1
|
Elias AD, Spoelstra NS, Staley AW, Sams S, Crump LS, Vidal GA, Borges VF, Kabos P, Diamond JR, Shagisultanova E, Afghahi A, Mayordomo J, McSpadden T, Crawford G, D'Alessandro A, Zolman KL, van Bokhoven A, Zhuang Y, Gallagher RI, Wulfkuhle JD, Petricoin Iii EF, Gao D, Richer JK. Phase II trial of fulvestrant plus enzalutamide in ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:41. [PMID: 37210417 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00544-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023] Open
Abstract
This clinical trial combined fulvestrant with the anti-androgen enzalutamide in women with metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer (BC). Eligible patients were women with ECOG 0-2, ER+/HER2- measurable or evaluable metastatic BC. Prior fulvestrant was allowed. Fulvestrant was administered at 500 mg IM on days 1, 15, 29, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Enzalutamide was given at 160 mg po daily. Fresh tumor biopsies were required at study entry and after 4 weeks of treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial was the clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24). The median age was 61 years (46-87); PS 1 (0-1); median of 4 prior non-hormonal and 3 prior hormonal therapies for metastatic disease. Twelve had prior fulvestrant, and 91% had visceral disease. CBR24 was 25% (7/28 evaluable). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 weeks (95% CI: 2-52). Adverse events were as expected for hormonal therapy. Significant (p < 0.1) univariate relationships existed between PFS and ER%, AR%, and PIK3CA and/or PTEN mutations. Baseline levels of phospho-proteins in the mTOR pathway were more highly expressed in biopsies of patients with shorter PFS. Fulvestrant plus enzalutamide had manageable side effects. The primary endpoint of CBR24 was 25% in heavily pretreated metastatic ER+/HER2- BC. Short PFS was associated with activation of the mTOR pathway, and PIK3CA and/or PTEN mutations were associated with an increased hazard of progression. Thus, a combination of fulvestrant or other SERD plus AKT/PI3K/mTOR inhibitor with or without AR inhibition warrants investigation in second-line endocrine therapy of metastatic ER+ BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony D Elias
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Nicole S Spoelstra
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alyse W Staley
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sharon Sams
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Lyndsey S Crump
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Gregory A Vidal
- West Cancer Center and Research Institute and Dept of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Germantown, TN, USA
| | - Virginia F Borges
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Peter Kabos
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jennifer R Diamond
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elena Shagisultanova
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anosheh Afghahi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jose Mayordomo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Tessa McSpadden
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Oncology Clinical Research Support Team, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Gloria Crawford
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Cancer Clinical Trials Office, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Angelo D'Alessandro
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kathryn L Zolman
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Adrie van Bokhoven
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Yonghua Zhuang
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rosa I Gallagher
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA
| | - Julia D Wulfkuhle
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA
| | - Emanuel F Petricoin Iii
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA
| | - Dexiang Gao
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jennifer K Richer
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sorokin M, Gorelyshev A, Efimov V, Zotova E, Zolotovskaia M, Rabushko E, Kuzmin D, Seryakov A, Kamashev D, Li X, Poddubskaya E, Suntsova M, Buzdin A. RNA Sequencing Data for FFPE Tumor Blocks Can Be Used for Robust Estimation of Tumor Mutation Burden in Individual Biosamples. Front Oncol 2021; 11:732644. [PMID: 34650919 PMCID: PMC8506044 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.732644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is a well-known efficacy predictor for checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies. Currently, TMB assessment relies on DNA sequencing data. Gene expression profiling by RNA sequencing (RNAseq) is another type of analysis that can inform clinical decision-making and including TMB estimation may strongly benefit this approach, especially for the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. Here, we for the first time compared TMB levels deduced from whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNAseq profiles of the same FFPE biosamples in single-sample mode. We took TCGA project data with mean sequencing depth 23 million gene-mapped reads (MGMRs) and found 0.46 (Pearson)–0.59 (Spearman) correlation with standard mutation calling pipelines. This was converted into low (<10) and high (>10) TMB per megabase classifier with area under the curve (AUC) 0.757, and application of machine learning increased AUC till 0.854. We then compared 73 experimental pairs of WES and RNAseq profiles with lower (mean 11 MGMRs) and higher (mean 68 MGMRs) RNA sequencing depths. For higher depth, we observed ~1 AUC for the high/low TMB classifier and 0.85 (Pearson)–0.95 (Spearman) correlation with standard mutation calling pipelines. For the lower depth, the AUC was below the high-quality threshold of 0.7. Thus, we conclude that using RNA sequencing of tumor materials from FFPE blocks with enough coverage can afford for high-quality discrimination of tumors with high and low TMB levels in a single-sample mode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxim Sorokin
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Subgroup, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.,The Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia.,OmicsWay Corp., Walnut, CA, United States
| | - Alexander Gorelyshev
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia.,OmicsWay Corp., Walnut, CA, United States
| | - Victor Efimov
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - Evgenia Zotova
- The Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marianna Zolotovskaia
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - Elizaveta Rabushko
- The Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Denis Kuzmin
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | | | - Dmitry Kamashev
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Xinmin Li
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Technology Center for Genomics & Bioinformatics, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Elena Poddubskaya
- World-Class Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Suntsova
- World-Class Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anton Buzdin
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Subgroup, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.,Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia.,OmicsWay Corp., Walnut, CA, United States.,Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.,World-Class Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Steelman LS, Chappell WH, Akula SM, Abrams SL, Cocco L, Manzoli L, Ratti S, Martelli AM, Montalto G, Cervello M, Libra M, Candido S, McCubrey JA. Therapeutic resistance in breast cancer cells can result from deregulated EGFR signaling. Adv Biol Regul 2020; 78:100758. [PMID: 33022466 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbior.2020.100758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) interacts with various downstream molecules including phospholipase C (PLC)/protein kinase C (PKC), Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK, PI3K/PTEN/Akt/GSK-3, Jak/STAT and others. Often these pathways are deregulated in human malignancies such as breast cancer. Various therapeutic approaches to inhibit the activity of EGFR family members including small molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) have been developed. A common problem with cancer treatments is the development of drug-resistance. We examined the effects of a conditionally-activated EGFR (v-Erb-B:ER) on the resistance of breast cancer cells to commonly used chemotherapeutic drugs such as doxorubicin, daunorubicin, paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-flurouracil as well as ionizing radiation (IR). v-Erb-B is similar to the EGFR-variant EGFRvIII, which is expressed in various cancers including breast, brain, prostate. Both v-Erb-B and EGFRvIII encode the EGFR kinase domain but lack key components present in the extracellular domain of EGFR which normally regulate its activity and ligand-dependence. The v-Erb-B oncogene was ligated to the hormone binding domain of the estrogen receptor (ER) which results in regulation of the activity of the v-Erb-ER construct by addition of either estrogen (E2) or 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4HT) to the culture media. Introduction of the v-Erb-B:ER construct into the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line increased the resistance to the cells to various chemotherapeutic drugs, hormonal-based therapeutics and IR. These results point to the important effects that aberrant expression of EGFR kinase domain can have on therapeutic resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda S Steelman
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - William H Chappell
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Shaw M Akula
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Stephen L Abrams
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Lucio Cocco
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lucia Manzoli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Ratti
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto M Martelli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Montalto
- Department of Health Promotion, Maternal and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council (CNR), Palermo, Italy
| | - Melchiorre Cervello
- Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council (CNR), Palermo, Italy
| | - Massimo Libra
- Research Center for Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer (PreDiCT), University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Saverio Candido
- Research Center for Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer (PreDiCT), University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - James A McCubrey
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kaur P, Campo D, Porras TB, Ring A, Lu J, Chairez Y, Su Y, Kang I, Lang JE. A Pilot Study for the Feasibility of Exome-Sequencing in Circulating Tumor Cells Versus Single Metastatic Biopsies in Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21144826. [PMID: 32650480 PMCID: PMC7402350 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21144826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The comparison of the landscape of somatic alterations in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) versus metastases is challenging. Here, we comprehensively characterized the somatic landscape in bulk (amplified and non-amplified), spike-in breast cancer cells, CTCs, and metastases from breast cancer patients using whole-exome sequencing (WES). We determined the level of genomic concordance for somatic nucleotide variants (SNVs), copy number alterations (CNAs), and structural variants (SVs). The variant allele fractions (VAFs) of somatic variants were remarkably similar between amplified and non-amplified cell line samples as technical replicates. In clinical samples, a significant fraction of somatic variants had low VAFs in CTCs compared to metastases. The most frequently recurrent gene mutations in clinical samples were associated with an elevated C > T mutational signature. We found complex rearrangement patterns including intra- and inter-chromosomal rearrangements, singleton, and recurrent gene fusions, and tandem duplications. We observed high molecular discordance for somatic alterations between paired samples consistent with marked heterogeneity of the somatic landscape. The most prevalent copy number calls were focal deletion events in CTCs and metastases. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of an integrated workflow for the identification of a complete repertoire of somatic alterations and highlight the intrapatient genomic differences that occur between CTCs and metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pushpinder Kaur
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; (P.K.); (Y.S.)
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; (J.L.); (I.K.)
| | - Daniel Campo
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA;
| | - Tania B. Porras
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA;
| | - Alexander Ring
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland;
| | - Janice Lu
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; (J.L.); (I.K.)
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and University of Southern California Norris Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Yvonne Chairez
- Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA;
| | - Yunyun Su
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; (P.K.); (Y.S.)
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; (J.L.); (I.K.)
| | - Irene Kang
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; (J.L.); (I.K.)
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and University of Southern California Norris Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Julie E. Lang
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; (P.K.); (Y.S.)
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; (J.L.); (I.K.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(323)-442-8140
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nikanjam M, Okamura R, Barkauskas DA, Kurzrock R. Targeting fusions for improved outcomes in oncology treatment. Cancer 2019; 126:1315-1321. [PMID: 31794076 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fusions are increasingly pursued as oncology therapeutic targets. The current study evaluated differences in outcomes for fusion versus nonfusion targets. METHODS Outcomes were compared for patients with fusions versus those with other alterations for US Food and Drug Administration-approved single agents (from package inserts) and for patients treated at the University of California at San Diego. RESULTS A total of 28 drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (6189 patients) were included in the analysis. The median response rate was 68% versus 50% for fusions versus nonfusion matches (odds ratio [OR], 1.67; P < .0001); solid tumor therapies had an OR of 2.07 (P < .0001) and hematologic therapies had an OR of 3.35 (P < .0001) for fusion versus nonfusion targets. The University of California at San Diego analysis included 79 patients in whom fusions were treated of the 2455 patients screened. Patients matched to fusions were found to have a longer median progression-free survival (PFS) (11.6 months; 95% CI, 4.0-35.4 months) compared with those unmatched to fusions (4.9 months; 95% CI, 3.5-8.8 months) (P = .034). Patients with fusions matched to other alterations present in the tumor had a median PFS that was indistinguishable from that of those patients with fusions who were treated with unmatched therapy (4.0 months vs 5.0 months; P = .75). CONCLUSIONS Significantly higher response rates and a longer PFS were observed when targeting fusions compared with nonfusions. The observations reported in the current study suggest that fusions are important targets and that additional studies are needed to confirm that optimized therapy may require targeting fusions, even in the presence of other alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Nikanjam
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Ryosuke Okamura
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Donald A Barkauskas
- Biostatistics Division, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nikanjam M, Arguello D, Gatalica Z, Swensen J, Barkauskas DA, Kurzrock R. Relationship between protein biomarkers of chemotherapy response and microsatellite status, tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 expression in cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2019; 146:3087-3097. [PMID: 31479512 PMCID: PMC7051881 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies are increasingly used in combinations. We determined associations between the presence of anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 therapeutic biomarkers and protein markers of potential chemotherapy response. Data were extracted from a clinical‐grade testing database (Caris Life Sciences; February 2015 through November 2017): immunotherapy response markers (microsatellite instability‐high [MSI‐H], tumor mutational burden‐high [TMB‐H], and PD‐L1 protein expression) and protein chemotherapy response markers (excision repair complementation group 1 [ERCC1], topoisomerase 1 [TOPO1], topoisomerase 2 [TOP2A], thymidylate synthase [TS], tubulin beta 3 [TUBB3], ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunit M1 [RRM1] and O‐6‐methyl guanine DNA methyltransferase [MGMT]). Relationships were determined by the Mantel‐Haenszel chi‐squared test or Fischer's exact tests. Overall, 28,034 patients representing a total of 40 tumor types were assessed. MSI‐H was found in 3.3% of patients (73% were also TMB‐H), TMB‐H, 8.4% (28.3% were also MSI‐H) and PD‐L1 expression in 11.0% of patients (5.1% were also MSI‐H; 16.4% were also TMB‐H). Based on concurrent biomarker expression, combinations of immunotherapy with platinum (ERCC1 negativity) or with doxorubicin, epirubicin or etoposide (TOP2A positivity) have a higher probability of response, whereas combinations with irinotecan or topotecan (TOPO1 positivity), with gemcitabine (RRM1 negativity), and fluorouracil, pemetrexed or capecitabine (TS negativity) may be of less benefit. The potential for immunotherapy and taxane (TUBB3 negativity) combinations is present for MSI‐H but not TMB‐H or PD‐L1‐expressing tumors; for temozolomide and dacarbazine (MGMT negative), PD‐L1 is frequently coexpressed, but MSI‐H and TMB‐H are not associated. Protein markers of potential chemotherapy response along with next‐generation sequencing for immunotherapy response markers can help support rational combinations as part of an individualized, precision oncology approach. What's new? With the emerging success of immunotherapy of cancers, combinations with conventional chemotherapies are increasingly being tested in clinical trials. Here the authors examined concurrent biomarker expression of checkpoint (PD‐1/PD‐L1) blockade immunotherapy and various cytotoxic chemotherapies to determine which chemotherapeutic agents will best synergize with immunotherapy. They predict that combining platinum or doxorubicin, epirubicin, or etoposide treatments with PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors would have a higher probability of response than other treatments, supporting a rational combination strategy in a possibly individualized treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Nikanjam
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA
| | | | | | | | - Donald A Barkauskas
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Biostatistics Division, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Development of Personalized Therapeutic Strategies by Targeting Actionable Vulnerabilities in Metastatic and Chemotherapy-Resistant Breast Cancer PDXs. Cells 2019; 8:cells8060605. [PMID: 31216647 PMCID: PMC6627522 DOI: 10.3390/cells8060605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Human breast cancer is characterized by a high degree of inter-patients heterogeneity in terms of histology, genomic alterations, gene expression patterns, and metastatic behavior, which deeply influences individual prognosis and treatment response. The main cause of mortality in breast cancer is the therapy-resistant metastatic disease, which sets the priority for novel treatment strategies for these patients. In the present study, we demonstrate that Patient Derived Xenografts (PDXs) that were obtained from metastatic and therapy-resistant breast cancer samples recapitulate the wide spectrum of the disease in terms of histologic subtypes and mutational profiles, as evaluated by whole exome sequencing. We have integrated genomic and transcriptomic data to identify oncogenic and actionable pathways in each PDX. By taking advantage of primary short-term in vitro cultures from PDX tumors, we showed their resistance to standard chemotherapy (Paclitaxel), as seen in the patients. Moreover, we selected targeting drugs and analyzed PDX sensitivity to single agents or to combination of targeted and standard therapy on the basis of PDX-specific genomic or transcriptomic alterations. Our data demonstrate that PDXs represent a suitable model to test new targeting drugs or drug combinations and to prioritize personalized therapeutic regimens for pre-clinal and clinical tests.
Collapse
|
8
|
Comparison of TCGA and GENIE genomic datasets for the detection of clinically actionable alterations in breast cancer. Sci Rep 2019; 9:1482. [PMID: 30728399 PMCID: PMC6365517 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37574-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Whole exome sequencing (WES), targeted gene panel sequencing and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays are increasingly used for the identification of actionable alterations that are critical to cancer care. Here, we compared The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) breast cancer genomic datasets (array and next generation sequencing (NGS) data) in detecting genomic alterations in clinically relevant genes. We performed an in silico analysis to determine the concordance in the frequencies of actionable mutations and copy number alterations/aberrations (CNAs) in the two most common breast cancer histologies, invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma. We found that targeted sequencing identified a larger number of mutational hotspots and clinically significant amplifications that would have been missed by WES and SNP arrays in many actionable genes such as PIK3CA, EGFR, AKT3, FGFR1, ERBB2, ERBB3 and ESR1. The striking differences between the number of mutational hotspots and CNAs generated from these platforms highlight a number of factors that should be considered in the interpretation of array and NGS-based genomic data for precision medicine. Targeted panel sequencing was preferable to WES to define the full spectrum of somatic mutations present in a tumor.
Collapse
|
9
|
Somm E, Jornayvaz FR. Fibroblast Growth Factor 15/19: From Basic Functions to Therapeutic Perspectives. Endocr Rev 2018; 39:960-989. [PMID: 30124818 DOI: 10.1210/er.2018-00134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Discovered 20 years ago, fibroblast growth factor (FGF)19, and its mouse ortholog FGF15, were the first members of a new subfamily of FGFs able to act as hormones. During fetal life, FGF15/19 is involved in organogenesis, affecting the development of the ear, eye, heart, and brain. At adulthood, FGF15/19 is mainly produced by the ileum, acting on the liver to repress hepatic bile acid synthesis and promote postprandial nutrient partitioning. In rodents, pharmacologic doses of FGF19 induce the same antiobesity and antidiabetic actions as FGF21, with these metabolic effects being partly mediated by the brain. However, activation of hepatocyte proliferation by FGF19 has long been a challenge to its therapeutic use. Recently, genetic reengineering of the molecule has resolved this issue. Despite a global overlap in expression pattern and function, murine FGF15 and human FGF19 exhibit several differences in terms of regulation, molecular structure, signaling, and biological properties. As most of the knowledge originates from the use of FGF19 in murine models, differences between mice and humans in the biology of FGF15/19 have to be considered for a successful translation from bench to bedside. This review summarizes the basic knowledge concerning FGF15/19 in mice and humans, with a special focus on regulation of production, morphogenic properties, hepatocyte growth, bile acid homeostasis, as well as actions on glucose, lipid, and energy homeostasis. Moreover, implications and therapeutic perspectives concerning FGF19 in human diseases (including obesity, type 2 diabetes, hepatic steatosis, biliary disorders, and cancer) are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Somm
- Service of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Hypertension, and Nutrition, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - François R Jornayvaz
- Service of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Hypertension, and Nutrition, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhao X, Xu F, Dominguez NP, Xiong Y, Xiong Z, Peng H, Shay C, Teng Y. FGFR4 provides the conduit to facilitate FGF19 signaling in breast cancer progression. Mol Carcinog 2018; 57:1616-1625. [PMID: 30074276 DOI: 10.1002/mc.22884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Revised: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Although genetic amplification and overexpression of the fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) gene are found in human breast cancer, mechanisms that contribute to such functional alterations remain elusive. We report here that high expression of FGF19 is associated with the aggressive malignant behavior and poor survival outcome of breast cancer patients. FGF19 is particularly highly expressed in luminal molecular subtype of breast tumors and its expression levels are positively associated with its secretion levels from breast cancer cells. Genetic knockout of FGF19 significantly induces repression of breast tumor progression and metastasis in either an orthotopic mouse model of breast cancer or an experimental metastasis model. The FGF19 specific receptor, FGFR4, can be activated and subsequently upregulate AKT signaling in breast cancer cell upon FGF19, which is critical for oncogenic role of FGF19. Inactivation of FGFR4 by its inhibitor BLU9931 significantly attenuates FGF19-induced tumor-promoting activity, suggesting interruption of FGFR4 function is sufficient to affect FGF19-driven breast cancer. Overall, these insights support the idea that targeting FGFR4 in breast cancer cells overexpressing FGF19 may represent an effective strategy to suppress cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangdong Zhao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Department of Oral Biology, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Faliang Xu
- Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Nestor P Dominguez
- Department of Oral Biology, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia.,Institute of Biomedicine, University of León, León, Spain
| | - Yuanping Xiong
- Department of Oral Biology, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Zhongxun Xiong
- Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Hong Peng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Chloe Shay
- The Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.,Emory Children's Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Yong Teng
- Department of Oral Biology, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia.,Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Characterizing Molecular Variants and Clinical Utilization of Next-generation Sequencing in Advanced Breast Cancer. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2018; 25:392-398. [PMID: 26862949 DOI: 10.1097/pai.0000000000000322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Women with advanced breast carcinomas have few therapeutic options. Recent advances in genomic profiling represent a new paradigm of cancer classification and treatment, but experience with genomic testing in a clinical setting remains limited. We retrospectively determined the genomic variants and correlate these with histology [histomorphologic subtype, nuclear grade, standard immunohistochemistry (IHC)] and clinical utilization (ordering, turnaround time, report review, and targeted therapy). Among 48 patients, 2 showed no genetic alterations, 11 (23%) showed variants of unclear significance only and 35 (73%) showed variant(s) affecting function (VaF) and/or variants of unclear significance. Overall, 119 variants were observed in 20 of 50 tested genes. Each patient had a unique molecular profile, with numerous (n=58) variants not previously reported in breast cancer. VaF detected in more than 2 patients included: TP53 (n=21), PIK3CA (n=20), and FGFR1 (n=3). VaF comprised 46 single nucleotide variants (79%), 7 amplifications (12%), 3 frameshifts (5%), 1 insertion (2%), and 1 deletion (2%). The tested samples had very high Ki67 index (average 57%±23%) and approximately half were hormone receptor and HER2 negative (25/46, 54%). Metastatic breast carcinomas showed a higher average VaF versus breast-localized tumors (1.3±0.99 vs. 0.18±0.60, P<0.05). Next-generation sequencing reports were promptly reported and reviewed (average 1 to 2 d) and 7 (∼25%) of potentially eligible patients received targeted therapy. Advanced breast cancers show unique landscapes of genetic variants. Most testing was done in late disease, often in metastatic and receptor-negative carcinomas. Next-generation sequencing results were promptly reported and reviewed, but the utilization of targeted therapies was limited.
Collapse
|
12
|
Yuan Y, Yost SE, Yim J, Yuan YC, Solomon NM, Mambetsariev I, Pal S, Frankel P, Salgia R, Neuhausen SL, Mortimer J. Genomic mutation-driven metastatic breast cancer therapy: a single center experience. Oncotarget 2018; 8:26414-26423. [PMID: 28061482 PMCID: PMC5432268 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has made genomic mutation-driven therapy feasible for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. We frequently submit tumor tissue from MBC patients for targeted NGS of tumor using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform (FoundationOne®, Foundation Medicine, MA). Herein, we report the results and clinical impact of this test in MBC patients. Patients and Methods We identified patients with MBC treated at City of Hope from January 2014 to May 2016 who underwent NGS. Patients’ clinical characteristics, response to treatment (clinical assessment of tumor regression), and genomic mutation profiles were reviewed. Results Forty-four patients with MBC underwent NGS: 24 triple negative breast cancer, 16 estrogen receptor positive, and 4 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive patients. Twenty-three patients received more than three lines of chemotherapy prior to NGS. Actionable mutations (potentially responsive to targeted therapies that are on the market or in registered clinical trials) were identified in almost all patients (42/44; 95%) and over half of these 42 patients with actionable mutations (23/42; 55%) initiated mutation-driven targeted therapies. Of these 23 patients, 16/23 (70%) had assessable responses, and 7/23 (30%) were not assessable for response due to short exposure (<2 weeks) or hospice transition. The remaining 19/42 (45%) patients did not initiate targeted therapy. Conclusion NGS can identify effective targeted therapy options for MBC patients based on actionable mutations that were not previously offered based on pathology type. NGS should be performed early in patients with good performance status and preferably in clinical settings where genomic mutation-driven therapeutic trials are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology & Molecular Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Yost
- Department of Medical Oncology & Molecular Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Yate-Ching Yuan
- Bioinformatics Core Facility, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Nicola M Solomon
- Department of Medical Oncology & Molecular Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Isa Mambetsariev
- Department of Medical Oncology & Molecular Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Sumanta Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology & Molecular Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Paul Frankel
- Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ravi Salgia
- Department of Medical Oncology & Molecular Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Joanne Mortimer
- Department of Medical Oncology & Molecular Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ikeda S, Tsigelny IF, Skjevik ÅA, Kono Y, Mendler M, Kuo A, Sicklick JK, Heestand G, Banks KC, Talasaz A, Lanman RB, Lippman S, Kurzrock R. Next-Generation Sequencing of Circulating Tumor DNA Reveals Frequent Alterations in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncologist 2018; 23:586-593. [PMID: 29487225 PMCID: PMC5947459 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
This article reports unique aspects of the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. The study aimed to determine if next‐generation sequencing of blood‐derived circulating tumor DNA from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma could identify actionable somatic molecular alterations. Illustrative examples of treated patients and of in silico molecular dynamic simulation to reveal genomic variant function are included. Background. Because imaging has a high sensitivity to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and tissue biopsies carry risks such as bleeding, the latter are often not performed in HCC. Blood‐derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis can identify somatic alterations, but its utility has not been characterized in HCC. Materials and Methods. We evaluated 14 patients with advanced HCC (digital ctDNA sequencing [68 genes]). Mutant relative to wild‐type allele fraction was calculated. Results. All patients (100%) had somatic alterations (median = 3 alterations/patient [range, 1–8]); median mutant allele fraction, 0.29% (range, 0.1%–37.77%). Mutations were identified in several genes: TP53 (57% of patients), CTNNB1 (29%), PTEN (7%), CDKN2A (7%), ARID1A (7%), and MET (7%); amplifications, in CDK6 (14%), EGFR (14%), MYC (14%), BRAF (7%), RAF1 (7%), FGFR1 (7%), CCNE1 (7%), PIK3CA (7%), and ERBB2/HER2 (7%). Eleven patients (79%) had ≥1 theoretically actionable alteration. No two patients had identical genomic portfolios, suggesting the need for customized treatment. A patient with a CDKN2A‐inactivating and a CTNNB1‐activating mutation received matched treatment: palbociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) and celecoxib (COX‐2/Wnt inhibitor); des‐gamma‐carboxy prothrombin level decreased by 84% at 2 months (1,410 to 242 ng/mL [normal: ≤7.4 ng/mL]; alpha fetoprotein [AFP] low at baseline). A patient with a PTEN‐inactivating and a MET‐activating mutation (an effect suggested by in silico molecular dynamic simulations) received sirolimus (mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor) and cabozantinib (MET inhibitor); AFP declined by 63% (8,320 to 3,045 ng/mL [normal: 0–15 ng/mL]). Conclusion. ctDNA derived from noninvasive blood tests can provide exploitable genomic profiles in patients with HCC. Implications for Practice. This study reports that blood‐derived circulating tumor DNA can provide therapeutically exploitable genomic profiles in hepatocellular cancer, a malignancy that is known to be difficult to biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadakatsu Ikeda
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
- Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Igor F Tsigelny
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
- San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
- CureMatch Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Åge A Skjevik
- San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Yuko Kono
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Michel Mendler
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Alexander Kuo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jason K Sicklick
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Gregory Heestand
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| | | | | | | | - Scott Lippman
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kato S, Kurasaki K, Ikeda S, Kurzrock R. Rare Tumor Clinic: The University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center Experience with a Precision Therapy Approach. Oncologist 2018; 23:171-178. [PMID: 29038235 PMCID: PMC5813742 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with rare tumors may lack approved treatments and clinical trial access. Although each rare tumor is uncommon, cumulatively they account for approximately 25% of cancers. We recently initiated a Rare Tumor Clinic that emphasized a precision medicine strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We investigated the first 40 patients presenting at the Rare Tumor Clinic. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tissue and plasma-derived, circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA), and protein markers were assessed. RESULTS Median age was 58 years (range, 31-78 years); 70% (28/40) were women; median number of previous systemic therapies was 2 (range 0-7). The most common diagnoses were sarcoma (n = 7) for solid tumors and Erdheim-Chester disease (n = 5) for hematologic malignancies. Twenty distinct diagnoses were seen. Examples of ultrarare tumors included ameloblastoma, yolk sac liver tumor, ampullary cancer, and Castleman's disease. Altogether, 32 of 33 patients (97%) with tissue NGS and 15 of 33 (45%) with ctDNA sequencing harbored ≥1 alteration. Overall, 92.5% of patients (37/40) had ≥1 actionable target based on either genomic (n = 32) or protein (n = 27) markers. In total, 52.5% (21/40) received matched therapy; 52.4% (11/21) achieved stable disease (SD) ≥6 months (n = 3), partial remission (PR; n = 6), or complete remission (CR; n = 2). Matched therapy resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival compared with last prior unmatched therapy (hazard ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.71, p = .008). CONCLUSION Identifying genomic and protein markers in patients with rare/ultrarare tumors was feasible. When therapies were matched, >50% of patients attained SD ≥6 months, PR, or CR. Further precision medicine clinical investigations focusing on rare and ultrarare tumors are urgently needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Although rare tumors are infrequent by definition, when all subtypes of rare cancers are combined, they account for approximately 25% of adult malignancies. However, patients with rare tumors may lack approved treatments and clinical trial access. This paper describes an institutional a Rare Tumor Clinic focused on a precision medicine strategy. Performing genomics and protein analyses was feasible amongst patients with rare cancers. Over 50% of patients attained SD ≥6 months, PR, or CR when they received matched therapy (genomically targeted and/or immunotherapy). Further studies investigating the efficacy of the precision therapy approach among rare tumors are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shumei Kato
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Kellie Kurasaki
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Sadakatsu Ikeda
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Subbiah V, Kurzrock R. Challenging Standard-of-Care Paradigms in the Precision Oncology Era. Trends Cancer 2018; 4:101-109. [PMID: 29458960 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2017] [Revised: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The pace of genomic and immunological breakthroughs in oncology is accelerating, making it likely that large randomized trials will increasingly become outdated before their completion. Traditional clinical research/practice paradigms must adapt to the reality unveiled by genomics, especially the need for customized drug combinations, rather than one-size-fits-all monotherapy. The raison-d'être of precision oncology is to offer 'the right drug for the right patient at the right time', a process enabled by transformative tissue and blood-based genomic technologies. Genomically targeted therapies are most suitable in early disease, when molecular heterogeneity is less pronounced, while immunotherapy is most effective against tumors with unstable genomes. Next-generation cancer research/practice models will need to overcome the tyranny of tradition and emphasize an innovative, precise and personalized patient-centric approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, Unit 0455, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Center for Personalized Therapy & Clinical Trials Office, UC San Diego - Moores Cancer Center, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, MC #0658, La Jolla, CA 92093-0658, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Riviere P, Fanta PT, Ikeda S, Baumgartner J, Heestand GM, Kurzrock R. The Mutational Landscape of Gastrointestinal Malignancies as Reflected by Circulating Tumor DNA. Mol Cancer Ther 2018; 17:297-305. [PMID: 29133621 PMCID: PMC5752585 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-0360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Revised: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to assess the utility of a novel, noninvasive method of detecting genomic alterations in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, i.e., the use of liquid biopsies to obtain blood-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) through an analysis of the genomic landscape of ctDNA (68 genes) from 213 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers. The most common cancer types were colorectal adenocarcinoma (N = 55; 26%), appendiceal adenocarcinoma (N = 46; 22%), hepatocellular carcinoma (N = 31; 15%), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (N = 25; 12%). The majority of patients (58%) had ≥1 characterized alteration (excluded variants of unknown significance). The median number of characterized alterations was 1 (range, 0-13). The number of detected alterations per patient varied between different cancer types: in hepatocellular carcinoma, 74% of patients (23/31) had ≥1 characterized alteration(s) versus 24% of appendiceal adenocarcinoma patients (11/46). The median percent ctDNA among characterized alterations was 2.50% (interquartile range, 0.76%-8.96%). Overall, 95% of patients (117/123) had distinct molecular portfolios with 143 unique characterized alterations within 56 genes. Overall, concordance rates of 96%, 94%, 95%, and 91%, respectively, were found between ctDNA and tissue biopsy (N = 105 patients) in the four most common alterations (KRAS amplification, MYC amplification, KRAS G12V, and EGFR amplification). Of 123 patients with characterized alterations, >99% (122/123; 57% of entire population tested; 122/213) had one or more alterations potentially actionable by experimental or approved drugs. These observations suggest that many patients with gastrointestinal tumors, including difficult-to-biopsy malignancies like hepatocellular cancers, frequently have discernible and theoretically pharmacologically tractable ctDNA alterations that merit further studies in prospective trials. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(1); 297-305. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Riviere
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California.
| | - Paul T Fanta
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Sadakatsu Ikeda
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Joel Baumgartner
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Gregory M Heestand
- Department of Medicine/Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Liu S, Nikanjam M, Kurzrock R. Dosing de novo combinations of two targeted drugs: Towards a customized precision medicine approach to advanced cancers. Oncotarget 2017; 7:11310-20. [PMID: 26824502 PMCID: PMC4905475 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2015] [Accepted: 01/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastatic cancers harbor complex genomic alterations. Thus, monotherapies are often suboptimal. Individualized combinations are needed in order to attenuate resistance. To help inform selection of safe starting doses for novel, two-agent, targeted drug combinations, we identified clinical trials in adult oncology patients who received targeted drug doublets (PubMed, January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2013). The dose percentage was calculated for each drug: (safe dose in combination divided by single agent full dose) X 100. Additive dose percentage represented the sum of the dose percentage for each drug. A total of 144 studies (N = 8568 patients; 95 combinations) were analyzed. In 51% of trials, each of the two drugs could be administered at 100% of their full dose. The lowest safe additive dose percentage was 60% if targets and/or class of drugs overlapped, or in the presence of mTor inhibitors, which sometimes compromised the combination dose. If neither class nor target overlapped and if mTor inhibitors were absent, the lowest safe additive dose percentage was 143%. The current observations contribute to the knowledge base that informs safe starting doses for new combinations of targeted drugs in the context of clinical trials or practice, hence facilitating customized combination therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sariah Liu
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Kaiser Permanente San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Mina Nikanjam
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bieg-Bourne CC, Millis SZ, Piccioni DE, Fanta PT, Goldberg ME, Chmielecki J, Parker BA, Kurzrock R. Next-Generation Sequencing in the Clinical Setting Clarifies Patient Characteristics and Potential Actionability. Cancer Res 2017; 77:6313-6320. [PMID: 28939679 PMCID: PMC5690871 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-1569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2017] [Revised: 07/22/2017] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Enhancements in clinical-grade next-generation sequencing (NGS) have fueled the advancement of precision medicine in the clinical oncology field. Here, we survey the molecular profiles of 1,113 patients with diverse malignancies who successfully underwent clinical-grade NGS (236-404 genes) in an academic tertiary cancer center. Among the individual tumors examined, the majority showed at least one detectable alteration (97.2%). Among 2,045 molecular aberrations was the involvement of 302 distinct genes. The most commonly altered genes were TP53 (47.0%), CDKN2A (18.0%), TERT (17.0%), and KRAS (16.0%), and the majority of patients had tumors that harbored multiple alterations. Tumors displayed a median of four alterations (range, 0-29). Most individuals had at least one potentially actionable alteration (94.7%), with the median number of potentially actionable alterations per patient being 2 (range, 0-13). A total of 1,048 (94.2%) patients exhibited a unique molecular profile, with either genes altered or loci within the gene(s) altered being distinct. Approximately 13% of patients displayed a genomic profile identical to at least one other patient; although genes altered were the same, the affected loci may have differed. Overall, our results underscore the complex heterogeneity of malignancies and argue that customized combination therapies will be essential to optimize cancer treatment regimens. Cancer Res; 77(22); 6313-20. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheyennedra C Bieg-Bourne
- San Diego State University, San Diego, California.
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | | | - David E Piccioni
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Paul T Fanta
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | | | | | - Barbara A Parker
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
With the advent of targeted therapies, there has been a revolution in the treatment of cancer across multiple histologies. Immune checkpoint blockade has made it possible to take advantage of receptor-ligand interactions between immune and tumor cells in a wide spectrum of malignancies. Toxicity in healthy tissue, however, can limit our use of these agents. Immune checkpoint blockade has been approved in advanced melanoma, renal cell cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, relapsed refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma, and urothelial cancer. Though FDA-approved indications for use of some of these novel agents depend on current protein-based programmed death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays, detection methods come with several caveats. Additional predictive tools must be interrogated to discern responders from non-responders. Some of these include measurement of microsatellite instability, PD-L1 amplification, cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) infiltrate density, and tumor mutational burden. This review serves to synthesize biomarker detection at the DNA, RNA, and protein level to more accurately forecast benefit from these novel agents.
Collapse
|
20
|
Balendran S, Liebmann-Reindl S, Berghoff AS, Reischer T, Popitsch N, Geier CB, Kenner L, Birner P, Streubel B, Preusser M. Next-Generation Sequencing-based genomic profiling of brain metastases of primary ovarian cancer identifies high number of BRCA-mutations. J Neurooncol 2017; 133:469-476. [PMID: 28497333 PMCID: PMC5537326 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2459-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 04/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer represents the most common gynaecological malignancy and has the highest mortality of all female reproductive cancers. It has a rare predilection to develop brain metastases (BM). In this study, we evaluated the mutational profile of ovarian cancer metastases through Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) with the aim of identifying potential clinically actionable genetic alterations with options for small molecule targeted therapy. Library preparation was conducted using Illumina TruSight Rapid Capture Kit in combination with a cancer specific enrichment kit covering 94 genes. BRCA-mutations were confirmed by using TruSeq Custom Amplicon Low Input Kit in combination with a custom-designed BRCA gene panel. In our cohort all eight sequenced BM samples exhibited a multitude of variant alterations, each with unique molecular profiles. The 37 identified variants were distributed over 22 cancer-related genes (23.4%). The number of mutated genes per sample ranged from 3 to 7 with a median of 4.5. The most commonly altered genes were BRCA1/2, TP53, and ATM. In total, 7 out of 8 samples revealed either a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 pathogenic mutation. Furthermore, all eight BM samples showed mutations in at least one DNA repair gene. Our NGS study of BM of ovarian carcinoma revealed a significant number of BRCA-mutations beside TP53, ATM and CHEK2 mutations. These findings strongly suggest the implication of BRCA and DNA repair malfunction in ovarian cancer metastasizing to the brain. Based on these findings, pharmacological PARP inhibition could be one potential targeted therapeutic for brain metastatic ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Balendran
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Liebmann-Reindl
- Core Facility Genomics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - A S Berghoff
- Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Central Nervous System Unit (CCC-CNS), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Medical Center and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Reischer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - N Popitsch
- Children's Cancer Research Institute, St. Anna Kinderkrebsforschung, Vienna, Austria
| | - C B Geier
- Immunology Outpatient Clinic, Schwarzspanierstraße 15/1/9, Vienna, Austria
| | - L Kenner
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Laboratory Animal Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cancer Research LBI-CR, Vienna, Austria
| | - P Birner
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Central Nervous System Unit (CCC-CNS), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - B Streubel
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Core Facility Genomics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Central Nervous System Unit (CCC-CNS), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - M Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Central Nervous System Unit (CCC-CNS), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sharabi A, Kim SS, Kato S, Sanders PD, Patel SP, Sanghvi P, Weihe E, Kurzrock R. Exceptional Response to Nivolumab and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in Neuroendocrine Cervical Carcinoma with High Tumor Mutational Burden: Management Considerations from the Center For Personalized Cancer Therapy at UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center. Oncologist 2017; 22:631-637. [PMID: 28550027 PMCID: PMC5469598 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2016] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
This article reports a patient with a rare metastatic, chemotherapy‐refractory neuroendocrine carcinoma who was treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) combined with anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 antibody. The novel treatment modality of SBRT combined with a checkpoint inhibitor is discussed, as well as the implications of molecular profiling and tumor mutational burden as potential predictors of response. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix is an ultra‐rare malignancy with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Checkpoint blockade immunotherapy has rapidly developed into an emerging standard of care for several common disease types. Interestingly, in preclinical and retrospective clinical data, radiation therapy has been demonstrated to synergize with checkpoint inhibitors. Here we report a patient with metastatic, chemotherapy‐refractory neuroendocrine carcinoma who presented with partial bowel obstruction due to a large tumor burden. Genomic analysis demonstrated a high number of alterations on liquid biopsy (circulating tumor DNA [ctDNA]), which prompted treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) combined with anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 antibody. Tissue rebiopsy and comprehensive genomic profiling confirmed high tumor mutational burden and a mismatch repair gene defect. The patient manifested near‐complete systemic resolution of disease, ongoing at 10+ months. We discuss the novel treatment modality of SBRT combined with a checkpoint inhibitor and the implications of molecular profiling and tumor mutational burden as potential predictors of response. Key Points. High‐grade, large‐cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix is an ultra‐rare malignancy that carries a grim prognosis. Next‐generation sequencing may reveal key mutations in MSH2 genes amongst others. MSH2 mutations target the DNA mismatch repair process and can predispose patients to malignancies with high mutational burdens. Immunotherapy combined with radiation therapy can elicit a significant response, both within and outside the field of radiation. The latter is termed the “abscopal” effect, perhaps mediated by radiation‐induced cross presentation of tumor antigens resulting in immune activation. Sequencing of blood‐derived ctDNA showed a high number of alterations, and tissue sequencing confirmed a high tumor mutational burden as a consequence of a mismatch repair gene defect. This observation led to a therapeutic “match” with an anti‐ programmed cell death protein 1 antibody combined with SBRT, resulting in a durable (10+ months), near‐complete remission in a patient with advanced chemotherapy‐refractory disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Sharabi
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Sangwoo Shawn Kim
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, California, USA
| | - Shumei Kato
- Division of Hematology & Oncology and Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Philip D Sanders
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Sandip Pravin Patel
- Division of Hematology & Oncology and Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Parag Sanghvi
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth Weihe
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, California, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Division of Hematology & Oncology and Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pitalúa-Cortés QG, García-Pérez FO, Villaseñor-Navarro Y, Lara-Medina FU, Matus-Santos JA, Soldevilla-Gallardo I, Porras-Reyes FI, Pérez-Sánchez VM, Maldonado-Martínez HA, Pérez-Báez W, Sollozo-Dupont I. 68Ga-DTPA Anti-HER2 positron emission tomography/CT successfully predicts the overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor in lung metastases from breast cancer. BJR Case Rep 2017; 3:20160136. [PMID: 30363270 PMCID: PMC6159203 DOI: 10.1259/bjrcr.20160136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Revised: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular identification of a metastatic tumour without the inconvenience of a biopsy and the time required for pathological characterization is possible using molecular imaging. Here, we present the case of a patient with breast cancer in whom 68Ga-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positron emission tomography-CT was successfully employed to characterize the expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in metastatic sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Wendy Pérez-Báez
- Deparment of Surgical Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, INCan, México
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nikanjam M, Liu S, Yang J, Kurzrock R. Dosing Three-Drug Combinations That Include Targeted Anti-Cancer Agents: Analysis of 37,763 Patients. Oncologist 2017; 22:576-584. [PMID: 28424323 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2016] [Accepted: 01/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combining targeted and cytotoxic agents has the potential to improve efficacy and attenuate resistance for metastatic cancer. Information regarding safe starting doses for clinical trials of novel three-drug combinations is lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS Published phase I-III adult oncology clinical trials of three-drug combinations involving a targeted agent were identified by PubMed search (January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013). A dose percentage was calculated to compare the dose used in combination to the single agent recommended dose: (U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved/recommended phase II dose/maximum tolerated dose). The additive dose percentage was the sum of the dose percentages for each drug in the combination. RESULTS A total of 37,763 subjects and 243 drug combinations were included. Only 28% of studies could give each of the three agents at 100%. For combinations involving two targeted agents and a cytotoxic agent, the lowest starting additive dose percentage was 133%, which increased to 250% if two antibodies were included. For combinations of one targeted agent and two cytotoxic agents, the lowest additive safe dose percentage was 137%. When both cytotoxic agents were held at 100%, as occurred in 56% of studies (which generally used cytotoxic doublets with known combination safety dosing), the lowest safe dose percentage was 225% (providing that a histone deacetylase inhibitor was not the targeted agent). CONCLUSION These findings serve as a safe starting point for dosing novel three-drug combinations involving a targeted agent in clinical trials and practice. The Oncologist 2017;22:576-584 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Targeted and cytotoxic drug combinations can improve efficacy and overcome resistance. More knowledge of safe starting doses would facilitate use of combinations in clinical trials and practice. Analysis of 37,763 subjects (243 combinations) showed three drugs could be safely administered, but less than 30% of combinations could include all three drugs at full dose. Dose reductions to 45% of the dose of each single agent may be required. Combinations involving two antibodies required fewer dose reductions, and the use of established cytotoxic doublets made initial dose assignment easier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Nikanjam
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sariah Liu
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Kaiser Permanente San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jincheng Yang
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ross JS, Gay LM. Comprehensive genomic sequencing and the molecular profiles of clinically advanced breast cancer. Pathology 2017; 49:120-132. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2016.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2016] [Revised: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 11/09/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
25
|
Park J, Hur B, Rhee S, Lim S, Kim MS, Kim K, Han W, Kim S. Information theoretic sub-network mining characterizes breast cancer subtypes in terms of cancer core mechanisms. J Bioinform Comput Biol 2016; 14:1644002. [DOI: 10.1142/s0219720016440029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
A breast cancer subtype classification scheme, PAM50, based on genetic information is widely accepted for clinical applications. On the other hands, experimental cancer biology studies have been successful in revealing the mechanisms of breast cancer and now the hallmarks of cancer have been determined to explain the core mechanisms of tumorigenesis. Thus, it is important to understand how the breast cancer subtypes are related to the cancer core mechanisms, but multiple studies are yet to address the hallmarks of breast cancer subtypes. Therefore, a new approach that can explain the differences among breast cancer subtypes in terms of cancer hallmarks is needed. We developed an information theoretic sub-network mining algorithm, differentially expressed sub-network and pathway analysis (DeSPA), that retrieves tumor-related genes by mining a gene regulatory network (GRN) of transcription factors and miRNAs. With extensive experiments of the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) breast cancer sequencing data, we showed that our approach was able to select genes that belong to cancer core pathways such as DNA replication, cell cycle, p53 pathways while keeping the accuracy of breast cancer subtype classification comparable to that of PAM50. In addition, our method produces a regulatory network of TF, miRNA, and their target genes that distinguish breast cancer subtypes, which is confirmed by experimental studies in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinwoo Park
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Benjamin Hur
- Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sungmin Rhee
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sangsoo Lim
- Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min-Su Kim
- Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwangsoo Kim
- Division of Clinical Bioinformatics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonshik Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Kim
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
- Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
- Bioinformatics Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Remarkable similarities of chromosomal rearrangements between primary human breast cancers and matched distant metastases as revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Oncotarget 2016; 6:37169-84. [PMID: 26439695 PMCID: PMC4741922 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2015] [Accepted: 09/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
To better understand and characterize chromosomal structural variation during breast cancer progression, we enumerated chromosomal rearrangements for 11 patients by performing low-coverage whole-genome sequencing of 11 primary breast tumors and their 13 matched distant metastases. The tumor genomes harbored a median of 85 (range 18-404) rearrangements per tumor, with a median of 82 (26-310) in primaries compared to 87 (18-404) in distant metastases. Concordance between paired tumors from the same patient was high with a median of 89% of rearrangements shared (range 61-100%), whereas little overlap was found when comparing all possible pairings of tumors from different patients (median 3%). The tumors exhibited diverse genomic patterns of rearrangements: some carried events distributed throughout the genome while others had events mostly within densely clustered chromothripsis-like foci at a few chromosomal locations. Irrespectively, the patterns were highly conserved between the primary tumor and metastases from the same patient. Rearrangements occurred more frequently in genic areas than expected by chance and among the genes affected there was significant enrichment for cancer-associated genes including disruption of TP53, RB1, PTEN, and ESR1, likely contributing to tumor development. Our findings are most consistent with chromosomal rearrangements being early events in breast cancer progression that remain stable during the development from primary tumor to distant metastasis.
Collapse
|
27
|
Comparative genomic analysis reveals bilateral breast cancers are genetically independent. Oncotarget 2016; 6:31820-9. [PMID: 26378809 PMCID: PMC4741642 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2015] [Accepted: 08/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Bilateral breast cancer (BBC) poses a major challenge for oncologists because of the cryptic relationship between the two lesions. The purpose of this study was to determine the origin of the contralateral breast cancer (either dependent or independent of the index tumor). Here, we used ultra-deep whole-exome sequencing and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to study four paired samples of BBCs with different tumor subtypes and time intervals between the developments of each tumor. We used two paired primary breast tumors and corresponding metastatic liver lesions as the control. We tested the origin independent nature of BBC in three ways: mutational concordance, mutational signature clustering, and clonality analysis using copy number profiles. We found that the paired BBC samples had near-zero concordant mutation rates, which were much lower than those of the paired primary/metastasis samples. The results of a mutational signature analysis also suggested that BBCs are independent of one another. A clonality analysis using aCGH data further revealed that paired BBC samples was clonally independent, in contrast to clonal related origin found for paired primary/metastasis samples. Our preliminary findings show that BBCs in Han Chinese women are origin independent and thus should be treated separately.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kato S, Tomson BN, Buys TPH, Elkin SK, Carter JL, Kurzrock R. Genomic Landscape of Malignant Mesotheliomas. Mol Cancer Ther 2016; 15:2498-2507. [PMID: 27507853 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-16-0229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Accepted: 07/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Understanding the genomic landscape of malignant mesothelioma may identify novel molecular drivers of this ultra-rare disease, which can lead to an expanded roster of targeted therapies and clinical trial options for patients with mesothelioma. We examined the molecular profiles of 42 patients with malignant mesothelioma (including pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial) that were referred by clinicians to be tested in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) laboratory using next-generation sequencing (NGS; 182 or 236 genes). Among 42 patients, there were 116 alterations, with 92 being distinct. The number of genomic alterations per patient ranged from 1 to 5 (median = 3). No two patients had identical molecular portfolios. The most common aberrations were in BAP1 (BRCA1-associated protein 1; 47.6% [20/42]), NF2 (38.1% [16/42]), and CDKN2A/B (loss) (35.7% [15/42]). BAP1 alterations and CDKN2A/B loss were associated with pleural mesothelioma (OR 3.4, P = 0.059 [BAP1] [trend]; OR 5.8, P = 0.01 [CDKN2A/B]). All 42 patients had a molecular abnormality that was potentially actionable (median = three actionable alterations per patient; range, 1 to 5), and, in 40 patients (95.2%), a drug approved by the FDA was applicable. In conclusion, each individual with malignant mesothelioma harbored a unique set of genomic aberrations, suggesting that NGS-based profiling of patients will be needed if patients are to be optimally matched to cognate treatments. All 42 patients had at least one alteration that was, in theory, pharmacologically tractable. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(10); 2498-507. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shumei Kato
- Department of Medicine, Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California.
| | | | | | | | | | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Department of Medicine, Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Stewart DJ, Batist G, Kantarjian HM, Bradford JP, Schiller JH, Kurzrock R. The Urgent Need for Clinical Research Reform to Permit Faster, Less Expensive Access to New Therapies for Lethal Diseases. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 21:4561-8. [PMID: 26473192 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-3246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
High costs of complying with drug development regulations slow progress and contribute to high drug prices and, hence, mounting health care costs. If it is exorbitantly expensive to bring new therapies to approval, fewer agents can be developed with available resources, impeding the emergence of urgently needed treatments and escalating prices by limiting competition. Excessive regulation produces numerous speed bumps on the road to drug authorization. Although an explosion of knowledge could fuel rapid advances, progress has been slowed worldwide by inefficient regulatory and clinical research systems that limit access to therapies that prolong life and relieve suffering. We must replace current compliance-centered regulation (appropriate for nonlethal diseases like acne) with "progress-centered regulation" in lethal diseases, where the overarching objective must be rapid, inexpensive development of effective new therapies. We need to (i) reduce expensive, time-consuming preclinical toxicology and pharmacology assessments, which add little value; (ii) revamp the clinical trial approval process to make it fast and efficient; (iii) permit immediate multiple-site trial activation when an eligible patient is identified ("just-in-time" activation); (iv) reduce the requirement for excessive, low-value documentation; (v) replace this excessive documentation with sensible postmarketing surveillance; (vi) develop pragmatic investigator accreditation; (vii) where it is to the benefit of the patient, permit investigators latitude in deviating from protocols, without requiring approved amendments; (viii) confirm the value of predictive biomarkers before requiring the high costs of IDE/CLIA compliance; and (ix) approve agents based on high phase I-II response rates in defined subpopulations, rather than mandating expensive, time-consuming phase III trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Stewart
- The University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Gerald Batist
- Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - John-Peter Bradford
- Bradford Bachinski Limited and the Life Saving Therapies Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joan H Schiller
- The University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX and Free to Breathe
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Effective treatment options for advanced salivary gland tumors are lacking. To better understand these tumors, we report their genomic landscape. We studied the molecular aberrations in 117 patients with salivary gland tumors that were, on physician request, tested in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) laboratory (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA) using next-generation sequencing (182 or 236 genes), and analyzed by N-of-One, Inc. (Lexington, MA). There were 354 total aberrations, with 240 distinct aberrations identified in this patient population. Only 10 individuals (8.5%) had a molecular portfolio that was identical to any other patient (with four different portfolios amongst the ten patients). The most common abnormalities involved the TP53 gene (36/117 [30.8% of patients]), cyclin pathway (CCND1, CDK4/6 or CDKN2A/B) (31/117 [26.5%]) and PI3K pathway (PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTEN or AKT1/3) (28/117 [23.9%]). In multivariate analysis, statistically significant co-existing aberrations were observed as follows: TP53 and ERBB2 (p = 0.01), cyclin pathway and MDM2 (p = 0.03), and PI3K pathway and HRAS (p = 0.0001). We were able to identify possible cognate targeted therapies in most of the patients (107/117 [91.5%]), including FDA-approved drugs in 80/117 [68.4%]. In conclusion, salivary gland tumors were characterized by multiple distinct aberrations that mostly differed from patient to patient. Significant associations between aberrations in TP53 and ERBB2, the cyclin pathway and MDM2, and HRAS and the PI3K pathway were identified. Most patients had actionable alterations. These results provide a framework for tailored combinations of matched therapies.
Collapse
|
31
|
Nikanjam M, Liu S, Kurzrock R. Dosing targeted and cytotoxic two-drug combinations: Lessons learned from analysis of 24,326 patients reported 2010 through 2013. Int J Cancer 2016; 139:2135-41. [PMID: 27389805 PMCID: PMC5096042 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Revised: 06/26/2016] [Accepted: 06/30/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Combining agents has the potential to attenuate resistance in metastatic cancer. However, knowledge of appropriate starting doses for novel drug combinations in clinical trials and practice is lacking. Analysis of 372 published studies was used to ascertain safe starting doses for doublets involving a cytotoxic and targeted agent. Phase I–III adult oncology clinical trial publications (January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013) were identified (PubMed). The dose of drug used in each combination was compared to the single agent recommended dose [FDA‐approved/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D)/maximum tolerated dose (MTD)]. Dose percentages were calculated as: (safe dose of drug in combination/dose of drug as single agent at FDA/RP2D/MTD) × 100. Additive dose percentages were the sum of the dose percentage for each drug. A total of 24,326 patients (248 drug combinations) were analyzed. In 38% of studies, both drugs could be administered at 100% of their FDA‐approved/RP2D/MTD dose. The lowest safe additive dose percentage was 41% with poly‐ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) or histone deacetylase inhibitors as the targeted agents; 82%, in the absence of these agents; and 97%, with an antibody in the combination. If one drug was administered at 100% of the single agent dose, the lowest safe dose percentage for the second drug was 17% (cytotoxic at 100%) or 36% (targeted at 100%) of the FDA‐approved/RP2D/MTD dose. The current findings can help inform safe starting doses for novel two‐drug combinations (cytotoxic and targeted agents) in the context of clinical trials and practice. What's new? Cytotoxic and targeted cancer drugs act through distinct mechanisms, and when used in combination they can potentially augment therapeutic effectiveness while minimally impacting toxicity. However, whereas algorithms for safe starting doses for new single‐agent therapies are well established, there are few guidelines for combination therapies. Here, analyses of data from published Phase I–III clinical trials shows that about 38% of patients tolerated combinations in which both drugs were administered at full starting doses. In the majority of patients, significant dose reductions were required to guard against toxicity. Intrapatient dose escalation is possible, however, potentially allowing for increased efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Nikanjam
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sariah Liu
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Kaiser Permanente San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Helsten T, Schwaederle M, Kurzrock R. Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling in hereditary and neoplastic disease: biologic and clinical implications. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2016. [PMID: 26224133 PMCID: PMC4573649 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-015-9579-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and their receptors (FGFRs) are transmembrane growth factor receptors with wide tissue distribution. FGF/FGFR signaling is involved in neoplastic behavior and also development, differentiation, growth, and survival. FGFR germline mutations (activating) can cause skeletal disorders, primarily dwarfism (generally mutations in FGFR3), and craniofacial malformation syndromes (usually mutations in FGFR1 and FGFR2); intriguingly, some of these activating FGFR mutations are also seen in human cancers. FGF/FGFR aberrations reported in cancers are mainly thought to be gain-of-function changes, and several cancers have high frequencies of FGFR alterations, including breast, bladder, or squamous cell carcinomas (lung and head and neck). FGF ligand aberrations (predominantly gene amplifications) are also frequently seen in cancers, in contrast to hereditary syndromes. There are several pharmacologic agents that have been or are being developed for inhibition of FGFR/FGF signaling. These include both highly selective inhibitors as well as multi-kinase inhibitors. Of note, only four agents (ponatinib, pazopanib, regorafenib, and recently lenvatinib) are FDA-approved for use in cancer, although the approval was not based on their activity against FGFR. Perturbations in the FGFR/FGF signaling are present in both inherited and malignant diseases. The development of potent inhibitors targeting FGF/FGFR may provide new tools against disorders caused by FGF/FGFR alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Helsten
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, MC #0658, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0658, USA.
| | - Maria Schwaederle
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, MC #0658, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0658, USA.
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, MC #0658, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0658, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gong J, Cho M, Sy M, Salgia R, Fakih M. Cancer Therapy Directed by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling: A Single Center Study. Cancer Res 2016; 76:3690-701. [PMID: 28178681 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-3043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2015] [Accepted: 04/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Gong
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - May Cho
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Marvin Sy
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ravi Salgia
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Marwan Fakih
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lazar V, Rubin E, Depil S, Pawitan Y, Martini JF, Gomez-Navarro J, Yver A, Kan Z, Dry JR, Kehren J, Validire P, Rodon J, Vielh P, Ducreux M, Galbraith S, Lehnert M, Onn A, Berger R, Pierotti MA, Porgador A, Pramesh CS, Ye DW, Carvalho AL, Batist G, Le Chevalier T, Morice P, Besse B, Vassal G, Mortlock A, Hansson J, Berindan-Neagoe I, Dann R, Haspel J, Irimie A, Laderman S, Nechushtan H, Al Omari AS, Haywood T, Bresson C, Soo KC, Osman I, Mata H, Lee JJ, Jhaveri K, Meurice G, Palmer G, Lacroix L, Koscielny S, Eterovic KA, Blay JY, Buller R, Eggermont A, Schilsky RL, Mendelsohn J, Soria JC, Rothenberg M, Scoazec JY, Hong WK, Kurzrock R. A simplified interventional mapping system (SIMS) for the selection of combinations of targeted treatments in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 2016; 6:14139-52. [PMID: 25944621 PMCID: PMC4546456 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2015] [Accepted: 03/02/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of death worldwide. Targeted monotherapies produce high regression rates, albeit for limited patient subgroups, who inevitably succumb. We present a novel strategy for identifying customized combinations of triplets of targeted agents, utilizing a simplified interventional mapping system (SIMS) that merges knowledge about existent drugs and their impact on the hallmarks of cancer. Based on interrogation of matched lung tumor and normal tissue using targeted genomic sequencing, copy number variation, transcriptomics, and miRNA expression, the activation status of 24 interventional nodes was elucidated. An algorithm was developed to create a scoring system that enables ranking of the activated interventional nodes for each patient. Based on the trends of co-activation at interventional points, combinations of drug triplets were defined in order to overcome resistance. This methodology will inform a prospective trial to be conducted by the WIN consortium, aiming to significantly impact survival in metastatic NSCLC and other malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Lazar
- Gustave-Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France.,WIN Consortium, Villejuif, France
| | - Eitan Rubin
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | | | | | - Jean-François Martini
- Pfizer Oncology Research, San Diego, CA, USA.,Pfizer Oncology, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Antoine Yver
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Global Medicines Development, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.,Oncology iMED, Waltham, MA, USA.,Oncology iMED, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK
| | - Zhengyin Kan
- Pfizer Oncology Research, San Diego, CA, USA.,Pfizer Oncology, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan R Dry
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Global Medicines Development, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.,Oncology iMED, Waltham, MA, USA.,Oncology iMED, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK
| | | | | | - Jordi Rodon
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Michel Ducreux
- Gustave-Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France.,University Paris-Sud, Kremlin-Bicetre, France
| | - Susan Galbraith
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Global Medicines Development, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.,Oncology iMED, Waltham, MA, USA.,Oncology iMED, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK
| | - Manfred Lehnert
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Amir Onn
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | - Ding-wei Ye
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Gerald Batist
- Segal Cancer Centre at the Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Andrew Mortlock
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Global Medicines Development, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.,Oncology iMED, Waltham, MA, USA.,Oncology iMED, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK
| | | | - Ioana Berindan-Neagoe
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Ion Chiricuta Oncology Institut, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Robert Dann
- General Electric Healthcare, Westborough, MA, USA
| | | | - Alexandru Irimie
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Ion Chiricuta Oncology Institut, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | | | | | - Trent Haywood
- Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Iman Osman
- New York University Langone Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Hilario Mata
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack J Lee
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Gary Palmer
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Richard Buller
- Pfizer Oncology Research, San Diego, CA, USA.,Pfizer Oncology, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Eggermont
- Gustave-Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France.,University Paris-Sud, Kremlin-Bicetre, France
| | | | - John Mendelsohn
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Charles Soria
- Gustave-Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France.,University Paris-Sud, Kremlin-Bicetre, France
| | - Mace Rothenberg
- Pfizer Oncology Research, San Diego, CA, USA.,Pfizer Oncology, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jean-Yves Scoazec
- Gustave-Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France.,University Paris-Sud, Kremlin-Bicetre, France
| | - Waun Ki Hong
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Helsten T, Kato S, Schwaederle M, Tomson BN, Buys TPH, Elkin SK, Carter JL, Kurzrock R. Cell-Cycle Gene Alterations in 4,864 Tumors Analyzed by Next-Generation Sequencing: Implications for Targeted Therapeutics. Mol Cancer Ther 2016; 15:1682-90. [PMID: 27196769 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-16-0071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2016] [Accepted: 04/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Alterations in the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-retinoblastoma (RB) machinery disrupt cell-cycle regulation and are being targeted in drug development. To understand the cancer types impacted by this pathway, we analyzed frequency of abnormalities in key cell-cycle genes across 4,864 tumors using next-generation sequencing (182 or 236 genes; Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments laboratory). Aberrations in the cell-cycle pathway were identified in 39% of cancers, making this pathway one of the most commonly altered in cancer. The frequency of aberrations was as follows: CDKN2A/B (20.1% of all patients), RB1 (7.6%), CCND1 (6.1%), CCNE1 (3.6%), CDK4 (3.2%), CCND3 (1.8%), CCND2 (1.7%), and CDK6 (1.7%). Rates and types of aberrant cell-cycle pathway genes differed between cancer types and within histologies. Analysis of coexisting and mutually exclusive genetic aberrations showed that CCND1, CCND2, and CCND3 aberrations were all positively associated with CDK6 aberrations [OR and P values, multivariate analysis: CCND1 and CDK6 (OR = 3.5; P < 0.0001), CCND2 and CDK6 (OR = 4.3; P = 0.003), CCND3 and CDK6 (OR = 3.6; P = 0.007)]. In contrast, RB1 alterations were negatively associated with multiple gene anomalies in the cell-cycle pathway, including CCND1 (OR = 0.25; P = 0.003), CKD4 (OR = 0.10; P = 0.001), and CDKN2A/B (OR = 0.21; P < 0.0001). In conclusion, aberrations in the cell-cycle pathway were very common in diverse cancers (39% of 4,864 neoplasms). The frequencies and types of alterations differed between and within tumor types and will be informative for drug development strategies. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(7); 1682-90. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Helsten
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Shumei Kato
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Maria Schwaederle
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | | | | | | | | | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cohen PR, Tomson BN, Elkin SK, Marchlik E, Carter JL, Kurzrock R. Genomic portfolio of Merkel cell carcinoma as determined by comprehensive genomic profiling: implications for targeted therapeutics. Oncotarget 2016; 7:23454-67. [PMID: 26981779 PMCID: PMC5029639 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2016] [Accepted: 02/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma is an ultra-rare cutaneous neuroendocrine cancer for which approved treatment options are lacking. To better understand potential actionability, the genomic landscape of Merkel cell cancers was assessed. The molecular aberrations in 17 patients with Merkel cell carcinoma were, on physician request, tested in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) laboratory (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA) using next-generation sequencing (182 or 236 genes) and analyzed by N-of-One, Inc. (Lexington, MA). There were 30 genes harboring aberrations and 60 distinct molecular alterations identified in this patient population. The most common abnormalities involved the TP53 gene (12/17 [71% of patients]) and the cell cycle pathway (CDKN2A/B, CDKN2C or RB1) (12/17 [71%]). Abnormalities also were observed in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway (AKT2, FBXW7, NF1, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTEN or RICTOR) (9/17 [53%]) and DNA repair genes (ATM, BAP1, BRCA1/2, CHEK2, FANCA or MLH1) (5/17 [29%]). Possible cognate targeted therapies, including FDA-approved drugs, could be identified in most of the patients (16/17 [94%]). In summary, Merkel cell carcinomas were characterized by multiple distinct aberrations that were unique in the majority of analyzed cases. Most patients had theoretically actionable alterations. These results provide a framework for investigating tailored combinations of matched therapies in Merkel cell carcinoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip R. Cohen
- Department of Dermatology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kurzrock R, Giles FJ. Precision oncology for patients with advanced cancer: the challenges of malignant snowflakes. Cell Cycle 2016; 14:2219-21. [PMID: 26030337 PMCID: PMC4615125 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1041695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision oncology implies customizing treatment to the unique molecular and biologic characteristics of each individual and their cancer. Its implementation is being facilitated by remarkable technological advances in genomic sequencing, as well as the increasing availability of targeted and immunotherapeutic drugs. Yet, next generation sequencing may be a disruptive technology in that its results suggest that classic paradigms for clinical research and practice are a poor fit with the complex reality encountered in metastatic malignancies. Indeed, it is evident that advanced tumors have heterogeneous molecular landscapes that mostly differ between patients. Traditional modes of clinical research/practice are drug centered, with a strategy of finding commonalities between patients so that they can be grouped together and treated similarly. However, if each patient with metastatic cancer has a unique molecular portfolio, a new patient-centered, N-of-one approach that utilizes individually tailored treatment is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Razelle Kurzrock
- a Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy; Division of Hematology and Oncology; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center ; San Diego , CA USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Targeted next-generation sequencing detects a high frequency of potentially actionable mutations in metastatic breast cancers. Exp Mol Pathol 2016; 100:421-5. [PMID: 27095739 DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2016.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Accepted: 04/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic breast cancer is a genetically heterogeneous disease and effective therapies for advanced stage disease are limited. METHODS In this study, distant metastases of 22 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast cancer samples were sequenced using the Ion Torrent PGM and the 50 gene AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 from 10ng of extracted DNA using 318 chips. Data analysis was performed with the Ion Torrent Variant Caller Plugin (hg19) and Golden Helix's SVS software for annotation and prediction of the significance of the variants. RESULTS All patients were female with a median age of 61years (range 37-85years). Metastatic sites included liver (n=6, 27%), skin (n=5, 23%), brain (n=4, 18%), lymph node (n=3, 14%), lung (n=2, 9%), retroperitoneum (n=1, 4.5%), and colon (n=1, 4.5%). Overall, 28 variants in 11 genes were observed. Five (23%) samples showed no alterations and 17 (77%) showed at least one potentially biologically significant variant (BSV) defined as having FDA-approved drugs or clinical trials evaluating their significance. BSVs included mutations in the following genes: TP53 (n=8), APC (n=4), PIK3CA (n=5), MET (n=2), ERBB2 (n=2), AKT1 (n=1), CDKN2A (n=1), KRAS (n=1), and FGFR3 (n=1). CONCLUSIONS Potentially actionable mutations were identified in the majority of breast cancer metastases. Evaluating metastatic breast tumors using a NGS approach provides a better understanding of the mechanisms behind tumor progression and evolution and also identifies additional potentially beneficial therapeutic targets for patient management or eligibility for clinical trials.
Collapse
|
39
|
Turski ML, Vidwans SJ, Janku F, Garrido-Laguna I, Munoz J, Schwab R, Subbiah V, Rodon J, Kurzrock R. Genomically Driven Tumors and Actionability across Histologies: BRAF-Mutant Cancers as a Paradigm. Mol Cancer Ther 2016; 15:533-47. [PMID: 27009213 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-15-0643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The diagnosis, classification, and management of cancer are traditionally dictated by the site of tumor origin, for example, breast or lung, and by specific histologic subtypes of site-of-origin cancers (e.g., non-small cell versus small cell lung cancer). However, with the advent of sequencing technologies allowing for rapid, low cost, and accurate sequencing of clinical samples, new observations suggest an expanded or different approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cancer-one driven by the unique molecular features of the tumor. We discuss a genomically driven strategy for cancer treatment using BRAF as an example. Several key points are highlighted: (i) molecular aberrations can be shared across cancers; (ii) approximately 15% of all cancers harbor BRAF mutations; and (iii) BRAF inhibitors, while approved only for melanoma, have reported activity across numerous cancers and related disease types bearing BRAF aberrations. However, BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer has shown poor response rate to BRAF inhibitor monotherapy, striking a cautionary note. Yet, even in this case, emerging data suggest BRAF-mutated colorectal cancers can respond well to BRAF inhibitors, albeit when administered in combination with other agents that impact resistance pathways. Taken together, these data suggest that molecular aberrations may be the basis for a new nosology for cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(4); 533-47. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Filip Janku
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics - a Phase I Clinical Trials Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Javier Munoz
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Richard Schwab
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics - a Phase I Clinical Trials Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jordi Rodon
- Vall d'Hebron Institut d'Oncologia and Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Schwaederle M, Daniels GA, Piccioni DE, Kesari S, Fanta PT, Schwab RB, Shimabukuro KA, Parker BA, Kurzrock R. Next generation sequencing demonstrates association between tumor suppressor gene aberrations and poor outcome in patients with cancer. Cell Cycle 2016; 14:1730-7. [PMID: 25928476 PMCID: PMC4614790 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1033596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Next generation sequencing is transforming patient care by allowing physicians to customize and match treatment to their patients’ tumor alterations. Our goal was to study the association between key molecular alterations and outcome parameters. We evaluated the characteristics and outcomes (overall survival (OS), time to metastasis/recurrence, and best progression-free survival (PFS)) of 392 patients for whom next generation sequencing (182 or 236 genes) had been performed. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models were used for our analysis, and results were subjected to internal validation using a resampling method (bootstrap analysis). In a multivariable analysis (Cox regression model), the parameters that were statistically associated with a poorer overall survival were the presence of metastases at diagnosis (P = 0.014), gastrointestinal histology (P < 0.0001), PTEN (P < 0.0001), and CDKN2A alterations (P = 0.0001). The variables associated with a shorter time to metastases/recurrence were gastrointestinal histology (P = 0.004), APC (P = 0.008), PTEN (P = 0.026) and TP53 (P = 0.044) alterations. TP53 (P = 0.003) and PTEN (P = 0.034) alterations were independent predictors of a shorter best PFS. A personalized treatment approach (matching the molecular aberration with a cognate targeted drug) also correlated with a longer best PFS (P = 0.046). Our study demonstrated that, across diverse cancers, anomalies in specific tumor suppressor genes (PTEN, CDKN2A, APC, and/or TP53) were independently associated with a worse outcome, as reflected by time to metastases/recurrence, best PFS on treatment, and/or overall survival. These observations suggest that molecular diagnostic tests may provide important prognostic information in patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Schwaederle
- a Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology; UCSD Moores Cancer Center ; La Jolla , CA , USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kurzrock R, Stewart DJ. Click chemistry, 3D-printing, and omics: the future of drug development. Oncotarget 2016; 7:2155-8. [PMID: 26734837 PMCID: PMC4823025 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.6787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2015] [Accepted: 12/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomics is a disruptive technology, having revealed that cancers are tremendously complex and differ from patient to patient. Therefore, conventional treatment approaches fit poorly with genomic reality. Furthermore, it is likely that this type of complexity will also be observed in other illnesses. Precision medicine has been posited as a way to better target disease-related aberrations, but developing drugs and tailoring therapy to each patient's complicated problem is a major challenge. One solution would be to match patients to existing compounds based on in silico modeling. However, optimization of complex therapy will eventually require designing compounds for patients using computer modeling and just-in-time production, perhaps achievable in the future by three-dimensional (3D) printing. Indeed, 3D printing is potentially transformative by virtue of its ability to rapidly generate almost limitless numbers of objects that previously required manufacturing facilities. Companies are already endeavoring to develop affordable 3D printers for home use. An attractive, but as yet scantily explored, application is to place chemical design and production under digital control. This could be accomplished by utilizing a 3D printer to initiate chemical reactions, and print the reagents and/or the final compounds directly. Of interest, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved a 3D printed drug-levetiracetam-indicated for seizures. Further, it is now increasingly clear that biologic materials-tissues, and eventually organs-can also be "printed." In the near future, it is plausible that high-throughput computing may be deployed to design customized drugs, which will reshape medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - David J. Stewart
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Patel SP, Schwaederle M, Daniels GA, Fanta PT, Schwab RB, Shimabukuro KA, Kesari S, Piccioni DE, Bazhenova LA, Helsten TL, Lippman SM, Parker BA, Kurzrock R. Molecular inimitability amongst tumors: implications for precision cancer medicine in the age of personalized oncology. Oncotarget 2015; 6:32602-9. [PMID: 26418953 PMCID: PMC4741715 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2015] [Accepted: 09/04/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor sequencing has revolutionized oncology, allowing for detailed interrogation of the molecular underpinnings of cancer at an individual level. With this additional insight, it is increasingly apparent that not only do tumors vary within a sample (tumor heterogeneity), but also that each patient's individual tumor is a constellation of unique molecular aberrations that will require an equally unique personalized therapeutic regimen. We report here the results of 439 patients who underwent Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA)-certified next generation sequencing (NGS) across histologies. Among these patients, 98.4% had a unique molecular profile, and aside from three primary brain tumor patients with a single genetic lesion (IDH1 R132H), no two patients within a given histology were molecularly identical. Additionally, two sets of patients had identical profiles consisting of two mutations in common and no other anomalies. However, these profiles did not segregate by histology (lung adenocarcinoma-appendiceal cancer (KRAS G12D and GNAS R201C), and lung adenocarcinoma-liposarcoma (CDK4 and MDM2 amplification pairs)). These findings suggest that most advanced tumors are molecular singletons within and between histologies, and that tumors that differ in histology may still nonetheless exhibit identical molecular portraits, albeit rarely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandip P. Patel
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Maria Schwaederle
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Gregory A. Daniels
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Paul T. Fanta
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Richard B. Schwab
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Kelly A. Shimabukuro
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Santosh Kesari
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - David E. Piccioni
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Lyudmila A. Bazhenova
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Teresa L. Helsten
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Scott M. Lippman
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Barbara A. Parker
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lips EH, Michaut M, Hoogstraat M, Mulder L, Besselink NJM, Koudijs MJ, Cuppen E, Voest EE, Bernards R, Nederlof PM, Wesseling J, Rodenhuis S, Wessels LFA. Next generation sequencing of triple negative breast cancer to find predictors for chemotherapy response. Breast Cancer Res 2015; 17:134. [PMID: 26433948 PMCID: PMC4592753 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-015-0642-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2014] [Accepted: 09/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction In triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) the initial response to chemotherapy is often favorable, but relapse and chemotherapy resistance frequently occur in advanced disease. Hence there is an urgent need for targeted treatments in this breast cancer subtype. In the current study we deep sequenced DNA of tumors prior to chemotherapy to search for predictors of response or resistance. Methods Next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for 1,977 genes involved in tumorigenesis. DNA from 56 pre-treatment TNBC-biopsies was sequenced, as well as matched normal DNA. Following their tumor biopsy, patients started neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. We studied associations between genetic alterations and three clinical variables: chemotherapy response, relapse-free survival and BRCA proficiency. Results The mutations observed were diverse and few recurrent mutations were detected. Most mutations were in TP53, TTN, and PIK3CA (55 %, 14 %, and 9 %, respectively). The mutation rates were similar between responders and non-responders (average mutation rate 9 vs 8 mutations). No recurrent mutations were associated with chemotherapy response or relapse. Interestingly, PIK3CA mutations were exclusively observed in patients proficient for BRCA1. Samples with a relapse had a higher copy number alteration rate, and amplifications of TTK and TP53BP2 were associated with a poor chemotherapy response. Conclusions In this homogenous cohort of TNBCs few recurrent mutations were found. However, PIK3CA mutations were associated with BRCA proficiency, which can have clinical consequences in the near future. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0642-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther H Lips
- Department of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Magali Michaut
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marlous Hoogstraat
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Lennart Mulder
- Department of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Nicolle J M Besselink
- Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Marco J Koudijs
- Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Edwin Cuppen
- Department of Medical Genetics, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Emile E Voest
- Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Rene Bernards
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Petra M Nederlof
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Department of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sjoerd Rodenhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
González-Alonso P, Chamizo C, Moreno V, Madoz-Gúrpide J, Carvajal N, Daoud L, Zazo S, Martín-Aparicio E, Cristóbal I, Rincón R, García-Foncillas J, Rojo F. Pyrosequencing-Based Assays for Rapid Detection of HER2 and HER3 Mutations in Clinical Samples Uncover an E332E Mutation Affecting HER3 in Retroperitoneal Leiomyosarcoma. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16:19447-57. [PMID: 26287187 PMCID: PMC4581306 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160819447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2015] [Revised: 08/05/2015] [Accepted: 08/10/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Mutations in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors (HER) are associated with poor prognosis of several types of solid tumors. Although HER-mutation detection methods are currently available, such as Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), alternative pyrosequencing allow the rapid characterization of specific mutations. We developed specific PCR-based pyrosequencing assays for identification of most prevalent HER2 and HER3 mutations, including S310F/Y, R678Q, L755M/P/S/W, V777A/L/M, 774-776 insertion, and V842I mutations in HER2, as well as M91I, V104M/L, D297N/V/Y, and E332E/K mutations in HER3. We tested 85 Formalin Fixed and Paraffin Embbeded (FFPE) samples and we detected three HER2-V842I mutations in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), ovarian carcinoma, and pancreatic carcinoma patients, respectively, and a HER2-L755M mutation in a CRC specimen. We also determined the presence of a HER3-E332K mutation in an urothelial carcinoma sample, and two HER3-D297Y mutations, in both gastric adenocarcinoma and CRC specimens. The D297Y mutation was previously detected in breast and gastric tumors, but not in CRC. Moreover, we found a not-previously-described HER3-E332E synonymous mutation in a retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma patient. The pyrosequencing assays presented here allow the detection and characterization of specific HER2 and HER3 mutations. These pyrosequencing assays might be implemented in routine diagnosis for molecular characterization of HER2/HER3 receptors as an alternative to complex NGS approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula González-Alonso
- Group of Cancer Biomarkers, Pathology Department, Health Research Institute Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD, UAM), Avda. Reyes Católicos.
| | - Cristina Chamizo
- Group of Cancer Biomarkers, Pathology Department, Health Research Institute Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD, UAM), Avda. Reyes Católicos.
| | | | - Juan Madoz-Gúrpide
- Group of Cancer Biomarkers, Pathology Department, Health Research Institute Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD, UAM), Avda. Reyes Católicos.
| | - Nerea Carvajal
- Group of Cancer Biomarkers, Pathology Department, Health Research Institute Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD, UAM), Avda. Reyes Católicos.
| | - Lina Daoud
- Group of Cancer Biomarkers, Pathology Department, Health Research Institute Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD, UAM), Avda. Reyes Católicos.
| | - Sandra Zazo
- Group of Cancer Biomarkers, Pathology Department, Health Research Institute Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD, UAM), Avda. Reyes Católicos.
| | - Ester Martín-Aparicio
- Group of Cancer Biomarkers, Pathology Department, Health Research Institute Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD, UAM), Avda. Reyes Católicos.
| | | | - Raúl Rincón
- Group of Cancer Biomarkers, Pathology Department, Health Research Institute Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD, UAM), Avda. Reyes Católicos.
| | | | - Federico Rojo
- Group of Cancer Biomarkers, Pathology Department, Health Research Institute Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD, UAM), Avda. Reyes Católicos.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Parker BA, Schwaederlé M, Scur MD, Boles SG, Helsten T, Subramanian R, Schwab RB, Kurzrock R. Breast Cancer Experience of the Molecular Tumor Board at the University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center. J Oncol Pract 2015; 11:442-9. [PMID: 26243651 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2015.004127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Multiplex genomic tests are enabling oncologists to interrogate the DNA of their patients. However, few oncologists are proficient with respect to the implications of complex molecular diagnostics. We initiated a Molecular Tumor Board that focused on individual patients with advanced cancer whose tumors underwent genomic profiling, and here report our experience with breast cancer. METHODS A multidisciplinary team that included physicians, scientists, geneticists, and bioinformatics/pathway specialists attended. All molecular tests were performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments environment (next-generation sequencing, 182 or 236 genes). RESULTS Forty of 43 patients (93%; mean age, 59 years) had at least one theoretically actionable aberration (mean, 4.79 anomalies/patient). Median time from ordering to report was 27 days (median of approximately 11 days for specimen acquisition and approximately 14 days for diagnostic processing). Even if we considered distinct abnormalities in a gene as the same, there were only two patients with an identical molecular profile. Seventy-three genes (206 abnormalities; 119 distinct) were aberrant. Seventeen of the 43 patients (40%; median, seven previous therapies in the metastatic setting) were treated in a manner consistent with Molecular Tumor Board discussions; seven (16% of 43, or 41% of 17) achieved stable disease for 6 or more months (n = 2) or partial remission (n = 5). Lack of access to targeted medication was the most common reason that patients could not be treated. CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary molecular tumor boards may help to optimize the management of patients with advanced, heavily pretreated breast cancer who have undergone genomic testing. Facilitating availability of appropriately targeted drugs and clinical trials is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara A Parker
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Maria Schwaederlé
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Michael D Scur
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Sarah G Boles
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Teresa Helsten
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rupa Subramanian
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Richard B Schwab
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Schott AF, Welch JJ, Verschraegen CF, Kurzrock R. The National Clinical Trials Network: Conducting Successful Clinical Trials of New Therapies for Rare Cancers. Semin Oncol 2015; 42:731-9. [PMID: 26433554 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2015.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Rare cancers account for 27% of neoplasms diagnosed each year, and 25% of cancer-related deaths in the United States. However, rare cancers show some of the highest response rates to targeted therapies, probably due to identification of oncogenic drivers with little interpatient variability. Although the low incidence of rare cancers makes large-scale randomized trials involving single histologies difficult to perform, drugs have been successfully developed in rare cancers using clinical trial designs that combine microscopic histologies. Such trials are being pursued within the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN), which possesses unique qualifications to perform widespread molecular screening of tumors for patient enrollment onto therapeutic clinical trials. When larger clinical trials are needed to determine optimum treatment strategies in rare cancers, the NCTN's broad reach in North America and internationally, and their ability to partner with both United States-based and international research organizations, can make these challenging studies feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne F Schott
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - John J Welch
- National Cancer Institute Center for Global Health , Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Personalized Therapy and Clinical Trials Office UC San Diego-Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Predictive Biomarker Profiling of > 6000 Breast Cancer Patients Shows Heterogeneity in TNBC, With Treatment Implications. Clin Breast Cancer 2015; 15:473-481.e3. [PMID: 26051240 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2014] [Revised: 04/13/2015] [Accepted: 04/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease without established targeted treatment options for patients with metastatic disease. This study was undertaken to evaluate potentially actionable biomarkers in a large cohort of TNBC and compare them with non-TNBCs. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated 6341 (2111 TNBC and 4230 non-TNBC) breast cancer samples at a central laboratory for biomarkers of potential drug response across multiple platforms, including gene sequencing, protein expression, and gene copy number. RESULTS TNBC expresses androgen receptor (AR) in a significantly (P < .05) lower percentage of cases (17%) than hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast carcinomas (59% and 79%, respectively), and gene comutations were differentially associated with AR-positive versus AR-negative cases. Higher AR expression levels in TNBC predicted for lower Ki-67 levels. Seventy percent of TNBC harbored a phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA), v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 (AKT1), or phosophatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) aberration. TNBC patients had a significantly lower PIK3CA mutation rate (13%) than all other subtypes (P < .05) and a higher tumor protein p53 (TP53) mutation rate (64%) than the estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cases (approximately 30%; P < .05). Topoisomerase 2 (TOP2A) amplification was observed in 1.3% of TNBC and in 1.6% of HER2-negative, HR-positive cancers; in contrast, HER2-positive, HR-negative or HR-positive cancers exhibited TOP2A amplification in 19% and 40% of cases, respectively (P <.05). CONCLUSION Multi-platform molecular profiling identifies subgroups of TNBC with different biomarker profiles, suggesting numerous potentially targetable alterations in TNBC. TNBC is further characterized by different gene mutations and proliferative activity relative to AR expression, highlighting a need for comprehensive pathologic examination with potential to develop different, individualized treatment options.
Collapse
|
48
|
Rodon J, Soria JC, Berger R, Batist G, Tsimberidou A, Bresson C, Lee JJ, Rubin E, Onn A, Schilsky RL, Miller WH, Eggermont AM, Mendelsohn J, Lazar V, Kurzrock R. Challenges in initiating and conducting personalized cancer therapy trials: perspectives from WINTHER, a Worldwide Innovative Network (WIN) Consortium trial. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:1791-8. [PMID: 25908602 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2015] [Accepted: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in 'omics' technology and targeted therapeutic molecules are together driving the incorporation of molecular-based diagnostics into the care of patients with cancer. There is an urgent need to assess the efficacy of therapy determined by molecular matching of patients with particular targeted therapies. WINTHER is a clinical trial that uses cutting edge genomic and transcriptomic assays to guide treatment decisions. Through the lens of this ambitious multinational trial (five countries, six sites) coordinated by the Worldwide Innovative Networking Consortium for personalized cancer therapy, we discovered key challenges in initiation and conduct of a prospective, omically driven study. To date, the time from study concept to activation has varied between 19 months at Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus in France to 30 months at the Segal Cancer Center, McGill University (Canada). It took 3+ years to be able to activate US sites due to national regulatory hurdles. Access to medications proposed by the molecular analysis remains a major challenge, since their availability through active clinical trials is highly variable over time within sites and across the network. Rules regarding the off-label use of drugs, or drugs not yet approved at all in some countries, pose a further challenge, and many biopharmaceutical companies lack a simple internal mechanism to supply the drugs even if they wish to do so. These various obstacles should be addressed to test and then implement precision medicine in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Rodon
- Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J C Soria
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France
| | - R Berger
- Oncology Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - G Batist
- Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital Mcgill University, Montreal Quebec Consortium de Recherche en Oncologie Clinique, Quebec, Canada
| | - A Tsimberidou
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | - J J Lee
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - E Rubin
- The National Institute of Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - A Onn
- Oncology Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - R L Schilsky
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Alexandria
| | - W H Miller
- Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital Mcgill University, Montreal Quebec Consortium de Recherche en Oncologie Clinique, Quebec, Canada
| | - A M Eggermont
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France
| | - J Mendelsohn
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - V Lazar
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France
| | - R Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, UC San Diego-Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Schwaederle M, Daniels GA, Piccioni DE, Fanta PT, Schwab RB, Shimabukuro KA, Parker BA, Kurzrock R. On the Road to Precision Cancer Medicine: Analysis of Genomic Biomarker Actionability in 439 Patients. Mol Cancer Ther 2015; 14:1488-94. [PMID: 25852059 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-14-1061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2014] [Accepted: 03/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Despite the increased use of molecular diagnostics, the extent to which patients who have these tests harbor potentially actionable aberrations is unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 439 patients with diverse cancers, for whom next-generation sequencing (mostly 236-gene panel) had been performed. Data pertaining to the molecular alterations identified, as well as associated treatment suggestions (on- or off-label, or experimental), were extracted from molecular diagnostic reports. Most patients (420/439; 96%) had at least one molecular alteration: 1,813 alterations (in 207 distinct genes) were identified [the majority being mutations (62%) or amplifications (29%)]. The three most common gene abnormalities were TP53 (44%), KRAS (16%), and PIK3CA (12%). The median number of alterations per patient was 3 (range, 0-16). Nineteen patients (4%) had no alterations; 48 patients (11%) had only one alteration; and 372 patients had two or more abnormalities (85%). The median number of potentially actionable anomalies per patient was 2 (range, 0-8). Most patients (393/439; 90%) had at least one potentially actionable alteration, and in all these cases the aberration could at least be targeted by an experimental drug in a clinical trial. A total of 307 patients (70%) had an alteration that was actionable with an approved drug, but in only 89 patients (20%) was the drug approved for their disease (on-label). Next-generation sequencing identified theoretically actionable aberrations in 90% of our patients. Many of the drugs are, however, experimental or would require off-label use. Strategies to address drug access for patients harboring potentially actionable mutations are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Schwaederle
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California.
| | - Gregory A Daniels
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - David E Piccioni
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Paul T Fanta
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Richard B Schwab
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Kelly A Shimabukuro
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Barbara A Parker
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wheler J, Lee JJ, Kurzrock R. Unique molecular landscapes in cancer: implications for individualized, curated drug combinations. Cancer Res 2014; 74:7181-4. [PMID: 25326492 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
With increasingly sophisticated technologies in molecular biology and "omic" platforms to analyze patients' tumors, more molecular diversity and complexity in cancer are being observed. Recently, we noted unique genomic profiles in a group of patients with metastatic breast cancer based on an analysis with next-generation sequencing. Among 57 consecutive patients, no two had the same molecular portfolio. Applied genomics therefore appears to represent a disruptive innovation in that it unveils a heterogeneity to metastatic cancer that may be ill-suited to canonical clinical trials and practice paradigms. Upon recognizing that patients have unique tumor landscapes, it is possible that there may be a "mismatch" between our traditional clinical trials system that selects patients based on common characteristics to evaluate a drug (drug-centric approach) and optimal treatment based on curated, individualized drug combinations for each patient (patient-centric approach).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Wheler
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - J Jack Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|