• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
  • Find an Author
Download
For: Cowen AR, Haywood JM, Workman A, Clarke OF. A set of X-ray test objects for image quality control in digital subtraction fluorography. I: Design considerations. Br J Radiol 1987;60:1001-9. [PMID: 3315090 DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-60-718-1001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]  Open
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Marshall NW, Vandenbroucke D, Cockmartin L, Wanninger F, Smet M, Feng Y, Ni Y, Bosmans H. Seven general radiography x-ray detectors with pixel sizes ranging from 175 to 76μm: technical evaluation with the focus on orthopaedic imaging. Phys Med Biol 2023;68:195007. [PMID: 37659394 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
2
Dedulle A, Fitousi N, Jacobs J, Marshall NW, Bosmans H. A methodology to estimate the patient diameter and thickness from thoracic and abdominal projection radiographs of adult patients. Phys Med Biol 2021;66. [PMID: 34157703 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac0d8c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
3
Van Peteghem N, Bosmans H, Marshall NW. NPWE model observer as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis of digital detectors in general radiography. Phys Med Biol 2016;61:N575-N591. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/21/n575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
4
de las Heras H, Torres R, Fernández-Soto JM, Vañó E. Objective criteria for acceptability and constancy tests of digital subtraction angiography. Phys Med 2015;32:272-6. [PMID: 26522881 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.10.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2015] [Revised: 10/13/2015] [Accepted: 10/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]  Open
5
Marshall NW, Mackenzie A, Honey ID. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors. Phys Med Biol 2011;56:979-99. [PMID: 21248386 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/4/007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
6
Marshall NW. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:2441-63. [PMID: 16675862 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
7
Charnock P, Connolly PA, Hughes D, Moores BM. Evaluation and testing of computed radiography systems. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:201-7. [PMID: 15933109 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
8
Fitzgerald AJ, Berry E, Miles RE, Zinovev NN, Smith MA, Chamberlain JM. Evaluation of image quality in terahertz pulsed imaging using test objects. Phys Med Biol 2002;47:3865-73. [PMID: 12452578 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/21/326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
9
Fenner JW, Morrison GD, Kerry J, West N. A practical demonstration of improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy. Br J Radiol 2002;75:596-602. [PMID: 12145133 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.75.895.750596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]  Open
10
Marshall NW, Kotre CJ, Robson KJ, Lecomber AR. Receptor dose in digital fluorography: a comparison between theory and practice. Phys Med Biol 2001;46:1283-96. [PMID: 11324965 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/46/4/325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
11
Cowen AR, Workman A. A physical image quality evaluation of a digital spot fluorography system. Phys Med Biol 2000. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/37/2/002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
12
Weatherburn GC, Davies JG. Comparison of film, hard copy computed radiography (CR) and soft copy picture archiving and communication (PACS) systems using a contrast detail test object. Br J Radiol 1999;72:856-63. [PMID: 10645191 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.72.861.10645191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]  Open
13
Marshall NW, Faulkner K, Busch HP, Lehmann KJ. The contrast-detail behaviour of a photostimulable phosphor based computed radiography system. Phys Med Biol 1999;39:2289-303. [PMID: 15551554 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/39/12/011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
14
Britten AJ. A phantom and a procedure to obtain variable-object-contrast test images in gamma camera emission computed tomography (SPECT). Phys Med Biol 1999;39:2331-47. [PMID: 15551557 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/39/12/014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
15
Manning D. Evaluation of diagnostic performance in radiography. Radiography (Lond) 1998. [DOI: 10.1016/s1078-8174(98)80030-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
16
Chesters MS. Human visual perception and ROC methodology in medical imaging. Phys Med Biol 1992;37:1433-76. [PMID: 1631192 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/37/7/001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
17
Thompson SR, Faulkner K. A phantom for the measurement of contrast detail performance in film-screen mammography. Br J Radiol 1991;64:1049-55. [PMID: 1742587 DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-64-767-1049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]  Open
18
Fowler RC, Bonsor G, Lintott DJ. Description and appraisal of a prototype digital fluorographic system. Clin Radiol 1989;40:508-13. [PMID: 2791464 DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(89)80265-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
19
Harrison RM. Digital radiography. Phys Med Biol 1988;33:751-84. [PMID: 3062645 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/33/7/001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA