Characterization of a G protein coupling "YL" motif of the human VPAC1 receptor, equivalent to the first two amino acids in the "DRY" motif of the rhodopsin family

Key interactions by conserved polar amino acids located at the transmembrane helical boundaries in Class B GPCRs modulate activation, effector specificity and biased signalling in the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor

Class B GPCRs can activate multiple signalling effectors with the potential to exhibit biased agonism in response to ligand stimulation. Previously, we highlighted key TM domain polar amino acids that were crucial for the function of the GLP-1 receptor, a key therapeutic target for diabetes and obesity. Using a combination of mutagenesis, pharmacological characterisation, mathematical and computational molecular modelling, this study identifies additional highly conserved polar residues located towards the TM helical boundaries of Class B GPCRs that are important for GLP-1 receptor stability and/or controlling signalling specificity and biased agonism. This includes (i) three positively charged residues (R3.30227, K4.64288, R5.40310) located at the extracellular boundaries of TMs 3, 4 and 5 that are predicted in molecular models to stabilise extracellular loop 2, a crucial domain for ligand affinity and receptor activation; (ii) a predicted hydrogen bond network between residues located in TMs 2 (R2.46176), 6 (R6.37348) and 7 (N7.61406 and E7.63408) at the cytoplasmic face of the receptor that is important for stabilising the inactive receptor and directing signalling specificity, (iii) residues at the bottom of TM 5 (R5.56326) and TM6 (K6.35346 and K6.40351) that are crucial for receptor activation and downstream signalling; (iv) residues predicted to be involved in stabilisation of TM4 (N2.52182 and Y3.52250) that also influence cell signalling. Collectively, this work expands our understanding of peptide-mediated signalling by the GLP-1 receptor.

The activation of the CGRP receptor

The CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide) receptor is a family B GPCR (G-protein-coupled receptor). It consists of a GPCR, CLR (calcitonin receptor-like receptor) and an accessory protein, RAMP1 (receptor activity modifying protein 1). RAMP1 is needed for CGRP binding and also cell-surface expression of CLR. CLR is an example of a family B GPCR. Unlike family A GPCRs, little is known about how these receptors are activated by their endogenous ligands. This review considers what is known about the activation of family B GPCRs and then considers how this might be applied to CLR, particularly in light of new knowledge of the crystal structures of family A GPCRs.

Similarity between class A and class B G-protein-coupled receptors exemplified through calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor modelling and mutagenesis studies

Modelling class B G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) using class A GPCR structural templates is difficult due to lack of homology. The plant GPCR, GCR1, has homology to both class A and class B GPCRs. We have used this to generate a class A–class B alignment, and by incorporating maximum lagged correlation of entropy and hydrophobicity into a consensus score, we have been able to align receptor transmembrane regions. We have applied this analysis to generate active and inactive homology models of the class B calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor, and have supported it with site-directed mutagenesis data using 122 CGRP receptor residues and 144 published mutagenesis results on other class B GPCRs. The variation of sequence variability with structure, the analysis of polarity violations, the alignment of group-conserved residues and the mutagenesis results at 27 key positions were particularly informative in distinguishing between the proposed and plausible alternative alignments. Furthermore, we have been able to associate the key molecular features of the class B GPCR signalling machinery with their class A counterparts for the first time. These include the [K/R]KLH motif in intracellular loop 1, [I/L]xxxL and KxxK at the intracellular end of TM5 and TM6, the NPXXY/VAVLY motif on TM7 and small group-conserved residues in TM1, TM2, TM3 and TM7. The equivalent of the class A DRY motif is proposed to involve Arg^2.39, His^2.43 and Glu^3.46, which makes a polar lock with T^6.37. These alignments and models provide useful tools for understanding class B GPCR function.

Mechanisms involved in VPAC receptors activation and regulation: lessons from pharmacological and mutagenesis studies

Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) plays diverse and important role in human physiology and physiopathology and their receptors constitute potential targets for the treatment of several diseases such as neurodegenerative disorder, asthma, diabetes, and inflammatory diseases. This article reviews the current knowledge regarding the two VIP receptors, VPAC(1) and VPAC(2), with respect to mechanisms involved in receptor activation, G protein coupling, signaling, regulation, and oligomerization.

Agnathan VIP, PACAP and their receptors: ancestral origins of today's highly diversified forms

VIP and PACAP are pleiotropic peptides belonging to the secretin superfamily of brain-gut peptides and interact specifically with three receptors (VPAC₁, PAC₁ and VPAC₂) from the class II B G protein-coupled receptor family. There is immense interest regarding their molecular evolution which is often described closely alongside gene and/or genome duplications. Despite the wide array of information available in various vertebrates and one invertebrate the tunicate, their evolutionary origins remain unresolved. Through searches of genome databases and molecular cloning techniques, the first lamprey VIP/PACAP ligands and VPAC receptors are identified from the Japanese lamprey. In addition, two VPAC receptors (VPACa/b) are identified from inshore hagfish and ligands predicted for sea lamprey. Phylogenetic analyses group these molecules into their respective PHI/VIP, PRP/PACAP and VPAC receptor families and show they resemble ancestral forms. Japanese lamprey VIP/PACAP peptides synthesized were tested with the hagfish VPAC receptors. hfVPACa transduces signal via both adenylyl cylase and phospholipase C pathways, whilst hfVPACb was only able to transduce through the calcium pathway. In contrast to the widespread distribution of VIP/PACAP ligands and receptors in many species, the agnathan PACAP and VPAC receptors were found almost exclusively in the brain. In situ hybridisation further showed their abundance throughout the brain. The range of VIP/PACAP ligands and receptors found are highly useful, providing a glimpse into the evolutionary events both at the structural and functional levels. Though representative of ancestral forms, the VIP/PACAP ligands in particular have retained high sequence conservation indicating the importance of their functions even early in vertebrate evolution. During these nascent stages, only two VPAC receptors are likely responsible for eliciting functions before evolving later into specific subtypes post-Agnatha. We also propose VIP and PACAP's first functions to predominate in the brain, evolving alongside the central nervous system, subsequently establishing peripheral functions.

Conformational switches in the VPAC(1) receptor

The vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 1 (VPAC(1) ) belongs to family B of GPCRs and is activated upon binding of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary AC-activating polypeptide neuropeptides. Widely distributed throughout body, VPAC(1) plays important regulatory roles in human physiology and physiopathology. Like most members of the GPCR-B family, VPAC(1) receptor is predicted to follow the actual paradigm of a common 'two-domain' model of natural ligand action. However the precise structural basis for ligand binding, receptor activation and signal transduction are still incompletely understood due in part to the absence of X-ray crystal structure of the whole receptor and to significant structural differences with the most extensively studied family of receptor, the GPCR-A/rhodopsin family. Here, we try to summarize the current knowledge of the molecular mechanisms involved in VPAC(1) receptor activation and signal transduction. This includes search for amino acids involved in the two-step process of VIP binding, in the stabilization of VPAC(1) inactive and active conformations, and in binding and activation of G proteins.

Differential determinants for coupling of distinct G proteins with the class B secretin receptor

The secretin receptor is a prototypic class B G protein-coupled receptor that is activated by binding of its natural peptide ligand. The signaling effects of this receptor are mediated by coupling with Gs, which activates cAMP production, and Gq, which activates intracellular calcium mobilization. We have explored the molecular basis for the coupling of each of these G proteins to this receptor using systematic site-directed mutagenesis of key residues within each of the intracellular loop regions, and studying ligand binding and secretin-stimulated cAMP and calcium responses. Mutation of a conserved histidine in the first intracellular loop (H157A and H157R) markedly reduced cell surface expression, resulting in marked reduction in cAMP and elimination of measurable calcium responses. Mutation of an arginine (R153A) in the first intracellular loop reduced calcium, but not cAMP responses. Mutation of a dibasic motif in the second intracellular loop (R231A/K232A) had no significant effects on any measured responses. Mutations in the third intracellular loop involving adjacent lysine and leucine residues (K302A/L303A) or two arginine residues separated by a leucine and an alanine (R318A/R321A) significantly reduced cAMP responses, while the latter also reduced calcium responses. Additive effects were elicited by combining the effective mutations, while combining all the effective mutations resulted in a construct that continued to bind secretin normally, but that elicited no significant cAMP or calcium responses. These data suggest that, while some receptor determinants are clearly shared, there are also distinct determinants for coupling with each of these G proteins.

Seven transmembrane receptors as shapeshifting proteins: the impact of allosteric modulation and functional selectivity on new drug discovery

It is useful to consider seven transmembrane receptors (7TMRs) as disordered proteins able to allosterically respond to a number of binding partners. Considering 7TMRs as allosteric systems, affinity and efficacy can be thought of in terms of energy flow between a modulator, conduit (the receptor protein), and a number of guests. These guests can be other molecules, receptors, membrane-bound proteins, or signaling proteins in the cytosol. These vectorial flows of energy can yield standard canonical guest allostery (allosteric modification of drug effect), effects along the plane of the cell membrane (receptor oligomerization), or effects directed into the cytosol (differential signaling as functional selectivity). This review discusses these apparently diverse pharmacological effects in terms of molecular dynamics and protein ensemble theory, which tends to unify 7TMR behavior toward cells. Special consideration will be given to functional selectivity (biased agonism and biased antagonism) in terms of mechanism of action and potential therapeutic application. The explosion of technology that has enabled observation of diverse 7TMR behavior has also shown how drugs can have multiple (pluridimensional) efficacies and how this can cause paradoxical drug classification and nomenclatures.

Adipokines and the immune system: an adipocentric view

There is increasing evidence of close interactions between the adipose and the immune systems. Adipocytes secrete multiple factors, including adipokines such as leptin and adiponectin that have both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects, and influence diseases involving the immune system. Further, adipose tissue also secretes various chemokines and cytokines, derived from either the adipocytes themselves, or the neighbouring cells including both resident and infiltrating macrophages. This close physical and paracrine interaction results in reciprocal actions of adipocytes, preadipocytes and macrophages within the microenvironment of the adipose tissue. Adipose tissue is a source of Acylation Stimulating Protein (ASP)/C3adesArg which interacts with the receptor C5L2 to stimulate triglyceride synthesis and glucose transport. C5L2, present on adipocytes, preadipocytes, macrophages, and numerous other myeloid and non-myeloid cells is also postulated to be a decoy receptor for C5a in immune cells. Several reviews within the past year have recently examined the role of C5L2 in C5a-mediated physiology. The present mini-review is an adipocentric view with emphasis on the role of ASP and C5L2 in lipid metabolism. C5L2 may play a role in mediating, on one hand, ASP stimulation of triglyceride synthesis in adipose, and, on the other hand, a role as mediator of C5a immune function. Both roles remain controversial, and will only be resolved with further studies.

Molecular mechanisms involved in vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor activation and regulation: current knowledge, similarities to and differences from the A family of G-protein-coupled receptors

An actual paradigm for activation and regulation of the GPCR (G-protein-coupled receptors)/seven-transmembrane helix family of receptors essentially emerges from extensive studies of the largest family of receptors, the GPCR-A/rhodopsin family. The mechanisms regulating the GPCR-B family signal transduction are less precisely understood due in part to the lack of the conserved signatures of the GPCR-A family (E/DRY, NPXXY) and in part to the absence of a reliable receptor modelling, although some studies suggest that both families share similar features. Here, we try to highlight the current knowledge of the activation and the regulation of the VIP (vasoactive intestinal peptide) receptors, namely VPAC (VIP/pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide receptor) 1 and 2. This includes search for amino acids involved in the stabilization of the receptor active conformation and in coupling to G-proteins, signalling pathways activated in response to VIP, agonist-dependent receptor down-regulation, phosphorylation and internalization as well as pharmacological consequences of receptor hetero-dimerization.

Asn229 in the third helix of VPAC1 receptor is essential for receptor activation but not for receptor phosphorylation and internalization: comparison with Asn216 in VPAC2 receptor

After stimulation with agonist, G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) undergo conformational changes that allow activation of G proteins to transduce the signal, followed by phosphorylation by kinases and arrestin binding to promote receptor internalization. Actual paradigm, based on a study of GPCR-A/rhodopsin family, suggests that a network of interactions between conserved residues located in transmembrane (TM) domains (mainly TM3, TM6 and TM7) is involved in the molecular switch leading to GPCR activation. We evaluated in CHO cells expressing the VPAC(1) receptor the role of the third transmembrane helix in agonist signalling by point mutation into Ala of the residues highly conserved in the secretin-family of receptors: Y(224), N(229), F(230), W(232), E(236), G(237), Y(239), L(240). N(229)A VPAC(1) mutant was characterized by a decrease in both potency and efficacy of VIP stimulated adenylate cyclase activity, by the absence of agonist stimulated [Ca(2+)](i) increase, by a preserved receptor recognition of agonists and antagonist and by a preserved sensitivity to GTP suggesting the importance of that residue for efficient G protein activation. N(229)D mutant was not expressed at the membrane, and the N(229)Q with a conserved mutation was less affected than the A mutant. Agonist stimulated phosphorylation and internalization of N(229)A and N(229)Q VPAC(1) were unaffected. However, the re-expression of internalized mutant receptors, but not that of the wild type receptor, was rapidly reversed after VIP washing. Receptor phosphorylation, internalization and re-expression may be thus dissociated from G protein activation and linked to another active conformation that may influence its trafficking. Mutation of that conserved amino acid in VPAC(2) could be investigated only by a conservative mutation (N(216)Q) and led to a receptor with a low VIP stimulation of adenylate cyclase, receptor phosphorylation and internalization. This indicated the importance of the conserved N residue in the TM3 of that family of receptors.

C5L2 is a functional receptor for acylation-stimulating protein

C5L2 binds acylation-stimulating protein (ASP) with high affinity and is expressed in ASP-responsive cells. Functionality of C5L2 has not yet been demonstrated. Here we show that C5L2 is expressed in human subcutaneous and omental adipose tissue in both preadipocytes and adipocytes. In mice, C5L2 is expressed in all adipose tissues, at levels comparable with other tissues. Stable transfection of human C5L2 cDNA into HEK293 cells results in ASP stimulation of triglyceride synthesis (TGS) (193 +/- 33%, 5 microM ASP, p < 0.001, where basal = 100%) and glucose transport (168 +/- 21%, 10 microM ASP, p < 0.001). C3a similarly stimulates TGS (163 +/- 12%, p < 0.001), but C5a and C5a des-Arg have no effect. The ASP mechanism is to increase Vmax of glucose transport (149%) and triglyceride (TG) synthesis activity (165%) through increased diacylglycerolacyltransferase activity (200%). Antisense oligonucleotide down-regulation of C5L2 in human skin fibroblasts decreases cell surface C5L2 (down to 54 +/- 4% of control, p < 0.001, comparable with nonimmune background). ASP response is coordinately lost (basal TGS = 14.6 +/- 1.6, with ASP = 21.0 +/- 1.4 (144%), with ASP + oligonucleotides = 11.0 +/- 0.8 pmol of TG/mg of cell protein, p < 0.001). In mouse 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, antisense oligonucleotides decrease C5L2 expression to 69.5 +/- 0.5% of control, p < 0.001 (comparable with nonimmune) with a loss of ASP stimulation (basal TGS = 22.4 +/- 2.9, with ASP = 39.6 +/- 8.8 (177%), with ASP + oligonucleotides = 25.3 +/- 3.0 pmol of TG/mg of cell protein, p < 0.001). C5L2 down-regulation and decreased ASP response correlate (r = 0.761, p < 0.0001 for HSF and r = 0.451, p < 0.05 for 3T3-L1). In HEK-hC5L2 expressing fluorescently tagged beta-arrestin, ASP induced beta-arrestin translocation to the plasma membrane and formation of endocytic complexes concurrently with increased phosphorylation of C5L2. This is the first demonstration that C5L2 is a functional receptor, mediating ASP triglyceride stimulation.

Molecular determinants of glucagon receptor signaling

A 29-amino acid polypeptide hormone, glucagon has been one of the most prolific models in the study of hormone action. The key biologic function of glucagon is to counterbalance the actions of insulin and maintain a normal level of serum glucose. Diabetes mellitus can thus be considered a bihormonal disorder with an excess of glucagon contributing to the hyperglycemic state. The effects of glucagon are mediated by the glucagon receptor, which is itself a prototypical member of a distinct category called family B receptors within the G protein-coupled superfamily of seven-helical transmembrane receptors (GPCRs). At the structural level, the peptide ligands of family B receptors are highly homologous, in particular in the N-terminal region of the molecules. The mechanism by which highly homologous peptide ligands selectively recognize their receptors involves distinct molecular interactions that are gradually being elucidated. This review focuses on structural determinants of the glucagon receptor that are important for its activity with respect to interaction with its ligand and G proteins. Information about the glucagon receptor is presented within the context of what is known about other members of the family B GPCRs.