Frequency and prognostic significance of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic literature review

Poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibition in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2-mutant tumors: Bridging science with the clinic

In this issue of Cancer, Cecchini et al. report findings from a phase 2, open‐label trial of olaparib in 30 patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations. Although the trial did not meet its primary end point, a subset of patients experienced prolonged clinical benefit, which highlights the potential for alternative therapeutic strategies involving poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibitors in future clinical trials.

Real-world outcomes of fluorouracil-based second-line therapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer refractory to gemcitabine and cisplatin-based treatment

Background

The prognosis for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) who have not responded to gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP)-based therapy is dismal. Fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy could be considered for those patients who are refractory to GP-based treatments. Our study aimed to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of 5-FU-based chemotherapy for BTC patients who had progressed after gemcitabine-based treatment.

Methods

This study analyzed patients from Seoul St. Mary's Hospital and St. Vincent's Hospital with advanced BTC who had previously failed treatment with GP-based chemotherapy. From June 2020 and May 2024, these patients received 5-FU-based chemotherapy as a second-line treatment. The 5-FU-based systemic treatments encompassed 5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX); 5-FU, leucovorin, and liposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI/FL); and 5-FU, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX). Our investigation focused on evaluating the survival outcomes and safety profiles of each regimen within this cohort.

Results

In our analysis of 147 patients, the primary tumor sites were distributed with 56 (38.1%) having intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 51 (34.7%) with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 40 (27.2%) with gallbladder cancer. Regarding the 5-FU-based regimens, 57 patients (38.8%) were treated with FOLFOX, 56 (38.1%) with Nal-IRI/FL, and 34 (23.1%) with FOLFIRINOX. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.0-2.6) and 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.8-5.8), respectively. Poor performance status and higher histologic grade were associated with worse PFS and OS, while female gender and prior surgery were linked to improved OS. FOLFOX and Nal-IRI/FL demonstrated comparable efficacy, with a median OS of 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.5-7.3) for FOLFOX and 4.7 months (95% CI, 2.6-6.9) for Nal-IRI/FL, and no significant differences were observed across subgroups. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia and biliary events were less frequent with FOLFOX, which also showed a lower incidence of adverse events and higher relative dose intensity than Nal-IRI/FL or FOLFIRINOX.

Conclusion

In patients with advanced BTC who failed GP treatment, the FOLFOX regimen demonstrated comparable efficacy, and a more favorable safety profile compared to other 5-FU-based treatments. Given its favorable toxicity profile in a real-world setting, FOLFOX should be considered a standard second-line treatment option.

Conversion treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Opportunities and challenges

The prevalence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is increasing globally. Despite advancements in comprehending this intricate malignancy and formulating novel therapeutic approaches over the past few decades, the prognosis for ICC remains poor. Owing to the high degree of malignancy and insidious onset of ICC, numerous cases are detected at intermediate or advanced stages of the disease, hence eliminating the chance for surgical intervention. Moreover, because of the highly invasive characteristics of ICC, recurrence and metastasis postresection are prevalent, leading to a 5-year survival rate of only 20%-35% following surgery. In the past decade, different methods of treatment have been investigated, including transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and combination therapies. For certain patients with advanced ICC, conversion treatment may be utilized to facilitate surgical resection and manage disease progression. This review summarizes the definition of downstaging conversion treatment and presents the clinical experience and evidence concerning conversion treatment for advanced ICC.

Systemic therapy for pretreated advanced biliary tract cancer: past developments and recent advances

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains among the most challenging malignancies with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options, particularly in pretreated patients. As most patients experience disease progression after first-line treatment, effective second-line and subsequent treatments are required. Although the addition of modified FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) to active symptom control improved the overall survival of patients with progressing advanced BTC despite gemcitabine plus cisplatin treatment, its efficacy was modest. Moreover, most clinical trials demonstrated modest efficacy of molecular-targeted agents for molecularly unselected pretreated advanced BTC. Patients with advanced BTC carry a relatively high druggable genetic alteration rate and have shown promising responses to molecular-matched therapies targeting gene alterations such as FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements, IDH1 mutation, and HER2 overexpression/amplification. Additionally, tumor-agnostic approaches, including BRAF V600E, NTRK fusion, and RET fusion, have expanded the treatment options for some patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown limited efficacy as mono- or combination therapy in patients with pretreated advanced BTC. Therefore, developmental efforts have shifted to immune checkpoint inhibitor and other combinations such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors or radiation. In addition to refining combination strategies to enhance the therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint inhibitor, future research should focus on elucidating the tumor microenvironment. This review delineates the evolution of systemic therapies in patients with pretreated advanced BTC. By examining past developments and recent advances through prospective trials, it highlights novel approaches that may improve outcomes in this challenging disease.

Role of genomics in liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge of cholangiocarcinoma molecular biology and to suggest a framework for implementation of next-generation sequencing in all stages of liver transplantation. This is timely as recent guidelines recommend increased use of these technologies with promising results.

RECENT FINDINGS

The main themes covered here address germline and somatic genetic alterations recently discovered in cholangiocarcinoma, particularly those associated with prognosis and treatment responses, and nascent efforts to translate these into contemporary practice in the peri-liver transplantation period.

SUMMARY

Early efforts to translate molecular profiling to cholangiocarcinoma care demonstrate a growing number of potentially actionable alterations. Still lacking is a consensus on what biomarkers and technologies to adopt, at what scale and cost, and how to integrate them most effectively into care with the ambition of increasing the number of patients eligible for liver transplantation and improving their long-term outcomes.

Current status and prospects of targeted therapy for cholangiocarcinoma based on molecular characteristics

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a serious public health issue due to its insidious onset and dismal prognosis. The past few years have witnessed and highlighted the development of understanding and management of CCA. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy regimen with immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors has been considered the new standard first-line treatment alternative for advanced CCA. Notably, the proportion of patients with advanced CCA with targetable genetic mutations is approximately 40 %, and these patients may be considered for molecularly targeted therapy in the second-line treatment. In this review, we highlight the advances and progress in targeted therapies for advanced CCA, with special attention to data from Asian populations, including Chinese. In addition, we present in detail the phosphatase tension homolog (PTEN), a novel biomarker for both of first-line chemotherapy and second-line targeted therapy in advanced CCA, and its ability to forecast prognosis in patients with CCA. The mechanisms of rapid resistance to targeted agents warrant further investigation and address in light of the development of new targeted therapies. Precision medicine is gradually playing an increasing role in achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes.

Spectrum of Findings Seen in Patients With IDH1/2-Mutant Cholangiocarcinoma

BackgroundCholangiocarcinoma-with a growing incidence rate and poor prognosis-is not an uncommon cancer. Molecular profiling can reveal actionable aberrations in at least a third of the tumors. This is especially so in the case of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), where mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 genes (IDH1/2) make up 15%-20% of these tumors. IDH1/2 mutant ICC is a rare disease that has not been adequately reported. To expand the spectrum of findings seen in these patients, we present a single institution case series.Methods and resultsWe descriptively characterize the clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings of 12 such patients. IDH1/2 mutant ICC was found in elderly women, with two-thirds of patients having additional co-mutations. Anecdotally, patients who did receive systemic and/or locoregional therapies had long-term durable outcomes.ConclusionOur findings indicate an increasing need to personalize an approach for these patients with specific molecular alterations. With the advent of the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib and other inhibitors in this space, IDH1/2 mutation have both prognostic and predictive value. Our series builds upon the patterns and findings seen in these patients.

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 gene mutations: a case review unveiling its biological impact on disease progression, prognosis and treatment in Chilean patients

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 gene (IDH1, [NADP (+)] 1) encodes for an enzyme that catalyses the oxidative decarboxylation of isocitrate into α-ketoglutarate. However, it is well known that mutant IDH1 (mu/IDH1) promotes the accumulation of D2-hydroxyglutarate, an oncometabolite that stimulates tumourigenesis through various secondary, complex metabolic effects. IDH1 and also IDH2 gene mutations have been identified in several types of cancers, such as gliomas, conventional central and periosteal malignant cartilaginous tumours, cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukaemia, and cholangiocarcinoma. Here, we present 4 cases of Chilean patients with different primary malignant tumours harbouring IDH1. One patient carried the IDH1 p. R132H mutation, the other has IDH1 p. R132L mutation, and the last 2, IDH1 p. R132C mutation. Of note, all these patients had a very poor response to chemotherapy and a rapid disease progression, resulting in a relatively swift death. Next-Generation Sequencing results highlighting mutations in those genes, and other cancer genes were further subjected to in silico study of protein-protein interactions, gene ontology, and pathway enrichment. We also include a state-of-the-art literature review about IDH1 and IDH2 molecular biology, biochemical properties, and the role of their mutations in cancer development and progression, along with insights into regional variations in cancer biology and treatment response.

Epidemiology and genomic features of biliary tract cancer and its unique features in Korea

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare but highly aggressive malignancy that includes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer (GBC). While BTC has a low global incidence, its regional variations are notable. Among nations, Korea has the second-highest incidence of BTC globally, with the highest mortality rate worldwide, underscoring the need for a deeper understanding of this cancer. Liver fluke infection and hepatitis B virus infection are key risk factors unique to Korea, contributing to regional differences in BTC incidence. Additionally, genomic alterations in Korean patients with BTC differ from those in other populations, including lower frequencies of IDH1 mutations and FGFR2 fusions in ICC and a higher prevalence of ERBB2 amplification in GBC. Recognizing the clinical significance of these alterations, ivosidenib and pemigatinib have been approved in Korea for BTC patients with IDH1 mutations and FGFR2 fusions, respectively. This review explores the epidemiology, risk factors, and molecular features of BTC, along with corresponding targeted therapies. Furthermore, we compare the unique characteristics of BTC in Korea with global data to inform future research and clinical practice.

Evaluation of an IDH1/2 Mutation FastTrack Assay for Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma, a malignancy originating from the bile ducts, poses significant treatment challenges due to its typically late diagnosis and limited therapeutic options. However, recent advances in molecular genetics enable more personalized treatment approaches. A notable breakthrough in this context is the identification of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations, particularly IDH1 and IDH2, which occur in a subset of cholangiocarcinoma patients. Those with IDH1/2 mutations may benefit from targeted therapies. For instance, Ivosidenib, an IDH1 inhibitor, has shown efficacy in clinical trials, offering a new therapeutic option for patients with IDH1-mutant cholangiocarcinoma. Developing and implementing standardized protocols for testing and reporting mutation status are crucial for consistency and accuracy in clinical practice. Both the Idylla™ IDH1-2 Mutation Assay Kit as a FastTrack method and Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels play critical roles in molecular characterization of cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Under this aspect, a set of cholangiocarcinomas was tested using the Idylla™ platform regarding the respective recommended guidelines and standards of DIN EN ISO:17020 and DIN EN ISO:15198.

RESULTS

Overall, 25 clinically diagnosed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas or Adeno-CUPs were analyzed. IDH1/2 mutations were identified in 68% (17/25) of cases using both methods, with high concordance between NGS and Idylla™ results. Discrepancies were observed in two samples, where Idylla™ detected no mutations, but NGS reported IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IdyllaTM offers a rapid, user-friendly, and specific method for detecting IDH1/2 mutations, ideal for immediate clinical needs. NGS, while more time-consuming and costly, provides comprehensive genetic profiles valuable for personalized medicine and research. The choice between these methods should be guided by the clinical context, resource availability, and individual patient needs. For routine diagnostics, we recommend an algorithmic approach starting with the FastTrack method followed by NGS for wildtype cases.

Olaparib in treatment-refractory isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1)- and IDH2-mutant cholangiocarcinoma: Safety and antitumor activity from the phase 2 National Cancer Institute 10129 trial

BACKGROUND

Neomorphic isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations lead to the accumulation of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), an oncometabolite implicated in tumor progression via inhibitory effects on alpha-ketoglutarate. Moreover, mutant IDH-dependent accumulation of 2-HG results in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), which preclinically renders tumors sensitive to poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Here, the results of the cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) arm of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) 10129 olaparib in IDH-mutant solid tumors basket trial are reported.

METHODS

Olaparib 300 mg twice daily was evaluated in an open-label, phase 2 clinical trial for treatment-refractory IDH-mutant solid tumors. Patients in the IDH-mutant CCA arm enrolled in two cohorts: (1) IDH inhibitor (IDHi) pretreated and (2) IDHi untreated, with a primary end point of overall response rate.

RESULTS

NCI 10129 enrolled 30 patients with IDH-mutant CCA with no objective responses seen, and recruitment was closed early. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.4 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 6.5 months) and median overall survival was 12.9 months (95% CI, 6.3 months to not reached). Eight patients (27%) had clinical benefit (CB), with a PFS of ≥6 months. Patients with CB had lower baseline 2-HG levels compared to those without CB (1.4 vs. 5.9 µmol/L; p = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Olaparib does not have sufficient single-agent activity to warrant further development in IDH-mutant CCA. However, a subgroup of patients demonstrated CB, and exploratory analysis revealed this subgroup to be enriched for lower baseline 2-HG levels. Future clinical trials leveraging the HRD properties of IDH mutations are warranted with enhanced patient selection and novel combination therapies.

Molecular subtypes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) presents in two clinically distinct subtypes: large duct (LD-iCCA) and small duct (SD-iCCA). These subtypes exhibit significant molecular, genetic, and histopathological differences that impact patient prognosis and treatment responsiveness. This review advocates for a subtype-specific approach to iCCA research and clinical management, including tailored therapeutic strategies that consider distinct genetic profiles and tumor microenvironments. Current therapeutic approaches hold promise, yet efficacy varies by subtype. Additionally, subtype-specific molecular diagnostics, including DNA methylation-based classifiers and transcriptomic sequencing, have shown potential in refining iCCA subclassification, thereby guiding precision medicine efforts. This article outlines existing clinical trials, key research trajectories, and future directions for developing more effective subtype-adapted therapies for iCCA.

Recent progress in emerging molecular targeted therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a diverse group of epithelial malignant tumors arising from the biliary tract, characterized by high molecular heterogeneity. It is classified into intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic CCA (eCCA) based on the location of the primary tumor. CCA accounts for approximately 15% of all primary liver cancers, with iCCA comprising 10-20% of all CCAs. iCCA is especially known for its characteristic aggressiveness and refractoriness, leading to poor prognosis. Despite the increasing global incidence and mortality rates, surgery remains the only available standard treatment approach for a subset (25%) of patients with early-stage, resectable iCCA. The paucity of effective systemic medical therapies restricts therapeutic options for patients with advanced or metastatic iCCA. In the past decade, advances in the understanding of the molecular complexity of these tumors have provided fruitful insights for the identification of promising new druggable targets and the development of feasible therapeutic strategies that may improve treatment outcomes for patients with iCCA. In this review, we aim to highlight critical up-to-date studies and medicinal chemistry aspects, focusing on novel targeted approaches utilizing promising candidates for molecular targeted therapy in iCCA. These candidates include aberrations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF), neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Furthermore, this review provides an overview of potential inhibitors aimed at overcoming acquired drug resistance in these actionable targets for iCCA.

IDH Mutant Cholangiocarcinoma: Pathogenesis, Management, and Future Therapies

Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genes are among the most frequently encountered molecular alterations in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). These neomorphic point mutations endow mutant IDH (mIDH) with the ability to generate an R-enantiomer of 2-hydroxyglutarate (R2HG), a metabolite that drives malignant transformation through aberrant epigenetic signaling. As a result, pharmacologic inhibition of mIDH has become an attractive therapeutic strategy in CCAs harboring this mutation. One such inhibitor, ivosidenib, has already undergone clinical validation and received FDA approval in this disease, but there is still much work to be done to improve outcomes in mIDH CCA patients. In this publication we will review the pathogenesis and treatment of mIDH CCA with special emphasis on novel agents and combinations currently under investigation.

Digestive cancers: mechanisms, therapeutics and management

Cancers of the digestive system are major contributors to global cancer-associated morbidity and mortality, accounting for 35% of annual cases of cancer deaths. The etiologies, molecular features, and therapeutic management of these cancer entities are highly heterogeneous and complex. Over the last decade, genomic and functional studies have provided unprecedented insights into the biology of digestive cancers, identifying genetic drivers of tumor progression and key interaction points of tumor cells with the immune system. This knowledge is continuously translated into novel treatment concepts and targets, which are dynamically reshaping the therapeutic landscape of these tumors. In this review, we provide a concise overview of the etiology and molecular pathology of the six most common cancers of the digestive system, including esophageal, gastric, biliary tract, pancreatic, hepatocellular, and colorectal cancers. We comprehensively describe the current stage-dependent pharmacological management of these malignancies, including chemo-, targeted, and immunotherapy. For each cancer entity, we provide an overview of recent therapeutic advancements and research progress. Finally, we describe how novel insights into tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion deepen our understanding of therapy resistance and provide an outlook on innovative therapeutic strategies that will shape the future management of digestive cancers, including CAR-T cell therapy, novel antibody-drug conjugates and targeted therapies.

New Relevant Evidence in Cholangiocarcinoma Biology and Characterization

Among solid tumors, cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) emerges as one of the most difficult to eradicate. The silent and asymptomatic nature of this tumor, particularly in its early stages, as well as the high heterogeneity at genomic, epigenetic, and molecular levels delay the diagnosis, significantly compromising the efficacy of current therapeutic options and thus contributing to a dismal prognosis. Extensive research has been conducted on the molecular pathobiology of CCA, and recent advances have been made in the classification and characterization of new molecular targets. Both targeted therapy and immunotherapy have emerged as effective and safe strategies for various types of cancers, demonstrating potential benefits in advanced CCA. Furthermore, the deeper comprehension of the cellular and molecular components in the tumor microenvironment (TME) has opened up possibilities for new innovative treatment methods. This review discusses recent evidence in the characterization and molecular biology of CCA, highlighting novel possible druggable targets.

Standardized Response Assessment in Patients with Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma Treated with Personalized Therapy

Background/Objectives: Current guidelines recommend Cisplatin/Gemcitabine/Durvalumab as first-line treatment for inoperable or recurrent cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Molecular tumor boards (MTB) have the expertise to support organ-specific tumor boards with evidence-based treatment recommendations for subsequent lines of treatment, based on genomic tumor data and scientific evidence. This study evaluates the adoption of an MTB at a comprehensive cancer center in Germany and whether actionable genetic alterations are associated with specific imaging phenotypes. Methods: Patients with CCA referred to MTB were enrolled from May 2019 to September 2021. For comparison, a cohort of patients from a second center was included. Data on treatment recommendations, regimens, and survival were collected from prospective registries. Baseline and follow-up contrast-enhanced CT were analyzed according to RECIST 1.1. The chi-square test and t-test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables. Results: 583 patients were referred to the MTB, and 92 patients (47 female/51%) with a mean age of 60.3 ± 11.2 were referred for CCA treatment. 65/92 patients harbored 1-3 targetable mutations. Liver metastases were more frequently observed in patients with targetable mutations (84% vs. 62%). Metastasis to the liver and lung was associated with increased sums of diameters (93 mm and 111 mm vs. 40/73 mm in patients with no liver/lung metastasis). The number of metastases in individual organs was unrelated to treatment targets. Follow-up was available for 25 patients with a median time until imaging progression of 23 weeks. Progression occurred as target progression in 63%, nontarget progression in 13%, and appearance of new lesions in 63%. Conclusions: Most patients with CCA harbored targetable mutations, some were related to disease patterns on imaging. The pattern of treatment response and progression was as diverse as the metastatic spread.

Optimizing outcomes and personalizing care with targeted agents in advanced cholangiocarcinoma

Traditional chemotherapy and immunotherapy-based systemic treatments for locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma have been associated with poor clinical outcomes driven partly by molecular heterogeneity promoting early treatment resistance and a higher toxicity profile associated with these regimens. Few patients are eligible for upfront surgical resection and clinical studies have been traditionally difficult to conduct due to the orphan nature of this disease. However, increasing use of genomic profiling in clinical practice have led to active investigations of aberrant albeit promising mechanistic therapeutic targets such as IDH-1, FGFRs, BRAFV600E, HER-2 and NTRK. This review article aims to highlight the complex genomic landscape of this difficult-to-treat disease, followed by a discussion of evidence-based biological mechanisms that can be actioned using targeted agents. We explore the clinical rationale behind a targeted therapeutic strategy, the role of liquid biopsies in guiding clinical decisions and future treatment pathways for cholangiocarcinoma management. We also discuss the challenges and opportunities originating from recent clinical trials evaluating targeted treatments and our own institutional experience at UCLH that have aimed to address some of these biological complexities and have translated into improved patient outcomes via effective molecularly driven patient selection strategies. We also provide perspectives on emerging novel, next generation targeted inhibitors overcoming treatment resistance to previous targeted agents with demonstrated clinical value in a challenging patient population.

Deciphering the multifaceted roles and clinical implications of 2-hydroxyglutarate in cancer

Increasing evidence indicates that 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) is an oncometabolite that drives tumour formation and progression. Due to mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and the dysregulation of other enzymes, 2HG accumulates significantly in tumour cells. Due to its structural similarity to α-ketoglutarate (αKG), accumulated 2HG leads to the competitive inhibition of αKG-dependent dioxygenases (αKGDs), such as KDMs, TETs, and EGLNs. This inhibition results in epigenetic alterations in both tumour cells and the tumour microenvironment. This review comprehensively discusses the metabolic pathways of 2HG and the subsequent pathways influenced by elevated 2HG levels. We will delve into the molecular mechanisms by which 2HG exerts its oncogenic effects, particularly focusing on epigenetic modifications. This review will also explore the various methods available for the detection of 2HG, emphasising both current techniques and emerging technologies. Furthermore, 2HG shows promise as a biomarker for clinical diagnosis and treatment. By integrating these perspectives, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of 2HG in cancer biology, highlight the importance of ongoing research, and discuss future directions for translating these findings into clinical applications.

Radiogenomics of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Correlation of Imaging Features With BAP1 and FGFR Molecular Subtypes

PURPOSE

Clinical research has shown unique tumor behavioral characteristics of BRCA -associated protein-1- ( BAP1 -) and fibroblast growth factor receptor ( FGFR )-mutated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs), with BAP1 -mutated tumors demonstrating more aggressive forms of disease and FGFR -altered CCAs showing more indolent behavior. We performed a retrospective case-control study to evaluate for unique imaging features associated with BAP1 and FGFR genomic markers in intrahepatic CCA (iCCA).

METHODS

Multiple imaging features of iCCA at first staging were analyzed by 2 abdominal radiologists blinded to genomic data. Growth and development of metastases at available follow-up imaging were also recorded, as were basic clinical cohort data. Types of iCCA analyzed included those with BAP1 , FGFR , or both alterations, as well as cases with low mutational burden or mutations with low clinical impact, which served as a control or "wild-type" group. There were 18 cases in the FGFR group, 10 with BAP1 mutations, and 31 wild types (controls).

RESULTS

Cases with BAP1 mutations showed significantly larger growth at first year of follow-up ( P = 0.03) and more frequent tumor-associated biliary ductal dilatation ( P = 0.04) compared with controls. FGFR -altered cases showed more infiltrative margins compared with controls ( P = 0.047) and demonstrated less enhancement between arterial to portal venous phases ( P = 0.02). BAP1 and FGFR groups had more cases with stage IV disease at presentation than controls ( P = 0.025, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Compared with wild-type iCCAs, FGFR -mutated tumors often demonstrate infiltrative margins, and BAP1 tumors show increased biliary ductal dilatation at presentation. BAP1 -mutated cases had significantly larger growth at first-year restaging.

Advances in target drugs and immunotherapy for biliary tract cancer

INTRODUCTION

After years of treatment stagnation in biliary tract cancers (BTC), there has been a notable shift with the emergence of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, leading to substantial progress in tackling this aggressive disease.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a comprehensive overview of the target therapies that are already part of the treatment algorithm for BTC, such as FGFR, IDH, and HER2 inhibitors. Additionally, we delve into some less known targets that are being explored, such as KRAS proto-oncogene, MAPK cascade, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and novel molecules directed against P53, claudin, histones, and mitochondrial metabolism. Furthermore, we discuss agnostic drugs and analyze the efficacy data available for BTC specifically. We also examine the expanding world of immunotherapy, with an eye on predictive factors of response for immune checkpoint inhibitors, and on novel immune drugs such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T and vaccines.

EXPERT OPINION

In the expert opinion, we discuss the problem of the scarcity of patients eligible for target therapies and how can clinical trials be designed to overcome this challenge. We also summarize the most promising trials that have the potential to change clinical practice both for immunotherapies and target drugs.

Evolving therapeutic landscape of advanced biliary tract cancer: from chemotherapy to molecular targets

Biliary tract cancer, the second most common type of liver cancer, remains a therapeutic challenge due to its late diagnosis and poor prognosis. In recent years, it has become evident that classical chemotherapy might not be the optimal treatment for patients with biliary tract cancer, especially after failure of first-line therapy. Finding new treatment options and strategies to improve the survival of these patients is therefore crucial. With the rise and increasing availability of genetic testing in patients with tumor, novel treatment approaches targeting specific genetic alterations have recently been proposed and have demonstrated their safety and efficacy in numerous clinical trials. In this review, we will first consider chemotherapy options and the new possibility of combining chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line treatment. We will then provide an overview of genomic alterations and their potential for targeted therapy especially in second-line therapy. In addition to the most common alterations such as isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/2) mutations, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions, and alterations, we will also discuss less frequently encountered alterations such as BRAF V600E mutation and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor gene (NTRK) fusion. We highlight the importance of molecular profiling in guiding therapeutic decisions and emphasize the need for continued research to optimize and expand targeted treatment strategies for this aggressive malignancy.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates and Their Potential in the Treatment of Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are aggressive in nature, often presenting asymptomatically until they are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Surgical resection or liver transplantation are potential curative options. However, a large proportion of patients present with incurable locally advanced or metastatic disease and most of these patients are only eligible for palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care. More recently, targeted therapies have proven beneficial in a molecularly selected subgroup of patients with cholangiocarcinoma who have progressed on previous lines of systemic treatment. However, only a minority of patients with BTCs whose tumours harbour specific molecular alterations can access these therapies. Methods: In relation to ADCs, studies regarding use of antibody-drug conjugates in cancer, particularly in BTCs, were searched in Embase (1974 to 2024) and Ovid MEDLINE(R) (1946 to 2024) to obtain relevant articles. Examples of current clinical trials utilising ADC treatment in BTCs were extracted from the ClinicalTrials.gov trial registry. Conclusions: Overall, this review has highlighted that ADCs have shown encouraging outcomes in cancer therapy, and this should lead to further research including in BTCs, where treatment options are often limited. The promising results observed with ADCs in various cancers underscore their potential as a transformative approach in oncology, warranting continued exploration and development and the need for education on the management of their specific toxicities. By addressing current challenges and optimising ADC design and application, future studies could potentially improve treatment outcomes for patients with BTCs and beyond, potentially in both early and advanced stage settings.

The clinicopathological significance and prognostic impact of 14-3-3σ/stratifin expression on patients with surgically resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. Through data mining of publicly available iCCA transcriptomic datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus, we identified SFN as the most significantly up-regulated gene in iCCA compared to normal tissue, focusing on the Gene Ontology term "cell proliferation" (GO:0008283). SFN encodes the 14-3-3σ protein, also known as stratifin, which plays crucial roles in various cellular processes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemistry was used to assess stratifin expression in 182 patients with localized iCCAs undergoing surgical resection. Patients were divided into low and high expression groups, and the association between stratifin expression and clinicopathological features was analyzed. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to assess overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MeFS).

RESULTS

Elevated stratifin expression in iCCAs was significantly associated with the absence of hepatitis, positive surgical margins, advanced primary tumor stages, and higher histological grades (all p ≤ 0.011). Survival analyses demonstrated a significant negative association between stratifin expression and all prognostic indicators, including OS, DSS, LRFS, and MeFS (all p ≤ 0.0004). Multivariate analysis revealed that stratifin overexpression was significantly correlated with poorer outcomes in terms of DSS, LRFS, and MeFS (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that stratifin may play a crucial role in iCCA oncogenesis and tumor progression, serving as a potential novel prognostic biomarker.

Facts and Hopes in the Systemic Therapy of Biliary Tract Carcinomas

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a heterogeneous group of cancers that continue to present a particularly poor prognosis. BTC treatment is rapidly evolving yet facing many challenges to improve patient outcomes and maximize benefit from treatment. Only a minority of patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease and are suitable for curative resection. Current surgical strategies are limited by a high relapse rate, and despite extensive efforts focused on adjuvant strategies, the development of more effective adjuvant strategies remains a challenge. In addition, the role of locoregional strategies, liver transplant, and neoadjuvant treatment remains unclear. Systemic treatment in the advanced setting is based on three main pillars: first, cytotoxic chemotherapy options; second, the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy; and third, targeted therapies. The role of targeted therapies is oriented by many promising targets, including IDH1 mutations, FGFR2 fusions, BRAF-V600E mutations, and HER2 amplifications. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current facts and future hopes in the management of BTC, including an overview of the unmet need, and particularly focus on systemic therapies.

Which therapy in biliary tract cancer? Review of main concerns in diagnosis and choice of therapy in advanced setting, current standard, and new options

The incidence of biliary tract cancer is increasing in developed countries and is generating renewed interest in the scientific community due to the evidence of a high percentage (approximately 40%) of potentially targetable molecular alterations. However, to date, patient selection and the development of therapeutic approaches remain challenging due to the need for accurate diagnosis, adequate sampling, a specialized team for molecular analysis, centralization of patients in high-volume centers capable of supporting the high cost of these methods, and the feasibility of clinical studies on diseases with aggressive onset and poor prognosis. In this article, we would like to provide a detailed overview of the necessary tools for diagnostic framing and the various therapeutic scenarios being investigated concerning the most frequently detected molecular alterations.

Advances in Personalized Oncology

Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have catalyzed a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, steering the focus from conventional, organ-specific protocols to precision medicine. Emerging targeted therapies offer a cutting-edge approach to cancer treatment, while companion diagnostics play an essential role in aligning therapeutic choices with specific molecular changes identified through NGS. Despite these advances, interpreting the clinical implications of a rapidly expanding catalog of genetic mutations remains a challenge. The selection of therapies in the presence of multiple mutations requires careful clinical judgment, supported by quality-centric genomic testing that emphasizes actionable mutations. Molecular tumor boards can play an increasing role in assimilating genomic data into clinical trials, thereby refining personalized treatment approaches and improving patient outcomes.

PARP inhibitor therapy in patients with IDH1 mutated cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) missense mutations occur at a frequency of 10%-15% in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). IDH1 mutations result in accumulation of (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate, an oncometabolite that leads to DNA hypermethylation and impairment of homologous recombination (HR). Impairment of HR results in a "BRCAness" phenotype which may confer sensitivity to poly(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort review to identify patients with advanced, IDH1 mutated iCCA treated with a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) at the University of Michigan between 2018 and 2023. Patients are described with respect to prior lines of therapy, response to platinum-based chemotherapy, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of PARPi initiation.

RESULTS

Between 2018 and 2023 we identified 40 patients with IDH1 mutated iCCA of which 6 patients were treated with a PARPi as monotherapy or in combination with an ATR inhibitor or anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor. Majority of patients (n = 5) carried an IDH1 R132C mutation per tissue-based next generation sequencing. All patients had previously received at least one line of cisplatin-based systemic therapy for advanced disease prior to treatment with PARPi. PFS and OS from time of PARPi initiation ranged from 1.4 to 18.5 months and 2.8 to 42.4 months, respectively. Best response on PARPi therapy included 2 partial responses.

CONCLUSION

This is the first case series to describe PARPi treatment in IDH1 mutated iCCA. Results underscore the limitation of PARPi monotherapy, potentially support combined PARPi therapies, and highlight a need for effective treatment options for patients with IDH1 mutated iCCA.

Targeting Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) in Solid Tumors: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

The isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) enzymes are involved in key metabolic processes in human cells, regulating differentiation, proliferation, and oxidative damage response. IDH mutations have been associated with tumor development and progression in various solid tumors such as glioma, cholangiocarcinoma, chondrosarcoma, and other tumor types and have become crucial markers in molecular classification and prognostic assessment. The intratumoral and serum levels of D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) could serve as diagnostic biomarkers for identifying IDH mutant (IDHmut) tumors. As a result, an increasing number of clinical trials are evaluating targeted treatments for IDH1/IDH2 mutations. Recent studies have shown that the focus of these new therapeutic strategies is not only the neomorphic activity of the IDHmut enzymes but also the epigenetic shift induced by IDH mutations and the potential role of combination treatments. Here, we provide an overview of the current knowledge about IDH mutations in solid tumors, with a particular focus on available IDH-targeted treatments and emerging results from clinical trials aiming to explore IDHmut tumor-specific features and to identify the clinical benefit of IDH-targeted therapies and their combination strategies. An insight into future perspectives and the emerging roles of circulating biomarkers and radiomic features is also included.

Overcoming treatment resistance in cholangiocarcinoma: current strategies, challenges, and prospects

Significant advancements in our understanding and clinical treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) have been achieved over the past 5 years. Groundbreaking studies have illuminated the immune landscape and pathological characteristics of the tumor microenvironment in CCA. The development of immune- and metabolism-based classification systems has enabled a nuanced exploration of the tumor microenvironment and the origins of CCA, facilitating a detailed understanding of tumor progression modulation. Despite these insights, targeted therapies have not yet yielded satisfactory clinical results, highlighting the urgent need for innovative therapeutic strategies. This review delineates the complexity and heterogeneity of CCA, examines the current landscape of therapeutic strategies and clinical trials, and delves into the resistance mechanisms underlying targeted therapies. Finally, from a single-cell and spatial transcriptomic perspective, we address the challenge of therapy resistance, discussing emerging mechanisms and potential strategies to overcome this barrier and enhance treatment efficacy.

COMPANION-002 A clinical trial of investigational drug CTX-009 plus paclitaxel vs paclitaxel in second line advanced BTC

Treatment options for patients with biliary tract cancer are limited, and the prognosis is poor. CTX-009, a novel bispecific antibody targeting both DLL4 and VEGF-A, has demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with advanced cancers as both a monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy. In a phase II study of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who had received one or two prior therapies, CTX-009 with paclitaxel demonstrated a 37.5% overall response rate (ORR). Described here is the design of and rationale for COMPANION-002, a randomized phase II/III study, which will evaluate the safety and efficacy of CTX-009 in combination with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone as second-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. The primary end point is ORR, and crossover is allowed.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05506943 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Cost-effectiveness of ivosidenib versus chemotherapy for previously treated IDH1-mutant advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

International guidelines recommend ivosidenib followed by modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX) for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations. Taiwan National Health Insurance covers only fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) chemotherapy for this ICC group, and there has been no prior economic evaluation of ivosidenib. Therefore, we aimed to assess ivosidenib's cost-effectiveness in previously treated, advanced ICC-presenting IDH1 mutations compared with mFOLFOX or 5-FU/LV.

METHODS

A 3-state partitioned survival model was employed to assess ivosidenib's cost-effectiveness over a 10-year horizon with a 3% discount rate, setting the willingness-to-pay threshold at 3 times the 2022 GDP per capita. Efficacy data for Ivosidenib, mFOLFOX, and 5-FU/LV were sourced from the ClarIDHy, ABC06, and NIFTY trials, respectively. Ivosidenib's cost was assumed to be NT$10,402/500 mg. Primary outcomes included incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and net monetary benefit. Deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were employed to evaluate uncertainty and explore price reduction scenarios.

RESULTS

Ivosidenib exhibited ICERs of NT$6,268,528 and NT$5,670,555 compared with mFOLFOX and 5-FU/LV, respectively, both exceeding the established threshold. PSA revealed that ivosidenib was unlikely to be cost-effective, except when it was reduced to NT$4,161 and NT$5,201/500 mg when compared with mFOLFOX and 5-FU/LV, respectively. DSA underscored the significant influence of ivosidenib's cost and utility values on estimate uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

At NT$10,402/500 mg, ivosidenib was not cost-effective for IDH1-mutant ICC patients compared with mFOLFOX or 5-FU/LV, indicating that a 50-60% price reduction is necessary for ivosidenib to be cost-effective in this patient group.

The Current Role of Radiation in the Management of Cholangiocarcinoma-A Narrative Review

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare cancer of bile ducts. It is associated with a poor prognosis. The incidence of CCA is rising worldwide. Anatomical subgroups have been used to classify patients for treatment and prognosis. There is a growing understanding of clinically important distinctions based on underlying genetic differences that lead to different treatment options and outcomes. Its management is further complicated by a heterogeneous population and relative rarity, which limits the conduct of large trials to guide management. Surgery has been the primary method of therapy for localized disease; however, recurrence and death remain high with or without surgery. Therefore, there have been concerted efforts to investigate new treatment options, such as the use of neoadjuvant treatments to optimize surgical outcomes, targeted therapy, leveraging a new understanding of immunobiology and stereotactic radiation. In this narrative review, we address the evidence to improve suboptimal outcomes in unresectable CCA with radiation, as well as the role of radiation in neoadjuvant and postoperative treatment. We also briefly discuss the recent developments in systemic treatment with targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Options in Targeted Therapy for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A 2024 Update

Bile duct carcinomas have a different prognosis and genetic profile depending on their location; intrahepatic/extrahepatic or at the level of the gallbladder. Although in recent years there have been important advances in first-line therapy, second-line therapy in cholangiocarcinoma does not currently have a standard. Therefore at this level, there is an acute need for personalized treatment. The present article is a narrative review that aims to list the newest targeted therapeutic options for this type of cancer, based on identified genetic alterations. The literature selected for analysis includes phase 2 or 3 studies with targeted therapy in this disease and original articles no older than three years that describe the prevalence of the most common gene alterations in this type of cancer. PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Clarivate-Web of Science databases were searched and keywords such as "cholangiocarcinoma," "biliary cancer," "targeted therapy," "gene amplifications," and "mutations" were used. This narrative review was designed taking into account the SANRA (Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles) criteria. The conclusions lead to the fact that next-generation sequencing testing is of particular usefulness in cholangiocarcinoma. Bile duct cancers are rich in targetable genetic alterations, and their treatment is in constant change, although much of the current data comes from phase II studies. There is a great need for the current options to be analyzed in phase III studies. Hence, the need of the oncological community to stay informed about targeted treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma is supported by the present article.

[Personalized medicine in oncology]

Due to the considerable technological progress in molecular and genetic diagnostics as well as increasing insights into the molecular pathogenesis of diseases, there has been a fundamental paradigm shift in the past two decades from a "one-size-fits-all approach" to personalized, molecularly informed treatment strategies. Personalized medicine or precision medicine focuses on the genetic, physiological, molecular, and biochemical differences between individuals and considers their effects on the development, prevention, and treatment of diseases. As a pioneer of personalized medicine, the field of oncology is particularly noteworthy, where personalized diagnostics and treatment have led to lasting change in the treatment of cancer patients in recent years. In this article, the significant change towards personalized treatment concepts, especially in the field of personalized oncology, will be discussed and examined in more detail.

Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for comprehensive genomic profiling of patients with biliary tract cancer, especially with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is a standard diagnostic method for biliary tract cancer (BTC), and samples obtained in this manner may be used for comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). This study evaluated the utility of EUS-TA for CGP in a clinical setting and determined the factors associated with the adequacy of CGP in patients with BTC.

METHODS

CGP was attempted for 105 samples from 94 patients with BTC at the Aichi Cancer Center, Japan, from October 2019 to April 2022.

RESULTS

Overall, 77.1% (81/105) of the samples were adequate for CGP. For 22-G or 19-G fine-needle biopsy (FNB), the sample adequacy was 85.7% (36/42), which was similar to that of surgical specimens (94%, p=0.45). Univariate analysis revealed that 22-G or larger FNB needle usage (86%, p=0.003), the target primary lesions (88%, p=0.015), a target size ≥30 mm (100%, p=0.0013), and number of punctures (90%, p=0.016) were significantly positively associated with CGP sample adequacy.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-TA is useful for CGP tissue sampling in patients with BTC. In particular, the use of 22-G or larger FNB needles may allow for specimen adequacy comparable to that of surgical specimens.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of ivosidenib in advanced IDH1-mutant cholangiocarcinoma: findings from the phase III ClarIDHy study

PURPOSE

Report pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) findings from the phase III ClarIDHy study and any association between PK/PD parameters and treatment outcomes in this population.

METHODS

Patients with mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) advanced cholangiocarcinoma were randomized at a 2:1 ratio to receive ivosidenib or matched placebo. Crossover from placebo to ivosidenib was permitted at radiographic disease progression. Blood samples for PK/PD analyses, a secondary endpoint, were collected pre-dose and up to 4 h post-dose on day (D) 1 of cycles (C) 1 - 2, pre-dose and 2 h post-dose on D15 of C1 - 2, and pre-dose on D1 from C3 onwards. Plasma ivosidenib and D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. All clinical responses were centrally reviewed previously.

RESULTS

PK/PD analysis was available for samples from 156 ivosidenib-treated patients. Ivosidenib was absorbed rapidly following single and multiple oral doses (time of maximum observed plasma concentration [Tmax] of 2.63 and 2.07 h, respectively). Ivosidenib exposure was higher at C2D1 than after a single dose, with low accumulation. In ivosidenib-treated patients, mean plasma 2-HG concentration was reduced from 1108 ng/mL at baseline to 97.7 ng/mL at C2D1, close to levels previously observed in healthy individuals. An average 2-HG inhibition of 75.0% was observed at steady state. No plasma 2-HG decreases were seen with placebo. Plasma 2-HG reductions were observed in ivosidenib-treated patients irrespective of best overall response (progressive disease, or partial response and stable disease).

CONCLUSION

Once-daily ivosidenib 500 mg has a favorable PK/PD profile, attesting the 2-HG reduction mechanism of action and, thus, positive outcomes in treated patients with advanced mIDH1 cholangiocarcinoma.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02989857 Registered February 20, 2017.

Recent Advances in Systemic Therapy for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Background

The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCA) is rising around the world. The disease is becoming a major global health issue. Conventionally, most patients with cholangiocarcinoma present with advanced disease and systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment. This review discusses recent advances in systemic treatments for patients with IHCCA.

Summary

The addition of durvalumab to a gemcitabine plus cisplatin regimen has significantly improved overall survival in the phase 3 TOPAZ-1 trial and is currently recommended as a standard first-line treatment. The phase 3 ABC-06 and phase 2b NIFTY trials have shown the benefit of second-line fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidine plus nanoliposomal irinotecan, respectively. They have provided a treatment option for patients without actionable alterations who progressed to first-line therapy. For patients with actionable genomic alterations, including FGFR2 rearrangement, IDH1 mutation, BRAF mutation, and ERBB2 amplification, targeted agents have shown encouraging efficacy in several phase 2-3 trials, and are recommended as subsequent treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are being investigated for the treatment of previously treated patients, although only a small proportion of patients showed durable responses.

Key Messages

Recent advances in systemic treatments have improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced IHCCA. However, most patients eventually show resistance to the treatment, and tumor progression occurs within a year. Indeed, there should be further efforts to improve the outcomes of patients with advanced IHCCA.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for comprehensive genomic profiling

Advances in next-generation sequencing have made comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) using tumor tissue specimens and liquid biopsy using blood samples feasible in routine clinical practice. In the context of pancreaticobiliary cancer, it is necessary to consider CGP in formulating individualized treatment strategies. Performing CGP with tumor tissue specimens requires a sufficient number of high-quality samples. EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is expected to play a significant role in this regard, and endosonographers need to address this role. Here, we review the current status of EUS-TA for CGP focusing on pancreatic cancer and biliary tract cancer.

Precision Oncology in Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer Surgery

Advances in technology have allowed for the characterization of tumors at the genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic levels. There are well-established targets for biliary tract cancers, with exciting new targets emerging in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and potential targets in hepatocellular carcinoma. Taken together, these data suggest an important role for molecular profiling for personalizing cancer therapy in advanced disease and need for design of novel neoadjuvant studies to leverage these novel therapeutics perioperatively in the surgical patient.

Comprehensive Immunogenomic Profiling of IDH1-/2-Altered Cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1/2 genomic alterations (GA) occur in 20% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA); however, the immunogenomic landscape of IDH1-/2-mutated iCCA is largely unknown.

METHODS

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed on 3,067 cases of advanced iCCA. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), PD-L1 expression (Dako 22C3), microsatellite instability (MSI), and genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) as a surrogate marker for homologous recombination deficiency were examined. RNA sequencing of 73 patient samples was analyzed for differences in stromal/immune cell infiltration, immune marker expression, and T-cell inflammation. Tissue microarray arrays were subjected to multiplex immunohistochemistry and colocalization analysis in 100 surgical samples. Retrospective clinical data were collected for 501 patients with cholangiocarcinoma to examine median overall survival (mOS) in IDH1/2+ versus IDHwt.

RESULTS

Of 3,067 iCCA cases subjected to CGP, 426 (14%) were IDH1+ and 125 (4%) were IDH2+. IDH1 GA included R132C (69%) and R132L/G/S/H/F (16%/7%/4%/3%/<1%). IDH2 GA occurred at R172 (94.4%) and R140 (6.6%). No significant difference was seen in median gLOH between IDH1+ versus IDHwt iCCA (P = .37), although patterns of comutations differed. MSI-High (P = .009), TMB ≥10 mut/Mb (P < .0001), and PD-L1 positivity were lower in IDH1/2+ versus IDHwt iCCA. Resting natural killer cell population, CD70, and programmed cell death 1 expression were significantly higher in non-IDH1-mutated cases, whereas V-set domain containing T-cell activation inhibitor 1 (B7-H4) expression was significantly higher in IDH1+. No significant difference in mOS was observed between IDH1/2+ versus IDHwt patients.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in GA and immune biomarkers are noted between IDH1/2+ and IDHwt iCCA. IDH1-/2-mutated tumors appear immunologically cold without gLOH. These immunogenomic data provide insight for precision targeting of iCCA with IDH alterations.

Molecular pathology for cholangiocarcinoma: a review of actionable genetic targets and their relevance to adjuvant & neoadjuvant therapy, staging, follow-up, and determination of minimal residual disease

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents a group of epithelial cell tumors classified based on their anatomic location along the biliary tree. This rare malignancy is often diagnosed at an advanced stage and deemed unresectable. Even for those patients who are surgical candidates, recurrence rates are high and survival rates low. The mainstay of therapy for advanced CCA remains cisplatin plus gemcitabine, with a median overall survival (mOS) under 12 months, although the TOPAZ-1 trial showed a survival benefit with the addition of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade. In recent years, molecular profiling has revealed a wealth of potentially targetable genetic alterations, including fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) fusions, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification and overexpression, and microsatellite instability (MSI). These discoveries have prompted numerous clinical trials employing drugs against these specific genetic changes. The foundation laid by early clinical studies and the landscape of ongoing trials are both summarized here. While the role of adjuvant therapy has yet to be defined in this disease, we emphasize the importance of employing targeted therapies in trials in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant spaces and discuss ways to overcome challenges due to low incidence of targetable mutations. Personalized medicine for this disease promises significant clinical benefit to patients, but further investigation is needed.

Practical guidelines for molecular testing of cholangiocarcinoma in clinical practice: Italian experts' position paper

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) represent a spectrum of malignancies associated with a dismal prognosis. Recent genomic profiling studies have provided a deeper understanding of the complex and heterogenous molecular landscape of BTCs, identifying several actionable genetic alterations, and expanding treatment options. Due to the high number and complexity of genetic alterations which require testing, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is currently the preferred approach over conventional methods (i.e., immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in-situ hybridization and PCR) for molecular profiling of BTCs and should be performed upfront in all BTC patients. However, BTC sampling often yields low tumor cellularity tissue, hampering NGS analysis. Future perspectives to overcome this obstacle include liquid biopsy and optimization of biopsy protocols. In this position paper, the authors discuss the current histopathologic, molecular, and therapeutic landscape of BTCs, provide a critical overview of the available testing methods for molecular diagnostics, and propose a practical diagnostic algorithm for molecular testing of BTC samples.

Current Standards, Multidisciplinary Approaches, and Future Directions in the Management of Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Biliary tract cancers are molecularly and anatomically diverse cancers which include intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic (perihilar and distal) cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer. While recognized as distinct entities, the rarer incidence of these cancers combined with diagnostic challenges in classifying anatomic origin has resulted in clinical trials and guideline recommended strategies being generalized patients with all types of biliary tract cancer. In this review, we delve into the unique aspects, subtype-specific clinical trial outcomes, and multidisciplinary management of patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. When resectable, definitive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (sometimes with selective radiation/chemoradiation) is current standard of care. Due to high recurrence rates, there is growing interest in the use of upfront/neoadjuvant therapy to improve surgical outcomes and to downstage patients who may not initially be resectable. Select patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are being successfully treated with novel approaches such as liver transplant. In the advanced disease setting, combination gemcitabine and cisplatin remains the standard base for systemic therapy and was recently improved upon with the addition of immune checkpoint blockade to the chemotherapy doublet in the recently reported TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 trials. Second-line all-comer treatments for these patients remain limited in both options and efficacy, so clinical trial participation should be strongly considered. With increased use of molecular testing, detection of actionable mutations and opportunities to receive indicated targeted therapies are on the rise and are the most significant driver of improved survival for patients with advanced stage disease. Though these targeted therapies are currently reserved for the second or later line, future trials are looking at moving these to earlier treatment settings and use in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. In addition to cross-disciplinary management with surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, patient-centered care should also include collaboration with advanced endoscopists, palliative care specialists, and nutritionists to improve global patient outcomes.

Current and Emerging Therapeutic Targets for the Treatment of Cholangiocarcinoma: An Updated Review

Cholangiocarcinoma is a malignancy of the bile ducts that is often associated with late diagnosis, poor overall survival, and limited treatment options. The standard of care therapy for cholangiocarcinoma has been cytotoxic chemotherapy with modest improvements in overall survival with the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The discovery of actionable mutations has led to the advent of targeted therapies against FGFR and IDH-1, which has expanded the treatment landscape for this patient population. Significant efforts have been made in the pre-clinical space to explore novel immunotherapeutic approaches, as well as antibody-drug conjugates. This review provides an overview of the current landscape of treatment options, as well as promising future therapeutic targets.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma

These guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) were commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology liver section. The guideline writing committee included a multidisciplinary team of experts from various specialties involved in the management of CCA, as well as patient/public representatives from AMMF (the Cholangiocarcinoma Charity) and PSC Support. Quality of evidence is presented using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) format. The recommendations arising are to be used as guidance rather than as a strict protocol-based reference, as the management of patients with CCA is often complex and always requires individual patient-centred considerations.

Ivosidenib: A Review in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma

Ivosidenib (Tibsovo®), a first-in-class, oral small molecule, potent and selective inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1), is approved in the EU and USA for the treatment of adults with pretreated, advanced, mIDH1 cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). It is presumed to exert its cytostatic effects in this setting by suppressing 2-hydroxyglutarate, an oncometabolite produced by mIDH1 that impairs cellular differentiation and promotes tumorigenesis. In the multinational phase 3 ClarIDHy study in patients with pretreated, advanced mIDH1 CCA, monotherapy with ivosidenib once daily significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and almost doubled the disease control rate compared with placebo. Moreover, it had a favourable effect on overall survival (OS), which was also significantly prolonged after correcting for a high rate of crossover from the placebo group (permitted by the trial protocol). Ivosidenib treatment preserved health-related quality of life (HRQOL) relating to physical function, pain and appetite loss/eating and was generally well tolerated, with the most common treatment-emergent adverse events being low-grade diarrhoea, nausea and fatigue. Thus, ivosidenib represents a novel and valuable targeted therapy for the subset of patients with pretreated, advanced CCA tumors harbouring mIDH1.

Tumor-wide RNA splicing aberrations generate immunogenic public neoantigens

T-cell-mediated immunotherapies are limited by the extent to which cancer-specific antigens are homogenously expressed throughout a tumor. We reasoned that recurrent splicing aberrations in cancer represent a potential source of tumor-wide and public neoantigens, and to test this possibility, we developed a novel pipeline for identifying neojunctions expressed uniformly within a tumor across diverse cancer types. Our analyses revealed multiple neojunctions that recur across patients and either exhibited intratumor heterogeneity or, in some cases, were tumor-wide. We identified CD8+ T-cell clones specific for neoantigens derived from tumor-wide and conserved neojunctions in GNAS and RPL22 , respectively. TCR-engineered CD8 + T-cells targeting these mutations conferred neoantigen-specific tumor cell eradication. Furthermore, we revealed that cancer-specific dysregulation in splicing factor expression leads to recurrent neojunction expression. Together, these data reveal that a subset of neojunctions are both intratumorally conserved and public, providing the molecular basis for novel T-cell-based immunotherapies that address intratumoral heterogeneity.

Targeted Therapies in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma

Primary tumor resection and liver transplantation are the only curative treatment options for the management of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). However, for patients with advanced or metastatic disease, palliative systemic therapy remains the only treatment option. The development of targeted therapeutics has begun to shift the treatment paradigm in CCA. Targets of interest in CCA include mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (mIDH-1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression/amplification, and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusion, in addition to less frequently observed targets such as BRAF V600E, deficient mismatch repair/high microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H), and high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H). These targets are observed in varying frequency among patients with intrahepatic CCA and extrahepatic CCA. Multiple novel therapies have been developed to exploit each of these targets, with some having received United States Food and Drug Administration approval for use in the second-line setting. In the current review, we discuss targets of interest in CCA and summarize current evidence evaluating available therapies directed at these targets.

Molecular Analysis of Biliary Tract Cancers with the Custom 3' RACE-Based NGS Panel

The technique 3' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (3' RACE) allows for detection of translocations with unknown gene partners located at the 3' end of the chimeric transcript. We composed a 3' RACE-based RNA sequencing panel for the analysis of FGFR1-4 gene rearrangements, detection of activating mutations located within FGFR1-4, IDH1/2, ERBB2 (HER2), KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA genes, and measurement of the expression of ERBB2, PD-L1, and FGFR1-4 transcripts. This NGS panel was utilized for the molecular profiling of 168 biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs), including 83 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs), 44 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (eCCAs), and 41 gallbladder adenocarcinomas (GBAs). The NGS failure rate was 3/168 (1.8%). iCCAs, but not other categories of BTCs, were characterized by frequent FGFR2 alterations (17/82, 20.7%) and IDH1/2 mutations (23/82, 28%). Other potentially druggable events included ERBB2 amplifications or mutations (7/165, 4.2% of all successfully analyzed BTCs) and BRAF p.V600E mutations (3/165, 1.8%). In addition to NGS, we analyzed microsatellite instability (MSI) using the standard five markers and revealed this event in 3/158 (1.9%) BTCs. There were no instances of ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1-3 gene rearrangements or MET exon 14 skipping mutations. Parallel analysis of 47 iCCA samples with the Illumina TruSight Tumor 170 kit confirmed good performance of our NGS panel. In conclusion, targeted RNA sequencing coupled with the 3' RACE technology is an efficient tool for the molecular diagnostics of BTCs.