Association of lipoprotein(a) with puberty in IDDM

Lipoprotein (a): impact by ethnicity and environmental and medical conditions

Levels of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], a complex between an LDL-like lipid moiety containing one copy of apoB, and apo(a), a plasminogen-derived carbohydrate-rich hydrophilic protein, are primarily genetically regulated. Although stable intra-individually, Lp(a) levels have a skewed distribution inter-individually and are strongly impacted by a size polymorphism of the LPA gene, resulting in a variable number of kringle IV (KIV) units, a key motif of apo(a). The variation in KIV units is a strong predictor of plasma Lp(a) levels resulting in stable plasma levels across the lifespan. Studies have demonstrated pronounced differences across ethnicities with regard to Lp(a) levels and some of this difference, but not all of it, can be explained by genetic variations across ethnic groups. Increasing evidence suggests that age, sex, and hormonal impact may have a modest modulatory influence on Lp(a) levels. Among clinical conditions, Lp(a) levels are reported to be affected by kidney and liver diseases.

Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is a LDL-like particle consisting of an ApoA moiety linked to one molecule of ApoB(100). Recent data from large-scale prospective studies and genetic association studies provide highly suggestive evidence for a potentially causal role of Lp(a) in affecting risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in general populations. Patients with Type 2 diabetes display clustered metabolic abnormalities and elevated risk of CVD. Lower plasma Lp(a) levels were observed in diabetic patients in several recent studies. Epidemiology studies of Lp(a) and CVD risk in diabetic patients generated inconsistent results. We recently found that Lp(a)-related genetic markers did not predict CVD in two diabetic cohorts. The current data suggest that Lp(a) may differentially affect cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients and in the general population. More prospective studies, Mendelian randomization analysis and functional studies are needed to clarify the causal relationship of Lp(a) and CVD in diabetic patients.

Reference distributions for apolipoproteins AI and B and B/AI ratios: comparison of a large cohort to the world's literature

Limiting the clinical utility of apolipoproteins AI (apo AI) and B (apo B) and the apo B/AI ratios until the last decade has been the lack of satisfactory methods for quantifying serum levels and credible reference materials. Great technological strides have been made in the last few years. The remaining barrier to more relevant and cost-effective use of serum protein data for diagnosis and prognosis has been the availability of widely recognized reliable reference intervals from birth to old age for both males and females. A total of 82 publications reporting reference intervals have been identified that meet most of the same inclusion criteria used in our prior six studies. These have been analyzed statistically and compared to similar studies, i.e., sufficient number, listed subject criteria, method, and reference material, in general terms. Published smaller studies with constrained age ranges, agree on average with our large series of life-long reference intervals that range from less than one year to over 80 years. This study was performed to assess the degree of agreement between smaller reference interval studies to our large population analysis. This meta-analysis provides support and reassurance that many of the smaller reference intervals published previously fall within reasonable limits of out large population.

Lipoprotein(a) and Other Cardiovascular Metabolic Risk Factors in Kuwaiti Children with Type-1 Diabetes

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Lipoprotein(a) synthesis and catabolism could be influenced by insulin or by diabetes metabolic complications in patients with type-1 diabetes. The aim of the study was to investigate the relation of plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations with metabolic cardiovascular risk factors in Kuwaiti children with uncomplicated type-1 diabetes.

METHODS

This case-control study included 115 (44 males and 71 females) diabetic children aged 6-18 years matched by age and sex to 115 non-diabetic children as controls.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the mean lipoprotein(a) concentrations in type-1 diabetic children (27.34 mg/dl) and their controls (22.80 mg/dl). Total cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1 and B levels were significantly higher in diabetic children than controls. In diabetic children, significant correlations were found between lipoprotein(a) levels and glycated hemoglobin (r = 0.249, p = 0.011), total cholesterol (r = 0.208, p = 0.025), and apolipoprotein B (r = 0.349, p < 0.001). The proportion of diabetic children with lipoprotein(a) >30 mg/dl was significantly higher in those having poor glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin >9.0%, p = 0.013), raised total cholesterol (p = 0.033), or with a family history of cardiovascular disease (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Plasma lipoprotein(a) levels were not elevated in young type-1 diabetic children compared to non-diabetic controls; however, lipoprotein(a) levels were significantly higher in diabetic children with poor glycemic control. Moreover, there were significant correlations between lipoprotein(a) and the metabolic cardiovascular risk factors total cholesterol, atherogenic index, apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein B/A1 ratio.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism and lipid profiles in Kuwaiti children with type 1 diabetes

METHODS

We studied angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphism and lipid profiles in Kuwaiti children with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes. A total of 125 children with type 1 diabetes were matched in a case-control study on age and gender to 125 non-diabetic children as controls. Serum lipids (total cholesterol, TC; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-c; triglycerides, TG; apolipoprotein A1 and B, apo A1 and B; lipoprotein(a), Lp(a)); and glycated hemoglobin, HbA1c were evaluated according to ACE genotypes.

RESULTS

Genotype distributions were found to be similar in cases [ACE insertion/insertion (II) 9.6%, ACE insertion/deletion (ID) 38.4%, ACE deletion/deletion (DD) 52.0%], and controls (II 8.8%, ID 43.2%, DD 48.0%), and were characterized by higher frequencies of DD, ID, and lower frequencies of II. Diabetic children with DD genotype showed significantly higher levels of TC (p < 0.01), HDL (p < 0.001), and apo A1 (p < 0.001) than controls. There was a higher proportion of diabetic children with family history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the DD genotype group (51.9%) than those with II genotype group (11.1%) (p < 0.001). Also, there was a significant increase in the frequency of diabetic children with Lp(a) > 30 mg/dL in children with a family history of CVD (p = 0.008). Lp(a) levels were correlated with HbA1c in the diabetic group (r = 0.239, p = 0.019), but when patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 9%) were excluded, the significant correlation disappeared (r = 0.127, p = 0.381). After adjusting confounding between variables, the logistic regression analysis showed that the two significantly related variables with the rise in Lp(a) were increasing TC level and poor glycemic control.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with type 1 diabetes, the role of ACE polymorphism as a probable contributor to CVD seems to be partially mediated through other factors such as poor glycemic control, TC, and Lp(a) level. A longitudinal study is recommended with a larger number of patients in each ACE genotype group in order to assess such associations.

Dietary fats do not contribute to hyperlipidemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative influence of diet, metabolic control, and familial factors on lipids in children with type 1 diabetes and control subjects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We assessed fasting serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein (apo)-A1, and apoB in 79 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and 61 age- and sex-matched control subjects, together with dietary intakes using a quantitative food frequency questionnaire.

RESULTS

Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apoB, HDL cholesterol, and apoA1 were significantly higher in children with diabetes. Children with diabetes had higher percentage energy intake from complex carbohydrates (P = 0.001) and fiber intake (P = 0.02), and they had lower intake of refined sugar (P < 0.001) and percentage energy from saturated fat (P = 0.045) than control subjects. Total cholesterol (beta = 0.43, P < 0.001), LDL cholesterol (beta = 0.4, P < 0.001), and apoB (beta = 0.32, P = 0.006) correlated independently with HbA(1c) but not dietary intake. HDL cholesterol (beta = 0.24, P = 0.05) and apoA1 (beta = 0.32, P = 0.004) correlated independently with HbA(1c), and HDL cholesterol (beta = -0.34, P = 0.009) correlated with percentage energy intake from complex carbohydrates. Triglycerides correlated independently with percentage energy intake from complex carbohydrates (beta = 0.33, P = 0.01) and insulin dose (beta = 0.26, P = 0.04). Subjects with diabetes and elevated LDL (>3.35 mmol/l, >130 mg/dl), for whom dietary therapy would be recommended, had significantly higher HbA(1c) (P = 0.007), but they had higher intake of complex carbohydrates than subjects with LDL cholesterol <3.35 mmol/l.

CONCLUSIONS

Lipid abnormalities remain common in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes who adhere to current dietary recommendations, and they relate to metabolic control but not dietary intake.

Endothelial dysfunction relates to folate status in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

Endothelial dysfunction occurs early in the development of vascular disease in diabetes. Total plasma homocyst(e)ine (tHcy) is associated with endothelial dysfunction. We therefore aimed to assess endothelial function in children with type 1 diabetes in relation to tHcy and its determinants. Endothelial function was assessed in 36 children with type 1 diabetes aged 13.7 +/- 2.2 years and 20 age- and sex-matched control subjects using ultrasound assessment of flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN)-dependent brachial artery responses. von Willebrand factor (vWF) and thrombomodulin, markers of endothelial activation, were measured in 64 children with type 1 diabetes and 52 control subjects. Fasting glucose, tHcy, serum and red cell folate, vitamin B12, HbA(1c), creatinine, and lipids were also measured. FMD (5.2 +/- 4.7 vs. 9.1 +/- 4.0%, P = 0.002) and the ratio of FMD:GTN-induced dilatation (0.22 +/- 0.39 vs. 0.41 +/- 0.29%, P = 0.008) were significantly lower in diabetic subjects, indicating endothelial dysfunction. In diabetic subjects, red cell folate correlated independently with FMD (beta = 0.42, P = 0.028) and the ratio of FMD:GTN-induced dilatation (beta = 0.59, P < 0.001). Resting vessel diameter correlated independently with tHcy (beta = -0.51, P < 0.001) and height (beta = 0.65, P < 0.001). vWF correlated independently with HbA(1c) (beta = 0.38, P = 0.003), and thrombomodulin correlated independently with red cell folate (beta = -0.38, P = 0.005), tHcy (beta = -0.37, P = 0.004), diastolic blood pressure (beta = -0.28, P = 0.025), and creatinine clearance (beta = 0.26, P = 0.033). Children with type 1 diabetes have early endothelial dysfunction. Better folate status is associated with better endothelial function, as measured by higher FMD, higher FMD:GTN ratio, and lower thrombomodulin. Folate may therefore protect against endothelial dysfunction in children with diabetes.

Reduced total plasma homocyst(e)ine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to investigate total plasma homocyst(e)ine (tHcy), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genotype, and the contribution of diet to homocysteine values in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and a control group.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 78 children with type 1 diabetes and 59 members of an age- and sex-matched control group were recruited. Fasting samples were collected for tHcy, MTHFR genotype, serum vitamin B(12), serum folate, red cell folate, and plasma creatinine. Food frequency questionnaires targeted intake of folate, vitamin B(6), and vitamin B(12).

RESULTS

Fasting tHcy was reduced in patients compared with the control group (4.7 vs 5.9 micromol/L, P <.001). Serum folate (P =.002), red cell folate(P <.001), and serum vitamin B(12) (P =.005) were higher, and plasma creatinine was lower. A significant difference in tHcy values between patients and the control group persisted after correction was done for these factors (r = 0.1, P =.02). No difference was seen in the frequency of MTHFR polymorphisms. tHcy was not elevated in those patients with the 677TT or 677T/1298C genotypes, although red cell folate was significantly higher in members of the case (P =.01) and control groups (P =.05) with a 677 TT genotype. Dietary intake of folate correlated with serum folate (r = 0.4,P =.005).

CONCLUSION

tHcy values are lower in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Higher serum levels of folic acid and vitamin B(12), reflecting differences in dietary intake between children with diabetes and members of a control group, partially account for this difference.

Biochemical risk factors and patient's outcome: the case of lipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a genetic variant of low density lipoproteins and consists of the covalent association of the unique and enigmatic apolipoprotein(a) to apoliprotein B100. Despite the high degree of homology with low density lipoproteins, Lp(a) displays distinctive physico-chemical properties, function and metabolism. The present article reviews the main biological and clinical evidences about the association between raised concentration of Lp(a) and atherothrombotic diseases and provides tentative guidelines to improve the clinical usefulness of Lp(a) measurements.

Modification of serum apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a) levels after bisphosphonates-induced acute phase response

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a low density lipoprotein-like particle displaying strong atherothrombotic properties. Although the concentration of Lp(a) in plasma is under strong genetic regulation, there are emerging evidences that several other factors, such as hormonal disorders, acute phase, liver and renal failure may affect its metabolism. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether bisphosphonates, an effectual drug in the treatment of malignant hypercalcemia and Paget's disease of bone, known to induce a concomitant acute phase, may have a significant influence on Lp(a) concentrations. Nine subjects (four men and five women), with plasma Lp(a) concentrations in the range between 6.4 and 17.7 mg/dl, were subjected to a single intravenous infusion of bisphosphonates (7.5 mg of aminohydroxybutylidene and 5.0 mg of aminohydroxylidene), previously dissolved in 250 ml of saline. Lp(a), apo A-I, apo B, C reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were measured at the baseline and after days one, two, four and seven. CRP, ESR and Lp(a) started to increase after two days from the treatment, reaching statistical significance after day two, four and seven, respectively. Apo B and apo A-I decreased significantly after days one and two, respectively. Although patterns and relative amounts of the increase of CRP were substantially different among the subjects studied, the increase of Lp(a) was more homogeneous; the peak of Lp(a) concentrations was reached only seven days after treatment in the group as a whole, in agreement with previous observations. In univariate regression analysis, significant correlations were found only between apo A-I and ESR, and apo A-I and Lp(a). The present study suggest that Lp(a) behaves as an acute phase protein. Besides, we observed a slight but significant decrease of apo A-I and apo B after administration of bisphosphonates.

Standardization and clinical management of lipoprotein(a) measurements

The present article proposes personal suggestions to improve determinations and clinical interpretation of results of lipoprotein(a) assays. Methods and procedures for sampling and quantification of the various isoforms of lipoprotein(a) in serum, plasma and urine are reviewed with the aim of improving the reliability and reproducibility of results and reinforcing the clinical utility of lipoprotein(a) measurements.

Serum lipoprotein (a) in type 1 diabetic children and adolescents: relationships with HbA1c and subclinical complications

In a population of 106 young type I diabetic patients, we evaluated whether a relationship exists between lipoprotein (Lp)(a) or apolipoproteins and the degree of metabolic control (HbA1c, fructosamine) or the subclinical complications. The patients were subdivided according to puberty and to the presence or not of subclinical complications (no complications [n = 32]; retinopathy at fluorescein angiography [n = 28]; neuropathy diagnosed by reduced peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity [n = 30]; nephropathy determined by presence of micro-albuminuria [n = 15]. Lp(a) concentrations were not significantly increased in the whole group of diabetic patients. There was no difference between girls and boys, nor between the prepubertal children and the others. There were no significant correlations between the markers of metabolic control and Lp(a). Nevertheless, if the diabetic patients were divided into two groups according to the levels of HbA1c (<7.6 or > or = 6% Hb), Lp(a) tends to be higher in the poorly controlled, but not to any significant degree. On the other hand, significant increases of total cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels were observed in poorly controlled patients. Lp(a) concentrations were significantly lower in patients with subclinical neuropathy or nephropathy than in patients without these complications, but not in patients with retinopathy versus no retinopathy. These results are confirmed by categorical analysis (i.e. Lp(a) < or = 30 vs > 30 mg/dl).

CONCLUSION

Lp(a) levels are not significantly increased in poorly controlled insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients. High controlled insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients. High levels of Lp(a), in young diabetic patients, are not markers for subclinical complications (retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy). On the contrary, low Lp(a) levels were found in subjects with subclinical neuropathy or nephropathy.

Lipoprotein(a) in health and disease

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] represents an LDL-like particle to which the Lp(a)-specific apolipoprotein(a) is linked via a disulfide bridge. It has gained considerable interest as a genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Several studies have described a correlation between elevated Lp(a) plasma levels and coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral atherosclerosis. In healthy individuals, Lp(a) plasma concentrations are almost exclusively controlled by the apo(a) gene locus on chromosome 6q2.6-q2.7. More than 30 alleles at this highly polymorphic gene locus determine a size polymorphism of apo(a). There exists an inverse correlation between the size (molecular weight) of apo(a) isoforms and Lp(a) plasma concentrations. The standardization of Lp(a) quantification is still an unresolved task due to the large particle size of Lp(a), the presence of two different apoproteins [apoB and apo(a)], and the large size polymorphism of apo(a) and its homology with plasminogen. A working group sponsored by the IFCC is currently establishing a stable reference standard for Lp(a) as well as a reference method for quantitative analysis. Aside from genetic reasons, abnormal Lp(a) plasma concentrations are observed as secondary to various diseases. Lp(a) plasma levels are elevated over controls in patients with nephrotic syndrome and patients with end-stage renal disease. Following renal transplantation, Lp(a) concentrations decrease to values observed in controls matched for apo(a) type. Controversial data on Lp(a) in diabetes mellitus result mainly from insufficient sample sizes of numerous studies. Large studies and those including apo(a) phenotype analysis came to the conclusion that Lp(a) levels are not or only moderately elevated in insulin-dependent patients. In noninsulin-dependent diabetics, Lp(a) is not elevated. Conflicting data also exist from studies in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Several case-control studies reported elevated Lp(a) levels in those patients, suggesting a role of the LDL-receptor pathway for degradation of Lp(a). However, recent turnover studies rejected that concept. Moreover, family studies also revealed data arguing against an influence of the LDL receptor for Lp(a) concentrations. Several rare diseases or disorders, such as LCAT- and LPL-deficiency as well as liver diseases, are associated with low plasma levels or lack of Lp(a).

Little association of lipid parameters and large sensory nerve fiber function in diabetes mellitus

The natural history of diabetic neuropathy and its risk factors are not well understood. The potential association of various lipids [e.g., high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides], and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations, with large sensory nerve fiber function as assessed by vibratory thresholds was examined in a group of 91 individuals with diabetes mellitus. In multivariate analyses, no independent relationships of any of the lipid or lipoprotein parameters measured in this study were found with vibratory thresholds (i.e., dependent variable). Independent associations of age, duration of diabetes, height, and medications that lower blood pressure with vibratory thresholds were shown and explained 51% of the overall variability of the model. In gender-specific models, age, height, and medications that lower blood pressure were statistically significant independent determinates (i.e., males R2 = 0.61, females R2 = 0.39). These cross-sectional data suggest that lipid and lipoprotein parameters measured in this study have little association with large sensory nerve fiber dysfunction. The interesting association with the use of medications that lower blood pressure and vibratory thresholds warrants further investigation.

Levels of lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein cholesterol distribution in IDDM. Results from follow-up in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial

Levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], apolipoprotein (apo) B, and lipoprotein cholesterol distribution using density-gradient ultracentrifugation were measured as part of a cross-sectional study at the final follow-up examination (mean 6.2 years) in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Compared with the subjects in the conventionally treated group (n = 680), those subjects receiving intensive diabetes therapy (n = 667) had a lower level of Lp(a) (Caucasian subjects only, median 10.7 vs 12.5 mg/dl, respectively; P = 0.03), lower apo B (mean 83 vs. 86 mg/dl, respectively; P = 0.01), and a more favorable distribution of cholesterol in the lipoprotein fractions as measured by density-gradient ultracentrifugation with less cholesterol in the very-low-density lipoprotein and the dense low-density lipoprotein fractions and greater cholesterol content of the more buoyant low-density lipoprotein. Compared with a nondiabetic Caucasian control group (n = 2,158), Lp(a) levels were not different in the intensive treatment group (median 9.6 vs. 10.7 mg/dl, respectively; NS) and higher in the conventional treatment group (9.6 vs. 12.5 mg/dl, respectively; P < 0.01). No effect of renal dysfunction as measured by increasing albuminuria or reduced creatinine clearance on Lp(a) levels could be demonstrated in the diabetic subjects. Prospective follow-up of these subjects will determine whether these favorable lipoprotein differences in the intensive treatment group persist and whether they influence the onset of atherosclerosis in insulin-dependent diabetes.

Longitudinal study of lipoprotein(a) in peripubertal children with insulin-dependent diabetes

We aimed to examine the longitudinal relationship between lipoprotein(a) and haemoglobin A1c, albumin excretion rate, and puberty in peripubertal children with insulin-dependent diabetes. A total of 114 patients aged 11.5 +/- 3.6 years (mean (SD)) were followed prospectively for 15.2 +/- 2.8 months. Lipoprotein(a), apolipoproteinB-100, haemoglobin A1c, mean overnight albumin excretion rate and Tanner stage were determined at the beginning and end of the study period. Lipoprotein(a) and apolipoproteinB-100 were measured using nephelometry. This method was correlated with radioimmunoassay and there was no significant change in mean bias during the study. Lipoprotein(a) fell significantly over time (214, (152, 276); 160 (84, 236) mg l-1 geometric mean (0.95 confidence intervals), p < 0.001); apolipoproteinB-100 did not change. Lipoprotein(a) and apolipoproteinB-100 did not differ in 233 cross-sectional controls of similar age. The change in lipoprotein(a) did not correlate with a small fall in haemoglobin A1c or with overnight albumin excretion rate, Tanner stage or insulin dose. Separate analysis of male and female patients and prepubertal and pubertal patients continued to show a significant fall in lipoprotein(a) independent of change in haemoglobin A1c or albumin excretion rate. Likewise, 53 patients with a change in haemoglobin A1c of greater than 1%, and 20 patients who progressed from normal albumin excretion rate to albumin excretion rate above the 95th centile, showed no relationship between lipoprotein(a) and haemoglobin A1c or albumin excretion rate. In conclusion, longitudinal changes in lipoprotein(a) do not relate to metabolic control or early changes in albuminuria in young patients with insulin-dependent diabetes.

The role of lipoprotein(a) in the vascular complications of diabetes mellitus

Lipoprotein(a) has been identified as an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease in non-diabetic populations. Because of its potential role in the pathogenesis of both microvascular and macrovascular complications in diabetes, there have recently been many reports on lipoprotein(a) in diabetic populations. Some studies indicate an association between elevated lipoprotein(a) and macrovascular disease in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), but this link has not been found with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). In IDDM, elevated lipoprotein(a) has been found in groups with diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy, raising the possibility that it plays a causative role. The relationship between glycaemic control and the lipoprotein(a) level has not been fully resolved. Most studies have not found any connection in NIDDM, but some found higher lipoprotein(a) levels in hyperglycaemic IDDM patients. Potentially, lipoprotein(a) is an important factor linking the microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes.

Long-term physical exercise and lipoprotein(a) levels in a previously sedentary male and female population

We investigated the effect of long-term physical exercise on serum lipoprotein(a) levels. 21 sedentary men and 15 sedentary women were trained three to four times a week with increasing intensity during 9 months. After 24 weeks all subjects ran a 15 km race and after 36 weeks a half marathon run (21 km). Blood samples were drawn before the training programme, 5 days before both races and 5 days after the half marathon run. Median (interquartile range) pre-training values in the male group were 32 (11-63) mg/L and in the female group 65 (23-199) mg/L. After 24 weeks of training, serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations had risen significantly in both male and female groups. Moreover, after 36 weeks of training, in preparation for the half marathon competition, median serum lipoprotein(a) rose almost twofold in both groups and was still elevated 5 days later. This study demonstrates that an exercise programme which includes running of increasing distances significantly increases serum lipoprotein(a) concentration.

Endogenous sex hormones: impact on lipids, lipoproteins, and insulin

Estrogen use has been reported to decrease triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Estrogen use increases the secretion of large, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) and also stimulates the uptake of VLDL-C by the liver and increases the catabolism of LDL-C in the liver. Sex hormones may affect several enzymes involved in the metabolism of HDL-C and triglyceride and may also affect lipolysis. In both pre- and postmenopausal women, several studies have shown that increased glucose and insulin concentrations are associated with increased free testosterone and decreased sex hormone binding globulin. The temporal direction of this relationship in premenopausal women is not clear, however. In contrast to women, increased androgen concentrations in men do not seem to be associated with increased cardiovascular risk factors, although testosterone concentrations are associated with increased HDL-C and decreased insulin concentrations. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) appear to be associated with improved cardiovascular risk factors in men, but this connection in women is less clear.

Lack of association between sex hormones and Lp(a) concentrations in American and Finnish men

Sex hormones may play a role in the determination of cardiovascular disease. Recently lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) has been recognized as a risk factor for coronary heart disease. Estrogens and anabolic steroids have been reported to alter Lp(a) levels, yet no data are available on the association between in vivo concentrations of sex hormones and Lp(a) concentrations. We examined the possible associations of sex hormone-binding globulin, total and free testosterone, estradiol, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate to Lp(a) concentrations in men in two population-based studies (San Antonio Heart Study [n = 178] and a Finnish study on the association between insulin resistance and atherosclerosis [n = 87]). In neither study were sex hormones significantly related to Lp(a) concentrations. In addition, Lp(a) was significantly related to apolipoprotein(a) molecular weight (which was measured in the Finnish study only). These results were unchanged when Lp(a) concentrations were adjusted for apolipoprotein(a) molecular weight (a strong correlate of Lp[a] concentrations). We conclude that in vivo concentrations of sex hormones are unlikely to be associated with Lp(a) concentrations in men.