Two-site immunoassays for osteoclastic tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase based on characterization of six monoclonal antibodies

Kinetic Studies of Newly Patented Aminoalkanol Derivatives with Potential Anticancer Activity as Competitive Inhibitors of Prostate Acid Phosphatase

BACKGROUND

Acid phosphatase and its regulation are important objects of biological and clinical research and play an important role in the development and treatment of prostate and bone diseases. The newly patented aminoalkanol (4-[2-hydroxy-3-(propan-2-ylamino)propyl]-1,7-dimethyl-8,9-diphenyl-4-azatricyclo[5.2.1.02,6]dec-8-ene-3,5,10-trione hydrochloride) (I) and (4-[3-(dimethylamino)-2-hydroxypropyl]-1,7-dimethyl-8,9-diphenyl-4-azatricyclo[5.2.1.02,6]dec-8-ene-3,5,10-trione hydrochloride) (II) derivatives have potential anticancer activity, and their influence on enzymatic activity can significantly impact the therapeutic effects of acid phosphatase against many diseases. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the action of compounds (I) and (II) on acid phosphatase.

METHODS

Capillary electrophoresis was used to evaluate the inhibition of acid phosphatase. Lineweaver-Burk plots were constructed to compare the Km of this enzyme in the presence of inhibitors (I) or (II) with the Km in solutions without these inhibitors.

RESULTS

Compound (I) showed a stronger competitive inhibition against acid phosphatase, whereas derivative (II) showed a weaker competitive type of inhibition. The detailed kinetic studies of these compounds showed that their type and strength of inhibition as well as affinity depend on the kind of substituent occurring in the main chemical molecule.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is of great importance because the disclosed inhibition of acid phosphatase by compounds (I) and (II) raises the question of whether these compounds could have any effect on the treatment possibilities of prostate diseases.

Osteoporosis and the Potential of Cell-Based Therapeutic Strategies

Osteoporosis, the most common chronic metabolic bone disease, is characterized by low bone mass and increased bone fragility. Nowadays more than 200 million individuals are suffering from osteoporosis and still the number of affected people is dramatically increasing due to an aging population and longer life, representing a major public health problem. Current osteoporosis treatments are mainly designed to decrease bone resorption, presenting serious adverse effects that limit their safety for long-term use. Numerous studies with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have helped to increase the knowledge regarding the mechanisms that underlie the progression of osteoporosis. Emerging clinical and molecular evidence suggests that inflammation exerts a significant influence on bone turnover, thereby on osteoporosis. In this regard, MSCs have proven to possess broad immunoregulatory capabilities, modulating both adaptive and innate immunity. Here, we will discuss the role that MSCs play in the etiopathology of osteoporosis and their potential use for the treatment of this disease.

Significance of serum TRACP in rheumatoid arthritis

Human serum contains two related isoforms of TRACP: TRACP 5a and TRACP 5b. Serum TRACP 5a protein is increased in about one third of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) sera. This study was undertaken to examine the significance of serum TRACP isoforms 5a and 5b as disease markers of inflammation and bone destruction in RA. One hundred eighteen patients were recruited including 50 with RA (25 with nodules), 26 with osteoarthritis (OA), and 42 with other rheumatic diseases. Twenty-six healthy adults served as controls. Serum TRACP 5a activity, TRACP 5a protein, and TRACP 5b activity were determined by in-house immunoassays. C-reactive protein (CRP) was determined by in-house immunoassay using commercial antibodies and CRP. Other commercial markers included bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), C-telopeptides of type-I collagen (ICTP), cartilage glycoprotein-39 (YKL-40), and IgM rheumatoid factors (IgM-RF). Mean TRACP 5a protein was significantly elevated only in RA compared with healthy controls and other disease groups. TRACP 5a protein correlated significantly only with IgM-RF in RA. Among RA patients, mean TRACP 5a protein and IgM RF were significantly higher in nodule formers. In contrast, TRACP 5b activity was slightly elevated in RA and correlated with BALP, ICTP, and YKL-40 but not with IgM-RF or CRP. Mean TRACP 5b activity was no different in RA patients with or without nodules. TRACP isoforms could be useful disease markers in RA; TRACP 5a protein may be a measure of systemic inflammatory macrophage burden and disease severity. TRACP 5b activity is a marker for osteoclast number and perhaps local or systemic bone destruction.

Morphine treatment accelerates sarcoma-induced bone pain, bone loss, and spontaneous fracture in a murine model of bone cancer

Metastatic bone cancer causes severe pain that is primarily treated with opioids. A model of bone cancer pain in which the progression of cancer pain and bone destruction is tightly controlled was used to evaluate the effects of sustained morphine treatment. In cancer-treated mice, morphine enhanced, rather than diminished, spontaneous, and evoked pain; these effects were dose-dependent and naloxone-sensitive. SP and CGRP positive DRG cells did not differ between sarcoma or control mice, but were increased following morphine in both groups. Morphine increased ATF-3 expression only in DRG cells of sarcoma mice. Morphine did not alter tumor growth in vitro or tumor burden in vivo but accelerated sarcoma-induced bone destruction and doubled the incidence of spontaneous fracture in a dose- and naloxone-sensitive manner. Morphine increased osteoclast activity and upregulated IL-1 beta within the femurs of sarcoma-treated mice suggesting enhancement of sarcoma-induced osteolysis. These results indicate that sustained morphine increases pain, osteolysis, bone loss, and spontaneous fracture, as well as markers of neuronal damage in DRG cells and expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Morphine treatment may result in "add-on" mechanisms of pain beyond those engaged by sarcoma alone. While it is not known whether the present findings in this model of osteolytic sarcoma will generalize to other cancers or opioids, the data suggest a need for increased understanding of neurobiological consequences of prolonged opioid exposure which may allow improvements in the use of opiates in the effective management of cancer pain.

Biochemical markers in preclinical models of osteoporosis

Although several treatments for osteoporosis exist, further understanding of the mode of action of current treatments, as well as development of novel treatments, are of interest. Thus, preclinical models of osteoporosis are very useful, as they provide the possibility for gaining knowledge about the cellular mechanisms underlying the disease and for studying pharmaceutical prevention or intervention of the disease in simple and strictly controlled systems. In this review, we present a comprehensive collection of studies using biochemical markers of bone turnover for investigation of preclinical models of osteoporosis. These range from pure and simple in vitro systems, such as osteoclast cultures, to ex vivo models, such as cultures of embryonic murine tibiae and, finally, to in vivo models, such as ovariectomy and orchidectomy of rats. We discuss the relevance of the markers in the individual models, and compare their responses to those observed using 'golden standard' methods.

Development of a novel fragments absorbed immunocapture enzyme assay system for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b

BACKGROUND

Osteoclastic activity is mainly assessed by measuring urinary markers. To correct for differences in renal clearance, the levels of urinary markers are usually corrected by the urine creatinine concentration. Therefore, alternative serum markers to evaluate osteoclastic activity are required. We developed a novel system for the determination of serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP5b) activity to evaluate osteoclastic activity.

METHODS

Two unique monoclonal antibodies were generated and the specificity was tested using a surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectroscopy (SELDI TOF-MS). A novel fragments absorbed immunocapture enzymatic assay (FAICEA) method was developed using 2 monoclonal antibodies.

RESULTS

FAICEA gave a sensitivity 0.1 U/l, linearity of 0.1-28 U/l, recovery 92-103%, inter-assay CV 2.95% and intra-assay CV 2.15%. Unlike other TRACP5b assay systems, FAICEA avoided interference from TRACP 5a.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the FAICEA, postmenopausal women had higher TRACP5b concentrations than younger women. The results show that TRACP5b is a novel bone resorption marker in serum.

Development and characterization of novel monoclonal antibodies against tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5

Serum band 5 tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP 5; EC 3.1.3.2) is a glycoprotein that exists as two very similar isoforms, TRACP 5a and TRACP 5b. The similarity of these two isoforms has made it difficult to establish monoclonal antibodies specific for either isoform. We report here the development of a monoclonal antibody with high specificity for TRACP 5b. We prepared TRACP 5b antigens from four sources: TRACP 5b purified from human bone, recombinant TRACP 5 from Escherichia coli, recombinant TRACP 5 from insect cells, and a synthetic TRACP 5b peptide. Thirty-seven mice were each immunized with 1 of the 4 different TRACP antigens to generate 473 antibody-producing clones. Three of these clones, Trk27, Trk49, and Trk62, reacted with TRACP 5b. These three clones were all established from mice exposed to native bone TRACP 5b antigen. In fact, none of the other antigens were able to generate anti-TRACP 5b monoclonal antibodies in mice. Furthermore, Trk62 interacted more strongly with TRACP 5b than with TRACP 5a. These results suggested that although recombinant proteins can be effective antigens, the native TRACP 5 protein might be more effective at generating monoclonal antibodies of greater specificity due to its more faithful representation of the native three-dimensional structure of the protein.

In Vitro, Ex Vivo, andIn VivoMethodological Approaches for Studying Therapeutic Targets of Osteoporosis and Degenerative Joint Diseases: How Biomarkers Can Assist?

Although our approach to the clinical management of osteoporosis (OP) and degenerative joint diseases (DJD)-major causes of disability and morbidity in the elderly-has greatly advanced in the past decades, curative treatments that could bring ultimate solutions have yet to be found or developed. Effective and timely development of candidate drugs is a critical function of the availability of sensitive and accurate methodological arsenal enabling the recognition and quantification of pharmacodynamic effects. The established concept that both OP and DJD arise from an imbalance in processes of tissue formation and degradation draws attention to need of establishing in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo experimental settings, which allow obtaining insights into the mechanisms driving increased bone and cartilage degradation at cellular, organ, and organism levels. When addressing changes in bone or cartilage turnover at the organ or organism level, monitoring tools adequately reflecting the outcome of tissue homeostasis become particularly critical. In this context, bioassays targeting the quantification of various degradation and formation products of bone and cartilage matrix elements represent a useful approach. In this review, a comprehensive overview of widely used and recently established in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo set-ups is provided, which in many cases effectively take advantage of the potentials of biomarkers. In addition to describing and discussing the advantages and limitations of each assay and their methods of evaluation, we added experimental and clinical data illustrating the utility of biomarkers for these methodological approaches.

Development of immunoassays for type-5 tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase in human serum

BACKGROUND

Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) is known as a marker of bone resorption. The purpose of this study was the development of a sensitive and specific immunoassay for TRAP.

METHODS

We have developed two types of immunoassays, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoselective enzyme immunoassay (ISEA) using monoclonal antibodies to recombinant TRAP, for determination of TRAP in human serum. To evaluate assay performance, recovery and dilution tests were performed. Further, we determined serum TRAP levels of patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism at different pH conditions.

RESULTS

The detected ranges of ELISA and ISEA were between 0.08 and 5 microg/l and between 0.063 and 4 U/l. Different concentrations of TRAP added were recovered on average at 98.0% in ELISA and 102.9% in ISEA. In the serial dilution test, serum TRAP levels were on average at 101.6% and 109.6% of the expected values in ELISA and ISEA, respectively. The serum TRAP levels of patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism were significantly higher than those of normal controls in ELISA and ISEA. Similar TRAP levels were obtained in the conditions at pH 5.5 and 6.1 in ISEA.

CONCLUSION

The present findings suggest that our assay methods are applicable for clinical tests, and strengthen the idea that serum TRAP is useful as a marker for bone resorption.

Acid phosphatases as markers of bone metabolism

Various biochemical markers have been used to assess bone metabolism and to monitor the effects of treatments. Tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP; EC 3.1.3.2) has often been used to assess bone absorption. Although osteoclasts contain abundant TRAP and they are responsible for bone resorption, the total TRAP activities in the serum measured by colorimetric methods little reflect the bone turnover. TRAP 5 is further separated into 5a and 5b by electrophoresis. Type 5b is considered to be derived from the osteoclast, and therefore attempts are being made to measure exclusively serum TRAP 5b by kinetic methods, immunological methods, and chromatographic methods including ion-exchange and heparin column chromatography.

Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoforms in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to evaluate the significance and source of serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Thirty-five RA, 32 osteoarthritis (OA) and 16 control subjects were studied. Serum TRACP-5b activity and total TRACP protein were determined by immunoassay. TRACP isoforms were analyzed by non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides (NTx), and C-terminal telopeptides (ICTP) of type I collagen were estimated as markers of bone turnover. C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured as a marker of chronic inflammation. Macrophages and dendritic cells (DC) were developed from peripheral blood monocytes. Cell lysates and culture supernatants were analyzed for TRACP isoforms by immunoassay and PAGE.

RESULTS

In RA, mean TRACP-5b activity was normal, but median total TRACP protein was increased twofold (p<0.001). In OA, TRACP-5b activity and protein were normal. In RA, TRACP-5b activity correlated weakly with ICTP (r=0.56) while TRACP protein levels correlated weakly with NTx (r=0.43). Additionally, TRACP protein, but not TRACP-5b activity correlated significantly with CRP (r=0.42). Macrophage and DC lysates contained TRACP-5b, while tissue culture supernatants contained TRACP-5a.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased total TRACP protein in RA sera was probably due to TRACP-5a and not derived from osteoclasts. Rather, it could be a secreted product of inflammatory macrophages and DC.

Acid phosphatases

Acid phosphatases (APs) are a family of enzymes that are widespread in nature, and can be found in many animal and plant species. Mystery surrounds the precise functional role of these molecular facilitators, despite much research. Yet, paradoxically, human APs have had considerable impact as tools of clinical investigation and intervention. One particular example is tartrate resistant acid phosphatase, which is detected in the serum in raised amounts accompanying pathological bone resorption. This article seeks to explore the identity and diversity of APs, and to demonstrate the relation between APs, human disease, and clinical diagnosis.

Role of biochemical markers in the management of osteoporosis

Several serum and urine biochemical markers of bone resorption and formation have been developed. Biochemical bone markers have been used as intermediate end-points in all major studies of anti-osteoporotic therapies. Bone resorption markers, in particular, may add an independent, predictive value to the assessment of bone loss and fracture risk. There are also potential advantages in monitoring anti-osteoporotic treatment in the short-term in addition to bone densitometry, to rapidly identify non-responders to therapy, or non-compliance. Despite these recent advances, until now bone markers have simply been very useful research tools, with their clinical utility being limited by intra-individual and diurnal variability. However, the probability of the true bone mineral density response to hormone replacement therapy for the individual patient may be predicted using algorithms based on a spectrum of cut-off bone marker levels with varying false positive and negative rates. Thus, the transition of biochemical bone markers into everyday clinical practice may be rapidly approaching.

Naphthol-ASBI phosphate as a preferred substrate for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b

Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) isoform 5b is a potential serum marker for osteoclastic activity. Biochemical assays for serum TRAP activity with para-nitrophenylphosphate (pNPP) have low specificity for bone because of hydrolysis by unrelated nontype 5 TRAPs of blood cells and by related isoform 5a. Our purpose was to increase the specificity of TRAP assay for osteoclastic activity by using naphthol-ASBI phosphate (N-ASBI-P) as a substrate for serum type 5 TRAP activity and heparin as an inhibitor of isoform 5a. TRAP activity in individual and pooled sera of normal subjects and patients with endstage renal disease (ESRD) and rheumatologic diseases was quantitated using pNPP and N-ASBI-P as substrate at pH 5.5 and 6.1. For some experiments, heparin (23U/ml) was added as a specific inhibitor of isoform 5a activity. Isoforms 5a and 5b were separated from serum pools by cation exchange chromatography and identified by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). N-ASBI-P was selectively hydrolyzed by TRAP isoform 5b. TRAP assays with pNPP and N-ASBI-P correlated only in ESRD sera, which contained primarily isoform 5b. The two assays did not correlate in normal or rheumatic sera with significant amounts of 5a. Heparin inhibited isoform 5a activity approximately 50% but had little effect on isoform 5b activity. Biochemical assay of serum TRAP activity can be made specific for isoform 5b by using N-ASBI-P and heparin. This method can be adapted to simple microplate biochemical or immunochemical assays. This simplified method for assessment of osteoclastic TRAP 5b activity warrants a detailed investigation in diseases of bone metabolism.

Biochemical markers to survey bone turnover

Molecular markers of bone turnover have gained increasing relevance in the evaluation of patients with metabolic bone diseases. Their clinical applications include the assessment of future osteoporotic fracture risk, complementation of bone density measurements, diagnosis of certain metabolic osteopathies, therapeutic decision making, and monitoring of therapeutic efficacy and patient compliance. One should be aware, however, that the results from large epidemiologic or clinical trials are sometimes difficult to translate into the everyday clinical situation. The individual patient often has more than one disease that might affect either bone turnover or the handling of the parameters mentioned (or both). Analytic and biologic variability of bone markers can be significant and also needs to be considered when using these indices. In the scientific setting, conventional and new markers of bone turnover can help to elucidate formerly unknown mechanisms and pathways. Because the development of ever more specific and sensitive markers of bone metabolism is progressing rapidly, we are likely to witness new insights into the pathophysiology of bone diseases in the near future.

Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase Isoform 5b as Serum Marker for Osteoclastic Activity

Background: Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (AcP) 5b is a marker of osteoclastic activity and bone resorption. Immunoassays for serum TRAcP may lack sensitivity and specificity because of the presence of non-bone isoform 5a. The purpose of this study was to isolate the serum isoforms, quantify their disease-related expressions, and test an improved immunoassay for TRAcP 5b.

Methods: We separated TRAcP isoforms chromatographically from pooled sera of healthy, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and endstage renal disease (ESRD) subjects. TRAcP isoforms were identified by electrophoresis and quantified by biochemical and immunochemical assays. Serum TRAcP activity in healthy, RA, and ESRD cohorts was assessed at pH 5.5 and 6.1, and compared with bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx).

Results: TRAcP isoforms 5a and 5b were present in all sera; 5b was identical to osteoclastic TRAcP. In serum from healthy subjects, 5a accounted for 87% of the enzyme protein but only 55% of the activity. In RA, both isoforms were increased two- to threefold in protein, but their specific activities were subnormal. In ESRD, only 5b was abnormal, being increased fivefold in protein and threefold in activity. In RA sera, TRAcP activity did not correlate with either BAP or NTx. In ESRD sera, TRAcP activity correlated with BAP and NTx only when measured at pH 6.1.

Conclusions: All sera contained both TRAcP isoforms 5a and 5b, but only 5b was present in bone. TRAcP isoform expression was variable in different diseases. Measurement of TRAcP activity at pH 6.1 improves the specificity of immunoassay for isoform 5b.

Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b: a novel serum marker of bone resorption

Human serum contains two forms of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), 5a and 5b. Of these, 5a contains sialic acid and 5b does not. We show here that antigenic properties and pH optimum of TRAP purified from human osteoclasts are identical to those of serum TRAP 5b and completely different from those of serum TRAP 5a, suggesting that 5b would be derived from osteoclasts and 5a from some other source. We developed a novel immunoassay specific for 5b using a monoclonal antibody O1A as capture antibody. O1A did not bind acid phosphatase derived from platelets and erythrocytes. Western analysis showed that O1A was specific for TRAP in both human bone and serum. We measured bound TRAP activity at pH 6.1, where 5b is highly active and 5a almost completely inactive. The immunoassay detected more than 90% of the initial TRAP 5b activity after 8-h incubation of serum samples at 25 degrees C and after 3 days incubation at 4 degrees C. Serum TRAP 5b activity decreased significantly after 6 months of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) of postmenopausal women compared with the change observed in postmenopausal women receiving placebo (p < 0.0001). Instead, no significant differences were observed between the changes in the placebo and HRT groups in total serum TRAP amount. These results show that serum TRAP 5b is a specific and sensitive marker for monitoring antiresorptive treatment. Instead, total serum TRAP cannot be used for that purpose. These findings may turn out to be a significant improvement in using serum TRAP as a resorption marker.

Clinical Significance of Immunoassays for Type-5 Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase

Background: Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP; EC 3.1.3.2) is a product of osteoclasts and a biochemical marker of bone resorption rate. However, erythrocytes and platelets contribute to total TRAP activity in serum, reducing the specificity of direct biochemical assays in serum. Osteoclast TRAP is also known as type-5 TRAP and is antigenically unique. Immunoassays are sought to improve the specificity and sensitivity of TRAP as a bone marker.

Methods: We developed two colorimetric microplate assays for type-5 TRAP: an enzyme capture immunoassay to measure antibody-bound enzymatic activity, and a two-site immunoassay to measure bound enzyme protein. Both use the same monoclonal antibody (14G6) to capture type-5 TRAP, which permits determination of specific activity of serum TRAP in health and disease.

Results: Both TRAP assays were linear from one-tenth to fivefold the mean value in 18 healthy subjects. In these subjects, the mean (SD) TRAP activity was 3.2 (0.54) U/L for the enzyme capture assay and 37 (13) μg/L for the two-site assay. Mean TRAP activity was not significantly increased in 64 patients with endstage renal disease requiring hemodialysis (HD) or 99 unselected patients with rheumatic diseases. By contrast, TRAP protein was increased in both the HD and rheumatic disease groups. The specific activity of TRAP in the 17 of 64 HD sera that had increased TRAP activity (0.088 U/μg) was similar to that in healthy subjects (0.091 U/μg). By contrast, the specific activity of TRAP in the 31 of 99 rheumatic sera with increased TRAP protein (0.035 U/μg) was significantly decreased.

Conclusions: Wide sample distributions for TRAP activity in HD patients and TRAP protein in rheumatic disease patients suggest the presence of subpopulations of HD patients with increased TRAP activity and of rheumatic patients with increased TRAP protein. Each assay for TRAP activity and protein may have its own biological significance and clinical applications in specific groups of patients.

Reactivity and assay restriction profiles of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies to acid phosphatases: a preliminary study

The development of secure diagnostic immunoassays requires, among others, rigorous characterisation of potential antibody reagents. The reactivity profiles of seven antibodies (six monoclonal [MAb] and one polyclonal [PAb]) with putative specificity for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and/or osteoclasts were evaluated in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and/or immunocytochemistry. MAbs 2H1, 4E6 and 5Cl demonstrated assay restriction: exhibiting reactivity only in ELISA. The remaining three MAbs (G211D, G312G and V35B) and the PAb 8023 recognised recombinant TRAP (rTRAP) in ELISA and native acid phosphatases in selected tissues and cell lines. The latter were cytochemically assessed for both tartrate-sensitive acid phosphatase (TSAP) and TRAP. V35B showed reactivity against the monocytic leukaemia cell line U937 and guinea pig kidney tissue (both TSAP+ and TRAP+) and ECV304 (TSAP+) cells. Interestingly, the reactivity of MAb G211D co-localised with TRAP activity in the membrane of osteoclasts but also detected cytoplasmic components in U937 cells and human embryonic lung fibroblasts (TRAP+ and TRAP+). G211D exhibited immunoreactivity against placental trophoblasts (positive for total AP). Intriguingly, MAbs 2H1, 4E6, 5Cl and PAb 8023 cross-reacted with potato acid phosphatase in ELISA, suggesting reactivity to conformationally similar epitopes. Thus, some of these reagents could be used in the development of standardised diagnostic immunoassays or as drug-targeting agents for conditions in which the pathological process involves bone resorption, the MAbs G211D, 2H1, 4E6, 5Cl and PAb 8023 being useful in ELISA but not immunocytochemical detection of TRAP.