks rely on complex computational models and large training datasets to categorise individual patients into diagnostic subgroups based on distinguishing imaging features. Reliable individual subject data interpretation is hugely important in the clinical setting to expedite the diagnosis and classify individuals into relevant prognostic categories. AREAS COVERED This article reviews (1) the neuroimaging studies that propose single-subject MRI classification strategies in symptomatic and pre-symptomatic FTLD, (2) potential practical implications and (3) the limitations of current single-subject data interpretation models. EXPERT OPINION Classification studies in FTLD have demonstrated the feasibility of categorising individual subjects into diagnostic groups based on multiparametric imaging data. Preliminary data indicate that pre-symptomatic FTLD mutation carriers may also be reliably distinguished from controls. Despite momentous advances in the field, significant further improvements are needed before these models can be developed into viable clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aizuri Murad
- Computational Neuroimaging Group, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | - William Huynh
- Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Jasmin Lope
- Computational Neuroimaging Group, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter Bede
- Computational Neuroimaging Group, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.,Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Sorbonne University, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A comparison of automated atrophy measures across the frontotemporal dementia spectrum: Implications for trials. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2021; 32:102842. [PMID: 34626889 PMCID: PMC8503665 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a common cause of young onset dementia, and whilst there are currently no treatments, there are several promising candidates in development and early phase trials. Comprehensive investigations of neuroimaging markers of disease progression across the full spectrum of FTD disorders are lacking and urgently needed to facilitate these trials. Objective To investigate the comparative performance of multiple automated segmentation and registration pipelines used to quantify longitudinal whole-brain atrophy across the clinical, genetic and pathological subgroups of FTD, in order to inform upcoming trials about suitable neuroimaging-based endpoints. Methods Seventeen fully automated techniques for extracting whole-brain atrophy measures were applied and directly compared in a cohort of 226 participants who had undergone longitudinal structural 3D T1-weighted imaging. Clinical diagnoses were behavioural variant FTD (n = 56) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA, n = 104), comprising semantic variant PPA (n = 38), non-fluent variant PPA (n = 42), logopenic variant PPA (n = 18), and PPA-not otherwise specified (n = 6). 49 of these patients had either a known pathogenic mutation or postmortem confirmation of their underlying pathology. 66 healthy controls were included for comparison. Sample size estimates to detect a 30% reduction in atrophy (80% power; 0.05 significance) were computed to explore the relative feasibility of these brain measures as surrogate markers of disease progression and their ability to detect putative disease-modifying treatment effects. Results Multiple automated techniques showed great promise, detecting significantly increased rates of whole-brain atrophy (p<0.001) and requiring sample sizes of substantially less than 100 patients per treatment arm. Across the different FTD subgroups, direct measures of volume change consistently outperformed their indirect counterparts, irrespective of the initial segmentation quality. Significant differences in performance were found between both techniques and patient subgroups, highlighting the importance of informed biomarker choice based on the patient population of interest. Conclusion This work expands current knowledge and builds on the limited longitudinal investigations currently available in FTD, as well as providing valuable information about the potential of fully automated neuroimaging biomarkers for sporadic and genetic FTD trials.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lombardi J, Mayer B, Semler E, Anderl‐Straub S, Uttner I, Kassubek J, Diehl‐Schmid J, Danek A, Levin J, Fassbender K, Fliessbach K, Schneider A, Huppertz H, Jahn H, Volk A, Kornhuber J, Landwehrmeyer B, Lauer M, Prudlo J, Wiltfang J, Schroeter ML, Ludolph A, Otto M. Quantifying progression in primary progressive aphasia with structural neuroimaging. Alzheimers Dement 2021; 17:1595-1609. [DOI: 10.1002/alz.12323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benjamin Mayer
- Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry University of Ulm Ulm Germany
| | - Elisa Semler
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany
| | | | - Ingo Uttner
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany
| | - Jan Kassubek
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany
| | - Janine Diehl‐Schmid
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich Germany
| | - Adrian Danek
- Department of Neurology Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany
| | - Johannes Levin
- Department of Neurology Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich Germany
| | - Klaus Fassbender
- Department of Neurology Saarland University Hospital Homburg Germany
| | - Klaus Fliessbach
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Hospital Bonn Bonn Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Bonn Germany
| | - Anja Schneider
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Hospital Bonn Bonn Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Bonn Germany
| | | | - Holger Jahn
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Alexander Volk
- Institute for Human Genetics University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Johannes Kornhuber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Hospital Erlangen Erlangen Germany
| | | | - Martin Lauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
| | - Johannes Prudlo
- Department of Neurology University Medicine Rostock Rostock Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock Germany
| | - Jens Wiltfang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Medical University Göttingen Göttingen Germany
| | - Matthias L. Schroeter
- Max‐Planck‐Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Clinic for Cognitive Neurology University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig Germany
| | - Albert Ludolph
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany
| | - Markus Otto
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wisse LEM, Ungrady MB, Ittyerah R, Lim SA, Yushkevich PA, Wolk DA, Irwin DJ, Das SR, Grossman M. Cross-sectional and longitudinal medial temporal lobe subregional atrophy patterns in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia. Neurobiol Aging 2021; 98:231-241. [PMID: 33341654 PMCID: PMC8018475 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
T1-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies report early atrophy in the left anterior temporal lobe, especially the perirhinal cortex, in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA). Improved segmentation protocols using high-resolution T2-MRI have enabled fine-grained medial temporal lobe (MTL) subregional measurements, which may provide novel information on the atrophy pattern and disease progression in svPPA. We aimed to investigate the MTL subregional atrophy pattern cross-sectionally and longitudinally in patients with svPPA as compared with controls and patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). MTL subregional volumes were obtained using the Automated Segmentation for Hippocampal Subfields software from high-resolution T2-MRIs in 15 svPPA, 37 AD, and 23 healthy controls. All MTL volumes were corrected for intracranial volume and parahippocampal cortices for slice number. Longitudinal atrophy rates of all subregions were obtained using an unbiased deformation-based morphometry pipeline in 6 svPPA patients, 9 controls, and 12 AD patients. Cross-sectionally, significant volume loss was observed in svPPA compared with controls in the left MTL, right cornu ammonis 1 (CA1), Brodmann area (BA)35, and BA36 (subdivisions of the perirhinal cortex). Compared with AD patients, svPPA patients had significantly smaller left CA1, BA35, and left and right BA36 volumes. Longitudinally, svPPA patients had significantly greater atrophy rates of left and right BA36 than controls but not relative to AD patients. Fine-grained analysis of MTL atrophy patterns provides information about the evolution of atrophy in svPPA. These results indicate that MTL subregional measures might be useful markers to track disease progression or for clinical trials in svPPA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E M Wisse
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Neurology, Penn Memory Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Molly B Ungrady
- Department of Neurology, Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ranjit Ittyerah
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sydney A Lim
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Paul A Yushkevich
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David A Wolk
- Department of Neurology, Penn Memory Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David J Irwin
- Department of Neurology, Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CNDR), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sandhitsu R Das
- Department of Neurology, Penn Memory Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Murray Grossman
- Department of Neurology, Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Benussi A, Premi E, Gazzina S, Brattini C, Bonomi E, Alberici A, Jiskoot L, van Swieten JC, Sanchez-Valle R, Moreno F, Laforce R, Graff C, Synofzik M, Galimberti D, Masellis M, Tartaglia C, Rowe JB, Finger E, Vandenberghe R, de Mendonça A, Tagliavini F, Santana I, Ducharme S, Butler CR, Gerhard A, Levin J, Danek A, Otto M, Frisoni G, Ghidoni R, Sorbi S, Le Ber I, Pasquier F, Peakman G, Todd E, Bocchetta M, Rohrer JD, Borroni B. Progression of Behavioral Disturbances and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Patients With Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2030194. [PMID: 33404617 PMCID: PMC7788468 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Behavioral disturbances are core features of frontotemporal dementia (FTD); however, symptom progression across the course of disease is not well characterized in genetic FTD. OBJECTIVE To investigate behavioral symptom frequency and severity and their evolution and progression in different forms of genetic FTD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This longitudinal cohort study, the international Genetic FTD Initiative (GENFI), was conducted from January 30, 2012, to May 31, 2019, at 23 multicenter specialist tertiary FTD research clinics in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Germany, Sweden, Finland, and Canada. Participants included a consecutive sample of 232 symptomatic FTD gene variation carriers comprising 115 with variations in C9orf72, 78 in GRN, and 39 in MAPT. A total of 101 carriers had at least 1 follow-up evaluation (for a total of 400 assessments). Gene variations were included only if considered pathogenetic. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms were assessed across disease duration and evaluated from symptom onset. Hierarchical generalized linear mixed models were used to model behavioral and neuropsychiatric measures as a function of disease duration and variation. RESULTS Of 232 patients with FTD, 115 (49.6%) had a C9orf72 expansion (median [interquartile range (IQR)] age at evaluation, 64.3 [57.5-69.7] years; 72 men [62.6%]; 115 White patients [100%]), 78 (33.6%) had a GRN variant (median [IQR] age, 63.4 [58.3-68.8] years; 40 women [51.3%]; 77 White patients [98.7%]), and 39 (16.8%) had a MAPT variant (median [IQR] age, 56.3 [49.9-62.4] years; 25 men [64.1%]; 37 White patients [94.9%]). All core behavioral symptoms, including disinhibition, apathy, loss of empathy, perseverative behavior, and hyperorality, were highly expressed in all gene variant carriers (>50% patients), with apathy being one of the most common and severe symptoms throughout the disease course (51.7%-100% of patients). Patients with MAPT variants showed the highest frequency and severity of most behavioral symptoms, particularly disinhibition (79.3%-100% of patients) and compulsive behavior (64.3%-100% of patients), compared with C9orf72 carriers (51.7%-95.8% of patients with disinhibition and 34.5%-75.0% with compulsive behavior) and GRN carriers (38.2%-100% with disinhibition and 20.6%-100% with compulsive behavior). Alongside behavioral symptoms, neuropsychiatric symptoms were very frequently reported in patients with genetic FTD: anxiety and depression were most common in GRN carriers (23.8%-100% of patients) and MAPT carriers (26.1%-77.8% of patients); hallucinations, particularly auditory and visual, were most common in C9orf72 carriers (10.3%-54.5% of patients). Most behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms increased in the early-intermediate phases and plateaued in the late stages of disease, except for depression, which steadily declined in C9orf72 carriers, and depression and anxiety, which surged only in the late stages in GRN carriers. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study suggests that behavioral and neuropsychiatric disturbances differ between the common FTD gene variants and have different trajectories throughout the course of disease. These findings have crucial implications for counseling patients and caregivers and for the design of disease-modifying treatment trials in genetic FTD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Benussi
- Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Enrico Premi
- Vascular Neurology Unit, Department of Neurological and Vision Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Gazzina
- Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Neurological and Vision Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Chiara Brattini
- Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Elisa Bonomi
- Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonella Alberici
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neurological and Vision Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Lize Jiskoot
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Raquel Sanchez-Valle
- Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, Neurology Service, Hospital Clínic, Institut d’Investigacións Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fermin Moreno
- Cognitive Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Donostia University Hospital, San Sebastian, Spain
- Neuroscience Area, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, San Sebastian, Gipuzkoa, Spain
| | - Robert Laforce
- Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire, Département des Sciences Neurologiques du CHU de Québec, and Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Caroline Graff
- Center for Alzheimer Research, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Bioclinicum, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
- Unit for Hereditary Dementias, Theme Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Matthis Synofzik
- Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniela Galimberti
- Fondazione Ca’ Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, Centro Dino Ferrari, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Masellis
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carmela Tartaglia
- Tanz Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James B. Rowe
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Finger
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Neurology Service, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Isabel Santana
- Neurology Service, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Coimbra, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Simon Ducharme
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Chris R. Butler
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander Gerhard
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Departments of Geriatric Medicine and Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Levin
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster of Systems Neurology, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrian Danek
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Otto
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Giovanni Frisoni
- IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Roberta Ghidoni
- Molecular Markers Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sandro Sorbi
- Department of Neurofarba, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy
| | - Isabelle Le Ber
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) U1127, Paris, France
- Centre de National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7225, Paris, France
- Unité Mixte de Recherche en Santé 1127, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 06), Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
- Institute du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, Paris, France
| | - Florence Pasquier
- Inserm CHU Lille, Lille Neurosciences & Cognition UMR-S1172 Degenerative and Vascular Cognitive Disorders, Université de Lille, Lille, France
- CHU Lille, DistAlz Licend Memory Clinic, Lille, France
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Georgia Peakman
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Todd
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martina Bocchetta
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan D. Rohrer
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Barbara Borroni
- Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dev SI, Dickerson BC, Touroutoglou A. Neuroimaging in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: Research and Clinical Utility. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2021; 1281:93-112. [PMID: 33433871 PMCID: PMC8787866 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51140-1_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
Frontotemporal lobar dementia (FTLD) is a clinically and pathologically complex disease. Advances in neuroimaging techniques have provided a specialized set of tools to investigate underlying pathophysiology and identify clinical biomarkers that aid in diagnosis, prognostication, monitoring, and identification of appropriate endpoints in clinical trials. In this chapter, we review data discussing the utility of neuroimaging biomarkers in sporadic FTLD, with an emphasis on current and future clinical applications. Among those modalities readily utilized in clinical settings, T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are best supported in differential diagnosis and as targets for clinical trial endpoints. However, a number of nonclinical neuroimaging modalities, including diffusion tensor imaging and resting-state functional connectivity MRI, show promise as biomarkers to predict progression and as clinical trial endpoints. Other neuroimaging modalities, including amyloid PET, Tau PET, and arterial spin labeling MRI, are also discussed, though more work is required to establish their utility in FTLD in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheena I Dev
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Bradford C Dickerson
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
| | - Alexandra Touroutoglou
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ducharme S, Dols A, Laforce R, Devenney E, Kumfor F, van den Stock J, Dallaire-Théroux C, Seelaar H, Gossink F, Vijverberg E, Huey E, Vandenbulcke M, Masellis M, Trieu C, Onyike C, Caramelli P, de Souza LC, Santillo A, Waldö ML, Landin-Romero R, Piguet O, Kelso W, Eratne D, Velakoulis D, Ikeda M, Perry D, Pressman P, Boeve B, Vandenberghe R, Mendez M, Azuar C, Levy R, Le Ber I, Baez S, Lerner A, Ellajosyula R, Pasquier F, Galimberti D, Scarpini E, van Swieten J, Hornberger M, Rosen H, Hodges J, Diehl-Schmid J, Pijnenburg Y. Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders. Brain 2020; 143:1632-1650. [PMID: 32129844 PMCID: PMC7849953 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 175] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a frequent cause of early-onset dementia. The diagnosis of bvFTD remains challenging because of the limited accuracy of neuroimaging in the early disease stages and the absence of molecular biomarkers, and therefore relies predominantly on clinical assessment. BvFTD shows significant symptomatic overlap with non-degenerative primary psychiatric disorders including major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, autism spectrum disorders and even personality disorders. To date, ∼50% of patients with bvFTD receive a prior psychiatric diagnosis, and average diagnostic delay is up to 5-6 years from symptom onset. It is also not uncommon for patients with primary psychiatric disorders to be wrongly diagnosed with bvFTD. The Neuropsychiatric International Consortium for Frontotemporal Dementia was recently established to determine the current best clinical practice and set up an international collaboration to share a common dataset for future research. The goal of the present paper was to review the existing literature on the diagnosis of bvFTD and its differential diagnosis with primary psychiatric disorders to provide consensus recommendations on the clinical assessment. A systematic literature search with a narrative review was performed to determine all bvFTD-related diagnostic evidence for the following topics: bvFTD history taking, psychiatric assessment, clinical scales, physical and neurological examination, bedside cognitive tests, neuropsychological assessment, social cognition, structural neuroimaging, functional neuroimaging, CSF and genetic testing. For each topic, responsible team members proposed a set of minimal requirements, optimal clinical recommendations, and tools requiring further research or those that should be developed. Recommendations were listed if they reached a ≥ 85% expert consensus based on an online survey among all consortium participants. New recommendations include performing at least one formal social cognition test in the standard neuropsychological battery for bvFTD. We emphasize the importance of 3D-T1 brain MRI with a standardized review protocol including validated visual atrophy rating scales, and to consider volumetric analyses if available. We clarify the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET for the exclusion of bvFTD when normal, whereas non-specific regional metabolism abnormalities should not be over-interpreted in the case of a psychiatric differential diagnosis. We highlight the potential role of serum or CSF neurofilament light chain to differentiate bvFTD from primary psychiatric disorders. Finally, based on the increasing literature and clinical experience, the consortium determined that screening for C9orf72 mutation should be performed in all possible/probable bvFTD cases or suspected cases with strong psychiatric features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Ducharme
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Str., Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4, Canada
| | - Annemiek Dols
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZ InGeest, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Laforce
- Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire (CIME), Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emma Devenney
- Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Fiona Kumfor
- Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jan van den Stock
- Laboratory for Translational Neuropsychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Harro Seelaar
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora Gossink
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZ InGeest, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Everard Vijverberg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edward Huey
- Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain, Department of Psychiatry, Colombia University, New York, USA
| | - Mathieu Vandenbulcke
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mario Masellis
- Department of Neurology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Calvin Trieu
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZ InGeest, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chiadi Onyike
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Paulo Caramelli
- Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology Research Group, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Leonardo Cruz de Souza
- Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology Research Group, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | | - Maria Landqvist Waldö
- Division of Clinical Sciences Helsingborg, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Olivier Piguet
- Division of Clinical Sciences Helsingborg, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Wendy Kelso
- Neuropsychiatry Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dhamidhu Eratne
- Neuropsychiatry Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dennis Velakoulis
- Neuropsychiatry Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Manabu Ikeda
- Department of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - David Perry
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Peter Pressman
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, USA
| | - Bradley Boeve
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mario Mendez
- Department of Neurology, UCLA Medical Centre, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Carole Azuar
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Richard Levy
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Le Ber
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Sandra Baez
- Department of Psychology, Andes University, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Alan Lerner
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA
| | - Ratnavalli Ellajosyula
- Department of Neurology, Manipal Hospital and Annasawmy Mudaliar Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - Florence Pasquier
- Univ Lille, Inserm U1171, Memory Center, CHU Lille, DISTAlz, Lille, France
| | - Daniela Galimberti
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Centro Dino Ferrari, Milan, Italy
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Policlinico, Neurodegenerative Diseases Unit Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Scarpini
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Centro Dino Ferrari, Milan, Italy
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Policlinico, Neurodegenerative Diseases Unit Milan, Italy
| | - John van Swieten
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Howard Rosen
- Memory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - John Hodges
- Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Janine Diehl-Schmid
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Yolande Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rosen HJ, Boeve BF, Boxer AL. Tracking disease progression in familial and sporadic frontotemporal lobar degeneration: Recent findings from ARTFL and LEFFTDS. Alzheimers Dement 2020; 16:71-78. [PMID: 31914219 PMCID: PMC6953606 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration (f-FTLD) due to autosomal dominant mutations is an important entity for developing treatments for FTLD. The Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects (LEFFTDS) longitudinal studies were designed to describe the natural history of f-FTLD. METHODS We summarized recent publications from the ARTFL and LEFFTDS studies, along with other recent publications describing the natural history of f-FTLD. RESULTS Published and emerging studies are producing data on all phases of f-FTLD, including the asymptomatic and symptomatic phases of disease, as well as the transitional phase when symptoms are just beginning to develop. These data indicate that rates of change increase along with disease severity, which is consistent with commonly cited models of neurodegeneration, and that measurement of biomarkers may predict onset of symptoms. DISCUSSION Data from large multisite studies are producing important data on the natural history of f-FTLD that will be critical for planning intervention trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard J. Rosen
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCalifornia
| | | | - Adam L. Boxer
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCalifornia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Staffaroni AM, Ljubenkov PA, Kornak J, Cobigo Y, Datta S, Marx G, Walters SM, Chiang K, Olney N, Elahi FM, Knopman DS, Dickerson BC, Boeve BF, Gorno-Tempini ML, Spina S, Grinberg LT, Seeley WW, Miller BL, Kramer JH, Boxer AL, Rosen HJ. Longitudinal multimodal imaging and clinical endpoints for frontotemporal dementia clinical trials. Brain 2019; 142:443-459. [PMID: 30698757 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awy319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia refers to a group of progressive neurodegenerative syndromes usually caused by the accumulation of pathological tau or TDP-43 proteins. The effects of these proteins in the brain are complex, and each can present with several different clinical syndromes. Clinical efficacy trials of drugs targeting these proteins must use endpoints that are meaningful to all participants despite the variability in symptoms across patients. There are many candidate clinical measures, including neuropsychological scores and functional measures. Brain imaging is another potentially attractive outcome that can be precisely quantified and provides evidence of disease modification. Most imaging studies in frontotemporal dementia have been cross-sectional, and few have compared longitudinal changes in cortical volume with changes in other measures such as perfusion and white matter integrity. The current study characterized longitudinal changes in 161 patients with three frontotemporal dementia syndromes: behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (n = 77) and the semantic (n = 45) and non-fluent (n = 39) variants of primary progressive aphasia. Visits included comprehensive neuropsychological and functional assessment, structural MRI (3 T), diffusion tensor imaging, and arterial spin labelled perfusion imaging. The goal was to identify measures that are appropriate as clinical trial outcomes for each group, as well as those that might be appropriate for trials that would include more than one of these groups. Linear mixed effects models were used to estimate changes in each measure, and to examine the correlation between imaging and clinical changes. Sample sizes were estimated based on the observed effects for theoretical clinical trials using bootstrapping techniques to provide 95% confidence intervals for these estimates. Declines in functional and neuropsychological measures, as well as frontal and temporal cortical volumes and white matter microstructure were detected in all groups. Imaging changes were statistically significantly correlated with, and explained a substantial portion of variance in, the change in most clinical measures. Perfusion and diffusion tensor imaging accounted for variation in clinical decline beyond volume alone. Sample size estimates for atrophy and diffusion imaging were comparable to clinical measures. Corpus callosal fractional anisotropy led to the lowest sample size estimates for all three syndromes. These findings provide further guidance on selection of trial endpoints for studies in frontotemporal dementia and support the use of neuroimaging, particularly structural and diffusion weighted imaging, as biomarkers. Diffusion and perfusion imaging appear to offer additional utility for explaining clinical change beyond the variance explained by volume alone, arguing for considering multimodal imaging in treatment trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam M Staffaroni
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter A Ljubenkov
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John Kornak
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Yann Cobigo
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Samir Datta
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gabe Marx
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Samantha M Walters
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kevin Chiang
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nick Olney
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Fanny M Elahi
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David S Knopman
- Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota USA
| | - Bradford C Dickerson
- Frontotemporal Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charleston, MA, USA
| | - Bradley F Boeve
- Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota USA
| | - Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Salvatore Spina
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lea T Grinberg
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Pathology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Pathology - LIM 22, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - William W Seeley
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Pathology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bruce L Miller
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joel H Kramer
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Adam L Boxer
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Howard J Rosen
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cosseddu M, Benussi A, Gazzina S, Alberici A, Dell'Era V, Manes M, Cristillo V, Borroni B, Padovani A. Progression of behavioural disturbances in frontotemporal dementia: a longitudinal observational study. Eur J Neurol 2019; 27:265-272. [DOI: 10.1111/ene.14071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Cosseddu
- Neurology Unit Spedali Civili of Brescia Brescia
| | - A. Benussi
- Neurology Unit Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences University of Brescia Brescia Italy
| | - S. Gazzina
- Neurology Unit Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences University of Brescia Brescia Italy
| | - A. Alberici
- Neurology Unit Spedali Civili of Brescia Brescia
| | - V. Dell'Era
- Neurology Unit Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences University of Brescia Brescia Italy
| | - M. Manes
- Neurology Unit Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences University of Brescia Brescia Italy
| | - V. Cristillo
- Neurology Unit Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences University of Brescia Brescia Italy
| | - B. Borroni
- Neurology Unit Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences University of Brescia Brescia Italy
| | - A. Padovani
- Neurology Unit Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences University of Brescia Brescia Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Whitwell JL. FTD spectrum: Neuroimaging across the FTD spectrum. PROGRESS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE 2019; 165:187-223. [PMID: 31481163 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2019.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia is a complex and heterogeneous neurodegenerative disease that encompasses many clinical syndromes, pathological diseases, and genetic mutations. Neuroimaging has played a critical role in our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of frontotemporal dementia and provided biomarkers to aid diagnosis. Early studies defined patterns of neurodegeneration and hypometabolism associated with the clinical, pathological and genetic aspects of frontotemporal dementia, with more recent studies highlighting how the breakdown of structural and functional brain networks define frontotemporal dementia. Molecular positron emission tomography ligands allowing the in vivo imaging of tau proteins have also provided important insights, although more work is needed to understand the biology of the currently available ligands.
Collapse
|
15
|
Chelban V, Bocchetta M, Hassanein S, Haridy NA, Houlden H, Rohrer JD. An update on advances in magnetic resonance imaging of multiple system atrophy. J Neurol 2019; 266:1036-1045. [PMID: 30460448 PMCID: PMC6420901 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-018-9121-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 11/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
In this review, we describe how different neuroimaging tools have been used to identify novel MSA biomarkers, highlighting their advantages and limitations. First, we describe the main structural MRI changes frequently associated with MSA including the 'hot cross-bun' and 'putaminal rim' signs as well as putaminal, pontine, and middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) atrophy. We discuss the sensitivity and specificity of different supra- and infratentorial changes in differentiating MSA from other disorders, highlighting those that can improve diagnostic accuracy, including the MCP width and MCP/superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP) ratio on T1-weighted imaging, raised putaminal diffusivity on diffusion-weighted imaging, and increased T2* signal in the putamen, striatum, and substantia nigra on susceptibility-weighted imaging. Second, we focus on recent advances in structural and functional MRI techniques including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), resting-state functional MRI (fMRI), and arterial spin labelling (ASL) imaging. Finally, we discuss new approaches for MSA research such as multimodal neuroimaging strategies and how such markers may be applied in clinical trials to provide crucial data for accurately selecting patients and to act as secondary outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viorica Chelban
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Emergency Medicine, Toma Ciorbă 1, 2052, Chisinau, Moldova
| | - Martina Bocchetta
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, WC1N 3BG, London, UK
| | - Sara Hassanein
- Diagnostic Radiology department, Faculty of Medicine Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
- Department of Brain, Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, WC1N 3BG, London, UK
| | - Nourelhoda A Haridy
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Henry Houlden
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, WC1N 3BG, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Guevara C, de Grazia J, Baabor P, Soruco W. Self-reported urinary impairment identifies 'fast progressors' in terms of neuronal loss in multiple system atrophy. Auton Neurosci 2019; 217:1-6. [PMID: 30704970 DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2018.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2018] [Revised: 11/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION MSA is an adult-onset, sporadic, progressive parkinsonian syndrome characterised by the presence of akinesia, cerebellar dysfunction, autonomic failure and pyramidal signs. Annualized-whole-brain atrophy rate (a-WBAR) is an informative way to quantify disease progression. In this longitudinal work we investigate the correlations of a-WBAR with clinical scales for motor impairment, autonomic disability and cognitive decline in MSA and explore how atrophy progresses within the brain. METHOD Fourty-one MSA patients were studied using Structural Imaging Evaluation with Normalization of Atrophy (SIENA). SIENA is an MRI-based algorithm that quantifies brain tissue volume. Clinical parameters were explored using the 18-item Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, the Hoehn and Yahr Scale, the Frontal Assessment Battery and the Natural History and Neuroprotection in Parkinson Plus Syndromes scale (sub-items for orthostatic and urinary functions). RESULTS The mean (±SD) age was 60.4 years ± 7.7 and a-WBAR was 1.65% ± 0.9. Demographics and clinical ratings at the time of the first scan were non-significantly associated with a-WBAR. The only exception was the baseline urinary score with a weak but significant association (R2 = 0.15, p = 0.04). Progression of grey matter atrophy was detected in the left superior temporal gyrus, right middle frontal gyrus, right frontopolar region and midbrain. CONCLUSION Urinary impairment at baseline may help to identify 'fast progressors' in terms of neuronal loss, particularly in the frontal and temporal lobes. Thus, urinary impairment should be recognized as a key target for disease modifying therapeutic interventions in MSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Guevara
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santos Dummont 999, Santiago, Chile.
| | - José de Grazia
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santos Dummont 999, Santiago, Chile
| | - Pablo Baabor
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santos Dummont 999, Santiago, Chile
| | - Wendy Soruco
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santos Dummont 999, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hurtado-Pomares M, Carmen Terol-Cantero M, Sánchez-Pérez A, Peral-Gómez P, Valera-Gran D, Navarrete-Muñoz EM. The frontal assessment battery in clinical practice: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2018. [PMID: 28627719 DOI: 10.1002/gps.4751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The frontal assessment battery (FAB) is a brief tool designed to evaluate executive function. Some studies have particularly focused on assessing its applicability addressing two issues: first, on detecting the brain regions responsible for the FAB performance, and second, on determining its capability for differential diagnosis. Our aim was to summarize and analyze critically the studies that assessed the neuroanatomical correspondence and the differential diagnostic value of the FAB in several study populations suffering from different pathologies. METHODS We completed a literature search in MEDLINE (via PubMed) database by using the term "frontal assessment battery" and the combination of this term with "applicability" or "use" or "usefulness". The search was limited to articles in English or Spanish languages, published between 1 September 2000 and 30 September 2016, human studies, and journal articles. RESULTS A total of 32 studies met inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies were aimed at identifying the brain regions or the neural substrates involved in executive functions measured by the FAB and 15 studies at verifying that the FAB was an appropriate tool for the differential diagnosis in neurological diseases. CONCLUSION Our study showed that the FAB may be an adequate assessment tool for executive function and may provide useful information for differential diagnosis in several diseases. Given that the FAB takes short time and is easy to administer, its usage may be of great interest as part of a full neuropsychological assessment in clinical settings. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Hurtado-Pomares
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | - M Carmen Terol-Cantero
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Alicante, Spain.,Department of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | - Alicia Sánchez-Pérez
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | - Paula Peral-Gómez
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | - Desirée Valera-Gran
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Alicante, Spain.,Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL-FISABIO Foundation), Alicante, Spain
| | - Eva María Navarrete-Muñoz
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Public Health, History of Medicine and Gynecology, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain.,Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL-FISABIO Foundation), Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Borroni B, Benussi A, Premi E, Alberici A, Marcello E, Gardoni F, Di Luca M, Padovani A. Biological, Neuroimaging, and Neurophysiological Markers in Frontotemporal Dementia: Three Faces of the Same Coin. J Alzheimers Dis 2018; 62:1113-1123. [PMID: 29171998 PMCID: PMC5870000 DOI: 10.3233/jad-170584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a heterogeneous clinical, genetic, and neuropathological disorder. Clinical diagnosis and prediction of neuropathological substrates are hampered by heterogeneous pictures. Diagnostic markers are key in clinical trials to differentiate FTD from other neurodegenerative dementias. In the same view, identifying the neuropathological hallmarks of the disease is key in light of future disease-modifying treatments. The aim of the present review is to unravel the progress in biomarker discovery, discussing the potential applications of available biological, imaging, and neurophysiological markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Borroni
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurology Unit, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alberto Benussi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurology Unit, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Enrico Premi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurology Unit, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonella Alberici
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurology Unit, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Elena Marcello
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Gardoni
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Di Luca
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Padovani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurology Unit, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cummings J. Disease modification and Neuroprotection in neurodegenerative disorders. Transl Neurodegener 2017; 6:25. [PMID: 29021896 PMCID: PMC5613313 DOI: 10.1186/s40035-017-0096-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) are urgently needed for neurodegenerative diseases (NDD) such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and many other disorders characterized by protein aggregation and neurodegeneration. Despite advances in understanding the neurobiology of NDD, there are no approved DMTs. Discussion Defining disease-modification is critical to drug-development programs. A DMT is an intervention that produces an enduring change in the trajectory of clinical decline of an NDD by impacting the disease processes leading to nerve cell death. A DMT is neuroprotective, and neuroprotection will result in disease modification. Disease modification can be demonstrated in clinical trials by a drug-placebo difference in clinical outcomes supported by a drug-placebo difference on biomarkers reflective of the fundamental pathophysiology of the NDD. Alternatively, disease modification can be supported by findings on a staggered start or delayed withdrawal clinical trial design. Collecting multiple biomarkers is necessary to support a comprehensive view of disease modification. Conclusion Disease modification is established by demonstrating an enduring change in the clinical trajectory of an NDD based on intervention in the fundamental pathophysiology of the disease leading to nerve cell death. Supporting data are collected in clinical trials. Effectively defining a DMT will assist in NDD drug development programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Cummings
- Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, 888 W Bonneville Ave, Las Vegas, NV 89106 USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gordon E, Rohrer JD, Fox NC. Advances in neuroimaging in frontotemporal dementia. J Neurochem 2017; 138 Suppl 1:193-210. [PMID: 27502125 DOI: 10.1111/jnc.13656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2016] [Revised: 05/02/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a clinically and neuroanatomically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder with multiple underlying genetic and pathological causes. Whilst initial neuroimaging studies highlighted the presence of frontal and temporal lobe atrophy or hypometabolism as the unifying feature in patients with FTD, more detailed studies have revealed diverse patterns across individuals, with variable frontal or temporal predominance, differing degrees of asymmetry, and the involvement of other cortical areas including the insula and cingulate, as well as subcortical structures such as the basal ganglia and thalamus. Recent advances in novel imaging modalities including diffusion tensor imaging, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and molecular positron emission tomography imaging allow the possibility of investigating alterations in structural and functional connectivity and the visualisation of pathological protein deposition. This review will cover the major imaging modalities currently used in research and clinical practice, focusing on the key insights they have provided into FTD, including the onset and evolution of pathological changes and also importantly their utility as biomarkers for disease detection and staging, differential diagnosis and measurement of disease progression. Validating neuroimaging biomarkers that are able to accomplish these tasks will be crucial for the ultimate goal of powering upcoming clinical trials by correctly stratifying patient enrolment and providing sensitive markers for evaluating the effects and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies. This review describes the key insights provided by research into the major neuroimaging modalities currently used in research and clinical practice, including what they tell us about the onset and evolution of FTD and how they may be used as biomarkers for disease detection and staging, differential diagnosis and measurement of disease progression. This article is part of the Frontotemporal Dementia special issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Gordon
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Nick C Fox
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Guevara C, Bulatova K, Soruco W, Gonzalez G, Farías GA. Retrospective Diagnosis of Parkinsonian Syndromes Using Whole-Brain Atrophy Rates. Front Aging Neurosci 2017; 9:99. [PMID: 28469572 PMCID: PMC5396185 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The absence of markers for ante-mortem diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) results in these disorders being commonly mistaken for each other, particularly in the initial stages. We aimed to investigate annualized whole-brain atrophy rates (a-WBAR) in these disorders to aid in the diagnosis between IPD vs. PSP and MSA. Methods: Ten healthy controls, 20 IPD, 39 PSP, and 41 MSA patients were studied using Structural Imaging Evaluation with Normalization of Atrophy (SIENA). SIENA is an MRI-based algorithm that quantifies brain tissue volume and does not require radiotracers. SIENA has been shown to have a low estimation error for atrophy rate over the whole brain (0.5%). Results: In controls, the a-WBAR was 0.37% ± 0.28 (CI 95% 0.17-0.57), while in IPD a-WBAR was 0.54% ± 0.38 (CI 95% 0.32-0.68). The IPD patients did not differ from the controls. In PSP, the a-WBAR was 1.93% ± 1.1 (CI 95% 1.5-2.2). In MSA a-WBAR was 1.65% ± 0.9 (CI 95%1.37-1.93). MSA did not differ from PSP. The a-WBAR in PSP and MSA were significantly higher than in IPD (p < 0.001). a-WBAR 0.6% differentiated patients with IPD from those with PSA and MSA with 91% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Conclusions: a-WBAR within the normal range is unlikely to be observed in PSP or MSA. a-WBAR may add a potential retrospective application to improve the diagnostic accuracy of MSA and PSP vs. IPD during the first year of clinical assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Guevara
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de ChileSantiago, Chile
| | | | - Wendy Soruco
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de ChileSantiago, Chile
| | - Guido Gonzalez
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de ChileSantiago, Chile
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Binney RJ, Pankov A, Marx G, He X, McKenna F, Staffaroni AM, Kornak J, Attygalle S, Boxer AL, Schuff N, Gorno‐Tempini M, Weiner MW, Kramer JH, Miller BL, Rosen HJ. Data-driven regions of interest for longitudinal change in three variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Brain Behav 2017; 7:e00675. [PMID: 28413716 PMCID: PMC5390848 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 02/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Longitudinal imaging of neurodegenerative disorders is a potentially powerful biomarker for use in clinical trials. In Alzheimer's disease, studies have demonstrated that empirically derived regions of interest (ROIs) can provide more reliable measurement of disease progression compared with anatomically defined ROIs. METHODS We set out to derive ROIs with optimal effect size for quantifying longitudinal change in a hypothetical clinical trial by comparing atrophy rates in 44 patients with behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), 30 with the semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), and 26 with the nonfluent variant PPA (nfvPPA) to atrophy in 97 cognitively healthy controls. RESULTS The regions identified for each variant were generally what would be expected from prior studies of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Sample size estimates for detecting a 40% reduction in annual rate of ROI atrophy varied substantially across groups, being 103 per arm in bvFTD, 31 in nfvPPA, and 10 in svPPA, but in all groups were less than those estimated for a priori ROIs and clinical measures. The variability in location of peak regions of atrophy across individuals was highest in bvFTD and lowest in svPPA, likely relating to the differences in effect size. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that, while cross-validated maps of change can improve sensitivity to change in FTLD compared with a priori regions, the reliability of these maps differs considerably across syndromes. Future studies can utilize these maps to design clinical trials, and should try to identify factors accounting for the variability in patterns of atrophy across individuals, particularly those with bvFTD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J. Binney
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Aleksandr Pankov
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
- Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Gabriel Marx
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Xuanzie He
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Faye McKenna
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Adam M. Staffaroni
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - John Kornak
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Suneth Attygalle
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Adam L. Boxer
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Norbert Schuff
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Maria‐Luisa Gorno‐Tempini
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Michael W. Weiner
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Joel H. Kramer
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Bruce L. Miller
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Howard J. Rosen
- Department of NeurologyMemory and Aging CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Woollacott IOC, Rohrer JD. The clinical spectrum of sporadic and familial forms of frontotemporal dementia. J Neurochem 2016; 138 Suppl 1:6-31. [PMID: 27144467 DOI: 10.1111/jnc.13654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2016] [Revised: 04/10/2016] [Accepted: 04/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The term frontotemporal dementia (FTD) describes a clinically, genetically and pathologically diverse group of neurodegenerative disorders. Symptoms of FTD can present in individuals in their 20s through to their 90s, but the mean age at onset is in the sixth decade. The most common presentation is with a change in personality and impaired social conduct (behavioural variant FTD). Less frequently patients present with language problems (primary progressive aphasia). Both of these groups of patients can develop motor features consistent with either motor neuron disease (usually the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis variant) or parkinsonism (most commonly a progressive supranuclear palsy or corticobasal syndrome). In about a third of cases FTD is familial, with mutations in the progranulin, microtubule-associated protein tau and chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 genes being the major causes. Mutations in a number of other genes including TANK-binding kinase 1 are rare causes of familial FTD. This review aims to clarify the often confusing terminology of FTD, and outline the various clinical features and diagnostic criteria of sporadic and familial FTD syndromes. It will also discuss the current major challenges in FTD research and clinical practice, and potential areas for future research. This review clarifies the terminology of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and summarizes the various clinical features and most recent diagnostic criteria of sporadic and familial FTD syndromes. It also discusses the current major challenges in FTD research and clinical practice, and highlights potential areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ione O C Woollacott
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Narayanan L, Murray AD. What can imaging tell us about cognitive impairment and dementia? World J Radiol 2016; 8:240-254. [PMID: 27029053 PMCID: PMC4807333 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Revised: 11/28/2015] [Accepted: 01/07/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Dementia is a contemporary global health issue with far reaching consequences, not only for affected individuals and their families, but for national and global socio-economic conditions. The hallmark feature of dementia is that of irreversible cognitive decline, usually affecting memory, and impaired activities of daily living. Advances in healthcare worldwide have facilitated longer life spans, increasing the risks of developing cognitive decline and dementia in late life. Dementia remains a clinical diagnosis. The role of structural and molecular neuroimaging in patients with dementia is primarily supportive role rather than diagnostic, American and European guidelines recommending imaging to exclude treatable causes of dementia, such as tumor, hydrocephalus or intracranial haemorrhage, but also to distinguish between different dementia subtypes, the commonest of which is Alzheimer’s disease. However, this depends on the availability of these imaging techniques at individual centres. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, such as functional connectivity MRI, diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and molecular imaging techniques, such as 18F fluoro-deoxy glucose positron emission tomography (PET), amyloid PET, tau PET, are currently within the realm of dementia research but are available for clinical use. Increasingly the research focus is on earlier identification of at risk preclinical individuals, for example due to family history. Intervention at the preclinical stages before irreversible brain damage occurs is currently the best hope of reducing the impact of dementia.
Collapse
|
25
|
Pankov A, Binney RJ, Staffaroni AM, Kornak J, Attygalle S, Schuff N, Weiner MW, Kramer JH, Dickerson BC, Miller BL, Rosen HJ. Data-driven regions of interest for longitudinal change in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2015; 12:332-40. [PMID: 27547726 PMCID: PMC4983147 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Current research is investigating the potential utility of longitudinal measurement of brain structure as a marker of drug effect in clinical trials for neurodegenerative disease. Recent studies in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have shown that measurement of change in empirically derived regions of interest (ROIs) allows more reliable measurement of change over time compared with regions chosen a-priori based on known effects of AD on brain anatomy. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder for which there are no approved treatments. The goal of this study was to identify an empirical ROI that maximizes the effect size for the annual rate of brain atrophy in FTLD compared with healthy age matched controls, and to estimate the effect size and associated power estimates for a theoretical study that would use change within this ROI as an outcome measure. Eighty six patients with FTLD were studied, including 43 who were imaged twice at 1.5 T and 43 at 3 T, along with 105 controls (37 imaged at 1.5 T and 67 at 3 T). Empirically-derived maps of change were generated separately for each field strength and included the bilateral insula, dorsolateral, medial and orbital frontal, basal ganglia and lateral and inferior temporal regions. The extent of regions included in the 3 T map was larger than that in the 1.5 T map. At both field strengths, the effect sizes for imaging were larger than for any clinical measures. At 3 T, the effect size for longitudinal change measured within the empirically derived ROI was larger than the effect sizes derived from frontal lobe, temporal lobe or whole brain ROIs. The effect size derived from the data-driven 1.5 T map was smaller than at 3 T, and was not larger than the effect size derived from a-priori ROIs. It was estimated that measurement of longitudinal change using 1.5 T MR systems requires approximately a 3-fold increase in sample size to obtain effect sizes equivalent to those seen at 3 T. While the results should be confirmed in additional datasets, these results indicate that empirically derived ROIs can reduce the number of subjects needed for a longitudinal study of drug effects in FTLD compared with a-priori ROIs. Field strength may have a significant impact on the utility of imaging for measuring longitudinal change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandr Pankov
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Richard J Binney
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Adam M Staffaroni
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John Kornak
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Suneth Attygalle
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Norbert Schuff
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael W Weiner
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joel H Kramer
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Bruce L Miller
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Howard J Rosen
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Stamelou M, Diehl-Schmid J, Hapfelmeier A, Kontaxopoulou D, Stefanis L, Oertel WH, Bhatia KP, Papageorgiou SG, Höglinger GU. The frontal assessment battery is not useful to discriminate progressive supranuclear palsy from frontotemporal dementias. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2015; 21:1264-8. [PMID: 26324212 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Revised: 07/08/2015] [Accepted: 08/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The frontal assessment battery (FAB) has been suggested as a useful tool in the differential diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) from Parkinson's disease (PD) and multiple system atrophy with parkinsonism (MSA-P). However, the utility of the FAB in the differential diagnosis of PSP from frontotemporal dementia (FTD) phenotypes is still under research. METHODS We performed the FAB, in a multi-centre cohort of 70 PSP, 103 FTD (N = 84 behavioral variant FTD, N = 10 semantic dementia, N = 9 progressive non-fluent aphasia), 26 PD and 11 MSA-P patients, diagnosed according to established criteria. Patients were also rated with the mini mental state examination and motor scales. RESULTS The FAB total score showed a poor discriminatory power between PSP and FTD as a group [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.523]. Moreover, the FAB score showed no correlation with disease duration in PSP (r = 0.05) or FTD group (r = 0.04). In contrast, we confirmed that the FAB is clinically useful to differentiate PSP from PD and MSA-P (AUC = 0.927). In fact, the sum of two FAB subscores together (verbal fluency and Luria motor series) were as good as the total score in differentiating PSP from PD and MSA-P (AUC = 0.957). CONCLUSIONS The FAB may not be a useful tool to differentiate PSP from FTDs, and shows no correlation with disease duration in these disorders. On the other hand, the essential information to differentiate PSP from PD and MSA-P is contained in the sum of only two FAB subscores. This should be taken into consideration in both clinical practice and the planning of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Stamelou
- Department of Neurology, Philipps Universität, Marburg, Germany; Second Department of Neurology, Attikon University Hospital, University of Athens, Greece; Movement Disorders Department, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - J Diehl-Schmid
- Department of Psychiatry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - A Hapfelmeier
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - D Kontaxopoulou
- Second Department of Neurology, Attikon University Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
| | - L Stefanis
- Second Department of Neurology, Attikon University Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
| | - W H Oertel
- Department of Neurology, Philipps Universität, Marburg, Germany
| | - K P Bhatia
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - S G Papageorgiou
- Second Department of Neurology, Attikon University Hospital, University of Athens, Greece; First Department of Neurology, Eginition University General Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
| | - G U Höglinger
- Department of Neurology, Philipps Universität, Marburg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Huston J, Murphy MC, Boeve BF, Fattahi N, Arani A, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Jones DT, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography of frontotemporal dementia. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 43:474-8. [PMID: 26130216 PMCID: PMC4696917 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2015] [Accepted: 06/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the feasibility of utilizing brain stiffness as a potential biomarker for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) patients. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a noninvasive technique for evaluating the mechanical properties of brain tissue in vivo. MRE has demonstrated decreased brain stiffness in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Materials and Methods We examined five male subjects with bvFTD and nine cognitively normal age‐matched male controls (NC) with brain 3T MRE. Stiffness was calculated in nine regions of interest (ROIs): whole brain (entire cerebrum excluding cerebellum), frontal lobes, occipital lobes, parietal lobes, temporal lobes, deep gray matter / white matter (GM/WM; insula, deep gray nuclei and white matter tracts), cerebellum, sensorimotor cortex (pre‐ and postcentral gyri), and a composite region labeled FT (frontal and temporal lobes excluding the pre‐ and postcentral gyri). Results Significantly lower stiffness values were observed in the whole brain (P = 0.007), frontal lobe (P = 0.001), and temporal lobes (P = 0.005) of bvFTD patients compared to NC. No significant stiffness differences were observed in any other ROIs of bvFTD patients compared to NC (P > 0.05). These results demonstrate that statistically significant brain softening occurs in the frontal and temporal lobes of bvFTD patients, which corresponds to the expected pathophysiology of bvFTD. Conclusion Future studies evaluating the feasibility of brain MRE for early disease detection and monitoring disease progression could shed new insights into understanding the mechanisms involved in bvFTD. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:474–478.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Huston
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Matthew C Murphy
- Schools of the Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bradley F Boeve
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nikoo Fattahi
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Arvin Arani
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kevin J Glaser
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Armando Manduca
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - David T Jones
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Richard L Ehman
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hughes LE, Rittman T, Regenthal R, Robbins TW, Rowe JB. Improving response inhibition systems in frontotemporal dementia with citalopram. Brain 2015; 138:1961-75. [PMID: 26001387 PMCID: PMC5412666 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2014] [Accepted: 03/18/2015] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Disinhibition is a cardinal feature of the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia, presenting as impulsive and impetuous behaviours that are often difficult to manage. The options for symptomatic treatments are limited, but a potential target for therapy is the restoration of serotonergic function, which is both deficient in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and closely associated with inhibitory control. Based on preclinical studies and psychopharmacological interventions in other disorders, we predicted that inhibition would be associated with the right inferior frontal gyrus and dependent on serotonin. Using magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography of a Go-NoGo paradigm, we investigated the neural basis of behavioural disinhibition in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and the effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibition on the neural systems for response inhibition. In a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled crossover design study, 12 patients received either a single 30 mg dose of citalopram or placebo. Twenty age-matched healthy controls underwent the same magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography protocol on one session without citalopram, providing normative data for this task. In the control group, successful NoGo trials evoked two established indices of successful response inhibition: the NoGo-N2 and NoGo-P3. Both of these components were significantly attenuated by behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Cortical sources associated with successful inhibition in control subjects were identified in the right inferior frontal gyrus and anterior temporal lobe, which have been strongly associated with behavioural inhibition in imaging and lesion studies. These sources were impaired by behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Critically, citalopram enhanced the NoGo-P3 signal in patients, relative to placebo treatment, and increased the evoked response in the right inferior frontal gyrus. Voxel-based morphometry confirmed significant atrophy of inferior frontal gyrus, alongside insular, orbitofrontal and temporal cortex in our patient cohort. Together, these data suggest that the dysfunctional prefrontal cortical systems underlying response inhibition deficits in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia can be partially restored by increasing serotonergic neurotransmission. The results support a translational neuroscience approach to impulsive neurological disorders and indicate the potential for symptomatic treatment of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia including serotonergic strategies to improve disinhibition.media-1vid110.1093/brain/awv133_video_abstractawv133_video_abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Hughes
- 1 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK 2 Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
| | - Timothy Rittman
- 1 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Ralf Regenthal
- 3 Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Leipzig, Germany
| | - Trevor W Robbins
- 4 Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 5 Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - James B Rowe
- 1 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK 2 Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK 5 Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mahoney CJ, Simpson IJA, Nicholas JM, Fletcher PD, Downey LE, Golden HL, Clark CN, Schmitz N, Rohrer JD, Schott JM, Zhang H, Ourselin S, Warren JD, Fox NC. Longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging in frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol 2015; 77:33-46. [PMID: 25363208 PMCID: PMC4305215 DOI: 10.1002/ana.24296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2014] [Revised: 10/08/2014] [Accepted: 10/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Novel biomarkers for monitoring progression in neurodegenerative conditions are needed. Measurement of microstructural changes in white matter (WM) using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) may be a useful outcome measure. Here we report trajectories of WM change using serial DTI in a cohort with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). METHODS Twenty-three patients with bvFTD (12 having genetic mutations), and 18 age-matched control participants were assessed using DTI and neuropsychological batteries at baseline and ~1.3 years later. Baseline and follow-up DTI scans were registered using a groupwise approach. Annualized rates of change for DTI metrics, neuropsychological measures, and whole brain volume were calculated. DTI metric performances were compared, and sample sizes for potential clinical trials were calculated. RESULTS In the bvFTD group as a whole, rates of change in fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) within the right paracallosal cingulum were greatest (FA: -6.8%/yr, p < 0.001; MD: 2.9%/yr, p = 0.01). MAPT carriers had the greatest change within left uncinate fasciculus (FA: -7.9%/yr, p < 0.001; MD: 10.9%/yr, p < 0.001); sporadic bvFTD and C9ORF72 carriers had the greatest change within right paracallosal cingulum (sporadic bvFTD, FA: -6.7%/yr, p < 0.001; MD: 3.8%/yr, p = 0.001; C9ORF72, FA: -6.8%/yr, p = 0.004). Sample size estimates using FA change were substantially lower than neuropsychological or whole brain measures of change. INTERPRETATION Serial DTI scans may be useful for measuring disease progression in bvFTD, with particular trajectories of WM damage emerging. Sample size calculations suggest that longitudinal DTI may be a useful biomarker in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin J Mahoney
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan D Rohrer
- UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ahmed RM, Paterson RW, Warren JD, Zetterberg H, O'Brien JT, Fox NC, Halliday GM, Schott JM. Biomarkers in dementia: clinical utility and new directions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014; 85:1426-34. [PMID: 25261571 PMCID: PMC4335455 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-307662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2014] [Revised: 08/27/2014] [Accepted: 09/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Imaging, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood-based biomarkers have the potential to improve the accuracy by which specific causes of dementia can be diagnosed in vivo, provide insights into the underlying pathophysiology, and may be used as inclusion criteria and outcome measures for clinical trials. While a number of imaging and CSF biomarkers are currently used for each of these purposes, this is an evolving field, with numerous potential biomarkers in varying stages of research and development. We review the currently available biomarkers for the three most common forms of neurodegenerative dementia, and give an overview of research techniques that may in due course make their way into the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R M Ahmed
- Neuroscience Research Australia and the University of NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - R W Paterson
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - J D Warren
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - H Zetterberg
- Department of Molecular Neuroscience, University College London Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - J T O'Brien
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - N C Fox
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - G M Halliday
- Neuroscience Research Australia and the University of NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - J M Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Menéndez-González M, López-Muñiz A, Vega JA, Salas-Pacheco JM, Arias-Carrión O. MTA index: a simple 2D-method for assessing atrophy of the medial temporal lobe using clinically available neuroimaging. Front Aging Neurosci 2014; 6:23. [PMID: 24715861 PMCID: PMC3970022 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2013] [Accepted: 02/11/2014] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose: Despite a strong correlation to severity of AD pathology, the measurement of medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) is not being widely used in daily clinical practice as a criterion in the diagnosis of prodromal and probable AD. This is mainly because the methods available to date are sophisticated and difficult to implement for routine use in most hospitals—volumetric methods—or lack objectivity—visual rating scales. In this pilot study we aim to describe a new, simple and objective method for measuring the rate of MTA in relation to the global atrophy using clinically available neuroimaging and describe the rationale behind this method. Description: This method consists of calculating a ratio with the area of 3 regions traced manually on one single coronal MRI slide at the level of the interpeduncular fossa: (1) the medial temporal lobe (MTL) region (A); (2) the parenchima within the medial temporal region, that includes the hippocampus and the parahippocampal gyrus—the fimbria taenia and plexus choroideus are excluded—(B); and (3) the body of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle (C). Therefrom we can compute the ratio “Medial Temporal Atrophy index” at both sides as follows: MTAi = (A − B)× 10/C. Conclusions: The MTAi is a simple 2D-method for measuring the relative extent of atrophy in the MTL in relation to the global brain atrophy. This method can be useful for a more accurate diagnosis of AD in routine clinical practice. Further studies are needed to assess the usefulness of MTAi in the diagnosis of early AD, in tracking the progression of AD and in the differential diagnosis of AD with other dementias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Menéndez-González
- Unidad de Neurología, Hospital Álvarez-Buylla Mieres, Spain ; Departamento de Morfología y Biología Celular, Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo, Spain ; Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo, Spain
| | - Alfonso López-Muñiz
- Departamento de Morfología y Biología Celular, Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo, Spain ; Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo, Spain
| | - José A Vega
- Departamento de Morfología y Biología Celular, Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo, Spain
| | - José M Salas-Pacheco
- Instituto de Investigación Científica, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango Durango, México
| | - Oscar Arias-Carrión
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento y Sueño (TMS), Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González/UNAM México DF, Mexico ; Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento y Sueño (TMS), Hospital General Ajusco Medio México DF, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Degnan AJ, Levy LM. Neuroimaging of rapidly progressive dementias, part 1: neurodegenerative etiologies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35:418-23. [PMID: 23436051 PMCID: PMC7964711 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a3454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Most dementias begin insidiously, developing slowly and generally occurring in the elderly age group. The so-called rapidly progressive dementias constitute a different, diverse collection of conditions, many of which are reversible or treatable. For this reason, prompt identification and assessment of acute and subacute forms of dementia are critical to effective treatment. Numerous other entities within this category of presenile rapid-onset dementias are untreatable such as the prion-related diseases. Neuroimaging aids in the diagnosis and evaluation of many of these rapidly progressive dementias, which include myriad conditions ranging from variations of more common neurodegenerative dementias, such as Alzheimer disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and frontotemporal dementia; infectious-related dementias such as acquired immune deficiency syndrome dementia; autoimmune and malignancy-related conditions; to toxic and metabolic forms of encephalopathy. This first of a 2-part review will specifically address the ability of MR imaging and ancillary neuroimaging strategies to support the diagnostic evaluation of rapidly progressive dementias due to neurodegenerative causes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Degnan
- From the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (A.J.D.), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Brettschneider J, Del Tredici K, Irwin DJ, Grossman M, Robinson JL, Toledo JB, Fang L, Van Deerlin VM, Ludolph AC, Lee VMY, Braak H, Trojanowski JQ. Sequential distribution of pTDP-43 pathology in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Acta Neuropathol 2014; 127:423-439. [PMID: 24407427 PMCID: PMC3971993 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-013-1238-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 234] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2013] [Revised: 12/18/2013] [Accepted: 12/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
We examined regional distribution patterns of phosphorylated 43-kDa TAR DNA-binding protein (pTDP-43) intraneuronal inclusions in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Immunohistochemistry was performed on 70 μm sections from FTLD-TDP autopsy cases (n = 39) presenting with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Two main types of cortical pTDP-43 pathology emerged, characterized by either predominantly perikaryal pTDP-43 inclusions (cytoplasmic type, cFTLD) or long aggregates in dendrites (neuritic type, nFTLD). Cortical involvement in nFTLD was extensive and frequently reached occipital areas, whereas cases with cFTLD often involved bulbar somatomotor neurons and the spinal cord. We observed four patterns indicative of potentially sequential dissemination of pTDP-43: cases with the lowest burden of pathology (pattern I) were characterized by widespread pTDP-43 lesions in the orbital gyri, gyrus rectus, and amygdala. With increasing burden of pathology (pattern II) pTDP-43 lesions emerged in the middle frontal and anterior cingulate gyrus as well as in anteromedial temporal lobe areas, the superior and medial temporal gyri, striatum, red nucleus, thalamus, and precerebellar nuclei. More advanced cases showed a third pattern (III) with involvement of the motor cortex, bulbar somatomotor neurons, and the spinal cord anterior horn, whereas cases with the highest burden of pathology (pattern IV) were characterized by pTDP-43 lesions in the visual cortex. We interpret the four neuropathological patterns in bvFTD to be consistent with the hypothesis that pTDP-43 pathology can spread sequentially and may propagate along axonal pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Brettschneider
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease research (CNDR), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3rd Floor Maloney Building, 3600 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kelly Del Tredici
- Clinical Neuroanatomy Section, Department of Neurology, Center for Biomedical research, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - David J Irwin
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease research (CNDR), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3rd Floor Maloney Building, 3600 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Murray Grossman
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3 W Gates, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - John L Robinson
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease research (CNDR), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3rd Floor Maloney Building, 3600 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jon B Toledo
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease research (CNDR), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3rd Floor Maloney Building, 3600 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Lubin Fang
- Clinical Neuroanatomy Section, Department of Neurology, Center for Biomedical research, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Vivianna M Van Deerlin
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease research (CNDR), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3rd Floor Maloney Building, 3600 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Albert C Ludolph
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Virginia M-Y Lee
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease research (CNDR), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3rd Floor Maloney Building, 3600 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Heiko Braak
- Clinical Neuroanatomy Section, Department of Neurology, Center for Biomedical research, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - John Q Trojanowski
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease research (CNDR), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3rd Floor Maloney Building, 3600 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kopp B, Rösser N, Tabeling S, Stürenburg HJ, de Haan B, Karnath HO, Wessel K. Performance on the Frontal Assessment Battery is sensitive to frontal lobe damage in stroke patients. BMC Neurol 2013; 13:179. [PMID: 24237624 PMCID: PMC4225667 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2013] [Accepted: 10/30/2013] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) is a brief battery of six neuropsychological tasks designed to assess frontal lobe function at bedside [Neurology 55:1621-1626, 2000]. The six FAB tasks explore cognitive and behavioral domains that are thought to be under the control of the frontal lobes, most notably conceptualization and abstract reasoning, lexical verbal fluency and mental flexibility, motor programming and executive control of action, self-regulation and resistance to interference, inhibitory control, and environmental autonomy. Methods We examined the sensitivity of performance on the FAB to frontal lobe damage in right-hemisphere-damaged first-ever stroke patients based on voxel-based lesion-behavior mapping. Results Voxel-based lesion-behavior mapping of FAB performance revealed that the integrity of the right anterior insula (BA13) is crucial for the FAB global composite score, for the FAB conceptualization score, as well as for the FAB inhibitory control score. Furthermore, the FAB conceptualization and mental flexibility scores were sensitive to damage of the right middle frontal gyrus (MFG; BA9). Finally, the FAB inhibitory control score was sensitive to damage of the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG; BA44/45). Conclusions These findings indicate that several FAB scores (including composite and item scores) provide valid measures of right hemispheric lateral frontal lobe dysfunction, specifically of focal lesions near the anterior insula, in the MFG and in the IFG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Kopp
- Cognitive Neurology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Salzdahlumer Str, 90, Braunschweig 38126, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tan KS, Libon DJ, Rascovsky K, Grossman M, Xie SX. Differential longitudinal decline on the Mini-Mental State Examination in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2013; 27:310-5. [PMID: 23314064 PMCID: PMC3648632 DOI: 10.1097/wad.0b013e31827bdc6f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine how phenotype affects longitudinal decline on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and Alzheimer disease (AD). BACKGROUND The MMSE is the most commonly administered assessment for dementia severity; however, the effects of phenotype on longitudinal MMSE performance in FTLD and AD have not been extensively studied. METHODS Data from 185 patients diagnosed with AD (n=106) and 3 FTLD (n=79) phenotypes [behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), nonfluent agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfaPPA), and semantic variant PPA (svPPA)] were collected for up to 52 months since initial evaluation. RESULTS Differential rates of decline were noted in that MMSE scores declined more precipitously for AD and svPPA compared with bvFTD and nfaPPA patients (P=0.001). The absolute 4-year MMSE decline given median baseline MMSE for bvFTD [14.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 14.63-14.71] and nfaPPA (11.02; 95% CI, 10.98-11.06) were lower than svPPA (22.32; 95% CI, 22.29-22.34) or AD (22.24; 95% CI, 22.22-22.26). CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that within-group AD and FTLD phenotypes present distinct patterns of longitudinal decline on the MMSE. MMSE may not be adequately sensitive to track disease progression in some phenotypes of FTLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay-See Tan
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - David J. Libon
- Department of Neurology, Drexel University College of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Katya Rascovsky
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Murray Grossman
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Sharon X. Xie
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sukkar R, Katz E, Zhang Y, Raunig D, Wyman BT. Disease progression modeling using Hidden Markov Models. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2013; 2012:2845-8. [PMID: 23366517 DOI: 10.1109/embc.2012.6346556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The development of novel treatments for many slowly progressing diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), is dependent on the ability to monitor and detect changes in disease progression. In some diseases the distinct clinical stages of the disease progress far too slowly to enable a quick evaluation of the efficacy of a given proposed treatment. To help improve the assessment of disease progression, we propose using Hidden Markov Models (HMM's) to model, in a more granular fashion, disease progression as compared to the clinical stages of the disease. Unlike many other applications of Hidden Markov Models, we train our HMM in an unsupervised way and then evaluate how effective the model is at uncovering underlying statistical patterns in disease progression by considering HMM states as disease stages. In this study, we focus on AD and show that our model, when evaluated on the cross validation data, can identify more granular disease stages than the three currently accepted clinical stages of "Normal", "MCI" (Mild Cognitive Impairment), and "AD".
Collapse
|
38
|
Kim EJ, Kim BC, Kim SJ, Jung DS, Sin JS, Yoon YJ, Chin J, Lee KH, Na DL. Clinical staging of semantic dementia in an FDG-PET study using FTLD-CDR. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2013. [PMID: 23208196 DOI: 10.1159/000345506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The frontotemporal lobar degeneration-specific clinical dementia rating (FTLD-CDR), which was recently developed to measure frontotemporal dementia (FTD) severity, includes 2 items that assess language and behavior in addition to the 6 items of the conventional CDR. METHODS To investigate which of the 3 ratings, i.e. the global score of the CDR (GCDR), the behavioral domain score of the FTLD-CDR (BCDR), or the language domain score of the FTLD-CDR (LCDR), is most suitable for monitoring the progression of semantic dementia (SD), the number of hypometabolic voxels was calculated by comparing 28 SD patients in each stage of the 3 ratings with 63 age/sex-matched controls using voxel-based statistical parametric mapping. RESULTS The hypometabolic areas increased as a function of the LCDR score in SD patients. However, hypometabolic areas associated with the GCDR did not increase gradually as the stage increased. Furthermore, those associated with the BCDR showed the reverse pattern. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that the severity and patterning of glucose hypometabolism measured by the LCDR correspond well with the natural course of SD reported in previous clinical and neuroimaging studies, whereas the BCDR and GCDR did not reflect disease progression in SD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun-Joo Kim
- Department of Neurology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Busan, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hughes LE, Rowe JB. The impact of neurodegeneration on network connectivity: a study of change detection in frontotemporal dementia. J Cogn Neurosci 2013; 25:802-13. [PMID: 23469882 PMCID: PMC3708294 DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
The neural response to unpredictable auditory events is suggested to depend on frontotemporal interactions. We used magnetoencephalography in patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia to study change detection and to examine the impact of disease on macroscopic network connectivity underlying this core cognitive function. In patients, the amplitudes of auditory cortical responses to predictable standard tones were normal but were reduced for unpredictable deviant tones. Network connectivity, in terms of coherence among frontal, temporal, and parietal sources, was also abnormal in patients. In the beta frequency range, left frontotemporal coherence was reduced. In the gamma frequency range, frontal interhemispheric coherence was reduced whereas parietal interhemispheric coherence was enhanced. These results suggest impaired change detection resulting from dysfunctional frontotemporal interactions. They also provide evidence of a rostro-caudal reorganization of brain networks in disease. The sensitivity of magnetoencephalography to cortical network changes in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia enriches the understanding of neurocognitive systems as well as showing potential for studies of experimental therapies for neurodegenerative disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Hughes
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hales CM, Hu WT. From frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathology to frontotemporal lobar degeneration biomarkers. Int Rev Psychiatry 2013; 25:210-20. [PMID: 23611350 DOI: 10.3109/09540261.2013.776522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is an increasingly recognized cause of dementia. This review discusses the different FTD clinical syndromes and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) pathological correlates as well as new genetic and proteomic findings that have added to our understanding of FTLD pathogenesis. Various diagnostic modalities including the use of biomarkers will also be addressed. Finally we will highlight future directions in the FTD field. More research is needed to elucidate the cellular mechanisms of neurodegeneration in FTLD and improve clinical diagnostic capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chadwick M Hales
- Department of Neurology, Emory Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
The advantages of frontotemporal degeneration drug development (part 2 of frontotemporal degeneration: the next therapeutic frontier). Alzheimers Dement 2012; 9:189-98. [PMID: 23062850 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2012] [Accepted: 03/07/2012] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) encompasses a spectrum of related neurodegenerative disorders with behavioral, language, and motor phenotypes for which there are currently no effective therapies. This is the second of two articles that summarize the presentations and discussions that occurred at two symposia in 2011 sponsored by the Frontotemporal Degeneration Treatment Study Group, a collaborative group of academic and industry researchers that is devoted to developing treatments for FTD. This article discusses the current status of FTD clinical research that is relevant to the conduct of clinical trials, and why FTD research may be an attractive pathway for developing therapies for neurodegenerative disorders. The clinical and molecular features of FTD, including rapid disease progression and relatively pure molecular pathology, suggest that there are advantages to developing drugs for FTD as compared with other dementias. FTD qualifies as orphan indication, providing additional advantages for drug development. Two recent sets of consensus diagnostic criteria will facilitate the identification of patients with FTD, and a variety of neuropsychological, functional, and behavioral scales have been shown to be sensitive to disease progression. Moreover, quantitative neuroimaging measurements demonstrate progressive brain atrophy in FTD at rates that may surpass Alzheimer's disease. Finally, the similarities between FTD and other neurodegenerative diseases with drug development efforts already underway suggest that FTD researchers will be able to draw on this experience to create a road map for FTD drug development. We conclude that FTD research has reached sufficient maturity to pursue clinical development of specific FTD therapies.
Collapse
|
42
|
Mahoney CJ, Downey LE, Ridgway GR, Beck J, Clegg S, Blair M, Finnegan S, Leung KK, Yeatman T, Golden H, Mead S, Rohrer JD, Fox NC, Warren JD. Longitudinal neuroimaging and neuropsychological profiles of frontotemporal dementia with C9ORF72 expansions. Alzheimers Res Ther 2012; 4:41. [PMID: 23006986 PMCID: PMC3580398 DOI: 10.1186/alzrt144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2012] [Revised: 08/21/2012] [Accepted: 08/31/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a common cause of early-onset dementia with a significant genetic component, as underlined by the recent identification of repeat expansions in the gene C9ORF72 as a major cause of FTD and motor neuron disease. Understanding the neurobiology and clinical phenomenology of this novel mutation is currently a major research focus. However, few data are available concerning the longitudinal evolution of this genetic disease. Here we present longitudinal neuropsychological and neuroimaging data on a cohort of patients with pathological repeat expansions in C9ORF72. METHODS Following a review of the University College London FTD DNA database, 20 cases were retrospectively identified with a C9ORF72 expansion. Twelve cases had longitudinal neuropsychology data available and six of these cases also had longitudinal volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging. Cortical and subcortical volumes were extracted using FreeSurfer. Rates of whole brain, hemispheric, cerebellar and ventricular change were calculated for each subject. Nonlinear fluid registration of follow-up to baseline scan was performed to visualise longitudinal intra-subject patterns of brain atrophy and ventricular expansion. RESULTS Patients had low average verbal and performance IQ at baseline that became impaired (< 5th percentile) at follow-up. In particular, visual memory, naming and dominant parietal skills all showed deterioration. Mean rates of whole brain atrophy (1.4%/year) and ventricular expansion (3.2 ml/year) were substantially greater in patients with the C9ORF72 mutation than in healthy controls; atrophy was symmetrical between the cerebral hemispheres within the C9ORF72 mutation group. The thalamus and cerebellum showed significant atrophy whereas no cortical areas were preferentially affected. Longitudinal fluid imaging in individual patients demonstrated heterogeneous patterns of progressive volume loss; however, ventricular expansion and cerebellar volume loss were consistent findings. CONCLUSION Disease evolution in C9ORF72-associated FTD is linked neuropsychologically with increasing involvement of parietal and amnestic functions, and neuroanatomically with rather diffuse and variable cortical and central atrophy but more consistent involvement of the cerebellum and thalamus. These longitudinal profiles are consistent with disease spread within a distributed subcortical network and demonstrate the feasibility of longitudinal biomarkers for tracking the evolution of the C9ORF72 mutation phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin J Mahoney
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Laura E Downey
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Gerard R Ridgway
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Jon Beck
- MRC Prion Unit, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Shona Clegg
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Melanie Blair
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Sarah Finnegan
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Kelvin K Leung
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Tom Yeatman
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Hannah Golden
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Simon Mead
- MRC Prion Unit, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Nick C Fox
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Jason D Warren
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rohrer JD, Clarkson MJ, Kittus R, Rossor MN, Ourselin S, Warren JD, Fox NC. Rates of hemispheric and lobar atrophy in the language variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Alzheimers Dis 2012; 30:407-11. [PMID: 22406442 DOI: 10.3233/jad-2012-111556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a neurodegenerative disorder which presents with either behavioral or language impairment. The two language syndromes are known as progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA) and semantic dementia (SEMD). While cross-sectional imaging patterns of brain atrophy are well-described in FTLD, fewer studies have investigated longitudinal imaging changes. We measured longitudinal hemispheric and lobar atrophy rates using serial MRI in a cohort of 18 patients with PNFA and 17 patients with SEMD as well as 14 cognitively-normal control subjects. We subsequently calculated sample size estimates for clinical trials. Rates of left hemisphere atrophy were greater than rates of right hemisphere atrophy in both PNFA and SEMD with no significant differences between the groups. The disease groups showed asymmetrical atrophy (more severe on the left) at baseline with significantly increasing asymmetry over time. Within a hemisphere, the fastest rate of atrophy varied between lobes: in SEMD temporal > frontal > parietal > occipital, while in PNFA frontal > temporal/parietal > occipital. In SEMD, using temporal lobe measures of atrophy in clinical trials would provide the lowest sample sizes necessary, while in PNFA left hemisphere atrophy measures provided the lowest sample size. These patterns provide information about disease evolution in the FTLD language variants that is of both clinical and neurobiological relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Filippi M, Agosta F, Barkhof F, Dubois B, Fox NC, Frisoni GB, Jack CR, Johannsen P, Miller BL, Nestor PJ, Scheltens P, Sorbi S, Teipel S, Thompson PM, Wahlund LO. EFNS task force: the use of neuroimaging in the diagnosis of dementia. Eur J Neurol 2012; 19:e131-40, 1487-501. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03859.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2012] [Accepted: 07/18/2012] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit; Division of Neuroscience; Institute of Experimental Neurology; San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University; Milan Italy
| | - F. Agosta
- Neuroimaging Research Unit; Division of Neuroscience; Institute of Experimental Neurology; San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University; Milan Italy
| | - F. Barkhof
- Department of Radiology; VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - B. Dubois
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière; Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Paris France
| | - N. C. Fox
- Dementia Research Centre; Institute of Neurology; University College London; London UK
| | - G. B. Frisoni
- IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli di Brescia; Brescia Italy
| | - C. R. Jack
- Department of Radiology; Mayo Clinic and Foundation; Rochester MN USA
| | - P. Johannsen
- Memory Clinic; Rigshospitalet; Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - B. L. Miller
- Memory and Aging Center; University of California; San Francisco CA USA
| | - P. J. Nestor
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - P. Scheltens
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center; VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - S. Sorbi
- Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Careggi; Florence Italy
| | - S. Teipel
- Department of Psychiatry; University of Rostock, and German Center for Neuro-degenerative Diseases (DZNE); Rostock Germany
| | - P. M. Thompson
- Department of Neurology; David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA USA
| | - L.-O. Wahlund
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics; Department of Neurobiology; Karolinska Institute; Stockholm Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Woollams AM. Apples are not the only fruit: the effects of concept typicality on semantic representation in the anterior temporal lobe. Front Hum Neurosci 2012; 6:85. [PMID: 22529789 PMCID: PMC3328795 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2012] [Accepted: 03/25/2012] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Intuitively, an apple seems a fairly good example of a fruit, whereas an avocado seems less so. The extent to which an exemplar is representative of its category, referred to here as concept typicality, has long been thought to be a key dimension determining semantic representation. Concept typicality is, however, correlated with a number of other variables, in particular age of acquisition (AoA) and name frequency. Consideration of picture naming accuracy from a large case-series of semantic dementia (SD) patients demonstrated strong effects of concept typicality that were maximal in the moderately impaired patients, over and above the impact of AoA and name frequency. Induction of a temporary virtual lesion to the left anterior temporal lobe, the region most commonly affected in SD, via repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation produced an enhanced effect of concept typicality in the picture naming of normal participants, but did not affect the magnitude of the AoA or name frequency effects. These results indicate that concept typicality exerts its influence on semantic representations themselves, as opposed to the strength of connections outside the semantic system. To date, there has been little direct exploration of the dimension of concept typicality within connectionist models of intact and impaired conceptual representation, and these findings provide a target for future computational simulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M. Woollams
- Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit, School of Psychological Sciences, University of ManchesterManchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Woollams AM. Apples are not the only fruit: the effects of concept typicality on semantic representation in the anterior temporal lobe. Front Hum Neurosci 2012. [PMID: 22529789 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Intuitively, an apple seems a fairly good example of a fruit, whereas an avocado seems less so. The extent to which an exemplar is representative of its category, referred to here as concept typicality, has long been thought to be a key dimension determining semantic representation. Concept typicality is, however, correlated with a number of other variables, in particular age of acquisition (AoA) and name frequency. Consideration of picture naming accuracy from a large case-series of semantic dementia (SD) patients demonstrated strong effects of concept typicality that were maximal in the moderately impaired patients, over and above the impact of AoA and name frequency. Induction of a temporary virtual lesion to the left anterior temporal lobe, the region most commonly affected in SD, via repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation produced an enhanced effect of concept typicality in the picture naming of normal participants, but did not affect the magnitude of the AoA or name frequency effects. These results indicate that concept typicality exerts its influence on semantic representations themselves, as opposed to the strength of connections outside the semantic system. To date, there has been little direct exploration of the dimension of concept typicality within connectionist models of intact and impaired conceptual representation, and these findings provide a target for future computational simulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M Woollams
- Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hu WT, Trojanowski JQ, Shaw LM. Biomarkers in frontotemporal lobar degenerations--progress and challenges. Prog Neurobiol 2011; 95:636-48. [PMID: 21554923 PMCID: PMC3173583 DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2010] [Revised: 04/19/2011] [Accepted: 04/22/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Neuronal and glial changes associated with tau, TAR DNA binding protein of ∼43 kDa (TDP-43), and fused in sarcoma (FUS) together constitute the pathologic spectrum of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Most patients with FTLD present with prominent behavior or language changes, sometimes accompanied by extrapyramidal symptoms or motor neuron disease. Identification of FTLD patients with mutations in genes for tau, TDP-43, and FUS lends strong support for their pathogenic roles in FTLD, and elucidation of their dysfunction will pave the way for development of substrate specific therapy. However, there remains no reliable biomarker for early detection of FTLD or prediction of underlying FTLD pathologic change. Clinical syndromes usually reflects the earliest affected brain regions where atrophy can be visualized on structural MRI, but neither clinical nor structural imaging-based biomarkers has been accurately correlated with underlying pathology on the individual patient level. Biochemical markers in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have also been investigated in FTLD and related disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). However, their accuracy and pathologic significance need to be confirmed in future multi-center studies. Here we review the progress made in FTLD biomarkers, including clinical phenotype/feature characterization, neuropsychological analysis, CSF and plasma analytes, and patterns of brain atrophy and network dysfunction detectable on brain imaging. Given the pathologic overlap of FTLD with ALS and PSP, collaboration with specialists in those fields will be essential in the translation of promising FTLD biomarkers into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William T Hu
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dickerson BC. Quantitating severity and progression in primary progressive aphasia. J Mol Neurosci 2011; 45:618-28. [PMID: 21573887 PMCID: PMC3208065 DOI: 10.1007/s12031-011-9534-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2011] [Accepted: 04/25/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is an insidiously progressive clinical syndrome that includes at its core an impairment in language. From a clinical perspective, there are a variety of diagnostic challenges; international consensus has only recently been reached on the nomenclature for specific clinical subtypes. There are at present no established treatments, and efforts to develop treatments have been hampered by the lack of standardized methods to monitor progression of the illness. This is further complicated by the multiplicity of underlying neuropathologies. Although measures developed from work with stroke aphasia and from work with disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia have provided a valuable foundation for monitoring progression, PPA presents unique challenges to clinicians aiming to quantify impairments for the purposes of full characterization and monitoring, and ultimately with the goal of designing clinical trials of interventions to make a meaningful difference in patients' lives. In this review, I will summarize the main points made in my presentation at the 2010 International Conference on Frontotemporal Dementia, expand from there to summarize our current approach to monitoring progression of PPA, and finally will outline some ideas about goals for the development of better tools for this purpose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradford C Dickerson
- Frontotemporal Dementia Unit, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Semantic dementia (SD) is a unique syndrome in the frontotemporal lobar degeneration spectrum. Typically presenting as a progressive, fluent anomic aphasia, SD is the paradigmatic disorder of semantic memory with a characteristic anatomical profile of asymmetric, selective antero-inferior temporal lobe atrophy. Histopathologically, most cases show a specific pattern of abnormal deposition of protein TDP-43. This relatively close clinical, anatomical and pathological correspondence suggests SD as a promising target for future therapeutic trials. Here, we discuss outstanding nosological and neurobiological challenges posed by the syndrome and propose a pathophysiological model of SD based on sequential, regionally determined disintegration of a vulnerable neural network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip D. Fletcher
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG UK
| | - Jason D. Warren
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hughes LE, Nestor PJ, Hodges JR, Rowe JB. Magnetoencephalography of frontotemporal dementia: spatiotemporally localized changes during semantic decisions. Brain 2011; 134:2513-22. [PMID: 21840892 PMCID: PMC3170535 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awr196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia is a neurodegenerative disorder with dysfunction and atrophy of the frontal lobes leading to changes in personality, behaviour, empathy, social conduct and insight, with relative preservation of language and memory. As novel treatments begin to emerge, biomarkers of frontotemporal dementia will become increasingly important, including functionally relevant neuroimaging indices of the neurophysiological basis of cognition. We used magnetoencephalography to examine behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia using a semantic decision task that elicits both frontal and temporal activity in healthy people. Twelve patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (age 50-75) and 16 matched controls made categorical semantic judgements about 400 pictures during continuous magnetoencephalography. Distributed source analysis was used to compare patients and controls. The patients had normal early responses to picture confrontation, indicating intact visual processing. However, a predominantly posterior set of regions including temporoparietal cortex showed reduced source activity 250-310 ms after stimulus onset, in proportion to behavioural measures of semantic association. In contrast, a left frontoparietal network showed reduced source activity at 550-650 ms, proportional to patients' deficits in attention and orientation. This late deficit probably reflects impairment in the neural substrate of goal-oriented decision making. The results demonstrate behaviourally relevant neural correlates of semantic processing and decision making in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, and show for the first time that magnetoencephalography can be used to study cognitive systems in the context of frontotemporal dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Hughes
- MRC-Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|