Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Versus Conservative Glucose Control in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: GLUCO-CABG Trial

Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: An Updated Review of Current Preventive Strategies

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent and often severe postoperative complication following cardiac surgery, which is associated with poor outcomes in both the short and long terms. Numerous randomized clinical trials have been conducted to investigate various strategies for prevention of cardiac surgery-associated AKI. Unfortunately, most trials conducted to date have been negative. However, encouraging results have been reported with several interventions, including preoperative implementation of oxygen delivery-directed perfusion, novel drugs such as teprasiran and amino acids. Many of these studies, however, require validation in larger, multicenter trials, before their routine use in clinical practice can be recommended.

Use of an insulin titration protocol based on continuous glucose monitoring in postoperative cardiac surgery patients with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Maintaining optimal glucose control is critical for postoperative care cardiac surgery patients. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in this setting remains understudied. We evaluated the efficacy of CGM with a specialized titration protocol in cardiac surgery patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and prediabetes.

METHODS

In this randomized-controlled trial, 54 cardiac surgery patients were randomized one day post-surgery, with 27 CGM and 25 point-of-care (POC) patients completing the study. The CGM group used Dexcom G6 with a CGM-specialized titration protocol, while the POC group used standard monitoring with blinded CGM. The primary outcome was time-in-range (TIR) 100-180 mg/dL for 7 days post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included various glycemic metrics and surgical outcomes. Multiple comparison adjustments were performed using false-discovery-rate (FDR).

RESULTS

Thirty-one (59.6%) had diabetes and 21 (40.4%) had prediabetes. While TIR 100-180 mg/dL showed no difference (74.7% vs. 71.6%, FDR-adjusted p = 0.376), the CGM group demonstrated improvements in TIR 70-180 mg/dL (83.8% vs. 75.8%, FDR-adjusted p = 0.026), time-in-tight-range (TITR) 100-140 mg/dL (46.3% vs. 36.3%, FDR-adjusted p = 0.018), and TITR 70-140 mg/dL (55.3% vs. 40.5%, FDR-adjusted p = 0.003). Both groups maintained very low rates of time below range (< 70 mg/dL: 0.03% vs. 0.18%, FDR-adjusted p = 0.109). The CGM group showed lower postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) (18.8% vs. 55.6%, FDR-adjusted p = 0.04999).

CONCLUSION

While the primary outcome was not achieved, CGM with a specialized titration protocol demonstrated safe glycemic control with improvements in TIR 70-180 mg/dL and TITRs in cardiac surgery patients with T2D and prediabetes. The observed reduction in postoperative AF warrants further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06275971.

Association of stress hyperglycemia ratio with short-term and long-term prognosis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting across different glucose metabolism states: a large-scale cohort study

BACKGROUND

Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) is recognized as a reliable indicator of acute hyperglycemia during stress. Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at high risk of stress hyperglycemia, but little attention has been paid to this population. This study is the first to investigate the association between SHR and both short-term and long-term prognosis in CABG patients, with a further exploration of the impact of SHR across different glucose metabolic states.

METHODS

A total of 18,307 patients undergoing isolated CABG were consecutively enrolled and categorized into three groups based on SHR tertiles. The perioperative outcome was defined as a composite of in-hospital death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and reoperation during hospitalization. The long-term outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Restricted cubic spline and logistic regression linked SHR to perioperative risks. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the relationship with long-term prognosis. Subgroup analyses were further conducted based on different glucose metabolic states.

RESULTS

A U-shaped association was observed between SHR and perioperative outcome in the overall population (P for nonlinear < 0.001). As SHR increased, the risk of perioperative events initially decreased (OR per SD: 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.97, P = 0.013) and then elevated (OR per SD: 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.28, P =  0.004), with an inflection point at 0.79. A similar U-shaped pattern was identified in patients with normal glucose regulation. Among those with prediabetes, the association was J-shaped, while in patients with diabetes, the association became nonsignificant when SHR exceeded 0.76. Adding SHR to the existing risk model improved the predictive performance for perioperative outcomes in the overall population (AUC: 0.720 → 0.752, P < 0.001; NRI: 0.036, P =  0.003; IDI: 0.015, P < 0.001). For long-term outcomes, the risk of events was monotonically elevated with increasing SHR, regardless of glucose metabolic status. The third tertile showed a 10.7% greater risk of MACCEs (HR: 1.107, 95% CI 1.023-1.231, P =  0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

SHR was significantly associated with prognosis in CABG patients, demonstrating a non-linear U-shaped relationship with short-term outcomes and a linear positive association with long-term outcomes. The in-hospital risk associated with SHR was attenuated in patients with diabetes.

RESEARCH INSIGHTS

WHAT IS CURRENTLY KNOWN ABOUT THIS TOPIC?: Stress hyperglycemia is common during the perioperative period in CABG patients and is linked to adverse short- and long-term outcomes. The stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) is a novel metric that accounts for baseline glycemia to better reflect acute stress-induced hyperglycemia. However, SHR has not been studied in the CABG population. WHAT IS THE KEY RESEARCH QUESTION?: This study is the first to investigate the association between SHR and both short-term and long-term prognosis in patients undergoing CABG, while further exploring its impact across different glucose metabolic states, categorized as normal glucose regulation, prediabetes, and diabetes. WHAT IS NEW?: In CABG patients, SHR shows a U-shaped relationship with perioperative events and a linear positive association with long-term outcomes, both of which are modulated by glucose metabolic status. HOW MIGHT THIS STUDYINFLUENCE CLINICAL PRACTICE?: Findings support the incorporation of SHR for risk stratification and personalized glucose management in CABG patients, ultimately improving both in-hospital and long-term prognosis.

Comparison of all-cause mortality with different blood glucose control strategies in patients with diabetes in the ICU: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The optimal glucose control strategy for intensive care unit (ICU) patients with diabetes remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to compare the effects of strict glucose control, intermediate strict glucose control, liberal glucose control, and very liberal glucose control on reducing all-cause mortality in ICU patients with diabetes through a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials comparing different glucose control strategies in ICU patients with diabetes up to October 1, 2024. The primary outcome was all-cause 90-day mortality. The Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to assess bias in the included studies. Data analysis was performed using Stata (version 17).

RESULTS

A total of 12 randomized controlled trials involving 5,297 participants were included in the final analysis. The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the four glucose control strategies in reducing all-cause 90-day mortality. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA), which was used to rank the strategies and display the probability of each strategy being ranked first, showed the following: intermediate strict control (SUCRA 88%), liberal control (SUCRA 55.3%), very liberal control (SUCRA 40.3%), and strict control (SUCRA 16.5%). The cumulative probability of each strategy's rank in reducing all-cause mortality, from best to worst, showed that the most likely ranking was intermediate strict control, liberal control, very liberal control, and strict control.

CONCLUSIONS

In ICU patients with diabetes, no significant statistical difference was observed among the four glucose control strategies in reducing all-cause 90-day mortality. The SUCRA rankings are hypothesis-generating and require further validation. Therefore, the current evidence is insufficient to definitively conclude that any one strategy is superior to the others in reducing mortality.

Real-time continuous glucose monitoring improves postoperative glucose control in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Effective glycaemic control following cardiac surgery improves clinical outcomes, and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) might be a valuable tool in achieving this objective. We investigated the effect of real-time CGM and telemonitoring on postoperative glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial (RCT), adults with T2D undergoing CABG were assigned to either a test group utilizing real-time CGM (Dexcom G6) and telemetry for glycaemic control, or a control group with blinded CGM measures, relying on point-of-care measures. The primary outcome was the percentage of time in range (TIR) of blood glucose between 70 and 180 mg/dL (3.9-10.0 mmol/L), measured by CGM.

RESULTS

Among 91 subjects, 48 were in the test group and 43 were in the control group. The least squares (LS) mean ± standard error of TIR was 60.3 ± 2.7%, 50.3 ± 2.9% in the test and control group, respectively. The test group had significantly higher TIR when adjusted with age, sex, body mass index, baseline fasting blood glucose and baseline glycated haemoglobin (LS mean difference, 10.0%; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-18.0; p = 0.014). The test group also had lower time above range and mean glucose levels, with no differences in time below range or hypoglycaemic events.

CONCLUSIONS

In this RCT, real-time CGM and telemonitoring improved glycaemic control during postoperative period without increasing hypoglycaemia risk. Given the benefits of effective glycaemic control on perioperative outcomes, CGM may be helpful in managing T2D after CABG.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024

The 2024 revised edition of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock (J-SSCG 2024) is published by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. This is the fourth revision since the first edition was published in 2012. The purpose of the guidelines is to assist healthcare providers in making appropriate decisions in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock, leading to improved patient outcomes. We aimed to create guidelines that are easy to understand and use for physicians who recognize sepsis and provide initial management, specialized physicians who take over the treatment, and multidisciplinary healthcare providers, including nurses, physical therapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists. The J-SSCG 2024 covers the following nine areas: diagnosis of sepsis and source control, antimicrobial therapy, initial resuscitation, blood purification, disseminated intravascular coagulation, adjunctive therapy, post-intensive care syndrome, patient and family care, and pediatrics. In these areas, we extracted 78 important clinical issues. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 42 GRADE-based recommendations, 7 good practice statements, and 22 information-to-background questions were created as responses to clinical questions. We also described 12 future research questions.

Perioperative glycemic control in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases, affecting globally about 537 million adults. Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death and medical emergencies in the DM patient population. As a result, about 40% of patients with DM undergo cardiac surgery, mainly in the coronary arteries. Uncontrolled hyperglycemia, especially the prolonged condition, is an independent factor in postoperative mortality and the cause of many serious complications, such as surgical wound infection, sepsis, renal failure or cerebral or cardiovascular incidents. Adequate glycemic control in the perioperative period is the most important way to prevent the above complications. The issue has remained an important topic of many observational and experimental studies for years. This paper summarizes the current knowledge with regard to strategies of hyperglycemic control in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024

The 2024 revised edition of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock (J-SSCG 2024) is published by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. This is the fourth revision since the first edition was published in 2012. The purpose of the guidelines is to assist healthcare providers in making appropriate decisions in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock, leading to improved patient outcomes. We aimed to create guidelines that are easy to understand and use for physicians who recognize sepsis and provide initial management, specialized physicians who take over the treatment, and multidisciplinary healthcare providers, including nurses, physical therapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists. The J-SSCG 2024 covers the following nine areas: diagnosis of sepsis and source control, antimicrobial therapy, initial resuscitation, blood purification, disseminated intravascular coagulation, adjunctive therapy, post-intensive care syndrome, patient and family care, and pediatrics. In these areas, we extracted 78 important clinical issues. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 42 GRADE-based recommendations, 7 good practice statements, and 22 information-to-background questions were created as responses to clinical questions. We also described 12 future research questions.

Modern-Day Therapeutics and Ongoing Clinical Trials against Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a global health concern that affects millions of people globally. The present review aims to narrate the clinical guidelines and therapeutic interventions for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients. Furthermore, the present work summarizes the ongoing phase 1/2/3 and clinical trials against T2DM.

METHODS

A meticulous and comprehensive literature review was performed using various databases, such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Clinical trials database (https://clinicaltrials.gov/), and Google Scholar, to include various clinical trials and therapeutic interventions against T2DM.

RESULTS

Based on our findings, we concluded that most T2DM-associated clinical trials are interventional. Anti-diabetic therapeutics, including insulin, metformin, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RAs), and Sodium- Glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are frontline therapeutics being clinically investigated. Currently, the therapeutics in phase IV clinical trials are mostly SGLT-2 inhibitors, implicating their critical contribution to the clinical management of T2DM.

CONCLUSION

Despite the success of T2DM treatments, a surge in innovative treatment options to reduce diabetic consequences and improve glycemic control is currently ongoing. More emphasis needs to be on exploring novel targeted drug candidates that can offer more sustained glycemic control.

Intraoperative hypoglycemia among adults with intraoperative glucose measurements: a cross-sectional multicentre retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Intraoperative hypoglycemia is presumed to be rare, but generalizable multicentre incidence and risk factor data for adult patients are lacking. We used a multicentre registry to characterize adults with intraoperative hypoglycemia and hypothesized that intraoperative insulin administration would be associated with hypoglycemia.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective multicentre cohort study. We searched the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group registry to identify adult patients with intraoperative hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.3 mmol·L-1 [< 60 mg·dL-1]) from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019. We evaluated characteristics of patients with intraoperative glucose measurements and with intraoperative hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

Of 516,045 patients with intraoperative glucose measurements, 3,900 (0.76%) had intraoperative hypoglycemia. Diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease were more common in the cohort with intraoperative hypoglycemia. The odds of intraoperative hypoglycemia were higher for the youngest age category (18-30 yr) compared with the odds for every age category above 40 yr (odds ratio [OR], 1.57-3.18; P < 0.001), and were higher for underweight or normal weight patients compared with patients with obesity (OR, 1.48-2.53; P < 0.001). Parenteral nutrition was associated with lower odds of hypoglycemia (OR, 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 0.47; P < 0.001). Intraoperative insulin use was not associated with hypoglycemia (OR, 0.996; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.09; P = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

In this large cross-sectional retrospective multicentre cohort study, intraoperative hypoglycemia was a rare event. Intraoperative insulin use was not associated with hypoglycemia.

Cambridge risk score, new hyperglycemia, and complications in surgical patients without diabetes

AIMS

Our study examined the association between the Cambridge Risk Score (CRS), new hyperglycemia (NH), and complications in patients undergoing elective surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, adult surgical patients, without diabetes, with NH (blood glucose ≥140 mg/dL) were identified, and the CRS was calculated. We used univariate regression models to evaluate the relationship between CRS and NH with 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS), and complications. Models were stratified by surgical specialty (cardiac/vascular, general, orthopedic, neurologic).

RESULTS

Of 10,531 patients in the study, 24 % had NH. After adjusting for covariates, the CRS was associated with increased odds of complications [OR 2.09; 95%CI:1.69, 2.59] and NH [OR 1.95; 95%CI:1.66, 2.29]. NH was associated with increased odds of 30-day readmission [β 1.60; 95%CI:1.31, 1.96], and increased LOS [β 0.64; 95%CI:0.59, 0.68]. When stratified by surgery type, the CRS was associated with increased LOS in neurosurgery, decreased LOS in orthopedics, and increased odds of complications and NH in neurosurgery and orthopedics.

CONCLUSION

The CRS is associated with NH, complications, and LOS in patients undergoing elective neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and general surgery. This suggests that CRS may have potential to help identify surgical patients at high risk for NH and complications.

16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Interventions to prevent surgical site infection in adults undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common type of hospital-acquired infection and affects up to a third of patients following surgical procedures. It is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. In the United Kingdom alone, it is estimated to add another £30 million to the cost of adult cardiac surgery. Although generic guidance for SSI prevention exists, this is not specific to adult cardiac surgery. Furthermore, many of the risk factors for SSI are prevalent within the cardiac surgery population. Despite this, there is currently no standard of care for SSI prevention in adults undergoing cardiac surgery throughout the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative periods of care, with variations in practice existing throughout from risk stratification, decontamination strategies and surveillance.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective: to assess the clinical effectiveness of pre-, intra-, and postoperative interventions in the prevention of cardiac SSI.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES

(i) to evaluate the effects of SSI prevention interventions on morbidity, mortality, and resource use; (ii) to evaluate the effects of SSI prevention care bundles on morbidity, mortality, and resource use.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid, from inception) and Embase (Ovid, from inception) on 31 May 2021.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) were also searched for ongoing or unpublished trials on 21 May 2021. No language restrictions were imposed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs evaluating interventions to reduce SSI in adults (≥ 18 years of age) who have undergone any cardiac surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed the methods as per our published Cochrane protocol. Our primary outcome was surgical site infection. Our secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, reoperation for SSI, hospital length of stay, hospital readmissions for SSI, healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness, quality of life (QoL), and adverse effects. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 118 studies involving 51,854 participants were included. Twenty-two interventions to reduce SSI in adults undergoing cardiac surgery were identified. The risk of bias was judged to be high in the majority of studies. There was heterogeneity in the study populations and interventions; consequently, meta-analysis was not appropriate for many of the comparisons and these are presented as narrative summaries. We focused our reporting of findings on four comparisons deemed to be of great clinical relevance by all review authors. Decolonisation versus no decolonisation Pooled data from three studies (n = 1564) using preoperative topical oral/nasal decontamination in all patients demonstrated an uncertain direction of treatment effect in relation to total SSI (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.36; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence). A single study reported that decolonisation likely results in little to no difference in superficial SSI (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.15; moderate-certainty evidence) and a reduction in deep SSI (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.77; high-certainty evidence). The evidence on all-cause mortality from three studies (n = 1564) is very uncertain (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.84; I2 = 49%; very low-certainty evidence). A single study (n = 954) demonstrated that decolonisation may result in little to no difference in hospital readmission for SSI (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.45; low-certainty evidence). A single study (n = 954) reported one case of temporary discolouration of teeth in the decolonisation arm (low-certainty-evidence. Reoperation for SSI was not reported. Tight glucose control versus standard glucose control Pooled data from seven studies (n = 880) showed that tight glucose control may reduce total SSI, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.85; I2 = 29%; numbers need to treat to benefit (NNTB) = 13; very-low certainty evidence). Pooled data from seven studies (n = 3334) showed tight glucose control may reduce all-cause mortality, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.91; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence). Based on four studies (n = 2793), there may be little to no difference in episodes of hypoglycaemia between tight control vs. standard control, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 2.12, 95% CI 0.51 to 8.76; I2 = 72%; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported superficial/deep SSI, reoperation for SSI, or hospital readmission for SSI. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) versus standard dressings NPWT was assessed in two studies (n = 144) and it may reduce total SSI, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.97; I2 = 0%; NNTB = 10; very low-certainty evidence). A single study (n = 80) reported reoperation for SSI. The relative effect could not be estimated. The certainty of evidence was judged to be very low. No studies reported superficial/deep SSI, all-cause mortality, hospital readmission for SSI, or adverse effects. Topical antimicrobials versus no topical antimicrobials Five studies (n = 5382) evaluated topical gentamicin sponge, which may reduce total SSI (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.84; I2 = 48%; NNTB = 32), superficial SSI (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.98; I2 = 69%), and deep SSI (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.96; I2 = 5%; low-certainty evidence. Four studies (n = 4662) demonstrated that topical gentamicin sponge may result in little to no difference in all-cause mortality, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.42; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence). Reoperation for SSI, hospital readmission for SSI, and adverse effects were not reported in any included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review provides the broadest and most recent review of the current evidence base for interventions to reduce SSI in adults undergoing cardiac surgery. Twenty-one interventions were identified across the perioperative period. Evidence is of low to very low certainty primarily due to significant heterogeneity in how interventions were implemented and the definitions of SSI used. Knowledge gaps have been identified across a number of practices that should represent key areas for future research. Efforts to standardise SSI outcome reporting are warranted.

Noniatrogenic hypoglycemia: A universal marker for poor outcomes

Objective

Previous retrospective studies have established a relationship between postoperative hypoglycemia and adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery, but none have accounted for the cause of hypoglycemia.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent cardiac surgery at a single institution between 2016 and 2021. Patients were categorized as hypoglycemic if they had 1 or more postoperative blood glucose measurement less than 70 mg/dL and normoglycemic otherwise. Hypoglycemia was subcategorized as noniatrogenic (underlying liver failure, adrenal insufficiency, sepsis, or shock) or iatrogenic (insulin infusion continued while nil per os or infusion protocol violated) via manual chart review. Baseline characteristics were compared between groups using Pearson χ2, analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis testing, and outcomes were compared using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

In total, 5373 patients and 183,346 glucose measurements were included. Hypoglycemia occurred in 5% (267) of patients, of whom 63% (169) were iatrogenic and 37% (98) were noniatrogenic. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, case urgency, pre-existing diabetes, and bypass time, both iatrogenic and noniatrogenic hypoglycemia were associated with greater odds of renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and prolonged intensive care unit length of stay relative to normoglycemia, but the magnitude was substantially lower in iatrogenic hypoglycemia. Patients with noniatrogenic hypoglycemia had 68.6 times greater odds of mortality relative to patients who were normoglycemic (odds ratio, 68.6; confidence interval, 39.5-119), but patients with iatrogenic hypoglycemia had no increased odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.45; confidence interval, 0.77-2.73).

Conclusions

When excluding patients with conditions known to cause hypoglycemia from the analysis, the morbidity and mortality of iatrogenic hypoglycemia from tight postoperative glycemic control is dramatically attenuated.

Endocrine Care for the Surgical Patient: Diabetes Mellitus, Thyroid and Adrenal Conditions

Patients with hyperglycemia, thyroid dysfunction, and adrenal insufficiency face increased perioperative risk, which may be mitigated by appropriate management. This review addresses preoperative glycemic control, makes evidence-based recommendations for the increasingly complex perioperative management of noninsulin diabetes medications, and provides guideline-supported strategies for the perioperative management of insulin, including suggested indications for continuous intravenous insulin. The authors propose a strategy for determining when surgery should be delayed in patients with thyroid dysfunction and present a matrix for managing perioperative stress dose corticosteroids based on the limited evidence available.

Association Between Individualized Versus Conventional Blood Glucose Thresholds and Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to compare individualized and conventional hyperglycemic thresholds for the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

This was an observational study.

SETTING

The study took place in a single-center tertiary teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery between January 2012 and November 2021 were enrolled.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Two blood glucose thresholds were used to define intraoperative hyperglycemia. While the conventional hyperglycemic threshold (CHT) was 180 mg/dL in all patients, the individualized hyperglycemic threshold (IHT) was calculated based on the preoperative hemoglobin A1c level. Various metrics of intraoperative hyperglycemia were calculated using both thresholds: any hyperglycemic episode, duration of hyperglycemia, and area above the thresholds. Postoperative AKI associations were compared using receiver operating characteristic curves and logistic regression analysis. Among the 2,427 patients analyzed, 823 (33.9%) developed AKI. The C-statistics of IHT-defined metrics (0.58-0.59) were significantly higher than those of the CHT-defined metrics (all C-statistics, 0.54; all p < 0.001). The duration of hyperglycemia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.16) and area above the IHT (1.003; 1.001-1.004) were significantly associated with the risk of AKI, except for the presence of any hyperglycemic episode. None of the CHT-defined metrics were significantly associated with the risk of AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Individually defined intraoperative hyperglycemia better predicted postcardiac surgery AKI than universally defined hyperglycemia. Intraoperative hyperglycemia was significantly associated with the risk of AKI only for the IHT. Target blood glucose levels in cardiac surgical patients may need to be individualized based on preoperative glycemic status.

Electronic Glycemic Management System Improved Glycemic Control and Reduced Complications in Patients With Diabetes Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In-hospital hyperglycemia poses significant risks for patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Electronic glycemic management systems (eGMSs) like InsulinAPP offer promise in standardizing and improving glycemic control (GC) in these settings. This study evaluated the efficacy of the InsulinAPP protocol in optimizing GC and reducing adverse outcomes post-CABG.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, open-label study was conducted with 100 adult type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients post-CABG surgery, who were randomized into two groups: conventional care (gCONV) and eGMS protocol (gAPP). The gAPP used InsulinAPP for insulin therapy management, whereas the gCONV received standard clinical care. The primary outcome was a composite of hospital-acquired infections, renal function deterioration, and symptomatic atrial arrhythmia. Secondary outcomes included GC, hypoglycemia incidence, hospital stay length, and costs.

RESULTS

The gAPP achieved lower mean glucose levels (167.2 ± 42.5 mg/dL vs 188.7 ± 54.4 mg/dL; P = .040) and fewer patients-day with BG above 180 mg/dL (51.3% vs 74.8%, P = .011). The gAPP received an insulin regimen that included more prandial bolus and correction insulin (either bolus-correction or basal-bolus regimens) than the gCONV (90.3% vs 16.7%). The primary composite outcome occurred in 16% of gAPP patients compared with 58% in gCONV (P < .010). Hypoglycemia incidence was lower in the gAPP (4% vs 16%, P = .046). The gAPP protocol also resulted in shorter hospital stays and reduced costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The InsulinAPP protocol effectively optimizes GC and reduces adverse outcomes in T2DM patients' post-CABG surgery, offering a cost-effective solution for inpatient diabetes management.

Clinical application of real-time continuous glucose monitoring system during postoperative enteral nutrition therapy in esophageal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Enteral nutrition (EN) support therapy increases the risk of abnormal blood glucose (BG). The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical value of a real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) system in BG monitoring during postoperative EN support therapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) with esophageal cancer who planned to receive postoperative EN were enrolled. With the self-monitoring of BG value as the reference BG, the accuracy of rt-CGM was evaluated by the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) value, correlation efficient, agreement analysis, and Parkes and Clarke error grid plot. Finally, paired t tests were used to compare the differences in glucose fluctuations between EN and non-EN days and slow and fast days.

RESULTS

The total MARD value of the rt-CGM system was 13.53%. There was a high correlation between interstitial glucose and fingertip capillary BG (consistency correlation efficient = 0.884 [95% confidence interval, 0.874-0.894]). Results of 15/15%, 20/20%, 30/30% agreement analysis were 58.51%, 84.71%, and 99.65%, respectively. The Parkes and Clarke error grid showed that the proportion of the A and B regions were 100% and 99.94%, respectively. The glucose fluctuations on EN days vs non-EN days and on fast days vs slow days were large, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The rt-CGM system achieved clinical accuracy and can be used as a new option for glucose monitoring during postoperative EN therapy. The magnitude of glucose fluctuation during EN therapy remains large, even in the postoperative population without DM.

How Would You Treat This Inpatient With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus? Grand Rounds Discussion From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Management of hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) presents unique challenges. Two recently released guidelines, one from the American Diabetes Association and the other from the Endocrine Society, provide useful recommendations and evidence review to inform the care of medical inpatients with T2DM. These guidelines mostly agree, although there are slight differences in their recommendations. In these rounds, 2 expert diabetologists discuss their approach to inpatient management of T2DM, specifically regarding inpatient glycemic goals on the medical ward, the use of noninsulin antihyperglycemic medications, and patient safety strategies for patients receiving long-acting insulin. They conclude with recommendations for Mr. D, a real patient with T2DM admitted with a recurrent foot infection.

Intraoperative Glucose and Kidney Injury After On-Pump Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after on-pump cardiac surgery, and previous studies have suggested that blood glucose is associated with postoperative AKI. However, limited evidence is available regarding intraoperative glycemic thresholds in cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to explore the association between peak intraoperative blood glucose and postoperative AKI, and determine the cut-off values for intraoperative glucose concentration associated with an increased risk of AKI.

METHODS

The study was retrospective and single-centered. Adult patients in West China Hospital of Sichuan University who underwent on-pump cardiac surgery (n = 3375) were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI. Multivariable logistic analysis using restricted cubic spline was performed to explore the association between intraoperative blood glucose and postoperative AKI.

RESULTS

The incidence of AKI in the study population was 18.0% (607 of 3375). Patients who developed AKI had a significantly higher peak intraoperative glucose during the surgery compared to those without AKI. After adjustment for confounders, the incidence of AKI increased with peak intraoperative blood glucose (adjusted odds ratio, 1.08, 95% confidence interval 1.03, 1.12). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the possibility of AKI was relatively flat till 127.8 mg/dL (7.1 mmol/L) glucose levels which started to rapidly increase afterward.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased intraoperative blood glucose was associated with an increased risk of AKI. Among patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery, avoiding a high glucose peak (i.e., below 127.8 mg/dL [7.1 mmol/L]) may reduce the risk of postoperative AKI.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Using the Dexcom G6 in Cardiac Surgery During the Postoperative Period

OBJECTIVE

Cardiac surgery is associated with hyperglycemia, which in turn is associated with adverse postsurgical outcomes such as wound infections, acute renal failure, and mortality. This pilot study seeks to determine if Dexcom G6Pro continuous glucose monitor (Dexcom G6Pro CGM) is accurate during the postoperative cardiac surgery period when fluid shifts, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and vasoactive medications are frequently encountered, compared to standard glucose monitoring techniques.

METHODS

This study received institutional review board approval. In this prospective study, correlation between clinical and Dexcom glucose readings was evaluated. Clinical glucose (blood gas, metabolic panel, and point of care) data set included 1428 readings from 29 patients, while the Dexcom G6Pro CGM data included 45 645 data points following placement to upper arm. Additionally, average clinical measurements of day and overnight temperatures and hemodynamics were evaluated. Clinical and Dexcom data were restricted to being at least 1 hour after prior clinical reading Matching Dexcom G6Pro CGM data were required within 5 minutes of clinical measure. Data included only if taken at least 2 hours after Dexcom G6Pro CGM insertion (warm-up time) and analyzed only following intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Finally, a data set excluding the first 24 hours after ICU admission was created to explore stability of the device. Patients remained on Dexcom G6Pro CGM until discharge or 10 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

The population was 71% male, 14% with known diabetes; 66% required intravenous insulin infusion. The Clarke error grid plot of all measures post-ICU admission showed 53.5% in zone A, 45.9% in zone B, and 0.6% (n = 5) in zones D or E. The restricted dataset that excluded the first 24 hours post-ICU admission showed 55.9% in zone A, 43.9% in zone B, and 0.2% in zone D. Mean absolute relative difference between clinical and Dexcom G6Pro CGM measures was 20.6% and 21.6% in the entire post-ICU admission data set, and the data set excluding the first 24 hours after ICU admission, respectively. In the subanalysis of the 12 patients who did not have more than a 5-minute tap in the operating room, a consensus error grid, demonstrated that after ICU admission, percentage in zone A was 53.9%, zone B 45.4%, and zone C 0.7%. Similar percentages were obtained removing the first 24 hours post-ICU admission. These numbers are very similar to the entire cohort. A consensus error grid created post-ICU admission demonstrated: (zone A) 54%, (zone B) 45%, (zone C) 0.9%, and the following for the dataset created excluding the first 24 hours: (zone A) 56%, (zone B) 44%, (zone C) 0.4%, which demonstrated very close agreement with the original Clarke error grid. No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost 100% of Dexcom G6Pro CGM and clinical data matching points fell within areas considered as giving clinically correct decisions (zone A) and clinically uncritical decisions (zone B). However, the relatively high mean absolute relative difference precludes its use for both monitoring and treatment in the clinical context. As technology evolves, interstitial glucose monitoring may become an important tool to limit iatrogenic anemia and mitigate glycemic fluctuations.

Malglycemia in the critical care setting. Part III: Temporal patterns, relative potencies, and hospital mortality

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between critical care mortality and combined impact of malglycemia remains undefined.

METHODS

We assessed the risk-adjusted relationship (n = 4790) between hospital mortality with malglycemia, defined as hypergycemia (hours Glycemic Ratio ≥ 1.1, where GR is quotient of mean ICU blood glucose (BG) and estimated average BG), absolute hypoglycemia (hours BG < 70 mg/dL) and relative hypoglycemia (excursions GR < 0.7 in those with HbA1c ≥ 8%).

RESULTS

Each malglycemia was independently associated with mortality - hyperglycemia (OR 1.0020/h, 95%CI 1.0009-1.0031, p = 0.0004), absolute hypoglycemia (OR 1.0616/h, 95%CI 1.0190-1.1061, p = 0.0043), and relative hypoglycemia (OR 1.2813/excursion, 95%CI 1.0704-1.5338, p = 0.0069). Absolute (7.4%) and relative hypoglycemia (6.7%) exposure dominated the first 24 h, decreasing thereafter. While hyperglycemia had lower risk association with mortality, it was persistently present across the length-of-stay (68-76% incidence daily), making it the dominant form of malglycemia. Relative contributions in the first five days from hyperglycemia, absolute hypoglycemia and relative hypoglycemia were 60%, 21% and 19% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Absolute and relative hypoglycemia occurred largely in the first 24 h. Relative to all hypoglycemia, the associated mortality from the seemingly less potent but consistently more prevalent hyperglycemia steadily accumulated with increasing length-of-stay. This has important implications for interpretation of study results.

Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Glycemic Control for Critically Ill Children and Adults 2024

RATIONALE

Maintaining glycemic control of critically ill patients may impact outcomes such as survival, infection, and neuromuscular recovery, but there is equipoise on the target blood levels, monitoring frequency, and methods.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose was to update the 2012 Society of Critical Care Medicine and American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) guidelines with a new systematic review of the literature and provide actionable guidance for clinicians.

PANEL DESIGN

The total multiprofessional task force of 22, consisting of clinicians and patient/family advocates, and a methodologist applied the processes described in the ACCM guidelines standard operating procedure manual to develop evidence-based recommendations in alignment with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Approach (GRADE) methodology. Conflict of interest policies were strictly followed in all phases of the guidelines, including panel selection and voting.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review for each Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes question related to glycemic management in critically ill children (≥ 42 wk old adjusted gestational age to 18 yr old) and adults, including triggers for initiation of insulin therapy, route of administration, monitoring frequency, role of an explicit decision support tool for protocol maintenance, and methodology for glucose testing. We identified the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak or as a good practice statement. In addition, "In our practice" statements were included when the available evidence was insufficient to support a recommendation, but the panel felt that describing their practice patterns may be appropriate. Additional topics were identified for future research.

RESULTS

This guideline is an update of the guidelines for the use of an insulin infusion for the management of hyperglycemia in critically ill patients. It is intended for adult and pediatric practitioners to reassess current practices and direct research into areas with inadequate literature. The panel issued seven statements related to glycemic control in unselected adults (two good practice statements, four conditional recommendations, one research statement) and seven statements for pediatric patients (two good practice statements, one strong recommendation, one conditional recommendation, two "In our practice" statements, and one research statement), with additional detail on specific subset populations where available.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines panel achieved consensus for adults and children regarding a preference for an insulin infusion for the acute management of hyperglycemia with titration guided by an explicit clinical decision support tool and frequent (≤ 1 hr) monitoring intervals during glycemic instability to minimize hypoglycemia and against targeting intensive glucose levels. These recommendations are intended for consideration within the framework of the patient's existing clinical status. Further research is required to evaluate the role of individualized glycemic targets, continuous glucose monitoring systems, explicit decision support tools, and standardized glycemic control metrics.

Tight versus liberal blood-glucose control in the intensive care unit: special considerations for patients with diabetes

Stress hyperglycaemia, hypoglycaemia, and diabetes are common in critically ill patients and related to clinical endpoints. To avoid complications related to hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia, it is recommended to start insulin therapy for the majority of critically ill patients with persistent blood glucose concentrations higher than 10·0 mmol/L (>180 mg/dL), targeting a range of 7·8-10·0 mmol/L (140-180 mg/dL). However, management and evidence-based targets for blood glucose control are under debate, particularly for patients with diabetes. Recent randomised controlled clinical trials now challenge current recommendations. In this Personal View, we aim to highlight these developments and the important differences between critically ill patients with and without diabetes, taking into account the considerable heterogeneity in this patient group. We critically discuss evidence from prospective randomised controlled trials and observational studies on the safety and efficacy of glycaemic control, specifically in the context of patients with diabetes in intensive care units.

A UK national survey of enteral feed use in people with diabetes 2022

AIMS

Enteral feeding is commonly used to manage a variety of medical conditions in hospitals. For people with diabetes this can present a specific challenge for glucose management. To address gaps in our understanding of modern enteral feeding outcomes and to help with the development of more specific guidance on maintaining glycaemic control, we conducted a national survey on the management of enteral feeding against the standards in the nationally adopted Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care (JBDS) guidelines.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed using the 2018 JBDS guideline as a template this questionnaire was sent out by email to all 220 UK specialist diabetes teams. Databases of Diabetes UK, the Association of British Diabetologists (ABCD) and the Diabetes Inpatient Specialist Nurse UK Group were used.

RESULTS

Twenty-six hospitals responded, 11 had guidelines for the management of insulin with enteral feeding. There were three main feed regimens used: continuous 24-h feeding, a single feed with one break in 24 h, or multiple feeds in 24 h. There were five regimens in common use: premixed insulin, isophane insulin, analogue basal insulin, variable rate intravenous insulin or basal bolus insulin. Overall glucose control was poor for all regimens and combinations. Continuous feed showed better glucose control than a single feed with a break, mean (±SD) glucose 12.4 mmol/L (5.6) versus 15.1 mmol/L (6.9) p < 0.005, but no group showed optimal control.

CONCLUSIONS

Managing diabetes control during enteral feeding remains a challenge. Our survey showed that glucose control during this treatment is suboptimal.

Association between Preoperative Glucose Dysregulation and Delirium after Non-Cardiac Surgery

This study aimed to investigate the association between glucose dysregulation and delirium after non-cardiac surgery. Among a total of 203,787 patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery between January 2011 and June 2019 at our institution, we selected 61,805 with available preoperative blood glucose levels within 24 h before surgery. Patients experiencing glucose dysregulation were divided into three groups: hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and both. We compared the incidence of postoperative delirium within 30 days after surgery between exposed and unexposed patients according to the type of glucose dysregulation. The overall incidence of hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and both was 5851 (9.5%), 1452 (2.3%), and 145 (0.2%), respectively. The rate of delirium per 100 person-months of the exposed group was higher than that of the unexposed group in all types of glucose dysregulation. After adjustment, the hazard ratios of glucose dysregulation in the development of delirium were 1.35 (95% CI, 1.18-1.56) in hyperglycemia, 1.36 (95% CI, 1.06-1.75) in hypoglycemia, and 3.14 (95% CI, 1.27-7.77) in both. The subgroup analysis showed that exposure to hypoglycemia or both to hypo- and hyperglycemia was not associated with delirium in diabetic patients, but hyperglycemia was consistently associated with postoperative delirium regardless of the presence of diabetes. Preoperative glucose dysregulation was associated with increased risk of delirium after non-cardiac surgery. Our findings may be helpful for preventing postoperative delirium, and further investigations are required to verify the association and mechanisms for the effect we observed.

Guideline for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus in the Elderly in China (2024 Edition)

With the deepening of aging in China, the prevalence of diabetes in older people has increased noticeably, and standardized diabetes management is critical for improving clinical outcomes of diabetes in older people. In 2021, the National Center of Gerontology, Chinese Society of Geriatrics, and Diabetes Professional Committee of Chinese Aging Well Association organized experts to write the first guideline for diabetes diagnosis and treatment in older people in China, the Guideline for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus in the Elderly in China (2021 Edition). The guideline emphasizes that older patients with diabetes are a highly heterogeneous group requiring comprehensive assessment and stratified and individualized management strategies. The guideline proposes simple treatments and de-intensified treatment strategies for older patients with diabetes. This edition of the guideline provides clinicians with practical and operable clinical guidance, thus greatly contributing to the comprehensive and full-cycle standardized management of older patients with diabetes in China and promoting the extensive development of clinical and basic research on diabetes in older people and related fields. In the past 3 years, evidence-based medicine for older patients with diabetes and related fields has further advanced, and new treatment concepts, drugs, and technologies have been developed. The guideline editorial committee promptly updated the first edition of the guideline and compiled the Guideline for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus in the Elderly in China (2024 Edition). More precise management paths for older patients with diabetes are proposed, for achieving continued standardization of the management of older Chinese patients with diabetes and improving their clinical outcomes.

Perioperative Glycemic Management in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review

Diabetes and hyperglycemic events in cardiac surgical patients are associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. The causes of dysglycemia, the abnormal fluctuations in blood glucose concentrations, in the perioperative period include surgical stress, surgical techniques, medications administered perioperatively, and patient factors. Both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia lead to poor outcomes after cardiac surgery. While trying to control blood glucose concentration tightly for better postoperative outcomes, hypoglycemia is the main adverse event. Currently, there is no definite consensus on the optimum perioperative blood glucose concentration to be maintained in cardiac surgical patients. This review provides an overview of perioperative glucose homeostasis, the pathophysiology of dysglycemia, factors that affect glycemic control in cardiac surgery, and current practices for glycemic control in cardiac surgery.

16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Glucose indices as inflammatory markers in children with acute surgical abdomen: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Glycaemic dysregulation potentiates the pro-inflammatory response and increases oxidative injury; therefore, preoperative hyperglycaemia is linked to increased mortalities. In addition, inflammation is accompanied by higher glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and the relationship between this and random blood sugar (RBS) could be non-linear.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study. Non-diabetic paediatric patients with acute surgical abdomen, presenting to the emergency surgical services were enrolled, over a period of 6 months. They were all screened for their random blood sugar and HbA1c levels.

RESULTS

Fifty-three cases were studied. The prevalence of glycaemic dysregulation in the enrolled children was high. Abnormal HbA1c was observed in 66% of the study group. Stress hyperglycaemia was observed in 60% of the enrolled children. There was a significant correlation (r = 0.770, p-value: < 0.001) between RBS and the total leucocytic count (TLC). The TLC cutoff value for predicting stress hyperglycaemia was 13,595 cells/mm3. The cutoff value of RBS for predicting leukocytosis was 111.5 mg/dl. Median RBS level was significantly higher in complicated appendicitis (169.5 mg/dl), compared to uncomplicated appendicitis (118.0 mg/dl).

CONCLUSION

HbA1c and RBS could be used as inflammatory markers for surgical acute abdomen and its degree of severity, respectively. HbA1c rises in a considerable number of cases with surgical acute abdomen, irrespective of the disease stage. However, as the disease progresses, the random blood sugar rises due to stress hyperglycaemia, thus becoming a surrogate inflammatory marker.

Perioperative Glycemic Surveillance and Control-Current Practices, Efficacy and Impact on Postoperative Outcomes following Infrainguinal Vascular Intervention

BACKGROUND

Perioperative glycemic control plays a pivotal role in improving postsurgical outcomes. Hyperglycemia occurs frequently in surgical patients and has been associated with higher rates of mortality and postoperative complications. However, no current guidelines exist regarding intraoperative glycemic monitoring of patients undergoing peripheral vascular procedures and postoperative surveillance is often restricted to diabetic patients. We sought to characterize the current practices around glycemic monitoring and efficacy of perioperative glycemic control at our institution. We also examined the impact of hyperglycemia in our surgical population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study performed at the McGill University Health Centre and Jewish General Hospital in Montreal, Canada. Patients undergoing elective open lower extremity revascularization or major amputation between 2019 and 2022 were included. Data collected from the electronic medical record included standard demographics, clinical, and surgical characteristics. Glycemic measurements and perioperative insulin use were recorded. Outcomes included 30-day mortality and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 303 patients were included in the study. Overall, 38.9% of patients experienced perioperative hyperglycemia defined as glucose ≥180 mg/dL (10 mmol/L) during their hospital admission. Only 12 (3.9%) patients within the cohort underwent any intraoperative glycemic surveillance, while 141 patients (46.5%) had an insulin sliding scale prescribed postoperatively. Despite these efforts, 51 (16.8%) patients remained hyperglycemic for at least 40% of their measurements during their hospitalization. Hyperglycemia in our cohort was significantly associated with an increased risk of 30-day acute kidney injury (11.9% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.042), major adverse cardiac events (16.1% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.048), major adverse limb events (13.6% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.038), any infection (30.5% vs. 20.5%, P = 0.049), intensive care unit admission (11% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.006) and reintervention (22.9% vs. 12.4%, P = 0.017) on univariate analysis. Furthermore, multivariable logistic regression including the covariates of age, sex, hypertension, smoking status, diabetic status, presence of chronic kidney disease, dialysis, Rutherford stage, coronary artery disease and perioperative hyperglycemia demonstrated a significant relationship between perioperative hyperglycemia and 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 25.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.469-250.00, P = 0.006), major adverse cardiac events (OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.008-4.292, P = 0.048), major adverse limb events (OR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.020-4.950, P = 0.045), acute kidney injury (OR: 7.58, 95% CI: 3.021-19.231, P < 0.001), reintervention (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.117-3.802, P = 0.021), and intensive care unit admission (OR: 3.38, 95% CI: 1.225-9.345, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative hyperglycemia was associated with 30-day mortality and complications in our study. Despite this, intraoperative glycemic surveillance occurred rarely in our cohort and current postoperative glycemic control protocols and management failed to achieve optimal control in a significant percentage of patients. Standardized glycemic monitoring and stricter control in the intraoperative and postoperative period therefore represent an area of opportunity for reducing patient mortality and complications following lower extremity vascular surgery.

Preoperative considerations for patients with diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing surgery require a thorough assessment preoperatively. Hyperglycemia is associated with poor outcomes, and stability of glucose levels is an important factor in preoperative management. Diabetes presents a particular challenge since patients are often on multiple medications encompassing glycemic management and cardiovascular therapies.

AREAS COVERED

A PubMed search of published data and reviews on preoperative approaches in diabetes was conducted. Consensus opinion drives most of the guidelines and recommendations for management of diabetes in surgical patients. Pathophysiology is often complex with varying levels of glucose and surgical stress. Establishing well-controlled diabetes prior to surgical intervention should be standard practice in non-emergent procedures. We review the best practices for implementing preoperative assessment, with diabetes with a focus on diabetes medications.

EXPERT OPINION

The management of a patient preoperatively varies by region and country. Institutions differ in approaches to preoperative evaluation and the establishment of consistent approaches would provide a platform for monitoring patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary teams and pre-assessment clinics for preoperative evaluation can enhance patient care for those undergoing surgery.

Perioperative glycaemic control for people with diabetes undergoing surgery

BACKGROUND

People with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of postoperative complications. Data from randomised clinical trials and meta-analyses point to a potential benefit of intensive glycaemic control, targeting near-normal blood glucose, in people with hyperglycaemia (with and without diabetes mellitus) being submitted for surgical procedures. However, there is limited evidence concerning this question in people with diabetes mellitus undergoing surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of perioperative glycaemic control for people with diabetes undergoing surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched the databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE, LILACS, WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of last search for all databases was 25 July 2022. We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) that prespecified different targets of perioperative glycaemic control for participants with diabetes (intensive versus conventional or standard care).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, hypoglycaemic events and infectious complications. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular events, renal failure, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, health-related quality of life, socioeconomic effects, weight gain and mean blood glucose during the intervention. We summarised studies using meta-analysis with a random-effects model and calculated the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, using a 95% confidence interval (CI), or summarised outcomes with descriptive methods. We used the GRADE approach to evaluate the certainty of the evidence (CoE).

MAIN RESULTS

A total of eight additional studies were added to the 12 included studies in the previous review leading to 20 RCTs included in this update. A total of 2670 participants were randomised, of which 1320 were allocated to the intensive treatment group and 1350 to the comparison group. The duration of the intervention varied from during surgery to five days postoperative. No included trial had an overall low risk of bias. Intensive glycaemic control resulted in little or no difference in all-cause mortality compared to conventional glycaemic control (130/1263 (10.3%) and 117/1288 (9.1%) events, RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.33; I2 = 0%; 2551 participants, 18 studies; high CoE). Hypoglycaemic events, both severe and non-severe, were mainly experienced in the intensive glycaemic control group. Intensive glycaemic control may slightly increase hypoglycaemic events compared to conventional glycaemic control (141/1184 (11.9%) and 41/1226 (3.3%) events, RR 3.36, 95% CI 1.69 to 6.67; I2 = 64%; 2410 participants, 17 studies; low CoE), as well as those considered severe events (37/927 (4.0%) and 6/969 (0.6%), RR 4.73, 95% CI 2.12 to 10.55; I2 = 0%; 1896 participants, 11 studies; low CoE). Intensive glycaemic control, compared to conventional glycaemic control, may result in little to no difference in the rate of infectious complications (160/1228 (13.0%) versus 224/1225 (18.2%) events, RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.04; P = 0.09; I2 = 55%; 2453 participants, 18 studies; low CoE). Analysis of the predefined secondary outcomes revealed that intensive glycaemic control may result in a decrease in cardiovascular events compared to conventional glycaemic control (107/955 (11.2%) versus 125/978 (12.7%) events, RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.97; P = 0.03; I2 = 44%; 1454 participants, 12 studies; low CoE). Further, intensive glycaemic control resulted in little or no difference in renal failure events compared to conventional glycaemic control (137/1029 (13.3%) and 158/1057 (14.9%), RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.22; P = 0.56; I2 = 38%; 2086 participants, 14 studies; low CoE). We found little to no difference between intensive glycaemic control and conventional glycaemic control in length of ICU stay (MD -0.10 days, 95% CI -0.57 to 0.38; P = 0.69; I2 = 69%; 1687 participants, 11 studies; low CoE), and length of hospital stay (MD -0.79 days, 95% CI -1.79 to 0.21; P = 0.12; I2 = 77%; 1520 participants, 12 studies; very low CoE). Due to the differences within included studies, we did not pool data for the reduction of mean blood glucose. Intensive glycaemic control resulted in a mean lowering of blood glucose, ranging from 13.42 mg/dL to 91.30 mg/dL. One trial assessed health-related quality of life in 12/37 participants in the intensive glycaemic control group, and 13/44 participants in the conventional glycaemic control group; no important difference was shown in the measured physical health composite score of the short-form 12-item health survey (SF-12). One substudy reported a cost analysis of the population of an included study showing a higher total hospital cost in the conventional glycaemic control group, USD 42,052 (32,858 to 56,421) compared to the intensive glycaemic control group, USD 40,884 (31.216 to 49,992). It is important to point out that there is relevant heterogeneity between studies for several outcomes. We identified two ongoing trials. The results of these studies could add new information in future updates on this topic.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

High-certainty evidence indicates that perioperative intensive glycaemic control in people with diabetes undergoing surgery does not reduce all-cause mortality compared to conventional glycaemic control. There is low-certainty evidence that intensive glycaemic control may reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, but cause little to no difference to the risk of infectious complications after the intervention, while it may increase the risk of hypoglycaemia. There are no clear differences between the groups for the other outcomes. There are uncertainties among the intensive and conventional groups regarding the optimal glycaemic algorithm and target blood glucose concentrations. In addition, we found poor data on health-related quality of life, socio-economic effects and weight gain. It is also relevant to underline the heterogeneity among studies regarding clinical outcomes and methodological approaches. More studies are needed that consider these factors and provide a higher quality of evidence, especially for outcomes such as hypoglycaemia and infectious complications.

Perioperative glycemic management in adults presenting for elective cardiac and non-cardiac surgery

Perioperative dysglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes in both cardiac and non-cardiac surgical patients. Hyperglycemia in the perioperative period is associated with an increased risk of postoperative infections, length of stay, and mortality. Hypoglycemia can induce neuronal damage, leading to significant cognitive deficits, as well as death. This review endeavors to summarize existing literature on perioperative dysglycemia and provides updates on pharmacotherapy and management of perioperative hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in surgical patients.

Current practice in the perioperative management of patients with diabetes mellitus: a narrative review

The prevalence of diabetes is increasing, and patients with diabetes mellitus have both an increased likelihood of requiring surgery and of developing postoperative complications when they do. We summarise available evidence underpinning current guidelines on preoperative assessment and optimisation, perioperative management of prescribed insulin and oral hypoglycaemic medication, intraoperative glycaemic control, and postoperative patient care.

Treatment of Severe Hyperglycemia in Patients Without Diabetes After Colorectal Surgery

Background: Several studies have suggested that intravenous insulin therapy for post-operative hyperglycemia improves outcomes after colorectal surgery. Despite the potential benefit, there is a reluctance to use this approach in patients without diabetes mellitus because of an unproven benefit and the potential for hypoglycemia. In this study, we examined whether sliding-scale insulin is sufficient to improve outcomes or if stricter glucose control is necessary. Patients and Methods: Of 1,064 consecutive colorectal surgery patients between August 2016 and December 2021, 478 patients without diabetes mellitus had an average of 6.4 ± 3.1 glucose samples taken within 48 hours after surgery. Sixty-six percent of patients with severe hyperglycemia (glucose ≥180 mg/dL) received sliding-scale insulin. Complication rates and effects of insulin were examined. Results: Severe hyperglycemia was associated with a higher total infection rate (p < 0.002), National Healthcare Safety Network-reported infections (NHSN; p < 0.026), total complications (p < 0.001), and length of stay (LOS; p < 0.000). Sliding-scale insulin did not lower the risk of infection or other complications. Hypoglycemia (glucose <70 mg/dL) occurred in 3.5% of patients, but was not related to insulin use, and was predictable with clinical variables: albumin (p < 0.032), operative duration (p < 0.012), and average post-operative glucose (p < 0.002; area under the curve [AUC], 0.86). Conclusions: Our data confirm that severe post-operative hyperglycemia in patients without diabetes mellitus after colorectal surgery is associated with complications. Sliding-scale insulin was safe but not effective. Treatment before severe hyperglycemia is reached, not after its occurrence, may be beneficial.

Gaps in our knowledge of managing inpatient dysglycaemia and diabetes in non-critically ill adults: A call for further research

AIMS

To describe the gaps in knowledge for the care of people in the hospital who have dysglycaemia or diabetes.

METHODS

A review of the current literature and the authors' knowledge of the subject.

RESULTS

Recent data has suggested that the prevalence of hospitalised people with diabetes is approximately three times the prevalence in the general population and is growing annually. A wealth of observational data over the last 4 decades has shown that people with hyperglycaemia, severe hypoglycaemia or diabetes, all experience more harm whilst in the hospital than those who do not have the condition. This often equates to a longer length of stay and thus higher costs. To date, the proportion of federal funding aimed at addressing the harms that people with dysglycaemia experience in hospitals has been very small compared to outpatient studies. National organisations, such as the Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care, the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society have produced guidelines or consensus statements on the management of various aspects of inpatient care. However, whilst a lot of these have been based on evidence, much remains based on expert opinion and thus low-quality evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights that inpatient diabetes is an underfunded and under-researched area.

Association between stress hyperglycaemia and in-hospital cardiac events after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients without diabetes: A retrospective observational study of 5450 patients

AIMS

To investigate the impact of stress hyperglycaemia (SH) on in-hospital adverse cardiac events after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients without diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 5450 patients without diabetes who underwent CABG were analysed. SH was defined as any two instances in which the random blood glucose level was >7.8 mmol/L after CABG in the intensive care unit (ICU). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including in-hospital mortality, acute myocardial infarction, stroke and acute renal failure. Secondary outcomes included surgical site infection (SSI) and length of ICU stay.

RESULTS

Patients with SH had higher rates of MACEs (5.7% vs. 2.3%, p < .0001) and higher SSI (3.3% vs. 1.4%, p = .0003) and longer ICU stays (2.6 ± 2.0 vs. 1.3 ± 1.3 days, p < .0001) than those without SH. Furthermore, SH was associated with a higher risk of MACEs [odds ratio (OR): 2.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38-3.90], SSI (OR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.20-3.95) and longer ICU stay (OR: 12.27, 95% CI: 9.41-16.92) after adjusting for confounders. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with SH >10 mmol/L or SH that occurred in the ICU and lasted more than 48 h had increased risks of postoperative complications (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

SH was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACEs, SSI and longer ICU stay after CABG in patients without diabetes. In addition, SH >10 mmol/L or that occurred in the ICU and lasted more than 48 h increased the risk of adverse outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of degludec U100 versus glargine U300 for the early postoperative management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A non-inferiority randomized trial

AIMS

To compare the efficacy and safety of degludec U100 versus glargine U300 for the early postoperative management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

METHODS

A total of 239 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a basal-bolus regimen in the early postoperative period using degludec U100 (n = 122) or glargine U300 (n = 117) as basal and glulisine before meals. The primary outcome was mean differences between groups in their daily BG concentrations. The major safety outcome was the occurrence of hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

There were no differences in mean daily BG concentrations (157 vs. 162 mg/dl), mean percentage of readings within target BG of 70-180 mg/dl (74% vs. 73%), daily basal insulin dose (19 vs. 21 units/day), length of stay (median [IQR]: 9 vs. 9 days), or hospital complications (21.3% vs. 21.4%) between treatment groups. There were no differences in the proportion of patients with BG <70 mg/dl (15.6% vs. 23.1%) or <54 mg/dl (1.6% vs. 4.3%) between degludec-100 and glargine-300 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with degludec U100 is as effective and safe as glargine U300 for the early postoperative hospital management of patients with T2D undergoing CABG.

[Position statement: surgery and diabetes mellitus (Update 2023)]

This position statement reflects the perspective of the Austrian Diabetes Association concerning the perioperative management of people with diabetes mellitus based on the available scientific evidence. The paper covers necessary preoperative examinations from an internal/diabetological point of view as well as the perioperative metabolic control by means of oral antihyperglycemic and/or insulin therapy.

16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Conventional Glycaemic Control May Not Be Beneficial in Diabetic Patients Following Cardiac Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Stress hyperglycaemia is common following cardiac surgery. Its optimal management is uncertain and emerging literature suggests that flexible glycaemic control in diabetic patients may be preferable. This study aims to assess the relationship between maximal postoperative in-hospital blood glucose levels (BSL) and the morbidity and mortality outcomes of diabetic and non-diabetic cardiac surgery patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients undergoing cardiac surgery at a tertiary single centre institution from 2015 to 2019 was undertaken. Early management and outcomes of hyperglycaemia following cardiac surgery were assessed via multivariable regression modelling. Follow-up was assessed to 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Consecutive non-diabetic patients (n=1,050) and diabetic patients (n=689) post cardiac surgery were included. Diabetics with peak BSL ≤13.9 mmol/L did not have an increased risk of morbidity or mortality compared to non-diabetics with peak BSL ≤10.0 mmol/L. In non-diabetics, stress hyperglycaemia with peak BSL >10.0 mmol/L was associated with overall wound complications (5.7% vs 8.8%, OR 1.64 [1.00-2.69], p=0.049) and postoperative pneumonia (2.7% vs 7.3%, OR 2.35 [1.26-4.38], p=0.007). Diabetic patients with postoperative peak BSL >13.9 mmol/L were at an increased risk of overall wound complication (7.4% vs 14.8%, OR 2.47 [1.46-4.16], p<0.001), graft harvest site infection (3.7% vs 11.8%, OR 3.75 [1.92-7.30], p<0.001), and wound-related readmission (3.1% vs 8.8%, OR 3.11 [1.49-6.47], p=0.002) when compared to diabetics with peak BSL ≤13.9 mmol/L.

CONCLUSION

In non-diabetics, stress hyperglycaemia with peak BSL >10.0 mmol/L is associated with morbidity. In diabetic patients, hyperglycaemia with peak BSL ≤13.9 mmol/L was not associated with an increased risk of morbidity or mortality compared to non-diabetics with peak BSL ≤10.0 mmol/L. Further investigation of flexible glycaemic targets (target BSL ≤13.9 mmol/L) in diabetic patients is warranted.

Clinical challenges of glycemic control in the intensive care unit: A narrative review

Glucose control in patient admitted to the intensive care unit has been a topic of much debate over the past 20 years. The harmful effects of uncontrolled hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in critically ill patients is well established. Although a large clinical trial in 2001 demonstrated significant mortality and morbidity benefits with tight glucose control in this patient population, the results could not be replicated by other investigators. The “Normoglycemia in Intensive Care Evaluation-Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation” trial in 2009 established that tight glucose control was not only of no benefit, but in fact harmful due to the significant risk of hypoglycemia. The current guidelines suggest a moderate approach with the initiation of intravenous insulin therapy in critically ill patients when the blood glucose level is above 180 mg/dL. The most important factor that underpins glycemic management in intensive care unit patients is the consequent prevention of hypoglycemia. Robust glucose monitoring strategies and insulin protocols need to be implemented in order to achieve this goal.