Clinical Relevance of Targeting the Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor, Somatostatin Receptor 2, or Chemokine C-X-C Motif Receptor 4 in Breast Cancer for Imaging and Therapy

Somatostatin receptor-targeted theranostics in patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer-a prospective exploratory study

PURPOSE

Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression has been reported in estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) by pathology and immunohistochemistry studies. We aimed to investigate whether SSTR could be a viable target for PET imaging and potential theranostics in ER + mBC.

METHODS

Thirty prospectively recruited patients with ER + mBC underwent PET/CT imaging with [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE (within three weeks). Detection rates (per-patient, per-region), number of lesions detected, SUVmax values, Krenning scores, SSTR-FDG visual scores, and PET-based staging with both radiotracers were compared.

RESULTS

[18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT had similar per-patient detection rates (100% vs 96.7%, P = 1.0). Per-region and per-lesion analyses revealed comparable detection of local/breast lesions, nodal, and skeletal metastases. However, [18F]FDG outperformed [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in detecting visceral/other metastases (235 vs 128 lesions, P = 0.003). [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE resulted in a lower PET-based M-stage compared to [18F]FDG in 10% of patients, although T-/N-stages were concordant in all patients. HER2- patients showed a trend of higher [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE lesional SUVmax values compared to the HER2 + sub-group (median 9.0 vs 3.8, P = 0.078). 3/30 (10%) participants had a patient-level Krenning score ≥ 3 ([68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE uptake higher than liver background in majority of the lesions), potentially making them suitable for SSTR-targeted radionuclide therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

SSTR-targeted theranostics may represent a novel potential alternative in a subset of patients with ER + mBC. Its generalized applicability is limited by poor sensitivity for visceral metastases and significant inter-lesion heterogeneity. Future studies must identify how tumor subtype, proliferation, and prior systemic therapies impact SSTR expression levels in these patients to ensure meaningful clinical translation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials Registry-India: CTRI/2023/03/051025 (prospectively registered on 23.03.2023).

A Vision for Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Targeting for Imaging and Therapy: Perspective from Academia and Industry

The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is overexpressed in various cancers, including prostate cancer, breast cancer, small cell and non-small cell lung cancer, uterine and ovarian cancer, colon cancer, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. This makes GRPR a multicancer target for theranostics, that is, molecular imaging and therapy. Here, we explore the current state of GRPR-targeted theranostics from bench to bedside, highlighting the preclinical development of various GRPR-targeting compounds and clinical applications. We review the role of GRPR-targeted molecular imaging for all stages of prostate cancer, breast cancer, and other tumors and provide a quo vadis GRPR. We aimed to offer a comprehensive overview of GRPR-targeted theranostics to inform researchers, clinicians, pharma, and regulators of the potential benefits and emerging opportunities in the pursuit of personalized precision cancer care.

Radioligand Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Harnessing Precision Oncology

Radioligand therapy (RLT) represents a promising advancement in precision oncology and enables the targeted delivery of radiation to cancer cells. This approach has shown success in other tumor types, such as prostate cancer and neuroendocrine tumors. Its potential in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) is currently under investigation. This review discusses RLT mechanism of action, therapeutic potential, and integration into the existing therapeutic landscape of mBC. While clinical trials have shown promising results, challenges remain regarding target heterogeneity, implementation, and optimizing treatment strategies. Further research is essential to integrate RLT into clinical practice and improve patient outcomes fully.

Characterizing SSTR2 expression and modulation for targeted imaging and therapy in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer

Patients with breast cancer which lack molecular targets, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) or hormone receptors, have limited access to targeted therapies. Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) is overexpressed in some cancers, and SSTR2-targeted radiopharmaceuticals are FDA-approved for theranostic targeted imaging and therapy in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Importantly, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors can epigenetically modulate SSTR2 expression in NETs with low or variable basal expression. The goal of this study is to characterize SSTR2 basal expression and induction via HDAC inhibition as a potential target for imaging and therapy in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). SSTR2 expression in mouse samples was assessed via Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR), flow cytometry, and cell binding assays were utilized to determine if HDAC inhibition can upregulate SSTR2 expression. [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, which targets SSTR2, was used to non-invasively characterize SSTR2 expression and variability in the EO771 and 4T1 TNBC models before and after HDAC inhibition. These studies demonstrate that HDAC inhibition can upregulate SSTR2 at the transcriptional, translational, and functional levels in breast cancer. Importantly, SSTR2 expression can be characterized non-invasively via PET imaging and modulation with HDAC inhibitors can be monitored longitudinally. Our findings highlight SSTR2 as a promising therapeutic molecular target in TNBC.

Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor: a promising new biomarker to identify cervical precursor lesions and cancer

Objective

This study aimed to verify the relation between gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), oncogenic Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical lesions severity.

Methods

GRPR mRNA levels were evaluated in cervical cancer-derived cell lines and in primary keratinocytes expressing HPV16 oncogenes by RT-PCR. GRPR protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in organotypic cell cultures derived from keratinocytes transduced with HPV16 oncogenes and in 208 cervical samples, including 59 non-neoplastic tissue, 28 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3), 44 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and 77 adenocarcinomas (ADC). Generic primers (GP5+/GP6+) were used to identify HPV infection in tissue samples. Experiments involving cell lines were analyzed through non-parametric tests (Kruskal Wallis), and Fisher's Exact Test for human tissues samples. All statistical tests were considered significant at p <0.05. Immunohistochemical evaluation was conducted independently and blindly by two observers (AD- LO). Any discordant findings were resolved through discussion to reach a consensus score.

Results

GRPR mRNA levels were not increased in cells expressing HPV16 or HPV18 oncogenes. However, at the protein level, GRPR was upregulated in organotypic cell cultures containing HPV oncogenes. Besides, it was identified an association between GRPR expression and cervical lesion severity (p < 0.0001). The detection rate of high-risk HPV DNA was directly correlated with cervical disease. Nonetheless, HPV infection was not directly associated with GRPR in cervical samples.

Conclusion

GRPR expression is highly predictive of cervical lesion severity, irrespective of HPV infection and might contribute to improving patient's therapeutic management as well as being used a marker of disease progression.

Exploring the landscape of current in vitro and in vivo models and their relevance for targeted radionuclide theranostics

Cancer remains a leading cause of mortality globally, driving ongoing research into innovative treatment strategies. Preclinical research forms the base for developing these novel treatments, using both in vitro and in vivo model systems that are, ideally, as clinically representative as possible. Emerging as a promising approach for cancer management, targeted radionuclide theranostics (TRT) uses radiotracers to deliver (cytotoxic) radionuclides specifically to cancer cells. Since the field is relatively new, more advanced preclinical models are not yet regularly applied in TRT research. This narrative review examines the currently applied in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo models for oncological research, discusses if and how these models are now applied for TRT studies, and whether not yet applied models can be of benefit for the field. A selection of different models is discussed, ranging from in vitro two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) cell models, including spheroids, organoids and tissue slice cultures, to in vivo mouse cancer models, such as cellline-derived models, patient-derived xenograft models and humanized models. Each of the models has advantages and limitations for studying human cancer biology, radiopharmaceutical assessment and treatment efficacy. Overall, there is a need to apply more advanced models in TRT research that better address specific TRT phenomena, such as crossfire and abscopal effects, to enhance the clinical relevance and effectiveness of preclinical TRT evaluations.

G protein-coupled receptors and traditional Chinese medicine: new thinks for the development of traditional Chinese medicine

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) widely exist in vivo and participate in many physiological processes, thus emerging as important targets for drug development. Approximately 30% of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs target GPCRs. To date, the 'one disease, one target, one molecule' strategy no longer meets the demands of drug development. Meanwhile, small-molecule drugs account for 60% of FDA-approved drugs. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has garnered widespread attention for its unique theoretical system and treatment methods. TCM involves multiple components, targets and pathways. Centered on GPCRs and TCM, this paper discusses the similarities and differences between TCM and GPCRs from the perspectives of syndrome of TCM, the consistency of TCM's multi-component and multi-target approaches and the potential of GPCRs and TCM in the development of novel drugs. A novel strategy, 'simultaneous screening of drugs and targets', was proposed and applied to the study of GPCRs. We combine GPCRs with TCM to facilitate the modernisation of TCM, provide valuable insights into the rational application of TCM and facilitate the research and development of novel drugs. This study offers theoretical support for the modernisation of TCM and introduces novel ideas for development of safe and effective drugs.

Advances of radiolabeled GRPR ligands for PET/CT imaging of cancers

GRPR is a type of seven-transmembrane G-protein coupled receptor that belongs to the bombesin protein receptor family. It is highly expressed in various cancers, including prostate cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, and so on. As a result, molecular imaging studies have been conducted using radiolabeled GRPR ligands for tumor diagnosis, as well as monitoring of recurrence and metastasis. In this paper, we provided a comprehensive overview of relevant literature from the past two decades, with a specific focus on the advancements made in radiolabeled GRPR ligands for imaging prostate cancer and breast cancer.

GRPR-targeting radiotheranostics for breast cancer management

Breast Cancer (BC) is the most common cancer worldwide and, despite the advancements made toward early diagnosis and novel treatments, there is an urgent need to reduce its mortality. The Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor (GRPR) is a promising target for the development of theranostic radioligands for luminal BC with positive estrogen receptor (ER) expression, because GRPR is expressed not only in primary lesions but also in lymph nodes and distant metastasis. In the last decades, several GRPR-targeting molecules have been evaluated both at preclinical and clinical level, however, most of the studies have been focused on prostate cancer (PC). Nonetheless, given the relevance of non-invasive diagnosis and potential treatment of BC through Peptide Receptor Radioligand Therapy (PRRT), this review aims at collecting the available preclinical and clinical data on GRPR-targeting radiopeptides for the imaging and therapy of BC, to better understand the current state-of-the-art and identify future perspectives and possible limitations to their clinical translation. In fact, since luminal-like tumors account for approximately 80% of all BC, many BC patients are likely to benefit from the development of GRPR-radiotheranostics.

GRPR versus PSMA: expression profiles during prostate cancer progression demonstrate the added value of GRPR-targeting theranostic approaches

Introduction

Central to targeted radionuclide imaging and therapy of prostate cancer (PCa) are prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting radiopharmaceuticals. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) targeting has been proposed as a potential additional approach for PCa theranostics. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent and at what stage of the disease GRPR-targeting applications can complement PSMA-targeting theranostics in the management of PCa.

Methods

Binding of the GRPR- and PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceuticals [177Lu]Lu-NeoB and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, respectively, was evaluated and compared on tissue sections of 20 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 16 primary PCa and 17 progressive castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) fresh frozen tissue specimens. Hematoxylin-eosin and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase stains were performed to identify regions of prostatic adenocarcinoma and potentially high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. For a subset of primary PCa samples, RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) was used to identify target mRNA expression in defined tumor regions.

Results

The highest median [177Lu]Lu-NeoB binding was observed in primary PCa samples, while median and overall [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 binding was highest in CRPC samples. The highest [177Lu]Lu-NeoB binding was observed in 3/17 CRPC samples of which one sample showed no [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 binding. RNA ISH analyses showed a trend between mRNA expression and radiopharmaceutical binding, and confirmed the distinct GRPR and PSMA expression patterns in primary PCa observed with radiopharmaceutical binding.

Conclusion

Our study emphasizes that GRPR-targeting approaches can contribute to improved PCa management and complement currently applied PSMA-targeting strategies in both early and late stage PCa.

Substitution of l-Tryptophan by -Methyl-l-Tryptophan in 177Lu-RM2 Results in 177Lu-AMTG, a High-Affinity Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Ligand with Improved In Vivo Stability

Theranostic applications targeting the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) have shown promising results. When compared with other peptide ligands for radioligand therapy, the most often used GRPR ligand, DOTA-Pip⁵-d-Phe⁶-Gln⁷-Trp⁸-Ala⁹-Val¹⁰-Gly¹¹-His¹²-Sta¹³-Leu¹⁴-NH₂ (RM2), may be clinically impacted by limited metabolic stability. With the aim of improving the metabolic stability of RM2, we investigated whether the metabolically unstable Gln⁷-Trp⁸ bond within the pharmacophore of RM2 can be stabilized via substitution of l-Trp⁸ by α-methyl-l-tryptophan (α-Me-l-Trp) and whether the corresponding DOTAGA analog might also be advantageous. A comparative preclinical evaluation of ¹⁷⁷Lu-α-Me-l-Trp⁸-RM2 (¹⁷⁷Lu-AMTG) and its DOTAGA counterpart (¹⁷⁷Lu-AMTG2) was performed using ¹⁷⁷Lu-RM2 and ¹⁷⁷Lu-NeoBOMB1 as reference compounds. Methods: Peptides were synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis and labeled with ¹⁷⁷Lu. Lipophilicity was determined at pH 7.4 (logD _7.4). Receptor-mediated internalization was investigated on PC-3 cells (37°C, 60 min), whereas GRPR affinity (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) was determined on both PC-3 and T-47D cells. Stability toward peptidases was examined in vitro (human plasma, 37°C, 72 ± 2 h) and in vivo (murine plasma, 30 min after injection). Biodistribution studies were performed at 24 h after injection, and small-animal SPECT/CT was performed on PC-3 tumor-bearing mice at 1, 4, 8, 24, and 28 h after injection. Results: Solid-phase peptide synthesis yielded 9%-15% purified labeling precursors. ¹⁷⁷Lu labeling proceeded quantitatively. Compared with ¹⁷⁷Lu-RM2, ¹⁷⁷Lu-AMTG showed slightly improved GRPR affinity, a similar low internalization rate, slightly increased lipophilicity, and considerably improved stability in vitro and in vivo. In vivo, ¹⁷⁷Lu-AMTG exhibited the highest tumor retention (11.45 ± 0.43 percentage injected dose/g) and tumor-to-blood ratio (2,702 ± 321) at 24 h after injection, as well as a favorable biodistribution profile. As demonstrated by small-animal SPECT/CT imaging, ¹⁷⁷Lu-AMTG also revealed a less rapid clearance from tumor tissue. Compared with ¹⁷⁷Lu-AMTG, ¹⁷⁷Lu-AMTG2 did not show any further benefits. Conclusion: The results of this study, particularly the superior metabolic stability of ¹⁷⁷Lu-AMTG, strongly recommend a clinical evaluation of this novel GRPR-targeted ligand to investigate its potential for radioligand therapy of GRPR-expressing malignancies.

GRPr Theranostics: Current Status of Imaging and Therapy using GRPr Targeting Radiopharmaceuticals

Addressing molecular targets, that are overexpressed by various tumor entities, using radiolabeled molecules for a combined diagnostic and therapeutic (theranostic) approach is of increasing interest in oncology. The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPr), which is part of the bombesin family, has shown to be overexpressed in a variety of tumors, therefore, serving as a promising target for those theranostic applications. A large amount of differently radiolabeled bombesin derivatives addressing the GRPr have been evaluated in the preclinical as well as clinical setting showing fast blood clearance and urinary excretion with selective GRPr-binding. Most of the available studies on GRPr-targeted imaging and therapy have evaluated the theranostic approach in prostate and breast cancer applying bombesin derivatives tagged with the predominantly used theranostic pair of ⁶⁸Ga/¹⁷⁷Lu which is the focus of this review.

Diagnostic value of 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT imaging for staging of ER+ /PR+ HER2- breast cancer patients with metastatic disease: Comparison with conventional imaging with bone scan, diagnostic CT and 18 F-FDG PET-CT in a prospective pilot trial

INTRODUCTION

¹⁸ F-Fludeoxyglucose PET-CT (FDG) is increasingly used to stage breast cancer. Most breast cancers express the Oestrogen Receptor (ER) and Progesterone Receptor (PR), and this subtype demonstrates lower activity on FDG imaging. Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) offer a potentially improved radiotracer target for ER⁺ /PR⁺ breast cancer. We present the first in␣vivo clinical study comparing ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT (DOTA) to FDG and conventional imaging (bone scan and diagnostic CT), in metastatic ER⁺ /PR⁺ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients with clinically progressive metastatic ER⁺ /PR⁺ HER2- breast cancer underwent restaging with DOTA, FDG and conventional imaging. Scans were analysed visually, and semi-quantitatively. Wilcoxon-Rank Scoring was used to assess significance.

RESULTS

Ten women (mean age 57 years) underwent imaging. 8/10 demonstrated disease on both DOTA and FDG. 2/10 positive on conventional imaging, but DOTA^- /FDG^- , and had no disease progression at 1-year follow-up. Heterogeneity of uptake was seen between DOTA and FDG with 5 bone lesions DOTA⁺ /FDG^- and 1 bone lesion FDG⁺ /DOTA^- . Twenty-one visceral lesions were FDG⁺ /DOTA^- (2 patients), with 10/21 identified on conventional imaging. Maximum standard uptake values (SUV max) of DOTA were greater than FDG (10.9 vs. 6.6, P = ns). Four sites were biopsied (3 patients). 3/4 had high ER/PR expression (mean DOTA SUV max 9.4) and 1/4 low ER/PR expression (DOTA SUV max 3.1).

CONCLUSION

Whilst we have not demonstrated DOTA to be superior to FDG in staging of ER⁺ /PR⁺ breast cancers, DOTA may have a role in assessing HR status and treatment decisions; further evaluation of this is warranted.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasm of the Breast Presenting as a Liver Metastasis: A Rare Diagnostic Challenge

We present a case of a 58-year-old female who presented initially to an outside institution with abdominal pain and was diagnosed on liver biopsy with a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor of an unknown primary source. She was referred to our academic institution for a second opinion after disease progression on the initial chemotherapy regimen. Through additional evaluation, diagnostics, and multi-disciplinary tumor board discussion she was diagnosed with metastases from a well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasm of the breast (NENB). Consequently, her treatment plan was modified leading to significant clinical and radiological improvement.

68Ga-Radiolabeling and Pharmacological Characterization of a Kit-Based Formulation of the Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor (GRP-R) Antagonist RM2 for Convenient Preparation of [68Ga]Ga-RM2

Background: [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 is a potent Gastrin-Releasing Peptide-receptor (GRP-R) antagonist for imaging prostate cancer and breast cancer, currently under clinical evaluation in several specialized centers around the world. Targeted radionuclide therapy of GRP-R-expressing tumors is also being investigated. We here report the characteristics of a kit-based formulation of RM2 that should ease the development of GRP-R imaging and make it available to more institutions and patients. Methods: Stability of the investigated kits over one year was determined using LC/MS/MS and UV-HPLC. Direct ⁶⁸Ga-radiolabeling was optimized with respect to buffer (pH), temperature, reaction time and shaking time. Conventionally prepared [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 using an automated synthesizer was used as a comparator. Finally, the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 product was assessed with regards to hydrophilicity, affinity, internalization, membrane bound fraction, calcium mobilization assay and efflux, which is a valuable addition to the in vivo literature. Results: The kit-based formulation, kept between 2 °C and 8 °C, was stable for over one year. Using acetate buffer pH 3.0 in 2.5–5.1 mL total volume, heating at 100 °C during 10 min and cooling down for 5 min, the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 produced by kit complies with the requirements of the European Pharmacopoeia. Compared with the module production route, the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 produced by kit was faster, displayed higher yields, higher volumetric activity and was devoid of ethanol. In in vitro evaluations, the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 displayed sub-nanomolar affinity (K_d = 0.25 ± 0.19 nM), receptor specific and time dependent membrane-bound fraction of 42.0 ± 5.1% at 60 min and GRP-R mediated internalization of 24.4 ± 4.3% at 30 min. The [^natGa]Ga-RM2 was ineffective in stimulating intracellular calcium mobilization. Finally, the efflux of the internalized activity was 64.3 ± 6.5% at 5 min. Conclusion: The kit-based formulation of RM2 is suitable to disseminate GRP-R imaging and therapy to distant hospitals without complex radiochemistry equipment.

Combination Therapy, a Promising Approach to Enhance the Efficacy of Radionuclide and Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Prostate and Breast Cancer

In recent years, radionuclide therapy (RT) and targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) have gained great interest in cancer treatment. This is due to promising results obtained in both preclinical and clinical studies. However, a complete response is achieved in only a small percentage of patients that receive RT or TRT. As a consequence, there have been several strategies to improve RT and TRT outcomes including the combination of these treatments with other well-established anti-cancer therapies, for example, chemotherapy. Combinations of RT and TRT with other therapies with distinct mechanisms of action represent a promising strategy. As for prostate cancer and breast cancer, the two most prevalent cancer types worldwide, several combination-based therapies have been evaluated. In this review, we will provide an overview of the RT and TRT agents currently used or being investigated in combination with hormone therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and external beam radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer and breast cancer.

Autoradiographical assessment of inflammation-targeting radioligands for atherosclerosis imaging: potential for plaque phenotype identification

PURPOSE

Many radioligands have been developed for the visualization of atherosclerosis by targeting inflammation. However, interpretation of in vivo signals is often limited to plaque identification. We evaluated binding of some promising radioligands in an in vitro approach in atherosclerotic plaques with different phenotypes.

METHODS

Tissue sections of carotid endarterectomy tissue were characterized as early plaque, fibro-calcific plaque, or phenotypically vulnerable plaque. In vitro binding assays for the radioligands [111In]In-DOTATATE; [111In]In-DOTA-JR11; [67Ga]Ga-Pentixafor; [111In]In-DANBIRT; and [111In]In-EC0800 were conducted, the expression of the radioligand targets was assessed via immunohistochemistry. Radioligand binding and expression of radioligand targets was investigated and compared.

RESULTS

In sections characterized as vulnerable plaque, binding was highest for [111In]In-EC0800; followed by [111In]In-DANBIRT; [67Ga]Ga-Pentixafor; [111In]In-DOTA-JR11; and [111In]In-DOTATATE (0.064 ± 0.036; 0.052 ± 0.029; 0.011 ± 0.003; 0.0066 ± 0.0021; 0.00064 ± 0.00014 %Added activity/mm2, respectively). Binding of [111In]In-DANBIRT and [111In]In-EC0800 was highest across plaque phenotypes, binding of [111In]In-DOTA-JR11 and [67Ga]Ga-Pentixafor differed most between plaque phenotypes. Binding of [111In]In-DOTATATE was the lowest across plaque phenotypes. The areas positive for cells expressing the radioligand's target differed between plaque phenotypes for all targets, with lowest percentage area of expression in early plaque sections and highest in phenotypically vulnerable plaque sections.

CONCLUSIONS

Radioligands targeting inflammatory cell markers showed different levels of binding in atherosclerotic plaques and among plaque phenotypes. Different radioligands might be used for plaque detection and discerning early from vulnerable plaque. [111In]In-EC0800 and [111In]In-DANBIRT appear most suitable for plaque detection, while [67Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [111In]In-DOTA-JR11 might be best suited for differentiation between plaque phenotypes.

Radiolabeled Peptides for SPECT and PET Imaging in the Detection of Breast Cancer: Preclinical and Clinical Perspectives

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Due to the heterogeneous nature of breast cancer, the optimal treatment and expected response for each patient may not necessarily be universal. Molecular imaging techniques could play an important role in the early detection and targeted therapy evaluation of breast cancer. This review focuses on the development of peptides labeled with SPECT and PET radionuclides for breast cancer imaging. We summarized the current status of radiolabeled peptides for different receptors in breast cancer. The characteristics of radionuclides and major techniques for peptide labeling are also briefly discussed.

Comparison of the binding of the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R) antagonist 68Ga-RM2 and 18F-FDG in breast cancer samples

The Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor (GRPR) is over-expressed in estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast tumors and related metastatic lymph nodes offering the opportunity of imaging and therapy of luminal tumors. ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 binding and ¹⁸F-FDG binding in tumoral zones were measured and compared using tissue micro-imaging with a beta imager on 14 breast cancer samples (10 primaries and 4 associated metastatic lymph nodes). Results were then assessed against ER expression, progesterone receptor (PR) expression, HER2 over-expression or not and Ki-67 expression. GRPR immunohistochemistry (IHC) was also performed on all samples. We also retrospectively compared ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 and ¹⁸F-FDG bindings to ¹⁸F-FDG SUV_max on the pre-therapeutic PET/CT examination, if available. ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 binding was significantly higher in tumors expressing GRPR on IHC than in GRPR-negative tumors (P = 0.022). In ER⁺ tumors, binding of ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 was significantly higher than ¹⁸F-FDG (P = 0.015). In tumors with low Ki-67, ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 binding was also significantly increased compared to ¹⁸F-FDG (P = 0.029). Overall, the binding of ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 and ¹⁸F-FDG displayed an opposite pattern in tumor samples and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 binding was significantly higher in tumors that had low ¹⁸F-FDG binding (P = 0.021). This inverse correlation was also documented in the few patients in whom a ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examination before surgery was available. Findings from this in vitro study suggest that GRPR targeting can be an alternative to ¹⁸F-FDG imaging in ER⁺ breast tumors. Moreover, because GRPR antagonists can also be labeled with lutetium-177 this opens new avenues for targeted radionuclide therapy in the subset of patients with progressive metastatic disease following conventional treatments.

Molecular profiling of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers from patients treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in the CARMINA 02 trial (UCBG-0609)

BACKGROUND

Postmenopausal women with large, hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative and low-proliferative breast cancer derived a benefit from neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in the CARMINA02 trial. This study was designed to correlate gene expression and mutation profiles with both response to NET and prognosis.

METHODS

Gene expression profiling using RNA sequencing was performed in 86 pre-NET and post-NET tumor samples. Targeted next-generation sequencing of 91 candidate breast cancer-associated genes was performed on DNA samples from 89 patients. Molecular data were correlated with radiological response and relapse-free survival.

RESULTS

The transcriptional profile of tumors to NET in responders involved immune-associated genes enriched in activated Th1 pathway, which remained unchanged in non-responders. Immune response was confirmed by analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). The percentage of TILs was significantly increased post-NET compared to pre-NET samples in responders (p = 0.0071), but not in non-responders (p = 0.0938). Gene expression revealed that lipid metabolism was the main molecular function related to prognosis, while PPARγ is the most important upstream regulator gene. The most frequently mutated genes were PIK3CA (48.3%), CDH1 (20.2%), PTEN (15.7%), TP53 (10.1%), LAMA2 (10.1%), BRCA2 (9.0%), MAP3K1 (7.9%), ALK (6.7%), INPP4B (6.7%), NCOR1 (6.7%), and NF1 (5.6%). Cell cycle and apoptosis pathway and PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway were altered significantly more frequently in non-responders than in responders (p = 0.0017 and p = 0.0094, respectively). The average number of mutations per sample was significantly higher in endocrine-resistant tumors (2.88 vs. 1.64, p = 0.03), but no difference was observed in terms of prognosis. ESR1 hotspot mutations were detected in 3.4% of treatment-naive tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

The Th1-related immune system and lipid metabolism appear to play key roles in the response to endocrine therapy and prognosis in HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. Deleterious somatic mutations in the cell cycle and apoptosis pathway and PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway may be relevant for clinical management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT00629616 ) on March 6, 2008, retrospectively registered.

68Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer: A Pilot Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

This prospective pilot study investigated the value of Ga-NOTA-RM26, an antagonist targeting gastrin-releasing peptide receptor, in evaluation of breast cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-five women in suspicion of breast cancer based on mammography or ultrasonography were recruited with informed consent. They underwent PET/CT scans 30 minutes after intravenous injection of Ga-NOTA-RM26 in a dose of 1.85 MBq (0.05 mCi) per kilogram body weight within 1 week before surgery. The Ga-NOTA-RM26 uptake was correlated with the pathological and immunohistochemical findings.

RESULTS

Ga-NOTA-RM26 positivity was found correlated with estrogen receptor (ER) expression (P = 0.006) and menstrual status (P = 0.019). In 34 patients diagnosed with breast cancer, the SUVmax was found significantly higher in the ER-positive breast cancer (4.97 ± 1.89) than in the ER-negative breast cancer (2.78 ± 0.65, P < 0.001). Ga-NOTA-RM26 was also found accumulated in normal breast tissue, with the SUVmax significantly higher in patients at the secretory phase of menstrual cycle (2.27 ± 0.71) than in those at the nonsecretory phase (1.59 ± 0.49, P = 0.017) and postmenopause (1.43 ± 0.44, P = 0.002). If the secretory phase patients were excluded, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiation of breast cancer from breast tissue increased from 85.3%, 86.8%, and 86.1% to 100%, 90.9%, and 95.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study indicates that the diagnostic accuracy of Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT in breast cancer may correlate with ER expression and menstrual status of the patient. It may be better to avoid performing this examination during the menstrual secretory phase to reduce physiological uptake in normal breast tissue.

Large set data mining reveals overexpressed GPCRs in prostate and breast cancer: potential for active targeting with engineered anti-cancer nanomedicines

Over 800 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are encoded by the human genome and many are overexpressed in tumors. GPCRs are triggered by ligand molecules outside the cell and activate internal signal transduction pathways driving cellular responses. The receptor signals are desensitized by receptor internalization and this mechanism can be exploited for the specific delivery of ligand-linked drug molecules directly into cells. Detailed expression analysis in cancer tissue can inform the design of GPCR-ligand decorated drug carriers for active tumor cell targeting. The active targeting process utilizes ligand receptor interactions leading to binding and in most cases internalization of the ligand-attached drug carrier resulting in effective targeting of cancer cells. In this report public microarray data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository was used to identify overexpressed GPCRs in prostate and breast cancer tissues. The analyzed data confirmed previously known cancer receptor associations and identified novel candidates for potential active targeting. Prioritization of the identified targeting receptors is also presented based on high expression levels and frequencies in cancer samples but low expression in healthy tissue. Finally, some selected examples were used in ligand docking studies to assess the feasibility for chemical conjugation to drug nanocarriers without interference of receptor binding and activation. The presented data demonstrate a large untapped potential to improve efficacy and safety of current and future anti-cancer compounds through active targeting of GPCRs on cancer cells.

SSTR-Mediated Imaging in Breast Cancer: Is There a Role for Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptor Antagonists?

Recent studies have shown enhanced tumor targeting by novel somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonists compared with clinically widely used agonists. However, these results have been obtained mostly in neuroendocrine tumors, and only limited data are available for cancer types with lower SSTR expression, including breast cancer (BC). To date, two studies have reported higher binding of the antagonist than the agonist in BC, but in both studies only a limited number of cases were evaluated. In this preclinical study, we further investigated whether the application of an SSTR antagonist can improve SSTR-mediated BC imaging in a large panel of BC specimens. We also generated an in vivo BC mouse model and performed SPECT/MRI and biodistribution studies. Methods: Binding of ¹¹¹In-DOTA-Tyr³-octreotate (SSTR agonist) and ¹¹¹In-DOTA-JR11 (SSTR antagonist) to 40 human BC specimens was compared using in vitro autoradiography. SSTR2 immunostaining was performed to confirm SSTR2 expression of the tumor cells. Furthermore, binding of the radiolabeled SSTR agonist and antagonist was analyzed in tissue material from 6 patient-derived xenografts. One patient-derived xenograft, the estrogen receptor-positive model T126, was chosen to generate in vivo mouse models containing orthotopic breast tumors for in vivo SPECT/MRI and biodistribution studies after injection with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-Tyr³-octreotate or ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-JR11. Results:¹¹¹In-DOTA-JR11 binding to human BC tissue was significantly higher than ¹¹¹In-DOTA-Tyr³-octreotate binding (P < 0.001). The median ratio of antagonist binding versus agonist binding was 3.39 (interquartile range, 2-5). SSTR2 immunostaining confirmed SSTR2 expression on the tumor cells. SPECT/MRI of the mouse model found better tumor visualization with the antagonist. This result was in line with the significantly higher tumor uptake of the radiolabeled antagonist than of the agonist as measured in biodistribution studies 285 min after radiotracer injection (percentage injected dose per gram of tissue: 1.92 ± 0.43 vs. 0.90 ± 0.17; P = 0.002). Conclusion: SSTR antagonists are promising candidates for BC imaging.

Evaluation of agonist and antagonist radioligands for somatostatin receptor imaging of breast cancer using positron emission tomography

Background

The somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sstr2) is expressed on a majority of luminal breast cancers, however SPECT and scintigraphy imaging with agonistic sstr2 probes has been sub-optimal. High affinity antagonists can access more binding sites on the cell surface, resulting in higher tumor uptake and improved sensitivity. We compared the tumor uptake and biodistribution of the antagonist ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-JR11 with two agonists ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-Tyr³-octreotide (⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC) and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-Tyr³-octreotate (⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE), in the human, sstr2-positive, luminal breast cancer model: ZR-75-1.

Results

Peptides were assayed for binding affinity using a filtration-based competitive assay to sstr2. ^natGa-DOTATOC and ^natGa-DOTATATE had excellent affinity (inhibition constant K_i: 0.9 ± 0.1 nM and 1.4 ± 0.3 nM respectively) compared to ^natGa-NODAGA-JR11 (25.9 ± 0.2 nM). The number of binding sites on ZR-75-1 cells was determined in vitro by saturation assays. Agonist ^67/natGa-DOTATOC bound to 6.64 ± 0.39 × 10⁴ sites/cells, which was 1.5-fold higher than ^67/natGa-NODAGA-JR11 and 2.3-fold higher than ^67/natGa-DOTATATE. All three ⁶⁸Ga-labeled peptides were obtained in good decay-corrected radiochemical yield (61-68%) and were purified by high performance liquid chromatography to ensure high specific activity (137 – 281 MBq/nmol at the end of synthesis). NOD scid gamma mice bearing ZR-75-1 tumors were injected intravenously with the labeled peptides and used for PET/CT imaging and biodistribution at 1 h post-injection. We found that ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC had the highest tumor uptake (18.4 ± 2.9%ID/g), followed by ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE (15.2 ± 2.2%ID/g) and ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-JR11 (12.2 ± 0.8%ID/g). Tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle ratios were also higher for the agonists (>40 and >150 respectively), compared to the antagonist (15.6 ± 2.2 and 45.2 ± 11.6 respectively).

Conclusions

The antagonist ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-JR11 had the lowest tumor uptake and contrast compared to agonists ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE in ZR-75-1 xenografts.

The main contributing factor to this result could be the use of an endogenously expressing cell line, which may differ from previously published transfected models in the number of low-affinity, antagonist-specific binding sites. The relative merit of agonists versus antagonists for sstr2 breast cancer imaging warrants further investigation, first in preclinical models with other sstr2-positive breast cancer xenografts, and ultimately in luminal breast cancer patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41181-017-0023-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Review: Receptor Targeted Nuclear Imaging of Breast Cancer

Receptor targeted nuclear imaging directed against molecular markers overexpressed on breast cancer (BC) cells offers a sensitive and specific method for BC imaging. Currently, a few targets such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), somatostatin receptor (SSTR), and the gastrin releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) are being investigated for this purpose. Expression of these targets is BC subtype dependent and information that can be gained from lesion visualization is dependent on the target; ER-targeting radiotracers, e.g., can be used to monitor response to anti-estrogen treatment. Here we give an overview of the studies currently under investigation for receptor targeted nuclear imaging of BC. Main findings of imaging studies are summarized and (potential) purposes of lesion visualization by targeting these molecular markers are discussed. Since BC is a very heterogeneous disease and molecular target expression can vary per subtype, but also during disease progression or under influence of treatment, radiotracers for selected imaging purposes should be chosen carefully.

Prospects of Targeting the Gastrin Releasing Peptide Receptor and Somatostatin Receptor 2 for Nuclear Imaging and Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The gastrin releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) and the somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) are overexpressed on primary breast cancer (BC), making them ideal candidates for receptor-mediated nuclear imaging and therapy. The aim of this study was to determine whether these receptors are also suitable targets for metastatic BC.

METHODS

mRNA expression of human BC samples were studied by in vitro autoradiography and associated with radioligand binding. Next, GRPR and SSTR2 mRNA levels of 60 paired primary BCs and metastases from different sites were measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Receptor mRNA expression levels were associated with clinico-pathological factors and expression levels of primary tumors and corresponding metastases were compared.

RESULTS

Binding of GRPR and SSTR radioligands to tumor tissue correlated significantly with receptor mRNA expression. High GRPR and SSTR2 mRNA levels were associated with estrogen receptor (ESR1)-positive tumors (p<0.001 for both receptors). There was no significant difference in GRPR mRNA expression of primary tumors versus paired metastases. Regarding SSTR2 mRNA expression, there was also no significant difference in the majority of cases, apart from liver and ovarian metastases which showed a significantly lower expression compared to the corresponding primary tumors (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Targeting the GRPR and SSTR2 for nuclear imaging and/or treatment has the potential to improve BC care in primary as well as metastatic disease.

Gastrin-releasing Peptide Receptor Imaging in Breast Cancer Using the Receptor Antagonist (68)Ga-RM2 And PET

Introduction: The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is overexpressed in breast cancer. The present study evaluates GRPR imaging as a novel imaging modality in breast cancer by employing positron emission tomography (PET) and the GRPR antagonist ⁶⁸Ga-RM2.

Methods: Fifteen female patients with biopsy confirmed primary breast carcinoma (3 bilateral tumors; median clinical stage IIB) underwent ⁶⁸Ga-RM2-PET/CT for pretreatment staging. In vivo tumor uptake of ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 was correlated with estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor expression, HER2/neu status and MIB-1 proliferation index in breast core biopsy specimens.

Results: 13/18 tumors demonstrated strongly increased ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 uptake compared to normal breast tissue (defined as PET-positive). All PET-positive primary tumors were ER- and PR-positive (13/13) in contrast to only 1/5 PET-negative tumors. Mean SUV_MAX of ER-positive tumors was 10.6±6.0 compared to 2.3±1.0 in ER-negative tumors (p=0.016). In a multivariate analysis including ER, PR, HER2/neu and MIB-1, only ER expression predicted ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 uptake (model: r²=0.55, p=0.025). Normal breast tissue showed inter- and intraindividually variable, moderate GRPR binding (SUV_MAX 2.3±1.0), while physiological uptake of other organs was considerably less except pancreas. Of note, ⁶⁸Ga-RM2-PET/CT detected internal mammary lymph nodes with high ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 uptake (n=8), a contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis (verified by biopsy) and bone metastases (n=1; not detected by bone scan and CT).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that ⁶⁸Ga-RM2-PET/CT is a promising imaging method in ER-positive breast cancer. In vivo GRPR binding assessed by ⁶⁸Ga-RM2-PET/CT correlated with ER expression in primary tumors of untreated patients.

G protein-coupled receptors as promising cancer targets

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate an array of fundamental biological processes, such as growth, metabolism and homeostasis. Specifically, GPCRs are involved in cancer initiation and progression. However, compared with the involvement of the epidermal growth factor receptor in cancer, that of GPCRs have been largely ignored. Recent findings have implicated many GPCRs in tumorigenesis, tumor progression, invasion and metastasis. Moreover, GPCRs contribute to the establishment and maintenance of a microenvironment which is permissive for tumor formation and growth, including effects upon surrounding blood vessels, signaling molecules and the extracellular matrix. Thus, GPCRs are considered to be among the most useful drug targets against many solid cancers. Development of selective ligands targeting GPCRs may provide novel and effective treatment strategies against cancer and some anticancer compounds are now in clinical trials. Here, we focus on tumor related GPCRs, such as G protein-coupled receptor 30, the lysophosphatidic acid receptor, angiotensin receptors 1 and 2, the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors and gastrin releasing peptide receptor. We also summarize their tissue distributions, activation and roles in tumorigenesis and discuss the potential use of GPCR agonists and antagonists in cancer therapy.