Phototesting in Lupus Erythematosus Tumidus—Review of 60 Patients¶

Lupus erythematosus tumidus: clinical perspectives

Lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET) is an uncommon and photosensitive inflammatory skin disorder which is characterised by erythematous urticarial plaques. In the last 20 years, extensive research on clinical and histological aspects of the disease have led to a better characterization of this nosological entity and to differentiate it from other similar or related diseases. Today, LET is considered as a separate subtype of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) with a benign, intermittent clinical course (intermittent CLE, ICLE) and only rarely associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Ultraviolet light induces increased T cell activation in lupus-prone mice via type I IFN-dependent inhibition of T regulatory cells

Ultraviolet (UV) light is a known trigger of skin and possibly systemic inflammation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Although type I interferons (IFN) are upregulated in SLE skin after UV exposure, the mechanisms to explain increased UVB-induced inflammation remain unclear. This paper compares the role of type I IFNs in regulating immune cell activation between wild-type and lupus-prone mice following UVB exposure. 10-week old female lupus-prone (NZM2328), wild-type (BALB/c) and iNZM mice (lack a functional type I IFN receptor on NZM2328 background) were treated on their dorsal skin with 100 mJ/cm² of UVB for 5 consecutive days. Following UVB treatment, draining lymph node cell populations were characterized via flow cytometry and suppression assays; treated skin was examined for changes in expression of type I IFN genes. Only NZM2328 mice showed an increase in T cell numbers and activation 2 weeks post UVB exposure. This was preceded by a significant increase in UVB-induced type I IFN expression in NZM2328 mice compared to BALB/c mice. Following UVB exposure, both BALB/c and iNZM mice demonstrated an increase in functional T regulatory (T_Reg) cells; however, this was not seen in NZM2328 mice. These data suggest a skewed UVB-mediated T cell response in lupus-prone mice where activation of T cells is enhanced secondary to a type I IFN-dependent suppression of T_Reg cells. Thus, we propose type I IFNs are important for UVB-induced inflammation in lupus-prone mice and may be an effective target for prevention of UVB-mediated flares.

Human and Murine Evidence for Mechanisms Driving Autoimmune Photosensitivity

Ultraviolet (UV) light is an important environmental trigger for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, yet the mechanisms by which UV light impacts disease are not fully known. This review covers evidence in both human and murine systems for the impacts of UV light on DNA damage, apoptosis, autoantigen exposure, cytokine production, inflammatory cell recruitment, and systemic flare induction. In addition, the role of the circadian clock is discussed. Evidence is compared in healthy individuals and SLE patients as well as in wild-type and lupus-prone mice. Further research is needed into the effects of UV light on cutaneous and systemic immune responses to understand how to prevent UV-light mediated lupus flares.

Lupus erythematosus tumidus: an underestimated entity

There have been few reports of lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET) in the literature. Most of textbooks of dermatology or dermatopathology mention this entity only briefly, if at all. The authors describe an additional case of this underdiagnosed disorder that further supports its existence as a separate entity in the spectrum of the variants of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Although most cases are reported in the European countries, to our knowledge, this is the first case documented in Portugal. The clinical, photobiological and histological features as well as differential diagnosis, treatment and prognosis are also discussed.

Lupus erythematosus revisited

Lupus erythematosus (LE) is a multifactorial autoimmune disease with clinical manifestations of differing severity. The exact pathomechanisms and interactions resulting in the inflammatory and immunological processes of this heterogeneous disease remain elusive. Approaches in the understanding of the pathomechanisms revealed that the clinical expression of LE is predisposed by susceptibility genes and that various environmental factors are responsible for an abnormal immune response. Several studies demonstrated that ultraviolet (UV) light is one of the major factors in the pathogenesis of the disease. Standardized photoprovocation in patients with LE has been shown to be a safe and efficient model for evaluating the underlying pathomechanisms which lead to the production of autoantibodies and immune complexes. In particular, interferons were defined as important players in the early activation of the immune system and were observed to play a specific role in the immunological interface between the innate and the adaptive immune system. Abnormalities or disturbances in the different processes of cell death, such as apoptosis or necrosis, have also been recognized as crucial in the pathogenesis of LE. Although each process is different and characterized by unique features, the processes are interrelated and result in a complex disease.

Photosensitivity, apoptosis, and cytokines in the pathogenesis of lupus erythematosus: a critical review

The underlying pathomechanisms of lupus erythematosus (LE), a multifactorial autoimmune disease, remain elusive. Due to the clinical evidence demonstrating a clear relationship between ultraviolet (UV) light exposure and skin lesions of LE, photosensitivity has been proven to be an important factor in the pathogenesis of the disease. Standardised photoprovocation with UVA and UVB irradiation has been shown to be a reliable model for evaluating photosensitivity in patients with cutaneous LE (CLE) and analysing the underlying medical conditions of the disease. In this respect, UV irradiation can cause aberrant induction of apoptosis in keratinocytes and contribute to the appearance of excessive apoptotic cells in the skin of CLE patients. Moreover, apoptotic cells that cannot be cleared by phagocytes may undergo secondary necrosis and release proinflammatory compounds and potential autoantigens, which may contribute to the inflammatory micromilieu that leads to formation of skin lesions in the disease. In addition to UV-mediated induction of apoptosis, the molecular and cellular factors that may cause the abnormal long-lasting photoreactivity in CLE include mediators of inflammation, such as cytokines and chemokines. In particular, interferons (IFNs) are important players in the early activation of the immune system and have a specific role in the immunological interface between the innate and the adaptive immune system. The fact that treatment with recombinant type I IFNs (α and β) can induce not only systemic organ manifestations but also LE-like skin lesions provides additional evidence for a pathogenetic role of these IFNs in the disease.

Photoaggravated disorders

Photoaggravated skin disorders are diseases that occur without UV radiation but are sometimes or frequently exacerbated by UV radiation. In conditions, such as lupus erythematosus, photoaggravation occurs in a majority of patients, whereas in conditions, such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, only a subset of patients demonstrate photoaggravation. Polymorphous light eruption is a common photodermatosis in all skin types, making it important to differentiate photoaggravation of an underlying disorder, such as lupus erythematosus, from superimposed polymorphous light eruption. Disease-specific treatments should be instituted where possible. A key component of management of photoaggravated conditions is photoprotection with behavioral change, UV-protective clothing, and broad-spectrum sunscreen.

Evaluation of patients with photodermatoses

The systematic evaluation of photosensitive patients involves a comprehensive history, physical examination, phototesting, and, if necessary, photopatch testing and laboratory evaluation. Polymorphous light eruption, chronic actinic dermatitis, solar urticaria, and photosensitivity secondary to systemic medications are the most commonly encountered photodermatoses in dermatology clinics worldwide.

Prevalence of self-report photosensitivity in cutaneous lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the prevalence of self-reported photosensitivity (PS) and its effects on quality of life in a US cutaneous lupus population.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the prevalence of self-reported PS among a cutaneous lupus population and to examine its impact on quality of life.

METHODS

A total of 169 patients with lupus were interviewed about PS symptoms and completed the modified Skindex-29+3, a quality-of-life survey. A complete skin examination was conducted and the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index was completed.

RESULTS

In all, 68% of patients reported some symptoms of PS. The PS group (those who reported a history of and current PS) scored worse on PS-related items of the modified Skindex-29+3 and had higher cutaneous disease activity as determined by the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index. Patients with PS had worse symptoms and emotions and experienced significant functional impairments compared with patients who had cutaneous lupus without PS.

LIMITATIONS

This study was done at a single referral center.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported PS is very common among patients with cutaneous lupus and is associated with significant impairments related to symptoms, emotions, and daily functioning.

Photoprovocation in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a multicenter study evaluating a standardized protocol

Photosensitivity is an important and distinguishing sign in various subtypes of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE); however, it remains poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether standardized photoprovocation is a reproducible method to assess photosensitivity in subjects with CLE. A total of 47 subjects with CLE (subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE), n=14; discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), n=20; lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET), n=13) and 13 healthy volunteers underwent photoprovocation at seven European sites. Of these, 22 (47%) subjects (57% SCLE, 35% DLE, and 54% LET) and none of the healthy volunteers developed photoprovoked lesions according to clinical analysis. Of these 22 subjects, 19 (86%) developed lesions that were histopathologically confirmed as specific for lupus erythematosus (LE). In CLE subjects who developed UV-induced lesions, 86% had Fitzpatrick's phototypes I or II, and the mean minimal erythema dose (MED) was significantly lower compared with subjects without UV-induced lesions (P=0.004). No significant differences in photoprovocation results were observed between study sites. Safety parameters showed no clinically meaningful differences between CLE subjects and healthy volunteers after photoprovocation. In conclusion, a standardized, safe, and reproducible protocol for photoprovocation using UVA and UVB radiation induced skin lesions in approximately half of all CLE subjects and showed comparable results across multiple sites. This method may therefore be used for future diagnostic testing and clinical trials.

Photoprotective effects of a broad-spectrum sunscreen in ultraviolet-induced cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-blind study

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess if the exclusive use of a broad-spectrum sunscreen can prevent skin lesions in patients with different subtypes of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) induced by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation under standardized conditions.

METHODS

A total of 25 patients with a medical history of photosensitive CLE were included in this monocentric, randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-blind, intraindividual study. The test product and its vehicle were applied 15 minutes before UVA and UVB irradiation of uninvolved skin areas on the upper aspect of the back in a random order, and standardized phototesting was performed daily for 3 consecutive days.

RESULTS

Characteristic skin lesions were induced by UVA and UVB irradiation in 16 patients with CLE in the untreated area, and 14 patients showed a positive test result in the vehicle-treated area. In contrast, no eruptions compatible with CLE were observed in the sunscreen-treated area in any of the 25 patients. This resulted in significant differences (P < .001) between UV-irradiated sunscreen-treated versus vehicle-treated areas, and between UV-irradiated sunscreen-treated versus untreated areas. Furthermore, a significant difference (P < .05) was observed concerning the age of disease onset and the patient history of photosensitivity. Patients who were younger than 40 years at onset of CLE reported photosensitivity significantly more often than patients with a higher age of disease onset. None of the patients showed any adverse events from application of the test product or the vehicle.

LIMITATIONS

Data resulting from standardized experimental phototesting might not be transferable to a clinical setting.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate clearly that the use of a highly protective broad-spectrum sunscreen can prevent skin lesions in photosensitive patients with different subtypes of CLE.

Overview of common, rare and atypical manifestations of cutaneous lupus erythematosus and histopathological correlates

The skin is the second most frequently affected organ system in lupus erythematosus. Although only very rarely life threatening--an example is lupus erythematosus-associated toxic epidermal necrolysis--skin disease contributes disproportionally to disease burden in terms of personal and psychosocial wellbeing, vocational disability, and hence in medical and social costs. Since several manifestations are closely associated with the presence and activity of systemic lupus erythematosus, prompt and accurate diagnosis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus is essential. This review aims to cover common, rare, and atypical manifestations of lupus erythematosus-associated skin disease with a detailed discussion of histopathological correlates. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus covers a wide morphological spectrum well beyond acute, subacute and chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus, which are commonly classified as lupus-specific skin disease. Other uncommon or less well-known manifestations include lupus erythematosus tumidus, lupus profundus, chilblain lupus, mucosal lupus erythematosus, and bullous lupus erythematosus. Vascular manifestations include leukocytoclastic and urticarial vasculitis, livedoid vasculopathy and livedo reticularis/ racemosa. Finally, we discuss rare presentations such as lupus erythematosus-related erythema exsudativum multiforme (Rowell syndrome), Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease, extravascular necrotizing palisaded granulomatous dermatitis (Winkelmann granuloma), and neutrophilic urticarial dermatosis.

Photosensitivity, phototesting, and photoprotection in cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease involving well-defined skin lesions that can be categorized as acute CLE (ACLE), subacute CLE (SCLE), chronic CLE (CCLE), or intermittent CLE (ICLE). It is commonly accepted that ultraviolet (UV) exposure can induce and exacerbate skin lesions in patients with certain subtypes of CLE. Phototesting with UVA and UVB irradiation using a standardized protocol has proven to be a reliable model to study photosensitivity in CLE and to analyse the underlying pathomechanisms of the disease. In addition to UV-mediated induction of apoptosis, the molecular and cellular factors that may underlie the abnormal long-lasting photoreactivity in CLE include mediators of inflammation such as cytokines and chemokines, inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS), and cellular adhesion molecules. The photosensitivity associated with CLE requires education of the patient about avoidance of excessive sun exposure, continuous photoprotection through physical measures such as protective clothing, and daily application of broad-spectrum sunscreens. Novel approaches to UV-protection, such as alpha-MSH or thymidine dinucleotides, might also have an impact on photosensitivity in patients with CLE. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about photosensitivity in patients with CLE, including an overview of standardized phototesting procedures, possible molecular pathomechanisms, and photoprotection. Lupus (2010) 19, 1036—1046.

Cutaneous lupus and the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index instrument

This article provides an overview of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, including classification schemes, disease subtypes, and therapy. It also describes the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index, a novel clinical outcome instrument that quantifies cutaneous activity and damage in cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Photodermatoses: classification, evaluation and management

Photodermatoses are skin disorders induced or exacerbated by light. They can be broadly classified into four groups: (i) immunologically mediated photodermatoses (idioapathic); (ii) drug- and chemical-induced photosensitivity; (iii) defective DNA repair disorders; and (iv) photoaggravated dermatoses. The exact pathomechanism of those diverse skin reactions to light radiation remains unclear. Immunologically mediated photodermatoses are the most common dermatoses among all photosesnsitive disorders. The management of photodermatoses starts with clinical recognition of characteristic lesions localized predominantly in light exposed skin. Detailed history-taking, phototesting and photopatch testing are required to establish a correct diagnosis, especially if patients present in disease-free intervals. Classification and short description of distinctive clinical features of most common photodermatoses, several practical aspects of evaluation and management of the patient with photosensitivity will be outlined.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: issues in diagnosis and treatment

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) may present in a variety of clinical forms. Three recognized subtypes of cutaneous LE are acute cutaneous LE (ACLE), subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE), and chronic cutaneous LE (CCLE). ACLE may be localized (most often as a malar or 'butterfly' rash) or generalized. Multisystem involvement as a component of systemic LE (SLE) is common, with prominent musculoskeletal symptoms. SCLE is highly photosensitive, with predominant distribution on the upper back, shoulders, neck, and anterior chest. SCLE is frequently associated with positive anti-Ro antibodies and may be induced by a variety of medications. Classic discoid LE is the most common form of CCLE, with indurated scaly plaques on the scalp, face, and ears, with characteristic scarring and pigmentary change. Less common forms of CCLE include hyperkeratotic LE, lupus tumidus, lupus profundus, and chilblain lupus. Common cutaneous disease associated with, but not specific for, LE includes vasculitis, livedo reticularis, alopecia, digital manifestations such as periungual telangiectasia and Raynaud phenomenon, photosensitivity, and bullous lesions. The clinical presentation of each of these forms, their diagnosis, and the inter-relationships between cutaneous LE and SLE are discussed. Common systemic findings in SLE are reviewed, as are diagnostic strategies, including histopathology, immunopathology, serology, and other laboratory findings. Treatments for cutaneous LE initially include preventive (e.g. photoprotective) strategies and topical therapies (corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors). For skin disease not controlled with these interventions, oral antimalarial agents (most commonly hydroxychloroquine) are often beneficial. Additional systemic therapies may be subdivided into conventional treatments (including corticosteroids, methotrexate, thalidomide, retinoids, dapsone, and azathioprine) and newer immunomodulatory therapies (including efalizumab, anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab). We review evidence for the use of these medications in the treatment of cutaneous LE.

Lupus erythematosus tumidus in Japan: a case report and a review of the literature

We report here the case of a 48-year-old Japanese woman showing plaque-forming scattered indurative papules on her face, buttock and extremities. Histological examination revealed a large amount of interstitial mucin deposition, and negative direct immunofluorescence was observed. The provocative phototesting reproduced the skin lesion, and the patient was diagnosed with lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET). A review of ten LET cases previously reported in Japan revealed that all of these cases had clinicopathological features similar to those reported for European cases, although not all of the former fully satisfied the European criteria.

Lupus erythematosus: systemic and cutaneous manifestations

Skin and joint involvements are the most commonly occurring manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. There are 3 forms of cutaneous lupus: chronic cutaneous (discoid) lupus, subacute cutaneous lupus, and acute cutaneous lupus. Joint manifestations are usually not associated with warmth of the joints and may be only associated with pain and swelling. Painful or swollen joints respond rapidly to small or moderate doses of corticosteroids, whereas cutaneous manifestations usually respond to antimalarial drugs. Anti-Ro is associated closely with a photosensitive rash and with subacute lupus.

Lupus erythematosus tumidus: a series of 26 cases

OBJECTIVE

To study 26 cases of lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET), a subset of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE), referred to in the literature as a rare entity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of 26 patients diagnosed with LET between 1996 and 2002. The clinical characteristics, histopathologic and laboratory findings, response to treatment, association with other subsets of lupus, course, and diagnostic criteria were analyzed.

RESULTS

The incidence by sex was similar. The mean age of presentation was 49.19 years. The clinical presentation usually involved erythematous, edematous plaques located on the face, chest, back, or extremities, related to sun exposure. A dermal lymphocytic infiltrate with a perivascular disposition and differing degrees of mucin deposition was observed in all cases. Minimal epidermal changes were present in 18 cases, and 11 of these also showed minimal dermal-epidermal changes. Only one case showed dermal-epidermal changes without any epidermal alteration. Direct immunofluorescence test was performed in 15 patients, and 11 were negative. All cases showed a benign course without systemic manifestations. The response to topical steroids or antimalarial treatment was excellent, but a seasonal recurrence was usually observed. Discussion No defined criteria for LET are universally accepted. The main controversies are the acceptance of LET as a separate subset of CCLE, and the histopathologic diagnostic features, mainly the presence or absence of epidermal and dermal-epidermal changes in these lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

No inflexible histologic criteria should be employed for the diagnosis of LET. This subset of lupus erythematosus is characterized by intense photosensitivity, definite clinical lesions, a benign course, the absence of systemic disease, good response to antimalarial treatment, and a tendency to recur. More studies should be performed in order to establish the true incidence of LET because this subset of CCLE is probably underestimated.

Kutaner Lupus erythematodes

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a heterogenous disorder with a wide range of skin manifestations. Therefore, it has been difficult to develop a unifying concept for classifying CLE from the dermatologic perspective in the past. In 2004, the classification system was updated and includes now acute CLE (ACLE), subacute CLE (SCLE), chronic CLE (CCLE), and intermittent CLE (ICLE). Additional rarely described variants are not listed as separate entities but are included in the classical forms. Diagnosis of the different subtypes of CLE is made by considering genetic, clinical, histopathologic, and immunoserologic findings, with a systematic analysis of individual criteria. In the past years, the etiology and pathogenesis of CLE has been subject of intensive research and it has been shown by several groups that exogenous factors, such as ultraviolet light and drugs, can induce CLE. The first part of this review will enable the reader to identify the various clinical manifestations of CLE and to employ characteristic criteria to assess differential diagnostic considerations.

Photosensitivity in lupus erythematosus

Lupus erythematosus (LE) is an autoimmune disease which can be triggered by environmental factors such as solar irradiation. It has long been observed that especially ultraviolet (UV) exposure can induce and exacerbate skin lesions in patients with this disease. However, despite the frequency of photosensitivity in LE, the mechanisms by which UV irradiation activates autoimmune responses is only now becoming increasingly unfolded by advanced molecular and cellular biological investigations. Phototesting, according to a standardized protocol with UVA and UVB irradiation has proven to be a valid model to study photosensitivity in various subtypes of LE and to evaluate the underlying pathomechanisms of this disease. Detailed analysis of the molecular events that govern lesion formation in experimentally photoprovoced LE showed increased accumulation of apoptotic keratinocytes and impaired expression of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). In the near future, gene expression profiling and proteomics will further increase our knowledge on the complexity of the "UV response" in LE. This review summarizes the current understanding of the clinical and molecular mechanisms that initiate photosensitivity in this disease.

Acute skin alterations following ultraviolet radiation investigated by optical coherence tomography and histology

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) appears to be a promising technique to study skin in vivo. As part of an exploratory study to investigate UV induced effects non-invasively we aimed to evaluate the kinetics of acute UVB- as well as UVA1 induced skin alterations by means of OCT, and to correlate the results obtained with routine histology. Twelve healthy subjects received daily 60 J/cm2 of UVA1 and 1.5 minimal erythema doses of UVB on their upper back over three consecutive days. One day (24 h) after the last UV exposure, OCT measurements and skin biopsies were performed in four subjects (day 1) on the centre of the irradiated sites and an adjacent non-irradiated control site. The same procedure was performed in four subjects 3 days and 6 days after irradiation, respectively. Prior to OCT assessment two waterproof marks were drawn on the centre of UVB and UVA1 exposed sites and the control site. The OCT scanner, SkinDex 300, was used in the RI1D measurement modus in order to investigate morphological features, epidermal thickness, and scattering coefficients. Immediately after OCT assessment, 4 mm punch biopsies were taken from the previously marked sites. OCT as well as histological examinations performed on day 1, 3, and 6, revealed markedly higher values for epidermal thickness on UVB exposed skin sites, and slightly increased epidermal thickening in UVA1 exposed sites. UVB exposed sites showed disruption of the entrance signal in the B-scan of OCT resulting in a thickened layer with a signal-poor centre corresponding to hyperkeratosis and parakeratosis as confirmed by routine histology. Surprisingly, the mean scattering coefficients of the epidermis were slightly lower on UVA1 exposed sites, as compared to non-irradiated skin. By contrast, the scattering coefficient of the upper dermis of UVA1 irradiated skin was hardly altered. Moreover, the scattering coefficient of the upper dermis assessed on UVB exposed skin on day 1 was clearly smaller than the scattering coefficient observed on non-irradiated and UVA1 exposed skin. Conclusively, it was possible to demonstrate by means of OCT differences of epidermal thickness and pathological features of the stratum corneum following UV exposure. UVA1 induced epidermal pigmentation as well as UVB induced dermal inflammation may affect the light attenuation in the tissue indicated by a decrease of the scattering coefficient. OCT seems to be a useful tool to monitor UV induced effects in vivo.

Clinical manifestations of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

The skin findings seen in lupus erythematosus can present with either lupus-specific or lupus-nonspecific findings, with lupus-specific skin disease showing findings histopathologically distinct for cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Lupus-specific skin diseases include chronic cutaneous, subacute cutaneous, and acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. The types of skin lesions in each group are clinically distinct and recognizing the specific subsets helps in prognosticating the likelihood of underlying systemic lupus. A number of medications are associated with cutaneous lupus, in particular with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Lupus nonspecific skin lesions are not histopathologically distinct for cutaneous lupus and/or may be seen as a feature of another disease process. Nonspecific disease-related skin lesions are frequently seen in patients with SLE, usually in the active phase of the disease. The current ACR classification criteria for SLE include four somewhat overlapping dermatologic criteria, butterfly rash, discoid lupus, photosensitivity, and oral ulcers and thus patients can be classified as having SLE with only skin manifestations.

Rosacea: I. Etiology, pathogenesis, and subtype classification

Rosacea is one of the most common conditions dermatologists treat. Rosacea is most often characterized by transient or persistent central facial erythema, visible blood vessels, and often papules and pustules. Based on patterns of physical findings, rosacea can be classified into 4 broad subtypes: erythematotelangiectatic, papulopustular, phymatous, and ocular. The cause of rosacea remains somewhat of a mystery. Several hypotheses have been documented in the literature and include potential roles for vascular abnormalities, dermal matrix degeneration, environmental factors, and microorganisms such as Demodex folliculorum and Helicobacter pylori. This article reviews the current literature on rosacea with emphasis placed on the new classification system and the main pathogenic theories. Learning objective At the conclusion of this learning activity, participants should be acquainted with rosacea's defining characteristics, the new subtype classification system, and the main theories on pathogenesis.

UVB-induced leucocyte trafficking in the epidermis of photosensitive lupus erythematosus patients: Normal depletion of Langerhans cells

BACKGROUND

The pathogenic mechanisms of UV-induced skin lesions of lupus erythematosus (LE) are unknown. In a recent study of pathogenic mechanisms of polymorphic light eruption (PLE), significantly more Langerhans cells (LCs) persisted in the epidermis after UVB overexposure than in healthy individuals. Interestingly, the same phenomenon was observed in one subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) patient. It could therefore be hypothesized that both photodermatoses share a common pathogenic mechanism of photosensitivity. In the present study, we tested this hypothesis by investigating leucocyte trafficking in the initial phase of cutaneous LE after intense UVB exposure.

METHODS

In 22 photosensitive LE patients (12 chronic discoid lupus erythematosus, seven systemic lupus erythematosus and three SCLE) and nine age/sex-matched controls, uninvolved buttock skin was exposed to six minimal erythemal dose (MED) UVB radiation. Subsequently, biopsies were taken after 24, 48 and 72 h, and one control biopsy was taken from unirradiated skin. Skin sections were stained for the presence of LCs, neutrophils and macrophages. Areal percentages of positively stained cells within the epidermis were quantified and compared between the patients and controls.

RESULTS

A gradual decrease of epidermal LCs and a gradual increase of epidermal neutrophils and macrophages at several timepoints after six MED irradiation was observed equally in both LE patients and controls.

CONCLUSION

Immunohistopathology of irradiated uninvolved skin of photosensitive LE patients did not reveal the same pathologic trafficking of LCs and neutrophils as described for PLE patients. We conclude that different mechanisms are operative in the pathogenesis of PLE and photosensitive LE.

UVA1 and UVB irradiated skin investigated by optical coherence tomography in vivo: a preliminary study

In histological studies, it has frequently been demonstrated that ultraviolet (UV) exposure, in particular UVB, can induce significant thickening of the viable epidermis and/or stratum corneum. Since skin biopsy alters the original skin morphology and always requires an iatrogenic trauma, we aimed to introduce optical coherence tomography (OCT) in vivo for the investigation of changes of epidermal thickness (ET) following UVA1 and UVB irradiation. Twelve healthy subjects received daily 60 J/cm2 of UVA1 and 1.5 minimal erythema doses UVB on their upper back over 3 consecutive days. Twenty-four hours after the last irradiation, OCT assessments were performed on UV exposed and adjacent nonirradiated control sites. Data of ET as expressed by comparison of the averaged A-scans differed significantly between nonirradiated (94.2 +/- 15.7 microm), UVA1 (105.4 +/- 12.8 microm) and UVB (125.7 +/- 22.1 microm) exposed sites. In comparison to the nonirradiated sites, UVA1 exposed skin showed significant (P = 0.022) increase of ET of 11% and UVB exposed sites a significant (P < 0.001) increase of 25%. ET of UVA1 and UVB exposed skin sites differed significantly (P =0.005). Our results obtained from OCT in vivo measurements confirm data of previous histological studies indicating that not only erythemogenic doses of UVB, but also suberythemogenic doses of UVA1 may have a significant impact on ET. OCT appears to be a promising bioengineering technique for photobiological studies. However, further studies are needed to establish its measurement precision and validity, and to investigate in vivo spectral dependence on UV induced skin changes such as skin thickening.

Investigation of photosensitive disorders

Investigation of photodermatosis is based primarily on the history and clinical findings, histological, immunological and biochemical findings are variably helpful depending on the clinical picture. Formal testing for photosensitivity may be the only definitive test proving photosensitivity on occasion. This article delineates the important features which allow classification of patients which then enables appropriate treatment.

Lupus erythematosus tumidus

BACKGROUND

Lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET) is a rare form of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus that characteristically presents as a succulent, erythematous plaques on sun-exposed areas. The histopathological change that primarily distinguishes LET from other variants of cutaneous lupus erythematosus is the lack of alterations of the dermo-epidermal junction and epidermis. Our purpose was to describe 15 cases of LET from Thailand.

METHODS

The records of 15 patients diagnosed with LET at Srinagarind Hospital Medical School between 1995 and 2002 were reviewed on the following aspects: clinical manifestation, laboratory investigation, direct immunofluorescence study, phototesting, histopathological findings, clinical course, and treatment.

RESULTS

All 15 patients consisted of 10 females and five males. The mean age at onset was 38.8 years. The lesions more commonly affect the face and trunk. One patient had concomitant discoid lupus erythematosus and two developed systemic involvement 4 and 6 months after LET. Direct immunofluorescence studies all showed negative results. Positive phototest reactions were detected in five of 10 tested patients: four with ultraviolet A and B and one with ultraviolet A only. Most patients responded well to chloroquine phosphate and the remainder successfully improved with methotrexate, topical and systemic corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate the features of LET that are repeatable and characteristic. Lupus erythematosus tumidus in this study was more common in women, and photosensitivity reactions of the patients were seen less frequently compared with those in the earlier report of Kuhn et al. Furthermore, two of 15 patients exhibited systemic involvement in the course of their disease.

Photosensitivity in lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Lupus erythematosus is a systemic disease process that may manifest with a variety of internal and cutaneous findings. Photosensitivity is one the most common manifestations of lupus erythematosus. In patients with lupus erythematosus, there is a relationship between exposure to ultraviolet light, autoantibodies, genetics and other factors in the development of photosensitivity.

METHODS

Literature was reviewed on the topics of lupus erythematosus and photosensitivity discussed together and separately. The suggested mechanisms for their relationship were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Photosensitivity's relationship to and influence on the systemic manifestations of lupus remain to be defined. Mechanisms for photosensitivity might include: modulation of autoantibody location, cytotoxic effects, apoptosis induction with autoantigens in apoptotic blebs, upregulation of adhesion molecules and cytokines, induction of nitric oxide synthase expression and ultraviolet-generated antigenic DNA. Tumor necrosis factor alpha also seems to play a role in the development of photosensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The basis for photosensitivity in lupus has yet to be fully defined. It is more commonly associated with subacute and tumid lupus erythematosus than with other variants. Anti-Ro antibodies appear to relate to photosensitivity. Tumor necrosis factor alpha polymorphisms appear to be important in some variants of lupus with photosensitivity. There is no sine qua non antibody or mutation of photosensitivity in lupus. In patients with lupus, more work needs to be done to define the mechanisms of photosensitivity.

Lupus erythematosus tumidus in childhood. Report of 3 patients

Lupus erythematosus (LE) is a rare disorder in childhood. Most patients reported in the literature present with systemic manifestations, and, to date, fewer than 20 children with chronic cutaneous LE have been documented. In this article, we describe 3 patients with childhood LE tumidus, an uncommon but distinct subtype of chronic cutaneous LE. The lesions are characterized by erythematous, urticaria-like, nonscarring plaques in sun-exposed areas and, unlike in other variants of chronic cutaneous LE, there is no epidermal involvement. The clinical, photobiological, and histologic features as well as the differential diagnoses of childhood LE tumidus are discussed and compared with the adult form of this disease.

Photosensitivity in rheumatic diseases

There have been a number of recent advances in the genetic understanding of photosensitive rheumatic diseases, especially subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis. These advances support the concept that increased numbers of ultraviolet light-induced apoptotic cells in skin lead to a supra-threshold concentration of antigenic peptides. The current genetic data suggest that increased keratinocyte apopotosis can result from increased amounts of TNF-alpha that induce apoptosis due to a ultraviolet light-sensitive TNF promoter polymorphism or to decreased clearance of apototic cells due to polymorphisms associated with decreased serum levels of collectins such as C1q and mannose-binding lectin. These diseases are frequently oligogenic, and other yet to be elucidated genes will, in individual patients, lead to increased numbers of apoptotic cells associated with these cutaneous autoimmune diseases. In the presence of specific MHC class I and II genes, antigen-presenting cells initiate a primary immune response that leads to cutaneous, and likely systemic, autoimmune disease.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: diagnosis and management

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) includes a variety of lupus erythematosus (LE)-specific skin lesions that are subdivided into three categories - chronic CLE (CCLE), subacute CLE (SCLE) and acute CLE (ACLE) - based on clinical morphology, average duration of skin lesions and routine histopathologic examination. This paper describes our personal experience in the management of CLE over the last 30 years, with details on preferential therapeutic options related to clinical, histologic and immunopathologic aspects of each clinical subset of the disease. Effective sunscreening and sun protection are considered the first rule in the management of CLE because of the high degree of photosensitivity of the disease. Antimalarial agents are crucial in the treatment of CLE and are the first-line systemic agents, particularly in discoid LE (DLE) and SCLE. Dapsone is the drug of choice for bullous systemic LE (BSLE) as well as for LE in small dermal vessels (e.g. leukocytoclastic vasculitis). Retinoids, known as second-line drugs for systemic therapy, are sometimes used to treat chronic forms of CLE and are particularly successful in treating hypertrophic LE. Systemic immunosuppressive agents are required to manage the underlying systemic LE disease activity in patients with ACLE. These drugs, especially azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine, together with corticosteroids, constitute third-line systemic therapy of CLE. In our experience, oral prednisone or parenteral 'pulsed' methylprednisolone are useful in exacerbations of disease activity. Thalidomide provides one of the most useful therapeutic alternatives for chronic refractory DLE, although its distribution is limited to a few countries because of the risk of teratogenicity and polyneuropathy. However, medical treatment with local corticosteroids remains the mainstay of CLE treatment, especially for DLE. Patient education regarding the disease is also important in the management of CLE, because it helps relieve undue anxiety and to recruit the patient as an active participant in the treatment regimen.

Classification and evaluation of photodermatoses

Photodermatoses can be classified into five general categories: 1) idiopathic photodermatoses, including polymorphic light eruption (PMLE), actinic prurigo, hyroa vacciniforme, chronic actinic dermatitis, and solar urticaria; 2) photodermatoses which are secondary to exogenous agents, including phototoxic and photoallergic reactions; 3) photodermatoses secondary to endogenous agents, mainly the porphyrias; 4) photoexacerbated dermatoses, including autoimmune disease, infectious conditions, and nutritional deficiencies; and 5) genodermatoses. The initial step in evaluating a photosensitive patient is based on a directed personal and family history. The morphology of the eruption, phototests, and in some patients, photopatch tests are essential in focusing the diagnosis. Skin biopsies and laboratory investigations, such as antinuclear antibody (ANA) panels and porphyrin profiles, may be required to further confirm the diagnosis.

Tumid lupus erythematosus: criteria for classification with immunohistochemical analysis

OBJECTIVE

To define comprehensive criteria for the classification and differential diagnosis of tumid lupus erythematosus (LE).

METHODS

A prospective study of patients fulfilling the classical description of tumid LE was performed. Clinical evaluation, histopathologic and direct immunofluorescence analyses of skin specimens, and serologic evaluation were conducted. The inflammatory cell infiltrate was quantitatively investigated by immunohistochemical analysis of fresh frozen skin specimens using multiple lymphocytic markers.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were followed for a mean of 7 years. Smooth, indurated, nonscarring, pink to violaceous papules, plaques, or nodules, devoid of surface changes were distributed on sun exposed sites. The mean lesion duration was 2 years, female:male ratio was 8:7, and racial distribution was 11 white, 2 Hispanic, and 2 African American patients. Histopathologic findings included a superficial and deep, perivascular, and frequently periadnexal infiltrate of lymphocytes, mucin deposition throughout the dermis, and absent to focal dermal-epidermal junctional involvement. Direct immunofluorescence immunoreactants and low titer antinuclear antibodies were variably present. Immunohistochemical findings included a predominance of pan-T cell marker CD3-expressing (78.0% +/- 6.3%) T lymphocytes. Most were CD4 expressing (82.7% +/- 8.0%) helper T cells; a minority were CD8 expressing (31.3% +/- 14.0%) cytotoxic T cells. The CD4:CD8 ratio was 3.1 (+/-1.3):1. One patient developed systemic LE and one a discoid LE lesion.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical criteria for the classification of tumid LE are proposed that differentiate tumid LE from other cutaneous disorders that may be clinically and histologically indistinguishable. The chronic, benign course indicates that tumid LE be classified as a form of chronic cutaneous LE, although it may be a cutaneous feature of systemic LE.

Photosensitivity in patients with lupus erythematosus: a clinical and photobiological study of 100 patients using a prolonged phototest protocol

BACKGROUND

There is a clear relationship between ultraviolet (UV) radiation (UVR) and the clinical manifestations of patients with lupus erythematosus (LE). Cutaneous lesions are induced or exacerbated by exposure to UVR. Of patients with LE, 24-83% are reported to be photosensitive to UVR. LE tumidus appears to be the most photosensitive subtype of LE, followed by subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE). In general, the history of patients with LE correlates poorly with the presence or absence of photosensitivity, due to a delayed time interval between UV exposure and exacerbation of skin lesions. Phototesting using artificial UVR and visible light is a reliable way of diagnosing photosensitivity.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the photoreactivity of patients with various subtypes of LE using an individualized phototest protocol. The results of phototests were correlated with the history of photosensitivity, the subtype of LE, the presence of autoantibodies and the use of anti-inflammatory medication by these patients.

METHODS

Phototesting with UVA, UVB and visible light was performed in 100 patients with LE. The diagnosis of LE was established both on clinical examination and skin histology. Serological studies were also performed in all patients. The phototests were performed on large skin areas of the forearm or trunk; the first dose was twice the minimal erythema dose and the dosage was increased according to the individual reactions of the patients at the test sites. Follow-up of skin reactions at the test sites was performed for up to 2 months. Histological examination of the photoprovoked skin lesions was carried out in 57 patients.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients included (81 women and 19 men; mean age 41 years, range 17-79), 46 had chronic discoid LE, 30 SCLE and 24 systemic LE. An abnormal reaction to UVR and visible light was found in 93% of our patients with LE. No clinical or histological evidence at the phototest sites of polymorphic light eruption was found. There was no correlation between photosensitivity and LE subtype, presence of autoantibodies or medical history. Concomitant use of anti-inflammatory medication seemed to exert only minimal influence on the results of phototesting.

CONCLUSIONS

When using an extended phototesting protocol, almost all patients with LE in this study showed clinical and histological evidence of aberrant photosensitivity. Therefore, patients with LE should receive thorough advice and instruction on photoprotective measures, regardless of their history, LE subtype or presence of autoantibodies.

Histopathologic findings in lupus erythematosus tumidus: review of 80 patients

BACKGROUND

In a recent study, we demonstrated that lupus erythematosus (LE) tumidus (LET) is a distinct subset of cutaneous LE (CLE), which is clinically characterized by erythematous, urticaria-like, nonscarring plaques in sun-exposed areas.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to analyze skin biopsy specimens from 80 patients with this disease and to determine whether it could be differentiated from other variants of CLE on histopathologic grounds.

METHODS

Skin biopsy specimens from 53 primary and 38 UVA- and/or UVB-induced lesions of 80 patients with LET were examined and compared with skin biopsy specimens from patients with discoid LE (DLE) and subacute CLE (SCLE).

RESULTS

Specimens from LET lesions showed a characteristic and diagnostic pattern of perivascular and periadnexal cellular infiltrates in the papillary and reticular dermis composed almost entirely of lymphocytes. In some cases, few scattered neutrophils were present. Furthermore, interstitial mucin deposition was observed in all specimens, as confirmed by colloidal iron staining. In contrast to discoid LE and subacute CLE lesions, epidermal atrophy or alteration at the dermoepidermal junction was not detected.

CONCLUSION

Skin lesions of patients with LET present with specific histopathologic features, and the differences compared with subacute CLE and discoid LE further support the concept to consider LET as a separate entity of CLE.

[Photodermatoses during childhood]

Actinic dermatitis and phototoxic and idiopathic photodermatoses occur relatively often during childhood. Photodermatoses stemming from enzyme defects and genetic disorders are much less common, while photoallergic and chronic actinic dermatitis have not been dealt with to date. A specific sensitivity of a child's skin to light is often the first manifest clinical symptom of a photodermatosis, the key is to ensure early diagnosis. However, it is often difficult to reach a diagnosis, as the lesions are barely perceptible or have even healed by the time the patient is examined. This is why photoprovocation tests are so important in diagnosing photodermatoses, particularly during childhood. In addition to early diagnosis of these illnesses and offering the appropriate treatment, it is also crucial that the parents be well informed and aware of what symptoms to look for so that they can protect their children from overexposure to UV light and thereby avoid later actinic injuries that can become as serious as malignancies.