1
|
Zukauskaite R, Kristensen MH, Eriksen JG, Johansen J, Samsøe E, Johnsen L, Lønkvist CK, Grau C, Hansen CR. Comparison of 3-year local control using DAHANCA radiotherapy guidelines before and after implementation of five millimetres geometrical GTV to high-dose CTV margin. Radiother Oncol 2024; 196:110284. [PMID: 38636711 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment planning using a five-millimetre geometrical margin from GTV to high-dose CTV (CTV1) has been used in DAHANCA treatment centres since 2013. We aimed to evaluate changes in CTV1 volumes, local control (LC), and recurrence pattern after the implementation of five-millimetre geometrical margins nationally. MATERIALS AND METHODS 1,948 patients with pharyngeal, and laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas completed definitive IMRT-based treatment in 2010-2012 and 2013-2015 in three centres. The patient-specific margin was calculated as median surface distance from primary tumour GTV (GTV-T) to CTV1. Radiologically verified local recurrences were analysed using a centre of mass (COM) of the delineated recurrence volume, measuring the shortest distance between COM to GTV-T and CTV1 boundaries. RESULTS Median GTV-CTV1 was 0.9 (0.0-0.97) and 0.47 cm (0.4-0.5) for 2010-2012 and 2013-2015, respectively. Median CTV1 changed in three centres from 76, 28, 42 cm3 to 61, 53, 62 cm3 for 2010-2012 and 2013-2015, respectively. Local failures occurred at 247 patients during first three years after radiotherapy. The 3-year LC rate for 2010-2012 and 2013-2015 was 0.84 and 0.87 (p = 0.06). Out of 146 radiology-verified analysable local recurrences, 102 (69.9%) were inside the CTV1. In 74.6% and 91% of cases, the LRs were covered by 95% isodose in 2010-2012 and 2013-2015, respectively. CONCLUSION DAHANCA radiotherapy guidelines based on a geometrically generated isotropic CTV1 margin led to less variation in treatment volumes and between centres than previous guidelines. The transition towards consensus GTV-CTV1 margins did not influence local tumour control. The majority of local recurrences were inside CTV1 and covered by the prescription dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruta Zukauskaite
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | | | - Jesper Grau Eriksen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jørgen Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Eva Samsøe
- Department of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Næstved, Denmark
| | - Lars Johnsen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Camilla Kjær Lønkvist
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Cai Grau
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christian Rønn Hansen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Melerowitz L, Sreenivasa S, Nachbar M, Stsefanenka A, Beck M, Senger C, Predescu N, Ullah Akram S, Budach V, Zips D, Heiland M, Nahles S, Stromberger C. Design and evaluation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation of maxillary and mandibular substructures using a 3D U-Net. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 47:100780. [PMID: 38712013 PMCID: PMC11070663 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Current segmentation approaches for radiation treatment planning in head and neck cancer patients (HNCP) typically consider the entire mandible as an organ at risk, whereas segmentation of the maxilla remains uncommon. Accurate risk assessment for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) or implant-based dental rehabilitation after radiation therapy may require a nuanced analysis of dose distribution in specific mandibular and maxillary segments. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and inconsistent, and there is no definition of jaw subsections. Materials and methods The mandible and maxilla were divided into 12 substructures. The model was developed from 82 computed tomography (CT) scans of HNCP and adopts an encoder-decoder three-dimensional (3D) U-Net structure. The efficiency and accuracy of the automated method were compared against manual segmentation on an additional set of 20 independent CT scans. The evaluation metrics used were the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and surface DSC (sDSC). Results Automated segmentations were performed in a median of 86 s, compared to manual segmentations, which took a median of 53.5 min. The median DSC per substructure ranged from 0.81 to 0.91, and the median HD95 ranged from 1.61 to 4.22. The number of artifacts did not affect these scores. The maxillary substructures showed lower metrics than the mandibular substructures. Conclusions The jaw substructure segmentation demonstrated high accuracy, time efficiency, and promising results in CT scans with and without metal artifacts. This novel model could provide further investigation into dose relationships with ORN or dental implant failure in normal tissue complication prediction models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Melerowitz
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - S. Sreenivasa
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - M. Nachbar
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - A. Stsefanenka
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - M. Beck
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - C. Senger
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - N. Predescu
- MVision AI, Paciuksenkatu 29 00270 Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - V. Budach
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - D. Zips
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - M. Heiland
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - S. Nahles
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - C. Stromberger
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sagawa T, Ikawa T, Ohira S, Kanayama N, Ueda Y, Inui S, Miyazaki M, Konishi K. What is the optimal isodose line for stereotactic radiotherapy for single brain metastases using HyperArc? J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024:e14408. [PMID: 38863310 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The study aimed to investigate the optimal isodose line (IDL) in linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for single brain metastasis, using HyperArc. We compared the dosimetric parameters for target and normal brain tissue among six plans with different IDLs. METHODS This study included 30 patients with single brain metastasis. We retrospectively generated six plans for each tumor with different IDLs (80%, 70%, 60%, 50%, 40%, and 33%) using HyperArc. All treatment plans were normalized to the prescription dose of 35 Gy in five fractions which was covered by 95% of the planning target volume (PTV), defined by adding a 1.0 mm margin to the gross tumor volume (GTV). The dosimetric parameters were compared among the six plans. RESULTS For GTV > 0.1 cm3, the ratio of brain-GTV volumes receiving 25 Gy to PTV (V25Gy/PTV) was significantly lower at IDL 40%-70% than at IDL 80% and 33% (p < 0.01, retrospectively). For GTV < 0.1 cm3, V25Gy/PTV decreased continuously as IDL decreased. The values of D99% and D80% for GTV increased with decreasing IDL. An IDL of 50% or less was required to achieve D99% of greater than 43 Gy and D80% of greater than 50 Gy. The mean values of D99% and D80% for IDL 50% were 44.3 and 51.9 Gy. CONCLUSION The optimal IDL is 40%-50% for GTV > 0.1 cm3. These lower IDLs could increase D99% and D80% of GTV while lowering V25Gy of normal brain tissue, which may help reduce the risk of radiation necrosis and improve local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Sagawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toshiki Ikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shingo Ohira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Kanayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ueda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shoki Inui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Miyazaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gullhaug A, Haakensen VD, De Ruysscher D, Simone CB, Hotca-Cho AE, Chhabra AM, Hellebust TP, Paulsen EE, Dimopoulos MP, Johansen S. Lung cancer reirradiation: Exploring modifications to utilization, treatment modalities and factors associated with outcomes. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2024; 55:221-231. [PMID: 38429174 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients treated for lung cancer (LC) often experience locoregional failure after initial treatment. Due to technological advances, thoracic reirradiation (re-RT) has become a viable treatment option. We sought to investigate the use of thoracic re-RT in LC patients over a time period characterized by technological advances in a large, multi-center cohort. METHODS AND MATERIALS LC patients treated with thoracic re-RT in two University Hospitals from 2010-2020 were identified. Clinical variables and RT data were extracted from the medical records and treatment planning systems. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the last day of re-RT until death or last follow up. RESULTS 296 patients (small cell LC n=30, non-small cell LC n=266) were included. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy was the RT technique used most frequently (63%), and 86% of all patients were referred for re-RT with palliative treatment intent. During the second half of the study period, the use of thoracic re-RT increased in general, more patients received curative re-RT, and there was an increased use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Median time between initial RT and re-RT was 18 months (range 1-213 months). Only 83/296 patients had combined treatment plans that allowed for registration of combined doses to organs at risk (OAR). Most of the combined doses to OAR were below recommendations from guidelines. Multivariate analysis showed superior OS (p<0.05) in patients treated with curative intent, SBRT or intensity modulated radiation therapy or had excellent performance status prior to re-RT. CONCLUSIONS The use of re-RT increased in the second half of the study period, although 2020 did not follow the trend. The use of SBRT and IMRT became more frequent over the years, yet the majority received palliative re-RT. Combined dose plans were only created for one third of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gullhaug
- Department of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Vilde D Haakensen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, the Netherlands
| | - Charles B Simone
- New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexandra E Hotca-Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | | | - Taran P Hellebust
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Erna E Paulsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway; Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | - Maria P Dimopoulos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Safora Johansen
- Department of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Singapore institute of Technology, Health and Social Sciences, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bertholet J, Mackeprang PH, Loebner HA, Mueller S, Guyer G, Frei D, Volken W, Elicin O, Aebersold DM, Fix MK, Manser P. Organs-at-risk dose and normal tissue complication probability with dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110237. [PMID: 38513960 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
We compared dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) to state-of-the-art volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for 46 head and neck cancer cases. DTRT had lower dose to salivary glands and swallowing structure, resulting in lower predicted xerostomia and dysphagia compared to VMAT. DTRT is deliverable on C-arm linacs with high dosimetric accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Paul-Henry Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hannes A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wuyckens S, Wase V, Marthin O, Sundström J, Janssens G, Borderias-Villarroel E, Souris K, Sterpin E, Engwall E, Lee JA. Efficient proton arc optimization and delivery through energy layer pre-selection and post-filtering. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38742774 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton arc therapy (PAT) has emerged as a promising approach for improving dose distribution, but also enabling simpler and faster treatment delivery in comparison to conventional proton treatments. However, the delivery speed achievable in proton arc relies on dedicated algorithms, which currently do not generate plans with a clear speed-up and sometimes even result in increased delivery time. PURPOSE This study aims to address the challenge of minimizing delivery time through a hybrid method combining a fast geometry-based energy layer (EL) pre-selection with a dose-based EL filtering, and comparing its performance to a baseline approach without filtering. METHODS Three methods of EL filtering were developed: unrestricted, switch-up (SU), and switch-up gap (SU gap) filtering. The unrestricted method filters the lowest weighted EL while the SU gap filtering removes the EL around a new SU to minimize the gantry rotation braking. The SU filtering removes the lowest weighted group of EL that includes a SU. These filters were combined with the RayStation dynamic proton arc optimization framework energy layer selection and spot assignment (ELSA). Four bilateral oropharyngeal and four lung cancer patients' data were used for evaluation. Objective function values, target coverage robustness, organ-at-risk doses and normal tissue complication probability evaluations, as well as comparisons to intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans, were used to assess plan quality. RESULTS The SU gap filtering algorithm performed best in five out of the eight cases, maintaining plan quality within tolerance while reducing beam delivery time, in particular for the oropharyngeal cohort. It achieved up to approximately 22% and 15% reduction in delivery time for oropharyngeal and lung treatment sites, respectively. The unrestricted filtering algorithm followed closely. In contrast, the SU filtering showed limited improvement, suppressing one or two SU without substantial delivery time shortening. Robust target coverage was kept within 1% of variation compared to the PAT baseline plan while organs-at-risk doses slightly decreased or kept about the same for all patients. CONCLUSIONS This study provides insights to accelerate PAT delivery without compromising plan quality. These advancements could enhance treatment efficiency and patient throughput.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Wuyckens
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Guillaume Janssens
- UCLouvain, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
- Ion Beam Applications SA, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Elena Borderias-Villarroel
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kevin Souris
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium
- Ion Beam Applications SA, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Edmond Sterpin
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium
- KULeuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of experimental radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium
- Particle Therapy Interuniversity Center Leuven - PARTICLE, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - John A Lee
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oliveira AM, Akkerman HB, Braccini S, van Breemen AJJM, Gelinck GH, Heracleous N, Leidner J, Murtas F, Peeters B, Silari M. A high-resolution large-area detector for quality assurance in radiotherapy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:10637. [PMID: 38724569 PMCID: PMC11082155 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61095-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Hadron therapy is an advanced radiation modality for treating cancer, which currently uses protons and carbon ions. Hadrons allow for a highly conformal dose distribution to the tumour, minimising the detrimental side-effects due to radiation received by healthy tissues. Treatment with hadrons requires sub-millimetre spatial resolution and high dosimetric accuracy. This paper discusses the design, fabrication and performance tests of a detector based on Gas Electron Multipliers (GEM) coupled to a matrix of thin-film transistors (TFT), with an active area of 60 × 80 mm2 and 200 ppi resolution. The experimental results show that this novel detector is able to detect low-energy (40 kVp X-rays), high-energy (6 MeV) photons used in conventional radiation therapy and protons and carbon ions of clinical energies used in hadron therapy. The GEM-TFT is a compact, fully scalable, radiation-hard detector that measures secondary electrons produced by the GEMs with sub-millimetre spatial resolution and a linear response for proton currents from 18 pA to 0.7 nA. Correcting known detector defects may aid in future studies on dose uniformity, LET dependence, and different gas mixture evaluation, improving the accuracy of QA in radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreia Maia Oliveira
- CERN - Occupational Health & Safety and Environmental Protection Unit, Radiation Protection Group, 1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland.
- Laboratory for High Energy Physics (LHEP), Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics (AEC), University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
- EBG MedAustron GmbH, Marie Curie-Straße 5, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
| | - Hylke B Akkerman
- Holst Centre/TNO, High Tech, Campus 31, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Saverio Braccini
- Laboratory for High Energy Physics (LHEP), Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics (AEC), University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Gerwin H Gelinck
- Holst Centre/TNO, High Tech, Campus 31, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Natalie Heracleous
- CERN - Occupational Health & Safety and Environmental Protection Unit, Radiation Protection Group, 1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Leidner
- CERN - Occupational Health & Safety and Environmental Protection Unit, Radiation Protection Group, 1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland
- Medidee Services SA, Chemin de Rovéréaz 5, 1012, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Fabrizio Murtas
- CERN - Occupational Health & Safety and Environmental Protection Unit, Radiation Protection Group, 1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland
- INFN-LNF, 00044, Frascati, Italy
| | - Bart Peeters
- Holst Centre/TNO, High Tech, Campus 31, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Silari
- CERN - Occupational Health & Safety and Environmental Protection Unit, Radiation Protection Group, 1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thakur N, Bansal N, Sudan M, Sharma A. Optimising craniospinal irradiation for medulloblastoma: a dosimetric comparison of two VMAT planning methods. Ecancermedicalscience 2024; 18:1700. [PMID: 38774570 PMCID: PMC11108045 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) poses a challenging planning process because of the complex target volume. Traditional 3D conformal CSI does not spare any critical organs, resulting in toxicity in patients. Here the dosimetric advantages of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using partial arc and avoidance sectors are compared with each other in planning in adult patients undergoing CSI to develop a clinically feasible technique that is both effective and efficient. Patient and methods Eight adult patients treated with CSI were retrospectively identified. In total 16 plans were made. We generated two plans for each patient: 1. VMAT plan using partial arc, namely VMAT_pa. 2. VMAT plan using avoidance sectors, namely VMAT_as. The dose prescribed was 36 Gy in 20 fractions. The dose-volume histogram for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) (lens, eye, heart, thyroid, lungs, liver, gonads and kidneys) were analysed and compared. Dose parameters of mean dose, V95%, and V107% for the PTV were evaluated. Results The median length of PTV is 65.58 cm (45.8-79.5). The volume of PTV receiving 95% of the dose (V95%) in both the plans are 97.51% (VMAT_as) and 97.99% (VMAT_pa) (p = 0.121) while V107% are 0.733 and 0.742 for VMAT_as and VMAT_pa, respectively (p = 0.969). The doses of OARs such as lens, eye, liver and gonads were comparable. The mean heart dose was 10.4 and 9.0 Gy in VMAT_as and VMAT_pa plans, respectively (p = 0.005). Significant lower doses to the thyroid, kidneys and lungs were seen in VMAT plans using avoidance sectors. Conclusion This study provides a practically useful VMAT planning method for the treatment of CSI and illustrates the ability of VMAT using avoidance sectors to generate highly conformal and homogeneous treatment plans for CSI, while limiting the dose to the relevant OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niketa Thakur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bilaspur 174037, India
| | - Nancy Bansal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar 143501, India
| | - Meena Sudan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar 143501, India
| | - Abhishek Sharma
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alsaihaty Z, Abdul Manan H, Sabarudin A, Yahya N. Hybrid Treatment Planning for Chest Wall Irradiation Utilizing Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT), Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT): A Systematic Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e59583. [PMID: 38832195 PMCID: PMC11144584 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Novel hybrid approaches for chest wall irradiation show promising outcomes regarding target coverage and sparing organs at risk (OARs). In this systematic review, we compared hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) or hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (H-IMRT) techniques with non-hybrid techniques, such as three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), field-in-field (FIF), intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), for breast cancer patients with mastectomy. Our focus was the plan quality and dose distribution to the OARs. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist, we performed a systematic review and quality appraisal of primary studies evaluating hybrid therapy to the chest wall and the OARs. An extensive online search of PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted using appropriate keywords. The dose to the OARs (lung, heart, and contralateral breast), planning target volume (PTV), homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI) were extracted. The data were then tabulated and compared for the outcomes between modalities among the studies. Nine studies that met the search criteria were selected to evaluate the PTV coverage and dosimetric results of hybrid and non-hybrid techniques. In terms of 95% PTV coverage, among nine reviewed studies, the largest difference between the two techniques was between VMAT (47.6 Gy) and H-VMAT (48.4 Gy); for the conformity index, the largest difference was noted between 3DCRT (0.58) and H-VMAT (0.79). In both cases, differences were statistically significant (P < 0.005). Two studies showed dose homogeneity improvement within the treatment target in H-VMAT (0.15 and 0.07) compared with 3DCRT (0.41 and 0.12), with a P value of <0.001. Two studies did not report on the homogeneity index, and three others observed no statistical difference. Regarding OARs, in the comparison of H-VMAT and VMAT, the largest significant change was in the volume receiving 5 Gy (V5Gy) of the ipsilateral lung and the V10Gy of the contralateral lung. For the ipsilateral lung, V5Gy was 90.7% with VMAT versus 51.45% with H-VMAT. For the contralateral lung, V10Gy was 54.9% with VMAT versus 50.5% with H-VMAT. In six studies, the mean dose of the contralateral breast was lower in hybrid techniques than in single modalities: VMAT (4.2%, 6.0%, 1.9%, 7.1%, 4.57%) versus H-VMAT (1.4%, 3.4%, 1.8%, 3.5%, 2.34%) and IMRT (9.1%) versus H-IMRT (4.69%). Although most studies did not report on monitor units and treatment time, those that included them showed that hybrids had lower monitor units and shorter treatment times. Hybrid techniques in radiotherapy, such as combining two modalities, can indeed facilitate lower doses to OARs for patients with a high risk of toxicities. Prospective clinical studies are needed to determine the outcomes of breast cancer treated with hybrid techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zainab Alsaihaty
- Radiation Therapy, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, SAU
- Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Centre for Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Investigative Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| | - Hanani Abdul Manan
- Functional Image Processing Laboratory, Department of Radiology, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| | - Akmal Sabarudin
- Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Centre for Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Investigative Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| | - Noorazrul Yahya
- Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Centre for Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Investigative Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Şenkesen Ö, Tezcanlı E, Alkaya F, İspir B, Çatlı S, Yeşil A, Bezirganoglu E, Turan S, Köksal C, Güray G, Hacıislamoğlu E, Durmuş İF, Çavdar Ş, Aksu T, Çolak N, Küçükmorkoç E, Doğan M, Ercan T, Karaköse F, Alpan V, Ceylan C, Poyraz G, Nalbant N, Kınay Ş, İpek S, Kayalılar N, Tatlı H, Zhu M. Current practices of craniospinal irradiation techniques in Turkey: a comprehensive dosimetric analysis. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:49. [PMID: 38627747 PMCID: PMC11022438 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02435-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluates various craniospinal irradiation (CSI) techniques used in Turkish centers to understand their advantages, disadvantages and overall effectiveness, with a focus on enhancing dose distribution. METHODS Anonymized CT scans of adult and pediatric patients, alongside target volumes and organ-at-risk (OAR) structures, were shared with 25 local radiotherapy centers. They were tasked to develop optimal treatment plans delivering 36 Gy in 20 fractions with 95% PTV coverage, while minimizing OAR exposure. The same CT data was sent to a US proton therapy center for comparison. Various planning systems and treatment techniques (3D conformal RT, IMRT, VMAT, tomotherapy) were utilized. Elekta Proknow software was used to analyze parameters, assess dose distributions, mean doses, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) for both target volumes and OARs. Comparisons were made against proton therapy. RESULTS All techniques consistently achieved excellent PTV coverage (V95 > 98%) for both adult and pediatric patients. Tomotherapy closely approached ideal Dmean doses for all PTVs, while 3D-CRT had higher Dmean for PTV_brain. Tomotherapy excelled in CI and HI for PTVs. IMRT resulted in lower pediatric heart, kidney, parotid, and eye doses, while 3D-CRT achieved the lowest adult lung doses. Tomotherapy approached proton therapy doses for adult kidneys and thyroid, while IMRT excelled for adult heart, kidney, parotid, esophagus, and eyes. CONCLUSION Modern radiotherapy techniques offer improved target coverage and OAR protection. However, 3D techniques are continued to be used for CSI. Notably, proton therapy stands out as the most efficient approach, closely followed by Tomotherapy in terms of achieving superior target coverage and OAR protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Öznur Şenkesen
- Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acıbadem Ataşehir Hospital, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Kayışdağı Cad. No:32, Ataşehir, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Evrim Tezcanlı
- Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acıbadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fadime Alkaya
- Health Sciences Institute, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Burçin İspir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acıbadem Adana Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Serap Çatlı
- Radiation Oncology Department, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Yeşil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medicana Bursa Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| | | | - Sezgi Turan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Neolife Medical Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Canan Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gülay Güray
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medikal Park Bahçelievler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Emel Hacıislamoğlu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Karadeniz Technical University Farabi Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - İsmail Faruk Durmuş
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeni Yuzyıl University Gaziosmanpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Şeyma Çavdar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medicana Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Telat Aksu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Nurten Çolak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Esra Küçükmorkoç
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anadolu Medical Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Doğan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Tülay Ercan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fatih Karaköse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Vildan Alpan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cemile Ceylan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Onkology Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gökhan Poyraz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medipol University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nilgül Nalbant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Basaksehir Cam Ve Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Şeyda Kınay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Servet İpek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Namık Kayalılar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acıbadem Maslak Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hamza Tatlı
- Elekta Instrument AB, Barbaros Mah. Begonya Sok. Nidakule, Ataşehir, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mingyao Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xie L, Zhang L, Hu T, Li G, Yi Z. Neural Network Model Based on Branch Architecture for the Quality Assurance of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:362. [PMID: 38671783 PMCID: PMC11048630 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11040362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy relies on quality assurance (QA) to verify dose delivery accuracy. However, current QA methods suffer from operation lag as well as inaccurate performance. Hence, to address these shortcomings, this paper proposes a QA neural network model based on branch architecture, which is based on the analysis of the category features of the QA complexity metrics. The designed branch network focuses on category features, which effectively improves the feature extraction capability for complexity metrics. The branch features extracted by the model are fused to predict the GPR for more accurate QA. The performance of the proposed method was validated on the collected dataset. The experiments show that the prediction performance of the model outperforms other QA methods; the average prediction errors for the test set are 2.12% (2%/2 mm), 1.69% (3%/2 mm), and 1.30% (3%/3 mm). Moreover, the results indicate that two-thirds of the validation samples' model predictions perform better than the clinical evaluation results, suggesting that the proposed model can assist physicists in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lizhang Xie
- Machine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China (Z.Y.)
| | - Lei Zhang
- Machine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China (Z.Y.)
| | - Ting Hu
- Machine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China (Z.Y.)
| | - Guangjun Li
- Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Zhang Yi
- Machine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China (Z.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
El Ouardy K, Zerfaoui M, Oulhouq Y, Bahhous K, Rrhioua A, Bakari D. A comparative study of boost dose delivery techniques in breast cancer radiotherapy optimising efficacy and minimising toxicity. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2024; 200:459-466. [PMID: 38273648 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncad328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
The present study aims to compare three techniques for delivering a boost absorbed dose: conventional reduced tangential (3D), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and fields forward-planned technique boost (3DF). The study included 15 postoperative breast cancer patients who received a boost absorbed dose following breast-conserving surgery. The conformity index and homogeneity index were used to evaluate treatment outcomes, along with the average absorbed dose received by organs at risk (OAR). All the calculated dosimetric plans are carried out using Monaco Treatment Planning System (TPS). VMAT offers superior conformity, dose homogeneity and target coverage, it is associated with higher absorbed doses to OAR such as the heart and lung. In contrast, the 3D and 3DF techniques exhibit advantages in reducing absorbed doses to critical structures, potentially minimising the risk of cardiac and pulmonary complications. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages. The choice of technique should be individualised, taking into account patient-specific factors and treatment goals and involves a multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid El Ouardy
- Laboratory of Physics of Matter and Radiation, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, 60000, Morocco
| | - Mustapha Zerfaoui
- Laboratory of Physics of Matter and Radiation, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, 60000, Morocco
| | - Yassine Oulhouq
- Laboratory of Physics of Matter and Radiation, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, 60000, Morocco
| | - Karim Bahhous
- Faculty of Science, University Mohammed V in Rabat, Rabat B.P. 1014, Morocco
| | - Abdeslem Rrhioua
- Laboratory of Physics of Matter and Radiation, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, 60000, Morocco
| | - Dikra Bakari
- National School of Applied Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda 60000, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nisha A, C S, Nagesh J, Nair SS. Comparison between Volumetric Modulated arc Therapy based Coplanar and Noncoplanar Planning for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Liver. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2024; 25:1383-1390. [PMID: 38680000 PMCID: PMC11162725 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2024.25.4.1383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study aims to investigate potential dosimetric benefits between non-coplanar and coplanar beam arrangements of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans for liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS Thirteen patients who had undergone liver SBRT treatment in our department were chosen retrospectively for the study. Two sets of SBRT-VMAT plans namely, non-coplanar (NC-VMAT) and Coplanar (C-VMAT) were generated in Monaco(v5.11) planning system for Elekta Versa HD Linac using unflatten 6MV photon. The NC-VMAT plans were created by two/three non-coplanar partial arcs with couch rotation of ±150 and had an arc span of 1300 to 1600 whereas the C-VMAT plans consisted of a full arc. Both plans were compared by statistically analyzing various dosimetric and technical parameters. RESULTS There is no statistically significant difference observed between the C-VMAT and NC-VMAT plans for planning target volume (PTV) coverage. However, the spine dose (D1cc) was much less in the NC-VMAT plan compared to the C-VMAT plan, with mean values of 6.127 ± 3.08Gy and 9.058 ± 4.76Gy, respectively (p-value=0.002). The low dose spillage to the healthy tissue was compared by the volume receiving 5Gy (V5Gy) and 10Gy (V10Gy). V5Gy of the NC-VMAT plan was 2399.23±1870.76cc while that of C-VMAT plans was 2835.36±1930.20cc with the p-value <0.001. Moreover, the monitor units(MU) were less with NC-VMAT than with C-VMAT SBRT plans (p=0.015). CONCLUSION The plan quality of NC-VMAT plans was favorable compared to C-VMAT plans for liver SBRT especially in reducing spine dose, low dose spillage to healthy tissue, and MU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjum Nisha
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Medical Radiation Physics Program, Manipal College of Health Professions(MCHP), Manipal Academy of Higher Education(MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India.
| | - Shambhavi C
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Medical Radiation Physics Program, Manipal College of Health Professions(MCHP), Manipal Academy of Higher Education(MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India.
| | - Jyothi Nagesh
- Radiotherapy and Oncology, Senior Grade Lecturer, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
| | - Sarath S Nair
- Radiotherapy and Oncology, Senior Grade Lecturer, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Loebner HA, Bertholet J, Mackeprang PH, Volken W, Elicin O, Mueller S, Guyer G, Aebersold DM, Stampanoni MF, Fix MK, Manser P. Robustness analysis of dynamic trajectory radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy plans for head and neck cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100586. [PMID: 38808098 PMCID: PMC11130727 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) has been shown to improve healthy tissue sparing compared to volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). This study aimed to assess and compare the robustness of DTRT and VMAT treatment-plans for head and neck (H&N) cancer to patient-setup (PS) and machine-positioning uncertainties. Materials and methods The robustness of DTRT and VMAT plans previously created for 46 H&N cases, prescribed 50-70 Gy to 95 % of the planning-target-volume, was assessed. For this purpose, dose distributions were recalculated using Monte Carlo, including uncertainties in PS (translation and rotation) and machine-positioning (gantry-, table-, collimator-rotation and multi-leaf collimator (MLC)). Plan robustness was evaluated by the uncertainties' impact on normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for xerostomia and dysphagia and on dose-volume endpoints. Differences between DTRT and VMAT plan robustness were compared using Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test (α = 5 %). Results Average NTCP for moderate-to-severe xerostomia and grade ≥ II dysphagia was lower for DTRT than VMAT in the nominal scenario (0.5 %, p = 0.01; 2.1 %, p < 0.01) and for all investigated uncertainties, except MLC positioning, where the difference was not significant. Average differences compared to the nominal scenario were ≤ 3.5 Gy for rotational PS (≤ 3°) and machine-positioning (≤ 2°) uncertainties, <7 Gy for translational PS uncertainties (≤ 5 mm) and < 20 Gy for MLC-positioning uncertainties (≤ 5 mm). Conclusions DTRT and VMAT plan robustness to the investigated uncertainties depended on uncertainty direction and location of the structure-of-interest to the target. NTCP remained on average lower for DTRT than VMAT even when considering uncertainties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannes A. Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul-Henry Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Michael K. Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhang H, Zhang B, Lasio G, Chen S, Nasehi Tehrani J. Assessing quality assurance of multi-leaf collimator using the structural similarity index. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14288. [PMID: 38345201 PMCID: PMC11005984 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the viability of utilizing the Structural Similarity Index (SSI*) as an innovative imaging metric for quality assurance (QA) of the multi-leaf collimator (MLC). Additionally, we compared the results obtained through SSI* with those derived from a conventional Gamma index test for three types of Varian machines (Trilogy, Truebeam, and Edge) over a 12-week period of MLC QA in our clinic. METHOD To assess sensitivity to MLC positioning errors, we designed a 1 cm slit on the reference MLC, subsequently shifted by 0.5-5 mm on the target MLC. For evaluating sensitivity to output error, we irradiated five 25 cm × 25 cm open fields on the portal image with varying Monitor Units (MUs) of 96-100. We compared SSI* and Gamma index tests using three linear accelerator (LINAC) machines: Varian Trilogy, Truebeam, and Edge, with MLC leaf widths of 1, 0.5, and 0.25 mm. Weekly QA included VMAT and static field modes, with Picket fence test images acquired. Mechanical uncertainties related to the LINAC head, electronic portal imaging device (EPID), and MLC during gantry rotation and leaf motion were monitored. RESULTS The Gamma index test started detecting the MLC shift at a threshold of 4 mm, whereas the SSI* metric showed sensitivity to shifts as small as 2 mm. Moreover, the Gamma index test identified dose changes at 95MUs, indicating a 5% dose difference based on the distance to agreement (DTA)/dose difference (DD) criteria of 1 mm/3%. In contrast, the SSI* metric alerted to dose differences starting from 97MUs, corresponding to a 3% dose difference. The Gamma index test passed all measurements conducted on each machine. However, the SSI* metric rejected all measurements from the Edge and Trilogy machines and two from the Truebeam. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that the SSI* exhibits greater sensitivity than the Gamma index test in detecting MLC positioning errors and dose changes between static and VMAT modes. The SSI* metric outperformed the Gamma index test regarding sensitivity across these parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Zhang
- Departments of Radiation OncologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Baoshe Zhang
- Departments of Radiation OncologyMedical SchoolUniversity of MarylandBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Giovanni Lasio
- Departments of Radiation OncologyMedical SchoolUniversity of MarylandBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Shifeng Chen
- Departments of Radiation OncologyMedical SchoolUniversity of MarylandBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Joubin Nasehi Tehrani
- Departments of Radiation OncologyMedical SchoolUniversity of MarylandBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim C, Kim H, Jung D, Kim H, Park Y, Han MC, Hong CS, Kim H, Lee H, Sung J, Kim DW, Kim JS. Evaluation of the deliverability of dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) by gantry wobble and its influence on dose. Sci Rep 2024; 14:7134. [PMID: 38532018 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57644-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the deliverability of dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) by gantry wobble owing to the intrinsic inter-segment break of the Elekta linear accelerator (LINAC) and its adverse influence on the dose to the patient. The deliverability of DCAT was evaluated according to the plan parameters, which affect the gantry rotation speed and resultant positional inaccuracies; the deliverability according to the number of control points and dose rates was investigated by using treatment machine log files and dosimetry devices, respectively. A non-negligible degradation in DCAT deliverability due to gantry wobble was observed in both the treatment machine log files and dosimetry devices. The resulting dose-delivery error occurred below a certain number of control points or above a certain dose rate. Dose simulations in the patient domain showed a similar impact on deteriorated deliverability. For targets located primarily in the isocenter, the dose differences were negligible, whereas for organs at risk located mainly off-isocenter, the dose differences were significant up to - 8.77%. To ensure safe and accurate radiotherapy, optimal plan parameters should be selected, and gantry angle-specific validations should be conducted before treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changhwan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hojae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dongmin Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Heesoo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yeonok Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center, Proton Therapy Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Min Cheol Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chae-Seon Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hojin Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jinsil Sung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Jin Sung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
D'Agostino GR, Badalamenti M, Stefanini S, Baldaccini D, Franzese C, Faro LL, Di Cristina L, Vernier V, Reggiori G, Scorsetti M. Long term update on toxicity and survival of a phase II trial of linac-based stereotactic body radiation therapy for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. Prostate 2024; 84:368-375. [PMID: 38112222 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2016 we published a phase II study exploring safety and efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) delivered with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Flattening Filter Free (FFF) beams techniques in prostate cancer (PC) patients. We present herein the updated results on late toxicity and long-term survival. METHODS Patients enrolled in the study had a biopsy-confirmed localized PC and the features of a low- or intermediate-risk disease (National Comprehensive Network Criteria). The radiotherapy (RT) schedule consisted of 35 Gy delivered in five fractions every other day. Toxicities were registered according to the common toxicity adverse events v4.0. Biochemical recurrence was defined as an increase of prostate specific antigen after nadir, confirmed at least once. Local recurrence (LR) and distant metastases were detected either with Choline- or PSMA-PET/CT scans. Kaplan-Meier curves for Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival (BFS), Local Control (LC), Distant Metastasis Free Survival (DMFS) and Cancer Specific Survival, were calculated by using MedCalc. RESULTS Ninety patients were submitted to SBRT between February 2012 and March 2015. Fifty-eight patients (64.5%) had a Gleason Score of 6, while 32 (35.5%) had a Gleason Score of 7. A late grade 1 Genito-Urinary toxicity was observed in 54.5% of patients while a grade 2 in 3.3%. A late Gastro-intestinal grade 1 toxicity was reported in 18.9% of patients, while a grade 2 in 2.2%. Erectile dysfunction was reported by 13% of patients No heavier toxicities were observed. At a median follow-up of 102 months, 5- and 8-year BFS were 93.0% and 84.4% respectively, 5- and 8-year LC were 95.2% and 87.0% respectively, 5- and 8-year DMFS were 95.3% and 88.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This long-term update confirms that SBRT is a valid therapeutic strategy for low-intermediate risk PC. RT with VMAT and FFF warrants optimal results in terms of toxicity and disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe R D'Agostino
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Badalamenti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Stefanini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Baldaccini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Lo Faro
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciana Di Cristina
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Veronica Vernier
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Guo HL, Wu WW, Huan Y, Zhang HW. SGRT-based stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer setup accuracy and margin of the PTV. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14195. [PMID: 37915300 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT, AlignRT) was used to analyze motion during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in lung cancer patients and to explore the margin of the planning target volume (PTV). METHODS The residual errors of the AlignRT were evaluated based on grayscale cone-beam computed tomography registration results before each treatment. AlignRT log file was used to analyze the correlation between the frequency and longest duration of errors larger than 2 mm and lasting longer than 2 s and maximum error with age and treatment duration. The displacement value at the end of treatment, the average displacement value, and the 95% probability density displacement interval were defined as intrafraction errors, and PTV1, PTV2, PTV3 were calculated by Van Herk formula or Z score analysis. Organ dosimetric differences were compared after the experience-based margin was replaced with PTV3. RESULTS The interfraction residual errors were Vrt0 , 0.06 ± 0.18 cm; Lng0 , -0.03 ± 0.19 cm; Lat0 , 0.02 ± 0.15 cm; Pitch0 , 0.23 ± 0.7°; Roll0 , 0.1 ± 0.69°; Rtn0 , -0.02 ± 0.79°. The frequency, longest duration and maximum error in vertical direction were correlated with treatment duration (r = 0.404, 0.353, 0.283, p < 0.05, respectively). In the longitudinal direction, the frequency was correlated with age and treatment duration (r = 0.376, 0.283, p < 0.05, respectively), maximum error was correlated with age (r = 0.4, P < 0.05). Vertical, longitudinal, lateral margins of PTV1, PTV2, PTV3 were 2 mm, 4 mm, 2 mm; 2 mm, 2 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm, 3 mm, respectively. After replacing the original PTV, mean lung dose (MLD), 2-cm3 chest wall dose (CD), lung V20 decreased by 0.2 Gy, 2.1 Gy, 0.5%, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION AlignRT can be used for interfraction setup and monitoring intrafraction motion. It is more reasonable to use upper and lower limits of the 95% probability density interval as an intrafraction error.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Liang Guo
- Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Wei-Wei Wu
- Department of Radiotherapy, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Gannan Medical University, GanZhou Cancer Hospital, Ganzhou, China
| | - Yan Huan
- Department of Oncology, People's Hospital of Qianxinan Buyi and Miao Minority Autonomous Prefecture, Qian xinan, China
| | - Huai-Wen Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, NHC Key Laboratory of Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Nanchang, China
- Department of Oncology, The Third People's Hospital of Jingdezhen, Jingdezhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Salim N, Loyko I, Tumanova K, Stolbovoy A, Levkina O, Prokofev I. Stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanoma: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol 2024; 20:23. [PMID: 38357672 PMCID: PMC10865074 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2024.2721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy worldwide. Surgical intervention and radiation therapy (RT) are the primary treatment options. Given the complexity and cosmetic discomfort associated with eye enucleation, this method is less frequently used. As a result, RT, including photon therapy, proton therapy and brachytherapy, has become the treatment of choice. Traditionally, plaque brachytherapy has been the most commonly used in clinical practice. However, the question of which type of radiation therapy is the most effective, safe, commonly available and cost-effective remains open. The present study provided a follow-up analysis of a patient with UM who was treated using the image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy (IG-VMAT) technique. A complete response without complications and symptom relief were noted one and a half years after treatment. The present findings suggest that photon external beam radiotherapy using the IG-VMAT technique may offer a viable and safe alternative for the management of UM. This approach potentially sidesteps the complex and morbid aspects of surgical intervention and plaque brachytherapy. Owing to the limited sample size, a more robust understanding of the efficacy and safety of this treatment will require the analysis of additional cases. Further research with a larger cohort is essential to validate these preliminary observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidal Salim
- Institute of Oncology, European Medical Center, Moscow 129090, Russia
- Radiation Therapy Department, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow 125993, Russia
| | - Ilya Loyko
- Institute of Oncology, European Medical Center, Moscow 129090, Russia
| | - Kristina Tumanova
- Institute of Oncology, European Medical Center, Moscow 129090, Russia
| | - Aleksander Stolbovoy
- Institute of Oncology, European Medical Center, Moscow 129090, Russia
- Radiation Therapy Department, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow 125993, Russia
| | - Oksana Levkina
- Ophthalmology Department, European Medical Center, Moscow 129090, Russia
| | - Igor Prokofev
- Institute of Oncology, European Medical Center, Moscow 129090, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pursley J, Remillard K, Depauw N, Lee G, Grassberger C, Paganetti H, Efstathiou JA, Kamran SC. Radiation Therapy for Stage IIA/B Seminoma: Modeling Secondary Cancer Risk for Protons and VMAT versus 3D Photons. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:784. [PMID: 38398175 PMCID: PMC10886533 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is an effective treatment for stage IIA and select stage IIB seminomas. However, given the long life expectancy of seminoma patients, there are concerns about the risk of secondary cancers from RT. This study assessed differences in secondary cancer risk for stage II seminoma patients following proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) and photon VMAT, compared to 3D conformal photon RT. Ten seminoma patients, five with a IIA staging who received 30 GyRBE and five with a IIB staging who received 36 GyRBE, had three RT plans generated. Doses to organs at risk (OAR) were evaluated, and secondary cancer risks were calculated as the Excess Absolute Risk (EAR) and Lifetime Attributable Risk (LAR). PBS reduced the mean OAR dose by 60% on average compared to 3D, and reduced the EAR and LAR for all OAR, with the greatest reductions seen for the bowel, liver, and stomach. VMAT reduced high doses but increased the low-dose bath, leading to an increased EAR and LAR for some OAR. PBS provided superior dosimetric sparing of OAR compared to 3D and VMAT in stage II seminoma cases, with models demonstrating that this may reduce secondary cancer risk. Therefore, proton therapy shows the potential to reduce acute and late side effects of RT for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Pursley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| | - Kyla Remillard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| | - Nicolas Depauw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| | - Grace Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| | - Jason A. Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| | - Sophia C. Kamran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Huang P, Shang J, Hu Z, Liu Z, Yan H. Predicting voxel-level dose distributions of single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plan for multiple brain metastases. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1339126. [PMID: 38420019 PMCID: PMC10900235 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1339126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Brain metastasis is a common, life-threatening neurological problem for patients with cancer. Single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been popularly used due to its highly conformal dose and short treatment time. Accurate prediction of its dose distribution can provide a general standard for evaluating the quality of treatment plan. In this study, a deep learning model is applied to the dose prediction of a single-isocenter VMAT treatment plan for radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases. Method A U-net with residual networks (U-ResNet) is employed for the task of dose prediction. The deep learning model is first trained from a database consisting of hundreds of historical treatment plans. The 3D dose distribution is then predicted with the input of the CT image and contours of regions of interest (ROIs). A total of 150 single-isocenter VMAT plans for multiple brain metastases are used for training and testing. The model performance is evaluated based on mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute differences of multiple dosimetric indexes (DIs), including (D max and D mean) for OARs, (D 98, D 95, D 50, and D 2) for PTVs, homogeneity index, and conformity index. The similarity between the predicted and clinically approved plan dose distribution is also evaluated. Result For 20 tested patients, the largest and smallest MAEs are 3.3% ± 3.6% and 1.3% ± 1.5%, respectively. The mean MAE for the 20 tested patients is 2.2% ± 0.7%. The mean absolute differences of D 98, D 95, D 50, and D2 for PTV60, PTV52, PTV50, and PTV40 are less than 2.5%, 3.0%, 2.0%, and 3.0%, respectively. The prediction accuracy of OARs for D max and D mean is within 3.2% and 1.2%, respectively. The average DSC ranges from 0.86 to 1 for all tested patients. Conclusion U-ResNet is viable to produce accurate dose distribution that is comparable to those of the clinically approved treatment plans. The predicted results can be used to improve current treatment planning design, plan quality, efficiency, etc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Zhiqiang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bertholet J, Zhu C, Guyer G, Mueller S, Volken W, Mackeprang PH, Loebner HA, Stampanoni MFM, Aebersold DM, Fix MK, Manser P. Dosimetrically motivated beam-angle optimization for non-coplanar arc radiotherapy with and without dynamic collimator rotation. Med Phys 2024; 51:1326-1339. [PMID: 38131614 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-coplanar techniques have shown to improve the achievable dose distribution compared to standard coplanar techniques for multiple treatment sites but finding optimal beam directions is challenging. Dynamic collimator trajectory radiotherapy (colli-DTRT) is a new intensity modulated radiotherapy technique that uses non-coplanar partial arcs and dynamic collimator rotation. PURPOSE To solve the beam angle optimization (BAO) problem for colli-DTRT and non-coplanar VMAT (NC-VMAT) by determining the table-angle and the gantry-angle ranges of the partial arcs through iterative 4π fluence map optimization (FMO) and beam direction elimination. METHODS BAO considers all available beam directions sampled on a gantry-table map with the collimator angle aligned to the superior-inferior axis (colli-DTRT) or static (NC-VMAT). First, FMO is performed, and beam directions are scored based on their contributions to the objective function. The map is thresholded to remove the least contributing beam directions, and arc candidates are formed by adjacent beam directions with the same table angle. Next, FMO and arc candidate trimming, based on objective function penalty score, is performed iteratively until a desired total gantry angle range is reached. Direct aperture optimization on the final set of colli-DTRT or NC-VMAT arcs generates deliverable plans. colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT plans were created for seven clinically-motivated cases with targets in the head and neck (two cases), brain, esophagus, lung, breast, and prostate. colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT were compared to coplanar VMAT plans as well as to class-solution non-coplanar VMAT plans for the brain and head and neck cases. Dosimetric validation was performed for one colli-DTRT (head and neck) and one NC-VMAT (breast) plan using film measurements. RESULTS Target coverage and conformity was similar for all techniques. colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT plans had improved dosimetric performance compared to coplanar VMAT for all treatment sites except prostate where all techniques were equivalent. For the head and neck and brain cases, mean dose reduction-in percentage of the prescription dose-to parallel organs was on average 0.7% (colli-DTRT), 0.8% (NC-VMAT) and 0.4% (class-solution) compared to VMAT. The reduction in D2% for the serial organs was on average 1.7% (colli-DTRT), 2.0% (NC-VMAT) and 0.9% (class-solution). For the esophagus, lung, and breast cases, mean dose reduction to parallel organs was on average 0.2% (colli-DTRT) and 0.3% (NC-VMAT) compared to VMAT. The reduction in D2% for the serial organs was on average 1.3% (colli-DTRT) and 0.9% (NC-VMAT). Estimated delivery times for colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT were below 4 min for a full gantry angle range of 720°, including transitions between arcs, except for the brain case where multiple arcs covered the whole table angle range. These times are in the same order as the class-solution for the head and neck and brain cases. Total optimization times were 25%-107% longer for colli-DTRT, including BAO, compared to VMAT. CONCLUSIONS We successfully developed dosimetrically motivated BAO for colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT treatment planning. colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT are applicable to multiple treatment sites, including body sites, with beneficial or equivalent dosimetric performances compared to coplanar VMAT and reasonable delivery times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Chengchen Zhu
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul-Henry Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hannes A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Joseph A, Akinsete A, Adeneye S, Balogun O, Awofeso O, Oladipo A, Ajose A, Elhamamsi I, Merrell K, Ngwa W, Puthoff D, Shour AR, Onitilo A. Feasibility and Safety of Implementing Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) for Pediatric Craniospinal Irradiation in a Low-Middle-Income Region: The Nigerian Experience. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101325. [PMID: 38405304 PMCID: PMC10885594 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a relatively new treatment technique in sub-Saharan Africa. Although craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in the pediatric population has been practiced in Nigeria for many years, the use of VMAT to deliver this treatment is previously undocumented. We reviewed the first set of patients to undergo CSI at a cancer center in Nigeria, detailing the treatment technique, the progress experienced, dose statistics achieved, treatment toxicities, and cancer outcomes to date. Methods and Materials This was a prospective case series of 5 children with histologically diagnosed cancers requiring CSI whose parents consented to the study. They were recruited at evaluation and followed through the process of their therapy. Toxicity was monitored at weekly review appointments using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Follow-up of the children will continue in the long-term effects clinic. Results Five patients with a median age of 6 were recruited. Diagnoses were intracranial germ cell tumor (n = 2), medulloblastoma (n = 1), pineoblastoma (n = 1), and ependymoma (n = 1). For all patients, a dose of 36.0 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions was prescribed to the entire neuraxis. A subsequent boost of 18 Gy (n = 4) to 19.8 Gy (n = 1) in 10 daily fractions to the primary tumor bed (n = 2) and posterior fossa (n = 2) was delivered. Four patients had chemotherapy before, during, or after radiation therapy. No patient experienced grade 3 or greater toxicity. Conclusions Our results indicate great progress has been made in the delivery of CSI in Nigeria, demonstrating tolerable acute side effects using VMAT. This series suggests the feasibility of implementing VMAT technology in low- or middle-income countries. Additional follow-up will be needed to determine whether survival rates and chronic toxicity rates are similar to those reported in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adedayo Joseph
- NSIA-LUTH Cancer Center, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Adeseye Akinsete
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Samuel Adeneye
- NSIA-LUTH Cancer Center, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
- Department of Radiation Biology, Radiotherapy and Radiodiagnosis, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Onyinye Balogun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Opeyemi Awofeso
- Psychosocial Oncology & Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aishat Oladipo
- NSIA-LUTH Cancer Center, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Azeezat Ajose
- NSIA-LUTH Cancer Center, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Ibrahim Elhamamsi
- NSIA-LUTH Cancer Center, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Kenneth Merrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Wilfred Ngwa
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - David Puthoff
- Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin
| | - Abdul R. Shour
- Cancer Care and Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin
| | - Adedayo Onitilo
- Cancer Care and Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Care and Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Biswal SS, Sarkar B, Goyal M. Comparative dosimetric, setup margin, and treatment time analysis between ring gantry and C-Arm linear accelerators for VMAT-based craniospinal irradiation plans. J Cancer Res Ther 2024; 20:224-231. [PMID: 38554325 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1091_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric and treatment delivery characteristics of volumetric modulated arc therapy technique (VMAT)-based craniospinal axis irradiation (CSI) between ring gantry Halcyon (HAL) and C-arm based Novalis Tx (NTx) linear accelerator. Set-up margin and treatment delivery time for both machines were also taken into account. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifteen patients, 4 females and 11 males treated between March 2019 and February 2022 within the age group 4-56 years simulated in the supine position and were planned for multiple isocentre VMAT technique in ring gantry Halcyon and C-Arm Novalis linear accelerator for 6FFF and 6 MV flatten beam energy. The number of isocenters was the same in both the machines, usually three for adult adolescent age group patients and two for pediatric patients. Total on-couch time and the patient positional shift were captured for each isocenter during each session of treatment. Margins were calculated using Herk's formula of margin = 2.5Σ +0.7σ. Dosimetry, on-couch time, and set-up margin were compared between two competing arms. RESULTS Ninety-five percent of PTV coverage (P = 0.333), volume receiving 107% (P = 0.676), total MU (P = 0.818) in both the arms were comparable and statically insignificant. Low-dose spillage such as D20% (P = 0.212) and D50% (P = 0.008) was lesser in HAL comparable to NTx. CI and HI were statically insignificant. Out of 26 organs at risk (OAR), only 3 organs showed a statically significant dose difference. The mean and maximum setup margin in any linear direction was 0.45 and 0.53 cm for HAL and 0.37 and 0.56 cm for NTx and, variation was statistically insignificant (0.23 < P < 0.47). On-couch time was 4.0 ± 5.5 min lesser for HAL and the difference in on-couch time between the two arms was statistically different. CONCLUSION Even though the majority of the delivery parameters such as gantry speed, dose rate, beam characteristic (flatten or unflatten), MLC width, and speed between the ring gantry HAL and C-arm NTx linear accelerators were distinctly different, they offered no or minimal difference in the dose distribution and in the setup margin. HAL gives a faster treatment time delivery, which could be crucial for some selective cases such as patients receiving treatment under general anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subhra S Biswal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apolo Multispeciality Hospitals, Kolkata, West Bengal
- Depertment of Physics, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Biplab Sarkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apolo Multispeciality Hospitals, Kolkata, West Bengal
- Depertment of Physics, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Monika Goyal
- Depertment of Physics, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tawfik ZA, Farid MEA, El Shahat KM, Hussein AA, Al Etreby M. Approaches for Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)/Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) in brain metastases using different radiotherapy modalities (Feasibility study). JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2024; 32:765-781. [PMID: 38277334 DOI: 10.3233/xst-230275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND SRS and SRT are precise treatments for brain metastases, delivering high doses while minimizing doses to nearby organs. Modern linear accelerators enable the precise delivery of SRS/SRT using different modalities like three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and Rapid Arc (RA). OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare dosimetric differences and evaluate the effectiveness of 3DCRT, IMRT, and Rapid Arc techniques in SRS/SRT for brain metastases. METHODS 10 patients with brain metastases, 3 patients assigned for SRT, and 7 patients for SRS. For each patient, 3 treatment plans were generated using the Eclipse treatment planning system using different treatment modalities. RESULTS No statistically significant differences were observed among the three techniques in the homogeneity index (HI), maximum D2%, and minimum D98% doses for the target, with a p > 0.05. The RA demonstrated a better conformity index of 1.14±0.25 than both IMRT 1.21±0.26 and 3DCRT 1.37±0.31. 3DCRT and IMRT had lower Gradient Index values compared to RA, suggesting that they achieved a better dose gradient than RA. The mean treatment time decreased by 26.2% and 10.3% for 3DCRT and RA, respectively, compared to IMRT. In organs at risk, 3DCRT had lower maximum doses than IMRT and RA, but some differences were not statistically significant. However, in the brain stem and brain tissues, RA exhibited lower maximum doses compared to IMRT and 3DCRT. Additionally, RA and IMRT had lower V15Gy, V12Gy, and V9Gy values compared to 3DCRT. CONCLUSION While 3D-CRT delivered lower doses to organs at risk, RA and IMRT provided better conformity and target coverage. RA effectively controlled the maximum dose and irradiated volume of normal brain tissue. Overall, these findings indicate that 3DCRT, RA, and IMRT are suitable for treating brain metastases in SRS/SRT due to their improved dose conformity and target coverage while minimizing dose to healthy tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zyad A Tawfik
- Radiological Sciences Department, Inaya Medical Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | | | - Khaled M El Shahat
- Radiation Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed A Hussein
- Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Mostafa Al Etreby
- Oncology Department, Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital | DSFH, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Oncology Department, Cairo University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mishra A, Pathak R, Mittal KK, Srivastava AK, Dayashankar MS, Mishra SP, Singh SK. Efficacy of the collapsed cone algorithm calculated radiotherapy plans in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT): A comparative dosimetric study in tumors of thorax. J Cancer Res Ther 2024; 20:383-388. [PMID: 38554350 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2171_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
AIM In this study, efficacy of collapsed cone algorithm-generated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were evaluated for treatment of thoracic esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten previously treated patients with VMAT were considered for evaluation. The planning parameters were evaluated in terms of max dose, mean dose, Homogeneity Index, Conformity Index for planning target volume, and organ at risk doses. Total monitor unit, treatment time, and gamma passing index were also reported. RESULTS The target dose coverage of the VMAT and IMRT plans achieved the clinical dosimetric criteria for all ten patients in the evaluation. Under the condition of equivalent target dose distribution, the VMAT plan's Conformity Index, monitor unit, treatment time, and gamma passing index rate were superior than in the IMRT plan, and the result was statistically significant. CONCLUSION Collapsed cone algorithm-based VMAT can have a more effective and better approach for esophageal cancer than IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atul Mishra
- Department of Physics, Tilak Dhari P. G. College, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
- Veer Bahadur Singh Purvanchal University, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ramji Pathak
- Department of Physics, Tilak Dhari P. G. College, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
- Veer Bahadur Singh Purvanchal University, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
- Department of Physics, D.A.V. Degree College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Kailash Kumar Mittal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Anoop Kumar Srivastava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Maurya Surendrakumar Dayashankar
- Department of Applied Physics, Amity University Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shalby Hospitals Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Surendra Prasad Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Sudesh Kumar Singh
- Department of Physics, Tilak Dhari P. G. College, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
- Veer Bahadur Singh Purvanchal University, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lehtonen M, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL. The past and present of prostate cancer and its treatment and diagnostics: A historical review. SAGE Open Med 2023; 11:20503121231216837. [PMID: 38050625 PMCID: PMC10693792 DOI: 10.1177/20503121231216837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The prognosis of local prostate cancer has improved drastically during the past 60 years. Similarly, the prognosis in metastatic stage is constantly improving due to a number of new pharmaceuticals introduced over the past 10 years. Previously, only palliative treatments were available for prostate cancer, but today, there are multiple options for treatment with curative intent: robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, stereotactic radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Additionally, life-prolonging chemotherapeutic and androgen-suppressive treatments, as well as diagnostic imaging and staging, have improved considerably. This review summarizes the history of the treatment and diagnostics of prostate cancer, with a focus on the past 60 years. The aim was to provide a concise and easy-to-read introduction on the matter for all people that work with prostate cancer, as well as for patients. The literature was thoroughly examined covering the period from the earliest traceable records to the latest state-of-the-art studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miikka Lehtonen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Research, Development and Innovation Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yamauchi R, Akiyama S, Mizuno N, Kobayashi T, Itazawa T, Masuda T, Hirano M, Tomita F, Hosoya Y, Kawamori J. Dosimetric Comparison of 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT), Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) in Cardiac-Sparing Whole Lung Irradiation. Cureus 2023; 15:e51047. [PMID: 38264368 PMCID: PMC10805560 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Whole lung irradiation (WLI) is used for the treatment of lung metastasis in Wilms tumor and Ewing sarcoma; however, cardiac complications are one of the concerns. We report the dosimetric advantages of WLI using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and present a dosimetric comparison of VMAT with anteroposterior-posteroanterior (AP-PA) and static-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Additionally, we evaluated the dosimetric impact of respiratory motion and intra-fractional motion during VMAT treatment. Methods Seven patients were recruited in this study. AP-PA, IMRT, one-isocenter (1-IC) VMAT, and 2-IC VMAT were planned on the maximum inspiration and expiration CT, respectively. The prescribed dose was 15 Gy in 10 fractions. To determine the effects of respiratory motion, the CT series was replaced and the dose was evaluated while maintaining the beam information. To determine the effect of patient motion, perturbed dose calculations were performed using a two-IC VMAT. The perturbation doses were calculated by shifting only the IC of the one side beam by 3 mm or 5 mm in the right-to-left (RL) direction. Results The mean heart dose was 1467.0 cGy, 790.0 cGy, 764.2 cGy, and 738.4 cGy for AP-PA, IMRT, 1-IC VMAT, and 2-IC VMAT, respectively. When the expiration CT plan was recalculated with inspiration CT, Dmax increased approximately by 8%. In the 2-IC VMAT plan, the D50%, D98%, and D2% dose differences were within ±2%, even with a 5 mm IC shift. Conclusion We confirmed a significant dosimetric advantage of VMAT over other techniques. 2-IC VMAT should be considered an effective treatment option during irradiation for large target volumes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryohei Yamauchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Shinobu Akiyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Norifumi Mizuno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Takako Kobayashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Tomoko Itazawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Tomoyuki Masuda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Miki Hirano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Fumihiro Tomita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Yosuke Hosoya
- Department of Pediatrics, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Jiro Kawamori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, JPN
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rydelius A, Bengzon J, Engelholm S, Kinhult S, Englund E, Nilsson M, Lätt J, Lampinen B, Sundgren PC. Predictive value of diffusion MRI-based parametric response mapping for prognosis and treatment response in glioblastoma. Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 104:88-96. [PMID: 37734574 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early detection of treatment response is important for the management of patients with malignant brain tumors such as glioblastoma to assure good quality of life in relation to therapeutic efficacy. AIM To investigate whether parametric response mapping (PRM) with diffusion MRI may provide prognostic information at an early stage of standard therapy for glioblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study included 31 patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma WHO grade IV, planned for primary standard postoperative treatment with radiotherapy 60Gy/30 fractions with concomitant and adjuvant Temozolomide. MRI follow-up including diffusion and perfusion weighting was performed at 3 T at start of postoperative chemoradiotherapy, three weeks into treatment, and then regularly until twelve months postoperatively. Regional mean diffusivity (MD) changes were analyzed voxel-wise using the PRM method (MD-PRM). At eight and twelve months postoperatively, after completion of standard treatment, patients were classified using conventional MRI and clinical evaluation as either having stable disease (SD, including partial response) or progressive disease (PD). It was assessed whether MD-PRM differed between patients having SD versus PD and whether it predicted the risk of disease progression (progression-free survival, PFS) or death (overall survival, OS). A subgroup analysis was performed that compared MD-PRM between SD and PD in patients only undergoing diagnostic biopsy. MGMT-promotor methylation status (O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) was registered and analyzed with respect to PFS, OS and MD-PRM. RESULTS Of the 31 patients analyzed: 21 were operated by resection and ten by diagnostic biopsy. At eight months, 19 patients had SD and twelve had PD. At twelve months, ten patients had SD and 20 had PD, out of which ten were deceased within twelve months and one was deceased without known tumor progression. Median PFS was nine months, and median OS was 17 months. Eleven patients had methylated MGMT-promotor, 16 were MGMT unmethylated, and four had unknown MGMT-status. MD-PRM did not significantly predict patients having SD versus PD neither at eight nor at twelve months. Patients with an above median MD-PRM reduction had a slightly longer PFS (P = 0.015) in Kaplan-Maier analysis, as well as a non-significantly longer OS (P = 0.099). In the subgroup of patients only undergoing biopsy, total MD-PRM change at three weeks was generally higher for patients with SD than for patients with PD at eight months, although no tests were performed. MGMT status strongly predicted both PFS and OS but not MD-PRM change. CONCLUSION MD-PRM at three weeks was not demonstrated to be predictive of treatment response, disease progression, or survival. Preliminary results suggested a higher predictive value in non-resected patients, although this needs to be evaluated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rydelius
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Neurology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| | - J Bengzon
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Neurosurgery, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - S Engelholm
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - S Kinhult
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - E Englund
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Pathology, Lund University, Clinical Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Medical Service, Lund, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - J Lätt
- Department for Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - B Lampinen
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - P C Sundgren
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department for Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Lund University, BioImaging Centre (LBIC), Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sundaram V, Khanna D, Mohandass P, Vasudeva T. Comparison of Progressive Resolution Optimizer and Photon Optimizer algorithms in RapidArc delivery for head and neck SIB treatments. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:623-635. [PMID: 38179289 PMCID: PMC10764045 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.97431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study is to analyze and verify characterization of two different algorithms using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in head and neck (H&N) plans. Materials and methods In our study 15 patients were selected, who received radiation therapy by using Eclipse volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) Progressive Resolution Optimizer (PRO) algorithm 15.1. The same cases were re-optimized using a Photon Optimizer (PO) algorithm 15.6.A total of 30 treatment plans (15 PRO-VMAT plans and 15 PO-VMAT plans) were produced in the present study. All plans were created using double full arcs, keeping the identical constraints, cost functions and optimization time. Plan evaluation was done using planning target volume (PTV) parameters (D98%, D95%, D50%, D2% mean dose and V105%), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), Monitor unit (MU) per degree with control points (CP), organ at risk (OAR) doses and gamma verification (Portal dosimetry and ArcCHECK) values were evaluated. Treatment was delivered in Varian Truebeam 2.5, energy 6 MV with Millennium 120 multileaf collimator (MLC). Results The PTV coverage (D95%) for PRO and PO were 98.7 ± 0.8 Gy, 98.8 ± 0.9 Gy, HI were 0.09 ± 0.02 and 0.09 ± 0.02, CI were 0.98 ± 0.01 and 0.99 ± 0.01. Monitor units (MU) for PRO and PO were 647.5 ± 137.9, 655.2 ± 138.4. The Portal dose results were [3%, 3mm (%) & 1 %, 1 mm (%)] for PO and PRO 100 ± 0.1, 95.1 ± 1.4 and 100 ± 0.1, 95.2 ± 1.3. For ArcCHECK were 99.9 ± 0.1, 94.7 ± 3.0 and 99.9 ± 0.1, 93.5 ± 3.9, respectively. Conclusion Results showed that PTV coverage and OAR doses were comparable. For individual patients CI and HI of PO showed slightly higher values than PRO. MUs for PO were slightly increased as compared to PRO. MU per degree with each individual control points generated by PO showed a high degree of modulation compared to PRO. Hence, new PO optimizer can produce a comparable degree of plan while using the same PRO objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venugopal Sundaram
- Department of Applied Physics, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meherbai Tata Memorial Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
| | - D Khanna
- Department of Applied Physics, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India
| | - P Mohandass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India
| | - Titiksha Vasudeva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meherbai Tata Memorial Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Loebner HA, Mueller S, Volken W, Wallimann P, Aebersold DM, Stampanoni MFM, Fix MK, Manser P. Impact of the gradient in gantry-table rotation on dynamic trajectory radiotherapy plan quality. Med Phys 2023; 50:7104-7117. [PMID: 37748175 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To improve organ at risk (OAR) sparing, dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) extends VMAT by dynamic table and collimator rotation during beam-on. However, comprehensive investigations regarding the impact of the gantry-table (GT) rotation gradient on the DTRT plan quality have not been conducted. PURPOSE To investigate the impact of a user-defined GT rotation gradient on plan quality of DTRT plans in terms of dosimetric plan quality, dosimetric robustness, deliverability, and delivery time. METHODS The dynamic trajectories of DTRT are described by GT and gantry-collimator paths. The GT path is determined by minimizing the overlap of OARs with planning target volume (PTV). This approach is extended to consider a GT rotation gradient by means of a maximum gradient of the path (G m a x ${G}_{max}$ ) between two adjacent control points (G = | Δ table angle / Δ gantry angle | $G = | \Delta {{\mathrm{table\ angle}}/\Delta {\mathrm{gantry\ angle}}} |$ ) and maximum absolute change of G (Δ G m a x ${{\Delta}}{G}_{max}$ ). Four DTRT plans are created with different maximum G&∆G:G m a x ${G}_{max}$ &Δ G m a x ${{\Delta}}{G}_{max}$ = 0.5&0.125 (DTRT-1), 1&0.125 (DTRT-2), 3&0.125 (DTRT-3) and 3&1(DTRT-4), including 3-4 dynamic trajectories, for three clinically motivated cases in the head and neck and brain region (A, B, and C). A reference VMAT plan for each case is created. For all plans, plan quality is assessed and compared. Dosimetric plan quality is evaluated by target coverage, conformity, and OAR sparing. Dosimetric robustness is evaluated against systematic and random patient-setup uncertainties between± 3 mm $ \pm 3\ {\mathrm{mm}}$ in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions, and machine uncertainties between± 4 ∘ $ \pm 4^\circ \ $ in the dynamically rotating machine components (gantry, table, collimator rotation). Delivery time is recorded. Deliverability and delivery accuracy on a TrueBeam are assessed by logfile analysis for all plans and additionally verified by film measurements for one case. All dose calculations are Monte Carlo based. RESULTS The extension of the DTRT planning process with user-definedG m a x & Δ G m a x ${G}_{max}\& {{\Delta}}{G}_{max}$ to investigate the impact of the GT rotation gradient on plan quality is successfully demonstrated. With increasingG m a x & Δ G m a x ${G}_{max}\& {{\Delta}}{G}_{max}$ , slight (case C,D m e a n , p a r o t i d l . ${D}_{mean,\ parotid\ l.}$ : up to-1Gy) and substantial (case A,D 0.03 c m 3 , o p t i c n e r v e r . ${D}_{0.03c{m}^3,\ optic\ nerve\ r.}$ : up to -9.3 Gy, caseB,D m e a n , b r a i n $\ {D}_{mean,\ brain}$ : up to -4.7Gy) improvements in OAR sparing are observed compared to VMAT, while maintaining similar target coverage. All plans are delivered on the TrueBeam. Expected and actual machine position values recorded in the logfiles deviated by <0.2° for gantry, table and collimator rotation. The film measurements agreed by >96% (2%global/2 mm Gamma passing rate) with the dose calculation. With increasingG m a x & Δ G m a x ${G}_{max}\& {{\Delta}}{G}_{max}$ , delivery time is prolonged by <2 min/trajectory (DTRT-4) compared to VMAT and DTRT-1. The DTRT plans for case A and B and the VMAT plan for case C plan reveal the best dosimetric robustness for the considered uncertainties. CONCLUSION The impact of the GT rotation gradient on DTRT plan quality is comprehensively investigated for three cases in the head and neck and brain region. Increasing freedom in this gradient improves dosimetric plan quality at the cost of increased delivery time for the investigated cases. No clear dependency of GT rotation gradient on dosimetric robustness is observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannes A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Wallimann
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shao HC, Li Y, Wang J, Jiang S, Zhang Y. Real-time liver motion estimation via deep learning-based angle-agnostic X-ray imaging. Med Phys 2023; 50:6649-6662. [PMID: 37922461 PMCID: PMC10629841 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-time liver imaging is challenged by the short imaging time (within hundreds of milliseconds) to meet the temporal constraint posted by rapid patient breathing, resulting in extreme under-sampling for desired 3D imaging. Deep learning (DL)-based real-time imaging/motion estimation techniques are emerging as promising solutions, which can use a single X-ray projection to estimate 3D moving liver volumes by solved deformable motion. However, such techniques were mostly developed for a specific, fixed X-ray projection angle, thereby impractical to verify and guide arc-based radiotherapy with continuous gantry rotation. PURPOSE To enable deformable motion estimation and 3D liver imaging from individual X-ray projections acquired at arbitrary X-ray scan angles, and to further improve the accuracy of single X-ray-driven motion estimation. METHODS We developed a DL-based method, X360, to estimate the deformable motion of the liver boundary using an X-ray projection acquired at an arbitrary gantry angle (angle-agnostic). X360 incorporated patient-specific prior information from planning 4D-CTs to address the under-sampling issue, and adopted a deformation-driven approach to deform a prior liver surface mesh to new meshes that reflect real-time motion. The liver mesh motion is solved via motion-related image features encoded in the arbitrary-angle X-ray projection, and through a sequential combination of rigid and deformable registration modules. To achieve the angle agnosticism, a geometry-informed X-ray feature pooling layer was developed to allow X360 to extract angle-dependent image features for motion estimation. As a liver boundary motion solver, X360 was also combined with priorly-developed, DL-based optical surface imaging and biomechanical modeling techniques for intra-liver motion estimation and tumor localization. RESULTS With geometry-aware feature pooling, X360 can solve the liver boundary motion from an arbitrary-angle X-ray projection. Evaluated on a set of 10 liver patient cases, the mean (± s.d.) 95-percentile Hausdorff distance between the solved liver boundary and the "ground-truth" decreased from 10.9 (±4.5) mm (before motion estimation) to 5.5 (±1.9) mm (X360). When X360 was further integrated with surface imaging and biomechanical modeling for liver tumor localization, the mean (± s.d.) center-of-mass localization error of the liver tumors decreased from 9.4 (± 5.1) mm to 2.2 (± 1.7) mm. CONCLUSION X360 can achieve fast and robust liver boundary motion estimation from arbitrary-angle X-ray projections for real-time imaging guidance. Serving as a surface motion solver, X360 can be integrated into a combined framework to achieve accurate, real-time, and marker-less liver tumor localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua-Chieh Shao
- The Advanced Imaging and Informatics for Radiation Therapy (AIRT) Laboratory, Dallas, Texas, USA
- The Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Yunxiang Li
- The Advanced Imaging and Informatics for Radiation Therapy (AIRT) Laboratory, Dallas, Texas, USA
- The Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Jing Wang
- The Advanced Imaging and Informatics for Radiation Therapy (AIRT) Laboratory, Dallas, Texas, USA
- The Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Steve Jiang
- The Advanced Imaging and Informatics for Radiation Therapy (AIRT) Laboratory, Dallas, Texas, USA
- The Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - You Zhang
- The Advanced Imaging and Informatics for Radiation Therapy (AIRT) Laboratory, Dallas, Texas, USA
- The Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Guyer G, Mueller S, Wyss Y, Bertholet J, Schmid R, Stampanoni MFM, Manser P, Fix MK. Technical note: A collision prediction tool using Blender. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14165. [PMID: 37782250 PMCID: PMC10647990 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-coplanar radiotherapy treatment techniques on C-arm linear accelerators have the potential to reduce dose to organs-at-risk in comparison with coplanar treatment techniques. Accurately predicting possible collisions between gantry, table and patient during treatment planning is needed to ensure patient safety. We offer a freely available collision prediction tool using Blender, a free and open-source 3D computer graphics software toolset. A geometric model of a C-arm linear accelerator including a library of patient models is created inside Blender. Based on the model, collision predictions can be used both to calculate collision-free zones and to check treatment plans for collisions. The tool is validated for two setups, once with and once without a full body phantom with the same table position. For this, each gantry-table angle combination with a 2° resolution is manually checked for collision interlocks at a TrueBeam system and compared to simulated collision predictions. For the collision check of a treatment plan, the tool outputs the minimal distance between the gantry, table and patient model and a video of the movement of the gantry and table, which is demonstrated for one use case. A graphical user interface allows user-friendly input of the table and patient specification for the collision prediction tool. The validation resulted in a true positive rate of 100%, which is the rate between the number of correctly predicted collision gantry-table combinations and the number of all measured collision gantry-table combinations, and a true negative rate of 89%, which is the ratio between the number of correctly predicted collision-free combinations and the number of all measured collision-free combinations. A collision prediction tool is successfully created and able to produce maps of collision-free zones and to test treatment plans for collisions including visualisation of the gantry and table movement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospital, and University of BernSwitzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospital, and University of BernSwitzerland
| | - Yanick Wyss
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospital, and University of BernSwitzerland
| | - Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospital, and University of BernSwitzerland
| | - Remo Schmid
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospital, and University of BernSwitzerland
| | | | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospital, and University of BernSwitzerland
| | - Michael K. Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospital, and University of BernSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Vorbach SM, Mangesius J, Dejaco D, Seppi T, Santer M, Zur Nedden S, Sarcletti MP, Pointner MJ, Hart TJ, Riechelmann H, Ganswindt U, Nevinny-Stickel M. Survival, Treatment Outcome, and Safety of Multiple and Repeated Courses of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Oligometastases of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5253. [PMID: 37958426 PMCID: PMC10647772 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Current literature regarding survival and treatment outcome of SBRT in patients with pulmonary oligometastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is limited. Additionally, most of the published studies include metastatic lesions deriving also from primaries with histologies other than SCC when investigating the outcome of SBRT. The aim of the present retrospective study is to explore local control (LC) of treated metastases, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of exclusively pulmonary oligometastatic HNSCC-patients treated with SBRT. Between 2006 and 2021, a total of 46 patients were treated with SBRT for a maximum of four pulmonary oligometastases (PM) concurrently (mean PM per patient = 2.0; range 1 to 6 PM, total of 92). Of these, 17 patients (37.0%) developed new pulmonary metastases after their first SBRT. Repeated courses of SBRT were required once in 15 patients (88.2%) and twice in 2 patients (11.8%). Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 0-109 months). One year after completion of SBRT, LC rate, PFS, and OS were 98.7%, 37.9%, and 79.5%, respectively. After two years, LC rate, PFS, and OS were 98.7%, 28.7%, and 54.9%; as well as 98.7%, 16.7%, and 31.0% after five years. Radiochemotherapy (HR 2.72, p < 0.001) or radiotherapy as primary treatment (HR 8.60; p = 0.003), as well as reduced patient performance status (HR 48.30, p = 0.002), were associated with lower PFS. Inferior OS correlated with poor performance status (HR 198.51, p < 0.001) and surgery followed by radiochemotherapy (HR 4.18, p = 0.032) as primary treatment, as well as radiotherapy alone (HR 7.11, p = 0.020). Treatment of more than one PM is an independent predictor of impaired OS (HR 3.30, p = 0.016). SBRT of HNSCC-derived PMs results in excellent LC rates and encouraging OS rates of 54.9% at two years along with good tolerability (no more than grade 2 toxicities). Favourable outcome and low toxicity also apply to repeated courses of SBRT of newly emerging PMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Moritz Vorbach
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Julian Mangesius
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Daniel Dejaco
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (D.D.); (M.S.); (H.R.)
| | - Thomas Seppi
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Matthias Santer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (D.D.); (M.S.); (H.R.)
| | - Stephanie Zur Nedden
- CCB-Biocenter, Institute of Neurobiochemistry, Medial University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Manuel Paolo Sarcletti
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Martin Josef Pointner
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Tilmann Jakob Hart
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Herbert Riechelmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (D.D.); (M.S.); (H.R.)
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Guyer G, Mueller S, Mackeprang PH, Frei D, Volken W, Aebersold DM, Loessl K, Manser P, Fix MK. Delivery time reduction for mixed photon-electron radiotherapy by using photon MLC collimated electron arcs. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:215009. [PMID: 37816376 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad021a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Electron arcs in mixed-beam radiotherapy (Arc-MBRT) consisting of intensity-modulated electron arcs with dynamic gantry rotation potentially reduce the delivery time compared to mixed-beam radiotherapy containing electron beams with static gantry angle (Static-MBRT). This study aims to develop and investigate a treatment planning process (TPP) for photon multileaf collimator (pMLC) based Arc-MBRT.Approach. An existing TPP for Static-MBRT plans is extended to integrate electron arcs with a dynamic gantry rotation and intensity modulation using a sliding window technique. The TPP consists of a manual setup of electron arcs, and either static photon beams or photon arcs, shortening of the source-to-surface distance for the electron arcs, initial intensity modulation optimization, selection of a user-defined number of electron beam energies based on dose contribution to the target volume and finally, simultaneous photon and electron intensity modulation optimization followed by full Monte Carlo dose calculation. Arc-MBRT plans, Static-MBRT plans, and photon-only plans were created and compared for four breast cases. Dosimetric validation of two Arc-MBRT plans was performed using film measurements.Main results. The generated Arc-MBRT plans are dosimetrically similar to the Static-MBRT plans while outperforming the photon-only plans. The mean heart dose is reduced by 32% on average in the MBRT plans compared to the photon-only plans. The estimated delivery times of the Arc-MBRT plans are similar to the photon-only plans but less than half the time of the Static-MBRT plans. Measured and calculated dose distributions agree with a gamma passing rate of over 98% (3% global, 2 mm) for both delivered Arc-MBRT plans.Significance. A TPP for Arc-MBRT is successfully developed and Arc-MBRT plans showed the potential to improve the dosimetric plan quality similar as Static-MBRT while maintaining short delivery times of photon-only treatments. This further facilitates integration of pMLC-based MBRT into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul-Henry Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Loessl
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Camolesi GCV, Veronese HRM, Celestino MA, Blum DFC, Márquez-Zambrano JA, Carmona-Pérez FA, Jara-Venegas TA, Pellizzon ACA, Bernaola-Paredes WE. Survival of osseointegrated implants in head and neck cancer patients submitted to multimodal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:641. [PMID: 37851170 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08088-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the survival rate in implants placement in irradiated and non-irradiated bone in patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. We focused on the consequences of the main complications, such as osteoradionecrosis and peri-implantitis. METHODS An electronic search conducted by PRISMA protocol was performed. Full texts were carefully assessed, and data were assimilated into a tabular form for discussion and consensus among the expert panel. The quality assessment and the risk of bias are verified by Joanna Briggs Institute checklist (JBI) and The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool. RESULTS A total of 452 records were identified in the based on our PICOs strategy and after screening, 19 articles were included in the descriptive analysis of the review. Totaling 473 implants placed in irradiated and non-irradiated bone, and 31.6% of the patients were over 60 years of age. 57.9%) performed implant placement in a period of 12 months or more after the ending of radiotherapy. Only 5 studies had a follow-up period longer than 5 years after implant placement, of which three were used for the meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis of 5-year survival rate, analysis of implants in irradiated bone was assessed; a random effect model was used and a weighted proportion (PP) of 93.13% (95% CI: 87.20-99.06; p < 0.001), and in the 5-year survival rate, analysis of implants in non-irradiated bone was analysed; a fixed effect model was used and a weighted proportion (PP) of 98.52% survival (95% CI: 97.56-99.48, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Survival rates of implants placed in irradiated bone are clinically satisfactory after a follow-up of 5 years, with a fewer percentage than in implants placed in non-irradiated bone after metanalyses performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gisela Cristina Vianna Camolesi
- Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery, and Implantology Unit (MedOralRes), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
| | | | | | - Davi Francisco Casa Blum
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Atitus Education, Passo Fundo, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tozuka R, Kadoya N, Tomori S, Kimura Y, Kajikawa T, Sugai Y, Xiao Y, Jingu K. Improvement of deep learning prediction model in patient-specific QA for VMAT with MLC leaf position map and patient's dose distribution. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14055. [PMID: 37261720 PMCID: PMC10562023 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Deep learning-based virtual patient-specific quality assurance (QA) is a novel technique that enables patient QA without measurement. However, this method could be improved by further evaluating the optimal data to be used as input. Therefore, a deep learning-based model that uses multileaf collimator (MLC) information per control point and dose distribution in patient's CT as inputs was developed. METHODS Overall, 96 volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans generated for prostate cancer treatment were used. We developed a model (Model 1) that can predict measurement-based gamma passing rate (GPR) for a treatment plan using data stored as a map reflecting the MLC leaf position at each control point (MLPM) and data of the dose distribution in patient's CT as inputs. The evaluation of the model was based on the mean absolute error (MAE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) between the measured and predicted GPR. For comparison, we also analyzed models trained with the dose distribution in patient's CT alone (Model 2) and with dose distributions recalculated on a virtual phantom CT (Model 3). RESULTS At the 2%/2 mm criterion, MAE[%] and r for Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3 were 2.32% ± 0.43% and 0.54 ± 0.03, 2.70% ± 0.26%, and 0.32 ± 0.08, and 2.96% ± 0.23% and 0.24 ± 0.22, respectively; at the 3%/3 mm criterion, these values were 1.25% ± 0.05% and 0.36 ± 0.18, 1.57% ± 0.35% and 0.19 ± 0.20, and 1.39% ± 0.32% and 0.17 ± 0.22, respectively. This result showed that Model 1 exhibited the lowest MAE and highest r at both criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%3 mm. CONCLUSIONS These findings showed that a model that combines the MLPM and dose distribution in patient's CT exhibited a better GPR prediction performance compared with the other two studied models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryota Tozuka
- Department of Radiation OncologyTohoku University Graduate School of MedicineSendaiMiyagiJapan
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- Department of Radiation OncologyTohoku University Graduate School of MedicineSendaiMiyagiJapan
| | - Seiji Tomori
- Department of RadiologyNational Hospital Organization Sendai Medical CenterSendaiMiyagiJapan
| | - Yuto Kimura
- Radiation Oncology CenterOfuna Chuo HospitalKamakuraJapan
| | - Tomohiro Kajikawa
- Department of Radiation OncologyTohoku University Graduate School of MedicineSendaiMiyagiJapan
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical ScienceKyoto Prefectural University of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | - Yuto Sugai
- Department of Radiological TechnologyKeio University Hospital, ShinjukuJapan
| | - Yushan Xiao
- Department of Radiation OncologyTohoku University Graduate School of MedicineSendaiMiyagiJapan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation OncologyTohoku University Graduate School of MedicineSendaiMiyagiJapan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kamer S, Yilmaz Susluer S, Balci Okcanoglu T, Kayabasi C, Ozmen Yelken B, Hoca S, Tavlayan E, Olacak N, Anacak Y, Olukman M, Gunduz C. Evaluation of the effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) techniques on survival response in cell lines with a new radiobiological modeling. Cancer Med 2023; 12:19874-19888. [PMID: 37754559 PMCID: PMC10587949 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal radiobiological model, which assesses the biological effects of novel radiotherapy techniques that concurrently modify multiple physical factors, has not yet been defined. This study aimed to investigate the impact of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) on cellular response in head and neck cancer and melanoma models. METHODS Clonogenic analysis, DNA double-strand break analysis, apoptosis, and cell cycle analysis were performed on cancer stem cell models, cancer models, and normal tissue cell models to assess radiation sensitivity. RESULTS The segmented radiation approach used in IMRT applications enhanced radiosensitivity and cytotoxicity in the cancer models, while changes in dose rate had varying effects on cytotoxicity depending on the tumor cell type. VMAT increased cellular resistance, favoring treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The biological processes were influenced differently by dose rate, IMRT, and VMAT depending on the tumor cell type. The selection of the most appropriate technique is crucial in representing new radiotherapy approaches. The obtained data can serve as a model to address clinical questions in daily practice. The integration of non-standard outcomes with standard applications should be considered in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serra Kamer
- Department of Radiation OncologyEge University Medical FacultyIzmirTurkey
| | | | | | - Cagla Kayabasi
- Department of Medical BiologyEge University Medical FacultyIzmirTurkey
| | | | - Sinan Hoca
- Department of Radiation OncologyEge University Medical FacultyIzmirTurkey
| | - Emin Tavlayan
- Department of Radiation OncologyEge University Medical FacultyIzmirTurkey
| | - Nezahat Olacak
- Department of Radiation OncologyEge University Medical FacultyIzmirTurkey
| | - Yavuz Anacak
- Department of Radiation OncologyEge University Medical FacultyIzmirTurkey
| | - Murat Olukman
- Department of PharmacologyEge University Medical FacultyIzmirTurkey
| | - Cumhur Gunduz
- Department of Medical BiologyEge University Medical FacultyIzmirTurkey
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rønde HS, Kronborg C, Høyer M, Hansen J, Bak ME, Agergaard SN, Als AB, Agerbæk M, Lauritsen J, Meidahl Petersen P, Dysager L, Kallehauge JF. Dose comparison of robustly optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) vs IMRT and VMAT photon plans for testicular seminoma. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1222-1229. [PMID: 37683054 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2254925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with stage II seminoma have traditionally been treated with photons to the retroperitoneal and iliac space, which leads to a substantial dose bath to abdominal and pelvic organs at risk (OAR). As these patients are young and with excellent prognosis, reducing dose to OAR and thereby the risk of secondary cancer is of utmost importance. We compared IMPT to opposing IMRT fields and VMAT, assessing dose to OAR and both overall and organ-specific secondary cancer risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS A comparative treatment planning study was conducted on planning CT-scans from ten patients with stage II seminoma, treated with photons to a 'dog-leg' field with doses ranging from 20 to 25 Gy and a 10 Gy sequential boost to the metastatic lymph node(s). Photon plans were either 3-4 field IMRT (Eclipse) or 1-2 arc VMAT (Pinnacle). Proton plans used robust (5 mm; 3.5%) IMPT (Eclipse), multi field optimization with 3 posterior fields supplemented by 2 anterior fields at the level of the iliac vessels. Thirty plans were generated. Mean doses to OARs were compared for IMRT vs IMPT and VMAT vs IMPT. The risk of secondary cancer was calculated according to the model described by Schneider, using excess absolute risk (EAR, per 10,000 persons per year) for body outline, stomach, duodenum, pancreas, bowel, bladder and spinal cord. RESULTS Mean doses to all OARs were significantly lower with IMPT except similar kidney (IMRT) and spinal cord (VMAT) doses. The relative EAR for body outline was 0.59 for IMPT/IMRT (p < .05) and 0.33 for IMPT/VMAT (p < .05). Organ specific secondary cancer risk was also lower for IMPT except for pancreas and duodenum. CONCLUSION Proton therapy reduced radiation dose to OAR compared to both IMRT and VMAT plans, and potentially reduce the risk of secondary cancer both overall and for most OAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi S Rønde
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Camilla Kronborg
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jolanta Hansen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Mads Agerbæk
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Lars Dysager
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jesper F Kallehauge
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mineur L, Vazquez L, Belkacemi M, Toullec C, Bentaleb N, Boustany R, Plat F. Capecitabine/Mitomycin versus 5-Fluorouracil/Mitomycin in Combination with Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:8563-8574. [PMID: 37754536 PMCID: PMC10528380 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30090621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Since EXTRA, a non-randomized phase II trial with 31 patients, explored the use of capecitabine, mitomycin and radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of localized squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC), this treatment has been considered as an acceptable alternative to infusional 5-FU. However, the differences in efficacy between capecitabine and 5-FU in chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) for local SCCAC are not well documented. Patients included in this prospective monocentric cohort study were treated with SIB-RapidArc (a unique RT method treatment for all patients: identical technique, volume and constraints for at-risk organs), mitomycin C and 5-FU each day of RT for 7 weeks (group 1) or capecitabine each day of RT (group 2). Patients treated between July 2009 and August 2017 (group 1) and between November 2012 and April 2018 (group 2) for local SCCAC T2-4 classified as N, M0 or T, N1-3, M0 were included. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and acute toxicities. Results: One hundred forty-seven patients were included, 91 in group 1 and 56 in group 2. The two groups were statistically comparable in terms of sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) and TNM. With a median duration of follow-up of 53.5 months, the PFS rate at 3 years was 80% for group 1 and 75% for group 2 (p = 0.32). The 3-year colostomy-free survival rate was 92% for group 1 and 85% for group 2 (p = 0.11). The rate of patients with at least one grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was 35.5% in group 1 and 21.4% in group 2 (p = 0.10), with a trend of fewer acute toxicities with capecitabine. Conclusion: Capecitabine/mitomycin in combination with SIB RapidArc radiation therapy for anal cancer seems as effective as 5-FU-based chemotherapy and is well tolerated with minimal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Mineur
- Oncodigestive and Clinical Research Department, Sainte Catherine Institut du Cancer Avignon-Provence, 84918 Avignon, France
| | - Léa Vazquez
- Oncodigestive and Clinical Research Department, Sainte Catherine Institut du Cancer Avignon-Provence, 84918 Avignon, France
| | - Mohamed Belkacemi
- Statistics Department, PRECIS, Nouvelles Technologies, Languedoc Mutualité, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - Clémence Toullec
- Oncodigestive and Clinical Research Department, Sainte Catherine Institut du Cancer Avignon-Provence, 84918 Avignon, France
| | - Newfel Bentaleb
- Oncodigestive and Clinical Research Department, Sainte Catherine Institut du Cancer Avignon-Provence, 84918 Avignon, France
| | - Rania Boustany
- Oncodigestive and Clinical Research Department, Sainte Catherine Institut du Cancer Avignon-Provence, 84918 Avignon, France
| | - Frederi Plat
- Oncodigestive and Clinical Research Department, Sainte Catherine Institut du Cancer Avignon-Provence, 84918 Avignon, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mishra A, Oberoi AS, Deo S, Sharma J, Gogia A, Sharma DN, Mathur S, Dhamija E. Bilateral Breast Cancer: Clinical Profile and Management. Indian J Surg Oncol 2023; 14:651-658. [PMID: 37900630 PMCID: PMC10611650 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-023-01731-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
There is paucity of literature regarding the demography, histopathology, management, and outcomes of bilateral breast cancer (BBC). We present our experience of treating 127 BBC with multimodality management. An audit of prospectively maintained computerized breast cancer database of the department of surgical oncology at a tertiary care center was performed. Demography, clinical profile, molecular sub-types, treatment patterns, and outcomes were analyzed. A total 127 patients presented with BBC between 1992 and 2019. Ninety-four had metachronous (MBBC) and 33 had synchronous breast cancer (SBBC). Most contralateral breast cancer (CBC) patients had early-stage breast cancer in comparison to the index side cancer (37% vs 32%). Ninety-four patients underwent bilateral mastectomy and only 18 patients underwent bilateral breast conservation. Seventy-one patients undergoing BCS and surgery for LABC were given postoperative radiotherapy. All patients received adjuvant chemo- and/or hormonal therapy both for index and CBC based on the stage and hormone receptor status. Thirty-three percent of patients had either locoregional or distant relapse. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of the entire cohort were 86.6% and 68.4% respectively. There was no difference in the OS and DFS between SBBC and MBBC. The incidence of BBC is expected to increase with effective diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and improving survival. Patients require individualized treatment planning in a multidisciplinary treatment setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashutosh Mishra
- Department of Surgical Oncology, BRA-IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | - Jyoti Sharma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, BRA-IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajay Gogia
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRA-IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - D. N. Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BRA-IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Ekta Dhamija
- Department of Radiology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Choi DH, Kim DW, Park SH, Ahn SH, Ahn WS, Lee R, Kim JS. Development of open access tool for automatic use factor calculation using DICOM-RT patient data. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:1043-1053. [PMID: 37470930 PMCID: PMC10480328 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01272-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
Our study recalculated the use factor of linear accelerators (LINACs) by using an in-house program based on Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine radiation therapy (DICOM-RT). We considered the impact of advancements and changes in treatment trends, including modality, technology, and radiation dose, on the use factor, which is one of the shielding parameters. In accordance with the methodology described in the NCRP 151 report, we computed the use factor for four linear accelerators (LINACs) across three hospitals. We analyzed the results based on the treatment techniques and treatment sites for three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. Our findings revealed that the use factors obtained at 45° and 90° were 14.8% and 13.5% higher than those of the NCRP 151 report. In treatment rooms with a high 3D-CRT ratio, the use factor at a specific angle differed by up to 14.6% relative to the NCRP 151 report value. Our results showed a large difference in the use factor for specific sites such as the breast and spine, so it is recommended that each institution recalculate the use factor using patient's data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Hyeok Choi
- Department of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Lab (MPBEL), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Lab (MPBEL), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - So Hyun Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju University College of Medicine, Jeju, Republic of Korea
| | - So Hyun Ahn
- Ewha Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Woo Sang Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
| | - Rena Lee
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Sung Kim
- Department of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Lab (MPBEL), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Koh HK, Park Y, Koo T, Cheong KH, Lee MY, Park HJ, Kim KJ, Park S, Han T, Kang SK, Ha B, Yoon JW, Kim MY, Bae H. Association Between Thyroid Radiation Dose and Hypothyroidism in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Regional Nodal Irradiation. In Vivo 2023; 37:2340-2346. [PMID: 37652492 PMCID: PMC10500486 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM To investigate the association between the thyroid dysfunction and thyroid radiation dose in regional nodal irradiation (RNI) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed medical data of 67 patients with breast cancer who underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, including RNI using VMAT, between 2018 and 2021. All patients had normal thyroid functional test results, including thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), T3, and free-T4. We defined subclinical hypothyroidism as increased TSH with or without decreased levels of free-T4 and T3 after the completion of VMAT. We calculated dose-volume histogram parameters (DVHPs), including the mean dose and relative thyroid volume receiving at least 10, 20, 30, and 40 Gy. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 23.2 months. The 3-year locoregional failure-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 96.3%, 94.7%, and 96.2%, respectively. The mean thyroid dose was 21.4 Gy (range=11.5-29.4 Gy). Subclinical hypothyroidism was noted in 14 patients (20.9%) and the median time to the event was 4.1 months. Among the DVHPs, the relative volume receiving ≥20 Gy (V20Gy) was associated with subclinical hypothyroidism. The 2-year rates of subclinical hypothyroidism were 24.8% and 59.1% in patients with V20Gy ≤46.3% and >46.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION A significant proportion of patients with breast cancer developed subclinical hypothyroidism after undergoing VMAT for RNI. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the thyroid as an organ at risk for VMAT planning, and suggest that V20Gy could be a useful dose-volume constraint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeon Kang Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University School of Medicine and Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Younghee Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Taeryool Koo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea;
| | - Kwang-Ho Cheong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Me Yeon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae Jin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoung Ju Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soah Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Taejin Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sei-Kwon Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Boram Ha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jai-Woong Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Me Young Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Hoonsik Bae
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Numakura K, Kobayashi M, Muto Y, Sato H, Sekine Y, Sobu R, Aoyama Y, Takahashi Y, Okada S, Sasagawa H, Narita S, Kumagai S, Wada Y, Mori N, Habuchi T. The Current Trend of Radiation Therapy for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:8092-8110. [PMID: 37754502 PMCID: PMC10529045 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30090587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
A recent approach to radiotherapy for prostate cancer is the administration of high doses of radiation to the prostate while minimizing the risk of side effects. Thus, image-guided radiotherapy utilizes advanced imaging techniques and is a feasible strategy for increasing the radiation dose. New radioactive particles are another approach to achieving high doses and safe procedures. Prostate brachytherapy is currently considered as a combination therapy. Spacers are useful to protect adjacent organs, specifically the rectum, from excessive radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuyuki Numakura
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Mizuki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Yumina Muto
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Hiromi Sato
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Yuya Sekine
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Ryuta Sobu
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Yu Aoyama
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Yoshiko Takahashi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Syuhei Okada
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Hajime Sasagawa
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Shintaro Narita
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Satoshi Kumagai
- Department of Radiology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (S.K.); (Y.W.); (N.M.)
| | - Yuki Wada
- Department of Radiology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (S.K.); (Y.W.); (N.M.)
| | - Naoko Mori
- Department of Radiology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (S.K.); (Y.W.); (N.M.)
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Li C, Pan Y, Yang X, Jing D, Chen Y, Luo C, Qiu J, Hu Y, Zhang Z, Shi L, Shen L, Zhou R, Lu S, Xiao X, Chen T. CT-based radiomics for predicting radio-chemotherapy response and overall survival in nonsurgical esophageal carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1219106. [PMID: 37681029 PMCID: PMC10482418 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1219106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To predict treatment response and 2 years overall survival (OS) of radio-chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) by radiomics based on the computed tomography (CT) images. Methods This study retrospectively collected 171 nonsurgical EC patients treated with radio-chemotherapy from Jan 2010 to Jan 2019. 80 patients were randomly divided into training (n=64) and validation (n=16) cohorts to predict the radiochemotherapy response. The models predicting treatment response were established by Lasso and logistic regression. A total of 156 patients were allocated into the training cohort (n=110), validation cohort (n=23) and test set (n=23) to predict 2-year OS. The Lasso Cox model and Cox proportional hazards model established the models predicting 2-year OS. Results To predict the radiochemotherapy response, WFK as a radiomics feature, and clinical stages and clinical M stages (cM) as clinical features were selected to construct the clinical-radiomics model, achieving 0.78 and 0.75 AUC (area under the curve) in the training and validation sets, respectively. Furthermore, radiomics features called WFI and WGI combined with clinical features (smoking index, pathological types, cM) were the optimal predictors to predict 2-year OS. The AUC values of the clinical-radiomics model were 0.71 and 0.70 in the training set and validation set, respectively. Conclusions This study demonstrated that planning CT-based radiomics showed the predictability of the radiochemotherapy response and 2-year OS in nonsurgical esophageal carcinoma. The predictive results prior to treatment have the potential to assist physicians in choosing the optimal therapeutic strategy to prolong overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Li
- Department of Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Yuteng Pan
- Medical Science and Technology Innovation Center, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Xianghui Yang
- Department of Oncology, Changsha Central Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Di Jing
- Department of Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yu Chen
- Department of Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chenhua Luo
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Hunan, Changsha, China
| | - Jianfeng Qiu
- Medical Engineering and Technology Research Center, Department of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Yongmei Hu
- Department of Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zijian Zhang
- Department of Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Liting Shi
- Medical Engineering and Technology Research Center, Department of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Liangfang Shen
- Department of Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Rongrong Zhou
- Department of Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shanfu Lu
- Perception Vision Medical Technologies Co. Ltd, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiang Xiao
- Hunan Cancer Hospital/the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Hunan, Changsha, China
| | - Tingyin Chen
- Department of Network and Information Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
McLaren DS, Devi A, Kyriakakis N, Kwok-Williams M, Murray RD. The impact of radiotherapy on the hypothalamo-pituitary axis: old vs new radiotherapy techniques. Endocr Connect 2023; 12:e220490. [PMID: 37450854 PMCID: PMC10448592 DOI: 10.1530/ec-22-0490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Multimodality cancer therapy has led to remarkable improvements in survival of childhood and young adult cancer, with survival rates exceeding 85%. Such remission rates come with their own adverse sequelea or 'late effects'. Although the cause of these late effects is multi-factorial, radiation-related adverse effects are one of the most prevalent. Hypopituitarism is a recognised complication of irradiation of brain tumours distant to the hypothalamo-pituitary (HP) axis when the axis is included within the exposed field. Much of the data concerning the development of hypopituitarism, however, relate to early forms of photon-based radiotherapy. In this narrative review, we discuss advances in individual radiotherapy techniques currently used in treating brain tumours and their theoretical benefits based primarily on dosimetric studies. Increasingly precise radiation techniques, including advances in the delivery of photons (i.e. intensity-modulated radiotherapy) and proton beam therapy, are now available options. The premise behind these newer techniques is to reduce the dose and volume of normal tissue irradiated whilst maintaining an effective radiation dose to target tissue. When treating brain tumours distant to the HP axis the expectation, based upon dosimetric studies, is that newer forms of radiotherapy will less frequently involve the HP axis in the exposed field, and where incorporated within the field it will be exposed to a lower radiotherapy dosage. Intuitively the dosimetric studies should translate into significant reductions in the prevalence of HP dysfunction. These data are promising; however, to date there are minimal robust clinical data to determine if the theoretical benefits of these newer techniques on HP dysfunction is to be realised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S McLaren
- Department of Endocrinology, Leeds Centre for Diabetes & Endocrinology, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Aarani Devi
- Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Nikolaos Kyriakakis
- Department of Endocrinology, Leeds Centre for Diabetes & Endocrinology, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Robert D Murray
- Department of Endocrinology, Leeds Centre for Diabetes & Endocrinology, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sidhu MS, Singh K, Sood S, Aggarwal R. A dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus rapid arc in gynecological malignancies: Dose beyond planning target volume, precisely 5Gy volume. J Cancer Res Ther 2023; 19:1267-1271. [PMID: 37787294 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_11_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Aim of radiotherapy is precise dose delivery with objective of achieving maximum local control and minimal toxicity by decreasing dose to organ at risk (OAR).This aim can be achieved by technologies like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy. However, later offers comparable or even better plan quality with shorter treatment time. It is important to note that low dose regions are also a concern due long-term risk of developing a second cancer after radiotherapy. The objective of our study is to do dosimetric comparison of IMRT vs. Rapid arc (RA) plan in gynecology cancer and specifically to assess dose beyond planning target volume (PTV), precisely 5 Gy volume. Methods Each 20 eligible patients underwent radiotherapy planning on eclipse by both IMRT and RA plans as per institution protocols. Comparative dosimetric analysis of both plans was done by paired sample t-test. PTV metrics compared were D95%, homogenecity index (HI), and conformity index (CI). OAR dose compared were bowel V40 Gy <30%, Rectum V30 Gy <60%, Bladder V45 Gy <35%, and bilateral femur head and neck V30 Gy < 50%. Futhermore, calculated monitor units (MUs) were also compared. Finally, volume of normal tissue beyond the PTV, specifically 5 Gy volume, was compared between plans. Results Dosimetric plan comparison showed statistically significant difference in RA and IMRT plans with improved PTV coverage and better OAR tolerance with RA plan. In addition, MU used were significantly less in RA plan, coupled with reduced V5 Gy volume. Conclusion In sum, RA plans are dosimetrically significantly better compared to IMRT plans in gynecological malignancies in terms of PTV coverage and OAR sparing. Importantly, not only less MU used but also significantly less normal tissue V5 Gy volume is less in RA compared to IMRT plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kulbir Singh
- Department of Medical Physics, DMCH Cancer Centre, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Sandhya Sood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, DMCH Cancer Centre, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Ritu Aggarwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, DMCH Cancer Centre, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Larjavaara S, Strengell S, Seppälä T, Tenhunen M, Anttonen A. Palliative intensity modulated radiotherapy of bone metastases based on diagnostic instead of planning computed tomography scans. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100456. [PMID: 37720465 PMCID: PMC10500021 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning is as a standard based on a computed tomography (CT) scan obtained at the planning stage (pCT), while most of the decisions whether to treat by RT are based on diagnostic CT scans (dCT). Bone metastases (BM) are the most common palliative RT target. The objective of this study was to investigate if a palliative RT treatment plan of BMs could be made based on a dCT with sufficient accuracy and safety, without sacrificing any treatment quality. Materials and methods A retrospective study with 60 BMs of 8 anatomical sites was performed. RT planning was performed using intensity-modulated radiation therapy/volumetric modulated arc therapy techniques in dCT and transferred to pCT. The dose of clinical target volumes (CTVs), D(CTVV95%, V50%), were compared between plans for dCT and pCT. Patient setup was investigated in cone-beam CT scans. Results The differences of D(CTVV95%, V50%) between dCT and pCT plans were the lowest in the pelvis (1.0%, 1.1%), lumbar spine (0.6%, 0.7%) and thoracic spine (0.7%, 2.1%), while the differences were higher in cervical spine (3.7%, 1.9%), long bones (2.3%, 0.8%), and costae (1.6%, 1.4%). The patient set-up was acceptable for 100% of the pelvic and lumbar, for 92% of thoracic spine cases, and for <80% of cases in other sites. Conclusion This study showed the feasibility of using dCT images in palliative RT planning of BMs in thoracic, lumbar spine and pelvic sites, indicating the potential suitability of this strategy for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suvi Larjavaara
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PL180, 00029 HUS, Finland
| | - Satu Strengell
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PL180, 00029 HUS, Finland
| | - Tiina Seppälä
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PL180, 00029 HUS, Finland
| | - Mikko Tenhunen
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PL180, 00029 HUS, Finland
| | - Anu Anttonen
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PL180, 00029 HUS, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Nikovia V, Chinis E, Gkantaifi A, Marketou M, Mazonakis M, Charalampakis N, Mavroudis D, Orfanidou KV, Varveris A, Antoniadis C, Tolia M. Current Cardioprotective Strategies for the Prevention of Radiation-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1038. [PMID: 37511651 PMCID: PMC10381791 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in females, accounting for the majority of cancer-related deaths worldwide. There is well-established understanding about the effective role of radiotherapy (RT) in BC therapeutic strategies, offering a better local-regional control, prolonged survival, and improved quality of life for patients. However, it has been proven that conventional RT modalities, especially in left-sided BC cases, are unable to avoid the administration of high RT doses to the heart, thus resulting in cardiotoxicity and promoting long-term cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Recent radiotherapeutic techniques, characterized by dosimetric dose restrictions, target volume revision/modifications, an increased awareness of risk factors, and consistent follow-ups, have created an advantageous context for a significant decrease inpost-RT CVD incidence. AIM This review presents the fundamental role of current cardioprotective strategies in the prevention of cardiotoxic effects in left-BCRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS A literature search was conducted up to January 2023 using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PubMed Central databases. Our review refers to new radiotherapeutic techniques carried out on patients after BC surgery. Specifically, a dose evaluation of the heart and left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) was pointed out for all the included studies, depending on the implemented RT modality, bed positioning, and internal mammary lymph nodes radiation. RESULTS Several studies reporting improved heart sparing with new RT techniques in BC patients were searched. In addition to the RT modality, which definitely determines the feasibility of achieving lower doses for the organs at risk (OARs), better target coverage, dose conformity and homogeneity, and the patient's position, characteristics, and anatomy may also affect the evaluated RT dose to the whole heart and its substructures. CONCLUSIONS Modern BC RT techniques seem to enable the administration of lower doses to the OARs without compromising on the target coverage. The analysis of several anatomical parameters and the assessment of cardiac biomarkers potentiate the protective effect of these new irradiation modalities, providing a holistic approach to the radiation-associated risks of cardiac disease for BC patients. Despite technological advances, an inevitable cardiac radiation risk still exists, while adverse cardiac events may be observed even many years after RT. Studies with longer follow-ups are required in order to determine the effectiveness of modern breast RT techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasiliki Nikovia
- Medical School, University of Crete, Vassilika, 71110 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Evangelos Chinis
- Medical School, University of Crete, Vassilika, 71110 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Areti Gkantaifi
- Radiotherapy Department, Theagenio Anticancer Hospital of Thessaloniki, 54639 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Maria Marketou
- Cardiology Department, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Michalis Mazonakis
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cret, Iraklion, P.O. Box 2208, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
| | | | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, 71500 Heraklion, Greece
| | | | - Antonios Varveris
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital/Medical School, University of Crete, Vassilika, 71110 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Chrysostomos Antoniadis
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital/Medical School, University of Crete, Vassilika, 71110 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Maria Tolia
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital/Medical School, University of Crete, Vassilika, 71110 Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sælen MG, Hjelle LV, Aarsæther E, Knutsen T, Andersen S, Bentzen AG, Richardsen E, Fosså SD, Haugnes HS. Patient-reported outcomes after curative treatment for prostate cancer with prostatectomy, primary radiotherapy or salvage radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:657-665. [PMID: 37353983 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2224051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trials reporting adverse health outcomes (AHOs) in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after contemporary curative treatment of prostate cancer (PC) are hampered by study heterogeneity and lack of new treatment techniques. Particularly, the evidence regarding toxicities after radiotherapy (RT) with the volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique is limited, and comparisons between men treated with surgery, primary radiotherapy (PRT) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) are lacking. The aim of the study was to evaluate change in PROMs 3 months after treatment with robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), PRT and SRT administered with VMAT. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective cohort study of men with PC who received curative treatment at the University Hospital of North Norway between 2012 and 2017 for RALP and between 2016 and 2021 for radiotherapy was conducted. A cohort of 787 men were included; 406 men treated with RALP, 265 received PRT and 116 received SRT. Patients completed the validated PROM instrument EPIC-26 before (pre-treatment) and 3 months after treatment. EPIC-26 domain summary scores (DSSs) were analysed, and changes from pre-treatment to 3 months reported. Changes were deemed clinically relevant if exceeding validated minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs). RESULTS Men treated with RALP reported clinically relevant declining urinary incontinence DSS (-41.7 (SD 30.7)) and sexual DSS (-46.1 (SD 30.2)). Men who received PRT reported worsened urinary irritative DSS (-5.2 (SD 19.6)), bowel DSS (-8.2 (SD 15.1)) and hormonal DSS (-9.6 (SD 18.2)). Men treated with SRT experienced worsened urinary incontinence DSS (-7.3 (SD 18.2)), urinary irritative DSS (-7.5 (SD 14.0)), bowel DSS (-12.5 (SD 16.1)), sexual DSS (-14.9 (SD 18.9)) and hormonal DSS (-23.8 (SD 20.9)). CONCLUSION AHOs 3 months after contemporary curative treatment for PC varied according to treatment modality and worsened in all treatment groups, although most in SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie G Sælen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Line V Hjelle
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Erling Aarsæther
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Tore Knutsen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UIT The Artic University, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Sigve Andersen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UIT The Artic University, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Anne G Bentzen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Elin Richardsen
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Sophie D Fosså
- Division of Cancer Medicine and Radiotherapy, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege S Haugnes
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UIT The Artic University, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|