Use of oral corticosteroids and risk of fractures

Advances and challenges in immunosuppressive antibody drug conjugates

Since the approval of Mylotarg™ in 2000 for acute myeloid leukemia, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have significantly advanced precision medicine, particularly for oncology applications. ADCs combine an antibody, a linker, and a payload to result in a targeted therapeutic that minimizes toxicity resulting from systemic drug exposure. This review explores the innovative application of ADC technology towards immunosuppressive therapeutics, primarily focusing on antibody-mediated delivery of glucocorticoids (GCs). Despite their potent anti-inflammatory effects, the clinical use of GCs is limited by adverse systemic effects including osteoporosis, high blood sugar, adrenal insufficiency, weight gain, and glaucoma. Therefore, targeted delivery via ADCs presents a promising strategy to enhance therapeutic efficacy while reducing toxicity. Herein, we review the current status of immune-suppressing ADC technology, starting with early investigations of CD163-targeted dexamethasone and moving to the design of ADCs employing next-generation ultra-potent GCs. Additionally, we will discuss the current status of anti-inflammatory ADCs that employ non-glucocorticoid immune-suppressive medications. Throughout, we will highlight preclinical and clinical data that serves to derisk and drive investment in this new therapeutic class. In parallel, we will focus on ADC design principles that illustrate the importance of careful selection of payload, linker, and conjugation technology in this emerging field.

Optimal dose of maintenance steroid therapy for relapse of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: a multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Long-term maintenance steroid therapy (MST) is often necessary for repeated relapses of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP). Because relapse does not indicate a worse prognosis, determining the optimal steroid dose to avoid overtreatment presents a clinical challenge. Our primary objective was to evaluate the optimal MST dose to prevent repeated relapses, and the secondary objectives included identifying serum eosinophil count at relapse and background factors of relapse.

METHODS

A multicentre retrospective study was conducted on patients with steroid-treated CEP. Background characteristics were compared between the non-relapse and relapse groups. The optimal MST dose was determined based on dose at relapse and the final relapse prevention dose. Additionally, serum eosinophil count at relapse was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were included, with 44 in the non-relapse group and 35 in the relapse group. The prednisolone doses required to achieve relapse-free rates of 50% (ED50) were 7.2 mg (95% CI, 4.6 to 23.6). The median serum eosinophil count at relapse was 1125 /µL (IQR, 735-2108). No clinically significant background factors were identified between the non-relapse and relapse groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that a prednisolone dose of 7.2 mg achieved a 50% relapse-free rate in the relapse group. Based on these findings, we encourage clinicians to evaluate individual minimum effective steroid doses.

The Role of Ferroptosis in Osteoporosis and Advances in Chinese Herbal Interventions

OP, a systemic bone disorder marked by reduced bone mass and heightened fracture risk, poses a significant global health burden, particularly among aging populations. Current treatments, including bisphosphonates and calcium supplementation, are limited by adverse effects and incomplete efficacy. Emerging research highlights ferroptosis-an iron-dependent cell death driven by lipid peroxidation-as a critical contributor to OP pathogenesis, characterized by dysregulated iron metabolism, oxidative stress, and lipid peroxide accumulation, which disrupt bone remodeling by impairing osteoblast function and enhancing osteoclast activity. This review elucidates the mechanistic interplay between ferroptosis and OP subtypes (diabetic osteoporosis (DOP), glucocorticoid-induced (GIOP), and postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP)) and evaluates the efficacy of Chinese herbal interventions in mitigating ferroptosis-driven bone loss. Key findings reveal that excess iron exacerbates lipid peroxidation via the Fenton reaction, while glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) inactivation and system Xc- inhibition amplify oxidative damage. In DIOP, hyperglycemia-induced ROS and advanced glycation end products suppress osteogenesis, countered by melatonin and naringenin via nuclear factor -related factor 2 (Nrf2)/GPX4 activation. GIOP involves dexamethasone-mediated GPX4 downregulation, mitigated by exosomes and melatonin through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. PMOP driven by estrogen deficiency-induced iron overload is alleviated by aconitine and icariin (ICA) via nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathways. Chinese herbs, including active compounds (quercetin, gastrodin, ICA, etc.) and formulations (Bugu Shengsui Capsule, Erxian Decoction (EXD), etc.), regulate iron metabolism, enhance antioxidant defenses (Nrf2/heme oxygenase 1(HO-1)), and inhibit lipid peroxidation, effectively restoring bone homeostasis. These findings underscore ferroptosis as a pivotal mechanism in OP progression and highlight the therapeutic promise of Chinese herbs in bridging traditional medicine with modern mechanistic insights. Future research should prioritize elucidating precise molecular targets, optimizing formulations, and validating clinical efficacy to address current therapeutic gaps.

Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes promote osteogenesis in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis through PI3K/AKT signaling pathway-mediated ferroptosis inhibition

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP), the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis, is characterized by significant bone loss, decreased bone quality, and increased fracture risk. The current treatments for GIOP have several drawbacks. Exosomes are vital for cellular processes. However, very few studies have focused on using human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (hUCMSC-EXOs) for GIOP treatment. In vitro and in vivo dexamethasone was used to evaluate the therapeutic effects of hUCMSC-EXOs on GIOP. CCK-8 and EdU assays were used to evaluate cell viability and proliferation, respectively. We conducted an alkaline phosphatase activity assay, alizarin red staining, Western blotting, and real-time PCR to detect the effect on osteogenesis. TMT-labeled quantitative proteomic and bioinformatic analyses were performed. Furthermore, we performed Western blotting, immunofluorescence, reactive oxygen species assays, and lipid peroxidation assays to investigate the regulatory mechanism by which hUCMSC-EXOs affect cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. The in vivo effects of hUCMSC-EXOs were evaluated using micro-CT, hematoxylin, and eosin staining, and immunohistochemical staining. We found that hUCMSC-EXOs reversed the inhibitory effects of glucocorticoids on human bone marrow stromal cell (hBMSC) proliferation and osteogenic differentiation and demonstrated that hUCMSC-EXOs reversed GIOP via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, inhibiting lipid peroxidation in vitro and in vivo. HUCMSC-EXOs promote hBMSC osteogenesis through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, inhibit ferroptosis, and have therapeutic potential for GIOP in mice.

["Paradoxical fractures": pathological fractures under anti-osteoporotic and antirheumatic treatment]

Pathological fractures under anti-osteoporotic and antirheumatic treatment are very rare events. Nevertheless, atypical femoral fractures occur during antiresorptive treatment with bisphosphonates or denosumab, the latter especially in patients previously treated with bisphosphonates. Treatment with teriparatide can be helpful. While glucocorticoids have a well-known influence on the development of osteoporosis and thus also fractures, the probably unproblematic use in the low-dose range has so far found little acceptance. Methotrexate-induced osteopathy is also a rare phenomenon but is now well accepted and known. There are several approved medications for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and for methotrexate-induced osteopathy, discontinuation of methotrexate is particularly essential.

Prednisolone impairs trabecular bone score changes in adolescents with 21-hydroxylase deficiency

BACKGROUND

Individuals with 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21OHD) require lifelong glucocorticoid (GC) therapy, which increases their risk of fragility fractures. However, fractures in GC-treated individuals can occur at normal bone mineral density (BMD) levels, suggesting an alteration in the bone microarchitecture.

PURPOSE

To evaluate trabecular bone microarchitecture and its changes in adolescents with 21OHD.

METHODS

We enrolled 38 adolescents with 21OHD for whom complete clinical data and baseline and follow-up lumbar spine BMD (LSBMD) measurements were available. The mean duration was 1.5±0.6 years. Trabecular bone score (TBS), an indirect measurement of bone microarchitecture, was analyzed using iNsight software version 3.0. Impaired BMD and TBS were defined as z scores ≤ -1.5.

RESULTS

At baseline, participants (55% female; 68% salt- wasting type; mean age, 15.2±3.8 years; bone age, 17.5± 2.8 years; mean GC dose, 18.5±6.5 mg/m2/day) had the prevalence of impaired BMD and TBS of 5% and 18%, respectively. During follow-up, adolescents with 21OHD receiving prednisolone showed a lower annual percentage change in TBS than those who received hydrocortisone (P=0.028). A stepwise regression analysis showed that body mass index percentile (P<0.001) and testosterone concentration (P=0.002) were independent positive predictors of the baseline TBS z score, whereas prednisolone use was the only negative predictor of the annual percentage change in TBS (P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Adolescents with 21OHD have a high prevalence of impaired bone microarchitecture. Furthermore, prednisolone therapy is associated with impaired bone microarchitecture development, suggesting that hydrocortisone may better preserve bone microarchitecture and should be considered the first-line treatment for this population.

Ukrainian guideline for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is a bone metabolic disorder caused by glucocorticoid (GC) use. It is one of the leading causes of secondary osteoporosis, increasing the risk of low-energy fractures, disability, and mortality. Although limited studies on GIOP epidemiology and treatment have been conducted in Ukraine, there were no national guidelines for its management. The aim was to create national guideline for the GIOP diagnosis, prevention, and treatment based on a comprehensive review of modern literature to enhance awareness within Ukraine's medical community, improve disease management, and reduce its socio-economic impact.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An Expert Group comprising 18 leading Ukrainian scientists from various fields was created for guideline development. A review of modern literature on GIOP epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and monitoring was conducted. Evidence synthesis followed the GRADE methodology, and the quality of recommendations was critically evaluated using the AGREE II tool.

RESULTS

The guideline comprises 12 statements covering GIOP screening, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. We highlight the need to raise awareness among healthcare providers and patients about the potential effects of GC therapy. Also, we outline approaches to clinical assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk in GC users and detail diagnostic and therapeutic methods currently available in Ukraine for managing GIOP.

CONCLUSION

The first Ukrainian national GIOP guideline is critical for healthcare providers across specialities. Endorsed by the Board of the Ukrainian Association of Osteoporosis, it is recommended for use in routine clinical practice to enhance patient outcomes and mitigate the disease's impact.

Osteoporosis and Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mechanisms Underlying Osteoclast Differentiation and Activation or Factors Associated with Hip Fractures

Osteoporosis is defined as a condition of increased risk of fracture due to decreased bone strength. In developed countries, the number of patients with osteoporosis and fragility fractures has been increasing in recent years due to the growing elderly population, posing a social challenge not only to fracture patients and their families but also to the social healthcare economy. Osteoporosis can be divided into two categories: primary osteoporosis caused by aging or menopause and secondary osteoporosis caused by metabolic or inflammatory diseases or drugs such as glucocorticoids. The majority of patients have primary osteoporosis, and the pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis and factors associated with fragility fractures in the elderly have been elucidated. On the other hand, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the causes of secondary osteoporosis. RA is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by joint swelling and destruction. Most often, treatment focuses on suppressing these symptoms. However, physicians should be aware of the risk of osteoporosis in RA patients, because (1) RA is a chronic inflammatory disease, which itself can be a risk factor for osteoporosis; (2) glucocorticoids, which are sometimes administered to treat RA, can be a risk factor for osteoporosis; and (3) patients with RA are becoming older, and aging is an osteoporosis risk factor. A comprehensive understanding of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and its fragility fractures requires elucidating the mechanisms underlying osteoclast activation, which drives their development. Furthermore, identifying the factors associated with fragility fractures is essential. This review summarizes the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, the factors associated with fragility fractures, and the associations between RA and osteoporosis development.

Autoimmune blistering diseases treated with glucocorticoids: An international study of steroid-induced myopathy

BACKGROUND

Patients with autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) are often exposed to chronic glucocorticoid (GC) treatment with many side effects. Glucocorticoid-induced myopathy (GIM) is a well-established side effect, which particularly affects the proximal muscles. The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) is a validated global assessment tool which quantifies GC toxicity over time.

OBJECTIVES

This study marks the first study which analyses GIM in patients with AIBDs. The objectives of this study were to utilize the GTI to investigate the nature and prevalence of GIM in AIBD patients and explore potential risk factors.

METHODS

This international cohort study was conducted in blistering disease clinics across Australia, China, Greece, Iran, Japan, the Philippines, Turkey and the United States of America between February 2019 and July 2023. The GTI tool was completed by a medical practitioner at each patient visit. Data related to glucocorticoid toxicity were entered into the Steritas GTI 2.0 to generate an aggregate improvement and cumulative worsening score at each visit.

RESULTS

The study included 139 patients. There were 132 episodes of myopathy, and 47.5% of patients developed muscle weakness at some point during the study period. Cumulative GC dose correlated positively with myopathy risk, while average dose and treatment duration were not significant. Older age, male gender and obesity more than doubled the likelihood of developing GIM.

CONCLUSIONS

GIM is a common side effect experienced by AIBD patients on GC treatment. Muscle weakness is less likely to occur if cumulative GC dose is less than 0.75 mg/kg/day. Studies of exercise programs to mitigate myopathy and newer alternative treatments to reduce cumulative GC dose should be considered.

Fracture Risk Assessment in the 2023 Osteoporosis Canada Guideline

Radiologists and other diagnostic imaging specialists play a pivotal role in the management of osteoporosis, a highly prevalent condition of reduced bone strength and increased fracture risk. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a critical component of identifying individuals at high risk for fracture. Strategies to prevent fractures are consolidated in the Osteoporosis Canada clinical practice guideline which was updated in 2023. In this guideline, treatment recommendations are based upon a consideration of fracture history, 10-year major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) risk, and BMD T-score in conjunction with age. The current review aims to familiarize radiologists and other diagnostic imaging specialists with the reporting requirements needed to support implementation of this guideline using the FRAX™ risk calculation tool. Fortunately, for specialists already familiar with the Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada (CAROC) tool, the transition to FRAX-based reporting is readily accommodated in a radiology workflow.

Rapid reduction in fracture risk after the discontinuation of long-term oral glucocorticoid therapy: a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide health insurance claims database in Japan

Increased fracture risk due to oral glucocorticoids (GCs) rapidly decreases with GC discontinuation. However, evidence for this is limited. We found that fracture risk decreased rapidly in the first year after GC discontinuation, while hip fracture risk remained higher than reference levels for about two years after GC discontinuation.

PURPOSE

We investigated changes in fracture risk following discontinuation of long-term oral glucocorticoids (GCs) using Japan's nationwide health insurance claims database (NDBJ).

METHODS

We identified patients aged ≥ 50 years who initiated GC therapy in 2012-2019. Those receiving ≥ 5 mg (prednisolone or equivalent, PSL)/day for ≥ 72 days in the initial 90 days of GC therapy were classified as the GC-exposure group, and those receiving < 5 mg PSL/day for < 30 days were classified as the reference group. Patients discontinuing GC after 90 days of GC therapy were classified as the GC-discontinuation group; all others were classified as the GC-continuation group. We tracked the incidence rates of hip and clinical vertebral fractures for up to 990 days, and assessed fracture risk after GC discontinuation by hazard ratios (HR) adjusted by inverse probability weighting using propensity scores for GC discontinuation.

RESULTS

There was a total of 52,179 GC-discontinuation, 91,969 GC-continuation, and 43,138 reference group women, and 57,560, 93,736, and 33,696 men in the corresponding groups, respectively. According to adjusted HRs, incidence rates of fractures were significantly lower in the GC-discontinuation group than in the GC-continuation group in the initial 90 days after GC discontinuation and remained significant for 360 days, except for hip fracture in men. HRs for hip fractures remained significantly higher in the GC-discontinuation group compared to the reference group for 720 days post-discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Fracture risk declines rapidly in the first year after GC discontinuation, but vigilance is necessary as the increased risk persists for two years post-discontinuation.

Superiority of denosumab over bisphosphonates in preventing and treating glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis with GRADE quality assessment

Background

The increasing prevalence of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) due to long-term glucocorticoid therapy underscores the need for effective treatment options. Denosumab and bisphosphonates, both key in managing GIOP, require further comparative evaluation to determine their relative efficacy and safety profiles.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Our analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing denosumab with bisphosphonates in GIOP management. The outcomes were percent changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at various sites, bone turnovers markers (BTMs) and the incidence of adverse events.

Results

Our study comprised five RCTs with 1,043 participants. The results showed a significant mean difference in BMD percentage change from baseline at LS of 2.87% (95% CI: 1.86 to 3.87, p<0.001) and at TH of 1.39% (95% CI: 0.15 to 2.64, p=0.03). Additionally, the safety profile of denosumab was found to be comparable to bisphosphonates, with no significant increase in the incidence of adverse events or serious adverse reactions.

Conclusions

Denosumab proved more effective in enhancing BMD than bisphosphonates in GIOP, maintaining a comparable safety profile. However, the study's limitations, including heterogeneity and the need for longer-term research, were noted.

Biological Heterogeneity in Susceptibility to Glucocorticoid-Induced Bone Loss: Short- and Long-Term Hip BMD Trajectories

CONTEXT

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are widely used for their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties. Their effect on bone health is predominantly negative by decreasing bone formation and increasing risk of fractures.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to quantify the short- and long-term changes in total hip bone mineral density (THBMD) after initiating systemic GC treatment in previously GC treatment-naive adults without bone protective agents.

METHODS

An observational study was conducted using THBMD data from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Individuals were stratified by sex and tertiles of GC exposure. Individuals not GC-exposed served as a reference group. Routine-care DXA scans were obtained from the main public hospitals servicing the Island of Funen in Denmark. A total of 15 099 adults underwent routine DXA at Odense University Hospital between 2006 and 2021. Data were enriched with Danish national registers. Intervention included systemic GCs (observational data). The short-term outcome included annualized THBMD changes between first 2 DXA scans. The long-term outcome included greater than 5% annualized THBMD loss over a 10-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Strong associations between GC exposure and THBMD loss was found for both outcomes, with larger losses in the middle and upper tertiles of GC exposure. The risk of experiencing greater than 5% annualized THBMD loss was elevated, especially in the first 2 years of initiating GC treatment. There is significant heterogeneity in THBMD responses, with approximately 1 in 5 patients experiencing no nominal bone loss despite receiving upper tertile levels of GC exposure.

CONCLUSION

The findings confirm the association between initial GC exposure and significant bone loss. The heterogeneity in individual responses emphasizes the need for early monitoring and personalized approaches in managing bone health for patients undergoing GC treatment.

Cushing's disease and bone

Bone impairment associated with Cushing's disease (CD) is a complex disorder, mainly involving deterioration of bone quality and resulting in an increased fracture rate, often despite normal bone mineral density. Bone complications are common in patients with CD at the time of diagnosis but may persist even after successful treatment. There is currently no agreement on the optimal diagnostic methods, thresholds for anti-osteoporotic therapy and its timing in CD. In this review, we summarize the current data on the pathophysiology, diagnostic approach and management of bone complications in CD.

Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with greater odds of complications following posterior lumbar fusion and further amplified for patients exposed to monoclonal antibody biologics

Background

Posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) is a common spine surgery that may be considered in patients with underlying comorbidities, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Prior literature examining the association of this disease and PLF outcomes was done in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), which only assessed in-hospital data and did not reveal an elevated risk of medical or surgical complications. However, characterization of PLF outcomes beyond hospital discharge is important and remains unknown for patients with IBD.

Methods

Patients with IBD who underwent single-level PLF ± interbody fusion were identified from the M165Ortho PearlDiver database. Exclusion criteria included: patients <18 years old, those undergoing concurrent cervical, thoracic, anterior, or multi-level fusion, those with prior trauma, neoplasm, or infection diagnosed within 90-days, and <90-days of follow-up. Adult patients with IBD were matched 1:4 with non-IBD patients based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI). The odds of 90-day individual and aggregated any, severe, and minor adverse events (AAE, SAE, and MAE, respectively), emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital readmission were compared by multivariable logistic regression. Five-year reoperation was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared by log-rank test.

Results

Overall, 4,392 (1.4%) of patients undergoing PLF were identified with IBD. These patients demonstrated elevated odds ratios (ORs) of aggregated MAE (OR 2.29), AAE (OR 2.27), and SAE (OR 1.84), as well as ED visits (OR 2.69) (p<.001 for all). Conversely, 5-year reoperation rates were not different for those with vs without IBD (p=.70).

Conclusions

The current study highlights the importance of investigating post-discharge outcomes, as these findings were not detected by prior inpatient literature. Our findings reveal the odds of various complications may be significantly elevated for IBD patients within 90-days postoperatively, however, these inferior outcomes encouragingly did not translate to an elevated rate of 5-year reoperation.

Prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in adults: recommendations from the European Calcified Tissue Society

INTRODUCTION

This report presents the recommendations of the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) in adults. Our starting point was that the recommendations be evidence based, focused on non-bone specialists who treat patients with glucocorticoid (GC) and broadly supported by ECTS.

METHODS

The recommendations were developed by global experts. After a comprehensive review of the literature, 25 recommendations were formulated, based on quality evidence. For stratifying fracture risk and the most appropriate first line of treatment, we have classified patients into 3 categories: those at medium risk of fractures, ie, adults without a recent (in the last 2 years) history of fracture; those at high risk of fractures, ie, adults with recent history of fracture, and/or at least one vertebral fracture (grade ≥ 2 according to Genant classification); and those at very high risk of fractures, ie, adults aged ≥70 years with a recent hip fracture, pelvis fracture, and/or at least one vertebral fracture (grade ≥ 2 according to Genant classification). The subtopics in the recommendations include who to assess, how to assess, who to treat, how to treat, and follow-up and monitoring.

RESULTS

General measures are recommended for all patients who are being prescribed GCs for ≥3 months, ie, calcium and protein intake should be normalized, a 25(OH) vitamin D concentration of 50-125 nmol/L should be attained, and the risk of falls be minimized. (1) Who to assess? (R1-2) A preliminary assessment of fracture risk should be routinely performed in patients likely to receive oral GCs for ≥3 months: (i) women and men ≥ 50 years and (ii) patients at increased risk of fracture (history of fragility fracture and/or have comorbidities or are on medications that are frequently associated with osteoporosis. (2) How to assess (fracture risk)? (R3-6) Clinical risk factors include history of fragility fracture, systematic vertebral imaging, and GC dose-adjusted FRAX, measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), fall risk, and biochemical testing. (3) Who to treat? (R7-12) Anti-osteoporosis treatment is indicated for women and men ≥ 50 years with (i) the presence of a recent history of vertebral and/or non-vertebral fracture (less than 2 years), (ii) and/or a GC dosage ≥ 7.5 mg/day, (iii) and/or age ≥ 70 years, (iv) and/or a T-score ≤ -1.5, (v) and/or 10-year probability risk above the country specific GC dose-adjusted FRAX® thresholds. In premenopausal women and men < 50 years with a Z-score ≤ -2 and/or a history of fragility fracture, it is recommended to refer the patient to a bone specialist. (4) How to treat? (R13-18) In women and men ≥ 50 years, (i) alendronate or risedronate is preferred as the first line of treatment in patients at medium risk of fractures, (ii) zoledronic acid or denosumab in patients at high risk of fractures, and (iii) teriparatide in patients at very high risk of fractures. It is imperative that sequential therapy be implemented in individuals receiving denosumab or teriparatide as their first-line treatment regimen. (5) Follow-up and monitoring (R19-25): in patients receiving anti-osteoporosis treatment, monitoring of clinical risk factors (eg, history of fragility fracture), systematic vertebral imaging, fall risk, BMD measurement using DXA, and biochemical testing should be performed regularly during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The new, evidence-based recommendations by the ECTS for the prevention and treatment of GIOP provide clear and pragmatic advice to all health practitioners especially those who are not bone specialists.

Current Challenges and Future Directions in the Assessment of Glucocorticoid Status

Glucocorticoid (GC) hormones are secreted in a circadian and ultradian rhythm and play a critical role in maintaining physiological homeostasis, with both excess and insufficient GC associated with adverse effects on health. Current assessment of GC status is primarily clinical, often in conjunction with serum cortisol values, which may be stimulated or suppressed depending on the GC disturbance being assessed. In the setting of extreme perturbations in cortisol levels ie, markedly low or high levels, symptoms and signs of GC dysfunction may be overt. However, when disturbances in cortisol GC status values are less extreme, such as when assessing optimization of a GC replacement regimen, signs and symptoms can be more subtle or nonspecific. Current tools for assessing GC status are best suited to identifying profound disturbances but may lack sensitivity for confirming optimal GC status. Moreover, single cortisol values do not necessarily reflect an individual's GC status, as they are subject to inter- and intraindividual variation and do not take into account the pulsatile nature of cortisol secretion, variation in binding proteins, or local tissue concentrations as dictated by 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity, as well as GC receptor sensitivity. In the present review, we evaluate possible alternative methods for the assessment of GC status that do not solely rely on the measurement of circulating cortisol levels. We discuss the potential of changes in metabolomic profiles, micro RNA, gene expression, and epigenetic and other novel biomarkers such as growth differentiating factor 15 and osteocalcin, which could in the future aid in the objective classification of GC status.

Pharmacologic or genetic interference with atrogene signaling protects against glucocorticoid-induced musculoskeletal and cardiac disease

Despite their beneficial actions as immunosuppressants, glucocorticoids (GC) have devastating effects on the musculoskeletal and cardiac systems, as long-term treated patients exhibit high incidence of falls, bone fractures, and cardiovascular events. Herein, we show that GC upregulate simultaneously in bone, skeletal muscle, and the heart the expression of E3 ubiquitin ligases (atrogenes), known to stimulate the proteasomal degradation of proteins. Activation of vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling with the VDR ligands calcitriol or eldecalcitol prevented GC-induced atrogene upregulation in vivo and ex vivo in bone/muscle organ cultures and preserved tissue structure/mass and function of the 3 tissues in vivo. Direct pharmacologic inhibition of the proteasome with carfilzomib also conferred musculoskeletal protection. Genetic loss of the atrogene MuRF1-mediated protein ubiquitination in ΔRING mice afforded temporary or sustained protection from GC excess in bone or skeletal and heart muscle. We concluded that the atrogene pathway downstream of MuRF1 underlies GC action in bone, muscle, and the heart, and it can be pharmacologically or genetically targeted to confer protection against the damaging actions of GC simultaneously in the 3 tissues.

Treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis with concurrent denosumab and romosozumab: a case report

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disorder for which treatment options include antiresorptive therapies (e.g., bisphosphonates, denosumab); anabolics (e.g., teriparatide, abaloparatide); and dual mechanisms (e.g., romosozumab). Management of osteoporosis with concurrent antiresorptive and anabolic agents may be superior to monotherapy, as demonstrated in the DATA trial with the combination of denosumab and teriparatide. However, there is limited experience with the combination of denosumab and romosozumab, which may be an alternative antiresorptive/anabolic regimen for individuals who are not candidates for PTH receptor agonists. In this case, we present a young man with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis who could not tolerate a daily injectable anabolic and who experienced improvement in bone mineral density with concurrent denosumab and off-label romosozumab administration.

Modelling Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Chronic Oral Corticosteroids in the UK

BACKGROUND

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are effective anti-inflammatory agents used across a range of conditions. However, substantial evidence associates their use with increased risks for adverse events (AEs), causing high burden on healthcare resources. Emerging biologics present as alternative agents, enabling the reduction of OCS use. However, current modelling approaches may underestimate their effects by not capturing OCS-sparing effects. In this study, we present a modelling approach designed to capture the health economic benefits of OCS-sparing regimens and agents.

METHODS

We developed a disease-agnostic model using a UK health technology assessment (HTA) perspective, with discounting of 3.5% for costs and outcomes, a lifetime horizon, and 4-week cycle length. The model structure included type 2 diabetes mellitus, established cardiovascular disease, and osteoporosis as key AEs and drivers of morbidity and mortality, as well as capturing transient events. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years, and costs were determined for OCS-only and OCS-sparing treatment arms. Outcomes were determined using baseline 50% OCS-sparing, considering several OCS average daily doses (5, 10, 15 mg).

RESULTS

A treatment regimen with 50% OCS dose-sparing led to lifetime incremental cost savings per patient of £1107 (95% confidence interval £1014-£1229) at 5 mg, £2403 (£2203-£2668) at 10 mg, and £19,501 (£748-£51,836) at 15 mg. Patients also gained 0.033 (0.030-0.036) to 0.356 (0.022-2.404) QALYs dependent on dose. The benefits of OCS sparing were long-term, plateauing after 35-40 years of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a modelling approach that captures additional long-term health economic benefits from OCS sparing that would otherwise be missed from current modelling approaches. These results may help inform future decision making for emerging OCS-sparing therapeutics by comparing them against the cost of such treatments.

Characterization and Predictors of Fractures Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

CONTEXT

Bone loss and fractures are common and serious complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and identifying risk predictors for fractures in transplant recipients remains challenging. The Taiwan Bone Marrow Donation Center is the largest databank of donors in Asia. However, no population-based studies have yet been conducted in Asia to accurately assess the risk of fractures.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to determine the incidence and risk factors for fractures in HSCT recipients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients older than 18 years who received a HSCT from January 1, 2003 to September 30, 2015, using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Fractures following HSCT were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for fractures.

RESULTS

A total of 3327 patients underwent a HSCT, of whom 126 (3.8%) had a fracture after HSCT. The cumulative incidence of fractures was 5.3% at 5 years, and 10.8% at 10 years. Multivariable analysis showed that a fracture in the 3 years prior to transplant (HR = 3.79; 95% CI, 2.39-6.03) was associated with a higher risk of fractures post HSCT. With a daily dose equivalent of more than 0.50-3.75 mg, more than 3.75-15.23 mg, and more than 15.23 mg prednisolone, the risk of fractures increased by 1.70-fold (95% CI, 1.07-2.71), 2.23-fold (95% CI 1.32-3.76), and 2.93-fold (95% CI, 1.43-6.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Regular screening to monitor bone loss should be initiated early, and counseling about the importance of general preventive measures for bone loss is warranted in HSCT recipients with a prior fracture and mean daily dose of steroids more than 0.50 mg.

Low-dose glucocorticoid increase the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a retrospective cohort study

Long-term glucocorticoids (GCs) treatment is associated with osteoporosis and fractures. We investigated whether low-dose GC treatment also increased the risk of osteoporotic fractures, and the results showed that even low-dose GC treatment increased the risk of osteoporotic fractures, especially spine fractures.

PURPOSE

The effect of low-dose glucocorticoid (GC) therapy on the fracture risk in postmenopausal women with low bone mass was investigated.

METHODS

119,790 66-year-old postmenopausal women with low bone mass based on bone mineral density (BMD) results were included. GC group consisted of patients who had been prescribed oral GCs within 6 months of BMD testing. In GC group, GCs dosage was calculated by a defined daily dose (DDD), and divided into five groups according to GC usage (Group 1[G1]; < 11.25 DDDs, G2; ≥ 11.25, < 22.5 DDDs, G3; ≥ 22.5, < 45 DDDs, G4; ≥ 45, < 90 DDDs, G5; ≥ 90 DDDs). The risk of major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and non-MOF was analyzed and compared with that of the control group during the 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The risk of total fracture was higher in G3-G5 than in the control group (G3, hazard ratio (HR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.46; G4, 1.37 [1.13-1.66]; G5 1.45 [1.08-1.94]). The risk of MOF was higher in all groups except G2 than in the control group (G1, 1.23 [1.05-1.45]; G3, 1.37 [1.11-1.68]; G4, 1.41 [1.09-1.83]; G5, 1.66 [1.14-2.42]). The risk of spine fracture was significantly higher in all GC groups except G2 than in the control group. The risk of non-MOF was higher only in G4 than in the control group (G4, 1.48 [1.13-1.94]).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose GC therapy can increase the risk of osteoporotic fractures, particularly spine fractures, in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

Biotransformation of hydrocortisone succinate with whole cell cultures of Monascus purpureus and Cunninghamella echinulata

Hydrocortisone succinate (1) is a synthetic anti-inflammatory drug and key intermediate in the synthesis of other steroidal drugs. This work is based on the fungal biotransformation of 1, using Monascus purpureus and Cunninghamella echinulata strains. Comopound 1 was transformed into four metabolites, identified as hydrocortisone (2), 11β-hydroxyandrost-4-en-3,17-dione (3), Δ1-cortienic acid (4), and hydrocortisone-17-succinate (5), obtained through side chain cleavage, hydrolysis, dehydrogenation, and oxidation reactions. These compounds have previously been synthesized either chemically or enzymatically from different precursors. Though this is not the first report on the biotransformation of 1, but it obviously is a first, where the biotransformed products of compound 1 have been characterized structurally with the help of modern spectroscopic techniques. It is noteworthy that these products have already shown biological potential, however a more thorough investigation of the anti-inflammatory properties of these metabolites would be of high value. These results not only emphasize upon the immense potential of biotransformation in catalysis of reactions, otherwise not-achievable chemically, but also holds promise for the development of novel anti-inflammatory compounds.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Systemic Corticosteroids in Autoimmune and Inflammatory Diseases: A Review of Current Evidence

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Systemic corticosteroids have a long history of use in the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Both efficacy and safety show large interindividual variability (IIV), suggesting that corticosteroids may have the potential for individualised dosing strategies to optimise therapy. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of current evidence on the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships of systemic corticosteroids in patients with autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase for PK/PD studies of systemic corticosteroids in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in humans published until December 2023. Studies were scored from 1 to 5 according to criteria for the levels of evidence, as inspired by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (1981-2016) were included. The majority of these studies had a small sample size. The corticosteroids involved were prednisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone and budesonide. Substantial IIV of corticosteroid PK was described in all studies. Evidence for a relationship between the PK of corticosteroids and efficacy was inconclusive and limited. However, there was some evidence for a relationship between the PK of prednisolone and the severity of Cushingoid features.

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions on the potential associations between PK and clinical outcome of systemic corticosteroid treatment in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. This is remarkable given the many decades that steroid drugs have been used in clinical care. Prospective research is recommended with robust and well-defined cohorts to fully quantify the PK/PD associations of corticosteroids.

Risk factors for treatment-related bone loss and osteoporosis in patients with follicular lymphoma

The survival rate of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has steadily improved. However, osteoporosis introduced by treatment is prevalent and associated with increased mortality and disability for patients with NHL. We aimed to investigate factors impacting bone mineral density (BMD) reduction and osteoporosis, and the trend of BMD after chemotherapy. Overall, 97 newly diagnosed patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) were retrospectively enrolled. CT attenuation values were measured to assess BMD levels. Although 73.2% of patients received calcium and vitamin D supplements, 44.3% showed significant BMD reduction, and baseline BMD and hemoglobin levels were the risk factors. 26.6% of patients newly developed osteoporosis post-chemotherapy where age and cumulative dose of glucocorticoid were risk factors. The results of 20 patients with consecutive follow-up showed that BMD continued to decline for 6 months post-chemotherapy and did not return to baseline values. Therefore, BMD evaluation and more positive anti-resorption treatments should be administered for high-risk patients.

The Association Between Oral Bone Mineral Density-Reducing Medications and the Risk of 2-Year Implant-Related Complications Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Certain medications interfere with the bone remodeling process and may potentially increase the risk of complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). As patients undergoing TKA may be taking these bone mineral density (BMD)-reducing medications, it is unclear as to whether and which medications impact TKA outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to observe the impact of various BMD-reducing medications on 2-year implant-related complications following TKA.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing primary TKA was conducted using a national administrative claims database. Patients were identified if they were taking any known BMD-reducing medication and were compared to control patients. To control for confounders associated with taking multiple agents, multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted for each 2-year outcome (all-cause revision, loosening-indicated revision, and periprosthetic fracture--indicated revision), with the output recorded as odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

In our study, 502,927 of 1,276,209 TKA patients (39.4%) were taking at least one BMD-reducing medication perioperatively. On multivariable analysis, medications associated with a higher likelihood of 2-year all-cause revision included first- and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) (OR: 1.42 and 1.26, respectively), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (OR: 1.14), glucocorticoids (1.13), and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (OR: 1.23) (P < .05 for all). Medications associated with a higher likelihood of 2-year periprosthetic fracture included SGAs (OR: 1.51), SSRIs (OR: 1.27), aromatase inhibitors (OR: 1.29), and PPIs (OR: 1.42) (P < .05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Of the drug classes observed, the utilization of perioperative PPIs, SSRIs, glucocorticoids, first-generation antipsychotics, and SGAs was associated with the highest odds of all-cause revision. Our findings suggest a relationship between these medications and BMD-related complications; however, further studies should seek to determine the causality of these relationships.

Improved Hearing Impairment of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis Treated with Rituximab and Avacopan without Glucocorticoids

A 78-year-old woman with a history of intractable otitis media presented with a fever, hearing impairment, thigh pain, and a skin rash. She had renal dysfunction, positive myeloperoxidase-antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody, otitis media, and multiple nodules in both lungs. She was diagnosed with granulomatosis with polyangiitis, crescentic glomerulonephritis, and interstitial nephritis, which was confirmed in a kidney biopsy specimen. Induction therapy with rituximab and avacopan without glucocorticoids promptly resolved her fever and thigh pain and improved her auditory acuity and nodule in the right lung. The patient experienced no adverse effects with rituximab or avacopan.

Common Mistakes in Managing Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Introduction: Errors are very common in medical practice and in particular, in the healthcare of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, most of these can be prevented. Aim: To address common errors in the management of IBD. Methods: Our approach to this problem consists in identifying mistakes frequently observed in clinical practice (according to our experience) in the management of patients with IBD, then reviewing the scientific evidence available on the subject, and finally proposing the most appropriate recommendation for each case. Results: The most common mistakes in the management of IBD include those related to diagnosis and differential diagnosis, prevention, nutrition and diet, treatment with different drugs (mainly 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, thiopurines, and anti-TNF agents), extraintestinal manifestations, anemia, elderly patients, pregnancy, and surgery. Conclusions: Despite the availability of guidelines for both disease management and preventive aspects of IBD care, a considerable variation in clinical practice still remains. In this review, we have identified common mistakes in the management of patients with IBD in clinical practice. There is a clear need for a greater dissemination of clinical practice guidelines among gastroenterologists and for the implementation of ongoing training activities supported by scientific societies. Finally, it is desirable to follow IBD patients in specialized units, which would undoubtedly be associated with higher-quality healthcare and a lower likelihood of errors in managing these patients.

Biological/targeted synthetic DMARDs do not arrest bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the differential effects of biological/target synthesized DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) on bone metabolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a real-world cohort.

METHODS

This was a multicentre prospective observational study of RA patients enrolled at the time of first b/tsDMARDs administration. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs) were measured during the 52-week observation. The study was designed to enrol all eligible RA patients. The end-points were differences in changes in BMD according to b/tsDMARD type, and the correlation between BMD and BTMs.

RESULTS

A total of 1164 patients were enrolled in this study. b/tsDMARDs improved RA disease activity from mean CDAI 25.5 at baseline to 4.5 at week 26. Patients not receiving anti-osteoporotic agents (anti-OP) at baseline with no history of fracture experienced a significant decrease in both femoral neck (F: mean 0.666-0.655 g/cm3) and radial (R: 0.518-0.514) BMD at week 26. Despite maintaining low CDAI levels during weeks 26-52 (5.3-4.4), there was a continued decline in BMD (F: 0.653, R: 0.509. Weeks 52). None of the b/tsDMARDs type preserved BMD. Conversely, patients receiving anti-OP at baseline maintained stable BMD throughout the study (Weeks 0/26/52. F: 0.551/0.551/0.555, R: 0.415/0.416/0.415). Although BTMs were changed by b/tsDMARDs, the changes were unrelated to those in BMD.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested the progression of osteoporosis in RA patients during b/tsDMARDs treatment without anti-OP. BTMs may not reflect BMD change. Regular monitoring of BMD in RA should be considered for early management of osteoporosis.

The osteocytic actions of glucocorticoids on bone mass, mechanical properties, or perilacunar remodeling outcomes are not rescued by PTH(1-34)

Glucocorticoids (GC) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) are widely used therapeutic endocrine hormones where their effects on bone and joint arise from actions on multiple skeletal cell types. In osteocytes, GC and PTH exert opposing effects on perilacunar canalicular remodeling (PLR). Suppressed PLR can impair bone quality and joint homeostasis, including in GC-induced osteonecrosis. However, combined effects of GC and PTH on PLR are unknown. Given the untapped potential to target osteocytes to improve skeletal health, this study sought to test the feasibility of therapeutically mitigating PLR suppression. Focusing on subchondral bone and joint homeostasis, we hypothesize that PTH(1-34), a PLR agonist, could rescue GC-suppressed PLR. The skeletal effects of GC and PTH(1-34), alone or combined, were examined in male and female mice by micro-computed tomography, mechanical testing, histology, and gene expression analysis. For each outcome, females were more responsive to GC and PTH(1-34) than males. GC and PTH(1-34) exerted regional differences, with GC increasing trabecular bone volume but reducing cortical bone thickness, stiffness, and ultimate force. Despite PTH(1-34)'s anabolic effects on trabecular bone, it did not rescue GC's catabolic effects on cortical bone. Likewise, cartilage integrity and subchondral bone apoptosis, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity, and osteocyte lacunocanalicular networks showed no evidence that PTH(1-34) could offset GC-dependent effects. Rather, GC and PTH(1-34) each increased cortical bone gene expression implicated in bone resorption by osteoclasts and osteocytes, including Acp5, Mmp13, Atp6v0d2, Ctsk, differences maintained when GC and PTH(1-34) were combined. Since PTH(1-34) is insufficient to rescue GC's effects on young female mouse bone, future studies are needed to determine if osteocyte PLR suppression, due to GC, aging, or other factors, can be offset by a PLR agonist.

Long-Term Use of Oral Corticosteroids and Safety Outcomes for Patients With Atopic Dermatitis

Importance

The use of oral corticosteroids for prolonged periods may be associated with adverse events (AEs). Nevertheless, the risk of AEs with oral corticosteroids, especially among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), has not been comprehensively investigated and lacks evidence on duration of treatment.

Objective

To assess the association between long-term exposure to oral corticosteroids and AEs among adult patients with AD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This nested case-control study used data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database of South Korea between January 1, 2012, and October 31, 2021, which included 1 year prior to the cohort entry date of January 1, 2013, for assessing exclusion criteria and baseline characteristics, and 1 year after the study end date of October 31, 2020, to ensure a minimum duration for assessing exposure. Among the population of adults with AD, patients diagnosed with any of 11 AEs were matched with patients who had never received a diagnosis of any of the 11 AEs.

Exposure

Long-term use of oral corticosteroids was defined as cumulative supply of more than 30 days or more than 90 days of oral corticosteroid prescription per year.

Main Outcomes and Measures

We used multivariable conditional logistic regression analyses to measure the risk of 11 individual outcomes (osteoporosis, fracture, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, avascular necrosis, cataract, or glaucoma) as the composite outcome, controlling for potential confounders. We further classified the composite outcome to individual outcomes to evaluate the AE-specific risk.

Results

Among 1 025 270 patients with AD between 2013 and 2020, 164 809 cases (mean [SD] age, 39.4 [14.8]; 56.9% women) were matched with 328 303 controls (mean [SD] age, 39.3 [14.7]; 56.9% women) for sex, age, cohort entry date, follow-up duration, and severity of AD, where the balance of most baseline characteristics was achieved. A total of 5533 cases (3.4%) and 10 561 controls (3.2%) were exposed to oral corticosteroids for more than 30 days, while 684 cases (0.4%) and 1153 controls (0.4%) were exposed to oral corticosteroids for more than 90 days. Overall, there was no increased risk of AEs with use of oral corticosteroids for more than 30 days (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.04), whereas the risk was slightly higher with use of oral corticosteroids for more than 90 days (AOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.23). The small elevation in experiencing an AE was observed with each cumulative or consecutive year of ever long-term use.

Conclusions and Relevance

This case-control study found a slightly increased risk of AEs associated with use of oral corticosteroids for more than 90 days per year, which warrants future research to fully elucidate the observed findings.

A comprehensive review on glucocorticoids induced osteoporosis: A medication caused disease

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are steroid hormones that are extensively used in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, inflammation, and cancer. The major ill effect of administering GCs is that it has a deleterious effect on bone, which leads to GC-induced osteoporosis. GC therapy induces bone loss and is associated with the risk of nonvertebral and vertebral fractures, as it works in combination by increasing bone reabsorption and suppressing bone formation during the initial phase of therapy. It is seen and established that GC in excess or in low dose for 3 months or more can be a risk factor for fracture, and the risk increases with an increase in dose and duration of usage. The most common cause of secondary osteoporosis is the administration of GC inside the body to treat various diseases. The degree of bone loss is directly proportional to the GC dose and the exposure duration. The first step is to evaluate the patients' risk factors for the development of glucocorticoids that induce osteoporosis, which include the dose, duration of use, patient age, sex, previous fractures, and other medical conditions.

Trabecular bone score (TBS) in Cushing's disease: TBS gain after hypercortisolism normalization

CONTEXT

Hypercortisolism frequently induces trabecular bone loss, more pronounced at the lumbar spine, resulting in osteoporosis, and thus an increase in fracture risk. Several studies have shown bone mass recovery in patients with Cushing's disease (CD) after treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To examine treatment effects on TBS (trabecular bone score) in addition to aBMD (areal bone mineral density) in a cohort of patients with CD.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Single-center retrospective longitudinal study in patients diagnosed with CD and successfully treated following surgery and/or medical treatment.

PATIENTS

We included 31 patients with median age and BMI (body mass index) of 37.7 [28.4;43.3] years old and 27.7 [25.8;30.4] kg/m2, respectively. Median 24 h urinary cortisol before treatment was 213.4 [168.5;478.5] μg/24 h. All subjects were completely biochemically controlled or cured after treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

aBMD and TBS were evaluated at AP Spine (L1-L4) with DXA prodigy (GE-Lunar), QDR 4500 (Hologic), and TBS iNsight® (Med-Imaps) before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Absolute TBS and aBMD gains following cure of CD were significant (p < 0.0001, and p < 0.001, respectively). aBMD and TBS increased by +3.9 and 8.2 % respectively after cure of CD. aBMD and TBS were not correlated before (p = 0.43) and after treatment (p = 0.53). Linear regression analyses showed that TBS gain was independent of baseline BMI and that low TBS at baseline was predictive of TBS gain after treatment.

CONCLUSION

The more significant improvement of microarchitecture assessed by TBS than aBMD and the absence of correlation between TBS and aBMD suggest that TBS may be an adequate marker of bone restoration after cure of CD. To support this conclusion, future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods should be carried out.

Drug-induced osteoporosis and mechanisms of bone tissue regeneration through trace elements

Osteoporosis is associated with an imbalance in bone formation, with certain drugs used in disease treatment being implicated in its development. Supplementation with trace elements may contribute to bone regeneration, offering an alternative approach by enhancing bone mineral density (BMD) and thereby thwarting the onset of osteoporosis. This review aims to assess the mechanisms through which trace elements such as copper (Cu), iron (Fe), selenium (Se), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn) are linked to increased bone mass, thus mitigating the effects of pharmaceuticals. Our findings underscore that the use of drugs such as aromatase inhibitors (AIs), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), antiretrovirals, glucocorticoids, opioids, or anticonvulsants can result in decreased BMD, a primary contributor to osteoporosis. Research indicates that essential elements like Cu, Fe, Se, Mn, and Zn, through various mechanisms, can bolster BMD and forestall the onset of the disease, owing to their protective effects. Consequently, our study recommends a minimum daily intake of these essential minerals for patients undergoing treatment with the aforementioned drugs, as the diverse mechanisms governing the effects of trace elements Cu, Fe, Mn, Se, and Zn facilitate bone remodeling.

Higher cumulative dose of topical corticosteroids is associated with osteoporosis and major osteoporotic fracture: A nationwide case-control study

BACKGROUND

Connections between long-term use of topical corticosteroids (TCSs) of varying potency and osteoporosis and major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) are unclear. Susceptibility to adverse bone effects of TCSs in different sex, age and ethnic groups is unknown too.

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate the association between cumulative dose of TCSs of varying potency and osteoporosis and MOF in Taiwanese population, with stratified analysis of sex and age.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide case-control study and obtained data from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Cumulative TCS doses in different exposure periods were calculated, and the potency of TCSs was converted to prednisolone equivalent. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for osteoporosis and MOF associated with TCS use.

RESULTS

From 2017 to 2020, 129,682 osteoporosis cases and 34,999 MOF cases were selected and randomly matched with 518,728 and 139,996 controls by sex and age. We found clear dose-response relationships between long-term TCS exposure and osteoporosis and MOF. For example, compared to no TCS use, adjusted ORs of osteoporosis were 1.216 (95% CI 1.189-1.243), 1.260 (95% CI, 1.241-1.280) and 1.341 (95% CI, 1.314-1.369) for exposure to low, medium and high cumulative TCS doses, respectively, over 5 years. Adjusted ORs of MOF were 1.118 (95% CI 1.069-1.170), 1.191 (95% CI, 1.156-1.227) and 1.288 (95% CI, 1.238-1.340) for exposure to low, medium and high cumulative TCS doses, respectively, over 5 years. Stratified analysis showed women had higher ORs of osteoporosis and MOF compared to men. Younger people (<50 years) had highest OR of osteoporosis compared to other age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher cumulative TCS dose was associated with increased risk of osteoporosis and MOF. Long-term use of TCSs should be cautious, especially in susceptible populations such as women and young people.

Neoplastic pathologic hip fractures are associated with a higher risk of post-operative bleeding and thromboembolic events

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment of hip fractures leads to significant post-operative complications. Although pathologic fractures (PF) are associated with worse outcomes, most studies do not differentiate between etiology (neoplastic and non-neoplastic PF). We seek to compare 30-day complication rates between 1) native hip fractures and neoplastic PF, and 2) neoplastic and non-neoplastic PF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 127,819 patients with hip fractures and 5104 with PF diagnosed from 2005 to 2021 were retrieved from the NSQIP database. We included 1843 patients with neoplastic PF and 3261 with non-neoplastic PF. Demographics, pre-operative labs and co-morbidities, and post-operative outcomes were analyzed. Propensity-score matching was conducted to control for confounders.

RESULTS

Patients with a neoplastic PF had a significantly higher rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (4 % vs 1.2 %, p = 0.001) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (2.4 % vs 0.7 %, p < 0.001), than native hip fractures. Rates of post-operative bleeding were significantly higher in the neoplastic PF group (29.3 % vs 23.9 %, p < 0.001) than non-neoplastic PF. No differences in soft tissue complications were found. When comparing neoplastic and non-neoplastic PF, the former had a higher rate of PE (2.5 % vs 1.0 %, p = 0.015) and post-operative bleeding (27.6 % vs 22.0 %, p = 0.009). Unplanned readmission rates and 30-day mortality rate were also higher in the neoplastic PF group.

CONCLUSION

Neoplastic PF of the hip are associated with higher risk of thromboembolic event rates and post-operative bleeding than both native hip fractures and non-neoplastic PF. No differences in rates of soft tissue complications were found between groups.

Ten-year fracture risk in Japanese patients with myasthenia gravis: A comprehensive assessment using the fracture risk assessment tool

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an immune disorder that causes muscle weakness with an increasing prevalence, particularly among the elderly in Japan. Glucocorticoid treatment for MG is problematic for bone health because of reduced bone density and increased fracture risk. The fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX®) can estimate fracture risk, but its applicability in patients with MG remains uncertain.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted on 54 patients with MG between April and July 2012. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured, and FRAX® scores were calculated with and without BMD. We also adjusted FRAX® scores based on glucocorticoid dosage. Patients were monitored for major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) until June 2022. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The study group included 12 men and 42 women with a mean age of 62 years. Higher FRAX® scores correlated with increased fracture risk, particularly in the hip and lumbar regions. The 10-year fracture-free rate was significantly lower in the high-FRAX® score group. The FRAX® score using BMD is a significant predictor of MOF risk. The hazard ratio for FRAX® scores was 1.17 (95% CI 1.10-1.26).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the effectiveness of the FRAX® tool in assessing fracture risk among patients with MG. High FRAX® scores correlated with increased fracture risk, emphasizing its importance. These findings support the incorporation of FRAX® assessment into clinical management to enhance patient care and outcomes. However, the small sample size and observational nature suggest a need for further research.

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Osteoporotic Fractures in Women

BACKGROUND

Predicting the risk of osteoporotic fractures is vital for prevention. Traditional methods such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) model use clinical factors. This study examined the predictive power of the FRAX score and machine-learning algorithms trained on FRAX parameters.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 2,147 female participants from the Ansan cohort study. The FRAX parameters employed in this study included age, sex (female), height and weight, current smoking status, excessive alcohol consumption (>3 units/d of alcohol), and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporotic fracture was defined as one or more fractures of the hip, spine, or wrist during a 10-year observation period. Machine-learning algorithms, such as gradient boosting, random forest, decision tree, and logistic regression, were employed to predict osteoporotic fractures with a 70:30 training-to-test set ratio. We evaluated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) scores to assess and compare the performance of these algorithms with the FRAX score.

RESULTS

Of the 2,147 participants, 3.5% experienced osteoporotic fractures. Those with fractures were older, shorter in height, and had a higher prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, as well as higher FRAX scores. The AUROC for the FRAX was 0.617. The machine-learning algorithms showed AUROC values of 0.662, 0.652, 0.648, and 0.637 for gradient boosting, logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted the immense potential of machine-learning algorithms to improve osteoporotic fracture risk prediction in women when complete FRAX parameter information is unavailable.

Corticosteroid Injections and Risk of Fracture

Importance

Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are an important tool for pain relief in many musculoskeletal conditions, but the longitudinal effects of these treatments on bone health and fracture risk are unknown.

Objective

To determine whether cumulative doses of corticosteroid injections are associated with higher risk of subsequent osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic fractures.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included adult patients receiving any CSI from May 1, 2018, through July 1, 2022. Eligible patients resided in Olmsted County, Minnesota, and were empaneled to receive primary care within the Mayo Clinic. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate risk of fracture based on cumulative injected corticosteroid dose.

Exposure

Receipt of any CSI during the study period.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was risk of fracture by total triamcinolone equivalents received. Secondary outcomes consisted of risks of fracture based on triamcinolone equivalents received in subgroups of patients not at high risk for fracture and patients with osteoporosis.

Results

A total of 7197 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 64.4 [14.6] years; 4435 [61.6%] women; 183 [2.5%] Black and 6667 [92.6%] White), and 346 (4.8%) had a new fracture during the study period. Of these fractures, 149 (43.1%) were considered osteoporotic. In the adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model, there was no association of higher fracture risk based on cumulative CSI dose (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.04 [95% CI, 0.96-1.11]). There was also no associated higher risk of fracture in the non-high-risk (adjusted HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.98-1.26]) or osteoporosis (adjusted HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.90-1.11]) subgroups. Age, Charleson Comorbidity Index, and previous fracture were the only factors that were associated with higher fracture risk.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of cumulative injected corticosteroid dose and risk of subsequent fracture, no association was observed, including in patients with a preexisting diagnosis of osteoporosis. Treatment of painful conditions with CSI should not be withheld or delayed owing to concern about fracture risk.

Average daily glucocorticoid dose, number of prescription days, and cumulative dose in the initial 90 days of glucocorticoid therapy are associated with subsequent hip and clinical vertebral fracture risk: a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide health insurance claims database in Japan

PURPOSE

Fracture risk assessment is recommended at three months after glucocorticoid (GC) therapy initiation. This study aimed to assess whether GC exposure in the initial 90 days of GC therapy is associated with subsequent hip and clinical vertebral fracture risk using the nationwide health insurance claims database of Japan (NDBJ).

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 50 years who were prescribed GC (≥ 70 mg prednisolone or equivalent; PSL) in the initial 90 days of GC therapy and were followed for hip and clinical vertebral fracture incidences for the subsequent 1080 days were selected from NDBJ. Associations of GC exposure with hip or clinical vertebral fracture risk were evaluated by Cox regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

We selected 316,396 women and 299,871 men for the GC-exposed group and 43,164 women and 33,702 men for the reference group. Higher GC doses and longer prescription days in the initial 90 days of GC therapy were significantly and dose-dependently associated with increased fracture risk relative to the reference group. Patients receiving GC ≥ 5 mg PSL/day had a significantly increased fracture risk in the stratum of 30-59 days of GC prescription. In addition, female patients who received GC (≥ 1 and < 2.5 mg PSL/day) for 90 days in the initial 90 days of GC therapy had a significantly increased fracture risk.

CONCLUSIONS

GC exposure in the initial 90 days of GC therapy was dose-dependently associated with hip and clinical vertebral fracture risk. GC may increase fracture risk with lower doses for shorter durations than previously reported. Fracture risk assessment three months after glucocorticoid (GC) therapy initiation is recommended. We found that GC exposure in the initial 90 days of GC therapy at lower daily doses for shorter durations than previously reported were significantly and dose-dependently associated with fracture risk using a nationwide health insurance claims database.

Real-world management of patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder using satralizumab: Results from a Japanese claims database

BACKGROUND

Satralizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, has been approved globally for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), based on positive results from two randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies: SAkuraSky (NCT02028884) and SAkuraStar (NCT02073279). There remains an unmet need to understand the real-world management of NMOSD, especially in patients undergoing tapering of concomitant therapy. We examined real-world treatment patterns, including concomitant glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants, and relapse in satralizumab-treated patients with NMOSD, using a Japanese administrative hospital claims database.

METHODS

We used retrospective data from the Medical Data Vision hospital-based administrative claims database. The index date was the date of first satralizumab prescription and the study period was set between August 2018 and March 2022. Patients were included in the overall population if they had a first prescription for satralizumab between August 2020 and March 2022, an International Classification of Disease, Version10 code of G36.0 prior to March 2022, and were observable for ≥90 days prior to the index date. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with relapse-free reduction of oral glucocorticoids to 0 mg/day at 360 days of continued satralizumab treatment. Secondary endpoints included time to relapse, number of relapses after the index date while being on continuous satralizumab treatment, annualized relapse rate before and after the index date, and concomitant medication use. Relapse and dose reduction were identified using definition specifically developed for this study.

RESULTS

Of the 131 patients included in the overall population, most were female (90.8 %), aged 18-65 years (75.6 %), and were prescribed oral glucocorticoids (93.1 %). Azathioprine (19.1 %) and tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor (18.3 %), were the most common immunosuppressants at index date. Six (4.6 %) patients had a history of biologic use (tocilizumab, 1 [0.8 %]; eculizumab, 5 [3.8 %]). Among 111 patients observable for 360 days pre-index, there were 0.6 ± 0.8 (mean ± SD) relapses during 360 days before the index date. The median (interquartile range) duration of satralizumab exposure was 197.0 (57.0-351.0) days. Most (125/131; 95.4 %) patients were relapse-free post-index; 6 (4.6 %) patients relapsed within 90 days after the index date, of which 2 had the first relapse within 7 days after the index date. Among 21 patients with 360-day follow-up, 6 (28.6 %) patients were on 0 mg/day dose of glucocorticoid prescription without relapse 360 days post-index. Of these 6 patients, 2 had no prescription of oral glucocorticoids at the index date and remained glucocorticoid- and relapse-free 360 days after the index date.

CONCLUSION

These real-world data support the phase 3 clinical trials. Our results, over a median duration of satralizumab exposure of 197.0 days, showed that a majority (125/131, 95.4 %) of patients were relapse-free after initiating satralizumab treatment. The number of glucocorticoid-free patients without relapse increased over time under continuous satralizumab prescription. Further studies are needed to confirm if satralizumab can be used as a potential immunosuppressant- and glucocorticoid-sparing agent.

Nationwide prevalence of glucocorticoid prescriptions over 17 years and osteoporosis prevention among long-term users

Objectives

Glucocorticoid steroids are frequently prescribed, and side effects are well-known, such as glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Our aim was to estimate the nationwide trend in the prevalence of glucocorticoid steroid prescriptions over 17 years and to elucidate the proportion of patients on long-term glucocorticoid steroid therapy who receive active bone protective therapy. As well as to examine which medical specialties prescribe glucocorticoid steroids the most.

Methods

This study was a retrospective observational registry study extended over 17 years (2003-2020). Data were retrieved from the Icelandic Prescription Medicine Register on all delivered glucocorticoid steroids (Anatomic therapeutic chemical code: H02AB) for oral use. Long-term users were defined as those who annually received ⩾90 defined daily doses of glucocorticoid steroids.

Results

Annually, 3.8% of the population received oral glucocorticoid steroids, from 3.3% in 2006 to 4.3% in 2017. Prednisolone was most frequently prescribed. Females dispatched glucocorticoid steroid prescriptions more often than males (55.8%). Males and females reached their peak prevalence between the ages of 60 and 70. General practitioners most often prescribe glucocorticoid steroids, followed by physicians in training, rheumatologists, internists, and medical students. Of those who received prescriptions for glucocorticoid steroids, 12.2%-18.1% were classified as long-term users. A declining number of patients have been receiving bone-protective therapy in recent years. Only 13.0% of chronic users received bone protective therapy in 2020.

Conclusion

The use of glucocorticoid steroids has increased during the last 2 decades despite improvements in treatment for inflammatory disorders. The prevalence of long-term users has remained stable. Meanwhile, the use of parallel active bone-protective therapy among long-term users of glucocorticoid steroids is declining. Thus, improvements in prophylaxis for corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis are urgently needed for patients who require long-term treatment with glucocorticoid steroids.

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 following joint and epidural corticosteroid injections: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The immunosuppressive effects of corticosteroid (CS) injections have come under more scrutiny during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of the study was to explore any relationship between joint/epidural CS injection and SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients 18 years or over who received at least one joint or epidural CS injection by physiatrists in a tertiary care center between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. This cohort of patients was then compared to a control group who did not receive any CS injection during this time period.

RESULTS

A total of 766 patients were identified in the CS injection group and 1546 patients in the control group. Overall, 12.27% of patients turned SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive in the CS injection group, which was similar to 11.90% in the control group (p = 0.797). But 3-month SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity rate showed a statistically significant higher rate among the CS injection group (3.30% in the CS injection group vs. 2.10% in the control group; p = 0.027). In multivariate regression analysis, after adjusting both groups for Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), there was statistically significant higher SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity rate in the CS injection group (p = 0.024). However, after adjusting both groups for age and total number of comorbidities, there was no difference between the groups in regard to SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity rate (p = 0.081). In the subgroup analysis of only COVID-19 vaccinated patients, there was an increased 3-month SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity rate among patients with severe comorbidities in the CS injection group (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

The study was not conclusive on the effect of joint or epidural CS injection on SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity rate, although adjusted analysis suggests higher 3-month SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity rate after CS injection in patients with severe comorbidities with significant disease burden when compared to controls.

Beneath the Surface: Exploring Hidden Threats of Long-Term Corticosteroid Therapy to Bone Density

Within the field of medical treatments, corticosteroids are potent substances that efficiently reduce inflammation and immunological responses, making them essential for the management of a wide range of medical ailments. However, continued use of these synthetic drugs presents a serious risk: the onset of osteoporosis brought on by corticosteroids. Determining the complex pathways by which corticosteroids cause a general disturbance in bone metabolism, suppress osteoblast function, increase osteoclast activity, and upset the delicate balance of bone remodelling emphasizes the need for all-encompassing management and prevention approaches. In this review, we aim to expose the complexities of corticosteroid-induced bone loss and urge for personalized, proactive measures to improve long-term therapeutic outcomes.

Risk of fracture in women with glucocorticoid requiring diseases is independent from glucocorticoid use: An analysis on a nation-wide database

OBJECTIVE

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is a common cause of secondary osteoporosis. However, glucocorticoid requiring diseases pose a risk themselves for fracture. The aim of the present study was to determine the risk of fracture associated with variety of glucocorticoid requiring diseases independently from glucocorticoid use and other risk factors for osteoporosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of a nation-wide cohort (DeFRACalc79 database). We used multivariable regression analysis adjusting for several risk factors for fracture and glucocorticoid intake to estimate the independent role of glucocorticoid requiring illnesses on fracture risk.

RESULTS

We found that patients with rheumatoid arthritis, connective tissue diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and neurological diseases were at greater risk of vertebral or hip fracture (crude ORs 1.31, 1.20, 1.92 and 2.97 respectively). After adjusting for potential confounders COPD and neurological diseases remained significantly associated with an increased risk of vertebral or hip fractures (aORs 1.33, 95 % CI 1.18-1.49 and 2.43, 95 % CI 2.17-2.74). Rheumatoid arthritis, COPD, IBD and neurological diseases also significantly increased the risk of non-vertebral, non-hip fractures (aORs 1.23, 1.42, 1.52 and 1.94 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Some glucocorticoid requiring diseases were independently associated with an increased risk of fractures. COPD and neurological diseases with both vertebral and non-vertebral fracture risk while RA and IBD were independently associated only with non-vertebral, non-hip fractures.

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Gene Therapy

Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies are allelic X-linked recessive neuromuscular diseases affecting both skeletal and cardiac muscles. Therefore, owing to their single X chromosome, the affected boys receive pathogenic gene mutations from their unknowing carrier mothers. Current pharmacological drugs are palliative that address the symptoms of the disease rather than the genetic cause imbedded in the Dystrophin gene DNA sequence. Therefore, alternative therapies like gene drugs that could address the genetic cause of the disease at its root are crucial, which include gene transfer/implantation, exon skipping, and gene editing. Presently, it is possible through genetic reprogramming to engineer AAV vectors to deliver certain therapeutic cargos specifically to muscle or other organs regardless of their serotype. Similarly, it is possible to direct the biogenesis of exosomes to carry gene editing constituents or certain therapeutic cargos to specific tissue or cell type like brain and muscle. While autologous exosomes are immunologically inert, it is possible to camouflage AAV capsids, and lipid nanoparticles to evade the immune system recognition. In this review, we highlight current opportunities for Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene therapy, which has been known thus far as an incurable genetic disease. This article is a part of Gene Therapy of Rare Genetic Diseases thematic issue.

Use of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in clinical practice and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool future directions

Fracture Risk Assessment Tool is a free, online fracture risk calculator which can be used to predict 10-year fracture risk for women and men over age 50 years. It incorporates seven clinical risk factors and bone density to give a 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture. This dynamic tool can be used with patients at the bedside to help guide treatment decisions. There are some limitations to Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, with the most central limitation being the fact that inputs are binary. Much research has been done to try to refine Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to allow for more accurate risk prediction, and this article describes the data for adjusting Fracture Risk Assessment Tool depending on the clinical scenario such as the dose of glucocorticoid use, presence of diabetes and others. Recently, the new FRAXplus tool has been developed to address many of these concerns and will likely replace the old Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in the future. At the current time, it is available in beta form.

Pain score as a predictor of subsequent fragility fracture in postmenopausal patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective case-control study

Objectives

Bone fragility fracture (BFF) is a serious incident in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We hypothesized that pain degree during treatment RA correlated with incident BFF and validated how pain affects incident BFF (inc-BFF).

Methods

Postmenopausal RA patients treated for at least 3 years were recruited. The primary endpoint was the development of inc-BFF. Follow-up began with the first bone mineral density measurement (baseline) and continued until the development of the first BFF or termination of the study. Clinical indicators at baseline, including pain score using a visual analog scale (PS-VAS), were analyzed statistically using Cox regression analysis, receiver operation characteristics (ROC), Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis (K-M), and chi-square test.

Results

A total of 239 patients were recruited. Using a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the baseline's PS-VAS and prevalent BFF (pr-BFF) demonstrated significantly higher risk ratios. For ROC, pr-BFF and PS-VAS had significant cutoff index (COI) (positive, 21.0) and an area under-curve of 0.692 (P < 0.001) and 0.616 (P < 0.01), respectively. PS-VAS > COI had a 2.24-fold higher hazard ratio than PS-VAS ≤ COI using K-M. When these 2 conditions were combined, patients with pr-BFF-positive and PS-VAS-positive had a sensitivity of 42.3% and a specificity of 88.8% for the inc-BFF. PS-VAS > COI had no statistical significance in the subgroup without pr-BFF, whereas the existence of pr-BFF had a significantly higher risk ratio in the PS-VAS ≤ COI.

Conclusions

The PS-VAS during RA treatment is a good indicator for predicting the inc-BFF in postmenopausal RA patients with pr-BFF.

Medication and bone health in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) are often prescribed medications associated with adverse effects on bone health. However, it is unclear whether these medications incur decreases in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and higher fracture risk in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of commonly used medications on aBMD and fracture risk among people with MS.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from their inception until February 5, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials as well as cross-sectional, retrospective, and prospective studies investigating whether glucocorticoids, immunomodulators, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, anxiolytics, opioids, or antipsychotics influenced aBMD or fracture risk in people with MS. Data were pooled using random effects meta-analyses to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

We included 22 studies (n = 18,193). Six studies were included in the meta-analyses of glucocorticoid use and aBMD, whereas 2 studies were included in the medication use and fracture risk meta-analyses. No studies assessed the effect of antidepressants, anxiolytics, anticonvulsants, opioids, and antipsychotics on aBMD, and no studies assessed the effect of immunomodulators on fracture risk. Glucocorticoid use was significantly negatively associated with femoral neck aBMD (correlation = -0.21 [95% CI = -0.29 to -0.13]), but not with lumbar spine aBMD (correlation = -0.21 [95% CI = -0.50 to 0.12]). There were no differences in fracture risk between users of glucocorticoids (HR = 1.71 [95% CI = 0.04 to 76.47]), antidepressants (HR = 1.84 [95% CI = 0.09 to 38.49]), or anxiolytics (HR = 2.01 [95% CI = 0.06 to 64.22]), compared with nonusers.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence is insufficient to support a relationship between greater fracture risk for people with MS taking glucocorticoid, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medication, compared with nonusers, and it is unclear whether these medications are associated with bone loss in people with MS, beyond that in the general population. Additional high-quality studies with homogenous methodology exploring how medications influence aBMD and fracture risk in people with MS are required.