Metabolic effects of restoring partial beta-cell function after islet allotransplantation in type 1 diabetic patients

Global scientific trends on the islet transplantation in the 21st century: A bibliometric and visualized analysis

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation (IT) has emerged as a significant research area for the treatment of diabetes mellitus and has witnessed a surge in scholarly attention. Despite its growing importance, there is a lack of bibliometric analyses that encapsulate the evolution and scientific underpinnings of this field. This study aims to fill this gap by conducting a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to delineate current research hotspots and forecast future trajectories within the IT domain with a particular focus on evidence-based medicine practices.

METHODS

This analysis scrutinized literature from January 1, 2000, to October 1, 2023, using the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Employing bibliometric tools such as VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the R package "bibliometrix," we systematically evaluated the literature to uncover scientific trends and collaboration networks in IT research.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed 8388 publications from 82 countries, predominantly the United States and China. However, global cross-institutional collaboration in IT research requires further strengthening. The number of IT-related publications has increased annually. Leading research institutions in this field include Harvard University, the University of Alberta, the University of Miami, and the University of Minnesota. "Transplantation" emerges as the most frequently cited journal in this area. Shapiro and Ricordi were the most prolific authors, with 126 and 121 publications, respectively. Shapiro also led to co-citations, totaling 4808. Key research focuses on IT sites and procedures as well as novel therapies in IT. Emerging research hotspots are identified by terms like "xenotransplantation," "apoptosis," "stem cells," "immunosuppression," and "microencapsulation."

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore a mounting anticipation for future IT research, which is expected to delve deeper into evidence-based methodologies for IT sites, procedures, and novel therapeutic interventions. This shift toward evidence-based medicine underscores the field's commitment to enhancing the efficacy and safety of IT for diabetes treatment, signaling a promising direction for future investigations aimed at optimizing patient outcomes.

Advances in Pancreatic Islet Transplantation Sites for the Treatment of Diabetes

Diabetes is a complex disease that affects over 400 million people worldwide. The life-long insulin injections and continuous blood glucose monitoring required in type 1 diabetes (T1D) represent a tremendous clinical and economic burdens that urges the need for a medical solution. Pancreatic islet transplantation holds great promise in the treatment of T1D; however, the difficulty in regulating post-transplantation immune reactions to avoid both allogenic and autoimmune graft rejection represent a bottleneck in the field of islet transplantation. Cell replacement strategies have been performed in hepatic, intramuscular, omentum, and subcutaneous sites, and have been performed in both animal models and human patients. However more optimal transplantation sites and methods of improving islet graft survival are needed to successfully translate these studies to a clinical relevant therapy. In this review, we summarize the current progress in the field as well as methods and sites of islet transplantation, including stem cell-derived functional human islets. We also discuss the contribution of immune cells, vessel formation, extracellular matrix, and nutritional supply on islet graft survival. Developing new transplantation sites with emerging technologies to improve islet graft survival and simplify immune regulation will greatly benefit the future success of islet cell therapy in the treatment of diabetes.

Pancreatectomy, Islet Cell Transplantation, and Nutrition Considerations

Pancreatic islet transplantation is a reliable approach for treating insulin-deficient diabetes. This established β-cell replacement approach has shown considerable improvements in the last 2 decades. It has helped achieve metabolic homeostasis and safe outcomes for a subset of patients with type 1 diabetes and severe pancreatitis. Nutrition support, until recently, was considered as a secondary factor, merely identified as a means of providing all the necessary nutrients for such patients. However, new literature suggests that several factors, such as the route, timing, quantity, and composition of all the nutrients administered, have key disease-altering properties and are vital during the perioperative management of such patients. This review will highlight the benefits of performing the clinical islet transplantation on a subgroup of patients with type 1 diabetes and pancreatitis and summarize new data that identify the pivotal role of nutrition support as a critical intervention in their management.

Defining outcomes for beta cell replacement therapy: a work in progress

Defined outcomes for beta cell replacement therapy in the treatment of diabetes are critically needed. Progress towards the clinical acceptance of pancreas and islet transplantation has been hampered by the lack of clear definitions of functional and efficacy outcomes, as well as a lack of consistently applied glycaemic control metrics, together with poor alignment with the field of artificial insulin delivery/artificial pancreas development. To address this problem, the International Pancreas & Islet Transplant Association (IPITA) collaborated with the European Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association (EPITA) to develop a consensus for a joint statement on the definition of function and failure of beta cell replacement therapies, which is summarised in this commentary.

Molecular Tools for Facilitative Carbohydrate Transporters (Gluts)

Facilitative carbohydrate transporters-Gluts-have received wide attention over decades due to their essential role in nutrient uptake and links with various metabolic disorders, including diabetes, obesity, and cancer. Endeavors directed towards understanding the mechanisms of Glut-mediated nutrient uptake have resulted in a multidisciplinary research field spanning protein chemistry, chemical biology, organic synthesis, crystallography, and biomolecular modeling. Gluts became attractive targets for cancer research and medicinal chemistry, leading to the development of new approaches to cancer diagnostics and providing avenues for cancer-targeting therapeutics. In this review, the current state of knowledge of the molecular interactions behind Glut-mediated sugar uptake, Glut-targeting probes, therapeutics, and inhibitors are discussed.

Single-centre experience of extending indications for percutaneous intraportal islet autotransplantation (PIPIAT) after pancreatic surgery to prevent diabetes: feasibility, radiological aspects, complications and clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE

Islet allotransplantation is a less invasive alternative to surgical pancreas transplantation for Type 1 diabetes, while percutaneous intraportal islet autotransplantation (PIPIAT) is usually performed after pancreatic surgery to prevent diabetes. Our aim was to assess the feasibility, radiological aspects, complications and clinical outcome of PIPIAT following pancreatic surgery for not only chronic pancreatitis but also benign and malignant nodules.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2012, 41 patients were enrolled for PIPIAT 12-48 h after pancreatic surgery (extended pancreatic surgery for chronic pancreatitis and benign/malignant neoplasms). PIPIAT was performed using a combined ultrasonography and fluoroscopy-guided technique (4-F catheter). PIPIAT feasibility, median follow-up and metabolic (insulin independence rate, graft function based on C-peptide levels) and oncologic outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

PIPIAT was not performed in 7/41 patients (4 cases for an inadequate islet mass, 2 cases for haemodynamic instability and 1 case for islet culture contamination), while it was successfully performed in 34/34 patients. Procedure-related major complications occurred in four patients: two bleedings requiring transfusions, one patient with left portal vein thrombosis and one patient with sepsis. Median follow-up duration was 546 days. Insulin independence was achieved in 15/34 (44%) patients, partial graft function in 16/34 (47%) patients and no function in 3/34 (9%) patients. None of the 17 patients with malignant nodules developed liver metastases during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

PIPIAT, performed under ultrasound and fluoroscopy combined guidance and not requiring immunosuppression, is feasible, with a relatively low complication rate and a better metabolic outcome than allotransplantation.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

PIPIAT can prevent pancreatogenic diabetes. Ultrasound is a useful tool for the guidance and monitoring of PIPIAT.

Comparison of Neutral Proteases and Collagenase Class I as Essential Enzymes for Human Islet Isolation

Efficient islet isolation requires synergistic interaction between collagenase class I (CI) and class II (CII). The CI degradation alters the ratio between CI and CII and is responsible for batch-to-batch variations. This study compares the role of neutral protease (NP) plus clostripain (CP) with CI as essential enzymes for human islet isolation.

METHODS

Human islets were isolated using 4 different enzyme mixtures composed of CII plus either intact (CI-115) or degraded CI (CI-100). Blends were administered either with or without NP/CP. Purified islets were cultured for 3 to 4 days before islet quality assessment.

RESULTS

Whereas using intact CI-115 without NP/CP did not significantly reduce islet yield (3429 ± 631 vs 3087 ± 970 islet equivalent/g, nonsignificant), administration of degraded CI-100 without NP/CP decreased islet yield from 3501 ± 580 to 1312 ± 244 islet equivalent/g (P < 0.01), doubled the amount of undigested tissue from 11.8 ± 1.6 to 24.4 ± 1.2% (P < 0.01) and triplicated the percentage of trapped islets from 7.7 ± 2.8 to 22.5 ± 3.6% (P < 0.05). Islet yield did not vary between supplemented CI-115 and CI-100, but was increased using CI-115 when NP/CP was omitted (P < 0.05). A trend toward higher viability and increased secretory insulin response was noted in both CI-100 and CI-115 when NP/CP was not added.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that NP/CP can compensate reduced CI activity. Future attempts to optimize enzyme blends should consider the possibility to increase the proportion of collagenase CI to reduce the need for potentially harmful NPs.

Species incompatibilities in the pig-to-macaque islet xenotransplant model affect transplant outcome: a comparison with allotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Porcine islet transplantation into diabetic non-human primates is considered most relevant in translational research supporting a clinical application. Most studies have focused on immunosuppressive protocols, while metabolic aspects have mainly been utilized in graft monitoring. We evaluated data from our group regarding human and non-human primate (NHP) allotransplantation and pig-to-NHP xenotransplantation to identify incompatibilities in metabolic factors and their consequences for transplant outcomes.

METHODS

Basic gluco-metabolic parameters (fasting blood glucose, C-peptide, and response to stimulation with arginine or glucose) were derived from literature (humans), 72 macaques, and 47 adult Landrace pigs. Islet preparations from 15 human deceased donors, 61 macaques, and 23 adult pigs were compared with respect to yield, fractional viability assessed by oxygen consumption normalized for DNA, and in vitro glucose-induced insulin release. Metabolic parameters at day 75 after a single islet transplantation in the liver were compared for 19 patients and 9 macaques receiving an allotransplant and 11 macaques receiving a porcine xenotransplant: recipients received chronic immunosuppression.

RESULTS

Pigs differ from NHPs and humans by a much lower C-peptide level (0.42 vs. 1.3 to 2.0 ng/ml, respectively) and a 2- to 7-fold lower C-peptide response to arginine stimulation. In contrast, NHPs have the highest metabolic demand as evidenced by a high C-peptide and high C-peptide response to arginine stimulation; values are about twice higher than in humans. For manufactured islet preparations, these differences are reflected by glucose-stimulated insulin release (the stimulation index for pigs is 1.5, for humans 3.8, and for macaques 7.7), but not by fractional viability, which was in the same range. The day 75 outcome after transplantation assessed by C-peptide was similar for allotransplanted humans and NHPs (80 to 90% good graft function) and lower in xenografted NHPs (36% good graft function); gluco-metabolic parameters were in accordance with graft function, albeit different between species because normoglycemia under exogenous insulin is maintained more aggressively in patients than in NHPs. In xenografted NHPs, the shift in glycemic control with respect to normal values, combined with low values of circulating porcine C-peptide, resembled more the normal condition in a pig than that in a macaque.

CONCLUSIONS

The substantially lower glucose-induced insulin response in adult porcine islet preparations as opposed to islets manufactured from humans or macaques combined with the much higher need for insulin in macaques than in humans creates an imbalance between the metabolic demand and the engrafted islet mass in the pig-to-NHP xenograft recipient. Engrafted islet mass is affected by dose, suggesting that a much higher dose level of islets is necessary in the xenogeneic setting than in human or NHP allotransplantation, and pig islets need to be given at a higher dose in macaques than the anticipated effective dose in humans. To cope with differences in metabolic demand and presumably also metabolic dynamics, a liberal regime in supportive exogenous insulin might be essential to achieve long-term survival. These intrinsic characteristics of the NHP model deserve consideration to optimally design experimental studies with the perspective of translational value of results.

Metabolic function of a suboptimal transplanted islet mass in nonhuman primates on rapamycin monotherapy

Although islet transplantation may restore insulin independence to individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus, most have abnormal glucose tolerance. We asked whether the defective glucose tolerance is due to inadequate β-cell mass or to impaired insulin sensitivity. We performed metabolic studies on four cynomolgus primates before inducing diabetes with streptozotocin (STZ), then again 2-3 weeks after restoring insulin independence via intrahepatic islet transplantation utilizing a calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppressive regimen (induction with rabbit antithymocyte globulin and maintenance therapy with rapamycin). Engrafted β-cell mass was assessed by acute insulin and C-peptide responses to glucose (AIR(glu) and ACR(glu)) and arginine (AIR(arg) and ACR(arg)). Insulin sensitivity (S(I)) was determined in naive and transplanted primates from an intravenous glucose tolerance test using the minimal model. α-Cell function was determined by the acute glucagon response to arginine (AGR(arg)). Glucose tolerance (K(g)) decreased from 4.1 ± 0.5%/min in naive primates to 1.8 ± 0.3%/min in transplanted primates (p < 0.01). Following transplantation, AIR(glu) was 28.7 ± 13.1 μU/ml compared to 169.9 ± 43.1 μU/ml (p < 0.03) in the naive condition, ACR(glu) was 14.5 ± 6.0 ng/ml compared to 96.5 ± 17.0 ng/ml naive (p < 0.01), AIR(arg) was 29.1 ± 13.1 μU/ml compared to 91.4 ± 28.2 μU/ml naive (p < 0.05), and ACR(arg) was 1.11 ± 0.51 ng/ml compared to 2.79 ± 0.77 ng/ml naive (p < 0.05). S(I) did not differ from naive to posttransplant states. AGR(arg) was reduced in transplanted primates (349 ± 118 pg/ml) when compared to both naive (827 ± 354 pg/ml) and post-STZ diabetic primates (1020 ± 440 pg/ml) (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). These data suggest that impaired glucose tolerance observed in islet transplant recipients is secondary to low functional β-cell mass and not to insulin resistance shortly after transplant. Furthermore, improved glycemic control achieved via islet transplantation over the diabetic state might be attained, in part, via reduced glucagon secretion.

Impact of islet transplantation on diabetes complications and quality of life

Insulin represents a life-saving therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes but, despite appropriate treatment, it prevents only partially long-term diabetic complications, while generating fatal hypoglycemic episodes. Islet transplantation gained attention because of its safety, effectiveness, and minimal invasiveness; however it remains a procedure reserved for a selected group of patients. The introduction of the Edmonton Protocol in 2000, based on a newly designed steroid-free immunosuppressive protocol, revamped the course of islet transplantation. The main goal of islet transplantation remains insulin independence, although the effect of islet transplantation can be more comprehensively evaluated in terms of frequency of hypoglycemic episodes and impact on diabetic complications and quality of life. Islet transplantation was shown to have positive consequences on cardiovascular, renal, neurologic, and ocular diabetic complications. The proof of concept for cellular replacement therapy in diabetes has been established with islet transplantation, it only needs to be improved and rendered widely available.

Immune and cell therapy in type 1 diabetes: too little too late?

INTRODUCTION

Type 1 diabetes is caused by autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing β-cells. Intensive insulin therapy protects most patients against chronic complications of diabetes, but exposes patients to acute complications like hypoglycaemia and impacts on quality of life. Therapies that aim at protecting or restoring endogenous insulin secretion might help in decreasing the risk of severe hypoglycemia and long-term complications.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the literature of clinical immunotherapy and β-cell transplantation in treatment of type 1 diabetes with specific focus on the effect on preserving and restoring β-cell mass.

EXPERT OPINION

Several studies in recent-onset type 1 diabetic patients have provided proof of principle that immunotherapy can preserve residual functional β-cell mass. The observation that this strategy is most effective early in the disease process opens possibilities of arresting and even preventing type 1 diabetes. In patients with too few or no surviving β-cells, current protocols of β-cell transplantation can restore functional β-cell mass up to 25% of levels in healthy controls. Unfortunately, both strategies to date are followed by progressive decline of endogenous insulin secretion later on. Strategies to restore functional β-cell mass to a higher level and to restore immune tolerance are thus needed.

Long-term follow-up of patients with type 1 diabetes transplanted with neonatal pig islets

Pancreas transplantation is an option to achieve better metabolic control and decrease chronic complications in patients with diabetes. Xenotransplantation becomes an important alternative. In this study, we show the clinical outcome of patients with type 1 diabetes transplanted with neonatal pig islets without immunosuppression. In a longitudinal study of 23 patients with type 1 diabetes, who received porcine islets between 2000 and 2004, we registered demographic and clinical characteristics every 3 months and chronic complications evaluation yearly. Porcine C-peptide was measured in urine samples under basal conditions and after stimulation with l-arginine. More than 50% were female, median current age was 20·8 years, median diabetes duration at transplantation 5·5 years, median current diabetes duration 11 years and median time post-transplantation 5·7 years. Their media of glycosylated haemoglobin reduced significantly after the first transplantation. Insulin doses remain with a reduction greater than 33% in more than 50% of the patients. Before transplantation, 14 of the 21 patients presented mild chronic complications and currently only two patients presented these complications. Porcine C-peptide was present in all urine samples under basal conditions and increased post-stimulation with l-arginine. These patients achieved an excellent metabolic control after the first transplantation. This could explain, as well as the remaining function of transplanted cells, the low frequency of chronic complications compared to patients with similar diabetes duration and age.

Liver focal fatty changes at ultrasound after islet transplantation: an early sign of altered graft function?

AIMS

Few longitudinal imaging studies of liver-engrafted islets after islet transplantation are available for islet-transplant-alone (ITA) and islet-after-kidney (IAK) transplanted patients. Particularly controversial is the link between islet function and the appearance of islet-induced liver focal fatty changes. Aims of this study were to assess liver focal fatty changes at ultrasound after islet transplantation and their relationship with islet function.

METHODS

The timing of first ultrasound detection of liver focal fatty changes and the prevalence and duration of these changes were assessed in 30 IAK transplanted patients, in five ITA patients and, retrospectively, in full-, partial- and no-function groups, according to islet function evaluated 1 year after transplantation. Patients with persistent ultrasound detected liver focal fatty changes underwent liver biopsy. Ultrasound positive and negative patients with functioning islets were compared for islet-function and C-peptide-levels during the follow-up. Variations of cholesterol/triglycerides and other metabolic parameters were also recorded at 1 year.

RESULTS

Liver focal fatty changes at ultrasound were found in 12 patients (10/30 IAK, 2/5 ITA). First detection was at 6 months in eight cases and at 12 months in four cases. Liver ultrasound changes were of more than 1 year duration in eight cases. Steatosis was found histologically in 8/8 patients. At 12 months, liver ultrasound changes were detected to a greater extent in patients with partial islet function (10/12, eight IAK, two ITA) compared with patients with full islet function. C-peptide-levels were significantly lower in ultrasound-positive than in ultrasound-negative patients. At 18 months, ultrasound- positive patients were more prone to worsening of their function (9/12) compared with ultrasound-negative patients (3/18). No statistically significant differences of cholesterol/triglycerides levels were found in either the total number of patients or the IAK and ITA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver focal fatty changes at ultrasound (steatosis) after islet transplantation in IAK and ITA patients may represent an early sign of altered graft function.

[Pancreas and islet transplantation]

Pancreas transplantation is a successful and effective procedure resulting in tight glucose control. Due to the postoperative morbidity and the need for immunosuppression pancreas transplantation should be considered in patients with type I diabetes at the time of kidney transplantation. Besides this pancreas transplantation alone can be taken into consideration for patients with very poor metabolic control and quality of life despite optimal medical treatment. Recently, islet transplantation became a less invasive alternative to pancreas transplantation. Due to the lack of long-term follow-up and due to the need of multiple donor grafts for one recipient, islet transplantation should be performed under experimental settings in experienced centers. New developments in protecting transplanted islets and in the induction of donor-specific tolerance could increase the indication to perform the procedure. Therefore alternative sources of beta-cells have to be identified.

Transplante de ilhotas na prática clínica: estado atual e perspectivas

O transplante de ilhotas é um procedimento em desenvolvimento, como alternativa para o tratamento do diabetes tipo 1 que está na fronteira entre o experimental e o clínico. É uma terapia celular na qual as células são implantadas em território diferente do fisiológico em que apenas determinado número incerto conseguirá se adaptar. Aperfeiçoar este processo para obter os mesmos resultados que no transplante de pâncreas, representa um desafio para o qual convergem contribuições da biologia celular, da imunologia e das técnicas de laboratório que se entrelaçam de maneira extremamente complexa. Este trabalho revisa a literatura expondo a evolução do procedimento, a sua metodologia atual e os resultados clínicos obtidos. As perspectivas futuras do transplante diante dos recentes avanços também são discutidas.

The clinical impact of islet transplantation

Islet cell transplantation has recently emerged as one of the most promising therapeutic approaches to improving glycometabolic control in diabetic patients and, in many cases, achieving insulin independence. Unfortunately, many persistent flaws still prevent islet transplantation from becoming the gold standard treatment for type 1 diabetic patients. We review the state of the art of islet transplantation, outcomes, immunosuppression and--most important--the impact on patients' survival and long-term diabetic complications and eventual alternative options. Finally, we review the many problems in the field and the challenges to islet survival after transplantation. The rate of insulin independence 1 year after islet cell transplantation has significantly improved in recent years (60% at 1 year posttransplantation compared with 15% previously). Recent data indicate that restoration of insulin secretion after islet cell transplantation is associated with an improvement in quality of life, with a reduction in hypoglycemic episodes and potentially with a reduction in long-term diabetic complications. Once clinical islet transplantation has been successfully established, this treatment could even be offered to diabetic patients long before the onset of diabetic complications.

Nutritional status and behavior in subjects with type 1 diabetes, before and after islet transplantation

BACKGROUND

To investigate whether changes of nutritional status and behavior are associated with islet transplantation (ITx) and to assess their possible mechanisms.

METHODS

In this observational study, 52 subjects with type 1 diabetes, 30 of whom received ITx, underwent nutritional assessments. The study consisted of questionnaires complemented by a dietary intake recording, anthropometric measurements, and body composition analysis. Laboratory tests were also reviewed as part of the follow up.

RESULTS

After ITx, significant reductions in body weight (3.7 kg; P<0.0001), body mass index (1.39 kg/m2; P<0.0001), waist circumference (3.96 cm; P=0.006), and fat weight (3.28 kg; P<0.01) were observed. The average consumption of carbohydrate and protein were also lower than pretransplant, together with some micronutrients (vitamins B12 and B6, zinc, and phosphorus). Insulin administration and changes in A1C were not associated with a significant change in anthropometric measurements. Subjects on exenatide after ITx showed significantly lower weight and body mass index than those not taking exenatide.

CONCLUSIONS

ITx is associated with modifications in nutritional behavior and status. Drugs and health conditions are likely to be at least in part responsible for these changes, but a voluntary modification of eating habits by the patients also plays a role. Strict monitoring of nutritional parameters, counseling by experts in nutrition, and multivitamin/mineral supplement after ITx could be of benefit to the patients.

Insulin effect on serum potassium and auto-inhibition of insulin secretion is intact in a patient with leprechaunism despite severe impairment of substrates metabolism

BACKGROUND

The effect of insulin on glucose, protein metabolism, circulating fatty acids (FFA), potassium (K(+)) and C-peptide concentrations were investigated in a 12-year-old girl with leprechaunism. The mutations do not affect the insulin-receptor binding affinity and insulin-stimulated auto-phosphorylation of the receptor.

METHODS

The subject was studied with a primed-continuous infusion of [6,6 - (2)H(2)] glucose and [1-(13)C] leucine during a basal period followed by two steps of insulin infusion (1 and 10 mU/kg/min) of 2 h each, during which plasma glucose level decreased from 131 to 115 and then to 95 mg/dL.

RESULTS

Whole body glucose disposal was virtually unaffected by insulin, slightly decreasing from 21 micromol/kg/min in the basal period to 20 and to 19 micromol/kg/min during the two steps of insulin infusion, respectively. The endogenous leucine flux, an index of proteolysis, was completely insensitive to insulin, being 182, 189 and 180 micromol/kg/min, in the three periods, respectively. The FFA concentration (an indirect index of lipolysis) decreased from 1135 to 799 during step 1. During step 2 the FFA concentration rebounded to 917 micromol/L. The concentration of K(+) decreased from 4.2 to 3.2 mmol/L and an infusion of 20 mEq/h of KCl was necessary to prevent further hypokalemia (final value 3.3 mmol/l). The C-peptide concentration declined from 1.85 to 0.97 and then to 0.29 pmol/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

The dissociation of control exerted by insulin on K+ uptake and on beta-cell secretion may rely on a differential expression and folding of the mutated receptors in the different insulin target tissues.

Beta-cell replacement in immunosuppressed recipients: old and new clinical indications

Islet transplantation is an appealing procedure able to improve glycemic control in type 1 diabetic patients. However, the possible side effects that may be induced by immunosuppressive therapy limit its application to a select number of patients for whom the risk of immunosuppressants' side effects can be justified. For patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus-who will take immunosuppressants regardless, as they require a solid organ transplant-islet infusion can be an interesting therapeutic option for improving metabolic compensation, whenever pancreas transplant is not possible. Hence, islet infusion can be an important therapeutic option for patients with secondary diabetes mellitus even when a minor pancreatic endocrine function remains. For these patients, results may be better than those obtained with islet infusion for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus thanks to the lack of autoimmune reaction to the infused islets. The final result is the improvement of the glycemic compensation and most likely also an extension of the graft survival.

Pancreatic islet cell transplant for treatment of diabetes

Islet cell transplantation recently has emerged as one the most promising therapeutic approaches to improving glycometabolic control in type 1 diabetic patients, and, in many cases, to obtaining insulin independence. Islet cell transplantation requires a relatively short hospital stay and has the advantage of being a relatively noninvasive procedure. The rate of insulin independence 1 year after islet cell transplantation has improved significantly in recent years (60% at 1 year after transplantation compared to the 15% in the past years). Data from a recent international trial confirmed that islet cell transplantation potentially can be a cure for type 1 diabetes. Recent data indicate that insulin independence after islet cell transplantation is associated with an improvement in glucose metabolism and quality of life and with a reduction in hypoglycemic episodes. Islet cell transplantation is still in its initial stages, and many obstacles still need to be overcome. Once clinical islet transplantation has been established, this treatment could be offered to diabetic patients long before the onset of diabetic complications or to patients with life-threatening hypoglycemic unawareness and brittle diabetes.

Expectations and Strategies Regarding Islet Transplantation: Metabolic Data From the GRAGIL 2 Trial

BACKGROUND

Whether islet transplantation should be aimed at restoring insulin independence or providing adequate metabolic control is still debated. The GRAGIL2 trial was designed as a phase 1-2 study where primary outcome was the rate of insulin independence, and secondary outcome was the success rate defined by a composite score based upon basal C-peptide, HbA1c, hypoglycemic events, and exogenous insulin needs.

METHODS

C-peptide negative type 1 brittle diabetic patients experiencing severe hypoglycemia were eligible to receive a maximum of two islet preparations totalizing 10,000 IE/kg or more, with a threshold of 5,000 IE/kg for the first infusion, according to the Edmonton protocol, within the Swiss-French GRAGIL multicentric network. A sequential analysis with a triangular test was performed in every five patients after 6- and 12-month follow-up. Maximal inefficiency was set at 40% and minimal efficiency at 66%.

RESULTS

From September 2003 to October 2005, 10 patients were included. Median waiting time was 6.7 months (first injection) and 9 weeks (second injection). All but one patient received 11,089+/-505 IE/kg: one received a single graft of 5398 IE/kg. At 6 months, insulin independence and composite success rates were 6 of 10 and 6 of 10, respectively. At 12 months, insulin independence was observed in 3 of 10 patients and success in 5 of 10 patients.

CONCLUSION

Based upon our sequential analysis settings, islet transplantation failed to achieve the primary goal, insulin independence, but tended to succeed in reaching the secondary goal, successful metabolic control. Currently it appears to be a successful biological closed-loop glucose control method for brittle diabetes.

Estado actual del trasplante de islotes pancreáticos

Due to the numerous advances in islet transplantation in the last few years, clinical outcomes following this procedure are continually improving. Novel immunosuppression protocols, improved donor and recipient selection, and careful attention to the process of organ extraction, preservation and islet isolation have contributed to long-term success. The present article reviews the results of clinical islet transplantation and their relationship with the different advances introduced. The use of new islet sources such as living and non-heart-beating donors, as well as recent advances in our knowledge of the mechanisms of rejection and its prevention, are also reviewed.

Assessment of islet function following islet and pancreas transplantation

Pancreas and islet transplant recipients are monitored using various metabolic and imaging methods. The inaccessibility of the transplanted whole pancreas and of the isolated islets poses specific problems (eg, all assessment techniques are indirect). Although successful pancreas transplantation typically restores normal glucose homeostasis, islet transplantation into the liver does not completely normalize islet hormone secretion and glucose metabolism. Development of better testing strategies, such as direct islet imaging, will significantly advance the field.

The favorable outcome of human islet transplantation in Korea: experiences of 10 autologous transplantations

BACKGROUND

Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas are an increasingly diagnosed entity, and surgical resection of the pancreas is advocated. Islet autotransplantation is a therapeutic approach used to prevent diabetes in cases of pathologically benign neoplasm after major pancreatectomy.

METHODS

A total of 10 patients underwent pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation. To evaluate islet transplantation efficiency, the authors compared 23 subjects who did not undergo islet transplantation after partial pancreatectomy with 87 subjects with normal glucose tolerance and with 77 diabetic subjects that did not undergo pancreatectomy.

RESULTS

Ten female patients with nine cystic neoplasms and one patient with pancreatic injury underwent transplantation. Their mean islet equivalents (IEQ) was 3,159 IEQ/kg. During follow-up, two recipients required insulin or oral agents. At the 12-month follow-up, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-beta was 77.36+/-17.68, the insulinogenic index (INSindex) was 0.49+/-0.11, and fasting C-peptide and hemoglobin A1c were 1.28+/-0.18 ng/mL and 5.73+/-0.26%, respectively. Islet replacement was found to increase HOMA-beta by approximately 17% compared with distal pancreatectomy in normal glucose tolerance subjects without islet autotransplantation and by 46% compared with distal pancreatectomy diabetes subjects without islet autotransplantation. Factors different in the two insulin and oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA)-requiring recipients and the eight insulin- and OHA-free recipients were pancreatectomy extent, preoperative glucose metabolism insufficiency, age, and underlying cystic neoplasm disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Even partial islet graft function can have a beneficial metabolic effect on the recipient in terms of metabolic parameters such as HOMA-beta and INSindex. This study suggests that islet replacement should be considered for experimental procedures in benign pancreatic conditions.

Natural history of kidney graft survival, hypertrophy, and vascular function in end-stage renal disease type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients: beneficial impact of pancreas and successful islet cotransplantation

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes, hypertension, infections, and nephrotoxicity of certain immunosuppressive drugs (i.e., calcineurin inhibitors) can reduce functional survival of the kidney graft. Our aim was to evaluate survival, hypertrophy, and vascular function of the kidney graft in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) type 1 diabetic patients after transplant.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The study population consisted of 234 ESRD type 1 diabetic patients who underwent kidney-pancreas (KP; 166 patients), successful kidney-islet (KI-s; 24 patients), and kidney (KD; 44 patients) transplant. Kidney size, graft survival, vascular function, and microalbuminuria were evaluated prospectively yearly for 6 years. Sixty-eight protocol kidney biopsies were performed routinely between 1993 and 1998 cross-sectionally (3.2 +/- 0.3 years from kidney transplant).

RESULTS

The KP and KI-s groups had better cumulative kidney graft survival at 6 years than did the KD group (KP: 73%; KI-s: 86%; KD: 42%, P < 0.01). The KP group but not the KI-s/KD groups showed a persistent kidney graft hypertrophy up to 6 years of follow-up. A significant increase in creatinine levels from baseline to year 6 was evident in the KD group (1.58 +/- 0.08 to 2.78 +/- 0.44 mg/dl, P < 0.05) but not in the KP/KI-s groups. The KP/KI-s groups only showed a reduction of renal resistance index from baseline to year 6 (KP at baseline: 0.74 +/- 0.01 to 0.68 +/- 0.01%, P < 0.01; KI-s at baseline: 0.72 +/- 0.02 to 0.69 +/- 0.02%, P < 0.05). At year 6, an increase from baseline in urinary albumin excretion was observed only in the KD group (31.4 +/- 9.0 to 82.9 +/- 33.6 mg/l, P < 0.05). Preliminary data suggested that graft nitric oxide (NO) expression was higher in the KP/KI-s groups than in the KD group (data not shown).

CONCLUSIONS

In ESRD type 1 diabetic patients, KP and KI-s compared with KD resulted in enhanced kidney graft survival, hypertrophy, and vascular function.

The role of current product release criteria for identification of human islet preparations suitable for clinical transplantation

BACKGROUND

Alloimmunity, autoimmunity, and nonspecific inflammation are known to be potential determinants for long-term islet survival and insulin independence. Sufficient islet mass is a key determinant. But islet engraftment and posttransplant survival may also depend on functional characteristics of the graft. This study investigated the significance of current product release criteria for the transplantation outcome.

METHODS

Fourty five consecutive transplanted human islet preparations and their functional outcomes were analyzed. Islet mass was determined according to standard criteria: purity by light microscopy, viability by dye exclusion and Insulin secretory response to static glucose incubation. Islet graft function was monitored for > or = 1 year. Islet function was defined as full (FF), partial (PF), or nonfunction (NF) based on serum C-peptide levels and insulin independence.

RESULTS

All islet grafts displayed primary function. Islet mass [IEQ/kg BW]: 7331.3 +/- 679.7 (FF), 5821.3 +/- 546.7 (PF), 6468.6 +/- 658.5 (NF), (FF vs PF p = .032) Purity [%] 86.9 +/- 3.1 (FF), 76.0 +/- 2.87 (PF), 88.2 +/- 2.3 (NF) (FF vs PF P =.045, PF vs NF, P = 0.01). (4) Viability [%]:89.2 +/- 2 (FF), 86.2 +/- 1.7 (PF), 87.3 +/- 1.8 (NF) (ns). Stimulation index (SI): 20 +/- 6.3 (FF), 80.2 +/- 28.2 (PF), 21.6 +/- 3.5 (NF) (ns) No correlation was observed between SI and any other parameter nor between SI and C-peptide levels. Islet mass significantly correlated with C-peptide levels at 6 and 12 months after transplantation for functioning grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Stringent product release criteria allow identification of islet preparations suitable for clinical transplantation. However, currently used parameters are not predictive of long-term graft function, indicating that further refined quality assessments including apoptosis and resistance to early inflammation, are required to assess the primary engrafted islet mass.

Beta-score: an assessment of beta-cell function after islet transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Success after islet transplantation can be defined in terms of insulin independence, C-peptide secretion, or glycemic control. These measures are interdependent and all need to be considered in evaluating beta-cell function after islet transplantation. For the current study, a composite beta-score was developed that provides an integrated measure of beta-cell function success after islet transplantation.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The proposed scoring system gave 2 points each for normal fasting glucose, HbA(1c), stimulated C-peptide, and absence of insulin or oral hypoglycemic agent use. No points were awarded if the fasting glucose was in the diabetic range, the HbA(1c) was >6.9%, C-peptide secretion was absent on stimulation, or daily insulin use was in excess of 0.24 units/kg. One point was given for intermediate values. The score ranged from 0 to 8 and was correlated with the glucose value 90 min after a standard mixed meal challenge (n = 218) in 57 subjects before and after islet transplantation. The score was also used to follow subjects for up to 5 years after islet transplantation.

RESULTS

The beta-score correlated well with the plasma glucose level 90 min after a mixed meal challenge (r = -0.849, P < 0.001). On follow-up, the beta-score rose after the first transplant and was maintained up to 5 years, demonstrating continuing function of the transplanted beta-cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The beta-score provides a simple clinical scoring system that encompasses glycemic control, diabetes therapy, and endogenous insulin secretion that correlates well with physiological measures of beta-cell function. On this basis, it is suitable as an overall measure of beta-cell transplant function. The beta-score gives an integrated measure of beta-cell function as a continuum that may be more useful than simply assessing the presence or absence of insulin independence.

Technique, complications, and therapeutic efficacy of percutaneous transplantation of human pancreatic islet cells in type 1 diabetes: the role of US

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the role of ultrasonography (US) with regard to the technique, complications, and therapeutic efficacy of percutaneous intrahepatic transplantation of human pancreatic islet cells with combined US and fluoroscopic guidance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved the study, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. After kidney transplantation, 34 uremic diabetic patients (20 men, 14 women; mean age, 40.9 years; age range, 29-61 years) underwent percutaneous intrahepatic transplantation of islet cells. Portal vein patency and liver echotexture were preliminarily assessed with color Doppler US. US also was used to identify early complications and presence (group A patients) or absence (group B patients) of hepatic parenchymal changes. Differences between the two groups in C peptide serum level and range were analyzed (Mann-Whitney test). Therapeutic efficacy of transplantation was assessed with regard to insulin independence period (rate and duration), exogenous insulin requirement, glycated hemoglobin, and C peptide level. A C peptide level of more than 0.5 ng/mL was considered to indicate well-functioning islet cells.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight procedures were technically successful, with a single puncture used in 51 of 58 patients. Complications occurred in three of 58 patients (hemoperitoneum, hemothorax, and thrombosis in one patient each) and were conservatively treated and resolved. Duration of insulin independence in 12 patients was more than 3 months (mean, 21 months). Well-functioning islet cells at 6 years were found in 19 of 34 patients. Hyperechoic parenchymal changes were evident at US in 12 of 34. No statistically significant difference in C peptide level was found between groups (P > .05), but a wider range of values was recorded in group B.

CONCLUSION

Complication rate of transplantation with US and fluoroscopic guidance was low. Well-functioning islet cells were found in about 50% of patients at 6 years of follow-up. Hepatic implantation of islet cells was evident on US images in more than one-third of patients.

Islet transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients

Islet transplantation has been shown to improve overall glucose homeostasis and retard the progression of complications in type I diabetic patients. Also the percentage of recipients achieving complete insulin independence has progressively increased over recent years. An unsolved problem is whether the short-term graft function is secondary to progressive islet exhaustion or to recurrent autoimmunity despite the immunosuppressive therapy. The indications for this procedure remain limited to selected type I diabetic patients. The risks of the immunosuppressive therapy are only proposed to type I diabetic recipients with uncontrolled disease, despite all efforts of the diabetologist and the patient (brittle diabetes), or with a poor quality of life due to unawareness hypoglycemia or severe chronic and progressive complications.

Risks and side effects of islet transplantation

Islet transplantation can deliver stable glycemic control, relief from recurrent severe hypoglycemia, and insulin independence. Accessing the portal vein via the percutaneous hepatic approach carries the risk of bleeding, and the infusion of islets a risk of portal vein thrombosis. In the long term, common minor problems with immunosuppression are mouth ulcers, diarrhea, and acne. Longer-term risks include malignancy and serious infection, both rare to date in clinical islet transplantation. Sensitization to donor antigens may also occur. The long-term diabetes complications may stabilize, but of this aspect little is known to date. In the short term, there may be some elevation of serum cholesterol and blood pressure, in some patients there has been a decline in renal function, and in a few, acute retinal bleeds. For most, improvement in glucose control with resolution of glycemic lability and hypoglycemia has been a net benefit.

Beta-cell replacement for type I diabetes

The ability to achieve insulin independence with either solid-organ pancreas or islet transplantation has increased the number of patients seeking beta-cell replacement as an alternative to insulin therapy. Despite dramatic improvements in the ability to achieve insulin independence following solid-organ pancreas transplantation, the secondary complications of long-standing diabetes are frequently irreversible by the time surgical intervention is justified based on the risk of this procedure. Pancreatic islet transplantation provides a safer and less invasive alternative for beta-cell replacement that could be justified earlier in the course of diabetes to prevent the development of secondary complications. Recent advances in the technology of islet isolation, as well as the ability to prevent the alloimmune and recurrent autoimmune response following islet transplantation with immunosuppressive regimens that are not toxic to beta cells, have rekindled an interest in this field. Widespread application of islet transplantation will depend on further improvements in selective immunosuppression, development of immunologic tolerance, and finding new sources of beta cells.

Clinical islet transplantation

Type 1 diabetes affects over 1 million persons in the United States, with over 30,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Transplantation of new insulin-producing b cells, in the form of the whole pancreas or isolated islets, has been shown to ameliorate the disease by eliminating the need for exogenous insulin and normalizing glycosylated hemoglobin levels. Islet transplants are a particularly attractive form of therapy because they are a minimally invasive procedure and are more likely to be scaled-up to treat the large numbers of people affected by diabetes. Currently, only a handful of programs have been successful in the endeavor. Nevertheless, the early clinical experience strongly demonstrates that islet transplantation is an effective treatment strategy in select patients with type 1 diabetes. To scale up this therapy and use it earlier in the disease and for more people, the shortage of suitable donor tissue must be solved and the requirement of lifelong immunosuppression must be minimized.

Islet transplantation is associated with improvement of renal function among uremic patients with type I diabetes mellitus and kidney transplants

The potential effects of islet transplantation on the renal function of 36 patients with type I diabetes mellitus and kidney transplants were studied with 4 yr of follow-up monitoring. Kidney-islet recipients were divided into two groups, i.e., patients with successful islet transplants (SI-K group) (n = 24, fasting C-peptide levels of >0.5 ng/ml for >1 yr) and patients with unsuccessful islet transplants (UI-K group) (n = 12, fasting C-peptide levels of <0.5 ng/ml). Kidney graft survival rates and function, urinary albumin excretion rates, and sodium handling were compared. Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase activity in protocol kidney biopsies and in red blood cells was cross-sectionally analyzed. The SI-K group demonstrated better kidney graft survival rates (100, 83, and 83% at 1, 4, and 7 yr, respectively) than did the UI-K group (83, 72, and 51% at 1, 4, and 7 yr, respectively; P = 0.02). The SI-K group demonstrated reductions in exogenous insulin requirements and higher C-peptide levels, compared with the UI-K group, whereas GFR values were similar. Microalbuminuria (urinary albumin index) increased significantly in the UI-K group only (UI-K, from 92.0 +/- 64.9 to 183.8 +/- 83.8, P = 0.05; SI-K, from 108.5 +/- 53.6 to 85.0 +/- 39.0, NS). In the SI-K group, but not in the UI-K group, natriuresis decreased at 2 and 4 yr (P < 0.01). The SI-K group demonstrated greater Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase immunoreactivity in renal tubular cells (P = 0.05) and higher activity in red blood cells (P = 0.03), compared with the UI-K group. The Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase activity in red blood cells was positively correlated with circulating C-peptide levels but not with glycated hemoglobin levels. Successful islet transplantation was associated with improvements in kidney graft survival rates and function among uremic patients with type I diabetes mellitus and kidney grafts.

Pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation for the treatment of severe chronic pancreatitis: the first 40 patients at the leicester general hospital

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of the pancreas is considered a final resort in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. However, the opportunity to perform an islet autotransplant at the same time provides the potential to prevent the onset of diabetes.

METHODS

Pancreatectomy together with islet autotransplantation has been offered in our center since 1994. A total of 40 patients have now undergone this procedure. The follow-up times range from 6 months to 7 years. The data presented here include the annual postoperative oral glucose tolerance test and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) results, together with insulin and opiate requirements.

RESULTS

Nineteen male and 21 female patients (median age 44, range 21-65) have been transplanted. Pancreatitis was related to alcohol in 45% and was idiopathic in 40%. A median of 130108 (24332-1, 165538) islet equivalent (IEQ) were transplanted, which related to 2020 (320-23311) IEQ per kilogram of body weight. At 2 years posttransplant, 18 patients had a median HbA(1c) of 6.6% (5.2-19.3%), fasting C-peptide of 0.66 ng/mL (0.26-2.65 ng/mL), and required a median of 12 (0-45) units of insulin per day. At 6 years, these figures were 8% (6.1-11.1%), 1.68 ng/mL (0.9-2.78 ng/ml) and 43 U/day (6-86 U/day), respectively. The majority of patients no longer require opiate analgesia, 68% have been able to return to work, and one patient has had a baby.

CONCLUSIONS

Islet autotransplantation offers a valuable addition to surgical resection of the pancreas, as a treatment for chronic pancreatitis; and even in cases in which insulin independence is not achieved, the potential beneficial effects of C-peptide make the procedure worthwhile.

Islet transplantation improves vascular diabetic complications in patients with diabetes who underwent kidney transplantation: a comparison between kidney-pancreas and kidney-alone transplantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of islet transplantation on patient survival and diabetic vascular complications.

METHODS

Thirty-seven type 1 uremic diabetic kidney transplant patients underwent islet transplantation (KI group). Uremic type 1 diabetic kidney-pancreas (KP group, n=162), kidney-alone (KD group, n=42) transplant patients, and uremic type 1 diabetic patients still on hemodialysis (HD+DM group, n=196) constituted the control groups for survival and endothelial morphology.

RESULTS

Patient survival was similar in the KI and KP groups and higher than in the HD+DM group (P<0.05). Patients experiencing long-term islet function (KI-successful [KI-s], n=24) showed a better survival (100%, 100%, and 90%) than those in the KI group who lost islet function (KI-unsuccessful [KI-u], n=13) (84%, 75%, and 45%) at 1, 4 and 7 years, respectively (P=0.02). The cardiovascular death rate for the KI group (18%) was similar to the KD group (19%) but lower when the KI-s group is considered alone (5%), and showed a cardiovascular death rate similar to the KP group (8%). The KI-s group showed a good metabolic profile, with reduction of exogenous insulin requirement and persistent C-peptide secretion, as compared with the KI-u group. The endothelial morphology was evaluated with a skin biopsy obtained in all groups. The KI-s and the KP groups demonstrated decreased signs of endothelial injury compared with the KI-u and HD+DM groups. The KI group showed a better atherothrombotic profile than the HD+DM group, with higher levels of natural anticoagulant protein.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful islet transplantation improves survival, atherothrombotic profile, and endothelial morphology in uremic type 1 diabetic kidney transplant patients.

Long-term beneficial effect of islet transplantation on diabetic macro-/microangiopathy in type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate the long-term effects of transplanted islets on diabetic macro-/microangiopathy in type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 34 type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients underwent islet transplantation and were divided into two groups: successful islet-kidney transplantation (SI-K; 21 patients, fasting C-peptide serum concentration >0.5 ng/ml for >1 year) and unsuccessful islet-kidney transplantation (UI-K; 13 patients, fasting C-peptide serum concentration <0.5 ng/ml). Patients cumulative survival, cardiovascular death rate, and atherosclerosis progression were compared in the two groups. Skin biopsies, endothelial dependent dilation (EDD), nitric oxide (NO) levels, and atherothrombotic risk factors [von Willebrand factor (vWF) and D-dimer fragment (DDF)] were studied cross-sectionally.

RESULTS

The SI-K group showed a significant better patient survival rate (SI-K 100, 100, and 90% vs. UI-K 84, 74, and 51% at 1, 4, and 7 years, respectively, P = 0.04), lower cardiovascular death rate (SI-K 1/21 vs. UI-K 4/13, chi(2) = 3.9, P = 0.04), and lower intima-media thickness progression than the UI-K group (SI-K group: delta1-3 years -13 +/- 30 micro m vs. UI-K group: delta1-3 years 245 +/- 20 micro m, P = 0.03) with decreased signs of endothelial injuring at skin biopsy. Furthermore, the SI-K group showed a higher EDD than the UI-K group (EDD: SI-K 7.8 +/- 4.5% vs. UI-K 0.5 +/- 2.7%, P = 0.02), higher basal NO (SI-K 42.9 +/- 6.5 vs. UI-K 20.2 +/- 6.8 micro mol/l, P = 0.02), and lower levels of vWF (SI-K 138.6 +/- 15.3 vs. UI-K 180.6 +/- 7.0%, P = 0.02) and DDF (SI-K 0.61 +/- 0.22 vs. UI-K 3.07 +/- 0.68 micro g/ml, P < 0.01). C-peptide-to-creatinine ratio correlated positively with EDD and NO and negatively with vWF and DDF.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful islet transplantation improves survival, cardiovascular, and endothelial function in type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients.

Insulin action on protein metabolism in acromegalic patients

Insulin resistance in acromegaly causes glucose intolerance and diabetes, but it is unknown whether it involves protein metabolism, since both insulin and growth hormone promote protein accretion. The effects of acromegaly and of its surgical cure on the insulin sensitivity of glucose and amino acid/protein metabolism were evaluated by infusing [6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose, [1-(13)C]leucine, and [2-(15)N]glutamine during a euglycemic insulin (1 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)) clamp in 12 acromegalic patients, six studied again 6 mo after successful adenomectomy, and eight healthy controls. Acromegalic patients, compared with postsurgical and control subjects, had higher postabsorptive glucose concentration (5.5 +/- 0.3 vs. 4.9 +/- 0.2 micromol/l, P < 0.05, and 5.1 +/- 0.1 micromol/l) and flux (2.7 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.2 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1), P < 0.01, and 2.2 +/- 0.1 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1), P < 0.05) and reduced insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (+15 +/- 9 vs. +151 +/- 18%, P < 0.01, and 219 +/- 58%, P < 0.001 from basal). Postabsorptive leucine metabolism was similar among groups. In acromegalic and postsurgical subjects, insulin suppressed less than in controls the endogenous leucine flux (-9 +/- 1 and -12 +/- 2 vs. -18 +/- 2%, P < 0.001 and P < 0.05), the nonoxidative leucine disposal (-4 +/- 3 and -1 +/- 3 vs. -18 +/- 2%, P < 0.01 and P < 0.05), respectively, indexes of proteolysis and protein synthesis, and leucine oxidation (-17 +/- 6% in postsurgical patients vs. -26 +/- 6% in controls, P < 0.05). Within 6 mo, surgery reverses insulin resistance for glucose but not for protein metabolism. After adenomectomy, more leucine is oxidized during hyperinsulinemia.

Defining optimal immunosuppression for islet transplantation based on reduced diabetogenicity in canine islet autografts

BACKGROUND

The recent results of clinical islet transplantation have improved substantially with the introduction of a more potent but less diabetogenic immunosuppressant protocol. The successful development of this protocol was based in part on the outcomes of studies reported herein, addressing the diabetogenic potential of a series of immunosuppressant agents used alone or in combination in a canine islet autograft model. Although it is recognized that failure to achieve long-term insulin independence in human islet allotransplantation has been multifactorial, with low engraftment mass, acute or chronic rejection, autoimmune recurrence, loss of islet-acinar integrity, heterotopic site, denervation, and insulin resistance all being implicated to varying degrees, avoidance of diabetogenic immunosuppression has been pivotal to the enhanced outcomes of clinical islet transplantation. We here explore the effects of clinically relevant doses of cyclosporine or tacrolimus when given alone or in combination with glucocorticoids on long-term canine islet autograft function.

METHOD

Dogs (n=8) underwent total pancreatectomy, islet isolation, and intrasplenic autotransplantation and were normoglycemic with stable long-term graft function 3 months to 8 years posttransplant. The frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) was performed predrug (baseline), at 1 month of therapy (on drug), and again 1 month after withdrawal of therapy (postdrug).

RESULTS

Monotherapy treatments with low- or high-dose prednisone, Neoral, or tacrolimus had minimal impact on islet autograft function. The combination of Neoral and prednisone led to a marked impairment in glucose decay (25% decline from 1.77+/-0.2 to 1.24+/-0.2, P<0.05), without significant change in insulin responsiveness or glucose effectiveness. However, insulin sensitivity was markedly impaired while on therapy (7.10+/-1.2 to 3.10+/-0.5, P<0.01). Importantly, glucose decay and insulin sensitivity failed to return to baseline after withdrawal of therapy. The combination of tacrolimus and glucocorticoids led to permanent and irreversible diabetes in all recipients (n=6, P<0.001). Similar treatment of healthy control dogs led to a 44% decrease in glucose decay (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppression must be specifically tailored for islet transplantation and be glucocorticoid free if insulin independence is to be sustained clinically.

Reduction of blood glucose variability in type 1 diabetic patients treated by pancreatic islet transplantation: interest of continuous glucose monitoring

OBJECTIVE

To compare the glycemic profiles of patients with type 1 diabetes treated with either an implantable insulin pump or pancreas or islet transplantation by the means of the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS; Minimed, Sylmar, CA).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The CGMS enabled recording of subcutaneous glucose concentrations (range 2.2-22 mmol/l) over 72 h (288 measurements per day). Over 3 days, 26 patients with type 1 diabetes were connected to a CGMS: 10 patients were treated with intraperitoneal insulin infusion through an implantable pump (IPII), 9 patients were treated with simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK), and 7 patients were treated with pancreatic islet transplantation after kidney grafting (IAK). All SPK patients and four IAK patients were insulin independent, whereas three IAK patients had partial graft function and reduced exogenous insulin needs. Glucose control was evaluated by the mean glucose concentration, glucose variability, and the number and duration of hypoglycemic events (<3.3 mmol/l) over 3 days.

RESULTS

The mean glucose concentration and the glucose variability in SPK and IAK patients were significantly lower than those observed in patients treated with IPII: 5.38 +/- 1.12 and 5.83 +/- 0.81 vs. 7.81 +/- 1.55 mmol/l (P < 0.001) and 1.40 +/- 0.42 and 1.32 +/- 0.53 vs. 3.47 +/- 1.66 mmol/l (P < 0.001), respectively. Furthermore, the mean glucose concentration and the glucose variability were comparable between SPK and IAK patients. Over 3 days, no hypoglycemic events were observed in SPK patients and insulin-independent IAK patients. A total of 4.12 +/- 1.66 hypoglycemic events were detected in the IPII patient group, whereas only 0.66 +/- 0.57 events were observed in IAK patients with partial graft function (P < 0.001). The duration of the hypoglycemic events was significantly longer in IPII patients as compared with IAK patients: 64 +/- 33 vs. 30 +/- 15 min for the day period and 130 +/- 62 vs. 30 +/- 27 min for the night period (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of subcutaneous CGMS confirms that islet transplantation can be as efficient as pancreas transplantation in restoring good metabolic control and reducing blood glucose variability. Metabolic improvement due to use of an implantable insulin pump requires insulin delivery by a closed loop.

Successful islet transplantation: continued insulin reserve provides long-term glycemic control

Clinical islet transplantation is gaining acceptance as a potential therapy, particularly for subjects who have labile diabetes or problems with hypoglycemic awareness. The risks of the procedure and long-term outcomes are still not fully known. We have performed 54 islet transplantation procedures on 30 subjects and have detailed follow-up in 17 consecutive Edmonton protocol-treated subjects who attained insulin independence after transplantation of adequate numbers of islets. Subjects were assessed pretransplant and followed prospectively posttransplant for immediate and long-term complications related to the procedure or immunosuppressive therapy. The 17 patients all became insulin independent after a minimum of 9,000 islets/kg were transplanted. Of 15 consecutive patients with at least 1 year of follow-up after the initial transplant, 12 (80%) were insulin independent at 1 year. In 14 subjects who have maintained demonstrable C-peptide secretion, glucose control has been stable and glycemic lability and problems with hypoglycemic reactions have been corrected. After 2 of the 54 procedures, some thrombosis was detected in the portal vein circulation. Five subjects had bleeding related to the percutaneous portal vein access procedures: three required transfusion alone, and in one subject, who had a partial thrombosis of the portal vein, an expanding intrahepatic and subscapular hemorrhage occurred while on anticoagulation, requiring transfusion and surgery. Elevated liver function test results were found in 46% of subjects but resolved in all. Complications related to the therapy have been hypercholesterolemia requiring statin therapy in 65%; a rise in creatinine in two patients, both of whom had preexisting renal disease; a rise in protein in four, all of whom had preexisting proteinuria; and antihypertensive therapy increased or started in 53%. Three of the 17 patients have required retinal laser photocoagulation. There have been no cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder or cytomegalovirus infection, and no deaths. The acute insulin response to arginine correlated better with transplanted islet mass than acute insulin response to glucose (AIR(g)) and area under the curve for insulin (AUC(i)), but the AIR(g) and AUC(i) were more closely related to glycemic control. The AUC(i) directly posttransplant was lower in those who eventually became C-peptide deficient. Our results, with a maximum follow-up of 34 months, indicate that prolonged insulin independence can be achieved after islet transplantation. There are some risks associated acutely with the procedure, and hypercholesterolemia and hypertension are treatable concerns on longer-term follow-up. All patients with persisting C-peptide secretion have had a resolution of both glycemic lability and problems with hypoglycemic reactions. Apart from the rise in serum creatinine in two subjects, no serious consequences of immunosuppressive therapy have been encountered. Islet transplantation is a reasonable option in those with severe problems with glycemic lability or hypoglycemia.

Nomenclature of the GLUT/SLC2A family of sugar/polyol transport facilitators

The recent identification of several additional members of the family of sugar transport facilitators (gene symbol SLC2A, protein symbol GLUT) has created a heterogeneous and, in part, confusing nomenclature. Therefore, this letter provides a summary of the family members and suggests a systematic nomenclature for SLC2A and GLUT symbols.

Identification of a novel glucose transporter-like protein-GLUT-12

Facilitative glucose transporters exhibit variable hexose affinity and tissue-specific expression. These characteristics contribute to specialized metabolic properties of cells. Here we describe the characterization of a novel glucose transporter-like molecule, GLUT-12. GLUT-12 was identified in MCF-7 breast cancer cells by homology to the insulin-regulatable glucose transporter GLUT-4. The GLUT-12 cDNA encodes 617 amino acids, which possess features essential for sugar transport. Di-leucine motifs are present in NH(2) and COOH termini at positions similar to the GLUT-4 FQQI and LL targeting motifs. GLUT-12 exhibits 29% amino acid identity with GLUT-4 and 40% to the recently described GLUT-10. Like GLUT-10, a large extracellular domain is predicted between transmembrane domains 9 and 10. Genomic organization of GLUT-12 is highly conserved with GLUT-10 but distinct from GLUTs 1-5. Immunofluorescence showed that, in the absence of insulin, GLUT-12 is localized to the perinuclear region in MCF-7 cells. Immunoblotting demonstrated GLUT-12 expression in skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and small intestine. Thus GLUT-12 is potentially part of a second insulin-responsive glucose transport system.