Potential savings in the cost of caring for Alzheimer's disease. Treatment with rivastigmine

Prospects for the use of graphene-based biological sensors in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (review of literature)

Among the most significant challenges presented to modern medicine is the problem of cognitive disorders. The relevance of her research is determined by the wide spread of disorders of the higher cortical functions, their significant negative impact on the quality of life of patients, as well as high economic costs on the part of the state and the patient's relatives aimed at organizing medical, diagnostic and rehabilitation processes. The main cause of cognitive impairment in the elderly is Alzheimer's disease. Currently, the criteria for the diagnosis of this nosological form have been developed and are widely used in practice. However, it should be noted that their use is most effective if the patient has a detailed clinical picture, at the stage of dementia. In addition, they provide for the study of biomarkers in a number of cases in the cerebrospinal fluid or using positron emission tomography, which presents certain technical difficulties. Especially significant problems arise in the pre-dement stages. This situation dictates the need to search for new promising diagnostic methods that will have high sensitivity and specificity, as well as the possibility of application in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease, including in outpatient settings. The article provides information about modern methods of computer neuroimaging, discusses the research directions of individual biomarkers, and also shows the prospects for using diagnostic test panels developed on the basis of graphene biosensors, taking into account the latest achievements of nanotechnology and their integration into medical science.

Predicted Lifetime Health Outcomes for Aducanumab in Patients with Early Alzheimer's Disease

INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a chronic and progressive neurodegenerative disease that places a substantial burden on patients and caregivers. Aducanumab is the first AD therapy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to reduce a defining pathophysiological feature of the disease, brain amyloid plaques. In the phase 3 clinical trial EMERGE (NCT02484547), aducanumab reduced clinical decline in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD and mild AD dementia and confirmed amyloid pathology.

METHODS

We used a Markov modeling approach to predict the long-term clinical benefits of aducanumab for patients with early AD based on EMERGE efficacy data. In the model, patients could transition between AD severity levels (MCI due to AD; mild, moderate, and severe AD dementia) and care settings (community vs. institution) or transition to death. The intervention was aducanumab added to standard of care (SOC), and the comparator was SOC alone. Data sources for base-case and scenario analyses included EMERGE, published National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center analyses, and other published literature.

RESULTS

Per patient over a lifetime horizon, aducanumab treatment corresponded to 0.65 incremental patient quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and 0.09 fewer caregiver QALYs lost compared with patients treated with SOC. Aducanumab treatment translated to a lower lifetime probability of transitioning to AD dementia, a lower lifetime probability of transitioning to institutionalization (25.2% vs. 29.4%), delays in the median time to transition to AD dementia (7.50 vs. 4.92 years from MCI to moderate AD dementia or worse), and an incremental median time in the community of 1.32 years compared with SOC.

CONCLUSION

The model predicted long-term benefits of aducanumab treatment in patients with MCI due to AD and mild AD dementia and their caregivers. The predicted outcomes provide a foundation for healthcare decision-makers and policymakers to understand the potential clinical and socioeconomic value of aducanumab.

A fixed-dose combination of memantine extended-release and donepezil in the treatment of moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease

Currently available therapies for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) consist of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs), such as donepezil, and the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist memantine. In December 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration approved Namzaric™, a once-daily, fixed-dose combination (FDC) of memantine extended-release (ER) and donepezil for patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The FDC capsule is bioequivalent to the coadministered individual drugs, and its bioavailability is similar when taken fasting, with food, or sprinkled onto applesauce. The combination of memantine and ChEIs in moderate-to-severe AD provides additional benefits to ChEI monotherapy across multiple domains and may delay the time to nursing home admission. A dedicated study of memantine ER compared to placebo in patients on a stable dose of a ChEI found statistically significant benefits on cognition and global status but not functioning. Treatment with memantine ER and donepezil is generally well tolerated, although higher doses of ChEIs are associated with more serious adverse events such as vomiting, syncope, and weight loss. Potential advantages of the FDC include a simpler treatment regimen, reduction in pill burden, and the ability to sprinkle the capsule onto soft foods. Patients who may benefit from the FDC include those with significant dysphagia, a history of poor compliance, or limited caregiver interaction. However, available evidence that these advantages would increase treatment adherence and persistence is conflicting, meaning that the added cost of switching patients from generic options to an FDC may not always be justified.

Cost-utility analysis of memantine extended release added to cholinesterase inhibitors compared to cholinesterase inhibitor monotherapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe dementia of the Alzheimer's type in the US

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of memantine extended release (ER) as an add-on therapy to acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) [combination therapy] for treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) from both a healthcare payer and a societal perspective over 3 years when compared to AChEI monotherapy in the US.

METHODS

A phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of memantine ER for treatment of AD patients taking an AChEI. The analysis assessed the long-term costs and health outcomes using an individual patient simulation in which AD progression is modeled in terms of cognition, behavior, and functioning changes. Input parameters are based on patient-level trial data, published literature, and publicly available data sources. Changes in anti-psychotic medication use are incorporated based on a published retrospective cohort study. Costs include drug acquisition and monitoring, total AD-related medical care, and informal care associated with caregiver time. Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), life years, care time for caregiver, time in community and institution, time on anti-psychotics, time by disease severity, and time without severe symptoms are reported. Costs and health outcomes are discounted at 3% per annum.

RESULTS

Considering a societal perspective over 3 years, this analysis shows that memantine ER combined with an AChEI provides better clinical outcomes and lower costs than AChEI monotherapy. Discounted average savings were estimated at $18,355 and $20,947 per patient and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) increased by an average of 0.12 and 0.13 from a societal and healthcare payer perspective, respectively. Patients on combination therapy spent an average of 4 months longer living at home and spend less time in moderate-severe and severe stages of the disease.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe AD is a cost-effective treatment compared to AChEI monotherapy in the US.

Therapeutic approaches to age-associated neurocognitive disorders

The United Nations projects that the number of individuals with dementia in developed countries alone will be approximately 36,7 million by the year 2050. International recognition of the significant emotional and economic burden of Alzheimer's disease has been matched by a dramatic increase in the development of pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches to this illness in the past decade. Changing demographics have underscored the necessity to develop similar approaches for the remediation of the cognitive impairment associated with more benign syndromes, such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and age-associated cognitive decline (AACD). The present article aims to provide an overview of the most current therapeutic approaches to age-associated neurocognitive disorders. Additionally, it discusses the conceptual and methodological issues that surround the design, implementation, and interpretation of such approaches.

Pharmacoeconomics of Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors

Until more effective and especially disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are available, the therapeutic arsenal consists of cholinesterase inhibitors for mild to moderate dementia and memantine for moderate to severe dementia. Health economic data make an important contribution to the planning of healthcare services and the estimation of the cost of drug reimbursement. As such, for cholinesterase inhibitors it is claimed that the direct cost of the drug itself is eclipsed by the cost savings associated with delaying institutionalisation or delaying the time of progression into a more severe disease state. The present manuscript reviews several factors contributing to the costs of AD, gives an overview of available studies claiming the cost-effectiveness of current AD treatments, highlights strengths and weaknesses of the aforementioned studies, and discusses the impact of (early) identification and treatment of AD. It is concluded that there still is a need for long-term follow-up data from prospective cohort studies before the cost-effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors for AD can be confirmed.

Model-based economic evaluation in Alzheimer's disease: a review of the methods available to model Alzheimer's disease progression

OBJECTIVE

To consider the methods available to model Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression over time to inform on the structure and development of model-based evaluations, and the future direction of modelling methods in AD.

METHODS

A systematic search of the health care literature was undertaken to identify methods to model disease progression in AD. Modelling methods are presented in a descriptive review.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 42 studies presenting methods or applications of methods to model AD progression over time. The review identified 10 general modelling frameworks available to empirically model the progression of AD as part of a model-based evaluation. Seven of these general models are statistical models predicting progression of AD using a measure of cognitive function. The main concerns with models are on model structure, around the limited characterization of disease progression, and on the use of a limited number of health states to capture events related to disease progression over time. None of the available models have been able to present a comprehensive model of the natural history of AD.

CONCLUSIONS

Although helpful, there are serious limitations in the methods available to model progression of AD over time. Advances are needed to better model the progression of AD and the effects of the disease on peoples' lives. Recent evidence supports the need for a multivariable approach to the modelling of AD progression, and indicates that a latent variable analytic approach to characterising AD progression is a promising avenue for advances in the statistical development of modelling methods.

Assessing the cost-effectiveness of the rivastigmine transdermal patch for Alzheimer's disease in the UK using MMSE- and ADL-based models

OBJECTIVE

Assess long-term cost-effectiveness of rivastigmine patch in Alzheimer's disease (AD) management in the UK, using cognitive and functional models based on clinical trial efficacy data.

METHODS

Incremental costs and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) associated with rivastigmine patch and capsule treatment versus best supportive care (BSC) were calculated using two economic models, one based solely on Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, and one also incorporating activities of daily living (ADL) scores. The clinical pathway was populated with data from a clinical trial of rivastigmine patch (9.5 mg/24 h) and capsules (12 mg/day) versus placebo. Costs were based on the UK health and social care costs and basic UK National Health Service (NHS) prices. Disease progression was modelled beyond the trial period over 5 years using published equations to predict natural decline in AD patients. Base case costing variables included drugs, clinical monitoring, and institutionalization.

RESULTS

The MMSE model estimated incremental costs per QALY of £10 579 for rivastigmine patch and £15 154 for capsule versus BSC. The MMSE-ADL model estimated incremental costs per QALY of £9114 for rivastigmine patch and £13 758 for capsules. The main difference between the models was a greater number of institutionalized days avoided for rivastigmine versus BSC estimated by the MMSE-ADL model.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the MMSE and MMSE-ADL models suggest that rivastigmine patch and capsules are cost-effective treatments versus BSC. Incorporating ADL evidence makes a marginal but important difference to estimates in this case. Future economic evaluations of AD treatment should include measures of both cognition and functioning.

The economic cost of Alzheimer's disease: Family or public health burden?

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients suffer progressive cognitive, behavioral and functional impairment which result in a heavy burden to patients, families, and the public-health system. AD entails both direct and indirect costs. Indirect costs (such as loss or reduction of income by the patient or family members) are the most important costs in early and community-dwelling AD patients. Direct costs (such as medical treatment or social services) increase when the disorder progresses, and the patient is institutionalized or a formal caregiver is required. Drug therapies represent an increase in direct cost but can reduce some other direct or indirect costs involved. Several studies have projected overall savings to society when using drug therapies and all relevant cost are considered, where results depend on specific patient and care setting characteristics. Dementia should be the focus of analysis when public health policies are being devised. South American countries should strengthen their policy and planning capabilities by gathering more local evidence about the burden of AD and how it can be shaped by treatment options.

Persistence with cholinesterase inhibitor therapy in a population-based cohort of patients with Alzheimer's disease

PURPOSE

To estimate the risk (and determinants) of discontinuing cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) in a population-based sample of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study based on linked de-identified administrative health data from the province of Saskatchewan, Canada. The cohort included all AD patients receiving a ChEI prescription during the first year of provincial coverage (2000-2001). Persistence was defined as no gap of 60+ days between depletion and subsequent refill of a ChEI prescription. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the risk of discontinuation over 40 months. Cox regression with time-varying covariates was used to assess risk factors for ChEI discontinuation.

RESULTS

The sample included 1080 patients (64% female, average age 80 +/- 7 years). Baseline mean (SD) Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) scores were 20.8 (4.4) and 17.5 (7.7), respectively. Over 40 months, 84% discontinued therapy. The 1-year risk of discontinuation was 66.4% (95%CI 63.5-69.3%). Discontinuation was significantly more likely for females (adjusted HR 1.34, 95%CI 1.16-1.55) and among those with lower MMSE scores (2.52, 2.01-3.17 if <15), not receiving social assistance (1.25, 1.07-1.45), and paying at least 65% of total prescription costs (1.51, 1.30-1.74). It was significantly less likely for patients with frequent physician visits (0.78, 0.66-0.93, for 7-19 vs. <7 visits), higher Chronic Disease Scores (0.74, 0.61-0.89, for 7+ vs. <4), and FAQ scores of 9+ (0.82, 0.69-0.99).

CONCLUSION

The likelihood of discontinuing ChEI therapy was high in this real-world sample of AD patients. Significant predictors included clinical, socioeconomic, and practice factors.

Alzheimer's disease: the strength of association of costs with different measures of disease severity

OBJECTIVE

To identify Alzheimer's disease (AD) severity measures for use in cost-effectiveness models that effectively capture the impact of AD on costs.

METHODS

A review of the literature and data abstraction from papers that present 1) mean AD costs (direct, indirect, or total) by disease severity, defined using measure of cognition, functional status, and behavior; and/or 2) the results of regression analyses that estimate the strength of the association between AD costs and disease severity.

RESULTS

All papers reviewed showed that mean total costs increase with disease severity regardless of severity-measurement method. The relative difference in mean total costs between patients with severe disease compared to those with moderate disease, or moderate disease compared to mild disease, was fairly consistent across studies, suggesting that any of the disease-severity measures may be used to broadly categorize patients by cost. However, when regression analysis included multiple disease-severity measures, independent associations with costs were noted for the different measures. Cognitive and functional status measures were consistently associated with direct costs, whereas functional status and behavioral measures were consistently associated with indirect costs and caregiver hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Either multidimensional disease-severity measures, or a single disease-severity measure, that capture the impact of cognition, functional status, and behavior on costs are needed for cost-effectiveness models.

Commentary on "Health economics and the value of therapy in Alzheimer's disease." Cost-effectiveness studies

The high prevalence of dementia has a great impact on the formal care systems as well as on the situation for informal caregivers. Thus the question of cost effectiveness is crucial. This paper is based on the health-economic portion of the dementia project of the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Healthcare. After a database search and quality judgment of papers, 35 papers were included (22 were pharmacoeconomic studies, and 13 focused on programs, such as daycare, caregiver support, and living arrangements). No empirical drug study was regarded as a complete health-economic study. Of the four prospective, randomized, controlled trials, three yielded a nonsignificant difference regarding costs (all for donepezil), whereas there was a significant cost reduction in the Memantine study (favoring Memantine treatment), mainly due to reduction in caregiver time. The majority of the complete pharmacoeconomic modeling studies showed a dominance for drug treatment, indicating cost effectiveness. In conclusion, as regards the cost effectiveness of treatment for Alzheimer's disease, no evidence could be stated in terms of empirical studies, mainly because of a lack of studies. Although most models indicated cost effectiveness, the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Healthcare did not regard this as sufficient evidence of cost effectiveness. There is a need for larger and longer empirical studies, and for enlarged sensitivity analyses, in terms of model studies.

Early identification and treatment of Alzheimer's disease: social and fiscal outcomes

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that places substantial burdens on those who provide support for family members with declining cognitive and functional abilities. Many AD patients eventually require formal long-term care services because of the absence, exhaustion, or inability of family members to provide care. The costs of long-term care, and especially nursing home care, often deplete private financial resources, placing a substantial burden on state Medicaid programs. Current evidence suggests that pharmacological treatments and caregiver interventions can delay entry into nursing homes and potentially reduce Medicaid costs. However, these cost savings are not being realized because many patients with AD are either not diagnosed or diagnosed at late stages of the disease, and have no access to Medicare-funded caregiver support programs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A Monte Carlo cost-benefit analysis, based on estimates of parameters available in the medical literature, suggests that the early identification and treatment of AD have the potential to result in large, positive net social benefits as well as positive net savings for states and the federal government.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that the early diagnosis and treatment of AD are not only socially desirable in terms of increasing economic efficiency, but also fiscally attractive from both state and federal perspectives. These findings also suggest that failure to fund effective caregiver interventions may be fiscally unsound.

Decision analytic models for Alzheimer's disease: state of the art and future directions

Decision analytic policy models for Alzheimer's disease (AD) enable researchers and policy makers to investigate questions about the costs and benefits of a wide range of existing and potential screening, testing, and treatment strategies. Such models permit analysts to compare existing alternatives, explore hypothetical scenarios, and test the strength of underlying assumptions in an explicit, quantitative, and systematic way. Decision analytic models can best be viewed as complementing clinical trials both by filling knowledge gaps not readily addressed by empirical research and by extrapolating beyond the surrogate markers recorded in a trial. We identified and critiqued 13 distinct AD decision analytic policy models published since 1997. Although existing models provide useful insights, they also have a variety of limitations. (1) They generally characterize disease progression in terms of cognitive function and do not account for other distinguishing features, such as behavioral symptoms, functional performance, and the emotional well-being of AD patients and caregivers. (2) Many describe disease progression in terms of a limited number of discrete states, thus constraining the level of detail that can be used to characterize both changes in patient status and the relationships between disease progression and other factors, such as residential status, that influence outcomes of interest. (3) They have focused almost exclusively on evaluating drug treatments, thus neglecting other disease management strategies and combinations of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. Future AD models should facilitate more realistic and compelling evaluations of various interventions to address the disease. An improved model will allow decision makers to better characterize the disease, to better assess the costs and benefits of a wide range of potential interventions, and to better evaluate the incremental costs and benefits of specific interventions used in conjunction with other disease management strategies.

Economic considerations in the management of Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer’s disease is a devastating chronic disease that significantly increases healthcare costs and affects the quality of life (QoL) of the afflicted patients and their caregivers. Population aging and other demographic changes may further increase the already staggering costs of this devastating disease. While few pharmacoeconomic studies have used a prospective health economics design to assess resource utilization, most studies showed beneficial treatment effects and suggested potential savings in healthcare costs and reductions in caregiver burden. Various degrees of cost savings have been reported depending on the type of economic model, treatment evaluated, and region used in the studies. Direct comparisons of the results are difficult because different methods have been used in these evaluations. The preference of patients and families for home care for as long as possible suggests that promoting noninstitutional care for these patients should become a priority. Continued home care for patients under pharmacological treatment may reduce caregiver burden, healthcare costs, and ultimately improve patients’ and caregivers’ QoL.

Modelling disease progression in Alzheimer's disease: a review of modelling methods used for cost-effectiveness analysis

The literature reporting economic evaluations related to the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has developed over the last decade. Most analyses have used economic models to estimate the cost effectiveness of drugs for the treatment of AD. This review considers the range of methods used in the published cost-effectiveness literature to model AD progression and the effect of interventions on the progression of AD. The review builds on and updates an earlier systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies on drugs for AD. Systematic and rigorous methods were used to search the literature for economic evaluations estimating the cost effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine or memantine in AD. The literature search covered a wide range of electronic databases (e.g. MEDLINE, EMBASE), and included literature from the inception of databases up to the end of 2005. The search identified 22 published economic evaluations. An outline and brief critical review of the identified studies is provided, and thereafter the methods used to model disease progression were considered in more detail. The review employs recent guidance on good practice in decision-analytic modelling in HTA to critically review the modelling methods used. Using this guidance, the models are assessed against the broad criteria of model structure, data inputs and assessment of uncertainty and inconsistency. Concerns were noted over the model structure employed in all models. The reliance on cognitive scores to model AD, the progression of the disease, and the effect of treatment on costs and consequences is regarded as a serious limitation in almost all of the studies identified. There are also limitations over the data used to populate published models, especially around the failure of studies to document and establish the basis for the modelling of treatment effects. It is also clear that studies modelling AD progression, and subsequently the cost effectiveness of treatment, have not addressed uncertainty or consistency (internal and/or external) in sufficient detail. Further research is required on more appropriate methods for the modelling of AD progression. In the meantime, future economic evaluations of treatment need to be more explicit on the methods used to model AD, and the data used to populate models.

Functional impairment, healthcare costs and the prevalence of institutionalisation in patients with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias

INTRODUCTION

The progressive decline in functional status for patients with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias (ADOD) is well documented. However, there is limited information on the economic benefits of interventions improving functional status in an ADOD population. This study estimated the relationship between the degree of functional impairment in patients with ADOD and their healthcare costs and prevalence of institutionalisation.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional analyses of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) were performed. A nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries with ADOD was identified from the 1995-8 waves of the MCBS (n = 3138): 34% in the community, 57% institutionalised and 9% residing in both settings during the year. Three measures of functioning were used: the number of activities of daily living (ADLs) and independent ADLs (IADLs) impaired; an index summarising number and severity of ADL and IADL impairments; and the Katz Index of ADLs. Healthcare costs included costs for all healthcare services received in all settings, regardless of whether they were covered by insurance or paid out of pocket. The relationships between each measure of impairment and healthcare costs and prevalence of institutionalisation were estimated using linear and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Healthcare costs (1995-8 values) for all ADOD patients increased by 1,958 US dollars (p < 0.001) for each additional ADL impairment and 549 US dollars (p = 0.073) for each additional IADL impairment. For community-dwelling ADOD patients, healthcare costs increased by 1,541 US dollars (p < 0.001) for each additional ADL and 714 US dollars (p = 0.022) for each additional IADL. Costs also increased by severity on the summary index and the Katz Index. Odds of institutionalisation also increased by the three measures of functional impairment.

CONCLUSION

Although relationships between function and costs have been described previously, the exact nature of these relationships has not been investigated solely in patients with dementia. The data from this study suggest a strong relationship between functional impairment and healthcare costs, specifically in patients with dementia. Even IADL impairments, which are common in mild to moderate dementia, may significantly raise costs. The results suggest that therapies and care management that improve functioning may possibly reduce other healthcare costs.

Drug persistency of two cholinesterase inhibitors: rivastigmine versus donepezil in elderly patients with Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVES

To compare persistency rates and persistency days in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) who initiated therapy with either rivastigmine or donepezil, and to identify factors influencing persistency in a real-world setting.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This study used data collected by MarketScan from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2002. Patients were included if they were newly diagnosed with AD and filled at least one prescription for rivastigmine or donepezil between 1 July 2000 and 30 June 2001, were > or =65 years of age on the index prescription date, and had continuous health and prescription insurance during the entire study period. Patients were excluded if they filled a prescription for any cholinesterase inhibitor during the 18 months prior to initiation of the study drugs. Patients who refilled their initial cholinesterase inhibitor prescription within a permissible gap of 60 days after depleting the drug supply from the prior prescription were considered to be persistent. Sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the persistency definition. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine persistency rates across time and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate relative risks of discontinuation or switch with adjustment for other covariates, and to identify factors significantly influencing persistency of the study drugs.

RESULTS

Of the newly treated AD patients, the proportion of rivastigmine and donepezil patients who continued their medication was the same (47%; p = 0.5). On average, rivastigmine users continuously used their medication for 234 days (median 312 days) while those taking donepezil used their medication for 235 days (median 315 days) [p = 0.91]. Patients were more likely to discontinue or switch their initial cholinesterase inhibitor if they used a central nervous system (CNS) medication before initiation of therapy (relative risk [RR] = 1.23; 95% CI 1.01, 1.51 without adjustment for study variables; RR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.05, 1.60 with adjustment for study variables). On the other hand, patients were less likely to discontinue their cholinesterase inhibitor if they visited their physician office frequently (RR = 0.24; 95% CI 0.18, 0.32 without adjustment; RR = 0.23; 95% CI 0.17, 0.30 with adjustment) or if they were hospitalised after initiation of their cholinesterase inhibitor therapy (RR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.39, 0.91 without adjustment; RR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.42, 0.99 with adjustment).

CONCLUSION

Patients who were newly diagnosed with AD and initiated therapy with either rivastigmine or donepezil had similar levels of persistency with their initial AD therapy in a real-world setting.

Impact of donepezil use in routine clinical practice on health care costs in patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias enrolled in a large medicare managed care plan: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies have shown efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitors (eg, donepezil) in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, there are limited studies examining the impact on health care costs of cholinesterase inhibitors prescribed in routine clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to estimate the impact of donepezil use on health care costs and utilization in patients with mild to moderate AD and related dementias.

METHODS

This case-control study was conducted using data from the Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York (New York, New York). Data from patients with predominantly mild to moderate AD and related dementias who were enrolled in this Medicare managed care plan from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2002, were included. The health care costs and utilization of patients who had received donepezil prescribed in routine clinical practice were compared with those of patients who had never received donepezil or other cholinesterase inhibitors (control group). The 2 study groups were matched for age, sex, number of comorbid conditions, and presence of complications of late-stage dementia. Regression analysis was used to estimate the impact of donepezil use on health care costs and utilization during a 12-month follow-up period, controlling for characteristics associated with the outcomes. The analyses did not use a direct measure of disease severity but instead used proxy measures of severity based on medical conditions associated with late-stage dementia.

RESULTS

Data from 687 patients were included in the study. The donepezil group comprised 229 patients (140 women, 89 men; mean age, 79.6 years); the control group, 458 patients (280 women, 178 men; mean age, 80.0 years). The mean costs of medical services per year in the donepezil group were US $2500 (95% CI, $300-$4671) less than those in the control group (P = 0.024). Lower medical costs in the donepezil group ($3325; 95% CI, $1163-$5486; P < 0.003 vs controls) were largely attributable to the lower costs of services performed in the hospital ($2594; 95% CI, $846-$4341; P < 0.004 vs controls) and postacute skilled nursing facility (SNF) ($1012; 95% CI, $444-$1579; P < 0.001 vs controls), which were partially offset by $1241 in higher prescription, physician's office, and outpatient hospital costs. Patients receiving donepezil had shorter mean lengths of stay in the hospital (3.00 vs 5.43 days; 95% CI, 0.66-4.19; P < 0.008) and postacute SNF (0.42 vs 3.40 days; 95% CI, 1.28-4.69; P < 0.001) but a higher mean number of physician's office visits (10.91 vs 7.91 visits; 95% CI, 1.63-4.36; P < 0.001) compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

In this case-control study in patients with predominantly mild to moderate AD and related dementias, donepezil therapy prescribed in routine clinical practice was associated with reduced health care costs to the Medicare managed care plan studied. The findings support previous pharmacoeconomic studies with larger sample sizes obtained over a longer period of time, and with improved case-matching criteria.

Economics of dementia and pharmacoeconomics of dementia therapy

BACKGROUND

The economic impact of dementia is not well appreciated, even though Alzheimer's disease and related dementias were the third most expensive health condition in the United States in 2000. In 1997, the cost of managing patients with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias was estimated at US dollar 100 billion. Direct medical costs are compounded by indirect costs of care, including unpaid care and loss of earnings.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to examine studies of the economic impact of approved treatments for dementia therapy.

METHODS

Searches of the MEDLINE database were conducted to identify prospective, randomized trials and retrospective or modeling studies of the economic impact of dementia medications, as well as analyses of managed care data (years 1996-2004; English language; search terms: dementia or Alzheimer's cross-referenced with economic or costs).

RESULTS

Only 3 studies directly examined the economic effects of dementia therapy. Two of these demonstrated economic benefits of treatment, whereas the third study concluded that there were no benefits; however, the conclusions of the latter study may have been weakened by such factors as the high rate of attrition and biased selection of study participants. Modeling studies and analyses of managed care data also indicate economic benefits from approved treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapies that are efficacious early in the disease can postpone the progression of dementia to more severe stages and may offer economic benefit to patients' families, caregivers, and society.

Impact of rivastigmine use on the risk of nursing home placement in a US sample

INTRODUCTION

Although numerous studies have evaluated predictors of nursing home placement (NHP), few have focused on the effects of cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) use on NHP. The objective of this study was to compare the risk of NHP between rivastigmine patients versus no-ChEI patients (control group), and secondly, between rivastigmine versus donepezil patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a large US medical claims database was performed. Eligible subjects were identified from those who had continuous medical coverage from 1 April 2000 to 30 June 2002. Rivastigmine and donepezil subjects were new users, defined as having received no ChEI treatment during the initial 6 months of the study. Control subjects were diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD) at some point after the initial 6-month period. All subjects were followed from baseline (initiation of ChEI therapy or initial AD diagnosis) to the date of NHP or 30 June 2002, whichever occurred first.

RESULTS

In the rivastigmine (n=1181), donepezil (n=3864), and control (n=517) groups, 3.7%, 4.4% and 11.0% of subjects, respectively, had an NHP (p <0.001 for rivastigmine versus control). A Cox proportional hazard model, controlling for age, gender, comorbidities and behavioural disorders, showed that the control subjects were almost 3-fold more likely to have NHP than rivastigmine subjects (hazard ratio [HR]=2.71; 95% CI 1.82, 4.03). The difference in the risk of NHP was not significant between the rivastigmine and donepezil groups (HR=1.23; 95% CI 0.89, 1.71).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated that rivastigmine decreased the risk of NHP in a large insured population.

Modelling the cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors in the management of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cost effectiveness (from the UK NHS and personal social services perspective) of the cholinesterase inhibitors donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine compared with usual care in the treatment of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease. Patients had a mean age of 74 years, a mean disease duration of 1 year and a mean Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale score of 24.

METHODS

A pharmacoeconomic model was used to predict long-term outcomes over a 5-year time horizon and to estimate the cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors for the management of Alzheimer's disease. The model structure is informed by a systematic review of the literature on the clinical and cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and a review of the literature on the costs and outcomes associated with treatment for Alzheimer's disease. The main outcome measure used was the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. All healthcare costs (excluding cholinesterase inhibitor costs) were indexed to pounds sterling (2003 values). Drug costs are 2005 values. Multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were undertaken to assess uncertainty in the results.

RESULTS

The clinical benefits on cognition from treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors resulted in an incremental cost per QALY gained ranging from 53,780 pounds sterling to 74,735 pounds sterling, over 5 years (vs usual care). Uncertainty analysis suggests that the probability of any of these treatments having an incremental cost per QALY of < 30,000 pounds sterling is < 21%. The key determinants of cost effectiveness were the effectiveness of treatment, the mean treatment cost and the cost savings associated with an expected delay in disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Results presented in this paper suggest that the use of cholinesterase inhibitors may not be a cost-effective use of NHS resources. Guidance from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness (NICE) in the UK on their judgements surrounding the acceptability of technologies as an effective use of resources, indicates there would need to be special reasons for accepting cholinesterase inhibitors as a cost-effective use of NHS resources.

The economic benefits of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Alzheimer disease and associated dementias

Most cost-effectiveness studies using simulation modeling have demonstrated that donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine are cost effective for the treatment of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease (AD). These conclusions are in large part based on the assumption that improvement in cognitive status, or prevention of cognitive and functional decline, reduces the amount of time patients spend institutionalized or receiving other full-time care. However, as discussed in this article, outcomes besides delay to institutionalization affect the costs of AD. In reviews of utilization data from Medicare and managed care organizations, it was noted that hospitalization and post acute care in skilled nursing facilities accounted for the largest amount of excess direct costs, even among patients with mild or moderate AD. These utilization reviews also suggest that many patients with AD and related dementias require inpatient care because they are not able to self-manage comorbid conditions. The improvements in cognitive status and daily functioning associated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) therapy are expected to translate into improved management of comorbidities and reduced caregiver burden, thus reducing the total cost of care. To confirm these and other economic benefits of AChEIs, pharmacoeconomic outcomes should be evaluated routinely as part of randomized, controlled trials and through well-controlled observational studies of AD patients in community and institutional settings.

Pharmacotherapeutic approaches to the treatment of Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD), a progressive degenerative disorder of the brain, is the most common cause of cognitive impairment in the elderly. The pharmacotherapy of AD is evolving rapidly. Cholinergic stabilization with cholinesterase-inhibitor (ChEI) therapy implies neuroprotection and a resultant slowing of disability and disease progression. The moderate-affinity N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonist memantine may block neural excitotoxicity.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review was to examine the evidence for the responsiveness to pharmacotherapy of established AD; specifically, the extent to which the benefits of therapy have been proved, the extent to which currently available ChEIs support cholinergic neurotransmission, and the extent to which currently available ChEIs and memantine provide neuroprotection.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive search of MEDLINE for articles published between January 1999 and February 2004 using the terms Alzheimer's pharmacotherapy, cholinesterase inhibitor therapy, Alzheimer's disease, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, glutamatergic system modifiers, and memantine; a search of the reference lists of identified articles; and a manual search of pertinent journals. Articles were selected that contained higher-level evidence, based on explicit validated criteria.

RESULTS

ChEI therapy was associated with quality-of-life improvements that included enhanced performance of activities of daily living, reduced behavioral disturbances, stabilized cognitive impairment, decreased caregiver stress, and delay in the first dementia-related nursing home placement. In large clinical trials in moderate to severe AD (a stage that is associated with distress for patients and caregiver burden, and for which other treatments are not available), memantine showed an ability to delay cognitive and functional deterioration. The combination of memantine and ChEI therapy was significantly more efficacious than ChEI therapy alone (P < 0.001) and was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The idea that AD is pharmacologically unresponsive appears to be changing. With the use of ChEI and NMDA-receptor antagonist therapy, the symptoms and outcomes of this devastating neurodegenerative disease can be improved and its course altered.

Cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a review with methodological considerations

Cholinesterase inhibitors have been available for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease since 1993. They have significantly positive effects on cognitive functioning and other domains of functional capacity, such as activities of daily life in terms of efficacy, but the clinical value of these effects are under discussion. Cholinesterase inhibitors may also influence behavioural and psychological symptoms in Alzheimer's disease. Cholinesterase inhibitors are also regarded as rather expensive and, therefore, the question of cost effectiveness is essential. Pharmacoeconomic evaluations of cholinesterase inhibitors have so far been conducted in retrospect on efficacy data from prospective randomised clinical trials combined with economic data from other sources. There are no published specific cost-effectiveness studies of cholinesterase inhibitors which prospectively collected empirical data on costs and outcomes. There is only one published randomised clinical trial with such empirical data with a cost consequence analysis design, indicating cost neutrality. Several types of models to describe the long-term effects have been published, indicating cost effectiveness. However, due to methodological considerations, the validity of these models is difficult to judge. A research agenda for the cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors is proposed, including long-term studies with empirical data on resource use, costs and outcomes, studies on quality of life, informal care and behavioural and psychological symptoms, combination and comparative studies on mild cognitive impairment.

Cost Effectiveness of Memantine in???Moderately Severe to Severe Alzheimer???s Disease

BACKGROUND

In patients with moderately severe to severe Alzheimer's disease, the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist memantine has been shown to improve outcomes and to be associated with reductions in resource utilisation and total healthcare costs relative to no pharmacological intervention after 28 weeks in phase III clinical and pharmacoeconomic studies. However, the longer term cost implications of treatment with memantine are not known.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of treatment with memantine in patients with moderately severe to severe Alzheimer's disease on resource use and on cost and patient outcomes in Finland over a 5-year time horizon.

METHODS

A Markov model was constructed to simulate a patient's progression through a finite series of health states with a time horizon of 5 years. The states were defined in terms of physical dependency, place of residency (community or institution), and cognitive function. Each 6-month Markov cycle was repeated ten times. A 5% rate was used to discount costs. Inputs for the model were derived from epidemiological data collected during the Kuopio 75+ Study, a Finnish population-based health survey of dementia and functional capacity among in-dividuals aged >/=75 years. Costs were considered from a societal perspective. Probabilities used in the model, together with cost and resource use differences between treatment with memantine (Ebixa((R)), Namenda((R)), Axura((R))) and no pharmacological intervention, were derived from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial that included an economic assessment. This study enrolled 252 patients with moderately severe to severe Alzheimer's disease. We took a conservative approach that assumed that the effectiveness of treatment with memantine was limited to 12 months' duration. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the effect of treatment with memantine on duration of independence and time to institutionalisation. Sensitivity analyses included memantine efficacy best- (5 years) and worst- (6 months) case scenarios, and an analysis in which 5% discounting was not applied.

RESULTS

Memantine therapy was associated with approximately 4 extra months of independence, 1 additional month of residence in the community, and a cost reduction relative to placebo of approximately euro1700 per patient over 5 years, despite the limiting of persistence of efficacy to 12 months (year of costing, 2001). Monte Carlo simulations and sensitivity analyses supported the findings.

CONCLUSION

According to the model, over 5 years the additional drug costs of treating patients with moderately severe to severe Alzheimer's disease with memantine were amply offset by cost savings related chiefly to increased independence and delayed institutionalisation.

Rational choice of cholinesterase inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease in Canada: a comparative economic analysis

BACKGROUND

Cholinesterase inhibitors, such as galantamine, donepezil and rivastigmine are approved for symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in Canada. In making choices amongst these drugs, one should consider their clinical merits and their economic implications.

METHODS

Each drug's short-term efficacy was estimated based on independent Cochrane reviews of the clinical trials. Long-term clinical and economic outcomes were estimated using the Assessment of Health Economics in Alzheimer's Disease (AHEAD) model.

RESULTS

While all treatments reduced the need for full-time care, only galantamine and donepezil 10 mg reduced the overall management costs of AD patients. The somewhat greater cognitive effect provided over six months by galantamine leads to the longest estimated delay before full-time care is required and, consequently to lower overall costs, with savings estimated at between 323 dollars and 4,246 dollars.

CONCLUSION

Although there is uncertainty in estimated results, the best information currently available suggests that the first choice for treatment of AD should be galantamine. These results should be interpreted with caution, however, as results are not based on direct comparisons among the drugs and the differences emerging from meta-analyses of the trials are relatively small.

Economic evaluation of galantamine in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease in the United States

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is estimated to affect up to 11% of those aged > or =65 years in the United States, and the number of patients with AD is predicted to increase over the next few decades as the population ages. The substantial social and economic burden associated with AD is well established, with the cost of management increasing as the disease progresses.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the economic impact of galantamine 16 and 24 mg/d relative to no pharmacologic treatment in the management of mild to moderate AD in the United States based on the concept of need for full-time care (FTC).

METHODS

Calculations were made using the Assessment of Health Economics in Alzheimer's Disease model, which applies predictive equations to estimate the need for FTC and the associated costs. The predictive equations were developed from longitudinal data on patients with AD. Inputs to the equations were derived by analyzing the data from 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, galantamine clinical trials. Resource use (from a payer perspective) was estimated from US clinical trial data, and costs were estimated from several US databases. Analyses were carried out over 10 years, and costs and benefits were discounted at 3%.

RESULTS

In the base case, 3.9 to 4.6 patients need to start treatment with galantamine to avoid 1 year of FTC, depending on dose. Treated patients spent 7% to 8% more time pre-FTC and 12% to 14% less time requiring FTC, resulting in savings of 2408 to 3601 US dollars. Time horizons below 3 years, very high discontinuation rates, or increased survival with galantamine reversed the savings. Conversely, limiting treatment to responders delayed FTC by 6 to 7 months, with savings of approximately 9097 to 11,578 US dollars.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that use of galantamine in patients with AD in the United States could reduce the use of costly resources such as formal home care and nursing homes, leading to cost savings over time.

A review of rivastigmine: a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Rivastigmine tartrate is a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor indicated for the symptomatic treatment of mild to moderate dementia. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) on April 21, 2000.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review was to summarize the background on dementia of the Alzheimer type and the pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy and tolerability profiles, clinical applications, adverse effects (AEs), drug interactions, and pharmacoeconomics of rivastigmine.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (1995-2002), EMBASE Geriatrics and Gerontology (1995-2002), the National Institutes of Health Alzheimer's Disease Education and Resource Center Combined Health Information Database, and Google. Search terms included rivastigmine, Exelon, ENA 713, and ENA-713. The bibliographies of retrieved articles also were searched for relevant articles.

RESULTS

In clinical trials, rivastigmine has improved or maintained cognitive function, global function (ie, activities of daily living [ADLs]), and behavior in patients with mild to moderate AD for up to 52 weeks. AEs are generally mild to moderate and primarily affect the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Clinically significant drug interactions with rivastigmine have thus far not been reported. Treatment with rivastigmine for up to 2 years may reduce the cost of caring for patients with AD. Cost savings are minimal during the first year, particularly for those with mild disease, but increase during the second year of treatment. Cost savings occur earlier for those with moderate AD. Most savings are realized from a delay in the need for institutionalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Rivastigmine has been shown to improve or maintain patients' performance in 3 major domains: cognitive function, global function (ADLs), and behavior. The efficacy and tolerability of rivastigmine have been proved by numerous clinical trials, with the most prominent AE being GI irritation.

Pharmacoeconomics of cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease

Cholinesterase inhibitors constitute one of few treatment options available for Alzheimer's disease, the most common cause of dementia. The modest effects and relatively high acquisition costs of these drugs make the health economics of dementia an important subject of study. Simulation models can be used to bring together existing data and make predictions of the long-term cost effectiveness of treatment. Most models have been built around cognitive function as a key parameter based on the observed relationship between cognitive function and costs of care. Patients with more severe disease attain higher total costs of care. Also, these patients have a higher share of formal care costs than do patients with mild disease, who are usually looked after by informal caregivers. The valuation of unpaid care is controversial, and the choice of method may affect results considerably. Another important issue is the measurement of health-related QOL in patients with Alzheimer's disease. The few existing studies have used proxy respondents to elicit utility weights in different disease states; however, this methodology has not been validated. It is likely that the increased drug costs incurred by the use of cholinesterase inhibitors will be offset (at least partly) by savings in other healthcare costs. However, these results should be viewed as preliminary, since we are still awaiting data from long-term follow-up studies. Also, the value of treatment for patients and caregivers in terms of QOL improvements has yet to be established.

"Value for money" in treating Alzheimer's disease with the new cholinesterase inhibitors

The absolute number of dementia cases is likely to increase due to the impending demographic changes. Several cost-of-illness studies of Alzheimer's disease, mainly from a societal perspective in developed countries, have demonstrated a huge economic burden. A substantial component of this huge economic burden is the direct costs of institutionalization and the indirect cost incurred by informal carers. This huge economic burden is of great interest because of the emergence of several cholinesterase inhibitors with proven efficacy in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Several cost-effectiveness studies of these drugs, based mainly on Markov modelling techniques and using data from population-based epidemiological studies and efficacy trials, have indicated that these drugs are cost-effective. A theoretical delay in placement into a residential or a nursing home and consequent cost savings may explain this cost-effectiveness. In the UK, although health authorities would fund the prescription of these drugs, social services would benefit from the cost savings; thus there is little financial incentive for health authorities to fund these drugs.

The costs of vascular dementia: a comparison with Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the costs of Medicare patients with vascular dementia (VaD). To compare the costs of VaD to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and controls without dementia.

METHODS

The study samples were drawn from community-dwelling patients in a large Medicare managed care organization (MCO) operating in the Northeast region of the USA. Costs for three study groups were contrasted in the study: 240 cases with vascular dementia (VaD), 1,366 cases with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and 19,300 controls without dementia. Costs were estimated from medical and pharmacy claims data. Estimated cost differences are controlled for age, gender, and comorbid conditions using regression analysis.

RESULTS

VaD patients accounted for 6% of all dementia patients identified in the health plan. VaD patients had substantially higher prevalence rates for 10 cardiovascular conditions compared with AD patients and controls. Annual costs for VaD patients were US$6,797 greater than AD patients. Compared with controls, costs were US$10,545 higher for VaD patients and US$3,748 higher for AD patients. Higher costs for VaD and AD patients relative to controls were largely attributable to higher inpatient costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Annual medical costs for VaD patients were substantially higher than costs for patients with AD and control patients without dementia. The high cost of VaD patients suggests a need to improve medical management and treatment of these patients to optimize patient outcomes and medical costs.

Optimizing coding and reimbursement to improve management of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias

The objectives of this study were to review the diagnostic, International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), diagnosis related groups (DRGs), and common procedural terminology (CPT) coding and reimbursement issues (including Medicare Part B reimbursement for physicians) encountered in caring for patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD); to review the implications of these policies for the long-term clinical management of the patient with ADRD; and to provide recommendations for promoting appropriate recognition and reimbursement for clinical services provided to ADRD patients. Relevant English-language articles identified from MEDLINE about ADRD prevalence estimates; disease morbidity and mortality; diagnostic coding practices for ADRD; and Medicare, Medicaid, and managed care organization data on diagnostic coding and reimbursement were reviewed. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is grossly undercoded. Few AD cases are recognized at an early stage. Only 13% of a group of patients receiving the AD therapy donepezil had AD as the primary diagnosis, and AD is rarely included as a primary or secondary DRG diagnosis when the condition precipitating admission to the hospital is caused by AD. In addition, AD is often not mentioned on death certificates, although it may be the proximate cause of death. There is only one ICD-9-CM code for AD-331.0-and no clinical modification codes, despite numerous complications that can be directly attributed to AD. Medicare carriers consider ICD-9 codes for senile dementia (290 series) to be mental health codes and pay them at a lower rate than medical codes. DRG coding is biased against recognition of ADRD as an acute, admitting diagnosis. The CPT code system is an impediment to quality of care for ADRD patients because the complex, time-intensive services ADRD patients require are not adequately, if at all, reimbursed. Also, physicians treating significant numbers of AD patients are at greater risk of audit if they submit a high frequency of complex codes. AD is grossly undercoded in acute hospital and outpatient care settings because of failure to diagnose, limitations of the coding system, and reimbursement issues. Such undercoding leads to a lack of recognition of the effect of AD and its complications on clinical care and impedes the development of better care management. We recommend continuing physician education on the importance of early diagnosis and care management of AD and its documentation through appropriate coding, expansion of the current ICD-9-CM codes for AD, more appropriate use of DRG coding for ADRD, recognition of the need for time-intensive services by ADRD patients that result in a higher frequency of use of complex CPT codes, and reimbursement for CPT codes that cover ADRD care management services.

Is mental health economics important in geriatric psychiatry in developing countries?

BACKGROUND

limited healthcare budgets and a seamless demand for resources suggests that a formula for allocating resources is needed. Economic evaluation can assist in developing this formula.

METHOD

mental health economic studies (cost minimisation, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, cost-benefit and cost of illness analysis) in geriatric psychiatry from developed and developed countries were examined along with all mental health economic studies in developed countries.

RESULTS

there were no health economic studies in geriatric psychiatry from developing countries against a background of many such studies in developed countries. There were a greater number of health economic studies in other areas of psychiatry in developing countries. Several reasons for the paucity of such studies, the feasibility of undertaking these studies and their significance are discussed.

CONCLUSION

mental health economic studies in geriatric psychiatry in developing countries are feasible, realistic and may well have an important part to play in the allocation of resources. Also, data sets necessary for such studies are emerging from many developing countries.

Donepezil and rivastigmine in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a best-evidence synthesis of the published data on their efficacy and cost-effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Various drugs have been approved for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the United States and Canada, including donepezil and rivastigmine, although questions remain as to their efficacy, effectiveness, and long-term benefits.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to conduct a best-evidence synthesis of data on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of donepezil and rivastigmine in the treatment of AD.

METHODS

Relevant published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Phase IV open-label extension studies (excluding abstracts) were identified through searches of MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, and PsycINFO for the period January 1984 to October 2001. The bibliographies of retrieved articles were searched for additional publications. For inclusion in the best-evidence synthesis, clinical trials had to pass a blinded quality assessment (score > or =5 on the Jadad scale) and use National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disease and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association diagnostic criteria. Economic studies were selected using National Health Service Centre for Reviews and Dissemination criteria for reporting critical summaries of economic evaluations.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs of donepezil and 2 of rivastigmine were identified and met inclusion criteria for the best-evidence synthesis. Eight donepezil trials and both rivastigmine trials included patients with mild AD (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score, 15-27) or moderate AD (MMSE score, 8-14); 1 donepezil trial included patients with moderate or severe AD (MMSE score, 0-7). In the RCTs of donepezil, the mean decrease in scores on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) was greater with active treatment than with placebo (lower scores indicate less cognitive deterioration). In the RCTs of rivastigmine, ADAS-cog scores decreased over the follow-up period with both active treatment and placebo; however, scores decreased more with active treatment. Three Phase IV studies of donepezil and I Phase IV study of rivastigmine were identified. Their results were consistent with those of the RCTs. Ten economic studies (7 donepezil, 3 rivastigmine) were identified and reviewed. In 4 of the donepezil studies and all 3 rivastigmine studies, use of the drug cost less than a no-drug strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy data indicate that both donepezil and rivastigmine can delay cognitive impairment and deterioration in global health for at least 6 months in patients with mild to moderate AD. Patients receiving active treatment will have more favorable ADAS-cog scores for at least 6 months, after which their scores will begin to converge with those of patients receiving placebo. Differences in methodology, types of direct or indirect costs included, and sources of cost data made it difficult to compare and synthesize findings of the economic studies; therefore, the cost-effectiveness data are inconclusive.

Costs and cognitive disability: modelling the underlying associations

BACKGROUND

The high support needs of elderly people with cognitive disability raise questions about the cost-effectiveness of different treatments. Associations between costs and cognitive disability could be influenced by other factors, particularly comorbidities.

AIMS

To examine the links between costs and cognitive disability in the context of covariates.

METHOD

Secondary analyses of data from the UK Office of Population Censuses and Surveys disability surveys for over 4500 elderly people living in households were used to examine associations between cost and cognitive disability.

RESULTS

Costs varied considerably, and were associated with severity of disability along a number of dimensions. The cost-raising effects of cognitive disability were smaller when the analyses controlled for levels of disability in other domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive disability is significantly associated with higher costs, but these analyses highlight the need to examine a range of disabilities.

Understanding and managing behavioural symptoms in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: focus on rivastigmine

Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are among the most distressing manifestations of dementia and result in considerable social and economic costs. Practical, non-pharmacological approaches such as environmental and behavioural changes may provide some benefit for patients in managing mild BPSD. In addition, various pharmacological approaches to treatment have been employed, such as neuroleptics and atypical antipsychotics, which differ in neurochemical target and clinical effectiveness. Growing evidence suggests that the neurobiological basis of BPSD in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias is a loss of cholinergic neurones and a resultant decline in acetylcholine (ACh) in brain regions which regulate behavioural and emotional responses, such as the limbic system. This cholinergic deficit can be partly corrected by inhibiting cholinesterase enzymes (ChEs). Studies of ChE inhibitors have shown positive effects to improve or stabilise existing BPSD and delay the emergence of new behavioural symptoms. In placebo-controlled studies, donepezil has reported efficacy in non-institutionalised moderate to moderately severe patients over a period of 24 weeks, but has failed to demonstrate efficacy in mild to moderate AD and in institutionalised patients with severe disease. Galantamine has been shown to delay the onset of BPSD in mild to moderate AD patients in one placebo-controlled study, and improve BPSD in a similar study of patients with cerebrovascular disease or probable vascular dementia. Studies with rivastigmine have shown efficacy in placebo-controlled studies of mild to moderately severe AD and in patients with Lewy body variant AD. Institutionalised patients with severe disease also show symptomatic benefits in BPSD with rivastigmine, resulting in a reduction in concomitant psychoactive medication use. Symptom complexes responding to ChE inhibitors appear to differ - all agents improve apathy, depression and anxiety, while rivastigmine additionally improves hallucinations and delusions, possibility as a result of dual inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase. The presence of hallucinations has been shown to predict response to rivastigmine. Accumulating data from studies of ChE inhibitors suggest that early intervention and long-term treatment, in addition to providing cognitive benefits, improves BPSD and offers potential to enhance quality of life. Differences seen between the agents in terms of efficacy in BPSD, tolerability and safety profiles may be the result of differences in neuropharmacological profiles.

Rivastigmine for Alzheimer's disease: Canadian interpretation of intermediate outcome measures and cost implications

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies have shown that patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) who are treated with rivastigmine have statistically significantly better scores on 5 scales used to assess AD than control patients receiving placebo. However, the clinical meaning and cost implications of these differences are not clear.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical meaning and cost implications of statistically significant results obtained in clinical trials of rivastigmine for the treatment of AD. Potential cost implications for the health care system, caregivers, and society are considered.

METHODS

Data on clinical effects of rivastigmine were obtained from published North American and European clinical studies of patients with mild to moderately severe AD receiving rivastigmine 6 to 12 mg/d (n = 828) or placebo (n = 647). Differences in scores on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Function, Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change with both clinical and caregiver information considered, Progressive Deterioration Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Global Deterioration Scale were assessed. A convenience panel of 9 Canadian specialists experienced in the treatment of AD provided their opinions on the clinical importance of the trial results. Chart review was performed to identify specific behaviors that improved, and cost implications of improvements were assessed.

RESULTS

The panel determined that statistically significant differences in scores on all scales except the MMSE were likely associated with functional or cognitive differences that were clinically relevant for patients, reflecting stabilization that would have beneficial consequences for caregivers and health care resource use. Subsequent chart review showed that improvement on specific scale items confirmed the physician panel's opinion. Analysis of possible cost implications to society indicated that medication expenditures would be offset largely by delays in the need for paid home care and institutionalization, positive effects on caregiver health, and less time lost from work for the caregiver.

CONCLUSIONS

From the perspective of a Canadian specialist panel, rivastigmine treatment for AD produces clinically relevant effects for patients that are beneficial to caregivers. These effects suggest decreased use of caregiver resources and delays in the need for institutionalization, both of which reduce societal costs.

Galantamine: a review of its use in Alzheimer's disease

Currently, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors are the most promising class of drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Galantamine is a reversible, competitive, tertiary alkaloid AChE inhibitor. The drug is selective for AChE rather than butyrylcholinesterase. In addition to inhibition of AChE galantamine interacts allosterically with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors to potentiate the action of agonists at these receptors. Recipients of galantamine 16 or 24 mg/day achieved significant improvements in cognitive and global symptoms relative to placebo recipients in large (n = 285 to 978 patients with mild to moderate AD) well-designed trials of 3 to 6 months' duration. Galantamine also improved activities of daily living in these patients and significantly reduced the requirement for caregiver assistance with activities of daily living. Moreover, galantamine recipients achieved significantly better outcomes on behavioural symptoms than placebo recipients. In a long term study (12 months), galantamine 24 mg/day slowed the progression of symptoms of the disease and maintained cognitive function and activities of daily living in patients with mild to moderate AD. Galantamine was generally well tolerated with the majority of adverse events being mild to moderate in intensity and transient. Predictably, adverse events were cholinergic in nature and generally related to the gastrointestinal system. These effects were reduced in patients receiving the recommended dose escalation regimen. Galantamine had no clinically relevant effects on vital signs, haematological or biochemical laboratory parameters and, importantly, there were no reports of hepatotoxicity. The incidence of serious adverse events was similar between galantamine (8 to 32 mg/day) and placebo groups (6 to 16% of patients across all treatment groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Galantamine is an effective well tolerated symptomatic treatment for AD which improves cognition, function and activities of daily living in the short term (up to 6 months) in patients with mild to moderate AD. In addition, it delays the development of behavioural disturbances and psychiatric symptoms, and reduces caregiver burden (as measured by caregiver time). In the long term (up to 1 year), galantamine maintains cognition and activities of daily living. Adverse events associated with galantamine are mainly cholinergic, usually mild to moderate in intensity and transient. Galantamine has been evaluated in several large well-designed studies and, given the relative lack of established treatment options, it may be considered as one of the first-line pharmacological treatments in patients with mild to moderate AD.