Pharmacokinetic Profile of Ganciclovir After its Oral Administration and From its Prodrug, Valganciclovir, in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Estimation of Ganciclovir Exposure in Adults Transplant Patients by Machine Learning

INTRODUCTION

Valganciclovir, a prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), is used to prevent cytomegalovirus infection after transplantation, with doses adjusted based on creatinine clearance (CrCL) to target GCV AUC0-24 h of 40-60 mg*h/L. This sometimes leads to overexposure or underexposure. This study aimed to train, test and validate machine learning (ML) algorithms for accurate GCV AUC0-24 h estimation in solid organ transplantation.

METHODS

We simulated patients for different dosing regimen (900 mg/24 h, 450 mg/24 h, 450 mg/48 h, 450 mg/72 h) using two literature population pharmacokinetic models, allocating 75% for training and 25% for testing. Simulations from two other literature models and real patients provided validation datasets. Three independent sets of ML algorithms were created for each regimen, incorporating CrCL and 2 or 3 concentrations. We evaluated their performance on testing and validation datasets and compared them with MAP-BE.

RESULTS

XGBoost using 3 concentrations generated the most accurate predictions. In testing dataset, they exhibited a relative bias of -0.02 to 1.5% and a relative RMSE of 2.6 to 8.5%. In the validation dataset, a relative bias of 1.5 to 5.8% and 8.9 to 16.5%, and a relative RMSE of 8.5 to 9.6% and 10.7% to 19.7% were observed depending on the model used. XGBoost algorithms outperformed or matched MAP-BE, showing enhanced generalization and robustness in their estimates. When applied to real patients' data, algorithms using 2 concentrations showed relative bias of 1.26% and relative RMSE of 12.68%.

CONCLUSIONS

XGBoost ML models accurately estimated GCV AUC0-24 h from limited samples and CrCL, providing a strategy for optimized therapeutic drug monitoring.

Pre-emptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viraemia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and death in solid organ transplant recipients. Pre-emptive treatment of patients with CMV viraemia using antiviral agents has been suggested as an alternative to routine prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2006 and updated in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of pre-emptive treatment of CMV viraemia to prevent CMV disease and death (any cause) and the indirect effects of CMV infection (acute rejection, graft loss, opportunistic infections) in solid organ transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies was searched up to 17 December 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing pre-emptive treatment with placebo, no specific treatment, or antiviral prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of the identified studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted all data. Results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model. The certainty of evidence was assessed per outcome using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we have included seven new studies, bringing the total number of included studies to 22 (1883 participants). Of these, seven investigated pre-emptive treatment versus placebo or standard care, 12 looked at pre-emptive treatment versus antiviral prophylaxis, one study investigated oral versus intravenous pre-emptive treatment, one investigated pre-emptive valganciclovir versus pre-emptive ganciclovir, and one investigated letermovir 40 mg twice/day versus 80 mg once/day. Studies were conducted in Australia, Brazil, the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Japan, Norway, Spain, South Korea, and the USA. Organ transplant recipients included kidney, liver, heart, lung, and kidney-pancreas. Thirteen studies were single-centre studies, six were multicentre, and three were unknown. The number of participants ranged from 12 to 296. Overall, selection bias was unclear (55%); performance, detection and attrition bias were high (91%, 63% and 95%, respectively), and reporting bias was low (55%). Compared with placebo or standard care, pre-emptive treatment probably reduces the risk of CMV disease (7 studies, 315 participants: RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.80; I2 = 54%; moderate-certainty evidence) but may result in little or no difference in death (any cause) (3 studies, 176 participants: RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.30; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence). Pre-emptive treatment may result in little or no difference in CMV organ involvement, CMV-associated symptoms, acute rejection, graft loss, other infections or leucopenia. Compared to prophylaxis, pre-emptive treatment may make little or no difference to the risk of developing CMV disease (11 studies, 1322 participants: RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.01; I2 = 54%; low-certainty evidence) and probably makes little or no difference to death (any cause) (9 studies, 1098 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.52; I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). Pre-emptive treatment may increase the risk of CMV infection (8 studies, 867 participants: RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.48 to 2.61; I2 = 66%; low-certainty evidence). The risk of leucopenia (7 studies, 869 participants: RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.87; I2 = 33%; moderate-certainty evidence) and neutropenia (5 studies, 859 participants: RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.90; I2 = 0% moderate certainty evidence) probably decreases with pre-emptive therapy. There may be little or no difference in the risks of acute rejection, graft loss, and infections other than CMV. Single studies were identified for comparisons between different pre-emptive treatments: 1) oral ganciclovir versus IV ganciclovir; 2) valganciclovir versus ganciclovir; 3) 40 mg twice/day versus 80 mg once/day. No differences between these treatment modalities in terms of CMV disease, death (any cause), or adverse events were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this review, we have included seven new studies, yet the available evidence is overall of low certainty and the conclusions remain similar to the previous version of this review. Pre-emptive treatment probably reduces the risk of CMV disease compared with placebo or standard care. There were no clear differences between pre-emptive treatment and prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease or reduce the risk of death (any cause). The risk of CMV infection may be higher for patients receiving pre-emptive therapy, but the risk of adverse events, such as leucopenia, is probably lower.

Antiviral medications for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid organ transplant recipients has resulted in the frequent use of prophylaxis to prevent the clinical syndrome associated with CMV infection. This is an update of a review first published in 2005 and updated in 2008 and 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of antiviral medications to prevent CMV disease and all-cause death in solid organ transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We contacted the information specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 5 February 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing antiviral medications with placebo or no treatment, comparing different antiviral medications or different regimens of the same antiviral medications for CMV prophylaxis in recipients of any solid organ transplant. Studies examining pre-emptive therapy for CMV infection are studied in a separate review and were excluded from this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

This 2024 update found four new studies, bringing the total number of included studies to 41 (5054 participants). The risk of bias was high or unclear across most studies, with a low risk of bias for sequence generation (12), allocation concealment (12), blinding (11) and selective outcome reporting (9) in fewer studies. There is high-certainty evidence that prophylaxis with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment is more effective in preventing CMV disease (19 studies: RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.52), all-cause death (17 studies: RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.92), and CMV infection (17 studies: RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77). There is moderate-certainty evidence that prophylaxis probably reduces death from CMV disease (7 studies: RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.78). Prophylaxis reduces the risk of herpes simplex and herpes zoster disease, bacterial and protozoal infections but probably makes little to no difference to fungal infection, acute rejection or graft loss. No apparent differences in adverse events with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment were found. There is high certainty evidence that ganciclovir, when compared with aciclovir, is more effective in preventing CMV disease (7 studies: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.60). There may be little to no difference in any outcome between valganciclovir and IV ganciclovir compared with oral ganciclovir (low certainty evidence). The efficacy and adverse effects of valganciclovir or ganciclovir were probably no different to valaciclovir in three studies (moderate certainty evidence). There is moderate certainty evidence that extended duration prophylaxis probably reduces the risk of CMV disease compared with three months of therapy (2 studies: RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.35), with probably little to no difference in rates of adverse events. Low certainty evidence suggests that 450 mg/day valganciclovir compared with 900 mg/day valganciclovir results in little to no difference in all-cause death, CMV infection, acute rejection, and graft loss (no information on adverse events). Maribavir may increase CMV infection compared with ganciclovir (1 study: RR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.65; moderate certainty evidence); however, little to no difference between the two treatments were found for CMV disease, all-cause death, acute rejection, and adverse events at six months (low certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis with antiviral medications reduces CMV disease and CMV-associated death, compared with placebo or no treatment, in solid organ transplant recipients. These data support the continued routine use of antiviral prophylaxis in CMV-positive recipients and CMV-negative recipients of CMV-positive organ transplants.

Evidence supporting the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of ganciclovir in transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes current knowledge of ganciclovir (GCV) and valganciclovir (ValGCV) pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics, highlighting the likely contribution from host genetic factors to interpatient variability. The evidence and challenges surrounding optimization of drug dosing through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) are examined, with recommendations made.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pharmacokinetic studies of current dosing guidelines have shown high interindividual and intraindividual variability of GCV concentrations. This is sometimes associated with a slow decline in cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load in some transplant recipients. A high incidence of GCV-associated myelosuppression has limited the use of this drug in the transplant setting. Patient groups identified to benefit from GCV TDM include pediatric patients, cystic fibrosis with lung transplantation, obese with kidney transplantation, and patients with fluctuating renal function or on hemodialysis. The emergence of refractory resistant CMV, particularly in immune compromised patients, highlights the importance of appropriate dosing of these antivirals. Host genetic factors need to be considered where recently, two host genes were shown to account for interpatient variation during ganciclovir therapy. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring has been shown to improve target antiviral-level attainment. The use of TDM may guide concentration-based dose adjustment, potentially improving virological and clinical outcomes. However, evidence supporting the use of TDM in clinical practice remains limited and further study is needed in the transplant cohort.

SUMMARY

Further studies examining novel biomarkers are needed to guide target concentrations in prophylaxis and treatment. The use of TDM in transplant recipients is likely to improve the clinical efficacy of current antivirals and optimize outcomes in transplant recipients.

Oral antiviral drugs for treatment of cytomegalovirus in transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic pathogen responsible for substantial morbidity after solid organ transplantation and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Treatment of CMV disease involves a two-pronged approach with antiviral drug treatment coupled with strategies to minimize the intensity of immune suppression.

OBJECTIVES

This narrative review examines the evidence for the current treatment of CMV disease in transplant recipients, including the use of oral antiviral drugs.

SOURCES

Literature search was performed on PubMed with keywords cytomegalovirus, transplantation, ganciclovir, valganciclovir, maribavir, letermovir, cidofovir, and foscarnet.

CONTENT

Intravenous and oral valganciclovir are the standard first-line treatment of cytomegalovirus disease after transplantation. Oral maribavir has demonstrated superior efficacy and safety over CMV DNA polymerase inhibitors for the treatment of refractory or resistant CMV infection. Transplant patients with severe and life-threatening CMV disease, those with very high viral load, and patients with impaired gastrointestinal absorption should still be treated initially with intravenous antiviral drugs, including ganciclovir and foscarnet. Criteria for the safe transition from intravenous therapies to oral antiviral drugs include achieving clinical improvement and satisfactory decline in viral load. Recurrence of CMV viremia and disease is common, particularly among transplant patients who are lymphopenic and have impaired CMV-specific immunity.

IMPLICATIONS

Oral antiviral drugs for the treatment of CMV infection and disease in transplant recipients have improved the CMV landscape, because they reduce the cost and mitigate the inconvenience and risks related to prolonged hospitalization and the need for long-term intravascular access. However, their antiviral efficacy should be complemented by an intentional strategy of reducing the degree of immune suppression to allow for immunologic recovery that ensures durable control of CMV infection.

Optimizing ganciclovir and valganciclovir dosing regimens in pediatric patients with cytomegalovirus infection: a spotlight on therapeutic drug monitoring

INTRODUCTION

Infants and immunocompromised children with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection have significant morbidity and mortality. Ganciclovir (GCV) and its oral prodrug valganciclovir (VGCV) are the major antiviral options of choice for the prophylaxis and treatment of CMV infection. However, with the currently recommended dosing regimens used in pediatric patients, large intra- and inter-individual variability of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and exposure are observed.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of GCV and VGCV in pediatrics. Moreover, the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and current clinical practice for GCV and VGCV dosing regimens optimization in pediatrics are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

GCV/VGCV TDM has shown the potential value to improve the benefit/risk ratio in pediatrics when using the therapeutic ranges derived from adults. However, well-designed studies are required to evaluate the relationship of TDM with clinical outcomes. Furthermore, studies to explore the children-specific dose-response-effect relationships will be helpful to facilitate the TDM practice. In the clinical setting, optimal sampling methods such as limited sampling strategies for pediatrics can be used in TDM and intracellular ganciclovir triphosphate may be used as an alternative TDM marker.

Cell and Tissue Specific Metabolism of Nucleoside and Nucleotide Drugs: Case Studies and Implications for Precision Medicine

Many clinically used antiviral drugs are nucleoside or nucleotide analog drugs, which have a unique mechanism of action that requires intracellular phosphorylation. This dependence on intracellular activation presents novel challenges for the discovery and development of nucleoside/nucleotide analog drugs. Contrary to many small molecule drug development programs that rely on plasma pharmacokinetics and systemic exposures, the precise mechanisms that result in efficacious intracellular nucleoside triphosphate concentrations must be understood in the process of nucleoside/nucleotide drug development. The importance is highlighted here, using the following as case studies: the herpes treatment acyclovir, the cytomegalovirus therapy ganciclovir, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatments based on tenofovir, which are also in use for HIV prophylaxis. For each drug, the specificity of metabolism that results in its activation in different cells or tissues is discussed, and the implications explored. Acyclovir's dependence on a viral enzyme for activation provides selective pressure for resistance mutations. Ganciclovir is also dependent on a viral enzyme for activation, and suicide gene therapy capitalizes on that for a novel oncology treatment. The tissue of most relevance for tenofovir activation depends on its use as treatment or as prophylaxis, and the pharmacogenomics and drug-drug interactions in those tissues must be considered. Finally, differential metabolism of different tenofovir prodrugs and its effects on toxicity risk are explored. Taken together, these examples highlight the importance of understanding tissue specific metabolism for optimal use of nucleoside/nucleotide drugs in the clinic. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Nucleoside and nucleotide analogue drugs are cornerstones in current antiviral therapy and prevention efforts that require intracellular phosphorylation for activity. Understanding their cell and tissue specific metabolism enables their rational, precision use for maximum efficacy.

Standard ganciclovir dosing results in slow decline of cytomegalovirus viral loads

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can cause severe disease, including rejection in transplant recipients. Ganciclovir and its oral prodrug valganciclovir have been used as first-line therapy for CMV disease in transplant recipients. The exposure targets of ganciclovir are not exactly known, and toxicity and resistance have interfered with ganciclovir therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ganciclovir in transplant recipients.

METHODS

We used patient data from a previous observational study on ganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in prophylaxis and therapy. The ganciclovir concentrations and CMV viral loads were determined during routine clinical care. The PK/PD population modelling and simulations were done with non-parametric methodology using the Pmetrics program.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were included in the PK modelling. The final PK model was a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. A subset of 17 patients on CMV therapy were included in the PD modelling. A median of 4 (range 2-8) viral loads were obtained per patient. A simulation of 10 000 patients showed that an approximately 1 log10 reduction of CMV viral load will be observed after 12.5 days at the current recommended dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed linked PK/PD population model and subsequent PD simulations showed slow decline of CMV viral load and it appears that dosing of (val)ganciclovir in this study might have been inadequate to achieve fast reduction of viral load. It is clear that further studies are needed to specify the PD effects of ganciclovir by performing systematic measurements of both ganciclovir concentrations and CMV viral loads.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ganciclovir: Where Are We?

BACKGROUND

Ganciclovir is the mainstay of therapy for the prophylaxis and treatment of Cytomegalovirus. However, therapy with this antiviral agent is hindered by side effects such as myelosuppression, which often leads to therapy cessation. Underdosing, as an attempt to prevent side effects, can lead to drug resistance and therapy failure. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been used to overcome these problems. The purpose of this narrative review was to give an overview of ganciclovir TDM, available assays, population pharmacokinetic models, and discuss the current knowledge gaps.

METHODS

For this narrative review, a nonsystematic literature search was performed on the PubMed database in April 2021. The following search terms were used: ganciclovir, valganciclovir, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, population pharmacokinetics, therapeutic drug monitoring, bioassay, liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography, chromatography, spectrophotometry, and toxicity. In addition, the reference lists of the included articles were screened.

RESULTS

The most common bioanalysis method identified was liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. There are different models presenting ganciclovir IC50; however, establishing a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target for ganciclovir based on preclinical data is difficult because there are no studies combining dynamic drug exposure in relation to inhibition of viral replication. The data on ganciclovir TDM show large interindividual variability, indicating that TDM may play a role in modifying the dose to reduce toxicity and prevent treatment failure related to low concentrations. The main hurdle for implementing TDM is the lack of robust data to define a therapeutic window.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the pharmacokinetics (PK) involved is relatively well-described, both the pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship are not. This is because the studies conducted to date have mainly focused on estimating ganciclovir exposure, and owing to the limited therapeutic options for CMV infections, future studies on ganciclovir are warranted.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Valganciclovir and Ganciclovir in Transplantation

Ganciclovir and valganciclovir are first choice drugs for the prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid organ and stem cell transplant recipients. Only a few studies on the pharmacokinetics and exposure/efficacy or exposure/safety relationships of ganciclovir and valganciclovir in transplant recipients have been published so far, and there are still controversies about the exposure parameter to use for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). We performed an extensive literature review of the clinical pharmacokinetics data, the exposure/effect relationships in terms of efficacy and safety, and the available tools for valganciclovir and ganciclovir TDM in adults and pediatrics transplant recipients. The pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir and valganciclovir is well described in adults and children, and a high interindividual variability is commonly observed. In contrast, the drug pharmacodynamics has been poorly described in adults and barely in children. The average 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC_0-24h ) seems to be the best predictor of efficacy and toxicity. The benefit of TDM remains controversial in adult patients but should be considered in children due to higher interindividual variability and lower probability of target attainment. Several bayesian estimators based on limited sampling strategies have been developed with this aim and may be used in clinical practice for the AUC-based individual dose adjustment of ganciclovir and valganciclovir.

Considerations and controversies of pharmacologic management of the pediatric kidney transplant recipient

Pediatric kidney transplantation has experienced considerable growth and improvement in patient and allograft outcomes over the past 20 years, in part due to advancements in immunosuppressive regimens and management. Despite this progress, care for this unique population can be challenging due to limited pediatric transplant data and trials, intricacies related to differences in children and adolescents compared with their adult counterparts, and limitations to long-term survival facing all solid organ transplant populations. Immunosuppression and infection prevention practices vary from one pediatric transplant center to another and clinical controversies exist surrounding treatment and dosing. This review aims to summarize key aspects of pharmacologic management in this population and present pertinent data that describe the influence of practice to serve as a resource for practitioners caring for this unique specialty patient population. Additionally, this review highlights select controversies that exist within pediatric kidney transplantation.

Optimization of Ganciclovir use in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients - the role of therapeutic drug monitoring

Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic infectious complication that can occur after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The mainstay of treatment and prevention of this infection is ganciclovir and its ester prodrug valganciclovir. There is conflicting evidence on the clinical utility of routine ganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as a means to optimize treatment.Areas covered: This review aims to describe the current knowledge of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of ganciclovir and valganciclovir, and to explore the evidence and challenges surrounding ganciclovir TDM within the allogeneic HCT cohort.Expert opinion: Ganciclovir TDM is important to optimize efficacy in selected patient groups where there are variable pharmacokinetic factors or inadequate response to treatment. However, defined pharmacokinetic exposures which correlate with treatment efficacy and toxicity remain elusive. Prospective clinical studies in specific patient groups are required to clarify this issue. Alternative TDM targets such as the intracellular ganciclovir triphosphate should be explored as they may prove to have better correlation with clinical outcomes and adverse effects. With recent advances in CMV immune monitoring, novel approaches integrating TDM with specific CMV immune phenotyping in a predictive model will be advantageous in optimizing ganciclovir dosing by combining TDM with a risk stratification approach.

Acyclovir in the Treatment of Herpes Viruses – A Review

Background:

Herpes Simplex (HSV) viruses are widely spread, highly contagious human pathogens. The statistics indicate that 50-90% of adults worldwide are seropositive for these viruses, mainly HSV-1 and HSV-2. The primary infection results in the appearance of watery blisters (cold sores) on the skin, lips, tongue, buccal mucosa or genitals. The ocular infection is the major cause of corneal blindness in the Western World. Once the HSV virus enters human body, it cannot be completely eradicated because HSV viruses are able to change into their latent form which can survive the treatment. The viron resides in trigeminal ganglia of the host, who becomes vulnerable to the reoccurrence of the disease during the whole lifespan. The neurotropic and neuro-invasive properties of HSV are responsible for neurodegenerative illnesses, such as Alzheimer's disease. Acyclovir and its analogues, being the inhibitors of the viral DNA replication, are the only approved medicines for HSV infection therapies.

Objective:

The current paper presents the up-to-date overview of the important pharmacological features of acyclovir, its analogues and their delivery systems including the mechanism of action, routes of administration, absorption and metabolism, as well as side effects of the therapy.

Conclusion:

Acyclovir remains the gold standard in the treatment of herpes virus infections, mainly due to the emerging of the new delivery systems improving considerably its bioavailability. The analogues of acyclovir, especially their esters, characterized by significantly higher bioavailability and safety, may gradually replace acyclovir in selected applications.

Efficacy and Safety of a Weight-based Dosing Regimen of Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Pediatric Solid-organ Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Valganciclovir has been widely used for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in solid-organ transplant recipients. However, the optimal dosing protocol and target exposure in children are still unclear. Specific data as to the efficacy and safety of low-dose/low-exposure regimens are lacking and urgently needed.

METHODS

During 2010 to 2015, the clinical efficacy and safety of a weight-based regimen of valganciclovir of 17 mg/kg/day, with a stratified dose reduction for impaired creatinine clearance, given as a CMV prophylaxis for 3 to 6 months, was retrospectively evaluated among pediatric kidney and liver transplant recipients, 12 months posttransplantation. Incidence of CMV infection was assessed by periodic measurements of viral load; adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighty-three children who had undergone 86 transplantations and were treated with 17 mg/kg of valganciclovir were included. Median age was 9.77 years (range, 0.6 to 18.9). Twelve (14%) developed CMV infection: 1 during prophylaxis and 11 during follow-up. These events comprised 6 cases of asymptomatic viremia and 6 cases of a clinically significant disease without occurrences of tissue-invasive disease. Treatment-related adverse effects occurred in 7 patients (8%), mostly hematological, resulting in premature drug cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the use of 17 mg/kg of valganciclovir for CMV prophylaxis in liver and kidney transplanted children as it showed satisfactory long-term efficacy and a good safety profile.

Ganciclovir Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Case Series

This article presents 3 cases of immunocompromised patients for whom therapeutic drug monitoring of ganciclovir in combination with cytomegalovirus viral load measurement was used to guide treatment. The first patient is diagnosed with thymoma A, the second is a heart transplant recipient, and the third is an HIV-positive patient. These patients were all diagnosed with cytomegalovirus and treated with ganciclovir. Our case studies illustrate how therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosing can be helpful in the management of these complex cases.

Pediatric Dosing of Ganciclovir and Valganciclovir: How Model-Based Simulations Can Prevent Underexposure and Potential Treatment Failure

Intravenous ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir are effective in the prevention and treatment of pediatric cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection but various dosing regimens are used in medical practice. Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model-based simulations were used to propose a new ganciclovir pediatric dosing algorithm for regulatory review and to evaluate the approved valganciclovir pediatric dosing algorithm against published dosing recommendations derived from quantitative approaches. Oral valganciclovir (mg = 7 × body surface area (BSA) × creatinine clearance according to the Schwarz formula (CrCLS) daily) and i.v. ganciclovir (mg = 3 × BSA × CrCLS daily) are effective in reaching ganciclovir target exposure for the prevention of CMV (area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)_0-24 40-60 μg ∙ hour/mL) in most pediatric patients across the full pediatric age range. In contrast, ganciclovir and valganciclovir dosing based on body weight, as commonly used in medical practice, leads to underexposure, particularly in younger pediatric patients. This example shows that model-based dosing algorithms built on clinical pharmacology and implemented using good modeling practice can prevent underexposure and reduce the risk of treatment failure in pediatric patients.

Antiviral Therapies for Herpesviruses: Current Agents and New Directions

PURPOSE

The objective of this review was to summarize the recent literature describing the current burden of disease due to herpesviruses in the antiviral and transplant era; describe mechanisms of action of antiviral agents and the development of resistance; summarize the literature of recent antiviral agents brought to market as well as agents under development; and to present literature on future strategies for herpesvirus therapeutics.

METHODS

An extensive search of the medical literature related to antiherpesviral therapy was conducted to compose this narrative review. Literature searches were performed via PubMed and ultimately 137 articles were included as most relevant to the scope of this article.

FINDINGS

Herpesviruses are a family of DNA viruses that are ubiquitous throughout human populations and share the feature of establishing lifelong infections in a latent phase with the potential of periodic reactivation. With the exception of herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus, and Epstein-Barr virus, which have a significant disease burden in individuals with normal immune function, the morbidity and mortality of the remaining viruses are primarily associated with the immunocompromised host. Over the last half-century, several agents have been tested in large randomized, placebo-controlled trials that have resulted in safe and effective antiviral agents for the treatment of many of these infections.

IMPLICATIONS

With increasing use of antiherpesviral agents for extended periods, particularly in immunocompromised hosts, the emergence of resistant viruses has necessitated the development of newer agents with novel targets and better side-effect profiles.

Low-dose valganciclovir prohylaxis is efficacious and safe in cytomegalovirus seropositive heart transplant recipients with anti-thymocyte globulin

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains an important pathogen in solid organ transplant patients.

OBJECTIVE

We executed a hybrid prophylactic and pre-emptive valganciclovir (VGCV) prophylaxis to prevent CMV infection in heart transplant patients with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction and retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of this regimen.

METHODS

Hundred adult heart transplant patients between 2004 and 2010 were included. Recipients with CMV serostatus D+/R- received VGCV 900 mg OD for 6 months and 94.2% (81/86) of R+ recipients received a low-dose 450 mg OD for 3 months. Blood CMV was monitored until 3 months after cessation of the prophylaxis.

RESULTS

All patients accomplished the prophylaxis. The overall incidence of CMV disease was 4% (4/100) and it was more frequent in D+/R- patients (P = .001). Three of eighty-six (3.5%) of R+ patients had CMV infection (one CMV disease) while on prophylaxis, 2/3 were still on the original significantly reduced renal dose though. There was one late CMV disease in both D+/R- and R+ groups. Ganciclovir/VGCV treatment was successful in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The hybrid strategy with low-dose VGCV in R+ patients with ATG was efficient and safe. The good treatment results indicate that the regimen did not lead to a clinically relevant resistance. Optimal renal dosage is essential throughout prophylaxis.

Using chemical bond-based method to predict site of metabolism for five biotransformations mediated by CYP 3A4, 2D6, and 2C9

Although it has been proposed for decades to predict site of metabolism (SOM) by in silico methods, identifying SOM correctly remains an unsolved fundamental problem and is an active area of research. In our prior works, we proposed a chemical bond-based approach to construction of SOM prediction models by integrating chemical bond descriptors and drug-metabolizing enzymes data. Although it has been evaluated with both 10-fold cross-validation and independent validation, we believe comparisons between this method and prior methods using publicly accessible external datasets are indispensable and more desirable. In the current study, based on chemical bond-based method, metabolism data released by Sheridan et al. and Zaretzki et al. was utilized to establish metabolite prediction models for CYP450 3A4, 2D6, and 2C9. Five major reaction types were involved, including Aliphatic C-hydroxylation, Aromatic C-hydroxylation, N-dealkylation, O-dealkylation, and S-Oxidation. Consequently, all our five models showed impressive performance on predicting SOMs, with accuracy and area under curve exceeded 0.940 and 0.953, respectively. Compared to prior works, our models were better than SOMP both in "SOM-scale" and "molecule-scale". In conclusion, comparisons between chemical-bond based method and prior works were conducted for the first time, which demonstrated that chemical-bond based method is better than or at least comparable to prior works.

Ganciclovir

Ganciclovir is synthetic nucleoside analog of guanine closely related to acyclovir but has greater activity against cytomegalovirus. This comprehensive profile on ganciclovir starts with a description of the drug: nomenclature, formulae, chemical structure, elemental composition, and appearance. The uses and application of the drug are explained. The methods that were used for the preparation of ganciclovir are described and their respective schemes are outlined. The methods which were used for the physical characterization of the dug are: ionization constant, solubility, X-ray powder diffraction pattern, crystal structure, melting point, and differential scanning calorimetry. The chapter contains the spectra of the drug: ultraviolet spectrum, vibrational spectrum, nuclear magnetic resonance spectra, and the mass spectrum. The compendial methods of analysis of ganciclovir include the United States Pharmacopeia methods. Other methods of analysis that were reported in the literature include: high-performance liquid chromatography alone or with mass spectrometry, electrophoresis, spectrophotometry, voltammetry, chemiluminescence, and radioimmunoassay. Biological investigation on the drug includes: pharmacokinetics, metabolism, bioavailability, and biological analysis. Reviews on the methods used for preparation or for analysis of the drug are provided. The stability of the drug in various media and storage conditions is reported. More than 240 references are listed at the end of the chapter.

Valganciclovir Dosing for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Pediatric Solid-organ Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Pharmacokinetic Study

BACKGROUND

Valganciclovir is extensively used for prophylaxis and treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid-organ transplant recipients. However, pharmacokinetic data in children are scarce, and the pediatric dosing regimen is uncertain. This study sought to prospectively evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile, the clinical efficacy and safety of oral valganciclovir in pediatric transplant recipients and compare different dosing regimens.

METHODS

The cohort included solid-organ transplant recipients treated with valganciclovir for CMV prophylaxis in 2014-2015 at a tertiary pediatric medical center. All received a weight-based once-daily oral dose of 17 mg/kg. Ganciclovir concentrations were measured and the area under the curve (AUC0-24) was calculated.

RESULTS

Thirteen children of median age 7.3 years (interquartile range, 2.2-11.6) were included. Median ganciclovir AUC0-24 was 21.0 mcg·h/mL (interquartile range, 17.1-39.8); 10 patients (77%) attained AUC0-24 <40 mcg·h/mL. Exposure to ganciclovir was about 2-fold lower in young children (<9 years old; P = 0.01) and children with low body surface area (BSA; <0.7 m; P = 0.006) than in their counterparts. Significantly lower doses were recommended with our weight-based protocol than with the manufacturer-recommended BSA- and glomerular filtration rate-based protocol (P = 0.002), reaching a 3-fold difference in infants. No evidence of CMV viremia or disease was observed while prophylaxis was given.

CONCLUSIONS

The weight-based regimen of 17 mg/kg/dose oral valganciclovir results in relatively low ganciclovir exposure, especially in young children with low BSA, yet showed satisfactory clinical efficacy for CMV prophylaxis. The manufacturer's dosing recommendation appears to result in supratherapeutic ganciclovir concentrations. Further studies are needed to establish target AUCs and valganciclovir dosing for CMV prophylaxis in pediatric transplant recipients.

Treatment of alpha and beta herpesvirus infections in solid organ transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Human herpesviruses frequently cause infections in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Areas covered: We provide an overview of the clinical impact of alpha and beta herpesviruses and highlight the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical indications, and adverse effects of antiviral drugs for the management of herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus and cytomegalovirus. We comprehensively evaluated key clinical trials that led to drug approval, and served as the foundation for management guidelines. We further provide an update on investigational antiviral agents for alpha and beta herpesvirus infections after SOT. Expert commentary: The therapeutic armamentarium for herpes infections is limited by the emergence of drug resistance. There have been major efforts for discovery of new drugs against these viruses, but the results of early-phase clinical trials have been less than encouraging. We believe, however, that more antiviral drug options are needed given the adverse side effects associated with current antiviral agents, and the emergence of drug-resistant virus populations in SOT recipients. Likewise, optimized use and strategies are needed for existing and novel antiviral drugs against alpha and beta-herpesviruses in SOT recipients.

Construction of Metabolism Prediction Models for CYP450 3A4, 2D6, and 2C9 Based on Microsomal Metabolic Reaction System

During the past decades, there have been continuous attempts in the prediction of metabolism mediated by cytochrome P450s (CYP450s) 3A4, 2D6, and 2C9. However, it has indeed remained a huge challenge to accurately predict the metabolism of xenobiotics mediated by these enzymes. To address this issue, microsomal metabolic reaction system (MMRS)—a novel concept, which integrates information about site of metabolism (SOM) and enzyme—was introduced. By incorporating the use of multiple feature selection (FS) techniques (ChiSquared (CHI), InfoGain (IG), GainRatio (GR), Relief) and hybrid classification procedures (Kstar, Bayes (BN), K-nearest neighbours (IBK), C4.5 decision tree (J48), RandomForest (RF), Support vector machines (SVM), AdaBoostM1, Bagging), metabolism prediction models were established based on metabolism data released by Sheridan et al. Four major biotransformations, including aliphatic C-hydroxylation, aromatic C-hydroxylation, N-dealkylation and O-dealkylation, were involved. For validation, the overall accuracies of all four biotransformations exceeded 0.95. For receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, each of these models gave a significant area under curve (AUC) value >0.98. In addition, an external test was performed based on dataset published previously. As a result, 87.7% of the potential SOMs were correctly identified by our four models. In summary, four MMRS-based models were established, which can be used to predict the metabolism mediated by CYP3A4, 2D6, and 2C9 with high accuracy.

Bottom-up Meets Top-down: Complementary Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Regulatory Approval of a Dosing Algorithm of Valganciclovir in Very Young Children

Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are frequently used to support pediatric drug development. Both methods have strengths and limitations and we used them complementarily to support the regulatory approval of a dosing algorithm for valganciclovir (VGCV) in children <4 months old. An existing pediatric PBPK model was extended to neonates and showed that potential physiological differences compared with older children are minor. The PopPK model was used to simulate ganciclovir (GCV) exposures in children with population typical combinations of body size and renal function and to assess the effectiveness of an alternative dosing algorithm suggested by the US Food and Drug Administration. PBPK and PopPK confirmed that the proposed VGCV dosing algorithm achieves similar GCV exposures in children of all ages and that the alternative dosing algorithm leads to underexposure in a substantial fraction of patients. Our approach raised the confidence in the VGCV dosing algorithm for children <4 months old and supported the regulatory approval.

Population pharmacokinetics of valganciclovir prophylaxis in paediatric and adult solid organ transplant recipients

AIM

Our aims were to quantify ganciclovir pharmacokinetics in paediatric and adult kidney, liver and lung transplant patients taking a range of valganciclovir doses to prevent herpes virus infections, including a 450 mg regimen, and to identify sources of pharmacokinetic variability.

METHOD

Plasma samples were collected at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-transplant and at 4, 6, 8 and 12 months post-transplant in subjects prescribed longer courses. Ganciclovir was measured by liquid chromatography/ultraviolet detection. Non-linear mixed effects modelling was used to analyze the concentration-time data and evaluate demographic and transplant-related covariates.

RESULTS

A two compartment model with first order absorption best described the data. Given the range of body sizes, clearance and volume of distribution terms were scaled using standard weight-based allometric exponents. Creatinine clearance was included on apparent oral clearance. Final estimates in a standard 70 kg individual for apparent oral clearance, central volume of distribution, intercompartmental clearance and peripheral volume of distribution were 14.5 l h(-1) , 87.5 l, 4.80 l h(-1) and 42.6 l, respectively. The median terminal half-life for kidney, liver and lung transplant recipients was 9.4, 9.5 and 8.2 h, respectively. Median exposure (i.e. AUC(0,∞) in subjects taking valganciclovir 900 mg or 450 mg once daily was 57.4 and 34.3 μg ml(-1)  h, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Allometric scaling allowed simultaneous analysis of data from children and adults. Ganciclovir pharmacokinetics were similar among kidney, liver and lung transplant recipients. Ganciclovir exposure after valganciclovir 450 mg once daily may be suboptimal in some individuals and requires evaluation along with virologic outcomes data.

Optimal sparse sampling for estimating ganciclovir/valganciclovir AUC in solid organ transplant patients using NONMEN

BACKGROUND

Ganciclovir and valganciclovir (GCV/VGCV) are used for the treatment and prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients. An area under the time-concentration curve of 40-50 μg × h/mL is related to efficacy. Therapeutic drug monitoring could prevent suboptimal drug exposure and adverse events, but obtaining full concentration profiles is not feasible. Sampling optimization by developing a reliable and clinically applicable limited sampling strategy (LSS) may simplify dose adjustment.

METHODS

An LSS was developed using an original pharmacokinetic (PK) data set of 40 full profiles from 20 adult SOT patients. The LSS was developed based on population and Bayesian prediction approaches. Population PK parameters from a previous model were used for simulation or as priors (NONMEM version 7.2). Median percentage of prediction error and median of absolute percentage prediction error were calculated for plasma clearance (CL) and central compartment distribution volume (V(2)). Bias and precisions were compared using 1-way analysis of variance (SPSSv19.0).

RESULTS

Sampling windows were designed according to the PK profile previously observed with the entire set of data. The 4 windows selected were distributed from 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours, 4 to 5 hours, and 6 to 8 hours. Predose and concentrations beyond 8 hours were not considered in any case because simulated negative concentrations occurred in both cases. Predicted exposure using 3 sampling times (0.5-1.5, 4-5, and 6-8 hours) showed the best predictive performance, by either the population or Bayesian approaches. Bias and imprecision for CL and V(2) were 0 and 0.60%, and -0.78% and 0.78%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

GCV/VCG area under the time-concentration curve in SOT patients could be predicted with acceptable accuracy for clinical management and dose individualization using LSS. The estimator of GCV/VGC, using 3 concentrations measured at 0.5-1.5, 4-5, and 6-8 hours after drug intake, could be used for dose adjustment.

Pharmacokinetic studies and LC-MS/MS method development of ganciclovir and dipeptide monoester prodrugs in Sprague Dawley rats

Ganciclovir (GCV) is utilized as an anti-herpetic agent. Reports from our laboratory have suggested that dipeptide ester prodrugs of GCV exhibit high affinity towards the oligopeptide transporter hPEPT1 and therefore seem to be promising candidates for the treatment of oral herpes virus infections. In this study, we have examined the bio-availability of a dipeptide prodrug of GCV after oral administration in jugular cannulated Sprague-Dawley rats. A new bio-analytical method was developed with Q-TRAP liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS) for simultaneous analysis of GCV, Valine-GCV (VGCV) and Tyrosine-Valine-GCV (YVGCV). Acyclovir (ACV) was used as an internal standard in the analysis. Area under plasma-concentration time curves for total concentration of GCV after oral administration of YVGCV was found to be approximately 200 % more than that of GCV following intestinal absorption. A complete conversion of the dipeptide prodrug (YVGCV) to parent compound, GCV, by hepatic first-pass metabolism was evident due to the absence of intermediate metabolite VGCV and administered prodrug YVGCV. The dipeptide prodrugs of GCV exhibit higher systemic availability of regenerated GCV upon oral administration and thus seem to be promising drug candidate in the treatment of systemic herpes infections.

Antiviral medications for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid organ transplant recipients has resulted in the frequent use of prophylaxis with the aim of preventing the clinical syndrome associated with CMV infection. This is an update of a review first published in 2005 and updated in 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of antiviral medications to prevent CMV disease and all-cause mortality in solid organ transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library to February 2004 for the first version of this review. The Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register was searched to February 2007 and to July 2011 for the first and current updates of the review without language restriction.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing antiviral medications with placebo or no treatment, comparing different antiviral medications and comparing different regimens of the same antiviral medications in recipients of any solid organ transplant. Studies examining pre-emptive therapy were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. Results were reported as risk ratios (RR) or risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and by mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis and univariate meta-regression were performed using restricted maximum-likelihood to estimate the between study variance. Multivariate meta-regression was performed to investigate whether the results were altered after allowing for differences in drugs used, organ transplanted, and recipient CMV serostatus at the time of transplantation.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 37 studies (4342 participants). Risk of bias attributes were poorly performed or reported with low risk of bias reported for sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding and selective outcome reporting in 25% or fewer studies.Prophylaxis with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment significantly reduced the risk for CMV disease (19 studies; RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.52), CMV infection (17 studies; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77), and all-cause mortality (17 studies; RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.92) primarily due to reduced mortality from CMV disease (7 studies; RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.78). Prophylaxis reduced the risk of herpes simplex and herpes zoster disease, bacterial and protozoal infections but not fungal infection, acute rejection or graft loss.Meta-regression showed no significant difference in the relative benefit of treatment (risk of CMV disease or all-cause mortality) by organ transplanted or CMV serostatus; no conclusions were possible for CMV negative recipients of negative organs.Neurological dysfunction was more common with ganciclovir and valaciclovir compared with placebo/no treatment. In direct comparison studies, ganciclovir was more effective than aciclovir in preventing CMV disease (7 studies; RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.60) and leucopenia was more common with aciclovir. Valganciclovir and IV ganciclovir were as effective as oral ganciclovir. The efficacy and adverse effects of valganciclovir/ganciclovir did not differ from valaciclovir in three small studies. Extended duration prophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of CMV disease compared with three months therapy (2 studies; RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.35). Leucopenia was more common with extended duration prophylaxis but severe treatment associated adverse effects did not differ between extended and three month durations of treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis with antiviral medications reduces CMV disease and CMV-associated mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. These data suggest that antiviral prophylaxis should be used routinely in CMV positive recipients and in CMV negative recipients of CMV positive organ transplants.

Pre-emptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viraemia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Pre-emptive treatment of patients with CMV viraemia using antiviral agents has been suggested as an alternative to routine prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2005.

OBJECTIVES

This review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pre-emptive treatment with antiviral medications in preventing symptomatic CMV disease.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register (to 16 January 2013) through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of pre-emptive treatment compared with placebo, no specific treatment or with antiviral prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four authors assessed the quality and extracted all data. Analyses used a random-effects model and results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 15 eligible studies (1098 participants). Of these, six investigated pre-emptive treatment versus placebo or treatment of CMV when disease occurred (standard care), eight looked at pre-emptive treatment versus antiviral prophylaxis, and one reported on oral versus intravenous pre-emptive treatment.Assessment of risk of bias identified that the processes reported for sequence generation and allocation concealment were at low risk of bias in only five and three studies, respectively. All studies were considered to be at low risk of attrition bias, and seven studies were considered to be at low risk of bias for selective reporting. Only one study reported adequate blinding of participants and personnel; no study reported blinding of outcome assessment.Compared with placebo or standard care, pre-emptive treatment significantly reduced the risk of CMV disease (6 studies, 288 participants: RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.80) but not acute rejection (3 studies, 185 participants: RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.12) or all-cause mortality (3 studies, 176 participants: RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.30). Comparative studies of pre-emptive therapy versus prophylaxis showed no significant differences in preventing CMV disease between pre-emptive and prophylactic therapy (7 studies, 753 participants: RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.74) but there was significant heterogeneity (I² = 63%). Leucopenia was significantly less common with pre-emptive therapy compared with prophylaxis (6 studies, 729 participants: RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.90). Other adverse effects did not differ significantly or were not reported. There were no significant differences in the risks of all-cause mortality, graft loss, acute rejection and infections other than CMV.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Few RCTs have evaluated the effects of pre-emptive therapy to prevent CMV disease. Pre-emptive therapy is effective compared with placebo or standard care. Despite the inclusion of five additional studies in this update, the efficacy of pre-emptive therapy compared with prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease remains unclear due to significant heterogeneity between studies. Additional head-to-head studies are required to determine the relative benefits and harms of pre-emptive therapy and prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients.

Pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir and valganciclovir in the adult horse

Equine herpes myeloencephalopathy, resulting from equine herpes virus type 1 (EHV-1) infection, is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in the horse. As compared to other antiviral drugs, such as acyclovir, ganciclovir has enhanced potency against EHV-1. This study investigated the pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir and its oral prodrug, valganciclovir, in six adult horses in a randomized cross-over design. Ganciclovir sodium was administered intravenously as a slow bolus at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg, and valganciclovir was administered orally at a dose of 1800 mg per horse. Intravenously administered ganciclovir disposition was best described by a three-compartment model with a prolonged terminal half-life of 72 ± 9 h. Following the oral administration of valganciclovir, the mean observed maximum serum ganciclovir concentration was 0.58 ± 0.37 μg/mL, and bioavailability of ganciclovir from oral valganciclovir was 41 ± 20%. Superposition predicted that oral dosing of 1800-mg valganciclovir two times daily would fail to produce and maintain effective plasma concentrations of ganciclovir. However, superposition suggested that i.v. administration of ganciclovir at 2.5 mg/kg every 8 h for 24 h followed by maintenance dosing of 2.5 mg/kg every 12 h would maintain effective ganciclovir serum concentrations in most horses throughout the dosing interval.

Evaluation of valganciclovir pharmacokinetics in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Valganciclovir is commonly used for cytomegalovirus prevention after lung transplantation. The pharmacokinetic profile of valganciclovir in lung transplant patients has not been well described or linked to efficacy and safety.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, crossover study determined the steady-state pharmacokinetic profile of 2 different doses of valganciclovir in lung transplant recipients and compared these profiles with intravenous ganciclovir.

RESULTS

Ten patients were evaluated. Patients were 56.8 ± 3.4 years old and had a mean creatinine clearance of 69 ± 9 ml/min. Oral bioavailability of ganciclovir after administration of valganciclovir was 59%, and mean half-life was 3.73 ± 1.15 hours. The maximal concentration after intravenous 5 mg/kg ganciclovir was significantly higher than after 450 mg valganciclovir (8.37 ± 3.03 mg/liter vs. 5.3 ± 2.09 mg/liter, respectively; p = 0.02) and similar to 900 mg valganciclovir (7.93 ± 3.97 mg/liter; p = 0.78). A higher area under the curve at 0-24 hours (AUC(0-24)) was found with 900 mg valganciclovir compared with intravenous 5 mg/kg/day ganciclovir (47.8 ± 19.7 vs 32.9 ± 10.8 mg · hour/liter, respectively; p = 0.049). The AUC(0-24) for 450 mg valganciclovir twice daily was 45.5 ± 22.9 mg · hour/liter.

CONCLUSION

Valganciclovir at 900 mg/day resulted in the equivalent of a mean daily dose of 7.7 mg/kg intravenous ganciclovir. Higher systemic ganciclovir exposures occurred after 900 mg/day valganciclovir compared with intravenous 5 mg/kg/day ganciclovir. Valganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring may be warranted in select lung transplant patients to avoid increased toxicity.

Thermus thermophilus nucleoside phosphorylases active in the synthesis of nucleoside analogues

Cells extracts from Thermus thermophilus HB27 express phosphorolytic activities on purines and pyrimidine nucleosides. Five putative encoding genes were cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli, and the corresponding recombinant proteins were purified and studied. Two of these showed phosphorolytic activities against purine nucleosides, and third one showed phosphorolytic activity against pyrimidine nucleosides in vitro, and the three were named TtPNPI, TtPNPII, and TtPyNP, respectively. The optimal temperature for the activity of the three enzymes was beyond the water boiling point and could not be measured accurately, whereas all of them exhibited a wide plateau of optimal pHs that ranged from 5.0 to 7.0. Analytical ultracentrifugation experiments revealed that TtPNPI was a homohexamer, TtPNPII was a monomer, and TtPyNP was a homodimer. Kinetic constants were determined for the phosphorolysis of the natural substrates of each enzyme. Reaction tests with nucleoside analogues revealed critical positions in the nucleoside for its recognition. Activities with synthetic nucleobase analogues, such as 5-iodouracil or 2,6-diaminopurine, and arabinosides were detected, supporting that these enzymes could be applied for the synthesis of new nucleoside analogs with pharmacological activities.

Valganciclovir to prevent or treat cytomegalovirus disease in organ transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is generally considered the most significant pathogen to infect patients following organ transplantation. Significant improvements have been achieved in the management of CMV disease over recent years, especially since the introduction of oral drugs such as oral ganciclovir followed by valganciclovir (VGC), a prodrug of ganciclovir with enhanced bioavailability. Several randomized controlled trials have shown that VGC is an efficacious and convenient oral drug to prevent or treat CMV disease in solid-organ transplant recipients. In this article, we discuss the clinical and pharmacological experience with the use of VGC for the management of CMV in solid-organ transplant recipients. Finally, novel strategies to further reduce the incidence of CMV disease after transplantation are also reviewed.

Determination of ganciclovir in human plasma by ultra performance liquid chromatography-UV detection

OBJECTIVES

Implement a sensitive UHPLC method for the assay of ganciclovir in human plasma.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We developed and validated a chromatographic method coupled to ultraviolet detection for quantification of ganciclovir, with a short run time using a small volume of human plasma. Comparison of system performance was made with respect to analysis time, efficiency and sensitivity.

RESULTS

Correlation coefficients (r) of the calibration curves ranged from 0.999744 to 0.999784. Within-day and between-day imprecision and inaccuracy, specificity and recovery were also evaluated for validation. The method was precise and accurate and the retention time was 0.7 min. The calibration curves were linear between 0.5 and 30 μg/mL. There was a good correlation between HPLC and UHPLC techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a method that is currently applied in a clinical study assessing GCV plasma concentration variability after ganciclovir and valganciclovir administration.

Antiviral drugs for viruses other than human immunodeficiency virus

Most viral diseases, with the exception of those caused by human immunodeficiency virus, are self-limited illnesses that do not require specific antiviral therapy. The currently available antiviral drugs target 3 main groups of viruses: herpes, hepatitis, and influenza viruses. With the exception of the antisense molecule fomivirsen, all antiherpes drugs inhibit viral replication by serving as competitive substrates for viral DNA polymerase. Drugs for the treatment of influenza inhibit the ion channel M(2) protein or the enzyme neuraminidase. Combination therapy with Interferon-α and ribavirin remains the backbone treatment for chronic hepatitis C; the addition of serine protease inhibitors improves the treatment outcome of patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1. Chronic hepatitis B can be treated with interferon or a combination of nucleos(t)ide analogues. Notably, almost all the nucleos(t) ide analogues for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B possess anti-human immunodeficiency virus properties, and they inhibit replication of hepatitis B virus by serving as competitive substrates for its DNA polymerase. Some antiviral drugs possess multiple potential clinical applications, such as ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C and respiratory syncytial virus and cidofovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus and other DNA viruses. Drug resistance is an emerging threat to the clinical utility of antiviral drugs. The major mechanisms for drug resistance are mutations in the viral DNA polymerase gene or in genes that encode for the viral kinases required for the activation of certain drugs such as acyclovir and ganciclovir. Widespread antiviral resistance has limited the clinical utility of M(2) inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of influenza infections. This article provides an overview of clinically available antiviral drugs for the primary care physician, with a special focus on pharmacology, clinical uses, and adverse effects.

Incidence and outcomes of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infections in 1244 kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in kidney transplant recipients are in most cases successfully treated with oral valganciclovir (VGCV). However, in a few percent of patients, mutations in the UL 97 or UL 54 gene lead to drug resistance.

METHODS

We investigated the incidence and outcomes of ganciclovir-resistant CMV viremia in all 1244 kidney recipients transplanted at our center from 2004 through 2008. CMV DNAemia was monitored in all patients at least weekly, and patients who were positive were treated preemptively with VGCV (900 mg once daily).

RESULTS

Ganciclovir-resistant mutations were detected in 27 patients (2.2%), of which 26 occurred in the 209 CMV IgG-negative recipients receiving a CMV-positive kidney (12.5%). All had UL97 gene mutations, and none had UL54 gene mutations. Mean DNAemia half-life for the first (nonresistance) episode of CMV viremia was 3.8 ± 1.2 days. After established resistance, 25 of 27 patients had their mycophenolate mofetil dose reduced by approximately 50%, and 10 of these were also treated with intravenous foscarnet. The DNAemia half-life was 3.7 ± 1.4 days in the foscarnet-treated patients, significantly shorter than in the other 17 patients, 10.8 ± 6.7 days (P = 0.001). Time to DNAemia eradication was 30 ± 16 and 81 ± 51 days in the two groups, respectively (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Use of 900 mg VGCV once daily for preemptive CMV treatment is associated with a high incidence of CMV UL97-resistance gene mutations in D+/R- patients. Foscarnet treatment rapidly and safely eradicated CMV DNAemia, and also patients who only reduced the immunosuppression and continued on VGCV treatment eventually cleared the virus.

Ganciclovir pharmacokinetic parameters do not change when extending valganciclovir cytomegalovirus prophylaxis from 100 to 200 days

BACKGROUND

A 3-month course of prophylaxis is usually recommended for cytomegalovirus (CMV) D+/R- renal transplant recipients. Based on recent data, up to 6 months of prophylaxis may be used. A subanalysis was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir after valganciclovir administration and to perform an exploratory pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis.

METHODS

In Improved Protection Against Cytomegalovirus in Transplant, a phase III, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 318 CMV D+/R- kidney transplant recipients received valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily) for 200 or 100 days. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted on a subgroup of patients (n=120). The relationships between ganciclovir exposure (AUC0-24 hr) and clinical outcomes were explored.

RESULTS

The final population parameter estimates (95% confidence interval) were as follows: apparent clearance of ganciclovir, 12 L/hr (11.3-12.7 L/hr); volume of distribution, 18.5 L (14.4-22.6 L); and peripheral volume, 44.4 L (40.2-48.6 L). No differences were apparent between the two treatment groups and these estimates. These results are consistent with previously published pharmacokinetic models. There were no direct correlations between the likelihood of developing hematologic adverse events and ganciclovir exposure at the time of the event. The incidence of CMV disease was not correlated with ganciclovir exposure.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir were similar between the two dosing groups (100 vs. 200 days), with the majority of patients achieving an area under the concentration time curve in the target therapeutic range (40-60 μg hr/mL). The fact that the majority of patients were within the target therapeutic range and the absence of a control arm (no treatment) precluded any attempt to validate a correlation with clinical parameters (i.e., CMV disease).