Insulin antibody responses after long-term intraperitoneal insulin administration via implantable programmable insulin delivery systems

Exogenous Insulin Antibody Syndrome in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Background

Exogenous insulin antibody syndrome (EIAS) is an immunological disorder caused by circulating insulin antibodies (IAs), featuring hypersensitivity to exogenous insulin and insulin resistance. With the wide use of recombinant human insulin and insulin analogs, there has been a significant proliferation of EIAS.

Case Report

We describe two cases of diabetes mellitus (DM) with hyperinsulinemia and high serum levels of IAs. They had never been exposed to methimazole, glutathione, lipoic acid, and other sulfhydryl drugs, but they all received insulin treatment. The patient in case 1 had recurrent hypoglycemia before hospitalization. A prolonged oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) showed hypoglycemia with inappropriately high insulin levels. The patient in case 2 was hospitalized for diabetic ketosis. An OGTT indicated hyperglycemia with hyperinsulinemia and low levels of C-peptide. IAs induced by exogenous insulin in the two patients with DM were positive at high titers, prompting a diagnosis of another condition-EIAS.

Conclusion

We discussed the differences between these two cases of EIAS in clinical manifestations and treatment and summarized all patients of EIAS treated in our department to date.

Favourable serum calcification propensity with intraperitoneal as compared with subcutaneous insulin administration in type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Serum calcification propensity can be monitored using the maturation time of calciprotein particles in serum (T₅₀ test). A shorter T₅₀ indicates greater propensity to calcify; this is an independent determinant of cardiovascular disease. As the intraperitoneal (IP) route of insulin administration mimics the physiology more than the subcutaneous (SC) route in persons with type 1 diabetes (T1DM), we hypothesized that IP insulin influences determinants of calcium propensity and therefore result in a longer T₅₀ than SC insulin administration.

METHODS

Prospective, observational case-control study. Measurements were performed at baseline and at 26 weeks in age and gender matched persons with T1DM.

RESULTS

A total of 181 persons, 39 (21.5%) of which used IP and 142 (78.5%) SC insulin were analysed. Baseline T₅₀ was 356 (45) minutes. The geometric mean T₅₀ significantly differed between both treatment groups: 367 [95% confidence interval (CI) 357, 376] for the IP group and 352 (95% CI 347, 357) for the SC group with a difference of -15 (95% CI -25, -4) minutes, in favour of IP treatment. In multivariable analyses, the IP route of insulin administration had a positive relation on T₅₀ concentrations while higher age, triglycerides and phosphate concentrations had an inverse relation.

CONCLUSION

Among persons with T1DM, IP insulin administration results in a more favourable calcification propensity time then SC insulin. It has yet to be shown if this observation translates into improved cardiovascular outcomes.

Exogenous insulin antibody syndrome (EIAS): a clinical syndrome associated with insulin antibodies induced by exogenous insulin in diabetic patients

Insulin has been used for diabetes therapy and has achieved significant therapeutic effect. In recent years, the use of purified and recombinant human insulin preparations has markedly reduced, but not completely suppressed, the incidence of insulin antibodies (IAs). IAs induced by exogenous insulin in diabetic patients is associated with clinical events, which is named exogenous insulin antibody syndrome (EIAS). The present review is based on our research and summarizes the characterization of IAs, the factors affecting IA development, the clinical significance of IAs and the treatments for EIAS.

Finding the right route for insulin delivery - an overview of implantable pump therapy

INTRODUCTION

Implantable pump therapy adopting the intraperitoneal route of insulin delivery has been available for the past three decades. The key rationale for implantable pump therapy is the restoration of the portal-peripheral insulin gradient of the normal physiology. Uptake in clinical practice is limited to specialized centers and selected patient populations. Areas covered: Implantable pump therapy is discussed, including technical aspects, rationale for its use, and glycemic and non-glycemic effects. Target populations, summaries of clinical studies and issues related to implantable pump therapy are highlighted. Limitations of implantable pump therapy and its future outlook in clinical practice are presented. Expert opinion: Although intraperitoneal insulin delivery appears closer to the normal physiology, technical, pharmacological, and costs barriers prevent a wider adoption. Evidence from clinical studies remains scarce and inconclusive. As a consequence, the use of implantable pump therapy will be confined to a small population unless considerable technological progress is made and well-conducted studies can demonstrate glycemic and/or non-glycemic benefits justifying wider application.

Wearable and implantable pancreas substitutes

A lifelong-implanted and completely automated artificial or bioartificial pancreas (BAP) is the holy grail for type 1 diabetes treatment, and could be a definitive solution even for other severe pathologies, such as pancreatitis and pancreas cancer. Technology has made several important steps forward in the last years, providing new hope for the realization of such devices, whose feasibility is strictly connected to advances in glucose sensor technology, subcutaneous and intraperitoneal insulin pump development, the design of closed-loop control algorithms for mechatronic pancreases, as well as cell and tissue engineering and cell encapsulation for biohybrid pancreases. Furthermore, smart integration of the mentioned components and biocompatibility issues must be addressed, bearing in mind that, for mechatronic pancreases, it is most important to consider how to recharge implanted batteries and refill implanted insulin reservoirs without requiring periodic surgical interventions. This review describes recent advancements in technologies and concepts related to artificial and bioartificial pancreases, and assesses how far we are from a lifelong-implanted and self-working pancreas substitute that can fully restore the quality of life of a diabetic (or other type of) patient.

Advances in pump technology: insulin patch pumps, combined pumps and glucose sensors, and implanted pumps

This review discusses the most recent developments in insulin pump technology. The benefits of the insulin pump to patients with type 1 diabetes are recognized both for its metabolic effectiveness and its positive effects on quality of life. The current pumps are reliable, small and light, and are becoming more and more sophisticated. Nevertheless, there remain practical and psychological constraints for the patient. However, recent patch-pump advances should simplify the technical aspects of pump treatment and enhance patient comfort. Another advance combines the insulin pump with a glucose sensor. Such a combination is logical for optimizing pump use and, to that end, developing an automated or 'closed-loop'system that permits the delivery of subcutaneous insulin adjusted according to measured levels of subcutaneous glucose. Finally, implanted insulin pumps have proven their worth not only because of their simple use, but also for their contribution in the artificial pancreas project. Indeed, the prompt response with intraperitoneal administration of insulin makes it of interest for use in a closed-loop system.

Circulating insulin antibodies: influence of continuous subcutaneous or intraperitoneal insulin infusion, and impact on glucose control

The purification of animal insulin preparations and the use of human recombinant insulin have markedly reduced the incidence, but not completely suppressed, the development of anti-insulin antibodies (IAs). Advances in technologies concerning the mode of delivery of insulin, i.e. continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), continuous peritoneal insulin infusion (CPII) and more recently inhaled insulin administration, appear to significantly increase circulating levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-IAs in diabetic patients. However, the increase is usually moderate and mostly transient as compared to previous observations with poorly purified animal insulin preparations. The clinical impact of these circulating anti-IAs remains unclear. Nevertheless, several studies have suggested that antibodies could retard insulin action, leading to a worsening of postprandial hyperglycaemia and/or serve as a carrier, thus leading to unexpected hypoglycaemia. CPII may be associated with more marked and sustained increase in IAs levels, possibly related to the use of an unstable insulin and the formation of immunogenic aggregates of insulin. The possible clinical consequences of these high levels of IAs remain to be evaluated because a low-glucose morning syndrome or severe insulin resistance with ketone bodies production have been reported in some cases. In conclusion, even if CSII and CPII may promote the development of circulating IAs, this increase does not lead to immunological insulin resistance, compared to that previously described with animal non-purified insulin preparations, and seems to have only marginal influence on blood glucose control or complications in most diabetic patients.

Implantable insulin delivery pumps

Implantable insulin delivery pumps are a response to the search for an insulin therapy that would be more physiological, more comfortable and, finally, better adapted to instantaneous insulin needs by their connection to a long term glucose sensor. The last decade has been devoted to their technical finalization and to the acquisition of the clinical knowledge on how to use them, so that these devices can be safe and reliable. The forthcoming availability on the market of the specific insulin formulation they require and the present development of glucose sensors are two favourable conditions for the diffusion of this technology aiming at an improved diabetes treatment. This review summarizes the rationale for the choice of intraperitoneal insulin route, the key-steps in assessing their feasibility and effectiveness in blood glucose control of diabetic patients, and the present development of this technique toward an implantable artificial beta-cell.

Insulin delivery route for the artificial pancreas: subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, or intravenous? Pros and cons

Insulin delivery is a crucial component of a closed-loop system aiming at the development of an artificial pancreas. The intravenous route, which has been used in the bedside artificial pancreas model for 30 years, has clear advantages in terms of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, but cannot be used in any ambulatory system so far. Subcutaneous (SC) insulin infusion benefits from the broad expansion of insulin pump therapy that promoted the availability of constantly improving technology and fast-acting insulin analog use. However, persistent delays of insulin absorption and action, variability and shortterm stability of insulin infusion from SC-inserted catheters generate effectiveness and safety issues in view of an ambulatory, automated, glucose-controlled, artificial beta cell. Intraperitoneal insulin delivery, although still marginally used in diabetes care, may offer an interesting alternative because of its more-physiological plasma insulin profiles and sustained stability and reliability of insulin delivery.

Clinical experience with an implanted closed-loop insulin delivery system

AIM: To report the first clinical experience with a prototype of implanted artificial beta-cell. METHODS: The Long-Term Sensor System® project assessed the feasibility of glucose control by the combined implantation of a pump for peritoneal insulin delivery and a central intravenous glucose sensor, connected physically by a subcutaneous lead and functionally by PID algorithms. It was performed in 10 type 1 diabetic patients from 2000 to 2007. RESULTS: No harmful complication related to implants occurred. Insulin delivery was affected by iterative but reversible pump slowdowns due to insulin precipitation. Glucose measurement by the intravenous sensors correlated well with meter values (r = 0.83-0.93, with a mean absolute deviation of 16.5%) for an average duration of 9 months. Uploading of pump electronics by PID algorithms designed for closed-loop insulin delivery allowed in-patient 48 hourtrials. CONCLUSION: Although the concept of a fully implantable artificial beta-cell has been shown as feasible, improvements in the sensor structure to increase its longevity and decrease sensor delay that affected closed-loop control at meal-times are expected.

Immunological responses to exogenous insulin

Regardless of purity and origin, therapeutic insulins continue to be immunogenic in humans. However, severe immunological complications occur rarely, and less severe events affect a small minority of patients. Insulin autoantibodies (IAAs) may be detectable in insulin-naive individuals who have a high likelihood of developing type 1 diabetes or in patients who have had viral disorders, have been treated with various drugs, or have autoimmune disorders or paraneoplastic syndromes. This suggests that under certain circumstances, immune tolerance to insulin can be overcome. Factors that can lead to more or less susceptibility to humoral responses to exogenous insulin include the recipient's immune response genes, age, the presence of sufficient circulating autologous insulin, and the site of insulin delivery. Little proof exists, however, that the development of insulin antibodies (IAs) to exogenous insulin therapy affects integrated glucose control, insulin dose requirements, and incidence of hypoglycemia, or contributes to beta-cell failure or to long-term complications of diabetes. Studies in which pregnant women with diabetes were monitored for glycemic control argue against a connection between IAs and fetal risk. Although studies have shown increased levels of immune complexes in patients with diabetic microangiopathic complications, these immune complexes often do not contain insulin or IAs, and insulin administration does not contribute to their formation. The majority of studies have shown no relationship between IAs and diabetic angiopathic complications, including nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy. With the advent of novel insulin formulations and delivery systems, such as insulin pumps and inhaled insulin, examination of these issues is increasingly relevant.

Insulin antibodies with pulmonary delivery of insulin

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Delivery of insulin to the deep lung presents unique challenges to the body's mucosal defense system. Pulmonary mucosal defense has the ability to discriminate between self and non-self antigens and has the potential for induction of immunologic tolerance. Published data concerning the immunogenicity of inhaled human insulin in drug trials will be reviewed, and data regarding the possible adverse effects of anti-insulin antibody development will be presented. Examination of the immunologic safety of inhaled human insulin will include discussion of comparator studies, factors affecting immunogenicity, the effects of insulin immunity on glycemic control and pulmonary function, and the relationship of insulin antibodies to dose requirements, pharmacodynamics, and hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled human insulin, whether formulated as a powder or liquid, has been shown to be more immunogenic than comparator insulins given by subcutaneous routes; however, adverse effects of antibody formation have not been demonstrated.

Implantable insulin pumps. A position statement about their clinical use

AIM

To review clinical use of implantable insulin pumps and to suggest indications for this therapy.

METHODS

The EVADIAC group performed a review of published reports on implantable insulin pumps for the last 15 years and analyzed its own centralized database. From this update, a position statement on indications of this therapy is drawn.

RESULTS

Published papers mostly report safety and effectiveness data from observational cumulated experiences of 15-350 patient-years. While HbA(1c) reduction does not reach statistical significance in all reported studies, improvement of blood glucose stability and reduction of severe hypoglycaemia appear as constant characteristics of this therapy. When compared to subcutaneous insulin therapy in randomized controlled studies, implantable pumps allow significantly reduced blood glucose fluctuations and improved quality of life in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, and a significant weight decrease in type 2 diabetic patients. While the EVADIAC registry shows the reduced occurrence of pump-pocket complications thanks to preventive measures and a lower incidence of catheter obstructions following improvements of catheter design, underdelivery due to insulin aggregation in pumps remains a recurrent although reversible issue. Determinants of increased anti-insulin antibody production in some patients remain elusive but impact on blood glucose control is limited in most cases.

CONCLUSION

From analyzed data, the EVADIAC group states that implantable pumps can be safely indicated and provide metabolic improvements in type 1 diabetic patients who remain far from targeted HbA(1c) below 7% and/or experience large fluctuations of blood glucose including recurrent severe hypoglycaemia, in spite of intensive follow-up and education when treated by subcutaneous insulin.

Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion does not increase the risk of organ-specific autoimmune disease in type 1 diabetic patients: results of a multicentric, comparative study

AIM

The purpose of this national multicenter prospective study by the French EVADIAC group was to investigate the possibility that continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion using an implanted pump (CIpii) increases the risk of autoimmune disease in type 1 diabetic patients as it increased anti-insulin immunogenicity.

METHODS

Prevalence of clinical (Hashimoto's disease, hyperthyroidism, gastric atrophic disease and vitiligo) and subclinical (presence of anti-thyroperoxidase antibodies, anti-intrinsic factor antibodies, abnormal TSH levels) autoimmune diseases was estimated by comparing two groups of patients already treated by either CIpii (n=154) or external pump (CSII) (n=121) for an average of 6 years. Incidence of autoimmune disease was determined by comparing the same measurements one year after inclusion.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed for the total prevalence of clinical and subclinical auto-immune thyroid and gastric di-seases (35.6% and 3.2% respectively in the CIpii group versus 40.4% and 2.6% in the CSII group). No significant difference for the incidence of clinical and subclinical auto-immune diseases was observed: 7.2% and 0% in CIpii and 7.3% and 1.7% in CSII.

CONCLUSION

As previously shown AIA (anti-insulin antibodies) levels were higher in CIpii than in CSII (32.9% vs 20.2%, P<0.0001) but no correlation was observed with either clinical or subclinical autoimmune disease. This large-scale study eliminates the possibility that CIpii increases the risk of autoimmune disease.

Artificial β-cell: clinical experience toward an implantable closed-loop insulin delivery system

AIM

Restoration of long-term normal blood glucose control in diabetic patients supports the elaboration of an artificial beta cell. The possibility of implantation of the three crucial components of such a system (insulin delivery device, glucose sensor and controller) is analyzed.

METHODS

The Long-Term Sensor System project, aiming at a fully implantable artificial beta cell, assessed the feasibility of glucose control by the combined implantation of a pump for peritoneal insulin delivery and a central intravenous glucose sensor close to the right atrium, connected via a subcutaneous lead. It was initiated in 10 Type 1 diabetic patients in our clinic from 2000. Data obtained during this experience are reviewed and confronted to reported closed-loop trials using other approaches.

RESULTS

No significant complication related to prolonged implantation of intravenous sensors occurred and the combined implants were well tolerated. Glucose measurement by the intravenous sensors correlated well with meter values (r=0.83-0.93, with a mean absolute deviation of 16.5%) and accuracy has been sustained for an average duration of 9 months. Uploading of pump electronics by algorithms designed for closed-loop insulin delivery allowed in-patient 48 hour-trials aiming at automated glucose control. Glucose control was similar to that reported by investigations combining subcutaneous sensors to wearable pumps for subcutaneous insulin infusion. The benefits of more physiological insulin kinetics due to intra-peritoneal delivery have been hampered by the slow response time of intravenous sensors.

CONCLUSION

Although the concept of a fully implantable artificial beta cell has been validated as feasible, the limited performance in achieving glucose control requests improvements in the sensor structure to increase its longevity and decrease sensor delay.

Antibody response to inhaled insulin in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. An analysis of initial phase II and III inhaled insulin (Exubera) trials and a two-year extension trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare antibody responses to inhaled human insulin vs. sc human insulin and to determine whether insulin antibody binding is associated with adverse clinical consequences.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Insulin antibody data from initial phase II/III trials were analyzed comparing the efficacy and safety of inhaled insulin with various agents, including sc insulin. Additionally, data from a 24-month extension of the phase III studies were examined. Data were pooled into the following three groups based on insulin treatment status at baseline: patients with type 1 diabetes, and patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin and not using insulin at baseline. Ig class analysis was also performed on randomly selected sera from type 1 patients at the end of the initial trials.

RESULTS

In the initial trials, greater insulin antibody binding was observed in patients receiving inhaled insulin vs. sc insulin. The greatest antibody responses to inhaled insulin were observed in patients with type 1 diabetes [nonparametric comparison of medians at the end of the study, 22.0% binding (unadjusted 95% confidence interval: 19.5, 24.5)], and the lowest responses were observed in non-insulin-using patients with type 2 diabetes in which there was no difference in median values at the end of the study. There were no correlations between antibody binding and glycemic control (measured using glycosylated hemoglobin), insulin dose requirements, hypoglycemic events, or pulmonary function (measured by changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec and diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide). Antibody responses were IgG in type. Differences in antibody levels observed in patients with type 1 vs. type 2 diabetes were maintained over the 24-month extension trials. Peak antibody levels across all groups were generally observed after 6-12 months of insulin therapy. Inhaled insulin therapy was not associated with a greater incidence of allergy or other hypersensitivity reactions.

CONCLUSION

Inhaled insulin was observed to produce a larger antibody response than sc insulin. Insulin antibody binding has not been associated with adverse clinical consequences in trials to date.

Reproducibility of plasma insulin kinetics during intraperitoneal insulin treatment by programmable pumps

OBJECTIVE

To study the reproducibility of plasma insulin kinetics during intraperitoneal (IP) insulin therapy using an implanted programmable pump in patients with type 1, insulin dependent, diabetes mellitus (IDDM).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In a group of ten type 1 IDDM patients beginning chronic IP insulin treatment with an implanted pump, plasma free insulin profiles were determined from 12: 00 am to 12: 30 pm on two separate test days, one month apart. Anti-insulin antibody (AIA) levels were measured on each test day.

RESULTS

From test day 1 to test day 2, no difference was observed in morning fasting free insulin levels (m +/- SD): 9.7 +/- 5.4 mU/L versus 9.8 +/- 5.3 mU/L, insulin peak values: 19.1 +/- 17 mU/L versus 20.8 +/- 9.9 mU/L, time to peak: 40 +/- 15 versus 42.8 +/- 16 minutes or post-bolus area under the plasma free insulin curve (AUC): 40.7 +/- 29 mU/L.h versus 45.5 +/- 29 mU/L.h. The intrapatient coefficient of variation was 14.4 +/- 13% for insulin peaks and 16.9 +/- 9.2% for post-bolus AUC. A significant increase in AIA levels (m +/- SD) was observed from 16.5 +/- 18% on test day 1 to 28.1 +/- 28% on test day 2.

CONCLUSIONS

The reproducibility of plasma free insulin profiles is highly satisfactory during insulin delivery by the IP route using an implanted device.

Development of an animal–human antibody complex for use as a control in ELISA

In order to provide the equivalent of a human anti-human protein antibody as positive control in ELISAs, a goat-human antibody complex was created using chemical cross-linking. The resulting hybrid complex had a larger molecular size on HPLC and SDS-PAGE. In ELISA, the goat-human complex bound to human antigen and was detectable by a secondary anti-human conjugate. The method to make the hybrid complex is simple, cost-effective and can be used to make human-like antibodies to many human proteins.

Effect of long-term exposure to insulin lispro on the induction of antibody response in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term effects of insulin lispro on inducing lispro-specific, insulin-specific, and cross-reactive (reactive with both insulin lispro and human insulin) antibodies.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A multinational, multicenter combination of controlled and noncontrolled, open-label studies of 4.5 years' duration was designed to evaluate the long-term immunologic profile of subcutaneously administered insulin lispro. A total of 1,221 patients (men and women; 12-81 years of age) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were enrolled. Circulating anti-insulin antibodies were measured using radioimmunoassays.

RESULTS

Insulin-specific and lispro-specific antibody responses were within the background noise levels of the assays. Significant elevations of antibody were confined to a cross-reactive antibody response. Antibody levels resulting from prior exposure to long- and short-acting insulins changed little after transfer to insulin lispro and remained within or near the baseline levels. De novo exposure to insulin lispro resulted in increases in cross-reactive but not insulin- or lispro-specific antibody levels. Cross-reactive insulin antibodies developed more readily in patients with type 1 diabetes than in those with type 2 diabetes. Long-term antibody responses tended to decrease over time and returned to baseline or near-baseline levels by the end of the long-term studies. No evidence of an anamnestic antibody response could be found in individuals treated intermittently with insulin lispro.

CONCLUSIONS

The immunogenic profile of patients treated with insulin lispro was comparable to that of patients treated with recombinant human insulin. Inductions of significant levels of specific or cross-reactive antibodies were not observed in patients who had received insulin previously. No significant antibody-dependent increases in insulin dosage requirements were noted in these patients. The incidence of insulin allergy was not different from that in patients treated with recombinant regular human insulin.

Comparison of antigenicity of Hoechst 21PH insulin using either implantable intraperitoneal pump or subcutaneous external pump infusion in type 1 diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the antigenicity of the insulin Hoechst 21PH (Hoe21PH) using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and to compare the antigenicity of this insulin when administered intraperitoneally or subcutaneously. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS; Peritoneal administration of Hoe21PH (Hoechst-Roussel, Somerville, NJ) insulin using implantable devices (continuous peritoneal insulin infusion [CPII]) increases anti-insulin antibody (AIA) levels in type 1 diabetic patients. Intraperitoneal administration, addition of a stabilizer (polyethylene polypropylene glycol), or insulin modifications due to storage in the pump may be involved in this antigenicity. In this nonrandomized study, 24 type 1 diabetic patients were treated with either CSII (n = 11, group 1) or CPII (n = 13, group 2). AIA levels were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before starting patients on Hoe21PH and again after 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Patients were comparable in the two groups. AIA levels (RIA) remained stable (24.3 +/- 8.5% [month 0] to 24.9 +/- 8.5.5% [month 6]) in group 1 and increased (21.8 +/- 6.7% [month 0] to 41.8 +/- 6.9% [month 6]) in group 2 (P = 0.005, Wilcoxon's rank-sum test). Using ELISA, AIA remained stable in the patients in group 1 (n = 9; 3.8 +/- 0.8 units/ml [month 0] and 4.1 +/- 1.0 units/ml [month 6]) and tended to increase in the patients in group 2 (n = 12; 4.1 +/- 0.7 units/ml [month 0] to 17.5 +/- 4.6 units/ml [month 6]) (P = 0.07). Comparison of the evolution of AIA formation between the two groups, using RIA at months 0, 3, and 6 showed a significant difference (analysis of variance, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

No increase in AIA levels was demonstrated when Hoe21PH insulin was administered subcutaneously as assessed by two different assays. CPII is proven to be more antigenic than CSII, and this is not related to a specific antigenicity of Hoe21PH insulin. The intraperitoneal route of administration or insulin modifications due to insulin storage in implantable devices might explain this antigenicity.

Macrophage activation in type 1 diabetic patients with catheter obstruction during peritoneal insulin delivery with an implantable pump

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activation of macrophages in type 1 diabetic patients during peritoneal insulin delivery with an implantable pump against two types of insulin: that which was collected from the pump reservoir and that which came straight fromn the bottle (i.e., vial insltlin). Macrophage activation was studied in patients with and without cathcter obstruction and compared with activation in healthy subjects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Human insulin (21 PH, 400 U/ml; Hoescht) was collected from the pump reservoir (Minimed) of diabetic patients with (n = 3) or without (n = 7) catheter obstruction, as assessed by histological examination of the catheter tip. Monocytes were obtained from venous blood samples from both kinds of diabetic patients and from healthy subjects (n = 5) and were differentiated into monocyte-derived macrophages in culture. Their chemotaxis and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) release were studied with respect to both types of insulin, as previously stated. Formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were used as controls.

RESULTS

Neither insulin recovered from the pump reservoir nor vial insulin proved chemotactic to macrophages from either healthy subjects or those diabetic patients with and without catheter obstruction. The migration toward fMLP of macrophages from patients presenting a catheter obstruction was significantly higher than that observed with macrophages from either diabetic patients without obstruction or healthy subjects, the chemotactic index (mean +/- SD) was 3.81 +/- 0.36 vs. 2.30 +/- 0.89 and 2.60 +/- 0.80, respectively (P < 0.05). LPS significantly stimulated the TNF-alpha secretion of macrophages from diabetic subjects with a catheter obstruction, whereas both native and reservoir-recovered insulin had no effect on this release (144.83 +/- 67.25 vs. 5.15 +/- 2.93 and 5.27 +/- 2.43 pg/ml, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The human insulin used in implantable pumps, regardless of how long it had remained in the pump reservoir, did not induce macrophage activation in diabetic patients treated through intraperitoneal insulin delivery. In some of these diabetic patients, catheter obstruction could be explained by their high capacity of macrophage chemotaxis.

Current status and future prospects of parenteral insulin regimens, strategies and delivery systems for diabetes treatment

A strong relationship between long term metabolic control and low frequency of chronic diabetes complications was shown in the Diabetes Control Complication Trial (DCCT). However, the subcutaneous intensive insulin therapy required to achieve the glycemic goals defined by the DCCT led to an unacceptable frequency of severe hypoglycemia and a significant weight gain. This limits the benefits of this therapy and excludes groups of patients such as young children, the elderly or hypoglycemia prone patients. The intensive therapy and self blood glucose monitoring (SMBG) necessary to limit hypoglycemia represent a heavy burden for the patients and their family. Improvements in parenteral insulin therapy are possible by either modifying subcutaneous insulin characteristics (analogs, adjunction of peptides such as amylin, GLP1, IGF1), or by developing better routes of administration and making SMBG easier, which is a key to intensive insulin therapy success. The ultimate goal remains the development of an automated, glucose controlled device.

Immunogenicity of intraperitoneal insulin infusion using programmable implantable devices

Intraperitoneal insulin infusion using implantable devices in insulin-dependent diabetic (IDDM) patients is promising since it improves diabetic control and decreases frequency of hypoglycaemia. However, preliminary data show a striking increase in plasma levels of anti-insulin antibodies with this therapy. In order to more precisely evaluate the immunogenicity and its consequences, anti-insulin antibody levels in 62 IDDM patients were assessed every 3 months during a 2-year period following pump implantation. At the same time, diabetes control was evaluated with HbA1c, mean blood glucose levels, standard deviation of the daily blood glucose levels and the frequency of low blood glucose (< 3.58 mmol/l). Factors involved in antibody formation such as age, gender, HLA typing, and complement C4 alleles were also studied. After implantation, anti-insulin antibody levels increased significantly from 3.14% (range 0-26%) to 8.34% (0-49%) after 1 year and remained elevated. Patients were divided into two groups: responders able to show at least one antiinsulin antibody titre higher than 15% and non-responders whose titres were always lower than 6%. None of the factors studied was shown to statistically influence the anti-insulin antibody titres. Non-responders had significantly better metabolic results than the responders. Severe hypoglycaemic episodes decreased dramatically in both groups. Insulin requirements were comparable at time 0 and decreased initially in both groups. They remained low for the non-responders but returned to pre-implantation values for responders. Intraperitoneal insulin infusion led to a high immunogenetic response towards insulin in about half of the patients, leading to only moderately deleterious effects on metabolic control.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)