Clinical evaluation of presepsin considering renal function

Urinary presepsin is a novel biomarker capable of directly assessing monocyte/macrophage infiltration in kidney diseases

Serum presepsin levels are elevated during sepsis and are widely employed in clinical practice. However, the association between urinary presepsin and kidney diseases remains elusive. Given that monocytes/macrophages, primary presepsin producers, are closely associated with the pathophysiology of nephritis, we explored the potential of urinary presepsin as a kidney disease biomarker. In a cross-sectional study involving patients who underwent kidney biopsy (n = 463 patients; 43% female, median age 58 years), the median urinary presepsin/creatinine levels were 590 (interquartile range [IQR], 244-1276), 1023 (IQR, 491-2749), 1429 (IQR, 644-2725), and 3518 (IQR, 2084-6321) ng/g creatinine, indicating minimal (< 5%), mild (5-25%), moderate (26-50%), and severe (> 50%) interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration in biopsy samples, respectively. The area under the curve of urinary presepsin/creatinine (0.81) had a higher accuracy for distinguishing severe interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration than that of the N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase/creatinine (0.70) (P = 0.003). The tubulointerstitial nephritis group had the highest urinary presepsin/creatinine level. Immunofluorescence staining revealed that monocytes and macrophages predominantly expressed presepsin in the kidney interstitium, with the stained area positively and significantly correlated with presepsin/creatinine values (r = 0.57, P = 0.02). Urinary presepsin could be a biomarker for directly assessing monocyte/macrophage infiltration in kidney disease.

Plasma presepsin for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury requiring continuous kidney replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

The reliability of presepsin as a biomarker of sepsis may be reduced in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). This study analyzed the utility of plasma presepsin values in predicting mortality in patients with AKI requiring CKRT, particularly those with sepsis-associated AKI.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 57 patients who underwent CKRT, with plasma presepsin measurements, from April 2022 to March 2023; 35 had sepsis-associated AKI. The predictive values of plasma presepsin, as well as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, for 28-day mortality were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for 28-day mortality in the sepsis-associated AKI subgroup.

RESULTS

Overall, plasma presepsin showed a lower area under the curve value (0.636; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.491-0.781) than the APACHE II (0.663; 95% CI, 0.521-0.804) and SOFA (0.731; 95% CI, 0.599-0.863) scores did. However, in sepsis-associated AKI, the area under the curve increased to 0.799 (95% CI, 0.653-0.946), which was higher than that of the APACHE II (0.638; 95% CI, 0.450-0.826) and SOFA (0.697; 95% CI, 0.519-0.875) scores. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, a high presepsin level was an independent risk factor for 28-day mortality in sepsis-associated AKI (hazard ratio, 3.437; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Presepsin is a potential prognostic marker in patients with sepsis-associated AKI requiring CKRT.

Advances of presepsin in sepsis-associated ARDS

This article reviews the correlation between presepsin and sepsis and the resulting acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS is a severe complication of sepsis. Despite the successful application of protective mechanical ventilation, restrictive fluid therapy, and neuromuscular blockade, which have effectively reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with ARDS, the mortality rate among patients with sepsis-associated ARDS remains notably high. The challenge lies in the prediction of ARDS onset and the timely implementation of intervention strategies. Recent studies have demonstrated significant variations in presepsin (PSEP) levels between patients with sepsis and those without, particularly in the context of ARDS. Moreover, these studies have revealed substantially elevated PSEP levels in patients with sepsis-associated ARDS compared to those with nonsepsis-associated ARDS. Consequently, PSEP emerges as a valuable biomarker for identifying patients with an increased risk of sepsis-associated ARDS and to predict in-hospital mortality.

Variation in presepsin and thrombomodulin levels for predicting COVID-19 mortality

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has caused extensive mortality globally; therefore, biomarkers predicting the severity and prognosis of COVID-19 are essential. This study aimed to evaluate the application of presepsin (P-SEP) and thrombomodulin (TM), which are biomarkers of sepsis and endothelial dysfunction, respectively, in the prognosis of COVID-19. Serum P-SEP and TM levels from COVID-19 patients (n = 183) were measured. Disease severity was classified as mild, moderate I, moderate II, or severe based on hemoglobin oxygen saturation and the history of intensive care unit transfer or use of ventilation at admission. Patients in the severe group were further divided into survivors and non-survivors. P-SEP and TM levels were significantly higher in the severe group than those in the mild group, even after adjusting for creatinine values. In addition, TM levels were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors. Changes in the P-SEP levels at two time points with an interval of 4.1 ± 2.2 days were significantly different between the survivors and non-survivors. In conclusion, TM and continuous P-SEP measurements may be useful for predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19. Moreover, our data indicate that P-SEP and TM values after creatinine adjustment could be independent predictive markers, apart from renal function.

The role of presepsin in pediatric patients with oncological and hematological diseases experiencing febrile neutropenia

Febrile neutropenia (FN) represents one of the main complications of pediatric patients with oncological and hematological diseases. In these patients, it is crucial to identify bacterial infections. The aim of this study is to evaluate presepsin as an early biomarker of bacterial infections during FN. We compared patients with oncological and hematological diseases and a 2:1 age-matched healthy control group. In the FN group, we evaluated 4 biomarkers, namely, C reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin 6 (IL6) and presepsin at the onset of fever (T0) and 48 h after T0 (T1). In the control group, we only evaluated presepsin. We enrolled a total of 41 children with oncological and hematological diseases disease experiencing 50 FN episodes and 100 healthy patients in the control group. In patients with FN, we found that presepsin was significantly higher than in the control group (p < 0.001). However, in the FN group, we did not find a statistically significant difference between patients with and without bacteremia (p = 0.989 at T0, p = 0.619 at T1). Presepsin values at T1 were higher in patients experiencing an unfavorable outcome (p = 0.025). This study shows that presepsin increases in neutropenic patients, but it only revealed useful in predicting an unfavorable outcome 48 h from the onset of fever.

The cutoff value of presepsin for diagnosing sepsis increases with kidney dysfunction, a cross-sectional observational study

As presepsin levels increase with kidney dysfunction (KD), our aim was to establish cutoff points for presepsin adapted to the level of KD in order to avoid bacterial infection overdiagnosis, antibiotic overprescription, and risk of bacterial resistance. This is a unicenter retrospective study, which included all patients admitted on an emergency basis to 2 departments of a teaching hospital during a 2-year interval to whom presepsin level was determined at the emergency department prior to admission. Serum creatinine (sCrt) was employed to estimate the severity of KD using 3 thresholds (1.5, 2, and 4 mg/dL) resulting in 4 degrees of severity: KD_1, KD_2, KD_3, KD_4. There is an ascending exponential relationship between presepsin and sCrt: presepsin = 600.03e0.212sCrt. Presepsin levels are significantly different between the patients with KD_1, KD_2, KD_3, and KD_4. In the receiver operating characteristic curves exploring the usefulness of presepsin in sepsis diagnosis, the area under the curve was satisfactory for KD_1 (0.78), KD_2 (0.78), and KD_3 (0.82), but unacceptably low for KD_4 (0.59), while the optimal cutoff points were (depending on the computational method) 700/ 982, 588/ 1125, 1065, and 2260 pg/mL for KD_1, KD_2, KD_3, and KD_4 respectively. The threshold for abnormal presepsin should be about 600, 1000, and 1300 pg/mL in patients with KD_1, KD_2, and KD_3, respectively. In patients with KD_4, presepsin has a poor discriminating power for sepsis diagnosis. If, notwithstanding, it is used for this purpose, the cutoff point should be at least at 2200.

Dynamic blood presepsin levels are associated with severity and outcome of acute pancreatitis: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disorder of the pancreas with an unpredictable course of illness. A major challenge of AP is the early identification of patients at high-risk for organ failure and death. However, scoring systems are complicated and time consuming, and the predictive values for the clinical course are vague.

AIM

To determine whether the dynamic changes in presepsin levels can be used to evaluate the severity of disease and outcome of AP.

METHODS

In this multicentric cohort study, 133 patients with AP were included. Clinical severity was dynamically evaluated using the 2012 revised Atlanta Classification. Blood presepsin levels were measured at days 1, 3, 5 and 7 after admission by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

The median concentration of presepsin increased and the clearance rate of presepsin decreased with disease severity and organ failure in AP patients. The presepsin levels on days 3, 5 and 7 were independent predictors of moderately severe and severe AP with time-specific area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.827, 0.848 and 0.867, respectively. The presepsin levels positively correlated with bedside index of severity in AP, Ranson, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, computed tomography severity index and Marshall scores. Presepsin levels on days 3, 5 and 7 were independent predictors of 28-d mortality of AP patients with AUC values of 0.781, 0.846 and 0.843, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Blood presepsin levels within 7 d of admission were associated with and may be useful to dynamically predict the severity of disease course and 28-d mortality in AP patients.

Presepsin cut-off value for diagnosis of sepsis in patients with renal dysfunction

Presepsin is used as a marker for diagnosing sepsis, but its serum concentration is affected by renal function. We investigated the effect of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) determined by creatinine on the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin to identify the optimal cut-off value in patients with renal dysfunction. A total of 834 patients aged ≥18 years with serum presepsin and creatinine measured on the same day over a period of 1 year were included. Sepsis was diagnosed in three ways: sepsis-1, sepsis-3, and clinical diagnosis (Sep-C). Presepsin showed a significant negative correlation with eGFR (r = −0.55, p<0.01), with median and interquartile ranges of presepsin values for patients in each eGFR category as follows: ≥90, 263 (169–460); ≥60–<90, 309 (205–578); ≥45–<60, 406 (279–683); ≥30–<45, 605 (379–1109); ≥15–<30, 1027 (675–1953); <15, 1977 (1199–3477); and on hemodialysis, 3964 (2343–6967). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for sepsis-1 was the lowest (0.64 ± 0.02), while Sep-C (0.80± 0.03) and sepsis-3 (0.75 ± 0.03) were moderately accurate. Comparing AUCs after dividing patients into eGFR ≥60 and <60 showed that the AUC of Sep-C was lower in the eGFR ≥60 group, while the AUC of sepsis-3 was ≥ 0.7 in both groups. The following cut-offs were obtained by ROC analysis for sepsis-3: 466 pg/mL in the ≥60 group and 960 pg/mLin the < 60 group. Presepsin facilitated diagnosis sepsis based on sepsis-3 criteria regardless of renal function. We found that the optimal cut-offs for patients in this study were 500 pg/mL for eGFR ≥ 60 and 1000 pg/mL for < 60. However, future prospective diagnostic studies on sepsis-3 are needed to determine the cut-offs for patients with renal dysfunction.

Serum stratifin and presepsin as candidate biomarkers for early detection of COVID-19 disease progression

The prognosis of patients with severe cases of COVID-19 is poor; thus, biomarkers for earlier prediction of COVID-19 progression are vital. We measured levels of five lung injury-related biomarkers, SP-D, KL-6, presepsin, kallistatin and stratifin, in serum samples collected serially during hospitalization from 31 patients with mild/moderate or severe/critical COVID-19 pneumonia, and their predictive performances were compared. Like the previously reported presepsin, a new biomarker candidate, stratifin, was significantly elevated with the onset of severe or critical symptoms in COVID-19 patients and decreased with symptom improvement. Notably, changes in stratifin and presepsin levels were distinctly earlier than those in SP-D, KL-6 and even SpO₂/FiO₂ values. Furthermore, serum levels of these biomarkers were significantly higher at the pre-severe stage (before the start of oxygen support) of patients who eventually advanced to severe/critical stages than in the patients who remained at the mild/moderate stage. These results were confirmed in an independent cohort, including 71 mild/moderate and 14 severe/critical patients, for whom the performance of stratifin and presepsin in discriminating between mild/moderate and pre-severe conditions of COVID-19 patients was superior to that of the SpO₂/FiO₂ ratio. Therefore, we concluded that stratifin and presepsin could be used as prognostic biomarkers for severe COVID-19 progression.

Plasma presepsin level predicts acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis in the emergency department

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients with sepsis. We evaluated the potential prognostic value of plasma presepsin to predict AKI in patients with sepsis in the emergency department. A total of 193 patients diagnosed with sepsis based on the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) were included in this observational study. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes clinical practice guideline. Plasma presepsin levels were measured on admission to the emergency department. We compared plasma presepsin levels between patients who did and those who did not develop AKI. AKI occurred in 100 (51.8%) patients. The median plasma presepsin level was significantly higher in patients with AKI than in those without AKI (1061 pg/mL vs 495 pg/mL, P <.001). Plasma presepsin levels were significantly increased in patients with AKI stage 3 compared with those with AKI stages 1 and 2 (P =.001). The area under the curve of presepsin for predicting AKI was 0.793 (95% confidence interval: 0.729-0.848). The optimal presepsin cutoff value for predicting AKI was >572 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 77.0% and specificity of 81.7%. Plasma presepsin level is a valuable biomarker for the prediction of AKI in patients with sepsis in the emergency department.

Combined Use of Presepsin and (1,3)-β-D-glucan as Biomarkers for Diagnosing Candida Sepsis and Monitoring the Effectiveness of Treatment in Critically Ill Patients

New biomarker panel was developed and validated on 165 critically ill adult patients to enable a more accurate invasive candidiasis (IC) diagnosis. Serum levels of the panfungal biomarker (1,3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) and the inflammatory biomarkers C-reactive protein, presepsin (PSEP), and procalcitonin (PCT) were correlated with culture-confirmed candidemia or bacteremia in 58 and 107 patients, respectively. The diagnostic utility was evaluated in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). BDG was the best marker for IC, achieving 96.6% sensitivity, 97.2% specificity, 94.9% PPV, and 98.1% NPV at a cut-off of 200 pg/mL (p ≤ 0.001). PSEP exhibited 100% sensitivity and 100% NPV at a cut-off of 700 pg/mL but had a lower PPV (36.5%) and low specificity (5.6%). Combined use of PSEP and BDG, thus, seems to be the most powerful laboratory approach for diagnosing IC. Furthermore, PSEP was more accurate for 28-day mortality prediction the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC = 0.74) than PCT (AUC = 0.31; PCT cut-off = 0.5 ng/mL). Finally, serum PSEP levels decreased significantly after only 14 days of echinocandin therapy (p = 0.0012). The probability of IC is almost 100% in critically ill adults with serum BDG and PSEP concentrations > 200 pg/mL and >700 pg/mL, respectively, defining a borderline between non-invasive superficial Candida colonization and IC.

Presepsin as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Sepsis

Sepsis is a condition characterized by high morbidity and mortality which is commonly encountered in an emergency and critical care setting. Despite a substantial body of research, the ideal biomarker for the diagnosis and prognostic stratification of septic patients remains unknown. This review aimed to summarize the publications referring to the validity of the biomarker presepsin when used for the detection, monitoring and prognosis in patients suffering with sepsis.

This work is a narrative review based on a PubMed/Medline search conducted in order to identify all relevant publications referring to the use of presepsin in sepsis. Search was not limited by year of publication so all articles archived in the database would be retrieved. No article from before 2010 was identified.

A total of 57 publications of the last decade were included, all of which support the use of presepsin as a biomarker for the assessment of septic patients. It has been used alone or in combination with commonly used biomarkers in the evaluation of patients with sepsis in settings such as the emergency department and the intensive care unit. It is useful in the initial workup of patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency setting and may be a predictive factor of mortality and the most severe complication of sepsis.

Presepsin seems to be a valuable tool for the laboratory workup of sepsis, especially when used in conjunction with other biomarkers and clinical rating scores with an established role in this population. Further research is needed to evaluate the clinical implications of utilizing presepsin measurements in the workup of sepsis.

The pathogenesis and diagnosis of sepsis post burn injury

Burn is an under-appreciated trauma that is associated with unacceptably high morbidity and mortality. Although the survival rate after devastating burn injuries has continued to increase in previous decades due to medical advances in burn wound care, nutritional and fluid resuscitation and improved infection control practices, there are still large numbers of patients at a high risk of death. One of the most common complications of burn is sepsis, which is defined as “severe organ dysfunction attributed to host's disordered response to infection” and is the primary cause of death in burn patients. Indeed, burn injuries are accompanied by a series of events that lead to sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, such as a hypovolaemic state, immune and inflammatory responses and metabolic changes. Therefore, clear diagnostic criteria and predictive biomarkers are especially important in the prevention and treatment of sepsis and septic shock. In this review, we focus on the pathogenesis of burn wound infection and the post-burn events leading to sepsis. Moreover, the clinical and promising biomarkers of burn sepsis will also be summarized.

Determining the factors affecting serum presepsin level and its diagnostic utility: A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to identify factors affecting presepsin levels and to determine their diagnostic utility.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at an outpatient clinic and emergency department at an acute care hospital in Japan between January 2015 and December 2017. We enrolled 1,840 consecutive outpatients with at least one measurement of serum presepsin, who were suspected of having bacterial infection. The outcome variables were bacterial infection, lower respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, cholangitis, and other infections diagnoses, based on the chart review. We collected blood analysis data on the patients' presepsin levels.

RESULTS

There was a significant association between presepsin level and the diagnosis of bacterial infection even when adjusted for age, sex, renal function, and biliary enzyme levels. An increase of 1 unit in the log of presepsin values resulted in a relative risk ratio of 1.71 (1.09-2.66), 2.1 (1.58-2.79), 2.93 (2.05-4.19), 4.7(2.90-7.61), and 2.41(1.70-3.43), for bacterial infection, lower respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, cholangitis, and other infections, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Presepsin showed a statistically significant increase in the diagnosis of bacterial infections (lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, cholangitis, and non-severe patients) in a community hospital setting. However, in patients with renal dysfunction, presepsin levels should be interpreted with caution.

Presepsin Level Correlates with the Development of Moderate Coronary Artery Calcifications in Hemodialysis Patients: A Preliminary Cross-Section Design Study

Purpose

End-stage renal disease patients have a high mortality rate linked to cardiovascular complications, and one of these complications is vascular calcification. This study was performed to test if presepsin, an inflammatory marker, is a predictor of coronary artery calcification (CAC) in hemodialysis (HD) patients.

Patients and Methods

This study was a cross-sectional design involving 48 HD patients and 13 control subjects. Coronary artery calcification score (CACs) was evaluated by a high resolution, ECG synchronized computed tomography of the heart using a CT calcium scoring. Presepsin and other laboratory analyses were performed on blood samples drawn before HD.

Results

Presepsin levels in HD patients were 14 times higher than healthy controls (P<0.01). Also, all laboratory tests except for vitamin D were significantly different than controls. Presepsin, phosphorus levels, and calcium-phosphate product were positively correlated with increasing CACs within groups of zero to moderate calcifications (p<0.05, R=0.459 and <0.01, R=0.591, respectively). These correlations were not seen with eGFR, PTH, calcium, vitamin D, CRP, or ESR levels. Furthermore, the log-transformed data of presepsin correlated with 1–15 months of HD vintage (p<0.05, R=0.482), whereas CACs data correlated with 1–20 months of HD vintage (p<0.05, R=0.425).

Conclusion

Although this study is preliminary and has a limited number of patients, it shows that presepsin, as an inflammatory marker, correlates with the development of moderate CAC in HD patients and may predict CAC development. Therefore, measuring presepsin and managing inflammation before and during the early phases of HD may lower coronary calcification development. However, more clinical studies in this direction are essential.

Biomarkers for Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Sepsis

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. In 2017, almost 50 million cases of sepsis were recorded worldwide and 11 million sepsis-related deaths were reported. Therefore, sepsis is the focus of intense research to better understand the complexities of sepsis response, particularly the twin underlying concepts of an initial hyper-immune response and a counter-immunological state of immunosuppression triggered by an invading pathogen. Diagnosis of sepsis remains a significant challenge. Prompt diagnosis is essential so that treatment can be instigated as early as possible to ensure the best outcome, as delay in treatment is associated with higher mortality. In order to address this diagnostic problem, use of a panel of biomarkers has been proposed as, due to the complexity of the sepsis response, no single marker is sufficient. This review provides background on the current understanding of sepsis in terms of its epidemiology, the evolution of the definition of sepsis, pathobiology and diagnosis and management. Candidate biomarkers of interest and how current and developing point-of-care testing approaches could be used to measure such biomarkers is discussed.