Links of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program With Food Insecurity, Poverty, and Health: Evidence and Potential

The association of neighborhood-level deprivation with glioblastoma outcomes: a single center cohort study

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain malignancy. Though literature has suggested the association of glioblastoma outcomes and socioeconomic status, there is limited evidence regarding the association of neighborhood-level socioeconomic deprivation on glioblastoma outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of neighborhood-level socioeconomic deprivation on glioblastoma survival. We retrospectively reviewed all adult glioblastoma patients seen at a single institution from 2008 to 2023. Neighborhood deprivation was assessed via Area Deprivation Index (ADI), with higher ADI indicating greater neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage. Log-rank tests and multivariate cox regression was used to assess the effect of ADI and other socioeconomic variables while controlling for a priori selected clinical variables with known relevance to survival. In total, 1464 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age at diagnosis was 60 ± 14 years with a median overall survival of 13.8 months (IQR 13-14.8). The median ADI of the cohort was 66(IQR 46-84). Patients with high neighborhood disadvantage had worse overall survival compared to patients with those without (11.7 vs. 14.8 months, p =.001). In the multivariable model, patients with high neighborhood disadvantage had worse overall survival (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.09-1.43). To account for changes in WHO guidelines, we implemented the model on patients diagnosed between 2017 and 2023 and findings were consistent (HR 1.26,95%CI 1.01-1.56). We report the first study demonstrating glioblastoma patients with higher neighborhood deprivation have worse survival after controlling for other socioeconomic and biomolecular markers. Neighborhood socioeconomic status may be a prognostic marker for glioblastoma survival.

Early Childhood Food Insecurity and Cardiovascular Health in Young Adulthood

Importance

Food insecurity is a social risk factor that may be associated with cardiovascular health across the life course.

Objective

To evaluate the association of food insecurity in early childhood with cardiovascular health (CVH) in young adulthood and whether associations are modified by participation during childhood in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Future of Families-Cardiovascular Health Among Young Adults cohort study was conducted in 20 US cities among 1071 individuals enrolled at birth (February 1998 to September 2000), evaluated in childhood (age, 3-5 years), and followed up to young adulthood (September 2021 to September 2023; mean [SD] participant age, 22.3 [0.7] years).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Household food insecurity (assessed by the US Department of Agriculture Food Insecurity survey) and SNAP participation at ages 3 to 5 years and CVH (assessed by the American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 [LE8] score, component LE8 scores, and clinical CVH risk factors).

Results

Of the 1071 participants, 570 were female (53%), 422 (39%) lived in households with food insecurity, and 475 (44%) participated in SNAP. Early childhood food insecurity was associated with having a lower LE8 score in young adulthood (β, -2.2 [95% CI, -4.0 to -0.4]). Among component LE8 scores and clinical CVH risk factors, food insecurity was associated with a lower LE8 score for body mass index (BMI; β, -4.9 [95% CI, -9.6 to -0.3]) and higher odds of having a BMI of 30 or more (adjusted odds ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.07-1.84]). Food insecurity was more strongly associated with a lower LE8 score among those whose households did not participate in SNAP (β, -4.9 [95% CI, -7.6 to -2.3]) compared with those whose households participated in SNAP (β, 1.0 [95% CI, -1.6 to 3.7]).

Conclusions and Significance

This study suggests that early childhood food insecurity is associated with a higher BMI in young adulthood, which is associated with a worse overall LE8 score, especially among children whose families did not participate in SNAP. Policies to promote food security among children may promote healthy BMIs and better CVH across the life course.

Childhood Food Insecurity Trajectories and Adult Weight and Self-Reported Health

INTRODUCTION

Research has demonstrated that food insecurity during childhood is associated with worse physical and mental health in childhood. However, little is known about how food insecurity during childhood impacts health outcomes in young adulthood.

METHODS

This study analyzed data from the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing Study (2024), a longitudinal birth cohort study of children born in 1998-2000. Childhood food insecurity trajectory groups from age 3 to 15 years were identified using group-based trajectory modeling. Associations between childhood food insecurity trajectory groups and young adult weight (BMI, overweight status, and obese status) and high self-reported health (good/excellent) at age 22 were modeled with multivariate linear and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Three trajectories were identified among 4,296 participants: 66.9% were food secure, 7.5% were food insecure, and 25.6% transitioned from being food insecure-to-secure throughout childhood. In adjusted analyses, young adults assigned to the food insecure-to-secure trajectory group as children had higher BMI (B 0.82, 95% CI [0.07-1.58]) and higher odds of overweight status (OR 1.24, 95% CI [1.01-1.52]) than young adults assigned to the food secure trajectory group as children. Young adults in the food insecure trajectory group as children had lower odds of high self-reported health than those in the food secure trajectory group as children (OR 0.65, 95% CI [0.48-0.89]).

CONCLUSIONS

Food insecurity in childhood is associated with high weight status and poor self-reported health in young adulthood. These findings highlight the importance of childhood food insecurity screening and interventions to promote health throughout the life course.

The Association of Area Deprivation Index and Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic and Narrative Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

With an aging population, the prevalence of spine pathology including degenerative spine disease continues to increase. These pathologies present a significant disease burden, often requiring long-term and expensive care. Recent literature has linked several socioeconomic determinants of health with outcomes after spine surgery. We sought to conduct a systematic review to determine the relationship between Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a measure of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status, and objective and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures after spine surgery and to propose potential interventions.

METHODS

An Embase and Medline search was conducted from inception to April 1st, 2024, for relevant articles assessing ADI and spine surgery outcomes. The inclusion criteria were all North American observational studies available in English that reported on the association of ADI and adult cervical, lumbar, neoplastic, or deformity spine surgery outcomes.

RESULTS

Ten articles met the inclusion criteria resulting in a combined 56 925 patients who had undergone elective surgery for cervical, lumbar, spine metastases, and adult spine deformity pathologies. Two studies reported ADI to be associated with increased costs of care and postoperative lengths of stay after cervical spine surgery. Five studies found the association between high ADI with increased rates of respiratory failure, 90-day emergency room visits, longer lengths of stay, 90-day reoperation rates, and poor PROs after lumbar spine surgery. One study found an association with high ADI and increased 30-day and 90-day readmissions across all spine surgeries, and 1 study found no association between ADI and overall survival after surgery for spinal metastases.

CONCLUSION

Across available literature, high ADI seems to be associated with higher rates of postoperative readmissions and worse PROs. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying the effects of ADI on spine surgery outcomes and identify possible interventions to optimize outcomes.

Catastrophic health expenditures and food insecurity among older cancer survivors in the United States

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients face a costly trade-off between medical care and basic necessities including food. This study aims to explore whether catastrophic health expenditures lead to food insecurity among older cancer survivors in the US.

METHODS

Longitudinal study of individuals aged 50 or older who were diagnosed with cancer during 2000-2020 and their follow-up measurements selected from the Health and Retirement Study. Data consists of 2505 cancer survivors and 11,614 person-year observations for an average of 4.6 observations per participant. Catastrophic health expenditures were defined as out-of-pocket costs exceeding 5%, 10%, or 15% of household income. Participants were classified as food insecure if they experienced insufficient access to food due to financial limitations. This study utilized fixed effects ordered logistic regression to implement a within-subject research design.

RESULTS

Of the 2505 cancer survivors, 77 (3.1%) were moderately food insecure and 73 (2.9%) were severely food insecure. In ordered logistic regression, all three measures of catastrophic health expenses were associated with a higher odds of food insecurity. These associations were more pronounced for males, ethnic minorities, survivors without college education, those in fair or poor health, retirees, and survivors with below-median income.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of food insecurity among older cancer survivors was relatively low, with 6% of the sample experiencing food insecurity. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that a major predictor of food insecurity among older cancer survivors is catastrophic health costs. Given the health benefits of secure food access, older cancer survivors should consult care providers about their financial capacity to afford recommended cancer treatments while maintaining healthy diets. Policymakers should also consider interventions to reduce out-of-pocket financial burden on older cancer survivors, as improved financial security may enhance treatment outcomes and lower cancer-related mortality.

SNAP Participation as a Moderator of Food and Nutrition Security and Combined Cardiometabolic Conditions: A Mixed Regression Approach

Objectives: To examine the relationships between food security, nutrition security, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation, and cardiometabolic outcomes, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or diabetes, among low-income U.S. individuals. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 486 participants (April-June 2021) assessed food and nutrition security and cardiometabolic outcomes. Mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusted for covariates and included a random effect for state of residence. Moderation analyses evaluated SNAP participation's impact. Results: Very low food security was associated with higher odds of having at least one cardiometabolic condition, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or diabetes (AOR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.04-3.69; p = 0.04). SNAP moderated this relationship (p-interaction = 0.007), with non-participants experiencing significantly higher risk. Non-SNAP participants with very low food security had 3.17 (95% CI = 1.17-8.61) times higher odds of having a cardiometabolic condition. Among SNAP participants, very low food security was not significantly associated with having a cardiometabolic condition (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 0.64-4.13). Higher nutrition security was associated with lower odds of having at least one cardiometabolic condition (AOR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41-0.83; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Nutrition security and SNAP participation mitigate cardiometabolic risks, underscoring their importance in public health interventions.

Laws Limiting Access to SNAP Benefits for People With Felony Drug Convictions: A Policy-Mapping Study

Objectives. To map US state Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) bans for individuals with felony drug convictions between 2004 and 2021. Methods. Using standard legal-mapping methodology, we categorized states as maintaining the lifetime ban imposed by federal law, modifying the lifetime ban, or fully opting out of the lifetime ban in each year. Among states with modified bans in 2021, we coded types of modifications. Results. As of 2021, 26 states and the District of Columbia fully opted out of the lifetime ban, 23 states modified bans, and 1 state maintained a lifetime ban. Among states with modified bans in 2021, 13 states required compliance with parole and probation, 12 states required drug treatment, 7 states required drug testing, and 9 states limited eligibility to certain populations. Conclusions. Most states effectively de-implemented the federal lifetime ban on SNAP for people with felony drug convictions by fully opting out or modifying bans over time. However, some states still had stringent modified ban provisions. Public Health Implications. These findings underscore the need to study the effects of this patchwork of drug conviction-related ban policies on substance use and nutrition-related outcomes. (Am J Public Health. 2025;115(2):170-177. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307873).

The Association of Neighborhood-Level Deprivation with Glioblastoma Outcomes: A Single Center Cohort Study

Purpose

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain malignancy. Though literature has suggested the association of glioblastoma outcomes and socioeconomic status, there is limited evidence regarding the association of neighborhood-level socioeconomic deprivation on glioblastoma outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of neighborhood-level socioeconomic deprivation on glioblastoma survival.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all adult glioblastoma patients seen at a single institution from 2008 to 2023. Neighborhood deprivation was assessed via Area Deprivation Index (ADI), with higher ADI indicating greater neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation. Log-rank tests and multivariate cox regression was used to assess the effect of ADI and other socioeconomic variables while controlling for a priori selected clinical variables with known relevance to survival.

Results

In total, 1464 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age at diagnosis was 60 ± 14 years with a median overall survival of 13.8 months (IQR 13-14.8). The median ADI of the cohort was 66(IQR 46-84). Patients with high ADI had worse overall survival compared to patients with low ADI (11.7 vs 14.8 months, p=.001). In the multivariable model, patients with high ADI had worse overall survival (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.09-1.43). To account for changes in WHO guidelines, we implemented the model on patients diagnosed between 2017-2023 and findings were consistent (HR 1.26,95%CI 1.01-1.56).

Conclusion

We report the first study demonstrating glioblastoma patients with higher neighborhood deprivation have worse survival after controlling for other socioeconomic and biomolecular markers. Neighborhood socioeconomic status may be a prognostic marker for glioblastoma survival.

Supporting students through the COVID-19 pandemic: the perspectives of food pantry workers

BACKGROUND

College students in the United States are disproportionately impacted by food insecurity, which is associated with diminished health outcomes and poor academic performance. One key resource to support students through periods of food insecurity are on-campus food pantries, which distribute food, personal hygiene products, and other essential items. But as colleges and universities navigated through the COVID-19 pandemic, many campuses closed their food pantries as the demand for their services among students grew. Few studies, however, have assessed how food pantries at academic institutions navigated through the COVID-19 pandemic to support students. With this knowledge gap in mind, our study objectives included the following: (1) to compare staff members' perceptions on the impact of COVID-19 on food pantries of academic institutions; and (2) to provide recommendations to improve campus food pantries in navigating through future public health threats.

METHODS

The research team conducted a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with staff members, including directors and supervisors, of food pantries located on the campuses of colleges and universities in the state of Connecticut. Participants also completed a short post-interview survey assessing demographic information and perspectives on food insecurity-related issues impacting their respective college or university. A template organizing approach was used to allow members of the research team to create a codebook of both inductive and deductive codes and identify emergent themes from the qualitative data.

RESULTS

Twelve interviews were conducted, of which 7 participants represented four-year and 5 from 2-year institutions. Based on our thematic analysis if the interviews, we identified four central themes: (1) Persistent Pre-COVID-19 Pandemic Barriers to Food Pantry Utilization; (2) Innovative responses to the COVID-19 pandemic; (3) International Students' Reliance on Food Pantries at Four-Year Colleges and Universities; and (4) Demand for Non-Food-Related Items.

CONCLUSIONS

Our research underscores the importance of lessons gleaned by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly through the lens of on-campus food pantry workers. Their unique insight and lessons learned ought to be considered when academic institutions deliberate allocating resources and making key decisions to help mitigate food insecurity concerns on their campuses.

A community-engaged implementation mapping approach to increase SNAP participation in a diverse Latine community

BACKGROUND

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is an underutilized program. SNAP uptake is limited in Latine households in particular due to concerns about immigration eligibility, even when there are SNAP-eligible household members. Implementation strategies are urgently needed to increase SNAP participation rates among those who are eligible.

PURPOSE

We used collaborative planning and implementation mapping to design implementation strategies to increase SNAP participation.

METHODS

Collaborative planning and implementation mapping included: (i) identify a shared priority; (ii) review relevant data to identify determinants of SNAP participation; (iii) design strategies to accomplish the priority goal; (iv) reach consensus and pilot-chosen strategies and workflows; and (v) evaluate implementation success based on chosen outcomes. Using the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model, we identified two implementation strategies, a community and a policy strategy, to pilot from January to December 2023.

RESULTS

The community strategy leveraged an existing food program to identify participants who were not already enrolled in SNAP. This resulted in 69 referrals and 4 new SNAP enrollees. The policy strategy leveraged the existing policy context to link SNAP enrollment with Medicaid insurance reenrollment at the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency protections. This resulted in an unknown number of referrals due to data workflow barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite considering context in the design and piloting of two implementation strategies, success was limited. Future success will require including the perspectives of those with lived experience to inform processes to identify eligible individuals without creating additional stigma or furthering distrust among those who may be ineligible.

Food needs and health behaviors in the COVID-19 situation: a case study of quarantined communities in densely populated areas of Bangkok, Thailand

BACKGROUND

The Thai government's initial response to the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) led to confusion and food insecurity in quarantined low-income communities. Although free food programs were initiated, no official assessment of their impact exists. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of these food programs by surveying the food requirements, food needs, and health behaviors of quarantined, densely populated communities in Bangkok.

METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with 410 urban dwellers from quarantined communities who received free food assistance. Data were collected via a questionnaire on food requirements, food hygiene, food needs, and health behaviors during the COVID-19 epidemic. The data were analyzed in terms of frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The associations between demographic characteristics, food needs, and health behaviors were analyzed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

The participants demanded dried/canned food (54.9%) and three meals per day (64.9%), while the majority of the food provided consisted of rice and side dishes (96.2%) that were clean and qualified. In consideration of food needs, a high level of demand was observed in the first three levels: enough food, acceptable food, and reliability. Overall, dietary health behaviors were good. Logistic regression analysis revealed that being elderly (AOR = 3.67, 95% CI = 1.63-8.27) and having a moderate to high income level (AOR = 3.93, 95% CI = 2.23-6.94) were positively correlated with food needs. Similarly, good health behaviors were positively correlated with being female (AOR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.12-2.69), being elderly (AOR = 3.73, 95% CI = 1.72-8.08), and having a moderate to high income level (AOR = 3.76, 95% CI = 2.38-5.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Preparing for future crises requires the consideration of demographic factors that influence food needs, personal choices, and dietary health behaviors. Future food assistance programs should focus on the provision of nonperishable and long-lasting food, which will ensure the consistent availability of three meals per day.

Enhancing Referrals to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program through Clinical Integration of a Standards-Based Decision Support System

BACKGROUND

 The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is one of the most successful national programs to reduce poverty and improve health outcomes, but millions of Americans who qualify still do not have access to SNAP, and limited data are available to determine how referrals to the program can be completed successfully.

OBJECTIVES

 We aimed to design and develop a standards-based digital care coordination platform to support closed-loop social services referrals between patients and social and health care providers and demonstrate the feasibility to screen, diagnose, plan, and complete interventions with selected patients in real settings.

METHODS

 We partnered with community members to design the platform through Community Engagement Studios and with a Federally Qualified Health Center, Local Mental Health Authority, and Food Bank to determine the features and workflow requirements of the platform design. We customized currently available systems to use Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) that could exchange information in real time across providers and participants.

RESULTS

 The platform was successfully demonstrated through a pilot where patients were recruited in clinical settings and referred to a Food Bank that provided SNAP application assistance to study participants. We translated the requirements of the platform to national standards and required workflows of providers and patients. Study participants were notified electronically of the specific steps to follow to complete their SNAP applications while receiving support from specialists from the Food Bank.

CONCLUSION

 The pilot demonstrated the feasibility of collecting granular social service referral information that can be used to better address gaps in social care. The pilot also highlighted the importance of further coordination on the usage and harmonization of needs assessment nationally and that current digital systems are still not ready to fully utilize national Social Determinants of Health data standards.

State expansion of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program eligibility and rates of firearm-involved deaths in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Poverty is a consistent correlate of firearm-involved mortality, yet little work has considered the effects of social and economic policies on these deaths. This study examined associations of state elimination of the asset test and increases in the income limit for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) eligibility with rates of firearm-involved suicide and homicide deaths in the United States.

METHODS

This ecological repeated cross-sectional study used 2015-2019 data from the SNAP Policy Database and death certificate data from the National Vital Statistics System. The exposures were (1) state elimination of the asset test for SNAP eligibility and (2) state elimination of the asset test and increases in the income limit for SNAP eligibility, compared with (3) state adoption of neither policy. The outcomes were firearm-involved suicide deaths and firearm-involved homicide deaths. The research team conducted mixed-effects regressions to estimate associations.

RESULTS

State elimination of the asset test for SNAP eligibility (incidence rate ratio (IRR), 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.91) and state adoption of both eliminating the asset test and increasing the income limit for SNAP eligibility (IRR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.92) were associated with decreased rates of firearm-involved suicide deaths compared with state adoption of neither policy. There were no associations with state firearm-involved homicide rates.

CONCLUSIONS

SNAP is an important social safety net programme that addresses food insecurity, and the present results suggest it may also contribute to reducing firearm-involved suicide.

Social Service Providers' Perceptions of Older Adults' Food Access During COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated risk factors for food insecurity among older adults, while also altering how government agencies and social service organizations could serve this population given their disproportionate vulnerability to the virus. The current study sought to understand social service providers' perspectives about how low-income community-dwelling older adults' access to food and related resources changed during the COVID pandemic. Data were collected via in-depth interviews with 22 social service providers from Oregon-based public and private social service agencies. Responses indicated that changes to older adults' food access during the pandemic stemmed from increases in public benefit amounts and social distancing guidelines. Participants indicated that temporary increases in SNAP allotments supported older adults' food security. Additionally, social distancing guidelines disrupted usual ways of procuring food, such as going to grocery stores, obtaining food with the assistance of family or neighbors, receiving deliveries from social programs, and visiting congregate meal sites. Food assistance programs changed their operations to reduce in-person interaction and increase the use of technology. When investigating older adults' food access, future research should consider adults' experiences of and barriers to SNAP receipt, social support from social networks and safety net programs, and technology access and knowledge.

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and depressive symptoms among adults with low family income in the U.S.: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2018

BACKGROUND

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) has been established to reduce food insecurity. Limited evidence is available on SNAP participation status over time and depressive symptoms. We aimed to examine the associations of SNAP status over time among low-income individuals, with depressive symptoms in the U.S.

METHODS

NHANES participants aged ≥20 years of low family income from 2011 to 2018 with information available on depressive symptoms and SNAP use were included in analysis. Depressive symptoms were assessed using 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 is indicative of significant depressive symptoms. Multivariable linear and logistic regressions models were conducted to examine the associations of SNAP participation status over time (never receiving SNAP, receiving SNAP prior to >12 months ago, current receiving SNAP, receiving SNAP in the last 12 months but not currently) with depressive symptoms and significant depressive symptoms.

RESULTS

Currently receiving SNAP (beta (β) = 0.17, 95 % CI: 0.10, 0.25; odds ratio (OR) = 1.52, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.16, 2.00) and receiving SNAP in the last 12 months but not currently (β = 0.24, 95 % CI: 0.04, 0.43; OR = 1.83, 95 % CI: 1.16, 2.89) were associated with higher depressive symptoms and higher prevalence of significant depressive symptoms.

LIMITATIONS

The cross-sectional design precludes causal interpretation, and key variables were measured with self-report.

CONCLUSION

Receiving SNAP in the last 12 months was associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms among individuals with low family income. Improvement on diet quality may be important for reducing depressive symptoms among SNAP users.

The Association between Federal Nutrition Assistance Programs and Adolescent Food Security during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Baltimore, Maryland

Given the lack of attention on adolescent food insecurity, the primary objective of this study was to assess the association of household participation in federal food assistance programs with food security status among adolescents in Baltimore during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adolescents, ages 14-19 years, were invited to participate in two online surveys. The baseline was implemented between October 2020 and January 2021, while the follow-up took place one year later from November 2021 to January 2022 after schools had re-opened. We then matched survey participants with household participation in food nutrition assistance programs using data obtained from the Maryland Department of Social Services. We used logistic regression to examine the association between food assistance program participation status and food insecurity. Additionally, to examine whether the impact of program participation on food insecurity changed between the baseline survey and one year later at follow-up when schools re-opened, a difference-in-differences analysis was conducted. The results showed no significant associations between adolescent food security and participation in any of the federal nutrition assistance programs. Increased attention on how best to improve adolescent food security in low-income households that can respond to the unique needs of adolescents is clearly warranted.

Emergency Allotments in SNAP and Food Hardship Among Households With Children

Importance

Households with children and minoritized racial and ethnic groups experience a disproportionate burden of food hardship. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the US federal government implemented emergency allotments in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), increasing the amount of food purchasing assistance received by many participating households.

Objective

To examine the association of implementing emergency allotments in SNAP with food hardship among households with children overall and for households with Black, Hispanic, and White children by comparing income-eligible households that did and did not participate in SNAP.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This ecologic cross-sectional study used 2016-2022 National Survey of Children's Health data and a difference-in-differences approach to compare changes in the risk of food hardship from before implementation of emergency allotments in SNAP (2016-2019) to during implementation (2020-2022). Households with children younger than 18 years and incomes 130% or less of the federal poverty level (FPL) in all 50 states and Washington, DC, were included.

Exposure

Implementation of emergency allotments in SNAP.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary outcome was caregiver report of household food hardship during the past 12 months.

Results

Of 44 753 households with incomes 130% or less of the FPL, a weighted 23.4% had Black children, 56.7% had White children, and 19.9% had children of other races. More than one-third of households (37.8%) had Hispanic children, and 31.8% had young children aged 0 to 5 years. The percentage of households that experienced food hardship decreased from 2016 to 2021 (from 62.9% to 48.2% among SNAP-participating households and from 44.3% to 38.9% among income-eligible nonparticipating households) but increased in 2022 (to 58.0% among SNAP-participating households and to 47.5% among nonparticipating households). Adjusting for confounders, implementing emergency allotments in SNAP was associated with a decreased risk of food hardship among SNAP-participating compared with nonparticipating households (risk ratio [RR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.96). Implementing emergency allotments in SNAP was associated with a decreased risk of food hardship among SNAP-participating households with Hispanic (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.02) and White (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.94) children compared with nonparticipating households but not among households with Black children (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87-1.23).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this ecologic cross-sectional study, implementing emergency allotments in SNAP was associated with a decreased risk of food hardship among households with children. Efforts are needed to ensure that all populations benefit from economic policies.

Rationale and design of the KP ENRICH trial: A food is medicine intervention in low-income high-risk adults with diabetes within Kaiser Permanente

BACKGROUND

Food insecurity is associated with poor glycemic control and increased risk for diabetes-related complications. The clinical benefit of addressing these challenges through a medically supportive grocery prescription (GRx) program in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) remains unclear. We report the aims and design of a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a 6-month GRx intervention on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels among low-income adults with T2D.

METHODS

The Kaiser Permanente Evaluating Nutritional Interventions in Food-Insecure High-Risk Adults (KP ENRICH) Study is a pragmatic randomized trial enrolling 1100 participants within Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Southern California, two integrated health care delivery systems serving >9 million members. Medicaid-insured adults with T2D and baseline HbA1c ≥7.5% will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either GRx, delivered as $100 per month for select items from among a curated list of healthful food groups in an online grocery ordering and home-delivery platform along with biweekly digital nutrition educational materials, or control, consisting of free membership and deliveries from the online grocery platform but without curated food groups or purchasing dollars. The primary outcome is 6-month change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes include 12-month change in HbA1c, and 6- and 12-month change in medical resource utilization, food security, nutrition security, dietary habits, diabetes-related quality of life, and dietary self-efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this large randomized clinical trial of GRx will help inform future policy and health system-based initiatives to improve food and nutrition security, disease management, and health equity among patients with T2D.

Research trends and gaps concerning food insecurity in college students in the United States: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review explores the broad body of peer-reviewed research measuring food insecurity in post-secondary students in the U.S. to identify trends and gaps to inform future research.

METHODS

Three search engines (PubMed, Web of Science, and CINHAL Full Text) were systematically searched for articles reporting on food security status in U.S. college students.

RESULTS

One-hundred and sixty studies met inclusion criteria. Emerging high-risk student characteristics include gender non-conforming (GNC) and non-binary, financial independence in college, and pregnant and parenting students. Emerging correlates include lack of transportation, anxiety, and eating disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence data can be used by colleges to advocate for services and programs. Additional multi-institutional cohort, longitudinal and qualitative studies are needed to identify timely interventions and effective solutions. A new "rights-based" approach to food security solutions that includes nutrition and food literacy for all students is needed.

Understanding the Role of Extension Professionals in Public Health and One Health in Kansas

This study aims to understand the roles of selected extension professionals (EPs) in the field of public health and One Health and the challenges involved in performing these duties to their communities in the state of Kansas. To evaluate the role of EPs in public health and One Health, researchers interviewed nine (9) EPs following a set of structured questions. Emerging themes were extrapolated from the responses of the EPs. Researchers assigned codes for qualitative analysis and assigned themes related to public health, One Health, and effective delivery of services. Researchers identified the following themes related to the role of EPs in public health (youth development, physical activity, personal health care, proper nutrition, access to transportation), One Health (food safety and food security, environmental health, disease control and prevention) and effective delivery of services (community engagement, collaboration, challenges in implementation). The study provided an overview of the diverse roles that EPs play in public health and One Health, keys on how to engage the community effectively, and challenges in extending services to the community.

Dietary Patterns Among US Children: A Cluster Analysis

BACKGROUND

Most children in the United States consume low-quality diets. Identifying children's dietary patterns and their association with sociodemographic characteristics is important for designing tailored youth dietary interventions.

OBJECTIVE

This study's objective was to use cluster analysis to investigate children's dietary patterns and these patterns' associations with sociodemographic characteristics.

DESIGN

Data from two cycles (2015-2016 and 2017-2018) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were evaluated to examine dietary patterns.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Participants included 3,044 US youth aged 2 to 11 years who completed at least 1 valid 24-hour diet recall.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were Healthy Eating Index (HEI) 2015 component and composite scores.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

A cluster analysis was performed on standardized scores of 11 components of the HEI-2015 to identify dietary patterns. One logistic analysis combined the two higher-HEI score clusters and the 2 lower-HEI score clusters to form a 3-category variable of higher-, medium-, and lower-HEI score clusters. Another logistic analysis contrasted 2 higher- and then the 2 lower-HEI clusters with each other to examine sociodemographic factors contributing to cluster membership.

RESULTS

Five clusters were identified, each displaying a distinct dietary pattern. Older, non-Hispanic Black, and overweight children had higher odds of being in the higher-HEI clusters than the medium-HEI cluster. Being older and non-Hispanic Black were linked to higher odds of being in the lower-HEI clusters than the medium-HEI cluster. Conversely, being Mexican American and living with a college-educated reference person were associated with lower odds of being in the lower-HEI clusters compared with the medium-HEI cluster. Among the higher-HEI clusters, Mexican American and Asian American children had higher odds of being in the Pescatarian cluster. Among the lower-HEI clusters, children who were racially or ethnically minoritized had lower odds of being in the Excess Sugar cluster.

CONCLUSIONS

Children in this study displayed different dietary patterns, with key sociodemographic variation.

Food Insecurity Among Aging SNAP Participants and Eligible Nonparticipants in Two Predominantly Low-Income Black Neighborhoods: Implications for SNAP Enrollment and Outreach for Older Adults

BACKGROUND

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) plays a critical role in alleviating poverty and food insecurity. Despite these benefits, many older Americans who are eligible for SNAP do not participate in the program. Few studies have explored household factors and food insecurity outcomes associated with nonparticipation among older Black Americans.

OBJECTIVES

The study aim was to explore changes in food insecurity and related financial hardship outcomes between 2020 and 2021 among SNAP participants, eligible nonparticipants, and ineligible nonparticipants; compare reasons for not participating in SNAP; and to compare household factors associated with SNAP nonparticipation.

METHODS

Longitudinal design examining data from 2020 and 2021 to assess changes in food insecurity over the course of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Participants were 528 adults (aged 30 to 97 years) in households randomly selected from a listing of all residential addresses in two predominantly Black neighborhoods with lower incomes in Pittsburgh, PA, and surveyed between March to May 2020 and May to December 2021.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Food security was measured using the validated 6-item US Department of Agriculture Adult Food Security Survey Module.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

Findings are based on a descriptive analysis of food security and related indicators. Statistical testing was performed to assess differences between SNAP participation status and individual characteristics, food security, and financial hardship using Wald F test for continuous measures and Pearson χ2 test for categorical measures. A multivariable linear model was used to assess the association of SNAP participation and eligibility status with change in food insecurity.

RESULTS

In cross-sectional analyses of 2021 data, no differences were observed between SNAP participants and eligible nonparticipants for food insecurity, food bank use, mean weekly food spending per person, and difficulty paying for basics. However, with respect to changes in food insecurity over the course of the pandemic, SNAP participants experienced a greater improvement in mean food security scores between 2020 and 2021 (-0.52 reduction in mean food insecurity score or a 16% improvement in food security; P ≤ 0.05) relative to SNAP-eligible nonparticipants. Perceived ineligibility (71.3%) and perceived lack of need (23%) were the most common reasons for not participating in SNAP.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one-third of SNAP participants and eligible nonparticipants experienced food insecurity and financial hardship. However, there were differences in the changes in food insecurity between these groups.

California provider and advocate perspectives about opportunities to optimize nutrition services and resources in the first 1000 days

Background

Nutrition in the first 1000 days of life, from conception to age 2 years, plays a critical role in shaping offspring's physical and mental development, yet many families from underserved backgrounds suffer from nutrition inequity during this important stage of development. The objective of this study is to assess nutrition services and resources provided to families during the first 1000 days across diverse settings in California.

Methods

A semistructured survey was disseminated to healthcare and educational providers who offer services to pregnant and/or postpartum women and children up to age 2 years. Perspectives about five domains of early-life nutrition services and resources were assessed: (1) accessibility, (2) mode of content delivery, (3) content of messages, (4) breastfeeding support, and (5) professional development on early-life nutrition. Mixed methodology was used to conduct descriptive and thematic analyses for closed and open-ended survey questions, respectively.

Results

Survey respondents (n = 148) worked in healthcare (37%), governmental (20%), community (20%), and childcare settings (23%). Over 60% primarily served low-income families. Less than 9% reported that their organizations provide prenatal nutrition messaging about critical micronutrients required to support foetal neurodevelopment, highlighting an opportunity for professional development training in nutrition. Need for equitable access to nutrition education and resources by addressing Language, Income, Food resources, Time and Transportation (LIFTT) was a cross-cutting theme that emerged.

Conclusion

Providers perceive a need to enhance LIFTT accessibility and improve delivery of early-life nutrition-related services for families in the first 1000 days by providing topic-specific education and culturally responsive resources with consistent, evidence-based messages.

The association between unhealthy dietary behaviors and participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): No evidence in support of the self-selection hypothesis

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants tend to have unhealthier dietary consumption compared to eligible non-participants. It has been suggested, though never empirically tested, that individuals who enroll in SNAP may have unhealthy diets prior to program participation. Using a longitudinal cohort study design, we examined the association between low-income adults' SNAP participation status and prior dietary behaviors to test the argument that individuals with unhealthier dietary consumption self-select into SNAP. A sample of households from predominantly lower-income cities were surveyed at baseline (T1) and 2-4 years later (T2). The main analyses were restricted to adults who did not participate in SNAP at T1 and with household income <200% of the federal poverty line (n = 170) at both T1 and T2. Participants were grouped into two categories, based on their SNAP participation at T2; (a) Non-participants (n = 132): no SNAP participation at T1 or T2, and (b) T2 SNAP participants (n = 38): SNAP participation at T2 but not T1. Daily consumption frequency of whole fruits, fruit juice, vegetables, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), and energy dense snacks were measured through self-reports. To observe dietary differences between the two groups prior to SNAP participation, T1 behaviors were compared. There were no significant differences in dietary behaviors at T1 (prior to SNAP participation) between non-participants and T2 participants, providing no evidence of self-selection of individuals with unhealthier dietary consumption into SNAP among our study sample. Improvements in SNAP participants' diets may benefit from focusing on policy changes that encourage healthy dietary habits during participation in the program.

Association of food insecurity with health, access to care, affordability of care, financial burden of care, and financial hardships among US adults during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVES

To examine the associations between food insecurity and health, access to care, affordability of care, financial burden of care, and financial hardships among US adults during the COVID-19 pandemic and examine whether the associations were less pronounced among adults with safety nets.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective longitudinal cohort study using the 2020-2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

METHODS

Linear probability models were used to assess the associations between food insecurity in one year and the outcomes of interest in the following year while adjusting for baseline characteristics. We performed the analyses for the entire population and then conducted stratified analyses for adults with and without Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits or Medicaid coverage.

RESULTS

Compared with food-secure adults, food-insecure adults were 9.1 percentage points less likely to report life satisfaction and 9.9, 10.2, and 13.2 percentage points more likely to experience delays in getting medical care, postpone or forgo medical care because of cost, and struggle with paying medical bills. Food-insecure adults were 30.4, 27.2, and 23.5 percentage points more likely to face challenges in affording necessities, paying utility bills, and meeting rent or mortgage payments on time than food-secure adults. Notably, the strengths of these associations were attenuated among adults with SNAP benefits or Medicaid coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Food insecurity was associated with poor health, limited access to and affordability of care, and a greater financial burden of care among US adults during the pandemic. Nevertheless, safety net programs can play a critical role in alleviating adverse consequences.

Relationship between Food Security, Nutrition Security, and Diabetes: The Role of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation

Background

Inadequate nutrition and poor diet quality are associated with a heightened risk of diabetes. The connection between food insecurity measures and diabetes has been established, with evidence indicating that Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation contributes to reductions in food insecurity. Recently developed nutrition security measures, defined as the ability to acquire healthful foods to prevent diseases, and their association with diabetes and SNAP participation are not yet understood.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the relationship between food security and nutrition security in relation to diabetes overall and by SNAP participation and nutrition security as potential modifiers.

Methods

Secondary data analysis of cross-sectional pilot study data collected from adults in 5 US states (N = 517). Logistic regression mixed models included moderation analysis and clustering effects by state to address site-level confounding.

Results

Higher nutrition security scores among adults, after adjusting for confounders, were significantly associated with lower odds of diabetes risk (adjusted odds ratio = 0.59; 95% confidence interval: 0.40, 0.87; P value = 0.008). Statistically significant interaction effect of differences according to SNAP participation was observed for nutrition security (Phomogeneity/interaction = 0.021), adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, employment, National School Lunch Program, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, food pantry use, household with children, survey mode, and food security. The association between food security and diabetes was not statistically significant overall. However, statistically significant interaction effect of differences according to SNAP participation was observed for food security (Phomogeneity/interaction = 0.047). Further, no interaction effect of differences in nutrition security was found between food security and self-reported diabetes/prediabetes (Phomogeneity/interaction = 0.250).

Conclusions

This study sheds light on the early exploration of the intricate relationship between nutrition security and diabetes. The findings suggest that a higher nutrition security score, after adjusting for confounders, was significantly associated with lower odds of diabetes risk. Notably, there were statistically significant interaction effects in these associations based on SNAP participation.

Investigating level of food security among patients with hypertension and diabetes at a student-run free clinic

Background

Nutritional recommendations for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension assume high food security. However, food insecurity is estimated to affect 10% of the US population and more so patients at our student-run free clinic (SRFC). The aims of the study were to (1) assess food security in patients with a diagnosis of T2DM, hypertension, or both and (2) examine the relationship between food security and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) or blood pressure at an SRFC.

Methods

Eligible participants completed a 10-item food security questionnaire and an item addressing perceived barriers. Most recent HbA1C and blood pressure measurements were gathered. Comparisons were made using univariate or multivariate linear regression analysis.

Results

Results from 79 participants showed that 25.3% experienced high food security, 29.1% had marginal food security, 13.9% had low food security, and 30.4% had very low food security. No statistically significant association was found between food security category and HbA1C or blood pressure. However, we did find that approximately 73% of patients experienced some degree of food insecurity.

Conclusions

Patients at our SRFC are ethnically and racially diverse, most have a high school education or less, and most have food insecurity. No association between food security category and HbA1C or blood pressure control was found. Providers should consider the degree of food insecurity and incorporate a culturally sensitive approach when making nutritional recommendations.

Racial and ethnic demographics in malnutrition related deaths

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Currently, 40 million Americans are food insecure. They are forced to skip meals and buy non-nutritious food, leading to health disparities for those of low socioeconomic status. This study aims to investigate relationships between malnutrition deaths and sociodemographic groups.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study from 2009 to 2018 used aggregate data from the CDC Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC Wonder). Patients with known race, gender, and Hispanic origin age ≥18 who died from malnutrition (E40-E46) were included. Place of death was grouped into home, inpatient medical facility, hospice facility, nursing facility/long-term care, other (including outpatient, ED, and DOA), and unknown. Crude rates of malnutrition deaths per 100,000 persons for race, gender, and Hispanic origin were calculated using US census estimates. Gross proportions of total deaths were calculated for each place of death.

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2018, there were 46,517 malnutrition deaths in the US. Death rates for Black (1.8) and White Americans (2) were twice as high compared to Native Americans (1.1) and Asians or Pacific Islanders (0.7). Death rates among females (2.3) were higher than males (1.5). Death rates among non-Hispanics (2.1) were twice as high compared to Hispanics (0.7). Most people who died of malnutrition died in hospitals (37 %).

CONCLUSION

Malnutrition deaths occur at greater rates among White, Black, non-Hispanic Americans, and females. Despite reported disparities in food access, Black and White Americans have similar malnutrition mortality rates, raising concerns that malnutrition is under-diagnosed among Black patients. Given the existing nutrition literature, this finding requires further investigation.

Food Insecurity, Neighborhood Food Environment, and Health Disparities: State of the Science, Research Gaps and Opportunities

Food insecurity and the lack of access to affordable, nutritious food are associated with poor dietary quality and an increased risk of diet-related diseases, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and certain types of cancer. Those of lower socioeconomic status and racial and ethnic minority groups experience higher rates of food insecurity, are more likely to live in under-resourced food environments, and continue to bear the greatest burden of diet-related chronic diseases in the United States. Despite the growing body of literature in this area, there are still significant gaps in our understanding of the various pathways that link food insecurity and neighborhood food environments to racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in health and the most effective intervention strategies to address these disparities. To better understand the science in this area, the National Institutes of Health, in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), convened a virtual 3-d workshop 21-23 September 2021: Food Insecurity, Neighborhood Food Environment, and Nutrition Health Disparities: State of the Science. The workshop brought together a diverse group of researchers, practitioners, policymakers, and federal partners with expertise in nutrition, the food environment, health and social policy, and behavioral and social sciences. The workshop had the following 3 research objectives: 1) summarize the state of the science and knowledge gaps related to food insecurity, neighborhood food environments, and nutrition health disparities, 2) identify research opportunities and strategies to address research gaps, and 3) examine evidence-based interventions and implementation approaches to address food insecurity and neighborhood food environments to promote health equity. This article summarizes workshop proceedings and describes research gaps and future opportunities that emerged from discussions.

The association between the supplemental nutrition assistance programme participation and dental caries among U.S. adults

INTRODUCTION

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programme (SNAP) is a federal programme aimed to alleviate hunger and improve food insecurity. The impact of SNAP participation on overall health has been studied. However, little is known about the effects of SNAP participation on oral health. We aimed to investigate the association between participating in SNAP and dental caries and to explore the role of food insecurity as a moderator in this relationship.

METHODS

We obtained data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles 2011-2012 and 2013-2014.The primary outcome was untreated dental caries (none vs. one or more). Self-reported SNAP participation status in the past 12 months was the predictor, and food security was the moderator. Food security was measured as overall food security status (full food secure/ food insecure) and household-level food security (full, marginal, low and very low). Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between SNAP and dental caries, and whether food insecurity moderates this relationship. Statistical analysis was carried out in September 2020.

RESULTS

Our results suggested that after adjusting for potential confounders, SNAP participants were more likely to have untreated dental caries than non-SNAP participants (odds ratio: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2-2.0). Food security status did not alter the relationship between SNAP participation and untreated dental caries.

CONCLUSIONS

Food security status did not alter the relationship between SNAP participation and untreated dental caries. SNAP participation was associated with untreated dental caries among U.S. adults, and this was not affected by their food security status.

Exploring the Lived Experiences of Rural Hospice Social Workers in Navigating "Cracked" Systems

Social workers often encounter health and resource disparities and caregiver challenges in support of hospice patients and families. Social workers also play a critical role in navigating systems and confronting systemic barriers. Their input regarding macro practice is invaluable, though there is not much literature pertaining to end-of-life disparities as experienced from the social worker point of view. There is also limited research from the hospice social worker perspective, with little pertaining to those providing care in rural areas. To address these gaps, this phenomenological study explored the lived experiences of rural hospice social workers to better understand their role in these matters. Data collection occurred through in-depth unstructured qualitative interviews. A total of 19 rural hospice workers participated in the study. There were four main themes identified: systemic issues in hospice settings, resource and geographic barriers, tensions and benefits of interprofessional collaboration, and hospice work environment. Based on these findings, recommendations for hospice social work practice, research, and policy include support of and elevation of the voice of hospice social workers on the interprofessional team, assessment of resource barriers to improve hospice social work interventions and improve quality of life for dying persons, education of hospice administrators to understand best ways to support hospice social, and implementation of policy change to expedite access to caregiver resources at end of life.

Association of emergency allotment discontinuation with household food insufficiency in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants: A quasi-experimental study

OBJECTIVE

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) was modified to mitigate food insecurity faced by low-income families during the pandemic. These changes included enhancement of SNAP benefits via 2020 emergency allotments (EA). Despite the high food price inflation in 2022, 17 states ceased providing EA benefits by end of 2022. The objective of this research is to examine the impact of EA discontinuation on food insufficiency.

METHODS

Using Household Pulse Survey data from December 2021-January 2023, SNAP participants (n = 57,556) from states that discontinued EA at some point during the study period and those from states that did not discontinue EA were included. The main analyses examined the impact of EA discontinuation on food insufficiency via staggered difference-in-difference models using two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regression. Additional analyses examined this association using Callaway-Sant'Anna approach for difference-in-difference analyses.

RESULTS

Using TWFE, EA discontinuation was significantly associated with increased food insufficiency in the overall sample, as well as in individuals who were non-Hispanic White and Hispanic, and who had annual family incomes of less than $25,000. Investigation of time-varying association of EA termination with food insufficiency suggested that EA discontinuation was significantly associated with greater food insufficiency in the second week following rollback. DiD analyses using Callaway-Sant'Anna approach suggested that states' rollback of EA was significantly associated with higher food insufficiency in non-Hispanic White individuals.

CONCLUSION

Findings imply that EA discontinuation, amidst the corresponding surge in inflation, could have contributed to increased rates of household food insufficiency.

Cumulative Health Vulnerabilities Among Adolescents by Age and Neighborhood Opportunity

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Early detection of health vulnerabilities in adolescents is integral to promoting healthy behaviors into adulthood. Our objective was to quantify the prevalence of health vulnerabilities among adolescents and examine differences by age and neighborhood opportunity.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional analysis of electronic health record data for adolescents aged 13 to 18 years with preventive visits in a large pediatric primary care network between September 2021 and September 2022, we examined 5 health vulnerabilities: Tobacco use, substance use, firearm access, condomless intercourse, and depressive symptoms. Health vulnerabilities were assessed via self-reported adolescent health questionnaire and the validated Patient Health Questionnaire-Modified. Prevalence of health vulnerabilities were calculated alone and in combination, and compared by age and by quintile of neighborhood Child Opportunity Index (COI) score. Multivariable logistic regression estimated associations of neighborhood COI with reporting ≥2 health vulnerabilities.

RESULTS

Among 40 197 adolescents (57.7% aged 13-15 years, 66.3% living in "high"/"very high" COI neighborhoods), 29.7% reported at least 1 health vulnerability and 7.9% reported ≥2 vulnerabilities. Cumulative health vulnerabilities were more prevalent among older adolescents and adolescents from lower opportunity neighborhoods. In adjusted models, lower COI was associated with 65% higher odds of having ≥2 vulnerabilities (odds ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.43-1.91) compared with adolescents from the highest COI quintile.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the relationship between health vulnerabilities and neighborhood opportunities among adolescents may allow pediatric primary care providers and health systems to offer more tailored community support services and transdiagnostic specialized care navigation to address the health needs of teens with multiple vulnerabilities.

Structural Inequality and COVID-19 Mortality in Chicago: An Ecological Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prior studies establish that Black neighborhoods and older persons experience higher rates of COVID-19 death than white neighborhoods and younger persons. However, such works point to the effect of age on COVID-19 mortality and the racial and ethnic inequalities present in COVID-19 deaths as independent vectors of inequality, neglecting to consider the multiplicative impact of structural conditions.

METHODS

Using weekly ZIP code counts of deaths from March 2020 through July 2021 from the Chicago Department of Public Health (n = 4168) and measures of structural characteristics derived from the 5-year estimates of the 2019 American Community Survey, the current study examined how place, racial composition, and the age structure of communities act in tandem to shape the number of deaths due to COVID-19. We used STATA to estimate negative binomial models predictive of COVID-19 mortality.

RESULTS

Findings from our statistical analysis revealed that in predominately Black neighborhoods, racial composition amplified the association of age structure (65 +) on COVID-19 mortality by 40%. Neighborhoods that were not predominately black did not show this multiplicative risk of death. Our findings underscore that the elevated risk of death in in older Black communities is attributed to historic and contemporary structural inequality.

CONCLUSIONS

Although society typically frames pandemics as natural disasters, doing such undermines dimensions of marginalization that amplify vulnerability among select populations. To begin eliminating such inequalities, the USA must deal with the entrenched limitations of institutions that render unequal attention and care to sectors of its population.

Adequacy of SNAP Benefits for Indiana Households, 2022

We investigated the adequacy of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for Indiana households. Methods included focus groups, interviews, and a statewide survey of 652 households. SNAP benefit-level increases over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic increased their adequacy overall yet were still inadequate for some households. As of June 2022, Indiana households reported their SNAP benefits lasting 13 days a month. The inadequacy of SNAP benefits reveals that some participating households still experience food insecurity, which has adverse public health implications. (Am J Public Health. 2023;113(S3):S224-S226. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307408).

Assessing the effect of adverse economic events on severity of hunger among food pantry clients

This study assessed relationship between adverse economic events (AEE) and hunger level (i.e., little to no, moderate, severe). A cross-sectional survey was conducted from June to August 2018 in 10 food pantries with 616 food pantry users. Hunger level was assessed by the Household Hunger Scale. AEE were evaluated over the past 3 months. Participants (60.55%) experienced unexpected or increased medical expenses (17.69%), job loss (13.64%), pay reduction (11.85%), and death of a family member (9.09%). Pay reduction (OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.12, 3.14) and increased debt (OR = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.92, 3.84) were associated with moderate hunger; death of a family member (OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.21, 4.90), pay reduction (OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.24, 7.04), and increased debt (OR = 3.46, 95% CI: 1.98, 6.04) were associated with severe hunger. Awareness of AEE can inform public health programs and policies for people in need of additional resources, which is essential in times of increased economic instability.

Low-Income Asian Americans: High Levels Of Food Insecurity And Low Participation In The CalFresh Nutrition Program

Little is known about food insecurity and the extent of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation in the heterogeneous Asian American population. Using California Health Interview Survey data from the period 2011-20, we examined both issues among low-income Asian American adults from six origin groups: Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, South Asian, and Vietnamese. We found high and varied levels of overall food insecurity, with the highest burden among Filipino adults (40 percent). Food insecurity by severity was also heterogenous; very low food security affected 2 percent of Chinese adults but 9 percent and 10 percent of Filipino and Japanese adults, respectively. Participation in CalFresh (California-implemented SNAP) ranged from 11 percent and 12 percent among Korean and Chinese adults, respectively, to 20 percent among Vietnamese adults. Compared with English-proficient low-income Asian American adults, those with limited English proficiency were no less likely to participate in CalFresh, possibly reflecting language assistance required by California law and provided by community-based organizations. These results underscore the importance of collecting and reporting disaggregated data by Asian origin group that could inform targeted outreach and interventions.

"I Felt Like I Had Something I Could Do About It": Pediatric Clinician Experiences With a Food Insecurity-Focused Produce Prescription Program

Efforts to address food insecurity (FI) in pediatric clinics have increased over the last decade, particularly after a groundbreaking 2015 American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement supporting universal routine screening and intervening. Produce prescription programs are a novel strategy addressing FI. Limited data exist on effectiveness and feasibility in pediatric clinical settings. This study explored clinician experiences after enrolling patients who completed a produce prescription program in an urban primary-care clinic in Washington, DC. One year after program completion, the experiences of 11 clinicians were explored through qualitative interviews and coded using thematic content analysis. Identified themes explored changes in clinician knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Clinicians expressed that the program offered a tangible resource to address FI, building trust and strengthening their sense of self-efficacy in addressing families' concerns. Incorporation of a produce prescription intervention to address FI was feasible and well accepted by pediatric primary-care clinicians.

Food Insecurity and Diabetes: Overview of Intersections and Potential Dual Solutions

Food insecurity increases the risk of developing diabetes and its complications. In this article, we describe the complex relationship that exists between food insecurity and diabetes and describe potential mechanisms that may underlie this association. We then describe how two different types of interventions, food-is-medicine and federal nutrition assistance programs, may help address both food insecurity and health. Finally, we outline the research, policy, and practice opportunities that exist to address food insecurity and reduce diabetes-related health disparities.

Policy Opportunities and Legal Considerations to Reform SNAP-Authorized Food Retail Environments

CONTEXT

There is an invigorated national interest in nutrition security, with emphasis on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) playing a key role.

OBJECTIVE

To support healthy food purchasing, several strategies have emerged to modify the food retail environment. However, the legal feasibility of several such policy options has not been established.

DESIGN

Research was conducted using Lexis+ to evaluate statutes, regulations, and case law to determine the legal feasibility of requiring retail-based SNAP signage and nutrition disclosures, healthy endcaps and checkout aisles, and tying advertising restrictions to the licensing of SNAP retailers.

SETTING

US in-store and online food retail retailers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Legal feasibility.

RESULTS

Requiring retailers that designate certain foods or locations as SNAP-eligible to consistently do so in all SNAP-eligible pages/locations is likely feasible. If properly drafted to focus on the nutritional quality of food, healthy checkout and endcap restrictions are legally feasible. It is of unclear legal feasibility to require retailers (especially in-store) to disclose nutrition-related labeling, shelf tags, or nonfactual symbols indicating the relative healthfulness of products. Restricting or banning advertising is not legally feasible even if the government ties the restrictions to retail licensing requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

Entities seeking to support healthy food retail should not seek to restrict advertising or compel retailers to convey messages against their interests. The government can license retailers and require them to abide by laws and other requirements that do not violate their constitutional rights. The government can also use its own speech through public service announcements, billboards, and transit advertising to encourage healthy food consumption for all shoppers including those who use SNAP. Additional research is warranted into online retail practices to evaluate variations in online checkout pages and to determine whether online retailers treat SNAP participants differently from non-SNAP participants.

Adoption Of Standard Medical Deduction Increased SNAP Enrollment And Benefits In 21 Participating States

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) reduces food insecurity but is underused among many households. To increase SNAP participation, twenty-one states have adopted the standard medical deduction (SMD), which simplifies administrative requirements for eligible households (those with older adults or people with disabilities). However, to offset the costs of the SMD, states have reduced SNAP benefits elsewhere, raising concerns of negative spillover effects. Using national data from the period 2004-19 and a fixed-effects estimator, we found that the SMD was associated with increased SNAP participation among SMD-eligible households, in terms of aggregate household counts (20 percent) and as a share of households receiving SNAP (5 percentage points). Moreover, estimated annual SNAP benefits per state increased for SMD-eligible households but decreased (although not statistically significantly) for ineligible households. Offsetting SNAP costs may have benefited households with older adults and households with people with disabilities at the expense of others.

Association of parent-child interactions with parental psychological distress and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction

The effects of psychological distress/resilience on parent-child engagement (e.g., family dinners, reading) during the COVID-19 pandemic have not been well studied. Among very young children from underrepresented backgrounds enrolled in the ongoing longitudinal Bronx Mother Baby Health Study of healthy term infants, we (1) examined associations between exposures to COVID-19-related events, demographic factors and parental psychological distress and resilience; and (2) correlated these factors with parent-child engagement activities.

Methods

Between June 2020-August 2021, parents of 105 Bronx Mother Baby Health Study participants aged birth-25 months completed questionnaires related to exposures to COVID-19-related events, frequency of positive parent-child engagement activities, food and housing insecurity, and parental psychological distress and resilience. Families were also asked open ended questions about the pandemic's impact.

Results

29.8% and 47.6% of parents reported food and housing insecurity, respectively. Greater exposures to COVID-19-related events were associated with increased parental psychological distress. Positive parent-child interactions were associated with demographic factors and higher levels of maternal education, but not with exposures to COVID-19-related events.

Discussion

This study adds to a growing body of literature on the negative impacts of COVID-19 exposures and psychosocial stressors on families during the pandemic, supporting the need for enhanced mental health resources and social supports for families.

"If I start panicking over having enough, then I start eating too much": Understanding the eating behaviors of SNAP recipients in larger bodies during COVID-19

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Living in a food-insecure household may increase the risk for disordered eating. Though the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) was designed to reduce food insecurity, it may increase risk for disordered eating with the frequency in which benefits are distributed. Limited research has explored the lived experiences of managing eating behaviors while on SNAP, particularly among SNAP participants in larger bodies, and during COVID-19. Thus, the purpose of this study is to examine the experiences with eating behaviors among adults with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m², and who received SNAP benefits during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Eligible adults were recruited to participate in a semi-structured interview. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis and content analysis.

RESULTS

Participants (N = 16), had a mean (±SD) age of 43.4 ± 10.9 years, and overwhelmingly identified as female (86 %). One-third of the participants were Black. We identified 4 main themes: (1) not having enough money/benefits to cover needs; (2) navigating loss of control and emotional eating; (3) making sure the kids are alright; and (4) still feeling the pressure to manage weight.

CONCLUSION

Managing eating behaviors while also navigating SNAP benefits is complex and may exacerbate risk of disordered eating.

Impact of the Affordable Care Act on participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program among low-income older Medicare beneficiaries

BACKGROUND

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) provisions, especially Medicaid expansion, are believed to have "spillover effects," such as boosting participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) among eligible individuals in the United States (US). However, little empirical evidence exists about the impact of the ACA, with its focus on the dual eligible population, on SNAP participation. The current study investigates whether the ACA, under an explicit policy aim of enhancing the interface between Medicare and Medicaid, has improved participation in the SNAP among low-income older Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS

We extracted 2009 through 2018 data from the US Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) for low-income (≤ %138 Federal Poverty Level [FPL]) older Medicare beneficiaries (n = 50,466; aged ≥ 65), and low-income (≤ %138 FPL) younger adults (aged 20 to < 65 years, n = 190,443). MEPS respondents of > %138 FPL incomes, younger Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, and older adults without Medicare were excluded from this study. Using a quasi-experimental comparative interrupted time-series design, we examined (1) whether ACA's support for the Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligible program, through facilitating the online Medicaid application process, was associated with an increase in SNAP uptake among low-income older Medicare beneficiaries, and (2) in the instance of an association, to assess the magnitude of SNAP uptake that can be explicitly attributed to the policy's implementation. The outcome, SNAP participation, was measured annually from 2009 through 2018. The year 2014 was set as the intervention point when the Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office started facilitating Medicaid applications online for eligible Medicare beneficiaries.

RESULTS

Overall, the change in the probability of SNAP enrollment from the pre- to post-intervention period was 17.4 percentage points higher among low-income older Medicare enrollees, compared to similarly low-income, SNAP-eligible, younger adults (β = 0.174, P < .001). This boost in SNAP uptake was significant and more apparent among older White (β = 0.137, P = .049), Asians (β = 0.408, P = .047), and all non-Hispanic adults (β = 0.030, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The ACA had a positive, measurable effect on SNAP participation among older Medicare beneficiaries. Policymakers should consider additional approaches that link enrollment to multiple programs to increase SNAP participation. Further, there may be a need for additional, targeted efforts to address structural barriers to uptake among African Americans and Hispanics.

Post-Resettlement Food Insecurity: Afghan Refugees and Challenges of the New Environment

BACKGROUND

Lack of access to adequate, safe, and nutritious food is a major concern for the Afghan population due to ongoing war and humanitarian crises. Recently resettled Afghan refugees in the US continue to face challenges securing adequate, nutritious food resources in new environments. This study examined Afghan refugees' food access and insecurity in the San Joaquin Valley, California.

METHODS

Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted to collect the perspectives and experiences of key informants and newly arrived Afghan refugees.

RESULTS

This study highlights environmental and structural factors (availability and accessibility of grocery stores; availability of religious-appropriate items in the stores; the public benefit received by a family; and public transportation) and individual factors (religious and cultural practices; financial and language barriers) as major determinants of post-resettlement food insecurity.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the accessibility and affordability of culturally and religiously appropriate food items within the US food system, enhancing the collaboration of community volunteers and resettlement organizations in the direct assistance of new families, and providing continuous access to public benefits are possible steps to mitigate the risk of food insecurity among Afghan refugees. This study suggests a continuous examination of the degree of food insecurity in this population and its attendant health impacts.

Experiences of Parents Earning Low Wages in Raleigh, North Carolina: Compounding Effects of Caretaker Responsibility, Piecemeal Resources, and Lack of Economic Opportunities

We conducted interviews with parents earning low wages to understand their experiences related to financial responsibilities and use of government and informal resources in Raleigh, North Carolina. Inadequate economic opportunities and assistance programs, and high costs of living, compounded into cycles of playing catch up on expenses. Assistance programs aimed at alleviating hardships related to poverty were described as piecemeal. We found that social and economic systems failed to support parents earning low wages. Our findings suggest that ordinances that assure a livable minimum wage paired with expansions of safety net programs could better meet the needs these parents.

Food security status and breast cancer screening among women in the United States: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study and Health Care and Nutrition Study

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of food insecurity on biennial breast cancer screenings (i.e., mammography or breast X-ray) among older women in the United States (US).

METHODS

Data from the 2014 and 2016 waves of the Health and Retirement Study and the 2013 Health Care and Nutrition Study were used. The analyses were limited to a nationally representative sample of 2,861 women between 50 and 74 years of age, residing in the US. We employed a propensity score weighting method to balance observed confounders between food-secure and food-insecure women and fit a binary logistic regression to investigate population-level estimates for the association between food security and breast cancer screening.

RESULTS

Food insecurity was significantly associated with failure to obtain a mammogram or breast X-ray within the past two years. Food-insecure women had 54% lower odds of reporting breast cancer screening in the past 2 years (adjusted OR = 0.46; 95% CI 0.30-0.70, p-value < 0.001) as compared to food-secure women. Additional factors associated with a higher likelihood of receiving breast cancer screenings included greater educational attainment, higher household income, regular access to health care/advice, not smoking, and not being physically disabled or experiencing depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Results demonstrate a socioeconomic gradient existing in regard to the utilization of regular breast cancer screenings among women. Those who tend to have lower education, lower income, and lack of reliable healthcare access are more likely to be food insecure. Thus, more likely to face the financial, logistical, or environmental barriers in obtaining screening services that accompany food insecurity.