Cholinesterase inhibitors for vascular dementia and other vascular cognitive impairments: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) describes a broad spectrum of cognitive impairments caused by cerebrovascular disease, ranging from mild cognitive impairment to dementia. There are currently no pharmacological treatments recommended for improving either cognition or function in people with VCI. Three cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine) are licenced for the treatment of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. They are thought to work by compensating for reduced cholinergic neurotransmission, which is also a feature of VCI. Through pairwise comparisons with placebo and a network meta-analysis, we sought to determine whether these medications are effective in VCI and whether there are differences between them with regard to efficacy or adverse events.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To assess the efficacy and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of adults with vascular dementia and other VCI. (2) To compare the effects of different cholinesterase inhibitors on cognition and adverse events, using network meta-analysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched ALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's register, MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), PsycINFO (OvidSP), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection (ISI Web of Science), LILACS (BIREME), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform on 19 August 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials in which donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine was compared with placebo or in which the drugs were compared with each other in adults with vascular dementia or other VCI (excluding cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL)). We included all drug doses and routes of administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently identified eligible trials, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and applied the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. The primary outcomes were cognition, clinical global impression, function (performance of activities of daily living), and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were serious adverse events, incidence of development of new dementia, behavioural disturbance, carer burden, institutionalisation, quality of life and death. For the pairwise analyses, we pooled outcome data at similar time points using random-effects methods. We also performed a network meta-analysis using Bayesian methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight trials (4373 participants) in the review. Three trials studied donepezil 5 mg or 10 mg daily (n= 2193); three trials studied rivastigmine at a maximum daily dose of 3 to 12 mg (n= 800); and two trials studied galantamine at a maximum daily dose of 16 to 24 mg (n= 1380). The trials included participants with possible or probable vascular dementia or cognitive impairment following stroke. Mean ages were between 72.2 and 73.9 years. All of the trials were at low or unclear risk of bias in all domains, and the evidence ranged from very low to high level of certainty. For cognition, the results showed that donepezil 5 mg improves cognition slightly, although the size of the effect is unlikely to be clinically important (mean difference (MD) -0.92 Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) points (range 0 to 70), 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.44 to -0.40; high-certainty evidence). Donepezil 10 mg (MD -2.21 ADAS-Cog points, 95% CI -3.07 to -1.35; moderate-certainty evidence) and galantamine 16 to 24 mg (MD -2.01 ADAS-Cog point, 95%CI -3.18 to -0.85; moderate-certainty evidence) probably also improve cognition, although the larger effect estimates still may not be clinically important. With low certainty, there may be little to no effect of rivastigmine 3 to 12 mg daily on cognition (MD 0.03 ADAS-Cog points, 95% CI -3.04 to 3.10; low-certainty evidence). Adverse events reported in the studies included nausea and/or vomiting, diarrhoea, dizziness, headache, and hypertension. The results showed that there was probably little to no difference between donepezil 5 mg and placebo in the number of adverse events (odds ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.58; moderate-certainty evidence), but there were slightly more adverse events with donepezil 10 mg than with placebo (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.15; high-certainty evidence). The effect of rivastigmine 3 to 12 mg on adverse events was very uncertain (OR 3.21, 95% CI 0.36 to 28.88; very low-certainty evidence). Galantamine 16 to 24 mg is probably associated with a slight excess of adverse events over placebo (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.43; moderate-certainty evidence). In the network meta-analysis (NMA), we included cognition to represent benefit, and adverse events to represent harm. All drugs ranked above placebo for cognition and below placebo for adverse events. We found donepezil 10 mg to rank first in terms of benefit, but third in terms of harms, when considering the network estimates and quality of evidence. Galantamine was ranked second in terms of both benefit and harm. Rivastigmine had the lowest ranking of the cholinesterase inhibitors in both benefit and harm NMA estimates, but this may reflect possibly inadequate doses received by some trial participants and small trial sample sizes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found moderate- to high-certainty evidence that donepezil 5 mg, donepezil 10 mg, and galantamine have a slight beneficial effect on cognition in people with VCI, although the size of the change is unlikely to be clinically important. Donepezil 10 mg and galantamine 16 to 24 mg are probably associated with more adverse events than placebo. The evidence for rivastigmine was less certain. The data suggest that donepezil 10 mg has the greatest effect on cognition, but at the cost of adverse effects. The effect is modest, but in the absence of any other treatments, people living with VCI may still wish to consider the use of these agents. Further research into rivastigmine is needed, including the use of transdermal patches.

CDP-choline and galantamine, a personalized α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor targeted treatment for the modulation of speech MMN indexed deviance detection in healthy volunteers: a pilot study

RATIONALE

The combination of CDP-choline, an α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7 nAChR) agonist, with galantamine, a positive allosteric modulator of nAChRs, is believed to counter the fast desensitization rate of the α7 nAChRs and may be of interest for schizophrenia (SCZ) patients. Beyond the positive and negative clinical symptoms, deficits in early auditory prediction-error processes are also observed in SCZ. Regularity violations activate these mechanisms that are indexed by electroencephalography-derived mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to auditory deviance.

OBJECTIVES/METHODS

This pilot study in thirty-three healthy humans assessed the effects of an optimized α7 nAChR strategy combining CDP-choline (500 mg) with galantamine (16 mg) on speech-elicited MMN amplitude and latency measures. The randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, and counterbalanced design with a baseline stratification method allowed for assessment of individual response differences.

RESULTS

Increases in MMN generation mediated by the acute CDP-choline/galantamine treatment in individuals with low baseline MMN amplitude for frequency, intensity, duration, and vowel deviants were revealed.

CONCLUSIONS

These results, observed primarily at temporal recording sites overlying the auditory cortex, implicate α7 nAChRs in the enhancement of speech deviance detection and warrant further examination with respect to dysfunctional auditory deviance processing in individuals with SCZ.

Comparative risk of cardiac arrhythmias associated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors used in treatment of dementias - A narrative review

Donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine are the three acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs), out of a total of only four medications prescribed in the treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and related dementias. These medications are known to be associated with bradycardia given their mechanism of action of increasing acetylcholine (ACh). However, in March 2015, donepezil was added to the CredibleMeds "known-risk" category, a list where medications have a documented risk for acquired long-QT syndrome (ALQTS) and torsades de pointes (TdP) - a malignant ventricular arrhythmia that is a different adverse event than bradycardia (and is not necessarily associated with ACh action). The purpose of this article is to review the three AChEIs, especially with regards to mechanistic differences that may explain why only donepezil poses this risk; several pharmacological mechanisms may explain why. However, from an empirical point-of-view, aside from some case-reports, only a limited number of studies have generated relevant information regarding AChEIs' and electrocardiogram findings; none have specifically compared donepezil against galantamine or rivastigmine for malignant arrhythmias such as TdP. Currently, the choice of one of the three AChEIs for treatment of AD symptoms is primarily dependent upon clinician and patient preference. However, clinicians should be aware of the potential increased risk associated with donepezil. There is a need to examine the comparative risk of malignant arrhythmias among AChEIs users in real-world practice; this may have important implications with regards to changes in AChEI prescribing patterns.

Anti-foodborne enteritis effect of galantamine potentially via acetylcholine anti-inflammatory pathway in fish

Foodborne enteritis has become a limiting factor in aquaculture. Plant protein sources have already caused enteritic inflammation and inhibition in growth performance. Attempts have been made to find an effective solution to foodborne enteritis. Based on the previously suggested fish cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, galantamine, a typical cholinesterase inhibitor, was tested for the repression of pro-inflammatory cytokines for soybean meal induced enteritis by injection into grass carp. Both the phylogenetic analysis of cholinesterase, AchR and bioinformatic prediction, indicated galantamine's potential use as an enteritis drug. The result highlighted galantamine's potential effect for anti-enteritis in fish, especially in carps. Subsequently, a 4-week feeding trail using galantamine as an additive, in a zebrafish soybean meal induced enteritis model, demonstrated the prevention of enteritis. The results demonstrated that galantamine could prevent intestinal pathology, both histologically and molecularly, and also maintain growth performance. Reflected by gene expressional analysis, all mechanical, chemical and immune functions of the intestinal barrier could be protected by galantamine supplementation, which aided molecularly in the control of fish foodborne enteritis, through down-regulating Th17 type proinflammatory factors, meanwhile resuming the level of Treg type anti-inflammatory factors. Therefore, the current results shed light on fish intestinal acetylcholine anti-inflammation, by the dietary addition of galantamine, which could give rise to protection from foodborne enteritis.

Galantamine protects against synaptic, axonal, and vision deficits in experimental neurotrauma

Our goal was to investigate the neuroprotective effects of galantamine in a mouse model of blast-induced indirect traumatic optic neuropathy (bITON). Galantamine is an FDA-approved acetylcholinesterase inhibitor used to treat mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease. We exposed one eye of an anesthetized mouse to repeat bursts of over-pressurized air to induce traumatic optic neuropathy. Mice were given regular or galantamine-containing water (120 mg/L) ad libitum, beginning immediately after blast and continuing for one month. Electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials were performed just prior to endpoint collection. Histological and biochemical assessments were performed to assess activation of sterile inflammation, axon degeneration, and synaptic changes. Galantamine treatment mitigated visual function deficits induced by our bITON model via preservation of the b-wave of the electroretinogram and the N1 of the visual evoked potential. We also observed a reduction in axon degeneration in the optic nerve as well as decreased rod bipolar cell dendritic retraction. Galantamine also showed anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. Galantamine may be a promising treatment for blast-induced indirect traumatic optic neuropathy as well as other optic neuropathies.

Galantamine attenuates reinstatement of cue-induced methamphetamine-seeking behavior in mice

Methamphetamine (METH) dependence is becoming a serious socioeconomic health problem worldwide. The enhancement of the cholinergic nervous system is expected to greatly alleviate drug dependence. We investigated the effect of galantamine on the reinstatement of cue-induced METH-seeking behavior using a self-administration experiment. Treatment with galantamine (1 mg/kg, p.o.) 30 minutes before exposure to the cues suppressed the reinstatement of METH-seeking behavior. However, galantamine did not affect the cue-induced reinstatement of food-seeking behavior or locomotor activity. These results suggest that galantamine may be a candidate drug for treating relapses of METH-seeking behavior.

Positive allosteric modulation of α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as a new approach to smoking reduction: evidence from a rat model of nicotine self-administration

RATIONALE

The α4β2 subtype of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) plays a central role in the mediation of nicotine reinforcement. Positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) at α4β2 nAChRs facilitate the intrinsic efficiency of these receptors, although they do not directly activate the receptors. α4β2 PAMs are hypothesized to reduce nicotine self-administration in subjects engaged in routine nicotine consumption. The present study tested this hypothesis using a rat model of nicotine self-administration.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained in daily 1-h sessions to intravenously self-administer nicotine (0.03 mg/kg per infusion, free base) on a fixed-ratio 5 schedule. The effects of the α4β2 PAM desformylflustrabromine (dFBr), α4β2 agonist 5-iodo-A-85380, and acetylcholinesterase inhibitor galantamine on nicotine intake were examined. The ability of dFBr and 5-iodo-A-85380 to substitute for nicotine was also assessed.

RESULTS

dFBr and 5-iodo-A-85380 dose-dependently reduced nicotine self-administration without changing lever responses for food. Galantamine decreased the self-administration of nicotine and food at high doses. Unlike 5-iodo-A-85380, dFBr failed to substitute for nicotine in supporting self-administration behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrated the effectiveness of dFBr in reducing nicotine intake and the inability of dFBr to support self-administration behavior. These findings suggest that positive allosteric modulation of α4β2 nAChRs may be a promising target for the treatment of nicotine addiction. Moreover, α4β2 PAMs, in contrast to agonist medications, may have clinical advantages because they may have little liability for abuse because of their lack of reinforcing actions on their own.

Ligand-functionalized nanoliposomes for targeted delivery of galantamine

The purpose of this study was to design ligand-functionalized nanoliposomes that are proficient in providing effective intracellular delivery of an alkaloid drug (galantamine) into PC12 neuronal cells in response to managing Alzheimer's disease (AD). Ligand-functionalized nanoliposomes were produced and validated for their physicochemical properties, in silico molecular mechanics energy relationships, ex vivo cytotoxicity, peptide coupling efficiency (PCE), drug entrapment efficiency (DEE), drug release, fluorometry and confocal microscopy. Particle sizes of the nanoliposomes ranged from 127 nm to 165 nm (PdI=0.39-0.03), zeta potential values of -18 mV to -36 mV, PCE from 40% to 78% while DEE ranged from 42% to 79%. The surface morphology of the nanoliposomes was stable, spherically and uniform in shape. Thermal behavior and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analyses confirmed that galantamine and the peptide-ligand were incorporated into the inner core and surface of the nanoliposomes, respectively. The optimized formulation showed sustained drug release (30% of drug released within 48 h). Fluorometry and confocal microscopy revealed that the ligand-functionalized nanoliposomes facilitated galantamine uptake into PC12 neuronal cells via the Serpin Enzyme Complex Receptor in a mediated manner. CytoTox-Glo™ cytotoxicity assay established the low cytotoxicity on PC12 neuronal cells when exposed to native nanoliposomes and the ligand-functionalized nanoliposomes. Response surface analysis demonstrated there was a high degree of correlation between the experimental and fitted values. Furthermore, ex vivo studies showed that the high galantamine accumulation into PC12 neuronal cells was influenced by the post-engineering of peptides on the surface of the galantamine-loaded nanoliposomes. MMER analysis aptly corroborated the experimental findings.

[Microcirculatory effects of fluctophoresis series in patient with moderate chronic periodontal disease]

The results of fluctophoresis series in 160 patients aged 35-75 years with chronic periodontal disease are discussed in the paper. It was shown that fluctophoresis may improve both clinical and rheographic values, as well and laser Doppler flowmetry rates because of improved microcirculation. Mildronat fluctophoresis influences myogenic regulation while nivaline acts as neurogenic vessel tone regulator. Acovegine fluctophoresis is effective in cases with neither myogenic nor neurogenic regulation disorder.

Pharmacokinetic behavior and efficiency of acetylcholinesterase inhibition in rat brain after intranasal administration of galanthamine hydrobromide loaded flexible liposomes

Galanthamine hydrobromide (GH) has been approved for symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia. Hence, the effects of intranasal administration of GH loaded flexible liposomes have been investigated for the first time on the efficiency of acetylcholinesterase inhibition, as well as the pharmacokinetic behavior of GH in rat brain. The GH loaded flexible liposomes were characterized for shape, entrapment capacity, size distribution and zeta potential by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), ultracentrifugation and dynamic light scattering (DLS), respectively. The inhibition of acetylcholinesterase was investigated using rat brain homogenates as an enzyme resource and microdialysis was used to determine the pharmacokinetic behavior of GH in rats brain. The rat pheochromocytoma PC-12 cell line was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of GH loaded flexible liposomes. The results revealed that: (i) the efficiency of acetylcholinesterase inhibition of GH was greatly enhanced by intranasal administration compared with oral administration, especially GH loaded in flexible liposomes; (ii) the C(max) and AUC(0→10) for intranasal administration of GH loaded flexible liposomes were 3.52 and 3.36 times higher than those of orally administered GH, moreover, the T(max) was greatly shortened from 1.5h for oral administration to 0.75h for intranasal administration of GH loaded flexible liposomes; and (iii) PC-12 cells viability tests showed that the flexible liposome carrier is not toxic to the cultured cells and the cytotoxicity of GH to cells was clearly decreased by loading in flexible liposomes. These results indicate that intranasal administration of GH loaded flexible liposomes could readily transport GH into brain tissues, suggesting some promise for this approach in successful brain-drug targeting in AD treatment.

Two galantamine titration regimens in patients switched from donepezil

OBJECTIVES

In addition to inhibiting acetylcholinesterase, galantamine has allosteric-modulating activity at nicotinic receptors. This may make galantamine an attractive option for patients starting treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD), but also for those who have not benefited from their current therapy. This study explored outcomes in subjects with AD transitioning from donepezil because of insufficient tolerability or efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects previously receiving donepezil for mild-to-moderate AD were enrolled in a 12-week randomized, open-label study. After screening and a 7-day washout, subjects were randomly allocated to galantamine fast (8 mg/week increments) or slow (8 mg/4 week) titration to 16-24 mg. Efficacy outcomes included the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog/11), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change - Plus Caregiver's Input (CIBIC-plus) and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL).

RESULTS

Eighty-six of 89 patients (fast titration, n = 44; slow titration, n = 45) completed the study. At week 12, ADAS-cog/11 score improved from screening by 2.6 and 0.6 in the fast- and slow-titration arms, respectively (overall, -1.6; P = 0.002). MMSE scores improved slightly in both arms (overall, +0.9; P = 0.002). Two-thirds of patients had improvement or no change on the CIBIC-plus at week 12. ADCS-ADL scores did not change significantly from screening in either treatment arm. Galantamine was generally well tolerated; nausea (5.6%) and bradycardia (4.5%) were the most commonly reported adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in whom donepezil is ineffective or poorly tolerated may benefit from a switch to galantamine.

[New approach to gait disorders therapy in late stages of Parkinson's disease]

We conducted an open noncontrolled study of efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) combined with acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (galantamine) therapy in 30 Parkinson's disease patients with cognitive impairment and higher level of gait disorders. Galantamine dose gradually increase to maximum of 16 mg/day (8 weeks) before rTMSand after that we start rTMS for 10 consecutive days. Cognitive, neuropsychiatric and motor symptoms were assessed clinically at baseline and at end of 10 weeks combined therapy using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Freezing Of Gait (FOG), Clinical Gait And Balance Scale (GABS), Tinetti scale, the clock drawing test, the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), PDQ-39 and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The metabolism in the frontal lobes, caudate nucleus, thalamus were assessed in 9 patients at baseline and end of rTMS by [18F]FDG-PET. Changes in total point scores on the scales at the ends of 10 weeks were compared with the baseline. Results were significant in the FOG (p = 0.00002), GABS (p = 0.000006), MMSE (p = 0.0001), FAB (0 = 0.003), PDQ-39 (p = 0.00009), BDI (p = 0.00004). Improvements in gait and decreases in freezing and falls were seen in the end of study period. Our study demonstrated the beneficial effect of rTMS of the DLPFC combined with acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment on metabolism in the frontal lobes, caudate nucleus, thalamus ([18F]FDG-PET), improving of gait and cognitive functions in PD patients.

[The application of electrical stimulation by bipolar pulsed currents and galanthamine electrophoresis for the rehabilitation of patients with diabetes mellitus]

Clinical observations provided evidence of the positive effects of multichannel electrical stimulation by bipolar pulsed currents in combination with galanthamine electrophoresis applied for the treatment of patients with complicated diabetes mellitus. Such treatment facilitated normalization of water and carbohydrate metabolism and reduction of the body weight; moreover, it improved blood circulation and the state of the nervous system.

Galantamine and behavior in Alzheimer disease: analysis of four trials

OBJECTIVES

Many individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) experience behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms, which may cause caregiver distress and lead to the institutionalization of the patient. This analysis characterized behavioral symptoms and caregiver distress in trials of galantamine and their response to treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were pooled from four randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of galantamine in patients with mild to moderate AD (three studies) or AD plus cerebrovascular disease (one study) (n = 2177). Behavior and associated caregiver distress were assessed in each study using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and NPI distress (NPI-D), respectively.

RESULTS

After 5/6 months, but not after 3 months, NPI score was significantly improved with galantamine vs placebo (P = 0.013). The benefit was particularly pronounced in patients categorized as having advanced moderate AD. At 5/6 months, there was a numerical benefit of galantamine over placebo in terms of caregiver distress; the difference was statistically significant in patients with moderate or advanced moderate AD.

CONCLUSIONS

Galantamine reduces behavioral symptoms in patients with mild to moderate AD, leading to reduced caregiver burden. The reductions were greatest in patients with moderate or advanced moderate disease.

[The application of multichannel electrostimulation and nivalin electrophoresis for the rehabilitative treatment of the patient following plastic surgery in the facial region]

This paper describes for the first time the combined treatment of the patients who underwent plastic surgery for the correction of cosmetic defects in the form of grade II and III senile atrophy of the skin in conjunction with complicated neuropathies of the facial nerve. The essence of the proposed combined treatment consists in using lymphatic drainage massage, medicinal electrophoresis of a nivalin solution, multichannel electrostimulation, and microcurrent therapy with bipolar pulsed currents. The method made it possible to significantly improve the properties of the skin in the facial region, neuro-muscular conductivity, general microcirculation and cerebral circulation in the treated patients.

Predictors of adherence among Alzheimer's disease patients receiving oral therapy

OBJECTIVES

Treatment effectiveness depends upon administering medications as prescribed, and adherence is critical for Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients to receive optimal benefit from therapy. The objective of this study was to investigate factors associated with adherence to AD oral medications.

METHODS

This retrospective claims analysis identified AD patients who initiated oral AD therapy (rivastigmine, donepezil, galantamine, or memantine) between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007 from a large US health plan. Patient baseline characteristics were assessed during the 6-month pre-index period; outcomes were assessed during the 1-year post-index period. Pill burden was measured as a count of unique units of medication/day. Adherence was measured by medication possession ratio (MPR), with MPR >or=80% defined as adherent. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess how potential covariates affect adherence probability.

RESULTS

A total of 3091 AD patients (36% male; mean age 80 [8.25 SD]) were identified. Only 58% of patients were adherent to oral AD medications. Compared to patients <75 years, patients >or=86 years were likely to be more adherent (OR = 1.401, p < 0.001). Other factors found to be positively associated with the probability of adherence to AD medications were male gender (OR = 1.175, p < 0.05), overall pill burden (OR = 1.192, p < 0.001), and a lower formulary tier status of the AD medication (OR = 1.332, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among the several variables assessed, being male, >or=86 years of age, having a greater overall daily pill burden, or using a lower formulary tier AD medication was associated with better adherence to oral AD medication in patients diagnosed with AD. The database had no information on caregiver support, medication management interventions, or use of adherence aids that may have affected adherence in this cohort, yet, a substantial proportion of patients (42%) remained non-adherent. A better understanding of the causes of non-adherence is necessary, and methods to improve adherence, such as transdermal medications and educational programs, should be considered.

[Oral galantamine versus rivastigmine transdermal patch: a descriptive study at a memory clinic in The Netherlands]

OBJECTIVES

Since January 2008 in The Netherlands, two cholinesterase inhibitors, oral galantamine and rivastigmine transdermal patch, are registered as a one-day symptomatic treatment for Alzheimer's disease. As no head to head study was performed yet, the objective of this study was to describe the daily practice of oral galantamine and rivastigmine transdermal patch in a real life population of a memory clinic of a suburban teaching hospital in The Netherlands.

METHODS

A randomized open label study in 84 ambulant Alzheimer's patients with at least 6 months follow-up and treated either with oral galantamine (group G) or rivastigmine transdermal patch (group R). Data collection included patients' demographic and disease variables. Adverse events were collected and, in case of interruption of the primary treatment, the alternative treatment was registered.

RESULTS

Serious adverse events did not occur. In group G respectively group R adverse events occurred in 20 patients (50%) and 18 patients (41%). No difference occurred in the frequency of nausea or vomiting. In group R more patients noted dermatological adverse events. In group G respectively group R medication was stopped in 12 patients (30%) and 14 patients (32%). However, compared to group G after stopping the treatment in group R more patients received a new anti-dementia medication (respectively 11 patients (79%) and 4 patients (33%)) (chi2(1) = 5.418, p = .026).

CONCLUSION

Despite different forms, the use of oral galantamine and rivastigmine transdermal patch showed neither difference in the frequency of adverse events neither in the frequency of stopping primary treatment. However, compared to oral galantamine use, rivastigmine transdermal patch resulted in more dermatological adverse events and after stopping rivastigmine transdermal patch, new anti-dementia medication or form was more often started. More research is urgently needed.

Alternative method of oral dosing for rats

Oral administration of drugs to laboratory rodents typically is achieved by using the gavage technique. Although highly effective, this method occasionally can cause esophageal injury as well as restraint-associated distress, particularly with repeated use. The aim of this study was to assess an alternative oral dosing method that could reduce the distress and morbidity associated with standard gavage techniques. The palatability and pharmacokinetic profile of 2 medicines approved for the treatment of Alzheimer disease, donepezil and galantamine, were investigated in male Lister hooded rats by using a syringe-feeding method and compared with results from traditional gavage administration. In addition, the stimulant nicotine was tested by using the syringe-feeding method in a separate series of experiments. Animals reliably learned to drink voluntarily from the syringe, and latency to drink decreased rapidly. The addition of donepezil, galantamine, or nicotine to sucrose had no apparent effect on the palatability of the solution, although nicotine produced aversive effects that inhibited subsequent voluntary intake. Oral bioavailability was improved by using syringe feeding with donepezil but not galantamine. Both drugs improved cognitive performance in the novel object recognition test, with similar behavioral profiles between the 2 methods of administration. Our results suggest that the syringe-feeding technique is an effective alternative oral dosing method in rats.

[Effects of anti-dementia drugs on sleep-wake patterns in sleep-disturbed rats]

Dementia is a neurologic disorder presenting memory impairment as a main symptom. It is well known that patients often complain of sleep disturbance as an associated symptom in dementia. It has been reported that donepezil caused sleep disturbance, but little is known about the effect of galantamine on sleep-wake patterns. In the present study, we investigated the effects of anti-dementia drugs on sleep-wake patterns in sleep-disturbed rats. Single administration of donepezil and galantamine caused no significant effect on sleep-wake patterns at doses used in the present study in rats. On the other hand, piracetam caused a significant decrease in sleep latency at a dose of 500 mg/kg. Next, we examined the changes in sleep-wake patterns from repeated administration of donepezil, galantamine and piracetam. Donepezil caused significant increases in sleep latency and total wake time and decrease in total non-rapid eye movement sleep time at a dose of 1 mg/kg. However, galantamine caused no effect on sleep-wake patterns. Piracetam caused significant decreases in sleep latency and total wake time at a dose of 500 mg/kg. From these results, it is concluded that donepezil deteriorated sleep disturbance, and piracetam caused somnolence. In addition, galantamine showed no influence on the sleep.

[Galantamine (reminyl) in the treatment of severe Alzheimer's disease]

Twenty-five patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) in moderate-severe and severe stages received galantamine in dosage 8 mg daily during the 1st month with the following increasing to 16 mg daily. Six patients received 24 mg per day from the 3rd month. The total duration of therapy was 26 weeks. 15 patients received in addition the antipsychotic therapy. Reminyl had a positive effect on cognitive functions and psychotic symptoms of dementia, in particular delusions, aggression and irritability, apathy, aberrant motor behavior, eating and sleep disorders. The therapeutic reduction of these disorders resulted in the distinct reduction of physical and mental burden on the caregivers. The therapeutic effects of reminyl and its good tolerability allow to recommend this drug for treatment of severe stages of AD.

Galantamine for the treatment of BPSD in Thai patients with possible Alzheimer's disease with or without cerebrovascular disease

OBJECTIVES

This study was to investigate an efficacy of galantamine in treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia in Thai elderly who suffered from possible Alzheimer's disease (AD) with or without cerebrovascular disease and vascular dementia.

METHODS

A 6-month, multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled trial was undertaken in 75 patients. Eligible patients received an initial galantamine dose of 8 mg/dayand escalated over 5 to 8 weeks to maintenance doses of 16 or 24 mg/day. The behavioral response was assessed as an intention-to-treat analysis using the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (BEHAVE-AD).

RESULTS

Galantamine improved behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (P < .05 vs baseline) over the 24 weeks of treatment. BEHAVE-AD score was significantly improved from baseline in paranoid and delusion ideation, diurnal rhythm disturbances, anxieties, and phobias.

CONCLUSIONS

Galantamine may be a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for improving psychotic, behavioral, and psychological symptoms in Thai elderly with possible AD with or without cerebrovascular disease and vascular dementia.

PET imaging of the in vivo brain acetylcholinesterase activity and nicotine binding in galantamine-treated patients with AD

The effect of galantamine treatment on cortical acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity and nicotinic receptor binding was investigated by positron emission tomography (PET) in 18 patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) in relation to galantamine concentration and the patients' cognitive performances. The first 3 months of the study was of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design, during which 12 patients received galantamine (16-24mg/day) and 6 patients the placebo, and this was followed by 9 months' galantamine treatment in all patients. The patients underwent PET examinations to measure cortical AChE activity ((11)C-PMP) and (11)C-nicotine binding. Neuropsychological tests were performed throughout the study. Inhibition (30-40%) of cortical AChE activity was observed after 3 weeks to 12 months of galantamine treatment. No significant change in mean cortical (11)C-nicotine binding was observed during the study. (11)C-Nicotine binding, however, positively correlated with plasma galantamine concentration. Both the changes of AChE activity and (11)C-nicotine binding correlated positively with the results of a cognitive test of attention. In conclusion, galantamine caused sustained AChE inhibition for up to 12 months. At the individual level, the in vivo cortical AChE inhibition and (11)C-nicotine binding were associated with changes in the attention domain of cognition rather than episodic memory.

The impact of galantamine on cognition and mood during electroconvulsive therapy: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to: (1) assess the effectiveness of galantamine in the prevention of cognitive impairments during ECT treatment and (2) to explore the safety and tolerability of galantamine during ECT treatment.

METHODS

Nine consecutive ECT patients were given galantamine 4 mg bid throughout the course of their ECT treatments followed by a second cohort of eight consecutive ECT patients who did not receive galantamine. Objective measures of cognitive functioning and depression severity were performed pre-ECT and post-ECT. Subjective ratings of depression, confusion, and side effects were obtained weekly.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in age, gender and admission Global Assessment Functioning (GAF) scores. There were no significant between group differences found with regards to mean seizure duration, energy administered to induce seizures, blood pressure, or heart rate during and post-ECT treatment. None of the patients discontinued galantamine due to side effects and there were no severe adverse drug reactions. Patients receiving galantamine performed significantly better on delayed memory and abstract reasoning following ECT. The galantamine group showed a greater but non-significant mood improvement (repeated measure ANOVA).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the hypothesis that galantamine may reduce cognitive impairment during ECT, especially with regards to new learning. In addition, galantamine may also enhance the antidepressant action of ECT. Galantamine was both safe and well tolerated during ECT.

[Cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of dementia--are they useful in clinical practice?]

BACKGROUND

Some randomized studies, mostly of short duration, have indicated that cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine) may have a beneficial effect in Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia and in dementia caused by Lewy body disease. The benefit of these drugs in clinical practice has not been satisfactorily documented.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Literature collected regularly for many years supplemented by extensive non-systematic searches of Pubmed and Embase.

RESULTS

Only in a few placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised studies were the patients followed for more than one year. Several clinical tests were performed, among them the Mini Mental Status (MMS)-test, which is the most commonly used test in clinical practice. The three cholinesterase inhibitors led to statistically significant results, although of limited clinical relevance, in various forms of dementia.

INTERPRETATION

Based on the results obtained it could be questioned whether the observed effects are of clinical significance. Only a small proportion of patients with Alzheimer's disease seem to benefit from the cholinesterase inhibitors tested, and it is difficult to predict who will in advance. Treatment should first be evaluated after 2-4 months and subsequently on a regular basis, and accepted clinical tests should be applied.

Cholinesterase inhibitors: tremor and exacerbation of Parkinson's disease

(1) Three cholinesterase inhibitors are marketed in France for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine. Tremor and dystonia are known adverse effects of cholinesterase inhibitors. (2) In patients with Parkinson's disease who have cognitive disorders, or in patients with Lewy body dementia, exacerbations of parkinsonism and tremor have been observed during treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors at normal doses. The disorders were reversible on withdrawal of the cholinesterase inhibitor. (3) Withdrawal of cholinesterase inhibitors should be considered if gait disorders, falls or parkinsonism occur or worsen during treatment.

[Are anti-dementia drugs worthwhile?]

The efficacy of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitors donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine for Alzheimer's disease is well-documented by a number of studies. In Germany, the three substances are approved for the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease; the glutamate antagonist memantine is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease. The health economical benefit of these medicines is disputed and ultimately depends on the health policy evaluation. However, from the medical perspective, every newly diagnosed case of Alzheimer's disease justifies a therapeutic attempt. In a given case, changing between the three approved acetylcholinesterase inhibitors or memantine may be indicated. Whether a combination of the substances has advantages is currently being tested.

Evaluation of centrally acting cholinesterase inhibitor exposures in adults

BACKGROUND

There are 4 centrally acting cholinesterase inhibitors (CA-ChEI) available in the US: tacrine, galantamine, rivastigmine, and donepezil. Documented clinical experience involving exposure to these agents is limited. The lack of information makes decisions involving excessive or unintended CA-ChEI exposure difficult.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects, demographics, and outcomes of CA-ChEI exposures reported to US poison centers.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the Toxic Exposure Surveillance System of the American Association of Poison Control Centers data of acute and acute-onchronic exposures involving only a CA-ChEI in patients 19 years of age or older with documented medical outcomes from 2000-2005 was performed.

RESULTS

There were 1026 records that met criteria for this study. Patients aged 70-89 years made up 73% of reports; 69% of the patients were female. Moderate (197) and major outcomes (20) accounted for 21% of exposures. There were no deaths. Clinical effects that occurred in 5% or more of patients included vomiting (34%), nausea (28%), diarrhea (12%), dizziness/vertigo (9.9%), drowsiness/lethargy (7.7%), diaphoresis (7.4%), tremor (5.2%), and bradycardia (5%). Patients were admitted to the hospital in 19% of all exposures. Of those patients, 42% were admitted to a critical care unit. The majority (65%) of exposures were attributed to unintentional therapeutic error. Patients received at least one form of therapy in 47% of exposures, including intravenous fluid (111), antiemetic (48), atropine (17), benzodiazepine (15), oxygen (14), antihypertensive (4), pralidoxime (4), intubation (3), antihistamine (2), antiarrhythmic (1), anticonvulsant (1), and pacemaker (1).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients evaluated in this retrospective study experienced no or mild effect; however, significant or life-threatening effects were observed in a small group of patients and an appreciable number of patients were admitted to a healthcare facility.

Galantamine treatment of vascular dementia: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

To evaluate efficacy and safety of galantamine for patients with vascular dementia (VaD).

METHODS

In this multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial, 788 patients with probable VaD who also satisfied strict centrally read MRI criteria were randomized to receive galantamine or placebo. Efficacy was evaluated using measures of cognition, daily function, and behavior. The primary efficacy measures were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog/11) and the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) total score. Secondary outcomes included the Clinician's Interview Based on Impression of Change-Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus), Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and EXIT-25 for assessment of executive functioning. Safety and tolerability were also monitored.

RESULTS

Patients treated with galantamine had a greater improvement in ADAS-cog/11 after 26 weeks compared with placebo (-1.8 vs -0.3; p < 0.001). There was no difference between galantamine and placebo at week 26 on the ADCS-ADL score (0.7 vs 1.3; p = 0.783). Improvement in global functioning measured by the CIBIC-plus associated with galantamine approached significance (p = 0.069). A difference between treatment groups for EXIT-25 favoring galantamine was detected (p = 0.041). Safety data revealed that 13% of galantamine and 6% of placebo patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Significance was not reached for both co-primary endpoints. Galantamine was effective for improving cognition, including executive function, in patients with vascular dementia, with good safety and tolerability. However, improvement in activities of daily living with galantamine was similar to that observed with placebo.

Efficacy and safety of galantamine in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies: a 24-week open-label study

BACKGROUND

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a common dementia of the elderly. A significant cholinergic deficit has been demonstrated that may be responsive to treatment by cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs).

METHODS

A 24-week, open-label study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a ChEI, galantamine, in 50 patients with DLB.

RESULTS

This study showed beneficial effects with galantamine in 2 of the 3 primary efficacy parameters. The scores on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-12) improved by 8.24 points from baseline (p = 0.01) especially in visual hallucinations and nighttime behaviors (p = 0.004). The scores on the Clinician's Global Impression of Change improved by 0.5 points from baseline (p = 0.01). The third primary efficacy parameter, the Cognitive Drug Research Computerized Cognitive Assessment System, was unchanged from baseline. Adverse events were generally mild and transient.

CONCLUSION

Galantamine appears to be an effective and safe therapy for patients with DLB.

[Criminal clozapine intoxications]

The paper deals with the topical problem--study criminal clozapine intoxications that have recently ranked first in the total structure of criminal intoxications, by ousting poisoning by clofelin. Thus, in 2004 to 2006, the number of victims taken to the Prof. A. A. Ostroumov Moscow City Hospital No. 33 increased by 1.9 times, by amounting to 1120 cases in 2006. At the same time, its correct prehospital diagnosis was made only in 1.76% of the victims. Abundant clinical material (2720 cases) has been analyzed, by using the currently performed studies. The specific features of the development and clinical manifestations of these intoxications, including those concurrent with alcoholic intoxication, are described in detail. The characteristic manifestations of impaired consciousness, hypersalivation, and myosis in the absence of generally, respiratory failure and hemodynamic disorders, as well as altered clinical and biochemical blood parameters are shown. At the same time there were elevated ammonia levels within the first hours after intoxication, which, in the authors' opinion, may suggest the development of hepatic dysfunction. Emphasis is laid on the fact that the leading component in the complex of medical measures is the administration of central anticholinesterase agents (aminostigmine and galantamine hydrobromide) that may be used as an antidote and for the differential diagnosis of these intoxications.

Galantamine reduces smoking in alcohol-dependent patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The high morbidity and mortality caused by smoking highlights the importance of investigating new strategies for smoking cessation or reduction. Galantamine is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that increases the effect of acetylcholine (ACh). The nicotinic ACh receptor is activated via positive allosteric modulation (APL).

METHODS

We investigated whether galantamine reduces smoking by performing a 24-week randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentric clinical trial in recently detoxified alcohol-dependent patients. We included all study subjects irrespective of an intention or motivation to abstain from nicotine. Specific treatment for cessation or reduction of smoking was not provided. Smoking behavior was assessed by means of patients' diaries. The nicotine metabolite cotinine was measured to verify the number of smoked cigarettes as documented in the patient's diary.

RESULTS

114 randomized smokers received galantamine (n = 56) or placebo (n = 58) for 12 weeks. Follow-up examinations were terminated after an additional 12 weeks without treatment. Smoking behavior did not differ between both groups at baseline. After treatment, the intention-to-treat analysis revealed significant differences with a 20% lower cumulative number of smoked cigarettes and a 15% lower number of smoking days in the galantamine group compared to placebo. The average number of smoked cigarettes per smoking day as well as the cotinine values decreased about 10%. Cotinine values showed a positive correlation with the number of documented cigarettes, validating the patients' diaries.

CONCLUSION

Our tentative data indicate that galantamine reduces smoking behavior even without any additional specific intervention. We suggest introducing the term "substitution therapy" into the treatment of smoking. This result could open up a new treatment approach for groups of patients which usually have a low motivation for change.

The influence of galantamine on reaction time, attention processes, and performance variability in elderly Alzheimer patients

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of galantamine in elderly patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (AD) on reaction time (RT), selective (SA) and alternating attention (AA), errors, and on interindividual and intraindividual variability.

METHODS

Forty-one outpatients with AD were included in an open-label prospective trial and evaluated at baseline and after 8 and 22 weeks of treatment using a RT test that allows differentiation between the decision and movement time components of the total RT. The various tasks of the RT test allowed calculation of SA and AA. Standard AD evaluation tests were performed at baseline and after 22 weeks.

RESULTS

After 8 and 22 weeks of treatment, an improvement of decision time and RT at all complexity levels was noted. For movement time, improvements were less pronounced and not present at both follow-up moments or at all complexity levels. Selective attention, but not AA, improved significantly after 22 weeks. A decrease in the number of errors was noted. At several complexity levels, both at 8 and 22 weeks, the interindividual and intraindividual variability decreased. Changes in Mini Mental State Evaluation score were correlated with those in SA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides arguments that galantamine treatment improves various parameters of the RT, attention, and interindividual and intraindividual variability in elderly AD patients. Because the study is not a controlled trial, further investigation is needed.

[Efficacy and safety of galantamine (reminyl) in the treatment of dementia in patients with Parkinson's disease (open-label controlled trial)]

Forty-one Parkinson's disease patients with dementia (21 galantamine group, 20--control group) with onset of dementia at least two years after the manifestation of parkinsonian symptoms participated in this open-label controlled trial of galantamine in maximum dose 16 mg/day. Cognitive, psychiatric and motor symptoms were assessed before and after 4, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment using clinical assessment as well as rating scales, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), ADAS-cog, clock drawing test, Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-12) with assessment of caregiver distress. Patients treated with galantamine had better scores on MMSE (p<0,05), ADAS-cog (p<0,05), clock drawing test (p<0,05) and FAB (p<0,01) to the end of the trial comparing to the control group. NPI scores on individual items changed from baseline at week 12 and 24, showing benefits of galantamine treatment as compared to the controls, with significant difference for hallucinations (p=0,0002), anxiety (p=0,04), sleep disorders (p=0,04) and apathy (p=0,006). Galantamine therapy was associated with a significant reduction in caregiver distress (p=0,007), improvement of daily life activity (p=0,003). Gait, freezing and falls were improved in the galantamine group but a mild worsening of tremor was noted in two patients. Adverse events (drooling, postural hypotension, nausea, dysuria) were observed in 7 (30%) of galantamine treated patients.

Changes of cholinesterase activities in the plasma and some tissues following administration of L-carnitine and galanthamine to rats

Changes of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activities in the hypophysis and brain (frontal cortex, hippocampus, medial septum and basal ganglia), and butyrylcholinesterase in plasma and liver following galanthamine (GAL) administration were studied in rats pretreated with L-carnitine (CAR). Following only GAL administration (10 mg/kg, i.m.), both cholinesterases (without clinical symptoms of GAL overdosage) were significantly inhibited. Pretreatment with CAR (3 consecutive days, 250 mg/kg, p.o.) followed by GAL administration showed higher AChE inhibition in comparison with single GAL administration. However, a statistically significant difference was observed for AChE in the hippocampus only. The activity of peripheral cholinesterases was not influenced by CAR pretreatment. Thus, pretreatment with CAR enhanced AChE inhibition in some brain parts of the rat following GAL administration.

In vitro formulation optimization of intranasal galantamine leading to enhanced bioavailability and reduced emetic response in vivo

The purpose of the current investigation was to optimize an intranasal (IN) galantamine (an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor used for treatment of Alzheimer's disease) formulation using an in vitro tissue model, to correlate those results to in vivo bioavailability, and to compare emetic response to oral dosing. A design-of-experiments (DOE) based formulation screening employing an in vitro tissue model of human nasal epithelium was used to assess drug permeability, tight junction modulation, and cellular toxicity. In vivo studies in rats compared pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of different formulations dosed intranasally. Finally, studies in ferrets evaluated PK and gastrointestinal (GI) related side effects of oral compared to nasal dosage forms. Galantamine permeation was enhanced without increasing cytotoxicity. Pharmacokinetic testing in rats confirmed the improved drug bioavailability and demonstrated an in vitro-in vivo correlation. Compared to oral dosing, IN galantamine resulted in a dramatically lowered incidence of GI-related side effects, e.g., retching and emesis. These findings illustrate that IN delivery represents an attractive alternative to oral dosing for this important Alzheimer's disease therapeutic. To our knowledge, the data herein represent the first direct confirmation of reducing GI-related side effects for IN galantamine compared to oral dosing.

In vitro galantamine-memantine co-application: mechanism of beneficial action

Several drugs are in clinical use for symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease patients. Since Alzheimer's disease is known to be associated with down-regulation of the cholinergic and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) systems, most of these drugs inhibit acetylcholinesterase, potentiate the activity of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), or modulate NMDA receptors. Galantamine is an anticholinesterase and allosterically potentiates the activity of the nicotinic receptors. We have recently found that galantamine potentiates the activity of NMDA receptors as well. Memantine is unique in that it inhibits the NMDA receptors. We have developed a hypothesis that combining galantamine and memantine will be more effective for improving the patient's conditions than monotherapy with either drug. Patch clamp and intracellular Ca(2+) imaging experiments using rat cortical and hippocampal neurons clearly provided the in vitro bases for our hypothesis. Memantine blocked the extrasynaptic NMDA receptor 100 times more potently than the synaptic NMDA receptor at negative membrane potentials and the block of both types of NMDA receptors was attenuated with depolarization. However, galantamine potentiation of the NMDA receptors was not voltage dependent. Thus, co-application of memantine with galantamine prevented the galantamine potentiation and the activation of extrasynaptic NMDA receptors, but membrane depolarization revealed the galantamine potentiation. Therefore, cell death is expected to be prevented by memantine near the resting potential while the NMDA-mediated synaptic transmission, which is down-regulated in the patients, is maintained and potentiated by galantamine. These results provide in vitro bases for the beneficial actions of galantamine and memantine combinations.

Galantamine extended release

Galantamine inhibits acetylcholinesterase (AChE) to slow acetylcholine hydrolysis, and may also modulate presynaptic nicotinic receptor activation, thereby increasing neurotransmitter concentrations in the synaptic cleft.black triangle Once-daily galantamine extended release (ER) 24 mg and twice-daily galantamine immediate release (IR) 12 mg are bioequivalent in terms of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours and steady-state minimum plasma concentration.black triangle Primary endpoints indicated a significantly greater effect of galantamine ER on cognitive performance than placebo, with efficacy similar to galantamine IR, in a randomised, double-blind trial. While galantamine ER did not show a significant effect on the coprimary endpoint of global change, neither did galantamine IR in this study. Exploratory post hoc analyses of global change correcting for study centre and prognostic factors associated with response (baseline Mini-Mental State Examination, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive score, prior cholinomimetic use) indicated nominal significance in the galantamine ER treatment arm. Secondary endpoints indicated an improvement in activities of daily living and memory- and nonmemory-dependent measures of cognitive performance, but not in measures of behaviour or dichotomised rating of global change. Adverse events occurred in similar proportions of galantamine ER, galantamine IR and placebo recipients.

Comparative analysis of mortality in patients with Alzheimer's disease treated with donepezil or galantamine

BACKGROUND

few studies have analysed the effect of the long-term use of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) on mortality.

OBJECTIVE

to compare the long-term effects of galantamine and donepezil treatment on the mortality rate in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients.

DESIGN

a retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND SUBJECTS

404 patients referred by primary care centres to a Memory Clinic who were diagnosed with probable AD and who were prescribed treatment with donepezil or galantamine.

METHODS

standardised review of the patient's medical records.

RESULTS

14.5% of the patients showed intolerance to the treatment with ChEIs during the first 15 days. Of those patients who initially tolerated the treatment, 18.5% gave it up after a mean duration of 13.36 months and a mean dose of 7.5 mg/day of donepezil or 14.3 mg/day of galantamine. The mean duration of the treatment in patients who did not abandon the treatment was 25.4 months and the mean dose was 8.1 mg/day of donepezil or 20.0 mg/day of galantamine. There were no differences in the mortality rate between patients treated with donepezil or galantamine (13.7 versus 12.2; P = 0.75). The multivariate analysis through binary logistic regression showed that the variables associated with mortality were male gender, older age, heart failure, treatment with antipsychotic drugs and a high score on the Global Deterioration Scale.

CONCLUSIONS

the duration and the dose of donepezil or galantamine are not related to an increase in mortality. The related variables were advanced age, the severity of the dementia, being male, heart failure and treatment with antipsychotic drugs.

The clinical and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVES

To provide an update review of the best quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine for mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) and of memantine for moderately severe to severe AD.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases, experts in the field and manufacturer submissions to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review of the literature and an economic evaluation were undertaken. The quality of included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using criteria developed by the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. An outline assessment of economic evaluations was undertaken using a standard checklist. The clinical and cost-effectiveness data were synthesised through a narrative review with full tabulation of the results of included studies. Where appropriate, meta-analysis of data was undertaken.

RESULTS

For mild to moderately severe AD, the results of the study suggested that all three treatments were beneficial when assessed using cognitive outcome measures. Global outcome measures were positive for donepezil and rivastigmine, but mixed for galantamine. Results for measures of function were mixed for donepezil and rivastigmine, but positive for galantamine. Behaviour and mood measures were mixed for donepezil and galantamine, but showed no benefit for rivastigmine. For memantine, two published RCTs were included; in one of these trials the participants were already being treated with donepezil. The results suggest that memantine is beneficial when assessed using functional and global measurements. The effect of memantine on cognitive and behaviour and mood outcomes is, however, less clear. Literature on the cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine was dominated by industry-sponsored studies, and studies varied in methods and results. Of the three UK studies, two report donepezil as not cost-effective, whereas a third study reports an additional cost (1996 pounds sterling) of between 1200 pounds sterling and 7000 pounds sterling per year in a non-severe AD health state (concerns over these estimates are raised, suggesting that they may underestimate the true cost-effectiveness of donepezil). Cost-effectiveness analysis undertaken in this review suggests that donepezil treatment has a cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in excess of 80,000 pounds sterling, with donepezil treatment reducing the mean time spent in full-time care (delays progression of AD) by 1.42-1.59 months (over a 5-year period). From four published cost-effectiveness studies, two UK studies report additional costs associated with rivastigmine treatment. Cost-effectiveness analysis undertaken in the current review suggests that rivastigmine treatment has a cost per QALY in excess of 57,000 pounds sterling, with rivastigmine treatment reducing the mean time spent in full-time care (delays progression) by 1.43-1.63 months (over a 5-year period). From five published cost-effectiveness studies, one UK study reports a cost per QALY of 8693 pounds sterling for 16-mg galantamine treatment and 10,051 pounds sterling for 24-mg galantamine treatment (concerns raised suggest that this may underestimate the true cost-effectiveness of galantamine). Cost-effectiveness analysis undertaken in the present review suggests that galantamine treatment has a cost per QALY in excess of 68,000 pounds sterling, with galantamine reducing the time spent in full-time care (delays progression) by 1.42-1.73 months (over a 5-year period). From two published cost-effectiveness studies, one reports analysis for the UK, finding that memantine treatment results in cost savings and benefits in terms of delaying disease progression (concerns raised suggest that this may underestimate the true cost-effectiveness of memantine). In the current review, the cost-effectiveness of memantine has not been modelled separately, but where alternative parameter inputs on the cost structure and utility values have been used in a reanalysis using the industry model, the cost-effectiveness is reported at between 37,000 pounds sterling and 52,000 pounds sterling per QALY, with this alternative analysis still based on what is regarded as an optimistic or favourable effectiveness profile for memantine.

CONCLUSIONS

Although results from the clinical effectiveness review suggest that these treatments may be beneficial, a number of issues need to be considered when assessing the results of the present review, such as the characteristics of the participants included in the individual trials, the outcome measures used, the length of study duration, the effects of attrition and the relationship between statistical significance and clinical significance. Many included trials were sponsored by industry. For donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine, the cost savings associated with reducing the mean time spent in full-time care do not offset the cost of treatment sufficiently to bring estimated cost-effectiveness to levels generally considered acceptable by NHS policy makers. It is difficult to draw conclusions on the cost-effectiveness of memantine; it is suggested that further amendments to the potentially optimistic industry model (measure of effect) would offer higher cost per QALY estimates. Future research should include: information on the quality of the outcome measures used; development of quality of life instruments for patients and carers; studies assessing the effects of these interventions of durations longer than 12 months; comparisons of benefits between interventions; and research on the prediction of disease progression.

Alzheimer's disease: beware of interactions with cholinesterase inhibitors

(1) Cholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine, are not very effective in slowing the cognitive decline associated with Alzheimer's disease. Memantine, which is no more effective, has dopaminergic and atropinic effects but is not a cholinesterase inhibitor. (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors have mainly cholinergic adverse effects, causing gastrointestinal, neurological, cardiovascular and urinary disorders (incontinence). (3) Increased mortality, mainly due to cardiovascular events, was observed in placebo-controlled trials of galantamine. In one trial there were more deaths in patients on donepezil than on placebo. (4) Atropinic drugs tend to aggravate cognitive disorders that are treated with cholinesterase inhibitors. (5) Cholinesterase inhibitor + neuroleptic combinations are associated with an increased risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. An increase in mortality was reported during trials of neuroleptics involving patients with dementia, and also during trials of cholinesterase inhibitors. (6) Combining cholinesterase inhibitors with drugs that reduce the heart rate, depress cardiac conduction, or induce torsades de pointes increases the risk of arrhythmias and cardiac conduction disorders. (7) Donepezil and galantamine are metabolised by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes 3A4 and 2D6, creating a strong potential for pharmacokinetic interactions with inhibitors and inducers of these isoenzymes. Rivastigmine is mainly metabolised by cholinesterases, and binds poorly to cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. (8) Cholinesterase inhibitors inhibit the metabolism of suxamethonium and thereby augment and prolong the neuromuscular blockade induced by this curare. (9) In practice, caregivers should be aware of the potential adverse effects of cholinesterase inhibitors, which often resemble symptoms of Alzheimer's disease and may be due to drug-drug interactions or to antagonist effects with other drugs, such as those with atropinic effects. Additionally, the many adverse effects associated with the use of cholinesterase inhibitors highlights the need for regular re-evaluation of the use of these medicines and of the balance of benefit versus risk in individual patients.

Therapeutic utility of a novel tight junction modulating peptide for enhancing intranasal drug delivery

Previously, a novel tight junction modulating (TJM) peptide was described affording a transient, reversible lowering of transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) in an in vitro model of nasal epithelial tissue. In the current report, this peptide has been further evaluated for utility as an excipient in transepithelial drug formulations. Chemical stability was optimal at neutral to acidic pH when stored at or below room temperature, conditions relevant to therapeutic formulations. The TJM peptide was tested in the in vitro tissue model for potential to enhance permeation of a low-molecular-weight (LMW) drug, namely the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor galantamine, as well as three peptides, salmon calcitonin, parathyroid hormone 1-34 (PTH(1-34)), and peptide YY 3-36 (PYY(3-36)). In all cases, the TJM peptide afforded a dramatic improvement in drug permeation across epithelial tissue. In addition, a formulation containing PYY(3-36) and TJM peptide was dosed intranasally in rabbits, resulting in a dramatic increase in bioavailability. The TJM peptide was as or more effective in enhancing PYY(3-36) permeation in vivo at a 1000-fold lower molar concentration compared to using LMW enhancers. Based on these in vitro and in vivo data, the novel TJM peptide represents a promising advancement in intranasal formulation development.

Efficacy study of galantamine in possible Alzheimer's disease with or without cerebrovascular disease and vascular dementia in Thai patients: a slow-titration regimen

The objective is to evaluate the efficacy of galantamine when a slow titration regimen is employed in Thai Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with or without cerebrovascular disease and vascular dementia (VaD). A 6-month, multicentre, open-label, uncontrolled trial was undertaken in 75 AD patients. Eligible patients received an initial galantamine dose of 8 mg/day and escalated over 5-8 weeks to maintenance doses of 16 or 24 mg/day. Primary efficacy measures were AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change-Plus version (CIBIC-plus). The Behavioural Pathology in AD Rating Scale (BEHAVE AD), the AD Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index were the secondary efficacy variables. Analyses were based on the intent-to-treat population. Treatment with galantamine showed significant improvement in cognition on the ADAS-cog and CIBIC-plus at month 6. Galantamine showed favourable effects on activities of daily living. Behavioural symptoms and sleep quality were also significantly improved (p < 0.05). Galantamine was well tolerated. The adverse events were mild-to-moderate intensity. The most frequent adverse events commonly reported were nausea (16.4%), dizziness (9.6%) and vomiting (6.8%). The results of this study may be consistent with galantamine being an effective and safe treatment for mild-to-moderate AD patients with or without cerebrovascular disease and VaD. Flexible dose escalation of galantamine was well tolerated. The daily maintenance dose of galantamine was 16 mg/day, followed by a back up dose of 24 mg/day.

Post hoc comparison of daily rates of nausea and vomiting with once- and twice-daily galantamine from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 6-month study

BACKGROUND

A once-daily extended-release galantamine(GAL-ER) formulation has been designed to improve tolerability compared with twice-daily immediate-release galantamine (GAL-IR).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to conduct a post hoc analysis of the clinical presentation of nausea and vomiting with GAL-ER compared with GAL-IR in subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

This is the report of a post hoc analysis of a large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of GAL-ER with GAL-IR as the active control in subjects with mild to moderate AD. Galantamine dose was titrated every 4 weeks by increments of 8 mg/d to a daily dose of 16 or 24 mg, based on tolerability. Daily rates of nausea and vomiting were compared for the GAL-ER and GAL-IR groups. AUCs of the daily percentage of subjects reporting nausea/vomiting during dose titration were calculated. Antiemetic use for nausea/vomiting was compared between GAL-ER and GAL-IR groups.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics were similar between the GAL-ER, GAL-IR, and placebo groups. Nausea was reported by 16.9% (54/319) of GAL-ER, 13.8% (45/326) of GAL-IR, and 5.0% (16/320) of placebo patients; vomiting was reported for 6.6% (21/319) of GAL-ER, 8.6% (28/326) of GAL-IR, and 2.2% (7/320) of placebo patients. The mean (SD) daily rate of nausea in the total population was 3.1 (13.43%) in the GAL-ER group and 5.2% (22.07%) in the GAL-IR group (P = NS); the mean (SD) daily rate of vomiting for the total population was 0.6% (4.14%) in the GAL-ER group and 1.6% (14.50%) in the GAL-IR group (P = NS). The mean (SD) daily rate of nausea or vomiting in the total population was 1.2 (8.46) and 0.4 (5.44) in the placebo group, respectively. For subjects reporting nausea, the mean (SD, SE) percentage of days with nausea was lower with GAL-ER than with GAL-IR (18.4% [28.22%, 5.31%] vs 38.0% [48.23%, 6.04%]; P = 0.014). AUC of the daily percentage of subjects reporting nausea/vomiting during dose titration was significantly higher in the GAL-IR group compared with the placebo group (320.9 vs 102.9; P = 0.01); there was no statistical difference between the GAL-ER group and placebo (171.1 vs 102.9; P = NS). Antiemetic use by subjects reporting nausea or vomiting was significantly lower in the GAL-ER group than the GAL-IR group (33.3% vs 53.4%; P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

In these subjects with AD, the daily percentage of subjects reporting nausea and vomiting, and the percentage of days with vomiting among subjects reporting vomiting, did not significantly differ between the GAL-ER and GAL-IR groups. However, GAL-ER was associated with a significantly lower percentage of days with nausea than GAL-IR among subjects reporting nausea. AUC of the daily percentage of subjects with nausea or vomiting during dose titration did not differ significantly between the GAL-ER and placebo groups but was significantly higher in the GAL-IR group than placebo. Subjects with nausea or vomiting who received GAL-ER reported significantly less antiemetic use than those treated with GAL-IR. These results suggest the need for additional studies to explore the potential differences in the tolerability of these formulations.

[Use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in Alzheimer-type dementia]

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic options to treat Alzheimer-type dementia (ATD) in recent years, have made it increasingly necessary to become familiar with the employment pattern of these new medicinal products.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study of the population with ATD treated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and/or memantine in the Gallician Health Service. Databases were compiled with the demographic variables and use data during April 2005 of the medicinal products studied.

RESULTS

Of the 5110 patients with ATD, 70.47% were women. The mean age of the women was 80.12 and of the men was 78.61 years old, with standard deviations of 6.66 and 7.03, respectively. The female sex was one of the factors associated with presenting ATD to pharmacological treatment (OR: 1.932 [CI 95%: 1.819-2.052]). The medication used most was donepezyl (44.46% of patients). Significant differences were found in that memantine was used to treat more patients in the group of patients < or =64 years (19.7% in < or =64 years vs. 14% in >64 years [p < 0.05]), and donepezyl was preferentially used in patients > or =95 years (75% in > or =95 years vs. 46.9% in <95 years [p < 0.03]). No significant differences were observed in the use of anti-dementia therapy, expressed in DDD/patient/day between the sexes, age groups, or in the age groups separated according to sex.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of memantine (in monotherapy or in combination) is more frequent in patients under 64 years old. Female sex was found to be a factor associated with presenting ATD to pharmacological treatment.