Characteristics of Dexmedetomidine Postconditioning in the Field of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Research progress on the protective effect of hormones and hormone drugs in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a condition where the heart muscle does not receive enough blood flow, leading to cardiac dysfunction. Restoring blood flow to the coronary artery is an effective clinical therapy for myocardial ischemia. This strategy helps lower the size of the myocardial infarction and improves the prognosis of patients. Nevertheless, if the disrupted blood flow to the heart muscle is restored within a specific timeframe, it leads to more severe harm to the previously deprived heart tissue. This condition is referred to as myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (MIRI). Until now, there is a dearth of efficacious strategies to prevent and manage MIRI. Hormones are specialized substances that are produced directly into the circulation by endocrine organs or tissues in humans and animals, and they have particular effects on the body. Hormonal medications utilize human or animal hormones as their active components, encompassing sex hormones, adrenaline medications, thyroid hormone medications, and others. While several studies have examined the preventive properties of different endocrine hormones, such as estrogen and hormone analogs, on myocardial injury caused by ischemia-reperfusion, there are other hormone analogs whose mechanisms of action remain unexplained and whose safety cannot be assured. The current study is on hormones and hormone medications, elucidating the mechanism of hormone pharmaceuticals and emphasizing the cardioprotective effects of different endocrine hormones. It aims to provide guidance for the therapeutic use of drugs and offer direction for the examination of MIRI in clinical therapy.

Dexmedetomidine as a cardioprotective drug: a narrative review

Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a highly selective alpha2-adrenoceptors agonist, is not only a sedative drug used during mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit but also a cardio-protective drug against ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Numerous preclinical in vivo and ex vivo studies, mostly evaluating the effect of DEX pretreatment in healthy rodents, have shown the efficacy of DEX in protecting the hearts from IRI. However, whether DEX can maintain its cardio-protective effect in hearts with comorbidities such as diabetes has not been fully elucidated. Multiple clinical trials have reported promising results, showing that pretreatment with DEX can attenuate cardiac damage in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, evidence of the post-treatment effects of DEX in clinical practice remains limited. In this narrative review, we summarize the previously reported evidence of DEX-induced cardio-protection against IRI and clarify the condition of the hearts and the timing of DEX administration that has not been tested. With further investigations evaluating these knowledge gaps, the use of DEX as a cardio-protective drug could be further facilitated in the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery and might be considered in a broader area of clinical settings beyond cardiac surgery, including patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Dexmedetomidine alleviates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury via inhibiting autophagy through PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway

Dexmedetomidine has been shown to protect against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury (CIRI). Nevertheless, the precise mechanism is obscure. In order to explore the effect of dexmedetomidine pre-conditioning on autophagy against CIRI in rats, middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) was conducted to establish cerebral ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) model in male SD rats with 2 h ischemia and 24 h reperfusion. Dexmedetomidine was delivered to rats at 10, 50 and 100 µg/kg doses respectively, and LY294002, a PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway inhibitor, was administered at 10 mg/kg intraperitoneally 30 min before MCAO. Neurological deficit score was assessed and cerebral infarct size was detected by TTC staining. Morris water maze (MWM) was performed to estimate spatial learning and memory ability. Furthermore, to detect activity of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and autophagy, p-Akt, p-mTOR, Beclin-1 and LC3 were measured by western blot. Our findings revealed that 50 and 100 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine pretreatment could improve the neurological deficit score and reduce cerebral infarct size after CIRI, while these effects were markedly suppressed by LY294002. In MWM test, dexmedetomidine was confirmed to shorten escape latency and increase times across platform after CIRI. Nevertheless, LY294002 pretreatment eliminated the improvement of dexmedetomidine on spatial learning and memory ability. Furthermore, dexmedetomidine pretreatment reduced ratios of Beclin-1 and LC3II/LC3I and elevated p-Akt/Akt and p-mTOR/mTOR after CIRI. However, above effects of dexmedetomidine were partly reversed by LY294002. Overall, dexmedetomidine pretreatment exerted neuroprotection against CIRI in rats by attenuating autophagy via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.

Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Basic Cardiac Electrophysiology in Adults; a Descriptive Review and a Prospective Case Study

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a commonly used sedative agent with no or minimal effects on breathing. DEX may also be beneficial in myocardial protection. Since the mechanisms of cardiac effects are not well known, we carried out a descriptive review and examined the effects of DEX on myocardial electrical conduction in a prospective and controlled manner. For the review, clinical studies exploring DEX in myocardial protection published between 2020-2022 were explored. A case study included 11 consecutive patients at a median (range) age of 48 (38-59), scheduled for elective radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A bolus dose of DEX 1 µg/kg given in 15 min was followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2-0.7 µg/kg/h. Direct intracardiac electrophysiologic measurements, hemodynamics and oxygenation were measured before and after the DEX bolus. Experimental studies show that DEX protects the heart both via stabilizing cardiac electrophysiology and reducing apoptosis and autophagy after cell injury. The clinical evidence shows that DEX provides cardiac protection during different surgeries. In a clinical study, DEX increased the corrected sinus node recovery time, prolongated the atrioventricular (AV) nodal refractory period and cycle length producing AV nodal Wenckebach retrograde conduction block. DEX has a putative role in organ protection against hypoxic, oxidative and reperfusion injury. DEX slows down the firing of the sinus node and prolongs AV refractoriness.

Dexmedetomidine postconditioning provides renal protection in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A randomized controlled trial

Background: For localized disease, partial nephrectomy of small tumors continues to be the gold-standard treatment. However, temporary clamping is routinely performed during this process to control renal blood flow, which can cause renal ischemic/reperfusion injury. We evaluated whether dexmedetomidine postconditioning (DPOC) can reduce renal ischemic/reperfusion injury for patients receiving laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

Methods: This randomized double-blind controlled trial included 77 patients who were scheduled for LPN at our hospital. Patients were randomly allocated to the DPOC or control group. DPOC was performed via intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine at 0.6 μg kg−1 for 10 min immediately after unclamping the renal artery. In the control group, saline was administered in place of dexmedetomidine under the same protocol. All participants underwent a 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome were the values of 99mTc-DTPA-GFR in the affected kidney at one and 6 months post-LPN.

Result: The GFR values in the DPOC group (35.65 ± 4.89 ml min−1.1.73 m−2) were significantly higher than those the control group (33.10 ± 5.41 ml min−1.1.73 m−2; p = 0.022) at 1 month after LPN. There was no statistically significant difference in GFR value between the two groups at 6 months after LPN.

Conclusion: DPOC provides therapeutic benefits to LPN patients, at least on a short-term basis, by alleviating renal ischemic/reperfusion injury.

Clinical Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier [ChiCTR-TRC-14004766].

Dexmedetomidine reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in young mice through MIF/AMPK/GLUT4 axis

BACKGROUND

Reperfusion of ischemic tissue has adverse impact on the myocardium. Dexmedetomidine (Dex) is a α2-adrenergic receptor (α2-AR) agonist with sedative and analgesic effects. Macrophage migration inhibition factor (MIF) is a pressure-regulating cytokine and is responsible for inflammatory and immune diseases. This study aims to reveal the consequences of Dex on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in young mice.

METHODS

Fifty mice were raised and examined. At the end of the experiment, all mice were euthanized. The anterior descending department of the left coronary artery in mice was under ischemia for 60 min, then the ligation line was released and reperfused for 120 min to establish the IRI model. Mice were randomly divided into Sham, control, treatment using 4,5-dihydro-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-isoxazoleacetic acid (ISO-1), Dex treatment, and Dex combined ISO-1 treatment groups. Interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ATP levels were recorded. The expressions of MIF, P-adenosine monophosphate-activated kinase α (AMPKα), glucose transporter (GLUT)4, Bax and Bcl-2 were detected by Western Blot (WB). Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining was used to study cell morphology. Apoptosis was detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay. Echocardiography was carried out at the end of reperfusion, and the infarct size was calculated by Electron microscopy.

RESULTS

I/R + Dex group showed significantly increased IL-6 and TNF-α levels and reduced myocardial cell necrosis and apoptosis. H&E staining showed alleviated myocardial disorder, myocardial cell swelling, myocardial fiber fracture, and inflammatory cell infiltration in I/R + Dex group. Myocardial cell necrosis and apoptosis were significantly reduced in I/R + Dex group. ATP level in myocardial tissue of mice in I/R group was substantially decreased, while that in Dex group was increased. WB results showed that MIF, P-AMPK α, GLUT4 and Bcl-2 levels were increased and Bax levels were decreased in I/R + Dex group.

CONCLUSION

Dex may exert myocardial protection in young mice through MIF/AMPK/GLUT4 axis.

Amelioration of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in diabetes: A narrative review of the mechanisms and clinical applications of dexmedetomidine

Mechanisms contributing to the pathogenesis of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury are complex and multifactorial. Many strategies have been developed to ameliorate myocardial I/R injuries based on these mechanisms. However, the cardioprotective effects of these strategies appear to diminish in diabetic states. Diabetes weakens myocardial responses to therapies by disrupting intracellular signaling pathways which may be responsible for enhancing cellular resistance to damage. Intriguingly, it was found that Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a potent and selective α2-adrenergic agonist, appears to have the property to reverse diabetes-related inhibition of most intervention-mediated myocardial protection and exert a protective effect. Several mechanisms were revealed to be involved in DEX’s protection in diabetic rodent myocardial I/R models, including PI3K/Akt and associated GSK-3β pathway stimulation, endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) alleviation, and apoptosis inhibition. In addition, DEX could attenuate diabetic myocardial I/R injury by up-regulating autophagy, reducing ROS production, and inhibiting the inflammatory response through HMGB1 pathways. The regulation of autonomic nervous function also appeared to be involved in the protective mechanisms of DEX. In the present review, the evidence and underlying mechanisms of DEX in ameliorating myocardial I/R injury in diabetes are summarized, and the potential of DEX for the treatment/prevention of myocardial I/R injury in diabetic patients is discussed.

Ozone preconditioning protects rabbit heart against global ischemia-reperfusion injury in vitro by up-regulating HIF-1α

Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) is a major factor that leads to cardiac dysfunction in cardiovascular surgery during extracorporeal circulation. Recent studies have found that ozone (O₃) has protective effect on MIRI caused by the anterior descending branch of the ligated left coronary artery. However, whether O₃ preconditioning has the same protective effect on global MIRI and the mechanism underlying this clinical treatment remains elusive. Here, we hypothesized that O₃ preconditioning (O₃P) could protect rabbit heart against global MIRI in vitro by up-regulating HIF-1α. Rabbits were treated intraperitoneally with O₂/O₃ mixture with different concentrations and then injected with YC-1 (inhibitor of HIF-1α) before the establishment of the global MIRI model using the Langendorff isolated heart perfusion apparatus. We investigated the effects of O₃ preconditioning on cardiac systolic function, myocardial infarction, inflammatory response, mitochondrial function, myocardial pathological changes and arrhythmias. We found that the heart with O₃ preconditioning significantly increased HR, LVDP and IL-10 expression, and decreased IL-6 expression, CK-MB, cTnT and cTnI concentration, myocardial infarction area, myocardial pathological injury and the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. Meanwhile, the level of HIF-1α was significantly increased. However, after treatment of specific inhibitor of HIF-1α, the protective effect of O₃ preconditioning was reversed completely. Our data indicates that O₃ preconditioning has protective effect on MIRI and this protective effect is positively associated with dosage of O₃. Energy metabolism disorder is the initial stage of MIRI and up-regulation of HIF-1α plays an important role in reducing mitochondrial dysfunction.

The Protective Mechanism of Dexmedetomidine in Regulating Atg14L-Beclin1-Vps34 Complex Against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

The blood flow restoration of ischemic tissues causes myocardial injury. Dexmedetomidine (Dex) protects multi-organs against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. This study investigated the protective mechanism of Dex post-treatment in myocardial I/R injury. The rat model of myocardial I/R was established. The effects of Dex post-treatment on cardiac function and autophagy flow were observed. Dex attenuated myocardial I/R injury and reduced I/R-induced autophagy in rats. Dex weakened the interactions between Beclin1 and Vps34 and Beclin1 and Atg14L, thus downregulating Vps34 kinase activity. In vitro, the cardiomyocytes subjected to oxygen glucose deprivation/reoxygenation were treated with Dex and PI3K inhibitor LY294002. LY294002 attenuated the myocardial protective effect of DEX, indicating that Dex protected against cardiac I/R by activating the PI3K/Akt pathway. In conclusion, Dex upregulated the phosphorylation of Beclin1 at S295 site by activating the PI3K/Akt pathway and reduced the interactions of Atg14L-Beclin1-Vps34 complex, thus inhibiting autophagy and protecting against myocardial I/R injury.

Combination of Cyclosporine A and Levosimendan Induces Cardioprotection under Acute Hyperglycemia

Prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction is detrimentally affected by comorbidities like diabetes mellitus. In the experimental setting, not only diabetes mellitus but also acute hyperglycemia is shown to hamper cardioprotective properties by multiple pharmacological agents. For Levosimendan-induced postconditioning, a strong infarct size reducing effect is demonstrated in healthy myocardium. However, acute hyperglycemia is suggested to block this protective effect. In the present study, we investigated whether (1) Levosimendan-induced postconditioning exerts a concentration-dependent effect under hyperglycemic conditions and (2) whether a combination with the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) blocker cyclosporine A (CsA) restores the cardioprotective properties of Levosimendan under hyperglycemia. For this experimental investigation, hearts of male Wistar rats were randomized and mounted onto a Langendorff system, perfused with Krebs-Henseleit buffer with a constant pressure of 80 mmHg. All isolated hearts were subjected to 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion under hyperglycemic conditions. (1) Hearts were perfused with various concentrations of Levosimendan (Lev) (0.3–10 μM) for 10 min at the onset of reperfusion, in order to investigate a concentration–response relationship. In the second set of experiments (2), 0.3 μM Levosimendan was administered in combination with the mPTP blocker CsA, to elucidate the underlying mechanism of blocked cardioprotection under hyperglycemia. Infarct size was determined by tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. (1) Control (Con) hearts showed an infarct size of 52 ± 12%. None of the administered Levosimendan concentrations reduced the infarct size (Lev0.3: 49 ± 9%; Lev1: 57 ± 9%; Lev3: 47 ± 11%; Lev10: 50 ± 7%; all ns vs. Con). (2) Infarct size of Con and Lev0.3 hearts were 53 ± 4% and 56 ± 2%, respectively. CsA alone had no effect on infarct size (CsA: 50 ± 10%; ns vs. Con). The combination of Lev0.3 and CsA (Lev0.3 ± CsA) induced a significant infarct size reduction compared to Lev0.3 (Lev0.3+CsA: 35 ± 4%; p < 0.05 vs. Lev0.3). We demonstrated that (1) hyperglycemia blocks the infarct size reducing effects of Levosimendan-induced postconditioning and cannot be overcome by an increased concentration. (2) Furthermore, cardioprotection under hyperglycemia can be restored by combining Levosimendan and the mPTP blocker CsA.

Effects of dexmedetomidine on the function of distal organs and oxidative stress after lower limb ischaemia-reperfusion in elderly patients undergoing unilateral knee arthroplasty

Aims

This study aims to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine on organ function, inflammation response, and oxidative stress in elderly patients following iatrogenic lower limb ischaemia–reperfusion (IR) during unilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

Following unilateral total knee arthroplasty, 54 elderly patients were randomized to receive either intraoperative intravenous injection of dexmedetomidine (n = 27) or equivalent volume of 0.9% saline (n = 27). Blood samples were harvested at 5 minutes before lower limb tourniquet release (baseline); and 1, 6 and 24 hours after tourniquet release. Surrogate markers of cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic and renal function, oxidative stress, inflammatory response, along with parasympathetic and sympathetic activity were recorded and analysed.

Results

The levels of blood xanthine oxidase, creatine kinase, lactic acid and respiratory index increased in patients following tourniquet‐induced lower limb IR injury. Dexmedetomidine administration decreased the respiratory index (P = .014, P = .01, and P = .043) and the norepinephrine level (P < .001) at 1, 6 and 24 hours; and decreased the xanthine oxidase level (P = .049, P < .001) at 6 and 24 hours after tourniquet release compared with the Control group. Other measurements, including creatine kinase isoenzyme, lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, urea nitrogen, glutamic–oxalacetic transaminase, glutamic–pyruvic transaminase, malondialdehyde, interleukin‐1, interleukin‐6 and tumour necrosis factor‐α, were not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

Intraoperative dexmedetomidine administration in elderly patients dampens the deterioration in respiratory function and suppresses the oxidative stress response in elderly patients following iatrogenic lower limb IR injury.

Dexmedetomidine alleviates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury and Ca2+ overload via the microRNA-346-3p/CaMKIId axis

Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (MI/R) may impair cardiac functions. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is protective in various clinical cases. Therefore, this study investigated the role and mechanism of DEX in MI/R. The myocardial infarct size, apoptosis, and levels of myocardial enzymes, SOD, ROS, Ca²⁺, and inflammatory factors in DEX-treated MI/R rats were measured. Differentially expressed microRNAs (miRs) in DEX-treated MI/R rats were detected. miR-346-3p was intervened to assess the effects of DEX on MI/R rats. The targeted binding relationship between miR-346-3p and CaMKIId was predicted and verified. DEX effect on hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R)-induced cell model was evaluated. The role of CaMKIId in DEX protection was assessed after CaMKIId overexpression in H/R cells. NF-κB pathway and NLRP3 inflammasome-related protein levels were detected. DEX alleviated the myocardial injury and Ca²⁺ overload in MI/R rats, as evidenced by reduced infarct size, apoptosis and levels of myocardial enzymes, ROS, Ca²⁺, and inflammatory factors. DEX promoted miR-346-3p expression in MI/R rats, and miR-346-3p knockdown reversed DEX protection on MI/R rats. miR-346-3p targeted CaMKIId. DEX improved H/R-induced cell injury and Ca²⁺ overload and inhibited NF-κB/NLRP3 inflammasome-related protein levels, which were all reversed by CaMKIId overexpression. DEX alleviated injury and Ca²⁺ overload in MI/R via regulating the miR-346-3p/CaMKIId axis and inhibiting the NF-κB/NLRP3 inflammasome pathway.

Pharmacological Conditioning of the Heart: An Update on Experimental Developments and Clinical Implications

The aim of pharmacological conditioning is to protect the heart against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury and its consequences. There is extensive literature that reports a multitude of different cardioprotective signaling molecules and mechanisms in diverse experimental protocols. Several pharmacological agents have been evaluated in terms of myocardial I/R injury. While results from experimental studies are immensely encouraging, translation into the clinical setting remains unsatisfactory. This narrative review wants to focus on two aspects: (1) give a comprehensive update on new developments of pharmacological conditioning in the experimental setting concentrating on recent literature of the last two years and (2) briefly summarize clinical evidence of these cardioprotective substances in the perioperative setting highlighting their clinical implications. By directly opposing each pharmacological agent regarding its recent experimental knowledge and most important available clinical data, a clear overview is given demonstrating the remaining gap between basic research and clinical practice. Finally, future perspectives are given on how we might overcome the limited translatability in the field of pharmacological conditioning.

RETRACTED: Upregulated microRNA-381-5p strengthens the effect of dexmedetomidine preconditioning to protect against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in mouse models by inhibiting CHI3L1

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). This article has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief. Concern was raised about the reliability of the Western blot results in Figs. 1F, 2F, 3F, 4F and 5F, which appear to have the same eyebrow shaped phenotype as many other publications tabulated here (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/149EjFXVxpwkBXYJOnOHb6RhAqT4a2llhj9LM60MBffM/edit#gid=0 [docs.google.com]). The journal requested the corresponding author comment on these concerns and provide the raw data. However, the authors were not responsive to the request for comment. Since original data could not be provided, the overall validity of the results could not be confirmed. Therefore, the Editor-in-Chief decided to retract the article.

Dexmedetomidine Provides Cardioprotection During Early or Late Reperfusion Mediated by Different Mitochondrial K+-Channels

BACKGROUND

Cardioprotective interventions-such as pharmacological postconditioning-are a promising strategy to reduce deleterious consequences of ischemia and reperfusion injury (I/RI) in the heart, especially as timing and onset of myocardial infarction are unpredictable. Pharmacological postconditioning by treatment with dexmedetomidine (Dex), an α2-adrenoreceptor agonist, during reperfusion protects hearts from I/RI, independently of time point and duration of application during the reperfusion phase. The mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K (mKATP) and mitochondrial large-conductance calcium-sensitive potassium channel (mBKCa) play a pivotal role in mediating this cardioprotective effect. Therefore, we investigated whether Dex-induced cardioprotection during early or late reperfusion is mediated variously by these mitochondrial K-channels.

METHODS

Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomized into 8 groups and underwent a protocol of 15 minutes adaption, 33 minutes ischemia, and 60 minutes reperfusion in an in vitro Langendorff-system. A 10-minute treatment phase was started directly (first subgroup, early reperfusion) or 30 minutes (second subgroup, late reperfusion) after the onset of reperfusion. Control (Con) hearts received vehicle only. In the first subgroup, hearts were treated with 3 nM Dex, 100 µM mKATP-channel blocker 5-hydroxydecanoate (5HD) or 1 µM mBKCa-channel blocker Paxilline (Pax) alone or with respective combinations (5HD + Dex, Pax + Dex). Hearts of the second subgroup received Dex alone (Dex30') or in combination with the respective blockers (5HD + Dex30', Pax + Dex30'). Infarct size was determined with triphenyltetrazoliumchloride staining. Hemodynamic variables were recorded during the whole experiment.

RESULTS

During early reperfusion (first subgroup), the infarct size reducing effect of Dex (Con: 57% ± 9%, Dex: 31% ± 7%; P< .0001 versus Con) was completely abolished by 5HD and Pax (52% ± 6%; Pax + Dex: 53% ± 4%; each P< .0001 versus Dex), while both blockers alone had no effect on infarct size (5HD: 54% ± 8%, Pax: 53% ± 11%). During late reperfusion (second subgroup) the protective effect of Dex (Dex30': 33% ± 10%, P< .0001 versus Con) was fully abrogated by Pax (Pax + Dex30': 58% ± 7%, P < .0001 versus Dex30'), whereas 5HD did not block cardioprotection (5HD + Dex30': 36% ± 7%). Between groups and within each group throughout reperfusion no significant differences in hemodynamic variables were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardioprotection by treatment with Dex during early reperfusion seems to be mediated by both mitochondrial K-channels, whereas during late reperfusion only mBKCa-channels are involved.

[Perioperative cardioprotection - From bench to bedside : Current experimental evidence and possible reasons for the limited translation into the clinical setting]

Hintergrund

Ziel der perioperativen Kardioprotektion ist es, die Auswirkungen eines Ischämie- und Reperfusionsschadens zu minimieren. Aus anästhesiologischer Sicht spielt dieser Aspekt insbesondere in der Herzchirurgie bei Patienten mit Einsatz der Herz-Lungen-Maschine, aber auch allgemein bei längerfristigen hypotensiven Phasen oder perioperativen ischämischen Ereignissen im nichtkardiochirurgischen Setting eine wichtige Rolle. Im Laufe der letzten Jahre konnten diverse pharmakologische sowie nichtpharmakologische Strategien der Kardioprotektion identifiziert werden. Die Ergebnisse von Studien an isoliertem Gewebe sowie von tierexperimentellen In-vivo-Studien sind vielversprechend. Eine Translation dieser kardioprotektiven Strategien in die klinische Praxis ist bislang jedoch nicht gelungen. Große klinische Studien konnten keine signifikante Verbesserung des Outcome der Patienten zeigen.

Ziel der Arbeit

Dieser Übersichtsartikel gibt einen Überblick über die aktuelle experimentelle Evidenz pharmakologischer und nichtpharmakologischer Kardioprotektion. Außerdem sollen mögliche Gründe für die limitierte Translation diskutiert werden. Schließlich werden Möglichkeiten aufgezeigt, wie der Schritt „from bench to bedside“ in Zukunft doch noch gelingen könnte.

Material und Methoden

Narrative Übersichtsarbeit.

Ergebnisse und Diskussion

Trotz der vielversprechenden präklinischen experimentellen Ansätze zum Thema Kardioprotektion besteht nach wie vor eine große Diskrepanz zu den Ergebnissen aus großen klinischen Studien in der perioperativen Phase. Mögliche Gründe für die limitierte Translation könnten insbesondere Komorbiditäten und Komedikationen, die Wahl des Anästhesieverfahrens, aber auch die Wahl des Studiendesigns sein. Eine sorgfältige Studienplanung mit Berücksichtigung der genannten Probleme sowie ein simultaner Einsatz mehrerer kardioprotektiver Strategien mit dem Ziel eines additiven bzw. synergistischen Effekts stellen mögliche Ansätze für die Zukunft dar.

Perioperative Cardioprotection: General Mechanisms and Pharmacological Approaches

Cardioprotection encompasses a variety of strategies protecting the heart against myocardial injury that occurs during and after inadequate blood supply to the heart during myocardial infarction. While restoring reperfusion is crucial for salvaging myocardium from further damage, paradoxically, it itself accounts for additional cell death-a phenomenon named ischemia/reperfusion injury. Therefore, therapeutic strategies are necessary to render the heart protected against myocardial infarction. Ischemic pre- and postconditioning, by short periods of sublethal cardiac ischemia and reperfusion, are still the strongest mechanisms to achieve cardioprotection. However, it is highly impractical and far too invasive for clinical use. Fortunately, it can be mimicked pharmacologically, for example, by volatile anesthetics, noble gases, opioids, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. These substances are all routinely used in the clinical setting and seem promising candidates for successful translation of cardioprotection from experimental protocols to clinical trials. This review presents the fundamental mechanisms of conditioning strategies and provides an overview of the most recent and relevant findings on different concepts achieving cardioprotection in the experimental setting, specifically emphasizing pharmacological approaches in the perioperative context.

Perioperative Cardioprotection: Clinical Implications

Perioperative cardioprotection aims to minimize the consequences of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. In isolated tissue and animal experiments, several treatments have been identified providing cardioprotection. Some of these strategies have been confirmed in clinical proof-of-concept studies. However, the final translation of cardioprotective strategies to really improve clinical outcome has been disappointing: large randomized controlled clinical trials mostly revealed inconclusive, neutral, or negative results. This review provides an overview of the currently available evidence regarding clinical implications of perioperative cardioprotective therapies from an anesthesiological perspective, highlighting nonpharmacological as well as pharmacological strategies. We discuss reasons why translation of promising experimental results into clinical practice and outcome improvement is hampered by potential confounders and suggest future perspectives to overcome these limitations.

Dexmedetomidine at a dose of 1 µM attenuates H9c2 cardiomyocyte injury under 3 h of hypoxia exposure and 3 h of reoxygenation through the inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress

Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) has been confirmed to induce endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) during downstream cascade reactions after the sufficient deterioration of cardiomyocyte function. However, clinically outcomes have been inconsistent with experimental findings because the mechanism has not been entirely elucidated. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), an α² adrenergic receptor agonist with anti-inflammatory and organ-protective activity, has been shown to attenuate IRI in the heart. The present study aimed to determine whether DEX is able to protect injured cardiomyocytes under in vitro hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) conditions and evaluate the conditions under which ERS is efficiently ameliorated. The cytotoxicity of DEX in H9c2 cells was evaluated 24 h after treatment with several different concentrations of DEX. The most appropriate H/R model parameters were determined by the assessment of cell viability and injury with Cell Counting Kit-8 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assays after incubation under hypoxic conditions for 3 h and reoxygenation conditions for 3, 6, 12 and 24 h. Additionally, the aforementioned methods were used to assess cardiomyocytes cultured with various concentrations of DEX under H/R conditions. Furthermore, the degree of apoptosis and the mRNA and protein expression levels of glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) and caspase-12 were evaluated in all groups. The addition of 1, 5 and 10 µM DEX to the cell culture significantly increased the proliferation of H9c2 cells by >80% under normal culture conditions. In the H/R model assessment, following 3 h of anoxia exposure, H9c2 cell viability decreased to 62.67% with 3 h of reoxygenation and to 36% with 6 h of reoxygenation compared with the control. The viability of H9c2 cells subjected to hypoxia for 3 h and reoxygenation for 3 h increased by 61.3% when pretreated with 1 µM DEX, and the LDH concentration in the supernatant was effectively decreased by 13.7%. H/R significantly increased the percentage of apoptotic cells, as detected by flow cytometry, and increased the expression levels of GRP78, CHOP and caspase-12, while treatment with either DEX or 4-phenylbutyric acid (4-PBA) significantly attenuated these effects. Additionally, despite the protective effect of DEX against H/R injury, 4-PBA attenuated the changes induced by DEX and H/R. In conclusion, treatment with 1 µM DEX alleviated cell injury, apoptosis and the increases in GRP78, CHOP and caspase-12 expression levels in H9c2 cells induced by 3 h of hypoxia and 3 h of reoxygenation.

Dexmedetomidine Attenuates Cellular Injury and Apoptosis in H9c2 Cardiomyocytes by Regulating p-38MAPK and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress

Background

Myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) has been confirmed to induce endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) when myocardial cell function continues to deteriorate to a certain degree. The clinical applications of effective tested strategies are sometimes inconsistent with the applications evaluated in experiments, although reasonable mechanisms and diverse signalling pathways have been broadly explored. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been shown to attenuate IRI of the heart in animal studies. This study aimed to determine whether DEX can protect injured cardiomyocytes under hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) at the cellular level and whether the mechanism is related to ERS and the p38 MAPK pathway.

Methods

H9c2 cells were subjected to H/R or thapsigargin (TG) to build a model. DEX or 4-PBA was added to the medium either 1 h or 24 h before modelling, respectively. Model parameters were determined by assessing cell viability and injury, which were measured by assessing cell counting kit-8 (CCK8), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release and flow cytometry results, and the expression of GRP78, CHOP and caspase-12. In addition, the protein expression of p38MAPK and p-p38MAPK was examined, and SB202190, a negative regulator, was also preincubated in medium.

Results

Compared to that of cells in the control group, the activity of cells in the H/R and TG groups was decreased dramatically, and the LDH concentration and proportion of apoptotic cells were increased. DEX could correspondingly reverse the changes induced by H/R or TG. Additionally, DEX effectively attenuated ERS defined as increased expression of GRP78, CHOP and caspase-12. Additionally, DEX could obviously depress the P38 MAPK phosphorylation and high p-p38 MAPK expression in the TG group, indicating DEX has a function similar to that of SB202190.

Conclusion

H/R injury in H9c2 cells can lead to abnormal ERS and apoptosis, as well as activation of the p38MAPK signalling pathway. DEX can protect cardiomyocytes by intervening in ERS, regulating p38MAPK and the downstream apoptotic signalling pathway.

The Effects of Dexmedetomidine Post-Conditioning on Cardiac and Neurological Outcomes After Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation in Swine

INTRODUCTION

One of the main contents of post-resuscitation care is to alleviate cardiac and neurological damage in cardiac arrest (CA) victims. Recently, dexmedetomidine pre- and post-conditioning have been shown to both effectively protect the heart and brain against regional ischemia reperfusion injury. In this study, we investigated the effects of dexmedetomidine post-conditioning on cardiac and neurological outcomes after CA and resuscitation in swine.

METHODS

A total of 28 male domestic swine were randomized into four groups: sham, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), low-dose dexmedetomidine post-conditioning (LDP), and high-dose dexmedetomidine post-conditioning (HDP). Sham animals underwent the surgical preparation only. The animal model was established by 8 min of CA and then 5 min of CPR. After the animal was successfully resuscitated, a loading dose of 0.25 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine was intravenously injected followed by continuous infusion of 0.25 μg/kg/h for 6 h in the LDP group, and meanwhile a double dose of dexmedetomidine was similarly administered in the HDP group. The same amount of saline was given in the other two groups. All the resuscitated animals were monitored for 6 h and then returned to their cages for an additional 18 h of observation.

RESULTS

After resuscitation, significantly greater cardiac, neurological dysfunction, and injuries were observed in all animals experiencing CA and resuscitation when compared with the sham group. However, the severity of cardiac and neurological damage was significantly milder in the two dexmedetomidine-treated groups than in the CPR group. Dexmedetomidine post-conditioning also significantly decreased post-resuscitation tissue inflammation, oxidative stress, and cell apoptosis and necroptosis in the heart and brain when compared with the CPR group. In addition, these protective effects produced by dexmedetomidine post-conditioning were significantly greater in the HDP group than in the LDP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine post-conditioning dose-dependently improved post-resuscitation cardiac and neurological outcomes through the inhibition of tissue inflammation, oxidative stress, and cell apoptosis and necroptosis.

Influence of Hyperglycemia on Dexmedetomidine-Induced Cardioprotection in the Isolated Perfused Rat Heart

Pharmacological preconditioning (PC) and postconditioning (PoC), for example, by treatment with the α2-adrenoreceptor agonist Dexmedetomidine (Dex), protects hearts from ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in experimental studies, however, translation into the clinical setting has been challenging. Acute hyperglycemia adversely affects the outcome of patients with myocardial infarction. Additionally, it also blocks cardioprotection by multiple pharmacological agents. Therefore, we investigated the possible influence of acute hyperglycemia on Dexmedetomidine-induced pre- and postconditioning. Experiments were performed on the hearts of male Wistar rats, which were randomized into 7 groups, placed in an isolated Langendorff system and perfused with Krebs-Henseleit buffer. All hearts underwent 33 min of global ischemia, followed by 60 min of reperfusion. Control (Con) hearts received Krebs-Henseleit buffer (Con KHB), glucose (Con HG) or mannitol (Con NG) as vehicle only. Hearts exposed to hyperglycemia (HG) received KHB, containing 11 mmol/L glucose (an elevated, but commonly used glucose concentration for Langendorff perfused hearts) resulting in a total concentration of 22 mmol/L glucose throughout the whole experiment. To ensure comparable osmolarity with HG conditions, normoglycemic (NG) hearts received mannitol in addition to KHB. Hearts were treated with 3 nM Dexmedetomidine (Dex) before (DexPC) or after ischemia (DexPoC), under hyperglycemic or normoglycemic conditions. Infarct size was determined by triphenyltetrazoliumchloride staining. Acute hyperglycemia had no impact on infarct size compared to the control group with KHB (Con HG: 56 ± 9% ns vs. Con KHB: 56 ± 7%). DexPC reduced infarct size despite elevated glucose levels (DexPC HG: 35 ± 3%, p < 0.05 vs. Con HG). However, treatment with Dex during reperfusion showed no infarct size reduction under hyperglycemic conditions (DexPoC HG: 57 ± 9%, ns vs. Con HG). In contrast, hearts treated with mannitol demonstrated a significant decrease in infarct size compared to the control group (Con NG: 37 ± 3%, p < 0.05 vs. Con KHB). The combination of Dex and mannitol presents exactly opposite results to hearts treated with hyperglycemia. While DexPC completely abrogates infarct reduction through mannitol treatment (DexPC NG: 55 ± 7%, p < 0.05 vs. Con NG), DexPoC had no impact on mannitol-induced infarct size reduction (DexPoC NG: 38 ± 4%, ns vs. Con NG). Acute hyperglycemia inhibits DexPoC, while it has no impact on DexPC. Treatment with mannitol induces cardioprotection. Application of Dex during reperfusion does not influence mannitol-induced infarct size reduction, however, administering Dex before ischemia interferes with mannitol-induced cardioprotection.

Organ-Protective Effects and the Underlying Mechanism of Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a highly selective α2 adrenergic receptor (α2AR) agonist currently used in clinical settings. Because DEX has dose-dependent advantages of sedation, analgesia, antianxiety, inhibition of sympathetic nervous system activity, cardiovascular stabilization, and significant reduction of postoperative delirium and agitation, but does not produce respiratory depression and agitation, it is widely used in clinical anesthesia and ICU departments. In recent years, much clinical study and basic research has confirmed that DEX has a protective effect on a variety of organs, including the nervous system, heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, and small intestine. It acts by reducing the inflammatory response in these organs, activating antiapoptotic signaling pathways which protect cells from damage. Therefore, based on wide clinical application and safety, DEX may become a promising clinical multiorgan protection drug in the future. In this article, we review the physiological effects related to organ protection in α2AR agonists along with the organ-protective effects and mechanisms of DEX to understand their combined application value.

Dexmedetomidine Preconditioning Protects Rats from Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Accompanied with Biphasic Changes of Nuclear Factor-Kappa B Signaling

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common and troublesome perioperative complications. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a potent α2-adrenoceptor (α2-AR) agonist with anti-inflammatory and renoprotective effects. In this study, a rat renal ischemia–reperfusion injury (IRI) model was induced. At 24 h after reperfusion, the IRI-induced damage and the renoprotection of DEX preconditioning were confirmed both biochemically and histologically. Changes in nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), as well as its downstream anti-inflammatory factor A20 and proinflammatory factor tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), were detected. Atipamezole, a nonselective antagonist, was then added 5 min before the administration of DEX to further analyze DEX's effects on NF-κB, and another anti-inflammatory medicine, methylprednisolone, was used in comparison with DEX, to further analyze DEX's effects on NF-κB. Different concentrations of DEX (0 nM, 0.1 nM, 1 nM, 10 nM, 100 nM, 1 μM, and 10 μM) were applied to preincubated human renal tubular epithelial cell line (HK-2) cells in vitro. After anoxia and reoxygenation, the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) tetrazolium assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were performed to evaluate the levels of NF-κB downstream anti-inflammatory cytokines. The results showed that, unlike methylprednisolone, DEX preconditioning led to a time-dependent biphasic change (first activation then inhibition) of NF-κB in the rat renal IRI models that were given 25 μg/kg i.p. It was accompanied by a similarly biphasic change of TNF-α and an early and persistent upregulation of A20. In vitro, DEX's cellular protection showed a concentration-dependent biphasic change which was protective within the range of 0 to 100 nM but became opposite when concentrations are greater than 1 μM. The changes in the A20 and NF-κB messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were consistent with the renoprotective ability of DEX. In other words, DEX preconditioning protected the rats from renal IRI via regulation biphasic change of NF-κB signaling.