FIGHT-302: first-line pemigatinib vs gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 rearrangements

Which therapy in biliary tract cancer? Review of main concerns in diagnosis and choice of therapy in advanced setting, current standard, and new options

The incidence of biliary tract cancer is increasing in developed countries and is generating renewed interest in the scientific community due to the evidence of a high percentage (approximately 40%) of potentially targetable molecular alterations. However, to date, patient selection and the development of therapeutic approaches remain challenging due to the need for accurate diagnosis, adequate sampling, a specialized team for molecular analysis, centralization of patients in high-volume centers capable of supporting the high cost of these methods, and the feasibility of clinical studies on diseases with aggressive onset and poor prognosis. In this article, we would like to provide a detailed overview of the necessary tools for diagnostic framing and the various therapeutic scenarios being investigated concerning the most frequently detected molecular alterations.

Prognostic value of FGFR2 alterations in patients with iCCA undergoing surgery or systemic treatments: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Over recent years, there has been a notable rise in the incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), which presents a significant challenge in treatment due to its complex disease characteristics and prognosis. Notably, the identification of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusion/rearrangement, a potential oncogenic driver primarily observed in iCCA, raises questions about its impact on the prognostic outcomes of patients undergoing surgical intervention or other therapeutic approaches.

METHODS

A comprehensive search from inception to July 2023 was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. The objective was to identify relevant publications comparing the prognosis of FGFR2 alterations and no FGFR2 alterations groups among patients with iCCA undergoing surgical resection or other systemic therapies. The primary outcome indicators, specifically Overall Survival (OS) and Disease-Free Survival (DFS), were estimated using Hazard Ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and statistical significance was defined as p < .05. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 software and Stata, version 12.0.

RESULTS

Six studies, involving 1314 patients (FGFR2 alterations group n = 173 and no FGFR2 alterations group n = 1141), were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis revealed that the FGFR2 alterations group exhibited a significantly better OS prognosis compared to the no FGFR2 alterations group, with a fixed-effects combined effect size HR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.001-1.715, p = .049. Furthermore, meta-regression and subgroup analysis showed that the length of the follow-up period did not introduce heterogeneity into the results. This finding indicates the stability and reliability of the study outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The current study provides compelling evidence that FGFR2 alterations are frequently associated with improved survival outcomes for patients with iCCA undergoing surgical resection or other systemic treatments. Additionally, the study suggests that FGFR2 holds promise as a safe and dependable therapeutic target for managing metastatic, locally advanced or unresectable iCCA. This study offers a novel perspective in the realm of targeted therapy for iCCA, presenting a new and innovative approach to its treatment.

Liver transplantation for tumor entities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tumor entities represent an increasing indication for liver transplantation (LT). This review addresses the most contentious indications of LT in transplant oncology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patient selection based on tumor biology in LT for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) demonstrated promising long-term outcomes and preserved quality of life despite high recurrence rates. In selected cases, LT for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is feasible, with acceptable survival even in high-burden cases responsive to chemotherapy. LT following a strict neoadjuvant protocol for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) resulted in long-term outcomes consistently surpassing benchmark values, and potentially outperforming liver resection.

SUMMARY

While preliminary results are promising, prospective trials are crucial to define applications in routine clinical practice. Molecular profiling and targeted therapies pave the way for personalized approaches, requiring evolving allocation systems for equitable LT access.

The combination of gemcitabine plus an anti-FGFR inhibitor can have a synergistic antitumor effect on FGF-activating cholangiocarcinoma

Anti-FGFR treatment for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alteration is a promising treatment option. Since the antitumor mechanisms of anti-FGFR inhibitors and conventional cytotoxic drugs differ, synergistic effects can be possible. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the combined administration of gemcitabine (GEM) and pemigatinib in CCA cells with FGFR2 alterations. To simulate the treatment for patients with 3 kinds of CCA, chemonaïve CCA with activation of the FGF pathway, chemo-resistant CCA with activation of the FGF pathway, and CCA without FGF pathway activation (as controls), we evaluated 3 different CCA cell lines, CCLP-1 (with a FGFR2 fusion mutation), CCLP-GR (GEM-resistant cells established from CCLP-1), and HuCCT1 (without FGFR mutations). There was no significant difference between CCLP-1 and HuCCT1 in GEM suspensibility (IC50 = 19.3, 22.6 mg/dl, p = 0.1187), and the drug sensitivity to pemigatinib did not differ between CCLP-1 and CCLP-GR (IC50 = 7.18,7.60 nM, p = 0.3089). Interestingly, only CCLP-1 showed a synergistic effect with combination therapy consisting of GEM plus pemigatinib in vitro and in vivo. In a comparison of the reaction to GEM exposure, only CCLP-1 cells showed an increase in the activation of downstream proteins in the FGF pathway, especially FRS2 and ERK. In association with this reaction, cell cycle and mitosis were increased with GEM exposure in CCLP-1, but HuCCT1/CCLP-GR did not show this reaction. Our results suggested that combination therapy with GEM plus pemigatinib is a promising treatment for chemonaïve patients with CCA with activation of the FGF pathway.

State-of-the-art and trends in fibroblast growth factor receptor-directed therapies in gastro-intestinal malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review is timely and relevant due to the increasing recognition of the significance of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family in cancer biology. Understanding the role of FGFRs and their dysregulation in various cancers is crucial for developing targeted therapies and improving patient outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The review highlights the importance of the FGFR family in cellular processes such as growth, proliferation, and survival. It discusses how abnormalities in FGFR2, including overexpression, gene amplification, and other genetic alterations, contribute to cancer progression, particularly in gastro-intestinal cancers. The paper also emphasizes the promising results of FGFR-targeted therapies, especially tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in certain cancers such as cholangiocarcinoma and oesophagogastric cancers.

SUMMARY

The findings underscore the potential of FGFR-targeted therapies in treating cancers with FGFR dysregulation. However, the review also addresses the challenges associated with these therapies, including toxicities and mechanisms of resistance. Understanding these complexities is essential for optimizing the efficacy of FGFR-targeted treatments and improving patient outcomes in clinical practice and research efforts.

Targeting FGFR for cancer therapy

The FGFR signaling pathway is integral to cellular activities, including proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Dysregulation of this pathway is implicated in numerous human cancers, positioning FGFR as a prominent therapeutic target. Here, we conduct a comprehensive review of the function, signaling pathways and abnormal alterations of FGFR, as well as its role in tumorigenesis and development. Additionally, we provide an in-depth analysis of pivotal phase 2 and 3 clinical trials evaluating the performance and safety of FGFR inhibitors in oncology, thereby shedding light on the current state of clinical research in this field. Then, we highlight four drugs that have been approved for marketing by the FDA, offering insights into their molecular mechanisms and clinical achievements. Our discussion encompasses the intricate landscape of FGFR-driven tumorigenesis, current techniques for pinpointing FGFR anomalies, and clinical experiences with FGFR inhibitor regimens. Furthermore, we discuss the inherent challenges of targeting the FGFR pathway, encompassing resistance mechanisms such as activation by gatekeeper mutations, alternative pathways, and potential adverse reactions. By synthesizing the current evidence, we underscore the potential of FGFR-centric therapies to enhance patient prognosis, while emphasizing the imperative need for continued research to surmount resistance and optimize treatment modalities.

An open-label study of pemigatinib in cholangiocarcinoma: final results from FIGHT-202

BACKGROUND

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions and rearrangements are clinically actionable genomic alterations in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Pemigatinib is a selective, potent, oral inhibitor of FGFR1-3 and demonstrated efficacy in patients with previously treated, advanced/metastatic CCA with FGFR2 alterations in FIGHT-202 (NCT02924376). We report final outcomes from the extended follow-up period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II FIGHT-202 study enrolled patients ≥18 years old with previously treated advanced/metastatic CCA with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements (cohort A), other FGF/FGFR alterations (cohort B), or no FGF/FGFR alterations (cohort C). Patients received once-daily oral pemigatinib 13.5 mg in 21-day cycles (2 weeks on, 1 week off) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in cohort A assessed as per RECIST v1.1 by an independent review committee; secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

FIGHT-202 enrolled 147 patients (cohort A, 108; cohort B, 20; cohort C, 17; unconfirmed FGF/FGFR alterations, 2). By final analysis, 145 (98.6%) had discontinued treatment due to progressive disease (71.4%), withdrawal by patient (8.2%), or adverse events (AEs; 6.8%). Median follow-up was 45.4 months. The ORR in cohort A was 37.0% (95% confidence interval 27.9% to 46.9%); complete and partial responses were observed in 3 and 37 patients, respectively. Median DOR was 9.1 (6.0-14.5) months; median PFS and OS were 7.0 (6.1-10.5) months and 17.5 (14.4-22.9) months, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were hyperphosphatemia (58.5%), alopecia (49.7%), and diarrhea (47.6%). Overall, 15 (10.2%) patients experienced TEAEs leading to pemigatinib discontinuation; intestinal obstruction and acute kidney injury (n = 2 each) occurred most frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemigatinib demonstrated durable response and prolonged OS with manageable AEs in patients with previously treated, advanced/metastatic CCA with FGFR2 alterations in the extended follow-up period of FIGHT-202.

How to incorporate new agents into precise medicine for cholangiocarcinoma?

Cholangiocarcinoma, a rare and aggressive form of cancer originating from the bile ducts in the liver, poses a significant challenge for treatment. However, the emergence of precision medicine has brought newfound hope for more effective therapies. Several precision medicine approaches have demonstrated promise in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. One such approach is targeted therapy, which involves utilizing drugs that specifically target the genetic mutations or alterations present in the tumor cells. In the case of cholangiocarcinoma, mutations in the IDH1 and IDH2 genes are frequently observed. Immunotherapy is another precision medicine approach being explored for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab and nivolumab can be used to bolster the body's immune response against cancer cells. While the response to immunotherapy can vary among individuals, studies have shown promising results, particularly in patients with high levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes or microsatellite instability. Moreover, molecular profiling of cholangiocarcinoma tumors can play a crucial role in identifying potential targets for precision medicine. Through advanced next-generation sequencing techniques, specific gene alterations or dysregulations in pathways can be identified, potentially guiding treatment decisions. This personalized approach enables tailored treatment plans based on the unique genetic characteristics of each patient's tumor. In conclusion, the advent of precision medicine has opened up new avenues for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy have exhibited promising results, and further molecular profiling is expected to uncover additional therapeutic options. Such advancements represent a significant step forward in the quest to enhance outcomes for individuals affected by cholangiocarcinoma.

Options in Targeted Therapy for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A 2024 Update

Bile duct carcinomas have a different prognosis and genetic profile depending on their location; intrahepatic/extrahepatic or at the level of the gallbladder. Although in recent years there have been important advances in first-line therapy, second-line therapy in cholangiocarcinoma does not currently have a standard. Therefore at this level, there is an acute need for personalized treatment. The present article is a narrative review that aims to list the newest targeted therapeutic options for this type of cancer, based on identified genetic alterations. The literature selected for analysis includes phase 2 or 3 studies with targeted therapy in this disease and original articles no older than three years that describe the prevalence of the most common gene alterations in this type of cancer. PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Clarivate-Web of Science databases were searched and keywords such as "cholangiocarcinoma," "biliary cancer," "targeted therapy," "gene amplifications," and "mutations" were used. This narrative review was designed taking into account the SANRA (Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles) criteria. The conclusions lead to the fact that next-generation sequencing testing is of particular usefulness in cholangiocarcinoma. Bile duct cancers are rich in targetable genetic alterations, and their treatment is in constant change, although much of the current data comes from phase II studies. There is a great need for the current options to be analyzed in phase III studies. Hence, the need of the oncological community to stay informed about targeted treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma is supported by the present article.

Molecular biology of cholangiocarcinoma and its implications for targeted therapy in patient management

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remains a devastating malignancy and a significant challenge to treat. The majority of CCA patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, making the disease incurable in most cases. The advent of high-throughput genetic sequencing has significantly improved our understanding of the molecular biology underpinning cancer. The identification of 'druggable' genetic aberrations and the development of novel targeted therapies against them is opening up new treatment strategies. Currently, 3 targeted therapies are approved for use in CCA; Ivosidenib in patients with IDH1 mutations and Infigratinib/Pemigatinib in those with FGFR2 fusions. As our understanding of the biology underpinning CCA continues to improve it is highly likely that additional targeted therapies will become available in the near future. This is important, as it is thought up to 40 % of CCA patients harbour a potentially actionable mutation. In this review we provide an overview of the molecular pathogenesis of CCA and highlight currently available and potential future targeted treatments.

Pemigatinib for patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements: A joint analysis of the French PEMI-BIL and Italian PEMI-REAL cohort studies

BACKGROUND

Pemigatinib is approved for patients with pretreated, locally advanced or metastatic CCA harboring FGFR2 rearrangements or fusions. We aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of pemigatinib in real-world setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A joint analysis of two multicentre observational retrospective cohort studies independently conducted in France and Italy was performed. All consecutive FGFR2-positive patients affected by CCA and treated with pemigatinib as second- or further line of systemic treatment in clinical practice, within or outside the European Expanded Access Program, were included.

RESULTS

Between July 2020 and September 2022, 72 patients were treated with pemigatinib in 14 Italian and 25 French Centres. Patients had a median age of 57 years, 76% were female, 81% had ECOG-PS 0-1, 99% had intrahepatic CCA, 74% had ≥ 2 metastatic sites, 67% had metastatic disease at diagnosis, while 38.8% received ≥ 2 previous lines of systemic treatment. At data cut-off analysis (April 2023), ORR and DCR were 45.8% and 84.7%, respectively. Median DoR was 7 months (IQR: 5.8-9.3). Over a median follow-up time of 19.5 months, median PFS and 1-year PFS rate were 8.7 months and 32.8%. Median OS and 1-year OS rate were 17.1 months and 60.6%. Fatigue (69.4%), ocular toxicity (68%), nail toxicities (61.1%), dermatologic toxicity (41.6%) hyperphosphataemia (55.6%), stomatitis (48.6%), and diarrhea (36.1%) were the most frequent, mainly G1-G2 AEs. Overall incidence of G3 AEs was 22.2%, while no patient experienced G4 AE. Dose reduction and temporary discontinuation were needed in 33.3% and 40.3% of cases, with 1 permanent discontinuation due to AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the effectiveness and safety of pemigatinib in a real-world setting.

A comprehensive overview of selective and novel fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors as a potential anticancer modality

The arrival of comprehensive genome sequencing has accelerated the understanding of genetically aberrant advanced cancers and target identification for possible cancer treatment. Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene alterations are frequent findings in various rare and advanced cancers refractive to mainstay chemo-therapy or surgical interventions. Several FGFR inhibitors have been developed for addressing these genetically altered FGFR-harboring malignancies, and some have performed well in clinical trials. In contrast, others are still being investigated in different phases of clinical trials. FDA has approved four anticancer agents such as erdafitinib, pemigatinib, infigratinib, and futibatinib, for clinical use in oncogenic FGFR-driven malignancies. These include cholangiocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and myeloid/lymphoid malignancies. Pemigatinib is the only FGFR inhibitor globally approved (USA, EU, and Japan) and available as a targeted therapy for two types of cancer, including FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangements harboring cholangiocarcinoma and relapsed/refractory myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with FGFR1 rearrangements. Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm is the latest area of application added to the therapeutic armamentarium of FGFR inhibitors. Furthermore, futibatinib is the first-in-class covalent or irreversible pan-FGFR inhibitor that has received FDA approval for locally advanced or metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 gene aberrations. This review highlights the current clinical progress concerning the safety and efficacy of all the approved FGFR-TKIs (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) and their ongoing investigations in clinical trials for other oncogenic FGFR-driven malignancies.

Molecular portraits of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who diverge as rapid progressors or long survivors on chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Cytotoxic agents are the cornerstone of treatment for patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), despite heterogeneous benefit. We hypothesised that the pretreatment molecular profiles of diagnostic biopsies can predict patient benefit from chemotherapy and define molecular bases of innate chemoresistance.

DESIGN

We identified a cohort of advanced iCCA patients with comparable baseline characteristics who diverged as extreme outliers on chemotherapy (survival <6 m in rapid progressors, RP; survival >23 m in long survivors, LS). Diagnostic biopsies were characterised by digital pathology, then subjected to whole-transcriptome profiling of bulk and geospatially macrodissected tissue regions. Spatial transcriptomics of tumour-infiltrating myeloid cells was performed using targeted digital spatial profiling (GeoMx). Transcriptome signatures were evaluated in multiple cohorts of resected cancers. Signatures were also characterised using in vitro cell lines, in vivo mouse models and single cell RNA-sequencing data.

RESULTS

Pretreatment transcriptome profiles differentiated patients who would become RPs or LSs on chemotherapy. Biologically, this signature originated from altered tumour-myeloid dynamics, implicating tumour-induced immune tolerogenicity with poor response to chemotherapy. The central role of the liver microenviroment was confrmed by the association of the RPLS transcriptome signature with clinical outcome in iCCA but not extrahepatic CCA, and in liver metastasis from colorectal cancer, but not in the matched primary bowel tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

The RPLS signature could be a novel metric of chemotherapy outcome in iCCA. Further development and validation of this transcriptomic signature is warranted to develop precision chemotherapy strategies in these settings.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma biomarkers: Towards early detection and personalized pharmacological treatments

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare malignancy originating from the biliary tree and is anatomically categorized as intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar, and extrahepatic or distal. iCCA, the second most prevalent hepatobiliary cancer following hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), constitutes 5-20 % of all liver malignancies, with an increasing incidence. The challenging nature of iCCA, combined with nonspecific symptoms, often leads to late diagnoses, resulting in unfavorable outcomes. The advanced phase of this neoplasm is difficult to treat with dismal results. Early diagnosis could significantly reduce mortality attributed to iCCA but remains an elusive goal. The identification of biomarkers specific to iCCA and their translation into clinical practice could facilitate diagnosis, monitor therapy response, and potentially reveal novel interventions and personalized medicine. In this review, we present the current landscape of biomarkers in each of these contexts. In addition to CA19.9, a widely recognized biomarker for iCCA, others such as A1BG, CYFRA 21-1, FAM19A5, MMP-7, RBAK, SSP411, TuM2-PK, WFA, etc., as well as circulating tumor DNA, RNA, cells, and exosomes, are under investigation. Advancing our knowledge and monitoring of biomarkers may enable us to improve diagnosis, prognostication, and apply treatments dynamically and in a more personalized manner.

Emerging Therapies in Management of Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is a heterogeneous group of biliary tract cancers that has a poor prognosis and globally increasing incidence and mortality. While surgical resection remains the only curative option for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma, the majority of cancers are unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Additionally, the prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma remains poor even with the current first-line systemic therapy regimens, highlighting the difficulty of treating locally advanced, metastatic, or unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Through recent developments, targetable oncogenic driver mutations have been identified in the pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma, leading to the utilization of molecular targeted therapeutics. In this review, we comprehensively discuss the latest molecular therapeutics for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma, including emerging immunotherapies, highlighting promising developments and strategies.

Cuproptosis-related genes score and its hub gene GCSH: A novel predictor for cholangiocarcinomas prognosis based on RNA seq and experimental analyses

Background: Recent researches have demonstrated that cuproptosis, a copper-dependent cell death mechanism, is related to tumorigenesis, progression, clinical prognosis, tumor microenvironment, and drug sensitivity. Nevertheless, the function and impact of cuproptosis in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), remain elusive. Methods: Utilizing data obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA-CHOL) datasets, we conducted subgroup typing of CCA according to cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) and explored functional differences and prognostic value between groups. A CRG score was established considering clinical prognosis and gene expression. Furthermore, differences in the immune microenvironment, response to immunotherapy, metabolic patterns, and cancer progression characteristics between high- and low-risk groups were examined on the basis of these scores. In vitro experiments validated the function of the key gene glycine cleavage system protein H (GCSH) in cellular and tissues, respectively. Results: Prognostic models established on the basis of subgroup genetic differences achieved satisfactory results in validation. Metabolic-related gene expression levels and tumor microenvironment distribution were significantly different between the high and low CRG groups. GCSH was revealed as the singular prognostic CRG in CCA (HR =6.04; 95% CI: 1.15-31.80). Moreover, inhibition of the cupcoptosis key gene GCSH attenuated the malignant ability of CCA cell lines in vitro, including cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and this function of GCSH may be achieved via JAK-STAT signaling in CCA. Conclusion: The CRG scoring system accurately predicts prognosis and opens up new possibilities for cuproptosis-related therapy for CCA. The cuproptosis key gene GCSH has been preliminarily confirmed as a reliable therapeutic target or prognostic marker for CCA patients.

Molecular Targeting of the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Pathway across Various Cancers

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are a family of receptor tyrosine kinases that are involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, survival, and development. FGFR alterations including amplifications, fusions, rearrangements, and mutations can result in the downstream activation of tyrosine kinases, leading to tumor development. Targeting these FGFR alterations has shown to be effective in treating cholangiocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms, and there are currently four FGFR inhibitors approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There have been developments in multiple agents targeting the FGFR pathway, including selective FGFR inhibitors, ligand traps, monoclonal antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates. However, most of these agents have variable and low responses, with some intolerable toxicities and acquired resistances. This review will summarize previous clinical experiences and current developments in agents targeting the FGFR pathway, and will also discuss future directions for FGFR-targeting agents.

Pemigatinib: A Review in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma

Pemigatinib (Pemazyre®), a selective, potent, reversible, oral inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3, has received conditional (in the EU) or accelerated (in the USA) approval for the treatment of adults with previously treated, unresectable locally-advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with an FGFR2 gene fusion or rearrangement. Over the course of a single-arm, phase 2 study (FIGHT-202), just over a third of patients with pretreated, advanced CCA [almost exclusively intrahepatic CCA (iCCA)] harbouring an FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement who received pemigatinib once daily (2 weeks on, 1 week off) had an objective response; nearly half had stable disease. Median progression-free survival and overall survival at the time of the final analysis were 7.0 months and 17.5 months, respectively. Pemigatinib was generally well tolerated and had a manageable safety profile. The most common treatment-related adverse event, hyperphosphataemia, was exclusively grade 1-2 in severity and, similarly, observed ocular and nail toxicities were rarely grade ≥ 3 in severity. Pending confirmation of its clinical benefits in an ongoing cisplatin plus gemcitabine-controlled, phase 3 study (FIGHT-302), pemigatinib provides a valuable targeted therapy for pretreated patients with advanced (i)CCA harbouring a FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement.

Current and Emerging Therapeutic Targets for the Treatment of Cholangiocarcinoma: An Updated Review

Cholangiocarcinoma is a malignancy of the bile ducts that is often associated with late diagnosis, poor overall survival, and limited treatment options. The standard of care therapy for cholangiocarcinoma has been cytotoxic chemotherapy with modest improvements in overall survival with the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The discovery of actionable mutations has led to the advent of targeted therapies against FGFR and IDH-1, which has expanded the treatment landscape for this patient population. Significant efforts have been made in the pre-clinical space to explore novel immunotherapeutic approaches, as well as antibody-drug conjugates. This review provides an overview of the current landscape of treatment options, as well as promising future therapeutic targets.

Comparative Genomic Analysis and Clinical Outcomes of BRAF-mutated Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

PURPOSE

BRAF mutations are rare in biliary tract cancers (BTC), but are of interest given the recent developments in targeted therapy for BTC. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a cohort of BRAF-mutant advanced BTC treated with first-line chemotherapy. Furthermore, we investigated the genomic landscape of BRAF class I, II, and III mutations in the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) subgroup of BTC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We analyzed two nonoverlapping cohorts. We examined the genomic landscape of BRAF-mutated iCCA in a "genomic cohort" [187 class I, 82 class II, 113 class III BRAF mutants and 8,026 wildtype (WT)]. We also analyzed median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on first-line chemotherapy in a separate multi-institutional "clinical cohort" of patients with BTC (including iCCA and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) and gallbladder cancer; 41 class I, 32 class II+III BRAF mutants and 1,042 WT).

RESULTS

In the entire BTC clinical cohort, the median PFS was shorter for class I [HR, 2.11 (P < 0.001)] and class II+III [HR, 1.72 (P = 0.007)] as compared with BRAF WT. OS was also shorter in class I [HR, 2.04 (P = 0.011)] and class II+III [HR, 1.86 (P = 0.002)] as compared with BRAF WT. In the iCCA subgroup, class I alterations were mutually exclusive with FGFR2, IDH1/2, ERBB2, and KRAS mutations. Class II+III mutations appear to be mutually exclusive with FGFR2 and KRAS.

CONCLUSIONS

In BTC, all classes of BRAF mutations are associated with a worse prognosis. BRAF mutations occur in 5% of iCCA subgroup and may be mutually exclusive with other targetable mutations.

Molecular Detection of FGFR2 Rearrangements in Resected Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas: FISH Could Be An Ideal Method in Patients with Histological Small Duct Subtype

Background and Aims

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a subtype of primary liver cancer for which effective therapeutic agents are lacking. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) has become a promising therapeutic target in ICC; however, its incidence and optimum testing method have not been fully assessed. This study investigated the rearrangement of FGFR2 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using multiple molecular detection methods.

Methods

The samples and clinical data of 167 patients who underwent surgical resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Zhongshan hospital, Fudan university were collected. The presence of FGFR2 gene rearrangement was confirmed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). FGFR2 protein expression was determined using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The concordance between the methods was statistically compared. PD-L1 expression was also assessed in this cohort. The clinicopathological characteristics and genomic profile related to FGFR2 rearrangements were also analyzed to assist candidate-screening for targeted therapies.

Results

FGFR2 rearrangement was detected in 21 of the 167 ICC cases (12.5%) using FISH. NGS analysis revealed that FGFR2 rearrangement was present in 16 of the 20 FISH-positive cases, which was consistent with the FISH results (kappa value=0.696, p<0.01). IHC showed that 80 of the 167 cases (48%) were positive for FGFR2 expression, which was discordant with both FISH and NGS results. By comparison, FGFR2-positivity tended to correlate with unique clinicopathological subgroups, featuring early clinical stage, histologically small duct subtype, and reduced mucus production (P<0.05), with improved overall survival (p<0.05). FGFR2-positivity was not associated with PD-L1 expression in ICCs. In genome research, we identified eight partner genes fused with FGFR2, among which FGFR2-BICC1 was the most common fusion type. BAP1, CDKN2A, and CDKN2B were the most common concomitant genetic alterations of FGFR2, whereas KRAS and IDH1 mutations were mutually exclusive to FGFR2 rearrangements.

Conclusions

FISH achieved satisfactory concordance with NGS, has potential value for FGFR2 screening for targeted therapies. FGFR2 detection should be prioritized for unique clinical subgroups in ICC, which features a histological small duct subtype, early clinical stage, and reduced mucus production.

A Systematised Literature Review of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers are rare aggressive malignancies typically diagnosed when the disease is metastatic or unresectable, precluding curative treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify treatment guidelines, real-world treatment patterns, and outcomes for unresectable advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers in adult patients.

METHODS

Databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) were systematically searched between 1 January, 2000 and 25 November, 2021, and supplemented by hand searches. Eligible records were (1) treatment guidelines and (2) observational studies reporting real-world treatment outcomes, for unresectable advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers. Only studies performed in the UK, Germany, France, Australia, Canada and South Korea were extracted, to moderate the number of records for synthesis while maintaining representation of a wide range of biliary tract cancer incidences.

RESULTS

A total of 66 relevant unique full-text records were extracted, including 16 treatment guidelines and 50 observational studies. Among guidelines, chemotherapies were most strongly recommended at first line (1L); the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GEMCIS) was recommended as the standard of care in 1L. Recommendations for systemic chemotherapy in the second line (2L) conflicted because of uncertainties around survival benefit. Guidelines on further lines of treatment included a range of locoregional modalities and stenting or best supportive care without providing clear recommendations because of data paucity. Fifty observational studies reporting real-world treatment outcomes were extracted, of which 25 (50%) and 9 (18%) reported outcomes in 1L and 2L, respectively; 22 (44%) reported outcomes for treatments described as 'palliative'. In 1L, outcomes for systemic chemotherapy were most frequently described (23/25 studies), and GEMCIS was the most common systemic chemotherapy used (10/23 studies) in line with guidelines. Median overall survival with 1L systemic chemotherapy was < 12 months in most studies (16/23; range 4.7-22.3 months). Most 2L studies (10/11) described outcomes for systemic chemotherapy, most commonly for fluoropyrimidine-based regimen (5/10 studies). Median overall survival with 2L systemic chemotherapy was < 12 months in 5/10 studies (range 4.9-21.5 months). Median progression-free survival was reported more rarely than median overall survival. Some studies with small sample sizes or specifically selected patient populations (e.g. higher performance status, or patients who had already responded to treatment) achieved higher median overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

At the time of this review, treatment options for unresectable advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers confer poor real-world survival. For over a decade, GEMCIS remained the 1L standard of care, highlighting the lack of therapeutic innovation in this indication and the urgent unmet need for novel treatments with improved outcomes in this aggressive condition. Additional observational studies are needed to further understand the effectiveness of currently available treatments, as well as newly available therapies including the addition of immunotherapy in the evolving treatment landscape.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion gene positive that responded to pemigatinib and caused hypophosphatemia

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a condition with a poor prognosis. Traditionally, there was no cure unless important drugs such as gemcitabine, cisplatin, and tegafur/gimeracil/uracil potassium showed efficacy. Pemigatinib has recently become accessible for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement gene abnormalities. Hyperphosphatemia is typically linked to pemigatinib. In the current case, pemigatinib was used to effectively treat a 48-year-old woman, and hypophosphatemia was observed. Patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma should undergo aggressive cancer multigene panel testing as well as careful monitoring of serum phosphorus levels.

Fibroblast growth factor receptors as targets for anticancer therapy in cholangiocarcinomas and urothelial carcinomas

Cholangiocarcinomas and urothelial carcinomas are lethal tumors worldwide and only a minority of patients are eligible for surgery at diagnosis. Moreover, patients are poorly responsive to current therapeutic strategies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and multimodality treatments. Recently, several advances have been made in precision medicine and these results are modifying the treatment paradigm for patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinomas and urothelial carcinoma. These histotypes exhibit a high rate of multiple fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) genetic alterations and numerous preclinical and clinical studies support FGFR as a highly attractive novel therapeutic target. Moreover, identifying specific genetic alterations may predict the tumor's response to conventional and novel FGFR-targeted drugs. Recent clinical studies showed promising data for FGFR-targeted therapy in reducing tumor volume and led to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of, e.g., pemigatinib, infigratinib, futibatinib, and erdafitinib. Moreover, FGFR inhibitors show promising results in the first-line setting of cholangiocarcinomas and urothelial carcinomas. Pemigatinib (FIGHT-302) and futibatinib (FOENIX-CAA3) are being evaluated in phase III trials that compare these agents to current first-line gemcitabine and cisplatin in FGFR2-rearranged cholangiocarcinoma. However, complexity in targeting the FGFR signaling pathway is observed. Herein, we describe the characteristics of the FDA-approved and other investigational FGFR-targeted therapeutics, evaluate the most recent preclinical and clinical studies focusing on targeting FGFR genomic alterations in the treatment of cholangiocarcinomas and urothelial cancer, and provide insight into factors involved in response and (acquired) resistance to FGFR inhibition.

Aquaporin 1 is a prognostic marker and inhibits tumour progression through downregulation of Snail expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recently, some studies have suggested a link between AQP1 and cancer progression.

AIMS

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of AQP1 on the clinicopathology and prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively detected the expression of AQP1 protein in 307 patients with ICC who underwent partial hepatectomy. Western blot analysis was used to detect AQP1 protein levels in stable AQP1 overexpression and knockdown cell lines. The influence of AQP1 on the invasion and metastasis ability of ICC cells was assessed by wound-healing and Transwell assays in vitro as well as by a splenic liver metastasis model in vivo.

RESULTS

Positive membranous AQP1 expression was identified in 34.2% (105/307) of the ICC specimens. Survival data revealed that positive AQP1 expression was significantly associated with favourable disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0290 and p = 0003, respectively). Moreover, high AQP1 expression inhibited the invasion and migration of ICC cells in vitro as well as inhibited liver metastasis in nude mice. Mechanistically, high AQP1 expression in ICC cells increased the levels of E-cadherin but decreased the levels of the Snail transcription factor.

CONCLUSIONS

AQP1 expression is associated with a favourable prognosis in ICC patients. AQP1 inhibits ICC cell invasion, metastasis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) through downregulation of Snail expression.

Safety analysis of pemigatinib leveraging the US Food and Drug administration adverse event reporting system

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly lethal and aggressive epithelial tumor of the hepatobiliary system. A poor prognosis, propensity for relapse, low chance of cure and survival are some of its hallmarks. Pemigatinib, the first targeted treatment for CCA in the United States, has been demonstrated to have a significant response rate and encouraging survival data in early-phase trials. The adverse events (AEs) of pemigatinib must also be determined. Objective: To understand more deeply the safety of pemigatinib in the real world through data-mining of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Disproportionality analysis was employed in a retrospective pharmacovigilance investigation to identify the AEs linked to pemigatinib use as signals. Data were collected between 1 January 2020 to 30 June 2022. Four data-mining methods (proportional reporting odds ratio; proportional reporting ratio; Bayesian confidence propagation neural networks of information components; empirical Bayes geometric means) were used to calculate disproportionality. Results: A total of 203 cases using pemigatinib as the prime-suspect medication were found in our search, which involved 99 preferred terms (PTs). Thirteen signals of pemigatinib-induced AEs in seven System Organ Classes were detected after confirming the four algorithms simultaneously. Nephrolithiasis was an unexpected significant AE not listed on the drug label found in our data-mining. Comparison of the differences between pemigatinib and platinum drugs in terms of 33 PTs revealed that 13 PTs also met the criteria of the four algorithms. Ten of these PTs were identical to those compared with all other drugs, in which (excluding a reduction in phosphorus in blood) other PT signal values were higher than those of all other drugs tested. However, comparison of the differences between pemigatinib and infigratinib in terms of the 33 PTs revealed no significant signals in each algorithm method. Conclusion: Some significant signals were detected between pemigatinib use and AEs. PTs with apparently strong signals and PTs not mentioned in the label should be taken seriously.

Past, present, and future of FGFR inhibitors in cholangiocarcinoma: from biological mechanisms to clinical applications

INTRODUCTION

Biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) is a heterogenous group of aggressive hepatic malignancies, second to hepatocellular carcinoma per prevalence. Despite clinical research advancement, the overall 5-year survival rate is just above 2%. With the identification of somatic core mutations in half of cholangiocarcinomas. In the intrahepatic subtype (iCCA), it is possible to target mutational pathways of pharmacological interest.

AREAS COVERED

Major attention has been drawn to fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), especially the type 2 (FGFR2), found mutated in 10-15% of iCCAs. FGFR2 fusions became the target of novel tyrosine-kinase inhibitors investigated in clinical studies, showing promising results so as to gain regulatory approval by American and European committees in recent years. Such drugs demonstrated a better impact on the quality of life compared to standard chemotherapy; however, side effects including hyperphosphatemia, gastrointestinal, eye, and nail disorders are common although mostly manageable.

EXPERT OPINION

As FGFR inhibitors may soon become the new alternative to standard chemotherapy in FGFR-mutated cholangiocarcinoma, accurate molecular testing and monitoring of acquired resistance mechanisms will be essential. The possible application of FGFR inhibitors in first-line treatment, as well as in combination with current standard treatments, remains the next step to be taken.

Immunotherapy in Biliary Tract Cancers: Current Standard-of-Care and Emerging Strategies

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs), comprising intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma as well as gallbladder adenocarcinoma, continue to be challenging to manage. Conventional chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease are limited in both options and benefits, and more effective perioperative regimens are also needed. Over the last decade, immunotherapy has had a profound impact on the management of many solid tumor types, particularly in using immune checkpoint inhibition to enable a tumor-directed T cell response. Immunotherapy administered on its own has had limited utility in BTCs, in part due to a hostile immune microenvironment and the relative infrequency of biomarker-based tumor-agnostic indications for immunotherapy. However, immunotherapy in conjunction with chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapies, and/or anti-angiogenic therapies has gained traction, supported by evidence that these agents can impart favorable immunomodulatory effects on the tumor microenvironment. The TOPAZ-1 trial led to the first BTC-specific immunotherapy approval, establishing the combination of durvalumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin as the preferred first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic disease. Recently, the KEYNOTE-966 trial showed positive results for the combination of pembrolizumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin in the same setting, adding further evidence for the addition of immune checkpoint inhibition to the standard chemotherapy backbone. Meanwhile, advances in the molecular profiling of BTCs has contributed to the recent proliferation of molecularly targeted therapeutics for the subset of BTCs harboring alterations in IDH1, FGFR2, MAP kinase signaling, HER2, and beyond, and there has been great interest in investigating combinations of these agents with immunotherapy. Emerging immunotherapy strategies beyond immune checkpoint inhibition are also being studied in BTCs, and these include immunostimulatory receptor agonists, Wnt signaling modulators, adoptive cell therapy, and cancer vaccines. A large number of trials are underway to explore promising new combinations and immune-targeted strategies, offering opportunities to expand the role of immunotherapy in BTC management in the near future.

Paradigm shift of chemotherapy and systemic treatment for biliary tract cancer

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are frequently identified at late stages and have a poor prognosis due to limited systemic treatment regimens. For more than a decade, the combination of gemcitabine and cis-platin has served as the first-line standard treatment. There are few choices for second-line chemo-therapy. Targeted treatment with fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 inhibitors, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitors, and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 inhibitors has had important results. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as pembrolizumab are only used in first-line treatment for microsatellite instability high patients. The TOPAZ-1 trial's outcome is encouraging, and there are several trials underway that might soon put targeted treatment and ICI combos into first-line options. Newer targets and agents for existing goals are being studied, which may represent a paradigm shift in BTC management. Due to a scarcity of targetable mutations and the higher toxicity profile of the current medications, the new category of drugs may occupy a significant role in BTC therapies.

Current Role and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy and Circulating Factors in Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancers

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogenous group of malignancies arising from the epithelial cells of the biliary tree and the gallbladder. They are often locally advanced or already metastatic at the time of the diagnosis and therefore prognosis remains dismal. Unfortunately, the management of BTCs has been limited by resistance and consequent low response rate to cytotoxic systemic therapy. New therapeutic approaches are needed to improve the survival outcomes for these patients. Immunotherapy, one of the newest therapeutic options, is changing the approach to the oncological treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are by far the most promising group of immunotherapeutic agents: they work by blocking the tumor-induced inhibition of the immune cellular response. Immunotherapy in BTCs is currently approved as second-line treatment for patients whose tumors have a peculiar molecular profile, such as high levels of microsatellites instability, PD-L1 overexpression, or high levels of tumor mutational burden. However, emerging data from ongoing clinical trials seem to suggest that durable responses can be achieved in other subsets of patients. The BTCs are characterized by a highly desmoplastic microenvironment that fuels the growth of cancer tissue, but tissue biopsies are often difficult to obtain or not feasible in BTCs. Recent studies have hence proposed to use liquid biopsy approaches to search the blood circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to use as biomarkers in BTCs. So far studies are insufficient to promote their use in clinical management, however trials are still in progress with promising preliminary results. Analysis of blood samples for ctDNA to research possible tumor-specific genetic or epigenetic alterations that could be linked to treatment response or prognosis was already feasible. Although there are still few data available, ctDNA analysis in BTC is fast, non-invasive, and could also represent a way to diagnose BTC earlier and monitor tumor response to chemotherapy. The prognostic capabilities of soluble factors in BTC are not yet precisely determined and more studies are needed. In this review, we will discuss the different approaches to immunotherapy and tumor circulating factors, the progress that has been made so far, and the possible future developments.

Potential Immunotherapy Targets for Liver-Directed Therapies, and the Current Scope of Immunotherapeutics for Liver-Related Malignancies

Liver cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, is increasing in incidence and mortality across the globe. An improved understanding of the complex tumor microenvironment has opened many therapeutic doors and led to the development of novel pharmaceuticals targeting cellular signaling pathways or immune checkpoints. These interventions have significantly improved tumor control rates and patient outcomes, both in clinical trials and in real-world practice. Interventional radiologists play an important role in the multidisciplinary team given their expertise in minimally invasive locoregional therapy, as the bulk of these tumors are usually in the liver. The aim of this review is to highlight the immunological therapeutic targets for primary liver cancers, the available immune-based approaches, and the contributions that interventional radiology can provide in the care of these patients.

FGFR2 testing in cholangiocarcinoma: translating molecular studies into clinical practice

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms burdened by a dismal prognosis. Several studies have investigated the genomic profile of CCA and identified numerous druggable genetic alterations, including FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. Approximately 5-7% of CCAs and 10-20% of intrahepatic iCCAs harbor FGFR2 fusions. With the recent advent of FGFR-targeting therapies into clinical practice, a standardization of molecular testing for FGFR2 alterations in CCA will be necessary. In this review, we describe the technical aspects and challenges related to FGFR2 testing in routine practice, focusing on the comparison between Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and FISH assays, the best timing to perform the test, and on the role of liquid biopsy.

Optimizing Circulating Tumour DNA Use in the Perioperative Setting for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnosis, Screening, Minimal Residual Disease Detection and Treatment Response Monitoring

In this review, we present the current evidence and future perspectives on the use of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in the diagnosis, management and understanding the prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) undergoing surgery. Liquid biopsies or ctDNA maybe utilized to: (1) determine the molecular profile of the tumour and therefore guide the selection of molecular targeted therapy in the neoadjuvant setting, (2) form a surveillance tool for the detection of minimal residual disease or cancer recurrence after surgery, and (3) diagnose and screen for early iCCA detection in high-risk populations. The potential for ctDNA can be tumour-informed or -uninformed depending on the goals of its use. Future studies will require ctDNA extraction technique validations, with standardizations of both the platforms and the timing of ctDNA collections.

FGFR2 Inhibition in Cholangiocarcinoma

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is the second most common primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma and accounts for 2% of cancer-related deaths. BTCs are classified according to their anatomical origin into intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar, or distal cholangiocarcinoma, as well as gall bladder carcinoma. While the mutational profiles in these anatomical BTC subtypes overlap to a large extent, iCCA is notable for the high frequency of IDH1/2 mutations (10-22%) and the nearly exclusive occurrence of FGFR2 fusions in 10-15% of patients. In recent years, FGFR2 fusions have become one of the most promising targets for precision oncology targeting BTC, with FGFR inhibitors already approved in Europe and the United States for patients with advanced, pretreated iCCA. While the therapeutic potential of nonfusion alterations is still under debate, it is expected that the field of FGFR2-directed therapies will be subject to rapid further evolution and optimization. The scope of this review is to provide an overview of oncogenic FGFR signaling in iCCA cells and highlight the pathophysiology, diagnostic testing strategies, and therapeutic promises and challenges associated with FGFR2-altered iCCA.

Integrative analysis of multiple genomic data from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma organoids enables tumor subtyping

As genomic analysis technology has advanced, it has become possible to sub-classify intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) at the histological or molecular level. Here, we verify the recently suggested two subgroups of ICC in the organoids model, compare the characteristics between types. ICC patients are subclassified into small-duct (SD) and large-duct (LD) subtype according to histological characteristics. ICC organoids are established, and unsupervised principal component analysis clustering separates each type of ICC. Differential gene expression reveals enrichment on KRAS, TGFβ and ERBB2 signaling pathways in LD-type compared with SD-type (P < 0.05). Gene set enrichment analysis demonstrates that the cholangiocarcinoma class 2 signature, defined by Andersen et al., is enriched in the LD-type (enrichment Score = 2.19, P < 0.001). A protein-protein interaction network analysis identifies ZNF217 as a significant hub protein (odds ratio = 4.96, P = 0.0105). We perform prospective modeling of histological subtype using patient-derived organoids. Moreover, gene expression profiling of ICC organoids enables identification of type-specific targetable pathways.

First proficiency testing for NGS-based and combined NGS- and FISH-based detection of FGFR2 fusions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harbours druggable genetic lesions including FGFR2 gene fusions. Reliable and accurate detection of these fusions is becoming a critical component of the molecular work-up, but real-world data on the performance of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and targeted RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) are very limited. Bridging this gap, we report results of the first round robin test for FGFR2 fusions in cholangiocarcinoma and contextualise test data with genomic architecture. A cohort of 10 cholangiocarcinoma (4 fusion positive and 6 fusion negative) was tested by the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. Data were validated by four academic pathology departments in Germany. Fusion-positive cases comprised FGFR2::BICC1, FGFR2::DBP, FGFR2::TRIM8, and FGFR2::ATE1 fusions. In a second step, a round robin test involving 21 academic and non-academic centres testing with RNA-based NGS approaches was carried out; five participants performed FISH testing in addition. Thirteen of 16 (81%) centres successfully passed the NGS only and 3 of 5 (60%) centres passed the combined NGS + FISH round robin test. Identified obstacles were bioinformatic pipelines not optimised for the detection of FGFR2 fusions and assays not capable of detecting unknown fusion partners. This study shows the benefit of targeted RNA-NGS for the detection of FGFR2 gene fusions. Due to the marked heterogeneity of the genomic architecture of these fusions, fusion partner agnostic (i.e. open) methodological approaches that are capable of identifying yet unknown fusion partners are superior. Furthermore, we highlight pitfalls in subsequent bioinformatic analysis and limitations of FISH-based tests.

To Investigate Growth Factor Receptor Targets and Generate Cancer Targeting Inhibitors

Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) regulates multiple pathways, including Mitogenactivated protein kinases (MAPKs), PI3/AKT, JAK/STAT pathway, etc. which has a significant role in the progression and metastasis of tumor. As RTK activation regulates numerous essential bodily processes, including cell proliferation and division, RTK dysregulation has been identified in many types of cancers. Targeting RTK is a significant challenge in cancer due to the abnormal upregulation and downregulation of RTK receptors subfamily EGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, VEGFR, and HGFR in the progression of cancer, which is governed by multiple RTK receptor signalling pathways and impacts treatment response and disease progression. In this review, an extensive focus has been carried out on the normal and abnormal signalling pathways of EGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, VEGFR, and HGFR and their association with cancer initiation and progression. These are explored as potential therapeutic cancer targets and therefore, the inhibitors were evaluated alone and merged with additional therapies in clinical trials aimed at combating global cancer.

Past, Present, and Future Management of Localized Biliary Tract Malignancies

Most of the patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) present with advanced disease. Complete staging with multiphasic liver imaging is essential to determine the extent of disease. Operative goals should include a margin-negative resection, portal lymphadenectomy for staging, and sufficient remnant liver volume. Biliary tract malignancies have distinct mutational drivers (GBC and pCCA = ERBB2 in 20%; iCCA = fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 or isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 in 20%) amenable to therapy with inhibitors. Clinical trials assessing neoadjuvant, peri-operative, and adjuvant treatments continue to evolve and now include targeted inhibitors and the integration of hepatic arterial infusion.

Revisiting targeted therapy and immunotherapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare and aggressive type of malignant tumor. In the past few years, there has been an increase in the incidence of CCA. Surgery is the only effective treatment but is only suitable for a small percentage of patients. Comprehensive treatment is the normal therapy for terminal CCA patients, depending basically on gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy. In the past decade, the emergence of next-generation sequencing technology can be used for the identification of important molecular features of CCA, and several studies have demonstrated that different CCA subtypes have unique genetic aberrations. Targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (EGFR2) are emerging targeted therapies. In addition, researches have indicated that immunotherapy has a key function in CCA. There is ongoing research on programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors (PD-1), chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and tumor-infiltrating leukocyte (TILs). Researches have shown that targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and conventional chemotherapy in CCA had certain mechanistic links, and the combination of those can greatly improve the prognosis of advanced CCA patients. This study aimed to review the research progress of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for CCA.

Cholangiocarcinoma: Molecular Abnormalities and Cells of Origin

Cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs) are a group of heterogeneous epithelial malignancies that can originate at the level of any location of the biliary tree. These tumors are relatively rare but associated with a high rate of mortality. CCAs are morphologically and molecularly heterogeneous and for their location can be distinguished as intracellular and extracellular, subdivided into perihilar and distal. Recent epidemiological, molecular, and cellular studies have supported that the consistent heterogeneity observed for CCAs may result from the convergence of various key elements mainly represented by risk factors, heterogeneity of the associated molecular abnormalities at genetic and epigenetic levels and by different potential cells of origin. These studies have consistently contributed to better defining the pathogenesis of CCAs and to identify in some instances new therapeutic targets. Although the therapeutic progress were still limited, these observations suggest that a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying CCA in the future will help to develop more efficacious treatment strategies.

Rational development of combination therapies for biliary tract cancers

Biliary tract cancers are an uncommon set of gastrointestinal malignancies that are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Most patients present with incurable locally advanced or metastatic disease. The pathophysiology of biliary tract cancer can be exploited for direct therapeutic benefit, and indeed, chemotherapy, precision medicine, immunotherapy and combination treatments are now applied as both standard-of-care and investigational therapies. In the first-line setting, the immune-based chemotherapy combination of durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin has recently been shown to improve survival compared to chemotherapy alone. In the second-line, precision medicine can be employed in those with select genetic alterations in IDH1/2 (isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2), FGFR2 (fibroblast growth factor receptor 2), KRAS, BRAF, ERBB2, NTRK (neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase), ROS, RET, and/or deficiencies in mismatch repair enzymes. In those patients without targetable genetic alterations, fluoropyridine doublets lead to modest improvements in outcomes. Next-generation sequencing is critical for direct patient care and to help elucidate genomic mechanisms of resistance in a research context. Currently, multiple clinical trials are ongoing - hence, this review seeks to provide an update on evolving standards of care and ongoing investigational agents, limitations to current treatments, and a framework for effective combination drug development for the future.

FGFR Inhibitors in Cholangiocarcinoma-A Novel Yet Primary Approach: Where Do We Stand Now and Where to Head Next in Targeting This Axis?

Cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs) are rare but aggressive tumours with poor diagnosis and limited treatment options. Molecular targeted therapies became a promising proposal for patients after progression under first-line chemical treatment. In light of an escalating prevalence of CCA, it is crucial to fully comprehend its pathophysiology, aetiology, and possible targets in therapy. Such knowledge would play a pivotal role in searching for new therapeutic approaches concerning diseases' symptoms and their underlying causes. Growing evidence showed that fibroblast growth factor/fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGF/FGFR) pathway dysregulation is involved in a variety of processes during embryonic development and homeostasis as well as tumorigenesis. CCA is known for its close correlation with the FGF/FGFR pathway and targeting this axis has been proposed in treatment guidelines. Bearing in mind the significance of molecular targeted therapies in different neoplasms, it seems most reasonable to move towards intensive research and testing on these in the case of CCA. However, there is still a need for more data covering this topic. Although positive results of many pre-clinical and clinical studies are discussed in this review, many difficulties lie ahead. Furthermore, this review presents up-to-date literature regarding the outcomes of the latest clinical data and discussion over future directions of FGFR-directed therapies in patients with CCA.

Durable response to the combination of pembrolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in a metastatic extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A case report and literature review

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive malignant tumor with poor overall survival. Although the first-line standard chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) combined with immunotherapy has yielded positive results with survival prolongation, the efficacy remains unsatisfactory, and new treatment modalities need to be explored.

Case presentation: We report the case of a patient with metastatic extrahepatic CCA who achieved a durable response and good tolerance to the combination treatment of pembrolizumab and nab-paclitaxel following progression on gemcitabine plus capecitabine chemotherapy. The tumor samples of the patient revealed low TMB, MSS, negative PD-L1 expression, and negative CD8+ TIL expression. This patient was treated with 3 cycles of pembrolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin, followed by 5 cycles of pembrolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel. Finally, 10 cycles of pembrolizumab monotherapy were administered. The patient survived for over 27 months after the initiation of combined therapy and was still in continuous remission at the last follow-up.

Conclusion: As far as we know, this is the first report that pembrolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel successfully treated a patient with advanced CCA. This combination therapy might be a potential treatment option for patients with cholangiocarcinoma, and further clinical trials are needed to explore the outcomes.

Pemigatinib in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Work in Progress

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most frequent primary liver cancer, following hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Progress in the molecular understanding of CCA has led to the development of several agents, including FGFR inhibitors, such as pemigatinib, whose approval has marked a new era in this hepatobiliary malignancy. However, a number of questions remain unanswered, including the development of secondary resistance and the role of combination therapies, including FGFR inhibitors. Herein, we specifically focus on the current challenges and future research directions of pemigatinib use in CCA patients.

Small-molecule inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and more: FDA-approved novel therapeutic drugs for solid tumors from 1991 to 2021

The United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) has always been a forerunner in drug evaluation and supervision. Over the past 31 years, 1050 drugs (excluding vaccines, cell-based therapies, and gene therapy products) have been approved as new molecular entities (NMEs) or biologics license applications (BLAs). A total of 228 of these 1050 drugs were identified as cancer therapeutics or cancer-related drugs, and 120 of them were classified as therapeutic drugs for solid tumors according to their initial indications. These drugs have evolved from small molecules with broad-spectrum antitumor properties in the early stage to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) with a more precise targeting effect during the most recent decade. These drugs have extended indications for other malignancies, constituting a cancer treatment system for monotherapy or combined therapy. However, the available targets are still mainly limited to receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), restricting the development of antitumor drugs. In this review, these 120 drugs are summarized and classified according to the initial indications, characteristics, or functions. Additionally, RTK-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint-based immunotherapies are also discussed. Our analysis of existing challenges and potential opportunities in drug development may advance solid tumor treatment in the future.

Effect of FGFR2 Alterations on Overall and Progression-Free Survival in Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Background

First-line standard-of-care therapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma is gemcitabine plus cisplatin; there is no established second-line systemic therapy. Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-2 fusions/rearrangements can be oncogenic drivers, occurring almost exclusively in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, but little is known about whether FGFR2 status affects the response to systemic chemotherapy.

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the effects of FGFR2 status on survival outcomes in patients receiving systemic therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, patients treated with systemic therapy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were categorized into three cohorts: FGFR2 fusions; other FGFR2 alterations; no FGFR2 alterations. Endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival per therapy line.

Results

In total, 132 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were included (FGFR2 fusions, n = 15; other FGFR2 alterations, n = 2 [data not reported]; no FGFR2 alterations, n = 115). First-line therapy was platinum based in 93% of patients; 80% received platinum/pyrimidine-based second-line therapy. For patients with FGFR2 fusions and no FGFR2 alterations, respectively, median overall survival from diagnosis was 31.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8–not estimable months) [n = 9] and 21.7 months (95% CI 16.1–26.6) [n = 109]; median progression-free survival in first-line therapy was 6.2 months (95% CI 2.0–16.8) [n = 15] and 7.2 months (95% CI 5.0–8.3) [n = 107], and median progression-free survival in second-line therapy was 5.6 months (95% CI 2.8–10.3) [n = 8] and 3.7 months (95% CI 2.6–5.6) [n = 81].

Conclusions

Patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and FGFR2 fusions may have a better prognosis than those without FGFR2 alterations in terms of overall survival, and progression-free survival on second-line, but not first-line systemic therapy. Progression-free survival improvement on second-line chemotherapy may imply an important impact of prior chemotherapy as first line.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) can be caused by changes in many different genes. One type of change in iCCA is a fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene (FGFR2) fusion. In fusions, the FGFR2 gene has fused to another gene. Our study examined people with iCCA to compare the overall survival following diagnosis for people with FGFR2 changes and people without. We also measured progression-free survival, which is the time from their first chemotherapy dose until their cancer got worse. All participants had iCCA and their first or second treatment was chemotherapy. Fifteen participants had FGFR2 fusions and 115 had no FGFR2 changes. We found that participants with FGFR2 fusions lived longer (median 31 months) than those without these fusions (median 22 months). During their first treatment, median progression-free survival was similar for participants with and without FGFR2 fusions. After the second chemotherapy, median progression-free survival was about 2 months longer for participants with FGFR2 fusions than those without. Results will vary from person to person and will depend on other factors. However, people with iCCA with FGFR2 fusions may stay slightly longer on their second treatment without their cancer getting worse. With chemotherapy, they may also live somewhat longer than those without FGFR2 fusions.

Molecular diagnostics and biomarkers in cholangiocarcinoma

Regardless of anatomic origin, cholangiocarcinoma is generally an aggressive malignancy with a relatively high case fatality. Surgical resection with curative intent remains the best opportunity to achieve meaningful long-term survival. Most patients present, however, with advanced disease and less than 20% of patients are candidates for surgical resection. Unfortunately, even patients who undergo resection have a 5-year survival that ranges from 20 to 40%. Biomarkers are indicators of normal, pathologic, or biologic responses to an intervention and can range from a characteristic (i.e., blood pressure reading which can detect hypertension) to specific genetic mutations or proteins (i.e., carcinoembryonic antigen level). Novel biomarkers and improved molecular diagnostics represent an attractive opportunity to improve detection as well as to identify novel therapeutic targets for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. We herein review the latest advances in molecular diagnostics and biomarkers related to the early detection and treatment of patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

The Molecular Landscape of Pancreatobiliary Cancers for Novel Targeted Therapies From Real-World Genomic Profiling

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapies have limited efficacy in pancreatic cancer (PC) and biliary tract cancer (BTC), underscoring the need for new regimens. Recently, tumor-agnostic approaches have been developed for some targeted therapies in advanced solid tumors; however, the frequency of alterations by clinical and genomic background is unclear in PC and BTC.

METHODS

To assess the frequencies of druggable gene alterations and investigate new potential therapeutic targetable genomic alterations, advanced PC and BTC patients were tested with comprehensive genomic profiling at Foundation Medicine during the course of clinical care.

RESULTS

A total of 16 913 PC patients and 3031 BTC patients were available for analyses, and frequencies of genomic alterations were stratified by age (≥40 years or <40 years), microsatellite instability status, tumor mutational burden status (high ≥10 or low <10 Muts/Mb), and select genomic alterations. Alterations in BRCA2, BRAF, ERBB2, CDK12, PIK3CA, FGFR2, EGFR, and other potential targets were seen across cohorts, with enrichment observed within particular subsets such as in PC patients lacking a KRAS mutation. In BTC patients, the rate of ERBB2 amplification was statistically significantly higher in the tumor mutational burden-high population (23.3% vs 13.7%). Interestingly, CDK12 rearrangement was observed in BTC patients with ERBB2 amplification tumors. In patients younger than 40 years, FGFR2 rearrangement (4%) was observed in PC: GATA6 amplification (11.1%) and rearrangement of BRAF (2.8%)FGFR2 (5.6%) was observed in BTC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified an appreciable frequency of immunotherapy biomarkers and targetable gene alterations in both PC and BTC, with notable frequencies in PC samples lacking KRAS mutations and children or adolescent and young adult populations, that should encourage comprehensive genomic profiling testing.

Hyperphosphatemic Tumoral Calcinosis With Pemigatinib Use

Background/Objective

Pemigatinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 inhibitor, is a novel therapeutic approach for treating cholangiocarcinoma when an FGFR fusion or gene rearrangement is identified. Although the most reported side effect of pemigatinib is hyperphosphatemia, tumoral calcinosis with soft tissue calcifications is not widely recognized as a complication. We report a case of patient with hyperphosphatemic tumoral calcinosis on pemigatinib.

Case Report

A 59-year-old woman with progressive metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, despite receiving treatment with cisplatin and gemcitabine for 7 months, was found to have an FGFR2-BICC1 fusion in the tumor on next-generation sequencing. Pemigatinib was, therefore, initiated. Four months into the therapy, multiple subcutaneous nodules developed over the lower portion of her back, hips, and legs. Punch biopsies revealed deep dermal and subcutaneous calcifications. Investigations revealed elevated serum phosphorus (7.5 mg/dL), normal serum calcium (8.7 mg/dL), and elevated intact fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23, 1216 pg/mL; normal value <59 pg/mL) levels. Serum phosphorus levels improved with a low-phosphorus diet and sevelamer. Calcifications regressed with pemigatinib discontinuation.

Discussion

Inhibition or deficiency of FGF-23 results in hyperphosphatemia and can lead to ectopic calcification. Pemigatinib, a potent inhibitor of FGFR-1-3, blocks the effect of FGF-23 leading to hyperphosphatemia and tumoral calcinosis as observed in our case. Treatment is aimed primarily at lowering serum phosphate levels through dietary restriction or phosphate binders; however, the regression of tumoral calcinosis can occur with pemigatinib cessation, as seen in this case.

Conclusion

As the use of FGFR 1-3 inhibitors becomes more prevalent, we aim to raise attention to the potential side effects of tumoral calcinosis.