Effects of medical therapies for acromegaly on glucose metabolism

Growth Hormone Receptor Antagonist Markedly Improves Gemcitabine Response in a Mouse Xenograft Model of Human Pancreatic Cancer

Chemotherapy treatment against pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is thwarted by tumoral activation of multiple therapy resistance pathways. The growth hormone (GH)-GH receptor (GHR) pair is a covert driver of multimodal therapy resistance in cancer and is overexpressed in PDAC tumors, yet the therapeutic potential of targeting the same has not been explored. Here, we report that GHR expression is a negative prognostic factor in patients with PDAC. Combinations of gemcitabine with different GHR antagonists (GHRAs) markedly improve therapeutic outcomes in nude mice xenografts. Employing cultured cells, mouse xenografts, and analyses of the human PDAC transcriptome, we identified that attenuation of the multidrug transporter and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition programs in the tumors underlie the observed augmentation of chemotherapy efficacy by GHRAs. Moreover, in human PDAC patients, GHR expression strongly correlates with a gene signature of tumor promotion and immune evasion, which corroborate with that in syngeneic tumors in wild-type vs. GH transgenic mice. Overall, we found that GH action in PDAC promoted a therapy-refractory gene signature in vivo, which can be effectively attenuated by GHR antagonism. Our results collectively present a proof of concept toward considering GHR antagonists to improve chemotherapeutic outcomes in the highly chemoresistant PDAC.

A Review on Coexisting Giants: The Interplay Between Acromegaly and Diabetes Mellitus

Acromegaly is a rare disease caused mainly by pituitary adenoma, which results in elevated growth hormone (GH) levels and its primary mediator, insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1). The condition causes various complications, including cardiovascular, respiratory, neuropsychiatric, metabolic, and gastrointestinal complications, which affect the patient's quality of life. Metabolically, there has been an increased incidence of acromegaly-associated diabetes mellitus (DM), IGF-1 being the primary mediator, affecting the patient's overall morbidity/mortality and associated surge in cardiovascular events. In the current state of medicine, both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic approaches in managing acromegaly-associated DM are validated, having their own individualistic positive or negative impact on glucose metabolism. This review article has compiled studies to demonstrate a link between acromegaly. It summarises the existing data on acromegaly associated with DM, explicitly understanding the effect of various medical treatments on glucose homeostasis.

Predictive factors and the management of hyperglycemia in patients with acromegaly and Cushing's disease receiving pasireotide treatment: post hoc analyses from the SOM230B2219 study

Introduction

Pasireotide, a somatostatin receptor ligand, is approved for treating acromegaly and Cushing's disease (CD). Hyperglycemia during treatment can occur because of the drug's mechanism of action, although treatment discontinuation is rarely required. The prospective, randomized, Phase IV SOM230B2219 (NCT02060383) trial was designed to assess optimal management of pasireotide-associated hyperglycemia. Here, we investigated predictive factors for requiring antihyperglycemic medication during pasireotide treatment.

Methods

Participants with acromegaly or CD initiated long-acting pasireotide 40 mg/28 days intramuscularly (acromegaly) or pasireotide 600 μg subcutaneously twice daily during pre-randomization (≤16 weeks). Those who did not need antihyperglycemic medication, were managed with metformin, or received insulin from baseline entered an observational arm ending at 16 weeks. Those who required additional/alternative antihyperglycemic medication to metformin were randomized to incretin-based therapy or insulin for an additional 16 weeks. Logistic-regression analyses evaluated quantitative and qualitative factors for requiring antihyperglycemic medication during pre-randomization.

Results

Of 190 participants with acromegaly and 59 with CD, 88 and 15, respectively, did not need antihyperglycemic medication; most were aged <40 years (acromegaly 62.5%, CD 86.7%), with baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <6.5% (<48 mmol/mol; acromegaly 98.9%, CD 100%) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <100 mg/dL (<5.6 mmol/L; acromegaly 76.1%, CD 100%). By logistic regression, increasing baseline HbA1c (odds ratio [OR] 3.6; P=0.0162) and FPG (OR 1.0; P=0.0472) and history of diabetes/pre-diabetes (OR 3.0; P=0.0221) predicted receipt of antihyperglycemic medication in acromegaly participants; increasing baseline HbA1c (OR 12.6; P=0.0276) was also predictive in CD participants. Investigator-reported hyperglycemia-related adverse events were recorded in 47.9% and 54.2% of acromegaly and CD participants, respectively, mainly those with diabetes/pre-diabetes.

Conclusion

Increasing age, HbA1c, and FPG and pre-diabetes/diabetes were associated with increased likelihood of requiring antihyperglycemic medication during pasireotide treatment. These risk factors may be used to identify those who need more vigilant monitoring to optimize outcomes during pasireotide treatment.

Conventional X-rays in the diagnosis and follow-up of vertebral fractures in patients with acromegaly: a real-life study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the role of conventional X-ray imaging in detecting vertebral fractures (VFs) in patients with acromegaly, both at diagnosis of disease and at the last clinical visit. The risk factors for VFs were also evaluated.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 60 consecutive patients with acromegaly, in a tertiary referral centre. Thoracolumbar spine radiography (X-spine) was performed at the last clinical visit during the follow-up in order to detect VFs. Routine chest radiograph, performed as a part of the general evaluation at diagnosis of acromegaly, were retrospectively analysed to screen for baseline VFs.

RESULTS

At diagnosis of acromegaly, chest X-ray revealed that 10 (17%) patients had VFs. Of the 50 patients without VFs at diagnosis of acromegaly, 33 (66%) remained unfractured at the last clinical visit (median [IQR] time, 144 [96-192] months after the diagnosis of acromegaly), whereas 17 (34%) had VFs. Overall, 22 patients (37%) had novel VFs detected on X-spine including five patients with previous VFs. Risk factor for incident VFs was the presence of hypogonadism at diagnosis of acromegaly (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

In acromegaly patients, conventional X-rays can detect vertebral fractures early at diagnosis of acromegaly. They can also reveal incident VFs, which may occur several years later even in patients without VFs at diagnosis, above all in relation to hypogonadism.

Efficacy and Safety of Pegvisomant in the Treatment of Acromegaly

Pegvisomant, the first and currently only clinically available growth hormone receptor antagonist, is an effective therapeutic option for the medical treatment of acromegaly, a rare disorder characterized by excessive growth hormone secretion. With now over 20 years of real world experience, its safety and efficacy is well-established. However, several aspects of its clinical use are still controversially discussed. The high cost of pegvisomant has limited its use in several countries, and recent studies have reported a lower efficacy than the initial clinical trials. A reported increase in tumor volume under therapy varies between studies and has been attributed to either actual growth or re-expansion after cessation of somatostatin receptor ligand therapy. Furthermore, different combinations of pegvisomant and other therapeutic agents aiming at reduction of acromegaly disease activity have been proposed to increase or retain effectiveness while lowering side effects and cost. This review aims to assess current clinical data on the safety and efficacy of pegvisomant while also addressing controversies surrounding its use.

Clinical Management of Acromegaly: Therapeutic Frontiers and New Perspectives for Somatostatin Receptor Ligands (SRLs)

Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) represent a true milestone in the medical therapy for acromegaly. The first-generation SRLs (FG-SRLs), octreotide and lanreotide, have demonstrated good efficacy in disease control and tumor shrinkage, and are still considered first-line medical therapies. The development of long-acting release (LAR) formulations has certainly improved the therapeutic tolerability of these drugs, although many patients still experience therapy-related burden. As such, new formulations have recently been developed to improve adherence and therapeutic efficacy and more solutions are on the way. In the case of FG-SRL-resistant disease, pasireotide, the only second generation SRL currently available, demonstrated superiority in disease control and tumor shrinkage compared to FG-SRLs. However, its use in clinical practice is still limited due to concern for impairment in glucose homeostasis. In this review, we discuss the news about the present and future role of SRLs in acromegaly, exploring the therapeutical frontiers of this drug class. Moreover, we provide practical guidance on the use of pasireotide, based on the data in the literature and our clinical experience.

Pegvisomant in the treatment of acromegaly

Despite improvements in surgical techniques, current radiotherapy options and development of long-acting somatostatin analogues, biochemical control of acromegaly is not achieved in some patients. The failure to achieve optimal serum growth hormone (RH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels means increased morbidity and mortality of acromegaly patients. The RH receptor antagonist pegvisomant (PEG) is a genetically engineered RH analog that prevents of RH receptor dimerization, i.e. a process that is crucial for the action of RH at the cellular level. The effect of the treatment is suppression of IGF-1 production. In pilot studies, normalization of IGF-1 levels was achieved in up to 90 % of patients receiving PEG. However, PEG efficacy in clinical settings is slightly lower (65 to 97 %) than reported in the key studies. A rare side effect of treatment is elevations of liver transaminases. In addition, pituitary tumor growth progression has been reported in several cases. In this review article, we present long-term data on pegvisomant treatment and discuss its associated risks and benefits.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Acromegalic Patients: Possible Role in the Assessment of Glycemia Control

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly is characterized by an insulin resistance condition. There is a significant difference between the different types of therapy in relation to the glycometabolic framework. The blinded continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS), throughout a period of maximum 6 days for a total of 288 glycemic registrations per day, identifies glycemic excursions and could constitute a valid device to understand the 24-hour glycemic profiles.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To compare the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and CGMS methods in acromegalic patients to evaluate their glycemic profiles, in relation to different treatments for acromegaly.

METHODS

Thirty-five acromegalic patients were divided into 18 somatostatin analogs (SSA), 9 pegvisomant, and 8 successfully surgically treated. A 72-hour CGM was performed and, immediately after, an OGTT.

RESULTS

Results obtained from OGTT: 11/35 impaired fasting glucose, 6/35 impaired glucose tolerance, and 4/35 diabetes mellitus. A positive significant correlation was demonstrated between the OGTT peak and CGM peak in all of the patients, CGM peak of patients treated with SSA and those surgically treated, OGTT average and CGM area under concentration-time curve (AUC) for hyperglycemia of patients treated with SSA and those surgically treated, and CGM AUC for hyperglycemia of patients treated with SSA and those surgically treated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show a significantly higher response in terms of mean and peak OGTT in patients treated with SSA, both compared to the CGM study, and compared to the group of patients receiving pegvisomant. The CGM system could represent an instrument for the evaluation of the glycemic trend of acromegalic patients.

Glucose metabolism outcomes in acromegaly patients on treatment with pasireotide-LAR or pasireotide-LAR plus Pegvisomant

INTRODUCTION

Disorders of glucose metabolism are a serious acromegaly comorbidity and may be differently impacted by medical treatments of acromegaly. In this retrospective longitudinal multicenter study, we investigated the outcome of glucose metabolism and its predictors in patients treated with Pasireotide LAR (PAS-LAR) alone or in combination with Pegvisomant (PAS-LAR + Peg-V).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Acromegaly patients treated continously with PAS-LAR or PAS-LAR + Peg-V for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

Forty patients (25 females, 15 males) were enrolled. At last visit, 27/40 patients (67.5%) reached biochemical control of acromegaly. Overall, glucose metabolism improved in 3 (all in PAS-LAR + Peg-V; 7.5%), worsened in 26 (65%) and remained unchanged in 11 patients (27.5%). Glucose metabolism worsened in 25 patients (73.5%) treated with PAS-LAR and in a single patient (16.7%) treated with PAS-LAR + Peg-V (p < 0.001). Among patients treated with Pas-LAR alone, GH at baseline was higher in those with worsening of glucose metabolism (p = 0.04) as compared to those with stable glucose status. A significantly higher reduction of HbA1c was observed in patients treated with PAS-LAR + Peg-V, as compared with those treated with PAS-LAR alone (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirmed that glucose metabolism in patients treated with PAS-LAR is often worsened, and may be predicted by entity of baseline GH hypersecretion and by the dose of PAS-LAR. Moreover, our data, although limited by small numbers, may suggest that the combination treatment PAS-LAR + Peg-V can improve glucose homeostasis in selected patients.

Cognitive Functioning and Cortical Brain Thickness in Acromegaly Patients: A Pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Cognitive effects in acromegaly patients are poorly understood and the mechanisms involved are still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cognitive function, depression, and quality of life of acromegaly patients treated with pegvisomant versus somatostatin analogues (SRLs) and to analyze the effect of the different treatments on cognition and possible structural brain changes.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study involved 23 acromegaly patients divided into two groups according to treatment modality: One group of 9 patients treated with pegvisomant and another group of 14 patients treated with SRLs. All participants underwent blood analysis, neuropsychological tests, depression tests, quality of life assessment, and 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences between groups in the neuropsychological tests, depression or quality of life; nor in the whole-brain cortical thickness. In the SRL group, the volume of the thalamus correlated positively with executive function, a correlation not found in the pegvisomant group. In addition, the pegvisomant group had significantly higher levels of insulin than the SRL group.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, in this pilot study, the type of pharmacological treatment in patients with acromegaly and good glycemic control did not influence the cognitive function and cortical brain thickness. However, pegvisomant could play a neuroprotective role on the thalamus that will have to be demonstrated with larger samples in future studies.

In patients with controlled acromegaly, indices of glucose homeostasis correlate with IGF-1 levels rather than with type of treatment

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is accompanied by abnormalities in glucose and lipid metabolism which improve upon treatment. Few studies have investigated whether these improvements differ between treatment modalities. This study aimed to compare glucose homeostasis, lipid profiles and postprandial gut hormone response in patients with controlled acromegaly according to actual treatment.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study at a tertiary care centre.

PATIENTS

Twenty-one patients with acromegaly under stable control (ie insulin growth factor 1 [IGF1] levels below sex- and age-specific thresholds and a random growth hormone level <1.0 µg/L) after surgery (n = 5), during treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogues (n = 10) or long-acting somatostatin analogues + pegvisomant (n = 6) were included.

MEASUREMENTS

Glucose, insulin, total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol were measured in fasting serum samples. Glucose, insulin, triglycerides, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide 1 were measured during a mixed meal test. Insulin sensitivity was evaluated by a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity or postprandial gut hormone responses between the three groups. Positive correlations between IGF1 levels and HbA1c, fasting glucose and insulin levels and postprandial area under the curve (AUC) of glucose and insulin and also an inverse association between IGF1 and glucose disposal rate were found in the whole cohort (all p < .05, lowest p = .001 for postprandial AUC glucose with r_s  = 0.660).

CONCLUSION

In this cross-sectional study in patients with controlled acromegaly, there were no differences in glucose homeostasis or postprandial substrate metabolism according to treatment modality. However, a lower IGF1 level seems associated with a better metabolic profile.

HOMA-IR in acromegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This review is aimed at examining whether the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) is higher in Caucasian, adult, treatment-naïve patients with acromegaly (ACRO) than in the reference population independently of diabetes presence and to evaluate the impact of treatment [surgery and somatostatin analogues (SSAs)] on its assessment.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed in PubMed and Web of Science from July 1985 to December 2019, registered with the code number CRD42020148737. The inclusion criteria comprised studies conducted in Caucasian adult treatment-naïve patients with active ACRO in whom HOMA-IR or basal insulin and glucose were reported. Three reviewers screened eligible publications, extracted the outcomes, and assessed the risk of biases.

RESULTS

Of 118 originally selected studies, 15 met the inclusion criteria. HOMA-IR was higher in ACRO than the reference population, with mean difference and (95% confidence intervals) of 2.04 (0.65-3.44), even in ACRO patients without diabetes, 1.89 (1.06-2.73). HOMA-IR significantly decreased after treatment with either surgery or SSAs - 2.53 (- 3.24- - 1.81) and - 2.30 (- 3.05- - 1.56); respectively. However, the reduction of HOMA-IR due to SSAs did not improve basal glucose.

CONCLUSION

HOMA-IR in treatment-naïve ACRO patients is higher than in the reference population, even in patients without diabetes. This finding, confirms that insulin resistance is an early event in ACRO. Our results also suggest that HOMA-IR is not an adequate tool for assessing insulin resistance in those patients treated with SSAs.

The Effect of 6 Months' Treatment With Pasireotide LAR on Glucose Metabolism in Patients With Resistant Acromegaly in Real-World Clinical Settings

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate glucose metabolism, as measured by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and the need for antidiabetic medical treatment, in patients with acromegaly resistant to first-generation somatostatin receptors ligands (SRLs) treated with pasireotide long-acting release (LAR) in real-world clinical practice. Biochemical control of acromegaly, as measured by growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels, was also assessed.

STUDY DESIGN

Two-center retrospective cohort of consecutive patients with acromegaly treated with first-generation SRLs at maximum doses, who had not achieved biochemical disease control. After SRLs were discontinued, patients were given pasireotide LAR 40 mg i.m. every 28 days. The dose was increased to 60 mg i.m. in patients for whom adequate control was not achieved after 3 months. Patients were given dietary and lifestyle advice, and antihyperglycemic treatment was modified as needed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Biochemical disease control parameters (GH and IGF-1 concentration), as well as HbA1c level at baseline and after 6 months.

RESULTS

In total, 39 patients with acromegaly were enrolled. GH concentration decreased (Δ_me =-1.56 µg/L, range -21.38-3.62, p <0.001) during 6 months of pasireotide LAR treatment. A worsening of metabolic status was observed, with an increase of median HbA1c (Δ_me =0.40%, range -0.20%-2.30%, p <0.001), and antihyperglycemic treatment intensification in 23 (59.0%) patients. The median decline in IGF-1 concentration was: -283.0 µg/L, range -682.7-171.6, p <0.001. IGF-1 reached the age- and gender-specific upper level of normal in 23 (59%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pasireotide LAR is an effective therapeutic option in patients with acromegaly refractory to first-generation SRLs. However, this therapy may result in pasireotide LAR-associated hyperglycemia, which requires early and aggressive antidiabetic medical therapy to prevent glucose homeostasis alterations.

Novel therapies for acromegaly

Acromegaly is a systemic disease associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Most of these comorbidities can be prevented or delayed with adequate disease treatment. Although three modalities of treatment (surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy) are available and new drugs were approved in the last decades, there are still some patients that maintain disease activity despite treatment. Therefore, there is a need for novel therapies for acromegaly and for that purpose new formulations of currently used drugs and also new drugs are currently under study. In this review, we summarize the novel therapies for acromegaly.

Combined therapy of somatostatin analogues with pegvisomant for the treatment of acromegaly: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly is a rare, chronic and severe disease. Drug therapy including somatostatin analogues (SAs), dopamine receptor agonists and growth hormone receptor antagonists (pegvisomant, PEG) are commonly used to treat patients who do not respond to surgery. The use of combination therapy with PEG and SAs has become more common over the last decade. We performed this study to accurately evaluate the effect of combination therapy of SAs with PEG on acromegalic patients.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and Trip database were searched for relevant studies. Prospective clinical trials treating acromegaly with the co-administration of SAs and PEG were included. We performed a meta-analysis by using Stata 12.1. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. The overall rate of serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) normalization was 66% (95% CI: 52-78%; I² = 62.59%). The combination therapy did not significantly change patients' fasting plasma glucose (ES: 0.011 mmol*L^- 1; 95% CI: - 0.374 to 0.397 mmol*L^- 1; P = 0.954) or glycosylated haemoglobin (ES: - 0.074%; 95% CI: - 0.166 to 0.315%; P = 0.544) while decreasing the fasting plasma insulin (ES: - 21.487 pmol*L^-1; 95% CI: - 35.713 to - 7.260 pmol*L^-1; P = 0.003). Elevation of liver enzyme levels was found in 14% (95% CI: 8 to 21%) of the patients. There was no significant difference for serious adverse events and treatment discontinuation due to adverse event between SAs monotherapy group and combination therapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined therapy of SAs and PEG effectively normalized IGF-1 levels in most of the patients whose IGF-1 level was greater than the upper limit of normal after high dose SAs monotherapy. The therapy also decreased significantly FPI levels with a neutral effect on glucose parameters in acromegaly patients. Moreover, elevated liver enzyme levels were observed in a small number of patients, which suggests a need for liver function monitoring.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

We have our protocol registered in PROSPERO. (Registration number: CRD42019115549 ).

Drug treatment strategies for secondary diabetes in patients with acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a rare disease due to oversecretion of growth hormone (GH). Even though the disease is often portrayed by its most apparent clinical features, given the abundance of GH receptors throughout the body, it truly is a systemic disease leading to numerous complications and comorbidities. A distinct medical issue in the context of acromegaly is diabetes: It can be a complication as a consequence of GH excess and its mediators, but it can also result from treatment of acromegaly.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the effects of acromegaly pathophysiology on glucose homeostasis. Furthermore, it devotes an extensive section on the influence that acromegaly treatment has on glucose metabolism, including approved as well as currently investigated drugs. It also summarizes observations from the use of anti-diabetic medication in patients with acromegaly.

EXPERT OPINION

Glucose imbalance is an important aspect of acromegaly comorbidity and deserves more attention. Even though numerous studies have investigated glucose homeostasis in acromegaly, there is still a clear need for more basic, translational, and also clinical research to advance the understanding of the underlying mechanisms and how to best address them.

Metabolic Fingerprint of Acromegaly and its Potential Usefulness in Clinical Practice

Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH) levels are the main targets for monitoring acromegaly activity, but they are not in close relationship with the clinical course of the disease and the associated comorbidities. The present study was aimed at identifying metabolites that could be used as biomarkers for a better disease phenotyping. For this purpose, metabolic fingerprint using an untargeted metabolomic approach was examined in serum from 30 patients with acromegaly and 30 age-matched controls. Patients with acromegaly presented fewer branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) compared to the control group (valine: 4.75 ± 0.87 vs. 5.20 ± 1.06 arbitrary units (AUs), p < 0.05; isoleucine: 2.54 ± 0.41 vs. 2.80 ± 0.51 AUs; p < 0.05). BCAAs were also lower in patients with active disease compared to patients with normal levels of IGF-1 with or without medical treatment. GH, but not IGF-1, serum levels were inversely correlated with both valine and isoleucine. These findings indicate that low levels of BCAAs represent the main metabolic fingerprint of acromegaly and that GH, rather than IGF-1, might be the primary mediator. In addition, our results suggest that the assessment of BCAAs could help to identify active disease and to monitor the response to therapeutic strategies.

Current perspectives on the impact of clinical disease and biochemical control on comorbidities and quality of life in acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare chronic, systemic disorder caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) secretion from a somatotroph pituitary adenoma. GH hypersecretion leads to overproduction of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which contributes to the somatic overgrowth, physical disfigurement, onset of multiple systemic comorbidities, reduced quality of life (QoL) and premature mortality of uncontrolled patients. Somatostatin receptor ligands, dopamine agonists and a GH receptor antagonist are currently available for medical therapy of acromegaly. The main aim of treatment is biochemical normalisation, defined as age-normalised serum IGF-1 values and random GH levels <1.0 μg/L. However, there is an increasing evidence suggesting that achieving biochemical control does not always decrease the burden of disease-related comorbidities and/or improve patients' QoL. This lack of correlation between biochemical and clinical control can be due to both disease duration (late diagnosis) or to the peculiarity of a given comorbidity. Herein we conducted ad hoc literature searches in order to find the most recent and relevant reports on biochemical and clinical disease control during medical treatment of acromegaly. Particularly, we analyse and describe the relationship between biochemical, as well as clinical disease control in patients with acromegaly receiving medical therapy, with a focus on comorbidities and QoL. In conclusion, we found that current literature data seem to indicate that clinical disease control (besides biochemical control), encompassing clinical signs and symptoms, comorbidities and QoL, emerge as a primary focus of acromegaly patient management.

Pegvisomant Improves Glucose Metabolism in Acromegaly: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Interventional Studies

INTRODUCTION

Pegvisomant (PEG) in monotherapy or combined with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) is used to control acromegaly, improving metabolism. However, the metabolic changes induced by PEG have not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

To address the following questions: does PEG or the combination of PEG and SSAs affect fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycosylated Hb (HbA1c), glucose load (2-hour oral glucose tolerance test), insulin levels [fasting plasma insulin (FPI)], homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-I), homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function, lipid profile, or body mass index? Are the effects disease-related or drug-related?

DATA SOURCES

Indexed databases up to January 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Prospective interventional trials reporting glycometabolic outcomes under PEG or PEG plus SSAs for a minimum of 6 months.

DATA EXTRACTION

Three reviewers screened eligible publications (7248), three others extracted the outcomes, and all assessed the risk of biases.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirteen studies were included in the PEG and 5 in the PEG plus SSAs analysis (overall 550 subjects). PEG significantly decreased FPG [effect size (ES) -0.80 mmol/L (95% CI, -1.06 to -0.55); P = 0.000], HbA1c [ES -0.43% (95% CI, -0.56 to -0.31); P = 0.000], FPI [ES -5.31 mU/L (95% CI, -10.23 to -0.39); P = 0.034], and HOMA-I [ES -0.61 (95% CI, -1.17 to -0.04); P = 0.034]. Effects on FPG and FPI were not correlated to IGF-1 changes. The addition of PEG to SSAs mitigated the effects of SSAs on metabolism, producing an overall neutral effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Independently of disease control, PEG in monotherapy or combined with SSAs seems to improve glucose metabolism, reducing FPG, HbA1c, FPI, and HOMA-I.

Diabetes in patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant: observations from acrostudy

PURPOSE

To explore the effects of pegvisomant (PEGV) on glucose metabolism in patients with acromegaly within ACROSTUDY, an international, observational, prospective safety surveillance study.

METHODS

Patients were retrospectively divided into two cohorts, with (DM group) or without diabetes mellitus (no-DM). Parameters of glucose metabolism and IGF-I values were analyzed yearly both cross-sectionally for 4 years (yrs) and longitudinally at 1 and 4-5 yrs of PEGV treatment.

RESULTS

Among 1762 patients, 510 (28.9%) had DM before PEGV start. At cross-sectional analyses, in the DM group mean blood glucose was 140.0 ± 58.7 mg/dl at baseline, 116.4 ± 44.8 mg/dl at year 1 and 120.0 ± 44.3 mg/dl at yr 4. Mean HbA1c was 6.6 ± 1.2 % at yr 1 vs. 7.0 ± 1.4 % at baseline. HbA1c was above 6.5% in 61.9% at baseline and ranged from 45.4 to 53.8% at subsequent yearly time points. At the 4-yr longitudinal analysis, in the DM group (n = 109), mean blood glucose decreased by 20.2 mg/dl at yr 4, mean HbA1c was 7.0 ± 1.5% at baseline vs. 6.8 ± 1.4%. Patients achieved IGF-I normalization in 52.1% and 57.4% of cases in the DM and no-DM groups, respectively at 1 year. The mean daily PEGV dose (mg/day) was higher in the DM group (18.2 vs. 15.3) while the absolute change of IGF-I values from baseline was similar in both groups. PEGV was well tolerated in both groups without any unexpected AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with DM had a moderate decrease in mean fasting glucose values during PEGV treatment.

Systemic Complications of Acromegaly and the Impact of the Current Treatment Landscape: An Update

Acromegaly is a chronic systemic disease with many complications and is associated with increased mortality when not adequately treated. Substantial advances in acromegaly treatment, as well as in the treatment of many of its complications, mainly diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and arterial hypertension, were achieved in the last decades. These developments allowed change in both prevalence and severity of some acromegaly complications and furthermore resulted in a reduction of mortality. Currently, mortality seems to be similar to the general population in adequately treated patients with acromegaly. In this review, we update the knowledge in complications of acromegaly and detail the effects of different acromegaly treatment options on these complications. Incidence of mortality, its correlation with GH (cumulative exposure vs last value), and IGF-I levels and the shift in the main cause of mortality in patients with acromegaly are also addressed.

Changes in metabolic parameters and cardiovascular risk factors after therapeutic control of acromegaly vary with the treatment modality. Data from the Bicêtre cohort, and review of the literature

CONTEXT

Untreated acromegaly is associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to malignant, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular disorders. Effective treatment of acromegaly reduces excess mortality, but its impact on cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic parameters are poorly documented.

AIM

We analyzed changes in cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic parameters in patients receiving various treatment modalities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 96 patients with acromegaly, both at diagnosis and after IGF-I normalization following surgery alone (n = 51) or medical therapy with first generation somatostatin analogues (SSA, n = 23), or pegvisomant (n = 22). Duration of follow-up was 77 (42-161) months, 75 (42-112) months, and 62 (31-93) months, in patients treated with surgery alone, SSA, and pegvisomant, respectively. In all the cases except four, patients treated medically had underwent previous unsuccessful surgery.

RESULTS

IGF-I normalization was associated with increased body weight, decreased systolic blood pressure (SBP) in hypertensive patients, decreased fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HOMA-IR and HOMA-B levels, increased HDL cholesterol (HDLc); whereas, LDL cholesterol (LDLc) was not significantly different. Plasma PCSK9 levels were unchanged in patients with available values. Cardiovascular and metabolic changes varied with the treatment modality: surgery, but not pegvisomant, had a beneficial effect on SBP; FPG decreased after surgery but increased after SSA; the decline in HOMA-IR was only significant after surgery; pegvisomant significantly increased LDLc and total cholesterol; whereas SA increased HDLc and had no effect on LDLc levels.

CONCLUSION

Treatments used to normalize IGF-I levels in patients with acromegaly could have differential effects on cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic parameters.

PREDICTIVE MARKERS FOR POSTSURGICAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF ACROMEGALY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND CONSENSUS TREATMENT GUIDELINE

Objective: To clarify the selection of medical therapy following transsphenoidal surgery in patients with acromegaly, based on growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) response and glucometabolic control. Methods: We carried out a systematic literature review on three of the best studied and most practical predictive markers of the response to somatostatin analogues (SSAs): somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression, tumor morphologic classification, and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity. Additional analyses focused on glucose metabolism in treated patients. Results: The literature survey confirmed significant associations of all three factors with SSA responsiveness. SSTR expression appears necessary for the SSA response; however, it is not sufficient, as approximately half of SSTR2-positive tumors failed to respond clinically to first-generation SSAs. MRI findings (T2-hypo-intensity) and a densely granulated phenotype also correlate with SSA efficacy, and are advantageous as predictive markers relative to SSTR expression alone. Glucometabolic control declines with SSA monotherapy, whereas GH receptor antagonist (GHRA) monotherapy may restore normoglycemia. Conclusion: We propose a decision tree to guide selection among SSAs, dopamine agonists (DAs), and GHRA for medical treatment of acromegaly in the postsurgical setting. This decision tree employs three validated predictive markers and other clinical considerations, to determine whether SSAs are appropriate first-line medical therapy in the postsurgical setting. DA treatment is favored in patients with modest IGF-1 elevation. GHRA treatment should be considered for patients with T2-hyperintense tumors with a sparsely granulated phenotype and/or low SSTR2 staining, and may also be favored for individuals with diabetes. Prospective analyses are required to test the utility of this therapeutic paradigm. Abbreviations: DA = dopamine agonist; DG = densely granulated; GH = growth hormone; GHRA = growth hormone receptor antagonist; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; SG = sparsely granulated; SSA = somatostatin analogue; SSTR = somatostatin receptor.

Diabetes mellitus induced by somatostatin analogue therapy is not permanent in acromegalic patients

CONTEXT

Therapy with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) may have deleterious effects on glucose metabolism in patients with acromegaly, often leading to the development of diabetes mellitus (DM).

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether DM, developed during therapy with SSAs, may revert after drug withdrawal and cure of acromegaly with pituitary adenomectomy.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study, in a tertiary referral centre.

PATIENTS

Eighteen acromegalic patients without DM at the diagnosis of acromegaly treated with SSAs as a primary therapy, and then cured by pituitary adenomectomy.

METHODS

Endocrine status and glucose homeostasis were evaluated at diagnosis of acromegaly and at least every 6 months during SSA therapy. At each visit, patients were classified into one of the following classes: normal glucose tolerance, prediabetes, overt diabetes.

RESULTS

Median follow-up after starting SSAs therapy was 69 months (IQR 54.75-132.25). During SSA therapy, all patients had controlled acromegaly defined by normal serum IGF1 concentrations for the age. Of the 13 euglycaemic patients at diagnosis, three developed prediabetes and three diabetes, whereas, of the five prediabetic patients at diagnosis, two worsened to overt diabetes and three remained in the prediabetic range (P = 0.04). After curing acromegaly with pituitary adenomectomy and subsequent SSA withdrawal, prediabetes reverted in five of six patients, and diabetes in all five patients (three reverted to euglycaemia, while two reverted to prediabetes) (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In acromegalic patients with controlled disease, changes in glycaemic status induced by SSAs are not permanent.

Insulin Resistance in Patients With Acromegaly

Acromegaly is characterized by chronic overproduction of growth hormone (GH) that leads to insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and, ultimately, diabetes. The GH-induced sustained stimulation of lipolysis plays a major role not only in the development of insulin resistance and prediabetes/diabetes, but also in the reduction of lipid accumulation, making acromegaly a unique case of severe insulin resistance in the presence of reduced body fat. In the present review, we elucidate the effects of GH hypersecretion on metabolic organs, describing the pathophysiology of impaired glucose tolerance in acromegaly, as well as the impact of acromegaly-specific therapies on glucose metabolism. In addition, we highlight the role of insulin resistance in the development of acromegaly-associated complications such as hypertension, cardiac disease, sleep apnea, polycystic ovaries, bone disease, and cancer. Taken together, insulin resistance is an important metabolic hallmark of acromegaly, which is strongly related to disease activity, the development of comorbidities, and might even impact the response to drugs used in the treatment of acromegaly.

Effectiveness and safety of pegvisomant: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational longitudinal studies

PURPOSE

Acromegaly is a rare disease that often requires drug treatment to achieve control, with pegvisomant being one of the most widely used therapies. In the present paper, we aimed to obtain evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of pegvisomant by reviewing real-world observational longitudinal studies.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed with a meta-analysis of event rates (95% confidence interval (CI)) using a random effects model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed (comprehensive meta-analysis 2.0). The systematic review was performed in accordance to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology, and Cochrane recommendations (PROSPERO register CRD 42017059880). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO were used to search for literature. Observational studies in patients using pegvisomant for the treatment of acromegaly were included.

RESULTS

Initially, 552 papers were retrieved from the databases; and 31 articles were included in the qualitative analysis and 14 in the quantitative analysis. Eight primary meta-analyses were performed. The overall rate of patients with disease control was of 60.9% (51.8-69.3%; 95% CI). When considering patients under monotherapy, the control rate was 71.7% (64.0-78.4%; 95% CI). Tumor growth was estimated in 7.3% (4.7-11.1%; 95% CI) and elevation of transaminases in 3.0% (1.7-5.2%; 95% CI).

CONCLUSIONS

The real-world data showed that the effectiveness of pegvisomant is not as high as reported in interventional studies. Acromegaly appears to be better controlled when pegvisomant is used as a monotherapy. No serious adverse events were associated with the use of pegvisomant; however, given the high cost of this drug, further studies are required.

Efficacy and Safety of switching to Pasireotide in Acromegaly Patients controlled with Pegvisomant and Somatostatin Analogues: PAPE extension study

OBJECTIVE

to assess the efficacy and safety after 48 weeks of treatment with pasireotide long-acting-release (PAS-LAR) alone or in combination with pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly. In addition, we assessed the relation between insulin secretion and pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia.

DESIGN

The PAPE extension study is a prospective follow-up study until 48 weeks after the core study of 24 weeks.

METHODS

59 out of 61 patients entered the extension study. Efficacy was defined as the percentage of patients achieving IGF-I normalization (≤ 1.2 x the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)) at 48-weeks through protocol-based adjustment of pegvisomant and PAS-LAR doses. At baseline, insulin secretion was assessed by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

RESULTS

At the end of the study median IGF-I was 0.98 x ULN, and 77% of patients achieved normal IGF-I levels with a mean pegvisomant dose of 64 mg/week, and an overall cumulative pegvisomant dose reduction of 52%. Frequency of diabetes mellitus increased from 68% at 24 weeks to 77% at 48 weeks, and 9 patients discontinued PAS-LAR treatment, mainly because of severe hyperglycemia. Pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia was inversely correlated with baseline insulin secretion (r = -0.37, P < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

PAS-LAR normalizes IGF-I levels in most acromegaly patients, with a fifty percent pegvisomant-sparing effect. However, PAS-LAR treatment coincided with a high incidence of diabetes mellitus. The risk for developing diabetes during PAS-LAR treatment seems inversely related to insulin secretion at baseline.

Screening for comorbid conditions in patients enrolled in the SODA registry: a 2-year observational analysis

PURPOSE

This 2-year analysis assessed frequency of comorbidities and comorbidity screening in the Somatuline^® (lanreotide, LAN) Depot for Acromegaly (SODA) registry.

METHODS

Patient data collected included pituitary hormone deficiencies, sleep studies, echocardiograms, gallbladder sonographies, colonoscopies, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone levels in patients with (DM) and without (non-DM) diabetes mellitus were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 241 patients enrolled. Pituitary hormone deficiencies were reported more frequently at enrollment in male (56.9%) vs female patients (32.0%; p < 0.001). TSH deficiency was the most common endocrine deficiency (69.8%), followed by gonadotropin deficiency (62.3%). Screening tests reported at enrollment: sleep studies in 29.9% (79.2% had sleep apnea), echocardiogram in 46.1% (46.8% abnormal), gallbladder sonography in 18.7% (17.8% had gallstones), and colonoscopy in 48.1% (35.3% had polyps). Follow-up studies were reported less frequently at 1 and 2 years. HbA1c data were reported in 30.8% and 41.2% after 1 and 2 years. HbA1c levels were similar at 1 and 2 years of LAN therapy among DM and non-DM patients with available data. Fewer DM vs non-DM patients achieved IGF-1 below upper limit of normal at Month 24 (58.3% vs 80.6%; p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer than half of patients in SODA had screening results reported at enrollment for sleep apnea, cardiomyopathy, and colon polyps. Gallbladder imaging was reported in a minority of patients. Lower IGF-1 control rates were observed in DM vs non-DM patients at Month 24. These data suggest a need for better monitoring of comorbidities in US acromegaly patients.

Somatostatin Analogs and Glucose Metabolism in Acromegaly: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Interventional Studies

INTRODUCTION

Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) effectivelycontrol growth hormone secretion in first and second line treatmentof acromegaly. Their effect onglucose metabolism is still debated.

AIM

to address the following questions: 1) Do SSAs affect fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), glucose load (2h-OGTT), HOMA-I, HOMA-β, triglycerides (TGD), weight (W) or body mass index (BMI)? 2) Do lanreotide (LAN) and octreotide LAR (OCT) affect metabolism differently? 3)Does their effect depend on disease control?

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of prospective interventional trialstreating acromegaly with SSAs. Inclusion criteria: all studies reporting glyco-metabolic outcomes before and after SSAs with a minimum 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 47 studies treating 1297 subjects (631 F). SSA treatment effectively lowered FPI (effect size [ES] -6.67 mU/L, 95%CI: -8.38 to -4.95mU/L; p<0.001), HOMA-I (ES -1.57, CI: -2.42 to -0.72; p<0.001), HOMA-β (ES -47.45, CI: -73.15 to -21.76; p<0.001) and TGD (ES -0.37 mmol/L, CI: -0.47 to -0.27 mmol/L; p<0.001). SSAs worsened 2h-OGTT (ES 0.59 mmol/L, CI: 0.05 to 1.13 mmol/L; p=0.032), but not FPG. A mild but significant increase in HbA1c (ES 0.12%, CI: 0.00to 0.25%; p=0.044) was found in OCT treated subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

SSA treatment in acromegaly patients-while improving disease control- reduces insulin levels, increases after load glucose and, ultimately, increases HbA1c levels without affecting FPG. The findings suggest that clinicians treating acromegaly with SSAs should consider targeting post-prandial glucose.

Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Pasireotide in Patients With Acromegaly Controlled With Pegvisomant and First-Generation Somatostatin Analogues (PAPE Study)

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of pasireotide long-acting release (PAS-LAR) alone or in combination with pegvisomant by switching patients with acromegaly who were well controlled with long-acting somatostatin analogues (LA-SSAs) and pegvisomant to PAS-LAR with or without pegvisomant.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with acromegaly were enrolled in a prospective open-label study. We included patients with an insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) ≤1.2 × upper limit of normal (ULN) during treatment with LA-SSAs and pegvisomant. At baseline, the pegvisomant dose was reduced by 50% up to 12 weeks. When IGF-I remained ≤1.2 × ULN after 12 weeks, patients were switched to PAS-LAR 60 mg monotherapy. When IGF-I was >1.2 × ULN, patients were switched to PAS-LAR 60 mg, and they continued with the 50% reduced pegvisomant dose.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean IGF-I was 0.97 × ULN, and the median pegvisomant dose was 80 mg/wk. At 12 weeks, mean IGF-I increased to 1.59 × ULN, and IGF-I levels ≤1.2 ULN were observed in 24.6% of participants. At 24 weeks, IGF-I levels were reduced into the reference range in 73.8% of patients. Between baseline and 24 weeks, the pegvisomant dose was reduced by 66.1%. PAS-LAR was well tolerated, but hyperglycemia was the most frequent adverse event. The frequency of diabetes increased from 32.8% at baseline to 68.9% at 24 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to PAS-LAR, either as monotherapy or combination with pegvisomant, can control IGF-I levels in most patients. PAS-LAR demonstrated a pegvisomant-sparing effect of 66% compared with the combination with LA-SSAs. Hyperglycemia was the most important safety issue.

Impact of Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogues on Glucose Metabolism in Acromegaly: A Hospital-Based Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the change in glucose tolerance in treatment-naïve patients with acromegaly after administration of SSA and to identify predictive factors of glucose impairment during SSA therapy.

METHODS

Oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) was performed on 64 newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve patients with acromegaly both at pretreatment and 3 months after initiation of treatment with long-acting SSA. Insulin resistance (IR) was assessed by homeostatic model assessment- (HOMA-) IR and IS_OGTT. Insulin secretion was assessed by HOMA-β, INS₀/BG₀, IGI (insulinogenic index), IGI/IR, ISSI2, and AUC_INS/AUC_BG. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the optimal cutoffs to predict the impact of SSA on glucose metabolism.

RESULTS

Pretreatment, 19, 24, and 21 patients were categorized as having normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and diabetes mellitus (DM), respectively. Posttreatment, IR, represented by IS_OGTT, was significantly improved in all 3 groups. Insulin secretion, represented by HOMA-β, declined in the NGT and IGT groups, but was unaltered in the DM group. The glucose tolerance status deteriorated in 18 (28.1%) patients, including 13 patients in the NGT group and 5 patients in the IGT group. Deterioration was associated with lower baseline BG₁₂₀ (plasma glucose 120 min post-OGTT), less reduction of growth hormone (GH), and greater reduction of insulin secretion after SSA therapy. BG₁₂₀ greater than 8.1 mmol/l provided the greatest sensitivity and specificity in predicting the stabilization and/or improvement of glucose tolerance status after SSA treatment (PPV 90.7%, NPV 66.7%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The deterioration of glucose metabolism induced by SSA treatment is caused by the less reduction of GH and the more inhibition of insulin secretion, which can be predicted by the baseline BG₁₂₀ during OGTT.

Diabetes Secondary to Acromegaly: Physiopathology, Clinical Features and Effects of Treatment

Acromegaly is a rare disease due to chronic GH excess and to the consequent increase in IGF-1 levels. Both GH and IGF-1 play a role in intermediate metabolism affecting glucose homeostasis. Indeed, chronic GH excess impairs insulin sensitivity, increases gluconeogenesis, reduces the glucose uptake in adipose tissue and muscle and alters pancreatic β cells function. As a consequence, glucose metabolism alterations are a very frequent complication in acromegaly patients, further contributing to the increased cardiovascular risk and mortality. Treatment modalities of acromegaly differently impact on glucose tolerance. Successful surgical treatment of acromegaly ameliorates glucose metabolism abnormalities. Drugs used to treat acromegaly patients may per se affect glucose homeostasis, therefore influencing patients' management. Indeed pegvisomant has been shown to positively impact on glucose metabolism, while somatostatin analogs, especially pasireotide, can cause hyperglycaemia. On the other hand, robust data on the effect of dopamine agonists on glycaemic profile are still lacking. This review summarizes the available data on diabetes mellitus in acromegaly patients, with a focus on the potential effects of the medical treatment of the disease on glucose homeostasis, providing an overview of the current state of the art.

[Diagnostics and treatment of acromegaly : Necessity for targeted monitoring of comorbidities]

Acromegaly is a rare and severe condition, presenting with typical signs and symptoms. The diagnosis is often initially made years after the first manifestations of the disease. In more than 99% of patients the disease is caused by a benign pituitary tumor that secretes growth hormone (GH). The diagnosis is based on the presence of increased insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels and a lack of GH suppression in the oral glucose tolerance test. The standard imaging procedure for tumor detection is magnetic resonance imaging in the region of the sella turcica. Treatment includes surgical, drug and radiation therapy. Important factors are an intensive aftercare of the patient, controls for detection of tumor recurrence and pituitary insufficiency as well as assessment of various organ functions and risk constellations. Patient care should involve close cooperation between endocrinologists, neurosurgeons and general practitioners as well as other specialist disciplines.

Effects of long-term combined treatment with somatostatin analogues and pegvisomant on cardiac structure and performance in acromegaly

To date, no data are available on the effects of long-term combined treatment with somatostatin analogues (SA) and pegvisomant (PEG) on cardiovascular complications in acromegaly. The current study aimed at investigating the effects of long-term SA + PEG on cardiac structure and performance. Thirty-six patients (14 M, 22 F, aged 52.3 ± 10.2 years) entered this study. Weight, BMI, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, IGF-I, fasting glucose (FG), fasting insulin (FI), HOMA-IR, HbA_1c, and lipids were evaluated at baseline (T0), after long-term (median 36 months) SA (T1), after 12 (T12) and 60 (T60) months of SA + PEG, and at last follow-up (LFU, median 78 months). At each time point, all patients underwent echocardiography. At T1, induced a slight but not significant decrease in IGF-I (p = 0.077), whereas FI (p = 0.004), HOMA-IR (p = 0.013), ejection fraction (EF, p = 0.013), early (E) to late (A) ventricular filling velocities (E/A, p = 0.001), and isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT, p = 0.000) significantly improved. At T12, IGF-I (p = 0.000) significantly reduced compared to T0, and FI (p = 0.001), HOMA-IR (p = 0.000), LVMI (p = 0.000), and E/A (p = 0.006) further improved compared to T1. At T60, FI (p = 0.027), HOMA-IR (p = 0.049), and E/A (p = 0.005) significantly improved as compared to T1. At LFU IGF-I normalized in 83.3 %, FI (p = 0.000), HOMA-IR (p = 0.000), LVMi (p = 0.000), and E/A (p = 0.005) further improved as compared to T1. PEG dose significantly correlated with LVMi at T12 (r = 0.575, p = 0.000) and T60 (r = 0.403, p = 0.037). Long-term PEG addition to SA improves cardiac structure and performance, particularly diastolic dysfunction, in acromegalic patients resistant to SA.

Diabetes in Patients With Acromegaly

Acromegaly is a clinical syndrome which results from growth hormone excess. Uncontrolled acromegaly is associated with cardiovascular mortality, due to an excess of risk factors including diabetes mellitus, hypertension and cardiomegaly. Diabetes mellitus is a frequent complication of acromegaly with a prevalence of 12-37%. This review will provide an overview of a number of aspects of diabetes mellitus and glucose intolerance in acromegaly including the following: 1. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of abnormalities of glucose homeostasis 2. The impact of different management options for acromegaly on glucose homeostasis 3. The management options for diabetes mellitus in patients with acromegaly RECENT FINDINGS: Growth hormone and IGF-1 have complex effects on glucose metabolism. Insulin resistance, hyperinsulinaemia and increased gluconeogenesis combine to produce a metabolic milieu which leads to the development of diabetes in acromegaly. Treatment of acromegaly should ameliorate abnormalities of glucose metabolism, due to reversal of insulin resistance and a reduction in gluconeogenesis. Recent advances in medical therapy of acromegaly have varying impacts on glucose homeostasis. These adverse effects influence management choices in patients with acromegaly who also have diabetes mellitus or glucose intolerance. The underlying mechanisms of disorders of glucose metabolism in patients with acromegaly are complex. The aim of treatment of acromegaly is normalisation of GH/IGF-1 with reduction of co-morbidities. The choice of therapy for acromegaly should consider the impact of therapy on several factors including glucose metabolism.

The role of combination medical therapy in the treatment of acromegaly

PURPOSE

Uncontrolled acromegaly results in approximately 2-fold excess mortality. Pituitary surgery is first-line therapy, and medical treatment is indicated for persistent disease. While cabergoline and pegvisomant are used in select patients, somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) remain the cornerstone of medical treatment. Management of patients poorly responsive to SRLs is therefore, challenging. The purpose of this review is to highlight the options for combination medical therapy in the treatment of acromegaly, with an emphasis on efficacy and safety.

METHODS

All original articles/abstracts detailing combination medical therapy in acromegaly were identified from a PubMed search.

RESULTS

Studies reviewed included retrospective and open-label prospective studies. While the combination of SRL and cabergoline was generally well tolerated, a lower baseline insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) level was the best predictor of efficacy; this combination may be most effective in patients with mildly elevated IGF-1. SRL-pegvisomant combination normalized IGF-1 in the majority of patients; continued efficacy despite individual drug dosing reduction was also reported. The risk of significant liver enzyme elevation was, however, higher than that reported with SRL monotherapy; close monitoring is recommended. Data on pegvisomant-cabergoline combination is limited, but this may be an option in the setting of SRL intolerance. Reports on temozolomide used in combination with other medical therapies in patients with aggressive GH-secreting tumors are also summarized.

CONCLUSION

While more prospective, randomized controlled trials on long-term efficacy and safety are needed, combination medical therapy remains a treatment strategy that should be considered for acromegaly patients poorly responsive to SRLs.

Disease activity and lifestyle influence comorbidities and cardiovascular events in patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study is to identify the predictors of comorbidities and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) that can develop after diagnosis of acromegaly. The role of therapy for acromegaly in the event of such complications was also evaluated.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study was conducted on 200 consecutive acromegalic patients in a tertiary referral center. The following outcomes were evaluated: diabetes, hypertension and MACE. Each patient was included in the analysis of a specific outcome, unless they were affected when acromegaly was diagnosed, and further classified as follows: (i) in remission after adenomectomy (Hx), (ii) controlled by somatostatin analogues (SSA) (SSAc) or (iii) not controlled by SSA (SSAnc). Data were evaluated using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

After diagnosis of acromegaly, diabetes occurred in 40.8% of patients. The SSAnc group had a three-fold higher risk of diabetes (HR: 3.32, P = 0.006), whereas the SSAc group had a 1.4-fold higher risk of diabetes (HR: 1.43, P = 0.38) compared with the Hx group. Hypertension occurred in 35.5% of patients, after diagnosis. The determinants of hypertension were age (HR: 1.06, P = 0.01) and BMI (HR: 1.05, P = 0.01). MACE occurred in 11.8% of patients, after diagnosis. Age (HR: 1.09, P = 0.005) and smoking habit (HR: 5.95, P = 0.01) were predictors of MACE. Conversely, therapy for acromegaly did not influence hypertension or MACE.

CONCLUSION

After diagnosis of acromegaly, control of the disease (irrespective of the type of treatment) and lifestyle are predictors of comorbidities and major adverse cardiovascular events.

Current and Emerging Aspects of Diabetes Mellitus in Acromegaly

Diabetes mellitus is a frequent complication of acromegaly, a disease characterized by chronic hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH) by a pituitary adenoma. Diabetes occurs commonly but not only as a consequence of an insulin-resistant state induced by GH excess. The development of diabetes in patients with acromegaly is clinically relevant, since such a complication is thought to increase the already elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk of the disease. Emerging data suggest that a specific cardiomyopathy can be identified in acromegaly patients with diabetes. Moreover, the presence of diabetes may also influence therapeutic decision making in acromegaly, since traditional and newly developed drugs used in this clinical setting may impact glucose metabolism regardless of control of GH hypersecretion.

Glycemic profile in patients with acromegaly treated with somatostatin analogue

Hypothesis. The growth hormone (GH) excess displayed in acromegaly induces insulin resistance up to diabetes mellitus (DM). The somatostatin analogues (as octreotide LAR) are useful in controlling the GH levels but disturbances of glucose metabolism might be seen.

Objective. This study evaluates the acromegalic glycemic profile under octreotide.

Methods & Results. Out of the total number of patients (N=34) diagnosed with active acromegaly, only some were followed (N=25; male/ female ratio: 6/ 19; mean age: 51.8 years) by testing GH, IGF1 (Insulin Growth Factor 1), basal glucose and oral glucose tolerance test (OCGTT) at baseline, 6 and 12 months under Octreotide (first 6 months with 20 mg/ 28 days + 6 months with 30 mg/ 28 days). Pre-treatment values were 17.6% of patients had DM, 14.7% - impaired glucose tolerance, 26.5% - impaired fasting glucose, and 41.2% - normal assays. From the statistical point of view, the DM patients were significantly older and had higher GH levels than the acromegalic without glycaemia disturbances. They did not achieve significant changes in basal blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin after 6 months, neither after 12 months.

After 6 months, there were no significant changes in basal glycaemia in patients with normal baseline glycaemia but 2-hours OGTT glucose values were significantly lower than initially (82.35 mg/ dl vs. 93 mg/ dl, p=0.005) consistent with reduced levels of GH and IGF1. After 12 months, both basal and 2-hours glucose levels in OGTT were similar to baseline despite the significant lower GH (3.3 vs. 6.61 ng/ mL, p=0.003) and IGF1 (332 vs. 713 ng/ mL, p=0.001).

Conclusions. Octreotide therapy induces an improvement in glycemic profile in patients with active acromegaly without diabetes mellitus consistent with decreased levels of GH and IGF1. In patients with diabetes, partial control of glucose metabolism is due to inadequate suppression of GH and IGF1 after one year of treatment.

Combined treatment of somatostatin analogues with pegvisomant in acromegaly

Treatment of acromegaly with monotherapy long-acting somatostatin analogues (LA-SSA) as primary treatment or after neurosurgery can only achieve complete normalization of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in roughly 40 % of patients. Recently, one of the acromegaly consensus groups has recommended switching to combined treatment of LA-SSA and pegvisomant (PEGV) in patients with partial response to LA-SSAs. This combination of LA-SSA and PEGV, a growth hormone receptor antagonist, can normalize IGF-I levels in virtually all patients, requiring that the adequate dose of PEGV is used. The required PEGV dose varies significantly between individual acromegaly patients. One of the advantages of the combination therapy is that tumor size control or even tumor shrinkage can be observed in a vast majority of patients. The main side effects of the combination treatment are gastrointestinal symptoms, lipohypertrophy and transient elevated liver transaminases. In this review we provide an overview of the efficacy and safety of the combined treatment of LA-SSAs with PEGV.

Preoperative octreotide therapy and surgery in acromegaly: associations between glucose homeostasis and treatment response

In acromegaly, high GH/IGF-1 levels associate with abnormal glucose metabolism. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) reduce GH and IGF-1 but inhibit insulin secretion. We studied glucose homeostasis in de novo patients with acromegaly and changes in glucose metabolism after treatment with SSA and surgery. In this post hoc analysis from a randomized controlled trial, 55 de novo patients with acromegaly, not using antidiabetic medication, were included. Before surgery, 26 patients received SSAs for 6 months. HbA1c, fasting glucose, and oral glucose tolerance test were performed at baseline, after SSA pretreatment and at 3 months postoperative. Area under curve of glucose (AUC-G) was calculated. Glucose homeostasis was compared to baseline levels of GH and IGF-1, change after SSA pretreatment, and remission both after SSA pretreatment and 3 months postoperative. In de novo patients, IGF-1/GH levels did not associate with baseline glucose parameters. After SSA pretreatment, changes in GH/IGF-1 correlated positively to change in HbA1c levels (both p < 0.03). HbA1c, fasting glucose, and AUC-G increased significantly during SSA pretreatment in patients not achieving hormonal control (all p < 0.05) but did not change significantly in patients with normalized hormone levels. At 3 months postoperative, HbA1c, fasting glucose, and AUC-G were significantly reduced in both cured and not cured patients (all p < 0.05). To conclude, in de novo patients with acromegaly, disease activity did not correlate with glucose homeostasis. Surgical treatment of acromegaly improved glucose metabolism in both cured and not cured patients, while SSA pretreatment led to deterioration in glucose homeostasis in patients not achieving biochemical control.

Italian Society for the Study of Diabetes (SID)/Italian Endocrinological Society (SIE) guidelines on the treatment of hyperglycemia in Cushing's syndrome and acromegaly

Hyperglycemia is a common feature associated with states of increased growth hormone secretion and glucocorticoid levels. The purpose of these guidelines is to assist clinicians and other health care providers to take evidence-based therapeutic decisions for the treatment of hyperglycemia in patients with growth hormone and corticosteroid excess. Both the SID and SIE appointed members to represent each society and to collaborate in Guidelines writing. Members were chosen for their specific knowledge in the field. Each member agreed to produce-and regularly update-conflicts of interest. The authors of these guidelines prepared their contributions following the recommendations for the development of Guidelines, using the standard classes of recommendation shown below. All members of the writing committee provided editing and systematic review of each part of the manuscript, and discussed the grading of evidence. Consensus was guided by a systematic review of all available trials and by interactive discussions.

Italian Society for the Study of Diabetes (SID)/Italian Endocrinological Society (SIE) guidelines on the treatment of hyperglycemia in Cushing's syndrome and acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Hyperglycemia is a common feature associated with states of increased growth hormone secretion and glucocorticoid levels.

AIMS

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist clinicians and other health care providers to take evidence-based therapeutic decisions for the treatment of hyperglycemia in patients with growth hormone and corticosteroid excess.

METHODOLOGY

Both the SID and SIE appointed members to represent each society and to collaborate in Guidelines writing. Members were chosen for their specific knowledge in the field. Each member agreed to produce--and regularly update--conflicts of interest. The Authors of these guidelines prepared their contributions following the recommendations for the development of Guidelines, using the standard classes of recommendation shown below. All members of the writing committee provided editing and systematic review of each part of the manuscript, and discussed the grading of evidence. Consensus was guided by a systematic review of all available trials and by interactive discussions.

Long-term effects of pegvisomant on comorbidities in patients with acromegaly: a retrospective single-center study

CONTEXT

The effect of pegvisomant on IGF1 levels in patients with acromegaly is well documented, but little is known of its long-term impact on comorbidity.

AIM

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effects of long-term pegvisomant therapy on cardiorespiratory and metabolic comorbidity in patients with acromegaly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the long-term (up to 10 years) effect of pegvisomant therapy given alone (n=19, 45%) or in addition to somatostatin analogues and/or cabergoline (n=23, 55%) on echocardiographic, polysomnographic and metabolic parameters in respectively 42, 12 and 26 patients with acromegaly followed in Bicêtre hospital.

RESULTS

At the first cardiac evaluation, 20±16 months after pegvisomant introduction, IGF1 levels normalized in 29 (69%) of the 42 patients. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved significantly in patients whose basal LVEF was ≤60% and decreased in those whose LVEF was >70%. The left ventricular mass index (LVMi) decreased from 123±25 to 101±21 g/m(2) (P<0.05) in the 17 patients with a basal LVMi higher than the median (91 g/m(2)), while it remained stable in the other patients. Pegvisomant reduced the apnoea-hypopnea index and cured obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in four of the eight patients concerned. Long-term follow-up of 22 patients showed continuing improvements in cardiac parameters. The BMI and LDL cholesterol level increased minimally during pegvisomant therapy, and other lipid parameters were not modified.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term pegvisomant therapy not only normalizes IGF1 in a large proportion of patients but also improves cardiac and respiratory comorbidity.

60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: Acromegaly

Acromegaly (ACM) is a chronic, progressive disorder caused by the persistent hypersecretion of GH, in the vast majority of cases secreted by a pituitary adenoma. The consequent increase in IGF1 (a GH-induced liver protein) is responsible for most clinical features and for the systemic complications associated with increased mortality. The clinical diagnosis, based on symptoms related to GH excess or the presence of a pituitary mass, is often delayed many years because of the slow progression of the disease. Initial testing relies on measuring the serum IGF1 concentration. The oral glucose tolerance test with concomitant GH measurement is the gold-standard diagnostic test. The therapeutic options for ACM are surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy (RT). The outcome of surgery is very good for microadenomas (80-90% cure rate), but at least half of the macroadenomas (most frequently encountered in ACM patients) are not cured surgically. Somatostatin analogs are mainly indicated after surgical failure. Currently their routine use as primary therapy is not recommended. Dopamine agonists are useful in a minority of cases. Pegvisomant is indicated for patients refractory to surgery and other medical treatments. RT is employed sparingly, in cases of persistent disease activity despite other treatments, due to its long-term side effects. With complex, combined treatment, at least three-quarters of the cases are controlled according to current criteria. With proper control of the disease, the specific complications are partially improved and the mortality rate is close to that of the background population.