Specificity of monoclonal anti-human insulin antibodies

Insights in regulated bioanalysis of human insulin and insulin analogs by immunoanalytical methods

Despite the long and illustrious history of insulin and insulin analogs as important biotherapeutics, the regulated bioanalysis (in this article, regulated bioanalysis refers to the formalized process for generating bioanalytical data to support pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic assessments intended for development of insulin and insulin analogs as biotherapeutics, as opposed to the analytical process used for measuring insulin as a biomarker) of these peptides remains a challenging endeavor for a number of reasons. Paramount is the fact that the therapeutic concentrations are often low in serum/plasma and not too dissimilar from the endogenous level, particularly in patients with insulin resistance, such as Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Accordingly, this perspective was written to provide helpful background information for the design and conduct of immunoassays to support regulated bioanalysis of insulin and insulin analogs. Specifically, it highlights the technical challenges for determination of insulin and insulin analogs by immunoanalytical methods that are intended to support evaluations of pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics. In a broader sense, this perspective describes the general bioanalytical issues that are common to regulated bioanalysis of peptides and articulates some of the bioanalytical differences between conventional monoclonal antibodies and peptide therapeutics.

Performance Evaluation and Cross-Reactivity from Insulin Analogs with the ARCHITECT Insulin Assay,

Background: Insulin measurement is used for the diagnosis of hypoglycemia and for insulin pharmacokinetic evaluations. We assessed the analytical and clinical performance of the ARCHITECT® insulin assay, a chemiluminescent immunoassay recently introduced for the ARCHITECT i2000 fully automated immunoassay analyzer (Abbott Laboratories). We also tested whether major insulin analogs cross-reacted with the immunoassay reagents.

Methods: We used Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols to assess the analytical performance of the ARCHITECT insulin assay and compared its accuracy with that of the E-test TOSOH II (IRI) from TOSOH Corporation. We used 3 recombinant insulin analogs (lispro, aspart, and glargine) to evaluate the cross-reactivity of insulin analogs with the ARCHITECT immunoassay reagent.

Results: The total CV for the ARCHITECT assay was <5%. Correlation between the ARCHITECT insulin assay and the E-test TOSOH II (IRI) was satisfactory in the measured range, but we detected a slope deviation between the assays. The ARCHITECT insulin assay showed low cross-reactivity to the insulin analog aspart, whereas it detected the other insulin analogs, lispro and glargine, in concentrations as high as the theoretical concentrations.

Conclusions: The ARCHITECT insulin assay showed favorable basic performance, including reproducibility, dilution linearity, detection limit, and effects of interfering substances. When interpreting results, clinicians and laboratory pathologists should be aware of the cross-reactivity of the ARCHITECT and other immunoassays to specific insulin analogs prescribed to diabetes patients.

Sensitive RIA for the Specific Determination of Insulin Lispro

Insulin lispro is an insulin analog in which the primary sequence has been altered by the inversion of amino acids B28 and B29. To date, it has not been possible to specifically measure insulin lispro in the presence of endogenous insulin because of the high degree of homology between these peptides. However, the specific determination of insulin lispro offers advantages over quantifying total concentrations of immunoreactive insulin. We therefore immunized guinea pigs and screened for antibodies with increased affinity and selectivity for insulin lispro. We prepared a monospecific antiserum by a novel immunoadsorption strategy using despentapeptide insulin. The antiserum was used to develop a competitive RIA for insulin lispro. The RIA has a low limit of quantification (17.2 pmol/L); has no interference from insulin, proinsulin, or C-peptide; and has interassay CVs of 2.6–13.4%. The new RIA is useful for measuring serum concentrations of insulin lispro.

Insulin as a target antigen in autoimmune diabetes: a natural repertoire as the source of antibody response

A solid-phase immunoenzymatic technique with B1- or B29-biotinylated insulin coupled to avidin-coated wells was used to characterize serum anti-insulin antibodies and to locate insulin antibody-producing B lymphocytes in different organs of mice. Low natural serum anti-insulin IgM and IgG antibodies were found in ten different healthy inbred strains of mice. Prediabetic non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice had significantly higher measurements than BALB/c mice (P < 0.05). Anti-insulin IgM antibody-producing B lymphocytes were found in bone marrow and spleen of NOD mice and healthy strains of mice, but not in peripheral lymph nodes, thymus, blood or pancreas. B29-fixed insulin was more frequently recognized than B1-fixed insulin. There was no relationship to the MHC or to other immune markers. IgG insulin antibody-producing cells were not detected. IgG insulin antibody-producing cells appeared in the draining lymph node and in the blood 10 days after immunization with insulin. IgM insulin-recognizing cells in the spleen were reduced in number during the same period (P < 0.05-0.01 for BALB/c, DBA2, B10.D2 and NOD), suggesting migration of these cells. This was tested by in vivo staining of spleens with the red-fluorescent membrane linker PKH-26 on day 7 after immunization. Cells from immunized lymph nodes were FACS-sorted on day 10. Insulin antibody-producing B lymphocytes with red-fluorescence were found, indicating a splenic origin. Examination of IgG subclasses showed preferential production of complement-fixing IgG2b in sera and lymph node cells of immunized NOD mice (P < 0.05 vs BALB/c).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Islet cell autoantigens in insulin-dependent diabetes

A burgeoning number of antigenic targets of the islet cell autoimmunity in IDD have been identified, and more can be anticipated through improved methods for their identification. The challenge for those investigating the pathogenesis of IDD will be to assign the relative importance of these antigens to the development of the disease, and to resolve whether there is a dominant primary immunologic event that is followed by a series of secondary immunizations to a variety of normally sequestered islet cell antigens in the sequence of pathogenic events that culminate in IDD. One interesting observation that may have potential pathogenic implications is the observation that of all islet cell autoantigens described, only two (i.e., 64 kD/GAD, 38 kD) are reactive in their native configurations, implying that recognition of conformational epitopes is most important. This property argues for primary immunizing agents rather than secondary ones after release of denatured antigens and antigenic recognition through their epitopes. Given the complex and multiple physiological functions of islet cells and the continuous variation in their activity, it is reasonable to speculate that the speed of the progression to IDD could vary between individuals with respect to their insulin needs and the relative activities of their islets. Activated islets may express autoantigens that have only limited expression in quiescent islets. The often times striking variation in the severity of insulitis seen in different islets of a single pancreas may be explained by the level of activity of individual islets. Furthermore, disparity in HLA-DR/DQ associations with disease may involve differences in the immunological recognition of autoantigens. Whereas there is still much to learn, it is clear that disease predictability and disease intervention studies have been enhanced through the identification of the islet cell autoantigens in IDD.

Insulin autoantibody polymorphisms with greater discrimination for diabetes in humans

Insulin autoantibodies, like islet cell antibodies, are found not only in the sera of newly diagnosed Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients and their relatives, but also in patients with other autoimmunities who do not develop diabetes. Insulin autoantibodies are oligo/monoclonal and frequently binding-site restricted. As determinant selection is genetically determined, we questioned whether certain polymorphisms of insulin autoantibodies, identified by their binding site on the insulin molecule, could better discriminate for Type 1 diabetes, which is also HLA determined. First, we raised monoclonal antibodies to human insulin by classic fusion methods in order to determine the range of antibody polymorphism, and identified five distinct types by their binding profiles to a panel of insulin variants, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Two of these polymorphisms, type A and type B, were subsequently found in insulin autoantibody positive human sera using the same panel of insulin variants, and successfully distinguished diabetes-related from diabetes-unrelated individuals. Thus, the type B polymorphism was responsible for binding in 60% of 41 insulin autoantibody positive individuals with polyautoimmune disease but no personal or family history of diabetes (diabetes unrelated), but in only 2% of a group which comprised 17 newly-diagnosed insulin autoantibody positive Type 1 diabetic patients, 19 insulin autoantibody positive discordant twins of Type 1 diabetes and six insulin autoantibody positive healthy siblings of Type 1 diabetic patients (diabetes related) (p less than 0.01). Isolation of the type A polymorphism alone reduced the proportion of false negatives in the insulin autoantibody test for diabetes relatedness from 49% to 20% without diminishing its specificity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)