A phase II study of i.v. methylprednisolone in secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis

Failed, Interrupted, or Inconclusive Trials on Immunomodulatory Treatment Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis: Update 2015-2020

In the past decades, multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment has experienced vast changes resulting from major advances in disease-modifying therapies (DMT). Looking at the overall number of studies, investigations with therapeutic advantages and encouraging results are exceeded by studies of promising compounds that failed due to either negative or inconclusive results or have been interrupted for other reasons. Importantly, these failed clinical trials are informative experiments that can help us to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying MS. In several trials, concepts taken from experimental models were not translatable to humans, although they did not lack a well-considered pathophysiological rationale. The lessons learned from these discrepancies may benefit future studies and reduce the risks for patients. This review summarizes trials on MS since 2015 that have either failed or have been interrupted for various reasons. We identify potential causes of failure or inconclusiveness, looking at the path from basic animal experiments to clinical trials, and discuss the implications for our current view on MS pathogenesis, clinical practice, and future study designs. We focus on anti-inflammatory treatment strategies, without including studies on already approved and effective DMT. Clinical trials addressing neuroprotective and alternative treatment strategies are presented in a separate article.

Re-examining the effects of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Background/objective: Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) is previously given to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) patients. This study aimed to re-examine the effects of IVMP in SPMS. Materials & methods: Major electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. Results: Four randomized controlled trials were included. IVMP may be inferior to mitoxantrone (MTX) in terms of expanded disability status scale (EDSS) improvement. There was no significant difference in terms of EDSS reduction and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plaque reduction when IVMP + MTX were compared with MTX. There is no significant difference between IVMP and cyclophosphamide based on EDSS progression and relapse reduction. Conclusion: IVMP should not be routinely used as treatment for SPMS and is not recommended as an alternative treatment for SPMS.

Long term effects of corticosteroids in multiple sclerosis in terms of the "no evidence of disease activity" (NEDA) domains

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that usually is clinically characterized by multiple subacute relapses and remissions. The established therapeutic strategies include intravenous methylprednisolone (IV-MP) for treatment of relapses and immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatment to prevent new relapses and progression of disability. Despite not being one of the recommended immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatments, monthly IV-MP is frequently seen in clinical practice especially in the low income developing countries.

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidences for the possible disease modifying potential of corticosteroids in the treatment of MS in terms of the NEDA 3 domains.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Available literature from PubMed search and personal experiences on corticosteroid treatment in multiple sclerosis were reviewed.

RESULTS

There is some evidence that pulsed treatment with methylprednisolone have beneficial long-term effects on relapse rate, MRI findings and disability progression.

CONCLUSION

More data is needed to determine long-term disease modifying effects of corticosteroids. The findings of this study suggest that, perhaps, regular pulse glucocorticoid treatment may have important long-term consequences (beneficial) for patients with MS and it may achieve the NEDA target. Certainly, the magnitude of the reported effects deserves further investigation in both relapsing and progressive MS populations.

A narrative review of psoriasis and multiple sclerosis: links and risks

The association of psoriasis (PsO) with other autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases has long been a topic of interest. Although previous studies have attempted to clarify the specific relationship between PsO and multiple sclerosis (MS), it remains obscure, with limited and conflicting evidence regarding a link between the two entities. Herein, we review the etiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of each disease and present the available literature to-date regarding a possible relationship between PsO and MS. We conclude that further study is necessary to discern whether there may be a significant relationship between PsO and MS. In the meantime, clinicians may find it appropriate to screen for MS in patients with PsO, allowing for timely referral to a neurologist should it be necessary.

Comparison between high-dose and low-dose intravenous methylprednisolone therapy in patients with brain necrosis after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy is the standard radical treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and may cause radiation-induced brain necrosis (RN). Intravenous steroids have been considered as an effective treatment for RN. However, evidence concerning the efficacy of different doses of intravenous steroid therapy remains insufficient to establish the optimal regimen for NPC patients with RN.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts of 169 patients who were diagnosed with RN after radiotherapy for NPC, treated with low-dose or high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) and followed up for 12 months. We collected the clinical data, including the Late Effects of Normal Tissue (LENT)/Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA) scales score and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed pre- and post-treatment to define the radiographic response.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the treatment response based on MRI, or changes in clinical symptoms and cognitive function between low and high-dose groups. Thirty of 93 low-dose patients (32.3%) and 21 of 76 high-dose patients (27.6%) presented effective response in MRI, with no significant differences between groups (P = 0.515). Neither group showed a significant difference in the effective rate based on the MoCA total score and LENT/SOMA score. The most commonly reported grade 3 adverse events in the high-dose group (n = 76) were infections and infestations (3 [3.9%] vs. none for low-dose group).

CONCLUSIONS

We found low-dose IVMP was not inferior to high-dose IVMP for NPC patients with RN. In addition, treatment-related infections and infestations were likewise more common with high-dose steroid than low-dose steroid.

Monthly Pulse Methylprednisolone Therapy is Effective in Preventing Permanent Disease Progression in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Introduction

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is the phase in which disability continues to worsen with or without accompanying attacks. Monthly methylprednisolone pulse therapy can be used in the secondary progressive phase. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of methylprednisolone pulse therapy on the basis of clinical and MRI parameters in patients with SPMS.

Methods

This was a multi-center, examiner-blinded, prospective study. Patients with SPMS with EDSS scores of 3 or more, using one or none of azathioprine, interferon or glatiramer acetate, were evaluated. Patients were given IVMP (1 dose of 1 g IV) once a month for 24 months. EDSS scores, MRI findings, quality of life, and adverse events were evaluated.

Results

Ninety-seven SPMS patients were included in the study. Significant decreases in new/enlarging, Gd-enhanced, and spinal lesions were observed from baseline to year 2. EDSS scores remained stable at the end of the second year. Monthly high-dose IVMP resulted in a significant decrease in attacks.

Conclusion

This study is important in terms of emphasizing that this therapeutic option should not be overlooked, since monthly pulse therapy can halt or even reverse progression, regarded as a natural course in SPMS, albeit to a small extent.

Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Many therapeutic advances for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) have occurred in the past 25 years. Although similar advances in disease-modifying therapies have not been realized in progressive MS, many symptomatic therapeutic strategies can benefit patients with progressive MS. Few guidelines exist for management of patients with progressive MS.

RECENT FINDINGS

The classification of progressive MS was revised in 2013 to include a description of inflammatory disease activity determined by clinical relapses or imaging findings. Developing knowledge about the pathogenesis of progressive MS and the role of comorbidities in modifying the disease course has implications for the clinical management of patients with progressive MS as well as for clinical trial design. Current and upcoming clinical trials will assess a wide range of interventions, including immunomodulatory agents, putative neuroprotective molecules, stem cell therapy, nutrition, and rehabilitation techniques.

SUMMARY

None of the therapies currently approved for use in relapsing-remitting MS have been shown to slow the gradual progression of disability that occurs in the absence of recent relapses or changes in MRI. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to address the many symptoms that impact quality of life for patients with progressive MS.

Neurotherapeutic Strategies for Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common disabling neurologic disease of young adults. There are now 16 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved disease-modifying therapies for MS as well as a cohort of other agents commonly used in practice when conventional therapies prove inadequate. This article discusses approved FDA therapies as well as commonly used practice-based therapies for MS, as well as those therapies that can be used in patients attempting to become pregnant, or in patients with an established pregnancy, who require concomitant treatment secondary to recalcitrant disease activity.

Double-Blind Controlled Randomized Trial of Cyclophosphamide versus Methylprednisolone in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic options are limited in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Open-label studies suggested efficacy of monthly IV cyclophosphamide (CPM) without induction for delaying progression but no randomized trial was conducted so far.

OBJECTIVE

To compare CPM to methylprednisolone (MP) in SPMS.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind clinical trial on two parallel groups. Patient with SPMS, with a documented worsening of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score during the last year and an EDSS score between 4·0 and 6·5 were recruited and received one intravenous infusion of treatment (CPM: 750 mg /m2 body surface area-MP: 1g) every four weeks for one year, and every eight weeks for the second year. The primary endpoint was the time to EDSS deterioration, when confirmed sixteen weeks later, analyzed using a Cox model.

RESULTS

Due to recruitment difficulties, the study was terminated prematurely after 138 patients were included (CPM, n = 72; MP, n = 66). In the CPM group, 33 patients stopped treatment prematurely, mainly due to tolerability, compared with 22 in the MP group. Primary endpoint: the hazard ratio for EDSS deterioration in the CPM in comparison with the MP group was 0.61 [95% CI: 0·31-1·22](p = 0·16). According to the secondary multistate model analysis, patients in the CPM group were 2.2 times more likely ([1·14-4.29]; p = 0.02) to discontinue treatment than those in the MP group and 2.7 times less likely (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.17-0.84; p = 0.02) to experience disability progression when they did not stop treatment prematurely. Safety profile was as expected.

CONCLUSION

Although the primary end-point was negative, secondary analysis suggested that CPM decreases the risk of progression in SPMS, but its use may be limited by low tolerability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00241254.

Targeted delivery of glucocorticoids to macrophages in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis using inorganic-organic hybrid nanoparticles

Glucocorticoids (GC) are widely used to treat acute relapses in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, but their application is accompanied by side effects due to their broad spectrum of action. Here, we report on the therapeutic option to apply GC via inorganic-organic hybrid nanoparticles (IOH-NP) with the composition [ZrO]²⁺[(BMP)_0.9(FMN)_0.1]^2- (designated BMP-NP with BMP: betamethasone phosphate; FMN: flavinmononucleotide). We found that these BMP-NP have an increased cell type-specificity compared to free GC while retaining full therapeutic efficacy in a mouse model of MS. BMP-NP were preferentially taken up by phagocytic cells and modulated macrophages in vivo more efficiently than T cells. When GC were applied in the form of BMP-NP, treatment of neuroinflammatory disease in mice exclusively depended on the control of macrophage function whereas effects on T cells and brain endothelial cells were dispensable for therapeutic efficacy. Importantly, BMP-NP were not only active in mice but also showed strong activity towards monocytes isolated from healthy human volunteers. We conclude that application of GC via IOH-NP has the potential to improve MS therapy in the future.

Disease-modifying therapies and infectious risks in multiple sclerosis

Immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) are associated with an increased risk of infection, which makes treatment of this condition challenging in daily clinical practice. Use of the expanding range of available drugs to treat MS requires extensive knowledge of treatment-associated infections, risk-minimizing strategies and approaches to monitoring and treatment of such adverse events. An interdisciplinary approach to evaluate the infectious events associated with available MS treatments has become increasingly relevant. In addition, individual stratification of treatment-related infectious risks is necessary when choosing therapies for patients with MS, as well as during and after therapy. Determination of the individual risk of infection following serial administration of different immunotherapies is also crucial. Here, we review the modes of action of the available MS drugs, and relate this information to the current knowledge of drug-specific infectious risks and risk-minimizing strategies.

Evaluating the Role of Corticosteroid Pulse Therapy in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Receiving Mitoxantrone: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Background:

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a central nervous system disorder with periods of recurrence and recovery. Mitoxantrone has been approved for secondary progressive MS (SPMS) treatment but data lacks the role of corticosteroid pulse therapy in SPMS.

Objectives:

To evaluate the role of corticosteroid pulse therapy in patients with SPMS receiving mitoxantrone.

Patients and Methods:

A double blind randomized controlled clinical trial was performed on 71 patients with SPMS referred to Shahid Sadoughi Hospital (Yazd, Iran) for receiving mitoxantrone in two groups. The first group (35 patients) received 20 mg mitoxantrone plus 500 mg methylprednisolone monthly for six months. The second group (36 patients) received the same dosage of mitoxantrone plus 100 CC of 5% dextrose water monthly for six months. Expanded disability status scale (EDSS), MRI plaques in both groups before and after the treatment completion and six months after the end of trial were compared together.

Results:

28 men and 43 women enrolled in the study. MRI plaques number reduced in groups significantly (2.29 vs. 2.17) without significant difference between the groups (P = 0.782). Six months after trial completion, plaques number increased in groups without significantly difference (0.72 vs. 0.77, P = 0.611). The mean value of EDSS showed significant reduction at the end of treatment in groups (0.79 and 0.53) without significant difference between the groups (P = 0.953). Six months after trial completion, EDSS increased in groups without significant difference (0.35 vs. 0.43, P = 0.624).

Conclusions:

Corticosteroid pulse therapy in SPMS was effective in inflammatory process, but could not postpone or decline the neurodegenerative process and besides the imposing side effects could not result in significant improvement in EDSS and MRI plaques number in long term.

Monthly oral methylprednisolone pulse treatment in progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

There is a large unmet need for treatments for patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Phase 2 studies with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker outcomes may be well suited for the initial evaluation of efficacious treatments.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of monthly oral methylprednisolone pulse treatment on intrathecal inflammation in progressive MS.

METHODS

In this open-label phase 2A study, 15 primary progressive and 15 secondary progressive MS patients received oral methylprednisolone pulse treatment for 60 weeks. Primary outcome was changes in CSF concentrations of osteopontin. Secondary outcomes were other CSF biomarkers of inflammation, axonal damage and demyelination; clinical scores; magnetic resonance imaging measures of disease activity, magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); motor evoked potentials; and bone density scans.

RESULTS

We found no change in the CSF concentration of osteopontin, but we observed significant improvement in clinical scores, MTR, DTI and some secondary CSF outcome measures. Adverse events were well-known side effects to methylprednisolone.

CONCLUSION

Monthly methylprednisolone pulse treatment was safe, but had no effect on the primary outcome. However, improvements in secondary clinical and MRI outcome measures suggest that this treatment regimen may have a beneficial effect in progressive MS.

[Immunotherapy and infectious issues in multiple sclerosis. Self-injectable and oral drugs for immunotherapy]

Immunotherapy is generally associated with an increased risk for the development of infections. Due to the continuously expanding spectrum of new and potent immunotherapy treatment options for multiple sclerosis (MS), this article describes the currently known risks for treatment-related infections and the current recommendations for prevention of corresponding problems with drugs used in treatment strategies for MS and their mechanisms of action. The new treatment options in particular are linked to specific and severe infections; therefore, intensive and long-lasting monitoring is required before, during and after treatment and multidisciplinary surveillance of patients is needed. This article gives a detailed review of drug-specific red flags and current recommendations for the prophylaxis of infections associated with treatment of relapsing-remitting MS and when using self-injectable and oral disease-modifying immunotherapeutic drugs.

Clinical trials in progressive multiple sclerosis: lessons learned and future perspectives

Progressive multiple sclerosis is characterised clinically by the gradual accrual of disability independent of relapses and can occur with disease onset (primary progressive) or can be preceded by a relapsing disease course (secondary progressive). An effective disease-modifying treatment for progressive multiple sclerosis has not yet been identified, and so far the results of clinical trials have generally been disappointing. Ongoing advances in the knowledge of pathogenesis, in the identification of novel targets for neuroprotection, and in improved outcome measures could lead to effective treatments for progressive multiple sclerosis. In this Series paper, we summarise the lessons learned from completed clinical trials and perspectives from trials in progress in progressive multiple sclerosis. We review promising clinical, imaging, and biological markers, along with novel designs, for clinical trials. The use of more refined outcomes and truly neuroprotective drugs, coupled with more efficient trial design, has the capacity to deliver a new era of therapeutic discovery in this challenging area.

Immunological effects of methylprednisolone pulse treatment in progressive multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of monthly oral methylprednisolone pulse treatment in progressive MS.

METHODS

30 progressive MS patients were treated with oral methylprednisolone every month. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Out of 102 leukocyte phenotypes investigated, 25 changed at nominal significance from baseline to week 12 (p<0.05). After correction for multiple comparisons, we found 5 subpopulations that changed compared to baseline. No pattern were suggesting modulation of Th17 or TFH cells.

CONCLUSION

Methylprednisolone pulse treatment has some effects on circulating immune cells but does not modulate markers of Th17 and TFH cell activity in progressive MS.

Multiple sclerosis treatment and infectious issues: update 2013

Immunomodulation and immunosuppression are generally linked to an increased risk of infection. In the growing field of new and potent drugs for multiple sclerosis (MS), we review the current data concerning infections and prevention of infectious diseases. This is of importance for recently licensed and future MS treatment options, but also for long-term established therapies for MS. Some of the disease-modifying therapies (DMT) go along with threats of specific severe infections or complications, which require a more intensive long-term monitoring and multi-disciplinary surveillance. We update the existing warning notices and infectious issues which have to be considered using drugs for multiple sclerosis.

Glucocorticoid treatment of multiple sclerosis

Glucorticorticoids have both anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties and both synthetic and natural glucocorticoid medications have been used to treat a number of inflammatory and autoimmune conditions, including the management of acute multiple sclerosis (MS) attacks. Many of the studies supporting the use of this approach to MS treatment have important limitations. Nevertheless, on balance, the data seem to support the notion that a brief glucocorticoid treatment regimen (~2 weeks) hastens recovery from an acute MS flare and that this treatment, in general, is well tolerated. However, such treatment does not seem to alter the final degree of recovery from the MS attack. Among the practice community, even within MS centers, there seems to be a general belief that the selection of the optimal agent, route of administration, and the duration of therapy can be made on the basis of personal experience and/or theoretic considerations. As a result, currently, there are a variety of idiosyncratic regimens (often vigorously defended), which are commonly used to treat patients. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize that the best route of administration, the optimal dose and duration of treatment, and the preferred agent or agents have yet to be firmly established. Moreover, although it may well turn out that some of these factors are more important than others, the best current evidence for the efficacy of glucocorticoid treatment in MS, by far, comes from the optic neuritis treatment trial, which used high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone for the first 3 days followed by an 11-day course of low-dose oral prednisone.

Management of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: prophylactic treatment-past, present, and future aspects

OPINION STATEMENT

Whereas the number of treatment options in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is growing constantly, alternatives are rare in the case of secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Besides mitoxantrone in North America and Europe, interferon beta-1b and beta-1a are approved for treatment in Europe. Glucocorticosteroids, azathioprine, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and cyclophosphamide (CYC), although not approved, are commonly utilized in SPMS. Currently monoclonal antibodies (mab), and masitinib are under examination for treatment for SPMS. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and immunoablative stem cell transplantation are therapies with the aim of reconstitution of the immune system. This review gives information on the different therapeutics and the trials that tested them. Pathophysiological considerations are presented in view of efficacy of the therapeutics. In addition, therapeutics that showed no efficacy in trials or with unacceptable side effects are topics of this review.

Disease-modifying agents in multiple sclerosis

Since 1993, six disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been proven to be of benefit in rigorous phase III clinical trials. Other agents are also available and are used to treat MS, but definitive data on their efficacy is lacking. Currently, disease-modifying therapy is used for relapsing forms of MS. This includes clinically isolated syndrome/first-attack high-risk patients, relapsing patients, secondary progressive patients who are still experiencing relapses, and progressive relapsing patients. The choice of agent depends upon drug factors (including affordability, availability, convenience, efficacy, and side effects), disease factors (including clinical and neuroimaging prognostic indicators), and patient factors (including comorbidities, lifestyle, and personal preference). This review will discuss the disease-modifying agents used currently in MS, as well as available alternative agents.

Repeated intrathecal triamcinolone acetonide administration in progressive multiple sclerosis: a review

At the present time, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, or immunosuppressive treatments of multiple sclerosis (MS) are mainly effective in the early phases of the disease but are of less advantage in progressive phases. Current therapeutic strategies of both primary and secondary progressive MS are rare. One alternative may be intrathecal application of triamcinolone acetonide (TCA). Number of papers deal with advantages and disadvantages of intrathecal administration in MS. Former trials lacked detailed selection of MS patients, with small sample sizes, low steroid dosages, and only a small number of intrathecal administration of short acting steroids. The present paper summarizes recent trials performed following a different treatment regime. They were conducted in patients with progressive MS suffering mainly from spinal symptoms and documented a significant improvement of EDSS and walking distance (WD). Intrathecal TCA administration is a proposal to take into account as one therapy option in patients with a progressive clinical course and predominantly spinal symptoms.

Role of intraspinal steroid application in patients with multiple sclerosis

Clinical trials on patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) have shown no clear evidence of an effective symptomatic treatment with improving disability. Immunomodulatory compounds efficaciously reduce the relapse rate. Numerous earlier papers exist on the pros and cons and/or on the efficacy of intrathecal administration of differing dosages of various conventional released steroids. Furthermore, this treatment approach was nearly abondoned owing to a debate on side effects and a missing proven superiority over intravenous systemic high dosage steroid administration. However, recent open-label studies in progressive MS patients with predominant spinal symptomatology investigated the repeated intraspinal application of the sustained-release compound triamcinolone acetonide (TCA). A distinct improvement of walking distance and MS scores in the short term and stabilization of this beneficial effect after repeat TCA application every 6-12 weeks was found. Moreover, patients with a relapse with acute onset of painful sensations showed a marked pain improvement after repeated TCA application following prior unsuccessful treatment with intravenous steroids. The available data from open studies ask for the performance of a randomized clinical trial, comparing intravenous with intrathecal steroid administration, to confirm the higher efficacy of the more invasive therapy with repeated lumbar puncture.

Corticosteroids and plasma exchange in multiple sclerosis

Corticosteroids (CS) remain a mainstay of treatment for relapses in multiple sclerosis (MS) and optic neuritis. Currently, there is not enough evidence that long-term corticosteroid treatment delays progression of long-term disability in patients with MS. Likewise, it is unclear whether there are, in fact, true differences among the various CS agents, doses, and their applications in specific pulse and tapering regimens.In some patients suffering from severe steroid-resistant relapses, the clinical response to CS treatment may be insufficient. Such patients may obtain clinical benefit from subsequent plasma exchange (PE). PE is increasingly considered as an individual treatment decision in patients with severe relapses not properly responding to CS. Because of the lack of appropriate studies, PE is not recommended as a permanent disease-modifying strategy in MS patients.

Managing adverse effects of disease-modifying agents used for treatment of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

First-line agents approved in the United States for treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) include intramuscular interferon beta (IFNbeta)-1a, subcutaneous (SC) IFNbeta-1a, SC IFNbeta-1b, and SC glatiramer acetate. Intravenous mitoxantrone is the only agent approved for secondary progressive MS, progressive relapsing MS, and worsening relapsing MS. Intravenous natalizumab is approved for relapsing forms of MS generally in patients who have an inadequate response to, or are unable to tolerate, first-line therapies. Corticosteroids are commonly used to treat relapses. This paper reviews the incidence and management of common adverse events (AEs) associated with these treatments.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for clinical trials and other publications between 1985 and 2007 reporting AEs associated with MS therapies, using these search terms: multiple sclerosis, interferon, Avonex, Betaseron, Rebif, glatiramer, copolymer 1, Copaxone, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, adverse events.

RESULTS

A class-specific flu-like syndrome associated with IFNbeta can be managed through initial dose escalation and administration of analgesics and antipyretics, prophylactically or symptomatically. Injection-site reactions can occur in patients receiving injectable therapies, particularly SC IFNbeta or glatiramer acetate. The greatest risk to patients receiving mitoxantrone is cardiotoxicity; thus, the cumulative dose is limited. Allergic reactions occur rarely with natalizumab, and there is a potential risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. AEs associated with short-term pulse corticosteroid therapy are usually transient and largely resolve after treatment is completed.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve adherence to therapy, it is important to educate patients regarding AEs and to manage AEs proactively.

Benefit with methylprednisolone in continuous pulsetherapy in progressive primary form of multiple sclerosis: study of 11 cases in 11 years

Primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is defined clinically with a progressive course from onset. There is no approved treatment for the PPMS. Methylprednisolone IV (MP) hastens the recovery from MS relapses. We studied 11 patients that met the MacDonald's diagnostic criteria for PPMS. The dose of MP was 30 mg/kg in 250 mL of glucose solution in three consecutive days during the first week, two doses during the second and one dose in the third week. One weekly session for eight consecutive weeks was given. After, a once-a week/eight-week interval was maintained. The medium EDSS before treatment was 6.2, and after 11.2 years of treatment, the EDSS was 4.9. Although we studied a small sample of PPMS we may conclude that therapy with IVMP prevents clinical worsening of MS in the majority of patients with improvement in EDSS scores.

Avonex Combination Trial in relapsing—remitting MS: rationale, design and baseline data

Objective To review the rationale, design and baseline data of the Avonex Combination Trial (ACT), an investigator-run study of intramuscular interferon beta-1a (IM IFNβ-1a) combined with methotrexate (MTX) and/or IV methylprednisolone (IVMP) in relapsing—remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients with continued disease activity on IM IFNβ-1a monotherapy.

Methods Eligibility criteria included RRMS, Expanded Disability Status Scale score 0—5.5, and ≥1 relapse or gadolinium-enhancing MRI lesion in the prior year while on IM IFNβ-1a monotherapy. Subjects continued IFNβ-1a 30 mcg IM weekly and were randomized in a 2 × 2 factorial design to adjunctive weekly placebo or MTX 20 mg PO, with or without IVMP 1000 mg/day for three days every other month. ACT was industry-supported, and collaboratively designed and governed by an Investigator Steering Committee with independent Advisory and Data Safety Monitoring Committees. Study operations, MRI analysis and aggregated data were managed by the Cleveland Clinic MS Academic Coordinating Center.

Results In total 313 subjects were enrolled with clinical and MRI characteristics typical of RRMS. Most subjects (86.9%) qualified with a clinical relapse, with or without an enhancing MRI lesion, in the preceding year. At baseline, 21.4% had enhancing lesions, and 5.1% had anti-IFNβ neutralizing antibodies. ACT's management and operational structures functioned well.

Conclusion This study provides an innovative model for academic—industry collaborative MS research and will enhance understanding of the utility of combination therapy for RRMS patients with continued disease activity on an established first-line treatment. Multiple Sclerosis 2008; 14: 370—382. http://msj.sagepub.com

Corticosteroids for the long-term treatment in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Short term high dose corticosteroid treatment improves symptoms and short term disability after an acute exacerbation of multiple sclerosis (MS) but it is unknown whether its long-term use can reduce the accumulation of disability.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of long-term corticosteroid use in MS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following bibliographic databases: CENTRAL (Issue 1, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2007) and EMBASE (1980 to February 2007). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials we searched reference lists and contacted trial authors and one pharmaceutical company.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered controlled, randomised trials (RCTs), with or without blinding, of long term treatment (i.e. longer than 6 months) of any type of corticosteroid in MS, irrespective of disease course.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials, all classified at high risk of bias, contributed to this review (Miller 1961; BPSM 1995; Zivadinov 2001) resulting in a total of 183 participants (91 treated). Corticosteroid therapy did not reduce the risk of being worse at the end of follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26 to 1.02) but there was a substantial heterogeneity between studies (I(2): 78.4%). I. v. periodic high dose methylprednisolone (MP) was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of disability progression at 5 years in relapsing-remitting (RR) MS (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.66), while oral continuous low dose prednisolone was not associated with any risk reduction in disability progression at 18 months (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.43 to 3.56). Risk of experiencing at least one exacerbation at end of follow-up was not significantly reduced with corticosteroid treatment (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.10 to 1.25). Only one study recorded adverse events: in one patient i. v. MP was discontinued after the fourth pulse when he developed acute glomerulonephritis; a second patient was removed from the study after the fifth i. v. MP pulse because of severe osteoporosis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no enough evidence that long-term corticosteroid treatment delays progression of long term disability in patients with MS. Since one study at high risk of bias showed that the administration of pulsed high dose i. v. MP is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of long term disability progression in patients with RR MS, an adequately powered, high quality RCT is needed to investigate this finding.

Effect of intravenous methylprednisolone on the number, size and confluence of plaques in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) pulses affect the confluence and enlargement of T2 lesions in the long term in patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS). Of 88 RR MS patients, randomly assigned to regular pulses of IVMP (1 g/day for 5 days with an oral prednisone taper) or IVMP on the same dose schedule only for relapses, and followed up without other disease-modifying drug therapy for 5 years, 81 patients completed the trial as planned. Pulsed IVMP was given every 4 months for 3 years, and then every 6 months for the subsequent 2 years. Calculations were performed for number, size and lesion volume (LV) of T2- and confluent T2-lesions. At study entry, the number, size and LV of T2- and confluent T2-lesions were well matched in the two study arms. At the end of the study, patients who received IVMP pulses every 4-6 months for 5 years had significantly fewer confluent T2 lesions (105 vs. 270, p<0.0001), lower confluent T2-LV (5.4 ml vs. 17.4 ml, p<0.00001), fewer large T2 lesions (>10 mm) (165 vs. 541, p<0.00001), and lower T2-LV/N degrees T2 lesion index (0.52 vs. 1.1, p=0.007) when compared to patients who received IVMP only for relapses. There were more small T2 lesions (1082 vs. 288, p<0.000001) in the IVMP pulsed arm. Patients who received higher total doses of IVMP showed the smallest changes in confluent T2-LV during the study. This study suggests that treatment with pulses of IVMP may prevent the confluence of T2 lesions, which may in turn contribute to slower progression of disability in the long term. However, pulsed IVMP treatment did not significantly slow down accumulation of overall T2-LV and there were more smaller T2 lesions in the IVMP pulsed arm at the end of the study.

Corticosteroids for multiple sclerosis: II. Application for disease-modifying effects

Physicians who treat multiple sclerosis (MS) face the challenge of patients exhibiting ongoing disease activity, including exacerbations, loss of functional capabilities, intellectual decline, and radiologic progression, despite being on a disease-modifying agent (DMA). After searching for factors that might at least in part explain these changes--such as nonadherent drug-taking behavior, or the presence of interferon-neutralizing antibodies--some providers may ultimately decide to switch the patient to another DMA. In most circumstances, patients likely derive only partial effects from these agents, even in the absence of compromising factors. Thus, a number of factors must be considered in order to intensify the treatment regimen in response to disease progression. In the context of an inadequate treatment response to a DMA, some clinicians will convert the patient to an alternative therapy, and others will instead use a second agent in combination with the first (the so-called platform agent). In the first of this two-part series, we explored the use of anti-inflammatory CS and ACTH to treat MS exacerbations. Although we underscored the limited availability of evidence-based studies to support specific regimens for this purpose, there is an even greater paucity of data to support the routine use of these agents in order to achieve chronic disease-modifying effects in those who continue to deteriorate clinically, radiographically, or both. Without doubt, a number of factors influence the formulation of combination treatment plan for MS. Nevertheless, we will focus on the rationale and practical schemes that can be considered for using corticosteroids (CS) (and perhaps even ACTH) in an attempt to modify various domains of ongoing disease activity.

Changes in the activation level of NF-kappa B in lymphocytes of MS patients during glucocorticoid pulse therapy

Nuclear factor-kappaB activity was analyzed in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients during the course of a methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Molecular effects were evaluated using lymphocytes derived from 20 MS patients before and after therapy and 24 healthy individuals. All patients responded to treatment clinically. The mean level of DNA-binding p65 in MS was proportionate to that of healthy controls, but was significantly decreased directly after therapy whereas the level of DNA-binding p50 was significantly elevated prior to therapy and remained unchanged. In summary, pulse therapy resulted in a decreased level of activated p65 NF-kappaB subunits leading to decreased levels of transcriptionally active pro-inflammatory NF-kappaB.

Efficacy of mitoxantrone and intrathecal triamcinolone acetonide treatment in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis patients

Treatment approaches are rare for chronic progressive patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective was to evaluate the clinical benefit of repeated intrathecal application of the sustained release steroid triamcinolone acetonide or the administration of mitoxantrone (MIX) in 2 similar cohorts of chronic progressive patients with MS in an open-label fashion. Expanded Disability Status Scale scores significantly decreased after the first 6 intraspinal triamcinolone acetonide injections, which were performed every third day, and then remained stable. Walking distance significantly increased and did not reduce until the end of the 1-year-long trial period. Mitoxantrone treatment did not improve the Expanded Disability Status Scale score; however, no further significant deterioration appeared. Walking distance did not significantly decrease. Both treatment regimens were safe; the patients experienced nearly no adverse effects. Triamcinolone acetonide application provided a clinical benefit, whereas MIX administration prevented further worsening of MS symptoms. We stress that only specialists with a broad experience in intraspinal triamcinolone acetonide application and MIX administration should perform both kinds of therapy only after a careful information and risk-benefit evaluation in cooperation with the patient. Future trials will show the efficacy of combination of both treatment approaches in chronic progressive patients with MS.

Monthly intravenous methylprednisolone in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis - reduction of enhancing lesions, T2 lesion volume and plasma prolactin concentrations

Background

Intravenous methylprednisolone (IV-MP) is an established treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses, accompanied by rapid, though transient reduction of gadolinium enhancing (Gd+) lesions on brain MRI. Intermittent IV-MP, alone or with immunomodulators, has been suggested but insufficiently studied as a strategy to prevent relapses.

Methods

In an open, single-cross-over study, nine patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RR-MS) underwent cranial Gd-MRI once monthly for twelve months. From month six on, they received a single i.v.-infusion of 500 mg methylprednisolone (and oral tapering for three days) after the MRI. Primary outcome measure was the mean number of Gd+ lesions during treatment vs. baseline periods; T2 lesion volume and monthly plasma concentrations of cortisol, ACTH and prolactin were secondary outcome measures. Safety was assessed clinically, by routine laboratory and bone mineral density measurements. Soluble immune parameters (sTNF-RI, sTNF-RII, IL1-ra and sVCAM-1) and neuroendocrine tests (ACTH test, combined dexamethasone/CRH test) were additionally analyzed.

Results

Comparing treatment to baseline periods, the number of Gd+ lesions/scan was reduced in eight of the nine patients, by a median of 43.8% (p = 0.013, Wilcoxon). In comparison, a pooled dataset of 83 untreated RR-MS patients from several studies, selected by the same clinical and MRI criteria, showed a non-significant decrease by a median of 14% (p = 0.32). T2 lesion volume decreased by 21% during treatment (p = 0.001). Monthly plasma prolactin showed a parallel decline (p = 0.027), with significant cross-correlation with the number of Gd+ lesions. Other hormones and immune system variables were unchanged, as were ACTH test and dexamethasone-CRH test. Treatment was well tolerated; routine laboratory and bone mineral density were unchanged.

Conclusion

Monthly IV-MP reduces inflammatory activity and T2 lesion volume in RR-MS.

Emerging therapies in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common neurological cause of disability in young people. The disease-modifying treatments, IFN-beta and glatiramer acetate, have been widely available over the last decade and have shown a beneficial effect on relapse rate and magnetic resonance imaging parameters of disease activity; however, their effect on disease progression and disability is modest. Therefore, the search for alternative treatment strategies continues. As understanding of the heterogeneous pathophysiology of MS has increased, emphasis has shifted to more selective therapy that targets components of the inflammatory cascade and the promotion of remyelination and neuroprotection. These agents target the blood-brain barrier, systemic immune dysfunction, local inflammation and neurodegeneration. Combination therapies are being investigated for patients who fail first-line treatments. Many new drugs are being developed and tested that address these issues with the aim of finding a more effective and convenient therapy. These include humanized monoclonal antibodies such as daclizumab (IL-2 antagonist), oral immunomodulators such as sirolimus and statins and neuroprotective agents such as NMDA antagonists and Na+-channel blockers. Many of the treatments discussed in this review are still at early stages of development, but provide exciting potential treatment options; others have proved disappointing in larger extended-phase studies.

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: current knowledge and future challenges

The secondary progressive phase of multiple sclerosis (MS), which is characterised by a steady accrual of fixed disability after an initial relapsing remitting course, is not clearly understood. Although there is no consensus on the mechanisms underlying such a transition to the progressive phase, epidemiological and neuroimaging studies indicate that it is probably driven by the high prevalence of neurodegenerative compared with inflammatory pathological changes. This notion is lent support by the limited efficacy of available immunomodulating and immunosuppressive treatment strategies, which seems to be further decreased in the late stages of secondary progressive MS. No established clinical or paraclinical predictors of the transition from relapsing remitting to secondary progressive MS have been described. However, the use of quantitative MRI-derived measures is warranted to monitor natural history studies and therapeutic trials of secondary progressive MS with increased reliability. In view of the small effects of immunomodulating and immunosuppressive treatments in preventing the transition to secondary progression, the development of treatments promoting neuroaxonal repair remains an important goal in this disease.

Irreversible Neurological Worsening Following High-Dose Corticosteroids in Advanced Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

A course of high-dose corticosteroids has been shown to hasten recovery from a relapse of multiple sclerosis (MS). Some patients with progressive MS ask for a course with corticosteroids outside a relapse, hoping to gain some functional improvement.

OBJECTIVE

To describe 4 patients with advanced progressive MS who experienced worsening of disability after treatment with high-dose corticosteroids.

RESULTS

All 4 patients had moderate to severe disability and asked for corticosteroid treatment because they were slowly progressing. None of them had a relapse. All experienced improvement by the end of the treatment course. One or 2 days after discontinuation of treatment, however, they deteriorated clinically and became more disabled than before treatment.

CONCLUSION

The use of high-dose corticosteroid therapy in progressive forms of MS outside relapses can be detrimental and worsen disability.

Corticosteroids and Multiple Sclerosis: To Treat or Not to Treat?

Although a rare disease, multiple sclerosis (MS) has a high prevalence rate in Canada and affects many Canadians and their families. An autoimmune disease of the central nervous system, it results in the destruction of the myelin sheath that surrounds the nerve axons. High-dose IV steroid therapy is often used to treat an acute exacerbation in MS. Steroids have immunosuppressant effects that work to decrease the autoimmune pathology component of the disease and to reduce the inflammation around the nerve axon, thereby promoting closer contact of the damaged myelin and subsequently partially restoring adequate electrical nerve conduction to reduce symptoms.

The high prevalence rate of MS in Canada makes it vital for pharmacists to become more aware of the different aspects of the disease and how these relate to therapy. The pharmacist should be aware of the adverse effects and impact of high-dose IV steroids in MS patients. The purpose of this review is threefold: 1) to provide a better understanding of MS pathology; 2) to contribute a systematic review of steroids; and 3) to assist in the clinical decision-making process and in the counselling requirements for patients on high-dose steroids.

Steroids and brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis

In this review, we focus on different pathogenetic mechanisms of corticosteroids that induce short- and long-term brain volume fluctuations in a variety of systemic conditions and disorders, as well as on corticosteroid-induced immunomodulatory, immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory mechanisms that contribute to the slowdown of brain atrophy progression in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). It appears that chronic low-dose treatment with corticosteroids may contribute to irreversible loss of brain tissue in a variety of autoimmune diseases. This side effect of steroid therapy is probably mediated by steroid-induced protein catabolism mechanism. Evidence is mounting that high-dose corticosteroids may induce reversible short-term brain volume changes due to loss of intracellular water and reduction of abnormal vascular permeability, without there having been axonal loss. Other apoptotic and selective inhibiting mechanisms have been proposed to explain the nature of corticosteroid-induced brain volume fluctuations. It has been shown that chronic use of high dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) in patients with MS may limit brain atrophy progression over the long-term via different immunological mechanisms, including downregulation of adhesion molecule expression on endothelial cells, decreased cytokine and matrix metalloproteinase secretion, decreased autoreactive T-cell-mediated inflammation and T-cell apoptosis induction, blood-brain barrier closure, demyelination inhibition and, possibly, remyelination promotion. Studies in nonhuman primates have confirmed that short-term brain volume fluctuations may be induced by corticosteroid treatment, but that they are inconsistent, potentially reversible and probably dependent upon individual susceptibility to the effects of corticosteroids. Further longitudinal studies are needed to elucidate pathogenetic mechanisms contributing to brain volume fluctuations in autoimmune diseases and multiple sclerosis.

Effect of drugs in secondary disease progression in patients with multiple sclerosis

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is a form of MS characterized by continuously worsening disability with or without superimposed relapses that occurs after a variable period of relapsing remitting disease and results in limited ambulation for almost all patients. The use of interferon beta (IFN beta) for immunomodulation in patients with SPMS has been evaluated in four recent clinical trials: The European multicentre trial on IFN beta-1b in SPMS (EUSPMS), the Secondary Progressive Efficacy Trial of Rebif (IFN beta-1a) in MS (SPECTRIMS), the North American Study of IFN beta-1b in SPMS (NASPMS), and the International MS Secondary Progressive Avonex Clinical Trial (IMPACT). EUSPMS was the only trial to demonstrate a significant positive effect of therapy on disease progression as measured by the expanded disability status scale (EDSS). However, results from all studies demonstrated significant positive effects of treatment on relapse, T2 lesion load, and gadolinium enhancement. Immunomodulation with IFN beta has the potential to significantly slow disease progression and improve quality of life for patients with SPMS. While results with monthly i.v. Ig were disappointing, positive effects on disease progression have been reported with the application of immunosuppressants, especially Mitoxantrone. The risk-benefit ratio of these cytostatic agents remains controversial. New strategies addressing the important neurodegenerative aspects of the disease are urgently needed.

Combination therapy for multiple sclerosis: the treatment strategy of the future?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease characterised by demyelination and axonal loss in the CNS. Although new immunomodulatory therapies including interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate became available during the last decade, these therapies are only partially effective. There is a continuing need to develop more effective treatment strategies to combat the chronic and progressive aspects of the disease. In view of the complex pathophysiology underlying the MS disease process, combination therapy offers a rational therapeutic approach. Combining immunomodulatory agents with different mechanisms of action that promote synergistic or additive effects represents an important objective in MS therapeutic research. Ultimately, the optimal therapies will likely include strategies that promote repair and limit tissue destruction in combination with anti-inflammatory interventions.

Efficacy of repeated intrathecal triamcinolone acetonide application in progressive multiple sclerosis patients with spinal symptoms

Background

There are controversial results on the efficacy of the abandoned, intrathecal predominant methylprednisolone application in multiple sclerosis (MS) in contrast to the proven effectiveness in intractable postherpetic neuralgia.

Methods

We performed an analysis of the efficacy of the application of 40 mg of the sustained release steroid triamcinolone acetonide (TCA). We intrathecally injected in sterile saline dissolved TCA six times within three weeks on a regular basis every third day in 161 hospitalized primary and predominant secondary progressive MS patients with spinal symptoms. The MS patients did not experience an acute onset of exacerbation or recent distinct increased progression of symptoms. We simultaneously scored the MS patients with the EDSS and the Barthel index, estimated the walking distance and measured somatosensory evoked potentials. Additionally the MS patients received a standardized rehabilitation treatment.

Results

EDSS score and Barthel index improved, walking distance increased, latencies of somatosensory evoked potentials of the median and tibial nerves shortened in all MS patients with serial evaluation (p < 0.0001 for all variables). Side effects were rare, five patients stopped TCA application due to onset of a post lumbar puncture syndrome.

Conclusions

Repeated intrathecal TCA application improves spinal symptoms, walking distance and SSEP latencies in progressive MS patients in this uncontrolled study. Future trials should evaluate the long-term benefit of this invasive treatment.

Corticosteroids treatment

Corticosteroids (Cs) are widely used for treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) acute relapses because of the potent immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory properties. As for patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) MS, short-term administrations of Cs markedly less severity of symptoms and promote faster recovery of clinical attacks. Chronic administrations of Cs significantly diminish the formation of T1 hypointense lesions and the progression of brain atrophy. As for patients with secondary progressive MS treatment with Cs delays the time to onset of sustained disability. Finally the association between methylprednisolone and interferon beta (IFNbeta) leads the recovery of active lesions at greater extent and reduces the formation of neutralizing antibodies (NABs) against IFNbeta in patients with RRMS.

Efficacy and safety of repeated intrathecal triamcinolone acetonide application in progressive multiple sclerosis patients

Available immunomodulatory and conventional steroid treatment options for patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) only provide limited symptomatic benefit. We performed an open trial on the short-term and long-term efficacy and safety of repeated intrathecal application of the sustained release steroid triamcinolone acetonide (TCA) in 36 progressive MS patients. Six TCA administrations, performed every third day, reduced the EDSS score (initial: 5.6+/-0.93 [mean+/-S.D.]; end: 4.9+/-1.0; p<0.001) and increased the walking distance (WD) (initial: 294+/-314 m; end: 604+/-540 m; p<0.001). Twenty MS patients continued intrathecal TCA treatment with one TCA injection performed with a variable frequency ranging from 6 to 12 weeks. Both EDSS and walking distance remained stable in these patients until the end of the follow-up investigation period. No serious side effects occurred. We conclude that repeated intrathecal TCA injection provides substantial benefit for progressive MS patients with predominantly spinal symptoms.

Prevention of autoimmune attack and disease progression in multiple sclerosis: current therapies and future prospects

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an important cause of progressive neurological disability, typically commencing in early adulthood. There is a need for safe and effective therapy to prevent the progressive central nervous system (CNS) damage and resultant disability that characterize the disease course. Increasing evidence supports a chronic autoimmune basis for CNS damage in MS. In the present study, we review current concepts of autoimmune pathogenesis in MS, assess current therapies aimed at countering autoimmune attack and discuss potential therapeutic strategies. Among currently available therapies, beta-interferon and glatiramer acetate have a modest effect on reducing relapses and slowing the accumulation of disability in relapsing-remitting MS. Beta-interferon is of doubtful efficacy in secondary progressive MS and appears to aggravate primary progressive MS, possibly by increasing antibody-mediated CNS damage through inhibition of B-cell apoptosis. Mitoxantrone may reduce relapses and slow disability progression in relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive MS, but its use is limited by the risk of cardiomyopathy. There are currently no effective treatments for primary progressive MS. Many therapies that are effective in the animal model, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), are either ineffective in MS or--in the case of gamma-interferon, lenercept and altered peptide ligands--actually make MS worse. This discrepancy may be explained by the occurrence in MS of defects in immunoregulatory mechanisms, the integrity of which is essential for the efficacy of these treatments in EAE. It is likely that the development of safe, effective therapy for MS will depend on a better understanding of immunoregulatory defects in MS.

Differentiation of multiple sclerosis subtypes: implications for treatment

There has been tremendous progress in the immunomodulatory treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) during recent years. With the introduction of interferon-beta, glatiramer acetate and mitoxantrone (recently registered for MS in the US), there are at least three therapeutic strategies that have proven effective in large phase III studies. However, not all patients with MS respond well to treatment with these drugs. This may largely be a consequence of disease heterogeneity. From a clinical perspective, patients with different disease courses show different treatment responses. Patients with relapsing-remitting MS are more likely to respond to immunomodulatory therapy than those with a progressive disease course. Studies of patients with secondary progressive MS have yielded inconsistent results and, so far, there has been no positive phase III study of immunomodulatory therapy in patients with primary progressive MS. Pathological evidence indicates that subtyping based on clinical findings alone does not reflect actual disease heterogeneity. In a large series of biopsy and autopsy specimens, at least four subtypes could be identified with respect to oligodendrocyte/myelin pathology and immunopathology. As long as the only method of identifying subtypes of disease is histopathology, differential therapy will remain a future goal. Thus, there is an urgent need for in vivo markers of immunopathogenesis in an individual patient that would allow treatment to be specifically directed towards a given pathological focus. However, at least from a theoretical point of view, some therapeutic approaches appear very attractive. Plasmapheresis and/or intravenous immunoglobulins could most plausibly be the best approach for the immunopathological subtype of MS, which is characterised by antibody and complement deposition next to demyelinated axons, in order to remove antibodies. The subtype of MS that is associated with heavy macrophage activation, T cell infiltration and expression of inflammatory mediator molecules, including tumour necrosis factor-alpha, may be most likely to respond to immunomodulation with interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate. There are other subtypes of MS in which viral infection or oligodendrocyte degeneration, rather than autoimmunity, appear to play a role. It is possible that these could benefit from antiviral therapy, oligodendrocyte protection or oligodendrocyte transplantation, although therapies based on these latter approaches have yet to be developed.

17 beta-estradiol inhibits cytokine, chemokine, and chemokine receptor mRNA expression in the central nervous system of female mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Cytokines and chemokines govern leukocyte trafficking, thus regulating inflammatory responses. In this study, the anti-inflammatory effects of low dose 17 beta-estradiol were evaluated on chemokine, chemokine receptor, and cytokine expression in the spinal cords (SC) of BV8S2 transgenic female mice during acute and recovery phases of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). In EAE protected mice, 17 beta-estradiol strongly inhibited mRNA expression of the chemokines RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, MIP-2, IP-10, and MCP-1, and of the chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR2 and CCR5 at both time points. Conversely, ovariectomy, which abrogated basal 17 beta-estradiol levels and increased the severity of EAE, enhanced the expression of MIP-1 alpha and MIP-2 that were over-expressed by inflammatory mononuclear cells in SC. 17 beta-estradiol inhibited expression of LT-beta, TNF-alpha, and IFN-gamma in SC, but had no effect on IL-4 or IL-10, indicating reduced inflammation but no deviation toward a Th2 response. Interestingly, elevated expression of CCR1 and CCR5 by lymph node cells was also inhibited in 17 beta-estradiol treated mice with EAE. Low doses of 17 beta-estradiol added in vitro to lymphocyte cultures had no direct effect on the activation of MBP-Ac1-11 specific T cells, and only at high doses diminished production of IFN-gamma, but not IL-12 or IL-10. These results suggest that the beneficial effects of 17 beta-estradiol are mediated in part by strong inhibition of recruited inflammatory cells, resulting in reduced production of inflammatory chemokines and cytokines in CNS, with modest effects on encephalitogenic T cells that seem to be relatively 17 beta-estradiol insensitive.