1
|
Gonzalez-Jaramillo N, Abbühl D, Roa-Díaz ZM, Kobler-Betancourt C, Frahsa A. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the general population and under-resourced communities from high-income countries: realist review. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e084560. [PMID: 38631831 PMCID: PMC11029206 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare vaccination willingness before rollout and 1 year post-rollout uptake among the general population and under-resourced communities in high-income countries. DESIGN A realist review. DATA SOURCES Embase, PubMed, Dimensions ai and Google Scholar. SETTING High-income countries. DEFINITIONS We defined vaccination willingness as the proportion of participants willing or intending to receive vaccines prior to availability. We defined vaccine uptake as the real proportion of the population with complete vaccination as reported by each country until November 2021. RESULTS We included data from 62 studies and 18 high-income countries. For studies conducted among general populations, the proportion of vaccination willingness was 67% (95% CI 62% to 72%). In real-world settings, the overall proportion of vaccine uptake among those countries was 73% (95% CI 69% to 76%). 17 studies reported pre-rollout willingness for under-resourced communities. The summary proportion of vaccination willingness from studies reporting results among people from under-resourced communities was 52% (95% CI 0.46% to 0.57%). Real-world evidence about vaccine uptake after rollout among under-resourced communities was limited. CONCLUSION Our review emphasises the importance of realist reviews for assessing vaccine acceptance. Limited real-world evidence about vaccine uptake among under-resourced communities in high-income countries is a call to context-specific actions and reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dominik Abbühl
- ISPM, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Zayne Milena Roa-Díaz
- ISPM, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Daama A, Rashid N, Asani K, Nalwoga GK, Nalugoda F, Bulamba R, Kyasanku E, Nakigozi G, Kigozi G, Kagaayi J, Mugamba S. Willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccines, associated factors and reasons for not taking a vaccine: a cross sectional study among persons aged 13-80 years in Wakiso, Central Uganda. BMC Infect Dis 2024; 24:391. [PMID: 38605355 PMCID: PMC11008005 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09285-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination has been recommended as one of the approaches for the control of COVID-19 pandemic. However, adequate vaccine coverage is critical to the effectiveness of the vaccine at population level. Data on acceptability of the vaccine in Ugandan urban areas are limited. This study examined the prevalence, factors associated with willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccine including reasons for not taking COVID-19 vaccine in a predominantly urban population of Wakiso, central Uganda. METHODS Data were obtained from a cross-sectional study conducted between March 1st, 2021 and September 30th, 2021 in the urban population-based cohort of the Africa Medical and behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO). A Multivariable modified Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals of willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. RESULTS A total of 1,903 participants were enrolled in this study; 61% of whom were females. About 63% of participants indicated their willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. Persons aged 13-19 years (aPR = 0.79; [95% CI: 0.74, 0.84]) or 20-29years (aPR = 0.93; [95% CI: 0.88, 0.98]) were less likely to accept the vaccine compared to persons aged 40-49 years. Persons with post-primary level of education (aPR = 1.05; [95% CI: 1.02, 1.09]) were more likely to accept the vaccine compared to persons with primary level of education. Additionally, students or individuals working in government (aPR = 1.13; [95% CI: 1.04, 1.23]) were more likely to accept the vaccine compared to individuals doing construction and Mechanic work as their main occupation. Reported reasons for not taking a COVID-19 vaccine included; concerns about side effects of the vaccine 154(57.0%), 64(23.7%) did not think the vaccines were effective, while 32(11.9%) did not like the vaccines. CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of individuals were not willing to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. Health education campaigns on vaccination within urban communities could help reduce COVID-19 vaccine misconceptions in the urban populations more especially the young and persons with low levels of formal education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Daama
- Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization, Nansana, Uganda.
- Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
| | - Naziru Rashid
- Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
- Islamic University, Mbale, Uganda
- Mayuge Institute of Global Health Sciences Research and Innovation, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Kasango Asani
- Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Fred Nalugoda
- Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization, Nansana, Uganda
| | - Robert Bulamba
- Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization, Nansana, Uganda
- Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Emmanuel Kyasanku
- Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization, Nansana, Uganda
| | - Gertrude Nakigozi
- Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization, Nansana, Uganda
| | - Godfrey Kigozi
- Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization, Nansana, Uganda
| | - Joseph Kagaayi
- Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Stephen Mugamba
- Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization, Nansana, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qureshi NS, Miller LG, Judge SP, Tran NDT, Henderson SO. Characterizing predictors of COVID-19 vaccine refusal in an urban southern California jail population. Vaccine 2024; 42:777-781. [PMID: 38195263 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Correctional populations have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19, and many large outbreaks have occurred in jails and prisons. Vaccination is a key strategy to reduce the SARS-CoV-2 transmission in carceral settings. Although implementation can be challenging due to vaccine hesitancy and medical mistrust, correctional settings provide largely equitable healthcare access and present a unique opportunity to identify potential predictors of vaccine hesitancy independent of access issues. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed electronic health record data for individuals offered COVID-19 vaccination at the Los Angeles County Jail between January 19, 2021, and January 31, 2023, and used multivariable logistic regression to determine predictors of COVID-19 vaccine refusal. RESULTS Of the 21,424 individuals offered COVID-19 vaccination, 2,060 (9.6 %) refused. Refusal was associated with male sex ([aOR] = 2.3, 95 % CI (1.9, 2.8)), age 18-34 ([aOR] = 1.2, 95 % CI (1.1, 1.4), referent group: age 45-54), Black race ([aOR] = 1.2, 95 % CI (1.1, 1.4)), reporting ever being houseless ([aOR] = 1.2, 95 % CI (1.1, 1.3)), and having a history of not receiving influenza vaccination while incarcerated ([aOR] = 2.4, 95 % CI (2.0, 2.8)). When analyzing male and female populations separately, male-specific trends reflected those seen in the overall population, whereas the only significant predictor of vaccine refusal in the female population was not receiving influenza vaccination while in custody ([aOR] = 6.5, 95 % CI (2.4, 17.6)). CONCLUSION Identifying predictors of vaccine refusal in correctional populations is an essential first step in the development and implementation of targeted interventions to mitigate vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazia S Qureshi
- Integrated Correctional Health Services-Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, 450 Bauchet St., Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Loren G Miller
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles CA, USA; Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 West Carson Street, Box 466, Torrance, CA 90509, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Stephen P Judge
- Integrated Correctional Health Services-Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, 450 Bauchet St., Los Angeles, CA, USA; Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles CA, USA; Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 West Carson Street, Box 466, Torrance, CA 90509, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Ngoc Dung T Tran
- Integrated Correctional Health Services-Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, 450 Bauchet St., Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sean O Henderson
- Integrated Correctional Health Services-Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, 450 Bauchet St., Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Geana MV, Liu P, Pei J, Anderson S, Ramaswamy M. "A Friendly Conversation." Developing an eHealth Intervention to Increase COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination Literacy Among Women with Criminal and Legal System Involvement. J Health Commun 2024; 29:131-142. [PMID: 38111197 PMCID: PMC10842808 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2023.2293094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Many women leaving jails are ill-prepared to follow recommended COVID-19 mitigation practices, including testing and vaccination. Low COVID-19-related health literacy, exposure to disinformation, and mistrust in authorities put women at increased risk. Research on this population has shown significant use of mobile devices for communication and web access and public Wi-fi for the internet. Using inductive (formative empirical research with the community) and deductive (theory-based) practices, we designed, developed, and pilot-tested a multimedia, culturally tailored web-based electronic health (eHealth) application to increase COVID-19-specific health literacy and promote testing and vaccination among women with criminal and legal system involvement (CLSI). The intervention included a serialized animated multimedia component and a telenovela-style series, complementing each other and addressing knowledge needs identified in the formative research phase of the project. The eHealth intervention was pilot-tested with 13 CLSI women by using online activity logs and semi-structured telephone interviews. Findings confirmed that eHealth interventions employing multimodal information delivery had increased chances of engaging audiences, especially when developed with input from the target population and are culturally tailored. In addition, using a web-based delivery optimized for mobile made the intervention accessible on various devices and decreased the risk of technical problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mugur V. Geana
- Center for Excellence in Health Communication to Underserved Populations, School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Pan Liu
- Department of Media, Design, and Communication, Marian University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jun Pei
- Center for Excellence in Health Communication to Underserved Populations, School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Sherri Anderson
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Megha Ramaswamy
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moazen B, Ismail N, Agbaria N, Mazzilli S, Petri D, Amaya A, D’Arcy J, Plugge E, Tavoschi L, Stöver H. Vaccination against emerging and reemerging infectious diseases in places of detention: a global multistage scoping review. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1323195. [PMID: 38347924 PMCID: PMC10859397 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1323195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the elevated risks of infection transmission, people in prisons frequently encounter significant barriers in accessing essential healthcare services in many countries. The present scoping review aimed to evaluate the state of availability and model of delivery of vaccination services within correctional facilities across the globe. Methods Following the methodological framework for scoping reviews and adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews criteria, we conducted a systematic search across four peer-reviewed literature databases (Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and EBSCO), as well as 14 sources of grey literature. Two researchers meticulously examined the identified papers independently to extract pertinent data published between 2012 and 2022. The quality of the selected publications was assessed using established quality assessment tools. Results Of the 11,281 identified papers 52 met the inclusion criteria. With the exception of one, all the included publications presented data from high-income countries, predominantly originating from the United States. Across the world, the most prevalent vaccines available in prison settings were COVID-19 and HBV vaccines, typically distributed in response to health crises such as pandemics, epidemics, and local outbreaks. Vaccine coverage and uptake rates within correctional facilities displayed noteworthy disparities among various countries and regions. Besides, individual and organizational barriers and facilitating factors of vaccination in prison settings emerged and discussed in the text. Discussion The lack of vaccination services combined with low rates of vaccination coverage and uptake among people living and working in correctional facilities represents a cause for concern. Prisons are not isolated from the broader community, therefore, efforts to increase vaccine uptake among people who live and work in prisons will yield broader public health benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babak Moazen
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Health and Social Work, Institute of Addiction Research (ISFF), Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nasrul Ismail
- School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Nisreen Agbaria
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Health and Social Work, Institute of Addiction Research (ISFF), Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sara Mazzilli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Davide Petri
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Arianna Amaya
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Emma Plugge
- UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Lara Tavoschi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Heino Stöver
- Department of Health and Social Work, Institute of Addiction Research (ISFF), Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Newman PA, Dinh DA, Nyoni T, Allan K, Fantus S, Williams CC, Tepjan S, Reid L, Guta A. Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Under-Vaccination among Marginalized Populations in the United States and Canada: A Scoping Review. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023:10.1007/s40615-023-01882-1. [PMID: 38117443 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-023-01882-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Amid persistent disparities in Covid-19 vaccination and burgeoning research on vaccine hesitancy (VH), we conducted a scoping review to identify multilevel determinants of Covid-19 VH and under-vaccination among marginalized populations in the U.S. and Canada. METHODS Using the scoping review methodology developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute, we designed a search string and explored 7 databases to identify peer-reviewed articles published from January 1, 2020-October 25, 2022. We combine frequency analysis and narrative synthesis to describe factors influencing Covid-19 VH and under-vaccination among marginalized populations. RESULTS The search captured 11,374 non-duplicated records, scoped to 103 peer-reviewed articles. Among 14 marginalized populations identified, African American/Black, Latinx, LGBTQ+, American Indian/Indigenous, people with disabilities, and justice-involved people were the predominant focus. Thirty-two factors emerged as influencing Covid-19 VH, with structural racism/stigma and institutional mistrust (structural)(n = 71) most prevalent, followed by vaccine safety (vaccine-specific)(n = 62), side effects (vaccine-specific)(n = 50), trust in individual healthcare provider (social/community)(n = 38), and perceived risk of infection (individual)(n = 33). Structural factors predominated across populations, including structural racism/stigma and institutional mistrust, barriers to Covid-19 vaccine access due to limited supply/availability, distance/lack of transportation, no/low paid sick days, low internet/digital technology access, and lack of culturally- and linguistically-appropriate information. DISCUSSION We identified multilevel and complex drivers of Covid-19 under-vaccination among marginalized populations. Distinguishing vaccine-specific, individual, and social/community factors that may fuel decisional ambivalence, more appropriately defined as VH, from structural racism/structural stigma and systemic/institutional barriers to vaccination access may better support evidence-informed interventions to promote equity in access to vaccines and informed decision-making among marginalized populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A Newman
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Duy A Dinh
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Thabani Nyoni
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kate Allan
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sophia Fantus
- School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA
| | - Charmaine C Williams
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Luke Reid
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Adrian Guta
- School of Social Work, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Novisky MA, Tostlebe J, Pyrooz D, Sanchez JA. "The COVID-19 pandemic and operational challenges, impacts, and lessons learned: a multi-methods study of U.S. prison systems". Health Justice 2023; 11:51. [PMID: 38051375 PMCID: PMC10696818 DOI: 10.1186/s40352-023-00253-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to examine how the COVID-19 pandemic changed U.S. prison operations and influenced the daily work of prison staff. METHODS In collaboration with the National Institute of Corrections, we administered a survey to 31 state correctional agencies in April 2021 and conducted five focus groups with 62 correctional staff. RESULTS Using a framework of bounded rationality, we find that daily operations were strained, particularly in the areas of staffing, implementing public health policy efforts, and sustaining correctional programming. While prison systems and staff were under-prepared to respond to the pandemic, they attempted to address complex problems with the limited resources they had. CONCLUSIONS Results underscore a need in corrections for prioritizing further developments and reviews of collaborative policies and practices for managing crisis situations. Seeking avenues for leveraging technological innovations to improve operations and facilitate enhanced communication are especially warranted. Finally, meaningful reductions in the prison population, changes in physical infrastructure, and expansions of hiring and retention initiatives are critical for positioning prisons to manage future emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan A Novisky
- Department of Criminology and Sociology, Cleveland State University, 2121 Euclid Avenue, UR 205, Cleveland, OH, 44115, USA.
| | - Jennifer Tostlebe
- School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - David Pyrooz
- Department of Sociology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cassarino N, Ahnger-Pier KK, Wurcel A. Trends in COVID-19 and influenza vaccine ordering and distribution in Massachusetts jails. Vaccine 2023; 41:6607-6611. [PMID: 37758570 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.09.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
Incarcerated populations are highly vulnerable to respiratory illnesses such as COVID-19 and influenza. We evaluated COVID-19 and influenza vaccine ordering and administration rates among 13 of 14 Massachusetts county jails and compared them with rates in the general population. Results showed heterogeneity in the number of vaccines ordered per incarcerated individual across institutions, with small to medium-sized jails ordering more vaccines per person. Vaccine administration in jails utilized approximately 41% of the total vaccines ordered by jails. Additionally, the study revealed disparities in vaccine brand distribution between incarcerated and non-incarcerated populations, potentially perpetuating historical health inequities in carceral settings. Considering that vaccine hesitancy among incarcerated individuals and jail staff has been identified as a significant barrier to vaccination, these findings underscore the need for equitable and comprehensive vaccine distribution strategies in carceral settings, necessitating collaboration between public health and correctional systems to ensure the health and well-being of incarcerated individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Cassarino
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, United States.
| | - Kathryn K Ahnger-Pier
- Bureau of Infectious Disease and Laboratory Sciences, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA 02130, United States
| | - Alysse Wurcel
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, United States; Department of Medicine, Division of Geographic Medicine, and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jenness SM, Wallrafen-Sam K, Schneider I, Kennedy S, Akiyama MJ, Spaulding AC. Dynamic Contact Networks of Residents of an Urban Jail in the Era of SARS-CoV-2. medRxiv 2023:2023.09.29.23296359. [PMID: 37873313 PMCID: PMC10593002 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.29.23296359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Background In custodial settings such as jails and prisons, infectious disease transmission is heightened by factors such as overcrowding and limited healthcare access. Specific features of social contact networks within these settings have not been sufficiently characterized, especially in the context of a large-scale respiratory infectious disease outbreak. The study aims to quantify contact network dynamics within the Fulton County Jail in Atlanta, Georgia, to improve our understanding respiratory disease spread to informs public health interventions. Methods As part of the Surveillance by Wastewater and Nasal Self-collection of Specimens (SWANSS) study, jail roster data were utilized to construct social contact networks. Rosters included resident details, cell locations, and demographic information. This analysis involved 6,702 residents over 140,901 person days. Network statistics, including degree, mixing, and turnover rates, were assessed across age groups, race/ethnicities, and jail floors. We compared outcomes for two distinct periods (January 2022 and April 2022) to understand potential responses in network structures during and after the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant peak. Results We found high cross-sectional network degree at both cell and block levels, indicative of substantial daily contacts. While mean degree increased with age, older residents exhibited lower degree during the Omicron peak, suggesting potential quarantine measures. Block-level networks demonstrated higher mean degrees than cell-level networks. Cumulative degree distributions for both levels increased from January to April, indicating heightened contacts after the outbreak. Assortative age mixing was strong, especially for residents aged 20-29. Dynamic network statistics illustrated increased degrees over time, emphasizing the potential for disease spread, albeit with a lower growth rate during the Omicron peak. Conclusions The contact networks within the Fulton County Jail presented ideal conditions for infectious disease transmission. Despite some reduction in network characteristics during the Omicron peak, the potential for disease spread remained high. Age-specific mixing patterns suggested unintentional age segregation, potentially limiting disease spread to older residents. The study underscores the need for ongoing monitoring of contact networks in carceral settings and provides valuable insights for epidemic modeling and intervention strategies, including quarantine, depopulation, and vaccination. This network analysis offers a foundation for understanding disease dynamics in carceral environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel M. Jenness
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Karina Wallrafen-Sam
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Isaac Schneider
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Shanika Kennedy
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Matthew J. Akiyama
- Divisions of General Internal Medicine & Infectious Diseases, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Anne C. Spaulding
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Osman I, Williams A, Pierson K, Ryu E, Shlafer RJ. Facilitators and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination among incarcerated people and staff in three large, state prisons: a cross-sectional study. Health Justice 2023; 11:38. [PMID: 37698742 PMCID: PMC10496182 DOI: 10.1186/s40352-023-00240-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted individuals in carceral facilities - both incarcerated people and staff. Vaccination is an important tool in reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death. While the importance of promoting vaccination is clear, there are considerable barriers to doing so. This study aims to better understand: (1) why individuals chose to receive the COVID-19 vaccine; (2) why individuals were hesitant to vaccinate; (3) what motivators might influence a person's decision to get vaccinated; and (4) what sources of information about COVID-19 vaccination people trust. METHODS We conducted a survey of incarcerated people and facility staff in three, large state prisons in Minnesota to identify barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination. Facilities were recruited to participate through purposive sampling, and surveys were administered between November and December 2021. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Stata. RESULTS Findings demonstrate that, for incarcerated individuals (N = 1,392), the most common reason for getting vaccinated was to return to normal activities in prison (61%, n = 801); the most common reason for being hesitant to get vaccinated was "other" (41%, n = 342), with individuals citing a variety of concerns. For staff (N = 190), the most common reason for getting vaccinated was to protect the health of family and friends (79%, n = 114); the most common reasons for being hesitant were disbelief that vaccination is necessary (55%, n = 23) and distrust of healthcare and public health systems (55%, n = 23). Incarcerated individuals reported that monetary and programmatic incentives would help motivate them to get vaccinated, while staff members said speaking with healthcare professionals and monetary incentives would help motivate them. Lastly, trusted sources of information for incarcerated individuals were healthcare professionals outside of prisons and jails, along with friends and family members. Staff members reported that they trusted healthcare professionals and national health organizations for information about COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSIONS While considerable barriers to COVID-19 vaccination persist among both incarcerated individuals and staff members, these findings also highlight areas of intervention to increase COVID-19 vaccine confidence and promote health equity among those disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingie Osman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA.
| | - Antonio Williams
- COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence Advisory Board, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Katie Pierson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA
| | - Eric Ryu
- Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Rebecca J Shlafer
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Martin P, Martin R, DeBritz AA, Kang AW. COVID-19 vaccination in correctional systems in the United States. J Public Health Policy 2023; 44:477-488. [PMID: 37542149 DOI: 10.1057/s41271-023-00426-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
Overcrowding and limited ability to social distance contribute to high rates of COVID-19 outbreaks in correctional facilities. Despite the Centers for Disease Controls' recommendations, incarcerated persons and correctional staff report a high prevalence of vaccine-hesitance. We sought to identify reasons underlying COVID-19 vaccine hesitation and refusal in correctional systems. We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines to design the review. We searched PubMed abstracts and reviewed literature relevant to COVID-19 vaccine uptake and hesitancy in correctional systems of the United States (n = 23). Reasons for vaccine hesitancy among incarcerated people and correctional staff include efficacy, safety concerns, lack of information, and distrust. Findings reveal higher vaccine hesitancy among young and Black residents whereas facilities in close collaborations with state health departments exhibited higher vaccination rates. Correctional facilities must prioritize communication and education to improve the current state of vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paige Martin
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Rosemarie Martin
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Audrey A DeBritz
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Augustine W Kang
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hershow RB, Burnett JC, Nicolae L, Marquez N, Everett M, Tyagi E, Williams SP. COVID-19 Burden in Adult Correctional or Detention Facilities and the Surrounding Communities, January 1, 2020-July 20, 2021. J Correct Health Care 2023; 29:241-246. [PMID: 37163216 PMCID: PMC10527881 DOI: 10.1089/jchc.22.02.0012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
We estimated the COVID-19 burden in adult correctional or detention facilities and associated counties by state, facility jurisdiction, and county urbanicity. COVID-19 cumulative incidence (cases per 1,000 persons) for each U.S. correctional or detention facility and people ages 18 years and older in the associated county was estimated between January 1, 2020 and July 20, 2021. Across 46 U.S. states, 1,083 correctional or detention facilities in 718 counties were included. The median COVID-19 incidence rate was higher in facilities than in associated counties for 42 of 46 states and for all facility jurisdictions and county urbanicity categories. COVID-19 burden was higher in most facilities than in associated counties. Implementing COVID-19 mitigation measures in correctional settings is needed to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission in facilities and associated counties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca B. Hershow
- National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Janet C. Burnett
- National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lavinia Nicolae
- National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- CDC COVID-19 Response, State, Tribal, Local, and Territories Task Force, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Neal Marquez
- UCLA Law COVID Behind Bars Data Project, University of California Los Angeles School of Law, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michael Everett
- UCLA Law COVID Behind Bars Data Project, University of California Los Angeles School of Law, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Erika Tyagi
- UCLA Law COVID Behind Bars Data Project, University of California Los Angeles School of Law, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Samantha P. Williams
- National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kerrison EMT, Hyatt JM. COVID-19 Vaccine Refusal and Medical Distrust Held by Correctional Officers. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1237. [PMID: 37515052 PMCID: PMC10384026 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11071237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
This study explores COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among prison security staff and the extent to which they trust varied sources of information about the vaccines. Cross-sectional survey data were obtained from a state-wide sample of corrections officers (COs, hereafter; n = 1208) in February 2021. Group differences, disaggregated by demographic characteristics, were examined using F-tests and t-tests. Despite the comparatively limited risk of contracting the virus, non-security staff reported they would accept a COVID-19 vaccine at no cost (74%), compared to their more vulnerable CO counterparts (49%). We observed vaccine refusal correlations between COs' reported gender, age, and length of time working as a CO, but none with their self-reported race. Vaccine refusal was more prevalent among womxn officers, younger officers, and those who had spent less time working as prison security staff. Our findings also suggest that the only trusted source of information about vaccines were family members and only for officers who would refuse the vaccine; the quality of trust placed in those sources, however, was not substantially positive and did not vary greatly across CO racial groups. By highlighting characteristics of the observed gaps in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance between COs and their non-security staff coworkers, as well as between corrections officers of varied demographic backgrounds, these findings can inform the development of responsive and accepted occupational health policies for communities both inside and intrinsically linked to prisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jordan M Hyatt
- College of Arts and Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shabir A, Alkubaisi NA, Shafiq A, Salman M, Baraka MA, Mustafa ZU, Khan YH, Malhi TH, Meyer JC, Godman B. COVID-19 Vaccination Status as Well as Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Hesitancy among Prisoners and the Implications. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1081. [PMID: 37376470 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Prisoners form a population who are highly vulnerable to COVID-19 due to overcrowding, limited movement, and a poor living environment. Consequently, there is a need to ascertain the status of COVID-19 vaccination and factors associated with hesitancy among prisoners. A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was undertaken among prisoners at three district jails in Punjab Province, Pakistan. A total of 381 prisoners participated and none of the study participants had received an influenza vaccine this year. In total, 53% received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, with the majority having two doses. The top three reasons of vaccine acceptance were "fear of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection" (56.9%), "desire to return to a pre-pandemic routine as soon as possible" (56.4%), and "having no doubts on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines" (39.6%). There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in any demographic variables between vaccinated and unvaccinated prisoners except for age, which was strongly association with COVID-19 vaccine uptake (χ2(3) = 76.645, p < 0.001, Cramer's V = 0.457). Among the unvaccinated prisoners (N = 179), only 16 subsequently showed willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. The top three reasons for hesitancy were: COVID-19 is not a real problem/disease (60.1%), safety concerns (51.1%), and COVID-19 vaccine is a conspiracy (50.3%). Efforts are needed to address their concerns given this population's risks and high hesitancy rates, especially among younger prisoners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Shabir
- Department of Medicines, Tehsil Headquarter (THQ) Hospital, Dera Ghazi Khan 32200, Pakistan
| | - Noorah A Alkubaisi
- Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amna Shafiq
- Department of Medicines, Tehsil Headquarter (THQ) Hospital, Dera Ghazi Khan 32200, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Salman
- Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical and Allied Health Sciences, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Mohamed A Baraka
- Clinical Pharmacy Program, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, AlAin Campus, Al Ain P.O. Box 64141, United Arab Emirates
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt
| | - Zia Ul Mustafa
- Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
- Department of Pharmacy Services, District Headquarter (DHQ) Hospital, Pakpattan 57400, Pakistan
| | - Yusra Habib Khan
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tauqeer Hussain Malhi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
| | - Johanna C Meyer
- Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa 0208, South Africa
- South African Vaccination and Immunisation Centre, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa 0208, South Africa
| | - Brian Godman
- Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa 0208, South Africa
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science (SIPBS), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
- Centre of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kim C, Aminawung JA, Brinkley-Rubinstein L, Wang EA, Puglisi LB. COVID-19 vaccine deliberation in individuals directly impacted by incarceration. Vaccine 2023; 41:3475-3480. [PMID: 37127524 PMCID: PMC10130327 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.04.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Delays in vaccinating communities of color to COVID-19 have signaled a need to investigate structural barriers to vaccine uptake, with mass incarceration demanding greater characterization as a potential factor. In a nationally representative survey from February-March 2021 (N = 1,157), exposure to the criminal legal system, defined as having been incarcerated in prison or jail or having had a family member or close friend incarcerated, was associated with higher odds for COVID-19 vaccine deliberation. Individuals with criminal legal system exposure reported lower confidence in physician recommendation as a reason to get vaccinated. They were also more likely to decline vaccination out of fear it would cause COVID-19 infection, and that the vaccine might be promoted as a political tool. Our analysis suggests that populations impacted by the criminal legal system would benefit from targeted vaccine outreach by trusted community members who can address distrust during current and future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Kim
- Yale School of Medicine, 129 York Street Apt #2M, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
| | - Jenerius A Aminawung
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar Street, P.O. Box 208056, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; SEICHE Center for Health and Justice, 300 George Street, Suite G05, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - Emily A Wang
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar Street, P.O. Box 208056, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; SEICHE Center for Health and Justice, 300 George Street, Suite G05, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Lisa B Puglisi
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar Street, P.O. Box 208056, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; SEICHE Center for Health and Justice, 300 George Street, Suite G05, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fukunaga R, Kaplan ZE, Rodriguez T, Hagan L, Aarvig K, Dusseau C, Crockett M, Long M. Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination among incarcerated persons in the Federal Bureau of Prisons, June-July 2021. Vaccine 2023:S0264-410X(23)00512-1. [PMID: 37164822 PMCID: PMC10151452 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.04.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand the attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination and trusted sources of vaccination-related information among persons incarcerated in the Federal Bureau of Prisons. METHODS From June-July 2021, persons incarcerated across 122 facilities operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons were invited to participate in a survey asking their reasons for receiving or declining COVID-19 vaccination and the information sources they relied upon to make these decisions. Descriptive analyses were conducted. RESULTS A total of 130,789 incarcerated persons with known vaccination status were invited to participate in the survey. At the time of survey, 78,496 (62%) were fully vaccinated; 3,128 (3%) were partially vaccinated and scheduled to complete their second dose, and 44,394 (35%) had declined either a first or second dose. 7,474 (9.5%) of the fully vaccinated group and 2,302 (4.4%) of the group declining either a first or second dose chose to participate in the survey; an overall survey return rate of 7.6% (n = 9,905). Among vaccinated respondents, the most common reason given for accepting vaccination was to protect their health (n = 5,689; 76.1%). Individuals who declined vaccination cited concerns about vaccine side effects (n = 1,304; 56.6%), mistrust of the vaccine (n = 1,256; 54.6%), and vaccine safety concerns (n = 1,252; 54.4%). Among those who declined, 21.2% (n = 489) reported that they would choose to be vaccinated if the vaccine was offered again. Those who declined also reported that additional information from outside organizations (n = 1128; 49.0%), receiving information regarding vaccine safety (n = 841; 36.5%), and/or speaking with a trusted medical advisor (n = 565; 24.5%) may influence their decision to be vaccinated in the future. CONCLUSION As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, it is important to increase vaccine confidence in prisons, jails, and detention facilities to reduce transmission and severe health outcomes. These survey findings can inform the design of potential interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake in these settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rena Fukunaga
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
| | - Zoe E Kaplan
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States
| | - Tami Rodriguez
- Federal Bureau of Prisons, Health Services Division, 320 First Street NW, Washington, DC 20534, United States; Commissioned Corps of the United States Public Health Service, 1101 Wootton Pkwy, Plaza level, Rockville, MD 20852, United States
| | - Liesl Hagan
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States
| | - Kathleen Aarvig
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States
| | - Charles Dusseau
- Federal Bureau of Prisons, Health Services Division, 320 First Street NW, Washington, DC 20534, United States; Commissioned Corps of the United States Public Health Service, 1101 Wootton Pkwy, Plaza level, Rockville, MD 20852, United States
| | - Michael Crockett
- Federal Bureau of Prisons, Health Services Division, 320 First Street NW, Washington, DC 20534, United States; Commissioned Corps of the United States Public Health Service, 1101 Wootton Pkwy, Plaza level, Rockville, MD 20852, United States
| | - Michael Long
- Federal Bureau of Prisons, Health Services Division, 320 First Street NW, Washington, DC 20534, United States; Commissioned Corps of the United States Public Health Service, 1101 Wootton Pkwy, Plaza level, Rockville, MD 20852, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Canada KE, Givens A, Huebner BM, Garcia-Hallett J, Taylor E, Inzana V, Edwards D, Peters CM, Plunkett Cafourek D. Perceptions of vaccine safety and hesitancy among incarcerated adults and correctional staff in the rural midwest. Vaccine X 2023; 13:100270. [PMID: 36852084 PMCID: PMC9958465 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives This project assessed vaccine hesitancy among staff and incarcerated adults in one rural medium-security prison in the Midwestern United States and identified differences in hesitancy across sociodemographic and work-related variables. Methods 610 prison staff and people incarcerated completed a cross-sectional survey in May 2021. The vaccine hesitancy scale (VHS) identified perceived risk and confidence in vaccination. A single item assessed whether people typically follow public health protocols in the prison. A combination of analyses was utilized, including ANOVA, Chi-Square, and Pearson's correlation. Results Vaccine hesitancy was moderate to high for both populations. Incarcerated people had more confidence in vaccination than staff; differences did not reach statistical significance. Incarcerated people had statistically significantly higher perceptions of risk compared to staff. Both populations reported doing their best to follow public health protocols. For both populations, vaccine hesitancy varied by education and veteran status. Among staff, hesitancy varied by gender and political beliefs. For people incarcerated, it varied by pre-incarceration income and visit frequency. Conclusions Results support the need for public health policy and procedural interventions to reduce hesitancy towards vaccination in correctional settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelli E Canada
- University of Missouri, School of Social Work, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Ashley Givens
- University of Missouri, School of Social Work, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Beth M Huebner
- Arizona State University, School of Criminology & Criminal Justice, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Janet Garcia-Hallett
- University of New Haven, Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice & Forensic Sciences, West Haven, CT, United States
| | - Elizabeth Taylor
- University of Missouri, School of Social Work, Columbia, MO, United States
| | | | - Daniel Edwards
- Missouri Department of Corrections, Jefferson City, MO, United States
| | - Clark M Peters
- University of Missouri, School of Social Work, Columbia, MO, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hammershaimb EA, Campbell JD, O'Leary ST. Coronavirus Disease-2019 Vaccine Hesitancy. Pediatr Clin North Am 2023; 70:243-257. [PMID: 36841593 PMCID: PMC9729588 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2022.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Early in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, before coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccines were authorized, surveys began tracking public acceptance of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine. As vaccines became more widely available, the focus shifted from evaluating premeditative thoughts about COVID-19 vaccines to observing behaviors, measuring uptake, and characterizing factors associated with acceptance. A wealth of peer-reviewed literature examining the complexities of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance has emerged, but our understanding of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance is constantly evolving. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge regarding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, with an emphasis on pediatric vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Adrianne Hammershaimb
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Health Sciences Research Facility 1, Research Facility 1, Room 480, 685 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - James D Campbell
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Health Sciences Research Facility 1, Research Facility 1, Room 480, 685 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Sean T O'Leary
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, F443, 1890 North Revere Court, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lind ML, Kennedy BS, Nieto MD, Houde AJ, Sosensky P, Borg R, Cummings DAT, Ko AI, Richeson RP. Covid-19 vaccine acceptance among individuals incarcerated in Connecticut state jails. Health Justice 2023; 11:16. [PMID: 36913159 PMCID: PMC10009345 DOI: 10.1186/s40352-023-00216-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccine hesitancy is common among incarcerated populations and, despite vaccination programs, vaccine acceptance within residents remains low, especially within jails. With the goal of assessing the Connecticut DOC's COVID-19 vaccine program within jails we examined if residents of DOC operated jails were more likely to become vaccinated following incarceration than in the community. Specifically, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis among people who spent at least one night in a DOC-operated jail between February 2 and November 8, 2021, and were eligible for vaccination at the time of incarceration (intake). We compared the vaccination rates before and after incarceration using an age-adjusted survival analysis with a time-varying exposure of incarceration and an outcome of vaccination. RESULTS During the study period, 3,716 people spent at least one night in jail and were eligible for vaccination at intake. Of these residents, 136 were vaccinated prior to incarceration, 2,265 had a recorded vaccine offer, and 479 were vaccinated while incarcerated. The age-adjusted hazard of vaccination following incarceration was significantly higher than prior to incarceration (12.5; 95% Confidence Intervals: 10.2-15.3). CONCLUSIONS We found that residents were more likely to become vaccinated in jail than in the community. Though these findings highlight the utility of vaccination programs within jails, the low level of vaccination in this population speaks to the need for additional program development within jails and the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret L. Lind
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
| | - Byron S. Kennedy
- Connecticut Department of Correction, 24 Wolcott Hill Rd, Wethersfield, CT 06109 USA
| | - Murilo Dorion Nieto
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
| | - Amy J. Houde
- Connecticut Department of Correction, 24 Wolcott Hill Rd, Wethersfield, CT 06109 USA
| | - Peri Sosensky
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
| | - Ryan Borg
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
| | - Derek A. T. Cummings
- Department of Biology, University of Florida, 214 Bartram Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, 2055 Mowry Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
| | - Albert I. Ko
- Connecticut Department of Correction, 24 Wolcott Hill Rd, Wethersfield, CT 06109 USA
- Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, BA Brazil
| | - Robert P. Richeson
- Connecticut Department of Correction, 24 Wolcott Hill Rd, Wethersfield, CT 06109 USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kramer C, Song M, Sufrin CB, Eber GB, Rubenstein LS, Saloner B. COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and uptake: Perspectives from people released from the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Vaccine 2023; 41:1408-1417. [PMID: 36690558 PMCID: PMC9866228 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
People in United States (US) prisons and jails have been disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This is due to challenges containing outbreaks in facilities and the high rates of health conditions that increase the risk of adverse outcomes. Vaccination is one strategy to disrupt COVID-19 transmission, but there are many factors impeding vaccination while in custody. We aimed to examine the perspectives of former residents in the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) regarding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance. Between September-October 2021, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 recently released individuals who were incarcerated before and during COVID-19 and coded transcripts thematically. We assessed perceptions of the vaccine rollout and factors shaping vaccination uptake in custody and after release. The vaccine was available to seven participants in custody, of whom three were vaccinated. Interviewees had mixed attitudes about how vaccines were distributed, particularly with priority given to staff. Most were reluctant to get vaccinated in custody for varying reasons including observing staff declining to be vaccinated, lack of counseling to address specific questions about safety, and general lack of trust in the carceral system. By contrast, twelve got vaccinated post-release because of greater trust in community health care and stated they would not have done so while incarcerated. For residents in the BOP, COVID-19 vaccination was not simply a binary decision, instead they weighed the costs and benefits with most deciding against getting vaccinated. Institutions of incarceration must address these concerns to increase vaccine uptake as the pandemic continues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Kramer
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 4940 Eastern Ave., A101 Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
| | - Minna Song
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Carolyn B Sufrin
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 4940 Eastern Ave., A101 Baltimore, MD 21224, USA; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Gabriel B Eber
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Leonard S Rubenstein
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Brendan Saloner
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Riback LR, Dickson P, Ralph K, Saber LB, Devine R, Pett LA, Clausen AJ, Pluznik JA, Bowden CJ, Sarrett JC, Wurcel AG, Phillips VL, Spaulding AC, Akiyama MJ. Coping with COVID in corrections: a qualitative study among the recently incarcerated on infection control and the acceptability of wastewater-based surveillance. Health Justice 2023; 11:5. [PMID: 36749465 PMCID: PMC9903258 DOI: 10.1186/s40352-023-00205-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Correctional settings are hotspots for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Social and biological risk factors contribute to higher rates of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among justice-involved individuals. Rapidly identifying new cases in congregate settings is essential to promote proper isolation and quarantine. We sought perspectives of individuals incarcerated during COVID-19 on how to improve carceral infection control and their perspectives on acceptability of wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) accompanying individual testing. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 adults who self-reported being incarcerated throughout the United States between March 2020 and May 2021. We asked participants about facility enforcement of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) COVID-19 guidelines, and acceptability of integrating WBS into SARS-CoV-2 monitoring strategies at their most recent facility. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the study sample and report on acceptability of WBS. We analyzed qualitative data thematically using an iterative process. RESULTS Participants were predominantly Black or multiple races (50%) and men (75%); 46 years old on average. Most received a mask during their most recent incarceration (90%), although only 40% received counseling on proper mask wearing. A quarter of participants were tested for SARS-CoV-2 at intake. Most (70%) believed they were exposed to the virus while incarcerated. Reoccurring themes included (1) Correctional facility environment leading to a sense of insecurity, (2) Perceptions that punitive conditions in correctional settings were exacerbated by the pandemic; (3) Importance of peers as a source of information about mitigation measures; (4) Perceptions that the safety of correctional environments differed from that of the community during the pandemic; and (5) WBS as a logical strategy, with most (68%) believing WBS would work in the last correctional facility they were in, and 79% preferred monitoring SARS-CoV-2 levels through WBS rather than relying on just individual testing. CONCLUSION Participants supported routine WBS to monitor for SARS-CoV-2. Integrating WBS into existing surveillance strategies at correctional facilities may minimize the impact of future COVID-19 outbreaks while conserving already constrained resources. To enhance the perception and reality that correctional systems are maximizing mitigation, future measures might include focusing on closer adherence to CDC recommendations and clarity about disease pathogenesis with residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey R Riback
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
| | - Peter Dickson
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Keyanna Ralph
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lindsay B Saber
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Rachel Devine
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lindsay A Pett
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Alyssa J Clausen
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jacob A Pluznik
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Chava J Bowden
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jennifer C Sarrett
- Center for the Study of Human Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | - Anne C Spaulding
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Matthew J Akiyama
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cassarino N, Lodolo L, Smyth E, Ramaswamy M, Wurcel A. "The bottom line is that it is all about trust": Interviews with Health Services Administrators about perceived barriers and facilitators to vaccine administration in jails. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e50. [PMID: 37008613 PMCID: PMC10052395 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Compared to the general population, individuals incarcerated in jails and prisons are more vulnerable to infection and mortality from communicable diseases, such as COVID-19 and influenza. However, vaccination rates among incarcerated individuals as well as staff who work in jails and prisons remain disproportionately low. Healthcare administrators working in jails have first-hand experience about barriers to vaccine provision, but their perspectives are infrequently collected and analyzed. Methods We reached out to Health Services Administrators (HSAs) from all 14 Massachusetts (MA) county jails for qualitative in-depth interviews to understand how their personal and professional feelings about vaccination relate to the barriers and facilitators that surround administration of vaccines in jail. Results Eight people participated in the study (8/14 = 57% response rate). Key themes emerged, including 1) HSAs expressed divergent opinions on incarceration as the correct opportunity to vaccinate individuals, 2) HSAs' personal views on vaccines influenced their operationalization of vaccination in jail, and 3) opinions varied on whether their institutions' vaccine protocols needed modification. Conclusions Our findings highlight the critical need to leverage the feedback and influence of stakeholders such as HSAs in efforts to improve preventative healthcare delivery in carceral health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Lodolo
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emma Smyth
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geographic Medicine, and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA , USA
| | - Megha Ramaswamy
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Alysse Wurcel
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geographic Medicine, and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Davidson Mhonde R, Riddick B, Hingle A, Shaw C, Rudes D, Pollack H, Schneider J, Zhao X, Taxman FS. "I Just Don't Know What to Believe": Sensemaking during the COVID-19 Pandemic among Criminal Legal Involved Communities. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:15045. [PMID: 36429763 PMCID: PMC9690514 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192215045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, those involved with the criminal legal system experience disproportionate vulnerability to infection, transmission, and mortality, facing additional systemic barriers due to criminal legal involvement (CLI) (e.g., prior incarcerations or probationary status affecting employability or housing security). We use Weick's (1979) model of sensemaking as a theoretical framework to inform our examination of CLI individuals' experiences during the pandemic. The primary objective of this paper is to explore the process of sensemaking amid misinformation, trust/mistrust, and vulnerability during the pandemic among CLI communities in three central states (Illinois, Louisiana, and Arkansas). We conducted seven online focus groups (n = 44), between December 2020 and January 2021, from the targeted communities about their awareness of misinformation, trusted or distrusted sources, attitudes about COVID-19 health behaviors (including testing, protective behaviors such as mask-wearing and social distancing, and vaccination), and experiences with the criminal legal system during the pandemic. The concept of equivocality was at the core of the narratives shared among participants, with uncertainty emerging as a meta-theme across all focus groups. The findings of this study should prove useful for those who are developing messaging to combat mis/disinformation and overcome mis/distrust with the medical system and government institutions among those who are disenfranchised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Breonna Riddick
- Department of Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
| | - Aayushi Hingle
- Department of Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
| | - Cameron Shaw
- Schar School of Policy and Government, Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
| | - Danielle Rudes
- College of Criminal Justice Huntsville, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77341, USA
| | - Harold Pollack
- Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy and Practice, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - John Schneider
- Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Xiaoquan Zhao
- Department of Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
| | - Faye S. Taxman
- Schar School of Policy and Government, Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Levintow SN, DiRosa E, Carda-Auten J, Brown ME, Bradley-Bull S, Blue C, Powers KA, Rosen DL. SARS-CoV-2 Mitigation Strategies, Testing, and Cases at 254 Jails in the US Southeast, October 2020 to May 2021. Am J Public Health 2022; 112:1589-1598. [PMID: 36223569 PMCID: PMC9558185 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2022.307012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
Objectives. To characterize severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mitigation strategies, testing, and cases across county jails in the Southeastern United States, examining variability by jail characteristics. Methods. We administered a 1-time telephone survey to personnel of 254 jails in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina between October 2020 and May 2021. Results. Some SARS-CoV-2 mitigation strategies (e.g., screening at intake, isolation and masking for symptomatic persons) were commonly reported (≥ 75% of jails). Other measures, such as masking regardless of symptoms (52%) and screening at release (26%), were less common and varied by jail state or population size. Overall, 41% of jails reported no SARS-CoV-2 testing in the past 30 days. Jails with testing (59%) tested a median of 6 per 100 incarcerated persons; of those jails, one third reported 1 or more cases of positive tests. Although most jails detected no cases, in the 20% of all jails with 1 or more case in the past 30 days, 1 in 5 tests was positive. Conclusions. There was low testing coverage and variable implementation of SARS-CoV-2 mitigation strategies in Southeastern US jails during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(11):1589-1598. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307012).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara N Levintow
- Sara N. Levintow and Kimberly A. Powers are with the Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Elena DiRosa, Jessica Carda-Auten, Mersedes E. Brown, Steve Bradley-Bull, and Colleen Blue are with the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. David L. Rosen is with the Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Elena DiRosa
- Sara N. Levintow and Kimberly A. Powers are with the Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Elena DiRosa, Jessica Carda-Auten, Mersedes E. Brown, Steve Bradley-Bull, and Colleen Blue are with the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. David L. Rosen is with the Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Jessica Carda-Auten
- Sara N. Levintow and Kimberly A. Powers are with the Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Elena DiRosa, Jessica Carda-Auten, Mersedes E. Brown, Steve Bradley-Bull, and Colleen Blue are with the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. David L. Rosen is with the Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Mersedes E Brown
- Sara N. Levintow and Kimberly A. Powers are with the Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Elena DiRosa, Jessica Carda-Auten, Mersedes E. Brown, Steve Bradley-Bull, and Colleen Blue are with the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. David L. Rosen is with the Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Steve Bradley-Bull
- Sara N. Levintow and Kimberly A. Powers are with the Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Elena DiRosa, Jessica Carda-Auten, Mersedes E. Brown, Steve Bradley-Bull, and Colleen Blue are with the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. David L. Rosen is with the Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Colleen Blue
- Sara N. Levintow and Kimberly A. Powers are with the Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Elena DiRosa, Jessica Carda-Auten, Mersedes E. Brown, Steve Bradley-Bull, and Colleen Blue are with the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. David L. Rosen is with the Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Kimberly A Powers
- Sara N. Levintow and Kimberly A. Powers are with the Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Elena DiRosa, Jessica Carda-Auten, Mersedes E. Brown, Steve Bradley-Bull, and Colleen Blue are with the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. David L. Rosen is with the Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - David L Rosen
- Sara N. Levintow and Kimberly A. Powers are with the Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Elena DiRosa, Jessica Carda-Auten, Mersedes E. Brown, Steve Bradley-Bull, and Colleen Blue are with the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. David L. Rosen is with the Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Marquez N, Moreno D, Klonsky A, Dolovich S. Racial And Ethnic Inequalities In COVID-19 Mortality Within Carceral Settings: An Analysis Of Texas Prisons. Health Aff (Millwood) 2022; 41:1626-1634. [DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Marquez
- Neal Marquez , University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Destiny Moreno
- Destiny Moreno, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Amanda Klonsky
- Amanda Klonsky, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Washington TA, Glenn W, Barreras J, Ramos A. A COVID-19 Prevention Program to Encourage Vaccination Uptake among Substance-Using Black and Latinx Sexual Minority Men. Health Soc Work 2022; 47:301-304. [PMID: 36099156 DOI: 10.1093/hsw/hlac022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Alex Washington
- Thomas Alex Washington, PhD, is professor, School of Social Work, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd., SPPA 224, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA
| | - Wendell Glenn
- Wendell Glenn, MSW, is director of ADAM and TEACH Projects, Behavioral Health Services, Inc., Long Beach, CA, USA
| | - Joanna Barreras
- Joanna Barreras, PhD, is assistant professor, School of Social Work, California State University, Long Beach, CA, USA
| | - Angel Ramos
- Angel Ramos, MSW, is post-MSW fellow, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Romanchuk K, Linthwaite B, Cox J, Park H, Dussault C, Basta NE, Varsaneux O, Worthington J, Lebouché B, MacDonald SE, Ismail SJ, Kronfli N. Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine willingness among people incarcerated in 3 Canadian federal prisons: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open 2022; 10:E922-E929. [PMID: 36280247 PMCID: PMC9640165 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maximizing uptake of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines among people in prison is essential in mitigating future outbreaks. We aimed to determine factors associated with willingness to receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination before vaccine availability. METHODS We chose 3 Canadian federal prisons based on their low uptake of influenza vaccines in 2019-2020. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire on knowledge, attitude and beliefs toward vaccines. The primary outcome was participant willingness to receive a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, measured using a 5-point Likert scale to the question, "If a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine becomes available in prison, how likely are you to get vaccinated?" We calculated the association of independent variables (age, ethnicity, chronic health conditions, 2019-2020 influenza vaccine uptake and prison security level), identified a priori, with vaccine willingness using logistic regression and crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS We recruited 240 participants from Mar. 31 to Apr. 19, 2021 (median age 46 years; 19.2% female, 25.8% Indigenous). Of these, 178 (74.2%) were very willing to receive a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Participants who received the 2019-2020 influenza vaccine (adjusted OR 5.20, 95% CI 2.43-12.00) had higher odds of vaccine willingness than those who did not; those who self-identified as Indigenous (adjusted OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.60) and in medium- or maximum-security prisons (adjusted OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.12-0.92) had lower odds of vaccine willingness than those who identified as white or those in minimum-security prisons, respectively. INTERPRETATION Most participants were very willing to receive vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 before vaccine roll-out. Vaccine promotion campaigns should target groups with low vaccine willingness (i.e., those who have declined influenza vaccine, identify as Indigenous or reside in high-security prisons).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Romanchuk
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Romanchuk, Linthwaite, Cox, Park, Dussault, Lebouché, Kronfli), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Cox, Basta, Kronfli), School of Population and Global Health, McGill University; Department of Medicine (Cox, Lebouché, Kronfli), Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Correctional Service Canada (Varsaneux, Worthington), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lebouché), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Faculty of Nursing (MacDonald), University of Alberta; School of Public Health (MacDonald), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Immunization Programs and Pandemic Preparedness (Ismail), Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada and Metro City Medical Clinic, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Blake Linthwaite
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Romanchuk, Linthwaite, Cox, Park, Dussault, Lebouché, Kronfli), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Cox, Basta, Kronfli), School of Population and Global Health, McGill University; Department of Medicine (Cox, Lebouché, Kronfli), Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Correctional Service Canada (Varsaneux, Worthington), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lebouché), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Faculty of Nursing (MacDonald), University of Alberta; School of Public Health (MacDonald), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Immunization Programs and Pandemic Preparedness (Ismail), Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada and Metro City Medical Clinic, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Joseph Cox
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Romanchuk, Linthwaite, Cox, Park, Dussault, Lebouché, Kronfli), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Cox, Basta, Kronfli), School of Population and Global Health, McGill University; Department of Medicine (Cox, Lebouché, Kronfli), Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Correctional Service Canada (Varsaneux, Worthington), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lebouché), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Faculty of Nursing (MacDonald), University of Alberta; School of Public Health (MacDonald), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Immunization Programs and Pandemic Preparedness (Ismail), Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada and Metro City Medical Clinic, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Hyejin Park
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Romanchuk, Linthwaite, Cox, Park, Dussault, Lebouché, Kronfli), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Cox, Basta, Kronfli), School of Population and Global Health, McGill University; Department of Medicine (Cox, Lebouché, Kronfli), Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Correctional Service Canada (Varsaneux, Worthington), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lebouché), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Faculty of Nursing (MacDonald), University of Alberta; School of Public Health (MacDonald), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Immunization Programs and Pandemic Preparedness (Ismail), Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada and Metro City Medical Clinic, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Camille Dussault
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Romanchuk, Linthwaite, Cox, Park, Dussault, Lebouché, Kronfli), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Cox, Basta, Kronfli), School of Population and Global Health, McGill University; Department of Medicine (Cox, Lebouché, Kronfli), Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Correctional Service Canada (Varsaneux, Worthington), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lebouché), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Faculty of Nursing (MacDonald), University of Alberta; School of Public Health (MacDonald), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Immunization Programs and Pandemic Preparedness (Ismail), Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada and Metro City Medical Clinic, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Nicole E Basta
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Romanchuk, Linthwaite, Cox, Park, Dussault, Lebouché, Kronfli), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Cox, Basta, Kronfli), School of Population and Global Health, McGill University; Department of Medicine (Cox, Lebouché, Kronfli), Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Correctional Service Canada (Varsaneux, Worthington), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lebouché), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Faculty of Nursing (MacDonald), University of Alberta; School of Public Health (MacDonald), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Immunization Programs and Pandemic Preparedness (Ismail), Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada and Metro City Medical Clinic, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Olivia Varsaneux
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Romanchuk, Linthwaite, Cox, Park, Dussault, Lebouché, Kronfli), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Cox, Basta, Kronfli), School of Population and Global Health, McGill University; Department of Medicine (Cox, Lebouché, Kronfli), Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Correctional Service Canada (Varsaneux, Worthington), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lebouché), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Faculty of Nursing (MacDonald), University of Alberta; School of Public Health (MacDonald), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Immunization Programs and Pandemic Preparedness (Ismail), Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada and Metro City Medical Clinic, Ottawa, Ont
| | - James Worthington
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Romanchuk, Linthwaite, Cox, Park, Dussault, Lebouché, Kronfli), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Cox, Basta, Kronfli), School of Population and Global Health, McGill University; Department of Medicine (Cox, Lebouché, Kronfli), Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Correctional Service Canada (Varsaneux, Worthington), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lebouché), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Faculty of Nursing (MacDonald), University of Alberta; School of Public Health (MacDonald), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Immunization Programs and Pandemic Preparedness (Ismail), Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada and Metro City Medical Clinic, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Bertrand Lebouché
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Romanchuk, Linthwaite, Cox, Park, Dussault, Lebouché, Kronfli), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Cox, Basta, Kronfli), School of Population and Global Health, McGill University; Department of Medicine (Cox, Lebouché, Kronfli), Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Correctional Service Canada (Varsaneux, Worthington), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lebouché), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Faculty of Nursing (MacDonald), University of Alberta; School of Public Health (MacDonald), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Immunization Programs and Pandemic Preparedness (Ismail), Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada and Metro City Medical Clinic, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Shannon E MacDonald
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Romanchuk, Linthwaite, Cox, Park, Dussault, Lebouché, Kronfli), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Cox, Basta, Kronfli), School of Population and Global Health, McGill University; Department of Medicine (Cox, Lebouché, Kronfli), Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Correctional Service Canada (Varsaneux, Worthington), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lebouché), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Faculty of Nursing (MacDonald), University of Alberta; School of Public Health (MacDonald), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Immunization Programs and Pandemic Preparedness (Ismail), Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada and Metro City Medical Clinic, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Shainoor J Ismail
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Romanchuk, Linthwaite, Cox, Park, Dussault, Lebouché, Kronfli), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Cox, Basta, Kronfli), School of Population and Global Health, McGill University; Department of Medicine (Cox, Lebouché, Kronfli), Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Correctional Service Canada (Varsaneux, Worthington), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lebouché), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Faculty of Nursing (MacDonald), University of Alberta; School of Public Health (MacDonald), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Immunization Programs and Pandemic Preparedness (Ismail), Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada and Metro City Medical Clinic, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Nadine Kronfli
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Romanchuk, Linthwaite, Cox, Park, Dussault, Lebouché, Kronfli), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Cox, Basta, Kronfli), School of Population and Global Health, McGill University; Department of Medicine (Cox, Lebouché, Kronfli), Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Correctional Service Canada (Varsaneux, Worthington), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lebouché), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Faculty of Nursing (MacDonald), University of Alberta; School of Public Health (MacDonald), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Immunization Programs and Pandemic Preparedness (Ismail), Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada and Metro City Medical Clinic, Ottawa, Ont.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ismail N, Tavoschi L, Moazen B, Roselló A, Plugge E. COVID-19 vaccine for people who live and work in prisons worldwide: A scoping review. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0267070. [PMID: 36084037 PMCID: PMC9462803 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Overcrowding, poor conditions, and high population turnover make prisons highly susceptible to COVID-19. Vaccination is key to controlling COVID-19, yet there is disagreement regarding whether people who live and work in prisons should be prioritised in national vaccination programmes. To help resolve this, we critically examine the extent, nature, and quality of extant literature regarding prioritisation of COVID-19 vaccinations for people who live and work in prisons. Using a scoping review as our methodological framework, we conducted a systematic literature search of 17 databases. From 2,307 potentially eligible articles, we removed duplicates and screened titles and abstracts to retain 45 articles for review and quality appraisal. Findings indicated that while most countries recognise that prisons are at risk of high levels of COVID-19 transmission, only a minority have explicitly prioritised people who live and work in prisons for COVID-19 vaccination. Even among those that have, prioritisation criteria vary considerably. This is set against a backdrop of political barriers, such as politicians questioning the moral deservingness of people in prison; policy barriers, such as the absence of a unified international framework of how vaccine prioritisation should proceed in prisons; logistical barriers regarding vaccine administration in prisons; and behavioural barriers including vaccine hesitancy. We outline five strategies to prioritise people who live and work in prisons in COVID-19 vaccination plans: (1) improving data collection on COVID-19 vaccination, (2) reducing the number of people imprisoned, (3) tackling vaccine populism through advocacy, (4) challenging arbitrary prioritisation processes via legal processes, and (5) conducting more empirical research on COVID-19 vaccination planning, delivery, and acceptability. Implementing these strategies would help to reduce the impact of COVID-19 on the prison population, prevent community transmission, improve vaccine uptake in prisons beyond the current pandemic, foster political accountability, and inform future decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasrul Ismail
- School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Lara Tavoschi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Babak Moazen
- Department of Health and Social Work, Institute of Addiction Research (ISFF), Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Emma Plugge
- UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Khorasani S, Zubiago J, Carreiro J, Guardado R, Wurcel AG. Influenza Vaccination in Massachusetts Jails: A Mixed-Methods Analysis. Public Health Rep 2022; 137:936-943. [PMID: 34524903 PMCID: PMC9379841 DOI: 10.1177/00333549211041659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Influenza infects millions of people each year and contributes to tens of thousands of deaths annually despite the availability of vaccines. People most at risk of influenza complications are disproportionately represented in people incarcerated in US prisons and jails. The objectives of this study were to survey health administrators in Massachusetts county jails about institutional influenza vaccine policies and practices and estimate influenza vaccination rates in Massachusetts jails from 2013 to 2020. METHODS In April 2020, we administered surveys to the health services administrators in Massachusetts' 14 county jails to gather information about influenza vaccination policies and delivery practices. To calculate influenza vaccination rates for each facility, we obtained data on influenza vaccine orders from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health for each county in Massachusetts for influenza seasons 2013-2020. We calculated summary statistics for each reporting facility and each year, conducted a Kruskal-Wallis analysis to compare vaccination rates between years, and used a linear regression model to identify predictors of vaccination rates. RESULTS Influenza vaccination rates in Massachusetts jails ranged from 1.9% to 11.8%. We found no significant differences in vaccination rates between years. Influenza vaccine ordering and delivery practices varied by jail, and respondents had high levels of confidence in influenza policies and vaccine delivery practices. CONCLUSIONS Influenza vaccination rates in Massachusetts jails are low, and delivery practices in jails vary. Lack of influenza vaccinations in jails is a gap in health care that needs to be prioritized, especially considering the current COVID-19 pandemic. Further investigations for effective and equitable vaccination in this population should involve people who are incarcerated and people who make influenza vaccine policies in jails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julia Zubiago
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases,
Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jac Carreiro
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rubeen Guardado
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases,
Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alysse G. Wurcel
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases,
Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Stufano A, Buonvino N, Trombetta CM, Pontrelli D, Marchi S, Lobefaro G, De Benedictis L, Lorusso E, Carofiglio MT, Vasinioti VI, Montomoli E, Decaro N, Lovreglio P. COVID-19 Outbreak and BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination Coverage in a Correctional Facility during Circulation of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 Variant in Italy. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10. [PMID: 35891301 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10071137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. The recent spread of the highly mutated SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) has raised concerns about protection against COVID-19 in congregate settings such as prisons, characterized by a high risk of transmission and possible difficulties in obtaining adequate vaccination coverage. The present study aims to investigate the spread of an outbreak of COVID-19 in an Italian correctional facility during the dominant circulation of the Omicron BA.1 variant, and also considers BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination coverage among inmates. A COVID-19 screening campaign by RT-PCR was performed on 515 detainees from 4−30 January 2022, in response to an outbreak that began in the correctional facility. Furthermore, 101 serum samples collected from healthy inmates 21 days after having received the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine were tested for neutralizing antibodies against both the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 strain and the Omicron BA.1 variant. The global attack rate during the study period was 43.6% (RR 0.8), progressively reducing from unvaccinated inmates (62.7%, RR 1.8) to those who had one dose (52.3%, RR 1.5), two doses (full cycle) (45.0%, RR 1.3), and the third dose (booster) vaccinated group (31.4%, RR 0.7). The percentage of SARS-CoV-2 positive subjects among unvaccinated inmates was significantly higher than in the other groups (p < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed between inmates with one or two vaccine doses. Only two of the positive inmates were hospitalized for COVID-19. The geometric mean titer of neutralizing antibodies in the tested sub-group after two doses of vaccine was lower than in previous studies against the wild-type virus, and showed a complete lack of neutralization against the Omicron variant in 92.1% of individuals. The findings support the need to prioritize vaccination in correctional facilities, as a public health measure to increase the protection of inmates and consequently of prison workers and the community against COVID-19, in coordination with the other prevention strategies.
Collapse
|
32
|
Silverman RA, Ceci A, Cohen A, Helmick M, Short E, Bordwine P, Friedlander MJ, Finkielstein CV. Vaccine Effectiveness during Outbreak of COVID-19 Alpha (B.1.1.7) Variant in Men's Correctional Facility, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28:1313-1320. [PMID: 35731137 PMCID: PMC9239860 DOI: 10.3201/eid2807.220091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
In April 2021, a COVID-19 outbreak occurred at a correctional facility in rural Virginia, USA. Eighty-four infections were identified among 854 incarcerated persons by facilitywide testing with reverse transcription quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). We used whole-genome sequencing to link all infections to 2 employees infected with the B.1.1.7α (UK) variant. The relative risk comparing unvaccinated to fully vaccinated persons (mRNA-1273 [Moderna, https://www.modernatx.com]) was 7.8 (95% CI 4.8–12.7), corresponding to a vaccine effectiveness of 87.1% (95% CI 79.0%–92.1%). Average qRT-PCR cycle threshold values were lower, suggesting higher viral loads, among unvaccinated infected than vaccinated cases for the nucleocapsid, envelope, and spike genes. Vaccination was highly effective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in this high-risk setting. This approach can be applied to similar settings to estimate vaccine effectiveness as variants emerge to guide public health strategies during the ongoing pandemic.
Collapse
|
33
|
Liu YE, LeBoa C, Rodriguez M, Sherif B, Trinidad C, del Rosario M, Allen S, Clifford C, Redding J, Chen WT, Rosas LG, Morales C, Chyorny A, Andrews JR. COVID-19 Preventive Measures in Northern California Jails: Perceived Deficiencies, Barriers, and Unintended Harms. Front Public Health 2022; 10:854343. [PMID: 35774562 PMCID: PMC9237366 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.854343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Carceral facilities are high-risk settings for COVID-19 transmission. Little is known about the hidden burden of infection or practical barriers to infection control in these settings, especially in jails. There is also limited research on the mental health impacts of the pandemic among people living and working in carceral facilities. Methods Between July 8, 2020 and April 30, 2021, we performed SARS-CoV-2 rapid antibody testing and administered a questionnaire among residents and staff of four Northern California jails. We utilized multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for demographic and carceral characteristics, to analyze factors associated with prior infection, including perceived likelihood of prior infection and access to new masks. We additionally assessed the implementation of, perceptions toward, and impacts of COVID-19 policies in practice. We engaged stakeholder representatives, including incarcerated individuals, to guide study design, procedures, and results interpretation. Results We enrolled 788 jail residents and 380 jail staff. Nearly half of residents and two-thirds of staff who were antibody-positive had not previously tested positive for COVID-19. Among residents without a prior COVID-19 diagnosis, antibody positivity was significantly associated with perceived likelihood of prior infection (adjusted OR = 8.9; 95% CI, 3.6–22.0). Residents who had flu-like illness in jail cited inadequate responses to reported illness and deterrents to symptom reporting, including fears of medical isolation and perceptions of medical neglect. Residents also disclosed deficient access to face masks, which was associated with antibody positivity (adjusted OR = 13.8, 95% CI, 1.8–107.0). Worsened mental health was pervasive among residents, attributed not only to fear of COVID-19 and unsanitary jail conditions but also to intensified isolation and deprivation due to pandemic restrictions on in-person visitation, programs, and recreation time. Conclusion Carceral settings present significant challenges to maintaining infection control and human rights. Custody officials should work diligently to transform the conditions of medical isolation, which could mitigate deterrents to symptom reporting. Furthermore, they should minimize use of restrictive measures like lockdowns and suspension of visitation that exacerbate the mental health harms of incarceration. Instead, custody officials should ensure comprehensive implementation of other preventive strategies like masking, testing, and vaccination, in conjunction with multisector efforts to advance decarceration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiran E. Liu
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Cancer Biology Graduate Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Yiran E. Liu
| | - Christopher LeBoa
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Marcela Rodriguez
- Stanford Center for Clinical Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Beruk Sherif
- Stanford Center for Clinical Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Chrisele Trinidad
- Stanford Center for Clinical Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Michael del Rosario
- Division of Correctional Health Services, San Mateo County Health, Redwood City, CA, United States
| | - Sophie Allen
- Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Sociology, Stanford School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, CA, United States
| | | | - Jennifer Redding
- Santa Clara County Office of the Public Defender, San Jose, CA, United States
| | - Wei-ting Chen
- Office of Community Engagement, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Lisa G. Rosas
- Office of Community Engagement, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Carlos Morales
- Division of Correctional Health Services, San Mateo County Health, Redwood City, CA, United States
| | - Alexander Chyorny
- Division of Custody Health, Department of Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System, San Jose, CA, United States
| | - Jason R. Andrews
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kobayashi T, Nishina Y, Tomoi H, Harada K, Tanaka K, Matsumoto E, Horimukai K, Ishihara J, Sasaki S, Inaba K, Seguchi K, Takahashi H, Salinas JL, Yamada Y. Corowa-kun: A messenger app chatbot delivers COVID-19 vaccine information, Japan 2021. Vaccine 2022; 40:4654-4662. [PMID: 35750541 PMCID: PMC9174339 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background There is a long history in Japan of public concerns about vaccine adverse events. Few studies have assessed how mobile messenger apps affect COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Methods Corowa-kun, a free chatbot, was created on February 6, 2021 in LINE, the most popular messenger app in Japan. Corowa-kun provides instant, automated answers to 70 frequently asked COVID-19 vaccine questions. A cross-sectional survey with 21 questions was performed within Corowa-kun during April 5–12, 2021. Results A total of 59,676 persons used Corowa-kun during February–April 2021. Of them, 10,192 users (17%) participated in the survey. Median age was 55 years (range 16–97), and most were female (74%). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy reported by survey respondents decreased from 41% to 20% after using Corowa-kun. Of the 20% who remained hesitant, 16% (1,675) were unsure, and 4% (3 6 4) did not intend to be vaccinated. Factors associated with vaccine hesitancy were: age 16–34 (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7; 95% confidential interval [CI]: 3.0–4.6, compared to age ≥ 65), female sex (OR = 2.4; Cl: 2.1–2.8), and history of a previous vaccine side-effect (OR = 2.5; Cl: 2.2–2.9). Being a physician (OR = 0.2; Cl: 0.1–0.4) and having received a flu vaccine the prior season (OR = 0.4; Cl: 0.3–0.4) were protective. Conclusions A substantial number of people used the chabot in a short period. Mobile messenger apps could be leveraged to provide accurate vaccine information and to investigate vaccine intention and risk factors for vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Kobayashi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Yuka Nishina
- Department of General Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hana Tomoi
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK
| | - Ko Harada
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kyuto Tanaka
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nippon Koukan Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Eiyu Matsumoto
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Kenta Horimukai
- Department of Pediatrics, Jikei University Katsushika Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Ishihara
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shugo Sasaki
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Moroyama, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kanako Inaba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kanto Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kyosuke Seguchi
- Department of Oncology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiromizu Takahashi
- Department of General Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jorge L Salinas
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Yuji Yamada
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kim H, Hughes E, Cavanagh A, Norris E, Gao A, Bondy SJ, McLeod KE, Kanagalingam T, Kouyoumdjian FG. The health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on adults who experience imprisonment globally: A mixed methods systematic review. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0268866. [PMID: 35594288 PMCID: PMC9122186 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The prison setting and health status of people who experience imprisonment increase the risks of COVID-19 infection and sequelae, and other health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Objectives To conduct a mixed methods systematic review on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health of people who experience imprisonment. Data sources We searched Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Social Sciences Abstracts, CINAHL, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts, Sociology Database, Coronavirus Research Database, ERIC, Proquest Dissertations and Theses, Web of Science, and Scopus in October 2021. We reviewed reference lists for included studies. Study eligibility criteria Original research conducted in or after December 2019 on health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on adults in prisons or within three months of release. Study appraisal and synthesis methods We used the Joanna Briggs Institute’s Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research for qualitative studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute’s Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data for quantitative studies. We qualitized quantitative data and extracted qualitative data, coded data, and collated similar data into categories. Results We identified 62 studies. People in prisons had disproportionately high rates of COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 mortality. During the pandemic, all-cause mortality worsened, access to health care and other services worsened, and there were major impacts on mental wellbeing and on relationships with family and staff. There was limited evidence regarding key primary and secondary prevention strategies. Limitations Our search was limited to databases. As the COVID-19 pandemic is ongoing, more evidence will emerge. Conclusions Prisons and people who experience imprisonment should be prioritized for COVID-19 response and recovery efforts, and an explicit focus on prisons is needed for ongoing public health work including emergency preparedness. Prospero registration number 239324.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Kim
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Emily Hughes
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alice Cavanagh
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emily Norris
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Gao
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan J. Bondy
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katherine E. McLeod
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tharsan Kanagalingam
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fiona G. Kouyoumdjian
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Di Giuseppe G, Pelullo CP, Lanzano R, Lombardi C, Nese G, Pavia M. COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake and Related Determinants in Detained Subjects in Italy. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:673. [PMID: 35632429 PMCID: PMC9146091 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10050673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This study explored the extent of COVID-19 vaccination coverage and investigated drivers and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake among people in prison. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from July to October 2021 among 517 detained people in the Campania region of South Italy. Results: In total, 47.1% of participants expressed a high concern about contracting COVID-19 after vaccination, whereas 60.6% and 53.8% of respondents reported a positive attitude towards usefulness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines, respectively. Adherence to the active offer of COVID-19 vaccination involved 89.7% of detained subjects. COVID-19 vaccination uptake was significantly higher in females, and in those who reported influenza vaccination uptake, had received information about COVID-19 vaccination from media and newspapers, did not express need of additional information about COVID-19 vaccine, believed that COVID-19 vaccine is safe, were involved in working activities in the prison, and had a high school or university degree. Conclusions: These findings showed a high self-reported COVID-19 vaccination coverage in detained subjects, supporting the effectiveness of the strategy aimed at giving priority to COVID-19 vaccinations in prisons. Further efforts are needed to contrast the hesitancy of those who refused vaccination to increase their confidence about usefulness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.
Collapse
|
37
|
Lessard D, Ortiz-Paredes D, Park H, Varsaneux O, Worthington J, Basta NE, MacDonald SE, Lebouché B, Cox J, Ismail SJ, Kronfli N. Barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccine acceptability among people incarcerated in Canadian federal prisons: A qualitative study. Vaccine X 2022; 10:100150. [PMID: 35243324 PMCID: PMC8883835 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Canadian correctional institutions have been prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination given the multiple outbreaks that have occurred since the start of the pandemic. Given historically low vaccine uptake, we aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination acceptability among people incarcerated in federal prisons. METHODS Three federal prisons in Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia (Canada) were chosen based on previously low influenza vaccine uptake among those incarcerated. Using a qualitative design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a diverse sample (gender, age, and ethnicity) of incarcerated people. An inductive-deductive analysis of audio-recorded interview transcripts was conducted to identify and categorize barriers and facilitators within the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). RESULTS From March 22-29, 2021, a total of 15 participants (n = 5 per site; n = 5 women; median age = 43 years) were interviewed, including five First Nations people and six people from other minority groups. Eleven (73%) expressed a desire to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, including two who previously refused influenza vaccination. We identified five thematic barriers across three TDF domains: social influences (receiving strict recommendations, believing in conspiracies to harm), beliefs about consequences (believing that infection control measures will not be fully lifted, concerns with vaccine-related side effects), and knowledge (lack of vaccine-specific information), and eight thematic facilitators across five TDF domains: environmental context and resources (perceiving correctional employees as sources of outbreaks, perceiving challenges to prevention measures), social influences (receiving recommendations from trusted individuals), beliefs about consequences (seeking individual and collective protection, believing in a collective "return to normal", believing in individual privileges), knowledge (reassurance about vaccine outcomes), and emotions (having experienced COVID-19-related stress). CONCLUSIONS Lack of information and misinformation were important barriers to COVID-19 vaccine acceptability among people incarcerated in Canadian federal prisons. This suggests that educational interventions, delivered by trusted health care providers, may improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Lessard
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Canada.,Canadian Institutes of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Mentorship Chair in Innovative Clinical Trial in HIV, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Canada
| | - David Ortiz-Paredes
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Canada
| | - Hyejin Park
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Canada
| | | | | | - Nicole E Basta
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Canada
| | - Shannon E MacDonald
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Canada.,School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - Bertrand Lebouché
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Canada.,Canadian Institutes of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Mentorship Chair in Innovative Clinical Trial in HIV, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Canada
| | - Joseph Cox
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Canada
| | - Shainoor J Ismail
- Division of Immunization Programs and Pandemic Preparedness, Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada and Metro City Medical Clinic, Canada
| | - Nadine Kronfli
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Di Giuseppe G, Pelullo CP, Volgare AS, Napolitano F, Pavia M. Parents' Willingness to Vaccinate Their Children With COVID-19 Vaccine: Results of a Survey in Italy. J Adolesc Health 2022; 70:550-558. [PMID: 35305792 PMCID: PMC8767903 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the parents' willingness to vaccinate their children with the COVID-19 vaccine and related determinants with specific attention to willingness for adolescents as compared to younger children. METHODS Data were collected through a confidential online questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 607 parents agreed to participate. More than two-thirds of the parents had good knowledge about the modes of transmission of COVID-19, knew that subjects of any age may be susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 85.5% correctly indicated the main behavioral preventive measures against COVID-19. With regard to attitudes, 78.7% agreed that COVID-19 is a serious disease, whereas only 42.3% agreed that it is preventable. Overall, 68.5% were willing to vaccinate their children with the COVID-19 vaccine, specifically 74.5% of parents of adolescents and 65.5% of those of younger children, and the results of the multivariate analysis showed that parents of adolescents aged 12-15 years or 16-18 years compared to those of children aged 11 years or less, those who had more than two children, those who reported that their children had been visited by the primary care pediatrician/physician in the previous 12 months, those who agreed that COVID-19 is a serious disease, considered very useful the COVID-19 vaccine, had been vaccinated against influenza in the previous season, and had received at least one shot of COVID-19 vaccine were more likely to be willing to vaccinate their children. CONCLUSION In conclusion, a relevant proportion of parents are willing to vaccinate their children, with the parents of adolescents showing a higher willingness compared to those of younger children. However, there is still room for reducing hesitancy and refusal of the COVID-19 vaccine in this strategic population group by promoting communication to mitigate concerns toward the COVID-19 vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Maria Pavia
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Liu YE, Oto J, Will J, LeBoa C, Doyle A, Rens N, Aggarwal S, Kalish I, Rodriguez M, Sherif B, Trinidad C, Del Rosario M, Allen S, Spencer R, Morales C, Chyorny A, Andrews JR. Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among residents of Northern California jails. Prev Med Rep 2022; 27:101771. [PMID: 35309721 PMCID: PMC8920969 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Carceral facilities are high-risk settings for COVID-19 transmission. Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among incarcerated individuals are poorly understood, especially among jail residents. Here, we conducted a retrospective review of electronic health record (EHR) data on COVID-19 vaccine uptake in custody and additionally administered a survey to assess reasons for vaccine hesitancy, sources of COVID-19 information, and medical mistrust among residents of four Northern California jails. We performed multivariate logistic regression to determine associations with vaccine acceptance. Of 2,564 jail residents offered a COVID-19 vaccine between March 19, 2021 and June 30, 2021, 1,441 (56.2%) accepted at least one dose. Among vaccinated residents, 497 (34.5%) had initially refused. Vaccine uptake was higher among older individuals, women, those with recent flu vaccination, and those living in shared housing. Among 509 survey respondents, leading reasons for vaccine hesitancy were concerns around side effects and suboptimal efficacy, with cost and the need for an annual booster being other hypothetical deterrents to vaccination. Vaccine hesitancy was also associated with mistrust of medical personnel in and out of jail, although this association varied by race/ethnicity. Television and friends/family were the most common and most trusted sources of COVID-19 information, respectively. Overall, vaccine acceptance was much lower among jail residents than the local and national general population. Interventions to increase vaccination rates in this setting should utilize accessible and trusted sources of information to address concerns about side effects and efficacy, while working to mitigate medical and institutional mistrust among residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiran E. Liu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Corresponding author at: 240 Pasteur Dr, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| | - Jillian Oto
- Custody Health Services, Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System, San Jose, CA, USA
| | - John Will
- Custody Health Services, Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System, San Jose, CA, USA
| | - Christopher LeBoa
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Alexis Doyle
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Neil Rens
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Shelley Aggarwal
- Department of Pediatrics, Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System, San Jose, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Custody Health, Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System, San Jose, CA, USA
| | - Iryna Kalish
- Custody Health Services, Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System, San Jose, CA, USA
| | - Marcela Rodriguez
- Stanford Center for Clinical Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Beruk Sherif
- Stanford Center for Clinical Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chrisele Trinidad
- Stanford Center for Clinical Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael Del Rosario
- Division of Correctional Health Services, San Mateo County Health, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Sophie Allen
- Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Sociology, Stanford School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Robert Spencer
- Division of Correctional Health Services, San Mateo County Health, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Carlos Morales
- Division of Correctional Health Services, San Mateo County Health, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Alexander Chyorny
- Department of Medicine, Division of Custody Health, Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System, San Jose, CA, USA
| | - Jason R Andrews
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wang Y, Liu Y. Multilevel determinants of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in the United States: A rapid systematic review. Prev Med Rep 2022; 25:101673. [PMID: 34934611 PMCID: PMC8675390 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy is a challenge for the success and optimal implementation of COVID-19 immunization programs in the US. The objective of this study was to summarize multilevel determinants of COVID-19 vaccination intention in the US to inform future intervention opportunities. To this end, we conducted a rapid systematic review by searching published articles via PubMed published by October 5, 2021, following the PRISMA guidelines. One hundred and six articles were included. According to nationally representative studies, the overall COVID-19 acceptance rate ranges from 53.6% to 84.4%. Individual (demographics, health history, behaviors and health beliefs), interpersonal (having a close friend/family member impacted by COVID-19), healthcare and societal level factors (healthcare provider recommendations, source/credential of COVID-19 related information, and COVID-19 related conspiracy theories) all contributed to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the US. This study demonstrates that the acceptance to COVID-19 vaccines is influenced by various factors, particularly the role of healthcare providers in enhancing public intent to vaccination. Potential interventions to mitigate people's concerns over the vaccines and address vaccine-related conspiracy/misinformation from social media are also critical to encourage vaccine uptake in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Wang
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, BOX 420644, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| | - Yu Liu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, BOX 420644, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Norhayati MN, Che Yusof R, Azman YM. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:783982. [PMID: 35155467 PMCID: PMC8828741 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.783982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vaccination is an essential intervention to curb the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This review aimed to estimate the pooled proportion of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance worldwide. METHODS A systematic search of the MEDLINE (PubMed) database using "COVID-19," "vaccine" and "acceptance" to obtain original research articles published between 2020 and July 2021. Only studies with full text and that were published in English were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute meta-analysis was used to assess the data quality. The meta-analysis was performed using generic inverse variance with a random-effects model using the Review Manager software. RESULTS A total of 172 studies across 50 countries worldwide were included. Subgroup analyses were performed with regard to vaccine acceptance, regions, population, gender, vaccine effectiveness, and survey time. The pooled proportion of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was 61% (95% CI: 59, 64). It was higher in Southeast Asia, among healthcare workers, in males, for vaccines with 95% effectiveness, and during the first survey. CONCLUSION COVID-19 vaccine acceptance needs to be increased to achieve herd immunity to protect the population from the disease. It is crucial to enhance public awareness of COVID-19 vaccination and improve access to vaccines. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO 2021, identifier CRD42021268645.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd Noor Norhayati
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
| | - Ruhana Che Yusof
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
| | - Yacob Mohd Azman
- Medical Practice Division, Ministry of Health, Federal Government Administrative Centre, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Di Giuseppe G, Pelullo CP, Lanzano R, Napolitano F, Pavia M. Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of incarcerated people regarding COVID-19 and related vaccination: a survey in Italy. Sci Rep 2022; 12:960. [PMID: 35046470 PMCID: PMC8770777 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-04919-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The cross-sectional study assessed knowledge, attitudes, and preventive practices toward COVID-19 disease of incarcerated people. A total of 685 subjects were surveyed. 94% were aware that respiratory droplets are involved in the transmission of COVID-19, and 77.2% that patients with chronic conditions are at risk of a more severe disease. Overall, 92.7% of respondents considered COVID-19 a more severe disease compared to influenza, and 85.4% believed that COVID-19 could cause serious consequences in their institution. Only 22.6% were self-confident about their ability to protect themselves from SARS-CoV-2 infection. This attitude was significantly higher in those who were involved in working activities in the institution, who did not report at least one common symptom compatible with COVID-19 in the previous 3 months, who did not show generalized anxiety symptoms, and did not need additional information. 63.9% of incarcerated people expressed willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccination. Older subjects, who knew that a COVID-19 vaccination is available, believed that COVID-19 is more serious than influenza, and were self-confident about their ability to protect themselves from SARS-CoV-2 infection, were significantly more willing to undergo COVID-19 vaccination. Public health response to COVID-19 in prisons should address vaccine hesitancy to increase vaccine confidence among incarcerated people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Di Giuseppe
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Luciano Armanni, 5, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Concetta P Pelullo
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Luciano Armanni, 5, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Lanzano
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Luciano Armanni, 5, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Napolitano
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Luciano Armanni, 5, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Pavia
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Luciano Armanni, 5, 80138, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Padamsee TJ, Bond RM, Dixon GN, Hovick SR, Na K, Nisbet EC, Wegener DT, Garrett RK. Changes in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Black and White Individuals in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2144470. [PMID: 35061038 PMCID: PMC8783270 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance COVID-19 has disproportionately affected Black individuals in the US; however, vaccination rates among Black individuals trail those among other racial groups. This disparity is often attributed to a high level of vaccine hesitancy among Black individuals, but few studies have examined changes in vaccine hesitancy over time. Objectives To compare changes in vaccine hesitancy between Black and White individuals in the US and to examine mechanisms that might help explain the observed differences. Design, Setting, and Participants This survey study used 7 waves of data collected using a panel design. A total of 1200 English-speaking adults in the US were recruited from a nonprobability online panel to construct a census-matched sample. Participants were contacted monthly between December 9, 2020, and June 16, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome of interest was self-reported vaccination intention, measured on a 6-point scale (where 1 indicates extremely unlikely and 6 indicates extremely likely). Beliefs about the safety, effectiveness, and necessity of COVID-19 vaccines were measured on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores denoting greater agreement. Results The baseline data included 1200 participants (693 women [52.0%; weighted]; 921 White individuals [64.0%; weighted], 107 Black individuals [12.2%; weighted]; weighted mean [SD] age, 49.5 [17.6] years). The survey participation rate was 57.0% (1264 of 2218). Black and White individuals had comparable vaccination intentions in December 2020, but Black individuals experienced larger increases in vaccination intention than White individuals relative to baseline in March 2021 (b = 0.666; P < .001), April 2021 (b = 0.890; P < .001), May 2021 (b = 0.695; P < .001), and June 2021 (b = 0.709; P < .001). The belief that the vaccines are necessary for protection also increased more among Black than White individuals in March 2021 (b = 0.221; P = .01) and April 2021 (b = 0.187; P = .04). Beliefs that the vaccines are safe and effective (b = 0.125; P < .001) and necessary (b = 0.405; P < .001) were positively associated with vaccination intention. There was no evidence that these associations varied by race. Conclusions and Relevance This survey study suggests that the intention of Black individuals to be vaccinated was initially comparable to that of White individuals but increased more rapidly. There is some evidence that this increase is associated with changes in beliefs about the vaccine. Vaccination rates continue to be lower among Black individuals than White individuals, but these results suggest that this might be less likely the result of vaccine hesitancy than other factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert M. Bond
- School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Graham N. Dixon
- School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | | | - Kilhoe Na
- Department of Communication and Media, Merrimack College, North Andover, Massachusetts
| | - Erik C. Nisbet
- School of Communication, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Yasmin F, Najeeb H, Moeed A, Naeem U, Asghar MS, Chughtai NU, Yousaf Z, Seboka BT, Ullah I, Lin CY, Pakpour AH. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the United States: A Systematic Review. Front Public Health 2021; 9:770985. [PMID: 34888288 PMCID: PMC8650625 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.770985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy in the US throughout the pandemic has revealed inconsistent results. This systematic review has compared COVID-19 vaccine uptake across US and investigated predictors of vaccine hesitancy and acceptance across different groups. A search of PUBMED database was conducted till 17th July, 2021. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were screened and 65 studies were selected for a quantitative analysis. The overall vaccine acceptance rate ranged from 12 to 91.4%, the willingness of studies using the 10-point scale ranged from 3.58 to 5.12. Increased unwillingness toward COVID-19 vaccine and Black/African Americans were found to be correlated. Sex, race, age, education level, and income status were identified as determining factors of having a low or high COVID-19 vaccine uptake. A change in vaccine acceptance in the US population was observed in two studies, an increase of 10.8 and 7.4%, respectively, between 2020 and 2021. Our results confirm that hesitancy exists in the US population, highest in Black/African Americans, pregnant or breastfeeding women, and low in the male sex. It is imperative for regulatory bodies to acknowledge these statistics and consequently, exert efforts to mitigate the burden of unvaccinated individuals and revise vaccine delivery plans, according to different vulnerable subgroups, across the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farah Yasmin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Hala Najeeb
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Moeed
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Unaiza Naeem
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Najeeb Ullah Chughtai
- Department of General Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Zohaib Yousaf
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | | | - Irfan Ullah
- Department of Community Medicine, Kabir Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan
| | - Chung-Ying Lin
- Institute of Allied Health Sciences, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Amir H. Pakpour
- Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ryckman T, Chin ET, Prince L, Leidner D, Long E, Studdert DM, Salomon JA, Alarid-Escudero F, Andrews JR, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD. Outbreaks of COVID-19 variants in US prisons: a mathematical modelling analysis of vaccination and reopening policies. Lancet Public Health 2021; 6:e760-e770. [PMID: 34364404 PMCID: PMC8342313 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00162-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residents of prisons have experienced disproportionate COVID-19-related health harms. To control outbreaks, many prisons in the USA restricted in-person activities, which are now resuming even as viral variants proliferate. This study aims to use mathematical modelling to assess the risks and harms of COVID-19 outbreaks in prisons under a range of policies, including resumption of activities. METHODS We obtained daily resident-level data for all California state prisons from Jan 1, 2020, to May 15, 2021, describing prison layouts, housing status, sociodemographic and health characteristics, participation in activities, and COVID-19 testing, infection, and vaccination status. We developed a transmission-dynamic stochastic microsimulation parameterised by the California data and published literature. After an initial infection is introduced to a prison, the model evaluates the effect of various policy scenarios on infections and hospitalisations over 200 days. Scenarios vary by vaccine coverage, baseline immunity (0%, 25%, or 50%), resumption of activities, and use of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) that reduce transmission by 75%. We simulated five prison types that differ by residential layout and demographics, and estimated outcomes with and without repeated infection introductions over the 200 days. FINDINGS If a viral variant is introduced into a prison that has resumed pre-2020 contact levels, has moderate vaccine coverage (ranging from 36% to 76% among residents, dependent on age, with 40% coverage for staff), and has no baseline immunity, 23-74% of residents are expected to be infected over 200 days. High vaccination coverage (90%) coupled with NPIs reduces cumulative infections to 2-54%. Even in prisons with low room occupancies (ie, no more than two occupants) and low levels of cumulative infections (ie, <10%), hospitalisation risks are substantial when these prisons house medically vulnerable populations. Risks of large outbreaks (>20% of residents infected) are substantially higher if infections are repeatedly introduced. INTERPRETATION Balancing benefits of resuming activities against risks of outbreaks presents challenging trade-offs. After achieving high vaccine coverage, prisons with mostly one-to-two-person cells that have higher baseline immunity from previous outbreaks can resume in-person activities with low risk of a widespread new outbreak, provided they maintain widespread NPIs, continue testing, and take measures to protect the medically vulnerable. FUNDING Horowitz Family Foundation, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Science Foundation, Open Society Foundation, Advanced Micro Devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Ryckman
- Stanford Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Elizabeth T Chin
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lea Prince
- Stanford Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - David Leidner
- California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Elk Grove, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Long
- Stanford Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - David M Studdert
- Stanford Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Joshua A Salomon
- Stanford Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Fernando Alarid-Escudero
- Division of Public Administration, Center for Research and Teaching in Economics, Aguascalientes, Mexico
| | - Jason R Andrews
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert
- Stanford Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cascini F, Pantovic A, Al-Ajlouni Y, Failla G, Ricciardi W. Attitudes, acceptance and hesitancy among the general population worldwide to receive the COVID-19 vaccines and their contributing factors: A systematic review. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 40:101113. [PMID: 34490416 PMCID: PMC8411034 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 189] [Impact Index Per Article: 63.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High rates of vaccination worldwide are required to establish a herd immunity and stop the current COVID-19 pandemic evolution. Vaccine hesitancy is a major barrier in achieving herd immunity across different populations. This study sought to conduct a systematic review of the current literature regarding attitudes and hesitancy to receiving COVID-19 vaccination worldwide. METHODS A systematic literature search of PubMed and Web of Science was performed on July 5th, 2021, using developed keywords. Inclusion criteria required the study to (1) be conducted in English; (2) investigate attitudes, hesitancy, and/or barriers to COVID-19 vaccine acceptability among a given population; (3) utilize validated measurement techniques; (4) have the full text paper available and be peer-reviewed prior to final publication. FINDINGS Following PRISMA guidelines, 209 studies were included. The Newcastle Ottawa (NOS) scale for cross-sectional studies was used to assess the quality of the studies.Overall, vaccine acceptance rates ranged considerably between countries and between different time points, with Arabian countries showing the highest hesitancy rates compared with other parts of the world. INTERPRETATION A variety of different factors contributed to increased hesitancy, including having negative perception of vaccine efficacy, safety, convenience, and price. Some of the consistent socio-demographic groups that were identified to be associated with increased hesitancy included: women, younger participants, and people who were less educated, had lower income, had no insurance, living in a rural area, and self-identified as a racial/ethnic minority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fidelia Cascini
- Section of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy
| | - Ana Pantovic
- Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Yazan Al-Ajlouni
- New York Medical College School of Medicine, Valhalla, New York, United States
| | - Giovanna Failla
- Department of Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Ricciardi
- Section of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Meinert E, Murphy M, Kane K, Chan P, Rich J, Brinkley-Rubinstein L. Initial SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Uptake in a Correctional Setting: Cross-sectional Study. JMIRx Med 2021; 2:e30176. [PMID: 34658368 PMCID: PMC8483152 DOI: 10.2196/30176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The largest outbreaks of COVID-19 in the United States have occurred in correctional facilities, and little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine campaigns among incarcerated people. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe a statewide vaccination program among incarcerated people and staff working in a prison setting. METHODS Between December 2020 and February 2021, the Rhode Island Department of Corrections (RIDOC) offered the opportunity for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination to all correctional staff and sentenced individuals. Two RIDOC public health educators provided education on the vaccine, answered questions, and obtained consent before the vaccine clinic day for the incarcerated group. All staff received information on signing up for vaccines and watched an educational video that was created by the medical director. Additional information regarding vaccine education and resources was sent via email to the entire RIDOC department. RESULTS During this initial campaign, 76.4% (1106/1447) of sentenced individuals and 68.4% (1008/1474) of correctional staff accepted and received the vaccine. Four months after the first vaccine was offered, 77.7% (1124/1447) of the sentenced population and 69.6% (1026/1474) of staff were fully vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the feasibility and efficiency of vaccine implementation in a carceral setting. Education and communication likely played an important role in mitigating vaccine refusals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthew Murphy
- Rhode Island Department of Corrections Providence, RI United States.,Warren Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence, RI United States
| | - Kimberly Kane
- Rhode Island Department of Corrections Cranston, RI United States.,Warren Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence, RI United States
| | - Philip Chan
- Warren Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence, RI United States.,Rhode Island Department of Health Providence, RI United States
| | - Josiah Rich
- Warren Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence, RI United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hagan LM, Dusseau C, Crockett M, Rodriguez T, Long MJ. COVID-19 vaccination in the Federal Bureau of Prisons, December 2020-April 2021. Vaccine 2021; 39:5883-5890. [PMID: 34465473 PMCID: PMC8363472 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe COVID-19 vaccine distribution operations in United States Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) institutions and offices from December 16, 2020-April 14, 2021, report vaccination coverage among staff and incarcerated people, and identify factors associated with vaccination acceptance among incarcerated people. METHODS The BOP COVID-19 vaccination plan and implementation timeline are described. Descriptive statistics and vaccination coverage were calculated for the BOP incarcerated population using data from the BOP electronic medical record. Coverage among staff was calculated using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccination Administration Management System. Vaccination coverage in the BOP versus the overall United States adult population was compared by state/territory. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were developed to identify demographic, health-related, and institution-level factors associated with vaccination acceptance among incarcerated people, using hierarchical linear modeling to account for institution-level clustering. RESULTS By April 14, 2021, BOP had offered COVID-19 vaccination to 37,870 (100%) staff and 88,173/126,413 (69.8%) incarcerated people, with acceptance rates of 50.2% and 64.2%, respectively. At the time of analysis, vaccination coverage in BOP was comparable to coverage in the overall adult population in the states and territories where BOP institutions and offices are located. Among incarcerated people, factors associated with lower vaccination acceptance included younger age, female sex, non-Hispanic Black and Asian race/ethnicity, and having few underlying medical conditions; factors associated with higher acceptance included having a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, being born outside the United States, and being assigned to a Federal Detention Center. CONCLUSIONS Early COVID-19 vaccination efforts in BOP have achieved levels of coverage similar to the general population. To build on this initial success, BOP can consider strategies including re-offering vaccination to people who initially refused and tailoring communication strategies to groups with lower acceptance rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesl M Hagan
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Division of Viral Hepatitis, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States; Federal Bureau of Prisons, Health Services Division, 320 First Street NW, Washington, DC 20534, United States.
| | - Charles Dusseau
- Federal Bureau of Prisons, Health Services Division, 320 First Street NW, Washington, DC 20534, United States; Commissioned Corps of the United States Public Health Service, 1101 Wootton Pkwy, Plaza level, Rockville, MD 20852, United States.
| | - Michael Crockett
- Federal Bureau of Prisons, Health Services Division, 320 First Street NW, Washington, DC 20534, United States; Commissioned Corps of the United States Public Health Service, 1101 Wootton Pkwy, Plaza level, Rockville, MD 20852, United States.
| | - Tami Rodriguez
- Federal Bureau of Prisons, Health Services Division, 320 First Street NW, Washington, DC 20534, United States; Commissioned Corps of the United States Public Health Service, 1101 Wootton Pkwy, Plaza level, Rockville, MD 20852, United States.
| | - Michael J Long
- Federal Bureau of Prisons, Health Services Division, 320 First Street NW, Washington, DC 20534, United States; Commissioned Corps of the United States Public Health Service, 1101 Wootton Pkwy, Plaza level, Rockville, MD 20852, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Khorasani SB, Koutoujian PJ, Zubiago J, Guardado R, Siddiqi K, Wurcel AG. COVID-19 Vaccine Interest among Corrections Officers and People Who Are Incarcerated at Middlesex County Jail, Massachusetts. J Urban Health 2021; 98:459-463. [PMID: 34041670 PMCID: PMC8152706 DOI: 10.1007/s11524-021-00545-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B Khorasani
- Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Alysse G Wurcel
- Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. .,Middlesex Sheriff's Office, Medford, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mesele M. COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance and Its Associated Factors in Sodo Town, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study. Infect Drug Resist 2021; 14:2361-2367. [PMID: 34194232 PMCID: PMC8238544 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s320771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has still affected many countries around the world. The COVID-19 vaccine has been presented as the perfect solution for solving the current pandemic. Understanding the willingness of the community to receive the COVID-19 vaccine will help in the development and implementation of effective COVID-19 vaccination promotion programs. The aim of this study was to assess the COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and its associated factors in Sodo town, Wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia. METHODS A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 415 participants in Wolaita Sodo, from April 1 to 30, 2021. To collect data, structured interviewer administered questionnaire was used. A p-value ≤0.05 in a multivariable logistic regression model was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Of 415 participants, 189 (45.5%) of them accepted of COVID-19 vaccines if available. Sex (AOR=2.15, 95% CI: 1.29, 3.56), educational status (AOR=3.09, 95% CI: 1.50, 6.37), mass media (AOR=1.97, 95% CI: 1.06, 3.63), received any vaccination during childhood (AOR=5.16, 95% CI: 2.44, 10.92), family members have been diagnosed with COVID-19 (AOR=4.40, 95% CI: 2.1, 9.25), friends have been diagnosed with COVID-19 (AOR=3.91, 95% CI: 1.52, 10.04), and respondents have tested for COVID-19 (AOR=4.40, 95% CI: 1.70, 11.36) were significantly associated with acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSION The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance was law. To enhance the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine, the government with different stakeholders should strengthen public education using mass media about the advantage of getting COVID-19 vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molalegn Mesele
- School of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|