A Patient Registry to Improve Patient Safety: Recording General Neurosurgery Complications

Quality improvement in neurosurgery: A systematic review

Quality improvement (QI) is crucial for advancing patient care and safety in surgical practices. Despite the presence of numerous systematic reviews on various types of surgeries, no current QI systematic review for neurosurgery is available, at least to the best of our knowledge. The present study thus aimed to explore existing QI frameworks, interventions and outcome measures, which are used to enhance patient care and efficiency in neurosurgery. For this purpose, a systematic review was conducted by identifying 75 articles using key words, such as 'Quality', 'Control', 'Improvement', 'Neurosurgical' and 'Neurosurgery' across various databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Wiley, ScienceDirect and Microsoft Academic. Each article was assessed based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, without a time limit for selection. The analysis of the 75 publications revealed an uneven distribution across neurosurgical fields: Adult neurosurgery (70.5%), spine surgery (22.5%), pediatric neurosurgery (4%) and neuro-oncology (3%). This pattern was reflected in the patient distribution (n=621,293), with 87.07% involved in spine surgery QI initiatives. Cranial-only and combined cranial and spinal studies accounted for only 0.21% of patients. QI interventions included mainly new protocols (18.67%), ERAS (17.33%), data analysis (16%), modified checklists (14.67%) and new sterilization devices (13.3%). By contrast, only a limited number of articles addressed the effectiveness of new technology, prediction models, incident reporting and staff education. On the whole, the QI studies enhanced neurosurgical care, focusing mainly on adult neurosurgery and targeting specifically spinal cases. The main interventions included new protocols, ERAS, data analysis and checklists. Further research is required to address QI initiatives in cranial surgery and evaluate the effectiveness of less commonly used methods, such as new technologies and predictive models.

Differences between real-world and score-based decision-making in the microsurgical management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is complex, balancing the risk of rupture and risk of treatment. Therefore, prediction scores have been developed to support clinicians in the management of UIAs. We analyzed the discrepancies between interdisciplinary cerebrovascular board decision-making factors and the results of the prediction scores in our cohort of patients who received microsurgical treatment of UIAs.

METHODS

Clinical, radiological, and demographical data of 221 patients presenting with 276 microsurgically treated aneurysms were collected, from January 2013 to June 2020. UIATS, PHASES, and ELAPSS were calculated for each treated aneurysm, resulting in subgroups favoring treatment or conservative management for each score. Cerebrovascular board decision-factors were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

UIATS, PHASES, and ELAPSS recommended conservative management in 87 (31.5%) respectively in 110 (39.9%) and in 81 (29.3%) aneurysms. The cerebrovascular board decision-factors leading to treatment in these aneurysms (recommended to manage conservatively in the three scores) were: high life expectancy/young age (50.0%), angioanatomical factors (25.0%), multiplicity of aneurysms (16.7%). Analysis of cerebrovascular board decision-making factors in the "conservative management" subgroup of the UIATS showed that angioanatomical factors (P=0.001) led more frequently to surgery. PHASES and ELAPSS subgroups "conservative management" were more frequently treated due to clinical risk factors (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis showed more aneurysms were treated based on "real-world" decision-making than recommended by the scores. This is because these scores are models trying to reproduce reality, which is yet not fully understood. Aneurysms, which were recommended to manage conservatively, were treated mainly because of angioanatomy, high life expectancy, clinical risk factors, and patient's treatment wish. The UIATS is suboptimal regarding assessment of angioanatomy, the PHASES regarding clinical risk factors, complexity, and high life expectancy, and the ELAPSS regarding clinical risk factors and multiplicity of aneurysms. These findings support the need to optimize prediction models of UIAs.

A nomogram for predicting the risk of major postoperative complications for patients with meningioma

PURPOSE

To identify risk factors for major postoperative complications in meningioma patients and to construct and validate a nomogram that identify patients at high risk of these complications.

METHODS

The medical records of meningioma patients who underwent surgical resection in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were collected. The patients were divided into a training set (815 cases from the main campus in 2018 and 2019) and a validation set (300 cases from two other campuses in 2020). Major postoperative complications were defined as any new neurological deficits and complications classified as Clavien-Dindo Grading (CDG) II or higher. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using the training set to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram was constructed based on these results. And then validated the nomogram through bootstrap re-sampling in both the training and validation sets. The concordance index (C-index) and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the discriminative ability of the nomogram. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed to evaluate the goodness-of-fit. The optimal cutoff point for the nomogram was calculated using Youden's index.

RESULTS

In the training set, 135 cases (16.56%) experienced major postoperative complications. The independent risk factors identified were male sex, recurrent tumors, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III-IV, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score < 80, preoperative serum albumin < 35 g/L, tumor in the skull base or central sulcus area, subtotal tumor resection (STR), allogeneic blood transfusion, and larger tumor size. A nomogram was constructed based on these risk factors. It demonstrated good predictive performance, with a C-index of 0.919 for the training set and 0.872 for the validation set. The area under the curve (AUC) > 0.7 indicated satisfactory discriminative ability. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed no significant deviation from the predicted probabilities. And the cutoff for nomogram total points was about 200 (specificity 0.881 and sensitivity 0.834).

CONCLUSIONS

The constructed nomogram demonstrated robust predictive performance for major postoperative complications in meningioma patients. This model can be used by surgeons as a reference in clinical decision-making.

Functional State and Rehabilitation of Patients after Primary Brain Tumor Surgery for Malignant and Nonmalignant Tumors: A Prospective Observational Study

The aim of this study was to compare the pre- and postoperative function of patients qualifying for resection of malignant and nonmalignant primary brain tumors to determine the relationship among tumor type, function, and the course of rehabilitation after surgery. This single-center, prospective, observational study recruited 92 patients requiring prolonged postoperative rehabilitation during their inpatient stay, who were divided into a nonmalignant tumor group (n = 66) and a malignant tumor group (n = 26). Functional status and gait efficiency were assessed using a battery of instruments. Motor skills, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay (LoS) were recorded and compared between groups. The frequency and severity of postoperative complications, the time needed to attain individual motor skills, and the proportion of patients losing independent gait (~30%) were similar between groups. However, paralysis and paresis were more frequent in the malignant tumor group before surgery (p < 0.001). While nonmalignant tumor patients deteriorated more according to all scales after surgery, patients with malignant tumors were still characterized by worse ADL, independence, and performance at discharge. Worse functional outcomes in the malignant tumor group did not affect LoS or rehabilitation. Patients with malignant and nonmalignant tumors have similar rehabilitation needs, and patient expectation-especially those with nonmalignant tumors-should be appropriately managed.

Surgical Complexity and Complications: The Need for a Common Language

BACKGROUND

Quality measurement and outcome assessment have recently caught an attention of the neurosurgical community, but lack of standardized definitions and methodology significantly complicates these tasks.

OBJECTIVE

To identify a uniform definition of neurosurgical complications, to classify them according to etiology, and to evaluate them comprehensively in cases of intracranial tumor removal in order to establish a new, easy, and practical grading system capable of predicting the risk of postoperative clinical worsening of the patient condition.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on all elective surgeries directed at removal of intracranial tumor in the authors' institution during 2-year study period. All sociodemographic, clinical, and surgical factors were extracted from prospectively compiled comprehensive patient registry. Data on all complications, defined as any deviation from the ideal postoperative course occurring within 30 days of the procedure, were collected with consideration of the required treatment and etiology. A logistic regression model was created for identification of independent factors associated with worsening of the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score at discharge after surgery in comparison with preoperative period. For each identified statistically significant independent predictor of the postoperative worsening, corresponding score was defined, and grading system, subsequently named Milan Complexity Scale (MCS), was formed.

RESULTS

Overall, 746 cases of surgeries for removal of intracranial tumor were analyzed. Postoperative complications of any kind were observed in 311 patients (41.7%). In 223 cases (29.9%), worsening of the KPS score at the time of discharge in comparison with preoperative period was noted. It was independently associated with 5 predictive factors-major brain vessel manipulation, surgery in the posterior fossa, cranial nerve manipulation, surgery in the eloquent area, tumor size >4 cm-which comprised MCS with a range of the total score from 0 to 8 (higher score indicates more complex clinical situations). Patients who demonstrated KPS worsening after surgery had significantly higher total MCS scores in comparison with individuals whose clinical status at discharge was improved or unchanged (3.24 ± 1.55 versus 1.47 ± 1.58; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

It is reasonable to define neurosurgical complication as any deviation from the ideal postoperative course occurring within 30 days of the procedure. Suggested MCS allows for standardized assessment of surgical complexity before intervention and for estimating the risk of clinical worsening after removal of intracranial tumor. Collection of data on surgical complexity, occurrence of complications, and postoperative outcomes, using standardized prospectively maintained comprehensive patient registries seems very important for quality measurement and should be attained in all neurosurgical centers.

Addressing Problems in Reporting and Classification of Complications in Neurosurgery

Objective. The purpose of this study was to quantify the rate of adverse events associated to in neurosurgery interventions, to evaluate the differences in reporting of such events among different authors and reviews, and to find the reason behind the occurrence of this differences. Methods. A systematic literature review of scientific publications on existing classifications and reports of frequency on complications in neurosurgery was performed by analysing articles from international databases. Results and conclusion. This current overview is taking an outlook on the existing issues in the classification and reporting of complications in neurosurgery. Complications are common in neurosurgery. Because of nonuniform criteria, unstandardized data gathering procedures, and retrospective data collection, their reporting is inconsistent and varies considerably among authors and reviews. The best way to address this issue is by gathering prospective, multi-institutional outcomes data on neurosurgical patients. The data collection initiatives in the future should be using same terminology and be based on the same universally accepted criteria.

Collagen-bound fibrin sealant (TachoSil®) for dural closure in cranial surgery: single-centre comparative cohort study and systematic review of the literature

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a well-known complication of craniotomies and there are several dural closure techniques. One commonly used commercial product as adjunct for dural closure is the collagen-bound fibrin sealant TachoSil®. We analysed whether the addition of TachoSil has beneficial effects on postoperative complications and outcomes. Our prospective, institutional database was retrospectively queried, and 662 patients undergoing craniotomy were included. Three hundred fifty-two were treated with dural suture alone, and in 310, TachoSil was added after primary suture. Our primary endpoint was the rate of postoperative complications associated with CSF leakage. Secondary endpoints included functional, disability and neurological outcome. Systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines was performed to identify studies comparing primary dural closure with and without additional sealants. Postoperative complications associated with CSF leakage occurred in 24 (7.74%) and 28 (7.95%) procedures with or without TachoSil, respectively (p = 0.960). Multivariate analysis confirmed no significant differences in complication rate between the two groups (aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.53–1.80, p = 0.930). There were no significant disparities in postoperative functional, disability or neurological scores. The systematic review identified 661 and included 8 studies in the qualitative synthesis. None showed a significant superiority of additional sealants over standard technique regarding complications, rates of revision surgery or outcome. According to our findings, we summarize that routinary use of TachoSil and similar products as adjuncts to primary dural sutures after intracranial surgical procedures is safe but without clear advantage in complication avoidance or outcome. Future studies should investigate whether their use is beneficial in high-risk settings.

Rehabilitation Outcomes for Patients with Motor Deficits after Initial and Repeat Brain Tumor Surgery

Repeat surgery is often required to treat brain tumor recurrences. Here, we compared the functional state and rehabilitation of patients undergoing initial and repeat surgery for brain tumors to establish their individual risks that might impact management. In total, 835 patients underwent operations, and 139 (16.6%) required rehabilitation during the inpatient stay. The Karnofsky performance status, Barthel index, and the modified Rankin scale were used to assess functional status, and the gait index was used to assess gait efficiency. Motor skills, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were recorded. Patients were classified into two groups: first surgery (n = 103) and repeat surgery (n = 30). Eighteen percent of patients required reoperations, and these patients required prolonged postoperative rehabilitation as often as those operated on for the first time. Rehabilitation was more often complicated in the repeat surgery group (p = 0.047), and the complications were more severe and persistent. Reoperated patients had significantly worse motor function and independence in activities of daily living before surgery and at discharge, but the deterioration after surgery affected patients in the first surgery group to a greater extent according to all metrics (p < 0.001). The length of hospital stay was similar in both groups. These results will be useful for tailoring postoperative rehabilitation during a hospital stay on the neurosurgical ward as well as planning discharge requirements after leaving the hospital.

Sex-related differences in postoperative complications following elective craniotomy for intracranial lesions: An observational study

INTRODUCTION

The integration of sex-related differences in neurosurgery is crucial for new, possible sex-specific, therapeutic approaches. In neurosurgical emergencies, such as traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, these differences have been investigated. So far, little is known concerning the impact of sex on frequency of postoperative complications after elective craniotomy. This study investigates whether sex-related differences exist in frequency of postoperative complications in patients who underwent elective craniotomy for intracranial lesion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent an elective intracranial procedure over a 2-year period at our center were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. Demographic data, comorbidities, frequency of postoperative complications at 24 hours following surgery and at discharge, and hospital length of stay were compared among females and males.

RESULTS

Overall, 664 patients were considered for the analysis. Of those, 339 (50.2%) were females. Demographic data were comparable among females and males. More females than males suffered from allergic, muscular, and rheumatic disorders. No differences in frequency of postoperative complications at 24 hours after surgery and at discharge were observed among females and males. Similarly, the hospital length of stay was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, no sex-related differences in frequency of early postoperative complications and at discharge following elective craniotomy for intracranial lesions were observed.

Spinous-Process-Splitting Versus Conventional Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Comparative Study with Respect to Short-Term Postoperative Pain and Analgesics Use

OBJECTIVE

Several microsurgical techniques are available for the decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). More recently, a spinous process-splitting laminectomy (SPSL) technique was introduced, with the premise of diminishing paraspinal muscle damage. This study aims to compare the neurologic and functional outcomes, as well as the differences in early postoperative pain and analgesic use during hospitalization after conventional decompression (CD) versus SPSL surgery for LSS.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective analysis of all spinal decompression procedures (CD or SPSL) that were performed or supervised by one consulting spine surgeon, performed for LSS between 2015 and 2020. Preoperative neurologic symptoms, functional outcomes, as well as perioperative analgesic use and reported pain scales during hospitalization were analyzed.

RESULTS

From a total of 106 patients, 58 were treated using CD and 48 using SPSL. In both groups, around one-third of the patients were taking opiates preoperatively (38% for CD, 31% for SPSL). Patients submitted to SPSL reported more pain on first postoperative day but significantly less pain in the further postoperative course (day 3 numeric rating scale [NRS] 2.4 vs. 3.4, P = 0.03 and on day 5 NRS 2.5 vs. 3.7, P = 0.009). Equal or less cumulative doses of analgesics were administered postoperatively (significantly less paracetamol on day 5 compared with CD; P = 0.013). Both groups showed a similarly favorable outcome in terms of improved mobility and there were no significant differences between complications and re-stenosis rates between both techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with SPSL technique for LSS showed an equivalent favorable functional outcome compared to CD. However, SPSL patients showed significantly less subacute postoperative pain while using equal amounts or fewer analgesics postoperatively.

Neurosurgery outcomes and complications in a monocentric 7-year patient registry

Introduction

Capturing adverse events reliably is paramount for clinical practice and research alike. In the era of "big data", prospective registries form the basis of clinical research and quality improvement.

Research question

To present results of long-term implementation of a prospective patient registry, and evaluate the validity of the Clavien-Dindo grade (CDG) to classify complications in neurosurgery.

Materials and methods

A prospective registry for cranial and spinal neurosurgical procedures was implemented in 2013. The CDG - a complication grading focused on need for unplanned therapeutic intervention - was used to grade complications. We assess construct validity of the CDG.

Results

Data acquisition integrated into our hospital workflow permitted to include all eligible patients into the registry. We have registered 8226 patients that were treated in 11994 surgeries and 32494 consultations up until December 2020. Similarly, we have captured 1245 complications on 6308 patient discharge forms (20%) since full operational status of the registry. The majority of complications (819/6308 ​= ​13%) were treated without invasive treatment (CDG 1 or CDG 2). At discharge, there was a clear correlation of CDG and the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS, rho ​= ​-0.29, slope -7 KPS percentage points per increment of CDG) and the length of stay (rho ​= ​0.43, slope 3.2 days per increment of CDG).

Discussion and conclusion

Patient registries with high completeness and objective capturing of complications are central to the process of quality improvement. The CDG demonstrates construct validity as a measure of complication classification in a neurosurgical patient population.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery strategies for elective craniotomy: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has led to a paradigm shift in perioperative care through multimodal interventions. Still, ERAS remains a relatively new concept in neurosurgery, and there is no summary of evidence on ERAS applications in cranial neurosurgery.

METHODS

The authors systematically reviewed the literature using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for ERAS protocols and elements. Studies had to assess at least one pre-, peri-, or postoperative ERAS element and evaluate at least one of the following outcomes: 1) length of hospital stay, 2) length of ICU stay, 3) postoperative pain, 4) direct and indirect healthcare cost, 5) complication rate, 6) readmission rate, or 7) patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

A final 27 articles were included in the qualitative analysis, with mixed quality of evidence ranging from high in 3 cases to very low in 1 case. Seventeen studies reported a complete ERAS protocol. Preoperative ERAS elements include patient selection through multidisciplinary team discussion, patient counseling and education to adjust expectations of the postoperative period, and mental state assessment; antimicrobial, steroidal, and antiepileptic prophylaxes; nutritional assessment, as well as preoperative oral carbohydrate loading; and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis. Anesthesiology interventions included local anesthesia for pin sites, regional field block or scalp block, avoidance or minimization of the duration of invasive monitoring, and limitation of intraoperative mannitol. Other intraoperative elements include absorbable skin sutures and avoidance of wound drains. Postoperatively, the authors identified early extubation, observation in a step-down unit instead of routine ICU admission, early mobilization, early fluid de-escalation, early intake of solid food and liquids, early removal of invasive monitoring, professional nutritional assessment, PONV management, nonopioid rescue analgesia, and early postoperative imaging. Other postoperative interventions included discharge criteria standardization and home visits or progress monitoring by a nurse.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide range of evidence-based interventions are available to improve recovery after elective craniotomy, although there are few published ERAS protocols. Patient-centered optimization of neurosurgical care spanning the pre-, intra-, and postoperative periods is feasible and has already provided positive results in terms of improved outcomes such as postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, reduced length of stay, and cost reduction with an excellent safety profile. Although fast-track recovery protocols and ERAS studies are gaining momentum for elective craniotomy, prospective trials are needed to provide stronger evidence.

Preoperative risk factors associated with new focal neurological deficit and other major adverse events in first-time intracranial meningioma neurosurgery

BACKGROUND

Neurosurgical resection is the mainstay of meningioma treatment. Adverse event (AE) rates of meningioma resections are significant, but preoperative risk factors for major AEs in patients undergoing first-time meningioma surgery are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to explore major AEs and identify preoperative risk factors in patients undergoing first-time meningioma surgery.

METHODS

Data on all meningioma resections performed at the University Hospital Zurich from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018 were collected in a prospective registry. All AEs that occurred within 3 months of surgery were documented in detail and classified as "minor" or "major." Statistical analysis included initial individual bivariate analyses of all preoperative factors and the occurrence of major AEs. Statistically significant variables were then included in a logistic regression model to identify predictors.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-five patients were included in the study. Mean age was 58.1 years, and 77.1% of patients were female. The overall major AE rate was 20.6%; the most common of which was a new focal neurological deficit (12.8% of patients). Six preoperative factors showed a significant association with the occurrence of major AEs in bivariate analysis. All variables included in the logistic regression model showed increased odds of occurrence of major AE, but only tumor complexity as measured by the Milan Complexity Scale was a statistically significant predictor, with a score of 4 or more having twice the odds of major AEs (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.15-3.48).

CONCLUSION

High tumor complexity is an independent predictor of the occurrence of major AEs following meningioma resection. Preoperative assessment of tumor complexity using the Milan Complexity Scale is warranted and can aid communication with patients about AE rates and surgical decision-making.

Failure of diffusion-weighted imaging in intraoperative 3 Tesla MRI to identify hyperacute strokes during glioma surgery

Intraoperatively acquired diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences in cranial tumor surgery are used for early detection of ischemic brain injuries, which could result in impaired neurological outcome and their presence might thus influence the neurosurgeon’s decision on further resection. The phenomenon of false-negative DWI findings in intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) has only been reported in single cases and therefore yet needs to be further analyzed. This retrospective single-center study’s objective was the identification and characterization of false-negative DWI findings in ioMRI with new or enlarged ischemic areas on postoperative MRI (poMRI). Out of 225 cranial tumor surgeries with intraoperative DWI sequences, 16 cases with no additional resection after ioMRI and available in-time poMRI (< 14 days) were identified. Of these, a total of 12 cases showed false-negative DWI in ioMRI (75%). The most frequent tumor types were oligodendrogliomas and glioblastomas (4 each). In 5/12 cases (41.7%), an ischemic area was already present in ioMRI, however, volumetrically increased in poMRI (mean infarct growth + 2.1 cm³; 0.48–3.6), whereas 7 cases (58.3%) harbored totally new infarcts on poMRI (mean infarct volume 0.77 cm³; 0.05–1.93). With this study we provide the most comprehensive series of false-negative DWI findings in ioMRI that were not followed by additional resection. Our study underlines the limitations of intraoperative DWI sequences for the detection and size-estimation of hyperacute infarction. The awareness of this phenomenon is crucial for any neurosurgeon utilizing ioMRI.

Development and external validation of a clinical prediction model for functional impairment after intracranial tumor surgery

OBJECTIVE

Decision-making for intracranial tumor surgery requires balancing the oncological benefit against the risk for resection-related impairment. Risk estimates are commonly based on subjective experience and generalized numbers from the literature, but even experienced surgeons overestimate functional outcome after surgery. Today, there is no reliable and objective way to preoperatively predict an individual patient's risk of experiencing any functional impairment.

METHODS

The authors developed a prediction model for functional impairment at 3 to 6 months after microsurgical resection, defined as a decrease in Karnofsky Performance Status of ≥ 10 points. Two prospective registries in Switzerland and Italy were used for development. External validation was performed in 7 cohorts from Sweden, Norway, Germany, Austria, and the Netherlands. Age, sex, prior surgery, tumor histology and maximum diameter, expected major brain vessel or cranial nerve manipulation, resection in eloquent areas and the posterior fossa, and surgical approach were recorded. Discrimination and calibration metrics were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the development (2437 patients, 48.2% male; mean age ± SD: 55 ± 15 years) and external validation (2427 patients, 42.4% male; mean age ± SD: 58 ± 13 years) cohorts, functional impairment rates were 21.5% and 28.5%, respectively. In the development cohort, area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.72 (95% CI 0.69-0.74) were observed. In the pooled external validation cohort, the AUC was 0.72 (95% CI 0.69-0.74), confirming generalizability. Calibration plots indicated fair calibration in both cohorts. The tool has been incorporated into a web-based application available at https://neurosurgery.shinyapps.io/impairment/.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional impairment after intracranial tumor surgery remains extraordinarily difficult to predict, although machine learning can help quantify risk. This externally validated prediction tool can serve as the basis for case-by-case discussions and risk-to-benefit estimation of surgical treatment in the individual patient.

Brain Tumor Resection in Elderly Patients: Potential Factors of Postoperative Worsening in a Predictive Outcome Model

Simple Summary

Brain tumor surgery in older patients is becoming more relevant, considering that the proportion of older adults being treated for cancer is rising, whereas some pivotal studies in neuro-oncology comprised young patients only. The knowledge of possible predictors of outcome should be included in the preoperative assessment to make the best possible decision in terms of management. We present a case series of 143 patients older than 65 years, intending to identify the possible factors predicting the risk of clinical worsening after elective surgical resection of intracranial tumors in elderly patients. We found that postoperative complications occurrence and preoperative surgical complexity significantly influence the outcome in this subgroup of patients, whereas postoperative complications were the only factor with an impact also at long-term follow-up.

Abstract

The decision of whether to operate on elderly patients with brain tumors is complex, and influenced by pathology-related and patient-specific factors. This retrospective cohort study, based on a prospectively collected surgical database, aims at identifying possible factors predicting clinical worsening after elective neuro-oncological surgery in elderly patients. Therefore, all patients ≥65 years old who underwent BT resection at a tertiary referral center between 01/2018 and 12/2019 were included. Age, smoking, previous radiotherapy, hypertension, preoperative functional status, complications occurrence, surgical complexity and the presence of comorbidities were prospectively collected and analyzed at discharge and the 3-month follow-up. The series included 143 patients (mean 71 years, range 65–86). Sixty-five patients (46%) had at least one neurosurgical complication, whereas 48/65 (74%) complications did not require invasive treatment. Forty-two patients (29.4%) worsened at discharge; these patients had a greater number of complications compared to patients with unchanged/improved performance status. A persistent worsening at three months of follow-up was noted in 20.3% of patients; again, this subgroup presented more complications than patients who remained equal or improved. Therefore, postoperative complications and surgical complexity seem to influence significantly the early outcome in elderly patients undergoing brain tumor surgery. In contrast, postoperative complications alone are the only factor with an impact on the 3-month follow-up.

Reporting morbidity associated with pediatric brain tumor surgery: are the available scoring systems sufficient?

OBJECTIVE

Complications in pediatric neurooncology surgery are seldom and inconsistently reported. This study quantifies surgical morbidity after pediatric brain tumor surgery from the last decade in a single center, using existing morbidity and outcome measures.

METHODS

The authors identified all pediatric patients undergoing surgery for an intracranial tumor in a single tertiary pediatric neurosurgery center between January 2008 and December 2018. Complications between postoperative days 0 and 30 that had been recorded prospectively were graded using appropriate existing morbidity scales, i.e., the Clavien-Dindo (CD), Landriel, and Drake scales. The result of surgery with respect to the predetermined surgical aim was also recorded.

RESULTS

There were 477 cases (364 craniotomies and 113 biopsies) performed on 335 patients (188 males, median age 9 years). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 1.26% (n = 6), and no deaths were a direct result of surgical complication. Morbidity on the CD scale was 0 in 55.14%, 1 in 10.69%, 2 in 18.66%, 3A in 1.47%, 3B in 11.74%, and 4 in 1.05% of cases. Morbidity using the Drake classification was observed in 139 cases (29.14%). Neurological deficit that remained at 30 days was noted in 8.39%; 78% of the returns to the operative theater were for CSF diversion.

CONCLUSIONS

To the authors' knowledge, this is the largest series presenting outcomes and morbidity from pediatric brain tumor surgery. The mortality rate and morbidity on the Drake classification were comparable to those of published series. An improved tool to quantify morbidity from pediatric neurooncology surgery is necessary.

Adverse Events in Neurosurgery: The Novel Therapy-Disability-Neurology Grade

BACKGROUND

The most widely used classifications of adverse events (AEs) in neurosurgery define their severity according to the therapy used to treat them. This concept has substantial shortcomings because it does not reflect the severity of AEs that are not treated, such as new neurological deficits.

OBJECTIVE

To present a novel multidimensional and patient-centered classification of the severity of AE in neurosurgery and evaluate its applicability.

METHODS

The Therapy-Disability-Neurology (TDN) grading system classifies AEs depending on the associated therapy, disability, and neurological deficits. We conducted a 2-center retrospective observational study on 6071 interventions covering the whole neurosurgical spectrum with data prospectively recorded between 2013 and 2019 at 2 institutions from 2 countries.

RESULTS

Using the first patient cohort (4680 interventions), a positive correlation was found between severity of AE and LOS as well as treatment cost. Each grade was associated with a greater deterioration of the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS) at discharge and at follow-up. When using the same methods on the external validation cohort (1391 interventions), correlations between the grades of AE, LOS, and KPS at discharge were even more pronounced.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the TDN grade is consistent with clinical and economic repercussions of AE and thus reflects AE severity. It is easily interpreted and enables comparison between different medical centers. The standardized report of the severity of AE in the scientific literature could constitute an important step forward toward a more critical, patient-centered, and evidence-based decision-making in neurosurgery.

Peri-operative prognostic factors for primary skull base chordomas: results from a single-center cohort

BACKGROUND

Skull base chordomas (SBC) are rare malignant tumors and few factors have been found to be reliable markers for clinical decision making and survival prognostication. The aim of the present work was to identify specific prognostic factors potentially useful for the management of SBC patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all the patients diagnosed and treated for SBC at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta" between January 1992 and December 2017 has been performed. Survival analysis was performed and a logistic regression model was used. Statistically significant predictors were rated based on their log odds in order to preliminarily build a personalized grading scale-the Peri-Operative Chordoma Scale (POCS).

RESULTS

Fifty-nine primary chordoma patients were included. The average follow-up from the first treatment was 82.6 months (95% CI, 65.5-99.7). POCS was built over PFS and MR contrast enhancement (intense vs mild/no, value 4), preoperative motor deficit (yes vs no, value 3), and the development of any postoperative complications (yes vs no, value 2). POCS ranges between 0 and 9, with higher scores being associated with reduced likelihood of survival and progression-free state.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that preoperative clinical symptoms (motor deficits), surgical features (extent of tumor resection and surgeon's experience), development of postoperative complications, and KPS decline represent significant prognostic factors. The degree of MR contrast enhancement significantly correlated to both OS and PFS. We also preliminarily developed the POCS as a prognostic grading scale which may help neurosurgeons in the personalized management of patients undergoing potential adjuvant therapies.

Safety of the paramedian supracerebellar-transtentorial approach for selective amygdalohippocampectomy

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to assess the reproducibility and safety of the recently introduced paramedian supracerebellar-transtentorial (PST) approach for selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SA).

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data originating from their surgical register of patients undergoing SA via a PST approach for lesional medial temporal lobe epilepsy. All patients received thorough pre- and postoperative clinical (neurological, neuropsychological, psychiatric) and instrumental (ictal and long-term EEG, invasive EEG if needed, MRI) workup. Surgery-induced complications were assessed at discharge and at every follow-up thereafter and were classified according to Clavien-Dindo grade (CDG). Epilepsy outcome was defined according to Engel classification. Data were reported according to common descriptive statistical methods.

RESULTS

Between May 2015 and May 2018, 17 patients underwent SA via a PST approach at the authors' institution (hippocampal sclerosis in 13 cases, WHO grade II glioma in 2 cases, and reactive gliosis in 2 cases). The median postoperative follow-up was 7 months (mean 9 months, range 3-19 months). There was no surgery-related mortality and no complication (CDG ≥ 2) in the whole series. Transitory CDG 1 surgical complications occurred in 4 patients and had resolved in all of them by the first postoperative follow-up. One patient showed a deterioration of neuropsychological performance with new slight mnestic deficits. No patient experienced a clinically relevant postoperative visual field defect. No morbidity due to semisitting position was recorded. At last follow-up 13/17 (76.4%) patients were in Engel class I (9/17 [52.9%] were in class IA).

CONCLUSIONS

The PST approach is a reproducible and safe surgical route for SA. The achievable complication rate is in line with the best results in the literature. Visual function outcome particularly benefits from this highly selective, neocortex-sparing approach. A larger patient sample and longer follow-up will show in the future if the seizure control rate and neuropsychological outcome also compare better than those achieved with current common surgical techniques.

Development of machine learning-based preoperative predictive analytics for unruptured intracranial aneurysm surgery: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The decision to treat unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) or not is complex and requires balancing of risk factors and scores. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have previously been effective at generating highly accurate and comprehensive individualized preoperative predictive analytics in transsphenoidal pituitary and open tumor surgery. In this pilot study, we evaluate whether ML-based prediction of clinical endpoints is feasible for microsurgical management of UIAs.

METHODS

Based on data from a prospective registry, we developed and internally validated ML models to predict neurological outcome at discharge, as well as presence of new neurological deficits and any complication at discharge. Favorable neurological outcome was defined as modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0 to 2. According to the Clavien-Dindo grading (CDG), every adverse event during the post-operative course (surgery and not surgery related) is recorded as a complication. Input variables included age; gender; aneurysm complexity, diameter, location, number, and prior treatment; prior subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH); presence of anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, and hypertension; microsurgical technique and approach; and various unruptured aneurysm scoring systems (PHASES, ELAPSS, UIATS).

RESULTS

We included 156 patients (26.3% male; mean [SD] age, 51.7 [11.0] years) with UIAs: 37 (24%) of them were treated for multiple aneurysm and 39 (25%) were treated for a complex aneurysm. Poor neurological outcome (mRS ≥ 3) was seen in 12 patients (7.7%) at discharge. New neurological deficits were seen in 10 (6.4%), and any kind of complication occurred in 20 (12.8%) patients. In the internal validation cohort, area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy values of 0.63-0.77 and 0.78-0.91 were observed, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of ML enables prediction of early clinical endpoints after microsurgery for UIAs. Our pilot study lays the groundwork for development of an externally validated multicenter clinical prediction model.

Impact of additional resection on new ischemic lesions and their clinical relevance after intraoperative 3 Tesla MRI in neuro-oncological surgery

Intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) has become a frequently used tool to improve maximum safe resection in brain tumor surgery. The usability of intraoperatively acquired diffusion-weighted imaging sequences to predict the extent and clinical relevance of new infarcts has not yet been studied. Furthermore, the question of whether more aggressive surgery after ioMRI leads to more or larger infarcts is of crucial interest for the surgeons' operative strategy. Retrospective single-center analysis of a prospective registry of procedures from 2013 to 2019 with ioMRI was used. Infarct volumes in ioMRI/poMRI, lesion localization, mRS, and NIHSS were analyzed for each case. A total of 177 individual operations (60% male, mean age 45.5 years old) met the inclusion criteria. In 61% of the procedures, additional resection was performed after ioMRI, which resulted in a significantly higher number of new ischemic lesions postoperatively (p < .001). The development of new or enlarged ischemic areas upon additional resection could also be shown volumetrically (mean volume in ioMRI 0.39 cm³ vs. poMRI 2.97 cm³; p < .001). Despite the surgically induced new infarcts, mRS and NIHSS did not worsen significantly in cases with additional resection. Additionally, new perilesional ischemia in eloquently located tumors was not associated with an impaired neurological outcome. Additional resection after ioMRI leads to new or enlarged ischemic areas. However, these new infarcts do not necessarily result in an impaired neurological outcome, even when in eloquent brain areas.

Assessing the surgical outcome of the "chopsticks" technique in endoscopic transsphenoidal adenoma surgery

OBJECTIVE

The "chopsticks" technique is a 3-instrument, 2-hand mononostril technique that has been recently introduced in endoscopic neurosurgery. It allows a dynamic surgical view controlled by one surgeon only while keeping bimanual dissection. Being a mononostril approach, it requires manipulation of the mucosa of one nasal cavity only. The rationale of the technique is to reduce nasal morbidity without compromising surgical results and complication rates. There are, however, no data available on its results in endoscopic surgery (transsphenoidal surgery [TSS]) for pituitary adenoma.

METHODS

The authors performed a cohort analysis of prospectively collected data on 144 patients (156 operations) undergoing TSS using the chopsticks technique with 3T intraoperative MRI. All patients had at least 3 months of postoperative neurosurgical, endocrinological, and rhinological follow-up (Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 [SNOT-20] and Sniffin' Sticks). The surgical technique is described, and the achieved gross-total resection (GTR) and extent of resection (EOR) together with patients' clinical outcomes and complications are descriptively reported.

RESULTS

On 3-month postoperative MRI, GTR was achieved in 71.2% of patients with a mean EOR of 96.7%. GTR was the surgical goal in 122 of 156 cases and was achieved in 106 of 122 (86.9%), with a mean EOR of 98.7% (median 100%, range 49%-100%). There was no surgical mortality. At a median follow-up of 15 months (range 3-70 months), there was 1 permanent neurological deficit. As of the last available follow-up, 11.5% of patients had a new pituitary single-axis deficit, whereas 26.3% had improvement in endocrinological function. Three patients had new postoperative hyposmia. One patient had severe impairment of sinonasal function (SNOT-20 score > 40). The operation resulted in endocrine remission in 81.1% of patients with secreting adenomas.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the chopsticks technique confers resection and morbidity results that compare favorably with literature reports of TSS. This technique permits a single surgeon to perform effective endoscopic bimanual dissection through a single nostril, reducing manipulation of healthy tissue and thereby possibly minimizing surgical morbidity.

Comparing Glioblastoma Surgery Decisions Between Teams Using Brain Maps of Tumor Locations, Biopsies, and Resections

Purpose

The aim of glioblastoma surgery is to maximize the extent of resection while preserving functional integrity, which depends on the location within the brain. A standard to compare these decisions is lacking. We present a volumetric voxel-wise method for direct comparison between two multidisciplinary teams of glioblastoma surgery decisions throughout the brain.

Methods

Adults undergoing first-time glioblastoma surgery from 2012 to 2013 performed by two neuro-oncologic teams were included. Patients had had a diagnostic biopsy or resection. Preoperative tumors and postoperative residues were segmented on magnetic resonance imaging in three dimensions and registered to standard brain space. Voxel-wise probability maps of tumor location, biopsy, and resection were constructed for each team to compare patient referral bias, indication variation, and treatment variation. To evaluate the quality of care, subgroups of differentially resected brain regions were analyzed for survival and functional outcome.

Results

One team included 101 patients, and the other included 174; 91 tumors were biopsied, and 181 were resected. Patient characteristics were largely comparable between teams. Distributions of tumor locations were dissimilar, suggesting referral bias. Distributions of biopsies were similar, suggesting absence of indication variation. Differentially resected regions were identified in the anterior limb of the right internal capsule and the right caudate nucleus, indicating treatment variation. Patients with (n = 12) and without (n = 6) surgical removal in these regions had similar overall survival and similar permanent neurologic deficits.

Conclusion

Probability maps of tumor location, biopsy, and resection provide additional information that can inform surgical decision making across multidisciplinary teams for patients with glioblastoma.

Screening tools for early neuropsychological impairment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Although most aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients suffer from neuropsychological disabilities, outcome estimation is commonly based only on functional disability scales such as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Moreover, early neuropsychological screening tools are not used routinely.

OBJECTIVE

To study whether two simple neuropsychological screening tools identify neuropsychological deficits (NPDs), among aSAH patients categorized with favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) at discharge.

METHODS

We reviewed 170 consecutive aSAH patients that were registered in a prospective institutional database. We included all patients graded by the mRS at discharge, and who had additionally been evaluated by a neuropsychologist and/or occupational therapist using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and/or Rapid Evaluation of Cognitive Function (ERFC). The proportion of patients with scores indicative of NPDs in each test were reported, and spearman correlation tests calculated the coefficients between the both neuropsychological test results and the mRS.

RESULTS

Of the 42 patients (24.7%) that were evaluated by at least one neuropsychological test, 34 (81.0%) were rated mRS 0-2 at discharge. Among these 34 patients, NPDs were identified in 14 (53.9%) according to the MoCA and 8 (66.7%) according to the ERFC. The mRS score was not correlated with the performance in the MoCA or ERFC.

CONCLUSION

The two screening tools implemented here frequently identified NPDs among aSAH patients that were categorized with favorable outcome according to the mRS. Our results suggest that MoCA or ERFC could be used to screen early NPDs in favorable outcome patients, who in turn might benefit from early neuropsychological rehabilitation.

Machine Learning Algorithm Identifies Patients at High Risk for Early Complications After Intracranial Tumor Surgery: Registry-Based Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Reliable preoperative identification of patients at high risk for early postoperative complications occurring within 24 h (EPC) of intracranial tumor surgery can improve patient safety and postoperative management. Statistical analysis using machine learning algorithms may generate models that predict EPC better than conventional statistical methods.

OBJECTIVE

To train such a model and to assess its predictive ability.

METHODS

This cohort study included patients from an ongoing prospective patient registry at a single tertiary care center with an intracranial tumor that underwent elective neurosurgery between June 2015 and May 2017. EPC were categorized based on the Clavien-Dindo classification score. Conventional statistical methods and different machine learning algorithms were used to predict EPC using preoperatively available patient, clinical, and surgery-related variables. The performance of each model was derived from examining classification performance metrics on an out-of-sample test dataset.

RESULTS

EPC occurred in 174 (26%) of 668 patients included in the analysis. Gradient boosting machine learning algorithms provided the model best predicting the probability of an EPC. The model scored an accuracy of 0.70 (confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.79) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73 and a sensitivity and specificity of 0.80 (CI 0.58-0.91) and 0.67 (CI 0.53-0.77) on the test set. The conventional statistical model showed inferior predictive power (test set: accuracy: 0.59 (CI 0.47-0.71); AUC: 0.64; sensitivity: 0.76 (CI 0.64-0.85); specificity: 0.53 (CI 0.41-0.64)).

CONCLUSION

Using gradient boosting machine learning algorithms, it was possible to create a prediction model superior to conventional statistical methods. While conventional statistical methods favor patients' characteristics, we found the pathology and surgery-related (histology, anatomical localization, surgical access) variables to be better predictors of EPC.

Ultrasonic aspiration in neurosurgery: comparative analysis of complications and outcome for three commonly used models

Introduction

Ultrasonic aspiration (UA) devices are commonly used for resecting intracranial tumors, as they allow for internal debulking of large tumors, hereby avoiding damage to adjacent brain tissue during the dissection. Little is known about their comparative safety profiles.

Methods and materials

We analyzed data from a prospective patient registry. Procedures using one of the following UA models were included: Integra® CUSA, Söring®, and Stryker® Sonopet. The primary endpoint was morbidity at discharge, defined as significant worsening on the Karnofsky Performance Scale. Secondary endpoints included morbidity and mortality until 3 months postoperative (M3), occurrence, type, and etiology of complications.

Results

Of n = 1028 procedures, the CUSA was used in n = 354 (34.4 %), the Söring in n = 461 (44.8 %), and the Sonopet in n = 213 (20.7 %). There was some heterogeneity of study groups. In multivariable analysis, patients in the Söring (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.29; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.80–2.08; p = 0.299), and Sonopet group (aOR, 0.86; 95 % CI, 0.46–1.61; p = 0.645) were as likely as patients in the CUSA group to experience discharge morbidity. At M3, patients in the Söring (aOR, 1.20; 95 % CI, 0.78–1.86; p = 0.415) and Sonopet group (aOR, 0.53; 95 % CI, 0.26–1.08; p = 0.080) were as likely as patients in the CUSA group to experience morbidity. There were also no differences for M3 morbidity in subgroup analyses for gliomas, meningiomas, and metastases. The grade (p = 0.608) and etiology (p = 0.849) of postoperative complications were similar.

Conclusions

Neurosurgeons select UA types with regard to certain case-specific characteristics. The safety profiles of three commonly used UA types appear mostly similar.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-019-04021-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Standardized assessment of outcome and complications in chronic subdural hematoma: results from a large case series

INTRODUCTION

Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) are commonly deemed to have a benign prognosis. However, detailed and standardized data describing outcome and complications in a large prospective patient cohort is lacking.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in our institutional patient registry on consecutive patients undergoing surgery for cSDH from 2013 to 2017. Complications were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo grading system (CDG). The outcome was measured with respect to two endpoints: occurrence of a complication with CDG 3-5 and lack of improvement in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

Out of 435 operations, 166 (38.3%) presented a complication until 3 months postoperative (CDG 1, 23 (5.3%); CDG 2, 62 (14.3%); CDG 3a, 7 (1.6%); CDG 3b, 64 (14.7%); CDG 4a, 2 (0.5%); and CDG 5, 8 (1.8%)). Higher CDG correlated with a lower KPS (r_s = - 0.27, p < 0.001). A lack of improvement in KPS was associated with a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) > 1 and the iso- or hypodense appearance of the cSDH.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a reliable estimate of the rate of medical and surgical complications in cSDH surgery. Complications that required a surgical intervention turned out to be rare. Recording complications in a standardized and prospective fashion can therefore serve as a basis for assessing patient outcome and quality control within the department.

Safety of resident training in the microsurgical resection of intracranial tumors: Data from a prospective registry of complications and outcome

The aim of the present study was to assess the safety of microsurgical resection of intracranial tumors performed by supervised neurosurgical residents. We analyzed prospectively collected data from our institutional patient registry and dichotomized between procedures performed by supervised neurosurgery residents (defined as teaching procedures) or board-certified faculty neurosurgeons (defined as non-teaching procedures). The primary endpoint was morbidity at discharge, defined as a postoperative decrease of ≥10 points on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Secondary endpoints included 3-month (M3) morbidity, mortality, the in-hospital complication rate, and complication type and severity. Of 1,446 consecutive procedures, 221 (15.3%) were teaching procedures. Patients in the teaching group were as likely as patients in the non-teaching group to experience discharge morbidity in both uni- (OR 0.85, 95%CI 0.60-1.22, p = 0.391) and multivariate analysis (adjusted OR 1.08, 95%CI 0.74-1.58, p = 0.680). The results were consistent at time of the M3 follow-up and in subgroup analyses. In-hospital mortality was equally low (0.24 vs. 0%, p = 0.461) and the likelihood (p = 0.499), type (p = 0.581) and severity of complications (p = 0.373) were similar. These results suggest that microsurgical resection of carefully selected intracranial tumors can be performed safely by supervised neurosurgical residents without increasing the risk of morbidity, mortality or perioperative complications. Appropriate allocation of operations according to case complexity and the resident's experience level, however, appears essential.

Incidence, depth, and severity of surgical site infections after neurosurgical interventions

BACKGROUND

Today, there are only few reports on the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in neurosurgery. The objective of this work was to determine the rate of SSI at a tertiary neurosurgical department for benchmarking purpose.

METHODS

Data of consecutive patients undergoing neurosurgical treatment between January 2013 and December 2016 were prospectively entered into a registry. SSIs were diagnosed according to the 2017 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, with severity graded according to the Clavien-Dindo grade (CDG). We analyzed type and length of surgery (LOS), time to SSI, responsible microorganisms, and its association with the functional status (Karnofsky Performance Status = KPS).

RESULTS

Of n = 5463 procedures, a SSI occurred in n = 106 (1.94%). The highest rates of SSI occurred after vascular (3.4%) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion procedures (3%), as well as after procedures performed to treat a previous complication (2.9%). There was no difference in LOS across procedures with and without SSI. The median time between the index procedure and SSI was 15.5 days. SSIs were most frequently diagnosed after hospital discharge (55%). The most common microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli. In 62.3% of cases, SSI required invasive treatment (surgical revision). Patients with SSI in the in- and out-patient setting (SSI occurring after hospital discharge) presented both with a median KPS of 80.

CONCLUSIONS

The current report provides an overview on SSI in a contemporary, unselected, large series of patients undergoing modern neurosurgical care for benchmarking purposes. The overall rate of SSI was about 2%, but subpopulations with higher risks were identified where additional measures could be taken to prevent SSI and monitor patients at risk more closely for SSI.

Repeated craniotomies for intracranial tumors: is the risk increased? Pooled analysis of two prospective, institutional registries of complications and outcomes

Purpose

Deciding whether to re-operate patients with intracranial tumor recurrence or remnant is challenging, as the data on safety of repeated procedures is limited. This study set out to evaluate the risks for morbidity, mortality, and complications after repeated operations, and to compare those to primary operations.

Methods

Retrospective observational two-center study on consecutive patients undergoing microsurgical tumor resection. The data derived from independent, prospective institutional registries. The primary endpoint was morbidity at 3 months (M3), defined as significant decrease on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Secondary endpoints were mortality, rate and severity of complications according to the Clavien–Dindo Grade (CDG).

Results

463/2403 (19.3%) were repeated procedures. Morbidity at M3 occurred in n = 290 patients (12.1%). In univariable analysis, patients undergoing repeated surgery were 98% as likely as patients undergoing primary surgery to experience morbidity (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72–1.34, p = 0.889). In multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex, tumor size, histology and posterior fossa location, the relationship remained stable (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 0.90–1.73, p = 0.186). Mortality was n = 10 (0.4%) at discharge and n = 95 (4.0%) at M3, without group differences. At least one complication occurred in n = 855, and the rate (35.5% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.892) and severity (CDG; p = 0.520) was similar after primary and repeated procedures. Results were reproduced in subgroup analyses for meningiomas, gliomas and cerebral metastases.

Conclusions

Repeated surgery for intracranial tumors does not increase the risk of morbidity. Mortality, and both the rate and severity of complications are comparable to primary operations. This information is of value for patient counseling and the informed consent process.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-018-03058-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Improving the aesthetic outcome with burr hole cover placement in chronic subdural hematoma evacuation-a retrospective pilot study

Background

The aesthetic outcome after burr hole trepanation for the evacuation of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) is often unsatisfactory, as the bony skull defects may cause visible skin depressions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of burr hole cover placement to improve the aesthetic outcome.

Methods

We reviewed consecutive patients treated by burr hole trepanation for cSDH with or without placement of burr hole covers by a single surgeon between October 2016 and May 2018. The clinical data, including complications, were derived from the institution’s prospective patient registry. The primary endpoint was the aesthetic outcome, as perceived by patients on the aesthetic numeric analog (ANA) scale, assessed by means of a standardized telephone interview. Secondary endpoints were skin depression rates and wound pain, as well as complications.

Results

From n = 33, outcome evaluation was possible in n = 28 patients (n = 24 male; mean age of 70.4 ± 16.1 years) with uni- (n = 20) or bilateral cSDH (n = 8). A total of 14 burr hole covers were placed in 11 patients and compared to 50 burr holes that were not covered. Patient satisfaction with the aesthetic outcome was significantly better for covered burr holes (mean ANA 9.3 ± 0.74 vs. 7.9 ± 1.0; p < 0.001). Skin depressions occurred over 7% (n = 1/14) of covered and over 92% (n = 46/50) of uncovered burr holes (p < 0.001). There was no difference in wound pain (p = 0.903) between covered and uncovered sites. No surgical site infection, cSDH recurrence, or material failure was encountered in patients who had received a burr hole plate.

Conclusions

In this retrospective series, placement of burr hole covers was associated with improved aesthetic outcome, likely due to reduction of skin depressions. A randomized controlled trial is developed to investigate whether adding burr hole covers results in superior aesthetic outcomes, without increasing the risk for complications.

Selection Strategy for Optimal Keyhole Approaches for Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Lateral Supraorbital Versus Minipterional Craniotomy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

The lateral supraorbital (LS) and minipterional (MP) approaches have been reported for treating intracranial aneurysms as alternative to the pterional approach. We describe our decision making for selecting the minicraniotomy, LS versus MP, for managing noncomplex aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), based on the depth of the aneurysm within the Sylvian fissure.

METHODS

We report on a consecutive case series of 50 patients who underwent clipping of 54 ruptured/unruptured MCA aneurysms by means of LS or MP craniotomies. The distance between the MCA (M1) origin and the aneurysmal neck is key to selection of the approach: LS was used for MCA aneurysms <15 mm from the M1 origin and MP for MCA aneurysms ≥15 mm from the M1 origin.

RESULTS

11 of 50 patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage (10 ruptured MCA aneurysms). Overall, 59 aneurysms were successfully clipped (54 of the MCA). The mean distance between the M1 origin and the aneurysmal neck was 10.1 mm (range, 4-17 mm) for patients treated by LS and 20 mm (range, 15-30 mm) for those treated by MP. All but 1 MCA aneurysms were successfully treated. At last follow-up (mean, 14 months), no reperfusion of the clipped aneurysms was observed.

CONCLUSION

Our strategy for selecting the keyhole approach based on the depth of the aneurysm within the Sylvian fissure is efficient and safe. We suggest the use of the LS approach when the aneurysm is <15 mm from the M1 origin and the MP approach when the aneurysm is ≥15 mm from the M1 origin.

Burr hole trepanation for chronic subdural hematomas: is surgical education safe?

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data concerning the safety and efficacy of surgical education for neurosurgical residents in the evacuation of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) by burr hole trepanation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients receiving burr hole trepanation for uni- or bilateral cSDH. Patients operated by a supervised neurosurgery resident (teaching cases) were compared to patients operated by a board-certified faculty neurosurgeon (BCFN; non-teaching cases). The primary endpoint was surgical revision for any reason until the last follow-up. The secondary endpoint was occurrence of any complication until the last follow-up. Clinical status, type of complications, mortality, length of surgery (LOS), and hospitalization (LOH) were tertiary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of n = 253 cases were analyzed, of which n = 217 (85.8%) were teaching and n = 36 (14.2%) non-teaching cases. The study groups were balanced in terms of age, sex, surgical risk (ASA score), and preoperative status (Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)). The cohort was followed for a mean of 242 days (standard deviation 302). In multivariate analysis, teaching cases were as likely as non-teaching cases to require revision surgery (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27-1.59; p = 0.348) as well as to experience any complication until the last follow-up (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.37-1.67; p = 0.532). Mean LOS was about 10 min longer in teaching cases (53.0 ± 26.1 min vs. 43.5 ± 17.8 min; p = 0.036), but LOH was similar. There were no group differences in clinical status, mortality and type of complication at discharge, and the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Burr hole trepanation for cSDH can be safely performed by supervised neurosurgical residents enrolled in a structured training program, without increasing the risk for revision surgery, perioperative complications, or worse outcome.

UniversitätsSpital Zürich: 80 years of neurosurgical patient care in Switzerland

Background

The predecessor of today’s Department of Neurosurgery, UniversitätsSpital Zürich (USZ), was founded 80 years ago as the first independent Swiss clinic dedicated to neurosurgical patient care. On the occasion of this anniversary, we aimed to highlight the history of neurosurgery as a specialty at the USZ, and to put it into the historical context of Swiss and European Neurosurgery.

Method

A literature review was conducted and we searched the archives of the USZ and the city of Zurich, as well as those of Swiss journals to extract relevant published articles, books, historical reports and pictures. The USZ Department of Medical History, the Museum of Medical History and the Swiss National Library were contacted to provide source material. To further verify the content, (emeritus) faculty from the USZ and external experts on the history of Swiss neurosurgery reviewed the manuscript.

Results

Surgeries of the head and spine had occasionally been conducted in Zurich by the general surgeons, Rudolf Ulrich Krönlein and Paul Clairmont, before an independent neurosurgical clinic was founded by Hugo Krayenbühl on 6 July 1937. This was the first Swiss department dedicated to neurosurgical patient care. Besides providing high-quality medicine for both the local and wider population, the department was chaired by eminent leaders of neurosurgery, who influenced the scientific and clinical neurosurgery of their time. As such, it has long been regarded as one of the top teaching and research hospitals in Switzerland and in Europe.

Conclusions

On the occasion of its 80th anniversary, we have performed an in-depth review of its development, successes and challenges, with a special focus on the early decades. Reflecting on the past, we have identified common denominators of success in neurosurgery that remain valid today.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-017-3357-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.

Validating a therapy-oriented complication grading system in lumbar spine surgery: a prospective population-based study

The aim of the present study was to validate a therapy-oriented complication grading system in a well-defined neurosurgical patient population in which complications may entrain neurological deficits, which are severe but not treated. The prospective patient registry of the Department of Neurosurgery, University of Zurich provides extensive population-based data. In this study we focused on complications after lumbar spine surgeries and rated their severity by Clavien-Dindo grade (CDG). Analyzing 138 consecutive surgeries we noted 44 complications. As to treatment, CDG correlated with the length of hospital stay and treatment cost. As to patient outcome, CDG correlated with performance and outcome (McCormick). The present study demonstrates the correlation between outcome scales and the CDG. While the high correlation of CDG with costs seems self-evident, the present study shows this correlation for the first time. Furthermore, the study validates the CDG for a surgical subspecialty. As a further advantage, CDG registers any deviation from the normal postoperative course and allows comparison between surgical specialties.

Postoperative Neurosurgical Infection Rates After Shared-Resource Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Single-Center Experience with 195 Cases

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rate of surgical-site infections (SSI) in neurosurgical procedures involving a shared-resource intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) scanner at a single institution derived from a prospective clinical quality management database.

METHODS

All consecutive neurosurgical procedures that were performed with a high-field, 2-room ioMRI between April 2013 and June 2016 were included (N = 195; 109 craniotomies and 86 endoscopic transsphenoidal procedures). The incidence of SSIs within 3 months after surgery was assessed for both operative groups (craniotomies vs. transsphenoidal approach).

RESULTS

Of the 109 craniotomies, 6 patients developed an SSI (5.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-9.8%), including 1 superficial SSI, 2 cases of bone flap osteitis, 1 intracranial abscess, and 2 cases of meningitis/ventriculitis. Wound revision surgery due to infection was necessary in 4 patients (4%). Of the 86 transsphenoidal skull base surgeries, 6 patients (7.0%, 95% CI 1.5-12.4%) developed an infection, including 2 non-central nervous system intranasal SSIs (3%) and 4 cases of meningitis (5%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the likelihood of infection significantly decreased with the number of operations in the new operational setting (odds ratio 0.982, 95% CI 0.969-0.995, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a shared-resource ioMRI in neurosurgery did not demonstrate increased rates of infection compared with the current available literature. The likelihood of infection decreased with the accumulating number of operations, underlining the importance of surgical staff training after the introduction of a shared-resource ioMRI.