Induction of protective immunity in chickens immunised with plasmid DNA encoding infectious bursal disease virus antigens

Advances in Poultry Vaccines: Leveraging Biotechnology for Improving Vaccine Development, Stability, and Delivery

With the rapidly increasing demand for poultry products and the current challenges facing the poultry industry, the application of biotechnology to enhance poultry production has gained growing significance. Biotechnology encompasses all forms of technology that can be harnessed to improve poultry health and production efficiency. Notably, biotechnology-based approaches have fueled rapid advances in biological research, including (a) genetic manipulation in poultry breeding to improve the growth and egg production traits and disease resistance, (b) rapid identification of infectious agents using DNA-based approaches, (c) inclusion of natural and synthetic feed additives to poultry diets to enhance their nutritional value and maximize feed utilization by birds, and (d) production of biological products such as vaccines and various types of immunostimulants to increase the defensive activity of the immune system against pathogenic infection. Indeed, managing both existing and newly emerging infectious diseases presents a challenge for poultry production. However, recent strides in vaccine technology are demonstrating significant promise for disease prevention and control. This review focuses on the evolving applications of biotechnology aimed at enhancing vaccine immunogenicity, efficacy, stability, and delivery.

Infectious bursal disease virus in chickens: prevalence, impact, and management strategies

Infectious bursal disease (IBD), also known as Gumboro disease, is a highly contagious, immunosuppressive disease of young chickens. Although first observed about 60 years ago, to date, the disease is responsible for major economic losses in the poultry industry worldwide. IBD virus (IBDV), a double-stranded RNA virus, exists as two serotypes with only serotype 1 causing the disease in young chickens. The virus infects the bursa of Fabricius of particularly the actively dividing and differentiating lymphocytes of the B-cells lineage of immature chickens, resulting in morbidity, mortality, and immunosuppression. Immunosuppression enhances the susceptibility of chickens to other infections and interferes with vaccination against other diseases. Immunization is the most important measure to control IBD; however, rampant usage of live vaccines has resulted in the evolution of new strains. Although the immunosuppression caused by IBDV is more directed toward the B lymphocytes, the protective immunity in birds depends on inducement of both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. The interference with the inactivated vaccine induced maternally derived antibodies in young chicks has become a hurdle in controlling the disease, thus necessitating the development of newer vaccines with improved efficacy. The present review illustrates the overall dynamics of the virus and the disease, and the recent developments in the field of virus diagnosis and vaccine research.

Advances in vaccine research against economically important viral diseases of food animals: Infectious bursal disease virus

Numerous reviews have been published on infectious bursal disease (IBD) and infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Many high quality vaccines are commercially available for the control of IBD that, when used correctly, provide solid protection against infection and disease caused by IBDV. Viruses are not static however; they continue to evolve and vaccines need to keep pace with them. The evolution of IBDV has resulted in very virulent strains and new antigenic types of the virus. This review will discuss some of the limitations associated with existing vaccines, potential solutions to these problems and advances in new vaccines for the control of IBD.

Protective efficacy of a DNA vaccine construct encoding the VP2 gene of infectious bursal disease and a truncated HSP70 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in chickens

Infectious bursal disease (IBD) is an acute, infectious, immunosuppressive disease affecting young chicken worldwide. The etiological agent IBD virus (IBDV) is a double stranded RNA virus with outer capsid protein VP2 of IBDV is the major antigenic determinant capable of inducing neutralizing antibody. DNA vaccines encoding VP2 has been extensively studied achieving only partial protection. However, the efficacy of DNA vaccines against IBDV can be augmented by choosing a potential molecular adjuvant. The goal of the present study is to evaluate the immune response and protective efficacy of a DNA vaccine encoding the C-terminal domain of the heat shock protein 70 (cHSP70) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gene genetically fused with the full length VP2 gene of IBDV (pCIVP2-cHSP70) in comparison to a 'DNA prime-protein boost' approach and a DNA vaccine encoding the VP2 gene (pCIVP2) alone. The results indicate that both pCIVP2-cHSP70 and 'DNA prime-protein boost' elicited humoral as well as cellular immune responses. Chickens in the pCIVP2-cHSP70 and 'DNA prime-protein boost' groups developed significantly higher levels of ELISA titer to IBDV antigen compared to the group immunized with pCIVP2 alone (p<0.01). However, significantly higher levels of lymphocyte proliferative response, IL-12 and IFN-γ production were found in the pCIVP2-cHSP70 group compared to 'DNA prime-protein boost' group. Additionally, chickens immunized with pCIVP2-cHSP70 and 'DNA prime-protein boost' vaccines were completely protected against the vvIBDV whereas pCIVP2 DNA vaccine alone was able to protect only 70%. These findings suggest that the truncated C-terminal HSP70 mediated DNA vaccine genetically fused with the VP2 gene construct stimulated both humoral and cell mediated immune responses and conferred complete protection against IBDV. This novel strategy is perhaps a seminal concept in utilizing HSP70 as an adjuvant molecule to elicit an immune response against IBD affecting chickens.

Codon optimization and woodchuck hepatitis virus posttranscriptional regulatory element enhance the immune responses of DNA vaccines against infectious bursal disease virus in chickens

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the protective efficacy of DNA vaccines against infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) in chickens and to determine whether codon optimization and the woodchuck hepatitis virus posttranscriptional regulatory element (WPRE) could improve the immunogenicity of the DNA vaccines. The VP2, VP243 and codon-optimized VP243 genes of IBDV were cloned into pCAGGS vector, and designated as pCAGVP2, pCAGVP243 and pCAGoptiVP243, respectively. Plasmids pCAGWVP243 and pCAGWoptiVP243 carrying the WPRE elements were also constructed as DNA vaccines. To evaluate vaccine efficacy, 2-week-old chickens were injected intramuscularly with the constructed plasmids twice at 2-week intervals and challenged with very virulent IBDV 2 weeks post-boost. Plasmid pCAGVP243 induced better immune responses than pCAGVP2. Chickens immunized with pCAGoptiVP243 and pCAGWVP243 had higher levels of antibody titers, lymphoproliferation responses and cytokine production compared with pCAGVP243. Furthermore, plasmid pCAGWoptiVP243 induced the highest levels of immune responses among the groups. After challenged, DNA vaccines pCAGVP2, pCAGVP243, pCAGoptiVP243, pCAGWVP243 and pCAGWoptiVP243 conferred protection for 33%, 60%, 80%, 87% and 100% of chickens, respectively, as evidenced by the absence of clinical signs, mortality, and bursal atrophy. These results indicate that codon optimization and WPRE could enhance the protective efficacy of DNA vaccines against IBDV and these two approaches could work together synergistically in a single DNA vaccine.

Current status of vaccines against infectious bursal disease

Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is the aetiological agent of the acute and highly contagious infectious bursal disease (IBD) or "Gumboro disease". IBD is one of the economically most important diseases that affects commercially produced chickens worldwide. Along with strict hygiene management of poultry farms, vaccination programmes with inactivated and live attenuated viruses have been used to prevent IBD. Live vaccines show a different degree of attenuation; many of them may cause bursal atrophy and thus immunosuppression with poor immune response to vaccination against other pathogens and an increase in vulnerability to various types of infections as possible consequences. Depending on their intrinsic characteristics or on the vaccination procedures, some of the vaccines may not induce full protection against the very virulent IBDV strains and antigenic variants observed in the last three decades. As chickens are most susceptible to IBDV in their first weeks of life, active immunity to the virus has to be induced early after hatching. However, maternally derived IBDV-specific antibodies may interfere with early vaccination with live vaccines. Thus new technologies and second-generation vaccines including rationally designed and subunit vaccines have been developed. Recently, live viral vector vaccines have been licensed in several countries and are reaching the market. Here, the current status of IBD vaccines is discussed.

An overview of infectious bursal disease

Infectious bursal disease (IBD) is a viral immunosuppressive disease of chickens attacking mainly an important lymphoid organ in birds [the bursa of Fabricius (BF)]. The emergence of new variant strains of the causative agent [infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)] has made it more urgent to develop new vaccination strategies against IBD. One of these strategies is the use of recombinant vaccines (DNA and viral-vectored vaccines). Several studies have investigated the host immune response towards IBDV. This review will present a detailed background on the disease and its causative agent, accompanied by a summary of the most recent findings regarding the host immune response to IBDV infection and the use of recombinant vaccines against IBD.

Virus-like particles of hepatitis B virus core protein containing five mimotopes of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) protect chickens against IBDV

Current infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) vaccines suffer from maternal antibody interference and mimotope vaccines might be an alternative. Previously we demonstrated an IBDV VP2 five-mimotope polypeptide, 5EPIS, elicited protective immunity in chickens. In the current study, the 5epis gene was inserted into a plasmid carrying human hepatitis B virus core protein (HBc) gene at its major immunodominant region site. The recombinant gene was efficiently expressed in Escherichia coli to produce chimeric protein HBc-5EPIS which self-assembles to virus-like particles (VLP). Two-week old specific-pathogen-free chickens were immunized intramuscularly with HBc-5EPIS VLP or 5EPIS polypeptide without adjuvant (50 μg/injection) on day 0, 7, 14 and 21. Anti-5EPIS antibody was first detected on day 7 and day 21 in HBc-5EPIS and 5EPIS groups, respectively; on day 28, anti-5EPIS titers reached 12,800 or 1600 by ELISA, and 3200 or 800 by virus neutralization assay in HBc-5EPIS and 5EPIS groups, respectively. No anti-5EPIS antibody was detected in the buffer control group throughout the experiment. Challenge on day 28 with a virulent IBDV strain (GX8/99) resulted in 100%, 40.0% and 26.7% survival for chickens immunized with HBc-5EPIS, 5EPIS and buffer, respectively. These data suggest epitope presentation on chimeric VLP is a promising approach for improving mimotope vaccines for IBDV.

Oral and nasal DNA vaccines delivered by attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium induce a protective immune response against infectious bronchitis in chickens

Several studies have reported that intramuscular injection of DNA vaccines against infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) induces protective immune responses. In the present study, we developed oral and nasal DNA vaccines that carried the S1 gene and N gene of IBV delivered by attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strains SL/pV-S1 and SL/pV-N, respectively. The safety and stability of recombinant Salmonella vaccine were evaluated. Following oral and nasal administration to chickens, the serum and mucosal samples were collected and antibodies against IBV were measured. Chickens were then challenged with IBV strain M41 by the nasal-ocular route 3 weeks after boosting. The results showed that oral and nasal immunization with coadministered SL/pV-S1 and SL/pV-N elicited significant IBV-specific humoral and mucosal immune responses and conferred protective efficacy against IBV challenge higher than that in chickens immunized only with SL/pV-S1. The current study shows that novel DNA vaccines delivered by attenuated S. Typhimurium may be promising candidates for the prevention of infectious bronchitis (IB).These vaccines are efficacious, easily produced economically, and able to be delivered orally and nasally rather than injected. Coadministration of SL/pV-S1 and SL/pV-N may represent an effective mucosal vaccination regimen.

Coadministration of chicken GM-CSF with a DNA vaccine expressing infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) S1 glycoprotein enhances the specific immune response and protects against IBV infection

Various approaches have been developed to improve the efficacy of DNA vaccination, such as the use of plasmids expressing cytokines as molecular adjuvants. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether co-administration of a plasmid containing a chicken granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) gene and a plasmid containing the S1 gene of infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) could enhance the immune response and protection efficacy in chickens against challenge by virulent IBV. Plasmids carrying the S1 gene of IBV (pVAX-S1) and the chicken GM-CSF gene (pVAX-chGM-CSF) were constructed. Seven-day-old chickens were injected intramuscularly with pVAX-S1, pVAX-chGM-CSF, or both and boosted 2 weeks later. Chickens were challenged with virulent IBV at 3 weeks after the booster immunization and observed for 2 weeks. The results showed that co-administration of pVAX-chGM-CSF led to a significant enhancement of humoral and cellular responses over that of vaccination with pVAX-S1 alone. In addition, vaccination with pVAX-chGM-CSF and pVAX-S1 provided 86.7% protection (13/15) against IBV challenge. In contrast, only 73.3% of the chickens were protected against IBV challenge by pVAX-S1 vaccination alone. These results strongly indicate that chGM-CSF can be used as a molecular adjuvant to enhance the protective immunity induced by an IBV-specific DNA vaccine.

A recombinant turkey herpesvirus expressing chicken interleukin-2 increases the protection provided by in ovo vaccination with infectious bursal disease and infectious bronchitis virus

In ovo vaccination remains an attractive option for the mass application of vaccines to poultry, ensuring a uniform application of vaccine in a cost-effective manner. However, the number of vaccines that can be delivered safely by this method is limited. Several infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) vaccines can be given in ovo though most are delivered post-hatch and there are no currently licensed embryo-safe infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) vaccines. Reduction in the dose of vaccines given in ovo is one possibility to ensure embryo safety though efficacy can be reduced when low doses are used. We have investigated the use of embryo-safe IBDV and IBV vaccines and the effects of co-delivery of a turkey herpesvirus recombinant expressing bioactive chicken IL-2 (IL-2/HVT). Co-delivery of the IL-2/HVT with low doses of the IBDV or IBV vaccines significantly increased the antibody response against these viruses. In addition the protection against challenge with virulent IBDV or IBV was increased significantly. This suggests that the co-delivery of IL-2/HVT with low doses of other vaccines in ovo may be one method to increase the number of vaccines that can be given safely and efficaciously via in ovo vaccination.

DNA vaccination with VP2 gene of very virulent infectious bursal disease virus (vvIBDV) delivered by transgenic E. coli DH5alpha given orally confers protective immune responses in chickens

The efficacy of different doses of oral DNA vaccines carrying VP2 gene of vvIBDV delivered by E. coli DH5alpha was studied and compared with purified VP2 recombinant expression plasmid DNA vaccine injected intradermally and whole virus vaccine either from homologous virus or from commercial source. The recombinant plasmid pRc-VP2 was transformed in a non-pathogenic strain of E. coli, the DH5alpha and designated as EC/pRC-VP2. Oral immunization of maternal antibody free broiler chickens at 7 and 14-day-old with different dosages of EC/pRc-VP2 elicited specific humoral immune response as measured by ELISA. Protection in different groups was calculated through clinical signs, gross and histopathological lesions, bursa of Fabricius to body weight ratio, humoral and cellular immune responses and mortality in the chickens. Vaccination with EC/pRc-VP2 at the dose rate of 10(9)CFU per chicken conferred 95.4% protection of the chickens against the challenge with homologous virulent field strain of vvIBDV. Protection afforded by attenuated vero cell adapted UAF-06 strain of vvIBDV was comparable (94%) to that by EC/pRc-VP2 and pRc-VP2 vaccines, which was significantly higher (P<0.05) than the protection provided by a commercial attenuated IBDV stain D-78 vaccine (D-78 vaccine was used as positive control due to its frequent use in the field for vaccination of poultry chickens) and other control groups in the study. The results revealed that DNA vaccines against IBDV may be successfully done by adopting bacterial-vectored oral delivery system and vaccination with homologous vvIBDV (UAF-06) conferred significantly higher protection as compared with imported non-homologous commercial IBDV vaccine.

Development of a multi-mimotope peptide as a vaccine immunogen for infectious bursal disease virus

To explore the mimotope vaccine approach against infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV), five IBDV-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were prepared and their binding peptides were screened against a phage-displayed 12-mer peptide library. After three rounds of biopanning, 12 phages were selected for each mAbs and their specificity to IBDV was verified by sandwich and competitive inhibition ELISAs. Seven phages per mAb were sequenced and their amino acid sequences were deduced. The five representative sequences of mimotopes corresponding mAbs were determined. An artificial gene, designated 5epis (5 epitopes) and consisting of the five mimotopes arranged in tandem (F1-F7-B34-2B1-2G8) with four GGGS spacers, was chemically synthesized and cloned into a prokaryotic expression plasmid pET28b. The protein, designated r5EPIS, was efficiently expressed in Escherichia coli and showed a size of 10kDa in SDS-PAGE. The r5EPIS protein reacted with anti-IBDV mAbs and polyclonal antibodies in Western blot immunoassays. Immunization of SPF chickens with r5EPIS protein (with Freund adjuvant, 50mug per injection on day 0 and 14) evoked high levels of antibody (12,800 by ELISA/1600 by virus neutralizing assay at day 21) and protected 100% of the chickens against a challenge of 200 ELD(50) of IBDV GX8/99 strain, which sharply contrasted with the, respectively, 13.3% and 6.6% survival rate in the adjuvant group and the untreated group. The multi-mimotope protein r5EPIS promises to be a novel subunit vaccine candidate for IBDV.

Effects of DDA, CpG-ODN, and plasmid-encoded chicken IFN-gamma on protective immunity by a DNA vaccine against IBDV in chickens

This study examined the adjuvant effects of dimethyl dioctadecyl ammonium bromide (DDA), CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG-ODN), and chicken interferon-γ (ChIFN-γ) on a DNA vaccine (pcDNA-VP243) against the infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). A plasmid encoding chicken IFN-ã was constructed. Twice at 2-week intervals, two-week-old chickens were injected intramuscularly and intraperitoneally with either a DNA vaccine alone or a DNA vaccine together with the respective adjuvants. On week 2 after the second immunization, the chickens were orally challenged with the highly virulent IBDV. The groups that received the DNA vaccines plus either DDA or CpG-ODN showed significantly lower survival rates than the group that received the DNA vaccine alone. However, the survival rates for the DNA vaccine alone and for the DNA vaccine plus ChIFN-γ were similar. The chickens had no detectable antibodies to the IBDV before the challenge but all the surviving chickens in all groups except for the normal control group showed the induction of antibodies to the IBDV at day 10 after the challenge. As judged by the lymphocyte proliferation assays using the a WST-8 solution performed on the peripheral blood and splenic lymphocytes, the stimulation indices (SI) of the peripheral blood lymphocytes in all groups except for the normal control group were similar immediately before the challenge. At 10 days post-challenge, the SI for DNA vaccine plus either CpG-ODN or ChIFN-γ was similar to that of the DNA vaccine control group. For splenic lymphocytes, the SI in the DNA vaccine plus CpG-ODN and DNA vaccine plus ChIFN-γ groups were higher than for the DNA vaccine control. These results suggest that DDA actually compromises the protection against the IBDV by DNA vaccine, and CpG-ODN and IFN-γ had no significant effect.

DNA vaccines for poultry: the jump from theory to practice

DNA vaccines could offer a solution to a number of problems faced by the poultry industry; they are relatively easy to manufacture, stable, potentially easy to administer, can overcome neonatal tolerance and the deleterious effects of maternal antibody, and do not cause disease pathology. Combined with this, in ovo vaccination offers the advantage of reduced labor costs, mass administration and the induction of an earlier immune response. Together, this list of advantages is impressive. However, this combined technology is still in its infancy and requires many improvements. The potential of CpG motifs, DNA vaccines and in ovo vaccination, however, can be observed by the increasing number of recent reports investigating their application in challenge experiments. CpG motifs have been demonstrated to be stimulatory both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, DNA vaccines have been successfully delivered via the in ovo route, albeit not yet through the amniotic fluid. Lastly, a recent report has demonstrated that a DNA vaccine against infectious bronchitis virus administered via in ovo vaccination, followed by live virus boost, can slightly improve on the protective effect induced by the live virus alone. Therefore, DNA vaccination via the in ovo route is promising and offers potential as a poultry vaccine, however, efficacy needs to be improved and the costs of production reduced before it is likely to be beneficial to the poultry industry in the long term.

Economically important non-oncogenic immunosuppressive viral diseases of chicken--current status

Immunosuppressive viral diseases threaten the poultry industry by causing heavy mortality and economic loss of production, often as a result of the chickens' increased susceptibility to secondary infections and sub-optimal response to vaccinations. This paper aimed to present an up-to-date review of three specific economically important non-oncogenic immunosuppressive viral diseases of chickens, viz. chicken infectious anaemia (CIA), infectious bursal disease (IBD) and hydropericardium syndrome (HPS), with emphasis on their immunosuppressive effects. CIA and IBD causes immunosuppression in chickens and the socio-economic significance of these diseases is considerable worldwide. CIA occurs following transovarian transmission of chicken anaemia virus and has potential for inducing immunosuppression alone or in combination with other infectious agents, and is characterized by generalized lymphoid atrophy, increased mortality and severe anemia. The virus replicates in erythroid and lymphoid progenitor cells, causing inapparent, sub-clinical infections that lead to depletion of these cells with consequent immunosuppressive effects. The IBD virus replicates extensively in IgM(+) cells of the bursa and chickens may die during the acute phase of the disease, although IBD virus-induced mortality is highly variable and depends, among other factors, upon the virulence of the virus strain. The sub-clinical form is more common than clinical IBD because of regular vaccination on breeding farms. Infection at an early age significantly compromises the humoral and local immune responses of chickens because of the direct effect of B cells or their precursors. HPS is a recently emerged immunosuppressive disease of 3-6-weeked broilers, characterized by sudden onset, high mortality, typical hydropericardium and enlarged mottled and friable livers, with intranuclear inclusion bodies in the hepatocytes. The agent, fowl adenovirus-4, causes immunosuppression by damaging lymphoid tissues; the presence of IBD and CIA viruses may predispose for HPS or HPS may predispose for other viral infections. Synergism with CIA or other virus infections or prior immunosuppression is necessary to produce IBH-HPS in chickens and the susceptibility of chickens infected with fowl adenovirus varies throughout the course of CIA infection. The mechanism of immunosuppression has been studied in detail for certain chicken viruses at molecular levels, which will provides new opportunities to control these diseases by vaccination.

In ovo DNA immunisation followed by a recombinant fowlpox boost is fully protective to challenge with virulent IBDV

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential use of DNA vaccination delivered in ovo for protecting against challenge with infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Using a plasmid expressing the beta-galactosidase gene, DNA was successfully delivered to the embryo after in ovo injection and localises to the proventriculus and thymus. The coding sequence for the immunogenic IBDV protein, VP2, was cloned into pCI-neo, creating pCI-Vp2. Complete protection against IBDV was obtained by priming in ovo with pCI-Vp2, followed by boosting with the fowlpox recombinant, fpIBD1, also expressing the VP2 gene. This complete protection was not evident with either of the experimental vaccines on their own. An antibody response was not detected after the prime-boost vaccination, even after chicks had been challenged with IBDV, implying that the DNA prime delivered in ovo stimulated a protective cellular immune response.

Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) induces apoptosis in chicken B cells

The ability of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) serotypes 1 and 2, and the role of VP4 of both serotypes as well as the capacity of three IBDV intermediate serotype 1-specific vaccine strains to induce apoptosis in a chicken B-lymphocyte cell line, DT40, were investigated using the TUNEL technique. It was observed that IBDV serotype 1 infected the DT40 cell line and directly induced apoptosis. In contrast, the non-pathogenic serotype 2 neither infected nor induced apoptosis, but was able to reduce the serotype 1-induced apoptosis when the two viruses were present in combination. VP4 of both serotypes did not induce apoptosis. IBDV VP2 of serotype 2 induced apoptosis in the same proportion and intensity as VP2 of serotype 1. IBDV intermediate vaccines varied in their ability to induce apoptosis in the DT40 cell line, which was also decreased-delayed in presence of serotype 2 IBDV. We hypothesize that both serotypes compete for the same receptor in DT-40 cells, and suggest that IBDV-induced apoptosis is a multistep process involving virus replication, protein expression, and release of virions.

DNA immunization against very virulent infectious bursal disease virus with VP2-4-3 gene and chicken IL-6 gene

The present study was to investigate the feasibility and efficiency of the DNA vaccine to protect chickens against very virulent infectious bursal disease virus (vvIBDV) infection. A plasmid DNA carrying VP2-4-3 genes of vvIBDV SH95 and a plasmid DNA carrying chicken interleukin-6 (ChIL-6) genes were constructed and designated as pALTER-MAX-VP2-4-3 and pALTER-MAX-ChIL-6 respectively. Several DNA vaccination experiments were performed: 1-week-old chickens were intramuscularly injected with only plasmid pcDNA3-VP2, pALTER-MAX-VP2-4-3 or mixture with pALTER-MAX-ChIL-6. The chickens at 4 weeks old were orally inoculated with vvIBDV SH95. The results showed that immunization with the mixture of pALTER-MAX-VP2-4-3 and pALTER-MAX-ChIL-6 three times conferred protection for 90% of chickens. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) antibody titres in chickens immunized together with pALTER-MAX-ChIL-6 were higher than those immunized simply with plasmid pcDNA3-VP2 or pALTER-MAX-VP2-4-3. IBDV was not detected in the bursa of the protected chickens at 8 days after challenge by RT-PCR. The results indicate that protection against vvIBDV can be achieved by using the VP2-4-3 gene of vvIBDV as a DNA vaccine. Furthermore, the simultaneous injection of ChIL-6 plasmid significantly increased the protection after challenge with the very virulent strain.

Enhancement of the immunogenicity of DNA vaccine against infectious bursal disease virus by co-delivery with plasmid encoding chicken interleukin 2

The immunoregulatory activity of a nonmammalian interleukin 2 (IL-2), chicken IL-2 (chIL-2), was investigated using a DNA vaccine against infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) as a model. Coadministration of a plasmid encoding the VP2 gene of IBDV (pCI-VP2) and a plasmid encoding chicken IL-2 gene (pCI-chIL-2) enhances bursal protection against both the homologous IBDV strain ZJ2000 and the heterologous strain BC6/85 compared to administration of pCI-VP2 alone. Vaccination with pCI-VP2 alone induces low bursal protection against ZJ2000 and only protects chickens from clinical outbreaks and mortality, but not from bursal damage caused by BC6/85. Co-administration of the plasmid encoding the polyprotein gene of IBDV (pCI-VP2/4/3) and pCI-chIL-2 provides complete protection (15/15) against ZJ2000 and satisfactory protection (13/15) against BC6/85. In contrast, only 10 out of 15 chickens and 6 out of 15 chickens were protected against ZJ2000 and BC6/85, respectively, using the pCI-VP2/4/3 vaccination alone. A significant increase in the IBDV-specific neutralizing antibody response was also observed in chickens that received pCI-VP2/4/3 plus pCI-chIL-2 as compared with those that received the pCI-VP2/4/3 vaccination alone. By administrating different amounts of plasmid DNA, we confirmed that the pCI-chIL-2, but not the backbone plasmid pCI, contributes to increased immunoprotection of DNA vaccine against IBDV. These results strongly indicate that the efficacy of avian DNA vaccine can be modulated by co-administration of a plasmid encoding chIL-2.

Immunization of Chickens with VP2 Protein of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana

Transgenic plants represent a safe, effective, and inexpensive way to produce vaccines. The immunogenicity of VP2 protein of an infectious bursal disease (IBD) virus variant E isolate expressed in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana was compared with a commercial vaccine in specific-pathogen-free broiler chickens. The VP2 coding sequence was isolated and integrated into A. thaliana genome by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Soluble VP2 expressed in transgenic plants was used to immunize chickens. Chickens receiving oral immunization with plant-derived VP2 at 1 and 3 wk of age had an antibody response using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and 80% protection against challenge infection at 4 wk. Chickens primed with a commercial vaccine at 1 wk followed by an oral booster with VP2 expressed in plants at 3 wk of age showed 90% protection. Chickens immunized with a commercial vaccine at 1 and 3 wk showed 78% protection. Results supported the efficacy of plant-produced VP2 as a vaccine against IBD.

Research on infectious bursal disease--the past, the present and the future

Infectious bursal disease (IBD) virus (IBDV) is the etiological agent of "Gumboro disease". Although first observed about 40 years ago, this disease continues to pose an important threat to the commercial poultry industry. The emergence of antigenic variant as well as very virulent strains in vaccinated flocks considerably stimulated research efforts on both, IBD and IBDV. In this review, some of the recent advances in the understanding of the structure, morphogenesis and molecular biology of the virus as well as in development of new diagnostic approaches and new strategies for vaccination against IBD are briefly summarized.

Partial protection against infectious bursal disease virus through DNA-mediated vaccination with the VP2 capsid protein and chicken IL-2 genes

Several DNA vaccination experiments were performed to determine the protective capability of a plasmid DNA molecule encoding the VP2 capsid protein gene of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) injected into chickens in the presence or absence of chicken interleukin 2 (IL-2) plasmid DNA. The results of these experiments indicate that partial protection against IBDV can be achieved by using the VP2 gene of IBDV as a DNA vaccine. Furthermore, the simultaneous injection of chicken IL-2 plasmid DNA significantly increased the protection after challenge with the virulent strain. It was also found that immunological tolerance may have been induced in one of the chicken experiments by vaccination with plasmid DNA.

Efficacy of DNA vaccines against infectious bursal disease virus in chickens enhanced by coadministration with CpG oligodeoxynucleotide

The objective of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of a DNA vaccine and CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) to protect chickens against infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) infection. Two plasmids DNA carrying VP2 genes of the very virulent (vv) strain of IBDV were constructed with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and designated as pcDNA3.1-VP2 and pCI-VP2. The VP2 protein expressed in COS-7 cells transfected with the plasmid was confirmed by indirect immunofluorescence assay. Seven-day-old chickens were intramuscularly injected with the plasmids alone or plus commercial attenuated infectious bursal disease (IBD) vaccine or synthetic CpG ODN twice at weekly intervals. Chickens at 5 wk old were orally inoculated with vvIBDV strain 99J1 and observed for 7 days after challenge. Immunization with plasmid plus commercial attenuated IBD vaccine or CpG ODN conferred protection for 70%-80% of chickens, as evidenced by the absence of dinical signs, mortality, and atrophy in the cloacal bursa. About 25%-45% of chickens vaccinated with commercial attenuated IBD vaccine or pcDNA3.1-VP2 or pCI-VP2 plasmid alone had dinical signs and died after challenge. Furthermore, there were significantly different histopathologic lesion scores in the clocal bursae between the pcDNA3.1-VP2 or pCI-VP2 plus CpG or live vaccine and pcDNA3.1-VP2, pCI-VP2, or live vaccine vaccinated group. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay antibody titers in chickens vaccinated the constructs DNA plus live vaccine or CpG ODN were significantly higher than in those inoculated with the constructs or the live vaccine alone. These results suggest that coadministration of the constructed plasmid pcDNA3.1-VP2 or pCI-VP2 with CpG ODN or commercial attenuated IBD vaccine could protect chickens efficiently from direct vvIBDV challenge.

Plasmid DNA encoding antigens of infectious bursal disease viruses induce protective immune responses in chickens: factors influencing efficacy

The complete polyprotein (VP2/4/3) and VP2 genes of two infectious bursal disease viruses (IBDVs) (one attenuated strain JD1 and one virulent strain ZJ2000) were amplified by long and accurate polymerase chain reaction (LA-PCR), cloned, sequenced and inserted into plasmids pCI and pcDNA3 under the control of human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) immediate early enhancer and promoter. A series of DNA vaccine preparations were made using liposome as the adjuvant to examine their immunogenicity. Although VP2 is the main protective immunogen of IBDV, DNA encoding VP2 initiated a very low level of neutralizing antibody and only protected chickens from clinical outbreak and morality, but not bursal damage. In contrast, DNA encoding VP2/4/3 induced neutralizing antibody and satisfactory protection against virulent IBDV. Recombinant plasmids encoding the polyprotein gene of strain ZJ2000 were more efficient at inducing an immune response than that of strain JD1. Polyprotein expressed by the pCI vector induced better immune response than that expressed by the pcDNA3. Delivery of DNA through intramuscular and/or intradermal routes elicited much higher protective responses than that of oral and eyedrop routes. Most of the chickens vaccinated with high doses of DNA were protected from challenge. Additionally, the immune response to the DNA vaccine was significantly enhanced by a liposome adjuvant. These results indicate that the source of the target genes (from different IBDV strains), the eukaryotic expression vector, the adjuvant, the delivery route and the dosage might play a role of varying degree in influencing the efficacy of the DNA vaccine against IBDV.

In ovo delivery of DNA to the avian embryo

We have developed a simple method of transfecting avian embryos in ovo with various plasmid vectors that results in protein expression in the embryo. Using the chloramphenicol acetyl transferease (CAT) reporter gene, we were able to show that transfecting avian embryos with a plasmid/neutral lipid/dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) mixture delivered to the air cell, is better than transfecting naked DNA or cationic lipid encapsulated DNA, using DMSO (P < 0.05). This method resulted in CAT expression in several avian embryonic tissues of all the embryos inoculated. We found that both the cytomegalovirus (CMV) and chicken beta actin promoters worked significantly better (P < 0.05) than the Rous sarcoma virus promoter in vitro for reporter gene expression after cationic liposome-mediated transfection. However, after in ovo delivery with neutral lipid encapsulation and DMSO mediated delivery, no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the various promoters could be determined. We believe this neutral lipid encapsulation method may represent an important platform for delivery of DNA to the avian embryo.

DNA vaccination in the avian

Inoculation of naked DNA represents a novel approach to vaccine and immune therapeutic development. DNA vaccines or genetic immunization offers several advantages over the conventional vaccines for specific immune activation. Although a large number of vaccines have been made and are being used in the poultry industry, there have been no major advances in vaccine technology for this animal industry sector for decades. The potential advantages of DNA vaccines, such as over coming maternal immunity, in ovo delivery and absence of requirement for a cold-chain, combined with immunological efficacy make this new vaccine technology very attractive for the poultry industry. This review lists all of the published reports of experimental DNA vaccines developed for use in poultry and focuses on the trends, potentials and remaining barriers in the development of this new revolution in poultry vaccinology.

A novel transcutaneous plasmid-dimethylsulfoxide delivery technique for avian nucleic acid immunization

In this report, we show that dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) enhances liposome-mediated transfection of nucleic acid in chicken macrophage cells and that this could be exploited for the transcutaneous delivery of naked DNA through the intact skin of chickens. We found that DMSO enhanced transfection efficiencies of lipofectamine and polyethyleneimine in HD-11 chicken macrophage cells. Based on this principle, we showed that transcutaneous delivery of a DNA plasmid-dimethylsulfoxide mixture (1:1) to untreated skin of chickens results in a wide distribution of the plasmid in the body. Distribution studies were done using plasmids encoding enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter gene and a bivalent DNA vaccine coding for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) immunogenic protein genes. This bivalent vaccine induced mucosal and systemic immune responses, as evidenced by IgA and IgM production in the tears and serum of vaccinated chickens. Mucosal immune responses in the tears after topical vaccination were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than after i.m. delivery of the same DNA vaccine and were characterized by the absence of an IgG response. The biodistribution of plasmid indicated that topical delivery with DMSO resulted in a wide distribution and persistence of the plasmid until 15 weeks post-primary vaccination. Both delivery methods resulted in insert-specific message being made in several body tissues, but after topical delivery the virus-specific mRNA could be detected in the bone marrow of one out of three chickens until 15 weeks post-primary vaccination. Furthermore, transcutaneous delivery of this DNA vaccine using DMSO conferred protection from challenge with virulent IBDV (86% survival) and NDV (86% survival). This novel transcutaneous method of delivery of a DNA vaccine shows promise as being an easy and effective way to deliver nucleic acids through intact skin for vaccination or therapeutic purposes.

Fate of plasmid DNA encoding infectious bursal disease virus VP2 capsid protein gene after injection into the pectoralis muscle of the chicken

The objective of this study was to determine whether recombinant plasmid DNA injected intramuscularly into chickens expressed the gene of interest in vivo and could be subsequently detected in primary and secondary lymphoid tissues with polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The VP2 capsid protein gene of the standard challenge strain (STC) of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) was cloned into a eukaryotic plasmid, and purified DNA was prepared. Fourteen 2-wk-old chickens were injected in the pectoral musculature with 500 microg of plasmid DNA dissolved in sterile PBS. Seven chickens were similarly injected with PBS alone. Pectoral muscle, thymus, spleen, bursa of Fabricius, and cecal tonsils were collected at 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and 168 h postinjection for detection of protein expression (in muscle) and to extract total DNA for PCR amplification of the VP2 capsid gene. Expression of VP2 was demonstrated in muscle tissue at 12 and 24 h postinjection by using an indirect immunofluorescence assay. PCR amplification with primers specific for the VP2 gene showed that the DNA was present in the thymus, spleen, and bursa of Fabricius but not in cecal tonsils. These results demonstrate that plasmid DNA injected directly into the pectoral muscle of chickens is transcribed and translated at the injection site and promptly distributed to primary and secondary lymphoid tissues.

Eye-drop DNA can induce IgA in the tears and bile of chickens

DNA vaccines protect chickens against lethal virus infections but whether they induce local antibody which is associated with preventing viral entry, is unknown. We were able to show how avian DNA vaccines can induce local IgA. 65 microg plasmid DNA encoding the reporter protein beta-galactosidase induced antigen-specific IgA in the tears of 6/10 birds, IgA in the bile of 4/10 birds and IgG in the serum of 2/10 birds. Giving the DNA by the intramuscular route, as is more usual, induced lacrimal IgA in 2/8 birds, biliary IgA in no birds and serum IgG in 4/8 birds. Eye-drop DNA therefore favoured local IgA whereas intramuscular DNA favoured serum IgG. Further to this preliminary work eye-drop DNA should be improved by adjuvants and cytokines as a way of inducing protective IgA at the mucosal surfaces of the alimentary and respiratory tracts.