The rising incidence of second cancers: patterns of occurrence and identification of risk factors for children and adults

Body mass index and colorectal cancer screening among cancer survivors: the role of sociodemographic characteristics

We examined the association between body mass index (BMI) and guideline-concordant colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization among cancer survivors while considering the role of sociodemographic characteristics using a representative sample of the United States. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis utilizing data from the 2022 and 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Our outcome of interest was guideline-concordant CRC screening utilization and our exposure of interest was BMI. We performed weighted descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analysis to examine the mentioned associations. Among 44,244 eligible cancer survivors, those who were overweight (84%) had the greatest CRC screening use, followed by those who were obese (81.3%), and underweight/normal weight (79.2%; p values < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed those who were overweight or obese compared to underweight/normal weight had 1.2-1.3-fold increased odds of having guideline-concordant CRC screening (overweight: OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.09-1.49; obese: OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.00-1.39). Our subpopulation analyses within the levels of BMI showed that females who were overweight (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.69-1.00) and non-Hispanic other (NHO) survivors who were underweight/normal weight (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.24-0.91) were 17%-53% less likely to be screened for CRC. Our findings indicate that BMI was positively associated with guideline-concordant CRC screening use among cancer survivors. However, female survivors who were obese and NHO survivors who were underweight/normal weight were less likely to be screened for CRC. Cancer survivorship care that integrates weight management and specific sociodemographic characteristics has potential for improving CRC screening adherence.

Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research recommendations for cancer prevention in adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: results from the SURVAYA study

PURPOSE

For adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors with a good prognosis, having a healthy lifestyle prevents morbidity and mortality after treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of (un)healthy lifestyle behaviors and related determinants in AYA cancer survivors.

METHODS

A population-based, cross-sectional study was performed among long-term (5-20 years) AYA cancer survivors (18-39 years old at diagnosis) registered within the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Self-reported questionnaires data about health behaviors were used to calculate the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) adherence score. Associations between the score and clinical/sociodemographic determinants of (un)healthy behaviors were investigated using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The mean WCRF/AICR score was low to moderate, 3.8 ± 1.2 (0.5-7.0) (n = 3668). Sixty-one percent adhered to "limit the consumption of sugar sweetened drinks," 28% to "be a healthy weight," 25% to "fruit and vegetable consumption," and 31% to "limit alcohol consumption." Moderate and high adherence were associated with being a woman (ORmoderate = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.14-1.85, and ORhigh = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.46-2.4) and highly educated (ORmoderate = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.30-1.83, and ORhigh = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.46-2.4). Low adherence was associated with smoking (ORmoderate = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.50-0.92, and ORhigh = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.21-0.44) and diagnosis of germ cell tumor (ORmoderate = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.39-0.86, and ORhigh = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.30-0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to the 2018 WCRF/AICR lifestyle recommendations was low to moderate, especially regarding body weight, fruit, vegetables, and alcohol consumption. Men, current smokers, lower-educated participants, and/or those diagnosed with germ cell tumors were less likely to have a healthy lifestyle.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Health-promotion programs (e.g., age-specific tools) are needed, focusing on high-risk groups.

Chronic Conditions and Racially Biased Healthcare Experiences Impact Breast Cancer and Colorectal Cancer Screening Across Racial/Ethnic Groups

INTRODUCTION

Mammogram uptake and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening are influenced by racially biased healthcare experiences and presence of chronic conditions; moreover, there is racially/ethnically disparate uptake of each. The current study aimed to expand on extant literature by examining the association between racially biased healthcare experiences and chronic conditions across three racial/ethnic groups.

METHODS

We conducted weighted multivariable logistic regressions to examine the interaction between chronic conditions (none, cancer, other chronic conditions) and racially biased healthcare experiences (none, better, worse, other) on mammogram and CRC screening adherence across three racial/ethnic groups (non-Hispanic White [NHW], non-Hispanic Black [NHB], Hispanic/non-Hispanic Other [NHO]) using 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data.

RESULTS

Among 42,053 and 86,033 eligible respondents for mammogram and CRC screening, most respondents had an up-to-date mammogram (77.4%) or CRC test (67.0%). In adjusted analysis, Hispanic/NHO respondents with conditions other than cancer and felt they were treated worse than other races while seeking healthcare had a decreased odds of having an up-to-date mammogram (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09-0.46). NHW respondents with cancer who felt they were treated better than other races while seeking healthcare had increased odds of having an up-to-date mammogram (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.11-2.60). All significant associations (i.e., p < 0.05) between chronic conditions and CRC screening were positive, regardless of treatment while seeking healthcare across racial/ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Culturally sensitive interventions aimed at improving patient-centered communication may improve mammogram and CRC screening adherence, particularly for racially/ethnically minoritized groups.

The Application of Glycolipid-Type Microbial Biosurfactants as Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients for the Treatment and Prevention of Cancer

Pharmaceutical scientists have researched the potential of secondary metabolites biosynthesized by microorganisms as active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) for the treatment of cancer. Ideally, these APIs should possess anticancer bioactivity that specifically targets tumor cells while having little cytotoxic effect on healthy tissue. Biosurfactants are microbial secondary metabolites with surface-active properties and individual bioactivities that have the potential to either destroy cancer cells in a targeted fashion or prevent tumor cell formation. Currently, the best-studied class of microbial biosurfactants for the purpose of anticancer bioactivity is glycolipids, which contain a hydrophilic sugar moiety bonded to a hydrophobic fatty acid. Anticancer investigations are mainly carried out using in vitro models that show that compounds belonging to each of the four sub-classes of microbial glycolipid have significant anticancer bioactivity. The targeted action of this activity appears to be highly dependent on a specific congener molecular structure with nuanced alterations in structure leading to the killing of both tumor and healthy cells. This review compiles the current literature relating to glycolipid anticancer activity and provides a critical appraisal of exploiting the bioactivity of these compounds as novel anticancer agents. Finally, we propose several suggestions on how this research could be improved moving forward via method standardization.

Improving organ dose sparing in left-sided breast cancer with yaw-limited volumetric modulated arc therapy: A dosimetric comparison to conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy approaches

BACKGROUND

To assess the dose-sparing capabilities of a yaw-limited volumetric modulated arc therapy (YL_VMAT) beam setup for adjacent organs at risk (OAR) in comparison with 3D-conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and conventional VMAT for radiation therapy in left-sided breast cancer patients.

METHODS

In total, 80 treatment plans for 20 patients, of which 10 patients underwent CT-scans in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and 10 patients in free-breathing (FB) technique. Besides generally tangential-weighted static and IMRT beams, VMAT treatment plans with approximately 270° arc length have been compared and analyzed to a multi-field, yaw-adapted, unconventional partial VMAT technique retrospectively. The prescription dose was set to 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions.

RESULTS

We achieved a more pronounced steeper dose falloff directed from the thoracic wall to the adjacent lung tissue resulting in a significantly better ipsilateral lung and considerably cardiac dose sparing using the YL_VMAT method in general. Compared with standard techniques (IMRT, VMAT, 3D-CRT), YL-VMAT in combination with DIBH can achieve lower mean doses for the heart (1.05 Gy vs. 1.73 Gy, 2.16 Gy and 1.44 Gy), the left anterior descending (LAD) artery (3.68 Gy vs. 6.53 Gy, 5.13 Gy and 8.64 Gy) and the left lung (3.59 Gy vs. 5.39 Gy, 4.79 Gy and 5.87 Gy), respectively. Also with FB, the corresponding mean doses for the left lung and cardiac structures were lower with the YL-VMAT method than with IMRT (heart: 1.70 Gy vs. 2.44 Gy; LAD: 6.50 Gy vs. 11.97 Gy; left lung: 3.10 Gy vs. 4.72 Gy), VMAT (heart: 1.70 Gy vs. 2.52 Gy; LAD: 6.50 Gy vs. 9.06 Gy; left lung: 3.10 Gy vs. 4.46 Gy) and 3D-CRT (heart: 1.70 Gy vs. 2.78 Gy; LAD: 6.50 Gy vs. 15.09 Gy; left lung: 3.10 Gy vs. 5.77 Gy). In addition, we found out superiority of YL_VMAT for the V5, V10, and V20 Gy to the left lung. For DIBH and FB, all differences for the left lung were significant, with p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

With the YL_VMAT technique, dose exposures to radiosensitive OARs like the lung, heart and LAD artery can be reduced considerably to very low values in comparison to already established planning methods. The benefits must be weighed against the potential risks induced by an increased dose exposure to the contralateral breast.

Defining a 'cells to society' research framework for appendiceal tumours

Tumours of the appendix - a vestigial digestive organ attached to the colon - are rare. Although we estimate that around 3,000 new appendiceal cancer cases are diagnosed annually in the USA, the challenges of accurately diagnosing and identifying this tumour type suggest that this number may underestimate true population incidence. In the current absence of disease-specific screening and diagnostic imaging modalities, or well-established risk factors, the incidental discovery of appendix tumours is often prompted by acute presentations mimicking appendicitis or when the tumour has already spread into the abdominal cavity - wherein the potential misclassification of appendiceal tumours as malignancies of the colon and ovaries also increases. Notwithstanding these diagnostic difficulties, our understanding of appendix carcinogenesis has advanced in recent years. However, there persist considerable challenges to accelerating the pace of research discoveries towards the path to improved treatments and cures for patients with this group of orphan malignancies. The premise of this Expert Recommendation article is to discuss the current state of the field, to delineate unique challenges for the study of appendiceal tumours, and to propose key priority research areas that will deliver a more complete picture of appendix carcinogenesis and metastasis. The Appendix Cancer Pseudomyxoma Peritonei (ACPMP) Research Foundation Scientific Think Tank delivered a consensus of core research priorities for appendiceal tumours that are poised to be ground-breaking and transformative for scientific discovery and innovation. On the basis of these six research areas, here, we define the first 'cells to society' research framework for appendix tumours.

Long-term safety of lentiviral or gammaretroviral gene-modified T cell therapies

Long-term risks of gene therapy are not fully understood. In this study, we evaluated safety outcomes in 783 patients over more than 2,200 total patient-years of observation from 38 T cell therapy trials. The trials employed integrating gammaretroviral or lentiviral vectors to deliver engineered receptors to target HIV-1 infection or cancer. Eighteen patients (2.3%) developed secondary malignancies after treatment, with a median onset of 1.94 years (range: 51 d to 14 years). Where possible, incident tumor samples were analyzed for vector copy number, revealing no evidence of high-level marking or other indications of insertional mutagenesis. One T cell lymphoma was detected, but malignant T cells were not marked by vector integration. Analysis of vector integration sites in 176 patients revealed no pathological insertions linked to secondary malignancies, although, in some cases, integration in or near specific genes, including tumor suppressor genes, was associated with modest clonal expansion and sustained T cell persistence. These findings highlight the safety of engineered T cell therapies.

T-cell neoplasias and secondary malignancies after CAR-T cell therapy: current knowledge, risk factors, and implications from CAR-T engineering strategies

Widespread use of CAR-T cell therapies for treatment of B cell malignancies has resulted in a frameshift in treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes since the first CAR-T product was FDA approved in 2017. Currently over 30,000 patients have been treated with approved CAR-T cell products, with many more likely to be treated in future, both as standard of care therapy as well as on clinical trials. As more patients are treated, development of rare complications has begun to emerge, and the incidence of second primary malignancies after CAR-T cell therapy is evolving from a hypothetical to a realized concern. Furthermore, in November 2023, the FDA issued a warning regarding the potential for CAR-T cell-derived T cell neoplasias to arise as a result of CAR-T manufacturing. Here we review patient risk factors for development of second primary malignancies including T cell neoplasias, CAR-T engineering strategies that may increase this risk, and the current body of literature surrounding incidence of second primary malignancies and case reports of T cell neoplasias arising after CAR-T cell therapy.

Thyroid Cancer in Childhood Cancer Survivors: Demographic, Clinical, Germline Genetic Characteristics, Treatment, and Outcome

Objective: Childhood cancer survival rates have improved, but survivors face an increased risk of second malignant neoplasms (SMNs), particularly thyroid cancer. This study examines the demographic, clinical, genetic, and treatment characteristics of childhood cancer survivors who developed thyroid cancer as a second or third malignancy, emphasizing the importance of long-term surveillance. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for childhood cancer survivors treated between 1990 and 2018 who later developed thyroid cancer as a second or third malignancy. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed. Results: Among the 3204 childhood cancer survivors, 10 patients (6 female, 4 male) developed papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), a median of 9 years post-initial diagnosis. Radiation therapy, particularly to the head and neck, was commonly used. Genetic testing revealed mutations in the Cell Cycle CheckPoint Kinase 2 (CHEK2) and Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) genes in four patients, possibly contributing to the increased risk. All were diagnosed through thyroid ultrasound and underwent total thyroidectomy, and three received radioactive iodine (RAI). No recurrences or deaths related to PTC occurred, with a median follow-up of 5.5 years after diagnosis. Conclusions: Radiation therapy, especially combined with chemotherapy, significantly increases the risk of thyroid cancer in childhood cancer survivors. Genetic predispositions also play a role. Lifelong thyroid cancer surveillance is essential, particularly for those who received radiation or chemotherapy. Further research is needed to refine surveillance strategies and better understand genetic factors that influence thyroid cancer risk. Early detection and ongoing monitoring are critical for improving long-term outcomes.

Socioeconomic determinants of cancer screening adherence among cancer survivors: analysis from the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

BACKGROUND

Factors associated with cancer survivors' preventive health behaviors are understudied. We hypothesized that socioeconomic and health-care access factors may be associated with adherence to recommended cancer screenings.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Cancer survivors eligible for United States Preventive Services Task Force-recommended breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal screenings were included. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify socioeconomic factors significantly associated with screening adherence.

RESULTS

Overall, 64 958 (weighted national estimate = 29 066 143) cancer survivors were included. Adherence rates varied across cancer types: 80.9% for breast, 88.9% for cervical, 54.1% for prostate, and 84.7% for colorectal cancer. Key predictors of low adherence included lower income (breast: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.43 to 0.74; cervical: aOR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.59; prostate: aOR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.52; colorectal: aOR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.96), lack of health-care coverage for colorectal cancer (aOR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.73), time since last checkup between 1 and 2 years prior for breast (aOR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.75), prostate (aOR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.91), and colorectal (aOR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.86) cancer, and no health-care provider for breast (aOR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.98), prostate (aOR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.31 to 0.65), and colorectal (aOR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.66) cancer.

CONCLUSION

Cancer survivors' adherence to screening is associated with factors including lack of health-care coverage, lower income, time since the last exam, and having a personal provider. Targeted interventions accounting for such factors may help mitigate these disparities.

Identifying Subsets of Cancer Patients with an Increased Risk of Developing Cutaneous Melanoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Based Analysis

Cancer survivors have an increased risk of developing second primary malignancies. We aimed to identify whether certain cancers lead to an increased risk of developing melanoma among cancer survivors. We evaluated the risk of developing cutaneous melanoma after the 20 most common cancers in the United States through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. We identified 9 primary cancers linked to increased risk of developing a subsequent cutaneous melanoma: cutaneous melanoma (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] = 9.65), leukemia (SIR = 1.76), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (SIR = 1.33), thyroid cancer (SIR = 1.32), brain and nervous system cancer (SIR = 1.31), myeloma (SIR = 1.23), breast cancer (SIR = 1.13), oral cavity/pharynx cancer (SIR= 1.12), and prostate cancer (SIR = 1.03). The risk of developing melanoma was highest 1-5 years after diagnosis of most primary cancers. Notably, individuals aged under 50 years with a prior melanoma had a 14-fold increased risk. Our findings highlight specific at-risk groups-such as those aged under 50 years with recent melanoma, individuals in their 60s diagnosed with leukemia, and those aged over 80 years with recent thyroid cancer-who may benefit from heightened clinical vigilance and tailored melanoma screening strategies.

Risk factors for second primary cancer in a prospective cohort of endometrial cancer survivors: an Alberta Endometrial Cancer Cohort Study

We examined associations between modifiable and nonmodifiable cancer-related risk factors measured at endometrial cancer diagnosis and during early survivorship (~3 years postdiagnosis) with second primary cancer (SPC) risk among 533 endometrial cancer survivors in the Alberta Endometrial Cancer Cohort using Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models. During a median follow-up of 16.7 years (IQR, 12.2-17.9), 89 (17%) participants developed an SPC; breast (29%), colorectal (13%), and lung (12%) cancers were the most common. Dietary glycemic load before endometrial cancer diagnosis (≥90.4 vs < 90.4 g/day: subhazard ratio [sHR] = 1.71; 95% CI, 1.09-2.69), as well as older age (≥60 vs < 60 years: sHR = 2.48; 95% CI, 1.34-4.62) and alcohol intake (≥2 drinks/week vs none: sHR = 3.81; 95% CI, 1.55-9.31) during early survivorship, were associated with increased SPC risk. Additionally, reductions in alcohol consumption from prediagnosis to early survivorship significantly reduced SPC risk (sHR = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.14-0.82). With 1 in 6 survivors developing an SPC, further investigation of SPC risk factors and targeted surveillance options for high-risk survivors could improve long-term health outcomes in this population. Reductions in dietary glycemic load and alcohol intake from prediagnosis to early survivorship showed promising risk reductions for SPCs and could be important modifiable risk factors to target among endometrial cancer survivors. This article is part of a Special Collection on Gynecological Cancer.

Risk of second primary cancers in nodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients by primary lymph node location: a retrospective cohort population-based study

Background

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a diverse group of blood cancers with increasing incidence and survival rates due to advancements in treatment and early detection. However, NHL survivors are at significant risk of developing second primary cancers, which can adversely impact their long-term survival.

Methods

This retrospective population-based cohort study utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, covering 17 geographic areas in the United States from 2000 to 2021. The authors included patients diagnosed with nodal NHL as a first primary cancer and excluded those diagnosed at autopsy or via death certificate only. Standardized Incidence Ratios, Absolute Excess Risks, and Person-Years at Risk were calculated to evaluate the risk of developing SPCs according to the primary lymph node site and stratified by latency periods following the initial NHL diagnosis.

Results

The cohort included 54 012 NHL patients. The authors' results showed that for most SPCs, the risk of development was different for different primary NHL lymph node locations. The highest risks were observed for thyroid cancer, acute myeloid leukemia, and Hodgkin lymphoma. Notably, the risk for thyroid cancer was highest in the first year post-diagnosis, while hematological malignancies such as acute myeloid leukemia and Hodgkin lymphoma showed elevated risks in the intermediate and late latency periods.

Conclusion

NHL survivors are at an increased risk of developing SPCs, influenced by the primary lymph node site and latency period. These findings highlight the need for tailored surveillance strategies and preventive measures to mitigate the long-term risks of SPCs in NHL survivors. Further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and to develop targeted interventions for this high-risk population.

Second Primary Lung Cancer - An Emerging Issue in Lung Cancer Survivors

As a result of an increased focus on early detection including lung cancer screening, combined with more curative treatment options, the 5-year survival rates for lung cancer are improving. Welcome though this is, it brings new, hitherto unseen challenges. As more patients are cured and survive longer, they are at risk of developing second primary cancers, particularly lung cancer. In this review, we examine the challenges that surveillance, diagnosis, and management of second primary lung cancer (SPLC) bring and how these can be addressed. Recent data from prospective follow-up studies suggests that the incidence of SPLC may be higher than previously appreciated, partly due to an increase in multi-focal adenocarcinoma spectrum disease. Over 5 years, up to 1 in 6 long-term lung cancer survivors may develop a SPLC. Although not routinely used in clinical practice at present, genomic approaches for differentiating SPLC from intrapulmonary metastases of the first primary are emerging, and we highlight how this could be used to help differentiate lesions. An accurate distinction between SPLC and the recurrence of the first primary is of paramount importance due to the very different management strategies that may be required. Wrongly classifying an SPLC as a recurrence of the first primary may have significant consequences for patient management and overall survival. Updated approaches to the classification of SPLC combining clinical history, histopathological assessment, and genomic profiling are needed. Finally, we review the potential role of early detection biomarkers in the identification of SPLC, focusing in particular on blood-based biomarkers that are being examined in a multi-center prospective study recruiting lung cancer survivors.

Excess Body Weight and the Risk of Second Primary Cancers Among Cancer Survivors

Importance

Little is known about the causes of second primary cancers among individuals with a history of cancer. Descriptive studies have suggested that lifestyle factors, including excess body weight, may be important.

Objective

To investigate whether excess body weight is associated with the risk of a second primary malignant neoplasm among cancer survivors.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study of adults in 21 states in the US used data from the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition cohort, a large prospective study that invited participants to respond to a survey in 1992 and biennial surveys starting in 1997, and who were followed-up through 2017. Eligible participants included those who received a diagnosis of a first primary nonmetastatic invasive cancer between 1992 and 2015. Data analysis occurred from September 2023 to March 2024.

Exposure

Body mass index (BMI), computed from self-reported height and weight at the time of the first primary cancer diagnosis (mean [SD] years to diagnosis, 1.7 [1.5] years).

Main Outcome and Measures

Main outcomes included a second primary cancer or an obesity-related second cancer. Cancer diagnoses were reported on biennial surveys and verified through medical record abstraction or linkage with state cancer registries.

Results

This cohort included 26 894 participants who received a diagnosis of a first nonmetastatic primary cancer (mean [SD] age at first cancer diagnosis, 72.2 [6.5] years; 15 920 male [59.2%]). At the time of first diagnosis, 11 497 participants (42.8%) had overweight and 4684 (17.2%) had obesity. During a median (IQR) follow-up time of 7.9 (3.4-13.6) years, 3749 (13.9%) participants received a diagnosis of a second primary cancer, of which 1243 (33.2%) were obesity-related second primary cancers. Compared with cancer survivors whose BMI was in the normal range (18.5 to <25), there was 15% increased risk of any second primary cancer for those who had overweight (25 to <30; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.25) and a 34% increased risk for those who had obesity (BMI ≥30; aHR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.21-1.48), with greater risk for obesity-related second primary cancers, including a 40% increased risk for those with overweight (aHR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.22,-1.61) and a 78% increased risk for those with obesity (aHR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.51-2.11).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of older survivors of nonmetastatic cancer, those who had overweight or obesity at the time of their first cancer diagnosis were at higher risk of developing a second cancer, especially an obesity-related second cancer. Given the high prevalence of overweight and obesity among cancer survivors, it is important to promote survivorship care guidelines recommending weight management and increase awareness of second cancers among physicians and cancer survivors.

Shorter long-term post-transplant life expectancy may be due to prior chemotherapy for the underlying disease: analysis of 3012 patients with acute myeloid leukemia enrolled on 9 consecutive ECOG-ACRIN trials

Several studies reported that patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who remain in long-term remission after allogeneic or autologous transplant have a shorter life expectancy, compared to the general population. However, little is known about the life expectancy of adult long-term survivors of AML who were treated with chemotherapy alone without a transplant and there have been no comparisons with survival among the general population. The current study indicates that the life expectancy of AML patients who achieved and maintained CR for at least 3 years is shorter than expected for age in the US population. This was observed also in patients who did not undergo a transplant including those who have not relapsed during the entire long follow-up period. Thus, late relapse does not explain why patients without transplants have a shortened life expectancy. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that prior chemotherapy for the underlying AML is at least a major contributing factor for the known shortened life expectancy post-transplant.

The Prognostic Implications of Synchronous Cancers in Breast Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine the prognostic value of synchronous cancer diagnosis following an initial diagnosis of breast cancer, with a focus on site-specific survival rates and the correlation between primary breast cancer and secondary cancers.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated at Saint Nicholas Hospital in Pitesti, Romania, from January 2016 to January 2024. The inclusion criteria were a confirmed diagnosis of primary breast cancer and a secondary synchronous cancer diagnosed within two months. Data collection included demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics, as well as treatment details and follow-up outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA), employing Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Cox regression models, and other relevant statistical tests.

RESULTS

Out of 73 initially identified patients, 49 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 59.6 years, with most patients being postmenopausal. Synchronous cancers were primarily contralateral breast cancer (44.9%) and female genital organ cancer (12.24%). Patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer had significantly better overall survival (33 months) compared to those with other synchronous cancers (23.5 months). Multivariate analysis indicated that synchronous non-breast cancers were associated with a higher risk of death (hazard ratio (HR)=1.6, 95% CI: 1.22-2.10, p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

Synchronous cancer diagnosis following an initial breast cancer diagnosis significantly impacts prognosis, with synchronous bilateral breast cancer associated with better survival outcomes compared to other synchronous cancers. These findings underscore the importance of vigilant screening and personalized treatment strategies for patients with synchronous malignancies.

The role of a social determinants of health summary measure on the association between cancer history status and colorectal cancer screening utilization among screening eligible adults

Objective

We sought to examine the influence of social needs on the relationship between cancer history and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization among adults in the United States.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Our outcome of interest was utilization of guideline-concordant CRC screening and exposures of interest were cancer history/levels of social needs. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the association.

Results

Among 74,743 eligible adults, a majority did not have a personal history of cancer (87.9 %), had at least one social need (58.4 %), and had undergone CRC screening (72.2 %). In multivariable analysis, a history of cancer was positively associated with use of CRC screening (OR = 1.59, 95 %CI, 1.35 - 1.87). Having at least one social need was associated with lower likelihood of being screened (one social need: OR = 0.85 95 %CI, 0.76 - 0.95; two + social needs: OR = 0.77, 95 % CI, 0.69 - 0.87). When exploring the effects of social needs, adults without a history of cancer who reported at least one need were 12-20 % less likely to be screened for CRC.

Conclusions

A personal history of cancer was associated with greater utilization of CRC screening, whilst having at least one social need had lower screening use. Having social needs plays an important role in reducing screening uptake among adults without a history of cancer. Integrated care that considers both cancer history and social needs may have implications for improved adherence of CRC screening recommendations.

Cumulative incidence estimates for solid tumors after HCT in the CIBMTR and California Cancer Registry

ABSTRACT

Compared with the general population, hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) survivors are at elevated risk for developing solid subsequent neoplasms (SNs). The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) is a key resource for quantifying solid SN incidence following HCT, but the completeness of SN ascertainment is uncertain. Within a cohort of 18 450 CIBMTR patients linked to the California Cancer Registry (CCR), we evaluated the completeness of solid SN data reported to the CIBMTR from 1991 to 2018 to understand the implications of using CIBMTR data alone or combined with CCR data to quantify the burden of solid SNs after HCT. We estimated the cumulative incidence of developing a solid SN, accounting for the competing risk of death. Within the cohort, solid SNs were reported among 724 patients; 15.6% of these patients had an SN reported by CIBMTR only, 36.9% by CCR only, and 47.5% by both. The corresponding cumulative incidence of developing a solid SN at 10 years following a first HCT was 4.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-4.4) according to CIBMTR data only, 5.3% (95% CI, 4.9-5.9) according to CCR data only, and 6.3% (95% CI, 5.7-6.8) according to both sources combined. The patterns were similar for allogeneic and autologous HCT recipients. Linking detailed HCT information from CIBMTR with comprehensive SN data from cancer registries provides an opportunity to optimize SN ascertainment for informing follow-up care practices and evaluating risk factors in the growing population of HCT survivors.

The whole transcriptome analysis using FFPE and fresh tissue samples identifies the molecular fingerprint of osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is a form of bone cancer that predominantly impacts osteoblasts, the cells responsible for creating fresh bone tissue. Typical indications include bone pain, inflammation, sensitivity, mobility constraints, and fractures. Utilising imaging techniques such as X-rays, MRI scans, and CT scans can provide insights into the size and location of the tumour. Additionally, a biopsy is employed to confirm the diagnosis. Analysing genes with distinct expression patterns unique to osteosarcoma can be valuable for early detection and the development of effective treatment approaches. In this research, we comprehensively examined the entire transcriptome and pinpointed genes with altered expression profiles specific to osteosarcoma. The study mainly aimed to identify the molecular fingerprint of osteosarcoma. In this study, we processed 90 FFPE samples from PathWest with an almost equal number of osteosarcoma and healthy tissues. RNA was extracted from Paraffin-embedded tissue; RNA was sequenced, the sequencing data was analysed, and gene expression was compared to the healthy samples of the same patients. Differentially expressed genes in osteosarcoma-derived samples were identified, and the functions of those genes were explored. This result was combined with our previous studies based on FFPE and fresh samples to perform a meta-analysis. We identified 1,500 identical differentially expressed genes in PathWest osteosarcoma samples compared to normal tissue samples of the same patients. Meta-analysis with combined fresh tissue samples identified 530 differentially expressed genes. IFITM5, MMP13, PANX3, and MAGEA6 were some of the most overexpressed genes in osteosarcoma samples, while SLC4A1, HBA1, HBB, AQP7 genes were some of the top downregulated genes. Through the meta-analysis, 530 differentially expressed genes were identified to be identical among FFPE (105 FFPE samples) and 36 fresh bone samples. Deconvolution analysis with single-cell RNAseq data confirmed the presence of specific cell clusters in FFPE samples. We propose these 530 DEGs as a molecular fingerprint of osteosarcoma.

Challenges in the management of operable triple-negative breast cancer in a survivor of the B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a case report

Background

Operable triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an unfavorable subtype of breast cancer, which usually requires an aggressive perioperative systemic treatment. When TNBC presents as a second primary cancer after cured acute leukemia, its management might be challenging.

Case presentation

We present a case report of a young postmenopausal woman with an operable TNBC who had a history of the B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and graft versus host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). A history of previous treatment with anthracyclines and radiotherapy and GVHD limited the use of doxorubicin for treatment of her TNBC. Due to the history of GVHD, perioperative treatment with pembrolizumab was omitted. Genetic testing was challenging due to the possible contamination of her tissues with the donor's cells after allo-SCT. In samples of our patient's buccal swab, peripheral blood, and tumor tissue, a pathogenic variant in the partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) gene was found. With neoadjuvant chemotherapy which included carboplatin, a pathologic complete response was achieved. Although our patient has a low risk for recurrence of TNBC, her risk for the development of new primary cancers remains substantial.

Conclusion

This case highlights challenges in the systemic treatment, genetic testing, and follow-up of patients with operable TNBC and other solid cancers who have a history of acute leukemia.

Risk of Subsequent Primary Cancers Among Adult-Onset 5-Year Cancer Survivors in South Korea: Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The number of cancer survivors who develop subsequent primary cancers (SPCs) is expected to increase.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the overall and cancer type-specific risks of SPCs among adult-onset cancer survivors by first primary cancer (FPC) types considering sex and age.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment database of South Korea including 5-year cancer survivors diagnosed with an FPC in 2009 to 2010 and followed them until December 31, 2019. We measured the SPC incidence per 10,000 person-years and the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) compared with the incidence expected in the general population.

RESULTS

Among 266,241 survivors (mean age at FPC: 55.7 years; 149,352/266,241, 56.1% women), 7348 SPCs occurred during 1,003,008 person-years of follow-up (median 4.3 years), representing a 26% lower risk of developing SPCs (SIR 0.74, 95% CI 0.72-0.76). Overall, men with 14 of the 20 FPC types had a significantly lower risk of developing any SPCs; women with 7 of the 21 FPC types had a significantly lower risk of developing any SPCs. The risk of developing any SPC type differed by age; the risk was 28% higher in young (<40 years) cancer survivors (SIR 1.28, 95% CI 1.16-1.42; incidence: 30 per 10,000 person-years) and 27% lower in middle-aged and older (≥40 years) cancer survivors (SIR 0.73, 95% CI 0.71-0.74; incidence: 80 per 10,000 person-years) compared with the age-corresponding general population. The most common types of FPCs were mainly observed as SPCs in cancer survivors, with lung (21.6%) and prostate (15.2%) cancers in men and breast (18.9%) and lung (12.2%) cancers in women. The risks of brain cancer in colorectal cancer survivors, lung cancer in laryngeal cancer survivors, and both kidney cancer and leukemia in thyroid cancer survivors were significantly higher for both sexes. Other high-risk SPCs varied by FPC type and sex. Strong positive associations among smoking-related cancers, such as laryngeal, head and neck, lung, and esophageal cancers, were observed. Substantial variation existed in the associations between specific types of FPC and specific types of SPC risk, which may be linked to hereditary cancer syndrome: for women, the risks of ovarian cancer for breast cancer survivors and uterus cancers for colorectal cancer survivors, and for men, the risk of pancreas cancer for kidney cancer survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

The varying risk for SPCs by age, sex, and FPC types in cancer survivors implies the necessity for tailored prevention and screening programs targeting cancer survivors. Lifestyle modifications, such as smoking cessation, are essential to reduce the risk of SPCs in cancer survivors. In addition, genetic testing, along with proactive cancer screening and prevention strategies, should be implemented for young cancer survivors because of their elevated risk of developing SPCs.

Prevalence of neoplasia at colonoscopy among testicular cancer survivors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

Testicular cancer survivors (TCS) treated with platinum-based chemotherapy have an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We determined the yield of colonoscopy in TCS to assess its potential in reducing CRC incidence and mortality. We conducted a colonoscopy screening study among TCS in four Dutch hospitals to assess the yield of colorectal neoplasia. Neoplasia was defined as adenomas, serrated polyps (SPs), advanced adenomas (AAs: ≥10 mm diameter, high-grade dysplasia or ≥25% villous component), advanced serrated polyps (ASPs: ≥10 mm diameter or dysplasia) or CRC. Advanced neoplasia (AN) was defined as AA, ASP or CRC. Colonoscopy yield was compared to average-risk American males who underwent screening colonoscopy (n = 24,193) using a propensity score matched analysis, adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption and body mass index. A total of 137 TCS underwent colonoscopy. Median age was 50 years among TCS (IQR 43-57) vs 55 years (IQR 51-62) among American controls. A total of 126 TCS were matched to 602 controls. The prevalence of AN was higher in TCS than in controls (8.7% vs 1.7%; P = .0002). Nonadvanced adenomas and SPs were detected in 45.2% of TCS vs 5.5% of controls (P < .0001). No lesions were detected in 46.0% of TCS vs 92.9% of controls (P < .0001). TCS treated with platinum-based chemotherapy have a higher prevalence of neoplasia and AN than matched controls. These results support our hypothesis that platinum-based chemotherapy increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia in TCS. Cost-effectiveness studies are warranted to ascertain the threshold of AN prevalence that justifies the recommendation of colonoscopy for TCS.

Secondary neoplasm to non-hodgkin lymphoma treatment manifesting as a cancer of unknown primary: the first case in literature

Introduction

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a tumour metastasis with no detectable primary origin. A secondary neoplasm (SN) is defined as a tumour secondary to a prior tumour treatment and has no histological relation to that primary tumour.

Case presentation

The authors report a case of a 72-year-old female patient who presented with back pain and had a history of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) treated with RCHOP 12 years ago. MRI showed a compression fracture in T5 and T7 vertebrae, while the PET/computed tomography (CT) only showed hypermetabolic lytic bone lesions in these vertebrae. Pathological examination of a biopsy of these lesions suggested metastatic breast cancer, but the mammography was normal. The above clinical description indicates that our case is a SN to RCHOP treatment manifested as a cancer of unknown origin.

Discussion

CUP is diagnosed when all screening procedures fail to find the original tumour. On the other hand, the literature showed that RCHOP treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma has a 0.68% chance of causing a SN. After an extensive literature search, we found that our case, which has the combination of both CUP and SN, is the first documented case.

Conclusion

This case suggests that cancer patients who received chemical or radiological treatment should be screened more carefully on the long term as it is possible to developed secondary neoplasms without a primary tumour in areas difficult to diagnose with traditional screening tools.

Causes of death among people living with metastatic cancer

Studying survivorship and causes of death in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer remains an important task. We characterize the causes of death among patients with metastatic cancer, across 13 cancer types and 25 non-cancer causes and predict the risk of death after diagnosis from the diagnosed cancer versus other causes (e.g., stroke, heart disease, etc.). Among 1,030,937 US (1992-2019) metastatic cancer survivors, 82.6% of patients (n = 688,529) died due to the diagnosed cancer, while 17.4% (n = 145,006) died of competing causes. Patients with lung, pancreas, esophagus, and stomach tumors are the most likely to die of their metastatic cancer, while those with prostate and breast cancer have the lowest likelihood. The median survival time among patients living with metastases is 10 months; our Fine and Gray competing risk model predicts 1 year survival with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.754 (95% CI [0.754, 0.754]). Leading non-cancer deaths are heart disease (32.4%), chronic obstructive and pulmonary disease (7.9%), cerebrovascular disease (6.1%), and infection (4.1%).

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of second neoplasms in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: the PETHEMA-PALG experience

The most important challenges in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is preventing early death and reducing long-term events, such as second neoplasms (s-NPLs). We performed a retrospective analysis of 2670 unselected APL patients, treated with PETHEMA "chemotherapy based" and "chemotherapy free" protocols. Only de novo APL patients who achieved complete remission (CR) and completed the three consolidation cycles were enrolled into the analysis. Out of 2670 APL patients, there were 118 (4.4%) who developed s-NPLs with the median latency period (between first CR and diagnosis of s-NPL) of 48.0 months (range 2.8-231.1): 43.3 (range: 2.8-113.9) for s-MDS/AML and 61.7 (range: 7.1-231.1) for solid tumour. The 5-year CI of all s-NPLs was of 4.43% and 10 years of 7.92%. Among s-NPLs, there were 58 cases of s-MDS/AML, 3 cases of other hematological neoplasms, 57 solid tumours and 1 non-identified neoplasm. The most frequent solid tumour was colorectal, lung and breast cancer. Overall, the 2-year OS from diagnosis of s-NPLs was 40.6%, with a median OS of 11.1 months. Multivariate analysis identified age of 35 years (hazard ratio = 0.2584; p < 0.0001) as an independent prognostic factor for s-NPLs. There were no significant differences in CI of s-NPLs at 5 years between chemotherapy-based vs chemotherapy-free regimens (hazard ratio = 1.09; p = 0.932). Larger series with longer follow-up are required to confirm the potential impact of ATO+ATRA regimens to reduce the incidence of s-NPLs after front-line therapy for APL.

Impact of prior cancer history on survival in brain malignancy: A propensity score-adjusted, population-based study

BACKGROUND

Individuals with a Prior Cancer History (PCH) are often excluded from clinical trials. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that prior cancer history does not present adverse outcomes on cancer patients. The evidence on the survival of brain cancer patients in this regard remains widely unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to estimate the prevalence and impact of prior cancer on survival of patients diagnosed with brain cancer. Data of patients who were diagnosed with brain cancer as their first or second primary malignancy between 2000 and 2019 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to ensure comparable baseline characteristics among the patients. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, as well as multivariate Cox proportional hazard and multivariate competing risk models.

RESULTS

Out of 42 726 patients, 1189 (2.78%) had PCH. Genitourinary (40.4%), Breast (13.6%), Hematologic and Lymphatic (11.4%), and Gastrointestinal malignancies (11.3%) were the most common types of prior cancer. PCH served as a significant risk factor for Overall Survival (OS) (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [AHR] 1.26; 95% CI [1.15-1.39]; p < .001) but did not have a statistically significant impact on Brain Cancer-Specific Survival (BCSS) (AHR 0.97; 95% CI [0.88-1.07]; p = .54). Glioblastoma exhibited the most substantial and statistically significant impact on survival as compared to other histological types. Of all the organs systems, only prior Gastrointestinal and Hematologic and Lymphatic malignancies had a statistically significant impact on OS of patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that PCH does not exert a substantial impact on the survival of brain cancer patients, except in cases involving gastrointestinal or hematologic and lymphatic PCH, or when the brain cancer is glioblastoma.

Senolytic treatment alleviates doxorubicin-induced chemobrain

Doxorubicin (Dox), a widely used treatment for cancer, can result in chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairments (chemobrain). Chemobrain is associated with inflammation and oxidative stress similar to aging. As such, Dox treatment has also been used as a model of aging. However, it is unclear if Dox induces brain changes similar to that observed during aging since Dox does not readily enter the brain. Rather, the mechanism for chemobrain likely involves the induction of peripheral cellular senescence and the release of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) factors and these SASP factors can enter the brain to disrupt cognition. We examined the effect of Dox on peripheral and brain markers of aging and cognition. In addition, we employed the senolytic, ABT-263, which also has limited access to the brain. The results indicate that plasma SASP factors enter the brain, activating microglia, increasing oxidative stress, and altering gene transcription. In turn, the synaptic function required for memory was reduced in response to altered redox signaling. ABT-263 prevented or limited most of the Dox-induced effects. The results emphasize a link between cognitive decline and the release of SASP factors from peripheral senescent cells and indicate some differences as well as similarities between advanced age and Dox treatment.

Health-Related Complications during Follow-Up and Their Impact on Blood Cancer Survivors: Results from the "Aftercare in Blood Cancer Survivors" (ABC) Study

INTRODUCTION

Blood cancer survivors are at increased risk for medical complications.

METHODS

Our questionnaire-based study involved 1,551 blood cancer survivors with a ≥3-year interval since the last intense treatment. Its goal was to quantify health-related complications during follow-up and assess their impact on the patients' lives.

RESULTS

A total of 20.4% of the responding survivors reported a disease relapse, most often in indolent lymphomas. Second primary malignancies occurred in 14.1%, primarily in lymphoma and allogeneic transplantation survivors. The most frequent malignancy was basal cell carcinoma of the skin, but myeloid malignancies, melanoma, bladder, head-and-neck, and thyroid cancer also appeared disproportionately frequent. An increased infection rate was reported by 43.7%, most often after allogeneic transplantation. New cardiovascular diseases were reported by 30.2%, with a high rate of thromboembolic events in multiple myeloma (MM) and myeloproliferative diseases. Polyneuropathies were reported by 39.1%, most often by survivors with a history of MM or aggressive lymphoma. Disease relapse was perceived as the highest burden, followed by second primary malignancy, increased infection frequency, and polyneuropathy. In each area investigated, the range of perceived severities was wide.

CONCLUSIONS

Health-related complications are frequent during blood cancer follow-up, with significant repercussions on the patients' lives.

Cumulative incidence of second primary cancers in a large nationwide cohort of Danish cancer survivors: a population-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

A new primary cancer is a serious late effect of a pre-existing cancer diagnosis, and can be attributed to hereditary cancer syndromes, immune or hormonal factors, cancer treatment, or modifiable lifestyle or environmental factors. We investigated the absolute and relative incidence of second primary cancers in a large cohort of Danish cancer survivors. Furthermore, we examined the association between alcohol-related, smoking-related, virus-related, and hormone-related first and second primary cancers.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified a cohort of Danish adults (aged ≥40 years) diagnosed with cancer from Jan 1, 1997, to Dec 31, 2014 and alive 1 year after diagnosis. Follow-up was from date of first cancer diagnosis and lasted up to 24 years, ending on Dec 31, 2020. Cohort identification and information on second primary cancers was obtained from the Danish Cancer Registry, and comorbidity and sociodemographic information was obtained from Danish population-based registries. Overall, and for 27 cancer types, cumulative incidence functions and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the incidence of second primary cancer and death, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of second primary cancer adjusted for sex, age and year of diagnosis, cohabitation status, income, and comorbidity.

FINDINGS

457 334 Danish adults were included in our study (230 150 [50·3%] male individuals and 227 184 [49·7%] female individuals; median age at diagnosis 68·3 years, IQR 59·7-76·6; median follow-up 3·6 years, IQR 0·6-9·3). The cumulative incidence of second primary cancer increased over time from 6·3% (95% CI 6·2-6·4) 5 years after diagnosis to 10·5% (10·4-10·6) 10 years after diagnosis and to 13·5% (13·4-13·7) 15 years after diagnosis. The highest cumulative incidence of second primary cancer 10 years after diagnosis was observed in survivors of cancers in the larynx (21·8%, 20·5-23·1), oropharynx and oral cavity (19·5%, 18·7-20·3), and bladder and urinary tract (18·5%, 18·0-19·0). Survivors of cancers related to alcohol (HR 1·09, 95% CI 1·06-1·13), smoking (1·73, 1·68-1·78), diet high in red or processed meat (1·32, 1·24-1·39), or virus (1·23, 1·13-1·35) were at increased risk of developing a second cancer with the same aetiology, whereas having had a hormone-related first cancer was associated with lower risk of a second hormone-related cancer (0·77, 0·73-0·81).

INTERPRETATION

Our results could help optimise prevention efforts targeting modifiable risk factors to reduce risk of developing a second primary cancer.

FUNDING

Nordic Cancer Union and The Health Foundation (Helsefonden).

Secondary Primary Cancer Risk After Radiation Therapy in Rectal Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether radiation therapy (RT) has an impact on the development of secondary primary cancer (SC) in rectal cancer (RC) patients, especially within the true pelvis.

AIM

To examine the incidence of SC in a population-based cohort of RC after surgical treatment with or without radiation therapy (RT, NRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The epidemiological cohort consisting of 13,919 RC patients with primary M0 stage diagnosed between 1998 and 2019 was collected from cancer registry data of Upper Bavaria. Competing risk analyses were conducted regarding the development of SC on 11 687 first malignancies, stratified by RT/NRT. A propensity score (PS) was generated by logistic regression modeling of RT to repeat competing risk analyses on a PS-matched cohort.

RESULTS

The median age (interquartile range) of the epidemiological cohort was 68.9 years (60.4-76.7). About 60.8%, were men, 38.7% had UICC III, 35.8% of tumors were localized lower than 8 cm, 41.3% underwent RT. Only 17.1% of patients older than 80 years at diagnosis received RT. In general, RT patients were 5 years younger than NRT patients (65.9 years [58.0-73.0] vs. 71.3 years [62.4-79.2], P < .0001). The 20-year cumulative incidence of SC was 16.5% in RT and 17.4% in NRT patients (P = .2298). Men with RT had a lower risk of prostate cancer (HR = 0.55, 95%CI [0.34-0.91], P = .0168). In the PS-matched cohort, RT patients had a significantly higher risk of bladder cancer during follow-up (10-year cumulative incidence of 1.1% vs. 0.6% in NRT). The direction of the RT effects in men and women and different tumor sites may cancel each other.

CONCLUSION

A protective effect of RT in rectal cancer patients on developing prostate SC by half is reproduced. Further analyses studying the long-term SC risks of RT should essentially focus on stratification by sex, and focus on more recent data.

Radiation-associated secondary malignancies: a novel opportunity for applying immunotherapies

Radiation is commonly used as a treatment intended to cure or palliate cancer patients. Despite remarkable advances in the precision of radiotherapy delivery, even the most advanced forms inevitably expose some healthy tissues surrounding the target site to radiation. On rare occasions, this results in the development of radiation-associated secondary malignancies (RASM). RASM are typically high-grade and carry a poorer prognosis than their non-radiated counterparts. RASM are characterized by a high mutation burden, increased T cell infiltration, and a microenvironment that bears unique inflammatory signatures of prior radiation, including increased expression of various cytokines (e.g., TGF-β, TNF-α, IL4, and IL10). Interestingly, these cytokines have been shown to up-regulate the expression of PD-1 and/or PD-L1-an immune checkpoint receptor/ligand pair that is commonly targeted by immune checkpoint blocking immunotherapies. Here, we review the current understanding of the tumor-immune interactions in RASM, highlight the distinct clinical and molecular characteristics of RASM that may render them immunologically "hot," and propose a rationale for the formal testing of immune checkpoint blockade as a treatment approach for patients with RASM.

Factors That Determine Multiple Primary Cancers in the Adult Population in the United States

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a major public health problem worldwide and a leading cause of death in the United States. Multiple primary cancers mean that an individual has more than one cancer in the same or a different organ but does not include instances of metastasis of initial primary cancer. Several factors such as genetics, for example, BRCA1 gene mutations, may predict multiple primary cancers. Factors such as the age at first cancer diagnosis may determine the outcome of multiple primary cancers. This study aims to determine factors that determine multiple primary cancers among the adult population in the United States.  Methods: This study uses data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2021 dataset. The study included all individuals recently diagnosed with cancer (sample size = 9806). All age groups were included in this study. Measures included the outcome variable number of cancers and a major independent variable: age at first cancer diagnosis. Covariates included race, sex, smoking status, and cancer treatment. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted using a statistical analysis system. It was hypothesized that individuals with age at first diagnosis of cancer at a younger age have higher odds of having multiple primary cancers as compared to individuals diagnosed at an older age.  Results: The age group of 50-64 years had the highest percentage of only one cancer type (35.87%) and of two or more cancers (35.46%). A majority of females had two or more cancers (53.52%) as compared to males (47.48%). The majority of participants with only one cancer type (80.59%) and two or more cancers (88.61%) were of White non-Hispanic ethnicity. At the multivariate level, the age group under 18 years had 9.4% higher odds of having two or more cancers compared to the age group of 18-29 years (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.094, 95%CI=1.026-1.166; p-value=0.0057). The age group 65 years and above had 11.6% lower odds of having multiple primary cancers as compared to the age group of 18-29 years (AOR=0.884; 95%CI=0.859-0910; p-value=<0.0001). The Black non-Hispanic group had 73.8% lower odds of having multiple primary cancers as compared to White non-Hispanic respondents (AOR= 0.262; 95%CI = 0.228-0.301; p-value = <0.0001). Hispanic respondents had 59.8% lower odds of having two or more cancers as compared to the White non-Hispanic group (AOR= 0.402; 95%CI=0.390-0.413; p-value=<0.0001). Current smokers had 9.7% higher odds of having multiple cancers as compared to individuals who never smoked (AOR = 1.097; 95%CI=1.066-1.129; p-value=<0.0001). Former smokers had 24.2% higher odds of having multiple cancers as compared to individuals who never smoked (AOR=1.242; 95%CI=1.224-1.261; p-value=<0.0001). Individuals who were currently on treatment had 2.676 higher odds of having two or more cancers as compared to individuals not on treatment (AOR=2.676; 95%CI=2.629-2.724; p-value=<0.0001).  Conclusion: Multiple primary cancers have been on the increase recently following advancements in anticancer therapy and cancer screening and diagnosis technology. It is important that studies that aim to demonstrate risk factors and predictors of multiple primary cancers such as the age at first diagnosis, smoking status, and cancer treatment are encouraged among public health specialists.

Second Primary Cancers Following Cancer Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Queensland, Australia, 1982-2018

Purpose: Increased risk of second primary cancers is an unwanted consequence of cancer survivorship. While the epidemiology of second cancers is well-documented for children and older people, less is known about second cancers among adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. Methods: Unit record data were obtained from the Queensland Cancer Register. The study cohort comprised Queensland residents aged 15 to 39 years who were diagnosed with a first primary invasive cancer between 1982 and 2013. Follow-up on second cancers was available for a minimum of 5 years to the end of 2018. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were used to approximate the risk of a second primary cancer relative to the general population. Results: In total, 3086 second primary cancers were observed among 34,431 eligible AYA patients (9%), equating to an overall SIR of 1.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-1.64). Melanoma (n = 853, 28%) and female breast cancer (n = 594, 19%) were the most common types of second primary cancer in the study cohort. Relative risk of all second primary cancers combined among AYA patients was inversely associated with age and was highest within the period immediately after first diagnosis irrespective of age group; for example, patients aged 15-24 at first diagnosis recorded more than four times as many second primary cancers than expected within 2 years of their first cancer (SIR = 4.40, 95% CI 2.83-6.82). Conclusions: Detailed data on second primary cancers among AYA cancer survivors are important in promoting increased awareness and to inform the development of targeted prevention and surveillance strategies.

Case report: Radiographic complete response of radiation-induced glioblastoma to front-line radiotherapy: A report and molecular characterization of two unique cases

Radiation-induced gliomas (RIGs) are an uncommon disease type and a known long-term complication of prior central nervous system radiation exposure, often during childhood. Given the rarity of this malignancy subtype, no clinical trials have explored optimal therapy for these patients, and the literature is primarily limited to reports of patient cases and series. Indeed, the genomic profiles of RIGs have only recently been explored in limited numbers, categorizing these gliomas into a unique subset. Here, we describe two cases of RIG diagnosed as glioblastoma (GB), IDH-wildtype, in adults who had previously received central nervous system radiation for childhood cancers. Both patients demonstrated a surprising complete radiographic response of the postoperative residual disease to front-line therapy, a phenomenon rarely observed in the management of any GB and never previously reported for the radiation-induced subgroup. Both tumors were characterized by next-generation sequencing and chromosomal microarray to identify potential etiologies for this response as well as to further add to the limited literature about the unique molecular profile of RIGs, showing signatures more consistent with diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype, WHO grade 4. Ultimately, we demonstrate that treatment utilizing a radiation-based regimen for GB in a previously radiated tissue can be highly successful despite historical limitations in the management of this disease.

Synchronous multiple primary malignant neoplasms in breast, kidney, and bilateral thyroid: A case report

BACKGROUND

Multiple primary malignant neoplasms (MPMNs) are rare, while synchronous MPMNs (SMPMNs) are even less common. Owing to the progression of medical technology and the extension of life expectancy, its incidence is gradually increasing.

CASE SUMMARY

Although reports of breast and thyroid dual cancers are common, cases of an additional diagnosis of kidney primary cancer within the same individual are rare.

CONCLUSION

We present a case of simultaneous MPMN of three endocrine organs, reviewing the relevant literature to enhance our understanding of SMPMNs while emphasizing the increasingly important need for accurate diagnosis and multidisciplinary management whenever this challenging situation arises.

Incidence of second primary cancers among survivors of childhood cancer: A population-based study, Osaka, Japan, 1975-2015

Second primary cancer (SPC) is one of the most life-threatening late effects of childhood cancers. We investigated the incidence and survival outcomes of SPC in childhood cancer patients in Japan. Data were obtained from the population-based Osaka Cancer Registry. Individuals diagnosed with cancer at age 0-14 years during 1975-2014 and survived 2 months or longer were followed through December 2015. The risk of developing SPC was assessed with standardized incidence ratio (SIR), excess absolute risk (EAR, per 100,000 person-years), and cumulative incidence. Multivariable Poisson regression analysis was carried out to assess relative risks of SPC by treatment method. Survival analysis was undertaken using the Kaplan-Meier method. Of 7229 childhood cancer survivors, 101 (1.4%) developed SPC after a median of 11.6 years. Overall SIR was 5.0, which corresponded with 84.3 EAR. The cumulative incidence was 0.9%, 2.1%, and 3.4% at 10, 20, and 30 years, respectively. Among all SPCs, the type that contributed most to the overall burden was cancers in the central nervous system (EAR = 28.0) followed by digestive system (EAR = 15.1), thyroid (EAR = 8.3), and bones and joints (EAR = 7.8); median latency ranged from 2.0 years (lymphomas) to 26.6 years (skin cancers). Patients treated with radiotherapy alone were at a 2.58-fold increased risk of developing SPC compared to those who received neither chemotherapy nor radiotherapy. Among patients who developed SPCs, 5-year and 10-year survival probabilities after SPC diagnosis were 61.7% and 52.0%, respectively. Risk-based long-term follow-up planning is essential to inform survivorship care and help reduce the burden of SPCs in childhood cancer survivors.

Different situations of identifying second primary malignant tumors in lymphoma patients with synchronous solid tumors

BACKGROUND

To our knowledge, the different situations of identifying second primary malignant tumors (SPMTs) in lymphoma patients with synchronous solid tumors remain to be comprehensively investigated.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected information pertaining to lymphoma patients with synchronous solid tumors (diagnosed within 6 months) at Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute between 2009 and 2019. The non-parametric Aalen-Johansen estimator was applied to calculate cumulative incidence function in the competing risk model. Furthermore, propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare survival differences in lymphoma patients with or without synchronous solid tumors.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled. There were three situations of identifying SPMTs. First, in 15 patients (39.5%), SPMTs were identified before the initiation of any treatment. Among them, priority was given to anti-lymphoma treatment in case of only three patients. Second, in 17 patients (44.7%), SPMTs were unexpectedly detected on surgical specimen assessment; of them, 13 received anti-lymphoma treatment after surgery. Third, in six patients (15.8%), SPMTs were identified after the outset of treatment for the primary tumor; in this population, three of four patients with lymphoma switched toward the treatment plan for SPMTs. The 5-year overall survival was 58.7%. The cumulative incidence function within 5 years was 26.6% for lymphoma and 14.7% for other solid tumors. The early identification of SPMTs was associated with better outcomes (p = 0.048). After balancing the baseline characteristics, no differences in survival were observed between lymphoma patients with and without synchronous solid tumors (p = 0.664).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to present the different situations of identifying SPMTs in lymphoma patients with synchronous solid tumors. In only <50% patients, SPMTs were identifiable at baseline. SPMT identification at different situations may make it difficult to choose the optimal therapeutic option, which may consequently impact patient survival.

Multiple malignant primary tumors (non-head and neck): Contemplation needed

BACKGROUND

The incidence of multiple malignant primary tumors (MMPT) is increasing which needs attention. Hence, we undertook this study to analyze clinico-demographic details and treatment outcomes in patients with non-head and neck MMPT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hospital case records of patients with histopathology proven MMPT registered in the radiation oncology department from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2020 were retrospectively studied. Modified Warren-Gates criteria were used to define MMPT. Patients with MMPT of the head and neck (both an index and second primary as head-neck) were excluded from the study. Demographic and clinical details were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-two eligible cases of non-head and neck MMPT were studied. The median age at diagnosis of an index case was 55 years (minimum 21, maximum 85) with a male to a female sex ratio of 5:37. Twelve patients had synchronous (28.57%) and 30 had metachronous (71.42%) MMPT. The average period between metachronous tumors was 77.77 months (minimum 12, maximum 312). The most common site of an index and second primary tumor was the breast (26; 61.90% and 23; 54.76%, respectively). Seventeen (65.38%) out of 26 index breast cancer were bilateral breast cancer and nine were others. In six cases of MMPT, there was an association between the breast and cervix.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer was the most common site for both an index and second primary malignancy followed by genital cancers. With cautious monitoring and patient education, second primary tumor could be detected earlier and managed better giving a good quality of life to patients.

Research Progress of Multiple Primary Malignancies Associated With Esophageal Cancer

With the improvement in survival of patients with tumors, and continuous advancement of diagnostic technology and treatment modalities, instances of multiple primary malignancies (MPMs) are becoming an increasingly common phenomenon. The occurrence of esophageal-relevant MPMs increases the difficulty of diagnosis and treatment, and the overall prognosis is poor. Esophageal cancer related-MPMs tend to occur in areas such as the head, neck, stomach, and lungs. "Field cancerization" is one theoretical basis for the disease, and chemoradiotherapy, environmental life factors, and gene polymorphism are etiological factors. However, the influence of new therapeutic methods on MPM is still unclear, and the relationship between gene polymorphism and MPMs related to esophageal cancer needs further elucidation. Additionally, there is a lack of unified standards for diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to review the causes, clinical features, and prognostic factors of MPMs related to esophageal cancer.

The underexplored links between cancer and the internal body climate: Implications for cancer prevention and treatment

In order to effectively manage and cure cancer we should move beyond the general view of cancer as a random process of genetic alterations leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation or simply a predictable evolutionary process involving selection for traits that increase cell fitness. In our view, cancer is a systemic disease that involves multiple interactions not only among cells within tumors or between tumors and surrounding tissues but also with the entire organism and its internal "milieu". We define the internal body climate as an emergent property resulting from spatial and temporal interactions among internal components themselves and with the external environment. The body climate itself can either prevent, promote or support cancer initiation and progression (top-down effect; i.e., body climate-induced effects on cancer), as well as be perturbed by cancer (bottom-up effect; i.e., cancer-induced body climate changes) to further favor cancer progression and spread. This positive feedback loop can move the system towards a "cancerized" organism and ultimately results in its demise. In our view, cancer not only affects the entire system; it is a reflection of an imbalance of the entire system. This model provides an integrated framework to study all aspects of cancer as a systemic disease, and also highlights unexplored links that can be altered to both prevent body climate changes that favor cancer initiation, progression and dissemination as well as manipulate or restore the body internal climate to hinder the success of cancer inception, progression and metastasis or improve therapy outcomes. To do so, we need to (i) identify cancer-relevant factors that affect specific climate components, (ii) develop 'body climate biomarkers', (iii) define 'body climate scores', and (iv) develop strategies to prevent climate changes, stop or slow the changes, or even revert the changes (climate restoration).

Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the axilla with breast cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Multiple primary malignant neoplasms refer to multiple tumors with different origins. They may be synchronous or metachronous. The incidence is 0.73%– 11.7%. Synchronous cases of breast cancer with sarcoma are rare.

CASE SUMMARY

Here, we report a 78-year-old female patient admitted to hospital after accidental discovery of a left axillary mass. Preoperative examination revealed a breast mass. Pathology showed left breast cancer and left axillary sarcoma. The patient underwent surgery, endocrine therapy and radiotherapy. She has been followed up for 1 year, and no local recurrence or distant metastasis was observed.

CONCLUSION

Attention should be paid to multiple primary malignant neoplasms, not limited to the current diagnosis and analysis, avoiding missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis.

Risk of second primary malignancy in patients with primary myelofibrosis: a SEER database study

Prior studies report a greater incidence of second primary malignancy (SPM) among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, although the true risk in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) has not been elucidated. We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to evaluate the risk of SPM in PMF patients and analyzed the effects of sociodemographic factors on the risk of SPM. Out of 5273 patients, 385 patients (7.30%) developed SPM. SPM occurred at SIR of 1.95 (95% CI 1.76-2.15) and AER of 149.01 per 10,000 population. A significantly higher incidence of melanoma (SIR 1.76, 95% CI 1.01-2.86), lymphoma (SIR 3.38, 95% CI 2.28-4.83), and leukemia (SIR 27.19, 95% CI 23.09-31.81) was observed. The risk was significantly higher in patients ≤60 years, males, chemotherapy recipients, within 5 years of PMF diagnosis, and for PMF diagnosed after 2009.

Secondary Malignancies after Ewing Sarcoma-Epidemiological and Clinical Analysis of an International Trial Registry

Ewing sarcoma (EwS) represents highly aggressive bone and soft tissue tumors that require intensive treatment by multi-chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy. While therapeutic regimens have increased survival rates, EwS survivors face long-term sequelae that include secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs). Consequently, more knowledge about EwS patients who develop SMNs is needed to identify high-risk patients and adjust follow-up strategies. We retrospectively analyzed data from 4518 EwS patients treated in five consecutive EwS trials from the Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Study (CESS) group. Ninety-six patients developed SMNs after primary EwS, including 53 (55.2%) with solid tumors. The latency period between EwS and the first SMN was significantly longer for the development of solid SMNs (median: 8.4 years) than for hematologic SMNs (median: 2.4 years) (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence (CI) of SMNs in general increased over time from 0.04 at 10 years to 0.14 at 30 years; notably, the specific CI for hematologic SMNs remained stable over the different decades, whereas for solid SMNs it gradually increased over time and was higher for metastatic patients than in localized EwS patients (20 years: 0.14 vs. 0.06; p < 0.01). The clinical characteristics of primary EwS did not differ between patients with or without SMNs. All EwS patients received multi-chemotherapy with adjuvant radiotherapy in 77 of 96 (80.2%) patients, and the use of radiation doses ≥ 60 Gy correlated with the occurrence of SMNs. The survival rate after SMNs was 0.49, with a significantly better outcome for solid SMNs compared with hematologic SMNs (3 years: 0.70 vs. 0.24, respectively; p < 0.001). The occurrence of SMNs after EwS remains a rare event but requires a structured follow-up system because it is associated with high morbidity and mortality.

Applications of a patient-specific whole-body CT-mesh hybrid computational phantom in second cancer risk prediction

Objective. CT-mesh hybrid phantoms (or ‘hybrid(s)’) made from integrated patient CT data and mesh-type reference computational phantoms (MRCPs) can be beneficial for patient-specific whole-body dose evaluation, but this benefit has yet to be evaluated for second cancer risk prediction. The purpose of this study is to compare the hybrid’s ability to predict risk throughout the body with a patient-scaled MRCP against ground truth whole-body CTs (WBCTs). Approach. Head and neck active scanning proton treatment plans were created for and simulated on seven hybrids and the corresponding scaled MRCPs and WBCTs. Equivalent dose throughout the body was calculated and input into five second cancer risk models for both excess absolute and excess relative risk (EAR and ERR). The hybrid phantom was evaluated by comparing equivalent dose and risk predictions against the WBCT. Main results. The hybrid most frequently provides whole-body second cancer risk predictions which are closer to the ground truth when compared to a scaled MRCP alone. The performance of the hybrid relative to the scaled MRCP was consistent across ERR, EAR, and all risk models. For all in-field organs, where the hybrid shares the WBCT anatomy, the hybrid was better than or equal to the scaled MRCP for both equivalent dose and risk prediction. For out-of-field organs across all patients, the hybrid’s equivalent dose prediction was superior than the scaled MRCP in 48% of all comparisons, equivalent for 34%, and inferior for 18%. For risk assessment in the same organs, the hybrid’s prediction was superior than the scaled MRCP in 51.8% of all comparisons, equivalent in 28.6%, and inferior in 19.6%. Significance. Whole-body risk predictions from the CT-mesh hybrid have shown to be more accurate than those from a reference phantom alone. These hybrids could aid in risk-optimized treatment planning and individual risk assessment to minimize second cancer incidence.

Radiation therapy for de novo anorectal cancer in patients with a history of prostate radiation therapy

Introduction

Radiation therapy (RT) for anorectal cancer after prior prostate cancer RT is usually avoided due to concern for complications. Data on this topic is scarce. Our aim was to evaluate tolerability, toxicity, and clinical outcomes associated with a second course of pelvic radiation in men with de novo anorectal cancers previously treated with RT for prostate cancer.

Materials/methods

We conducted a single-institution retrospective study of men treated with RT for rectal or anal cancer after prior prostate RT. Toxicity data were collected. Treatment plans were extracted to assess doses to organs at risk and target coverage. Cumulative incidence was calculated for local and distant progression. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

We identified 26 patients who received anorectal RT after prostate cancer RT: 17 for rectal cancer and 9 for anal cancer. None had metastatic disease. Prior prostate RT was delivered using low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR), external beam RT (EBRT), or EBRT + LDR. RT for rectal cancer was delivered most commonly using 50.4Gy/28 fractions (fr) or 1.5 Gy twice-daily to 30-45 Gy. The most used RT dose for anal cancer was 50Gy/25 fr. Median interval between prostate and anorectal RT was 12.3 years (range:0.5 - 25.3). 65% and 89% of rectal and anal cancer patients received concurrent chemotherapy, respectively. There were no reported ≥Grade 4 acute toxicities. Two patients developed fistulae; one was urinary-cutaneous after prostate LDR and 45Gy/25fr for rectal cancer, and the other was recto-vesicular after prostate LDR and 50Gy/25fr for anal cancer. In 11 patients with available dosimetry, coverage for anorectal cancers was adequate. With a median follow up of 84.4 months, 5-yr local progression and OS were 30% and 31% for rectal cancer, and 35% and 49% for anal cancer patients, respectively.

Conclusion

RT for anorectal cancer after prior prostate cancer RT is feasible but should be delivered with caution since it poses a risk of fistulae and possibly bleeding, especially in patients treated with prior LDR brachytherapy. Further studies, perhaps using proton therapy and/or rectal hydrogel spacers, are needed to further decrease toxicity and improve outcomes.

Assessment of Radiation-Induced Bladder and Bowel Cancer Risks after Conventionally and Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy for the Preoperative Management of Rectal Carcinoma

Preoperative management of rectal carcinoma can be performed by employing either conventionally or hypo-fractionated Radiotherapy (CFRT or HFRT, respectively), delivered by Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans, employing 6 MV or 10 MV photon beams. This study aims to dosimetrically and radiobiologically compare all available approaches, with emphasis on the risk of radiation-induced second cancer to the bladder and bowel. Computed Tomography (CT) scans and relevant radiotherapy contours from 16 patients were anonymized and analyzed retrospectively. For each case, CFRT of 25 × 2 Gy and HFRT of 5 × 5 Gy were both considered. IMRT and VMAT plans using 6 MV and 10 MV photons were prepared. Plan optimization was performed, considering all clinically used plan quality indices and dose–volume constraints for the critical organs. Resulting dose distributions were analyzed and compared. Moreover, the Lifetime Attributable Risk (LAR) for developing radiation-induced bladder and bowel malignancies were assessed using a non-linear mechanistic model, assuming patient ages at treatment of 45, 50, 55 and 60 years. All 128 plans created were clinically acceptable. Risk of second bladder cancer reached 0.26% for HFRT (5 × 5 Gy) and 0.19% for CFRT (25 × 2 Gy) at the age of 45. Systematically higher risks were calculated for HFRT (5 × 5 Gy) as compared to CFRT (25 × 2 Gy), with 6 MV photons resulting in slightly increased LAR, as well. Similar or equal bowel cancer risks were calculated for all techniques and patient ages investigated (range 0.05–0.14%). This work contributes towards radiotherapy treatment protocol selection criteria for the preoperative irradiation of rectal carcinoma. However, more studies are needed to establish the associated radiation-induced risk of each RT protocol.